Addictions Case Study: Part 2 – Diagnostic Impressions
6 months ago 40
AVisualGuidetoCannabisQuantities.docx
VIDEOS.docx
Instructions-AddictionsCaseStudyPart2DiagnosticImpressionsAssign.docx
GradingRubric-AddictionsCaseStudy-Part2DiagnosticImpressions.pdf
AVisualGuidetoCannabisQuantities.docx
image1.png
VIDEOS.docx
Instructions-AddictionsCaseStudyPart2DiagnosticImpressionsAssign.docx
EDCO 740
Addictions Case Study: Part 2 - Diagnostic Impressions
Assignment Instructions
Overview
The Addictions Case Study Assignment is designed to help you make application of course content to a potential counseling situation. The assignment will be divided up into three parts: Addictions Case Study: Part 1 - Case Conceptualization Assignment, Addictions Case Study: Part 2 - Diagnostic Impressions Assignment, and Addictions Case Study: Part 3 - Treatment Plan Assignment.
General Paper Instructions
The general requirements for the paper are:
· A medium-length paper (about a 7- to 9-page summary, not including the title and references pages – no abstract is needed).
· This is to be formatted in the most current APA style.
· For this assignment, you are only required to use one source: the DSM-5-TR (however, you can add more if desired).
Assignment Specific Instructions
For Addictions Case Study: Part 2 - Diagnostic Impressions Assignment, again using the Addictions Case Study: Narrative, take what you wrote in Part 1 and from the narrative, then document your diagnostic impressions of the client. In your write-up, using the DSM-5-TR, you will need to answer (each bullet is about a paragraph – review the rubric for more detail):
· What is the primary diagnosis for this client? Put your full diagnosis in bold and list the criteria the client meets from the DSM with supporting statements from Marci’s narrative.
· What is the prevalence rate, any culture and/or gender-related diagnostic issues, functional consequences, and comorbidity for this particular diagnosis?
· What are the differential diagnoses to be aware of for this client (choose only one/those that THIS client could be dealing with, not all that the DSM may show)?
· What are any secondary and tertiary diagnoses for this client? Put your full diagnosis in bold and list the criteria the client meets from the DSM with supporting statements from Marci’s narrative.
· What is the prevalence rate, any culture and/or gender-related diagnostic issues, functional consequences, and comorbidity for this particular diagnosis?
· What are the differential diagnoses to be aware of for this client (choose only one/those that THIS client could be dealing with, not all that the DSM may show)?
Note that each diagnosis you give needs to have the ICD-10 code written in this order: F-code number (without the parentheses), the name of the diagnosis, the severity, and any appropriate specifiers (if required).
Divide your paper as follows (showing each heading below as level 1 or level 2, starting on p. 2 – no abstract is needed):
Title of Paper
Primary Diagnostic Impression
Primary Diagnosis - Listing of Criteria Met
Prevalence, Culture/Gender Issues, Functional Consequences, Comorbidity
Possible Differential Diagnoses
Secondary Diagnostic Impressions
Secondary Diagnosis 1 - Listing of Criteria Met
Prevalence, Culture/Gender Issues, Functional Consequences, Comorbidity
Possible Differential Diagnoses
Secondary Diagnosis 2 - Listing of Criteria Met
Prevalence, Culture/Gender Issues, Functional Consequences, Comorbidity
Possible Differential Diagnoses
(continue on in the same manner for additional secondary/tertiary diagnoses you find)
References
Note: Your assignment will be checked for originality via the Turnitin plagiarism tool.
Page 2 of 2
GradingRubric-AddictionsCaseStudy-Part2DiagnosticImpressions.pdf
Criteria Ratings Points
Primary Diagnostic Impression
30 to >27 pts
Advanced
All pertinent criteria met shown. Summary of the Prevalence and Functional Consequences shown. Comorbidity shown. Culture- and Gender-related diagnostic issues shown. Differential diagnoses related to the diagnosis shown.
27 to >24 pts
Proficient
All pertinent criteria met shown. Summary of the Prevalence and Functional Consequences mostly shown. Comorbidity mostly shown. Culture- and Gender-related diagnostic issues mostly shown. Differential diagnoses related to the diagnosis shown.
24 to >21 pts
Developing
Most pertinent criteria met shown. Summary of the Prevalence and Functional Consequences barely or not shown. Comorbidity barely or not shown. Culture- and Gender-related diagnostic issues barely or not shown. Differential diagnoses related to the diagnosis barely or not shown.
21 to >0 pts
Below Expectations
Pertinent criteria met barely or not shown. Summary of the Prevalence and Functional Consequences barely or not shown. Comorbidity barely or not shown. Culture- and Gender-related diagnostic issues barely or not shown. Differential diagnoses related to the diagnosis barely or not shown.
0 pts
Not Present
30 pts
Main Secondary Diagnostic Impresson
30 to >27 pts
Advanced
All pertinent criteria met shown. Summary of the Prevalence and Functional Consequences shown. Comorbidity shown. Culture- and Gender-related diagnostic issues shown. Differential diagnoses related to the diagnosis shown.
27 to >24 pts
Proficient
All pertinent criteria met shown. Summary of the Prevalence and Functional Consequences mostly shown. Comorbidity mostly shown. Culture- and Gender-related diagnostic issues mostly shown. Differential diagnoses related to the diagnosis shown.
24 to >21 pts
Developing
Most pertinent criteria met shown. Summary of the Prevalence and Functional Consequences barely or not shown. Comorbidity barely or not shown. Culture- and Gender-related diagnostic issues barely or not shown. Differential diagnoses related to the diagnosis barely or not shown.
21 to >0 pts
Below Expectations
Pertinent criteria met barely or not shown. Summary of the Prevalence and Functional Consequences barely or not shown. Comorbidity barely or not shown. Culture- and Gender-related diagnostic issues barely or not shown. Differential diagnoses related to the diagnosis barely or not shown.
0 pts
Not Present
30 pts
Addictions Case Study: Part 2 – Diagnostic Impressions Grading Rubric | EDCO740_B02_202620
Criteria Ratings Points
Additional Secondary Diagnostic Impressions
10 to >9 pts
Advanced
All pertinent criteria met shown. Summary of the Prevalence and Functional Consequences shown. Comorbidity shown. Culture- and Gender-related diagnostic issues shown. Differential diagnoses related to the diagnosis shown.
9 to >7 pts
Proficient
All pertinent criteria met shown. Summary of the Prevalence and Functional Consequences mostly shown. Comorbidity mostly shown. Culture- and Gender-related diagnostic issues mostly shown. Differential diagnoses related to the diagnosis shown.
7 to >6 pts
Developing
Most pertinent criteria met shown. Summary of the Prevalence and Functional Consequences barely or not shown. Comorbidity barely or not shown. Culture- and Gender-related diagnostic issues barely or not shown. Differential diagnoses related to the diagnosis barely or not shown.
6 to >0 pts
Below Expectations
Pertinent criteria met barely or not shown. Summary of the Prevalence and Functional Consequences barely or not shown. Comorbidity barely or not shown. Culture- and Gender-related diagnostic issues barely or not shown. Differential diagnoses related to the diagnosis barely or not shown.
0 pts
Not Present
10 pts
Organization 10 to >9 pts
Advanced
All required elements are included and presented with strong headings and organizational clarity. There are clear transitions between paragraphs and sections. The treatment of the topic is logically oriented. The paper is 7-9 pages in length, not including the title and reference pages.
9 to >7 pts
Proficient
All required elements are included and organized. There are transitions between paragraphs and sections. The treatment of the topic is logically oriented. The paper meets the page length requirement of 7-9 pages (not including the title and reference pages) or comes very close.
7 to >6 pts
Developing
Most required elements are included and are mostly organized. Most paragraphs and sections have transitions. The logical treatment of the topic needs improvement. The paper may not meet the page length requirement.
