powerpoint

Tamcw
UnitVI.docx

Using t Test and ANOVA With Sun Coast Remediation Data Set 1

Using t Test and ANOVA With Sun Coast Remediation Data Set 5

Data Set

Tammie Witcher

Columbia Southern University

Data Analysis: Hypothesis Testing

Independent Samples t Test: Hypothesis Testing

Ho4: There is no statistically significant difference in mean values for Group A and Group B.

Ha4: There is a statistically significant difference in mean values for Group A and Group B.

Table 1: Two-sample independent t-test assuming equal variances

 

Group A Prior Training Scores

Group B Revised Training Scores

Mean

69.79

84.77

Variance

122.00

26.96

Observations

62.00

62.00

Pooled Variance

74.48

Hypothesized Mean Difference

0.00

df

122.00

t Stat

-9.67

P(T<=t) one-tail

0.000

t Critical one-tail

1.66

P(T<=t) two-tail

0.000

t Critical two-tail

1.98

 

The two tailed p-value leads to the rejection of the null hypothesis, t(122) = -9.67, p = 0.000. It is therefore concluded that there is a statistically significant difference in the means for group A (M = 69.79, SD = 122) and group B (M =84.77, SD = 26.96) at the 1% level of significance.

Dependent Samples (Paired Samples) t Test: Hypothesis Testing

Ho5: There is no statistically significant difference in mean values for Pre-Exposure μg/dL and Post-Exposure μg/dL.

Ha5: There is a statistically significant difference in mean values for Pre-Exposure μg/dL and Post-Exposure μg/dL.

Table 2: Two-sample pared t-test

 

Pre-Exposure μg/dL

Post-Exposure μg/dL

Mean

32.86

33.29

Variance

150.46

155.50

Observations

49.00

49.00

Pearson Correlation

0.99

Hypothesized Mean Difference

0.00

df

48.00

t Stat

-1.93

P(T<=t) one-tail

0.030

t Critical one-tail

1.68

P(T<=t) two-tail

0.060

t Critical two-tail

2.01

 

The two tailed p-value of the paired t test leads to the rejection of the null hypothesis, t(96) = -1.93, p = 0.030. It is therefore concluded that there is a statistically significant difference in the means for Pre-Exposure μg/dL (M = 32.86, SD = 150.46) and Post-Exposure μg/dL (M = 33.29, SD = 155.50) at the 5% level of significance.

ANOVA: Hypothesis Testing

Ho5: All the groups means are the equal.

Ha5: There exists at least one group mean that is statistically significantly different from the other group means.

Table 3: Single factor analysis of variance

SUMMARY

Groups

Count

Sum

Average

Variance

A = Air

20.00

178.00

8.90

9.36

B = Soil

20.00

182.00

9.10

3.04

C = Water

20.00

140.00

7.00

6.63

D = Training

20.00

108.00

5.40

1.41

ANOVA

Source of Variation

SS

df

MS

F

P-value

F crit

Between Groups

182.80

3.00

60.93

11.92

0.000

2.72

Within Groups

388.40

76.00

5.11

Total

571.20

79.00

 

 

 

 

The p-value of the results of the ANOVA procedure leads to the rejection of the null hypothesis that all the group means are equal, F(3, 76) = 11.92, p = 0.000. It is therefore concluded that there is at least one group mean that is statistically significantly from the other means at the 1% level of significance.