week 2.1-505

BSN-16
Week2.1rubric.docx

Week 2.1

Week 2: Refinement of a Nursing Concern into an Evidence-based Practice Proposal Using the Research Process (NOV18)

Week 2: Refinement of a Nursing Concern into an Evidence-based Practice Proposal Using the Research Process (NOV18)

Criteria

Ratings

Pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeOverview of Selected Evidence-based Practice Project

25.0 pts

Presentation of information was exceptional and included all of the following elements: • Explain the relationship between research and evidence-based practice (EBP) • Distinguish how EBP is different from research • Explain the contribution of EBP to professional nursing • Identify your MSN Program Specialty Track and practice focus • Explain how EBP promotes change within your future practice setting

22.0 pts

Presentation of information was good, but was superficial in places and included all of the following elements: • Explain the relationship between research and evidence-based practice (EBP) • Distinguish how EBP is different from research • Explain the contribution of EBP to professional nursing • Identify your MSN Program Specialty Track and practice focus • Explain how EBP promotes change within your future practice setting

20.0 pts

Presentation of information was minimally demonstrated in the all of the following elements: • Explain the relationship between research and evidence-based practice (EBP) • Distinguish how EBP is different from research • Explain the contribution of EBP to professional nursing • Identify your MSN Program Specialty Track and practice focus • Explain how EBP promotes change within your future practice setting

10.0 pts

Presentation of information in one or two of the following elements fails to meet expectations: • Explain the relationship between research and evidence-based practice (EBP) • Distinguish how EBP is different from research • Explain the contribution of EBP to professional nursing • Identify your MSN Program Specialty Track and practice focus • Explain how EBP promotes change within your future practice setting

0.0 pts

Presentation of information is unsatisfactory in three or more of the following elements: • Explain the relationship between research and evidence-based practice (EBP) • Distinguish how EBP is different from research • Explain the contribution of EBP to professional nursing • Identify your MSN Program Specialty Track and practice focus • Explain how EBP promotes change within your future practice setting

25.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeIdentification of the Nursing Concern to be Improved

25.0 pts

Presentation of information was exceptional and included all of the following elements: • Explain the selected nursing concern in detail • Identify how frequently the selected concern occurs within your specialty track setting • Identify the stakeholders impacted by the concern • Identify the consequences of the selected concern • Identify your proposed solution to the selected concern • Identify a purpose statement for this EBP proposal

22.0 pts

Presentation of information was good, but was superficial in places and included all of the following elements: • Explain the selected nursing concern in detail • Identify how frequently the selected concern occurs within your specialty track setting • Identify the stakeholders impacted by the concern • Identify the consequences of the selected concern • Identify your proposed solution to the selected concern • Identify a purpose statement for this EBP proposal

20.0 pts

Presentation of information was minimally demonstrated in the all of the following elements: • Explain the selected nursing concern in detail • Identify how frequently the selected concern occurs within your specialty track setting • Identify the stakeholders impacted by the concern • Identify the consequences of the selected concern • Identify your proposed solution to the selected concern • Identify a purpose statement for this EBP proposal

10.0 pts

Presentation of information in one, two or three of the following elements fails to meet expectations: • Explain the selected nursing concern in detail • Identify how frequently the selected concern occurs within your specialty track setting • Identify the stakeholders impacted by the concern • Identify the consequences of the selected concern • Identify your proposed solution to the selected concern • Identify a purpose statement for this EBP proposal

0.0 pts

Presentation of information is unsatisfactory in four or more of the following elements: • Explain the selected nursing concern in detail • Identify how frequently the selected concern occurs within your specialty track setting • Identify the stakeholders impacted by the concern • Identify the consequences of the selected concern • Identify your proposed solution to the selected concern • Identify a purpose statement for this EBP proposal

25.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomePICOT/PICo question and Literature Search Process

