Leadership in Organizations.
Leadership Research Findings, Practice, and Skills
Eighth Edition
ANDREW J. DuBRIN Rochester Institute of Technology
Australia • Brazil • Mexico • Singapore • United Kingdom • United States
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
© 2016, 2014, 2012, 2009 Cengage Learning
This is an electronic version of the print textbook. Due to electronic rights restrictions, some third party content may be suppressed. Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. The publisher reserves the right to
remove content from this title at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it. For valuable information on pricing, previous editions, changes to current editions, and alternate formats, please visit www.cengage.com/highered to search by
ISBN#, author, title, or keyword for materials in your areas of interest.
Important Notice: Media content referenced within the product description or the product text may not be available in the eBook version.
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
Leadership: Research Findings, Practice, and Skills, Eighth Edition
Andrew J. DuBrin
Vice President, General Manager, Social Science & Qualitative Business: Erin Joyner
Product Director: Michael Schenk
Senior Product Manager: Scott Person
Senior Content Developer: Julia Chase
Associate Content Developer: Sarah Ginn
Product Assistant: Brian Pierce
Marketing Director: Kristen Hurd
Brand Manager: Robin LeFevre
Market Development Manager: Emily Horowitz
Marketing Coordinator: Chris Walz
Art and Cover Direction, Production Management, and Composition: Lumina Datamatics, Inc.
Intellectual Property Project Manager: Amber Hosea
Intellectual Property Analyst: Diane Garrity
Manufacturing Planner: Ron Montgomery
Cover Image: © Paul Sutherland Photography/ Photographer’s Choice/Getty Images
© 2016, 2013 Cengage Learning
WCN: 02- -
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. No part of this work covered by the copyright herein may be reproduced, transmitted, stored, or used in any form or by any means graphic, electronic, or mechanical, including but not limited to photocopying, recording, scanning, digitizing, taping, Web distribution, information networks, or information storage and retrieval systems, except as permitted under Section 107 or 108 of the 1976 United States Copyright Act, without the prior written permission of the publisher.
For product information and technology assistance, contact us at Cengage Learning Customer & Sales Support, 1-800-354-9706
For permission to use material from this text or product, submit all requests online at www.cengage.com/permissions
Further permissions questions can be emailed to permissionrequest@cengage.com
Library of Congress Control Number: 2014945003
ISBN: 978-1-285-86636-9
Cengage Learning 20 Channel Center Street Boston, MA 02210 USA
Cengage Learning is a leading provider of customized learning solutions with office locations around the globe, including Singapore, the United Kingdom, Australia, Mexico, Brazil, and Japan. Locate your local office at: www.cengage.com/global
Cengage Learning products are represented in Canada by Nelson Education, Ltd.
To learn more about Cengage Learning Solutions, visit www.cengage.com
Purchase any of our products at your local college store or at our preferred online store www.cengagebrain.com
Printed in the United States of America Print Number: 01 Print Year: 2014
200 203
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
To Rosie, Clare, Camila, Sofia, Eliana, Julian, Carson, and Owen
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
CONTENTS
BRIEF
CHAPTER 1 The Nature and Importance of Leadership 1
CHAPTER 2 Traits, Motives, and Characteristics of Leaders 35
CHAPTER 3 Charismatic and Transformational Leadership 72
CHAPTER 4 Leadership Behaviors, Attitudes, and Styles 108
CHAPTER 5 Contingency and Situational Leadership 145
CHAPTER 6 Leadership Ethics and Social Responsibility 178
CHAPTER 7 Power, Politics, and Leadership 209
CHAPTER 8 Influence Tactics of Leaders 247
CHAPTER 9 Developing Teamwork 277
CHAPTER 10 Motivation and Coaching Skills 309
CHAPTER 11 Creativity, Innovation, and Leadership 344
CHAPTER 12 Communication and Conflict Resolution Skills 380
CHAPTER 13 Strategic Leadership and Knowledge Management 418
CHAPTER 14 International and Culturally Diverse Aspects of Leadership 448
CHAPTER 15 Leadership Development and Succession 483
Glossary 516
Indexes 521
iv Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s).
Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
CONTENTS
PREFACE xix
CHAPTER 1 The Nature and Importance of Leadership 1 The Meaning of Leadership 2
Leadership as Shared Responsibility and Collaboration 4 Leadership as a Relationship 4 Leadership Versus Management 5
The Impact of Leadership on Organizational Performance 7 Research and Opinion: Leadership Does Make a Difference 7 Research and Opinion: Formal Leadership Does Not Make a Difference 8
Leadership Roles 10 Leadership Self-Assessment Quiz 1-1: Readiness for the Leadership Role 11 Leadership Skill-Building Exercise 1-1: My Leadership Role Analysis 15 Leader in Action: Rosalind Brewer, Top Executive at Sam’s Club, Makes an Impact 16 The Satisfactions and Frustrations of Being a Leader 17
Satisfactions of Leaders 17 Dissatisfactions and Frustrations of Leaders 18
A Framework for Understanding Leadership 20 Skill Development in Leadership 22 Leadership Skill-Building Exercise 1-2: My Leadership Portfolio 23 Leadership Self-Assessment Quiz 1-2: The Leadership Experience Audit 24 Followership: Being an Effective Group Member 24
Types of Followers 25 Essential Qualities of Effective Followers 26 Collaboration Between Leaders and Followers 27
Summary • Key Terms • Guidelines for Action and Skill Development 27–28 Leadership Case Problem A: Elon Musk, Business Leader and Superhero 29 Leadership Case Problem B: Does Julia Share Too Much Responsibility? 31 Notes 32
v Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s).
Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
CHAPTER 2 Traits, Motives, and Characteristics of Leaders 35 Personality Traits of Effective Leaders 37
General Personality Traits 37
Leadership Self-Assessment Quiz 2-1: How Self-Confident Are You? 39 Leadership Self-Assessment Quiz 2-2: Behaviors and Attitudes of a Trustworthy Leader 43 Leadership Skill-Building Exercise 2-1: Enthusiasm, Optimism, and Warmth on the Job 46
Task-Related Personality Traits 47
Leadership Self-Assessment Quiz 2-3: My Tendencies Toward Being a Proactive Personality 48 Leadership Motives 53
The Power Motive 54 The Drive and Achievement Motive 55 Tenacity and Resilience 55
Cognitive Factors and Leadership 56 Cognitive (or Analytical) Intelligence 56 Knowledge of the Business or Group Task 57 Creativity 57 Insight into People and Situations 58 Farsightedness and Conceptual Thinking 58
Leader in Action: Kevin A. Plank, Founder of Under Armour Inc. 59 Leadership Skill-Building Exercise 2-2: Group Feedback on Leadership Traits 60 The Influence of Heredity and Environment on Leadership 60 The Strengths and Limitations of the Trait Approach 62 Summary • Key Terms • Guidelines for Action and Skill Development 63–64 Leadership Case Problem A: Store Manager, Ensign Jimmy Badger 65 Leadership Case Problem B: Blunt Brittany 67 Leadership Skill-Building Exercise 2-3: My Leadership Portfolio 68 Leadership Skill-Building Exercise 2-4: Analyzing the Traits, Motives, and Characteristics of a Well-Known Leader 68 Notes 68
CHAPTER 3 Charismatic and Transformational Leadership 72 The Meanings of Charisma 73
Charisma: A Relationship Between the Leader, Group Members, and Other Stakeholders 74
The Effects of Charisma 75
Three Types of Charismatic Leaders 76 Characteristics of Charismatic Leaders 77
vi CONTENTS
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
Leadership Self-Assessment Quiz 3-1: A Checklist of Behaviors and Attitudes Reflecting Charisma 80 The Vision Component of Charismatic Leadership 81 The Communication Style of Charismatic Leaders 83
Leadership by Inspiration 83
Leadership Skill-Building Exercise 3-1: Formulating a Vision 83 Leadership by Storytelling 84 Extensive Use of Social Networking 85
Leadership Skill-Building Exercise 3-2: Charismatic Leadership by Storytelling 85 The Development of Charisma 86
Techniques for Developing Charisma 87
Transformational Leadership 89 Leadership Self-Assessment Quiz 3-2: The Dual-Level Transformational Leadership (TFL) Scale 90
How Transformations Take Place 91 Attributes of Transformational Leaders 94 The Impact of Transformational and Charismatic Leadership on Performance and
Behavior 95
Leader in Action: Mary Barra, CEO of GM 97 Concerns about Charismatic Leadership 98
Challenges to the Validity of Charismatic Leadership 98 The Dark Side of Charismatic Leadership 98
Summary • Key Terms • Guidelines for Action and Skill Development 99–101 Leadership Case Problem A: Tim Puts His Charisma Online 102 Leadership Case Problem B: Turnaround Ashley 103 Leadership Skill-Building Exercise 3-3: My Leadership Portfolio 104 Leadership Skill-Building Exercise 3-4: Finding Inspirational Messages on a Social Networking Site 104 Notes 104
CHAPTER 4 Leadership Behaviors, Attitudes, and Styles 108 The Classic Dimensions of Consideration and Initiating Structure 109 Task-Related Attitudes and Behaviors 112 Leadership Skill-Building Exercise 4-1: Feedback Skills 114 Relationship-Oriented Attitudes and Behaviors 115 Leadership Self-Assessment Quiz 4-1: Task-Oriented Attitudes and Behaviors 116 Leadership Skill-Building Exercise 4-2: Clarifying Your Interpersonal Work Values 119
CONTENTS vii
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
360-Degree Feedback for Fine-Tuning a Leadership Approach 121 Leadership Skill-Building Exercise 4-3: Applying Relationship-Oriented and Task-Oriented Attitudes and Behaviors 122 Leadership Styles 124
Participative Leadership 125 Autocratic Leadership 126
Leader in Action: Craig Federighi, Senior Vice President, Software Engineering at Apple Inc. 127
Leadership Grid™ Styles 127
Leadership Self-Assessment Quiz 4-2: What Style of Leader Are You or Would You Be? 128
Entrepreneurial Leadership 131
Leadership Self-Assessment Quiz 4-3: Entrepreneurial Thinking and Behavior 132
Gender Differences in Leadership Style 134
Leadership Skill-Building Exercise 4-4: Entrepreneurial Leadership 134 Selecting the Best Leadership Style 136
Leadership Skill-Building Exercise 4-5: Contrasting Leadership Styles 137 Summary • Key Terms • Guidelines for Action and Skill Development 137–138 Leadership Case Problem A: Frank Won’t Accept “We Can’t” for an Answer 139 Leadership Case Problem B: Tricia and Her Facebook Friends and Twitter Followers 140 Leadership Skill-Building Exercise 4-6: My Leadership Portfolio 141 Leadership Skill-Building Exercise 4-7: The Entrepreneurial Leadership Style 142 Notes 142
CHAPTER 5 Contingency and Situational Leadership 145 Situational Influences on Effective Leadership Behavior 146 Fiedler’s Contingency Theory of Leadership Effectiveness 148
Measuring Leadership Style: The Least Preferred Coworker (LPC) Scale 148 Measuring the Leadership Situation 149 Overall Findings 149 Making the Situation More Favorable for the Leader 150 Evaluation of Fiedler’s Contingency Theory 151
The Path-Goal Theory of Leadership Effectiveness 151 Matching the Leadership Style to the Situation 153 Steps Leaders Can Take to Influence Performance and Satisfaction 154
Situational Leadership® II (SLII) 155
viii CONTENTS
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
Leadership Self-Assessment Quiz 5-1: Measuring Your Situational Perspective 156
Basics of SLII 157 Evaluation of SLII 158
Leadership Skill-Building Exercise 5-1: Applying Situational Leadership II 159 The Normative Decision Model 159
Decision-Making Styles 160 Contingency Factors and Application of the Model 160
Leader–Member Exchange (LMX) and Contingency Theory 161 Leadership Self-Assessment Quiz 5-2: Quality of Leader–Member Relations 162 Leadership During a Crisis 163 Leadership Self-Assessment Quiz 5-3: Checklist for Crisis Leadership 164 Leader in Action: Sandra E. Peterson, Group Worldwide Chairman of the Johnson & Johnson Consumer Health Unit 169 Evidence-Based Leadership for the Contingency and Situational Approach 169 Summary • Key Terms • Guidelines for Action and Skill Development 170–172 Leadership Case Problem A: Supervisory Styles at the Red Rascal 173 Leadership Case Problem B: Metal Recycling Executive Attempts to Salvage Martha Stewart Living 174 Leadership Skill-Building Exercise 5-2: My Leadership Portfolio 175 Leadership Skill-Building Exercise 5-3: Crisis Leadership 175 Notes 175
CHAPTER 6 Leadership Ethics and Social Responsibility 178 Principles and Practices of Ethical and Moral Leadership 179 Leadership Self-Assessment Quiz 6-1: The Leadership Ethics Quiz 180
Four Ethical Leadership Behaviors 181 Factors Contributing to Ethical Differences 182
Leadership Self-Assessment Quiz 6-2: The Air Force Character Attributes Checklist 185
The Ethical Mind for Leaders 186
Guidelines for Evaluating the Ethics of a Decision 187 Leadership Skill-Building Exercise 6-1: Should “Dinosaur Power” Be Placed on the Market? 188 A Sampling of Unethical Leadership Behaviors 188 Leadership, Social Responsibility, and Creating an Ethical Organizational Culture 190
Providing Strategic Leadership of Ethics and Social Responsibility 191 Creating a Pleasant Workplace 191
CONTENTS ix
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
Helping Build a Sustainable Environment 192
Leader in Action: Leadership at Coca-Cola and Nestlé Waters Protects Freshwater Supplies 194 Leadership Skill-Building Exercise 6-2: Conducting an Environmental Audit 195
Engaging in Social Entrepreneurship 195 Engaging in Philanthropy 196 Working with Suppliers to Improve Working Conditions 196 Establishing Written Codes of Ethical Conduct 197 Developing Formal Mechanisms for Dealing with Ethical Problems 197 Accepting Whistleblowers 198 Providing Training in Ethics and Social Responsibility 198 Placing Company Interests over Personal Interests 199
Leadership Skill-Building Exercise 6-3: Getting More Bang for the Buck with Layoffs 199 Ethical and Socially Responsible Behavior and Organizational Performance 200 Summary • Key Terms • Guidelines for Action and Skill Development 201–202 Leadership Case Problem A: Are Drivers or Smartphones to Blame? 203 Leadership Case Problem B: Let’s Go Green 204 Leadership Skill-Building Exercise 6-4: My Leadership Portfolio 205 Leadership Skill-Building Exercise 6-5: Company Policy for Employee Recycling of Electronic Products 206 Notes 206
CHAPTER 7 Power, Politics, and Leadership 209 Sources and Types of Power 211
Position Power 211 Personal Power 212 Power Stemming from Ownership 212
Manager Assessment Quiz 7-1: Rating a Manager’s Power 213 Power Stemming from Dependencies 214 Power Derived from Capitalizing on Opportunity 215 Power Stemming from Managing Critical Problems 215 Power Stemming from Being Close to Power 215 Power and Self-Serving Behavior 216
Tactics for Becoming an Empowering Leader 216 The Nature of Empowerment 217 Empowering Practices 218
Leadership Self-Assessment Quiz 7-1: Empowering Attitudes and Beliefs 219 Effective Delegation and Empowerment 222
x CONTENTS
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
Leadership Skill-Building Exercise 7-1: Conducting an Empowerment Session 223 Factors that Contribute to Organizational Politics 223
Pyramid-Shaped Organization Structure 224 Subjective Standards of Performance 224 Environmental Uncertainty and Turbulence 224 Emotional Insecurity 225 Machiavellian Tendencies 225 Encouraging Admiration from Subordinates 225
Political Tactics and Strategies 225 Ethical Political Tactics and Strategies 226
Leadership Self-Assessment Quiz 7-2: The Positive Organizational Politics Questionnaire 227 Leadership Skill-Building Exercise 7-2: Paying Back Favors from Network Members 229 Leadership Skill-Building Exercise 7-3: Asking Advice Role Play 232 Leader in Action: Carol B. Tomé, the Home Depot CFO 235 Leadership Self-Assessment Quiz 7-3: The Blunder Quiz 236
Unethical Political Tactics and Strategies 236
Exercising Control over Dysfunctional Politics 238 Leadership Skill-Building Exercise 7-4: Controlling Office Politics 240 Summary • Key Terms • Guidelines for Action and Skill Development 240–241 Leadership Case Problem A: Ray, the Empowered Athletic Club Director 242 Leadership Case Problem B: Brenda the Tweeting Leader 243 Leadership Skill-Building Exercise 7-5: My Leadership Portfolio 244 Notes 244
CHAPTER 8 Influence Tactics of Leaders 247 A Model of Power and Influence 249 Description and Explanation of Influence Tactics 250 Leadership Self-Assessment Quiz 8-1: Survey of Influence Tactics 251
Essentially Ethical and Honest Tactics 252
Leader in Action: Doug Scott, Truck Group Marketing Manager at Ford Motor Company 258
Essentially Neutral Influence Tactics 258
Leadership Self-Assessment Quiz 8-2: Measure of Ingratiating Behavior in Organizational Settings (MIBOS) 260
Essentially Dishonest and Unethical Tactics 262
Leadership Skill-Building Exercise 8-1: Influence Tactics 264
CONTENTS xi
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
Leadership Skill-Building Exercise 8-2: Identifying Influence Tactics 264 Leadership Influence for Organizational Change 265 Relative Effectiveness and Sequencing of Influence Tactics 266
Relative Effectiveness of Influence Tactics 266 Sequencing of Influence Tactics 268
Leadership Skill-Building Exercise 8-3: Applying Influence Tactics 268 Implicit Leadership Theories and Leadership Influence 269 Summary • Key Terms • Guidelines for Action and Skill Development 270–271 Leadership Case Problem A: Steve Tackles Mall World 272 Leadership Case Problem B: Maya the Manipulator 273 Leadership Skill-Building Exercise 8-4: My Leadership Portfolio 274 Leadership Skill-Building Exercise 8-5: A Leadership Essay 274 Notes 275
CHAPTER 9 Developing Teamwork 277 The Leader’s Role in the Team-Based Organization 279 Leader Actions That Foster Teamwork 280
Actions Leaders Can Take Using Their Own Resources 281
Leadership Skill-Building Exercise 9-1: Shelters for the Homeless 284 Leadership Self-Assessment Quiz 9-1: Team Player Attitudes 286
Actions Generally Requiring Organization Structure or Policy 291
Leader in Action: Jerry Murrell, the CEO and Founder of Five Guys Rewards Teamwork 292 Offsite Training and Team Development 295
Features of Outdoor and Offsite Training Programs 295
Leadership Skill-Building Exercise 9-2: The Team Leader Candidates 296 Leadership Skill-Building Exercise 9-3: Trust Me 296
Evaluation of Outdoor Training for Team Development 297
The Leader–Member Exchange Model and Teamwork 298 Different-Quality Relationships 298 First Impressions 301
Summary • Key Terms • Guidelines for Action and Skill Development 302 Leadership Case Problem A: The Global Insurance Tag Team 303 Leadership Case Problem B: Ashley Wants to Boost Teamwork 304 Leadership Skill-Building Exercise 9-4: My Leadership Portfolio 305 Leadership Skill-Building Exercise 9-5: The Trust Fall 306 Notes 306
xii CONTENTS
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
CHAPTER 10 Motivation and Coaching Skills 309 Leadership Self-Assessment Quiz 10-1: How Meaningful Is My Work? 311 Leadership and Employee Engagement 312
The Impact of Worker Engagement on Productivity 312
Leadership Skill-Building Exercise 10-1: Collecting Live Data on Worker Engagement 313
Meaningful Work for Employee Engagement 313
Expectancy Theory and Motivational Skills 314 Basic Components of Expectancy Theory 315 Leadership Skills and Behaviors Associated with Expectancy Theory 317
Leadership Skill-Building Exercise 10-2: Estimating Valences for Applying Expectancy Theory 318 Goal Theory 319
Basic Findings of Goal Theory 320 The Importance of How Goals Are Attained and Other Concerns 322
Leadership Skill-Building Exercise 10-3: The Application of Goal Theory 323 Using Recognition and Pride to Motivate Others 323 Leadership Self-Assessment Quiz 10-2: How Much Do I Crave Recognition? 324
Appealing to the Recognition Need of Others 325 Appealing to Pride 326
Coaching as an Approach to Motivation 327 Key Characteristics of Coaching 327 Fallacies About Coaching 328
Leader in Action: Tammy the Kindly Coach 329 Coaching Skills and Techniques 329 Leadership Self-Assessment Quiz 10-3: Characteristics of an Effective Coach 333 Executive Coaching and Leadership Effectiveness 333 Leadership Skill-Building Exercise 10-4: Coaching for Improved Performance 334
Specific Forms of Assistance Provided by Executive Coaches 334 Contributions of and Concerns About Executive Coaching 335
Summary • Key Terms • Guidelines for Action and Skill Development 336–338 Leadership Case Problem A: We Need More Engagement Around Here 338 Leadership Case Problem B: Tyler Faces a Feedback Challenge 340 Leadership Skill-Building Exercise 10-5: My Leadership Portfolio 341 Leadership Skill-Building Exercise 10-6: Position Paper on Motivation 341 Notes 341
CONTENTS xiii
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
CHAPTER 11 Creativity, Innovation, and Leadership 344 Steps in the Creative Process 346 Characteristics of Creative Leaders 347
Knowledge 348
Leadership Self-Assessment Quiz 11-1: The Creative Personality Test 349 Cognitive Abilities 350 Personality 351 Passion for the Task and the Experience of Flow 351
Overcoming Traditional Thinking as a Creativity Strategy 352 Organizational Methods to Enhance Creativity 353 Leader in Action: Modern Business Examples of Thinking Outside the Box 354
Systematically Collecting Fresh Ideas 354 Brainstorming 356 Using the Pet-Peeve Technique 356
Leadership Skill-Building Exercise 11-1 357 The Morality of Enhancing Creativity 358
Self-Help Techniques to Enhance Creative Problem Solving 359 Practicing Creativity-Enhancing Activities 359 Staying Alert to Opportunities 360
Leadership Skill-Building Exercise 11-2: The Multiple Uses Technique 360 Maintaining an Enthusiastic Attitude, Including Being Happy 361 Maintaining and Using a Systematic Place for Recording Your Ideas 361 Playing the Roles of Explorer, Artist, Judge, and Lawyer 361 Engaging in Appropriate Physical Exercise 362
Establishing a Climate and Culture for Creative Thinking 363 Leadership Practices for Enhancing Creativity 363
Leadership Diagnostic Activity 11-1: Assessing the Climate for Creativity and Innovation 364
Methods of Managing Creative Workers 367
Leader in Action: Jack Dorsey, the Creative Leader and Cofounder of Twitter and Square 369 Additional Leadership Practices That Enhance Innovation 370 Summary • Key Terms • Guidelines for Action and Skill Development 372–373 Leadership Case Problem A: The Rapid Cash Store Needs Ideas 374 Leadership Case Problem B: “How Can We Encourage a Few Disrupters?” 375 Leadership Skill-Building Exercise 11-3: My Leadership Portfolio 376 Leadership Skill-Building Exercise 11-4: The Multimedia Presentation 377 Notes 377
xiv CONTENTS
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
CHAPTER 12 Communication and Conflict Resolution Skills 380 Communication Networks for Leaders 381 Leadership Self-Assessment Quiz 12-1: A Self-Portrait of My Communication Effectiveness 382
Face-to-Face Communication Networks 383 Social Media Networks 384
Inspirational and Powerful Communication 385 Speaking and Writing 385 The Six Basic Principles of Persuasion 391 Nonverbal Communication Including Videoconferencing and Telepresence 392
Leadership Skill-Building Exercise 12-1: Feedback on Verbal and Nonverbal Behavior 395 Listening as a Leadership Skill 395
Show Respect 396 Selective Listening to Problems 396 Making the Rounds 396
Leadership Skill-Building Exercise 12-2: Leadership Listening 397 Overcoming Cross-Cultural Communication Barriers 397 Leadership Self-Assessment Quiz 12-2: Cross-Cultural Skills and Attitudes 397 The Leader’s Role in Resolving Conflict and Negotiating 402
Conflict Management Styles 402
Leader in Action: IBM CEO, Ginni Rometty, Expresses Anger at Total Workforce 403 Leadership Self-Assessment Quiz 12-3: My Conflict Resolution Style 404
Resolving Conflict Between Two Group Members 407 Negotiating and Bargaining 408
Leadership Skill-Building Exercise 12-3: Win–Win Bargaining 410 Summary • Key Terms • Guidelines for Action and Skill Development 411–412 Leadership Case Problem A: Margot, the Cross-Cultural Communicator 413 Leadership Case Problem B: Sean Contemplates a Delicate Confrontation 414 Leadership Skill-Building Exercise 12-4: My Leadership Portfolio 415 Leadership Skill-Building Exercise 12-5: Evaluating the Communication Skills of an Organizational Leader 415 Notes 416
CONTENTS xv
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
CHAPTER 13 Strategic Leadership and Knowledge Management 418 The Nature of Strategic Leadership 419
High-Level Cognitive Activity of the Leader 420
Leadership Self-Assessment Quiz 13-1: Are You a Strategic Thinker? 421 Maintaining a Human and Emotional Aspect 422 Gathering Multiple Inputs to Formulate Strategy 423 Anticipating and Creating a Future 424 Revolutionary and Contrarian Thinking 424 Creating a Vision 425 Leadership Effectiveness and Strategy Implementation 426
Leader in Action: Ford CEO Alan Mulally Focuses on the Company and the Outside World 427 Leadership Skill-Building Exercise 13-1: Mapping Out a Future for an Organization 428 Conducting a SWOT Analysis 428
Internal Strengths 428 Internal Weaknesses 429 External Opportunities 429 External Threats 429
Leadership Skill-Building Exercise 13-2: Conducting a SWOT Analysis 430 A Sampling of Business Strategies Formulated by Leaders 430 Knowledge Management and the Learning Organization 434
Knowledge Management 435 Servant Leadership and the Creation of Knowledge 436
Leadership Self-Assessment Quiz 13-2: My Attitudes Toward Sharing Knowledge 437
The Learning Organization 437
Leadership Skill-Building Exercise 13-3: The Knowledge-Sharing Investigation Teams 438 Summary • Key Terms • Guidelines for Action and Skill Development 441–442 Leadership Case Problem A: The Saratoga Supply Company Needs a Strategy 443 Leadership Case Problem B: “Superintendent Briggs Is Busy Creating Visions Today” 444 Leadership Skill-Building Exercise 13-4: My Leadership Portfolio 445 Leadership Skill-Building Exercise 13-5: Developing a Business Strategy for a Small Appliance Repair Chain 445 Notes 445
xvi CONTENTS
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
CHAPTER 14 International and Culturally Diverse Aspects of Leadership 448 The Advantages of Managing for Diversity 450 Leadership Skill-Building Exercise 14-1: Pinpointing a Diversity Advantage 452 Cultural Factors Influencing Leadership Practice 453
Key Dimensions of Differences in Cultural Values 453 Cultural Values and Leadership Style 455
Leadership Self-Assessment Quiz 14-1: Charting Your Cultural Value Profile 456 Cultural Sensitivity and Cultural Intelligence 458
Cultural Sensitivity 458
Leadership Self-Assessment Quiz 14-2: My Tolerance for Cultural Differences 460
The English-Only Policy and Cultural Sensitivity 462 Cultural Intelligence 463
Global Leadership Skills 464 General Model of Global Leadership Skills 464 Success Factors in International Management Positions 465 Motivating and Inspiring Workers in Other Cultures 466 Avoiding Product Names That Could Be Embarrassing in Another Culture 467
Leader in Action: Adriana Cisneros, CEO of the International Conglomerate, the Cisneros Group 467 Leadership Initiatives for Achieving Cultural Diversity 468
Hold Managers Accountable for Achieving Diversity 469 Establish Minority Recruitment, Retention, and Mentoring Programs 469 Conduct Diversity Training 469
Leadership Skill-Building Exercise 14-2: The Diversity Circle 470 Conduct Cross-Cultural Training 471 Encourage the Development of Employee Networks 472 Avoid Group Characteristics When Hiring for Person–Organization Fit 473 Modify Products and Services for Targeted Demographic Groups 473 Attain Diversity Among Organizational Leaders 474
Summary • Key Terms • Guidelines for Action and Skill Development 475–476 Leadership Case Problem A: What to Do About Louie? 477 Leadership Case Problem B: An Affinity Group for Workers 60 and Over? 478 Leadership Skill-Building Exercise 14-3: My Leadership Portfolio 479 Leadership Skill-Building Exercise 14-4: Positive Cross-Cultural Experiences in the Workplace 480 Notes 480
CONTENTS xvii
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
CHAPTER 15 Leadership Development and Succession 483 Development Through Self-Awareness and Self-Discipline 485
Leadership Development Through Self-Awareness 485 Leadership Development Through Self-Discipline 487
Leadership Self-Assessment Quiz 15-1: The Interpersonal Skills Checklist 488 Development Through Education, Experience, and Mentoring 489
Education 489 Experience 490 Mentoring 493
Leadership Self-Assessment Quiz 15-2: My Attitudes Toward Mentoring 494 Leadership Development Programs 496
Types of Leadership Development Programs 498
Leadership Succession 501 Leader in Action: Leadership at Hilton Worldwide Commits Heavily to Leadership Development 502
How the Board Chooses a Successor 503 Succession Planning at General Electric and Procter & Gamble 503 The Emotional Aspects of Leadership Succession 504 Developing a Pool of Successors 505 Promotion from Within 506
Challenges of Being a New Leader 506 Leadership Skill-Building Exercise 15-1: Building for the Future 508 Summary • Key Terms • Guidelines for Action and Skill Development 508–510 Leadership Case Problem A: Malcolm Eyes the Executive Suite 511 Leadership Case Problem B: Kaitlin the New Mentor 512 Leadership Skill-Building Exercise 15-2: My Leadership Portfolio 513 Leadership Skill-Building Exercise 15-3: Analyzing a Local Leader 513 Notes 513
Glossary 516
Name Index 521
Company Index 524
Subject Index 526
xviii CONTENTS
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
PREFACE
Welcome to the eighth edition of Leadership: Research Findings, Practice, and Skills. The new edition of this text is a thorough update of the seventh edition, which has been used widely in both graduate and undergraduate courses in leadership.
