Answers all the questions and write one essay for every question that asked to

sohk
Week1211.pptx

After Action Reports

Keep it simple

Do not overcomplicate…

Your project

Your paper structure

Your sentences

After Action Reports

Passive voice

Active voice

After Action Reports

After Action Reports

After Action Reports

In text citations:

At the end of the sentence, attribute the author(s) that you used to find that work

Examples

(Nelan & Grineski, 2012)

(WHO, 2016)

(NPR, 2012)

After Action Reports

In text citations:

If you are using a quotation, put in the page number for that quotation

Example:

(Nelan & Grineski, 2012, p. 150)

If you are not sure how to cite it use Purdue Owl or see me

APA style

Questions…

Any questions on the paper?

Informational Convergence

Convergence on communication centers, in the form of inquiries, offers of assistance

“Jamming”, “Swamping”, “Overloading” of existing communication facilities

If communication systems are down then the problem becomes more acute

Competition emerges between public and relief agencies for access to the channels which are still functioning

Can be detrimental to organizations and agencies, informal inquiries may overwhelm the channels

Informational Convergence

Is the answer to deny the general public access to these channels?

Informational Convergence

Is the answer to deny the general public access to these channels?

Evidence shows that this forces public to improvise informal, unofficial channels of communication

Resulting in officials having little understanding of the significant needs of the population

Informational Convergence

Challenges in measuring impact (1957):

1. Difficult to establish a “normal” capacity for systems which have been partially destroyed or which have lost some of their operating personnel

2. Personnel located at telephone switchboards, radio stations, etc. normally keep some form of tally or record of incoming messages – under stress of disaster those records might be neglected

3. While there might be a record of total number of messages or calls, there is no way of knowing the number of attempted communications that were rejected due to disruptions in channels

4. When tallies are kept of incoming and outgoing messages, they might not describe if those messages were disaster related or not

5. Large volume exists outside official or formally established channels (word of mouth communications)

Informational Convergence

Can we control it?

Not limited to the persons located in the zones near the disaster zone

External informational convergence originates simultaneously in many parts of the nation and world

In comparison – Initial external personal convergence originates from contiguous and proximate zones

When the event is reported, persons in remote zones attempt communication with persons or agencies in disaster area – compounding the problem with limited channels

Beyond Immediate Needs

Damage Assessment

Debris Removal

Damage Assessment

Identifying the extent of destruction including individual impact as well as overall economic losses in the community

Direct response activities

Helps identify immediate needs of disaster victims

Influences what material and financial resources will be sent to the disaster area

Damage Assessment

Necessary before federal relief is to be given to disaster-stricken communities

Determines if structure is sound

May assist in designation of hazardous area

Types of Damage Assessment

Rapid (or initial) Assessment

During Response

Initial survey of the disaster damages

Immediate

Quick comprehension of deaths, injuries, victim needs, general scope of disaster

What is the importance?

Secure mutual aid agreements

Request additional damage evaluators

Can lead to evacuations and sheltering

Types of Damage Assessment

Preliminary

During Recovery

Within weeks or months

Detailed assessment that is required if seeking federal disaster assistance

Determine extent of disaster and needs for outside assistance

Requirement before disaster declaration

Is possible before declaration, but still must be carried out to comply with laws

Types of Damage Assessment

Technical

Days, weeks, or months after event

Used to determine the cost of damages and method for rebuilding structures or the infrastructure

Conducted by engineers, insurance agents, FEMA employees and contractors

Conducting Damage Assessment

Windshield or drive-through assessments

Immediate after the event

Stay in vehicle

Assess damage on the ground from a distance

Assess initial stages of disaster

Assess priorities and needs

Conducting Damage Assessment

Aerial Assessments

From helicopters or planes

Useful when roads are impassable

Media uses this type of footage

Popular among politicians and key decision makers

Conducting Damage Assessment

Walkthrough/site visits

Tour damaged areas by foot

Determines amount and type of disaster assistance needed

May require knowledge of demolition and construction

Debris Management

Collection, sorting, storage, transportation, and disposal or recycling of rubble, destroyed materials, and other wastes associate with a disaster

Debris can be approx. 8x as much trash as is usual to be picked up

Examples:

Hurricane Floyd

18,000 mobile homes destroyed in North Carolina

1,500 tons of animal carcasses

500,000 cubic yards of debris after tornadoes in Oklahoma

Northridge Earthquake – 95,100 tons of debris

Types of Debris

Broken tree limbs

Mud and sediment

Hazardous waste

Broken plywood

Twisted metal

Shattered glass

Dead animal carcasses

Etc.

