Week 5: Literature Search, Rapid Critical Appraisal, and Summarization

week5rubric.html

Home >Nursing homework help >Week 5: Literature Search, Rapid Critical Appraisal, and Summarization

Rubric Detail

A rubric lists grading criteria that instructors use to evaluate student work. Your instructor linked a rubric to this item and made it available to you. Select Grid View or List View to change the rubric's layout.

Content

Name: NURS350-Literature Review with Rapid Critical Appraisal Checklists

	Meets or Exceeds Expectations	Mostly Meets Expectations	Below Expectations	Does Not Meet Expectations
Description of the research problem and purpose of each research article	Points: Points Range: 36 (18.00%) - 40 (20.00%) Research problem and purpose of each article are clearly identified. Feedback:	Points: Points Range: 30.4 (15.20%) - 35.6 (17.80%) Research problem and purpose are not identified in all articles. Feedback:	Points: Points Range: 24 (12.00%) - 30 (15.00%) Research problem and purpose of each article is absent or not identified for most articles. Feedback:	Points: Points Range: 0 (0.00%) - 23.6 (11.80%) Research problem and purpose are not identified for any articles. Feedback:
Description of the research methods for each research article	Points: Points Range: 36 (18.00%) - 40 (20.00%) A description of the research methods is clearly presented for each article. Feedback:	Points: Points Range: 30.4 (15.20%) - 35.6 (17.80%) A description of the research methods is somewhat presented for most articles. Feedback:	Points: Points Range: 24 (12.00%) - 30 (15.00%) A description of the research methods is not presented for most articles. Feedback:	Points: Points Range: 0 (0.00%) - 23.6 (11.80%) A description of the research methods is not presented for any articles. Feedback:
Summary of the findings/conclusions/themes for each research article	Points: Points Range: 36 (18.00%) - 40 (20.00%) A description of the findings, conclusions,and themes is clearly presented for each article. Feedback:	Points: Points Range: 30.4 (15.20%) - 35.6 (17.80%) A description of the findings, conclusions,and themes is somewhat presented for most articles. Feedback:	Points: Points Range: 24 (12.00%) - 30 (15.00%) A description of the findings, conclusions,and themes is not presented for most articles. Feedback:	Points: Points Range: 0 (0.00%) - 23.6 (11.80%) A description of the findings, conclusions,and themes is not presented for any articles. Feedback:
Describe similarities and differences among the research articles	Points: Points Range: 54 (27.00%) - 60 (30.00%) Similarities and differences among the research articles is clear and thorough. Feedback:	Points: Points Range: 45.6 (22.80%) - 53.4 (26.70%) Similarities and differences among the research articles is somewhat vague and unclear. Feedback:	Points: Points Range: 36 (18.00%) - 45 (22.50%) Similarities and differences among the research articles is vague and unclear. Feedback:	Points: Points Range: 0 (0.00%) - 35.4 (17.70%) Similarities and differences among the research articles is not made. Feedback:
Mechanics and APA Format	Points: Points Range: 18 (9.00%) - 20 (10.00%) Follows all the requirements related to format, length, source citations, and layout. Written in a clear, concise, formal, and organized manner. Responses are mostly error free. Information from sources is paraphrased appropriately and accurately cited. Feedback:	Points: Points Range: 15.2 (7.60%) - 17.8 (8.90%) Follows length requirement and most of the requirements related to format, source citations, and layout. Writing is generally clear and organized but is not concise or formal in language. Multiple errors exist in spelling and grammar with minor interference with readability or comprehension. Most information from sources is paraphrased and cited correctly. Feedback:	Points: Points Range: 12 (6.00%) - 15 (7.50%) Follows few requirements related to format, source citations, and layout. Writing is generally unclear and organized, not concise or formal in language. Multiple errors exist in spelling and grammar with some interference with readability or comprehension. Several sources are missing or improperly cited. Feedback:	Points: Points Range: 0 (0.00%) - 11.8 (5.90%) Does not follow format, length, source citations, and layout requirements. Writing is unclear and unorganized. Errors in spelling and grammar detract from readability and comprehension. Sources are missing or improperly cited. Feedback:

Show Descriptions Show Feedback

Description of the research problem and purpose of each research article--

Levels of Achievement: Meets or Exceeds Expectations 36 (18.00%) - 40 (20.00%) Research problem and purpose of each article are clearly identified. Mostly Meets Expectations 30.4 (15.20%) - 35.6 (17.80%) Research problem and purpose are not identified in all articles. Below Expectations 24 (12.00%) - 30 (15.00%) Research problem and purpose of each article is absent or not identified for most articles. Does Not Meet Expectations 0 (0.00%) - 23.6 (11.80%) Research problem and purpose are not identified for any articles. Feedback:

Description of the research methods for each research article--

Levels of Achievement: Meets or Exceeds Expectations 36 (18.00%) - 40 (20.00%) A description of the research methods is clearly presented for each article. Mostly Meets Expectations 30.4 (15.20%) - 35.6 (17.80%) A description of the research methods is somewhat presented for most articles. Below Expectations 24 (12.00%) - 30 (15.00%) A description of the research methods is not presented for most articles. Does Not Meet Expectations 0 (0.00%) - 23.6 (11.80%) A description of the research methods is not presented for any articles. Feedback:

Summary of the findings/conclusions/themes for each research article--

Levels of Achievement: Meets or Exceeds Expectations 36 (18.00%) - 40 (20.00%) A description of the findings, conclusions,and themes is clearly presented for each article. Mostly Meets Expectations 30.4 (15.20%) - 35.6 (17.80%) A description of the findings, conclusions,and themes is somewhat presented for most articles. Below Expectations 24 (12.00%) - 30 (15.00%) A description of the findings, conclusions,and themes is not presented for most articles. Does Not Meet Expectations 0 (0.00%) - 23.6 (11.80%) A description of the findings, conclusions,and themes is not presented for any articles. Feedback:

Describe similarities and differences among the research articles--

Levels of Achievement: Meets or Exceeds Expectations 54 (27.00%) - 60 (30.00%) Similarities and differences among the research articles is clear and thorough. Mostly Meets Expectations 45.6 (22.80%) - 53.4 (26.70%) Similarities and differences among the research articles is somewhat vague and unclear. Below Expectations 36 (18.00%) - 45 (22.50%) Similarities and differences among the research articles is vague and unclear. Does Not Meet Expectations 0 (0.00%) - 35.4 (17.70%) Similarities and differences among the research articles is not made. Feedback:

Mechanics and APA Format--

Levels of Achievement: Meets or Exceeds Expectations 18 (9.00%) - 20 (10.00%) Follows all the requirements related to format, length, source citations, and layout. Written in a clear, concise, formal, and organized manner. Responses are mostly error free. Information from sources is paraphrased appropriately and accurately cited. Mostly Meets Expectations 15.2 (7.60%) - 17.8 (8.90%) Follows length requirement and most of the requirements related to format, source citations, and layout. Writing is generally clear and organized but is not concise or formal in language. Multiple errors exist in spelling and grammar with minor interference with readability or comprehension. Most information from sources is paraphrased and cited correctly. Below Expectations 12 (6.00%) - 15 (7.50%) Follows few requirements related to format, source citations, and layout. Writing is generally unclear and organized, not concise or formal in language. Multiple errors exist in spelling and grammar with some interference with readability or comprehension. Several sources are missing or improperly cited. Does Not Meet Expectations 0 (0.00%) - 11.8 (5.90%) Does not follow format, length, source citations, and layout requirements. Writing is unclear and unorganized. Errors in spelling and grammar detract from readability and comprehension. Sources are missing or improperly cited. Feedback: