Learning Activity/Research Proposal Project

bwilliams327
Week5gradingrubics.docx

Claudia McCann8/9/2022 6:12:49 PM

View markup for B_Rouse HUM5100 Week 5 Assignment.docx

( 0.50 / 0.50) Selects an Existing or Hypothetical Human Services Organization/Agency Program

Distinguished - Selects an existing or hypothetical human services organization/agency program.

( 0.00 / 0.50) Compiles a Proposal that Develops, Evaluates, or Modifies the Hypothetical Implementation of this Change in a Real-World Setting

Non-Performance - The proposal that develops, evaluates, or modifies the hypothetical implementation of this change in a real-world setting is either nonexistent or lacks the components described in the assignment instructions.

 

You did a great job in regard to highlighting the need for research, and how you would go about conducting the research. You also need a proposed plan. If you had the opportunity to develop a program that the organization could implement...what would that program look like? Would it involve services for the victims and the perpetrators? Also, when you are creating this program, don't forget to include how you would monitor/evaluate that it is effective.

( 0.38 / 0.50) Describes the Process for Determining the Need for the New Program, the Evaluation, or the Modification of this Program

Basic - Minimally describes the process for determining the need for the new program, the evaluation, or the modification of this program. Relevant details are missing.

( 0.44 / 0.50) Explains the Proposed Solution to the Problem, Gap, or Need for this Hypothetical Proposal

Proficient - Explains the proposed solution to the problem, gap, or need for this hypothetical proposal. The explanation is slightly underdeveloped.

( 0.00 / 0.50) Selects a Qualitative, Quantitative, or Mixed Methods Design for the Proposal

Proficient - N/A

 

Great focus on qualitative methodology, and quantitative. Also great focus on case studies, in the context of the research, but not on the quasi experimental methods.

( 0.38 / 0.50) Explains Why this Methodology and Design is Most Appropriate for the Proposed Change

Basic - Minimally explains why this methodology and design is most appropriate for the proposed change. The explanation is underdeveloped.

( 0.38 / 0.50) Creates a Hypothetical Research Proposal to a Grant Funding Organization or an Organization Where the Evaluation of Programs is Part of the Job Description

Basic - Creates a limited hypothetical research proposal to a grant funding organization where the evaluation of programs is part of the job description. Relevant details are missing, unclear, and/or inaccurate.

Missing a proposed program

( 0.50 / 0.50) Addresses the Problem that was Identified, Including the Evidence that Supports this Problem

Distinguished - Thoroughly addresses the problem that was identified, including the evidence that supports this problem. 

( 0.66 / 0.75) Written Communication: Control of Syntax and Mechanics

Proficient - Displays comprehension and organization of syntax and mechanics, such as spelling and grammar. Written work contains only a few minor errors and is mostly easy to understand.

( 0.76 / 1.00) Written Communication: APA Formatting

Basic - Exhibits limited knowledge of APA formatting throughout the paper. However, layout does not meet all APA requirements. 

 

Headings, citations, references

( 0.25 / 0.25) Written Communication: Page Requirement

Distinguished - The length of the paper is equivalent to the required number of correctly formatted pages. 

( 1.52 / 2.00) Written Communication: Resource Requirement

Basic - Uses less than the required number of sources to support ideas. Some sources may not be scholarly. Most sources on the reference page are used within the body of the assignment. Citations may not be formatted correctly.

 

It appears that two sources were not used.

 

 

I apologize for leaving the overall comment here. Sometimes I am not able to put it in the correct section. This is a strong paper, that needs just a bit more. Please review the feedback and the highlighted sections and let me know if you need help. I would also be happy to give you the opportunity to resubmit after the corrections/revisions.

Dr. McCann

Overall Score: 5.77 / 8.00

Overall Grade: 5.77