6 to >0 pts
Below Expectations
Few or no required elements are included. Few or no transitions exist between paragraphs and sections. There may not be a logical treatment of the topic. The paper does not meet the page length requirement.
0 pts
Not Present
10 pts
Addictions Case Study: Part 2 – Diagnostic Impressions Grading Rubric | EDCO740_B02_202620
Criteria Ratings Points
Style 10 to >9 pts
Advanced
The paper properly uses current APA style. Proper headings, in-text citations, and references are formatted correctly. The paper reflects a graduate level voice and vocabulary. There are very few spelling and grammar errors.
9 to >7 pts
Proficient
The paper consistently uses current APA style with few or no exceptions. Proper headings, in-text citations, and references are formatted with few or no errors. The paper reflects a graduate level voice and vocabulary. There are few spelling and grammar errors.
7 to >6 pts
Developing
The paper inconsistently uses current APA style. Headings, in-text citations, and references are inconsistently formatted. The paper does not consistently reflect a graduate level voice and vocabulary. There are spelling and grammar errors.
6 to >0 pts
Below Expectations
The paper erroneously uses or does not use current APA style. Headings, in-text citations, and references are erroneously formatted or not present. The paper does not reflect a graduate level voice and vocabulary. There are spelling and grammar errors.
0 pts
Not Present
10 pts
Sources 10 to >9 pts
Advanced
The Reference page meets or exceeds the required number of sources (a minimum of 1 scholarly source: the DSM 5-TR). The DSM-5-TR is referenced throughout the paper.
9 to >7 pts
Proficient
The Reference page meets the required number of sources (1 scholarly source: the DSM-5-TR). The DSM-5-TR is referenced throughout the paper.
7 to >6 pts
Developing
The Reference page does not meet the required number of sources. The DSM-5-TR is not referenced throughout the paper.
6 to >0 pts
Below Expectations
The Reference page is not present or contains few sources. The DSM-5-TR is not referenced throughout the paper.
0 pts
Not Present
10 pts
Total Points: 100
Addictions Case Study: Part 2 – Diagnostic Impressions Grading Rubric | EDCO740_B02_202620
AVisualGuidetoCannabisQuantities.docx
image1.png
VIDEOS.docx
Instructions-AddictionsCaseStudyPart2DiagnosticImpressionsAssign.docx
EDCO 740
Addictions Case Study: Part 2 - Diagnostic Impressions
Assignment Instructions
Overview
The Addictions Case Study Assignment is designed to help you make application of course content to a potential counseling situation. The assignment will be divided up into three parts: Addictions Case Study: Part 1 - Case Conceptualization Assignment, Addictions Case Study: Part 2 - Diagnostic Impressions Assignment, and Addictions Case Study: Part 3 - Treatment Plan Assignment.
General Paper Instructions
The general requirements for the paper are:
· A medium-length paper (about a 7- to 9-page summary, not including the title and references pages – no abstract is needed).
· This is to be formatted in the most current APA style.
· For this assignment, you are only required to use one source: the DSM-5-TR (however, you can add more if desired).
Assignment Specific Instructions
For Addictions Case Study: Part 2 - Diagnostic Impressions Assignment, again using the Addictions Case Study: Narrative, take what you wrote in Part 1 and from the narrative, then document your diagnostic impressions of the client. In your write-up, using the DSM-5-TR, you will need to answer (each bullet is about a paragraph – review the rubric for more detail):
· What is the primary diagnosis for this client? Put your full diagnosis in bold and list the criteria the client meets from the DSM with supporting statements from Marci’s narrative.
· What is the prevalence rate, any culture and/or gender-related diagnostic issues, functional consequences, and comorbidity for this particular diagnosis?
· What are the differential diagnoses to be aware of for this client (choose only one/those that THIS client could be dealing with, not all that the DSM may show)?
· What are any secondary and tertiary diagnoses for this client? Put your full diagnosis in bold and list the criteria the client meets from the DSM with supporting statements from Marci’s narrative.
