Apa style
A Scoping Review of Inclusive Education for Disability in African Countries:
Case of Nigeria
ABSTRACT
Education disparities are a global concern, especially in the third world African nations Such as Nigeria. Research studies have confirmed the many types of disparities associated with gender, disability, and poverty observed in schools generally, and taken steps towards careers particularly. Study findings suggested that girls’ enrollment in educational institutions is low, and this ratio is even lower in girls with disabilities. This seems to have significant ramifications for the country's progress. Employment, gender, poverty situation, and geographical variances all have an impact on children's school attendance. This is a literature review paper focusing on a policy analysis of secondary information out of a scoping review to show how intersectionality created problems in inclusive education and how intersectionality can positively play its role in bringing inclusive education for children with disabilities to schools and getting the same education as the other typically developing children. Predicated on the analytical synthesis, discussions on possible solutions for inclusive education in African countries are undertaken, and recommendations are made for delivering education to the doorsteps of Nigerian students with disabilities, especially girls.
A Scoping Review of Inclusive Education for Disability in African Countries:
Case of Nigeria
Knowledge is a fundamental right as well as a necessary instrument for promoting justice, progress, and stability. Fair and equitable education helps a person, contributing toward a better equitable connection amongst males and females in the long run, and encouraging sexual equality in education settings results in a robust, skilled, and valuable human resource foundation. "No development plan is better than one that includes women as essential actors," said Kofi Annan, the ex-Secretary-General of the United Nations. It provides instant advantages in terms of food, healthcare, money, and development at the household, neighborhood, and, eventually, national levels. In addition, the importance of education in the third-world nations is critical since millions of impoverished students lack access to almost any or limited education that would enable them to achieve their full capabilities in life. This might be due to a variety of factors (Carnoy & Samoff, 2014). For example, essential and vital aspects of a child's education are lacking, such as the lack of a teacher or inexperienced teachers.
Second, overcrowding in classrooms, as well as poverty or any type of mental or physical handicap and incompetency of the government of such countries to cope with such situations. The failure of the government to cope with situations could also be because of the presence of intersectionality elements in the society of such countries (Jayawardena, 2016). Factors such as disability, gender or sexual orientation, race, social status, and ethnicity, not only make a child’s life miserable but also cause their right to seek education in these third world countries taken away or compromised. A third-world country that I am especially focusing on in my paper is Nigeria, my motherland. Poverty and gender biases in Nigerian society have badly affected its education system. And on top of that children with disabilities, especially females, were considered exempt or non-eligible to get an education in the past. Men and Women's educational disparities are a worldwide concern, especially in poor nations like Nigeria. Studies have confirmed the male dominance in educational institutions, as well as in careers specifically. Therefore, examining these problems through the lens of Inclusive education is very important for Nigerian society.
Inclusive Education
Inclusive education, or inclusion which is now broadly practiced in the developed world, could be defined as the theory, and conduct of schooling children with disabilities in regular school facilities (Ainscow, M. (2005). The method is based on the idea that each and every child must be treated equitably in the educational ambiance. To put it another way, children with disabilities thrive by studying in a regular classroom, whereas their classmates without impairments benefit by getting introduced to children possessing a wide range of skills, capabilities, and demeanors. The inclusive educational approach has apparent advantages, for example, kids ought to gain interpersonal interactions in a setting that closely resembles natural development as well as advancement settings (Ajuwon, 2008). Youngsters learn language relatively successfully throughout their early years when they are surrounded by children who talk naturally and correctly. Sometimes it is wonderful to see how possibly practically, and procedurally adaptable school community settings allow kids and teenagers with bodily impairments to perform as successfully as they would without. Also, certain changes to the surroundings typically make it easier for people who do not suffer from any impairments to reach their surroundings.
Global/International trends in inclusive education
Since the globe reacts to the immense issues that are evolving because of the epidemic catastrophe, the topic of such a particular challenge became an increasingly bigger international concern. It has highlighted the critical importance of developing educational institutions that incorporate all kids and youth. In this perspective, the goal is not to get back to usual. Instead, this is a chance to establish a modern norm based on insights acquired during the worldwide financial catastrophe (Ydo, 2020). Researchers also state that "many educators and families were already aware of the need to change the school model, but the pandemic revealed the urgency and the possibility of this transformation” (Novoa & Alvim, 2020). As we have seen, several governments and public sector organizations in the Developing World are implementing realistic responses to worldwide patterns in inclusive schooling. Some nations, on the other hand, lack organizational frameworks comparable to those seen in Europe and America, where inclusive education programs originated. Although international human rights accords are vital for stimulating international discourse and acknowledging the presence of an issue, meaningful remedies must be developed on the regional level. State and regional lobbying organizations can help build regionally appropriate inclusive methods for the 21st century by providing support and funding (Schuelka & Johnstone, 2012).
Inclusive education in African countries
As per the reports published by the DEEP, (2020), through legitimizing the Protocol on the disabled children's and adults’ rights states across Sub-Saharan Africa are committed to inclusion. Several countries went even farther, enacting their separate statutes and perhaps constitutions. However, inclusive education is not the sole problem in African countries. There are several other reasons too. Just school enrolment is not enough in these countries, yet their persistence is what is more significant. Analysis by LLC, Encompass, and Center for Inclusive policies (2020) provided the data that, in Africa, overall school enrollment ratios for disabled girls are 10.1 percent less than for girls having no impairments, while 12.8 percent less for disabled boys as compared to boys having no disability. Almost 33.3 percent of people with cognitive difficulties opted to leave out in one of the Kenyan districts. Registration and persistence are frequently hampered by fiscal, physiological, and societal obstacles (Mont et al., 2020). These vary from a dearth of access to infrastructure and resources to prejudice and maltreatment, as well as a shortage of adaptable or diverse instructional approaches. Entrances through stairways and railings are among the most basic and visible adjustments, yet just 8% of academic institutions in Ghana, for instance, used them in the year 2018. In countries like Uganda, Cameroon, Zambia, Senegal, and Ethiopia almost 956 disabled kids examined had experienced at least once in their lifetime incidents of sexual and emotional assault, while those who were abused physically are almost 81.5 percent. When inclusive methods are not integrated, educational performance suffers. Almost 80% of the instructors polled agreed that a dearth of inclusion measures contributes to suspensions. Also, it results in reduced educational performance for others who stay. Hardly one in ten instructors had undergone in-service instruction to encourage inclusion learning, according to an assessment of Eleven nations. About 38.3% of instructors who dealt with students with intellectual challenges had received special requirements in educational instruction, whereas 59.9% had received no professional education on the way to interact with students having any kind of impairments (Mont et al., 2020)
Inclusive education in Nigeria
As per the Nigerian Government, a program named "Special Education" was created to meet the needs of three groups of people: a) Those with visual, physical, auditory, intellectual, behavioral, interpersonal, language, cognitive, and numerous disabilities are classified as disabled. b) The Handicapped, which includes nomadic pastoralists' children, migrant fishermen, farmworkers, and poachers. c) The Talented and Exceptional ones, which include persons (both adults as well as kids) having a high IQ and particular abilities in the crafts, innovation, singing, management, and cognitive sartorial elegance who are not appropriately stretched in ordinary institutions. Moreover, under this program, schooling for kids with special requirements is anticipated to really be accessible at all degrees, as well as the required resources to facilitate easy access to educational institutions, are anticipated to be granted (Fareo, 2020).
