Change Initiative: Develop a Change Model POWERPOINT
Evaluate the Need for Change
11 points
Criteria Description
Evaluate the Need for Change
5. Excellent
11 points
Methods used to evaluate the need for change are extremely thorough and include extensive explanation and numerous supporting details.
4. Good
9.57 points
Methods used to evaluate the need for change are complete and include explanation and supporting details.
3. Satisfactory
8.69 points
Methods used to evaluate the need for change are included but lack explanation and supporting details.
2. Less than Satisfactory
8.14 points
Methods used to evaluate the need for change are incomplete or incorrect.
1. Unsatisfactory
0 points
Methods used to evaluate the need for change are not included.
Choosing Individuals or Teams for Change Initiative (B)
11 points
Criteria Description
Choosing Individuals or Teams for Change Initiative Analyze organizational behavior to determine systemic interdependencies among individuals, teams, and departments. (C 3.1, 6.1)
5. Excellent
11 points
Approach and criteria for choosing individuals or teams necessary for a change initiative are expertly crafted.
4. Good
9.57 points
Approach and criteria for choosing individuals or teams necessary for a change initiative are complete and clearly explained.
3. Satisfactory
8.69 points
Approach and criteria for choosing individuals or teams necessary for a change initiative are included but lack clear explanation.
2. Less than Satisfactory
8.14 points
Approach and criteria for choosing individuals or teams necessary for a change initiative are incomplete or incorrect.
1. Unsatisfactory
0 points
Approach and criteria for choosing individuals or teams necessary for a change initiative are not included.
Communication Strategies
11 points
Criteria Description
Communication Strategies
5. Excellent
11 points
Communication strategies are extremely detailed and well explained and align seamlessly with the organizational culture and behavior.
4. Good
9.57 points
Communication strategies are completely detailed and explained and consistent with the organizational culture and behavior.
3. Satisfactory
8.69 points
Communication strategies are included but are inconsistent with the organizational culture and behavior and/or lack detail and explanation.
2. Less than Satisfactory
8.14 points
Communication strategies are incomplete or incorrect.
1. Unsatisfactory
0 points
Communication strategies are not included.
Stakeholder Support and Overcoming Resistance
11 points
Criteria Description
Stakeholder Support and Overcoming Resistance
5. Excellent
11 points
Strategies to gather stakeholder support and over come resistance are expertly crafted.
4. Good
9.57 points
Strategies to gather stakeholder support and over come resistance are complete and clearly explained.
3. Satisfactory
8.69 points
Strategies to gather stakeholder support and over come resistance are included but lack clear explanation.
2. Less than Satisfactory
8.14 points
Strategies to gather stakeholder support and over come resistance are incomplete or incorrect.
1. Unsatisfactory
0 points
Strategies to gather stakeholder support and over come resistance are not included.
Implementation Strategies
11 points
Criteria Description
Implementation Strategies
5. Excellent
11 points
Implementation strategies are extremely detailed and well explained and align seamlessly with the organizational culture and behavior.
4. Good
9.57 points
Implementation strategies are completely detailed and explained and consistent with the organizational culture and behavior.
3. Satisfactory
8.69 points
Implementation strategies are inconsistent with the organizational culture and behavior and/or lack detail and explanation.
2. Less than Satisfactory
8.14 points
Implementation strategies are incomplete or incorrect.
1. Unsatisfactory
0 points
Implementation strategies are not included.
Sustainability Strategies
11 points
Criteria Description
Sustainability Strategies
5. Excellent
11 points
Sustainability strategies are extremely detailed and well explained and align seamlessly with the organizational culture and behavior.
4. Good
9.57 points
Sustainability strategies are completely detailed and explained and consistent with the organizational culture and behavior.
3. Satisfactory
8.69 points
Sustainability strategies are inconsistent with the organizational culture and behavior and/or lack detail and explanation.
2. Less than Satisfactory
8.14 points
Sustainability strategies are incomplete or incorrect.
1. Unsatisfactory
0 points
Sustainability strategies are not included.
Graphic Organizer: Visual Appeal and Clarity of Change Model
5.5 points
Criteria Description
Graphic Organizer: Visual Appeal and Clarity of Change Model
5. Excellent
5.5 points
The change model is presented using a graphic organizer that clearly illustrates the change model. Appropriate and thematic graphic elements are used to make visual connections that contribute to the understanding of concepts, ideas, and relationships. Differences in type size or color are used well and consistently.
4. Good
4.79 points
The change model is presented using a graphic organizer that illustrates the change model. Visual connections mostly contribute to the understanding of concepts, ideas, and relationships of the change model. Differences in type size or color are used well and consistently.
