Assign

Rubric for Evaluating Debates: Online Presentation

Criteria

Ratings

Pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeIntro to the debate topic and stance with rationale (3 pts) Ethical Framework (3pts)

Provides intro to the debate topic and stance (3 pts); Provides rationale as to which ethical framework (such as deontology, utilitarianism, natural law, etc) fits stance (3 pts)

6 ptsFull MarksProvides intro to the debate topic and assigned stance. Why is this a debate-worthy topic? (3pts) Provides ethical framework and describes in minimum of 3-5 sentences how this framework fits with stance (3 pts)

3 ptsPartially Met

0 ptsNo Marks

6 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeEthical Principles

At least three ethical principles (beneficence, non-maleficence, autonomy, justice, fidelity, sanctity or quality of life). (minimum 2-3 sentences for each principle)

9 ptsFull MarksProvides 3 ethical principles and how they are related to stance. Minimum of 2-3 sentences explaining how principles relate.

6 ptsPartially Met

3 ptsMinimally Met

0 ptsNo Marks

9 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeScholarly Sources

At least two scholarly sources besides the ppt or a textbook.

4 ptsFull Marks

2 ptsPartially Met

0 ptsNo Marks

4 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAPA format/Spelling/Grammar

(i.e. professional style)

5 ptsFull Marks

3 ptsPartially Met

0 ptsNo Marks

5 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeRebuttal to Partner

6 ptsFull MarksResponds to partner respectfully but remaining with assigned stance. Provides additional reference to support rationale for assigned stance rather than just reiterating initial stance/references.

3 ptsPartially Met

0 ptsNo Marks

6 pts