Research Project
Week 5-Project
Research Report for the Critique (Click on DOI URL)
Uslu, E. & Buldukoglu,K. (2020). Randomized controlled trial of the effects of nursing care based on a telephone intervention for medication adherence in schizophrenia. Perspectives in Psychiatric Care, 56, 63-71. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/ppc.12376 (Links to an external site.)
Follow the rubric in order to write your paper and use the rubric headings to guide your paper's organization and critique.
· Assignment is run through Turnitin before submitting it for a grade. There should be no evidence of similarity (plagiarism) in this assignment. Faculty will review the Turnitin Report when grading the assignment.
· Using the criteria sections as headings, respond to the following questions providing the rationale or citing examples or content from the study you read. Yes/No answers are not acceptable. No direct quotes are permitted.
· formatting in APA 7th edition format (including references).
Research Critique 2024
|
Research Critique 2024 |
|||||||
|
Criteria |
Ratings |
Pts |
|||||
|
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeProblem & Purpose The paper clearly and completely identifies the problem and purpose of the study. |
|
4 pts |
|||||
|
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeLiterature Review The critique provides a thorough literature review including critical evaluation of the references used in the study, including the currency, relevance, and completeness of theories and models discussed. |
|
5 pts |
|||||
|
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeFramework The literature review thoroughly and critically evaluates the framework discussion and map or model of the framework in the study, including how explicitly it is presented, relevance to the nursing body of knowledge, links to models, theories, concepts of interest and variables in the study. |
|
5 pts |
|||||
|
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeResearch Objectives The critique accurately and thoroughly evaluates how well the research objectives, questions, or hypotheses direct the conduct of the study. |
|
5 pts |
|||||
|
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeVariables All variables are clearly and accurately identified and defined (conceptually and operationally), including all of the following as applicable: independent, dependent, research, and attribute/demographic variables. |
|
8 pts |
|||||
|
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeResearch Design The research design is thoroughly and accurately critiqued, with clear discussion of the treatment or intervention, subject grouping, extraneous variables, and pilot study findings. |
|
10 pts |
|||||
|
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeSample & Sampling Method The sample and sampling are thoroughly and accurately critiqued, including inclusion/exclusion criteria, sampling method, sample size and analysis, subject participation, sample characteristics, ethical considerations, and study setting. |
|
8 pts |
|||||
|
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeMeasurement Strategy The measurement strategy and source are clearly and accurately identified, with a detailed description of the type, level, and development of each, as well as a critique of the reliability and validity of instruments used and the precision and accuracy of physiological measurement methods used (if any). |
|
9 pts |
|||||
|
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeStatistical Analysis The statistical analysis techniques are thoroughly and accurately identified, with an accurately completed table for each technique, and a discussion of the level of significance. |
|
15 pts |
|||||
|
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeInterpretation of Findings The critique of the interpretation of findings discussed in detail how the results are related to and support (or do not) the study's framework, as well as how the findings compare to expectations and previous findings. |
|
5 pts |
|||||
|
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeLimitations The discussion of study limitations clearly explains those that were discussed in the publication and provides thoughtful identification of limitations that were not discussed. |
|
4 pts |
|||||
|
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeConclusions The conclusions of the study are thoroughly and accurately critiqued, with an insightful discussion of how well the conclusions are supported by the findings. |
|
4 pts |
|||||
|
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeOverall Analysis An overall analysis provides a detailed and thoughtful summary of the study's significance, including knowledge added to nursing practice, strengths and weaknesses of the study, credibility, and replicability of findings, and recommendations. |
|
8 pts |
|||||
|
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWritten Communication The critique uses professional language throughout with virtually no errors in mechanics or grammar. |
|
5 pts |
|||||
|
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAPA Formatting The paper is in correct APA format, including title page, margins, headings and subheadings, intext, and reference page citations. Turnitin Report shows no issues with originality. |
|
5 pts |
|||||
|
Total Points: 100 |