Infotech Week3 discussion

Brian34
Week2Reading.pdf

WHAT MAKES INFORMATION STRATEGIC? AN EXAMINATION OF ACCESS TO INFORMATION RESOURCES FOR

ENTREPRENEURS AND BUSINESS PERFORMANCE

by

Yao Zhang

Bachelor of Arts Nankai University, 2006

Master of Arts

The University of Sheffield, 2009

Submitted in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements

For the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy in

Library and Information Science

College of Information and Communications

University of South Carolina

2016

Accepted by:

Kendra Albright, Major Professor

Samantha Hastings, Committee Member

Paul Solomon, Committee Member

Dirk Brown, Committee Member

Amir Karami, Committee Member

Lacy Ford, Senior Vice Provost and Dean of Graduate Studies

PR EV

IE W

All rig hts re se rve d

INFO RMATIO N TO ALL USERS The q ua lity o f this re p ro d uc tio n is d e p e nd e nt up o n the q ua lity o f the c o p y sub m itte d .

In the unlike ly e ve nt tha t the a utho r d id no t se nd a c o m p le te m a nusc rip t a nd the re a re m issing p a g e s, the se w ill b e no te d . A lso , if m a te ria l ha d to b e re m o ve d ,

a no te w ill ind ic a te the d e le tio n.

All rig hts re se rve d .

This w o rk is p ro te c te d a g a inst una utho rize d c o p ying und e r Title 17, Unite d Sta te s C o d e Mic ro fo rm Ed itio n © Pro Q ue st LLC .

Pro Q ue st LLC . 789 Ea st Eise nho w e r Pa rkw a y

P.O . Bo x 1346 Ann Arb o r, MI 48106 - 1346

Pro Q ue st 10127104

Pub lishe d b y Pro Q ue st LLC (2016). C o p yrig ht o f the Disse rta tio n is he ld b y the Autho r.

Pro Q ue st Num b e r: 10127104

PR EV

IE W

ii

© Copyright by Yao Zhang, 2016 All Rights Reserved.

PR EV

IE W

iii

DEDICATION

This dissertation is dedicated to my parents, who offer me unconditional love and

support, who encourage me to chase my dreams, who want me to be me. To my future

beloved one and children, thank you for letting me get prepared.

PR EV

IE W

iv

ACKNOWLDEGEMENTS

I would like to acknowledge the vast amount of support of my friends and family.

Group JJNN and 110120, you and your beloved ones have made this journey full of joy. I

could have never made this far without the support from my warmest family members.

My appreciation also goes to Dr. Liangzhi Yu, who is the first person shows me

the world of Library and Information Science, a role model of a scholar with great

attitude and elegance.

My many thanks go to my committee, Dr. Sam Hastings, Dr. Paul Solomon, Dr.

Amir Karami, and Dr. Dirk Brown. Your words of wisdom have made this process so

enjoyable. Thank you very much for your time and patience.

Dr. Kendra Albright, there will never be enough words to express my appreciation.

It is definitely the rightest decision I made to walk into your classroom in Sheffield.

My gratitude also goes to the SLIS family in USC and dearest friends at the

USC/Columbia Incubator. Life is so much easier with you guys around. Dr. Bob, don’t

work too hard, drink tea!

PR EV

IE W

v

ABSTRACT

The purpose of this study is to explore the nature of the relationship between the

access to and use of information resources of entrepreneurs and their business

performance. The survival and competence of organizations relies heavily on their

recognition of information as important strategic resource. Entrepreneurs, specifically,

face a constantly changing environment and are in a disadvantaged competitive position

in finance and experience compared with large companies. Access to, and use of

information resources, will help them improve their business performance.

This study collects both qualitative and quantitative data, investigating the

entrepreneurs’ business performance and their behaviour in accessing and using

information resources. The qualitative data is applied to explore the technology incubator

consultants’ understanding of business performance indicators for entrepreneurial

businesses. For the quantitative data collection, entrepreneurs are selected from

technology incubators in the U. S to participate in a questionnaire survey. Structural

Equation Modeling (SEM) is used to process and analyze the data reflecting the business

performance, access to information resources, and use of information resources.

