2 assignments
Rubric Detail
Select Grid View or List View to change the rubric's layout.
Content
Name: DDPA_8210_Wk9_Assignment_Rubric
| Exemplary | Acceptable | Progressing | Failing | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Responsiveness to Paper or Writing Assignment | Points: Points Range: 23 (30.67%) - 25 (33.33%) Responds to the assigned or selected topic. Goes beyond what is required in some meaningful way (e.g., ideas contribute a new dimension to what we know about the topic, unearths something unanticipated). Is substantive and evidence based. Demonstrates that the student has read, viewed, and considered the Learning Resources in the course and that the paper topic connects in a meaningful way to the course content. Is submitted by the due date. Feedback: | Points: Points Range: 20 (26.67%) - 22 (29.33%) Responds to the assigned or selected topic. Is substantive and evidence based. Demonstrates that the student has read, viewed, and considered the Learning Resources in the course and that the paper topic connects in a meaningful way to the course content. And, Is submitted by the due date. Feedback: | Points: Points Range: 18 (24%) - 19 (25.33%) Somewhat misses the point of the assigned or selected topic. And/or, Lacks in substance, relying more on anecdotal than scholarly evidence. And/or, Contains little evidence that the student has read, viewed, and considered the Learning Resources in the course and that the paper topic connects in a meaningful way to the course content. And, Is submitted by the due date. Feedback: | Points: Points Range: 0 (0%) - 17 (22.67%) Misses the point of the assigned or selected topic. and/or Relies primarily on anecdotal evidence. And/or, Contains little evidence that the student has read, viewed, and considered the Learning Resources in the course and that the paper topic connects in a meaningful way to the course content. And/or, Is submitted past the late deadline. Feedback: |
| Content Knowledge | Points: Points Range: 23 (30.67%) - 25 (33.33%) In-depth understanding and application of concepts and issues presented in the course (e.g., insightful interpretations or analyses. Accurate and perceptive parallels, ideas, opinions, and conclusions), showing that the student has absorbed the general principles and ideas presented and makes inferences about the concepts/issues or connects them to other ideas. Rich and relevant examples. Thought-provoking ideas and interpretations, original thinking, new perspectives. Original and critical thinking. and Mastery and thoughtful/ accurate application of knowledge and skills or strategies presented in the course. Feedback: | Points: Points Range: 20 (26.67%) - 22 (29.33%) Understanding and application of the concepts and issues presented in the course, demonstrating that the student has absorbed the general principles and ideas presented. Relevant examples. Thought-provoking ideas and interpretations, some original thinking, critical thinking. Original and critical thinking. And, Mastery and application of knowledge and skills or strategies presented in the course. Feedback: | Points: Points Range: 18 (24%) - 19 (25.33%) Minimal understanding of concepts and issues presented in the course, and, although generally accurate, displays some omissions and/or errors. And/or Few and/or irrelevant examples. And/or, Few if any thought-provoking ideas, little original thinking. And/or, “Regurgitated” knowledge rather than critical thinking. And, Little mastery of skills and/or numerous errors when using the knowledge, skills, or strategies presented in the course. Feedback: | Points: Points Range: 0 (0%) - 17 (22.67%) A lack of understanding of the concepts and issues presented in the course, and/or application is inaccurate and contains many omissions and/or errors. And/or, No examples or irrelevant examples. And/or, No thought-provoking ideas or original thinking. and/or No critical thinking. and Many critical errors when applying knowledge, skills, or strategies presented in the course. Feedback: |
| Quality of Writing | Points: Points Range: 23 (30.67%) - 25 (33.33%) Uses language that is clear, concise, and appropriate. Has few if any errors in spelling, grammar, and syntax. Is extremely well organized, logical, clear, and never confuses the reader. Uses a preponderance of original language and uses direct quotes only when necessary and/or appropriate. Provides information about a source when citing or paraphrasing it. Consistently uses correct APA form and style (including citations, references, use of nonbiased language, clear organization, good editorial style, etc.) with very few or no errors. Feedback: | Points: Points Range: 20 (26.67%) - 22 (29.33%) Uses language that is clear. Has a few errors in spelling, grammar, and syntax. Is well organized, logical, and clear. Uses original language and uses direct quotes when necessary and/or appropriate. Provides information about a source when citing or paraphrasing it. Provides correct APA citations about a source when citing or paraphrasing it. Feedback: | Points: Points Range: 18 (24%) - 19 (25.33%) Uses language that is unclear and/or inappropriate. and/or Has more than occasional errors in spelling, grammar, and syntax and/or lacks correct APA citations. and/or Is poorly organized, is at times unclear and confusing, and has some problems with logical flow. and/or Reflects an underuse of original language and an overuse of direct quotes and paraphrases. and/or Sometimes lacks information about a source when citing or paraphrasing it. Feedback: | Points: Points Range: 0 (0%) - 17 (22.67%) Uses unclear and inappropriate language. and/or Has many errors in spelling, grammar, and syntax. and/or Lacks organization in a way that creates confusion for the reader. and/or Contains many direct quotes from original source materials and/or consistently and poorly paraphrases rather than using original language. and/or Lacks information about a source when citing or paraphrasing it and/or incorrect use of APA. Feedback: |
Responsiveness to Paper or Writing Assignment--
Levels of Achievement: Exemplary 23 (30.67%) - 25 (33.33%) Responds to the assigned or selected topic. Goes beyond what is required in some meaningful way (e.g., ideas contribute a new dimension to what we know about the topic, unearths something unanticipated). Is substantive and evidence based. Demonstrates that the student has read, viewed, and considered the Learning Resources in the course and that the paper topic connects in a meaningful way to the course content. Is submitted by the due date. Acceptable 20 (26.67%) - 22 (29.33%) Responds to the assigned or selected topic. Is substantive and evidence based. Demonstrates that the student has read, viewed, and considered the Learning Resources in the course and that the paper topic connects in a meaningful way to the course content. And, Is submitted by the due date. Progressing 18 (24%) - 19 (25.33%) Somewhat misses the point of the assigned or selected topic. And/or, Lacks in substance, relying more on anecdotal than scholarly evidence. And/or, Contains little evidence that the student has read, viewed, and considered the Learning Resources in the course and that the paper topic connects in a meaningful way to the course content. And, Is submitted by the due date. Failing 0 (0%) - 17 (22.67%) Misses the point of the assigned or selected topic. and/or Relies primarily on anecdotal evidence. And/or, Contains little evidence that the student has read, viewed, and considered the Learning Resources in the course and that the paper topic connects in a meaningful way to the course content. And/or, Is submitted past the late deadline. Feedback:Content Knowledge--
Levels of Achievement: Exemplary 23 (30.67%) - 25 (33.33%) In-depth understanding and application of concepts and issues presented in the course (e.g., insightful interpretations or analyses. Accurate and perceptive parallels, ideas, opinions, and conclusions), showing that the student has absorbed the general principles and ideas presented and makes inferences about the concepts/issues or connects them to other ideas. Rich and relevant examples. Thought-provoking ideas and interpretations, original thinking, new perspectives. Original and critical thinking. and Mastery and thoughtful/ accurate application of knowledge and skills or strategies presented in the course. Acceptable 20 (26.67%) - 22 (29.33%) Understanding and application of the concepts and issues presented in the course, demonstrating that the student has absorbed the general principles and ideas presented. Relevant examples. Thought-provoking ideas and interpretations, some original thinking, critical thinking. Original and critical thinking. And, Mastery and application of knowledge and skills or strategies presented in the course. Progressing 18 (24%) - 19 (25.33%) Minimal understanding of concepts and issues presented in the course, and, although generally accurate, displays some omissions and/or errors. And/or Few and/or irrelevant examples. And/or, Few if any thought-provoking ideas, little original thinking. And/or, “Regurgitated” knowledge rather than critical thinking. And, Little mastery of skills and/or numerous errors when using the knowledge, skills, or strategies presented in the course. Failing 0 (0%) - 17 (22.67%) A lack of understanding of the concepts and issues presented in the course, and/or application is inaccurate and contains many omissions and/or errors. And/or, No examples or irrelevant examples. And/or, No thought-provoking ideas or original thinking. and/or No critical thinking. and Many critical errors when applying knowledge, skills, or strategies presented in the course. Feedback:Quality of Writing--
Levels of Achievement: Exemplary 23 (30.67%) - 25 (33.33%) Uses language that is clear, concise, and appropriate. Has few if any errors in spelling, grammar, and syntax. Is extremely well organized, logical, clear, and never confuses the reader. Uses a preponderance of original language and uses direct quotes only when necessary and/or appropriate. Provides information about a source when citing or paraphrasing it. Consistently uses correct APA form and style (including citations, references, use of nonbiased language, clear organization, good editorial style, etc.) with very few or no errors. Acceptable 20 (26.67%) - 22 (29.33%) Uses language that is clear. Has a few errors in spelling, grammar, and syntax. Is well organized, logical, and clear. Uses original language and uses direct quotes when necessary and/or appropriate. Provides information about a source when citing or paraphrasing it. Provides correct APA citations about a source when citing or paraphrasing it. Progressing 18 (24%) - 19 (25.33%) Uses language that is unclear and/or inappropriate. and/or Has more than occasional errors in spelling, grammar, and syntax and/or lacks correct APA citations. and/or Is poorly organized, is at times unclear and confusing, and has some problems with logical flow. and/or Reflects an underuse of original language and an overuse of direct quotes and paraphrases. and/or Sometimes lacks information about a source when citing or paraphrasing it. Failing 0 (0%) - 17 (22.67%) Uses unclear and inappropriate language. and/or Has many errors in spelling, grammar, and syntax. and/or Lacks organization in a way that creates confusion for the reader. and/or Contains many direct quotes from original source materials and/or consistently and poorly paraphrases rather than using original language. and/or Lacks information about a source when citing or paraphrasing it and/or incorrect use of APA. Feedback:| Total Points: 75 |
|---|
Name: DDPA_8210_Wk9_Assignment_Rubric