Many scholars and managers alike are convinced that effective leadership is required to meet most organizational challenges. Today, organizations recog- nize that leadership transcends senior executives. As a result, organizations require people with appropriate leadership skills to inspire and influence others in small teams, task forces, and units at all organizational levels.
Without effective leadership at all levels in organizations, it is difficult to sus- tain profitability, productivity, and good customer service. In dozens of different ways, researchers and teachers have demonstrated that leadership does make a difference. Many curricula in business schools and other fields, therefore, now emphasize the development of leadership skills. With the recent exposures of the dark side of business leadership, such as CEOs finding ways to create fortunes for themselves at the expense of employees and stockholders, more attention than ever is being paid to the values and personal characteristics of leaders. Toward that end, this text continues to emphasize the qualities of effective lea- ders, including an entire chapter on leadership ethics and social responsibilities.
Purpose of the Text
The purpose of this text is implied by its title—Leadership: Research Findings, Practice, and Skills, eighth edition. It is designed for undergraduate and graduate courses in leadership that give attention to research findings about leadership, leadership practice, and skill development. The text best fits courses in leadership that emphasize application and skill building. Leadership is also designed to fit courses in management development that emphasize the leadership aspect of management. In addition, it can serve as a supplement to organizational behavior or introductory management courses that emphasize leadership.
The student who masters this text will acquire an overview of the voluminous leadership literature that is based both on research and experience. Information in this text is not restricted to research studies and syntheses of research and theories; it also includes the opinions of practitioners, consultants, and authors who base their conclusions on observations rather than empirical research.
xix Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s).
Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
What the text is not also helps define its nature and scope. This book does not attempt to duplicate the scope and purpose of a leadership handbook by integrat- ing theory and research from several thousand studies. At the other extreme, it is not an evangelical approach to leadership espousing one leadership technique. I have attempted to find a midpoint between a massive synthesis of the literature and a trade book promoting a current leadership fad. Leadership: Research Find- ings, Practice, and Skills, eighth edition, is designed to be a mixture of scholarly integrity, examples of effective leadership in action, and skill development.
Leadership is not intended to duplicate or substitute for an organizational behav- ior text. Because almost all organizational behavior texts are survey texts, they will mention many of the topics covered here. My approach, however, is to emphasize skill development and prescription rather than to duplicate basic descriptions of con- cepts and theories. I have tried to minimize overlap by emphasizing the leadership aspects of any concept presented here that might also be found in an organizational behavior or management text. Often when overlap of a topic exists, the presentation here focuses more on skill development than on a review of theory and research. For example, the section on motivation emphasizes how to apply basic explanations of motivation such as expectancy theory and worker engagement, but I do not pres- ent an overview of motivation theories as is found in an organizational behavior text.
One area of intentional overlap with organizational behavior and manage- ment texts does exist: a review of most basic leadership theories. In such instances, however, I emphasize skill development and ideas for leadership practice stemming from these older theories.
Features of the Book
To accomplish its purpose, this textbook incorporates many features into each chapter in addition to summarizing and synthesizing relevant information about leadership:
● Chapter Outlines giving the reader a quick overview of the topics covered ● Learning Objectives to help focus the reader’s attention on major outcomes ● Boldfaced key terms, listed at the end of the chapter and defined in a Glos-
sary at the back of the textbook ● Real-life and hypothetical examples throughout the textbook ● Leader in Action inserts describing the leadership practices, behaviors, and
personal attributes of real-life leaders ● Leadership Self-Assessment Quizzes relating to both skills and personal
characteristics ● Leadership Skill-Building Exercises, including role plays, to emphasize the
activities and skills of effective leaders ● End-of-chapter Summaries that integrate all key topics and concepts ● End-of-chapter Guidelines for Action and Skill Development, giving additional
suggestions for improving leadership skill and practice ● Discussion Questions and Activities suited for individual or group analysis ● Two Leadership Case Problems per chapter, which illustrate the major theme
of the chapter and contain questions for individual or group analysis ● Role plays accompanying all the case problems to help reinforce the oppor-
tunity for learning interpersonal skills within the case problems
xx PREFACE
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
● A Leadership Portfolio skill-building exercise in each chapter that instructs the student to record progress in developing leadership skills and behaviors
Framework of the Text The text is a blend of description, skill development, insight development, and prescription. Chapter 1 describes the meaning, importance, and nature of lead- ership, including leadership roles and the importance of followership. Chapter 2 identifies personal attributes associated with effective leaders, a subject that has experienced renewed importance in recent years. Charismatic and transforma- tional leadership, an extension of understanding the personal attributes of lead- ership, is the subject of Chapter 3.
Chapter 4 surveys behaviors and practices associated with effective leader- ship in a variety of situations, and describes leadership styles. Chapter 5 extends the study of styles by describing the contingency and situational aspects of lead- ership. Chapter 6 focuses on leadership ethics and social responsibility. Chapter 7 describes how leaders use power and politics. Chapter 8 extends this topic by analyzing the tactics leaders use to influence people. Chapter 9 describes how leaders foster teamwork and empower team members.
The next five chapters deal with specific leadership skills: motivating and coaching skills (Chapter 10), which constitute the basis of many leadership posi- tions; creativity and innovation (Chapter 11); communication (including nonver- bal, social media, and cross-cultural communication) and conflict resolution skills (Chapter 12); vision and strategy creation and knowledge management (Chapter 13); and effective leadership in international and culturally diverse set- tings (Chapter 14).
Chapter 15 concludes the book with an overview of approaches to leadership development and learning. In addition, there is a discussion of leadership suc- cession and the challenges facing a new leader.
Changes in the Eighth Edition
The eighth edition of Leadership: Research Findings, Practice, and Skills is a thor- ough update of the seventh edition, although the structure and key subject areas of the previous edition are retained. Some of the changes in this edition reflect the recent leadership information I felt should be included in the new edition. To make way for the new material, I have selectively pruned older examples and research findings, and deleted some concepts that seem to be only slight variations of another concept in the text. The following list highlights the changes in the eighth edition, in addition to updating research and opinion.
Changes Throughout the Text ● A role-playing or other experiential activity linked to all end-of-chapter cases ● Twelve new chapter introductions plus updating of introductions in Chapters
1 and 15 ● Fourteen Leader in Action boxes are new ● Fifteen new cases ● To help readers better identify with the introductory cases and Leader in
Action inserts, we present more examples of business firms that students
PREFACE xxi
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
have either patronized or have been patronized by people in their network. Three examples are Campbell Soup, Amazon.com, and Chipotle.
● New research findings presented in each chapter ● New examples throughout ● At four places we describe how modern research supports a given leadership
principle of Dale Carnegie ● Four Guidelines for Action and Skill Development are supplemented with
additional information ● Seven new Skill-Building Exercises, plus three of them with new components ● Two new figures (Chapters 1 and 14) ● Five new Leadership Self-Assessment Quizzes ● For all but three introductory cases or Leader in Action inserts, the formal
education of the featured leader is included to reinforce the importance of formal education to leadership development. (The three exceptions are stories about programs rather than individual leaders.)
Content Changes Within Chapters Chapter 1 explains emergent leadership, provides information about relation- ship building electronically, and emphasizes the interactive nature of leadership, and active followers who contribute to the group mission. Information is pre- sented about leader job fatigue and burnout. A new basic framework or model of leadership is presented that has features in common with the model pre- sented in previous editions. Chapter 2 presents new information about leader- ship integrity, trust, and authenticity including experimental evidence related to these traits. Information is presented about leader positive state and job perfor- mance. Proactive personality is included as a task-related leadership trait, and information is presented about physical energy and leadership performance.
Chapter 3 adds new company vision statements and involvement of employ- ees in vision implementation. Research evidence is provided that some aspects of charisma can be taught, and that transformational leadership facilitates pro- active behavior among group members. Chapter 4 describes how the fit between initiating structure and consideration needed versus given relates to job perfor- mance. More information is presented about entrepreneurial leaders and the impact of servant leadership on organizational performance. New research is cited about gender differences in leadership.
Chapter 5 gives new guidelines for application of the normative decision model, additional information about the contingency aspects of LMX theory, and an expanded discussion of leadership during a crisis. Chapter 6 now includes information about leader moral identity and ethical behavior, and five dimen- sions of ethical leadership behavior. A method for evaluating sustainability initia- tives is cited, and a section appears about social entrepreneurship. Chapter 7 describes how power can be directed toward self-serving behavior. Information is presented about the leader taking into account group member expectations about empowerment, and research on the positive impact of empowerment.
Information is provided about the importance of perception of political behavior on the impact of the leader’s use of organizational politics. Research evidence is given about how political skills facilitate leaders being able to carry out both transformational and transactional leadership.
xxii PREFACE
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
Chapter 8 describes how social norms can be used to gently manipulate people, and the impact of leading by example on the organizational citizen- ship behavior of subordinates. Chapter 9 presents research about how mutual helping by team members improves team effectiveness. Mention is made of power sharing for team development, how interaction with team members enhances team work, and stand-up comedy as a form of off-site training. Research is cited about LMX can facilitate leader emergence and team performance.
Chapter 10 includes a section of the impact of worker engagement on pro- ductivity, and how meaningful work contributes to employee engagement. A meta-analysis of the impact of goals on group performance is cited. Research is mentioned that supports the Dale Carnegie leadership principle of giving recognition to employees. Chapter 11 provides several new business examples of thinking outside the box and emphasizes how spotting opportunities is part of business creativity. Neuroscience research is mentioned indicating that both the right brain and left brain are needed for creativity. New informa- tion is presented about working within constraints to enhance creativity. The use of whiteboards to collect creative ideas receives mention, as does asking “What-if?” questions to enhance creativity.
Chapter 12 adds several new subjects: how “conversations” fit into leader net- working, the impact of telepresence on the importance of effective nonverbal communication, and showing respect as part of effective listening. Also new is the leader’s personality as a variable affecting how much conflict he or she has to resolve, and research support for Dale Carnegie leadership principle of face- saving in negotiation.
Chapter 13 adds a section on maintaining a human and emotional aspect of strategy, and expands discussion of the leader’s role in strategy implementation. New subjects presented are crowdsourcing for gathering strategy inputs, disrup- tive technology stemming from revolutionary thinking, and how servant leader- ship facilitates knowledge creation. Chapter 14 now contains information about how cultural diversity can enhance team performance, an English-only policy and cultural sensitivity, and avoiding names that could be embarrassing in another culture. Chapter 15 now includes using a composite mentor for leader- ship development, the use of tweets for mentoring, more information about simulations in leadership development, and the evaluation of leadership devel- opment programs. More information is provided about promotion from within for leadership succession.
Supplements to Accompany This Text Instructor’s Companion Site Access important teaching resources on this com- panion website. For your convenience, you can download electronic versions of the instructor supplements from the password-protected section of the site, including the Instructor’s Manual, Cognero Testing files, Word Test Bank files, PowerPoint® slides, and a Video Guide.
Instructor’s Manual Designed to increase the teaching and learning value of Leadership: Research Findings, Practice, and Skills, Eighth Edition, this manual features an outline and lecture notes for each chapter, suggestions for using the
PREFACE xxiii
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
experiential exercises found in each chapter, and possible answers to the end-of- chapter discussion and case questions.
Cengage Learning Testing Powered by Cognero This is a flexible, online system that allows you to author, edit, and manage test bank content from multiple Cengage Learning solutions; create multiple test versions in an instant; and deliver tests from your LMS, your classroom, or wherever you want. Cengage Learning Testing Powered by Cognero works on any operating system or browser, no special installs or downloads needed. You can create tests from school, home, the coffee shop—anywhere with Internet access.
Word Test Bank files These files have been converted from the Cognero testing system. All questions have been scrutinized for accuracy, the test bank for each chapter includes true/false, multiple-choice, and essay questions, all correlated to national business Standards learning objectives, and are identified with the level of difficulty and page references.
PowerPoint® Lecture Presentations An asset to any instructor, the lectures pro- vide outlines for every chapter, illustrations from the text, and emphasize key concepts providing instructors with a number of learning opportunities for students.
DVD Guide Designed to facilitate use of the accompanying DVD, this guide pro- vides summaries of each segment as well as suggested questions to launch class- room discussions.
DVD Videos compiled specifically to accompany Leadership: Research Find- ings, Practice, and Skills, Eighth Edition, allow students to engage with the tex- tual materials by applying theories and concepts of real-world situations.
Mindtap The Leadership: Research Findings, Practice, and Skills, eighth edi- tion, now includes a robust set of online resources within the Mindtap platform designed to facilitate student progress through the stages of learning, allowing them to ENGAGE with the course content, CONNECT to the concepts through knowledge and comprehension activities, PERFORM as leaders through the application of those concepts, and LEAD through participation in real-world experiential exercises.
MindTap from Cengage Learning represents a new approach to a highly per- sonalized, online learning platform. A fully online learning solution, MindTap, combines all of a student’s learning tools—readings, multimedia, activities and assessments into a singular Learning Path that guides the student through the curriculum. Instructors personalize the experience by customizing the presenta- tion of these learning tools to their students; even seamlessly introducing their own content into the Learning Path via “apps” that integrate into the MindTap platform. Additionally, MindTap provides interoperability with major Learning Management Systems (LMS) via support for open industry standards and fos- ters partnerships with third-party educational application providers to provide a highly collaborative, engaging, and personalized learning experience. Learn more at www.cengage.com/mindtap.
xxiv PREFACE
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
Acknowledgments Any project as complex as this one requires a team of dedicated and talented people to see that it achieves its goals. First, I thank the many effective leaders whom I have observed in action for improving my understanding of leadership. Second, I thank the following professors who offered suggestions for improving this and previous editions:
Steve Barnett, Unitec New Zealand Steven Barry, University of Colorado-Boulder John Bigelow, Boise State University Meika Bowden McFarland, Albany Technical College Bruce T. Caine, Vanderbilt University Felipe Chia, Harrisburg Area Community College Jeewon Cho, Montclair State University Conna Condon, Upper Iowa University Emily J. Creighton, University of New Hampshire Michael de Percy, University of Canberra Rawlin Fairbough, Sacred Heart University Michael Fekula, The Citadel Janice Feldbauer, Austin Community College Justin Frimmer, Jacksonville University Barry Gold, Pace University George B. Graen, University of Cincinnati Stephen G. Green, Purdue University Nathan Hanson, Palm Beach Atlantic University James R. Harris, North Carolina Agricultural and Technical State University Paul Harris, Lee College Nell Hartley, Robert Morris College Linda Hefferin, Elgin Community College Winston Hill, California State University, Chico Katherine Hyatt, Reinhardt University Avis L. Johnson, University of Akron Marvin Karlins, University of South Florida Nelly Kazman, University of La Verne David Lee, University of Dayton Alan Lockyer, Unitec New Zealand Brian McNatt, University of Georgia Ralph Mullin, Central Missouri State University Linda L. Neider, University of Miami Andreas Nilsson, Umeå School of Business, Sweden Rhonda S. Palladi, Georgia State University Jeff Perlot, Green River Community College Joseph Petrick, Wright State University Mark Phillips, University of Texas at San Antonio Judy Quinn, Kutztown University Diana Rajendran, Swinburne University of Technology at Lily dale Clint Relyea, Arkansas State University
PREFACE xxv
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
Gary Renz, Webster University Howard F. Rudd, College of Charleston Silvia Sala, University of Massachusetts at Lowell Tom J. Sanders, University of Montevallo Robert Scherer, Wright State University Marianne Sebok, Community College of Southern Nevada Charles Seifert, Siena College Kimberley L. Simons, Madisonville Community College Randall G. Sleeth, Virginia Commonwealth University Steven Tello, University of Massachusetts at Lowell Ahmad Tootoonchi, Frostburg State University David Van Fleet, Arizona State University West John Warner, University of New Mexico Velvet Weems-Landingham, Kent State University—Geauga
The editorial and production team at Cengage Learning also receives my grati- tude. By name, they are Erin Joyner, Mike Schenk, Scott Person, Julia Chase, Sarah Ginn, and Carol Moore. Jenny Ziegler and the staff of Lumina Datamatics Ltd also receive my gratitude for their contributions to this book. Writing with- out loved ones would be a lonely task. My thanks, therefore, also go to my fam- ily members—Drew and Heidi, Douglas and Gizella, Melanie and Will, Rosie, Clare, Camila, Sofia, Eliana, Carson, Julian, and Owen. Thank you also to Stefa- nie for her contribution to my well-being.
A.J.D.
About the Author Andrew J. DuBrin is a professor of management emeritus in the Saunders Col- lege of Business at the Rochester Institute of Technology, where he teaches courses and conducts research in leadership, organizational behavior, and career management. He also served as department chairman and team leader in previous years. He received his PhD in industrial psychology from Michigan State University.
DuBrin has business experience in human resource management and con- sults with organizations and individuals. His specialties include leadership, influence tactics, and career development. DuBrin is an established author of both textbooks and trade books, and he has contributed to professional journals. He has written textbooks on organizational behavior, management, human rela- tions, organizational politics, and edited a handbook of crisis leadership. His trade books cover many topics, including charisma, team play, coaching and mentoring, office politics, and self-discipline.
xxvi PREFACE
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
CH AP
TE R
1 The Nature and Importance of Leadership
LEARNING OBJECTIVES After studying this chapter and doing the exercises, you should be able to
• Explain the meaning of leadership, and how it differs from management.
• Describe how leadership influences organizational performance.
• Pinpoint several important leadership roles.
• Identify the major satisfactions and frustrations associated with the leadership role.
• Describe a framework for understanding leadership.
• Recognize how leadership skills are developed.
• Pinpoint several traits, behaviors, and attitudes of a successful follower.
CHAPTER OUTLINE The Meaning of Leadership Leadership as Shared Responsibility and Collaboration Leadership as a Relationship Leadership Versus Management
The Impact of Leadership on Organizational Performance Research and Opinion: Leadership Does Make a
Difference Research and Opinion: Formal Leadership Does Not
Make a Difference
Leadership Roles
The Satisfactions and Frustrations of Being a Leader Satisfactions of Leaders Dissatisfactions and Frustrations of Leaders
A Framework for Understanding Leadership
Skill Development in Leadership
Followership: Being an Effective Group Member Types of Followers
Essential Qualities of Effective Followers
Collaboration Between Leaders and Followers
Summary
Key Terms
Guidelines for Action and Skill Development
Leadership Case Problem A
Leadership Case Problem B
Notes
Andre Sougarret is a serious-minded, highly focusedengineer who is also the manager of the government-owned El Teniente copper mine in Chile. One day news broke that thirty-three men were trapped deep within a goldmine in his country. Three days after the event, Sougarretwas summoned by Chile’s president, Sebastian Pinera. The 1
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
president’s orders were clear— the forty-six-year-old engi- neering leader would be in charge of the rescue operation.
Whether the miners were dead or alive, it would be the responsibility of Sougarret and his chosen team to complete the rescue operation as rapidly as possible. Sougarret faced enormous pressure because he had to decide where and how to drill through multiple layers of volcanic rock to reach the exact spot where the miners were located.
At the mine, the methodical Sougarret encountered a mass of confusion and anxiety. Loads of people, including rescue workers, police workers, and firefighters, were milling around, along with relatives desperately seeking word about the status of the trapped miners. Sougarret and his team cut through the confusion by asking the right questions to understand the critical elements in this complex situation.
Sougarret’s next move— in order to get the rescue mis- sion started and decrease some of the confusion— was to ask the rescue workers to leave until they might be needed later. He also requested any available maps of the mine.
Sougarret’s team began by involving a risk manager, and the team grew to 300 people in the next several
weeks. At the moment, Sougarret was placed in charge of the rescue operation; seven companies were already assigned to the task. Sougarret kept on those he thought could make the biggest contribution.
A key part of the rescue operation was building three shafts. At the end it was Plan B, a 28-inch wide shaft that reached the miners first, beating the estimate of how long the rescue operation would take by a couple of months. A remaining step was to encase the top of the funnel in steel pipes and test the workability of the escape capsule. At this point, Sougarret was no longer apprehensive. “The last stage for me was like butter,” he said.
As soon as the last miner had been pulled to the sur- face, the rescue team held up a sign with the words, Misión Cumplida, Chile (Mission Accomplished, Chile), a scenario watched by more than one billion television viewers.
In reflecting on the Chilean miracle, a business reporter said, “... the saving of those men gave us some- thing we don’t see enough, a brilliant example of human excellence— of cohesion, of united and committed action, of planning, of execution, of caring. They used the human brain and spirit to save life.”1
The description of Andre Sougarret touches on many leadership topics to be covered in this book, including the ideas that providing direction is part of a leader’s job, that technical expertise is an important leadership role, and that a superior leader can help workers get through a crisis.
Our introductory chapter begins with an explanation of what leadership is and is not. We then examine how leaders make a difference, the various roles they play, and the major satisfactions and frustrations they experience. The chapter also includes an explanation of how reading this book and doing the various quizzes and exercises will enhance your own leadership skills. It concludes with a discussion of followership—giving leaders good material to work with.
The Meaning of Leadership
You will read about many effective organizational leaders throughout this text. The common characteristic of these leaders is their ability to inspire and stimulate others to achieve worthwhile goals. Therefore, we can define leadership as the ability to inspire confidence and support among the peo- ple who are needed to achieve organizational goals.2
2 CHAPTER 1• THE NATURE AND IMPORTANCE OF LEADERSHIP
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
A Google search of articles and books about leadership in organizations indicates 123 million entries. In all those entries, leadership has probably been defined in many ways. Here are several other representative defini- tions of leadership:
• A process in which an individual influences a group of individuals to achieve a common goal.
• The influential increment over and above mechanical compliance with directions and orders.
• An act that causes others to act or respond in a shared direction. • The art of influencing people by persuasion or example to follow a line
of action. • An effort to maintain control and power over others. • The principal dynamic force that motivates and coordinates the organi-
zation in the accomplishment of its objectives.3
• The exercise of social influence between and among many sources of leadership (including the leader, follower, and setting), working toward a common goal by using various mechanisms including the leader’s traits, behavior, and emotion.4
• First figuring out what’s right, and then explaining it to people, as opposed to first having people explain to you what’s right, and then just saying what they want to hear (as defined by former New York mayor and presidential candidate Rudy Giuliani).5
Importantly, leadership is not only found among people in high-level positions. Quite the contrary: Leadership is needed at all levels in an organi- zation and can be practiced to some extent even by a person not assigned to a formal leadership position. For example, working as a junior accountant, a person might take the initiative to suggest to management that they need to be more careful about what they classify as a true sale. It has been sug- gested that for improved business results to come about, it will be because managers below the C-suite (such as CEO, COO, and CFO) take the initia- tive and risks to drive the company in a different direction. Change needs to come about from leaders at lower levels, rather than relying exclusively on leadership from the top.6
Another way of understanding that leadership can be exercised by many people in the organization is the presence of people who provide leadership to others who do not have a job title suggesting that they are managers or leaders. You can also rise to leadership when people come to respect your opinion and personal characteristics and are thus influenced by you. Emergent leaders are group members who significantly influence other group members even though they have not been assigned formal authority.7
You, therefore, can exert some leadership by being an influential coworker. A team member who is influential based on personal attributes and beha- viors will often be regarded as a leader by peers.
