human services
Print
Case Study Scenario for a Nonprofit, For-Profit, or Government Organization Scoring Guide
Due Date: Unit 7 Percentage of Course Grade: 20%.
Case Study Scenario for a Nonprofit, For-Profit, or Government Organization Scoring Guide| Criteria | Non-performance | Basic | Proficient | Distinguished |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Describe a selected case study scenario for a selected human services organization. 16% | Does not describe a selected case study scenario for a selected human services organization. | Describes a selected case study scenario but not as if it involved a selected human services organization or the description in incomplete, inaccurate, or otherwise flawed. | Describes a selected case study scenario for a selected human services organization. | Describes a selected case study scenario for a selected human services organization. Describes the stakeholders within the organization. |
| Analyze a leadership theory or model that might apply to service delivery for a selected human services scenario. 12% | Does not analyze a leadership theory or model that might apply to service delivery for a selected human services scenario. | Analyzes a leadership theory or model but it does not apply to service delivery for a selected human services scenario or the analysis is incomplete, inaccurate, or otherwise flawed. | Analyzes a leadership theory or model that might apply to service delivery for a selected human services scenario. | Analyzes a leadership theory or model that might apply to service delivery for a selected human services scenario. Explains specific ways the theory or model could apply to the scenario. |
| Analyze gaps in services in a human services scenario and examine how a leadership theory or model could be used to build community relationships to fill these gaps. 12% | Does not analyze gaps in services in a human services scenario and examine how a leadership theory or model could be used to build community relationships to fill these gaps. | Analyzes gaps in services in a human services scenario but does not examine how a leadership theory or model could be used to build community relationships to fill these gaps, or the analysis is incomplete or otherwise flawed. | Analyzes gaps in services in a human services scenario and examines how a leadership theory or model could be used to build community relationships to fill these gaps. | Analyzes gaps in services in a human services scenario and examines how a leadership theory or model could be used to build community relationships to fill these gaps. Describes other possible stakeholders who might be engaged in building community relationships or filling service gaps. |
| Evaluate the social, political, cultural, legal, and economic factors that affect interagency and multi-agency collaboration. 12% | Does not evaluate the social, political, cultural, legal, and economic factors that affect interagency and multi-agency collaboration. | Evaluates some but not all of the social, political, cultural, legal, and economic factors that affect interagency and multi-agency collaboration; or the evaluation is inaccurate or flawed. | Evaluates the social, political, cultural, legal, and economic factors that affect interagency and multi-agency collaboration. | Evaluates the social, political, cultural, legal, and economic factors that affect interagency and multi-agency collaboration. Provides specific examples of factors affecting agency collaboration. |
| Analyze for a selected organization how leadership styles and decisions are shaped by community, social, political, legal, and economic factors. 12% | Does not analyze for a selected organization how leadership styles and decisions are shaped by community, social, political, legal, and economic factors. | Analyzes for a selected organization how leadership styles and decisions are shaped by community, social, political, legal, and economic factors, but the analysis is incomplete, inaccurate, or otherwise flawed. | Analyzes for a selected organization how leadership styles and decisions are shaped by community, social, political, legal, and economic factors. | Analyzes for a selected organization how leadership styles and decisions are shaped by community, social, political, legal, and economic factors. Provides a specific example reflecting how a leadership style shaped one or more key factors. |
| Analyze multisystemic, multicultural concerns specific to a selected organization. 12% | Does not analyze multisystemic, multicultural concerns specific to a selected organization. | Analyzes multisystemic, multicultural concerns specific to a selected organization, but the analysis is incomplete, inaccurate, or otherwise flawed. | Analyzes multisystemic, multicultural concerns specific to a selected organization. | Analyzes multisystemic, multicultural concerns specific to a selected organization. Provides some specific examples of concerns in the identified organization. |
| Integrate literature from 6–8 academic sources (journal articles or textbooks) in the analysis of a human services scenario. 12% | Does not integrate literature from 6–8 academic sources (journal articles or textbooks) in the analysis of a human services scenario. | Integrates literature from fewer than 6 academic sources (journal articles or textbooks) in the analysis of a human services scenario or the sources are not academic or are unrelated to the scenario. | Integrates literature from 6–8 academic sources (journal articles or textbooks) in the analysis of a human services scenario. | Integrates literature from 6–8 academic sources (journal articles or textbooks) in the analysis of a human services scenario. Sources are cited in text and in references. |
| Write in a manner consistent with the expectations of the human services profession. 12% | Does not write in a manner consistent with the expectations of the human services profession. | Writes in a manner consistent with the expectations of the human services profession but with frequent errors or lapses. | Writes in a manner consistent with the expectations of the human services profession. | Writes in a manner consistent with the expectations of the human services profession. Uses proper APA style and formatting for all content, in-text citations, and references. |