Assignment
FIGURE 1
| SUMMARY INFORMATION |
| 1. Discuss the overall purpose of this data and how it should be used in analyzing the effectiveness of the program. |
| 2. Using the data contained in this figure, discuss the implications with regard to the effectiveness of the program. |
| FIGURE 1: SUMMARY OF PATHWAY'S STAFF FEEDBACK |
| Staff were provided with anonymous written surveys and asked to comment on specific aspects of the current interventions in place. Below are a sample of questions and responses to staff. |
| Question 1. How successful are the current intervention plans? |
| Responses: |
| Very successful. All the kids inappropriate behavior has decreased |
| Still a lot of inappropriate behavior. |
| I do not understand how to implement the new behavior plans. They take too much time and do not work. |
| Question 2. What did you learn from the staff training provided by Acme? |
| Responses: |
| How to identify the functions of behavior. |
| That behavior can get worse when given attention. |
| I did not learn anything new. |
FIGURE 2
| SUMMARY INFORMATION | ||||||||||
| 1. Use visual analysis and discuss the level, trend, and variability of the challenging behavior incidents reported during baseline (before) and treatment (after the intervention). | ||||||||||
| 2. Using the data, describe the effect that the intervention had on the frequency of behavior incidents within Pathways. | ||||||||||
| 3. Considering the level of data, as well as any trends in the data, discuss the effectiveness of the program. | ||||||||||
| FIGURE 2: FREQUENCY OF CHALLENGING BEHAVIORS | ||||||||||
| Baseline (No Program) | Intervention (Program Implemented) | |||||||||
| Month | SEPT | OCT | NOV | DEC | JAN | FEB | MAR | APR | MAY | June |
| fx of challenging behavior incidents | 248 | 270 | 290 | 250 | 290 | 240 | 150 | 100 | 80 | 30 |
Figure 2
SEPT OCT NOV DEC JAN FEB MAR APR MAY June 248 270 290 250 290 240 150 100 80 30Month
fx of challenging behavior incidents
before program (Baseline)
FIGURE 3
| SUMMARY INFORMATION | ||
| 1. Calculate the total frequency of physical aggression for each observer. | ||
| 2. Using the total count method of IOA, calculate the percentage of Inter-observer Agreement. | ||
| 3. Discuss the result of IOA. - Is the IOA percentage within the acceptable range? - Discuss what changes should be considered in relation to increase the IOA percentage. If changes are not necessary discuss what factors contribute to high percentage of Inter-observer agreement. | ||
| 4. Discuss how IOA measures can be used to assist with determining the effectiveness of the program. | ||
| FIGURE 3: OBSERVER DATA ON FREQUENCY OF PHYSICAL AGGRESSIOON DURING 10 MIN OBSERVATION | ||
| Interval | Observer 1 | Observer 2 |
| 1 | 1 | 1 |
| 2 | 2 | 2 |
| 3 | 1 | 2 |
| 4 | 4 | 4 |
| 5 | 3 | 3 |
| 6 | 1 | 1 |
| 7 | 2 | 1 |
| 8 | 2 | 1 |
| 9 | 2 | 2 |
| 10 | 1 | 2 |
| Notes | ||
| Each interval represents 1 minute of observation. | ||
| Both observers were presented with the same defintion for physical aggression and told to mark down the frequency of the behavior for each 1 minute interval. | ||
| The data in each column labeled observer represents the total frequency of physical aggression recorded for that observer during each 1 minut interval. |
FIGURE 4
| SUMMARY INFORMATION | |||
| 1. Calculate the percent correct results of the treatment integrity checklist before intervention, 1 day after intervention, and at the 3-month follow up. - This is the total factors with a “Yes” out of the total number of factors, multiplied by 100. | |||
| 2. Relate these treatment integrity measures to the effectiveness of the program. | |||
| 3. Discuss the importance of treatment integrity in relation to the success of behavior management programs. | |||
| FIGURE 4: STAFF TREATMENT INTEGRITY CHECKLIST | |||
| An integrity checklist was completed by the supervisor overseeing the implementation of the new behavior intervention plans created along with Pathways. The staff were observed during a 30 minute session and were marked correct or incorrect based on their performance on the measures listed below. Following is the integrity data for one staff member before the staff training, immediately following the training, and at a 3 month follow up. | |||
| KEY FOR CHART | |||
| Correct= Yes Incorrect= No | |||
| Observation 1 (Baseline) | Observation 2 (1 day after training) | Observation 3 (3 month follow up) | |
| Environmental Set Up: | |||
| 1. Has all materials and reinforcers ready | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| 2. Instruction area free of distraction | No | Yes | No |
| 3. Establish rapport with child | No | Yes | Yes |
| 4. Obtain child’s attention before delivering instruction | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| 5. Natural tone of voice | No | No | No |
| 6. Correct responses were reinforced | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| 7. Pair social reinforcement with tangible/edible reinforcement | No | Yes | Yes |
| Management of Problem Behaviors: | |||
| 8. Use appropriate prevention strategies | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| 9. React unemotionally to problem behaviors | No | Yes | No |
| 10. Ignore problem behavior when appropriate | No | Yes | No |