ALIGNING THE ESSENTIALS WITH A GAP IN PRACTICE OR PRACTICE CHANGE

NURS_8006_Week3_Assignment_Rubric

Criteria

Ratings

Pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeDescribe the organization type and the gap in practice or practice change that you selected for this Assignment.

10 to >9.0 ptsExcellentThe response accurately and clearly describes the organization type and the gap in practice or practice change that they selected for this Assignment. The response includes relevant, specific, and appropriate examples that fully support the explanations provided for each of the alignments described.

9 to >8.0 ptsGoodThe response accurately describes the organization type and the gap in practice or practice change that they selected for this Assignment. The response includes relevant, specific, and accurate examples that support the explanations provided for each of the alignments described.

8 to >7.0 ptsFairThe response inaccurately or vaguely describes the organization type and the gap in practice or practice change that they selected for this Assignment. The response includes inaccurate and irrelevant examples that may support the explanations provided for each of the alignments described.

7 to >0 ptsPoorThe response inaccurately and vaguely describes the organization type and the gap in practice or practice change that they selected for this Assignment or it is missing. The response includes inaccurate and vague examples that do not support the explanations provided for each of the alignments described or it is missing.

10 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeIdentify the four Domains from The Essentials you identified which closely align with the gap in practice or practice change.

10 to >9.0 ptsExcellentThe response accurately and clearly identifies the four Domains from The Essentials they identified which closely align with the gap in practice or practice change. The response includes relevant, specific, and appropriate examples that fully support the explanations provided for each of the alignments described.

9 to >8.0 ptsGoodThe response accurately identifies the four Domains from The Essentials they identified which closely align with the gap in practice or practice change. The response includes relevant, specific, and accurate examples that support the explanations provided for each of the alignments described.

8 to >7.0 ptsFairThe response inaccurately or vaguely identifies the four Domains from The Essentials they identified which closely align with the gap in practice or practice change. The response includes inaccurate and irrelevant examples that may support the explanations provided for each of the alignments described.

7 to >0 ptsPoorThe response inaccurately and vaguely identifies the four Domains from The Essentials they identified which closely align with the gap in practice or practice change or it is missing. The response includes inaccurate and vague examples that do not support the explanations provided for each of the alignments described or it is missing.

10 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeJustify your Domain choices, explaining how each aligns with the gap in practice or practice change you selected.

45 to >40.5 ptsExcellentThe response accurately and clearly justifies their Domain choices, explaining how each aligns with the gap in practice or practice change selected. The response includes relevant, specific, and appropriate examples that fully support the explanations provided for each of the alignments described.

40.5 to >36.0 ptsGoodThe response accurately justifies their Domain choices, explaining how each aligns with the gap in practice or practice change selected. The response includes relevant, specific, and accurate examples that support the explanations provided for each of the alignments described.

36 to >31.5 ptsFairThe response inaccurately or vaguely justifies their Domain choices, explaining how each aligns with the gap in practice or practice change selected. The response includes inaccurate and irrelevant examples that may support the explanations provided for each of the alignments described.

31.5 to >0 ptsPoorThe response inaccurately and vaguely justifies their Domain choices, explaining how each aligns with the gap in practice or practice change selected or it is missing. The response includes inaccurate and vague examples that do not support the explanations provided for each of the alignments described or it is missing.

45 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWritten Expression and Formatting - Paragraph Development and Organization: Paragraphs make clear points that support well-developed ideas, flow logically, and demonstrate continuity of ideas. Sentences are carefully focused—neither long and rambling nor short and lacking substance. A clear and comprehensive purpose statement and introduction is provided which delineates all required criteria.

5 to >4.0 ptsExcellentParagraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity. 90% of the time. A clear and comprehensive purpose statement, introduction, and conclusion is provided which delineates all required criteria.

4 to >3.5 ptsGoodParagraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity 80% of the time. Purpose, introduction, and conclusion of the assignment is stated, yet is brief and not descriptive.

3.5 to >3.0 ptsFairParagraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity 70% of the time. Purpose, introduction, and conclusion of the assignment is vague or off topic.

3 to >0 ptsPoorParagraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity < 70% of the time. No purpose statement, introduction, or conclusion was provided.

5 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWritten Expression and Formatting - English writing standards: Correct grammar, mechanics, and proper punctuation

5 to >4.0 ptsExcellentUses correct grammar, spelling, and punctuation with no errors.

4 to >3.5 ptsGoodContains a few (1 or 2) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors.

3.5 to >3.0 ptsFairContains several (3 or 4) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors.

3 to >0 ptsPoorContains many (≥ 5) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors that interfere with the reader’s understanding.

5 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWritten Expression and Formatting - The paper follows correct APA format for title page, headings, font, spacing, margins, indentations, page numbers, parenthetical/in-text citations, and reference list.

5 to >4.0 ptsExcellentUses correct APA format with no errors.

4 to >3.5 ptsGoodContains a few (1 or 2) APA format errors.

3.5 to >3.0 ptsFairContains several (3 or 4) APA format errors.

3 to >0 ptsPoorContains many (≥ 5) APA format errors.

5 pts