Challenges

Driving into the area

Mental well-being

Safety

Public health

Environment

Cost

Hurricane Georges in 1995

Exceeded $310,000,000 in 4 states combined

FEMA covers 100% of debris removal for first 72 hours after the event

After that, they cover 75% of costs borne by local government (when there is a disaster declaration)

Debris

What types of debris are there?

What challenges are caused by these types of debris?

Questions…

How does informational convergence differ today from how it did in 1957? Specifically, is it possible to overload channels?

Do you think it is easier to cause confusion in informational convergence today than it used to be? Why or why not?

Defining Recovery

Basic definition: Returning a community to pre-disaster levels or better

Recovery is more than just reconstruction

Defining Recovery

Definition has evolved

First academic paper on recovery was Haas, Kates, Bowden – 1977

They focused on the predictability of recovery

Recovery Defined - Haas, Kates, Bowden – 1977

Haas, Kates, Bowden (1977) – Reconstruction Following Disaster

Key Insights

Reconstruction process is ordered, knowable, and predictable

Generally, cities are rebuilt on the same site

The time needed for reconstruction can be approximated by the time required for earlier tasks in recovery

The existence of prior plans, detailed planning material, community consensus, and wide dissemination of information increase speed

Haas, Kates, Bowden (1977) – Reconstruction Following Disaster

Key Insights

Reconstruction process is ordered, knowable, and predictable

Ordered sequence of return (in both time and space) that mirrors the hierarchy of function, person, and power

Best locations and places with highest rents return fastest

Haas, Kates, Bowden (1977) – Reconstruction Following Disaster

Key Insights

Leveling of inequalities during the emergency period – does not continue into recovery

Research tells us that events can impact both rich and poor, there is an increase in prosocial behavior, people look beyond differences to help everyone

Restoration and reconstruction do not follow this path

People who had more access to resources prior to the event continue to do so

Haas, Kates, Bowden (1977) – Reconstruction Following Disaster

Key Insights

Reconstruction issues and decisions are value choices

Common goals in reconstruction: familiar, safer, efficient, attractive, equity

Each of these goals adds to:

Speed of recovery

Required resources (material, financial, technical, administrative)

Uncertainty and social disruption

Haas, Kates, Bowden (1977) – Reconstruction Following Disaster

Key Insights:

Ambitious planning is counterproductive – “The Impossible Seems Possible”

Disaster provide opportunities to improve communities

Funding is available, old plans for the community are resurrected

The cost becomes too high and it takes too much time

Haas, Kates, Bowden (1977) – Reconstruction Following Disaster

Three Phases:

1. Restoration – attempt to “patch up” the damaged physical and social systems

Temporary measures taken in the first days or weeks after the disaster event

Trying to make the community as functional as possible

Haas, Kates, Bowden (1977) – Reconstruction Following Disaster

Three Phases:

2. Reconstruction I - Replacement Reconstruction – returning the appearance of the community back to normal

Last from several months to several years after the event

3. Reconstruction II - Commemorative, Betterment, and Developmental Reconstruction – promoting future economic growth within the community

Now referred to as mitigation

Expected to continue until the next disaster event

Questions

Their definition is based on predictability in the recovery stage. Is it accurate to believe that most disasters follow a predictable trajectory in recovery?

What could happen that could impact that?

Is recovery based solely on the reconstruction of the build structure? If no, what other aspects play into recovery?