Also, with the strategy of including special kids in conventional classes, it is apparent that the education system of Nigeria is undergoing considerable adjustment. Since a crucial preliminary approach to achieving long-term sustainability, all sorts of mystical ideas regarding impairments must be eradicated, as they have always hindered the participation of disabled individuals in school and society. The importance of properly documenting disabled children and teenagers for efficient intervention could not indeed be overstated in this respect (Ajuwon, 2008). Every school administrator must also make the correct placement of competent certified special instructors in the primary school and secondary school settings a major consideration. Such school administrators and legislators should indeed avoid political influences to reach ill-informed judgments concerning special schooling or perhaps even regular educational programs for moral grounds. The government authorities should not just simply recommend global special education policies and procedures which are not yet been thoroughly analyzed or evaluated in underdeveloped nations. Educators, admins, various academic workers, legislators, kids both with and without impairments, as well as their families, must really be aware of the duty of teaching all kids so that everyone may attain their utmost capacity throughout the discussions as well as conversations that will take place. Regarding disabled kids, the ultimate objective ought to be equal accessibility to every available opportunity that will ensure progress in school, career, and social inclusion (Ajuwon, 2008).
Intersectionality
Intersectionality is basically the recognition of persecution, biases, and prejudice in society to isolate people based on various elements such as disability, gender or sexual orientation, race, social status, ethnicity, etc. (Gillborn, D. (2015). Intersectionality has also been employed to investigate how children at educational institutions feel privileged, disadvantaged, or perhaps a blend of both of these. It was also evidenced that the thoughts and feelings of Ecuadorian children who migrated to Spain in terms of schooling, race and sex, relocation, and dearth of residency rights, showcasing how systematic racism, shrinking labor business prospects, advertisements, regulations, and welfare institutions pervaded relationships among educators as well as learners, among educators at workplaces, among families and instructors, and among different student groups belonging to different ethnicities necessitating a variety of inclusive approaches (Balsera, 2014). The goal of inclusive schooling is to provide an educational atmosphere in which every child feels secure and comfortable in order to study and grow to their fullest capacity. Initial discussions about inclusion have been concordant with civic equality dialogue, and "advocates sought for students with disabilities the status of any minority group that was widely disenfranchised and discriminated against..." (Ferguson, 2008), to guarantee significant exposure to regular classes. Similarly, inclusiveness is described as "the theory and practice of educating children with disabilities in mainstream education settings," citing a variety of sources (Ajuwon, 2008).
Children with disabilities are increasingly having access to education in both low and middle income countries. However, they are not learning effectively as a result of segregation and social exclusion in the classroom as well as teaching methods that perpetuates inequality. Having segregated schools or classrooms perpetuates the misconceptions that children with disabilities are fundamentally different from their peers who are non-disabled and hence need to be separated or isolated which minimizes the chances of social inclusion. Therefore, in terms of academic achievements for students with disabilities, peer support is a significant resource. Despite the benefits that are associated with inclusive education, evidence shows that students with disabilities are less likely to attend a school or even complete it if they are able to enroll. Those who are able to enroll face an increased probability of undeserved discipline, violence, and bullying. Integrating children with disabilities is vital when it comes to the promotion of child development of their competencies, essential skills, as well as social relationships.
Intersectionality inducing factors
There are multiple factors that directly cause intersectionality, including poverty, gender biases, and disability. Such factors can make a child’s life miserable and their right to seek education in these third world countries is specially taken away or compromised.
Poverty
Poverty has wreaked havoc on the public's livelihoods in Nigeria, depriving them of even the most basic necessities. Hunger hits deep, determining public belief in Nigeria as well as dictating how they should spend their lives. Nigeria's system was a complete failure as its inhabitants never had a good living and enough work for any of them to survive (Amzat, 2010). Furthermore, the Nigerian administration is beset by dishonesty, which is the basis of the crisis in the nation. The corruption of the state is at the root of just about everything. Inequality is caused by corruption, which results from a poor or uneven allocation of the country's assets and justice. Corruption has buried Nigeria's whole structure under the Dead Sea, making it difficult for the government to function. Regarding education, a link has been discovered involving lack of education and poverty. Poverty directly influences the sort of qualifications that individuals in Nigeria ought to have. The public education system is devastated by poverty. Educational institutes are only a ghost of what they once were (Amzat, 2010).
Gender Biases
Teaching girls is a proven social strategic plan or a lengthy commitment that pays out handsomely. Even though the Government has passed a series of amendments and laws relating to "Universal Basic Education", it is now essential to put these laws into action by transforming primary and secondary schools into training centers with adequate means and staff. To allow every girl to reach her best capacity via equitable right to schooling, these obstacles must be removed. States should implement a strategy of integrating a participatory approach through major policy frameworks, according to the Global Conference on Women, to raise awareness of the underprivileged status of female children. Additionally, via societal information exchange approaches, families must also be educated and aware of the benefits of schooling (Alabi & Alabi, 2014).
Mutual effect of intersectionality inducing elements
It is evident that there are numerous signs of the way impoverishment and impairment interact. Impoverishment and impairment, for example, both can lead to lower educational attainment, according to research (Fareo, 2020). Educational institutions either regular ones or those for special children "frequently do not provide sufficient provision for the unique educational requirements of children with impairments," Slightly earlier impairment, in effect, might lead to reduced educational opportunities. Furthermore, delayed impairment in the context of learning as because of impoverishment implies that a person's education resources never transform into useful capability when they become disabled. Poor education is a contributory factor to impoverishment amongst disabled persons (Groce & Bakhshi, 2011). Mitra and his colleagues, (2011) also claimed that unemployment has a negative effect on schooling as well. Intersectionality is used to illustrate that perhaps the interplay of sexuality, disabilities, racism, and unemployment restricts females’ accessibility to school, leading to subsequent professional marginalization. In many underdeveloped nations, the ratio of employment amongst persons with impairments was less as compared to for quasi persons (Mizunoya & Mitra, 2013). However, deprivation of employment and impoverishment has an influence on such events as well. Loeb and his colleagues found that the unemployment rate is even higher in the eastern boundaries of South Africa. They also discovered employment ratios are considerably different between impaired and quasi working-age persons. Nevertheless, there have been considerable variances mostly in Western Cape, in which the business is better, with the labor force participation rate amongst normal persons nearly twice as compared to the impaired ones.
