Assigment .Apa seven . All instructions attached.
2 years ago 25
Assignment.docx
MSN5400PolicyLitReviewRubric1.docx
MSN5400PolicyLitReviewRubric1.docx
Assignment.docx
Assignment: Policy Literature Review
Completion requirements
Opened: Saturday, November 2, 2024, 12:00 AM
Due: Saturday, November 9, 2024, 11:59 PM
Objective: The purpose of this assignment is to critically analyze a recent healthcare legislature and review the relevant literature, focusing on the role of nursing in advocating for and supporting policy changes. You will conduct a literature review of peer-reviewed articles, examine statistical data, and assess the impact of the legislature on health outcomes and populations.
Due: 11/09/2024 by 11:59 pm
Instructions
1. Prepare a Policy Literature Review (see following sections containing Rubric and Assignment details).
MSN5400PolicyLitReviewRubric1.docx
Policy Literature Review Rubric
|
Criteria |
Excellent |
Good |
Fair |
Poor |
|
Selection of Healthcare Legislature (10 points) |
Legislature is recent, highly relevant, and clearly explained.
10 points
|
Legislature is recent and relevant, though explanation may lack depth.
7 to 9 points |
Legislature is selected, but explanation lacks relevance or detail.
4 to 6 points |
Legislature is not recent or relevant; explanation is unclear.
0 to 3 points |
|
Literature Review (3 Peer-Reviewed Articles) (20 points) |
Comprehensive review of 3 relevant peer-reviewed articles; strong connections to the issue and legislation.
20 points |
Adequate review of 3 peer-reviewed articles; connections to the issue are present but less developed.
15 to 19 points |
Review of articles is brief or lacks clear relevance to the issue.
10 to 14 points
|
Inadequate or no review of relevant peer-reviewed articles.
0 to 9 points |
|
Statistical Data and Health Outcomes (20 points) |
Provides thorough statistical data, clearly linking population impacts and health outcomes to the issue.
20 points |
Provides relevant statistical data; minor gaps in linking outcomes to population impact.
15 to 19 points |
Provides some statistical data, but fails to clearly link health outcomes and population impact.
10 to 14 points
|
Insufficient statistical data; no clear link to health outcomes or population impact.
0 to 9 points |
|
Nursing Role in the Legislature (20 points) |
Insightful analysis of nursing role in policy advocacy, supported by examples of nurse leadership and involvement.
20 points
|
Discusses nursing role in policy, but lacks depth or examples of leadership involvement.
15 to 19 points |
Minimal discussion of nursing role; lacks analysis or examples.
10 to 14 points |
Little to no discussion of nursing role in the legislature.
0 to 9 points |
|
Organization and Clarity (15 points) |
Well-organized, logical flow of ideas; writing is clear and engaging.
15 points
|
Generally well-organized with minor issues in clarity or flow.
11 to 14 points |
Organization needs improvement; some ideas are unclear or disjointed. 6 to 10 points |
Disorganized, difficult to follow; ideas are unclear.
0 to 5 points
|
|
APA Formatting and References (15 points) |
Consistently follows APA 7th edition format with accurate citations and references.
15 points
|
Mostly follows APA format with minor citation or reference errors.
11 to 14 points |
Inconsistent APA formatting with several citation or reference errors.
6 to 10 points |
Does not follow APA format; numerous citation or reference errors.
0 to 5 points |
image1.jpeg
image2.png
MSN5400PolicyLitReviewRubric1.docx
Policy Literature Review Rubric
|
Criteria |
Excellent |
Good |
Fair |
Poor |
|
Selection of Healthcare Legislature (10 points) |
Legislature is recent, highly relevant, and clearly explained.
10 points
|
Legislature is recent and relevant, though explanation may lack depth.
7 to 9 points |
Legislature is selected, but explanation lacks relevance or detail.
4 to 6 points |
Legislature is not recent or relevant; explanation is unclear.
