A2-Research Plan Overview

TT24

Follow instruction uploaded

  • a month ago
  • 25
files (6)

APALogin.docx

American Psychological Association.  Publication manual of the American Psychological Association (Current ed.). To access this resource, visit the  APA Style ManualThis book is provided in the course as an e-book.

Login: abrahamdelacruz4480 @gmail.com Password: Ab#3114204480

ResearchPlanOverviewAssignmentInstructions.docx

EDCO 747

Research Plan Overview Assignment Instructions

Overview

As you progress through this course, you will be developing a Research Plan Overview in outline format. The Research Plan Overview will be submitted in three stages throughout the course, with each stage revising and building upon the previous stage. The requirements for each stage of submission are described below, and the Research Plan Overview Template and Research Plan Overview Grading Rubrics for this assignment are available through Assignment Instructions.

Instructions

In addition to using the Research Plan Overview Template, you must include both a title and reference page (done in current APA format). Additionally, you must keep the headings (all text provided in black font) the same but replace the red text with your topic’s information typed in black font. All headings and subheadings must be included in your outline. Supply all of the pertinent information that the outline requests and include the uncompleted portions of the template (Methods, Appendices, etc.) in the document you submit—just leave the uncompleted portion in “red” text/font.

· Please utilize current APA Professional standards

NOTE: The Research Plan Overview Template (loosely) follows the Liberty’s Department of Community Care and Counseling’s Qualitative Dissertation Template (format); however, be aware that the format can change once you, the doctoral student, become a candidate (by finishing all coursework and successfully passing the comprehensive exam) and begin working with your dissertation committee.

Stage 1

For Stage 1, you must supply the information required for the Introduction (Section I) and the Review of Related Literature (Section II). You will continue to build the Review of Related Literature section throughout each stage of development, so be sure to supply what the red text requires.

Stage 2

Review Stage 1 of your research plan and make revisions or edits as necessary. Then, supply the information required for the Methods (Section III) subheadings A, B, C, D, and E along with Appendices A and B as applicable to your design ONLY.

NOTE: Subheadings F, G and H of the Methods (Section III) AND Appendices C and D are to be completed in Stage 3—NOT in Stage 2. Also, continue to build the Review of Related Literature (Section II).

Stage 3

This stage contributes the final section of the Research Plan Overview, giving you a complete outline. Review Stage 2 of your research plan and make revisions or edits as necessary. Supply the information required for the Methods section (III), subheadings F, G, and H. Also, supply the requested information for Appendices C and D. Finally, polish the Review of Related Literature section (II), adding any final elements you think are necessary.

Note: Your assignment will be checked for originality via the Turnitin plagiarism tool.

ResearchPlanOverview-IntroductionGradingRubric.pdf

Criteria Ratings Points

Introduction Section

28 to >25 pts

Advanced

Introduction clearly and concisely depicts a qualitative study; information is sufficient to prompt detailed, well-supported writing when outline is turned into final Research Prospectus.

25 to >23 pts

Proficient

Introduction mostly depicts a qualitative study clearly and concisely; information is mostly sufficient to prompt fairly detailed, supported writing when outline is turned into final Research Prospectus.

23 to >21 pts

Developing

Introduction vaguely depicts a qualitative study; information is barely sufficient to turn outline into a well-supported, well written final Research Prospectus.

21 to >0 pts

Below Expectations

Introduction does not depict a qualitative study; information is insufficient to turn outline into a well-supported, well written final Research Prospectus.

0 pts

Not Present

28 pts

Review of the Literature

21 to >19 pts

Advanced

Review of the literature is well supported and includes all information (including theoretical framework) from the outline/template.

19 to >17 pts

Proficient

Review of the literature is mostly well supported and includes most of the information (including theoretical framework) from the outline/template.

17 to >15 pts

Developing

Review of the literature is somewhat supported and includes some of the information (including theoretical framework) from the outline/template.

15 to >0 pts

Below Expectations

Review of the literature is not supported and does not include some of the information (e.g. theoretical framework) from the outline/template.

0 pts

Not Present

21 pts

Growing Understanding

21 to >19 pts

Advanced

The introduction and review of the literature sections clearly show the author’s growing understanding of qualitative research.

19 to >17 pts

Proficient

The introduction and review of the literature sections mostly give evidence to the author’s growing understanding of qualitative research.

