Week 3 Project
Criteria No Submission 0 points
Emerging (F through D Range) (24-28) 28 points
Satisfactory (C Range) (28-32) 32 points
Proficient (B Range) (32-36) 36 points
Exemplary (A Range) (36-40) 40 points
Criterion Score
Summarized the
course project to this
point.
/ 40Did not identify the course project to this
point.
Unsupported with
research.
Identified the course
project to this point.
Lacked credible
research support.
Described the course
project to this point.
Weakly supported
with research.
Summarized the
course project to this
point.
Sufficiently supported
with research.
Summary of the course project to this point was
compelling and showed well-developed logical
progression.
Well supported by research.
Criteria No Submission 0 points
Emerging (F through D Range) (24-28) 28 points
Satisfactory (C Range) (28-32) 32 points
Proficient (B Range) (32- 36) 36 points
Exemplary (A Range) (36-40) 40 points
Criterion Score
Analyzed three online
trading sites, and
determine the
requirements for trading,
including the price per
trade.
/ 40Did not identify three online trading sites, and
determine the requirements
for trading, including the
price per trade.
Unsupported with
research.
Identified three online
trading sites, and
determine the
requirements for trading,
including the price per
trade.
Lacked credible research
support.
Described three online
trading sites, and
determine the
requirements for trading,
including the price per
trade.
Weakly supported with
research.
Analyzed three online
trading sites, and
determine the
requirements for trading,
including the price per
trade.
Sufficiently supported
with research.
Analysis of three online trading sites,
and the requirements for trading,
including the price per trade was
compelling and showed well- developed
logical progression.
Well supported by research.
Criteria No Submission 0 points
Emerging (F through D Range) (24-28) 28 points
Satisfactory (C Range) (28-32) 32 points
Proficient (B Range) (32- 36) 36 points
Exemplary (A Range) (36-40) 40 points
Criterion Score
Evaluated three
companies (look for
investor information)
that offer DIPs or
DRIPs.
/ 40Did not identify three companies (look for
investor information) that
offer DIPs or DRIPs.
Unsupported with
research.
Identified three
companies (look for
investor information)
that offer DIPs or DRIPs.
Lacked credible research
support.
Described three
companies (look for
investor information)
that offer DIPs or DRIPs.
Weakly supported with
research.
Evaluated three
companies (look for
investor information)
that offer DIPs or DRIPs.
Sufficiently supported
with research.
Evaluation of three companies (look for
investor information) that offer DIPs or DRIPs
was compelling and showed well-developed
logical progression.
Well supported by research.
Criteria No Submission 0 points
Emerging (F through D Range) (24-28) 28 points
Satisfactory (C Range) (28-32) 32 points
Proficient (B Range) (32- 36) 36 points
Exemplary (A Range) (36-40) 40 points
Criterion Score
Summarized
requirements, including
minimum investments,
nature of the return,
costs, and other
features.
/ 40Did not identify requirements, including
minimum investments,
nature of the return, costs,
and other features.
Unsupported with
research.
Identified requirements,
including minimum
investments, nature of
the return, costs, and
other features.
Lacked credible research
support.
Described requirements,
including minimum
investments, nature of
the return, costs, and
other features.
Weakly supported with
research.
Summarized
requirements, including
minimum investments,
nature of the return,
costs, and other features.
Sufficiently supported
with research.
Summary of the requirements, including
minimum investments, nature of the
return, costs, and other features was
compelling and showed well-developed
logical progression.
Well supported by research.
Criteria No Submission 0 points
Emerging (F through D Range) (24-28)
Satisfactory (C Range) (28- 32)
Proficient (B Range) (32- 36)
Exemplary (A Range) (36-40) 40 points
Criterion Score
Total / 200
Overall Score
Close
28 points 32 points 36 points
Wrote in a clear, concise, and organized
manner; demonstrated ethical scholarship
in accurate representation and attribution
of sources (i.e., APA); and displayed
accurate spelling, grammar, and
punctuation.
/ 40Submission contains no discernible
overall intent in
author’s selection of
ideas.
Errors in basic
writing conventions
are sufficiently
numerous to
prevent reader
comprehension.
No attempt at
Academic/APA
formatting in
presentation
Submission contains
random presentation of
ideas, which prevents
understanding the
majority of author’s
overall intent.
Errors in basic writing
conventions are
sufficiently numerous to
prevent reader
comprehension of
majority of the work.
Academic/APA format is
attempted, but errors
are significant.
Ideas are presented in a
way that forces the reader
to make repeated
inferences in order to
identify and follow the
author’s overall intent.
Errors in basic writing
conventions interfere with,
but do not prevent, reader
comprehension.
Academic/APA format is
attempted but errors are
distracting.
The reader can follow the
author’s overall intent as
stated.
The reader noticed a few
errors in basic writing
conventions but these
few errors do not
interfere with reader
comprehension.
Using Academic/APA
format, accurately. Errors
are noticeable but minor.
The writer’s overall
argument and language are
clear and tightly focused,
leaving the reader with no
room for confusion about
author’s intent.
Text is basically error free, so
that a reader would have to
purposely search to find any
errors that may be present.
Using Academic/APA format
proficiently. Text is basically
error free.
No Submission 0 points minimum
Emerging (F through D Range) 140 points minimum
Satisfactory (C Range) 160 points minimum
Proficient (B Range) 180 points minimum
Exemplary (A Range) 200 points minimum