Weekly Reflection

le04
Week15-PowerPointPresentation.pdf

Political�Ecology Part�5:�Land�and�Environment

Land�Issues�Stem�From…

� Extreme�inequalities�in�land�ownership�in� most�Latin�American�countries � Most�land�is�held�by�a�tiny�minority�of�wealthy� landowners�– the�vast�majority�is�left�with�either� insufficient�holdings�or�no�land�at�all � The�fact�continues�to�be�a�major�source�of� political�conflict�and�instability

� The�origins�of�inequality�begin�in�the�colonial� period

Forms�of�Land�Holdings�from�the�Colonial�Period

� Plantations – tended�to�be� located�in�areas�where�the� indigenous�population�was� less�advanced�(and�were� soon�eliminated) � These�were�exportͲ oriented,�for�profit� business�– efficiently�run� operations

Forms�of�Land�Holdings�from�the�Colonial�Period

� Haciendas – tended�to�be� located�in�areas�with� indigenous�populations� that�were�subject�to�the� owners � Production�was�primarily�for� domestic�markets�– they� were�symbols�of�prestige� (power�and�status)�rather� than�a�“business”�like� plantations�– aristocrat� culture�with�feudal� relationship�to�peasants

Forms�of�Land�Holdings�from�the�Colonial�Period

� Smallholder communities – tended�to�be�located�in� inaccessible�or�undesirable� locations � Residual�indigenous� communities

� Retained�preͲColombian� practices � EX.�communal�land�

� Numbers�increased�with�poor� mestizo�peasants

Capitalist�Agriculture

� Plantation�model�grew�at�expense�of�the�hacienda� model�(and�smallholders)�as�foreign�interest� developed�post�independence�(late�19th�century)�– most�unequal�continent�in�the�world�at�the�time � US�companies�became�major�landowners,�turning� plantations�into�modern�capitalist�farms�– exporting� wealth�outside�the�region

� Landowners�with�large�holdings�(local�and�foreign)� became�richer�and�more�politically�influential,� acquiring�more�and�more�land

Peasant�Agriculture

� Population�growth�lead�to�increasingly� insufficient�land�holdings�as�plots�are�further� subdivided�as�families�expand� � Many�are�forced�to�seek�work�on�plantations� because�the�limited�land�cannot�support�families� year�round � 70%�of�rural�population�in�Central�America�are�seasonal� migrants

� Many�end�up�migrating�to�the�slums�in�cities�

Poverty�and�Extreme�Poverty�in�Rural� Areas,�1980Ͳ1999

Modern�Agriculture

� Development�schemes�with�government�investment�– typically�put�into�large�scale�export�agriculture�(favors� plantations�over�the�majority�smallholders) � Colombia�– 50Ͳfold�increase�1950Ͳ72;�Mexico�– irrigated�its�arid�northwest

� Alliance�for�Progress�(1961)�– US�support�of�Latin� American�land�reform�after�Cuban�Revolution�(wanted� to�quell�discontent) � However,�this�development�scheme�typically�had�incompatible� goals… � Redistribute�land�and�wealth�to�rural�poor�so�they�don’t�go�the�way�of� Cuba

� Increase�productivity�and�modernization�of�agricultural�sector�(which� typically�means�consolidating�land�in�large�scale�farms)

Modern�Agriculture

� Today,�agricultural�MNCs�have�drawn�back�from� direct�control�of�land,�preferring�instead�to� contract�out�to�local�farmers � Local�farmers�take�the�risks�(like�crop�failure)� and�deal�with�labor�issues

� Power�is�still�in�the�hands�of�largeͲscale� agriculture,�which�has�a�monopoly�on�land,� capital,�credit,�state�support,�and�access�to�global� markets

Competition�for�Land � Commercial�agriculture�– spread�into�peasant�farms�forcing�

smallholders�out � Through:�money,�legal�trickery�(deeds),�brute�force�(armed� thugs)

� Peasants�– seized�idle�lands,�organizing�political�movements�to� demand�agricultural�reform � EX. Movimento�dos�Trabalhadores�Rurais�Sem�Terra (MST)�in� Brazil � Largest�social�movement�in�Latin�America�(1.5M) � 3%�of�landowners�control�2/3�of�arable�land

067� &RQIURQWDWLRQ

Competition�for�Land � Plantations�– most�disputes�are�over�labor�issues�such�as�

wages�and�working�conditions � Government�response�to�demands�for�land�(and�to�reduce�

urban�tensions)�have�been�Colonization�Programs � Governments�use�colonization�of�the�frontier�as�an� alternative�to�land�reform

� But�the�land�is�often�unsuitable�for�agriculture�and/or�it�is� located�in�remote�areas�that�would�necessitate�outrageous� transportation�costs

)UDJPHQWDWLRQ�LQ� FRORQL]HG�DUHDV

0DQDXV�� %UD]LO

EX:�Mexico’s�Land�Reform � Came�out�of�Mexican�revolution�(1910Ͳ1917�)�– Article�27�of�the�

Constitution � Major�land�reform�efforts�under�Lazaro�Cardenas�(1934Ͳ1940)�–

helped�to�solidify�PRI�clientilism � Broke�up�haciendas,�gave�1.5M�families�land � Ejido system�is�practiced�in�many�indigenous�communities:�communallyͲ

owned�land�administered�by�Indian�communities�along�traditional�lines� � Although�land�was�redistributed,�there�was�a�failure�to�reform�the�necessary�

credit/investment�– overall,�done�little�to�improve�living�standards � Constitutional�reform�in�1990’s�allowed�piecemeal�privatization�of�

ejido lands � A�reason�for�the�Zapatista�uprising�in�1994

� Neoliberal�restructuring�has�put�past�gains�in�reverse�across�the� region

Environmental�Issues

� Land�viewed�as�a�resource�base�for�exploitation� with�no�sense�of�stewardship�(a�European�model)� since�colonization�

� Major�environmental�issues�in�the�region… � deforestation� � soil�erosion� � agricultural�pollution� � industrial�pollution� � poverty’s�affect�on�the�environment

Issue:�Deforestation � 62%�of�world’s�remaining�tropical�rainforest�are�located�in�

Latin�America�– 12%�had�been�destroyed�by�midͲ90’s � Why�are�forests�destroyed? � Pastures�for�cattle;�large�scale�agriculture � Colonization�programs�by�governments

� By�peasants�for�agriculture � Development�projects�– dams�and�industries � Logging

� What�are�the�costs�of�deforestation? � Erosion�of�topsoil � Disruption�of�the�local�climate � Forest�resources�for�the�poor�lost � Loss�of�way�of�life�for�indigenous � Loss�of�biological�diversity/genetic�materials � Loss�of�commercial�potential � Loss�of�“carbon�trading”�potential

Amazon�Deforestation

5RDG�FRQVWUXFWLRQ�LQ� WKH�$PD]RQ

Issue:�Agricultural�Pollution

� Soil�Erosion � Agriculture�contributes�to�soil�erosion�in�a�number�of�ways�

� Land�distribution�is�a�factor�– peasants�are�often�located�on�marginal�lands� (like�hillsides)�– not�practicing�sustainable�methods

� Mechanized�agriculture�can�also�be�inefficient�in�maintaining�soil�integrity

� Chemical�Inputs � Pesticide�companies�often�claim�philanthropic�pursuits � Chemicals�are�typically�only�used�on�export�crops�(too�expensive�for�

peasant�farmers)�– but�the�health�effects�are�felt�locally � Spraying�chemicals�puts�them�into�the�air,�and�workers�are�often�not�given� adequate�safety�instructions�or�safety�gear

� Irresponsible�management�– not�ensuring�proper�use � Pesticide�treadmill�– more�and�more�is�needed�as�pest�become�resistant � Protective�legislation/regulation�is�often�ignored

Chemical�Company’s�Materials�for�Workers

Philanthropic�Pursuits�of�AgroͲChemical� Industry?

� Monsanto people around the world are taking action, within their business teams and through their individual volunteer efforts. They work to develop systems that reward innovation in underserved markets, make our products and research safe, help their communities through volunteer efforts and charitable giving, and contribute to collaborative work environments.

� Helping�families�to�improve�food�production�and�nutrition,�including�research� on�reducing�the�impact�of�pests�on�subsistence�crops�

� Science�education,�with�grants�being�given�to�communities�near�Monsanto� facilities�for�programs�that�support�greater�science�literacy�

� Work�that�benefits�the�environment,�including�programs�that�promote� environmental�education�and�awareness,�improve�water�quality,�improve� wildlife�habitat,�and�encourage�conservation�

� Community�efforts,�including�arts�and�cultural�events,�local�school�projects,� human�needs�programs,�and�community�services�projects�

Issue:�Development�and�Industrial�Pollution

� Predilection�for�“big”�development�projects � Massive�dams�equal�hydroelectric�power�– industries�typically�spring�up�around�them � Problems:��debt,�displacement,� environmental/habitat�destruction�(reservoir),� climate/geologic�change,�loss�of�arable�land,� parasitic�disease�(from�standing�water),�siltation � Pressure�on�international�agencies�have�changed� policy�(less�megaͲdams�being�built);�but�countries� still�paying�off�debt�from�these�projects

Itaipu�Dam�&�Reservoir�:�Brazil/Paraguay

Issue:�Development�and�Industrial�Pollution

� Extractive�industries�– mining�and�oil� � Environmental�damage�integral,�unavoidable;�also� accidents � Other�industries�spring�up�around�them�as�well

� Small�producers�also�a�problem�– gold�prospectors�on� indigenous�lands�in�Amazon�use�mercury�which� contaminates�water�and�land

Oil�Spill�in�Ecuadorian�River

Expansion�of�Shrimp�Farms�in�Honduras

Effects�of�Shrimp�Farms

$�'HDG�0DQJURYH

+DELWDW�/RVV�LQ�(FXDGRU

Issue:�Restructuring�and�Population

� SAPs�– push�for�exportͲled�growth�(raw�material� production) � NTAE�(nonͲtraditional�agricultural�exports):��require� more�chemical�inputs�than�traditional/nonͲexport� products�(EX:�shrimp�farms)

� Maquiladoras:��well�known�industrial�polluters � Population�Issues�– urban�areas � Smog�in�urban�areas�– industry,�automobiles�(75%),�etc. � ISI�– unchecked�industrialization�and�agricultural�policies� which�forced�increased�urbanization

� Booming�population�growth�since�1950s*

Air�Quality�in�Mexico�City