Scholarly Argumentative Paper.
RUNNING HEADER: IS FORMULA BAD FOR BABIES? 1
Is the Use Formula Bad for Babies?
Jaden Thomas
PHI103 Informal Logic
Professor VanZanten
April 22nd, 2019
- 1 -
1
1. Generally nice APA
formatting throughout the
paper. There are minor
issues with: references, the
header, citations, spacing or
indentations. [Joel
VanZanten]
RUNNING HEADER: IS FORMULA BAD FOR BABIES? 2
There’s a lot of arguments that circulate on the topic of breastfeeding vs. formula. For
example, the argument of whether if women should breastfeed in public or the argument of
whether the formula is healthy for babies and provides the same nutrients that breast milk does.
Deciding whether to breastfeed, or use formula is a tough decision to make. It is a decision that
new moms must make for their newborn(s) nutrition, the choice of choosing what they believe is
best for their baby (WebMD). Moreover, this paper will explore the question of whether the use
of formula is healthy for babies, while also studying the benefits and nutrition of breastfeeding.
One article that I found when researching whether the formula is healthy for babies was an
article titled “If you’re feeding with formula, here’s what you can do to promote your baby’s
healthy growth.” The article was posted on a website titled “The Conversation” which is an
independent, nonprofit publisher of commentary and analysis that is authorized and edited by
journalists for the public. Their mission, quoted from the site is “to promote truthful information
and strengthen journalism by unlocking the rich diversity of academic research for audiences
across America” (The Conversation, Introduction page). The article argues that no, the use of
formula isn’t bad for babies, however it is essential that parents/moms choose the formula that
will apply all the health and growth benefits that breastmilk would work for their baby without
negatively impacting their health because formula feeding can increase the risk of being
overweight or obese during childhood. The reasoning contains these fundamental premises:
Premise 1: Protein levels. Higher protein content is associated with higher weight
- 2 -
1
2
3
1. whether the use
of formula is healthy for
babies, while also studying
the benefits and nutrition of
breastfeeding.
This research question is on
the right track, but could still
be more specific. Having
specificity will help you focus
your research and paper as
we move into the week 3 and
week 5 assignments.
We ideally want to see both
arguments taking opposing
views on the exact same
topic. [Joel VanZanten]
2. The instructions ask you to
use section headings and
labels throughout the paper.
Make sure you use them.
[Joel VanZanten]
3. The premises in a standard
form argument should contain
a single idea, expressed in a
single (complete) sentence.
The same is true with a
conclusion. [Joel
VanZanten]
RUNNING HEADER: IS FORMULA BAD FOR BABIES? 3
Premise 2: Not properly following preparation instructions
Premise 3: Feeding a baby by the clock instead of on demand
Premise 4: Late transitions out of the bottle
Conclusion: The use of formula can create a high risk of weight gain and obesity during
childhood (Laws, Denney-Wilson, Appleton, & Campbell, para. 2).
After reading and evaluating the article, I feel as though the research strongly supports
each premise listed. In the article, you can find links to support the premises that would make to
argue the formula may be a risk to weight gain or obesity. For example, in the article, you can
click on links that reference the studies/findings that support the premise that infant formula
feeding practices link to unhealthy weight gain (Laws, Denney-Wilson, Appleton, & Campbell,
para. 4). I feel as though this article provided significant evidence in support of the premises of
the conclusion. I like how in the article, it does argue that formula use is terrible. However, it
explains how improper use of formula and negatively impact a baby’s weight/health. I also like
how in the article, it advises the proper way or method in which parents can use to choose the
best formula for their child as well as instructs parents on when and how the baby should be fed
the formula to prevent more than just weight gain, but tooth decay ear infections, iron deficiency
and speech difficulties. Although I feel as though the article supports its premises well, I felt
confused when reading the part of the material that mentioned “tooth decay ear infections, iron
deficiency, and speech difficulties.” I felt confused because I wasn’t sure as too high feeding
from a bottle could cause these types of things. Had the editors of the article used evidence to
support that claim, it would make their argument to their conclusion a lot stronger. Overall the
article is great.
- 3 -
1
2
1. Conclusion: The use of
formula can create a high
risk of weight gain and
obesity during childhood
This doesn't sound like the
conclusion of an article that is
supportive of formula.
Make sure that you have
arguments on OPPOSING
sides of the issue. [Joel
VanZanten]
2. The week 1 assignment
asks you to take time to
discuss the quality of the
reasoning. This involves
thinking about the logic, e.g.
