Evaluation Plan Project: Portfolio Compilation
2/24/22, 12:50 PM Rubric Detail – Blackboard Learn
https://class.waldenu.edu/webapps/bbgs-deep-links-BBLEARN/app/course/rubric?course_id=_16936340_1&rubric_id=_2920720_1 1/5
Rubric Detail Select Grid View or List View to change the rubric's layout.
Excellent Good Fair Poor
Name: NURS_6541_Week9_Assignment_Rubric EXIT
Grid View List View
2/24/22, 12:50 PM Rubric Detail – Blackboard Learn
https://class.waldenu.edu/webapps/bbgs-deep-links-BBLEARN/app/course/rubric?course_id=_16936340_1&rubric_id=_2920720_1 2/5
Excellent Good Fair Poor
Compile all the revised elements of your HIT evaluation plan into one document.
Compilation should include:
An explanation of the goals of your evaluation plan
Literature review (with summary table as an appendix)
Evaluation methodology (including research design)
Evaluation tool
67 (67%) - 75 (75%)
Compiled HIT evaluation plan contains all required elements with appropriately incorporated Instructor feedback.
60 (60%) - 66 (66%)
Compiled HIT evaluation plan contains all required elements with some incorporated Instructor feedback.
53 (53%) - 59 (59%)
Compiled HIT evaluation plan is missing no more than 1 required element with little appropriately incorporated Instructor feedback.
0 (0%) - 52 (52%)
Compiled HIT evaluation plan contains few (more than 1 missing) required elements with little or no appropriately incorporated Instructor feedback.
2/24/22, 12:50 PM Rubric Detail – Blackboard Learn
https://class.waldenu.edu/webapps/bbgs-deep-links-BBLEARN/app/course/rubric?course_id=_16936340_1&rubric_id=_2920720_1 3/5
Excellent Good Fair Poor
In a 1-page re�ection include:
A summary of the criteria you will use to de�ne the success of your plan and an analysis of the process of creating an evaluation plan.
Some things to re�ect on include: the steps that may be present, challenges and how to address them, what went well and why, and ways to improve future evaluations.
9 (9%) - 10 (10%) The response summarizes clearly, accurately, and with speci�c detail the criteria used to de�ne the success of the plan and an analysis of the process of creating an evaluation plan.
8 (8%) - 8 (8%)
The response summarizes the criteria used to de�ne the success of the plan and an analysis of the process of creating an evaluation plan.
7 (7%) - 7 (7%) The response summarizes in vague or inaccurate detail the criteria used to de�ne the success of the plan and/or an analysis of the process of creating an evaluation plan.
0 (0%) - 6 (6%) The response summarizes in inaccurate and/or incomplete detail the criteria used to de�ne the success of the plan and/or an analysis of the process of creating an evaluation plan.
2/24/22, 12:50 PM Rubric Detail – Blackboard Learn
https://class.waldenu.edu/webapps/bbgs-deep-links-BBLEARN/app/course/rubric?course_id=_16936340_1&rubric_id=_2920720_1 4/5
Excellent Good Fair Poor
Written Expression and Formatting — Paragraph Development and Organization:
Paragraphs make clear points that support well- developed ideas, �ow logically, and demonstrate continuity of ideas. Sentences are carefully focused—neither long and rambling nor short and lacking substance. A clear and comprehensive purpose statement and introduction are provided that delineate all required criteria.
5 (5%) - 5 (5%) Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for �ow, continuity, and clarity.
A clear and comprehensive purpose statement, introduction, and conclusion are provided that delineate all required criteria.
4 (4%) - 4 (4%)
Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for �ow, continuity, and clarity 80% of the time.
Purpose, introduction, and conclusion of the assignment are stated, yet are brief and not descriptive.
3 (3%) - 3 (3%) Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for �ow, continuity, and clarity 60%–79% of the time.
Purpose, introduction, and conclusion of the assignment are vague or o� topic.
0 (0%) - 2 (2%) Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for �ow, continuity, and clarity < 60% of the time.
No purpose statement, introduction, or conclusion were provided.
Written Expression and Formatting — English Writing Standards:
Correct grammar, mechanics, and proper punctuation
5 (5%) - 5 (5%) Uses correct grammar, spelling, and punctuation with no errors.
4 (4%) - 4 (4%)
Contains a few (1 or 2) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors.
3 (3%) - 3 (3%) Contains several (3 or 4) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors.
0 (0%) - 2 (2%) Contains many (≥ 5) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors that interfere with the reader’s understanding.
2/24/22, 12:50 PM Rubric Detail – Blackboard Learn
https://class.waldenu.edu/webapps/bbgs-deep-links-BBLEARN/app/course/rubric?course_id=_16936340_1&rubric_id=_2920720_1 5/5
Excellent Good Fair Poor
Written Expression and Formatting — The paper follows correct APA format for title page, headings, font, spacing, margins, indentations, page numbers, running heads, parenthetical/in- text citations, and reference list.
5 (5%) - 5 (5%) Uses correct APA format with no errors.
4 (4%) - 4 (4%)
Contains a few (1 or 2) APA format errors.
3 (3%) - 3 (3%) Contains several (3 or 4) APA format errors.
0 (0%) - 2 (2%) Contains many (≥ 5) APA format errors.
Total Points: 100
Name: NURS_6541_Week9_Assignment_Rubric
EXIT