A preliminary Access-Performance model and a Use-Performance model are

presented. The results indicate that the use of information resources has a positive

influence on the performance of entrepreneurial businesses. No strong relationship is

revealed between the access to information resources and business performance.

PR EV

IE W

vi

However, there is a high probability that the entrepreneurs have other information

resource accesses options than those covered in the original model.

PR EV

IE W

vii

TABLE OF CONTENTS

DEDICATION ....................................................................................................................... iii

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS ........................................................................................................ iv

ABSTRACT ............................................................................................................................v

LIST OF TABLES ................................................................................................................ viii

LIST OF FIGURES ................................................................................................................. ix

LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS .......................................................................................................x

CHAPTER 1 INTRODUCTION ...................................................................................................1

CHAPTER 2 LITERATURE REVIEW ........................................................................................17

CHAPTER 3 METHODOLOGY ................................................................................................37

CHAPTER 4 DATA ANALYSIS ...............................................................................................48

CHAPTER 5 DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION .........................................................................67

REFERENCES .......................................................................................................................77

APPENDIX A – SURVEY MATRIX FROM INCUBATOR............................................................96

APPENDIX B – INTERVIEW QUESTIONS ...............................................................................97

APPENDIX C – QUESTIONNAIRE SURVEY ............................................................................98

PR EV

IE W

viii

LIST OF TABLES

Table 1.1 Definition of Independent Variables from Choo et al. (2008) ...........................12

Table 3.1 Dependent variables and measures ....................................................................41

Table 4.1 Response rate of questions .................................................................................52

Table 4.2 Codes for information resources access.............................................................55

Table 4.3 Access—Performance model fit ........................................................................59

Table 4.4 Significant test of variables in Access-Performance model (P (>|z|)) ...............60

Table 4.5 Use—Performance model fit .............................................................................61

Table 4.6 Use—Performance model standardized parameter estimate .............................63

PR EV

IE W

ix

LIST OF FIGURES

Figure 1.1 Stage of Firm Growth (Woodward et al, 2011) ..................................................8

Figure 3.1 Theoretical Framework of the Study ................................................................39

Figure 4.1 Age of the participants......................................................................................49

Figure 4.2 Gender of the participants ..............................................................................49

Figure 4.3 Education background of the participants ........................................................50

Figure 4.4 Entrepreneurial experiences .............................................................................51

Figure 4.5 Revenue growth ................................................................................................53

Figure 4.6 Investment attracted..........................................................................................53

Figure 4.7 Patents in holding or in pursuing ......................................................................54

Figure 4.8 Access-Performance model ..............................................................................56

Figure 4.9 Use-Performance model ...................................................................................57

Figure 4.10 Use-Performance model with parameter estimate ..........................................62

PR EV

IE W

x

LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS CFA ........................................................................................Confirmatory Factor Analysis EFA .......................................................................................... Exploratory Factor Analysis ICTs............................................................ Information and Communication Technologies NAICS....................................................... North American Industry Classification System RMSEA ............................................................ Root Mean Square Error of Approximation SBA ...................................................................................... Small Business Administration SEM ....................................................................................... Structural Equation Modeling SRMSR ............................................................... Standardized Root Mean Square Residual

PR EV

IE W

1

CHAPTER 1

INTRODUCTION

1.1 Purpose of Study

The purpose of the present study is to investigate the nature of the relationship

between the access to and use of information resources by entrepreneurs and their

business performance. This study focuses on entrepreneurs in technology incubators in

the U. S. by investigating the information resources that are available to them and their

use of those information resources as well as their business performance using a

quantitative data collection approach. Information and knowledge have, for a long time,

been regarded as valuable resources for strategic management and decision making

(Porter, 1998; Choo, 2005). Entrepreneurs face a constantly changing environment and

are in a disadvantaged competitive position in finance and experience compared with

large companies; access to and use of information resources will help them improve their

business performance. In addition, this study expands the issue by exploring the

relationship between access to and use of information resources in different industries.

