review attachment to complete the assignment

2

An Interview and Response Question

Student’s Name

Institutional Affiliation

Course Name

Instructor’s Name

Date

Transcription of Interview 1:

Interviewer: Thank you for taking the time to talk with me about your experience with the death penalty. Can you tell me a bit about how you felt when you first learned about the death penalty for your family member?

Interviewee: When I first learned about the death penalty for my family member, I was in complete shock. I was overwhelmed with sadness and disbelief. I didn't think the death penalty was something that could happen to someone I loved. It felt like a nightmare that I couldn't wake up from.

Interviewer: How has the death penalty affected your psychological well-being?

Interviewee: The death penalty has greatly impacted my psychological well-being. It has caused me to experience various emotions, including guilt, anger, and grief. It has been challenging to process the reality of the situation, and I have had to seek counseling to help me cope.

Interviewer: What has been the most challenging part of coping with the death penalty for your family member?

Interviewee: The most challenging part of coping with the death penalty for my family member has been dealing with the finality of it. It is hard to accept that there is no hope for a different outcome and that I won't be able to see my family member again. It has also been difficult to find a way to move forward and keep living my life.

Interviewer: How has the death penalty impacted your relationships with other family members and friends?

Interviewee: The death penalty has greatly impacted my relationships with other family members and friends. Discussing the situation with them has been challenging because it is a susceptible topic. Watching my family and friends grieve and try to make sense of it all has also been hard.

Interviewer: What do you think needs to be done to improve the death penalty system in Texas?

Interviewee: I think the death penalty system in Texas needs to be reformed in several ways. There needs to be more transparency in the process and a better understanding of the rights of the accused. I also think the appeals process needs to be improved so innocent people are not wrongly convicted. Lastly, I think that access to mental health services should be offered to family members of those who have been executed.

Interviewer: Do you believe the death penalty should remain legal in Texas?

Interviewee: I do not believe the death penalty should remain legal in Texas. I think that it is a cruel and inhumane punishment that does not provide justice for victims or their families. There are better ways to hold people accountable for their actions without resorting to capital punishment.

Interviewer: How has the death penalty process changed since your family member's execution?

Interviewee: Since my family member's execution, the death penalty process has become more stringent. The appeals process has been extended, and there is more oversight of the entire process. Additionally, mental health services are now available to family members of those who have been executed, providing more support and resources to those grieving.

Summary of Interview 2:

I interviewed a family member of a person who was executed in Texas. The interviewee felt shocked and disbelief when they first learned of the death penalty for their family member. The death penalty greatly impacted their psychological well-being, causing them to experience various emotions, including guilt, anger, and grief. The most challenging part of coping with the death penalty has been dealing with the finality of it and trying to find a way to move forward. The death penalty has also greatly impacted their relationships with other family members and friends, making it difficult to talk about the situation and watch their family members grieve. The interviewee believes that the death penalty should not remain legal in Texas, that the appeals process should be improved, and that more mental health services should be offered to family members of those who have been executed. Since their family member's execution, the death penalty process has become more stringent, with an extended appeals process and more oversight.

Transcribing and summarizing an interview are two different ways of turning interviews into data. Transcribing an interview is a more detailed and direct way of capturing the participant's experience, as it allows for a direct representation of their words and ideas. This approach enables an in-depth exploration of the participant's emotions and thoughts and allows a more accurate picture of the interviewee's experience (Alamri, 2019). Summarizing an interview, on the other hand, is a more efficient and effective way of capturing the main points of the interview. It allows for the identification of potential patterns and categories and the ability to identify key areas of focus quickly. However, it does not provide as in-depth an understanding of the participant's experience as transcribing an interview.

References

Alamri, W. A. (2019). Effectiveness of qualitative research methods: Interviews and diaries. International Journal of English and Cultural Studies, 2(1), 65-70.