The ability to lead others effectively is a rare quality. It becomes even rarer at the highest levels in an organization because the complexity of
THE MEANING OF LEADERSHIP 3
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
such positions requires a vast range of leadership skills. This is one reason that firms in search of new leadership seek out a select group of brand- name executives with proven track records. It is also why companies now emphasize leadership training and development to create a new supply of leaders throughout the firm.
Leadership as Shared Responsibility and Collaboration Many leadership theorists and managers agree that the leadership role within a team is seldom the responsibility of one person. Rather, several individuals within the team may serve as leaders, both by formal assign- ment and informally. Leadership may shift, depending on whose expertise is the most relevant at the moment,8 such as one member of a marketing team having advanced expertise in using social media for product promotion.
The essence of shared and collaborative leadership is reflected in the comments of Nick Petrie who conducted a study on leadership develop- ment. He said, “There is a transition occurring from the old paradigm in which leadership resided in a person or role, to a new one in which leadership is a collective process that is spread throughout networks of people.”9
A key force driving collaborative leadership is the hyperconnected organizational world fostered by e-mail and social media, along with globalization. The collaborative leadership style is well suited to harness the power of this multitude of connections.10 For example, a head of marketing can readily gather and welcome the input of thousands of peo- ple on broadening the market for a product. In this way, the head of mar- keting collaborates with people from afar instead of developing the strategy alone.
More will be presented and shared about collaborative leadership throughout the book, especially in the discussion in Chapter 4 about leader- ship styles, and Chapter 9 about developing teamwork.
Leadership as a Relationship A modern study of leadership emphasizes that it consists of a relationship between the leader and the people being led. A theoretical analysis by Gail T. Fairhurst and Mary Uhl-Bien explains that leadership is not a trait or behavior of an individual, but a phenomenon generated in the interactions among people acting in a given setting. The social actions between and among people enable them to work together in meaningful ways to produce leadership outcomes. For example, a leader at a vehicle dealership might be pursuing the outcome of generating more revenue per vehicle purchase. By building good relationships with dealer associates, he or she gains their cooperation in generating useful ideas for generating more revenue, such
4 CHAPTER 1• THE NATURE AND IMPORTANCE OF LEADERSHIP
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
as pushing harder to get customers to purchase a navigation and security system that generates monthly revenue.
The given setting mentioned previously refers to the context of the rela- tionship. In a high-power and authority context, such as an entry-level employee working with the CEO, the communication is likely to be both tasks based and relationship oriented as well. The entry-level worker, having much less power and authority, is likely to emphasize politeness, speak for- mally, and be complimentary.11
Research indicates that having good relationships with group members is a major success factor for the three top positions in large organizations. James Kouzes and Barry Posner conducted an online survey asking respon- dents to indicate, among other responses, which would be more essential to business success in five years: social skills or Internet skills. Seventy-two percent indicated social skills, and 28 percent, Internet skills. The authors concluded that the web of people matters more than the web of technology.12
(Yet a person who lacks Internet skills may not have the opportunity to be in a position to manage relationships.) Building relationships with people is such an important part of leadership that the theme will be introduced at various points in this text.
How leaders build relationships has changed somewhat in the modern era and its emphasis on interacting with people electronically. It is com- mon practice for leaders to give recognition and praise via e-mail or a posting on the company social media site, or a public social media site such as Facebook or Twitter. The late Steve Jobs, the Apple Company cofounder, however, emphasized that leaders should not let communica- tion technology block them from interacting face-to-face with work associates. “There’s a temptation in our networked age to think that ideas can be developed by e-mail and iChat. That’s crazy. Creativity comes from spontaneous meetings, from random discussions.”13 In addition to sparking innovation, the face-to-face encounters help develop relationships.
Leadership Versus Management To understand leadership, it is important to grasp the difference between leadership and management. We get a clue from the standard conceptuali- zation of the functions of management: planning, organizing, directing (or leading), and controlling. Leading is a major part of a manager’s job, yet a manager must also plan, organize, and control.
Broadly speaking, leadership deals with the interpersonal aspects of a manager’s job, whereas planning, organizing, and controlling deal with the administrative aspects. Leadership deals with change, inspiration, motiva- tion, and influence.
According to John P. Kotter, a prominent leadership theorist, managers must know how to lead as well as manage. Without being led as well as
THE MEANING OF LEADERSHIP 5
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
managed, organizations face the threat of extinction. Following are several key distinctions between management and leadership:
• Management produces order, consistency, and predictability. • Leadership produces change and adaptability to new products, new mar-
kets, new competitors, new customers, and new work processes. • Leadership, in contrast to management, involves having a vision
of what the organization can become and mobilizing people to accomplish it.
• Leadership produces change, often to a dramatic degree, such as by spearheading the launch of a new product or opening a new market for an old product. Management is more likely to produce a degree of predictability and order.
• Top-level leaders are likely to transform their organizations, whereas top- level managers just manage (or maintain) organizations.
• A leader creates a vision (lofty goal) to direct the organization. In contrast, the key function of the manager is to implement the vision. The manager and his or her team thus choose the means to achieve the end that the leader formulates.14
If these views are taken to their extreme, the leader is an inspirational figure, and the manager is a stodgy bureaucrat mired in the status quo. But we must be careful not to downplay the importance of management. Effective leaders have to be good managers themselves or be supported by effective managers. A germane example is the inspirational entrepre- neur who is so preoccupied with motivating employees and captivating customers that he or she neglects internal administration. As a result, costs skyrocket beyond income, and such matters as funding the employee pension plan and paying bills and taxes on time are over- looked. In short, the difference between leadership and management is one of emphasis. Effective leaders also manage, and effective managers also lead.
Management guru Henry Mintzberg, a professor at McGill University, based on firsthand information, strongly supports the position that the dif- ference between leadership and management should not be overdrawn. Mintzberg writes:
How would you like to be managed by someone who doesn’t lead? That can be awfully dispiriting. Well, then, why would you want to be led by someone who doesn’t manage? That can be terribly disengaging; how are such “leaders” to know what is going on?15
An example of how a company might recognize the difference between leadership and management took place at the Boston investment firm GMO LLC. The company brought on the first chief executive in its thirty-two-year history, Marc Mayer. His role was to take care of running the company (management) so that senior officials could focus more on navigating the treacherous market (strategic leadership).16
6 CHAPTER 1• THE NATURE AND IMPORTANCE OF LEADERSHIP
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
The Impact of Leadership on Organizational Performance
An assumption underlying the study of leadership is that leaders affect orga- nizational performance. Boards of directors—the highest-level executives of an organization—make the same assumption. A frequent antidote to major organizational problems is to replace the leader in the hope that the newly appointed leader will reverse performance problems. Here we will review some of the evidence and opinion, pro and con, about the ability of leaders to affect organizational performance.
Research and Opinion: Leadership Does Make a Difference The idea that leaders actually influence organizational performance and morale is widely believed, and there has been a moderate amount of research and opinion that deals with this issue. Think back to the story of the chief engineer who spearheaded activities to rescue the miners in Chile. It is difficult to imagine that the rescue would have been accomplished without an effective leader and manager in charge. Here we look at a sam- ple of the existing research and opinion on the topic of leaders making a difference on performance.
Another case history example of how the right approach to leader- ship can make a positive impact on organizational performance is the situation of chairman and CEO Mark Leslie at Veritas Software. When he joined the company 1990, he knew the type of culture he wanted to create. The culture included making decision making more transparent, which included a monthly staff meeting with managers worldwide being invited to listen in. Leslie emphasized sharing information, including earning projections. During the eleven years Leslie spent at Veritas, the number of employees increased from 12 to 6,000, and annual revenues increased from $95,000 to $1:5 billion. As Leslie looks back on his time at Veritas, he is convinced that the culture of openness was a driver of success.17
The Center on Leadership & Ethics at Duke University conducted a sur- vey about executive leadership based on 205 executives from public and pri- vate companies. One of the issues explored was whether leadership actions can affect performance. It was concluded that they can indeed, but only if the leader is perceived to be responsible and inspirational. Such behaviors included engaging employees in the company’s vision and inspiring employ- ees to elevate their goals. Another contributor to organizational perfor- mance was promoting an environment in which employees have a sense of responsibility for the entire organization.18
The flexible leadership theory developed by Gary Yukl, a professor of man- agement at the University of Albany, also provides insight as to when lea- ders contribute to organizational performance. One proposition of the theory is that organizational performance is stronger when the influence of
THE IMPACT OF LEADERSHIP ON ORGANIZATIONAL PERFORMANCE 7
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
middle- and lower-level leaders on important decisions is commensurate with their unique, relevant knowledge.19 The implication is that involving leaders throughout the organization in making decisions improves com- pany performance—if these leaders are knowledgeable about the problem to be resolved. (This proposition contrasts with leadership advisers who think that anybody should be encouraged to participate in decision making.)
In another study, a group of researchers analyzed 200 management techniques as employed by 150 companies over ten years. The aspect of the study evaluating the effects of leadership found that CEOs influence 15 percent of the total variance (influencing factors) in a company’s prof- itability or total return to shareholders. The same study also found that the industry in which a company operates also accounts for 15 percent of the variance in profitability. So, the choice of a CEO leader is as important as the choice of whether to remain in the same industry or enter a different one.20
An overview of research on managerial succession over a recent twenty- year period provides more support for the idea that leadership has an impact on organizational performance. A consistent relationship was found between who is in charge and how well an organization performed as mea- sured by a variety of indicators. Using different methodologies, these studies arrived at the same conclusion that changes in leadership are followed by changes in company performance. Statistical analyses suggest that the leader might be responsible for somewhere between 15 percent and 45 percent of a firm’s performance.21
Leadership researcher Bruce J. Avolio from the University of Washington, along with four colleagues, conducted a comprehensive syn- thesis of 200 studies about the impact of leadership. The studies analyzed included those conducted in laboratories and in work settings. The many outcomes of leadership studied included the satisfactions of subordinates and organizational performance. One of the many study findings was that the leader’s activities had a 66 percent probability of achieving a positive outcome.22
How leaders impact organizational (or unit) performance is the essential subject of this book. For example, good results are attained by developing teamwork and formulating the right strategy.
Research and Opinion: Formal Leadership Does Not Make a Difference In contrast to the previous argument, the anti-leadership argument holds that the impact of the leader on organizational outcomes is smaller than the impact of forces within the situation. To personalize this perspective, imagine yourself appointed as the manager of a group of highly skilled investment bankers. How well your group performs could be attributed as much to their talent and to economic conditions as to your leadership.
8 CHAPTER 1• THE NATURE AND IMPORTANCE OF LEADERSHIP
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
The two major arguments against the importance of leadership are substi- tutes for leadership and leadership irrelevance.
Substitutes for Leadership At times, competent leadership is not necessary, and incompetent leadership can be counterbalanced by certain factors in the work situation. Under these circumstances, leadership itself is of little conse- quence to the performance and satisfaction of team members. According to this viewpoint, many organizations have substitutes for leadership. Such substitutes are factors in the work environment that provide guidance and incentives to perform, making the leader’s role almost superfluous,23 as shown in Figure 1-1.
1. Closely knit teams of highly trained individuals. When members of a cohesive, highly trained group are focused on a goal, they may require almost no leadership to accomplish their task.
2. Intrinsic satisfaction. Employees who are engaged in work they find strongly self-motivating, or intrinsically satisfying, require a minimum of leadership. Part of the reason is that the task itself grabs the worker’s attention and energy. The worker may require little leadership as long as the task is proceeding smoothly.
3. Information technology. Some companies today use computer-aided monitoring and computer networking to take over many of the supervisor’s leadership functions. The computer provides productiv- ity and quality data, and directions for certain tasks are entered into the information system. (We could argue here that the computer is being used to control, rather than to lead, workers.) From a positive perspective, the information technology can provide workers at all levels with useful performance feedback enabling them to guide their own productivity.
4. Professional norms. Workers who incorporate strong professional norms often require a minimum of supervision and leadership. A group of certified professional accountants may not need visionary leadership to inspire them to do an honest job of auditing the books of a client or advising against tax fraud.
Leadership Irrelevance Jeffrey Pfeffer, a professor of organizational behavior at Stanford University, theorizes that leadership is irrelevant to most organi- zational outcomes. Rather, it is the situation that must be carefully
Closely knit teams of highly trained individuals
Intrinsic satisfaction
Computer technology
Professional norms
Substitutes for leadership and leadership function
© Ce ng ag e Le ar ni ng
FIGURE 1-1 Substitutes for Leadership.
THE IMPACT OF LEADERSHIP ON ORGANIZATIONAL PERFORMANCE 9
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
analyzed. Pfeffer argues that factors outside the leader’s control have a larger impact on business outcomes than do leadership actions.24 In recent years, the sales of smartphones have surpassed the sale of personal compu- ters, including laptops and tablet computers. The sales boom in these could be better attributed to an outside force of handheld communication technol- ogy becoming so essential for so many people than to inspirational leader- ship within telecommunications companies.
Another aspect of the leader irrelevance argument is that high-level lea- ders have unilateral control over only a few resources. Furthermore, the lea- der’s control of these resources is limited by obligations to stakeholders like consumers and stockholders. Finally, firms tend to choose new organiza- tional leaders whose values are compatible with those of the firm. The lea- ders therefore act in ways similar to previous leaders.
Jim Collins, who has extensively researched how companies endure and how they shift from average to superior performance, also doubts the rele- vance of leadership. According to his earlier research, corporate leaders are slaves of much larger organizational forces. Collins makes the analogy of children holding a pair of ribbons inside a coach and imagining they are driving the horse. It is not the leader’s personality that makes a difference; more important is the organization’s personality.25
Another argument for leadership irrelevance is that in the modern orga- nization effective leadership means widespread collaboration in obtaining ideas, rather than the heroic leader doing all the innovating. According to this point of view, instead of centralizing leadership in the hands of a few, authority and power are shared, and people lead themselves.26 (The concept of shared leadership was mentioned above in relation to the meaning of leadership and will surface at several places in the text.)
The leader irrelevance argument would have greater practical value if it were recast as a leader constraint theory, which would hold that leaders are constrained in what they can do but still have plenty of room to influence others.
A useful perspective on whether leadership makes a difference is to ask the right question as framed by J. Richard Hackman and Ruth Wageman. Instead of asking if leaders make a difference, we should be asking under what conditions leaders make a difference.27 A crisis mode is an example of a situation in which a strong leader usually makes a difference, such as get- ting field units back on track after a hurricane or product recall.
Leadership Roles
Another way to gain an understanding of leadership is to examine the vari- ous roles carried out by leaders. A role in this context is an expected set of activities or behaviors stemming from one’s job. Leadership roles are a sub- set of the managerial roles studied by Henry Mintzberg and others.28 Before reading ahead to the summary of leadership roles, you are invited to com- plete Leadership Self-Assessment Quiz 1-1.
10 CHAPTER 1• THE NATURE AND IMPORTANCE OF LEADERSHIP
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
LEADERSHIP SELF-ASSESSMENT QUIZ 1-1
Readiness for the Leadership Role
Instructions: Indicate the extent to which you agree with each of the following statements, using the following scale: 1, disagree strongly; 2, disagree; 3, neutral; 4, agree; 5, agree strongly.
DS D N A AS
1. I like having people count on me for ideas and suggestions. 1 2 3 4 5
2. I have definitely inspired other people. 1 2 3 4 5
3. It’s a good practice to ask people provocative questions about their work. 1 2 3 4 5
4. It’s easy for me to compliment others. 1 2 3 4 5
5. I have many more friends and followers on social working websites than do most people.
1 2 3 4 5
6. I like to cheer people up even when my own spirits are down. 1 2 3 4 5
7. What my team accomplishes is more important than my personal glory. 1 2 3 4 5
8. Many people imitate my ideas. 1 2 3 4 5
9. Building team spirit is important to me. 1 2 3 4 5
10. I would enjoy coaching other members of the team. 1 2 3 4 5
11. It is important to me to recognize others for their accomplishments. 1 2 3 4 5
12. I would enjoy entertaining visitors to my firm even if it interfered with my completing a report.
1 2 3 4 5
13. It would be fun for me to represent my team at gatherings outside our unit. 1 2 3 4 5
14. The problems of my teammates are my problems too. 1 2 3 4 5
15. Resolving conflict is an activity I enjoy. 1 2 3 4 5
16. I would cooperate with another unit in the organization even if I disagreed with the position taken by its members.
1 2 3 4 5
17. I am an idea generator on the job. 1 2 3 4 5
18. It is fun for me to bargain whenever I have the opportunity. 1 2 3 4 5
19. Team members listen to me when I speak. 1 2 3 4 5
20. People have asked me to assume the leadership of an activity several times in my life. 1 2 3 4 5
21. I have always been a convincing person. 1 2 3 4 5
22. I enjoy imagining a bright future for a group to which I belong. 1 2 3 4 5
23. Several people have told me that I have good ability to see the big picture. 1 2 3 4 5
24. I am willing to listen to people gripe and complain about their job. 1 2 3 4 5
25. I enjoy the opportunity to work with people from cultures different than my own. 1 2 3 4 5
Scoring and Interpretation: Calculate your total score by adding the numbers circled. A tentative interpretation of the scoring is as follows:
• 90–100: High readiness for the leadership role
• 60–89: Moderate readiness for the leadership role
LEADERSHIP ROLES 11
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
Leading is a complex activity, so it is not surprising that Mintzberg and other researchers identified ten roles that can be classified as part of the leadership function of management.
1. Figurehead. Leaders, particularly high-ranking managers, spend some part of their time engaging in ceremonial activities, or acting as a figurehead. Four specific behaviors fit the figurehead role of a leader: a. entertaining clients or customers as an official representative of the
organization b. making oneself available to outsiders as a representative of the
organization c. serving as an official representative of the organization at gatherings
outside the organization d. escorting official visitors
2. Spokesperson. When a manager acts as a spokesperson, the empha- sis is on answering letters or inquiries and formally reporting to individuals and groups outside the manager’s direct organizational unit. As a spokesperson, the managerial leader keeps five groups of people informed about the unit’s activities, plans, capabilities, and possibilities (vision): a. upper-level management b. clients or customers c. other important outsiders such as labor union d. professional colleagues
Dealing with outside groups and the general public is usually the respon- sibility of top-level managers.
3. Negotiator. Part of almost any manager’s job description is trying to make deals with others for needed resources. Four illustrative negotiat- ing activities are as follows: a. bargaining with superiors for funds, facilities, equipment, or other
forms of support
QUIZ 1-1 (continued)
• 40–59: Some uneasiness with the leadership role
• 39 or less: Low readiness for the leadership role
If you are already a successful leader and you scored low on this questionnaire, ignore your score. If you scored surprisingly low and you are not yet a leader, or are currently performing poorly as a leader, study the statements carefully. Consider changing your attitude or your behavior so that you can legitimately answer more of the state- ments with a 4 or a 5. Studying the rest of this text will give you additional insights that may be helpful in your development as a leader.
12 CHAPTER 1• THE NATURE AND IMPORTANCE OF LEADERSHIP
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
b. bargaining with other units in the organization for the use of staff, facilities, equipment, or other forms of support
c. bargaining with suppliers and vendors for services, schedules, and delivery times
d. bargaining with job candidates about starting compensation and benefits
4. Coach and motivator. An effective leader takes the time to coach and motivate team members, and sometimes to inspire large groups of people inside the organization. This role includes five specific behaviors: a. informally recognizing team members’ achievements b. providing team members with feedback concerning ineffective
performance c. ensuring that team members are informed of steps that can improve
their performance d. implementing rewards and punishments to encourage and sustain
good performance e. inspiring people through such means as being charismatic, creating
visions, telling interesting stories, and being highly ethical
5. Team builder. A key aspect of a leader’s role is to build an effective team. Activities contributing to this role include: a. ensuring that team members are recognized for their accomplish-
ments, such as through letters of appreciation b. initiating activities that contribute to group morale, such as giving
parties and sponsoring sports teams c. holding periodic staff meetings to encourage team members to talk
about their accomplishments, problems, and concerns
6. Team player. Related to the team-builder role is that of the team player. Three behaviors of team players are: a. displaying appropriate personal conduct b. cooperating with other units in the organization c. displaying loyalty to superiors by fully supporting their plans and
decisions
7. Technical problem solver. It is particularly important for supervisors and middle managers to help team members solve technical problems. Two activities contributing to this role are: a. serving as a technical expert or adviser, such as helping the group
make optimum of social marketing to promote the company. b. performing individual contributor tasks on a regular basis, such as
making sale calls or repairing machinery.
In recent years, many leaders have taken the initiative to experience some of the day-by-day tasks of workers at lower levels in the organiza- tion.29 For example, the CEO of a restaurant chain might work as a server
LEADERSHIP ROLES 13
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
for two weeks, or the head of a call center might work as a customer-service technician for a few weeks. The leader develops a strong empathy for the basic work of the company. At the same time, the CEO demonstrates tech- nical expertise.
8. Entrepreneur. Although not self-employed, managers who work in large organizations have some responsibility for suggesting innovative ideas or furthering the business aspects of the firm. Three entrepre- neurial leadership role activities are: a. reading trade publications and professional journals to keep up with
what is happening in the industry and profession b. talking with customers or others in the organization to keep aware of
changing needs and requirements c. getting involved in situations outside the unit that could suggest
ways of improving the unit’s performance, such as visiting other firms, attending professional meetings or trade shows, and partici- pating in educational programs
9. Strategic planner. Top-level managers engage in strategic planning, usually assisted by input from others throughout the organization. Carrying out the strategic-planner role enables the manager to practice strategic leadership. The strategist role is concerned with shaping the future of the organization, or a unit within the larger organization. Specific activities involved in this role include: a. setting a vision and direction for the organization and providing
innovative ideas to pursue b. helping the firm deal with the external environment c. helping develop organizational policies d. being a thought leader in the sense of the organization being widely
respected for advancing a field or producing a superior product30
10. Executor. In carrying out the executor role, the leader makes things happen, often helping translate plans into action. Parts of this role include: a. translating strategy into action, such as helping develop action plans b. making change happen c. holding people accountable to ensure that productive work is
accomplished
A common thread in the leadership roles of a manager is that the mana- gerial leader in some way inspires or influences others. An analysis in the Harvard Business Review concluded that the most basic role for corporate leaders is to release the human spirit that makes initiative, creativity, and entrepreneurship possible.31 An important practical implication is that man- agers at every level can exercise leadership. For example, a team leader can make an important contribution to the firm’s thrust for efficiency by explaining to team members how to minimize duplications in a mailing list. Leadership Skill-Building Exercise 1-1 provides an opportunity to apply role analysis to yourself.
14 CHAPTER 1• THE NATURE AND IMPORTANCE OF LEADERSHIP
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
LEADERSHIP SKILL-BUILDING EXERCISE 1-1
My Leadership Role Analysis
Here is an opportunity for you to think through your cur- rent level of skill or potential ability to carry out success- fully the ten leadership roles already described. Each role will be listed along with a reminder of one of its key aspects. Check next to each role whether it is an activity you could carry out now, or something for which you will need more experience and preparation. For those activities you check as “capable of doing it now,” jot down an example of your success in this area. For example, a person who checked “capable of doing it
now” for Role 7, technical problem solver, might have written: “I helped the restaurant where I was an assis- tant manager bring in more revenue during off-peak hours. I promoted an early-bird supper for senior citizens.”
Few readers of this book will have had experience in carrying out most of these roles. So relate the specific roles to any leadership experience you may have had, including full-time work, part-time work, volunteer work, clubs, committees, and sports.
LEADERSHIP ROLE CAPABLE OF DOING IT NOW
NEED PREPARATION AND EXPERIENCE
1. Figurehead (Engage in ceremonial activities; represent the group to outsiders.)
□ □
2. Spokesperson (Answer inquiries; report information about the group to outsiders.)
□ □
3. Negotiator (Make deals with others for needed resources.) □ □
4. Coach and motivator (Recognize achievements; encourage; give feedback and advice; inspire people.)
□ □
5. Team builder (Contribute to group morale; hold meetings to encour- age members to talk about accomplishments and concerns.)
□ □
6. Team player (Correct conduct; cooperate with others; be loyal.) □ □
7. Technical problem solver (Help group members solve technical problems; perform individual contributor tasks.)
□ □
8. Entrepreneur (Suggest innovative ideas and further business activity of the group; search for new undertakings for the group.)
□ □
9. Strategic planner (Set direction for others based on external environment.)
□ □
10. Executor (Makes things happen, often helping translate plans into action.)
□ □
Interpretation: The more of the ten roles you are ready to perform, the more ready you are to function as a manager or to perform managerial work. Your study of leadership will facilitate carrying out more of these roles effectively. For purposes of skill development, choose one of the roles in which you need preparation and experience. Read some information in this text or
elsewhere about the role, and then practice that role when the opportunity arises. Or create an opportunity to practice that role. For example, assume you have a valuable skill such as gathering followers on a social media website. During the next couple of weeks, coach a beginner in creating effective social media posts.
LEADERSHIP ROLES 15
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
The accompanying Leader in Action helps illustrate both leadership roles and the fact that a leader can make a difference.
LEADER IN ACTION
Rosalind Brewer, Top Executive at Sam’s Club, Makes an Impact
Rosalind Brewer, who had already held a variety of high- level leadership positions in business, was appointed as president and CEO of Sam’s Club in January 2012. A major business unit of Wal-Mart, Sam’s Club is a member’s only purchasing channel for individuals and small-business owners with 110,000 associates and 620 clubs.
Brewer was hired by Wal-mart in 2006, as regional vice president, overseeing operations in Georgia. A cou- ple of years later, she was appointed division president of the Southeast, and later became president of Wal-mart East. After graduating as a chemistry major at college, Brewster worked for Kimberly-Clark Corp., beginning as a scientist in Nonwoven Technology and Product Develop- ment. She became president of the Global Nonwovens Sector in 2004.
At Sam’s Club, Brewer has implemented a growth strategy focused on information technology and innova- tion, offering attractive locally oriented merchandise, and looking for opportunities to expand the number of club locations. She has also emphasized expanding e-commerce, giving members the convenience of shop- ping anywhere, anytime.
Former Wal-Mart president and CEO Mike Duke, described Brewer’s leadership approach. He said that she came to Wal-Mart with an outstanding background in consumer packaged goods, and then developed into a talented merchant and retailer. Duke says, “She has strong strategic, analytical, and operational skills, and has successfully managed a large and complex busi- ness. I’ve also been struck by Roz’s servant leadership (focus on helping subordinates) when I have visited stores with her. She always lets her team do the talking with her focus on how to better support their needs.”
Brewer thinks that her various leadership experiences have taught her how to lead change by identifying problems, creating a team, and drawing the roadmaps. She believes that these steps are a successful formula and set of tools for leaders.