Furthermore, it investigates whether access to and use of information resources have

positive or negative, financial and non-financial impacts on the companies studied. Using

a structural equation model, this study intends to address the complexities of those

concepts through the measured variables.

PR EV

IE W

2

1.2 Background

Entrepreneurs have been frequently linked to economic development and the

creation of wealth in the modern society (Lavoie, 2015). In addition, entrepreneurs have

played various roles throughout the history of economics (Barreto, 2013), for example:

the coordinator of resources, the arbitrageur in a world unbalanced with information, the

uncertainty-bearer in the business field, and the innovator of economic development

(Schumpeter, 1934). However, the failure rates of these businesses are consistently

incredibly high. Only about half of entrepreneurs survive beyond five years (Lueg. et al,

2014). The number is even lower among high-tech oriented companies (Cader and

Leatherman, 2011). Therefore, the sustainability of the entrepreneurs becomes a great

concern of research on entrepreneurs. The scope of this study goes beyond economic

conditions to include a diversity of factors such as industry, location, and various

environmental factors (Luo and Mann, 2011). Sustainable development is defined as a

way of social and structural economic transformation that optimizes the current available

benefit without jeopardizing the potential benefit in the future (Goodland and Ledec,

1987), which, in the case of entrepreneurial businesses, means entrepreneurial entities

should make the best use of the available resources and still keep the potential benefit for

strategic development in the future. The entrepreneurs leverage a set of resources and

produce goods and services valued by consumers to earn a profit. However, this process

is not supposed to be a one-time activity. The entrepreneurs need to repeat this cycle or

an variation of it to achieve the development of their companies and eventually grow to

be stable businesses, which are capable of resolving challenges from outside and within

the organization.

PR EV

IE W

2

Information has become recognized as a strategic resource for business in the

“information age” (Davenport and Prusak, 1997, p. 3). The infusion and the wide

application of information and knowledge have revolutionized the way organizations

operate and conduct business. The survival and competence of these organizations will

heavily rely on their recognition of information (Choo, 2005). The purpose of this study

is to explore the nature of the relationship between the access and use of information

resources of the entrepreneurs and their business performance.

Small businesses and entrepreneurs represent a vital and vigorous power in the

U.S. economy and have a significant impact on economic development. In the latest

Small Business Administration (SBA) report, small businesses added 1.4 million net new

jobs through the first three quarters of 2014; in the first quarter of fiscal year 2015,

venture capital investments totaled $23.4 billion (SBA, 2015). Entrepreneurs not only

contribute to economic growth and job creation but also lead in innovation. They are

responsible for half of all innovations and 95% of progressive changes in the U.S.

(Timmons and Spinelli, 2009). Innovation is the core ingredient of business success. It is

the application of a new idea or better solutions that meets existing or unarticulated

market needs. Information helps businesses discover existing opportunities as well as

potentially offering foresight to emerging trends, and, therefore, to allow businesses to

stay ahead of their competition as the environment changes.

The development of small business and entrepreneurs is even more significant in

the present economic environment. Economic development is abandoning the traditional

approach, which heavily relies on financial and labor capital, and shifting to a new

strategy, one which relies on building new businesses and supporting existing businesses

PR EV

IE W

3

(Edmiston, 2007). Supporting small businesses and entrepreneurs is the key intent of this

strategy, for small businesses and entrepreneurs are developing new ideas, creating

additional jobs, and producing innovative products and services. Entrepreneurship also

plays an indispensable role in the race for global innovation advantage (Atkinson and

Ezell, 2012). It is entrepreneurship that takes new products and services into commercial

application and tests the market. The market evaluates the utilization of the “idea” and

available knowledge and selectively keeps those ideas that can secure innovation

advantage. The action of taking a technological idea from concept to commercialization

is the only way to realize the economic value of creation and invention. Despite the value

that entrepreneurs create as goods and services, continuing evolution and innovation help

their organizations maintain a competitive advantage.

