Experttutor week 6 research reflection

dilcarucory
week6reasearchreadingreflection.docx

Reflection research week 6

February 5

Reading Reflection

Please submit a few sentences regarding this week chapter reading, explain what are some of the important aspects of this week's reading, provide examples when possible.

Topic 1- Sampling involves decisions about who or what will be tested, observed, or interviewed in your study (Morse, 2007)

•Key questions to address:

–Who should and should not be included?

–How many should be included?

Topic 2-Reliability is concerned with questions of consistency 

•Other terms for reliability are:

–Repeatability

–Reproducibility

–Stability

–Consistency

–Predictability

–Agreement

–Homogeneity

The initial post will be regarding the topic of the week and will be a minimum of 250 words. Make sure you provide appropriate references and utilize APA style. Peer posts will be a minimum of 75-100 words, otherwise will be counted as 0. There will be a total of 8 discussion posts worth 1.25 points each or 10 points of your grade. In order to obtain full credit students must follow the above requirements. Each discussion will be allocated to a specific Master's Essential.

Criteria

1.25 Point

1 Point

0.75 Point

0

Participation

Weight 25.00%

100 %

3 Posts

80 %

2 Posts

60 %

1 Posts

0 %

0 Posts

Quality of informtaion

Weight 25.00%

100 %

Information is clear and relates to topic

80 %

Information is somewhat clear and might relate to topic

60 %

Information has little relation to topic and is not clearly displayed

0 %

Information is not clear and it does not relate to topic

Resources

Weight 25.00%

100 %

Provides relevant resources using APA guidelines

80 %

Provides relevant resources without APA guidelines

60 %

Limited on the resources provided with major errors in APA

0 %

Does not provide any resources

Critical Thinking

Weight 25.00%

100 %

Enhances the critical thinking process through premise reflection

80 %

Enhances the critical thinking process without premise reflection

60 %

Does enhance the critical thinking process in a very limited manner

0 %

Does not enhance the critical thinking process