Australian Taxation law ( Deduction)
1 © 2018 Thomson Reuters (Professional) Australia Limited
Principles of Taxation Law 2018
CHAPTER 12 – GENERAL DEDUCTIONS
Question 12.1
Jeremy runs his own public relations business. During the year he incurred the following
expenses:
(a) salary costs of $500,000; (b) salary costs of $5,000 for his daughter who worked with him for one week as part of
her university training;
(c) travel expenses of $7,000 for travel between home and work; (d) travel expenses of $3,000 for travel from a client's premises to his home; (e) $1,500 on a new suit to impress his clients; (f) $700 on membership of the local sports club where he entertains clients; and (g) $8,000 in meal expenses on entertaining clients.
Advise Jeremy of his tax consequences in relation to the above expenses.
Question 12.2
Sulin is an accountant at a large accounting firm. In May, she went to Hong Kong for an
accounting conference. She incurred expenses of $2,000 on the plane ticket and $500 on
hotel costs. Her employer did not reimburse her for those expenses but provided Sulin with
a daily allowance of $200 for her meal and local transportation costs. Sulin had chosen to go
to the conference because her family is in Hong Kong and she took the opportunity to visit
them while she was there. The conference ran for two days and she stayed on for an
additional four days at her parents' home.
Advise Sulin as to the deductibility of the airfare and hotel costs.
Question 12.4
Rumpole is a scientist. He uses his own car to travel to various locations to conduct
experiments. He acquired the car on 1 October 2017 for $60,000. The acquisition cost was
funded entirely by a loan at an interest rate of 15%. He has determined that the
depreciation deduction on the car would be $2,300 for the year. In addition, Rumpole
incurred the following expenses during the year:
• Registration and insurance = $2,000; • Repairs and maintenance = $1,000; and • Oil and fuel costs = $1,500.
2 © 2018 Thomson Reuters (Professional) Australia Limited
For the period 1 October 2017 to 30 June 2018, Rumpole estimates that the car travelled a
total of 15,000 kilometres, 12,000 of which were for business purposes. You may assume
that Rumpole has maintained all necessary records and a logbook.
Calculate Rumpole's deduction for car expenses under the two methods in Div 28 of ITAA
1997. Assume that depreciation has been adjusted for part year use and the impact of the
car limit.
Question 12.5
Sarah is employed as a personal assistant to Martha Tallis, a successful freelance lifestyle
consultant and motivational speaker. One day, Martha told Sarah to go to the library and
borrow a book which Martha needed to prepare for a speech. Sarah borrowed the book and
gave it to Martha. Four weeks later Sarah received an email from the library advising her
that the book was overdue. Sarah asked Martha for the book so that she could return it.
Martha could not find the book. When Sarah told the library that the book was lost, the
library demanded that she pay a $110 fine for the loss of the book.
Advise Sarah as to the deductibility of the $110 fine payment.
Question 12.6
Following on from 12.5, Sarah did not have $110 in cash in order to pay the library fine, so
she charged the fine payment to her credit card, which incurred interest at a rate of 20% per
annum. On that same day, Sarah also paid a $190 speeding fine with her credit card, which
was the result of her speeding to get to work on time. Twelve months later Sarah was able
to pay off the total amount of $300 which she had charged to her credit card. By that time,
she had paid an amount of $60 in interest.
Advise Sarah as to the deductibility of the interest.
Question 12.8
Following on from 12.5–12.7, after Martha reimbursed Sarah the $110, she discovered that
Sarah had sent out to all of Martha's clients an email describing Martha as “a fraud and a
bully”. Unfortunately, the email had been passed on to a popular gossip website and it was
running as its lead story “Martha Tallis bullies PA”. Martha realised immediately that this
could seriously impact upon her business. She fired Sarah and called her lawyer again. Her
lawyer agreed to begin preparing a defamation suit against Sarah and the gossip website.
Three weeks later Martha's lawyer sent her a bill, which included:
3 © 2018 Thomson Reuters (Professional) Australia Limited
(a) a charge of $250 for the oral advice given over the phone in relation to whether Martha should reimburse Sarah for the library fine (described in Question 12.7); and
(b) a charge of $10,000 for the lawyer's work in preparing the defamation suit.
Advise Martha as to the deductibility of the legal fees.