A4- Research Plan Overview - Methods
Follow instruction uploaded
This is also part of D4
13 hours ago 45
Week4.docx
VIDEO.docx
ResearchPlanOverviewAssignmentInstructions.docx
ResearchPlanOverview-IntroductionGradingRubric2.pdf
ResearchPlanOverview-MethodsGradingRubric.pdf
Week4.docx
image1.png
VIDEO.docx
ResearchPlanOverviewAssignmentInstructions.docx
EDCO 747
Research Plan Overview Assignment Instructions
Overview
As you progress through this course, you will be developing a Research Plan Overview in outline format. The Research Plan Overview will be submitted in three stages throughout the course, with each stage revising and building upon the previous stage. The requirements for each stage of submission are described below, and the Research Plan Overview Template and Research Plan Overview Grading Rubrics for this assignment are available through Assignment Instructions.
Instructions
In addition to using the Research Plan Overview Template, you must include both a title and reference page (done in current APA format). Additionally, you must keep the headings (all text provided in black font) the same but replace the red text with your topic’s information typed in black font. All headings and subheadings must be included in your outline. Supply all of the pertinent information that the outline requests and include the uncompleted portions of the template (Methods, Appendices, etc.) in the document you submit—just leave the uncompleted portion in “red” text/font.
· Please utilize current APA Professional standards
NOTE: The Research Plan Overview Template (loosely) follows the Liberty’s Department of Community Care and Counseling’s Qualitative Dissertation Template (format); however, be aware that the format can change once you, the doctoral student, become a candidate (by finishing all coursework and successfully passing the comprehensive exam) and begin working with your dissertation committee.
Stage 1
For Stage 1, you must supply the information required for the Introduction (Section I) and the Review of Related Literature (Section II). You will continue to build the Review of Related Literature section throughout each stage of development, so be sure to supply what the red text requires.
Stage 2
Review Stage 1 of your research plan and make revisions or edits as necessary. Then, supply the information required for the Methods (Section III) subheadings A, B, C, D, and E along with Appendices A and B as applicable to your design ONLY.
NOTE: Subheadings F, G and H of the Methods (Section III) AND Appendices C and D are to be completed in Stage 3—NOT in Stage 2. Also, continue to build the Review of Related Literature (Section II).
Stage 3
This stage contributes the final section of the Research Plan Overview, giving you a complete outline. Review Stage 2 of your research plan and make revisions or edits as necessary. Supply the information required for the Methods section (III), subheadings F, G, and H. Also, supply the requested information for Appendices C and D. Finally, polish the Review of Related Literature section (II), adding any final elements you think are necessary.
Note: Your assignment will be checked for originality via the Turnitin plagiarism tool.
ResearchPlanOverview-IntroductionGradingRubric2.pdf
Criteria Ratings Points
Introduction Section
28 to >25 pts
Advanced
Introduction clearly and concisely depicts a qualitative study; information is sufficient to prompt detailed, well-supported writing when outline is turned into final Research Prospectus.
25 to >23 pts
Proficient
Introduction mostly depicts a qualitative study clearly and concisely; information is mostly sufficient to prompt fairly detailed, supported writing when outline is turned into final Research Prospectus.
23 to >21 pts
Developing
Introduction vaguely depicts a qualitative study; information is barely sufficient to turn outline into a well-supported, well written final Research Prospectus.
21 to >0 pts
Below Expectations
Introduction does not depict a qualitative study; information is insufficient to turn outline into a well-supported, well written final Research Prospectus.
0 pts
Not Present
28 pts
Review of the Literature
21 to >19 pts
Advanced
Review of the literature is well supported and includes all information (including theoretical framework) from the outline/template.
19 to >17 pts
Proficient
Review of the literature is mostly well supported and includes most of the information (including theoretical framework) from the outline/template.
17 to >15 pts
Developing
Review of the literature is somewhat supported and includes some of the information (including theoretical framework) from the outline/template.
15 to >0 pts
Below Expectations
Review of the literature is not supported and does not include some of the information (e.g. theoretical framework) from the outline/template.
0 pts
Not Present
21 pts
Growing Understanding
21 to >19 pts
Advanced
The introduction and review of the literature sections clearly show the author’s growing understanding of qualitative research.
19 to >17 pts
Proficient
The introduction and review of the literature sections mostly give evidence to the author’s growing understanding of qualitative research.
17 to >15 pts
Developing
The introduction and review of the literature sections somewhat or vaguely show the author’s growing understanding of qualitative research.
15 to >0 pts
Below Expectations
The introduction and review of the literature sections do not show the author’s growing understanding of qualitative research.
