discussion introduction
Unit 1 Discussion Board
Criteria Ratings Pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Personal Introduction
30 pts Meets or Exceeds Expected Performance Provides detailed introduction of 4-5 sentences including all suggested details. Proper English grammar, correct spelling, and complete sentences are used.
15 pts Developing Performance Makes comments to the question or task that are generally on target. Some parts of task are incomplete or missing. OR Comments do not use proper English grammar, correct spelling, or complete sentences.
0 pts Unacceptable Performance Does not provide response or response is minimal.
30 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Study Method
40 pts Meets or Exceeds Expected Performance Provides detailed responses to the task and or questions presented that are on target. Both study tip and example of how it helped the student succeed in the past are included. Uses proper English grammar, spelling, and complete sentences.
30 pts Developing Performance Makes comments to the question or task that are generally on target. Some parts of task are incomplete or missing. For example, provides study tip but no example of how it helped in past academic success. OR Does not use proper English grammar, correct spelling, and complete sentences.
15 pts Low Performing Response Minimal response with insufficient details of study tip and how it was used to promote success in the past.
0 pts Unacceptable Perfomance Does not provide response or response is off target
40 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Replies
30 pts Meets or Exceeds Expected Performance Replies with substantive and well-informed comments or feedback to at least 2 colleagues. Addresses the person by name, restates their idea, and explains in specific detail why they think the idea will be useful in the future.
15 pts Developing Performance Replies with substantive and well structured comments or feedback to 1 colleague including all of the following: Addresses the person by name, restates their idea, and explains in specific detail why they think the idea is a good one. OR Replies with minimal comments to 2 colleagues. For example, one or more of the following is missing from comments: Addresses the person by name, restates their idea, and explains in specific detail why they think the idea is a good one.
0 pts Unacceptable Performance Does not reply to colleagues. OR Replies to 1 or 2 colleagues, but answers meet none of the required standards.
30 pts