Week 3 Discussion
Problems and Applications
1.The one bureaucracy that virtually everyone must deal with at some point is
the Department of Motor Vehicles. For most, a visit to DMV is a miserable
experience—waiting in line, paying money, and dealing with grumpy people
behind the counter. Citizens crawl along in line, waiting to register a car or
renew a license, all the while trying to quell a gnawing feeling that the
transaction will unravel when they reach the clerk's window.
To be more specific, a preliminary study by the governor's office identified the
following six issues:
• Customers want fast, alternate ways to receive services and information.
• Customers arrive 1+ hours before the station opens, creating a lasting backlog throughout the day.
• Many actions required of the examiners do not directly support a goal of quickly serving the customer.
• Customers are not fully educated about (a) what is required of them and (b) the services offered through self-service channels and the county clerk offices.
• Many stations exceed rated occupancy.
• A high percentage of customers fail the knowledge test on the first and second attempts, further increasing station traffic.
Using the tools and techniques presented in this chapter—along with any
other ideas you have—suggest how a state might get its DMV to shed its
long-standing image as the monster of government bureaucracy. What, in
other words, do you recommend?
2.One particularly violent method of smuggling drugs across the U.S.-Mexican
border is known as port running. Port runners would load up to 500 pounds of
drugs in cars or small trucks, making little attempt to disguise or conceal it,
and then drive up to the inspection booth at selected border crossing points. If
the inspector asked for identification, or took too long, or asked to look in the
trunk, or attempted to pull the vehicle over for secondary examination, the
driver would accelerate away aggressively, smashing other vehicles out of the
way if necessary and running down the inspector or anyone else foolish enough
to get in the way—never mind the damage to the vehicle, the load was much
more valuable. Port runners picked crossing points where, within half a mile
of clearing the border, they could be lost in the backstreets of a densely
populated urban area, making pursuit and arrest virtually impossible.
In January 1995, Deputy Commissioner Mike Lane formed a team to
tackle the problem. The team had plenty of ideas about what to do.
Enforcement agents preferred pursuit, arrest, and seizures; inspectors
focused more naturally on changing inspection procedures; the intelligence
group wanted to study the smuggling organizations and take them down.
But most of that they had been doing already, and it was not enough.
Besides, their charge was not to make arrests or break down smuggling
organizations (although they were allowed to do those things if it helped);
they had been charged with eliminating the problem of port running.
Assume that you are on Commissioner Lane's team. Before working on
an action plan, the team must determine how it would assess performance.
How would it know if it was making progress, if not by numbers of arrest
and seizures? Obviously a decline in the number of port-running incidents
would be good, but even that would be open to interpretation. What is your
plan, and how will you evaluate success? What were the alternatives to
your plan, and why were they rejected?
SOURCE: Malcolm K. Sparrow, The Regulatory Craft (Washington, DC: Brookings, 2000).
3.Do you think an agency can or should have a successful TQM program
without using benchmarking?
4.Discuss the advantages and disadvantages of setting up a new agency to carry
out a program.
5.Find the critical path in the following network.