BUS4101 WEEK 1
SUO Discussion Rubric (80 Points) - Version 1.2 Course: BUS4101-Quality Management SU01
Response No Submission 0 points
Emerging (F-D: 1- 27) 27 points
Satisfactory (C: 28- 31) 31 points
Proficient (B: 32- 35) 35 points
Exemplary (A: 36- 40) 40 points
Criterion Score
Quality of
Initial Posting
/ 40No initial posting
exists to evaluate.
The information
provided is
inaccurate, not
focused on the
assignment’s topic,
and/or does not
answer the
question(s) fully.
Response
demonstrates
incomplete
understanding of the
topic and/or
inadequate
preparation.
The information
provided is accurate,
giving a basic
understanding of the
topic(s) covered. A
basic understanding
is when you are able
to describe the
terms and concepts
covered. Despite
this basic
understanding,
initial posting may
not include
complete
development of all
aspects of the
assignment.
The information
provided is accurate,
displaying a good
understanding of the
topic(s) covered. A
good understanding
is when you are able
to explain the terms
and topics covered.
Initial posting
demonstrates
sincere reflection
and addresses most
aspects of the
assignment,
although all
concepts may not be
fully developed.
The information
provided is accurate,
providing an in-
depth, well thought-
out understanding
of the topic(s)
covered. An in-
depth understanding
provides an analysis
of the information,
synthesizing what is
learned from the
course/assigned
readings.
Participation No Submission 0 points
Emerging (F-D: 1- 13) 13 points
Satisfactory (C: 14- 16) 16 points
Proficient (B: 17- 18) 18 points
Exemplary (A: 19- 20) 20 points
Criterion ScoreParticipation No Submission 0 points
Emerging (F-D: 1- 13) 13 points
Satisfactory (C: 14- 16) 16 points
Proficient (B: 17- 18) 18 points
Exemplary (A: 19- 20) 20 points
Criterion Score
Participation in
Discussion
/ 20No responses to
other classmates
were posted in this
discussion forum.
May include one or
more of the
following:
*Comments to only
one other student's
post.
*Comments are not
substantive, such as
just one line or
saying, “Good job”
or “I agree.
*Comments are off
topic.
Comments to two or
more classmates’
initial posts but only
on one day of the
week. Comments
are substantive,
meaning they reflect
and expand on what
the other student
wrote.
Comments to two or
more classmates’
initial posts on more
than one day.
Comments are
substantive,
meaning they reflect
and expand on what
the other student
wrote.
Comments to two or
more classmates’
initial posts and to
the instructor's
comment (if
applicable) on two
or more days.
Responses
demonstrate an
analysis of peers’
comments, building
on previous posts.
Comments extend
and deepen
meaningful
conversation and
may include a
follow-up question.
Writing No Submission 0 points
Emerging (F-D: 1- 13) 13 points
Satisfaction (C: 14- 16) 16 points
Proficient (B: 17- 18) 18 points
Exemplary (A: 19- 20) 20 points
Criterion Score
Writing
Mechanics
(Spelling,
Grammar,
/ 20No postings for
which to evaluate
language and
grammar exist.
Numerous issues in
any of the following:
grammar, mechanics,
spelling, use of
Some spelling,
grammatical, and/or
structural errors are
present. Some errors
Minor errors in
grammar, mechanics,
or spelling in the
initial posting are
Minor to no errors
exist in grammar,
mechanics, or
spelling in both the
Writing No Submission 0 points
Emerging (F-D: 1- 13) 13 points
Satisfaction (C: 14- 16) 16 points
Proficient (B: 17- 18) 18 points
Exemplary (A: 19- 20) 20 points
Criterion Score
Citation Style)
and
Information
Literacy
slang, and
incomplete or
missing citations and
references. If
required for the
assignment, did not
use course, text,
and/or outside
readings (where
relevant) to support
work.
in formatting
citations and
references are
present. If required
for the assignment,
utilizes sources to
support work for
initial post but not
comments to other
students. Sources
include course/text
readings but outside
sources (when
relevant) include
non-
academic/authoritati
ve, such as Wikis
and .com resources.
present. Minor
errors in formatting
citations and
references may
exist. If required for
the assignment,
utilizes sources to
support work for
both the initial post
and some of the
comments to other
students. Sources
include course and
text readings as well
as outside sources
(when relevant) that
are academic and
authoritative (e.g.,
journal articles,
other text books,
.gov Web sites,
professional
organization Web
sites, cases, statutes,
or administrative
rules).
initial post and
comments to others.
Formatting of
citations and
references is correct.
If required for the
assignment, utilizes
sources to support
work for both the
initial post and the
comments to other
students. Sources
include course and
text readings as well
as outside sources
(when relevant) that
are academic and
authoritative (e.g.,
journal articles,
other text books,
.gov Web sites,
professional
organization Web
sites, cases, statutes,
or administrative
rules).
Total / 80
Overall Score
No Submission 0 points
minimum
There was no
submission for
this assignment.
Emerging (F to D Range) 1 point minimum
Satisfactory progress has not
been met on the competencies
for this assignment.
Satisfactory (C Range) 56 points minimum
Satisfactory progress has been
achieved on the competencies
for this assignment.
Proficient (B Range) 64 points minimum
Proficiency has been
achieved on the
competencies for this
assignment.
Exemplary (A
Range) 72 points minimum
The competencies for
this assignment have
been mastered.