0 to 3 points |
|
Literature Review (3 Peer-Reviewed Articles) (20 points) |
Comprehensive review of 3 relevant peer-reviewed articles; strong connections to the issue and legislation.
20 points |
Adequate review of 3 peer-reviewed articles; connections to the issue are present but less developed.
15 to 19 points |
Review of articles is brief or lacks clear relevance to the issue.
10 to 14 points
|
Inadequate or no review of relevant peer-reviewed articles.
0 to 9 points |
|
Statistical Data and Health Outcomes (20 points) |
Provides thorough statistical data, clearly linking population impacts and health outcomes to the issue.
20 points |
Provides relevant statistical data; minor gaps in linking outcomes to population impact.
15 to 19 points |
Provides some statistical data, but fails to clearly link health outcomes and population impact.
10 to 14 points
|
Insufficient statistical data; no clear link to health outcomes or population impact.
0 to 9 points |
|
Nursing Role in the Legislature (20 points) |
Insightful analysis of nursing role in policy advocacy, supported by examples of nurse leadership and involvement.
20 points
|
Discusses nursing role in policy, but lacks depth or examples of leadership involvement.
15 to 19 points |
Minimal discussion of nursing role; lacks analysis or examples.
10 to 14 points |
Little to no discussion of nursing role in the legislature.
0 to 9 points |
|
Organization and Clarity (15 points) |
Well-organized, logical flow of ideas; writing is clear and engaging.
15 points
|
Generally well-organized with minor issues in clarity or flow.
11 to 14 points |
Organization needs improvement; some ideas are unclear or disjointed. 6 to 10 points |
Disorganized, difficult to follow; ideas are unclear.
0 to 5 points
|
|
APA Formatting and References (15 points) |
Consistently follows APA 7th edition format with accurate citations and references.
15 points
|
Mostly follows APA format with minor citation or reference errors.
11 to 14 points |
Inconsistent APA formatting with several citation or reference errors.
6 to 10 points |
Does not follow APA format; numerous citation or reference errors.
0 to 5 points |
image1.jpeg
image2.png
Assignment.docx
Assignment: Policy Literature Review
Completion requirements
Opened: Saturday, November 2, 2024, 12:00 AM
Due: Saturday, November 9, 2024, 11:59 PM
Objective: The purpose of this assignment is to critically analyze a recent healthcare legislature and review the relevant literature, focusing on the role of nursing in advocating for and supporting policy changes. You will conduct a literature review of peer-reviewed articles, examine statistical data, and assess the impact of the legislature on health outcomes and populations.
Due: 11/09/2024 by 11:59 pm
Instructions
1. Prepare a Policy Literature Review (see following sections containing Rubric and Assignment details).
MSN5400PolicyLitReviewRubric1.docx
Policy Literature Review Rubric
|
Criteria |
Excellent |
Good |
Fair |
Poor |
|
Selection of Healthcare Legislature (10 points) |
Legislature is recent, highly relevant, and clearly explained.
10 points
|
Legislature is recent and relevant, though explanation may lack depth.
7 to 9 points |
Legislature is selected, but explanation lacks relevance or detail.
4 to 6 points |
Legislature is not recent or relevant; explanation is unclear.
0 to 3 points |
|
Literature Review (3 Peer-Reviewed Articles) (20 points) |
Comprehensive review of 3 relevant peer-reviewed articles; strong connections to the issue and legislation.
20 points |
Adequate review of 3 peer-reviewed articles; connections to the issue are present but less developed.
15 to 19 points |
Review of articles is brief or lacks clear relevance to the issue.
10 to 14 points
|
Inadequate or no review of relevant peer-reviewed articles.
0 to 9 points |
|
Statistical Data and Health Outcomes (20 points) |
Provides thorough statistical data, clearly linking population impacts and health outcomes to the issue.
20 points |
Provides relevant statistical data; minor gaps in linking outcomes to population impact.
