Reading I NEED HELP ON MY HOMEWORK

LULULU
Week2ScientificMethodpost.pdf

4/4/2024

1

Research Methods

Getting to the truth:

The Scientific Method The scientific method is the process of testing our ideas about the world by:

setting up situations that test our ideas.

making careful, organized

observations.

analyzing whether the data fits with

our ideas.

If the data doesn’t fit our ideas, then we modify our ideas, and test again.

The Scientific Method

Acquiring knowledge through the formation of specific questions & systematic testing of those questions.

Steps in the Process

1. Understanding the theory

2. Develop hypotheses

3. Design study

4. Collect data and analyze findings

5. Report findings

4/4/2024

2

Theory: the big picture

Example of a theory: Social learning theory – Observing others engaging in prosocial behavior makes the observer more likely to engage in prosocial behavior.

Theory is an abstract system of

concepts and relationships that

help us understand a phenomenon or solve a problem.

Hypothesis •Hypothesis

• Testable prediction about relationship between variables

• Example

• Wearing a super hero costume makes people more prosocial

Methodology Basics

• Independent Variable: The variable that is observed or manipulated to see if it has an effect on another variable.

• Levels: number of conditions for a given IV

• Dependent Variable: The variable that is measured to see if it is being effected or influenced by the IV in any way.

4/4/2024

3

Costumes and Prosocial Behavior

• Hypothesis: Wearing a super hero costume makes people more prosocial

• IV:

• Costume or not

• DV:

• Measurement of prosocialness

How do we test hypotheses?

• Media Psychology Research:

• Non-Experimental Methods

• Surveys

• Experimental Methods

Survey research

• Surveys

• Self-reports of knowledge, feelings, experiences, attitudes, behavior, etc.

• Types

• Cross-sectional

• Longitudinal (trend, cohort, panel)

4/4/2024

4

population

Why take a sample?

• Sampling saves time. You can

find the ratio of colors in this jar

by making sure they are well

mixed (randomized) and then

taking a sample.

sample

Random sampling:

making sure that every

individual in a population

has an equal chance of

being in your sample.

“Random” means

that your selection of

participants is driven

only by chance, not

by any characteristic.

An observation that two

variables are related to

each other.

Especially useful when

you cannot manipulate

variables

Allow researchers to see

how two variables are

related.

The more years spent

smoking, the greater the

chance of lung cancer Correlations

Exposure to sexualized

advertisement associated

with dissatisfaction of

own body.

The greater the number

of Facebook friends, the

less time was spent

studying.

Correlation Coefficient

• A number that describes the strength of the relationship between two variables

• The + or – sign indicates whether this relationship is positive or negative

• Can vary from -1.0 to +1.0.

• -1.0 = perfect negative correlation

• 0.0 = no correlation

• +1.0 = perfect positive correlation

4/4/2024

5

Correlation Coefficient

Positive Correlation

• As the value of one variable increases, the value of the other variable increases

Comprehension of Miranda Rights

In te

ll ig

en ce

Positive Correlation

4/4/2024

6

Negative Correlation

• As the value of one variable decreases, the value of the other variable increases

No Correlation • Changes in one variable not associated with changes in other

variable

T em

p er

at u

re

Number of People with Hiccups

Correlation and Causation

• A correlation between X and Y does not mean that X causes Y

• All that is known is that X and Y are related in some way

4/4/2024

7

Ice Cream Does What?!?!

•Research has shown that when ice cream sales increase, so do the number of murders.

Ice Cream Sales and Crime

Amount of ice cream sold

C ri

m e

ra te

What is likely going on…

Crime

rate

Temperature

Ice cream

sold

4/4/2024

8

Correlational Design

• Advantages

• Study naturally occurring phenomena that cannot be manipulated

• Study phenomena that is unethical to create in lab

• Disadvantages

• CORRELATION DOES NOT EQUAL CAUSATION!!

• Third variable problem

So how do we find out about causation?

Experimentation:

manipulating one factor in

a situation to determine

its effect

IV: Costume or not

DV: Measurement of

prosocialness

Experimental Research

• Beyond just an observation between two variables

• When X increases, Y also increases

• A causal inference

• X is causing the change in Y

4/4/2024

9

Experimental Designs

•Experimental Design • Systematically manipulate one source of

influence while holding others constant

• Random assignment

•ONLY way to determine causality.

Just to clarify two similar- sounding terms…

First you sample, then you sort (assign).

Random assignment of participants to

control or experimental groups is how you control all

variables except the one you’re manipulating.

Random sampling is how you get a pool of

research participants that represents the

population you’re trying to

learn about.

Random Selection

•Rarely possible

•Any study where anyone, anywhere has the equal chance of being selected for that study??

•Random assignment is best solution • Evens out preexisting differences • Individual differences

• Reduces chance of confounds/third variables influencing results

4/4/2024

10

Eliminating Alternative Explanations •Use random assignment to assign

participants in experimental or control condition

• All persons have same chance of being in given condition

• Makes conditions equal

• Why can’t I let people choose what condition they want to be in?

Experiments

•Advantages

•Allow for causal conclusions

•Ability to tightly control environment

•Disadvantages

•Artificial situations

• Lack of generalizability

Evaluating all Research and Statements

• Be skeptical!!! Ask yourself: • Are they making causal statements w/ correlational

data? • Using unrepresentative sample or small sample? • Was random assignment used? • Are there enough study details? • Are they making generalizations that are just too

broad? • Have alternative explanations been eliminated?