Intersectionality: problem for inclusive education in African countries
Employing intersectionality with an academic perspective enables the assessment of the concurrent interplay between sexual identity, impairment, background, racial group, and category for any child, and the interaction among such children or collective attributes and organizational feedback to each other organizational (Grant & Zwier, 2011). While Waitoller and Kozleski, (2013) explained in their study that intersectionality can help clarify why some pupils (for example, a migrant student with conduct disorders) experience highly variable tiers of marginalization in academic institutions due to the way academic institutions confront or fail to acknowledge the interplay of their personalities, rather responding to just one facet of pupils' requirements. For example, educational institutions give handicap support to children based on their disabilities, as well as migrant children receive assistance with linguistic acquisition and stressful experiences. Whatever, though, causes a refugee kid with any impairment to go through. This kid would not receive the social assistance required, because these identification indicators are not properly differentiated and the domain of duty is not explicitly established (Walgenbach, 2017). Child's identities and abilities might be subsumed by how they are thought to be diverse, leading to a homogeneous picture of individuals. The perspective by which instructors may promote literacy inside the organizational environments wherein they operate is narrowed by these standard conceptions of pupils, which are incorporated into the pedagogical policy. Consequently, if a child is classified as requiring special assistance in one regard, other parts of the kid's requirements may be missed. Grant & Zwier, (2011) states that intersectionality can be very valuable in this situation. It proposes a multi-strategy to "more completely resolve concerns" of demand, fairness, and equality in current institutions by analyzing and conceptualizing instructional problems. Some academics believe that inclusive education requires a multi-dimensional paradigm. Similarly, many researchers explained the immediate need for intersectionality as described by Slee, (2001) "the discussion across intersections of class, race, gender, and disability reminds us both of the specificity and the general applications of claims for inclusive education" It is important to recognize that inclusive education is indeed a lengthy but slow process aimed at developing efficient solutions to prevent marginalization in an increasingly varied setting.
Ainscow, (2005) stated that in order to combat marginalization and adapt constructively to heterogeneity, inclusiveness is a notion that is invariably changing. As per the ebb & flow group, intersectionality, too, must always be considered continuously since it is always evolving in accordance with fresh advances and multidimensional socio-economic imbalances throughout time. It is a dynamic process that is always evolving in reaction to a united oppressive system. Intersectionality should be employed in relation to comprehensive inclusive schooling to underline the idea that pupils that are disadvantaged and biased typically face numerous types of banishment and stigmatization, not just on the interpersonal basis, but as well as on the institutional threshold. On the other hand, according to Hancock, (2007), such impacts produce the societal and academic inequality that inclusivity advocates aspire to eliminate, but rather find themselves locked in since they lack understanding of the overlapping character of such consequences while defining and implementing the educational system. When investigators combine such ideas, intersectionality aids in identifying prejudice and exclusionary practices, whereas inclusiveness aids in addressing such issues and creating the utmost effective educational environment conceivable for any and all children. The premise that the classifications employed for personal qualities such as identification identifiers are socially created is crucial to bridging intersectional and inclusiveness. Gillborn, (2015) says that these classifications generate divisions among people, that society perpetuates and reinforces. Social disparities are created and perpetuated through the connections and sociological domains of organizations, rather than being pre-existing and fundamental. Social terms like "migrant" and "refugee" are immutable trait inventions that are employed to legitimize, justify, and preserve a community's sociological structure.
United Nations’ role to eradicate impoverishment
The UN Millennium Conference approved 8 MDGs in the year 2000, with the deadline year of 2015 to accomplish them. Few of the very first objectives, eradicating severe hunger and poverty as well as achieving universal basic literacy, were intertwined. Poverty reduces the possibilities of acquiring any schooling, although education is also among the primary strategies for overcoming poverty. It is a global issue that has negative consequences for practically every element of domestic life as well as kids' results (Engle & Black, 2008). This study looks at how poverty impacts children's educational results, as well as treatments that were successful in boosting child academic results for low-income households in both developed countries like America and developing nations like Nigeria. Likewise, kids in emerging nations are far more likely than affluent kids to not ever join education, as well as the discrepancies, are significant. As per a survey conducted 12 percent of kids in the highest income group never went to school, so although 38 percent of kids within the lowest income group never went to school. Such disparities are particularly strongly linked to maternal affluence and schooling as compared to region and ethnicity. Poverty-affected children do worse in class. Studies reveal that there are substantial positive connections between social and economic position and pupil accomplishment among nations, age groups, and educational disciplines. Furthermore, in most nations, socioeconomic factors in success rates, also known as socioeconomic slopes, occur, demonstrating social standing disparity in exam outcomes (Engle & Black, 2008).
Salamanca Manifesto regarding inclusive Education
Although inclusivity is often linked with children with impairments, there seem to be a lot of perspectives that cover a variety of target demographics (Miles & Singal, 2010). The Salamanca Manifesto of the year 1994, emphasizes that inclusiveness must aim to assist all oppressed and underprivileged groups and compensate for multidimensional social inequalities that restrict pupils' academic success. Whereas an accommodating strategy does have the capacity to help a wide range of societal categories, the majority of the debates focus on pupils with impairments. Because it became a consequence of the Global Convention on "Special Needs Education", Miles and Singal contend that Salamanca Manifesto inherently relates inclusive education to people with impairments. The concentration on fulfilling the student's needs instead of forcing students to conform to a current framework is also at the heart of inclusion (Ajuwon, 2008). Throughout this vein, it is suggested that we should deliver facilities to students and personalize these to meet specific requirements. Moreover, according to Ferguson (2008), instructors should strive to give training help and accommodations instead of pedagogically imparting content to pupils.
