Assignment 4: Project Progress
Grading for this assignment will be based on answer quality, logic / organization of the paper, and language and writing skills, using the following rubric.
| Points: 200 | Assignment 4: Project Progress |
|||
| Criteria | Unacceptable Below 70% F | Fair 70-79% C | Proficient 80-89% B | Exemplary 90-100% A |
| 1. Analyze the impact of those events on the project. Weight: 15% | Did not submit or incompletely analyzed the impact of those events on the project. | Partially analyzed the impact of those events on the project. | Satisfactorily analyzed the impact of those events on the project. | Thoroughly analyzed the impact of those events on the project. |
| 2. Determine if any mitigation activities are required and explain why. Weight: 25% | Did not submit or incompletely determined if any mitigation activities are required; did not submit or incompletely explained why. | Partially determined if any mitigation activities are required; partially explained why. | Satisfactorily determined if any mitigation activities are required; satisfactorily explained why. | Thoroughly determined if any mitigation activities are required; thoroughly explained why. |
| 3. Determine if budget / schedule changes are necessary and explain why. Weight: 25% | Did not submit or incompletely determined if budget / schedule changes are necessary; did not submit or incompletely explained why. | Partially determined if budget / schedule changes are necessary; partially explained why. | Satisfactorily determined if budget / schedule changes are necessary; satisfactorily explained why. | Thoroughly determined if budget / schedule changes are necessary; thoroughly explained why. |
| 4. Update the risk register and highlight the changes made. Provide the justification for the changes. Weight: 20% | Did not submit or incompletely updated the risk register; did not submit or incompletely provided the changes made along with the justification for the changes. | Partially updated the risk register; partially provided the changes made along with the justification for the changes. | Satisfactorily updated the risk register; satisfactorily provided the changes made along with the justification for the changes. | Thoroughly updated the risk register; thoroughly provided the changes made along with the justification for the changes. |
| 5. 4 references Weight: 5% | No references provided | Does not meet the required number of references; some or all references poor quality choices. | Meets number of required references; all references high quality choices. | Exceeds number of required references; all references high quality choices. |
| 6. Clarity, writing mechanics, and formatting requirements Weight: 10% | More than 6 errors present | 5-6 errors present | 3-4 errors present | 0-2 errors present |