capstone course project

isdory
Week71RecommendationsEssay.docx

Week 7: Course Project - Recommendations Essay

Course Project - Recommendations Essay

This week, you will complete the capstone course project by submitting the recommendations essay you began earlier in the course. The capstone project is intended to further develop develop and assess student achievement of the General Education Common Learning Outcomes (GECLOs). The assignment grading rubric focuses on the six GECLOs as criteria. Read the rubric carefully, and evaluate whether your final essay adequately demonstrates each skill.

To see full details of expectations, please review the Course Project Overview and each of the weekly assignment pages.

Instructions

Briefly, the final essay should

· explore the positive and negative impacts of an emerging technology on individuals and groups from the perspective of a specific ethical theory;

· persuasively address leaders with the power to influence the technology's development and application; and

· provide that audience with practical, concrete recommendations to maximize present and future benefits while minimizing harms for all stakeholders.

To accomplish this, the essay should include the following sections:

· Introduction –  Establishing a clear focus frames the argument, establishes the writer's ethos, shows relevance for the intended audience, and presents the writer's overall thesis

· Historical Context -  Examining history, including important events, controversies, and actions, provides insights on our current situation

· Current Situation -  Looking beyond the shiny marketing helps us see both positive and negative implications for individual and groups of stakeholders.

· Future Implications and Needs -  Seeing potential opportunities and threats sets the stage for recommendations.

· Recommendations  - Providing practical, insightful, detailed recommendations can help your audience of powerful, profit-oriented influencers address underlying ethical issues, leading to longer term benefits for all stakeholders.

· Conclusion  - Capturing key points concisely prepares readers to take action.

Other requirements:

· Researched, ethics-based analysis of the historical, current, and potential future implications of a specific, emerging technology, all supporting practical recommendations for enhancing the technology's benefits while reducing or eliminating negative impacts on people and places

· 1200-1500 words

· Four or more academic-quality sources used and cited to support each section of the essay

· Word document formatted in the current APA style, ideally using the  Course Project Template  Download Course Project Template Open this document with ReadSpeaker docReader

Don't forget to submit your assignment for grading.

Action

Select the Start Assignment button to begin.

Once you have uploaded your file, select Submit Assignment.

LMA.GE.​LAS432.Week7.MAY23

Criteria

Ratings

Pts

 This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeGE.LAS432.​A.​​Critical Thinking

Final Paper Recommendations

threshold: 26.0 pts

30 pts

(30 to >26) Excellent: The essay demonstrates thorough analysis and evaluation of technology-related ethical dilemmas, stakeholder needs and potential solutions to propose a creative, specific and practical recommendation with an engaging thesis and strategically structured, well supported, rational argument.

26 pts

(26 to >23) Competent: The essay demonstrates strong analysis and evaluation of technology-related ethical dilemmas, stakeholder needs and potential solutions to propose a clear but general recommendation with a functional thesis and structured, supported, and reasonable argument.

23 pts

(23 to >20) Limited: The essay demonstrates superficial analysis and evaluation of technology-related ethical dilemmas, stakeholders and potential solutions to propose a a potentially inadequate or vague recommendation in an argument with limited support and a partially effective thesis.

20 pts

(20 to >17) Needs Improvement: The essay demonstrates limited analysis of a vaguely defined technology-related situation to suggest an incomplete solution in an argument that may be missing a central thesis.

17 pts

(17 to 0) Does Not Meet Expectations: The essay does not show analysis or evaluation regarding a technology-related situation, and may not propose a solution or argument.

30 pts

 This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeGE.​LAS432.​B.​Communication

Final Paper Recommendations

threshold: 17.0 pts

20 pts

(20 to >17) Excellent: The essay clearly communicates a central message through effective use of rhetorical strategies and precise usage (grammar, mechanics, style, word choice, tone), APA source use and citation conventions, and formats appropriate to the genre.