· What is the prevalence rate, any culture and/or gender-related diagnostic issues, functional consequences, and comorbidity for this particular diagnosis?
· What are the differential diagnoses to be aware of for this client (choose only one/those that THIS client could be dealing with, not all that the DSM may show)?
Note that each diagnosis you give needs to have the ICD-10 code written in this order: F-code number (without the parentheses), the name of the diagnosis, the severity, and any appropriate specifiers (if required).
Divide your paper as follows (showing each heading below as level 1 or level 2, starting on p. 2 – no abstract is needed):
Title of Paper
Primary Diagnostic Impression
Primary Diagnosis - Listing of Criteria Met
Prevalence, Culture/Gender Issues, Functional Consequences, Comorbidity
Possible Differential Diagnoses
Secondary Diagnostic Impressions
Secondary Diagnosis 1 - Listing of Criteria Met
Prevalence, Culture/Gender Issues, Functional Consequences, Comorbidity
Possible Differential Diagnoses
Secondary Diagnosis 2 - Listing of Criteria Met
Prevalence, Culture/Gender Issues, Functional Consequences, Comorbidity
Possible Differential Diagnoses
(continue on in the same manner for additional secondary/tertiary diagnoses you find)
References
Note: Your assignment will be checked for originality via the Turnitin plagiarism tool.
Page 2 of 2
GradingRubric-AddictionsCaseStudy-Part2DiagnosticImpressions.pdf
Criteria Ratings Points
Primary Diagnostic Impression
30 to >27 pts
Advanced
All pertinent criteria met shown. Summary of the Prevalence and Functional Consequences shown. Comorbidity shown. Culture- and Gender-related diagnostic issues shown. Differential diagnoses related to the diagnosis shown.
27 to >24 pts
Proficient
All pertinent criteria met shown. Summary of the Prevalence and Functional Consequences mostly shown. Comorbidity mostly shown. Culture- and Gender-related diagnostic issues mostly shown. Differential diagnoses related to the diagnosis shown.
24 to >21 pts
Developing
Most pertinent criteria met shown. Summary of the Prevalence and Functional Consequences barely or not shown. Comorbidity barely or not shown. Culture- and Gender-related diagnostic issues barely or not shown. Differential diagnoses related to the diagnosis barely or not shown.
21 to >0 pts
Below Expectations
Pertinent criteria met barely or not shown. Summary of the Prevalence and Functional Consequences barely or not shown. Comorbidity barely or not shown. Culture- and Gender-related diagnostic issues barely or not shown. Differential diagnoses related to the diagnosis barely or not shown.
0 pts
Not Present
30 pts
Main Secondary Diagnostic Impresson
30 to >27 pts
Advanced
All pertinent criteria met shown. Summary of the Prevalence and Functional Consequences shown. Comorbidity shown. Culture- and Gender-related diagnostic issues shown. Differential diagnoses related to the diagnosis shown.
27 to >24 pts
Proficient
All pertinent criteria met shown. Summary of the Prevalence and Functional Consequences mostly shown. Comorbidity mostly shown. Culture- and Gender-related diagnostic issues mostly shown. Differential diagnoses related to the diagnosis shown.
24 to >21 pts
Developing
Most pertinent criteria met shown. Summary of the Prevalence and Functional Consequences barely or not shown. Comorbidity barely or not shown. Culture- and Gender-related diagnostic issues barely or not shown. Differential diagnoses related to the diagnosis barely or not shown.
21 to >0 pts
Below Expectations
Pertinent criteria met barely or not shown. Summary of the Prevalence and Functional Consequences barely or not shown. Comorbidity barely or not shown. Culture- and Gender-related diagnostic issues barely or not shown. Differential diagnoses related to the diagnosis barely or not shown.
