Cohort group Proposal
3/29/23, 1:52 PM Week 5: Assignment
https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/54680/assignments/428276?module_item_id=1374837 1/6
Due Sunday by 10:59pm Points 10 Submitting a text entry box or a file upload Attempts 0 Allowed Attempts 2
Start Assignment
Back to Week at a Glance (https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/54680/modules/items/1374827)
This week you will submit your Cohort Group Proposal Assignment. Your edited paper will have many similarities to your cohort members as you collaborated to develop the concept. This may result in a higher than normal Safe Assign Report.
You will attach your Peer Evaluation as a separate document, either in the assignment tab or as a word document sent to your instructor as an email attachment. Your instructor may provide preferences for submitting the Peer Evaluation. This provides you the opportunity to review the School of Counseling’s Key Professional Dispositions as you reflect on your role and those of your cohort members in the Group Project collaboration in Weeks 3 and 4 discussion boards. This feedback may be used to enhance your Week 9 Group Leadership Self-Assessment.
COHORT GROUP PROPOSAL
RESOURCES
Be sure to review the Learning Resources before completing this activity. Click the weekly resources link to access the resources.
WEEKLY RESOURCES (https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/54680/modules/items/1374858)
BY DAY 7
3/29/23, 1:52 PM Week 5: Assignment
https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/54680/assignments/428276?module_item_id=1374837 2/6
COUN_6250_Week5_Assignment_Rubric
Submit your completed Group Proposal using the Cohort Group Proposal Template.
Before submitting your final assignment, you can check your draft for authenticity. To check your draft, access the Turnitin Drafts from the Start Here area.
1. To submit your completed assignment, save your Assignment as WK5Assgn_LastName_Firstinitial
2. Then, click on Start Assignment near the top of the page. 3. Next, click on Upload File and select Submit Assignment for review.
SUBMISSION INFORMATION
3/29/23, 1:52 PM Week 5: Assignment
https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/54680/assignments/428276?module_item_id=1374837 3/6
Criteria Ratings Pts
1 pts
1 pts
1 pts
Assignment Expectations:By Day 7: Submit your Cohort Group Proposal with each of the following components:1. An APA Style Title Page.2. Three to five pages of the body of the paper.3. Reference page(s).
1 to >0.89 pts A
Thoroughly addressed all required components of the assignment with a well- developed submission that exceeds expectations.
0.89 to >0.79 pts B
Addressed all required components of the assignment.
0.79 to >0.69 pts C
Addressed most of the required components of the assignment.
0.69 to >0 pts F
Addressed few or none of the required components of the assignment.
Assignment Expectations:The Cohort Group Proposal includes a section on the rationale that describes the population, the prevalence of the problem and risk factors, and describes the type of group proposed.
1 to >0.89 pts A
Thoroughly addressed all required components of the assignment with a well- developed submission that exceeds expectations.
0.89 to >0.79 pts B
Addressed all required components of the assignment.
0.79 to >0.69 pts C
Addressed most of the required components of the assignment.
0.69 to >0 pts F
Addressed few or none of the required components of the assignment.
Assignment Expectations:The Cohort Group Proposal includes a section on the review of the relevant literature.
1 to >0.89 pts A
Thoroughly addressed all required components of the assignment with a well- developed submission that exceeds expectations.
0.89 to >0.79 pts B
Addressed all required components of the assignment.
0.79 to >0.69 pts C
Addressed most of the required components of the assignment.
0.69 to >0 pts F
Addressed few or none of the required components of the assignment.
3/29/23, 1:52 PM Week 5: Assignment
https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/54680/assignments/428276?module_item_id=1374837 4/6
Criteria Ratings Pts
1 pts
1 pts
1 pts
Assignment Expectations:The Cohort Group Proposal includes a section on the goal of the group with measurable objectives.
1 to >0.89 pts A
Thoroughly addressed all required components of the assignment with a well- developed submission that exceeds expectations.
0.89 to >0.79 pts B
Addressed all required components of the assignment.
0.79 to >0.69 pts C
Addressed most of the required components of the assignment.
