Can you answer this question ?

mwhitener2011
TopicProposalGradingRubric1.docx

EDUC 703

Topic Proposal Grading Rubric

Criteria

Levels of Achievement

Content

Advanced

Proficient

Developing

Not present

Topics, Guiding Questions, & Article Selection

17 to 18 points

PHILOSOPHER TOPIC: Name is from the list.

HISTORICAL TOPIC: Narrow, specific, and relevant to the field.

BOTH GUIDING QUESTIONS: Clear, focused, concise, yet complex enough to require investigation in order to answer; meaningful & relevant to the field.

BOTH ARTICLE SELECTIONS: Titles align with topics and guiding questions.

15 to 16 points

PHILOSOPHER TOPIC: Name is from the list.

HISTORICAL TOPIC: Relevant.

BOTH GUIDING QUESTIONS: Relevant.

BOTH ARTICLE SELECTIONS: Titles somewhat align with topics and/or guiding questions.

1 to 14 points

PHILOSOPHER TOPIC: Name is not from the list.

HISTORICAL TOPIC: Too broad, vague, and/or irrelevant to the field.

GUIDING QUESTIONS: One or both are unclear; too simple; and/or irrelevant to the field.

ARTICLE SELECTIONS: One or both titles do not align with topics and/or guiding questions.

0 points

Not present

Structure

Advanced

Proficient

Developing

Not present

Mechanics &

APA Article Reference Format

4 points

Assignment is free of errors in APA format, spelling, grammar, or punctuation. Graduate-level writing style displays exceptional composition with all of the following elements: coherent, cohesive, effective sentence structures.

3 points

Few errors in APA format, spelling, grammar, or punctuation. Clear writing style displaying basic composition with most of the following elements: coherent, cohesive, effective sentence structures.

1 to 2 points

Several errors in APA, spelling, grammar, or punctuation; and/or writing includes several errors in multiple categories: coherent, cohesive, effective sentence structures.

0 points

Not present