UNESCO guidelines regarding inclusive education on global level
UNESCO in the year of 2011, established “Open File" resources to assist legislators, state authorities, and officials in advancing inclusive education in various regions. They provide a mechanism for legislators in various nations to rely on global expertise in directing their respective institutions further towards inclusiveness. Employees with management roles in public education departments, municipal governments, regional operations and service centers, private groups, NGOs (Non-Governmental Organizations), as well as other organizations are expected to be using the "Open File". While such important elements in the establishment of comprehensive inclusive schooling, the "Open File" is not mainly preoccupied with federal legislators or teaching practice. Federal policies, on the other hand, are primarily a political matter, whereas instructional practice and problems of intrinsic school improvement and organization are efficaciously addressed in UNESCO's "earlier teacher education resource pack, Special Needs in the Classroom, which is referenced all across the Open File" (UNESCO, 2020).
Barriers to inclusive education in the global context
There seem to be various challenges to delivering training to exceptional children in a traditional classroom setting, including all types of irrational assumptions regarding impairments, which have had for centuries prevented participation in learning and the society by disabled people. When these are accomplished, students with special challenges will be free to enjoy a unique adventure by participating in inclusive classrooms alongside their quasi peers. Hurdles to inclusive classrooms settings can be resolved by raising understanding about what integration does and the societal advantage it has, ensuring that school systems have had the funding and aptitude to reorganize their learning system to accommodate all learners, hiring educators having the skill sets and competency to encounter variable pressures in the lecture hall, and possessing support from family. The goal of this form of teaching for disabled kids is to provide them with equal exposure to options that would ensure their performance in school, work, and societal inclusion (Jacob & Olisaemeka, 2016). Conducting education or activity study to reduce investigator interference and tribalism is really nothing novel. Nevertheless, recognizing the merits and demerits of a gendered emphasis may be utilized to develop crucial perspectives about certain educational systems. At the moment, having a concentration appears to be turning things around. It is necessary to invert the rationale of the study. Originating from the holy summit and participating in the prescriptive 'how far' procedure, the typical strategy for reaching such an examination of institutions is what one would call the greatest universal number strategy. Studies on females, academic management, as well as the Developing Country studies, on the other hand, are not about focusing on females whatsoever. To do that might be to reinforce a detrimental sex disparities perspective and divert attention away from a more in-depth examination of the why but for whom authority in classrooms is evolved to be exerted in a specific manner. The cross-examining of the engrained and chosen to take gender aspects and speech by which instructional regulation is arbitrated is just the first move toward the development of new hypotheses of schooling management that would give both male and female teachers more adaptability and self-control. It is anticipated that further study, would allow institutions to emerge not only as "woman-friendly," but also "user-friendly" in general (Davies, 1987).
Barriers to implementing inclusion in Nigeria
In Nigeria, special needs schooling has still been beset by policy development but also execution issues, and the general public's and administration's dismissive stance toward disabled people, creating a climate that is not favorable to enabling practicing. As a result, establishing inclusiveness in a setting could be impractical and detrimental. Special needs training must be prioritized to ensure successful deployment. To put it another way, at the present, inclusion is merely a notion, and it is not a reality that can be practiced (Sunal & Mutua, 2013). Disabled students who would be integrated into regular schooling courses get interpersonal and intellectual gains even without stigmatized segregation or squeeze classes. Nevertheless, there are various obstacles to inclusiveness, including insufficient special instructors to educate disabled kids, a shortage of materials and infrastructure, and a lack of government financing, to name a few. To attain the intended outcomes, the administration, institutional authorities, educators, society, and families must all work together to address the issues (Fareo, 2020).
SSA has made mixed success despite a rising worldwide agreement on the importance of implementing inclusion. There are a few obstacles are recognized in underdeveloped regions pertaining to schooling, along with inadequate facilities as well as instructional resources, the abrogation of preschool programs, prejudice in the provision of services, a scarcity of appropriately skilled practitioners, as well as bad infrastructural facilities (Eleweke & Rodda, 2002). Special requirements schooling is considered expensive and unimportant, and administrations cannot be taken completely accountable if they neglect to deliver the required programs for people with impairments due to a dearth of legislative backing. Such are essential challenges in education, and learners having impairments are substantially affected because of their existing stigmatized standing in several countries. When it comes to these difficulties, Nigeria is one of a kind. In the history of counters of western Africa, as per Garuba, (2003), schooling for disabled students has indeed been exceedingly unequal, distinguished by commonalities and shatters, as well as a varied spectrum of characters. For example, from around the year 1945 to the year 1970, individual charitable organizations and benefactors offered support and programs for disabled people. Obiakor, (1998) further explains that Nigeria kept the imperial system of education as well as proceeded to hire overseas instructors after liberation, instead of adopting a philosophy of education that catered to the nation's demands and goals. After the Nigerian Civil War, which was from 1967 to 1970, the state's dedication to inclusion grew, as did its focus on improving the country's overall schooling infrastructure.
National Policy on Education in Nigeria
The decade 1970s was a period of significant academic improvements, such as the development of additional academic institutions and the introduction of grants, thanks to the priority on national reconciliation and finance from increasing oil earnings. Also, with the establishment of compulsory basic schooling in the year 1976, inclusive education acquired even more traction. A revised NPE was introduced in the year 1977 (Obiakor, 1998). While Eleweke, (2002) claimed that this strategy emphasizes equalizing academic chances for children with impairments and giving the tools for students to develop into self-sufficient, productive individuals. The NPE policy of the year 1977 paved the way for the inclusive education of disabled pupils in normal learning environments. Garuba, (2003), further explained that "at Ibadan, Jos, and the then-Federal Advanced Teachers College", additional educator development courses were also formed. Regrettably, several of such gains were undermined by the worldwide recession as well as the World Bank's adoption of SAP also called the structural adjustment program in the year 1980. The Nigerian authorities were forced to decrease state outlays, and schooling expenditures for each person declined dramatically during the period of the 1980s (Babalola, Lundwangya, & Adeyinka, 1999).
Research aims and objectives
The main objectives of this study are to examine issues centering around inclusive education as follows: Inclusive education for children in African countries and especially in Nigeria, Intersectionality between gender biases, disabilities, and poverty and its direct impact on the education of children; The policies that the Nigerian government has made to eradicate disparities between disabled and normal children, Implementation of special education policies in African countries especially focusing on Nigeria and the global concern and obligations to play their role in this regard in third world countries.
Research questions
My scoping review paper will answer several research questions through policy analysis of study synthesis. These questions include:How does inclusive education conceptualize in the existing literature as to policies and practices globally, in African countries, and especially in Nigeria?, What are some key barriers to inclusive education for students with disabilities in Nigeria, and are there similarities between Nigeria and other African countries, in this regard?