17 pts

(17 to >15) Competent: The essay communicates a central message using some rhetorical strategies with limited errors in usage (grammar, mechanics, style, word choice, tone), APA source use and citation conventions, and formats appropriate to the genre.

15 pts

(15 to >13) Limited: The essay attempts to communicate a central message but lacks proficiency in use of rhetorical strategies and has numerous errors in usage (grammar, mechanics, style, word choice, tone), APA conventions, and formats appropriate to the genre.

13 pts

(13 to >12) Needs Improvement: The essay does not clearly communicate a central message and demonstrates inadequate use of rhetorical strategies. Errors in usage impede understanding. The essay does not adequately follow APA conventions or formatting.

12 pts

(12 to 0) Does Not Meet Expectations: The essay lacks a central message and use of rhetorical strategies. Significant and persistent usage errors prevent understanding. The essay does not follow APA conventions or formatting.

20 pts

 This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeGE.​LAS432.​C.​Information Literacy

Final Paper Recommendations

threshold: 22.0 pts

25 pts

(25 to >22) Excellent: The essay analyzes and evaluates content from at least three appropriate academic sources. Sources are effectively integrated to support the overall argument.

22 pts

(22 to >19) Competent: The essay integrates adequate support from three appropriate academic sources and shows some analysis and evaluation of those sources.

19 pts

(19 to >17) Limited: The essay integrates limited support from one or two sources that may lack academic quality with limited analysis or evaluation of the sources.

17 pts

(17 to >14) Needs Improvement: The essay integrates inadequate source suport from one or two sources of questionable quality and demonstrates little to no analysis or evaluation of the sources.

14 pts

(14 to 0) Does Not Meet Expectations: The essay does not include supporting source information.

25 pts

 This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeGE.​LAS432.​D.​Technology Literacy

Final Paper Recommendations

threshold: 17.0 pts

20 pts

(20 to >17) Excellent: The essay demonstrates a clear understanding of the contemporary technologies studied and includes thoughtful recommendations to meet the needs of the relevant stakeholders.

17 pts

(17 to >15) Competent: The essay demonstrates some understanding of contemporary technologies and offers some recommendations relevant to the stakeholders.

15 pts

(15 to >13) Limited: The essay demonstrates minimal understanding of contemporary technologies and offers limited recommendations that may not meet the needs of relevant stakeholders.

13 pts

(13 to >12) Needs Improvement: The essay demonstrates inadequate understanding of technologies and makes little or no related recommendations.

12 pts

(12 to 0) Does Not Meet Expectations: The essay does not address contemporary technologies and/or makes no recommendation regarding technologies.

20 pts

 This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeGE.​LAS432.​E.​Cultural Competence

Final Paper Recommendations

threshold: 22.0 pts

25 pts

(25 to >22) Excellent: The essay presents a well-balanced argument for equitable recommendations reflecting evaluation and integration of diverse information, perspectives and ethical dimensions as they relate to relevant stakeholders.

22 pts

(22 to >19) Competent: The essay presents a somewhat one-sided or limited argument for equitable recommendations that reflects some evaluation and integration of diverse information, perspectives and ethical dimensions as they relate to more generic stakeholders.

19 pts

(19 to >17) Limited: The essay provides an imbalanced, incomplete argument that may lack a clear equitable recommendation and shows limited consideration of diverse information, perspectives, ethical dimensions or stakeholder needs.

17 pts

(17 to >14) Needs Improvement: The essay presents a strongly biased and incomplete argument and may include a vague equitable recommendation that does not adequately consider diverse perspectives, options or audience needs.

14 pts

(14 to 0) Does Not Meet Expectations: The essay presents opinion in an incomplete argument without a equitable recommendation or consideration of perspectives, options, or audience needs.

25 pts

 This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeGE.​LAS432.​F.​Global Awareness and Civic Engagement

Final Paper Recommendations

threshold: 26.0 pts

30 pts

(30 to >26) Excellent: The essay develops a practical, detailed, ethical and potentially effective recommendation for a relevant audience of stakeholders to resolve a civil, social, cultural and/or global issue with contemporary technologies.