Defining Recovery

Issues with Haas, Kates, and Bowden definition

Assumes that all members of society recover uniformly

Is too simple

Recovery does not always follow a clear and predictable path

Defining Recovery

“Recovery is messy and uncertain. Factors such as power, race, class, gender, past disaster experience, and access to resources, including information, can all play a role in shaping the process for social units ranging from households to societies.” (Smith and Wenger, 2007)

Defining Recovery

Is recovery simply the reconstruction of the built environment?

Recovery is not the same as reconstruction – it is a social process

“Recovery is not merely an outcome, but a social process that begins prior to disaster impact and encompasses decision-making concerning restoration and reconstruction activities.”

Defining Recovery

Rooted in the Social Structure and Fabric of Society

“... how recovery proceeds is rooted in the social structure and fabric of the impacted society. Put another way, reconstruction is less a technical issue than it is a social matter. Reconstruction only partly involves bricks and land use codes, it mostly concerns social values and group interests. “ – Dynes and Quarantelli 1989

Defining Recovery

Less a technical issue than a social matter

“... how recovery proceeds is rooted in the social structure and fabric of the impacted society. Put another way, reconstruction is less a technical issue than it is a social matter. Reconstruction only partly involves bricks and land use codes, it mostly concerns social values and group interests. “ – Dynes and Quarantelli 1989

Defining Recovery

Concerns social values and group interests

“... how recovery proceeds is rooted in the social structure and fabric of the impacted society. Put another way, reconstruction is less a technical issue than it is a social matter. Reconstruction only partly involves bricks and land use codes, it mostly concerns social values and group interests. “ – Dynes and Quarantelli 1989

Recovery as a social process

Importance of Family recovery

Effects of low socioeconomic status

Effects of race and ethnicity

Urban-Rural Differences

Family Recovery

Relationships with family networks become stronger

Increase in strength following the disaster event, continue into the recovery stage]

Kinship networks provide assistance

Emergency and temporary housing for socially vulnerable populations

Family Recovery – Trainer & Bolin 1976

Five general constraints:

1. Physical Constraint

Destruction of community facilities and other amenities available to pre-disaster community

Loss of these physical and structural resources constraint the functions that the family used to fulfill

Daily routines are altered

Visiting with friends/family

Leisure activities

Shopping

Family Recovery – Trainer & Bolin 1976

Three general constraints:

2. Economic Constraint

Dependent on community/government aid available

Impact their housing situation

May have lost their job as a result of the event

Family Recovery – Trainer & Bolin 1976

Five general constraints:

3. Temporal Constraint

Carrying out daily routines take much more time and effort

Time is taken up by the rebuilding, increased travel time if roads and public transportation are impacted

Family Recovery – Trainer & Bolin 1976

Three general constraints:

4. Social Constraints

Not being able to adhere to social norms could cause people to avoid their social networks

Social norms such as appropriate clothing, home, reciprocity in entertaining)

5. Subjective Constraints

“How a family defines their current situation and how it is constrained by that.”

Perceive their situation as the reason that they are not happy

Effects of Low Socioeconomic Status

Low-income families are both more vulnerable to disaster impacted losses, but also have a harder time recovering

Generally:

Housed in hazard-prone areas/substandard structures

Have greatest need following an event but have most difficulty accessing resources

Recovery is not uniform across the area

Effects of Race and Ethnicity

Least likely to have insurance to cover losses (Bolin and Bolton, 1986)

Extended kin networks have fewer resources to provide

Rely more extensively on government aid for relief and recovery

Defining Recovery

Based on Smith and Wenger:

“The differential process of restoring, rebuilding, and reshaping the physical, social, economic, and natural environment through pre-event planning and post-event actions.”

Explains the outcomes expected in recovery

“restoring, rebuilding, and reshaping the physical”

Recognizes the social aspects with people, groups, and institutions involved

“social, economic”

The recovery process is not necessarily linear, not only driven by technical but also social parameters

Defining Recovery

How are decisions made?

Who is involved in the decision-making?

What are the consequences that those decisions have on social groups in the affected communities?

Who benefits from these decisions? Who does not?

Defining Recovery

Short-term

Extension of the response phase in which basic services and functions are restored

Immediate and overlaps with response

It includes:

providing essential public health and safety services

restoring interrupted utility and other essential services

reestablishing transportation routes

providing food and shelter for those displaced by the incident.