17 to >15 pts

Developing

The introduction and review of the literature sections somewhat or vaguely show the author’s growing understanding of qualitative research.

15 to >0 pts

Below Expectations

The introduction and review of the literature sections do not show the author’s growing understanding of qualitative research.

0 pts

Not Present

21 pts

Research Plan Overview: Introduction Grading Rubric | EDCO747_B01_202630

Criteria Ratings Points

Format 10 to >9 pts

Advanced

All headings are present in the correct order from the template; red directions from the template are replaced with all pertinent outline/content information needed for this stage (Introduction).

9 to >8 pts

Proficient

Includes most of the headings in the correct order from the template; most of the red directions from the template have been replaced with pertinent outline/content information needed for this stage (Introduction).

8 to >7 pts

Developing

Includes some of the headings in the correct order from the template; some of the red directions from the template have been replaced with some pertinent content/outline information needed for this stage (Introduction).

7 to >0 pts

Below Expectations

Does not include the headings in the correct order from the template; the red directions from the template have not been replaced with some pertinent content/outline information needed for this stage (Introduction).

0 pts

Not Present

10 pts

References & Citations

10 to >9 pts

Advanced

All citations in section 2 and on the reference page are appropriately implemented and formatted per current APA; references in-text match those in the paper.

9 to >8 pts

Proficient

Most of the citations in section 2 and on the reference page are appropriately implemented and formatted per current APA; most references in-text match those in the paper.

8 to >7 pts

Developing

Some of the citations in section 2 and on the reference page are appropriately implemented and formatted per current APA; some references in-text match those in the paper.

7 to >0 pts

Below Expectations

None of the citations in section 2 and on the reference page are appropriately implemented and formatted per current APA; references in-text do not match those in the paper

0 pts

Not Present

10 pts

APA & Editing 10 to >9 pts

Advanced

All elements (including the title and reference page) of the plan are edited precisely for grammar, spelling, punctuation, and current APA formatting.

9 to >8 pts

Proficient

Most elements (including the title and reference page) of the plan are adequately edited for grammar, spelling, punctuation, and current APA formatting.

8 to >7 pts

Developing

Some/all elements (including the title and reference page) are poorly edited for grammar, spelling, punctuation, and current APA formatting.

7 to >0 pts

Below Expectations

All of the elements (including the title and reference page) are improperly edited for grammar, spelling, punctuation, and current APA formatting.

0 pts

No Marks

10 pts

Total Points: 100

Research Plan Overview: Introduction Grading Rubric | EDCO747_B01_202630

ResearchPlanOverviewTemplate.doc

EDCO 747

Research Plan Overview Template

Name:

Stage of Completion:

I. Introduction

A. Problem Statement

1. What is/are the problem(s), issue(s), or topic(s)?

a. related literature source

b. related literature source

2. Why is it important to study? What difference can it make?

a. related literature source

b. related literature source

3. Use the phrase, “The problem is…”

B. Purpose (focus of inquiry)

1. What is the purpose of this study?

2. Start with the phrase, “The purpose of this study is…”

C. General research questions (remember that qualitative questions are usually broader and become narrowed down as you move into the actual data collection/analysis process)

1. First question

2. Second question

3. Third question

D. Research Plan

1. How will the study be conducted? Qualitative or quantitative (has to be qualitative for this class)

2. Explain why this method choice is the right one for your study

II. Review of Related Literature

A. Theoretical Framework

1. What philosophical assumption(s) led to your choice of research? (Ontological, epistemological, axiological, rhetorical, and/or methodological.) Include citations

2. What is your worldview or a theory that helped shape this study? (Biblical, Postpositivism, Constructivism, Moral Realism, Behaviorism, Critical Theory…the theory does not have to come from your textbook reading) Include citations

B. Important Thinkers/experts/theorists in this field of study (At this point in time you will just find and list them. The literature review will be interwoven, like a quilt, later.)

1. Citation (i.e., Graves, D. (2003). Writing: Teachers and children at work (20th Anniversary ed.). Exeter, NH: Heinemann.)

a. why (seminal book on how to write and writing issues)

b. why (his work is cited in almost all writing textbooks and many research articles)

2. Citation (i.e., Fulwiler, T. (1987). The journal book. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.)

a. why (considered first major thinker in the world of journal writing)

b. why (published 5 textbooks and dozens of research articles on this topic)

C. Related Research (At this point in time you will just find and list them. This section should grow with each week as you continue to look for more information. The literature review will be interwoven, like a quilt, later.)