What have the Nigerian authorities done so far? How intersectionality has been part of the problem for inclusive education in African countries? And how are they willing to make it better? What solutions are there through the lens of intersectionality for promoting inclusive education in Nigeria and other African countries?
Methods
A scoping review was carried out using a multi-step procedure. Due to the general variety of conceptual contexts important to the analysis of inclusion, this type of evaluation was chosen. Scoping reviews look for pre-existing literature on important topics and the many types of supporting evidence that may be discovered. Scoping reviews attempt to summarize the range of academic findings on a given issue. This technique was relevant for the exploration of my study since it sought to interpret and integrate worldwide literature from a variety of perspectives on inclusive education and intersectionality, patterns, and challenges in inclusive education for students with disabilities in African nations, especially focusing on Nigeria. Overall inclusion and exclusion criteria, the importance of inclusive education, barriers such as gender biases and disability in education for children and leading to unemployment for adults, intersectionality between poverty, gender biases, and disability, as well as major causes and potential solutions. Furthermore, these secondary resources assisted in obtaining information regarding the dimensions that governments have employed, as well as WHO and UNICEF policies that were recommended to address the problem. In order to perform scoping review research, I followed the steps outlined in the subsequent section.
Identifying relevant studies
Data collection is a method of gathering evidence on a certain research subject, then analyzing and evaluating the resulting statistics to acquire a better understanding of the subject (de la Croix et al., 2018). On my own, I devised search techniques. Employing a combination of important phrases, I found related publications in ERIC, PubMed, PsychINFO, EBSCO, and Sci-hub, prominent databases in academic and social sciences. I used the following key search terms such as: Inclusion, inclusive education, intersectionality, global trends of inclusive education, disabled children, education, third-world nations, barriers, Nigeria, and/or African countries. One inquiry, for instance, included the terms "Inclusive education," "Nigeria," and "African nations." In each database, various sets of search phrases were input. There were hundreds of articles in all, even repetitions, as a result of all these searches. The abstracts of almost all of the papers generated from the search were then checked for policy reports and empirical research papers published in a peer-reviewed publication in English between 1999 and 2022, which met the inclusion criteria.
Besides review articles, information was obtained from various online websites to ascertain how intersectionality has contributed to the problem of inclusive education in African countries and what solutions can be found through the lens of intersectionality for promoting inclusive education in Nigeria and other African countries. Finally, data were gathered through reports published by official and non-governmental organizations. UNICEF and WHO reports employed in the current study provided statistical data. Additionally, the websites of LLC, Encompass, and the Center for Inclusive Policies, as well as DEEP, were utilized to gather statistical data on this topic. Owing to the broadness of the inclusion criteria, additional criteria were established to discover articles related to the scoping review's core goal of understanding the implementation of policies and barriers regarding inclusive education. Studies that were not relevant to inclusive education were omitted. In addition, articles that did not involve students with impairments were eliminated.
Study selection
Multiple qualitative data analysis methodologies from secondary resources were utilized to analyze the acquired data, which assisted in defining the study's conclusions and in identifying the differences between the data and the outcomes. Secondary sources regarded as the most prevalent and reliable were utilized. Those articles with duplicate abstracts were eliminated in the first go. Because of the escalating urgency for inclusive education, there is a pressing imperative to gather the information that underlines the importance of inclusion in education. So, I especially focused on inclusion and exclusion criteria and eliminated all the irrelevant articles. For example, articles concentrating on inclusive education but eliminating the intersectionality factors were discarded. Articles with high citation numbers were employed. Later on, I read the full articles and wrote this scoping review to the best of my capabilities and keeping the authenticity at its best.
Validity, Reliability, and Ethical Considerations
Concerns on Authenticity, Credibility, and Ethics Secondary source approaches such as webpages, organizational reports, and online peer-reviewed publications are all dependable and therefore beneficial in providing legitimate results and conclusions of the implementation of inclusive education policies. The secondary source data is accurate and credible since it has not been altered and is presented after many writers have reviewed it (Summers et al., 2019). Several ethical issues arise throughout the research process, the most essential of which is appropriately crediting sources. Because secondary sources are employed for data collecting and sampling in the present study, it is vital to reference anything included in the study from the sources. If the study work is not correctly mentioned, it might result in major infractions and, in certain cases, catastrophic penalties (Wangmo et al., 2019). Finally, in utilizing data from secondary sources, it is important to remember that certain material will not damage someone or compromise their integrity; alternatively, the investigators would have ethical problems.
Major cause of the problem regarding inclusive education (Results)
Intersectionality is employed in relation to inclusion in general and inclusive education particularly to underline the idea that individuals who are marginalized or persecuted typically face numerous types of stigmatizations as well as inequalities, not just on an interpersonal basis, yet at the institutional stage. Hancock, (2007) explains that such effects produce the societal and academic division those inclusive classrooms campaigners aspire to eradicate, however rather find themselves locked in so that many neglects to acknowledge the interconnected structure of such effects while defining and implementing an inclusive education system. When researchers combine such theories, intersectionality might aid in identifying racism and exclusionary mechanisms, whereas inclusion might aid in addressing such issues and creating the utmost effective educational environment attainable for everyone including pupils.
Figure 1: Intersection Union (Besic, 2020).
Solution of the problem regarding inclusive education
We discovered that instructors were conscious of many aspects of identities and attempted to address individualized education requirements. Instructors, on the other hand, were more conscious of how overlapping child characteristics are related to receiving excellent schooling and how practices lead to inequality. Instructors tended to evaluate their pupils to dominant concepts of linguistic proficiency, cultural status, and cognitive-behavioral abilities. Intersectionality also helps the teachers to get to know their students in a better way. However, disabled children based on their social status i.e., poverty, are more prone to bullying. So, intersectionality helps the trained inclusive education instructor to develop and maintain policies that will ultimately help the students, especially the impaired students.
Analysis of children based on enrolment in schools
Some analytical studies carried out in some African countries revealed the ratio of children enrolled in school. These ratios explained the rational difference between normal children’s enrolment, as well as the enrolment of disabled children. In this analysis, they also compared the percentage of girls versus boys’ school enrolment as well as disabled girls versus disabled boys’ School enrolment. The analysis by LLC, Encompass, and Center for Inclusive policies (2020) provided the data that, in Africa, overall school enrollment ratios for disabled girls are 10.1 percent less than for girls having no impairments, while 12.8 percent less for disabled boys as compared to boys having no disability. Almost 33.3 percent of people with cognitive difficulties opted to leave out in one of the Kenyan districts. Registration and persistence are frequently hampered by fiscal, physiological, and societal obstacles (Mont et al., 2020). These vary from a dearth of access to infrastructure and resources to prejudice and maltreatment, as well as a shortage of adaptable or diverse instructional approaches. Entrances through stairways and railings are among the most basic and visible adjustments, yet just 8% of academic institutions in Ghana, for instance, used them in the year 2018 (Mont et al., 2020). Further ratios of children enrolled in school at the elementary level in different zones of Nigeria are explained in the table as well as graphically represented.