20.0 pts

Presentation of information was exceptional and included all of the following elements: • Identify the question in correct format with all required elements o PICOT for quantitative research approach o PICo for qualitative research approach • Identify how the expected outcome will be useful to your future practice setting • Discuss the purpose of conducting literature review and the contribution it will provide to this EBP proposal • Identify the steps used to conduct a literature review for this EBP proposal by including: o The specific library databases used o The key search terms and phrases used o The minor (additional) search terms and phrases used o Identify any specialty organization that is relevant to this EBP proposal

18.0 pts

Presentation of information was good, but was superficial in places and included all of the following elements: • Identify the question in correct format with all required elements o PICOT for quantitative research approach o PICo for qualitative research approach • Identify how the expected outcome will be useful to your future practice setting • Discuss the purpose of conducting literature review and the contribution it will provide to this EBP proposal • Identify the steps used to conduct a literature review for this EBP proposal by including: o The specific library databases used o The key search terms and phrases used o The minor (additional) search terms and phrases used o Identify any specialty organization that is relevant to this EBP proposal

16.0 pts

Presentation of information was minimally demonstrated in the all of the following elements: • Identify the question in correct format with all required elements o PICOT for quantitative research approach o PICo for qualitative research approach • Identify how the expected outcome will be useful to your future practice setting • Discuss the purpose of conducting literature review and the contribution it will provide to this EBP proposal • Identify the steps used to conduct a literature review for this EBP proposal by including: o The specific library databases used o The key search terms and phrases used o The minor (additional) search terms and phrases used o Identify any specialty organization that is relevant to this EBP proposal

8.0 pts

Presentation of information in one or two of the following elements fails to meet expectations: • Identify the question in correct format with all required elements o PICOT for quantitative research approach o PICo for qualitative research approach • Identify how the expected outcome will be useful to your future practice setting • Discuss the purpose of conducting literature review and the contribution it will provide to this EBP proposal • Identify the steps used to conduct a literature review for this EBP proposal by including: o The specific library databases used o The key search terms and phrases used o The minor (additional) search terms and phrases used o Identify any specialty organization that is relevant to this EBP proposal

0.0 pts

Presentation of information is unsatisfactory in three or more of the following elements: • Identify the question in correct format with all required elements o PICOT for quantitative research approach o PICo for qualitative research approach • Identify how the expected outcome will be useful to your future practice setting • Discuss the purpose of conducting literature review and the contribution it will provide to this EBP proposal • Identify the steps used to conduct a literature review for this EBP proposal by including: o The specific library databases used o The key search terms and phrases used o The minor (additional) search terms and phrases used o Identify any specialty organization that is relevant to this EBP proposal

20.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeTheoretical Framework

20.0 pts

Presentation of information was exceptional and included all of the following elements: • Explain the theoretical framework to be used in this EBP proposal • Describe how the identified theoretical framework is applies to this EBP proposal

18.0 pts

Presentation of information was good, but was superficial in places and included all of the following elements: • Explain the theoretical framework to be used in this EBP proposal • Describe how the identified theoretical framework is applies to this EBP proposal

16.0 pts

Presentation of information was minimally demonstrated in the all of the following elements: • Explain the theoretical framework to be used in this EBP proposal • Describe how the identified theoretical framework is applies to this EBP proposal

8.0 pts

Presentation of information in one of the following elements fails to meet expectations: • Explain the theoretical framework to be used in this EBP proposal • Describe how the identified theoretical framework is applies to this EBP proposal

0.0 pts

Presentation of information is unsatisfactory in two of the following: • Explain the theoretical framework to be used in this EBP proposal • Describe how the identified theoretical framework is applies to this EBP proposal

20.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomePaper Specifications

10.0 pts

This section included all of the following: • Paper meet length requirements of 5 to 8 page. • Minimum of 6 (six) scholarly nursing references • Dictionary, required textbook for this course and Chamberlain College of Nursing lesson information, were NOT used as scholarly references. • All references are current - within a 5-year time frame unless a valid rationale was provided and the instructor approved them.