0 pts
Not Present
21 pts
Research Plan Overview: Introduction Grading Rubric | EDCO747_B01_202630
Criteria Ratings Points
Format 10 to >9 pts
Advanced
All headings are present in the correct order from the template; red directions from the template are replaced with all pertinent outline/content information needed for this stage (Introduction).
9 to >8 pts
Proficient
Includes most of the headings in the correct order from the template; most of the red directions from the template have been replaced with pertinent outline/content information needed for this stage (Introduction).
8 to >7 pts
Developing
Includes some of the headings in the correct order from the template; some of the red directions from the template have been replaced with some pertinent content/outline information needed for this stage (Introduction).
7 to >0 pts
Below Expectations
Does not include the headings in the correct order from the template; the red directions from the template have not been replaced with some pertinent content/outline information needed for this stage (Introduction).
0 pts
Not Present
10 pts
References & Citations
10 to >9 pts
Advanced
All citations in section 2 and on the reference page are appropriately implemented and formatted per current APA; references in-text match those in the paper.
9 to >8 pts
Proficient
Most of the citations in section 2 and on the reference page are appropriately implemented and formatted per current APA; most references in-text match those in the paper.
8 to >7 pts
Developing
Some of the citations in section 2 and on the reference page are appropriately implemented and formatted per current APA; some references in-text match those in the paper.
7 to >0 pts
Below Expectations
None of the citations in section 2 and on the reference page are appropriately implemented and formatted per current APA; references in-text do not match those in the paper
0 pts
Not Present
10 pts
APA & Editing 10 to >9 pts
Advanced
All elements (including the title and reference page) of the plan are edited precisely for grammar, spelling, punctuation, and current APA formatting.
9 to >8 pts
Proficient
Most elements (including the title and reference page) of the plan are adequately edited for grammar, spelling, punctuation, and current APA formatting.
8 to >7 pts
Developing
Some/all elements (including the title and reference page) are poorly edited for grammar, spelling, punctuation, and current APA formatting.
7 to >0 pts
Below Expectations
All of the elements (including the title and reference page) are improperly edited for grammar, spelling, punctuation, and current APA formatting.
0 pts
No Marks
10 pts
Total Points: 100
Research Plan Overview: Introduction Grading Rubric | EDCO747_B01_202630
ResearchPlanOverview-MethodsGradingRubric.pdf
Criteria Ratings Points
Introduction Section
20 to >18 pts
Advanced
Introduction and Review of Literature sections clearly and concisely depict a qualitative study.
18 to >16 pts
Proficient
Introduction and Review of Literature sections depict a qualitative study in a manner which is mostly clear and concise.
16 to >15 pts
Developing
Introduction and Review of Literature sections vaguely depict a qualitative study in a manner which is somewhat clear and concise.
15 to >0 pts
Below Expectations
Introduction and Review of Literature sections do not depict a qualitative study.
0 pts
Not Present
20 pts
Methods 20 to >18 pts
Advanced
Methods section is clearly qualitative with sufficient information for the completed research plan overview.
18 to >16 pts
Proficient
Methods section is mostly qualitative with adequate information for the completed research plan overview.
16 to >15 pts
Developing
Methods section is somewhat qualitative with some information for the completed research plan overview.
15 to >0 pts
Below Expectations
Methods section is vaguely qualitative with some information for the completed research plan overview.
0 pts
Not Present
20 pts
Growing Understanding
20 to >18 pts
Advanced
The introduction, review of the literature and methods sections clearly show the author’s growing understanding of qualitative research. The introduction, review of the literature and methods sections clearly show the author’s growing understanding of qualitative research.
18 to >16 pts
Proficient
The introduction, review of the literature and methods sections mostly give evidence to the author’s growing understanding of qualitative research.
16 to >15 pts
Developing
The introduction, review of the literature and methods sections somewhat or vaguely show the author’s growing understanding of qualitative research.
15 to >0 pts
Below Expectations
The introduction, review of the literature and methods sections do not show the author’s growing understanding of qualitative research.
0 pts
Not Present
20 pts
Research Plan Overview: Methods Grading Rubric | EDCO747_B01_202630
Criteria Ratings Points
Appendices 10 to >9 pts
Advanced
Appendices include all details necessary, which can be easily written in the final Research Prospectus.
9 to >8 pts
Proficient
Appendices include most of the details necessary, which can be written in the final Research Prospectus.
8 to >7 pts
Developing
Appendices include some of the details necessary to be written in the final Research Prospectus.
7 to >0 pts
Below Expectations
Appendices include few of the details necessary to be written in the final Research Prospectus.