What do you think are the
strengths or weaknesses of
this type of reasoning?
It also involves thinking about
the truth of the premises, e.g.
Do you think research would
back up these claims and
premises?
You haven't engaged this
section with enough depth.
[Joel VanZanten]
RUNNING HEADER: IS FORMULA BAD FOR BABIES? 4
The next article that I found on the topic of “breastfeeding vs. formula is from the
website, WebMD, titled “Breastfeeding vs. Formula.” WebMD is a website that provides
valuable health information and tools for managing your health. The article argues how breast
milk is suitable or good for babies in many ways and is also recommended by the American
Academy Pediatrics (AAP) as the best form of nutrition for babies (para. 4). The premises to
support this argument consist of:
Premise 1: It provides natural antibodies that help your baby resist illnesses, such as ear
infections (WebMD).
Premise 2: It's usually more easily digested than formula. So breastfed babies are often less
constipated and gassy (WebMD).
Premise 3: It may lower the risk of sudden infant death syndrome in the first year of your baby's
life (WebMD).
Premise 4: It may raise your child's intelligence. Studies show that breastfed babies have higher
levels of cognitive function (WebMD).
Premise 5: Breast milk may even help your child in later years, by reducing the risk of being
overweight, and of developing asthma, type 1 and type 2 diabetes, high cholesterol, Hodgkin's
disease, leukemia, and lymphoma (WebMD).
Conclusion: The American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP) recommends breast milk as the best
nutrition for infants (para. 4).
After evaluating this article, I noticed a short, yet very straight forward the article is. This
made it easy to identify the argument as well as the premises in the article. Although the article is
- 4 -
1
2
1. There is a problem with this
source... namely, that the
source itself does NOT make
an argument. It reports a
variety of issues and
concerns, but it isn't directly
argumentative.
This is a fundamentally
informative source - and it
doesn't work well for our
assignment. [Joel
VanZanten]
2. I think this presentation is
on the right track. Your task
is to identify all of the main
evidence in the article that
supports the article's position
and faithfully reconstruct the
article's argument. I think
you've done that nicely -
especially considering the
source material is more
informative than
argumentative.
One challenge with this
argument/presentation is that
it looks like a list of
supporting reasons" for a
conclusion - but not a list of
premises the drive an
inference TO the conclusion.
Strong arguments are more
than a shotgun list of reasons
- and the first step is to ask,
what sort of argument is this?
Is it deductive or inductive?
Answering these basic
questions about the structure
of the argument is both a
good way of working on
argument presentation but
also a key way of beginning
to evaluate the quality of the
reasoning, and not just the
quality of the evidence. [Joel
VanZanten]
RUNNING HEADER: IS FORMULA BAD FOR BABIES? 5
short, I feel as though it provided a lot of detailed information to support the claims as to why it
is best for an infant’s nutrition. I also like how although it is a short article, it provides links to
references in keywords or points in the article. I like this method because it keeps the article
short and sweet while giving me the option to dig deeper and expand my research on a specific
premise. With, I did explore and click the references to how breastfeeding can prevent ear
infections, as I mentioned earlier in this paper how I wished my first article provided evidence as
to how the use of formula in a bottle can cause ear infections. Overall, I love the fact that the
article was short and simple and straight to the point, while also support its conclusions and
premises.
In the end, I love how neither article degraded either breastfeeding or formula. Both
materials provided information on each opposing side regarding the choice and its benefits.
- 5 -
1
1. As before, your evaluation
of the reasoning in this
argument should be
improved.
Even at this early stage in the
course, I expect you to begin
to think about two things.
One, that the premises are
likely to be true. Two, that the
author is demonstrating
reliable reasoning or logic.
[Joel VanZanten]
RUNNING HEADER: IS FORMULA BAD FOR BABIES? 6
Reference
Breastfeeding vs. Formula Feeding. (n.d.). Retrieved from
https://www.webmd.com/baby/breastfeeding-vs-formula-feeding#2
Laws, R., Denney-Wilson, E., Appleton, J., & Campbell, K. (2019, March 15). If you're feeding
with formula, here's what you can do to promote your baby's healthy growth. Retrieved from
http://theconversation.com/if-youre-feeding-with-formula-heres-what-you-can-do-to-promote-
your-babys-healthy-growth-106165
- 6 -
[no notes on this page]