0 pts
Not Present
30 pts
Addictions Case Study: Part 2 – Diagnostic Impressions Grading Rubric | EDCO740_B02_202620
Criteria Ratings Points
Additional Secondary Diagnostic Impressions
10 to >9 pts
Advanced
All pertinent criteria met shown. Summary of the Prevalence and Functional Consequences shown. Comorbidity shown. Culture- and Gender-related diagnostic issues shown. Differential diagnoses related to the diagnosis shown.
9 to >7 pts
Proficient
All pertinent criteria met shown. Summary of the Prevalence and Functional Consequences mostly shown. Comorbidity mostly shown. Culture- and Gender-related diagnostic issues mostly shown. Differential diagnoses related to the diagnosis shown.
7 to >6 pts
Developing
Most pertinent criteria met shown. Summary of the Prevalence and Functional Consequences barely or not shown. Comorbidity barely or not shown. Culture- and Gender-related diagnostic issues barely or not shown. Differential diagnoses related to the diagnosis barely or not shown.
6 to >0 pts
Below Expectations
Pertinent criteria met barely or not shown. Summary of the Prevalence and Functional Consequences barely or not shown. Comorbidity barely or not shown. Culture- and Gender-related diagnostic issues barely or not shown. Differential diagnoses related to the diagnosis barely or not shown.
0 pts
Not Present
10 pts
Organization 10 to >9 pts
Advanced
All required elements are included and presented with strong headings and organizational clarity. There are clear transitions between paragraphs and sections. The treatment of the topic is logically oriented. The paper is 7-9 pages in length, not including the title and reference pages.
9 to >7 pts
Proficient
All required elements are included and organized. There are transitions between paragraphs and sections. The treatment of the topic is logically oriented. The paper meets the page length requirement of 7-9 pages (not including the title and reference pages) or comes very close.
7 to >6 pts
Developing
Most required elements are included and are mostly organized. Most paragraphs and sections have transitions. The logical treatment of the topic needs improvement. The paper may not meet the page length requirement.
6 to >0 pts
Below Expectations
Few or no required elements are included. Few or no transitions exist between paragraphs and sections. There may not be a logical treatment of the topic. The paper does not meet the page length requirement.
0 pts
Not Present
10 pts
Addictions Case Study: Part 2 – Diagnostic Impressions Grading Rubric | EDCO740_B02_202620
Criteria Ratings Points
Style 10 to >9 pts
Advanced
The paper properly uses current APA style. Proper headings, in-text citations, and references are formatted correctly. The paper reflects a graduate level voice and vocabulary. There are very few spelling and grammar errors.
9 to >7 pts
Proficient
The paper consistently uses current APA style with few or no exceptions. Proper headings, in-text citations, and references are formatted with few or no errors. The paper reflects a graduate level voice and vocabulary. There are few spelling and grammar errors.
7 to >6 pts
Developing
The paper inconsistently uses current APA style. Headings, in-text citations, and references are inconsistently formatted. The paper does not consistently reflect a graduate level voice and vocabulary. There are spelling and grammar errors.
6 to >0 pts
Below Expectations
The paper erroneously uses or does not use current APA style. Headings, in-text citations, and references are erroneously formatted or not present. The paper does not reflect a graduate level voice and vocabulary. There are spelling and grammar errors.
0 pts
Not Present
10 pts
Sources 10 to >9 pts
Advanced
The Reference page meets or exceeds the required number of sources (a minimum of 1 scholarly source: the DSM 5-TR). The DSM-5-TR is referenced throughout the paper.
9 to >7 pts
Proficient
The Reference page meets the required number of sources (1 scholarly source: the DSM-5-TR). The DSM-5-TR is referenced throughout the paper.
7 to >6 pts
Developing
The Reference page does not meet the required number of sources. The DSM-5-TR is not referenced throughout the paper.
6 to >0 pts
Below Expectations
The Reference page is not present or contains few sources. The DSM-5-TR is not referenced throughout the paper.
0 pts
Not Present
10 pts
Total Points: 100
Addictions Case Study: Part 2 – Diagnostic Impressions Grading Rubric | EDCO740_B02_202620