Unit 2 Assignment: Fibreboard Paper Products Corp. v. NLRB (HRM 341)

Unit 2 Assignment: Fibreboard Paper Products Corp. v. NLRB

Due Date: 11:59 pm Sunday of Unit 2 Total Points: 100 Overview: For our first assignment, we will focus on explaining the concept of mandatory bargaining and the duties of employers. In this case study, you will explore the role of the Supreme Court and what actions caused this complaint in the first place.

Instructions:

Refer to case study 5.10 - Fibreboard Paper Products Corp. v. NLRB on page 177 of your textbook. Then answer the following three questions provided at the end of the case study:

1. What company action caused this complaint?

2. What remedy did the Board order?

3. With this decision, did the Supreme Court expand the scope of mandatory bargaining to include all subcontracting situations?

Requirements:

 Be sure to read the assignment instructions and rubric carefully before beginning.

 Use full sentences and appropriate academic language in all work.

 Use Microsoft Word to complete the assignment.

 Follow standard APA guidelines (proper margins, double-spaced, Times New Roman

font, and 12-point font)

 Use APA citation format and include a reference/work cited page when necessary.

 Each question should have an answer of 250-words or more in length.

 Include an introduction and conclusion.

 Label cover page of all assignments with your full name, course title, and date.

Be sure to read the criteria, by which your paper/project will be evaluated, before you write, and again after you write. Response to questions #1-#3 will be evaluated at a maximum of 25 points each question based on the rubric

below.

HRM341 Employment Law

Evaluation Rubric for Unit 2 Assignment

CRITERIA Deficient Proficient Exemplary

(0 - 2 Points) (3 - 4 Points) (5 Points)

Introduction Does not provide an adequate introduction or

is missing.

Introduction is presented, though may not be clear or

complete.

Introduction is clearly presented and provides the reader a context for the rest of the response.

(0 – 16 Points) (17 - 21 Points) (22 - 25 Points)

Question #1 Response

Did not highlight a company action that

caused this complaint. Did not provide an

adequate response – less than 200 words.

Did highlight a company action that

caused this complaint. Did not provide an

adequate response – between 201-249

words.

Clearly highlighted a company action that

caused this complaint. Provided a more than

accurate response – 250 words or more.

Question #2 Response

Did not highlight the remedy that the Board

ordered. Did not provide an adequate response – less than

200 words.

Did highlight the remedy that the Board

ordered. Did not provide an adequate response – between

201-249 words.

Clearly highlighted the remedy that the Board ordered. Provided a more than accurate

response – 250 words or more.

Question #3 Response

Did not answer the question or did not

explain why or why not. Did not provide an

adequate response – less than 200 words.

Answered the question. Did not

provide an adequate response – between

201-249 words.

Answered the question. Provided a more than

accurate response – 250 words or more.

(0 - 5 Points) (6 - 8 Points) (9 - 10 Points)

Assignment Requirements

References and citations missing or formatting does not

resemble APA.

References and citations are present

with some errors.

References and citations are present and near

perfect.

Clear and professional writing and format

Errors impede professional

presentation; guidelines not followed.

Few errors that do not impede professional

presentation.

Writing and format is clear, professional, and

error free.