2 Pages Reflection paper
Guest
FreeText
Blank page. Keep going
Guest
Line
Guest
Line
Guest
Line
Guest
Line
Guest
Line
Guest
Line
Guest
Line
Guest
Line
Guest
Line
Guest
Line
Guest
Line
Guest
Line
Guest
Line
Guest
Line
Guest
Line
Guest
Line
Guest
Line
Guest
Line
Guest
FreeText
Good writers will tell you what they are going to do. That is what's happening here.
Guest
FreeText
Guest
FreeText
Insert text here
Guest
Line
Guest
Line
Guest
Line
Guest
Line
Guest
Line
Guest
Line
Guest
Line
Guest
FreeText
Here they describe the incompatibility of these two approaches
Guest
Line
Guest
Line
Guest
Line
Guest
Line
Guest
Line
Guest
Line
Guest
Line
Guest
Line
Guest
Line
Guest
Line
Guest
Line
Guest
Line
Guest
Line
Guest
Line
Guest
Line
Guest
Line
Guest
Line
Guest
Line
Guest
Line
Guest
Line
Guest
Line
Guest
FreeText
Also note the use of active voice here. "We want to suggest..." Another example of good writing
Guest
FreeText
This is a very empirical, rather than theory-driven argument, which is emblematic of the overall argument they are making
Guest
Line
Guest
Line
Guest
Line
Guest
Line
Guest
Line
Guest
Rectangle
Guest
Rectangle
Guest
Line
Guest
Line
Guest
Line
Guest
Line
Guest
Line
Guest
Line
Guest
Line
Guest
Line
Guest
Line
Guest
Line
Guest
Line
Guest
FreeText
This marks the end of the 'introduction' section and gives a road map of where the rest of the article is going.
Guest
Line
Guest
Line
Guest
Line
Guest
Line
Guest
Line
Guest
Line
Guest
Rectangle
Guest
FreeText
Intro of the theory
Guest
FreeText
Data that support the theory
Guest
Line
Guest
Line
Guest
Line
Guest
Line
Guest
Line
Guest
Line
Guest
Line
Guest
Line
Guest
FreeText
Actually, we will discuss this claim ^ with some new thoughts/evidence.
Guest
Rectangle
Guest
FreeText
More theory
Guest
FreeText
More data for this new piece of the theory
Guest
Line
Guest
Rectangle
Guest
Rectangle
Guest
Line
Guest
Line
Guest
Line
Guest
Line
Guest
Line
Guest
Line
Guest
FreeText
Think: Any problems with this strategy?
Guest
Line
Guest
Line
Guest
Line
Guest
Line
Guest
Line
Guest
Line
Guest
Line
Guest
Line
Guest
Rectangle
Guest
Line
Guest
Line
Guest
Line
Guest
FreeText
Specifically, these neurochemicals are released when children snuggle with their mothers AND when lovers touch each other (and when people pet dogs)
Guest
Line
Guest
Line
Guest
Line
Guest
Line
Guest
Line
Guest
Line
Guest
FreeText
Aha, see!
Guest
Line
Guest
Line
Guest
Line
Guest
Line
Guest
FreeText
Do you think only in pairs?
Guest
Line
Guest
Line
Guest
Line
Guest
Line
Guest
Line
Guest
Line
Guest
Line
Guest
Line
Guest
Line
Guest
Line
Guest
Line
Guest
Line
Guest
Line
Guest
Line
Guest
Line
Guest
Line
Guest
Rectangle
Guest
Line
Guest
Line
Guest
Line
Guest
Line
Guest
Line
Guest
Line
Guest
Line
Guest
Line
Guest
FreeText
You should be familiar with these from other psych classes. Now applied to human sex
Guest
Line
Guest
Line
Guest
Line
Guest
Line
Guest
Line
Guest
Line
Guest
Line
Guest
Line
Guest
Line
Guest
Line
Guest
Line
Guest
Line
Guest
Line
Guest
Line
Guest
Line
Guest
Line
Guest
Line
Guest
Line
Guest
FreeText
Can you think of a useful example to illustrate this?