0 pts
Not Present
10 pts
Format 10 to >9 pts
Advanced
All headings are present in the correct order from the template; red directions from the template are replaced with all pertinent outline/content information needed for this stage (Methods).
9 to >8 pts
Proficient
Includes most of the headings in the correct order from the template; most of the red directions from the template have been replaced with pertinent outline/content information needed for this stage (Methods).
8 to >7 pts
Developing
Includes some of the headings in the correct order from the template; some of the red directions from the template have been replaced with some pertinent content/outline information needed for this stage (Methods).
7 to >0 pts
Below Expectations
Does not include the headings in the correct order from the template; the red directions from the template have not been replaced with some pertinent content/outline information needed for this stage (Methods).
0 pts
Not Present
10 pts
References & Citations
10 to >9 pts
Advanced
All citations in section 2 and on the reference page are appropriately implemented and formatted per current APA; references in-text match those in the paper.
9 to >8 pts
Proficient
Most of the citations in section 2 and on the reference page are appropriately implemented and formatted per current APA; most references in-text match those in the paper.
8 to >7 pts
Developing
Some of the citations in section 2 and on the reference page are appropriately implemented and formatted per current APA; some references in-text match those in the paper.
7 to >0 pts
Below Expectations
None of the citations in section 2 and on the reference page are appropriately implemented and formatted per current APA; references in-text do not match those in the paper.
0 pts
No Marks
10 pts
Research Plan Overview: Methods Grading Rubric | EDCO747_B01_202630
Criteria Ratings Points
APA & Editing 10 to >9 pts
Advanced
All elements (including the title and reference page) of the plan are edited precisely for grammar, spelling, punctuation, and current APA formatting.
9 to >8 pts
Proficient
Most elements (including the title and reference page) of the plan are adequately edited for grammar, spelling, punctuation, and current APA formatting.
8 to >7 pts
Developing
Some/all elements (including the title and reference page) are poorly edited for grammar, spelling, punctuation, and current APA formatting.
7 to >0 pts
Below Expectations
Most of the elements (including the title and reference page) are improperly edited for grammar, spelling, punctuation, and current APA formatting.
0 pts
No Marks
10 pts
Total Points: 100
Research Plan Overview: Methods Grading Rubric | EDCO747_B01_202630
Week4.docx
image1.png
VIDEO.docx
ResearchPlanOverviewAssignmentInstructions.docx
EDCO 747
Research Plan Overview Assignment Instructions
Overview
As you progress through this course, you will be developing a Research Plan Overview in outline format. The Research Plan Overview will be submitted in three stages throughout the course, with each stage revising and building upon the previous stage. The requirements for each stage of submission are described below, and the Research Plan Overview Template and Research Plan Overview Grading Rubrics for this assignment are available through Assignment Instructions.
Instructions
In addition to using the Research Plan Overview Template, you must include both a title and reference page (done in current APA format). Additionally, you must keep the headings (all text provided in black font) the same but replace the red text with your topic’s information typed in black font. All headings and subheadings must be included in your outline. Supply all of the pertinent information that the outline requests and include the uncompleted portions of the template (Methods, Appendices, etc.) in the document you submit—just leave the uncompleted portion in “red” text/font.
· Please utilize current APA Professional standards
NOTE: The Research Plan Overview Template (loosely) follows the Liberty’s Department of Community Care and Counseling’s Qualitative Dissertation Template (format); however, be aware that the format can change once you, the doctoral student, become a candidate (by finishing all coursework and successfully passing the comprehensive exam) and begin working with your dissertation committee.
Stage 1
For Stage 1, you must supply the information required for the Introduction (Section I) and the Review of Related Literature (Section II). You will continue to build the Review of Related Literature section throughout each stage of development, so be sure to supply what the red text requires.
Stage 2
Review Stage 1 of your research plan and make revisions or edits as necessary. Then, supply the information required for the Methods (Section III) subheadings A, B, C, D, and E along with Appendices A and B as applicable to your design ONLY.
NOTE: Subheadings F, G and H of the Methods (Section III) AND Appendices C and D are to be completed in Stage 3—NOT in Stage 2. Also, continue to build the Review of Related Literature (Section II).
Stage 3
This stage contributes the final section of the Research Plan Overview, giving you a complete outline. Review Stage 2 of your research plan and make revisions or edits as necessary. Supply the information required for the Methods section (III), subheadings F, G, and H. Also, supply the requested information for Appendices C and D. Finally, polish the Review of Related Literature section (II), adding any final elements you think are necessary.
Note: Your assignment will be checked for originality via the Turnitin plagiarism tool.