Brewer advises leaders to be agile, but never compro- mise core values, no matter how strong the pressures are for immediate results. She also emphasizes the impor- tance of keeping your ego under control, “… because you are not the business, just the leader at the time.”
When asked why she chose to stay with Wal-Mart, Brewer says that it is a rare company that allows her to impact many lives and many issues. “There is no other employer in the world like this today,” she says. “We provide opportunities that may only the military can com- pete with.”
Rosalind (“Roz”) Brewer has received many awards so far in her career for her business accomplishments, including the following three. In 2013, she was named one of the World’s 100 Most Powerful Women by Forbes. In 2010, she was included in Black Enterprise’s “75 Most Powerful Woman in Business.” Brewer is the recip- ient of the Spelman College Legacy of Leadership award. When asked why she chose to serve on the Spelman College Board of Trustees, Brewer said, “I chose to serve as a trustee because of the genuine love I have for my alma mater and my personal interest in investing in the education of African-American women.”
Brewer holds a B.S. from Spelman College, and is a graduate of the Advanced Management Program at the Wharton School of the University of Pennsylvania. Brewer believes that her education shaped her career by teach- ing her discipline. She says, “College for me required focus, determination, independence and drive. My cour- sework at the end was grueling. My chemistry/science background has been my key to my ability to solve problems.”
QUESTIONS
1. How important do you think grueling coursework and discipline are for becoming a successful business leader?
16 CHAPTER 1• THE NATURE AND IMPORTANCE OF LEADERSHIP
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
The Satisfactions and Frustrations of Being a Leader
The term leader has a positive connotation for most people. To be called a leader is generally better than to be called a follower or a subordinate. (The preferred term for a person who reports to a leader or manager is team member, group member, or associate. Researchers, however, continue to use the terms subordinate and follower for technical purposes.) Yet being a leader, such as a team leader, vice president, or COO (chief operating offi- cer), does not always bring personal satisfaction. Some leadership jobs are more fun than others, such as being the leader of a successful group with cheerful team members.
Because most of you are contemplating becoming a leader or moving fur- ther into a leadership role, it is worthwhile to examine some of the potential satisfactions and frustrations many people find in being an organizational leader.
Satisfactions of Leaders The types of satisfactions that you might obtain from being a formal leader depend on your particular leadership position. Factors such as the amount of money you are paid and the type of people in your group influence your satisfaction. Leaders often experience seven sources of satisfaction.
1. A feeling of power and prestige. Being a leader automatically grants you some power. Prestige is forthcoming because many people think highly of people who are leaders. In some organizations, top-level leaders are addressed as Mr., Mrs., or Ms., whereas lower-ranking people are referred to by their surnames. Yet most leaders encourage others to address them by their first names.
2. A chance to help others grow and develop. A leader works directly with people, often teaching them job skills, serving as a mentor, and listening to personal problems. Part of a leader’s job is to help other people become managers and leaders. A leader often feels as much of a people helper as does a human resource manager or a counselor. Kip Tindell, founder of the Container Store, says that one of the most rewarding aspects of his job is enriching people’s lives.32
ACTION (continued)
2. What information might you take away from this excerpt about a business leader that would help you in your present or future leadership roles?
3. How does Brewer’s analysis of the merits of Wal-Mart as an employer fit your perception of the company?
Source: Original story created from facts and observations in the following sources: Carolyn M. Brown, “Rosalind Brewer Makes
History as Sam’s Club CEO,” Black Enterprise (www.blackenterprise .com), January 3, 2012. pp. 1–2; Mille Alderman, “From Chemist to CEO, Rosalind Brewer Knows a Thing or Two About Hard Work,” AY Magazine (www.aymag.com), September 2012, pp. 1–4; “Trustees: Rosalind G. Brewer, C’84,” (www.Spelman.edu/about- us), September 30, 2013, pp. 1–2; “Executive Team: Rosalind G. Brewer, President & CEO, Sam’s Club,” (http://www3.samsclub .com/NewsRoom/AboutUs/ExecutiveTeam/), September 30, 2013, Sam’s West Inc.
THE SATISFACTIONS AND FRUSTRATIONS OF BEING A LEADER 17
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
3. High income. Leaders, in general, receive higher pay than team mem- bers, and executive leaders in major business corporations typically earn several million dollars per year. A handful of business executives receive compensation of over $100 million per year and several have received over $150 million as compensation for being fired. If money is an important motivator or satisfier, being a leader has a built-in satisfaction. In some situations, a team leader earns virtually the same amount of money as other team members. Occupying a team leadership position, however, is a starting point on the path to high-paying leadership positions.
4. Respect and status. A leader frequently receives respect from group members. He or she also enjoys a higher status than people who are not occupying a leadership role. Status accompanies being appointed to a lead- ership position on or off the job. When an individual’s personal qualifica- tions match the position, his or her status is even higher.
5. Good opportunities for advancement. Once you become a leader, your advancement opportunities increase. Obtaining a leadership position is a vital first step for career advancement in many organizations. Staff or indi- vidual contributor positions help broaden a person’s professional experi- ence, but most executives rise through a managerial path.
6. A feeling of being in on things. A side benefit of being a leader is that you receive more inside information. For instance, as a manager you are invited to attend management meetings. In those meetings, you are given information not passed along to individual contributors. One such tidbit might be plans for expansion or downsizing.
7. An opportunity to control money and other resources. A leader is often in the position of helping to prepare a department budget and authorize expenses. Even though you cannot spend this money personally, knowing that your judgment on financial matters is trusted does provide some satis- faction. Many leaders in both private and public organizations control annual budgets of several million dollars.
Dissatisfactions and Frustrations of Leaders About one out of ten people in the work force is classified as a supervisor, administrator, or manager. Not every one of these people is a true leader. Yet the problems these people experience often stem from the leadership portions of their job. Many individual contributors refuse to accept a leader- ship role because of the frustrations they have seen leaders endure. These frustrations include the following:
1. Too much uncompensated overtime. People in leadership jobs are usually expected to work longer hours than other employees. Such unpaid hours are called casual overtime. People in organizational lead- ership positions typically spend about fifty-five hours per week working. During peak periods of peak demands, this figure can surge to eighty hours per week.
18 CHAPTER 1• THE NATURE AND IMPORTANCE OF LEADERSHIP
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
2. Too many headaches. It would take several pages to list all the poten- tial problems leaders face. Being a leader is a good way to discover the validity of Murphy’s law: “If anything can go wrong, it will.” A leader is subject to a batch of problems involving people and things. Many peo- ple find that a leadership position is a source of stress, and many man- agers experience burnout.
3. Facing a perform-or-perish mentality. Many leaders face an enormous amount of pressure to either perform or be fired. These pressures often can be found in companies owned by private equity (or buyout) firms. The head of each company owned by an equity firm is expected to make the company profitable through such means as slashing costs, boosting sales in international markets, and paying down debt. There is also considerable pressure on the CEO to improve operations by mak- ing them more efficient.33
4. Not enough authority to carry out responsibility. People in managerial positions complain repeatedly that they are held responsible for things over which they have little control. As a leader, you might be expected to work with an ill-performing team member, yet you lack the power to fire him or her. Or you might be expected to produce high-quality service with too small a staff and no authority to become fully staffed.
5. Loneliness. The higher you rise as a leader, the lonelier you will be in a certain sense. Leadership limits the number of people in whom you can confide. It is awkward to confide negative feelings about your employer to a team member. It is equally awkward to complain about one group member to another. Some people in leadership positions feel lonely because they miss being one of the gang.
6. Too many problems involving people. A major frustration facing a leader is the number of human resource problems requiring action. The lower your leadership position, the more such problems you face. For example, the office supervisor spends more time dealing with problem employees than does the chief information officer. If you do not like dealing with people problems, you are not suited for a leadership or management position.34
7. Too much organizational politics. People at all levels of an organization, from the office assistant to the chairperson of the board, must be aware of political factors. Yet you can avoid politics more easily as an individual contributor than you can as a leader. As a leader you have to engage in political byplay from three directions: below, sideways, and upward. Polit- ical tactics such as forming alliances and coalitions are a necessary part of a leader’s role. Another troublesome aspect of organizational politics is that there are people lurking who want to take you out of the game, par- ticularly if you are changing the status quo. These enemies within might attack you directly in an attempt to shift the issue to your character and style and avoid discussing the changes you are attempting to implement. Or your superiors might divert you from your goals by keeping you over- whelmed with the details of your change effort.35 In addition, backstab- bers may agree with you in person but bad-mouth you to others.
THE SATISFACTIONS AND FRUSTRATIONS OF BEING A LEADER 19
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
8. The pursuit of conflicting goals. A major challenge facing leaders is to navigate among conflicting goals. The central theme of these dilemmas is attempting to grant others the authority to act independently, yet still getting them aligned or pulling together for a common purpose.36 Many of the topics relating to these conflicting goals are discussed at later points in the text.
9. Being perceived as unethical, especially if you are a corporate execu- tive. The many corporate financial scandals made public in recent years have led to extreme perceptions that CEOs, in particular, are dishonest, unethical, and almost criminal in their behavior. Even if 95 percent of corporate leaders are honest and devoted to their constituents, the leader still has to deal with the possibility of being perceived as dishonest.
10. Job fatigue and burnout as a result of the preceding nine problems. Leaders occupying high-level positions face so many pressures that many of them experience fatigue and even burnout—intense fatigue and resentment caused by dealing with heavy stress over a prolonged period of time. According to a study conducted by Harvard Medical School faculty, 96 percent of senior leaders reported at least some burnout, with one-third describing their burnout as extreme. The round-the-clock attention to responsibilities contributes to the exces- sive fatigue. Another major contributor to leader burnout is being responsible for an action that hurts so many people, such as laying off workers.37
A Framework for Understanding Leadership
Many different theories and explanations of leadership have been developed because of the interest in leadership as a practice and as a research topic. Several attempts have been made to integrate the large number of leader- ship theories into one comprehensive framework.38 The framework pre- sented here focuses on the major sets of variables that influence leadership effectiveness. The basic assumption underlying the framework can be expressed in terms of a simple formula with a profound meaning:
L ¼ f ðl, gm, sÞ
The formula means that the leadership process is a function of the leader, group members (or followers), and other situational variables. Bruce J. Avolio emphasizes that leadership is a function of both the leader and the led and the complexity of the context (setting and environment).39
In other words, leadership does not exist in the abstract but takes into account factors related to the leader, the person or persons being led, and a variety of forces in the environment. A charismatic and visionary leader
20 CHAPTER 1• THE NATURE AND IMPORTANCE OF LEADERSHIP
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
might be just what a troubled organization needs to help it achieve world- class success. Yet a group of part-time telemarketers might need a more direct and focused type of leader to help them when their telephone calls mostly meet with abrupt rejection from the people solicited.
The basic framework presented in Figure 1-2 emphasizes this situational perspective. According to this model, leadership can best be understood by examining its key variables: leader characteristics and traits, behavior and style, group member characteristics, and the internal and external environ- ment. At the left side of the framework, leadership effectiveness refers to attaining desirable outcomes such as productivity, quality, and satisfaction in a given situation. Whether or not the leader is effective depends on the three sets of variables in the box.
The left box, leader characteristics and behavior refers to the inner quali- ties, such as self-confidence and problem-solving ability that help a leader function effectively in many situations. Leader behavior and style refers to the activities engaged in by the leader, including characteristic approach, that relate to his or her effectiveness. A leader who frequently coaches group members and practices participative leadership, for example, might be effective in many circumstances.
Group member characteristics refers to attributes of the group members that could have a bearing on how effective the leadership attempt will be. Intelligent and well-motivated group members, for example, help the leader do an outstanding job. The internal and external environment also influences leadership effectiveness. A leader in a culturally diverse environment, for example, will need to have multicultural skills to be effective. All of the topics in this text fit somewhere into this model, and the fit will be more obvious at some places than at others.
The information at the bottom of Figure 1-2 outlines how the elements of leadership line up with chapters in the text.
Leadership effectiveness
equals combined influence
of three sets of factors
Leader characteristics, behavior, and
style
Group member
characteristics and behavior
Context (internal and
external environment)
© 20 16
Ce ng ag e Le ar ni ng
FIGURE 1-2 A Basic Framework for Understanding Leadership.
Leader characteristics and behavior are described in Chapters 2, 3, 4, 8, 11, and 12. Group member characteristics and behavior are described in Chapters 5, 9, and 12. The context of leadership is described in Chapters 5, 13, 14, and 15.
A FRAMEWORK FOR UNDERSTANDING LEADERSHIP 21
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
A key point of this model is that leadership is a multilevel phenomenon. The leader interacts with group members one at a time, and also with the group. At the same time, leadership takes place in the context of the organi- zation and the external environment. As noted by leadership scholars Francis J. Yammarino and Fred Danjsereau, leadership involves a move- ment from one level (person level) to a higher level (leader–follower group level).40 After that come the organizational and societal levels. A brief exam- ple of leadership as a multilevel phenomenon follows:
Team leader Ashley decides to coach team member Li on how to express her ideas more forcibly when making a PowerPoint presentation. Ashley recognizes that Li is shy, so she moves slowly with her coaching. Ashley also recognizes that she is working with a supportive team, so she thinks that the team will be encouraging toward Li in whatever progress she makes. In addition, Ashley recognizes that the organization as a whole encourages assertiveness, so she feels justified in coaching Li toward being more assertive in her presentations. Yet at the same time Ashley understands that Li was raised in a culture (society level) that values humility and timidity so she does not push Li too fast to make improvements.
A recently developed integrative process model of leadership provides two implications41 of the framework presented in Figure 1-2. The first implication is that context influences leadership at any given moment. Con- text in this sense refers to any external stimuli that may impact the nature of leadership. For example, if the organization is facing a crisis, the leader might have to emphasize compassion for people and provide clear guidance about a plan to deal with the crisis.
The second implication is that leadership is a process with intrapersonal and interpersonal mechanisms (or modes of transmission). The intraper- sonal mechanisms include the leader’s traits and emotions. Among the traits are cognitive skills and personality factors that influence leadership effec- tiveness, such an intelligent person being effective at developing strategy. The interpersonal mechanisms refer to the impact of the leader on the behavior of others. For example, a leader who is perceived to be charismatic might influence others to make personal sacrifices for the good of the organization.
Skill Development in Leadership
Leadership skills are in high demand. Executives who recruit candidates for high-level management jobs list leadership skills as the top attributes they want. Leadership skills are also sought in candidates for entry-level profes- sional positions.42 Although students of leadership will find this information encouraging, developing leadership skills is more complex and ambiguous than developing a structured skill such as inserting an additional memory
22 CHAPTER 1• THE NATURE AND IMPORTANCE OF LEADERSHIP
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
card into a computer. Nevertheless, you can develop leadership skills by studying this textbook, which follows a general learning model:
1. Conceptual information and behavioral guidelines. Each chapter in this textbook presents useful information about leadership, including a sec- tion titled “Guidelines for Action and Skill Development.”
2. Conceptual information demonstrated by examples and brief descrip- tions of leaders in action. Students can learn much from reading about how effective (or ineffective) leaders operate.
3. Experiential exercises. The textbook provides an opportunity for practice and personalization through cases, role plays, and self-assessment quizzes. Self-quizzes are emphasized here because they are an effective method of helping you personalize the information, thereby linking conceptual infor- mation to yourself. For example, you will read about the importance of assertiveness in leadership and also complete an assertiveness quiz.
4. Feedback on skill utilization, or performance, from others. Feedback exercises appear at several places in the text. Implementing some of the skills outside of the classroom will provide additional opportunities for feedback.
5. Practice in natural settings. Skill development requires active practice. A given skill has to be practiced many times in natural settings before it becomes integrated comfortably into a leader’s mode of operation. A basic principle of learning is that practice is necessary to develop and improve skills. Suppose, for example, that you read about giving advice in the form of questions, as described in Chapter 10. If you practice this skill at least six times in live settings, you will probably have acquired an important new skill for coaching others.
Leadership Skill-Building Exercise 1-2 gives you the opportunity to begin developing your leadership skills systematically.
LEADERSHIP SKILL-BUILDING EXERCISE 1-2
My Leadership Portfolio
Here, we ask you to begin developing a leadership port- folio that will be a personal document of your leadership capabilities and experiences. In each chapter, we will recommend new entries for your portfolio. At the same time, we encourage you to use your imagination in deter- mining what constitutes a suitable addition to your lead- ership portfolio.
We suggest you begin your portfolio with a personal mission statement that explains the type of leadership
you plan to practice. An example might be, “I intend to become a well-respected corporate professional, a key member of a happy and healthy family, and a contributor to my community. I aspire to lead many people toward constructive activities.” Include your job resume in your portfolio, and devote a special section to leadership experiences. These experiences can be from the job, community and religious activities, and sports. (See Leadership Self-Assessment Quiz 1-2.)
SKILL DEVELOPMENT IN LEADERSHIP 23
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
Followership: Being an Effective Group Member
To be an effective leader, one needs good followers. Leaders cannot exist without followers. As we mentioned at the outset of this book, the word fol- lowers suffers from political incorrectness, yet it is a neutral term as used by leadership researchers. A point of view that represents a modern view of lead- ership, as explained by J. Richard Hackman and Ruth Wageman, is that lea- ders are also followers and followers also exhibit leadership. Each boss is
LEADERSHIP SELF-ASSESSMENT QUIZ 1-2
The Leadership Experience Audit
Instructions: Readers of this book vary considerably in their leadership, managerial, and supervisory experience. Yet even readers who have not yet occupied a formal leadership position may have had at least a taste of being a leader. Use the following checklist to record any possible leadership experiences you might have had in the past or have now.
1. Held a formal leadership position, such as vice president, department head, manager, assistant manager, team leader, group leader, or project manager
□
2. Seized the opportunity on the job to take care of a problem, although not assigned such responsibility
□
3. Headed a committee or task force □ 4. Was captain or co-captain of an athletic team □ 5. Held office in a club at high school, career school, or college □ 6. Was editor of a campus newspaper or section of the newspaper such as sports □ 7. Organized a study group for a course □ 8. Organized an ongoing activity to sell merchandise at people’s homes, such as for Avon, Mary Kay,
or Tupperware □
9. Worked in multilevel sales and recruited and guided new members □ 10. Organized a charity drive for a school or religious organization □ 11. Organized a vacation trip for friends or family □ 12. Took charge during a crisis, such as by helping people out of a burning building or a flooded
house □
13. Was head of a choir or a band □ 14. Headed a citizens’ group making demands on a company or the government □ 15. Organized a group of friends to help out people in need, such as physically disabled senior
citizens □
16. Other □
Interpretation: The more experiences you checked, the more leadership experience you already have under your belt. Leadership experience of any type can be valuable in learning to work well with people and coordinate their efforts. Many CEOs in a variety of fields got their start as assistant fast-food restaurant managers.
24 CHAPTER 1• THE NATURE AND IMPORTANCE OF LEADERSHIP
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
also a subordinate, such as a team leader reporting to a middle manager.43
And each subordinate will often carry out a leadership role, such as heading up a short-term project—or even organizing this year’s holiday party. Another perspective on followers is that they are the people who get things done; that the bright ideas of leaders would go nowhere without the doers.44
Most of the topics in our study of leadership are aimed at inspiring, moti- vating, and influencing group members to want to achieve organizational goals. It is also valuable, however, to focus on three key aspects of being an effective group member: types of followers, the personal characteristics of productive followers, and the importance of collaboration between leaders and followers.
Types of Followers A major challenge in being a leader is to recognize that followers differ sub- stantially in talent and motivation. Similarly, a challenge in becoming an effec- tive follower is to understand your basic approach to being a group member. Barbara Kellerman offers a typology that helps explain how followers differ from one another. She focuses on the defining factor of the level of engage- ment with the leader or group to arrive at five types of follower, as illustrated in Figure 1-3. At one end of the continuum is “feeling and doing nothing.” At the other end is “being passionately committed and deeply involved.”45
1. Isolates are completely detached and passively support the status quo by not taking action to bring about changes. They do not care much about their leaders and just do their job without taking an interest in the overall organiza- tion. Isolates need coaching, yet sometimes firing them is the only solution.
2. Bystanders are free riders who are typically detached when it fits their self-interests. At a meeting, a bystander is more likely to focus on the refreshments and taking peeks at his or her personal text messages. Bystan- ders have low internal motivation, so the leader has to work hard to find the right motivators to spark the bystander into action.
Level of Engagement Isolates
Bystanders
Participants
Activists
Diehards
© Ce ng ag e Le ar ni ng
FIGURE 1-3 Followers Classified by Level of Engagement.
FOLLOWERSHIP: BEING AN EFFECTIVE GROUP MEMBER 25
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
3. Participants show enough engagement to invest some of their own time and money to make a difference, such as taking the initiative to learn new technology that would help the group. Participants are sometimes for, and sometimes against, the leader and the company. The leader has to review their work and attitudes carefully to determine whether or not the partici- pant is being constructive.
Participants have also been regarded as active followers, or those who make a major contribution to the mission of the group. The term derives from experi- ences at the space shuttle activities at NASA, and the National Outdoor Leader- ship School that includes mountain climbing, expeditions, and adventure paths. Leaders at both activities said that success in their ventures requires a single- minded focus on the goal and a team of active followers.46 Such individuals will inform the leader and the group about what they think is necessary for suc- cess, or survival, such as alerting the leader to a potential avalanche.
4. Activists are considerably engaged, heavily invested in people and pro- cesses, and eager to demonstrate their support or opposition. They feel strongly, either positively or negatively, about their leader and the organization and act accordingly. An activist might be enthusiastic about reaching company goals, or so convinced that the company is doing the wrong thing that he or she blows the whistle (reports the company to an outside agency). The leader has to stay aware of whether the activist is for or against the company.
5. Diehards are super-engaged to the point that they are willing to go down for their own cause, or willing to oust the leader if they feel he or she is headed in the wrong direction. Diehards can be an asset or a liability to the leader. Diehards have an even stronger tendency to be whistleblowers than do activists. A diehard, for example, might take it on her own to test the lead quantity of paint in children’s furniture sold by the company. Leaders have to stay in touch with diehards to see if their energy is being pointed in the service of the organization.
The categorization of followers just presented adds a touch of realism to understanding the challenging role of a leader. Not everybody in the group is supercharged and eager to collaborate toward attaining organizational goals.
Essential Qualities of Effective Followers As observed by Robert E. Kelley, effective followers share four essential qualities:47
1. Self-management. The key to being a good follower is to think for one- self and to work well without close supervision. Effective group mem- bers see themselves as being as capable as their leaders.
2. Commitment. Effective followers are committed to something beyond themselves, be it a cause, product, department, organization, idea, or value. To a committed group member, the leader facilitates progress toward achieving a goal.
26 CHAPTER 1• THE NATURE AND IMPORTANCE OF LEADERSHIP
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
3. Competence and focus. Effective followers build their competence and focus their efforts for maximum impact. Competence centers on master- ing skills that will be useful to the organization. Less effective group members rarely take the initiative to engage in training and development.
4. Courage. Effective followers establish themselves as independent, criti- cal thinkers and fight for what they believe is right. A good follower, for example, might challenge the company’s policy of taking ninety days to make good on accounts payable, or of recruiting key people almost exclusively from people with demographic characteristics similar to those of top management.
This list is illustrative, since almost any positive human quality would contribute directly or indirectly to being an effective group member or fol- lower. Another way of framing the qualities of effective followers is to say that such followers display the personal characteristics and qualities of lea- ders. Although leaders cannot be expected to change the personalities of group members, they can take steps to encourage these qualities. Interven- tions such as coaching, empowerment, supportive communication, and fre- quent feedback would support effective followership.
Collaboration Between Leaders and Followers A key role for followers is to collaborate with leaders in achieving organiza- tional goals, as reflected in the emphasis on collaborative leadership. As described by leadership guru Warren Bennis, the post-bureaucratic organi- zation (a type of organization that came after the bureaucratic era, such as team-based organizations) requires a new kind of alliance between leaders and the led. When high-level leaders do not make all of the decisions but solicit input from knowledgeable group members, leaders and followers work together more closely.48
A related point here is that the new leader and the led are close allies. Great leaders are made by great groups; every organizational member needs to con- tribute energy and talent to help leaders carry out their roles successfully.
SUMMARY
Leadership is the ability to inspire confidence in and support among the people who are needed to achieve organizational goals. Leading is a major part of a manager’s job, but a manager also plans, organizes, and controls. Leadership is said to deal with change, inspiration, motivation, and influence. In contrast, management deals more with maintain- ing equilibrium and the status quo. Leadership is often regarded as a partnership or collaboration between leaders and group members.
Many people attribute organizational perfor- mance to leadership actions. Some research evidence supports this widely accepted view. For example, one study showed that leadership actions can affect per- formance, but only if the leader is perceived to be responsible and inspirational. Others argue that cer- tain factors in the work environment, called substi- tutes for leadership, make the leader’s role almost superfluous. Among these factors are close-knit teams of highly trained workers, intrinsic satisfaction
SUMMARY 27
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
with work, computer technology, and professional norms. Another anti-leadership argument is that the leader is irrelevant in most organizational outcomes because the situation is more important and the leader has unilateral control over only a few resources. Moreover, since new leaders are chosen whose values are compatible with those of the firm, those values actually are more important.
Examining the roles carried out by leaders con- tributes to an understanding of the leadership func- tion. Ten such leadership roles are the figurehead, spokesperson, negotiator, coach and motivator, team builder, team player, technical problem solver, entrepreneur, strategic planner, and execu- tor. An important implication of these roles is that managers at every level can exert leadership.
Leadership positions often are satisfying because they offer such things as power, prestige, the oppor- tunity to help others, high income, and the oppor- tunity to control resources. At other times being a leader carries with it a number of frustrations, such as facing a perform-or-perish mentality, insufficient authority, having to deal with human problems, and too much organizational politics. The leader also has the difficult task of balancing workers’ need to be independent with their need to commit to a com- mon purpose.
The framework for understanding leadership pre- sented here is based on the idea that the leadership process is a function of the leader, group members,
and other situational variables. According to the model, leadership can best be understood by exam- ining its key variables: leader characteristics and traits, leader behavior and style, group member characteristics, and the internal and external envi- ronment. Leadership effectiveness is dependent on all three sets of variables. Another point of the model is that leadership is multilevel, involving the individual, the small group, and the organization. The society and culture might also need to be taken into account. Two implications of the model are that context influences leadership at any given moment, and leadership is a process with intrapersonal and interpersonal mechanisms.
Leadership skills can be developed by following a general learning model that involves acquiring conceptual knowledge, reading examples, doing experiential exercises, obtaining feedback, and practicing in natural settings.