Guest
Line
Guest
Line
Guest
Line
Guest
Line
Guest
Line
Guest
Line
Guest
Line
Guest
Line
Guest
FreeText
Remember this when we get to reparative therapy programs later
Guest
Line
Guest
Line
Guest
Line
Guest
Line
Guest
Line
Guest
Line
Guest
Line
Guest
Line
Guest
Line
Guest
Line
Guest
Line
Guest
Line
Guest
Line
Guest
FreeText
Make sense? The language here is kind of technical
Guest
FreeText
We use this in IO psych a LOT
Guest
Rectangle
Guest
Line
Guest
FreeText
Similar to equity theory, if you are familiar with that
Guest
Line
Guest
Line
Guest
FreeText
Aha, this is equity theory here
Guest
Line
Guest
Line
Guest
Line
Guest
Line
Guest
Line
Guest
Line
Guest
Line
Guest
Line
Guest
FreeText
This is now describing something similar to expectancy theory. It's interesting how these theories for sexual behavior are also used in other domains (e.g., work motivation)
Guest
FreeText
Again, an assumption of just two people here
Guest
Line
Guest
Line
Guest
Line
Guest
Line
Guest
Line
Guest
Line
Guest
Line
Guest
Line
Guest
Line
Guest
Line
Guest
Line
Guest
Line
Guest
Line
Guest
Line
Guest
Line
Guest
Line
Guest
Line
Guest
Line
Guest
Line
Guest
Line
Guest
Line
Guest
Line
Guest
Line
Guest
Line
Guest
FreeText
So, here we are shifting to the other main types of arguments that were introduced earlier
Guest
Line
Guest
Line
Guest
Line
Guest
Line
Guest
Line
Guest
Line
Guest
Line
Guest
Line
Guest
Line
Guest
Line
Guest
Line
Guest
Line
Guest
Line
Guest
Line
Guest
Line
Guest
Line
Guest
Line
Guest
Line
Guest
Line
Guest
Line
Guest
Line
Guest
Line
Guest
Line
Guest
FreeText
I'm noticing here that the language is now a bit harder to follow and much more technical. I'm guessing that one author wrote the previous section and the other wrote this one. This is a sign of bad writing (we shouldn't be able to tell a difference)
Guest
Line
Guest
Line
Guest
Line
Guest
Line
Guest
Line
Guest
FreeText
This is important but notice how the flowery language obscures meaning
Guest
FreeText
Do you think it is possible to convey these ideas in a more simple way? Why do you think this last sentence is so long?
Guest
Line
Guest
Line
Guest
Line
Guest
Line
Guest
Line
Guest
Line
Guest
Line
Guest
Line
Guest
Line
Guest
Line
Guest
Line
Guest
Line
Guest
Line
Guest
Line
Guest
Line
Guest
Line
Guest
Line
Guest
Line
Guest
Line
Guest
Line
Guest
Line
Guest
Line
Guest
Line
Guest
Line
Guest
Line
Guest
Line
Guest
Line
Guest
Line
Guest
Line
Guest
Line
Guest
Line
Guest
Line
Guest
Line
Guest
Line
Guest
Line
Guest
Line
Guest
Line
Guest
Line
Guest
Line
Guest
Line
Guest
Line
Guest
Line
Guest
Line
Guest
Line
Guest
Line
Guest
Line
Guest
Line
Guest
Line
Guest
Line
Guest
Rectangle
Guest
Line
Guest
Line
Guest
Line
Guest
Line
Guest
Line
Guest
Line
Guest
Line
Guest
Line
Guest
Line
Guest
Line
Guest
Line
Guest
Line
Guest
Line
Guest
Line
Guest
Line
Guest
Line
Guest
Line
Guest
Line
Guest
FreeText
You can skip the rest and stop reading here if you like