15 to 19 points |
Provides some statistical data, but fails to clearly link health outcomes and population impact.
10 to 14 points
|
Insufficient statistical data; no clear link to health outcomes or population impact.
0 to 9 points |
|
Nursing Role in the Legislature (20 points) |
Insightful analysis of nursing role in policy advocacy, supported by examples of nurse leadership and involvement.
20 points
|
Discusses nursing role in policy, but lacks depth or examples of leadership involvement.
15 to 19 points |
Minimal discussion of nursing role; lacks analysis or examples.
10 to 14 points |
Little to no discussion of nursing role in the legislature.
0 to 9 points |
|
Organization and Clarity (15 points) |
Well-organized, logical flow of ideas; writing is clear and engaging.
15 points
|
Generally well-organized with minor issues in clarity or flow.
11 to 14 points |
Organization needs improvement; some ideas are unclear or disjointed. 6 to 10 points |
Disorganized, difficult to follow; ideas are unclear.
0 to 5 points
|
|
APA Formatting and References (15 points) |
Consistently follows APA 7th edition format with accurate citations and references.
15 points
|
Mostly follows APA format with minor citation or reference errors.
11 to 14 points |
Inconsistent APA formatting with several citation or reference errors.
6 to 10 points |
Does not follow APA format; numerous citation or reference errors.
0 to 5 points |
image1.jpeg
image2.png
MSN5400PolicyLitReviewRubric1.docx
Policy Literature Review Rubric
|
Criteria |
Excellent |
Good |
Fair |
Poor |
|
Selection of Healthcare Legislature (10 points) |
Legislature is recent, highly relevant, and clearly explained.
10 points
|
Legislature is recent and relevant, though explanation may lack depth.
7 to 9 points |
Legislature is selected, but explanation lacks relevance or detail.
4 to 6 points |
Legislature is not recent or relevant; explanation is unclear.
0 to 3 points |
|
Literature Review (3 Peer-Reviewed Articles) (20 points) |
Comprehensive review of 3 relevant peer-reviewed articles; strong connections to the issue and legislation.
20 points |
Adequate review of 3 peer-reviewed articles; connections to the issue are present but less developed.
15 to 19 points |
Review of articles is brief or lacks clear relevance to the issue.
10 to 14 points
|
Inadequate or no review of relevant peer-reviewed articles.
0 to 9 points |
|
Statistical Data and Health Outcomes (20 points) |
Provides thorough statistical data, clearly linking population impacts and health outcomes to the issue.
20 points |
Provides relevant statistical data; minor gaps in linking outcomes to population impact.
15 to 19 points |
Provides some statistical data, but fails to clearly link health outcomes and population impact.
10 to 14 points
|
Insufficient statistical data; no clear link to health outcomes or population impact.
0 to 9 points |
|
Nursing Role in the Legislature (20 points) |
Insightful analysis of nursing role in policy advocacy, supported by examples of nurse leadership and involvement.
20 points
|
Discusses nursing role in policy, but lacks depth or examples of leadership involvement.
15 to 19 points |
Minimal discussion of nursing role; lacks analysis or examples.
10 to 14 points |
Little to no discussion of nursing role in the legislature.
0 to 9 points |
|
Organization and Clarity (15 points) |
Well-organized, logical flow of ideas; writing is clear and engaging.
15 points
|
Generally well-organized with minor issues in clarity or flow.
11 to 14 points |
Organization needs improvement; some ideas are unclear or disjointed. 6 to 10 points |
Disorganized, difficult to follow; ideas are unclear.
0 to 5 points
|
|
APA Formatting and References (15 points) |
Consistently follows APA 7th edition format with accurate citations and references.
15 points
|
Mostly follows APA format with minor citation or reference errors.
11 to 14 points |
Inconsistent APA formatting with several citation or reference errors.
6 to 10 points |
Does not follow APA format; numerous citation or reference errors.
0 to 5 points |