When inclusive methods are not integrated, educational performance suffers. Almost 80% of the instructors polled agreed that a dearth of inclusion measures contributes to suspensions. Also, it results in reduced educational performance for others who stay. Hardly one in ten instructors had undergone in-service instruction to encourage inclusion learning, according to an assessment of Eleven nations. About 38.3% of instructors who dealt with students with intellectual challenges had received special requirements in educational instruction, whereas 59.9% had received no professional education on the way to interact with students having any kind of impairments (Mont et al., 2020). In countries like Uganda, Cameroon, Zambia, Senegal, and Ethiopia almost 956 disabled kids examined had experienced at least once in their lifetime incidents of sexual and emotional assault, while those who were abused physically are almost 81.5 percent.
Challenges of policy implementation in African countries
In contrast to issues at the educational institutes and cultural levels, concerns also with the execution of inclusion policies seem to originate in particular to inconsistencies in Educational White Paper. According to the Department of Education, (2001), there are advantages of policy measures, is the cost efficiency of inclusiveness. However, Stofile (2008), stated that it is challenging to see how notable alterations to Africa's instructional framework can be achieved without offering regional divisions with considerable rises in brief financing to assist in taking such requisite first stages. It is possible that the uncertainty in economic resources and administrative tasks is deliberate. Several African rules are adopted for ideological significance instead of pragmatism; as a result, imprecise regulations are frequently approved; nobody is made responsible for effective execution (Jansen, 2001). Stofile (2008), further explained that indeed, school administrators in Africa's province of Eastern Cape complained that they received the sense that the federal Education department never was dedicated to implementing the comprehensive inclusion strategy and had attempted to delegate their obligations to everyone else.
Challenges to policy implementation in Nigeria
Cost
Inclusion is hampered by a lack of financial resources. Experts and supplementary personnel are required to educate disabled children in regular educational courses. Organizing programs and providing specific help to students necessitates more funding, which many institutions lack, especially in this economic climate. Insufficient financing might stymie continuous technical training that brings experts and teaching staff up to speed on optimal inclusive strategies.
Misrepresentation
A nasty perception is among the most significant obstacles to inclusion in school. This mindset and prejudice, like many in the community, is frequently the result of a paucity of education and awareness. To eliminate dogmas regarding the cause of handicaps and to alter the anxieties and mythologies about disabled children which create confusion and impede pleasant conversation, mass awareness tasks in educational institutes must start by instructing the educational institutes as well as and the public.
Lacking Skilled Staff
In a classroom with disabled children, an instructor without inclusive education capabilities may well not perceive the necessity to describe orientations or placements while discussing specific items or concepts. Whereas many researchers including Ajuwon, (2008) indicated they remained patient with different attitudes inside the inclusive environment, to their students. they were less confident to handle the conduct of special children in Nigeria. Ease of access
Disabled people cannot study in an inclusive school setting if they are unable to even enter classes or dorms. Fareo, (2020) further explained that any institutions currently have escalators, stairs, concrete walkways, and elevators that allow wheelchair kids to enter and exit facilities.
Course Adjustments
As the setting has to be approachable to disabled children, the syllabus and curricula must also allow for an inclusive classroom setting. Instructors ought to be adaptable with how they instruct and assess the skill and comprehension of their pupils.
Collaboration
The effectiveness of a framework for implementing inclusive education is hampered by a shortage of interaction among administration, instructors, experts, employees, families, and children. Educators and professionals will require the opportunity to connect and develop well-thought-out strategies for identifying and implementing modifications, adjustments, and particular objectives for children individually (Omede, 2016). To satisfy a child's requirements and enhance learning, cooperation between educators, and professionals, including families of a disabled child is required.
Equipment and Resources
Fareo, (2020) said that most the kids with exceptional needs benefit from a setting rich in educational resources. Helpful gadgets or helpful smart gadgets are the terms for such educational materials. Research reveals that a dearth of necessary infrastructure and resources is a key barrier to successful mainstreaming deployment.
The rationality of the literature used
In this paper, I used over 30 articles, to describe inclusive education and intersectionality and its global and African countries’ trends, especially focusing on Nigeria.
Figure 2: Ratio of Literature
Discussion and conclusion
According to literature synthesis, disabled kids who are integrated into educational courses gain personally and intellectually without the prejudice of being isolated or drawing classes in primary schooling. Children with categories have much more opportunities to meet better norms by becoming autonomous students since the expectations for conduct and teaching are greater. Inclusion further into regular is also thought to allow kids with impairments to gain from the stimulus of mingling with students who are comparatively more capable and to witness better standards of interpersonal and intellectual behavior. Enhanced connectivity and interpersonal interplay prospects, age-appropriate approaches to behavior skills, quite active engagement in the educational setting, individualized schooling objectives, and availability to the core classes are all social and academic advantages of integration for all classmates, regardless of having disabilities or not having any. All children thrive from a relevant, demanding, and relevant program, as well as varied education strategies that target their individual talents and weaknesses. According to research, even kids without impairments can flourish in inaccessible environments. Scholastic achievement is equivalent to or better than that of comparison groupings of kids schooled in a quasi-environment, and disabled children in integrated contexts do not severely restrict or disrupt school time for their non-disabled classmates. People without impairments learn from the inclusive environment because it fosters partnerships and raises understanding of differences.
In terms of interpersonal relationships, inclusive schooling helps students to form bonds with classmates and experience reduced societal stress as a result of their disability. Several individuals feel that kids who are integrated into regular classes have a stronger identity than kids who are separated into other classes solely since they are special or need special attention. The adoption of the inclusive school setting, as opposed to a segmented schooling system, offers a few benefits. It teaches pupils without impairments to embrace and understand impaired kids, among other things. Increase the socialization of impaired youngsters. It lowers the expense of offering special schooling for students with and without disabilities without even any specific requirements; it removes or decreases the stigmatization attached to persons with disabilities and particular requirements; promotes a children's overall growth, both with as well as without disabilities particular requirements; and allows youngsters who do not have specific requirements to have a good attitude in the direction of individuals with disabilities. With the approach of including kids with disabilities in conventional classes, it is apparent that perhaps the education system of Nigeria is undergoing considerable adjustment. Because of a crucial preliminary move in assuring long-term achievement, all sorts of irrational ideas about a disability must be eradicated, as they have traditionally prevented persons with impairments from participating in school as well as the society. The importance of accurate registration of toddlers and teenagers with impairments for successful training must not be overstated in this respect. Every school administrator should also make the correct placement of accessible certified special teachers in the different school grades a concern.