A major challenge facing leaders is that followers differ substantially in characteristics, including level of engagement from feeling and doing nothing to total passion, commitment, and involvement. To be an effective leader, one needs good followers with characteristics such as self-management, com- mitment, competence and focus, and courage. A key role for followers is to collaborate with leaders in achieving organizational goals. The post- bureaucratic organization requires a new kind of alliance between leaders and the led.
KEY TERMS
leadership 2 emergent leaders 3
substitutes for leadership 9 leadership effectiveness 21
GUIDELINES FOR ACTION AND SKILL DEVELOPMENT
Vast amounts of information have been gathered about leaders and leadership, and many different leadership theories have been developed. Many lead- ership research findings and theories are confusing and contradictory. Nevertheless, from this thicket of information emerge many useful leadership
concepts and techniques to guide you toward becoming a more effective leader.
As you work toward leadership effectiveness, first be familiar with the approaches to leadership described in this text. Then choose the formulation that seems best to fit the leadership situation you
28 CHAPTER 1• THE NATURE AND IMPORTANCE OF LEADERSHIP
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
LEADERSHIP CASE PROBLEM A
face. For example, if you are leading a team, review the information about team leadership. Typically, an effective leader needs to combine several leadership approaches to meet the demands of a given situa- tion. For instance, a leader might need to combine creative problem solving and emotional support to members to help the team rebound from a crisis.
The eclectic (choosing from among many) approach we recommend is likely to be more effec- tive than accepting an idea such as “there are six secrets to leadership success.”
Discussion Questions and Activities
1. Why is being perceived as having leadership qual- ities considered a compliment by most people?
2. Give an example of how you have exerted leader- ship on or off the job in a situation in which you did not have a formal leadership position. Explain why you describe your activity as leadership.
3. What would a boss of yours have to do to dem- onstrate that he or she is an effective leader and an effective manager?
4. Identify a business or sports leader who you think is highly effective, and explain why you think he or she is highly effective.
5. Many people who were voted “the most likely to succeed” in their high school yearbooks become leaders later on in their career. How can you explain this finding?
6. Top-level leaders of major business corpora- tions receive some of the highest compensation packages in the work force. Why are business leaders paid so much?
7. If so much useful information is available about leadership, why do we still find so many managers who cannot gain the respect of their subordinates?
8. Considering that so many people of all ages do much of their communication with text mes- sages, what would be wrong with leaders com- municating with group members mostly through texting?
9. A twenty-five-year-old manager of a branch of a fast-food restaurant was told by her boss that she was not an effective leader. She replied, “For $29,000 a year, how can you expect me to be an effective leader?” What do you think of her argument?
10. In what way might being an effective follower help prepare a person for becoming an effective leader?
Elon Musk, Business Leader and Superhero
While still in his early forties, Elon Musk had estab- lished himself as one of the world’s best known entrepreneurs and corporate leaders. His rise to fame began in 1999 when he founded X.com, an online payment company that eventually became PayPal, and was later sold to eBay for $1:5 billion in stock. In a few years, Musk invested this large amount of money into three start-up companies.
Musk wanted to start a low-cost Mars mission that would capture the imagination of thousands of people about space travel. To make life inter- planetary, Musk reasoned that a transport system was needed that would be completely and rapidly reusable. To meet this need, in 2002, he founded Space Exploration Technologies (or SpaceX). In
2012, the Dragon spacecraft of SpaceX delivered 500 pounds of provisions and equipment to the International Space Station. Dragon returned nine days later, landed in the Pacific Ocean precisely on target two minutes ahead of schedule and in excel- lent condition.
In his quest to help Earth become less depen- dent on carbon-generating fuels, he cofounded Tesla, the electric car company and SolarCity that manufacture and markets solar-energy systems. Tesla automobiles are sold directly to consumers, often through two dozen stores of galleries in the United States. Traditional dealers dislike this direct approach to sales because they say it violates state franchise laws.
LEADERSHIP CASE PROBLEM A 29
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
Musk was raised in South Africa and Canada before coming to the United States to complete his college education. He holds undergraduate degrees in physics and business from the University of Pennsylvania. Musk acquired his expertise in aerospace engineering on his own, including being guided by textbooks on subjects such as fundamen- tals of liquid propellants as well as propulsion ele- ments. Musk has also carefully studied the biography of Albert Einstein.
Musk is a strong believer in simplicity in techni- cal design, manufacturing, and in running an orga- nization. Tim Mueller, the director of propulsion systems at SpaceX, says that the bureaucracy is much simpler in his company than in an organiza- tion such as NASA that has to satisfy so many con- stituents. He says, “If you want to change something or fix something, just talk to Elon. It keeps the signal-to-noise ratio high.”
Musk displays a strong belief in his own capa- bilities and creativity, seen as a sign of hubris by some observers. He believes that he has a design that will allow for the colonization of Mars. Musk has filed for almost no patents because he believes that he is so strongly ahead of the field that nobody else could copy his technology. Musk’s reasoning is that if you move fast enough, nobody can catch you.
Several people who worked for Musk in the past describe him as autocratic and blunt, often to the point of being offensive. Steve Jurveson, a SpaceX board member said about Musk, “Like Steve Jobs, Elton does not tolerate C or D players. But I’d say he’s nicer than Jobs and a bit more refined than Bill Gates.” In 2013, when three battery-related fires erupted in Tesla cars, Musk responded combatively to critics via his blog. He pointed out that gasoline fires were a greater potential danger than battery fires in an electric vehicle.
Musk is such a fanatic about design that he devotes hours to personally inspecting every Tesla car. He will notice a headlamp misaligned by a few millimeters. He once said that the wrong type of screw in a sun visor, “feels like daggers in my eyes.”
Jon Farveau, a friend of Musk, and the director of Iron Man movies claims that Musk is the basis for his version of comic book hero Tony Stark, the playboy who invents a flying suit with built-in weapons.
Questions
1. Which roles does Musk appear to occupy as a leader of his companies?
2. What would you perceive to be a key advantage and a key disadvantage of reporting directly to Musk?
3. What is your overall evaluation of Elon Musk as both a business leader and a leader in society?
4. What factors might have Musk, similar to the late Steve Jobs, going for him as a leader that people will put up with his blunt approach to people?
Sources: Original case based on facts and observations in the following sources: Ashlee Vance, “Elon Musk, Man of Tomorrow,” Bloomberg Businessweek, September 17–September 23, 2012, pp. 74–79; Richard Branson, “Elon Musk: Our Escort to the Future,” Time, April 29/May 6, 2013, pp. 34–35; Jeffrey Kluger, “Rocket Man: Billionaire Elon Musk is Getting America Back In the Space Game.” Time, June 18, 2012, pp. 44–48; Alan Ohnsman, “Telsa CEO Uses Twitter to Find Engineers for ‘Autopilot’ Car,” Bloomberg News, September 19, 201; Mike Ramsey and Valerie Bauerline, “Telsa Clashes with Car Dealers: Electric-Vehicle Maker Wants to Sell Directly to Consumers; Critics Say Plan Violates Franchises Laws.” The Wall Street Journal, June 18, 2013, pp. B1, B2; Diane Brady, “Elon Musk,” Bloomberg Businessweek, May 2–May 8, 2011, p. 76.
ASSOCIATED ROLE PLAY One student plays the role of a direct report to Musk who believes that he should stop trying to sell Tesla automobiles directly to the public. You
think, for example, that Tesla Motors Inc. might be better off distributing its vehicles through Toyota or Ford dealers, or perhaps establishing a
30 CHAPTER 1• THE NATURE AND IMPORTANCE OF LEADERSHIP
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
LEADERSHIP CASE PROBLEM B
network of Tesla dealers. Another person plays the role of Elon Musk who may not take kindly to a direct report who disagrees with his marketing strategy. Run the role play for about six minutes,
and observe how effectively the direct report is in gaining acceptance of his or her opinion. Observe also the leadership skills of Musk in dealing with dissent.
Does Julia Share Too Much Responsibility?
Julia is the director of the municipal bond group of a financial services firm. Julia has four managers reporting to her, each of whom supervises a unit of the group: retail sales, institutional sales, cus- tomer service, and internal administration.
Laura, the branch director and company vice president, heard rumblings that the group was not receiving enough supervision, so she decided to investigate. During a dinner meeting requested by Laura, she asked Julia about her approach to lead- ing the group. Julia replied:
“I am leading my four managers as if they are all responsible professionals. I believe in management by exception. Unless I am aware of a problem, I am hesitant to get involved in how my managers con- duct their work. Don’t forget that as the head of the municipal bond group, I have some responsibility for spending time with major customers as well as meeting with you and other senior executives. I do hold a weekly meeting, and conduct my annual performance reviews as required.”
Laura thanked Julia for having attended the din- ner and said that the meeting was informative. With Julia’s permission, Laura said that she would be visiting the municipal bond group to have a few casual conversations with the four managers.
When asked about Julia’s leadership, the first manager said his nickname for Julia was Macro Julia; instead of being a micromanager, she went to the other extreme and was a macromanager who had minimal contact with the group. He added that at times Julia didn’t seem to even care what was happening. The manager said, “I recently asked Julia’s advice about finding a good contact
who could introduce me to the pension fund man- ager of a hospital. Julia told me that a big part of my job was to develop contacts on my own.”
The second manager Laura spoke to said that she enjoyed working with Julia because she was a nice person who didn’t get in her hair. “I don’t need a boss to remind me to attain my goals or get my work done on time. A little smile of encouragement here and there is all I need,” the manager said.
The third manager said to Laura, “I think Julia would be a great manager for me a few years down the road. But right now, I do not want to feel so much on my own. Julia is a talented person who I could learn from. Yet she is more involved with customers and higher-level management than she is with her managers. I’m new in the field, so I could use more of a coaching style of manager.”
The fourth manager said, “I remember meeting Julia a few times, but I don’t remember much about her. You said she is my manager? I don’t care if my comments get back to her, because I’m joining a competitor next month.”
Discussion Questions
1. To what extent has Julia chosen the right approach to leading the managers in her unit of the financial services firm?
2. What advice can you offer Julia to be a more effective leader?
3. What advice can you offer Laura to help Julia be a more effective leader?
4. Explain whether you think Laura was justified in asking Julia’s direct reports about Julia’s approach to leadership.
LEADERSHIP CASE PROBLEM B 31
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
NOTES
ASSOCIATED ROLE PLAY One student plays the role of Gus, who asks Laura for a good contact who could introduce him to the pen- sion fund manager of a hospital. Gus believes that the manager should help him directly develop useful busi- ness contacts. Another person plays the role of Laura who believes that an effective leader emphasizes shar- ing and empowerment. As a result, she wants to encourage Gus to develop his own contacts.
Run the role play in front of the class or within a small group for about five minutes. Observers will concentrate on how successful Laura has been in getting Gus to develop contacts on his own. Also observe how effective Gus has been as a follower in prompting Laura to provide him more specific guidance.
1. Original story created from facts and observations in the following sources: Faaiza Rashid, Amy C. Edmondson, and Herman B. Leonard, “Leadership Lessons from the Chilean Mine Rescue,” Harvard Business Review, July– August 2013, pp. 113–119; Vivian Sequera, “Veteran Engineer Behind Chile Rescue,” The Associated Press, October 16, 2010; Terri A. Scandura, “Leadership Lessons from the Chilean Mine,” The Miami Herald (www .miamiherald.com), October 25, 2010; Peggy Noonan, “Viva Chile! They Left NoMan Behind,” The Wall Street Journal, October 16–17, 2010, p. A17; Tim Padgett, Anthony Espositio, and Aaron Helsen, “5: The Chilean Miners,” Time, December 27, 2010–January 3, 2011, p. 105.
2. W. Kan Kim and Rene A. Maubourgne, “Parables of Leadership,” Harvard Business Review, July–August 1992, p. 123.
3. Derived from a literature review in Bernard M. Bass (with Ruth Bass), The Bass Handbook of Leadership: Theory, Research, and Managerial Applications, Fourth Edition (New York: The Free Press, 2008), pp. 15–23.
4. Marion B. Eberly, Michael D. Johnson, Morela Hernandez, and Bruce J. Avolio, “An Integrative Process Model of Leadership: Examining Loci, Mechanisms, and Event Cycles,” American Psychologist, September 2013, p. 439.
5. Brian M. Carney, “Of Tax Cuts and Terror,” The Wall Street Journal, June 30–July 1, 2007, p. A7.
6. James Kelly and Scott Nadler, “Leading from Below,” The Wall Street Journal, March 3–4, 2007, p. R4.
7. Sankalp Chaturvedi, Michael J. Zyphur, Richard D. Arvey, Bruce J. Avolio, and Gerry Larsson, “The Heritability of Emergent Leadership: Age and Gender as Moderating Factors,” Leadership Quarterly, April 2012, p. 219.
8. Tamara L. Friedrich, et al., “A Framework for Understanding Collective Leadership: The Selective Utilization of Leader and Team Expertise within Networks,” The Leadership Quarterly, December 2009, pp. 933–958.
9. Christopher Hann, “We’re All in This Together,” Entrepreneur, March 2013, pp. 157–158.
10. Herminia Ibarra and Morten T. Hansen, “Are You a Collaborative Leader?” Harvard Business Review, July–August 2011, p. 71.
11. Gail T. Fairhurst and Mary Uhl-Bien, “Organizational Discourse Analysis (ODA): Examining Leadership as a Relational Process,” The Leadership Quarterly, December 2012, pp. 1043–1062.
12. James M. Kouzes and Barry Z. Posner, The Leadership Challenge, Third Edition (San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 2002), p. 20.
13. Walter Isaacson, “The Real Leadership Lessons of Steve Jobs,” Harvard Business Review, April 2012, p. 100.
14. John P. Kotter, A Force for Change: How Leadership Differs from Management (New York: The Free Press, 1990); “Managing þ Leading ¼ True Leadership,” Executive Leadership, September 2004, p. 8; Edwin A. Locke and Associates, The Essence of Leadership: The Four Keys to Leading
32 CHAPTER 1• THE NATURE AND IMPORTANCE OF LEADERSHIP
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
Successfully (New York: Lexington/Macmillan, 1991), p. 4.
15. Henry Mintzberg, Managing (San Francisco: Berrett-Koehler Publishers, 2009), p. 8.
16. Diya Gullapalli, “GMO Taps 1st CEO in 32- Year History,” The Wall Street Journal, February 13, 2009, p. C9.
17. Christopher Hann, “The Masters,” Entrepreneur, March 2012, pp. 54–63.
18. Duke University Executive Leadership Survey, Center on Leadership & Ethics, March 2009, pp. 1–17.
19. Gary Yukl, “How Leaders Influence Organizational Effectiveness,” The Leadership Quarterly, December 2008, pp. 708–722.
20. Nitin Nohria, William Joyce, and Bruce Roberson, “What Really Works,” Harvard Business Review, July 2003, p. 51.
21. Robert B. Kaiser, Robert Hogan, and S. Bartholomew Craig, “Leadership and the Fate of Organizations,” American Psychologist, February–March 2008, p. 103.
22. Bruce J. Avolio, Rebecca J. Reichard, Sean T. Hannah, Fred O. Walumbwa, and Adrian Chan, “A Meta-Analytic Review of Leadership Impact Research: Experimental and Quasi- Experimental Studies,” The Leadership Quarterly, October 2009, pp. 764–784.
23. Jon P. Howell, David E. Bowen, Peter W. Dorfman, Steven Kerr, and Philip Podaskoff, “Substitutes for Leadership: Effective Alternatives to Ineffective Leadership,” Organizational Dynamics, Summer 1990, p. 23.
24. Jeffrey Pfeffer, “The Ambiguity of Leadership,” Academy of Management Review, April 1977, pp. 104–112.
25. Cited in Jerry Useem, “Conquering Vertical Limits,” Fortune, February 19, 2001, p. 94.
26. Thomas H. Hout, “Are Managers Obsolete?” Harvard Business Review, March–April 1999, pp. 161–162. (Books in Review)
27. J. Richard Hackman and Ruth Wageman, “Asking the Right Questions About Leadership,” American Psychologist, January 2007, p. 43.
28. Updated and expanded from Henry Mintzberg, The Nature of Managerial Work (New York: Harper & Row, 1973); Kenneth Graham Jr. and William M. Mihal, The CMD Managerial Job Analysis Inventory (Rochester, N.Y.: Rochester Institute of Technology, Center for
Management Development, 1987), pp. 132–133; Mary Jo Hatch, Monika Kostera, and Andrzej K. Ko!zmi!nski, “The Three Faces of Leadership: Manager, Artist, Priest,” Organizational Dynamics, vol. 35, no. 1, 2006, pp. 49–68; Dave Ulrich, Norm Smallwood, and Kate Sweetman, The Leadership Code: Five Rules to Lead By (Boston: Harvard Business Press, 2008).
29. Marcia Wade Talbert, “Trading Places: B.E. CEOs Step into Their Employee’s Shoes,” Black Enterprise, June 2011, pp. 122–128.
30. Henry G. Jackson, “Thought Leadership: What It Means to You,” HR Magazine, February 2011, p. 8.
31. Christopher A. Bartlett and Sumantra Ghosal, “Changing the Role of Top Management Beyond Systems to People,” Harvard Business Review, June 2002, pp. 132–133.
32. Cited in Justin Fox, “Employees First!” Time, July 7, 2008, p. 45.
33. Emily Thornton, “Perform or Perish,” BusinessWeek, November 5, 2007, p. 040.
34. Eilene Zimmerman, “Are You Cut Out for Management,” The New York Times (nytimes.com) January 16, 2011, p. 2.
35. Ronald A. Heifetz and Mary Linsky, “A Survival Guide for Leaders,” Harvard Business Review, June 2002, pp. 65–74.
36. Thomas A. Stewart, “The Nine Dilemmas Leaders Face,” Fortune, March 18, 1996, pp. 112–113.
37. Leslie Kwoh, “When the CEO Burns Out: Job Fatigue Catches up to Some Executive Amid Mounting Expectations; No More Forced Smiles,” The Wall Street Journal, May 8, 2013. The study mentioned is cited in this source.
38. Two examples are Marion B. Eberly, Michael D. Johnson, Morela Hernandez, and Bruce J. Avolio, “An Integrative Process Model of Leadership: Examining Loci, Mechanisms, and Event Cycles,” American Psychologist, September 2013, pp. 427–443; Francis Yammarino, Fred Dansereau, and Christina J. Kennedy, “A Multiple-Level Multidimensional Approach to Leadership: Viewing Leadership Through an Elephant’s Eye,” Organizational Dynamics, Winter 2001, pp. 149–162; Bruce J. Avolio, “Promoting More Integrative Strategies for Leadership Theory-Building,” American Psychologist, January 2007, pp. 25, 31.
NOTES 33
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
39. Bruce J. Avolio, “Promoting More Integrative Strategies for Leadership Theory Building,” American Psychologist, January 2007, pp. 25, 31.
40. Francis J. Yammarino and Fred Dansereau, “Multi-Level Nature of and Multi-Level Approaches to Leadership,” The Leadership Quarterly, April 2008, p. 136.
41. Eberly, Johnson, Hernandez, and Avolio, “An Integrative Process Model of Leadership,” pp. 436–438.
42. Randall S. Hansen and Katharine Hansen, “What Do Employers Really Want? Top Skills and Values Employers Seek from Job Seekers,” Quintessential Careers (http://www.quintcareers.com/), accessed February 18, 2001; Reem Boudraa, “Are Your Skill Sets in Demand and What You Can Do About It,” http://blog.bayt.com, August 22, 2013, pp. 1–4.
43. Hackman and Wageman, “Asking the Right Questions About Leadership,” p. 45.
44. Nancy Lublin, “Let’s Hear It for the Little Guys,” Fast Company, April 2010, p. 33.
45. Barbara Kellerman, “What Every Leader Needs to Know About Followers,” Harvard Business Review, December 2007, pp. 84–91.
46. “The Power of ‘Active Followers,’ from Mission Control to Mountain Climbing,” Knowledge@Wharton (http://knowledge. wharton.upenn.edu), July 03, 2012, pp. 1–3.
47. Robert E. Kelley, “In Praise of Followers,” Harvard Business Review, November– December 1988, pp. 142–148.
48. Warren Bennis, “The End of Leadership: Exemplary Leadership Is Impossible Without Full Inclusion, Initiatives, and Cooperation of Followers,” Organizational Dynamics, Summer 1999, pp. 76–78. (This statement has become increasingly true over the years.)
34 CHAPTER 1• THE NATURE AND IMPORTANCE OF LEADERSHIP
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
CH AP
TE R
2 Traits, Motives, and Characteristics of Leaders
LEARNING OBJECTIVES After studying this chapter and doing the exercises, you should be able to
• Identify general and task-related traits that contribute to leadership effectiveness.
• Describe how emotional intelligence contributes to leadership effectiveness.
• Identify key motives that contribute to leadership effectiveness.
• Describe cognitive factors associated with leadership effectiveness.
• Discuss the heredity versus environment issue in relation to leadership effectiveness.
• Summarize the strengths and weaknesses of the trait approach to leadership.
CHAPTER OUTLINE Personality Traits of Effective Leaders General Personality Traits Task-Related Personality Traits
Leadership Motives The Power Motive The Drive and Achievement Motive Tenacity and Resilience
Cognitive Factors and Leadership Cognitive (or Analytical) Intelligence Knowledge of the Business or Group Task Creativity Insight into People and Situations Farsightedness and Conceptual Thinking
The Influence of Heredity and Environment on Leadership
The Strengths and Limitations of the Trait Approach
Summary
Key Terms
Guidelines for Action and Skill Development
Leadership Case Problem A
Leadership Case Problem B
Notes
Denise Morrison attained her long-time goal ofbecoming a CEO of a major business corporationwhen she was promoted to that position at Campbell Soup Co. in 2011 eight years after joining the company.
Although the company is best known for its soups, Campbell is a global manufacturer of other well-known brands including Pepperidge Farm and Prego.
35 Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s).
Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
Morrison attributes some of her refinements in her leader- ship approach to advice from sponsors and mentors. While she was working in a senior leadership position at Nabisco, Doug Conant pulled Morrison aside and said that she was so results driven and so transaction-oriented that she wasn’t investing enough time in building relationships. (Conant later became CEO of Campbell Soup, but had hired Morrison at Nabisco.) Conant said, “When you build those relationships of trust, you can then bring your ideas to those relationships and get more done. You will have more influence.”
A few years later, Conant said thatMorrison has the essen- tial leadership qualities of humility and perseverance, and an appetite for learning second to none. At the same time, she works collaboratively with people to think through a strategy.
Morrison also sharpens her leadership approach through discussions with her sister, Maggie Wilderotter, the chair- woman and chief executive officer of Frontier Communica- tions. She said “being a new CEO, she’s been thrown into a lot of different situations that are new to her, so I’m a good sounding board. Denise also has a lot of traits that impress me, but most impressive, she is a learner.”
In describing what it takes to succeed in a high-level business leadership position, Morrison says that there are three keys. First, she always surrounds herself with strong people. Second, she believes in having open lines of communication and collaborating across an organiza- tion. Third, a leader needs good strategies combined with good execution. In describing her biggest weakness as a leader, Morrison says that she is impatient. While she prides herself in being a good listener, she always feels a need for speed.
Morrison says that business success is about growth, and that she defines success as driving sustainable profit growth. Success in her perception is also about leaving a legacy, and that ultimately her legacy will be about how well the company performs against the strategy that she and her team have put in place. Morrison adds that she wants to make a lasting impact.
Morrison obtained a B.S. degree in economics and psy- chology from Boston College, graduating magna cum laude. Always adventuresome, in high school she was a majorette and fire-twirler.1
The vignette just presented describes a highly placed manager who has sev- eral of the leadership traits discussed in this chapter, particularly the ability to think conceptually (see the big picture), as well as being self-confident yet showing humility at the same time. Morrison also sheds some light on the debate whether parts of leadership are inherited considering that her sister is a CEO. (Not mentioned above, her father was an executive at AT&T, and several other family members are business leaders.)
When people evaluate managers in terms of their leadership effective- ness, they often scrutinize the managers’ traits and personal characteristics. Instead of focusing only on the results the managers achieve, those making the evaluation assign considerable weight to the manager’s attributes, such as adherence to high standards. Many people believe intuitively that per- sonal characteristics strongly determine leadership effectiveness.
The trait-based perspective on leadership has reemerged in recent years after having fallen out of favor for decades. A group of researchers analyzed the results of many syntheses of studies about leadership effectiveness. The traits groupings covered were personality and intelligence, and the leader- ship effectiveness criteria included group performance and satisfaction with the leaders. The behaviors studied included factors such as providing struc- ture to subordinate and being considerate. A major conclusion for this study of many studies is that traits and behaviors combined explain a minimum of 31 percent of leadership effectiveness, with behaviors accounting for even more of the differences.2
36 CHAPTER 2• TRAITS, MOTIVES, AND CHARACTERISTICS OF LEADERS
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
The trait-based perspective also acknowledges that the situation often influences which trait to emphasize, such as a supervisor of highly technical workers needing to emphasize problem-solving ability. In contrast, a super- visor of workers performing nontechnical, repetitive work might need to emphasize enthusiasm as a motivator.
This chapter and the following chapter concentrate on personal charac- teristics; Chapter 4 describes the behaviors and skills that contribute to leadership effectiveness. Recognize, however, the close association between personal characteristics and leadership skills and behaviors. For example, creative thinking ability (a characteristic) helps a leader formulate an excit- ing vision (leadership behavior). The combination of traits and behaviors helps to explain why leaders show individual differences in effectiveness.3
For example, a leader who is highly intelligent, trustworthy, and passionate about the mission of the group is likely to achieve more success than his or her counterpart who has average intelligence, untrustworthy, and is indiffer- ent about what work the group is performing.
Personality Traits of Effective Leaders
Characteristics associated with leadership can be classified into three broad categories: personality traits, motives, and cognitive factors. These categories of behavior serve as helpful guides. However, they are not definitive: A con- vincing argument can often be made that an aspect of leadership placed in one category could be placed in another. Nevertheless, no matter how personal characteristics are classified, they point toward the conclusion that effective leaders are made of the right stuff. Published research about the trait perspec- tive first appeared in the mid-nineteenth century, and it continues today. Since a full listing of every personal characteristic ever found to be associated with leadership would take several hundred pages, this chapter discusses only the major and most consistently found characteristics related to leadership effectiveness. In this section of the chapter, we focus on personality traits.
Observations by managers and human resource specialists, as well as dozens of research studies, indicate that leaders have certain personality traits.4 These characteristics contribute to leadership effectiveness in many situations, as long as the leader’s style fits the situation reasonably well. For example, an executive might perform admirably as a leader in several differ- ent high-technology companies with different organizational cultures. How- ever, his or her intellectual style might make him or her a poor fit with production workers. Leaders’ personality traits can be divided into two groups: general personality traits such as self-confidence and trustworthi- ness, and task-related traits, such as an internal locus of control.