1. Research article (must have a methodology section, results, etc.: i.e., Clarke, L. K. (1988). Invented versus traditional spelling in first graders’ writing: Effects on learning to spell and read. Research in the Teaching of English, 22(3), 281-309.

a. what is it about?

b. why important to this study? (Write key descriptors here—efficacy and writing link; teachers’ belief in students, etc. These descriptors will help you form literature review headings later and create the review of literature ‘quilt.’)

c. and so on…

2. Research article (i.e., Linnenbrink, E. A., & Pintrich, P. R. (2003). The role of self-efficacy beliefs in student engagement and learning in the classroom. Reading & Writing Quarterly, 19, 119-137.)

a. what is it about?

b. why important to this study? (Write key descriptors here—efficacy and writing link; teachers’ belief in students etc. These descriptors will help you form literature review headings later and create the review of literature ‘quilt.’)

c. and so on…

III. Methods

A. Design (approach) and Rationale

1. Which approach are you using? (Phenomenological, Case Study, Grounded Theory)

2. Why is this approach a valid design for your study?

B. Site

1. Pseudonym (made up name of the site)

2. Location (general information, i.e., “large high school in central VA”)

3. Specific demographics

4. Other pertinent information about the site

C. Participants

1. How many?

2. How selected?

3. Specific information (gender, age, etc.)

D. Role of Researcher or Personal biography (the 2nd is much more detailed…you will have to decide what you believe is more pertinent to your study)

1. Name

2. Job

3. Background information

4. Anything else that will impact how you view the data and the research surroundings (i.e., I would have to put my love affair with God)

E. Data Collection (a critical aspect of qualitative inquiry is rigorous and varied data collection techniques)

1. Method 1(i.e., interviews)

a. detail (i.e., principal at least 3 times)

b. detail (i.e., parents, snowball sampling, etc.)

2. Method 2

a. detail

b. detail

3. Method 3

a. detail

b. detail

F. Data Analysis

1. 1st Technique (i.e., open coding)

a. information about it (i.e., organizing data into…)

b. specific information on how this process will be done

c. why important (i.e., this process allows the researcher to…)

2. 2nd Technique (i.e., constant comparison method of looking at data…)

G. Trustworthiness (the reliability, dependability, and transferability information goes here)

1. 1st Technique (i.e., member checks)

a. information about it (i.e., having participants review and respond to…)

b. why important (i.e., this process increases the reliability of the study because…)

2. 2nd Technique (i.e., audit trail)

a. information about it

b. why important

3. 3rd Technique (i.e., reflexivity or memoing)

a. information about it

b. why important

c. and so on…

H. Ethical Considerations

1. potential issue and how addressed (i.e., negative results could impact school/researcher, used pseudonyms for all participants and identifiable names)

2. potential issue and how addressed

3. protection of data

References

List all references cited and formatted according to current APA edition guidelines

Appendix A Interview Questions/Guide

What are the general questions you will ask?

Questions should be opened ended; no yes/no questions

Start with an “icebreaker” to initation a conversational interview

Appendix B: Other Data Collection Procedures (e.g. Focus Groups, Document Analysis, Writing Prompts, Cognitive Representations, Observations, etc.)

In addition to interviews, how will you gather information?

Will you use a template with time stamps (every 5 minutes mark the time)?

If you conduct a focus group, what questions might you ask?

Will you use photo narrative? Cognitive representations? Participant journals?

Appendix C Timeline and Budget

Be specific. Here is an example:

August 2025—Finish coursework ($ for these items)

September 2025—Get committee together and register for dissertation course EDCO 988 ($)

Spring 2026—Defend proposal ($)

Summer 2026—Submit research plan to the Institutional Review Board (IRB) for approval ($)

And so on…

Appendix D Consent Form

Include a robust, substantive consent form; check out Liberty’s IRB Website for example(s). Do you need one for various participants? If you need one for students/minors, it is called an ‘assent form.’

Page 1 of 4

Read-CreswellPothChapters3.pdf
This file is too large to display.View in new window