EXPOSURE DRAFT/RECENT STANDARD PRESENTATION ASSIGNMENT
Criteria Ratings Points
Discussion of Any Problem/Suggested Changes
25 to >22.0 pts
Advanced
Presentation meets all of the following criteria: • Clear and concise bullet points from the paper • Details in the notes sections • Summarizes content
22 to >20.0 pts
Proficient
One of the following criteria is not met: • Clear and concise bullet points from the paper • Details in the notes sections • Summarizes content
20 to >0.0 pts
Developing
Two or more of the following criteria are not met: • Clear and concise bullet points from the paper • Details in the notes sections • Summarizes content
0 pts
Not Present
25 pts
PowerPoint Content
115 to >105.0 pts
Advanced
All of the following are substantively addressed: • Summarize the main points of the Current Exposure Draft • Compare/contrast with current theory/standards • Compare and contrast U.S. GAAP and IFRS in respect to the exposure draft topic • Research the need for the new standard/amendment (include pros and cons) • Evaluate the exposure draft’s provisions in light of the conceptual framework • Develop a logical, well-articulated response to the exposure draft
105 to >96.0 pts
Proficient
One or Two of the following are not substantively addressed: • Summarize the main points of the Current Exposure Draft • Compare/contrast with current theory/standards • Compare and contrast U.S. GAAP and IFRS in respect to the exposure draft topic • Research the need for the new standard/amendment (include pros and cons) • Evaluate the exposure draft’s provisions in light of the conceptual framework • Develop a logical, well-articulated response to the exposure draft
96 to >0.0 pts
Developing
Three or more of the following are not substantively addressed: • Summarize the main points of the Current Exposure Draft • Compare/contrast with current theory/standards • Compare and contrast U.S. GAAP and IFRS in respect to the exposure draft topic • Research the need for the new standard/amendment (include pros and cons) • Evaluate the exposure draft’s provisions in light of the conceptual framework • Develop a logical, well-articulated response to the exposure draft
0 pts
Not Present
115 pts
Sources 10 to >9.0 pts
Advanced
The submission utilizes at least 5 peer-reviewed articles, relevant to the content/topic.
9 to >7.0 pts
Proficient
The submission utilizes 3-4 peer-reviewed articles, relevant to the content/topic.
7 to >0.0 pts
Developing
The submission includes 2 or fewer peer-reviewed articles relevant to the content/topic.
0 pts
Not Present
10 pts
Exposure Draft/Recent Standard Presentation Grading Rubric | ACCT632_B01_202140
Criteria Ratings Points
APA Format 10 to >9.0 pts
Advanced
The presentation adheres to current APA format without errors or 1 minimal error including a title page, citations (parenthetical or in-text), and reference page.
9 to >7.0 pts
Proficient
The presentation uses APA format but has 2-3 errors including a title page, outline, citations (parenthetical or in-text), and reference page.
7 to >0.0 pts
Developing
The presentation has 4 or more APA errors.
0 pts
Not Present
10 pts
Structure and Length
40 to >36.0 pts
Advanced
The presentation includes at least 7 content slides and a reference slide.
36 to >33.0 pts
Proficient
One of the following criteria is not met:. The presentation includes at least 7 content slides and a reference slide.
33 to >0.0 pts
Developing
Neither of the following criteria are met: The presentation includes at least 7 content slides and a reference slide.
0 pts
Not Present
40 pts
Total Points: 200
Exposure Draft/Recent Standard Presentation Grading Rubric | ACCT632_B01_202140