General Personality Traits We define a general personality trait as a trait that is observable both within and outside the context of work. That is, the same general traits are related
PERSONALITY TRAITS OF EFFECTIVE LEADERS 37
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
to success and satisfaction in both work and personal life. Figure 2-1 lists the general personality traits that contribute to successful leadership.
Self-Confidence Self-confidence improves one’s performance in a variety of tasks, including leadership.5 A leader who is self-assured without being bombastic or overbearing instills self-confidence in team members. A self- confident team leader of a group facing a seemingly impossible deadline might tell the group, “We are understaffed and overworked, but I know we can get this project done on time. I’ve been through tough demands like this before. If we work like a true team, we can pull it off.”
Self-confidence was among the first leadership traits researchers identi- fied, and it currently receives considerable attention as a major contributor to leadership effectiveness.6 In addition to being self-confident, the leader must project that self-confidence to the group. He or she may do so by using unequivocal wording, maintaining good posture, and making appro- priate gestures such as pointing an index finger outward.
Self-confidence is not only a personality trait. It also refers to a behav- ior and an interpersonal skill that a person exhibits in a number of situa- tions. It is akin to being cool under pressure. We can conclude that a person is a self-confident leader when he or she maintains composure when dealing with a crisis, such as while managing a large product recall. The interpersonal skill comes into play in being able to keep others calm
LEADERSHIP EFFECTIVENESS
IN MANY SITUATIONS
Sense of humor
Self-confidence Humility
Assertiveness Extraversion
Authenticity
Trustworthiness
Core self- evaluations
Enthusiasm, optimism, and
warmth
© Ce ng ag e Le ar ni ng
FIGURE 2-1 General Personality Traits of Effective Leaders.
38 CHAPTER 2• TRAITS, MOTIVES, AND CHARACTERISTICS OF LEADERS
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
during turmoil. In speaking about the suitability of job candidates who were recently military officers, Noel Tichy, director of the Global Business Partnership at the University of Michigan said, “There’s a big pool of these officers who had had the kind of under-fire judgment experience that makes them really valuable.”7
Leadership Self-Assessment Quiz 2-1 gives you an opportunity to think about your level of self-confidence.
LEADERSHIP SELF-ASSESSMENT QUIZ 2-1
How Self-Confident Are You?
Indicate the extent to which you agree with each of the following statements. Use a 1-to-5 scale: (1) disagree strongly; (2) disagree; (3) neutral; (4) agree; (5) agree strongly.
DS D N A AS
1. I frequently say to people, “I’m not sure.” 5 4 3 2 1
2. I have been hesitant to take on any leadership assignments. 5 4 3 2 1
3. Several times, people have asked me to be the leader of the group to which I belonged.
1 2 3 4 5
4. I perform well in most situations in life. 1 2 3 4 5
5. At least several people have told me that I have a nice, firm handshake. 1 2 3 4 5
6. I am much more of a loser than a winner. 5 4 3 2 1
7. I am much more of a winner than a loser. 1 2 3 4 5
8. I am cautious about making any substantial change in my life. 5 4 3 2 1
9. I dread it when I have to learn a new skill, such as reading a foreign language. 5 4 3 2 1
10. I freely criticize other people, even over minor matters such as their hair style or word choice.
5 4 3 2 1
11. I become extremely tense when I know it will soon be my turn to present in front of the group or class.
5 4 3 2 1
12. Speaking in front of the class or other group is a frightening experience for me. 5 4 3 2 1
13. When asked for my advice, I willingly offer it. 1 2 3 4 5
14. I feel comfortable attending a social event by myself. 1 2 3 4 5
15. It is rare that I change my opinion just because somebody challenges me. 1 2 3 4 5
Scoring and Interpretation: Calculate your total score by adding the numbers circled. A tentative interpretation of the scoring is as follows:
• 65–75: Very high self-confidence, with perhaps a tendency toward arrogance
• 55–64: A high, desirable level of self-confidence
• 35–54: Moderate, or average, self-confidence
• 15–34: Self-confidence needs strengthening
PERSONALITY TRAITS OF EFFECTIVE LEADERS 39
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
Humility Although self-confidence is a key leadership trait, so is humility, or being humble at the right times. Part of humility is admitting that you do not know everything and cannot do everything, as well as admitting your mistakes to team members and outsiders. A leader, upon receiving a compli- ment for an accomplishment, may explain that the group deserves the credit. The case for humility as a leadership trait is made strongly by Stephen G. Harrison, the president of a consulting firm, in his comment about how the definition of great leadership has changed: “Great leadership is manifested or articulated by people who know how to understate it. There is leadership value in humility, the leadership that comes from putting people in the lime- light, not yourself. Great leadership comes from entirely unexpected places. It’s understatement, it’s dignity, it’s service, it’s selflessness.”8
Core Self-Evaluations Self-confidence is one way of looking at the self that contributes to leadership effectiveness. Extensive research suggests that a set of four other related self-perceptions also contributes to leadership effec- tiveness. Core self-evaluations is a broad personality trait that captures bottom-line self-assessment that is composed of self-esteem, locus of con- trol, generalized self-efficacy, and emotional stability. All four traits are pos- itively related to each other. Self-esteem deals with feeling positive toward the self, and generalized self-efficacy means roughly the same thing as being self-confident in many situations. Locus of control refers to whether a per- son feels personally responsible for events happening to him or her, helping the leader deliver a take-charge attitude. Emotional stability refers to having emotional control, not being neurotic, and having good mental health.
A leader with positive core evaluations is more likely to make decisions more rapidly and pursue initiatives to implement the decisions. Such a leader will feel confident, be steady under pressure, and believe that he or she can control the external environment to some extent.9 One of the quali- ties admired in Jeff Smisek, CEO of Continental Airlines Inc., is his reputa- tion for providing stable leadership to the company. Having a high standing on the trait of emotional stability contributes to stable leadership.10
Trustworthiness Being trustworthy and earning trust is considered so essen- tial to effective leadership that some companies use these factors to evaluate leaders and managers. Furthermore, evidence and opinion continue to mount that being trustworthy and/or honest contributes to leadership effec- tiveness. According to a study conducted by Linda Stewart, CEO of the con- sultancy Interaction Associates, high levels of trust are closely associated with high levels of organizational performance. At the same time, the lower performing companies in the study had lower levels of trust.11 (In both find- ings, we are assuming that leadership behavior influenced organizational performance.)
An effective leader or manager is supposed to walk the talk, thereby showing a consistency between deeds (walking) and words (talk). In this context, trust is defined as a person’s confidence in another individual’s intentions and motives and in the sincerity of that individual’s word.12
40 CHAPTER 2• TRAITS, MOTIVES, AND CHARACTERISTICS OF LEADERS
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
Leaders must be trustworthy, and they must also trust group members. Trust is closely related to transparency, in which organizational leadership is open rather than secretive about activities that affect the welfare of stake- holders. Given that so many people distrust top-level business leaders, as well as political leaders, gaining and maintaining trust is a substantial chal- lenge. The following trust builders are worthy of a prospective leader’s attention and implementation:13
• Make your behavior consistent with your intentions. Practice what you preach, and set the example. Let others know of your intentions and invite feedback on how well you are achieving them.
• When your organization or organizational unit encounters a problem, move into a problem-solving mode instead of looking to blame others for what went wrong.
• Honor confidences. One incident of passing along confidential informa- tion results in a permanent loss of trust by the person whose confidence was violated.
• Maintain a high level of integrity. Build a reputation for doing what you think is morally right in spite of the political consequences.
• Listen with compassion and attentiveness when interacting with others. Appear attentive by your body language such as maintaining eye contact, moving toward the person, and put away electronic interrupters such as a smartphone.
• Tell the truth in ways people can verify. It is much easier to be consistent when you do not have to keep patching up your story to conform to an earlier lie. An example of verification would be for a group member to see if the manager really did attempt to buy new conference room furni- ture as promised.
• Admit mistakes. Covering up a mistake, particularly when everybody knows that you did it, destroys trust quickly.
• Make trust pay in terms of receiving rewards. Trust needs to be seen as a way of gaining advantage.
It takes a leader a long time to build trust, yet one brief incident of untrustworthy behavior can permanently destroy it. Leaders are usually allowed a fair share of honest mistakes. In contrast, dishonest mistakes quickly erode leadership effectiveness.
When a leader is perceived as trustworthy, the organization benefits, as indicated above. Kurt T. Dirks and Donald L. Ferrin examined the findings and implications of research during the last four decades about trust in leadership. The review involved 106 studies and 27,103 individuals. The meta-analysis (quantitative synthesis of studies) emphasized supervisory leadership based on the importance of trust in day-to-day interactions with group members. Trusting a leader was more highly associated with a variety of work attitudes of group members. The highest specific relationships with trust were as follows: more job satisfaction, more commitment to the orga- nization, less intention to leave the company, and more satisfaction with the leader. The relationship of trust to job performance was statistically
PERSONALITY TRAITS OF EFFECTIVE LEADERS 41
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
significant but quite low.14 One reason may be that many people perform well for a leader they distrust out of fear of being fired or bad-listed.
Michael E. Palanski and Francis J. Yammarino conducted an online experiment, a study in a health care organization, and a lab study to investi- gate how integrity relates to job performance. (Integrity was defined as the consistency between words and actions.) No direct relationship between integrity and job performance was found, yet integrity facilitated the leader being trusted, which in turn was associated with higher performance. Leader integrity also enhanced job satisfaction to some extent, which in turn can sometimes enhance job performance.15
Leadership Self-Assessment Quiz 2-2 gives you the opportunity to exam- ine your own tendencies toward trustworthiness.
Authenticity Embedded in the trait of being trustworthy is authenticity— being genuine and honest about your personality, values, and beliefs as well as having integrity. Bill George, a Harvard Business School professor and former chairman and CEO of Medtronic, developed the concept of authentic leadership. In his words, “Authentic leaders demonstrate a pas- sion for their purpose, practice their values consistently, and lead with their hearts as well as their heads. They establish long-term meaningful relation- ships and have the self-discipline to get results. They know who they are.”16
To become an authentic leader and to demonstrate authenticity, be yourself rather than attempting to be a replica of someone else. Others respond to your leadership, partly because you are genuine rather than phony. The authentic leader can emphasize different values and characteristics to dif- ferent people without being phony. For example, a corporate-level manager at Goodyear service centers might engage in more banter when he or she visits a service center than when meeting with financial analysts.
George and several colleagues conducted an intensive leadership develop- ment study of 125 diverse business leaders to understand how they became and remain authentic. The authentic leaders typically learned from their experiences by reflecting on them. They also took a hard look at themselves to understand what they really believe, such as whether they really care if their workers are satisfied. The authors of the study concluded that the leader being authentic is the only way to create long-term, positive business results.17
Authentic leadership can also have a payoff in terms of daily interactions with group members. A study conducted with two telecom firms in China found that employees who reported to supervisors with authentic leadership behavior tended to be better organizational citizens, and were also more engaged in their work.18 (Organizational citizenship behavior refers to a willingness to help out beyond one’s job description without expecting to be rewarded.)
A team of researchers conducted two studies to better understand the relationship between authentic leadership and job performance. The set- tings chosen were a police organization and a training camp at a U.S. Army base. These difficult, or extreme, settings were chosen because such
42 CHAPTER 2• TRAITS, MOTIVES, AND CHARACTERISTICS OF LEADERS
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
LEADERSHIP SELF-ASSESSMENT QUIZ 2-2
Behaviors and Attitudes of a Trustworthy Leader
Instructions: Listed here are behaviors and attitudes of leaders who are generally trusted by their group members and other constituents. After you read each characteristic, check to the right whether this is a behavior or attitude that you appear to have developed already, or whether it does not fit you at present.
FITS ME DOES NOT FIT ME
1. Tells people he or she is going to do something, and then always follows through and gets it done.
□ □
2. Is described by others as being reliable. □ □
3. Is good at keeping secrets and confidences. □ □
4. Tells the truth consistently. □ □
5. Minimizes telling people what they want to hear. □ □
6. Is described by others as “walking the talk.” □ □
7. Delivers consistent messages to others in terms of matching words and deeds.
□ □
8. Does what he or she expects others to do. □ □
9. Minimizes hypocrisy by not engaging in activities he or she tells others are wrong.
□ □
10. Readily accepts feedback on behavior from others. □ □
11. Maintains eye contact with people when talking to them. □ □
12. Appears relaxed and confident when explaining his or her side of a story. □ □
13. Individualizes compliments to others rather than saying something like “You look great” to many people.
□ □
14. Does not expect lavish perks for himself or herself while expecting others to go on an austerity diet.
□ □
15. Does not tell others a crisis is pending (when it is not) just to gain their cooperation.
□ □
16. Collaborates with others to make creative decisions. □ □
17. Communicates information to people at all organizational levels digitally and in person.
□ □
18. Readily shares financial information with others. □ □
19. Listens to people and then acts on many of their suggestions. □ □
20. Generally engages in predictable behavior. □ □
Scoring and Interpretation: These statements are mostly for self-reflection, so no specific scoring key exists. However, the more of these statements that fit you, the more trustworthy you are— assuming you are answering truthfully. The usefulness of this self-quiz increases if somebody who knows you well also answers it about you. Your ability and willingness to carry out some of the behaviors specified in this quiz could have an enormous impact on your career because so many business leaders in recent years have not been perceived as trustworthy. Being trustworthy is therefore a career asset.
PERSONALITY TRAITS OF EFFECTIVE LEADERS 43
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
contexts provide greater opportunity for leaders to encourage positive atti- tudes and reduce negativity among subordinates. The results of both studies showed that leaders rated as being more authentic had subordinates rated as more effective performers. The underlying mechanism appeared to be that group members who reported to an authentic leader reported experiencing more positive emotions and fewer negative emotions than those individuals reporting to a less authentic leader.19 In short, having an authentic leader puts you in a better mood and can elevate your job performance.
Extraversion Extraversion (the scientific spelling for extroversion) has been recognized for its contribution to leadership effectiveness because it is help- ful for leaders to be gregarious, outgoing, and upbeat in most situations. Also, extraverts are more likely to want to assume a leadership role and par- ticipate in group activities. A meta-analysis of seventy-three studies involv- ing 11,705 subjects found that extraversion was the most consistent personality factor related to leadership effectiveness and leadership emer- gence.20 (Emergence refers to someone being perceived as having leadership qualities.) Extraversion is also the personality trait most consistently and strongly related to the type of leadership that brings about major changes (the transformational type).21
Extraversion may be an almost innate personality characteristic, yet most people can move toward becoming more extraverted by consciously attempting to be friendlier toward people including smiling and asking questions. An example is, “How are things going for you today?”
Research evidence suggests that an extraverted leader may be more effec- tive in stimulating good job performance among laid back than proactive workers. (The proactive worker takes the initiative to solve problems and seize opportunities.) The authors of the study in question, Adam M. Grant, Francesca Gino, and David A. Hofmann, sent questionnaires to managers and their employees at 130 franchises of a U.S. pizza delivery company. Managers were asked to rate their own extent of extraversion. Employees were asked to estimate how often they and their coworkers “try to bring about improved procedures,” among other proactive behaviors. Data were also collected on store profitability, yet controlling for location such as being close to a college campus. (A laboratory study was also conducted about extraverted leaders and proactive employees, finding comparable results.) Among the findings in the pizza franchise study that provide clues to the best leadership approach to proactive employees were the following:
• In stores where employees were below average in proactive personality, extraverted leadership was associated with 16 percent higher profits than average.
• In stores where employees offered ideas, extroverted leadership was associated with 14 percent lower profits.
A key conclusion drawn from the study is that when employees are proactive, extraverted leadership is associated with lower performance.
44 CHAPTER 2• TRAITS, MOTIVES, AND CHARACTERISTICS OF LEADERS
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
The problem is that extraverted leaders may attempt to come up with most of the ideas for improvement themselves, rather than listening carefully to employee suggestions. Furthermore, with proactive employees leaders need to be receptive to suggestions from the group. When employees are not pro- active, extraverted leadership was associated with higher group perfor- mance.22 The implication is that with less proactive group members, the leader needs to act more demonstratively and set a clear direction.
Assertiveness Letting others know where you stand contributes to leader- ship effectiveness, and also contributes to being or appearing extraverted. Assertiveness refers to being forthright in expressing demands, opinions, feelings, and attitudes. Being assertive helps leaders perform many tasks and achieve goals. Among them are confronting group members about their mistakes, demanding higher performance, setting high expectations, and making legitimate demands on higher management. A director of her company’s mobile phone service unit was assertive when she said to her staff, “Our cell service is the worst in the industry. We have to improve.” An assertive person is reasonably tactful rather than being aggressive and obnoxious. A leader with good sensitivity, or emotional intelligence, knows when assertiveness crosses the line into aggressiveness, such as insulting subordinates or making unreasonable demands.
Enthusiasm, Optimism, and Warmth In almost all leadership situations, it is desirable for the leader to be enthusiastic. Group members tend to respond positively to enthusiasm, partly because enthusiasm may be perceived as a reward for constructive behavior. Enthusiasm is also a desirable leadership trait because it helps build good relationships with team members. A leader can express enthusiasm both verbally (“Great job”; “I love it”) and nonver- bally (making a fist-bump or high-five gesture).
Ajay Banga, the CEO of MasterCard, exemplifies an enthusiastic execu- tive. Shortly after joining the company as president and chief operating offi- cer in 2009, he developed the reputation of being the company’s cheerleader, shaking up its low-key culture with hugs and fist bumps in the hallway.23
Enthusiasm often takes the form of optimism, which helps keep the group in an upbeat mood and hopeful about attaining difficult goals. The optimistic leader is therefore likely to help bring about exceptional levels of achievement. Yet, there is a potential downside to an optimistic leader. He or she might not develop contingency plans to deal with projects that do not go as well as expected.24 An overly optimistic information technology manager, for example, might not take into account that an earthquake could hit the geographic area where company data are stored.
Being a warm person and projecting that warmth is part of enthusiasm and contributes to leadership effectiveness in several ways. First, warmth helps establish rapport with group members. Second, the projection of warmth is a key component of charisma. Third, warmth is a trait that helps
PERSONALITY TRAITS OF EFFECTIVE LEADERS 45
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
provide emotional support to group members. Giving such support is an important leadership behavior. Fourth, being warm is engaging, whereas being cold tends to create distance from others.
Experimental evidence has been collected suggesting that a leader with a positive emotional state can have a positive impact on job performance. As framed by James B. Avey, Bruce J. Avolio, and Fred Luthans, being positive is part of having positive psychological capital that includes self-efficacy, optimism, hope, and resilience. As part of a broader experiment, engineers in an aerospace company were assigned to leaders with a high or low posi- tive psychological capital. (Low positive psychological capital means that the leader has a negative emotional state.) Leaders in the experiment were given either positive or negative scripts to reflect the two differences in pos- itive psychological states. The experimental task for the engineers was to solve a complex aerospace engineering task. A positive relationship was found between the leader’s positive state and (a) the follower’s positive state, and (b) performance. The study therefore supports the conventional wisdom that leaders with a positive attitude can facilitate group members developing a positive attitude and performing well.25
Leadership Skill-Building Exercise 2-1 provides an opportunity to use display positive psychological capital to group members.
Sense of Humor Whether humor is a trait or a behavior, the effective use of humor is an important part of the leader’s role. Humor adds to the approach- ability and people orientation of a leader. Laughter and humor serve such functions in the workplace as relieving tension and boredom and defusing hostility. Because humor helps the leader dissolve tension and defuse con- flict, it helps him or her exert power over the group. Self-effacing humor is the choice of comedians and organizational leaders alike. By being self- effacing, the leader makes a point without insulting or slighting anybody. Instead of criticizing a staff member for being too technical, the leader might say, “Wait, I need your help. Please explain how this new product works in terms that even I can understand.”
LEADERSHIP SKILL-BUILDING EXERCISE 2-1
Enthusiasm, Optimism, and Warmth on the Job
One person plays the role of the CEO of an American com- pany that makes medical devices, including a computer- ized leg prosthesis that enables the wearer to engage in everyday activities comfortably, as well as play demanding physical sports such as tennis, soccer, and half-court basketball (within limits). The CEO as well as the top- management team have just learned that a medical device manufacturer located in Malaysia has produced an equally
good prosthetic leg that will be sold in the United States for one-half the price of their device. The CEO has sched- uled an 8:30 A.M. Monday meeting to discuss the problem. The CEO believes that enthusiasm, optimism, warmth, as well as the display of positive psychological capital will be necessary to help the team deal with this peril. About five other students will play the role of the top-management team members who attend the meeting.
46 CHAPTER 2• TRAITS, MOTIVES, AND CHARACTERISTICS OF LEADERS
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
Humor as used by leaders has been the subject of considerable serious inquiry, and here are a few recommendations based on this research:26
• People who occupy high-status roles joke at a higher rate than those of lesser status and tend to be more successful at eliciting laughter from others. (A possible reason that high-status people elicit more laughter is that lower-status people want to please them.)
• Self-enhancing humor (building up yourself) facilitates the leader’s acquisition of power from superiors by increasing the leader’s appeal.
• Executives and other managers who use self-deprecating humor appear more approachable and likeable to subordinates.
• Aggressive humor can be used to victimize, belittle, and cause others some type of disparagement—and will lead to negative outcomes such as stress and counter-hostility among group members. (No surprise to readers here.)
Task-Related Personality Traits Certain personality traits of effective leaders are closely associated with task accomplishment. The task-related traits described here are outlined in Figure 2-2.
Proactive Personality Leadership is often perceived to mean about the same thing as taking the initiative. Initiative, in turn, is closely related to being proactive, or creating or controlling a situation by causing something to happen, rather than reacting after the event happens. According to its origi- nal research-based definition, a person with a proactive personality has a relatively stable tendency to effect environmental change.27 Proactive behav- ior usually stems from a proactive personality and refers to self-initiated anticipatory action with the intent of either changing the situation or one’s own behavior and attitudes.28 An effective leader therefore often has a pro- active personality, and therefore exhibits proactive behavior.
Passion
Emotional intelligence
1. Self-awareness 2. Self-management 3. Social awareness 4. Relationship management
Flexibility and adaptability
Proactive personality
Courage ©
Ce ng ag e Le ar ni ng
FIGURE 2-2 Task-Related Personality Traits of Leaders.
PERSONALITY TRAITS OF EFFECTIVE LEADERS 47
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
Most of the leaders, you will read about in this book, show high proactivity including the CEO described in the chapter opener who wants to leave a leg- acy. An example of research evidence for the importance of leader proactivity is found in a study of district managers and their business units from a large U.S.-based consumer packaged goods company. The managers were rated on their proactivity by their immediate managers, using statements such as “Takes charge in situations where a leader is needed.” Part of the study found that proactive high-level managers establish more challenging goals for their business units, which in turn are associated with higher sales performance.29
Leadership Self-Assessment Quiz 2-3 gives you an opportunity to think through your own tendencies toward having a proactivity personality and therefore being proactive.
LEADERSHIP SELF-ASSESSMENT QUIZ 2-3
My Tendencies Toward Being a Proactive Personality
Indicate on a 1-to-5 scale the extent of your agreement with the statements below: agree strongly (AS), agree (A), neutral (N), disagree (D), and disagree strongly (DS).
AS A N D DS
1. I plan carefully for things that might go wrong. 5 4 3 2 1
2. I don’t worry about problems until after they have taken place. 1 2 3 4 5
3. If I see something that is broken, I fix it. 5 4 3 2 1
4. I have been told several times that I am good at taking the initiative. 5 4 3 2 1
5. I often let things like a computer password expire without making the necessary changes.
1 2 3 4 5
6. When something important needs doing, I wait for somebody else to take the initiative.
1 2 3 4 5
7. I think that having a home security system is a good investment in money. 5 4 3 2 1
8. I look around for good opportunities that would help me in my career or personal life. 5 4 3 2 1
9. I don’t give much thought to the future because there is not much I can do about it. 1 2 3 4 5
10. It is a good idea to start saving or investing for retirement at the beginning of your career.
5 4 3 2 1
11. I begin projects and tasks by myself, without requiring prompting from somebody else.
5 4 3 2 1
12. The old saying, “The early bird gets the worm,” doesn’t make much sense in real life. 1 2 3 4 5
13. I let the future take care of itself without giving it much thought. 1 2 3 4 5
14. I set my own goals rather than have others set them for me. 5 4 3 2 1
15. I create a lot of change both in work and personal life. 5 4 3 2 1
16. I have often asked for feedback on my job performance. 5 4 3 2 1
17. If your job is going well, it is a bad idea to explore new job possibilities from time to time.
1 2 3 4 5
48 CHAPTER 2• TRAITS, MOTIVES, AND CHARACTERISTICS OF LEADERS
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
Passion for the Work and the People A dominant characteristic of effective leaders is their passion for their work and to some extent for the people who help them accomplish the work. The passion goes beyond enthusiasm and often expresses itself as an obsession for achieving company goals. Many leaders begin their workday at 6:00 A.M. and return to their homes at 7:00 P.M. After dinner, they retreat to their home offices to conduct business for about two more hours. Information technology devices, such as tablet computers and smart phones, feed the passion for work, making it possible to be in touch with the office even during golf or a family picnic. The down- side to extreme passion for work is that it can lead to work addiction, thereby interfering with other joys in life.
Passion for their work is especially evident in entrepreneurial leaders, no matter what size and type of business. A given business, such as refurbish- ing engines, might appear mundane to outsiders. The leader of such a busi- ness, however, is willing to talk for hours about tearing down old engines and about the wonderful people who help do the job.
QUIZ 2-3 (continued)
AS A N D DS
18. Once you have chosen a satisfactory career, it is a bad idea to explore the possibili- ties of another career from time to time.
1 2 3 4 5
19. I readily express my opinion about the effectiveness of a work process. 5 4 3 2 1
20. It is best to stick carefully to your job description rather than create responsibilities for yourself.
1 2 3 4 5
21. I regularly take positive steps to increase the chances that I will stay healthy and physically fit.
5 4 3 2 1
22. I am quite innovative both in work and personal life. 5 4 3 2 1
Scoring and Interpretation: Total the numbers corresponding to your answers.
• 100–125: Scores in this range suggest that you have strong tendencies toward being a proactive personality. Such proactivity should be (or already is) an asset to you in your career and personal life. Yet scoring 115 points or more could suggest that you sometimes annoy people with your constant need for taking on new responsibility and creating change.
• 70–99: Scores in this range suggest that you have about average tendencies toward being proactive. To enhance you success and have more fun in life, you might attempt to become more proactive.
• 25–69: Scores in this range suggest that you have a problem with proactivity. Both your work and personal life would probably be enhanced if you became more proactive.