In this paper, I characterized inclusion and inclusive education and emphasized the significance of expanding the extent of inclusive schooling in different countries of South Africa especially focusing on Nigeria, where it concentrates primarily on kids with impairments along with many other attributes like poverty and gender biases. After then, the fundamental philosophical paradigm, interdependence, was introduced. Not only did I articulate the intersectionality premise, yet I also emphasized that an intersectionality perspective in inclusive schooling is necessary for identifying the interactions of several variables that contribute to exclusionary practices in education targeting various groups of students. Moreover, I demonstrated that while considering inclusive schooling, within-group inequalities must be recognized. Despite the fact that intersectional has indeed been neglected in inclusive education studies, I emphasize the necessity of "thinking intersectionality" in the inclusive pedagogical study and educational practice. Putting it different perspective, shifting the attention from disabled students to all kids emphasizes the imperative to extend the notion of inclusion schooling. Since present inclusive school metrics and regulations are solely focused on kids with impairments, an expansion of the concept of inclusive education is required. This concentration, undoubtedly, provided for significant fundamental improvements in the institution for kids with impairments. D Between disparities between students, on the other hand, must be investigated. Studies and policymakers overlook the wider image by concentrating on only one identification indicator, for example, handicap, notably, that kids are exempted/precluded from several dimensions. Using a single-axis paradigm does not adequately represent inclusive education since most people with disabilities often have yet other identifications that further marginalize them. Additionally, simplifying a complicated problem by concentrating on just one cause of variance in understanding academic performance failure of various student groupings. It also is deceptive to suggest that the educational system operates in a bubble, unaffected by culture as well as the activities that occur inside it. Such aspects necessitate re-centering inclusive education discussion at the crossroads of various personality indicators pertaining to learners, as well as the framework and broader community; embracing a much more subtle research method and attempting to avoid the brief portrayal of persons based on just one authenticity indicator.
To correlate inclusiveness with comprehensive inclusive schooling or assimilation is a fallacy. Although these phrases have been employed interchangeably, there is no evidence that they actually signify a comparable thing. The term inclusion brings to mind the past practices of excluding specific groups of people from educational institutions because of their socioeconomic condition or impairments. Owing to the Global Proclamation of Basic Principles (1948) as well as the United Nations Agreement on the Responsibilities of the Children (1990), which acknowledges everybody's entitlement to comprehensive and obligatory schooling, such traditions progressively altered. As a result of these pronouncements, these separated groups were able to be integrated into or incorporated into the educational structure. Inclusion is the term used to describe this activity. It is diametrically opposed to the conventional methods of exclusive schooling among the rich and educational marginalization among the impoverished. Inclusionary education refers to the procedures meant to keep historically marginalized groups in the school setting and enhance their learning. Researchers must examine all restrictive, marginalizing issues in the educational system, never just amongst various student organizations, yet also inside them, to alter the structure.
To put this idea into reality, there are certain challenges. Achieving inclusive education therefore in a broader sense would very certainly necessitate adjustments in mindsets as well as behaviors at all levels of the educational system. Nonetheless, as soon as a particular criterion of student diversity (mainly impairment) remains the primary emphasis of inclusive education, its execution will be riddled with preconceptions thinking inclusive education is just a continuation of special schooling. Such is particularly concerning when one considers that every individual is not simply a person with impairments, yet simply a kid with several orientations. If academics and professionals neglect to recognize within-group variations in any of such categories, children who are subjected to intersectionality prejudice will be made inaccessible or unfulfilled in terms of their individual needs. So, in inclusive education, the need to undermine the existing quo by destabilizing instructional practices and policies that preserve an emphasis on disabled children whilst marginalizing others, particularly those whose several dimensions of distinction cross. To summarize, inclusive education must be based on a better comprehension of the pupils provided by schools today, as well as an essential recognition of the societal relics of snag that pervade schools as well as other sociocultural structures, especially at a moment when certain circumstances are growing increasingly perhaps quite complex and difficult because of relocation and transnationality.
Recommendations
To demonstrate Nigeria's devotion to comprehensive inclusion schooling, legislative action is required. That includes the removal of the notion of "special schools'' from the National Education policy of Nigeria, allowing for complete sociological inclusion of disabled students within conventional education systems. In addition, an immediate enumeration to discover each citizen's impairment is required to provide proper preparatory work for inclusionary schooling in the country. The state's education initiatives must be strongly pushed to assure the elimination of discrimination and stereotypical conduct toward handicapped individuals. The UBE legislation must contain measures for handicapped kids that incorporate suitable training and avocational resources and tools. To guarantee that academic provision is accessible to each and every kid, conventional educational instructors must undergo extensive education and training in inclusion methodologies and abilities. They will also be taught in handicap evaluation activities. Extensive and pedagogically competent study into the individual requirements and preferences of a distinct category of students with special demands is required to establish how effectively to assimilate kids into traditional classroom culture and community. Among the kids of anglers, livestock ranchers, and archers, it is necessary to develop a traditionally sensitive classroom atmosphere wherein the coursework is customized to the conventional profession and current capabilities are offered for students in traditional educational environments. In order to implement a successful comprehensive educational policy, both commissions working for inclusive education must both be intensified. Such commissions are the Universal Basic Education Commission and National Commission for Nomadic Education. For this purpose, an enhancement in educational funding provision beyond the existing under 10 percent of the total to the UN benchmark of 26 percent of overall GDP is now advocated. This additional funding must go toward providing suitable educational services and infrastructural facilities, along with healthcare staff (particularly medics and physiotherapists) to assist Nigeria's inclusive educational system. Nevertheless, after providing enough buildings and services for comprehensive schooling, an effective legislative mechanism to penalize anti-inclusive academic conduct must be established. Any conduct that obstructs the implementation of Nigerian inclusive education shall be punished with a penalty or a sentence of one year in custody.
References
Ainscow, M. (2005). Understanding the development of an inclusive education system.
Ajuwon, P. M. (2008). Inclusive education for students with disabilities in Nigeria: Benefits,
challenges and policy implications. International journal of special education, 23(3),
11-16.