ResearchPlanOverview-IntroductionGradingRubric2.pdf
Criteria Ratings Points
Introduction Section
28 to >25 pts
Advanced
Introduction clearly and concisely depicts a qualitative study; information is sufficient to prompt detailed, well-supported writing when outline is turned into final Research Prospectus.
25 to >23 pts
Proficient
Introduction mostly depicts a qualitative study clearly and concisely; information is mostly sufficient to prompt fairly detailed, supported writing when outline is turned into final Research Prospectus.
23 to >21 pts
Developing
Introduction vaguely depicts a qualitative study; information is barely sufficient to turn outline into a well-supported, well written final Research Prospectus.
21 to >0 pts
Below Expectations
Introduction does not depict a qualitative study; information is insufficient to turn outline into a well-supported, well written final Research Prospectus.
0 pts
Not Present
28 pts
Review of the Literature
21 to >19 pts
Advanced
Review of the literature is well supported and includes all information (including theoretical framework) from the outline/template.
19 to >17 pts
Proficient
Review of the literature is mostly well supported and includes most of the information (including theoretical framework) from the outline/template.
17 to >15 pts
Developing
Review of the literature is somewhat supported and includes some of the information (including theoretical framework) from the outline/template.
15 to >0 pts
Below Expectations
Review of the literature is not supported and does not include some of the information (e.g. theoretical framework) from the outline/template.
0 pts
Not Present
21 pts
Growing Understanding
21 to >19 pts
Advanced
The introduction and review of the literature sections clearly show the author’s growing understanding of qualitative research.
19 to >17 pts
Proficient
The introduction and review of the literature sections mostly give evidence to the author’s growing understanding of qualitative research.
17 to >15 pts
Developing
The introduction and review of the literature sections somewhat or vaguely show the author’s growing understanding of qualitative research.
15 to >0 pts
Below Expectations
The introduction and review of the literature sections do not show the author’s growing understanding of qualitative research.
0 pts
Not Present
21 pts
Research Plan Overview: Introduction Grading Rubric | EDCO747_B01_202630
Criteria Ratings Points
Format 10 to >9 pts
Advanced
All headings are present in the correct order from the template; red directions from the template are replaced with all pertinent outline/content information needed for this stage (Introduction).
9 to >8 pts
Proficient
Includes most of the headings in the correct order from the template; most of the red directions from the template have been replaced with pertinent outline/content information needed for this stage (Introduction).
8 to >7 pts
Developing
Includes some of the headings in the correct order from the template; some of the red directions from the template have been replaced with some pertinent content/outline information needed for this stage (Introduction).
7 to >0 pts
Below Expectations
Does not include the headings in the correct order from the template; the red directions from the template have not been replaced with some pertinent content/outline information needed for this stage (Introduction).
0 pts
Not Present
10 pts
References & Citations
10 to >9 pts
Advanced
All citations in section 2 and on the reference page are appropriately implemented and formatted per current APA; references in-text match those in the paper.
9 to >8 pts
Proficient
Most of the citations in section 2 and on the reference page are appropriately implemented and formatted per current APA; most references in-text match those in the paper.
8 to >7 pts
Developing
Some of the citations in section 2 and on the reference page are appropriately implemented and formatted per current APA; some references in-text match those in the paper.
7 to >0 pts
Below Expectations
None of the citations in section 2 and on the reference page are appropriately implemented and formatted per current APA; references in-text do not match those in the paper
0 pts
Not Present
10 pts
APA & Editing 10 to >9 pts
Advanced
All elements (including the title and reference page) of the plan are edited precisely for grammar, spelling, punctuation, and current APA formatting.
9 to >8 pts
Proficient
Most elements (including the title and reference page) of the plan are adequately edited for grammar, spelling, punctuation, and current APA formatting.
8 to >7 pts
Developing
Some/all elements (including the title and reference page) are poorly edited for grammar, spelling, punctuation, and current APA formatting.
7 to >0 pts
Below Expectations
All of the elements (including the title and reference page) are improperly edited for grammar, spelling, punctuation, and current APA formatting.
0 pts
No Marks
10 pts
Total Points: 100
Research Plan Overview: Introduction Grading Rubric | EDCO747_B01_202630
ResearchPlanOverview-MethodsGradingRubric.pdf
Criteria Ratings Points
Introduction Section
20 to >18 pts
Advanced
Introduction and Review of Literature sections clearly and concisely depict a qualitative study.
18 to >16 pts
Proficient
Introduction and Review of Literature sections depict a qualitative study in a manner which is mostly clear and concise.
16 to >15 pts
Developing
Introduction and Review of Literature sections vaguely depict a qualitative study in a manner which is somewhat clear and concise.
15 to >0 pts
Below Expectations
Introduction and Review of Literature sections do not depict a qualitative study.