May last for weeks

Defining Recovery

Long-term recovery

A restoration of both the personal lives of individuals and the livelihood of the community

May involve some of the same actions but may continue for a number of months or years depending on the severity and extent of the damage sustained

Long-term recovery may include the complete redevelopment of damaged areas.

Impacts on Recovery

Pre-disaster Intergroup dynamics and relationship (political influence)

Relative size in the community

Political linkages to those in decision-making positions

Cultural history

These relationships existed before the disaster, they will exist after

Recovery takes a long time…

Recovery happens at different speeds…

Successful Local Recovery Plans (Mileti 1999)

1. Community Involvement

2. Information

3. Organization

4. Procedures

5. Damage Evaluation

6. Finances

Community Involvement

Involve stakeholders who are affected by the decision made for recovery

Stakeholders should be able to provide input

Policymakers need to get those stakeholders to buy into the their plans

Helps to make sure that their needs are met

Also avoids conflict

Information

Should include:

Hazard characteristics and areas likely to be impacted

Population size, composition, distribution

Local economic factors

Resources available post-disaster

Information

Powers, programs, and responsibilities of local, state, and federal governments

Also nonprofits, businesses, and other relevant stakeholder organizations

Current and projected land use patterns

Type and location of existing and projected building stock and infrastructure

How does it interconnect with existing and projecting development?

Organization

Identify relevant groups and organizations to provide specific or assigned types of assistance

Include governmental agencies, nonprofits, emergent organizations

By using various types of groups, can account for people who might otherwise be hard to reach

Procedures

Policymaking procedures need to be modified so that changes can be made quickly

Streamline building code review procedures, permits, or stop building until a recovery plan is made

Damage Evaluation

Recovery plan must account for operational tasks (mobilization, deployment, coordination) during damage assessment

Information must be rapidly assimilated

Information is necessary to understand local needs

Implemented in construction strategies

Finances

An understanding of where the money is coming from

Local municipal budgets

State/federal funds

What parts of the plan are feasible based on those funds?

Federal Recovery Assistance

Two types of programs:

Individual Assistance

Relief to citizens, businesses, and others affected by disaster

Public Assistance

Recovery aid for government entities

Individual Assistance

Loan Programs

Lending money

Individuals, families, businesses (who have sustained losses)

Interest rates generally lower than market average

Loan rates and repayment schedule determined by ability of recepient to repay

Grants

Gift funds that do not need to be repaod

Individual Assistance

National Processing Service Center

Online and over the phone

National Emergency Management Information System (NEMIS)

FEMA representatives can record personal information, damage, losses, needs, etc.

Along with fieldwork, determines what type of assistance they are eligible for

Disaster Recovery Centers

Physical location where individuals can access services

Public Assistance

Categories

Local governments

State government agencies

Indian tribes and related organizations

Private nonprofit organizations

Hospitals

Schools

Utility companies

Zoos

Museums

Community centers

Homeless shelters, etc.

Public Assistance

Emergency Assistance

Financial or other types of assistance to help local and state governments deal with the immediate impacts of disasters

Permanent Assistance

Financial payments or reimbursements to local and state governments for long-term rebuilding activities

Emergency Assistance

Debris removal assistance

Funding to clear disaster-related debris

Protective measures

Reimbursement that has purpose of reducing losses or eliminating threats to life, public health, and safety

Examples:

Sandbagging before a flood

Shoring up buildings after earthquake

Permanent Assistance

Road Systems assistance

Repays expenses associate with the rebuilding or repairing of bridges, lights, and culverts

Damages must be directly related to the disaster

Water control assistance

Repairs to rives, dikes, levees, dams

Must fall under U.S. Army Cops of Engineers or Natural Resource Conservation System specifications

Permanent Assistance

Public Buildings/Equipment assistance

Repair or replace buildings, supplies, and vehicles

Private or self insurances must cover all applicable payments before federal reimbursements are made

Conform to preexisting capacity and standards

Buildings/equipment must have been in use before disaster

Public Utility

Water, gas, sewage system repairs