MGT3045 WK 4 Project
MGT3045 Week 4 Project Rubric Course: MGT3045-Human Resource Management SU01
Criteria No Submission 0 points
Emerging (F through D Range) (6-7) 7 points
Satisfactory (C Range) (7-8) 8 points
Proficient (B Range) (8-9) 9 points
Exemplary (A Range) (9-10) 10 points
Criterion Score
Assessed the main
features of the Fair Labor
Standards Act (FLSA),
comparing the definitions
of exempt and nonexempt
employees.
/ 10Did not identify main
features of the Fair Labor
Standards Act (FLSA).
Unsupported with research.
Identified main features of
the Fair Labor Standards Act
(FLSA).
Lacked credible research
support.
Described main features of
the Fair Labor Standards Act
(FLSA).
Weakly supported with
research.
Assessed main features of
the Fair Labor Standards Act
(FLSA), comparing the
definitions of exempt and
nonexempt employees.
Sufficiently supported with
research.
Assessment of main features
of the Fair Labor Standards
Act (FLSA), comparing the
definitions of exempt and
nonexempt employees was
compelling and well-
considered.
Well-supported by research.
Criteria No Submission 0 points
Emerging (F through D Range) (6-7) 7 points
Satisfactory (C Range) (7-8) 8 points
Proficient (B Range) (8-9) 9 points
Exemplary (A Range) (9-10) 10 points
Criterion Score
Analyzed at least three
criteria that differentiate
an exempt and nonexempt
employee.
/ 10Did not identify criteria that
differentiate an exempt and
nonexempt employee.
Unsupported with research.
Identified criteria that
differentiate an exempt and
nonexempt employee.
Lacked credible research
support.
Described at least three
criteria that differentiate an
exempt and nonexempt
employee.
Weakly supported with
research.
Analyzed at least three
criteria that differentiate an
exempt and nonexempt
employee.
Sufficiently supported with
research.
Analysis of at least three
criteria that differentiate an
exempt and nonexempt
employee was compelling
and thorough.
Well supported by research.
Criteria No Submission 0 points
Emerging (F through D Range) (12-14) 14 points
Satisfactory (C Range) (14-16) 16 points
Proficient (B Range) (16-18) 18 points
Exemplary (A Range) (18-20) 20 points
Criterion Score
Analyzed some of the
controversies and
objections associated with
the FLSA modifications,
including analysis of who
benefits, employers or
employees and your
preference of the previous
FLSA law or the
modifications.
/ 20Did not identify any
controversies or objections
associated with the FLSA
modifications.
Unsupported with research.
Identified one controversy or
objection associated with
the FLSA modifications.
Lacked credible research
support.
Described at least two
controversies or objections
associated with the FLSA
modification.
Weakly supported with
research.
Analyzed 2-3 controversies
and objections associated
with the FLSA modifications,
including who benefits,
employers or employees, and
preference of the previous
FLSA law or the
modifications.
Sufficiently supported with
research.
Analysis of 2-3
controversies and objections
associated with the FLSA
modifications, including who
benefits, employers or
employees, and preference
of the previous FLSA law or
the modifications was
compelling and well-
considered.
Well supported by research.
Total / 50
Overall Score
Criteria No Submission 0 points
Emerging (F through D Range) (6-7) 7 points
Satisfactory (C Range) (7-8) 8 points
Proficient (B Range) (8-9) 9 points
Exemplary (A Range) (9-10) 10 points
Criterion ScoreCriteria No Submission 0 points
Emerging (F through D Range) (6-7) 7 points
Satisfactory (C Range) (7-8) 8 points
Proficient (B Range) (8-9) 9 points
Exemplary (A Range) (9-10) 10 points
Criterion Score
Wrote in a clear, concise,
and organized manner;
demonstrated ethical
scholarship in accurate
representation and
attribution of sources (i.e.,
APA); and displayed
accurate spelling, grammar,
and punctuation.
/ 10Submission contains no
discernible overall intent in
author’s selection of ideas.
Errors in basic writing
conventions are sufficiently
numerous to prevent reader
comprehension.
No attempt at
Academic/APA formatting in
presentation
Submission contains random
presentation of ideas, which
prevents understanding the
majority of author’s overall
intent.
Errors in basic writing
conventions are sufficiently
numerous to prevent reader
comprehension of majority
of the work.
Academic/APA format is
attempted, but errors are
significant.
Ideas are presented in a way
that forces the reader to
make repeated inferences in
order to identify and follow
the author’s overall intent.
Errors in basic writing
conventions interfere with,
but do not prevent, reader
comprehension.
Academic/APA format is
attempted but errors are
distracting.
The reader can follow the
author’s overall intent as
stated.
The reader noticed a few
errors in basic writing
conventions but these few
errors do not interfere with
reader comprehension.
Using Academic/APA format,
accurately. Errors are
noticeable but minor.
The writer’s overall
argument and language are
clear and tightly focused,
leaving the reader with no
room for confusion about
author’s intent.
Text is basically error free, so
that a reader would have to
purposely search to find any
errors that may be present.
Using Academic/APA format
proficiently. Text is basically
error free.
No Submission 0 points minimum
Emerging (F through D Range) 35 points minimum
Satisfactory (C Range) 40 points minimum
Proficient (B Range) 45 points minimum
Exemplary (A Range) 50 points minimum