Along with the opportunities brought about by innovations, there are also

challenges for entrepreneurs. Newness and smallness make the chances of survival and

success extraordinarily problematic. Even if they do survive, they may be less financially

secure than large companies and their financial rewards smaller during the first couple of

years (Timmons and Spinelli, 2009). Historical research shows that only two of every

five new small firms survive six or more years, with few achieving any growth during the

first four years (Phillips and Kirchhoff, 1988). Studies illustrate that the failure rates

among entrepreneurs are very high; even the most optimistic research has indicated

failure rates as high as 46.4% (Timmons and Spinelli, 2009). It is not uncommon to find

that the business performance of many of these companies failed to meet the

entrepreneurs’ expectation (Cassar, 2014; Solaimani and Bouwman, 2012).

PR EV

IE W

4

Despite their poor survival record, entrepreneurs have a number of qualities that

help them survive and achieve their ultimate goal—sustainable development of the

business.

1.2 Statement of the problem

Entrepreneurs have realized that sustainable development is necessary for them to

achieve economic, social, and environmental goals without compromising their future

growth. Therefore, entrepreneurs must constantly prepare for change, including the

identification of potential markets and opportunities for organizational learning.

Environmental scanning is recognized as a key approach of generating such business

insights. Through information acquisition and knowledge transformation, environmental

scanning sustains and enhances business performance in a turbulent environment (Choo,

2002).

Innovation is necessary for survival and sustainable development (Timmons and

Spinelli, 2009) and is a characteristic that distinguishes entrepreneurial businesses from

other small businesses. Developing an entrepreneurial business is a process of

recombining the existing knowledge and exploiting new knowledge (Schumpeter, 1934).

Successful technical innovation is usually associated with the flow and diffusion of

knowledge (Porter and Stern, 2001; Acs et al., 2009; West & Noel, 2009; Sullivan &

Marvel, 2011; Lai et al., 2014; Lueg. et al, 2014; Love and roper, 2015). More

importantly, the nature of knowledge allows it to be transferred into economic gain by

using knowledge to support creation, manufacturing, and business management processes

(Zander and Kogut, 1995; Zucker, Darby, and Brewer, 1998; Jensen and Thursby, 2001;

Gans and Stern, 2003; Block et al., 2013; Braunerhjelm, 2015;). Entrepreneurship serves

PR EV

IE W

5

this function very well because it spurs innovation into production and services and bring

products to the market in exchange for revenues.

In order to supplement the insufficient financial resources of entrepreneurial

businesses and to assist developing the features that will help such businesses to secure a

competitive advantage, information and knowledge are desperately needed and are

strategic assets in the overall business field (Kenny and Gudergan, 2006; Schiuma, 2012;

Dobbin and Baum, 2014). De Geus (2002) points out that “during the past 50 years, the

world of business has shifted from one dominated by capital to one dominated by

knowledge” (De Geus, 2002, pp.16). As information and knowledge become a central

productive and strategic element, organizations are increasingly reliant on their ability to

access and use information and knowledge.

Information plays multiple functions in entrepreneurial organizations, which

include optimizing creation, keeping the flow of innovative trends, and establishing a

learning environment in order to maximize profitability. Understanding relevant

regulation and policies also help businesses to locate available financial support, cut costs

to explore potential products and services, and add protections on existing assets; for

example, filing a patent. Information provides supports to these activities in multiple

ways, such as time, cost, and strategic planning. Therefore, accessing and using

information is a central management responsibility for entrepreneurs in order to

consolidate their achievement and maintain the competitive advantage.

The process of systemically and actively managing the knowledge in an

organization is equally important to maintaining competitive advantages. The

management of knowledge can be categorized into a number of activities, including

PR EV

IE W

6

creation, validation, presentation, distribution, and application. It is a process of

capitalizing on knowledge, which aims at creating a learning environment to nurture the

growth of technology, techniques, and people (Hislop, 2013). Knowledge management is

significantly facilitated via the access and the use of information resources. Information

resources provide the sources of particular types of data for knowledge creation as well as

the approaches, which enable the communication of knowledge.

