Final Project
DIFFERENTIATION CHART 2
|
Type of differentiation |
Subject |
How I’ll use the strategy |
Student grouping |
|
Compacting |
Mathematics |
Assessing student knowledge through a pretest. Creating a plan for mastering all parts of the curriculum and enrichment activities (Benjamin, A., 2014) |
Individually according to a student’s learning profile |
|
Tiered assignments |
Social Studies |
Tiering assignments based on tiered challenge level, complexity, and processes Tiered assignments guided by Bloom’s Taxonomy (Sousa, D.A., 2009) |
Dividing students into small groups according to their readiness level |
|
Independent study |
Science |
Letting the students to choose the topic of study but help them in choosing it. Ensuring they are proficient in the skills required to complete the study Laying out expectations of the study to help the student stay on track |
Individually according to their personal interests |
|
Learning contracts |
English |
Pre-testing students about basic knowledge in the course Specifying in writing the task to be completed, the rubric and consequences for not meeting the task Specifying the time period for the task (Knowles, M. S. 1991) |
Individually based on the student’s readiness level |
|
Learning centers |
Mathematics |
Creating differentiated learning stations Giving each student relevant physical objects to use when solving questions Providing spreadsheets requiring students to manipulate data No mandatory rotations for students, they can switch stations if they feel the need |
Pairing students or grouping them into small groups |
|
Choice boards |
Social Studies |
Identifying the most important elements of the unit Interviewing students on the exercises that help them remember key points Creating negotiables which expand upon the minimum understands of students. These negotiables go beyond the basic levels of Bloom’s Taxonomy (Wormeli, R. 2018) |
Individually according to a student’s interest or learning style
|
|
Adjusting questions |
Science |
Using Bloom’s Taxonomy to develop queries from the basic to more advanced Using task cards where each card has a single query |
Individually according to a student’s readiness or ability level |
|
Flexible grouping |
Mathematics |
Differentiating engaging activities for each group Give specific instructions about tasks that groups must perform and set specific time limit for students to complete their group work Continually assessing the groups and moving students into appropriate groups (Opitz, M. F. 1998) |
Small groups based on students’ learning profiles and interests |
|
Pre-teaching |
Science and Social Studies |
Using visual records such as anchor charts, lists, graphic organizers and symbols Building text-specific knowledge and suggesting comprehension strategies Relating the topic to students’ personal lives |
Small groups according to students’ learning abilities |
|
Re-teaching |
Mathematics |
Modeling Using relevant physical objects for the subject Incorporating charts and illustrations Running literature circles |
Small groups according to students’ learning abilities |
|
Response to intervention |
Mathematics and Science |
Teaching the entire class in the most effective ways Adding time and resource materials to a small number of students who do not learn from step 1 Having special classes and individual tutoring that is more resource intensive for a smaller group not learning from steps 1 and 2 (Riccomini, P. J., & Witzel, B. S. 2010)
|
Large group of students |
References
Benjamin, A. (2014). Differentiated instruction: A guide for elementary school teachers. Hoboken: Taylor and Francis.
Campbell,P.,Wang,A.,&Algozzine,B. (2010). 55 tactics for implementing RTI in iclusive settings. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin.
http://www.teachhub.com/flexible-grouping-differentiated-instruction-strategy
Knowles, M. S. (1991). Using learning contracts. San Francisco, Calif.
Opitz, M. F. (1998). Flexible grouping in reading: Practical ways to help all students become stronger readers. New York: Scholastic.
Reis, S. M., & Eckert, R. D. (2009). Joyful reading: Differentiation and enrichment for successful literacy learning. San Francisco, Calif: Jossey-Bass.
Riccomini, P. J., & Witzel, B. S. (2010). Response to intervention in math. Thousand Oaks, Calif: Corwin.
Sousa, D. A. (2009). How the gifted brain learns. Thousand Oaks, Calif: Corwin.
Smutny, J. F., & Phi Delta Kappa. (2003). Differentiated instruction. Bloomington, Ind: Phi Delta Kappa Educational Foundation.
Sousa, D. A. (2009). How the gifted brain learns. Thousand Oaks, Calif: Corwin.