Source: The idea for this scale and several of its statements stem from Thomas S. Bateman and J. Michael Grant, “The Proactive Compo- nent of Organizational Behavior: A Measure and Correlates,” Journal of Organizational Behavior, March 1993, p. 112.
PERSONALITY TRAITS OF EFFECTIVE LEADERS 49
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
One of the ways for an entrepreneur to inject passion into a business is to tell a creation-of-the-enterprise story. The story should inspire people to under- stand how your product or cause will make the world a better place. Howard Schultz, the founder and chairman of Starbucks, provides an example.30
Schultz’s story begins in 1961, when his father broke his ankle at work and was left without income, insurance or any way to support his family. The family’s fear inspired change. Schultz grew up driven to create a com- pany in which employees have a safety net woven of respect and dignity.
Emotional Intelligence Many different aspects of emotions, motives, and person- ality that help determine interpersonal effectiveness and leadership skill have been placed under the comprehensive label of emotional intelligence. Emotional intelligence refers to the ability to do such things as understanding one’s feel- ings, have empathy for others, and regulate one’s emotions to enhance one’s quality of life. This type of intelligence generally has to do with the ability to connect with people and understand their emotions. Many of the topics in this chapter (such as warmth) and throughout the text (such as political skill) can be considered related to emotional intelligence. In addition to being an ability, emotional intelligence is also a trait, or part of the leader’s personality.31
Based on research in dozens of companies, Daniel Goleman discovered that the most effective leaders are alike in one essential way: They all have a high degree of emotional intelligence. Cognitive intelligence (or general mental ability) and technical skills are considered threshold capabilities for success in executive positions. Yet, according to Goleman, without a high degree of emotional intelligence, a person can have excellent training, superior analytical skills, and loads of innovative suggestions, but he or she still will not make a great leader. His analysis also revealed that emotional intelligence played an increasingly important role in high-level management positions, where differences in technical skills are of negligible importance. (Keep in mind, however, that most high-level managers would not have advanced to their position if they lacked good technical skills or business knowledge.) Furthermore, when star performers were compared with aver- age ones in senior leadership positions, differences in emotional intelligence were more pronounced than differences in cognitive abilities.32
Four key factors in emotional intelligence are described next, along with a brief explanation of how each factor links to leadership effectiveness. The components of emotional intelligence have gone through several versions, and the version presented here is tied closely to leadership and interper- sonal skills. The leader who scores high in emotional intelligence is described as resonant.33
1. Self-awareness. The ability to understand your own emotions is the most essential of the four emotional intelligence competencies. Having high self- awareness allows people to know their strengths and limitations and have high self-esteem. Resonant leaders use self-awareness to accurately measure their own moods, and they intuitively understand how their moods affect others. (Effective leaders seek feedback to see how well their actions are
50 CHAPTER 2• TRAITS, MOTIVES, AND CHARACTERISTICS OF LEADERS
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
received by others. A leader with good self-awareness would recognize such factors as whether he or she was liked or was exerting the right amount of pressure on people.)
2. Self-management. This is the ability to control one’s emotions and act with honesty and integrity in a consistent and adaptable manner. The right degree of self-management helps prevent a person from throwing temper tantrums when activities do not go as planned. Resonant leaders do not let their occasional bad moods ruin their day. If they cannot overcome the bad mood, they let work associates know of the problem and how long it might last. (A leader with high self-management would not suddenly decide to fire a group member because of one difference of opinion.)
3. Social awareness. This includes having empathy for others and intuition about organizational problems. Socially aware leaders go beyond sensing the emotions of others by showing they care. In addition, they accurately size up political forces in the office. (A team leader with social awareness, or empathy, would be able to assess whether a team member had enough enthusiasm for a project to assign it to him. A CEO who had empathy for a labor union’s demands might be able to negotiate successfully with the head of the labor union to avoid a costly strike.)
4. Relationship management. This includes the interpersonal skills of being able to communicate clearly and convincingly, disarm conflicts, and build strong personal bonds. Resonant leaders use relationship management skills to spread their enthusiasm and solve disagreements, often with kind- ness and humor. (A leader with good relationship management skills would not burn bridges and would continue to enlarge his or her network of peo- ple to win support when support is needed. A leader or manager with good relationship management skills is more likely to be invited by headhunters to explore new career opportunities.)
It is also helpful to recognize that emotional intelligence has relevance for leaders other than those in the executive suite. Two studies with stu- dents taking a course in organizational behavior, and assigned small-group projects, examined how emotional intelligence was related to emergent leadership. Among the dimensions of emotional intelligence measured, it was found that the ability to understand emotions was the most consistently related to leadership emergence.34 In other words, the study participants with the best skill in understanding emotions in others were more likely to be perceived as having leadership qualities.
If leaders do not have emotional intelligence, they may not achieve their full potential despite their high cognitive intelligence. Almost daily, a scan- ning of newspapers will reveal an organizational leader who was disgraced or dismissed because of displaying poor emotional intelligence. Sometimes the business leader is a person of outstanding reputation and accomplish- ment. Among the frequent errors in emotional intelligence are lying about credentials, repeated sexual harassment of subordinates and customers, and insider trading. Most of the leaders described in this book have good
PERSONALITY TRAITS OF EFFECTIVE LEADERS 51
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
emotional intelligence. Here are two examples of making good use of emo- tional intelligence on the job:35
• Your company is approached about merging. The due diligence process suggests everything is favorable, yet your gut instinct says something is amiss. Rather than ignore your intuition, use it to motivate yourself to gather more information on the principals in the company.
• Your stomach knots as you prepare for a presentation. Your anxiety may stem from your sense that you are not well prepared. The emotionally intel- ligent response is to dig into the details and rehearse your presentation until the knots are replaced by a sense of welcome anticipation and confidence.
Research on emotional intelligence and leadership has also focused on the importance of the leader’s mood in influencing performance. Daniel Goleman, Richard Boyatzis, and Annie McKee believe that the leader’s mood and his or her associated behaviors greatly influence bottom-line perfor- mance. One reason is that moods are contagious. A cranky and ruthless leader creates a toxic organization of underachievers (who perform at less than their potential). In contrast, an upbeat and inspirational leader breeds followers who can surmount most challenges. Thus mood finally affects profit and loss. The implication for leaders is that they have to develop emotional intelligence regarding their moods. It is also helpful to develop a sense of humor, because lightheartedness is the most contagious of moods.36 Furthermore, evidence has accumulated that leaders who express positive emotions are more likely to receive high ratings from subordinates. Conversely, leaders who display negative emotions tend to be rated as less effective.37
A concluding note about the study of emotional intelligence is that it contri- butes to the understanding of leadership because Emotional Intelligence high- lights the importance of leaders making effective use of emotions. Information about emotional intelligence also leads to a better understanding of how leader- ship emerges, leadership behaviors, and leadership effectiveness. Nevertheless, some proponents of emotional intelligence go too far in their claims about its importance in relation to leadership effectiveness. Specifically, we cannot over- look the contribution of general mental ability (cognitive intelligence) to being an effective leader. Two separate syntheses of research studies suggest that emo- tional intelligence is only one of various factors (including other personality traits, cognitive ability, and functional skills) that influences what leaders accomplish.38
Flexibility and Adaptability A leader is someone who facilitates change. It therefore follows that a leader must be flexible enough to cope with such changes as technological advances, downsizings, global outsourcing, a shift- ing customer base, and a changing work force. Flexibility, or the ability to adjust to different situations, has long been recognized as an important leadership characteristic. Leaders who are flexible are able to adjust to the demands of changing conditions, much as antilock brakes enable an auto- mobile to adjust to changes in road conditions. Without the underlying trait of flexibility, a person might be an effective leader in only one or two situations. The manufacturing industry exemplifies a field in which
52 CHAPTER 2• TRAITS, MOTIVES, AND CHARACTERISTICS OF LEADERS
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
situation adaptability is particularly important because top executives are required to provide leadership for both traditional production employees as well as highly skilled professionals.
Courage Leaders need courage to face the challenges of taking prudent risks and taking initiative in general. Courage comes from the heart, as sug- gested by the French word for heart, coeur. Leaders must face up to respon- sibility and be willing to put their reputations on the line. It takes courage for a leader to suggest a new undertaking, because if the undertaking fails, the leader is often seen as having failed. Courageous leadership has also been described as gutsy. Many people criticized the late Steve Jobs (the for- mer Apple Inc. CEO and then Chairman) and his management team when they initiated Apple stores because they saw no useful niche served by these retail outlets. Apple stores were an immediate and long-lasting success, vin- dicating the judgment of Jobs and his team. The more faith people place in the power of leaders to cause events, the more strongly they blame leaders when outcomes are unfavorable.
According to Kathleen K. Reardon, courage in business is a special kind of calculated risk taking that comes about with experience. One of the requirements of taking an intelligent gamble is having contingency plans.39
For example, if Apple stores had failed, the properties could have been sold to other posh retailers, thereby reducing possible losses.
Leadership Motives
Effective leaders have frequently been distinguished by their motives and needs. In general, leaders have an intense desire to occupy a position of responsibility for others and to control them. Figure 2-3 outlines four
Tenacity Drive and
achievement motive
Strong work ethic
Power motive
© Ce ng ag e Le ar ni ng
FIGURE 2-3 Leadership Motives.
LEADERSHIP MOTIVES 53
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
specific leadership motives or needs. All four motives can be considered task related.
The Power Motive Effective leaders have a strong need to control resources. Leaders with high power motives have three dominant characteristics: (1) they act with vigor and determination to exert their power, (2) they invest much time in think- ing about ways to alter the behavior and thinking of others, and (3) they care about their personal standing with those around them.40 The power motive is important because it means that the leader is interested in influ- encing others. Without power, it is much more difficult to influence others. Power is not necessarily good or evil; it can be used for the sake of the power holder (personalized power motive) or for helping others (social- ized power motive).41
Personalized Power Motive Leaders with a personalized power motive seek power mostly to further their own interests. They crave the trappings of power, such as status symbols, luxury, and money. The wealthiest of CEOs purchase luxury condominium apartments in major cities, even when they have another home. Some leaders with strong personalized power motives typically enjoy dominating others. Their need for domi- nance can lead to submissive subordinates who are frequently sycophants and yes-persons.
Another characteristic of leaders with a personalized power motive is that they do not worry about everybody liking them. They recognize that as you acquire power, you also acquire enemies. In the words of successful college football coach Steve Spurrier, “If people like you too much, it’s prob- ably because they are beating you.”42
Socialized Power Motive Leaders with a socialized power motive use power primarily to achieve organizational goals or a vision. In this context, the term socialized means that the leader uses power primarily to help others. As a result, he or she is likely to provide more effective leadership. Leaders with socialized power motives tend to be more emotionally mature than lea- ders with personalized power motives. They exercise power more for the benefit of the entire organization and are less likely to manipulate others through the use of power. Leaders with socialized power motives are also less defensive and more willing to accept expert advice. Finally, they have longer-range perspectives.43
It is important not to draw a rigid line between leaders with personal- ized power motives and those with socialized power motives. The distinc- tion between doing good for others and doing good for oneself is often made on the basis of very subjective criteria. A case in point is Denise Morrison, the CEO of Campbell Soup. The many nutritious, relatively
54 CHAPTER 2• TRAITS, MOTIVES, AND CHARACTERISTICS OF LEADERS
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
low-priced foods her company manufactures facilitate the well-being of millions of people throughout the world. At the same time, Morrison is growing in power and stature because the company she leads is so successful.
The Drive and Achievement Motive Leaders are known for working hard to achieve their goals. Drive refers to a propensity to put forth high energy into achieving objectives and to persistence in applying that energy. Drive also includes achievement motivation—finding joy in accomplishment for its own sake. Entrepre- neurs and high-level corporate managers usually have strong achievement motivation. Such people have a consistent desire to:
1. Achieve through their efforts and take responsibility for success or failure
2. Take moderate risks that can be handled through their own efforts 3. Receive feedback on their level of performance 4. Introduce novel, innovative, or creative solutions 5. Plan and set goals44
Drive usually requires a high level of physical energy, especially because many leadership positions require long hours and heavy travel. In recogni- tion of the energy requirements of their position, many business executives emphasize physical fitness. An extreme case in point is Gary Smith, the CEO of Clena Corp., a manufacturer of telecommunications network sys- tems. He has converted stables on his private property into a facility devoted to CrossFit exercises. Such exercises involve mixing different heavy exercises into one session, such as bouncing a medicine ball against a wall, power lifting, and pushups.45
Tenacity and Resilience A final observation about the motivational characteristics of organiza- tional leaders is that they are tenacious. Tenacity multiplies in importance for organizational leaders because it takes a long time to implement a new program or to consummate a business deal, such as acquiring another company. Resilience is part of tenacity because the tenacious person will bounce back from a setback through continuous effort. Visualize the leader of an information technology group in a large corporation. Perhaps he or she builds a website to process customer orders, and the first attempt fails. Instead of giving up, he or she tenaciously works with the team to fix the problems, thereby bouncing back from a major setback in his or her career.
LEADERSHIP MOTIVES 55
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
Cognitive Factors and Leadership
Mental ability as well as personality is important for leadership success. To inspire people, bring about constructive change, and solve problems crea- tively, leaders need to be mentally sharp. Another mental requirement is the ability to sort out essential information from less essential information and then store the most important information in memory. Problem-solving and intellectual skills are referred to collectively as cognitive factors. We discuss five cognitive factors that are closely related to cognitive intelligence, as shown in Figure 2-4. The descriptor cognitive is somewhat necessary to differ- entiate traditional mental ability from emotional intelligence.
Cognitive (or Analytical) Intelligence Being very good at solving problems is a fundamental characteristic of effective leaders in all fields. Business leaders, for example, need to under- stand how to analyze company finances, use advanced software, manage inventory, and deal with international trade regulations. Research spanning 100 years has demonstrated that leaders receive higher scores than most people on mental ability tests, including IQ (a term for a test score that for many people is synonymous with intelligence). A meta-analysis of 151 stud- ies found a positive relationship between intelligence and job performance of leaders in many different settings. The relationship is likely to be higher when the leader plays an active role in decision making and is not overly stressed. The researchers also found support for the old idea that intelli- gence contributes the most to leadership effectiveness when the leader is not vastly smarter than most group members.46 Again, group members pre- fer that their leaders be smarter than the average group member even if the difference is not huge.
Knowledge of the business or group task
Creativity
Farsightedness and conceptual
thinking
Insight into people and situations
Cognitive (or analytical) Intelligence
© Ce ng ag e Le ar ni ng
FIGURE 2-4 Cognitive Factors and Leadership.
56 CHAPTER 2• TRAITS, MOTIVES, AND CHARACTERISTICS OF LEADERS
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
The top 1 percent in combined mental ability (as measured by intelli- gence tests) and income includes large numbers of successful professionals such as doctors, lawyers, and business executives.47
Cognitive intelligence is all the more useful for leadership when it is sup- plemented by practical intelligence, the ability to solve everyday problems by using experience-based knowledge to adapt to and shape the environment. Practical intelligence is sometimes referred to as street smarts.48 A leader with good practical intelligence would know, for example, not to deliver a vision statement on a day most of the company employees were worried about a power outage in their homes created by a massive lightning storm.
A study with printing industry CEOs along with founders of printing indus- try and graphics companies lends support to the importance of practical intel- ligence for leaders. The primary finding of the study was that entrepreneurs who learn through concrete experience and amplify their practical intelligence with growth goals are more likely to lead and operate growing ventures.49
David Fischer, the vice president of marketing at Facebook, illustrates a leader with good cognitive as well as practical intelligence. A former Google executive, he said he knew when he was hired that Facebook Chief Executive Mark Zuckerberg would not tolerate pop-up ads or marketing campaigns that dominate the Facebook home screen. This demand pushed Fischer to create ways to make ad products that will also engage readers.50 Although he works with a team, Fischer also has to generate useful ideas himself.
Knowledge of the Business or Group Task Intellectual ability is closely related to having knowledge of the business or the key task the group is performing. An effective leader has to be techni- cally competent in some discipline, particularly when leading a group of specialists. It is difficult for the leader to establish rapport with group mem- bers when he or she does not know what the group members are doing and when the group does not respect the leader’s technical skills.
The importance of knowledge of the business is strongly recognized as an attribute of executive leadership. Leaders at every level are expected to bring forth useful ideas for carrying out the mission of the organization or organizational unit. A representative example is that according to a team of researchers, a key requirement for the chief supply chain management offi- cer is “end-to-end understanding of the supply chain.”51
Knowledge of the business or the group task is particularly important when developing strategy, formulating mission statements, and sizing up the external environment. Chapter 13 deals with strategy formulation at length.
Creativity Many effective leaders are creative in the sense that they arrive at imagina- tive and original solutions to complex problems. The marketing vice president of Facebook presented as an example of high intelligence also illustrates the importance of creative thinking. Creative ability lies on a
COGNITIVE FACTORS AND LEADERSHIP 57
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
continuum, with some leaders being more creative than others. At one end of the creative continuum are business leaders who think of innovative pro- ducts and services. One example was the late Steve Jobs of Apple Inc. Jobs contributed creative product ideas to his company including endorsing the development of the iPod, followed by the iPhone and iPad. Even while on medical leave, and working from home, Jobs had been involved in product development and company strategy formulation.
At the middle of the creativity continuum are leaders who explore imaginative—but not breakthrough—solutions to business problems. At the low end of the creativity continuum are leaders who inspire group members to push forward with standard solutions to organizational problems. Creativity is such an important aspect of the leader’s role in the modern organization that the development of creative problem-solving skills receives separate attention in Chapter 11.
Insight into People and Situations Another important cognitive trait of leaders is insight, a depth of under- standing that requires considerable intuition and common sense. Intuition is often the mental process used to provide the understanding of a problem. Insight helps speed decision making. Jeff Bezos of Amazon.com believes that the bigger the decision, such as whether or not to enter a particular business, the greater the role of insight and intuition.
Insight into people and situations involving people is an essential charac- teristic of managerial leaders because it helps them make the best use of both their own and others’ talents. For example, it helps them make wise choices in selecting people for key assignments. Insight also enables man- agers to do a better job of training and developing team members because they can wisely assess the members’ strengths and weaknesses. Another major advantage of being insightful is that the leader can size up a situation and adapt his or her leadership approach accordingly. For instance, in a cri- sis situation, group members welcome directive and decisive leadership. Being able to read people helps the manager provide this leadership.
You can gauge your insight by charting the accuracy of your hunches and predictions about people and business situations. For example, size up a new coworker or manager as best you can. Record your observations and test them against how that person performs or behaves many months later. The feedback from this type of exercise will help sharpen your insights.
Farsightedness and Conceptual Thinking To develop visions and corporate strategy, a leader needs farsightedness, the ability to understand the long-range implications of actions and policies. A farsighted leader recognizes that hiring talented workers today will give the firm a long-range competitive advantage. A more shortsighted view would be to hire less-talented workers to satisfy immediate employment needs. The farsighted leader/manager is not oblivious to short-range needs
58 CHAPTER 2• TRAITS, MOTIVES, AND CHARACTERISTICS OF LEADERS
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
LEADER IN ACTION
Kevin A. Plank, Founder of Under Armour Inc.
Kevin A. Plank is the entrepreneurial leader who founded Under Armour Inc., the popular line of sports apparel. Plank launched a basic idea of tight, breathable, sports clothes, and built into a company of several billion dol- lars in annual sales, and a 3 percent share of the sports apparel market in the United States and Canada.
While a student at the University of Maryland, Plank started several businesses, including Cupid’s Valen- tine, a small firm that delivered roses on Valentine’s Day. Savings from the rose delivery business became the startup money for Under Armour. As Plank became frustrated with the inability of his T-shirts to absorb per- spiration and keep him dry, he searched for material that would wick the sweat from his body, making him lighter and faster. Plank did find the right type of syn- thetic fabric, used in women’s lingerie. He had a tailor create a handful of prototypes, and asked his team- mates to give the T-shirts a try, suggesting that the sweat-absorbing shirts would enhance their perfor- mance. Plank later sent sample T-shirts to professional football players, asking them to pass them out to other players in the locker room. An advertisement in ESPN The Magazine prompted $1 million in direct sales the following year.
To market his new business, Plank traveled exten- sively, visiting locker rooms across the country to introduce athletes and equipment managers to a novel item— a tight-fitting, moisture-wicking T-shirt that provides muscle support and regulates the body temperature. Over the years, the product line has expanded including professional and amateur team uniforms, footwear, and even loose-fitting garments such as tennis shirts.
A major part of the company image Plank has created is that of a youthful, athletic lifestyle. The average employee age is in the low thirties, and most are physi- cally fit. Employees work out physically on company pre- mises, and food in the company cafeteria is coded according to its level of healthiness, including “God” foods, “slow” foods, and “Whoa” foods.
Plank has made Under Armour a place where anyone with a creative idea will be listened to carefully and encouraged. Many suggestions for improvement come from employees in their early twenties. Plank will some- times clap his hands in enthusiasm when he and an employee agree on a course of action, such as a product improvement. Plank stays actively involved in the details of the business such as new product development and seeking the most appropriate professional athletes for product endorsements.
A key part of Plank’s management style is to incorpo- rate athletic values into the office environment. Instead of meetings, the company holds “huddles.” Employees are encouraged to “manage the clock,” “executive the play,” and “respect your teammates.”
Plank is so excited about entrepreneurship that he initiated the Cupid’s Cup Business and Innovation Com- petition and Showcase, named after the Valentine’s Day rose delivery business he started while at college. The initiative encourages young entrepreneurs to compete for an opportunity to build their businesses. Plank is also a frequent speaker at organizations and universities throughout the United States.
QUESTIONS
1. What evidence is presented in this story that Kevin Plank has good cognitive skills?
2. Which personality traits does Plank appear to possess?
3. Assuming that he had a job available in your field, how would you enjoy reporting directly to Plank?
Source: Original story created from facts and observations in the follow- ing sources: Daniel Roberts, “Under Armour Gets Serious,” Fortune, November 7, 2011, pp. 152–162; “Kevin Plank and Under Armour,” (www.uabiz.com), pp. 1–3; Jean Marbella, “Under Armour Founder Kevin Plank Sees Himself as the Underdog: CEO Grounds Myriad Ambi- tions in His Maryland Roots,” Baltimore Sun (http://articles.baltimore- sun.com), May 9, 2013, pp. 1–2; Jason Fagone, “Kevin Plank, the Man Under the Armour,” Men’s Journal (www.mensjournal.com), September 2013, pp. 1–8.
COGNITIVE FACTORS AND LEADERSHIP 59
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
but will devise an intermediate solution, such as hiring temporary workers until people with the right talents are found.
Conceptual thinking refers to the ability to see the overall perspective, and it makes farsightedness possible. A conceptual thinker is also a systems thinker, because he or she understands how the external environment influ- ences the organization and how different parts of the organization influence each other. A good conceptual thinker recognizes how his or her organiza- tional unit contributes to the firm or how the firm meshes with the outside world.
The CEO of PepsiCo, Indra Nooyi, believes that the single most impor- tant skill needed for any CEO today is strategic acuity (meaning conceptual thinking and farsightedness). She notes that over twenty-five years ago, when she was chosen to run the European business for PepsiCo, Roger Enrico, the company CEO at the time, said, “I’m pulling you back.” When Nooyi asked why, Enrico replied, “I can get operating executives to run a profit-and-loss-center. But I cannot find people to help me re-conceptualize PepsiCo. That’s the skill in shortest supply.”52
The accompanying Leader in Action insert gives you a CEO in the sports apparel field to study in terms of his personal attributes including cognitive skills.
To help personalize the information about key leadership traits presented so far, do Leadership Skill-Building Exercise 2-2.
The Influence of Heredity and Environment on Leadership
Which contributes more to leadership effectiveness, heredity or environ- ment? Are leaders born or made? Do you have to have the right stuff to be a leader? Many people ponder these issues now that the study of leadership is in vogue. The most sensible answer is that the traits, motives, and charac- teristics required for leadership effectiveness are caused by a combination
LEADERSHIP SKILL-BUILDING EXERCISE 2-2
Group Feedback on Leadership Traits
The class organizes into groups of about seven people. A volunteer sits in the middle of each group. Each group member looks directly at the person in the hot seat and tells him or her which leadership trait, characteristic, or motive he or she seems to possess. It will help if the feedback providers offer a few words of explanation for their observations. For example, a participant who is told that he or she has self-confidence might also be told, “I noticed how confidently you told the class about your
success on the job.” The group next moves on to the second person, and so forth. (We assume that you have had some opportunity to observe your classmates prior to this exercise.)
Each member thus receives positive feedback about leadership traits and characteristics from all the other members in the group. After all members have had their turn at receiving feedback, discuss as a group the value of the exercise.
60 CHAPTER 2• TRAITS, MOTIVES, AND CHARACTERISTICS OF LEADERS
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
of heredity and environment. Leaders are both born and made. Personality traits and mental ability traits are based on certain inherited predispositions and aptitudes that require the right opportunity to develop. Cognitive intelli- gence is a good example. We inherit a basic capacity that sets an outer limit to how much mental horsepower we will have. Yet people need the right opportunity to develop their cognitive intelligence so that they can behave brightly enough to be chosen for a leadership position.
Evelyn Williams, who directs the leadership development program at Stanford University, makes the following metaphor: “I think leadership is a combination of nature and nurture. Just as some musicians have a special talent for playing instruments, some people seem to be born with leadership abilities. But whatever their natural talent, people can certainly learn to be better musicians—and better leaders.”53
The physical factor of energy also sheds light on the nature- versus-nurture issue. Some people are born with a biological propensity for being more energetic than others. Yet unless that energy is properly chan- neled, it will not help a person to become an effective leader.
Advances in neuroscience provide additional evidence that there is most likely a genetic and biological component to leadership. David Rock, founder of the NeuroLeadership Institute in Australia, points out that an effective leader is adaptive, such as knowing when to be dogmatic versus collaborative, or when to focus on details versus the big picture. To be adaptive, a person needs an integrated brain. Such integration requires strong connections across all regions of the brain. These connections are mostly genetic although they can be enhanced though mental activities such as creativity training. When the brain is well integrated, the leader can switch between different approaches with ease, such as being tough and unforgiving in one situation and displaying empathy in another.54
A convincing example of how brain structure can influence leadership behavior comes from a study about the use of neurological imaging to clas- sify transformational versus non-transformational leaders. As will be explained in the next chapter, transformational leaders bring about major positive changes. In the brain imaging study referenced here, leaders were classified as transformational versus non-transformational based on psycho- logical test results. The 200 leaders studied came from a variety of indus- tries as well as the military. A complex analysis of EEG recordings was able to classify leaders as transformational versus non-transformational with an astonishing 92:5 percent accuracy. A key finding was that transformational leadership is linked to dominance of the frontal part of the brain—precisely the part of the brain associated with executive functions such as planning and foresight.55 Keep in mind that the frontal part of the brain can be devel- oped through concentrated intellectual activity over time, suggesting that becoming a transformational leader requires more than having inherited a brain with a dominant frontal lobe.