The phrase, information resources, is defined as “the services, the packages, and

the support technologies and systems used to generate, store, organize, manipulate, and

provide access to these information-bearing entities” (Matthews 2002, p.1). In this study,

interpersonal contacts will also be included. Information resources will assist

entrepreneurs in investigating the market, locating financial resources, spotting latest

technology, and developing efficient networks by providing timing and comprehensive

information and knowledge (Davenport and Prusak, 1997). Previous research found that

information is an important component for business success (Vaughan, 1999; Klusek and

Bornstein, 2006; Wu and Kendall, 2006; James, 2010; Chang and Wang, 2011; Isik et al.,

2013). There is also a positive correlation between information use and financial benefits

(West & Olsen, 1988; Subramanian et al., 1993; Keh et al., 2007). In addition, the

absence and dysfunction of access to information resources have also been identified in

recent studies (Banda et al., 2004; Underwood, 2009; Leavitt et al. 2010). The nature of

the relationship between information resources and entrepreneurial business performance,

however, is not broadly recognized nor has there been much discussion on any specific

function of the ways in which information resources support the growth and development

PR EV

IE W

7

of entrepreneurs. This study seeks to fill that gap by investigating the function of and

contribution made by information resources to entrepreneurial business performance.

1.3 Definitions

Before examining the role of the access to and the use of information resources in

entrepreneurial business development, it is useful to have a better understanding of what

these and other terms mean in this research context. The following section includes

definitions of important concepts used in this study.

Entrepreneur

Ahmad and Hoffman (2008) define entrepreneurs as “those persons (business

owners) who seek to generate value, through the creation or expansion of economic

activity, by identifying and exploiting new products, processes or markets” (Ahmad and

Hoffman 2008, pp. 8). The firms they own or manage are founded within a relatively

short time but have been helped through the incubation period (Figure 1.1) (Woodward et

al, 2011). Incubator, in the entrepreneurial business context, refers to organizations

dedicated to help startup and early-state companies to develop by providing office spaces,

business advisory, or technical assistance (Bruneel et al. 2012). This assistance is

accessible through counseling activities with the incubator management and networking

interactions with other businesses.

Not all business people in private enterprise economies are entrepreneurs.

Distinguished from other young firms, the identifying feature of entrepreneurial

organizations is that they are doing something new, whether they are inventing new

products or installing a new process. The role of the entrepreneur is to innovate

(Schumpeter, 1934). In the Oslo Manual innovation is defined as “the implementation of

PR EV

IE W

8

a new or significantly improved product (good or service), or process, a new marketing

method, or a new organizational method in business practices, workplace organization or

external relations” (OECD, 2005, pp. 49). The newness or significant improvement of the

product, process, marketing method, or organizational method to the firm means the firm

has to initially develop the product, process, or method, or be the first to adopt from other

firms or organizations (OECD, 2005).

Figure 1.1 Stage of Firm Growth (Woodward et al, 2011)

This study focuses on the entrepreneurs in technology incubators, who operate or

manage their own businesses. To capture the opportunity of taking technological concept

to commercialization, they need to acquire relevant and applicable information to help

them keep a fast pace of innovation. A technology incubator is an infrastructure that

provides lab, office, and manufacturing facilities to the newly-formed technology-

PR EV

IE W

9

intensive firms at a reasonable price until they enter the stable growth stage (Stevenson

and Thomas, 2001; Sá and Lee, 2012). Technology incubator staffs provide technology

assessment, help write business plans and proposals, and offer entrepreneurial mentoring.

Entrepreneurs within the incubators are normally examined and pre-selected according to

certain standards. For example, to be qualified to be accepted by the University of South

Carolina’s technology incubator, a business must “need interaction with the university, be

a technology-based company with a business plan, and have growth potential and team-

building capability” (Stevenson and Thomas 2001, pp. 11).

Information Resources

Information resources are defined as “the available data, technology, people and

processes within an organization to be used by the manager to perform business

processes and tasks” (Pearlson and Saunders 2010, pp. 48). Information resources can be

assets that a firm uses to create, produce, or distribute its products and services, or

capabilities that it learned and developed to forge those activities. As the entrepreneurial

businesses are restricted by size and have limited financial support, they also have to seek

information resources, which are able to provide business insights at a relatively

acceptable price to fulfil their needs. Such resources are scattered in a variety of

professions and fields. Therefore, this research redefines information resources within the

entrepreneur business context as the available people, institutions, and ICTs-based

(Information and Communication Technologies) social networks that can be used by

entrepreneurs to perform business processes and tasks.

