Final Project Submission (Please review all previous assignments and ruberic and make adjustments as necessary)

idsara
Week2RubricDetailBlackboardLearn.pdf

4/15/2020 Rubric Detail – Blackboard Learn

https://class.waldenu.edu/webapps/rubric/do/course/gradeRubric?mode=grid&isPopup=true&rubricCount=1&prefix=_21261949_1&course_id=undefin… 1/2

Rubric Detail A rubric lists grading criteria that instructors use to evaluate student work. Your instructor linked a rubric to this item and made it available to you. Select Grid View or List View to change the rubric's layout.

  Excellent Above Average

Average Fair Poo

Writing Quality

10 (20.00%) - 10 (20.00%) Demonstrated correct spelling, proper grammar, and sentence structure AND Statements normally requiring references or citations were always validated with the source

8 (16.00%) - 9 (18.00%)

Occasional minor spelling, grammar, or sentence structure errors BUT Statements normally requiring references or citations were always validated with the source

7 (14.00%) - 7 (14.00%) Occasional minor spelling, grammar, or sentence structure errors AND Most, but not all, statements normally requiring references or citations were validated with the source

6 (12.00%) - 6 (12.00%) Frequent spelling, grammar, or sentence structure errors AND/OR Statements normally requiring references or citations were not always validated with the source

0 (0 (10

Reg of s gra or str err sta nor req ref or we val wit sou

Content Completeness and Relevance

20 (40.00%) - 20 (40.00%) Content included all of

16 (32.00%) - 19 (38.00%) Content included all

14 (28.00%) - 15 (30.00%) Some minor content was

12 (24.00%) - 13 (26.00%) Some major content

0 (0 11 Mu con

Name: HLTH_6110_Week2_Final_Project_Component1_Rubric EXIT

Grid View List View

4/15/2020 Rubric Detail – Blackboard Learn

https://class.waldenu.edu/webapps/rubric/do/course/gradeRubric?mode=grid&isPopup=true&rubricCount=1&prefix=_21261949_1&course_id=undefin… 2/2

  Excellent Above Average

Average Fair Poo the required components as per the assignment instructions and was very relevant to the topic

of the required components as per the assignment instructions and was usually relevant to the topic

missing OR Content was not always fully relevant to the topic

items were missing OR Content was often irrelevant to the topic or too vague

item mis OR Co wa top ver

Critical Application

20 (40.00%) - 20 (40.00%) Explanations were analytical, and insightful AND Connections were clearly made between ideas and how they were or could be applied

16 (32.00%) - 19 (38.00%) All or most explanations were analytical, and insightful AND Connections were almost always made between ideas and how they were or could be applied

14 (28.00%) - 15 (30.00%) Some analysis or some insight of the topic was present BUT Connections were not always made between ideas and how they were or could be applied

12 (24.00%) - 13 (26.00%) Little analysis or limited insight of the topic was present AND/OR Connections were not often made between content and applicability AND/OR of goals and motivations

0 (0 11 No or the wa AN No con ma app wa

Feedback to Learner

Name:HLTH_6110_Week2_Final_Project_Component1_Rubric EXIT