A3-Five Approaches Table
Follow the template and grading rubric
Follow instruction
4 days ago 20
FiveApproachesTableTemplate.doc
VIDEO.docx
APALogin.docx
FiveApproachesTableAssignmentInstructions.docx
FiveApproachesGradingRubric.pdf
FiveApproachesTableTemplate.doc
VIDEO.docx
VIDEO
https://canvas.liberty.edu/courses/1035064/pages/watch-a-primer-on-qualitative-research-approaches?module_item_id=103967200
APALogin.docx
American Psychological Association. Publication manual of the American Psychological Association (Current ed.). To access this resource, visit the APA Style Manual. This book is provided in the course as an e-book.
Login: abrahamdelacruz4480 @gmail.com Password: Ab#3114204480
FiveApproachesTableAssignmentInstructions.docx
EDCO 747
Five Approaches Table Assignment Instructions
Overview
This assignment will help you organize the critical elements for the five major qualitative research approaches.
Instructions
Using the Five Approaches Table Template, write the key points for each heading and qualitative approach.
· Use your own words for the table; do not simply cut and paste direct quotes from the reading.
· Utilize APA formatting.
The process of writing the right phrase for each area will help you understand the similarities and differences between these five common approaches. Review the red typing in a few of the cells to see examples of the information you must be filling in. Delete these examples as you complete the table. This table will help you write the explicit summaries for the Discussion assignment.
Note: Your assignment will be checked for originality via the Turnitin plagiarism tool.
FiveApproachesGradingRubric.pdf
Criteria Ratings Points
Pertinent Information
20 to >18 pts
Advanced
Well-constructed, pertinent, and concise information is present for all content areas in the table for all five research approaches
18 to >16 pts
Proficient
Information is mostly well constructed, pertinent, and concise for all content areas in the table for all five research approaches
16 to >15 pts
Developing
Information is constructed with some pertinence for all content areas in the table for all five research approaches
15 to >0 pts
Below Expectations
Information is poorly constructed with limited pertinence for all content areas in the table for all five research approaches
0 pts
Not Present
Not present
20 pts
Comprehension of Approaches
15 to >13 pts
Advanced
Table clearly shows a solid understanding of the differences in each of the five approaches through careful word choice
13 to >12 pts
Proficient
Table adequately shows an understanding of the differences in each of the five approaches through adequate word choice
12 to >11 pts
Developing
Table somewhat shows an understanding of the differences of each of the five approaches through imprecise word choice
11 to >0 pts
Below Expectations
Table vaguely shows a limited understanding of the differences of each of the five approaches through imprecise word choice
0 pts
Not Present
Not present
15 pts
Format 10 to >9 pts
Advanced
Table uses clear and original writing with short phrases or short sentences when necessary; is free of spelling errors
9 to >8 pts
Proficient
The majority of the table uses clear and original writing with short phrases or short sentences; contains minimal spelling errors
8 to >7 pts
Developing
Table uses a fair amount of clear and original writing, short phrases or short sentences; spelling errors are present.
7 to >0 pts
Below Expectations
Table uses a limited amount of clear and original writing, short phrases or short sentences; spelling errors are pervasive
0 pts
Not Present
Not present
10 pts
APA 5 to >4 pts
Advanced
Citations are appropriately implemented and are formatted per current APA. Overall paper is formatted per current APA.
4 to >3 pts
Proficient
Minor errors regarding appropriate implementation and/or current APA formatting of citations. Few errors in paper format per current APA.
3 to >2 pts
Developing
A fair number of errors regarding appropriate implementation and/or APA formatting of citations. Several errors in paper format per APA.
2 to >0 pts
Below Expectations
Pervasive errors regarding appropriate implementation and/or current APA formatting of citations. Multiple errors in paper format per current APA.
0 pts
Not Present
Not present
5 pts
Five Approaches Grading Rubric | EDCO747_B01_202630
Criteria Ratings Points
Total Points: 50
Five Approaches Grading Rubric | EDCO747_B01_202630
FiveApproachesTableTemplate.doc
VIDEO.docx
VIDEO
https://canvas.liberty.edu/courses/1035064/pages/watch-a-primer-on-qualitative-research-approaches?module_item_id=103967200
APALogin.docx
American Psychological Association. Publication manual of the American Psychological Association (Current ed.). To access this resource, visit the APA Style Manual. This book is provided in the course as an e-book.
Login: abrahamdelacruz4480 @gmail.com Password: Ab#3114204480
FiveApproachesTableAssignmentInstructions.docx
EDCO 747
Five Approaches Table Assignment Instructions
Overview
This assignment will help you organize the critical elements for the five major qualitative research approaches.
Instructions
Using the Five Approaches Table Template, write the key points for each heading and qualitative approach.
· Use your own words for the table; do not simply cut and paste direct quotes from the reading.
· Utilize APA formatting.
The process of writing the right phrase for each area will help you understand the similarities and differences between these five common approaches. Review the red typing in a few of the cells to see examples of the information you must be filling in. Delete these examples as you complete the table. This table will help you write the explicit summaries for the Discussion assignment.
Note: Your assignment will be checked for originality via the Turnitin plagiarism tool.
FiveApproachesGradingRubric.pdf
Criteria Ratings Points
Pertinent Information
20 to >18 pts
Advanced
Well-constructed, pertinent, and concise information is present for all content areas in the table for all five research approaches
18 to >16 pts
Proficient
Information is mostly well constructed, pertinent, and concise for all content areas in the table for all five research approaches
16 to >15 pts
Developing
Information is constructed with some pertinence for all content areas in the table for all five research approaches
15 to >0 pts
Below Expectations
Information is poorly constructed with limited pertinence for all content areas in the table for all five research approaches
0 pts
Not Present
Not present
20 pts
Comprehension of Approaches
15 to >13 pts
Advanced
Table clearly shows a solid understanding of the differences in each of the five approaches through careful word choice
13 to >12 pts
Proficient
Table adequately shows an understanding of the differences in each of the five approaches through adequate word choice
12 to >11 pts
Developing
Table somewhat shows an understanding of the differences of each of the five approaches through imprecise word choice
11 to >0 pts
Below Expectations
Table vaguely shows a limited understanding of the differences of each of the five approaches through imprecise word choice
0 pts
Not Present
Not present
15 pts
Format 10 to >9 pts
Advanced
Table uses clear and original writing with short phrases or short sentences when necessary; is free of spelling errors
9 to >8 pts
Proficient
The majority of the table uses clear and original writing with short phrases or short sentences; contains minimal spelling errors
8 to >7 pts
Developing
Table uses a fair amount of clear and original writing, short phrases or short sentences; spelling errors are present.
7 to >0 pts
Below Expectations
Table uses a limited amount of clear and original writing, short phrases or short sentences; spelling errors are pervasive
0 pts
Not Present
Not present
10 pts
APA 5 to >4 pts
Advanced
Citations are appropriately implemented and are formatted per current APA. Overall paper is formatted per current APA.
4 to >3 pts
Proficient
Minor errors regarding appropriate implementation and/or current APA formatting of citations. Few errors in paper format per current APA.
3 to >2 pts
Developing
A fair number of errors regarding appropriate implementation and/or APA formatting of citations. Several errors in paper format per APA.
2 to >0 pts
Below Expectations
Pervasive errors regarding appropriate implementation and/or current APA formatting of citations. Multiple errors in paper format per current APA.
0 pts
Not Present
Not present
5 pts
Five Approaches Grading Rubric | EDCO747_B01_202630
Criteria Ratings Points
Total Points: 50
Five Approaches Grading Rubric | EDCO747_B01_202630