|
Video Argument Rubric - 100 Points Total
|
|
Criteria
|
Ratings
|
Pts
|
|
Introduction
|
|
5 to >4 pts
Excellent
The introduction is motivating, and hooks the viewer from the beginning.
|
4 to >2 pts
Satisfactory
The introduction is clear and coherent and evokes moderate interest/response from the viewer.
|
2 to >0 pts
Needs Improvement
The introduction does not orient the viewer to what will follow.
|
|
5 pts
|
|
Presentation of Evidence
|
|
10 to >6 pts
Excellent
Complete evidence for one side or complete evidence for both sides
|
6 to >3 pts
Satisfactory
Incomplete evidence for both sides
|
3 to >0 pts
Needs Improvement
No evidence or insufficient evidence from only one side
|
|
10 pts
|
|
Documentation
|
|
5 to >4 pts
Excellent
All elements from other sources are accurately documented.
|
4 to >2 pts
Satisfactory
Most of the elements taken from other sources are documented; however, some documentation may be inaccurate or missing.
|
2 to >0 pts
Needs Improvement
There is no documentation.
|
|
5 pts
|
|
Core Argument
Feasibility & Creativity of Solution
Review of the Subject Material
|
|
10 to >6 pts
Excellent
Compelling Argument; New, Creative Solution; Complete Review
|
6 to >3 pts
Satisfactory
Basic Argument/Good Argument Conventional Solution Basic Review/Good Review
|
3 to >0 pts
Needs Improvement
No argument/Weak argument; No solution/Unrealistic solution; No review/Weak Review
|
|
10 pts
|
|
Subject Content
|
|
30 to >21 pts
Excellent
Subject knowledge is evident throughout the video. All information is clear, appropriate, and correct.
|
21 to >10 pts
Satisfactory
Subject knowledge is evident in much of the video. Most information is clear, appropriate, and correct.
|
10 to >0 pts
Needs Improvement
Subject knowledge is not evident. Information is confusing, incorrect, or flawed.
|
|
30 pts
|
|
Video Content & Organization
|
|
10 to >6 pts
Excellent
Video includes a clear statement of purpose. Events and messages are presented in a logical order, with relevant information that supports the video’s main ideas.
|
6 to >3 pts
Satisfactory
Information is connected to a theme. Details are logical and information is relevant throughout most of the video.
|
3 to >0 pts
Needs Improvement
The video lacks a central theme, clear point of view, and logical sequence of information. Much of the information is irrelevant to the overall message.
|
|
10 pts
|
|
Conclusion
|
|
5 to >4 pts
Excellent
Excellent conclusion. Revisits all sides of the argument.
|
4 to >2 pts
Satisfactory
Satisfactory conclusion. Partially revisits all sides of the argument.
|
2 to >0 pts
Needs Improvement
No conclusion or minimal conclusion that revisits one side of the argument.
|
|
5 pts
|
|
Mechanics
|
|
5 to >4 pts
Excellent
The text and/or audio have no errors in grammar, spelling, or formatting.
|
4 to >2 pts
Satisfactory
The text and/or audio have 1-2 errors in grammar, spelling, or formatting.
|
2 to >0 pts
Needs Improvement
The text and/or audio have 4 or more errors in grammar, spelling, or formatting.
|
|
5 pts
|
|
Production
|
|
20 to >16 pts
Excellent
Video is of excellent quality and is edited. Transitions added enhance the quality of the video and transitions used do not detract from the video. There is ample evidence of visual rhetoric/graphics throughout the presentation.
|
16 to >11 pts
Satisfactory
Video is edited. A variety of transitions are used and most transitions help tell the story. Most of video has good pacing and timing. Graphics are used appropriately.
|
11 to >0 pts
Needs Improvement
Video is of poor quality and is unedited. There are no transitions added or transitions are used so frequently that they detract from the video. There are no graphics.
|
|
20 pts
|
|
Total Points: 100
|