0.69 to >0 pts F
Addressed few or none of the required components of the assignment.
Assignment Expectations:The Cohort Group Proposal includes a section on the practical considerations including the screening procedures; informed consent and cancellation policy; group rules; time, location, and frequency of meetings; and necessary community resources.
1 to >0.89 pts A
Thoroughly addressed all required components of the assignment with a well- developed submission that exceeds expectations.
0.89 to >0.79 pts B
Addressed all required components of the assignment.
0.79 to >0.69 pts C
Addressed most of the required components of the assignment.
0.69 to >0 pts F
Addressed few or none of the required components of the assignment.
Assignment Expectations:The Cohort Group Proposal includes a section with an outline or brief narrative of planned strategies/interventions.
1 to >0.89 pts A
Thoroughly addressed all required components of the assignment with a well- developed submission that exceeds expectations.
0.89 to >0.79 pts B
Addressed all required components of the assignment.
0.79 to >0.69 pts C
Addressed most of the required components of the assignment.
0.69 to >0 pts F
Addressed few or none of the required components of the assignment.
3/29/23, 1:52 PM Week 5: Assignment
https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/54680/assignments/428276?module_item_id=1374837 5/6
Criteria Ratings Pts
1 pts
1 pts
1 pts
Assignment Expectations:The Cohort Group Proposal includes a section on how diversity may be addressed in the group.
1 to >0.89 pts A
Thoroughly addressed all required components of the assignment with a well- developed submission that exceeds expectations.
0.89 to >0.79 pts B
Addressed all required components of the assignment.
0.79 to >0.69 pts C
Addressed most of the required components of the assignment.
0.69 to >0 pts F
Addressed few or none of the required components of the assignment.
Assignment Expectations:The Cohort Group Proposal includes a section describing the termination procedures.
1 to >0.89 pts A
Thoroughly addressed all required components of the assignment with a well- developed submission that exceeds expectations.
0.89 to >0.79 pts B
Addressed all required components of the assignment.
0.79 to >0.69 pts C
Addressed most of the required components of the assignment.
0.69 to >0 pts F
Addressed few or none of the required components of the assignment.
Assignment Expectations:The Cohort Group Proposal includes a section on the objective and subjective evaluations of the group.
1 to >0.89 pts A
Thoroughly addressed all required components of the assignment with a well- developed submission that exceeds expectations.
0.89 to >0.79 pts B
Addressed all required components of the assignment.
0.79 to >0.69 pts C
Addressed most of the required components of the assignment.
0.69 to >0 pts F
Addressed few or none of the required components of the assignment.
3/29/23, 1:52 PM Week 5: Assignment
https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/54680/assignments/428276?module_item_id=1374837 6/6
Total Points: 10
Criteria Ratings Pts
0.5 pts
0.5 pts
Learning Objective: Develop a proposal describing the necessary components of a group proposal.
0.5 to >0.44 pts A
Demonstrated understanding and integration of course content to the extent that the learning objective was mastered,
0.44 to >0.39 pts B
Demonstrated understanding and integration of course content to the extent that the learning objective was met.
0.39 to >0.34 pts C
Demonstrated understanding and integration of course content to the extent that the learning objective was partially met.
0.34 to >0 pts F
Demonstrated limited understanding and integration of course content to the extent that the learning objective was minimally met OR the assignment was not submitted or completed.
Submission Quality: The extent to which the submission demonstrated writing quality.
0.5 to >0.44 pts A
Writing was extremely organized, concise, well written, and included citations and references for ideas of others used in the assignment.
0.44 to >0.39 pts B
Writing was mostly organized, concise, well written, and included citations and references for ideas of others used in the assignment.
0.39 to >0.34 pts C
Writing was somewhat organized, concise, and well written, but had some writing errors or may have failed to provide appropriate citations and references for ideas of others used in the assignment.
0.34 to >0 pts F
Writing was marginally organized, concise, or written demonstrating significant writing errors AND/OR failed to provide appropriate citations and references for ideas of others used in the assignment.