WEEK 6 ESSAY ASSIGNMENT
|
Open Date |
Feb 4, 2019 12:05 AM |
|
Graded? |
Yes |
|
Points Possible |
100.0 |
|
Resubmissions Allowed? |
No |
|
Attachments checked for originality? |
Yes |
Top of Form
Assignment Instructions
Week 6 Essay Assignment
· Review the material and deliverables from our Syllabus and Lessons.
· Essay should include title page, abstract, body (5-page minimum with sub-categories), summary/conclusion and reference page (at least three academic references), per APA guidelines.
· Please provide subcategories studied thus far for each of our career fields.
· Developmental Psychology
· Personality Psychology
· Biopsychology
· Perception Psychology
· Learning/Memory Psychology
· Psychopathology
· Industrial Organized Psychology
· Social Psychology
· For each of the career fields, please explain:
· What type of work is involved in each career field. Provide examples.
· The opportunities available within the fields
· Level of education one must achieve in each of these career fields
· Typical work setting. Provide examples.
· Average incomes
· Your biggest take-away learned from each career field
·
|
Component |
Excellent |
Satisfactory |
Needs Improvement |
Unsatisfactory |
Points Earned |
|
Description of subcategories studied thus far (Weeks 1 – 5)
60 Points Possible |
Student clearly addresses the level/type of work, opportunities, education required, work settings, average incomes, and biggest take away from each career field.
|
Student provides a mostly accurate description of work, opportunities, education required, work settings, average incomes, and biggest take away from each career field. At times, content lacks coherence. |
Student provides a marginal description of work, opportunities, education required, work settings, average incomes, and biggest take away from each career field.
Sufficient details and supporting evidence are lacking. |
Does not clearly discuss and describe work, opportunities, education required, work settings, average incomes, and biggest take away from each career field. |
|
|
Conclusion/Summary
20 Points Possible |
Student clearly highlights all content objectives and is thorough in Conclusion/Summary. |
Student provides some content objectives and presents adequate Conclusion/Summary. |
Student provides marginal knowledge of content objectives. Conclusion/Summary is lacking in sufficiently wrapping the paper. |
Student does not provide conclusion/summary |
|
|
Usage of Academic, Scholarly Sources
10 Points Possible |
Student clearly paraphrases from at least three scholarly, academic sources and cites them according to APA Style on the References Slide. |
Student paraphrases from three scholarly, academic sources. Direct quotations may be used in place of paraphrasing or there may be citation/formatting errors. |
Student paraphrases from less than three scholarly, academic sources. Many direct quotations are used or citation style is mostly inaccurate. |
Student uses only sources from the popular web (e.g., Wikipedia, WebMD, etc…) or does not include a References slide. |
|
|
Overall Presentation of material (Flow, Clarity, Professional Appearance of Final Product, Use of Proper Grammar/Spelling to convey thoughts)
10 Points Possible |
Submission is clear and coherent, flows well, and has a professional appearance. Few, if any, errors in grammar/spelling are made (for written entries) or in spoken English (for video entries). |
Submission is understandable, but flow may be stilted or meaning unclear in spots. Some written or spoken grammatical errors are evident. Submission appears “amateurish” in spots. |
Submission seems choppy or difficult to understand. Submission appears mostly amateurish or unprofessional. Many errors in grammar/spelling in evident. |
Submission appears largely unprofessional, messy, and contains numerous grammar/spelling errors. |
|
Bottom of Form