0 pts
Not Present
20 pts
Methods 20 to >18 pts
Advanced
Methods section is clearly qualitative with sufficient information for the completed research plan overview.
18 to >16 pts
Proficient
Methods section is mostly qualitative with adequate information for the completed research plan overview.
16 to >15 pts
Developing
Methods section is somewhat qualitative with some information for the completed research plan overview.
15 to >0 pts
Below Expectations
Methods section is vaguely qualitative with some information for the completed research plan overview.
0 pts
Not Present
20 pts
Growing Understanding
20 to >18 pts
Advanced
The introduction, review of the literature and methods sections clearly show the author’s growing understanding of qualitative research. The introduction, review of the literature and methods sections clearly show the author’s growing understanding of qualitative research.
18 to >16 pts
Proficient
The introduction, review of the literature and methods sections mostly give evidence to the author’s growing understanding of qualitative research.
16 to >15 pts
Developing
The introduction, review of the literature and methods sections somewhat or vaguely show the author’s growing understanding of qualitative research.
15 to >0 pts
Below Expectations
The introduction, review of the literature and methods sections do not show the author’s growing understanding of qualitative research.
0 pts
Not Present
20 pts
Research Plan Overview: Methods Grading Rubric | EDCO747_B01_202630
Criteria Ratings Points
Appendices 10 to >9 pts
Advanced
Appendices include all details necessary, which can be easily written in the final Research Prospectus.
9 to >8 pts
Proficient
Appendices include most of the details necessary, which can be written in the final Research Prospectus.
8 to >7 pts
Developing
Appendices include some of the details necessary to be written in the final Research Prospectus.
7 to >0 pts
Below Expectations
Appendices include few of the details necessary to be written in the final Research Prospectus.
0 pts
Not Present
10 pts
Format 10 to >9 pts
Advanced
All headings are present in the correct order from the template; red directions from the template are replaced with all pertinent outline/content information needed for this stage (Methods).
9 to >8 pts
Proficient
Includes most of the headings in the correct order from the template; most of the red directions from the template have been replaced with pertinent outline/content information needed for this stage (Methods).
8 to >7 pts
Developing
Includes some of the headings in the correct order from the template; some of the red directions from the template have been replaced with some pertinent content/outline information needed for this stage (Methods).
7 to >0 pts
Below Expectations
Does not include the headings in the correct order from the template; the red directions from the template have not been replaced with some pertinent content/outline information needed for this stage (Methods).
0 pts
Not Present
10 pts
References & Citations
10 to >9 pts
Advanced
All citations in section 2 and on the reference page are appropriately implemented and formatted per current APA; references in-text match those in the paper.
9 to >8 pts
Proficient
Most of the citations in section 2 and on the reference page are appropriately implemented and formatted per current APA; most references in-text match those in the paper.
8 to >7 pts
Developing
Some of the citations in section 2 and on the reference page are appropriately implemented and formatted per current APA; some references in-text match those in the paper.
7 to >0 pts
Below Expectations
None of the citations in section 2 and on the reference page are appropriately implemented and formatted per current APA; references in-text do not match those in the paper.
0 pts
No Marks
10 pts
Research Plan Overview: Methods Grading Rubric | EDCO747_B01_202630
Criteria Ratings Points
APA & Editing 10 to >9 pts
Advanced
All elements (including the title and reference page) of the plan are edited precisely for grammar, spelling, punctuation, and current APA formatting.
9 to >8 pts
Proficient
Most elements (including the title and reference page) of the plan are adequately edited for grammar, spelling, punctuation, and current APA formatting.
8 to >7 pts
Developing
Some/all elements (including the title and reference page) are poorly edited for grammar, spelling, punctuation, and current APA formatting.
7 to >0 pts
Below Expectations
Most of the elements (including the title and reference page) are improperly edited for grammar, spelling, punctuation, and current APA formatting.
0 pts
No Marks
10 pts
Total Points: 100
Research Plan Overview: Methods Grading Rubric | EDCO747_B01_202630
- Assignment 1: LASA2: Historical Context
- Finance power point
- need a management paper in 2 hours
- Our course textbook describes the case study of Genie. For this week's discussion, consider this case in light of Genie's...
- Blowing Rock Railroad decided to use the high-low method and operating data from the past six months to estimate the...
- Assignment 4: Educational Paradigms and Models
- assignment 5.1
- Week Three - Structural Choices for Organizations - Assignment 3
- WK 7 ELECTRONIC PRESENTATION FOR EXPERT_RESEARCHER
- ACC 546 Week 5 Learning Team Assignment Audit Program Design Part II