Wk 4, DAT 565: Call Time Business Research Email

Mesamada
Wk4-CallTimeAnalysis.docx

DAT/565 v4

Call Time Analysis

DAT/565 v4

Page 2 of 2

Call Time Analysis

Time in Queue Test

The team performed a test of hypothesis to determine whether the average TiQ is lower than the industry standard of 2.5 minutes (150 seconds).

A significance level α=0.05 was used.

This was a test of mean against a hypothesized value of 150 seconds. Because the sample size was large, we assumed knowledge of the population’s variance.

The null and alternate hypotheses is:

Ho : µ ≥ 150

H1 : µ < 150

This is a left-tailed test, and with a significance level of α=0.05 the critical value is z = -1.645. The decision rule becomes: Reject Ho if zcalc < -1.645.

Chart of the TiQ rejection region. Reject Ho if zcalc < -1.645.

Figure 1: TiQ Rejection Region

The test statistic is given by:

The test statistic zcalc falls outside the rejection region, so we reject the null hypothesis in favor of the alternate hypothesis. We conclude the call center’s average TiQ is greater than the industry’s average of 150 seconds.

Results of TiQ hypothesis test, mean versus hypothesized value 150.000 hypothesized value 147.922 mean queue time 137.971 standard deviation 3.372 standard error 1674 n -0.62 z 0.2689 p-value (one tailed, lower) 141.313 confidence interval 95% lower 154.532 confidence interval 95% upper 6.609 margin of error

Figure 2: Results of TiQ Hypothesis Test: Mean versus Hypothesized Value

Average Service Time Test

The team performed a test of hypothesis to determine whether the service time (ST) with new service protocol PE is lower than with the current PT protocol. A significance level of α=0.05 was used.

This is a test of means for two independent samples with unknown variances assumed unequal.

Sample 1 is the data from the PT (current) protocol. Sample 2 is the data from the PE (new) protocol. We tested whether the mean ST with protocol PE is smaller than the mean with protocol PT.

The null and alternate hypotheses are:

Ho : µ1 ≤ µ2

H1 : µ1 > µ2

This is a right-tailed test. Because of the very large samples, there is no real difference between finding the critical value with a normal distribution or the t distribution. The critical value with a significance level α=0.05 is t = 1.645.

The decision rule becomes: Reject Ho if tcalc > 1.645.

Hypothesis Test of Independent Groups (t-test, unequal variance) PE protocol 149.28 mean 185.89 standard deviation 853 n PT protocol 212.16 mean 190.58 standard deviation 821 n 1665 df -62.883 difference (PE protocol - PT protocol) 9.206 standard error of difference 0 hypothesized difference -6.831 t 5.91E-12 p-value (one-tailed, lower) -80.940 confidence interval 95% lower -44.826 confidence interval 95% upper 18.057 margin of error

Figure 3: Hypothesis Test of Independent Groups (t-test, unequal variance)

The tcalc = -6.8 falls in the rejection region. We conclude that the new protocol (PE) results in a shorter average service time than the traditional protocol (PT) based on available data.

image1.png

image2.png

image3.png