26 pts

(26 to >23) Competent: The essay recommends a strong recommendation that may not be fully developed to address practical and ethical considerations or address a relevant audience to resolve a civil, social, cultural and/or global issue with identified contemporary technologies.

23 pts

(23 to >20) Limited: The essay makes a recommendation that may be impractical, may lack detail or not adequately address ethical considerations for a relevant audience who can use the recommendation to resolve a civil, social, cultural and/or global issue with contemporary technologies.

20 pts

(20 to >17) Needs Improvement: The essay offers a significantly incomplete or vague recommendation to non-specific audience of stakeholders to address a broad and undefined civil, social, cultural and/or global issue with technologies.

17 pts

(17 to 0) Does Not Meet Expectations: The essay fails to offer a recommendation relevant to an audience to resolve a civil, social, cultural and/or global issue with technology.

30 pts

Total Points: 150

Week 6: Course Project - Recommendations Essay (due Week 7)

Course Project - Recommendations Essay

Over the past several weeks, you have conducted extensive research on your chosen technology to explore its history, current strengths and weaknesses, and its potential opportunities and threats from an ethical and equity perspective. You are becoming a credible expert able to deliver insightful recommendations to powerful change-makers who in turn can influence the technology for the benefit of individuals, societies, cultures, communities, and their environments.

Your task over the next 2 weeks is to synthesize the information you have gathered and develop specific and practical recommendations your audience can use to maximize the technology's benefits and opportunities while minimizing or resolving problems and threats.

Remember that your audience is the owners, developers, regulators and/or other powerful change-makers who directly influence the technology as we see it today and in the future. Individual consumers are not your audience, since you cannot effectively address them with an essay, and they cannot individually implement changes that will have a systemic influence on the technology.

As you prepare your recommendation, reflect on and apply the ethical theory you believe to be most appropriate for the situation. Will you maximize utility, focus on social benefit, follow certain values or moral rules?

Your research-supported recommendations section should provide one or more specific, detailed, practical, ethics-based suggestions for how your audience can best develop, implement, and manage the selected technology. They might include expansions to the technology's abilities, development of new applications, regulations to control the safety or equity of its use, distribution to new people and places, and so on.

Please review the Course Project Overview page in Modules to guide your project completion. As a reminder, the template shared earlier suggested the following outline for your recommendations and conclusion sections:

Recommendation

· First recommended action to resolve or at least mitigate the technology’s current and potential negative impacts on some or all stakeholders and/or to maximize current and potential positive impacts of the technology

· Specific people, organizations, or agencies responsible for various aspects of the action

· Action to be taken, such as specific policy changes, investments, infrastructure projects, or other interventions, including specific tasks, locations, communities

· Details about resources needed, costs, timeline for completion, potential barriers, etc.

· Expected positive outcomes or benefits

· Additional recommended action(s)

· People

· Action

· Details

· Outcomes

Conclusion

· Concise review of history leading to the current situation and potential future impacts

· Summary of recommended action(s) the audience and others should take to address or mitigate problems and maximize benefits

· Closing call to action

· First step

· Vision for the future

No assignment is due this week, but you will share several paragraphs from your recommendations section in this week's Discussion. By collaborating with peers and professor, you can gain insights to help strengthen your argument and improve your recommendations' practicality and potential effectiveness.

Remember to take advantage of the various tutoring options as you prepare your final essay.

Requirements for the final Recommendations Essay due at the end of Week 7:

· Researched, ethics-based analysis of the historical, current, and potential future implications of a specific, emerging technology, all supporting practical recommendations for enhancing the technology's benefits while reducing or eliminating negative impacts on people and places

· 1200-1500 words

· Four or more academic-quality sources used and cited to support each section of the essay

· Word document formatted in the current APA style.

Previous Next