PR EV

IE W

10

Interpersonal Connections

Studies show that interpersonal connection is the major channel for entrepreneurs

and small business owners to acquire information regardless of their operating

environment (Lillard, 2002; Ikoja-Odongo and Ocholla, 2004). Based on previous

research, people can serve as information resources. This includes the entrepreneurs

themselves (as they often make decisions based on previous experience), friends, family,

coworkers, suppliers, customer, consultants/experts/specialists in the industry, faculty and

students from the university, and information specialists, such as librarians.

Institutional Platforms

Information institutions are units that facilitate the creation, distribution, and

management of information to support the user’s needs. The forms and services they

provide vary and have greatly expanded over time. Information creation institutions

include book publishers, newspapers publishers, magazine and journal publishers, and the

film and record industry (Lester, 2003). In previous studies, the film and record industry

is hardly mentioned as a useful source of information for entrepreneurs, so it is excluded

in this research. Lester (2003) also lists the mass media and Internet based technologies

(which are categorized as information technology) as information distribution

approaches. The convergence of media and technologies has had tremendous growth

since the volume of information has increased the complexity of managing information.

Meanwhile, knowledge, whose importance in attaining competitive intelligence and

organizational advantage (Semertzaki, 2011), has been realized, and is therefore valued

not only as a power, but also as an organizational asset. It is given equally as much

attention as information, if not more. Professional and targeted services are in such urgent

PR EV

IE W

11

demand, and organizations to process information have emerged to fulfill those needs.

Libraries, database vendors, educational programs, business consulting units, and

information centers, despite the difference in title, have all served this purpose with each

one of their specialties.

ICTs-based Social Networks

Information and knowledge in business context are continuously recreated and

reconstructed through dynamic and interactive activities, therefore, it is necessary for

entrepreneurs to adopt and use a variety of emerging social networking technologies

(Burke, 2013). ICT-based social network refers to computer-based systems that support

the creation, collection, distribution, and management of information. It includes the

hardware (such as computer), software (such as mobile application), as well as the

Internet-based platform (such as Twitter).

Use of Information

The use of information involves a process of gathering, organizing, analyzing, and

communicating (Taylor, 1991). The result of using information resources is rarely

presented in terms of tangible products or services, as the products and services are most

often evaluated by the revenue generated or customer satisfaction, which raises questions

regarding whether information plays any role in business activity. In consideration of the

difficulties in measuring the use of information, usage is measured in various ways

including: 1) the time entrepreneurs spend in retrieving information, 2) the money they

spend in acquiring the information, 3) the information use behavior of the entrepreneurs,

for which there is clear evidence that information is used by individuals and businesses.

Choo et al. (2008) introduced new information behavior and value variables, which are

PR EV

IE W

12

based on Kirk’s (2002) information use outcome model—the result of his information use

and culture study. Choo et al. defined the independent variables (Table 1) in this model,

and evaluated outcomes of information use in three companies in Canada. In their study,

the variables were weighted on information use behavior, not the value or principle for

data collection, so the researchers were able to tell if the variables have created any

outcomes.

The Choo et al study addresses the question of does the use of information

resources of entrepreneurs have effects on their business performance, but the use cannot

be directly observed. Choo’s theory provides an approach to explain this behavior by

evaluating measurable factors, which include information sharing, information

proactiveness, information transparency, information integrity, information informality,

and information control. Definitions of these variables are based on Choo et al. (2008).

Table 1. 1 Definition of Independent Variables from Choo et al. (2008)

Variables Definition

Information sharing Willingness to provide others with information in an

appropriate and collaborative manner

Information proactiveness Active concern to obtain and apply new information to

respond to changes and to promote innovation

Information transparency Openness in reporting information on errors and failures

thus allowing learning from mistakes

Information integrity Use of information in a trustful and principled manner at

the individual and organizational level

Information informality Willingness to use and trust informal sources over

PR EV

IE W