3. Satisfactory
4.35 points
The change model is presented using a graphic organizer, but the design does not clearly illustrate the intended change model. Elements do not consistently contribute to the understanding of concepts, ideas, and relationships. There is some variation in type size, color, and layout of the graphic design used.
2. Less than Satisfactory
4.07 points
The change model is presented using a graphic organizer. Presentation of change model uses garish color or the typographic variations are overused and legibility suffers. Background interferes with readability. Understanding of concepts, ideas, and relationships is limited within the chosen design.
1. Unsatisfactory
0 points
The change model is not presented using a graphic organizer.
Presentation of Content on PowerPoint
11 points
Criteria Description
Presentation of Content on PowerPoint
5. Excellent
11 points
The content is written clearly and concisely. Ideas universally progress and relate to each other. The project includes motivating rationale and advanced organizers. The project gives the audience a clear sense of the main idea.
4. Good
9.57 points
The content is written with a logical progression of ideas and supporting information exhibiting a unity, coherence, and cohesiveness. Persuasive information from reliable sources is included.
3. Satisfactory
8.69 points
The presentation slides are generally competent, but ideas may show some inconsistency in organization or in their relationships to each other.
2. Less than Satisfactory
8.14 points
The content is vague in conveying a point of view and does not create a strong sense of purpose. Some persuasive information is included
1. Unsatisfactory
0 points
The content lacks a clear point of view and logical sequence of information. Little persuasive information is included. Sequencing of ideas is unclear.
PowerPoint Layout
5.5 points
Criteria Description
PowerPoint Layout
5. Excellent
5.5 points
The layout is visually pleasing and contributes to the overall message with appropriate use of headings, subheadings, and white space. Text is appropriate in length for the target audience and to the point. The background and colors enhance the readability of the text.
4. Good
4.79 points
The layout background and text complement each other and enable the content to be easily read. The fonts are easy to read and point size varies appropriately for headings and text.
3. Satisfactory
4.35 points
The layout uses horizontal and vertical white space appropriately. Sometimes the fonts are easy to read, but in a few places the use of fonts, italics, bold, long paragraphs, color, or busy background detracts and does not enhance readability.
2. Less than Satisfactory
4.07 points
The layout shows some structure, but appears cluttered and busy or distracting with large gaps of white space or a distracting background. Overall readability is difficult due to lengthy paragraphs, too many different fonts, dark or busy background, overuse of bold, or lack of appropriate indentations of text.
1. Unsatisfactory
0 points
The layout is cluttered, confusing, and does not use spacing, headings, and subheadings to enhance the readability. The text is extremely difficult to read with long blocks of text, small point size for fonts, and inappropriate contrasting colors. Poor use of headings, subheadings, indentations, or bold formatting is evident.
Research
11 points
Criteria Description
Research
5. Excellent
11 points
Research is supportive of the rationale presented. Sources are distinctive. Addresses all of the issues stated in the assignment criteria. Strong support and rationale is presented for the change model.
4. Good
9.57 points
Research is timely and relevant, and addresses all of the issues stated in the assignment criteria. Adequate support and rationale is presented for the change model.
3. Satisfactory
8.69 points
Research is adequate. Sources are standard in relevance, quality of outside sources, or timeliness. General support and rationale is presented for the change model.
2. Less than Satisfactory
8.14 points
Few outside sources were used to support the change model. Limited research is apparent to provide support or rationale for the change model.
1. Unsatisfactory
0 points
No outside sources were used to support the change model.
Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, and language use)
5.5 points
Criteria Description
Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, and language use)
5. Excellent
5.5 points
The writer is clearly in command of standard, written, academic English.
4. Good
4.79 points
Prose is largely free of mechanical errors, although a few may be present. The writer uses a variety of effective sentence structures and figures of speech.
3. Satisfactory
4.35 points
Some mechanical errors or typos are present, but they are not overly distracting to the reader. Correct and varied sentence structure and audience-appropriate language are employed.
2. Less than Satisfactory
4.07 points
Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader. Inconsistencies in language choice (register) or word choice are present. Sentence structure is correct but not varied.
1. Unsatisfactory
0 points
Surface errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning. Inappropriate word choice or sentence construction is employed.
Documentation of Sources
5.5 points
Criteria Description
Documentation of Sources (citations, footnotes, references, bibliography, etc., as appropriate to assignment and style)
5. Excellent
5.5 points
Sources are completely and correctly documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is free of error.
4. Good
4.79 points
Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is mostly correct.
3. Satisfactory
4.35 points
Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, although some formatting errors may be present.
2. Less than Satisfactory
4.07 points
Documentation of sources is inconsistent or incorrect, as appropriate to assignment and style, with numerous formatting errors.
1. Unsatisfactory
0 points
Sources are not documented.
Total 110 points