Alabi, T., & Alabi, O. S. (2014). Female education: A sociological analysis of girl-child
education in Nigeria. International Journal of Educational policy research and
review, 1(1), 006-013.
Babalola, J., Lundwangya, G., & Adeyinka, A. (1999). Education under structural adjustment
in Nigeria and Zambia. McGill Journal of Education, 34, 79–98. Retrieved from
http://mje.mcgill.ca/article/viewFile/8460/6393
Balsera, M. R. (2014). Young migrants’ aspirations, expectations and perspectives of well-
being investigated using biographical narratives, the capability approach and
intersectionality.
Besic, E. (2020). Intersectionality: A pathway towards inclusive education? Prospects, 49(3),
111-122.
Carnoy, M., & Samoff, J. (2014). Education and social transition in the Third World.
In Education and Social Transition in the Third World. Princeton University Press.
Davies, L. (1987). Research dilemmas concerning gender and the management of education
in third world countries. Comparative Education, 23(1), 85-94.
de la Croix, A., Barrett, A., & Stenfors, T. (2018). How to… do research interviews in
different ways. The clínical teacher, 15(6), 451-456.
Eleweke, C. J., & Rodda, M. (2002). The challenge of enhancing inclusive education in
developing countries. International Journal of Inclusive Education, 6(2), 113-126.
Eleweke, C. J. (2002). A review of issues in deaf education under Nigeria's 6-3-3-4 education
system. Journal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education, 7(1), 74-82.
Engle, P. L., & Black, M. M. (2008). The effect of poverty on child development and
educational outcomes. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1136(1), 243-
256.
Fareo, D. O. (2020). Prospects and Challenges of Inclusion of Children with Disabilities into
Regular School Setting in Nigeria. Saudi Journal of Humanities and Social
Sciences, 5(6), 269-273.
Ferguson, D. L. (2008). International trends in inclusive education: The continuing challenge
to teach each one and everyone. European Journal of special needs education, 23(2),
109-120.
Garuba, A. (2003). Inclusive education in the 21st Century: Challenges and opportunities for
Nigeria. Asia Pacific Disability Rehabilitation Journal, 14, 191–200. Retrieved from
http://www.aifo.it/english/resources/online/apdrj/apdrj203/inclued-nigeria.pdf
Gillborn, D. (2015). Intersectionality, critical race theory, and the primacy of racism: Race,
class, gender, and disability in education. Qualitative Inquiry, 21(3), 277-287.
Grant, C. A., & Zwier, E. (2011). Intersectionality and student outcomes: Sharpening the
struggle against racism, sexism, classism, ableism, heterosexism, nationalism, and
linguistic, religious, and geographical discrimination in teaching and learning.
Multicultural perspectives, 13(4), 181-188.
Groce, N. E., & Bakhshi, P. (2011). Illiteracy among adults with disabilities in the developing
world: A review of the literature and a call for action. International Journal of
Inclusive Education, 15(10), 1153-1168.
Hancock, A. M. (2007). When multiplication doesn't equal quick addition: Examining
intersectionality as a research paradigm. Perspectives on politics, 5(1), 63-79.
Jacob, U. S., & Olisaemeka, A. N. (2016). Inclusive education in the 21st century: Parameters
and opportunities for learners with special needs. European Scientific Journal, 12(10).
Jansen, J.D., (2001). Symbols of change, signals of conflict. In A Kraak & M Young (eds).
The Implementation of Education Policies, 1990–2000. Pretoria: Human Sciences
Research Council.
Jayawardena, K. (2016). Feminism and nationalism in the Third World. Verso Books.
Miles, S., & Singal, N. (2010). The Education for All and inclusive education debate:
Conflict, contradiction or opportunity? International Journal of Inclusive Education,
14(1), 1–15. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13603110802265125
Mitra, S., Posarac, A., & Vick, B. (2013). Disability and poverty in developing countries: a
multidimensional study. World Development, 41, 1-18.
Mizunoya, S. & Mitra, S., (2013). Is there a disability gap in employment rates in developing
countries?, in World Development 42, 28–43. doi:10.1016/j.worlddev.2012.05.037
Mont, D., Mulcahy-Dunn, A., & Venetis, E. (2020, December 1). USAID Studies Explore
Current Trends in Disability Inclusive Education in Sub-Saharan Africa . Education
Links. Retrieved May 20, 2022, from http://www.edu-links.org/learning/usaid-
studies-trends-disability-inclusive-education-
africa#:%7E:text=Countries%20 throughout%20Sub%2DSaharan%20Africa
,legislation%20and%2 For%20constitutional%20provisions.
Obiakor, F. E. (1998). Special education reform in Nigeria: Prospects and challenges.
European Journal of Special Needs Education, 13(1), 57-71.
Omede, A. A. (2016). Policy framework for inclusive education in Nigeria: Issues and
challenges. Public Policy and Administration Research, 6(5), 33-38.
Slee, R. (2001). Social justice and the changing directions in educational research: The case
of inclusive education. International journal of inclusive education, 5(2-3), 167-177.
Statista. (2022, February 1). Enrollment rate elementary school in Nigeria 2018, by zone and
gender. Retrieved May 21, 2022, from
https://www.statista.com/statistics/1129980/enrollment-rate-elementary-school-in-
Stofile, S. Y. (2008). Factors affecting the implementation of inclusive education policy: A
case study in one province in South Africa (Doctoral dissertation, University of the
Western Cape).
Summers, R., Wang, S., Abd-El-Khalick, F. and Said, Z., 2019. Comparing likert scale functionality across culturally and linguistically diverse groups in science education research: An illustration using qatari students’ responses to an attitude toward science survey. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 17(5), pp.885-903.
Sunal, C. S., & Mutua, K. (Eds.). (2013). Research on the influences of educational policy on
teaching and learning. IAP.
UNESCO. (2020). Towards inclusion in education: Status, trends and challenges. The
UNESCO Salamanca Statement 25 Years on.
Waitoller, F. R., & Kozleski, E. B. (2013). Working in boundary practices: Identity
development and learning in partnerships for inclusive education. Teaching and
Teacher Education, 31, 35-45.
Walgenbach, K. (2017). Heterogeneity-Intersectionality-Diversity in Education (Vol.
8546). etc.
Wangmo, T., Lipps, M., Kressig, R.W. and Ienca, M., 2019. Ethical concerns with the use of intelligent assistive technology: findings from a qualitative study with professional stakeholders. BMC medical ethics, 20(1), pp.1-11.