9.0 pts

This section included three of the following: • Paper meet length requirements of 5 to 8 page. • Minimum of 6 (six) scholarly nursing references • Dictionary, required textbook for this course and Chamberlain College of Nursing lesson information, were NOT used as scholarly references. • All references are current - within a 5-year time frame unless a valid rationale was provided and the instructor approved them.

8.0 pts

This section included only two of the following: • Paper meet length requirements of 5 to 8 page. • Minimum of 6 (six) scholarly nursing references • Dictionary, required textbook for this course and Chamberlain College of Nursing lesson information, were NOT used as scholarly references. • All references are current - within a 5-year time frame unless a valid rationale was provided and the instructor approved them.

4.0 pts

This section included only one of the following: • Paper meet length requirements of 5 to 8 page. • Minimum of 6 (six) scholarly nursing references • Dictionary, required textbook for this course and Chamberlain College of Nursing lesson information, were NOT used as scholarly references. • All references are current - within a 5-year time frame unless a valid rationale was provided and the instructor approved them.

0.0 pts

This section included none of the following: • Paper meet length requirements of 5 to 8 page. • Minimum of 6 (six) scholarly nursing references • Dictionary, required textbook for this course and Chamberlain College of Nursing lesson information, were NOT used as scholarly references. • All references are current - within a 5-year time frame unless a valid rationale was provided and the instructor approved them.

10.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAPA Style

25.0 pts

APA guidelines, as per the 6th edition of the manual, are demonstrated for the • title page, • running head, • body of paper (including margins, headings, font etc.), and reference page One deduction for each type of APA format error 0 to 1 APA error was present

22.0 pts

APA guidelines, as per the 6th edition of the manual, are demonstrated for the • title page, • running head, • body of paper (including margins, headings, font, etc.), and reference page One deduction for each type of APA format error 2 - 3 APA errors were present

20.0 pts

APA guidelines, as per the 6th edition of the manual, are demonstrated for the • title page, • running head, • body of paper (including margins, headings, font, etc.), and reference page One deduction for each type of APA format error 4 – 5 APA errors were are present

10.0 pts

APA guidelines, as per the 6th edition of the manual, are demonstrated for the • title page, • running head, • body of paper (including margins, headings, font, etc.), and reference page One deduction for each type of APA format error 6 – 7 APA errors were present

0.0 pts

APA guidelines, as per the 6th edition of the manual, are demonstrated for the • title page, • running head, body of paper (including margins, headings, font, etc.), and reference page One deduction for each type of APA format error 8 or greater APA errors were present

25.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeCitations

10.0 pts

There were 0-1 errors in the crediting of ideas, and information that contributed to knowledge.

9.0 pts

There were 2-3 errors in the crediting of ideas, and information that contributed to knowledge.

8.0 pts

There were 4-5 errors in the crediting of ideas, and information that contributed to knowledge

4.0 pts

There were 6-7 errors in the crediting of ideas, and information that contributed to knowledge

0.0 pts

There were 8 or greater errors in the crediting of ideas, and information that contributed to knowledge

10.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWriting Mechanics

15.0 pts

1–2 errors or exceptions to the rules of grammar, spelling, word usage, punctuation and other aspects of formal written work as found in the 6th edition of the APA manual

13.0 pts

3 – 4 errors or exceptions to the rules of grammar, spelling, word usage, punctuation and other aspects of formal written work as found in the 6th edition of the APA manual

12.0 pts

5 – 6 errors or exceptions to the rules of grammar, spelling, word usage, punctuation and other aspects of formal written work as found in the 6th edition of the APA manual

6.0 pts

7 – 8 errors or exceptions to the rules of grammar, spelling, word usage, punctuation and other aspects of formal written work as found in the 6th edition of the APA manual

0.0 pts

9 or greater errors or exceptions to the rules of grammar, spelling, word usage, punctuation and other aspects of formal written work as found in the 6th edition of the APA manual

15.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeLate Deductions

0.0 pts

0 pts lost - submission met deadline

0.0 pts

Student does not meet the deadline for submission 10% per day up to 30% total (3-days)

0.0 pts

Total Points: 150.0

Previous Next