Research about emotional intelligence reinforces the statements made so far about leadership being a combination of inherited and learned factors. The outermost areas of the brain, known collectively as the neocortex,
THE INFLUENCE OF HEREDITY AND ENVIRONMENT ON LEADERSHIP 61
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
govern analytical thinking and technical skill, which are associated with cognitive or traditional intelligence. The innermost areas of the brain gov- ern emotions, such as the rage one might feel when being criticized by a customer. Emotional intelligence originates in the neurotransmitters of the limbic system of the brain, which governs feelings, impulses, and drives.
A person’s genes, therefore, influence the emotional intelligence neces- sary for leadership. However, experience is important for emotional intelli- gence because it increases with age,56 and a person usually becomes better at managing relationships with practice. As one turnaround manager said, “I’ve restructured five different companies, and I’ve learned to do it without completely destroying morale.”
The Strengths and Limitations of the Trait Approach
A compelling argument for the trait approach is that there is convincing evidence that leaders possess personal characteristics that differ from those of non-leaders. Based on their review of the type of research reported in this chapter, Kirkpatrick and Locke concluded: “Leaders do not have to be great men or women by being intellectual geniuses or omni- scient prophets to succeed. But they do need to have the ‘right stuff’ and this stuff is not equally present in all people.”57 The current emphasis on emotional intelligence, charisma, innovative thinking, and ethical conduct, which are really traits, attitudes, and behaviors, reinforces the importance of the trait approach.
Understanding the traits of effective leaders serves as an important guide to leadership selection. If we are confident that honesty and integrity, as well as creativity and imagination, are essential leadership traits, then we can concentrate on selecting leaders with those characteristics. Another important strength of the trait approach is that it can help people prepare for leadership responsibility and all of the issues that accompany it. A person might seek experiences that enable him or her to develop vital characteristics such as self-confidence, good problem-solving ability, and assertiveness.
A limitation to the trait approach is that it does not tell us which traits are absolutely needed in which leadership situations. We also do not know how much of a trait, characteristic, or motive is the right amount. For example, some leaders get into ethical and legal trouble because they allow their ambition to cross the borderline into greed and gluttony. In addition, too much focus on the trait approach can breed an elitist conception of leadership. People who are not outstanding on key leadership traits and characteristics might be discouraged from seeking leadership positions.
A subtle limitation to the trait approach is that it prompts some people to believe that to be effective, you have to have a high standing on almost every leadership characteristic. In reality, the majority of effective leaders are outstanding in many characteristics but are low on others. Another possible limitation to the trait approach is that some leaders might be
62 CHAPTER 2• TRAITS, MOTIVES, AND CHARACTERISTICS OF LEADERS
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
READER’S ROADMAP
convinced that they must be strong on one trait at the exclusion of its polar opposite, such as always being extraverted and avoiding introversion. Peter Grauer, the CEO of Bloomberg Ltd., believes that a combination of opposite traits is often required for leadership effectiveness. For example, a leader who is a big-picture thinker might also need to be strong at details. He says that such a leader can give direction on little things and also encourage big ideas.58
A balanced perspective on the trait approach is that certain traits, motives, and characteristics increase the probability that a leader will be effective, but they do not guarantee effectiveness. The leadership situation often influences which traits will be the most important.59 At the same time, different situations call for different combinations of traits. Visualize yourself as managing a restaurant staffed by teenagers who had never worked previously. You would need to emphasize warmth, enthusiasm, flex- ibility, and adaptability. Less emphasis would be required on cognitive skills and the power motive.
In this chapter, we focused on the traits, motives, and characteristics of the leader— his or her inner qualities. In the next chapter, we dig further into leadership qualities by studying charismatic and transformational leadership.
SUMMARY
The trait-based perspective of leadership contends that certain personal characteristics and skills con- tribute to leadership effectiveness in many situa- tions. General personality traits associated with effective leadership include (1) self-confidence; (2) humility; (3) core self-evaluations; (4) trustwor- thiness; (5) authenticity; (6) extraversion; (7) asser- tiveness; (8) enthusiasm, optimism, and warmth; and (9) sense of humor.
Some personality traits of effective leaders are closely associated with task accomplishment. Among them are (1) proactive personality, (2) pas- sion for the work and the people, (3) emotional intelligence, (4) flexibility and adaptability, and (5) courage. Emotional intelligence is composed of four traits: self-awareness, self-management, social awareness, and relationship management.
Certain motives and needs associated with leader- ship effectiveness are closely related to task accom- plishment. Among them are (1) the power motive,
(2) the drive and achievement motive, (3) strong work ethic, and (4) tenacity and resilience.
Cognitive factors are also important for leadership success. They include cognitive (or analytical) intelli- gence and knowledge of the business or group task (or technical competence.) Practical intelligence con- tributes to cognitive intelligence. Creativity is another important cognitive skill for leaders, but effective lea- ders vary widely in their creative contributions. Insight into people and situations, including the abil- ity to make effective judgments about business oppor- tunities, also contributes to leadership effectiveness. Farsightedness and conceptual thinking help leaders to understand the long-range implications of actions and policies and to take an overall perspective.
The issue of whether leaders are born or bred frequently surfaces. A sensible answer is that the traits, motives, and characteristics required for leadership effectiveness are a combination of hered- ity and environment.
SUMMARY 63
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
The trait approach to leadership is supported by many studies showing that leaders are different from non-leaders, and that effective leaders are dif- ferent from less effective leaders. Nevertheless, the
trait approach does not tell us which traits are most important in which situations or how much of a trait is required. Also, different situations call for different combinations of traits.
KEY TERMS
core self-evaluations 40 trust 40 authenticity 42 assertiveness 45 proactive personality 47
emotional intelligence 50 flexibility 52 drive 55 achievement motivation 55 cognitive factors 56
practical intelligence 57 insight 58 farsightedness 58
GUIDELINES FOR ACTION AND SKILL DEVELOPMENT
Because emotional intelligence is so important for leadership success, many organizations sponsor emotional intelligence training for managers. One way to get started on improving emotional intelli- gence would be to attend such a training program. However, like all forms of training, emotional intel- ligence training must be followed up with consis- tent and determined practice. A realistic starting point in improving your emotional intelligence is to work with one of its four components at a time, such as the empathy aspect of social awareness.
Begin by obtaining as much feedback as you can from people who know you. Ask them if they think you understand their emotional reactions, and how well they think you understand them. It is also help- ful to ask someone from another culture or some- one who has a severe disability how well you communicate with him or her. (A higher level of empathy is required to communicate well with somebody much different from you.) If you have external or internal customers, ask them how well you appear to understand their position.
Another way of gaining insight into one’s level of emotional intelligence would be complete a profes- sional assessment of EQ (emotional intelligence quotient), combined with an interview by a skilled professional to supplement the assessment. One such instrument is the Emotional Intelligence Appraisal-Me Edition that also offers an e-learning course to strengthen emotional intelligence.60
If you find any area of deficiency, work on that deficiency steadily. For example, perhaps you are not perceived as taking the time to understand a point of view quite different from your own. Attempt to understand other points of view. Sup- pose you believe strongly that money is the most important motivator for practically everybody. Speak to a person with a different opinion, and lis- ten carefully until you understand that person’s perspective.
A few months later, obtain more feedback about your ability to empathize. If you are making prog- ress, continue to practice. Then, repeat these steps for another facet of emotional intelligence. As a result of this practice, you will have developed another valuable interpersonal skill.
Another way of developing emotional intelligence is through mindfulness, which refers to being more aware of your thoughts and actions. Reflect carefully on how you react to people and what you are think- ing. As with meditation, pay careful attention to the moment. For example, you might be a participant in an intense meeting, and you think of a witty com- ment that at first you feel cannot wait. Through mindfulness, you might decide to postpone the com- ment until a less intense moment.61
A constructive approach to applying trait theory to attain your goals in a given situation is to think through which combination of traits is the most likely to lead to positive outcomes in the situation at
64 CHAPTER 2• TRAITS, MOTIVES, AND CHARACTERISTICS OF LEADERS
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
LEADERSHIP CASE PROBLEM A
hand. Finding the right cluster of traits to emphasize is usually much more useful than emphasizing one trait. You might be leading a group, for example, that is worried because it needs a creative idea to become more productive. Here you might emphasize your cognitive skills, be assertive about expressing your ideas, and also express enthusiasm about the group’s chances for success.
Discussion Questions and Activities
1. Which personality trait or traits in a leader have you found to be the most effective in deal- ing with you? Why?
2. Suppose a college student graduates with a major for which he or she lacks enthusiasm. What might this person do about becoming a passionate leader?
3. What have you observed personally to be help- ful about a leader displaying a sense of humor?
4. What would lead you to conclude that a leader was non-authentic (phony)?
5. Under what circumstances do you think it is acceptable for a leader to lose emotional con- trol, such as ranting, swearing, or crying?
6. What are your best-developed leadership traits, motives, and characteristics? How do you know?
7. Provide an example of a leader you have observed who appears to have good cognitive intelligence, yet is lacking in practical intelligence.
8. Which do you think is the most outstanding leadership trait, motive, or characteristic of the person teaching this class? Explain your answer.
9. If leadership ability is partially inherited, to what extent is it still worthwhile for a person without any family members who have held leadership positions to pursue a career as a high-level business leaders?
10. Many people who disagree with the trait approach to leadership nevertheless still con- duct interviews when hiring a person for a lead- ership position. Why is conducting such interviews inconsistent with their attitude toward the trait approach?
Store Manager, Ensign Jimmy Badger
During his senior year in high school, Jimmy Badger decided that he would apply for a scholar- ship with the Naval Reserve Officers Training Corps (NROTC) Scholarship Program. The pros- pect of having a scholarship that included the cost of tuition, textbooks, lab fees, and minor living expenses seemed outstanding. The focus of the NROTC program on developing leadership skills, including community-service activities, was another plus for Jimmy. He reasoned also that the formal education he would receive would help pre- pare him for a good career in whatever field he chose. Furthermore, Jimmy thought that serving his country for the six required years was an excel- lent idea. In his words, “If the powers that be think our country needs a Navy, I want to do my part.”
Jimmy found appealing the idea that after grad- uation from college he would be commissioned as an Ensign in the Naval Reserve, if he committed to
a minimum of five years of active duty service. After a successful four years at his chosen state uni- versity, Jimmy became submarine officer Ensign Badger. The five years in the Navy fulfilled their promise. Jimmy enjoyed working with sailors, other officers at his level, and more experienced officers. Jimmy particularly enjoyed being a leader and having so much responsibility. He noted that “One mistake in a submarine can have disastrous consequences for hundreds of people.”
Jimmy’s superiors thought highly of his work, and they consistently give him outstanding performance evaluations (fitness reports). The one area of sug- gested improvement in his performance as a naval officer was that at times his performance expecta- tions of those in his command tended to be unrealis- tically high. A senior officer once told him, “Ensign Badger, this is not your grandfather’s Navy. You need to be a little more patient with young sailors.”
LEADERSHIP CASE PROBLEM A 65
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
When Jimmy began his job search as he approached the end of his naval service, he found that many companies were actively recruiting former military officers. The most attractive opportunities were for management positions, or management training programs that would lead quickly to a man- agement position. After a brief job search, Jimmy accepted a management training position at one of the best-known home-improvement chains.
From the start of the training program, Jimmy knew that he had made a good career choice. He believed strongly that his command experience in the Navy, as well as his formal education and part-time jobs, were a strong combination for being successful as a store manager. Jimmy began by working as a store associate for three months in order to learn the business from an entry-level per- spective. Next, he was appointed as manager of the tool department at one store for nine months.
Jimmy’s giant step into a leadership position took place when was appointed as the store man- ager at a medium-size store in the chain, located in Denver, Colorado. In his first meeting with the department managers and other key personnel, Jimmy told them, “I am so pleased to have com- mand of this store. I will soon be asking you for your suggestions as to how to make our store one of the highest-performing units in the company. Communication with me will be constant. My smartphone will be turned on 24/7 to listen to your problems, as well as to inform you of any trou- ble spots I observe.”
A few months into his position, Jimmy transmit- ted an e-mail to every worker in the store, depart- ment supervisors included. The e-mail read in part: “Last evening during my late-night inspection, I noticed several deficiencies in the parking lot that I do not want to see repeated. I found several shop- ping carts scattered around the lot, instead of in their designated parking space. I found garbage on
the ground. I saw two of our store associates puff- ing cigarettes outside the store.
“All of the above are totally unacceptable. Let me know by the end of your shift how you are going to fix the problem.”
Toward the end of Jimmy’s first year, the human resources department conducted its annual morale and job satisfaction survey using the company intranet. Participants were assured that all responses would be anonymous. As a result, parti- cipants were encouraged to be entirely candid. Sev- eral of the write-in comments about store manager Jimmy Badger were as follows:
● Our manager is energetic and eager to win. He is still learning about the home-improvement busi- ness, but I think his high standards will help us down the road.
● I heard that Jimmy was an officer on a subma- rine. Will somebody please tell Jimmy to not worry so much? One mistake by a store associ- ate will not drown us.
● Our man Jimmy Badger is a good leader. But he needs to know that some of the yahoos we hire as store associates don’t fix their mistakes with one dressing down.
● I like our store manager. But I think he thinks that our ship is sinking and his job is to pull off a rescue mission.
Questions
1. Which leadership characteristics of Jimmy Badger are revealed in this case? Justify your conclusions.
2. To what extent should Jimmy modify his lead- ership approach?
3. What do you think of the home-improvement store’s positive bias toward hiring former military officers for its management training program?
ASSOCIATED ROLE PLAY Today, district manager Lola Sanchez holds a per- formance review with store manager Jimmy Badger. One student plays the role of Lola, who is
not looking forward to this review. She is pleased with Jimmy’s results, but she is concerned that he is going too far in pushing for high standards of
66 CHAPTER 2• TRAITS, MOTIVES, AND CHARACTERISTICS OF LEADERS
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
LEADERSHIP CASE PROBLEM B
behavior and compliance with store rules. Lola worries that Jimmy’s high standards of perfor- mance and behavior might create some unwanted turnover. Another student plays the role of Jimmy, who is expecting an outstanding performance
evaluation because of his high standards of perfor- mance and behavior. Run the role play for about eight minutes, with observers providing some feed- back after the role players have completed their task.
Blunt Brittany
Brittany is the director of merchandising for Auto Pal, a large chain of automotive supply stores in the United States and Canada. The company has con- tinued to grow in terms of stores and income, as so many more people keep their vehicles longer, and also perform more maintenance, such as oil changes, by themselves. Merchandising is a core function of Auto Pal because the chain distributes thousands of products in its stores, from floor mats to transmissions.
With profit margins thin, and heavy competition, the pace of conducting business at Auto Pal is hectic. Brittany moves quickly when dealing with her direct reports, sometimes to their surprise.
Sid, a merchandise specialist for vehicle clean- ing and polishing supplies, recently requested a two-week paternity leave because he and his wife were expecting a baby any moment now. Brittany replied that such a request was kind of wimpy, and a little bit out of the ordinary. “Don’t you have a mother-in-law who can help with the new baby? Or, are you so poor that you can’t hire a nanny for two weeks?”
Katie, a merchandising specialist for batteries, regulators, and radiators, sent Brittany a detailed report about new procurement software that might save thousands of dollars for Auto Pal in the long run. Brittany sent back an e-mail stating in part, “Does this great new software come from
a company that employs a relative of yours? We are already using state-of-the art software.”
Jeff, the office manager, and one of Auto Pal’s most senior employees, sent Brittany an e-mail ask- ing if he could take his ten days of vacation in five two-day pieces next year instead of ten consecutive working days. The next day, Brittany wrote back, “I like your idea Jeff. In this way your work flow would be less disrupted. And besides, an old-timer like you needs a few more long weekends than the rest of us do.”
One day, Auto Pal CEO Derek asked Brittany how well she was proceeding with her strategic plan for next year. Brittany replied, “Not much progress yet. I’m running around putting out fires and dealing with the realities of making sure my team gets the right merchandise into the stores. Maybe you could have one of those overpaid marketing specialists dream up a strategic plan that I could sign off on.”
Questions
1. In which leadership trait or characteristic does Brittany seem to need the most development?
2. How would you rate Brittany’s warmth and enthusiasm as a leader?
3. What action would you recommend that Derek take to improve Brittany’s leadership effectiveness?
ASSOCIATED ROLE PLAY CEO Derek has heard some rumors that Brittany is insensitive in dealing with her direct reports, and he has also observed some of this insensitivity
in his interactions with Brittany. At the same time, Derek recognizes that her leadership in mer- chandising has helped Auto Pal grow and prosper.
LEADERSHIP CASE PROBLEM B 67
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
NOTES
Derek decides to schedule a one-on-one meeting with Brittany. She thinks that perhaps the meeting will be a good opportunity for her to complain about how thin-skinned some of her
direct reports appear to be. Run the role play for about eight minutes with observers, providing some feedback after the role players have com- pleted their task.
LEADERSHIP SKILL-BUILDING EXERCISE 2-3
My Leadership Portfolio
For this addition to your leadership portfolio, first select five of the traits, motives, and characteris- tics described in this chapter that you think you have already exhibited. For each of these attri- butes, explain why you think you have it. An exam- ple would be as follows:
Insight into people and situations: As a restaurant manager, my job was to help hire an assistant man- ager who would share some of the responsibilities of running the restaurant. I invited a friend of mine, Laura, to apply for the position, even though she had never worked in a restaurant. I noticed that she was businesslike and also had a good touch with peo- ple. Laura was hired, and she proved to be a fantastic assistant manager. I obviously sized her up correctly.
Second, select several leadership traits, motives, or characteristics that you think you need to develop to enhance your leadership skills. Explain why you think you need this development, and how you think you might obtain it. An example would be as follows:
Passion for the work and people: So far I am not particularly passionate about any aspect of work or any cause, so it is hard for me to get very excited about being a leader. I plan to read more about my field and then interview a couple of successful peo- ple in this field to find some aspect of it that would be a joy for me to get involved in.
LEADERSHIP SKILL-BUILDING EXERCISE 2-4
Analyzing the Traits, Motives, and Characteristics of a Well-Known Leader
Choose one or two well-known leaders as a topic for discussion. Well-known in this context refers to somebody whom the majority of the class has observed, either in person or through the media, including the Internet, newspapers, and onYouTube. Take a few classmoments to agree onwhich leader or leaders will be analyzed. Possibilities include (a) your
college president, (b) your country president or prime minister, or (c) a well-known NFL coach.
The next step is for the class to discuss this lea- der’s traits, motives, and characteristics, using ideas from this chapter of the text. Look to see if you can find consensus about the leader’s strongest and weakest personal attributes.
1. Original story created from facts and observations in the following sources: “Born to Be the Boss: Campbell Soup’s Chief Executive
Denise Morrison on How She Got Where She Is,” The Wall Street Journal, May 7, 2012, p. B12; “Denis Morrison—Campbell Soup
68 CHAPTER 2• TRAITS, MOTIVES, AND CHARACTERISTICS OF LEADERS
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
Company’s First Female CEO,” Caroline Cox, Little Pink Book (www.littlepinkbook.com), July 2011, pp. 1–5; Richard Deitsch, “Souper Woman: Spelling Out Campbell’s Success Strategy,” The Costco Connection, September 2012, pp. 26–28.
2. D. Scott DeRue, Jennifer D. Nahrgang, Ned Wellman, and Stephen E. Humphrey, “Trait and Behavioral Theories of Leadership: An Integration and Meta-Analytic Test of Their Relative Validity,” Personnel Psychology, no. 1, 2011, pp. 7–52.
3. Stephen J. Zaccaro, “Individual Differences and Leadership: Contributions to a Third Tipping Point,” The Leadership Quarterly, August 2012, pp. 718–728.
4. Timothy A. Judge, Ronald F. Picccolo, and Tomek Kosalka, “The Bright and Dark Sides of Leader Traits: A Review and Theoretical Extension of the Leader Trait Paradigm,” The Leadership Quarterly, December 2009, pp. 855–875; Stephen J. Zaccaro, “Trait Based Perspectives of Leadership,” American Psychologist, January 2007, p. 11.
5. George P. Hollenbeck and Douglas T. Hall, “ Self-Confidence and Leader Performance,” Organizational Dynamics, no. 3, 2004, p. 254.
6. Bernard M. Bass (with Ruth Bass), The Bass Handbook of Leadership: Theory, Research, and Managerial Applications, fourth Edition (New York: The Free Press, 2008), p. 189.
7. Quoted in Brian O’Keefe, “Battle-Tested: How a Decade of War Has Created a New Generation of Elite Business Leaders,” Fortune, March 22, 2010, p. 112.
8. Stephen G. Harrison, “Leadership and Hope Go Hand in Hand,” Executive Leadership, June 2002, p. 8.
9. Mike Esterl, “Co-Pilot Takes the Controls at Continental,” The Wall Street Journal, December 31, 2009, p. B1; Ted Reed, “No Wonder United’s CEO Is Buying United Stock,” Forbes (www.forbes.com), September 1, 2013, pp. 1–2.
10. Judge, Picccolo, and Kosalka, “The Bright and Dark Sides of Leader Traits,” p. 866.
11. Study cited in John Patrick Pullen, “The Bottom Line: Transparency is the Key to Inspiring Trust in Your Staff—and that Leads to Better Performance All Around,” Entrepreneur, June 2013, p. 64.
12. Roy J. Lewicki, Daniel McAllister, and Robert J. Bies, “Trust and Distrust: New Relationships and Realities,” Academy of Management Review, July 1998, p. 439.
13. “4 Keys to Building Trust Quickly,” Manager’s Edge, March 2005, p. 4; David Horsager, The Trust Edge: How Top Leaders Gain Faster Results, Deeper Relationships, and a Stronger Bottom Line (Minneapolis: Summerside Press, 2011).
14. Kurt T. Kirks and Donald L. Ferrin, “Trust in Leadership: Meta-Analytic Findings and Implications for Research and Practice,” Journal of Applied Psychology, August 2002, pp. 611–628.
15. Michael E. Palansaki and Francis J. Yammarino, “Impact of Behavioral Integrity on Follower Job Performance: A Three-Study Examination,” The Leadership Quarterly, August 2011, pp. 765–786.
16. Bill George, Peter Sims, Andrew N. McClean, and Diana Mayer, “Discovering Your Authentic Leadership,” Harvard Business Review, February 2007, p. 130.
17. Ibid., pp. 129–138. 18. Fred O. Walumbwa, Peng Wang, Hui Wang,
John Schaubroeck, and Bruce J. Avolio, “Psychological Processes Linking Authentic Leadership to Follower Behaviors,” The Leadership Quarterly, October 2010, pp. 901–914.
19. Suzanne J. Peterson, Fred O. Walumba, Bruce J. Avolio, and Sean T. Hannah, “The Relationship Between Authentic Leadership and Follower Job Performance: The Mediating Role of Follower Positivity in Extreme Contexts,” The Leadership Quarterly, June 2012, pp. 502–516.
20. Timothy A. Judge, Joyce E. Bono, Remus Ilies, and Megan W. Gerhardt, “Personality and Leadership: A Qualitative and Quantitative Review,” Journal of Applied Psychology, August 2002, pp. 765–780.
21. Researched reported in Judge, Picccolo, and Kosalka, “The Bright and Dark Sides of Leader Traits,” p. 865.
22. Adam M. Grant, Francesca Gino, and David A. Hofmann, “Reversing the Extraverted Leadership Advantage: The Role of Employee Proactivity,” Academy of Management Journal, June 2001, pp. 528–550; Adam M. Grant, Francesca Gino, and David A. Hofmann, “The
NOTES 69
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
Hidden Advantages of Quiet Bosses,” Harvard Business Review, December 2010, p. 28.
23. Robin Sidel, “Banga To Be MasterCard’s Protector,” The Wall Street Journal, May 29–30, 2010, p. B1.
24. Jared Sandberg, “The Office Pessimists May Not Be Lovable, but Are Often Right,” The Wall Street Journal, November 27, 2007, p. B1.
25. James B. Avey, Bruce J. Avolio, and Fred Luthans, “Experimentally Analyzing the Impact of Leader Positivity on Follower Positivity and Performance,” The Leadership Quarterly, April 2011, pp. 282–294.
26. Eric J. Romeo and Kevin W. Cruthirds, “The Use of Humor in the Workplace,” Academy of Management Perspectives, May 2006, pp. 60, 63–64. Additional research reported in Sue Shellenbarger, “Comedic Gold or Clunker? Secrets of Effective Office Humor,” The Wall Street Journal, August 14, 2013, pp. D1, D2.
27. Thomas S. Bateman and J. Michael Crant, “The Proactive Component of Organization Behavior: A Measure and Correlates,” Journal of Organizational Behavior, March 1993, p. 103.
28. Uta K. Bindle and Sharon Parker, “Proactive Work Behavior: Forward Thinking and Change-Oriented Action in Organizations,” In Sheldon Zedeck (Editor), APA Handbook of Industrial and Organizational Psychology (Washington, D.C.: American Psychological Association, 2010).
29. Craig D. Crossley, Cecily D. Cooper, and Tara S. Wernsing, “Making Things Happen Through Challenging Goals: Leader Proactivity, Trust, and Business-Unit Performance,” Journal of Applied Psychology, May 2013, pp. 540–549.
30. “Starbucks: More Than a Caffeine High,” Executive Leadership, August 2006, p. 4.
31. Rashimah Rajah, Zhaloi Song, and Richard D. Arvey, “Emotionality and Leadership: Taking Stock of the Past Decade of Research,” The Leadership Quarterly, December 2011, p. 1110.
32. Daniel Goleman, “What Makes a Leader?” Harvard Business Review, November– December 1998, p. 94.
33. Daniel Goleman, Richard Boyatzis, and Annie McKee, “Primal Leadership: The Hidden Driver of Great Performance,” Harvard Business Review, December 2001, pp. 42–51.
34. Stéphane Côté, Paulo N. Lopes, Peter Salovey, and Christopher T. H. Miners, “Emotional Intelligence and Leadership Emergence in Small Groups,” The Leadership Quarterly, June 2010, pp. 496–208.
35. Lynette M. Loomis, “Use Emotions to Guide Thinking, Enhance Results,” (New York: Rochester), Democrat and Chronicle, October 21, 2007, p. 2E.
36. Goleman, Boyatzis, and McKee, “Primal Leadership,” pp. 42–51.
37. Rajah, Song, and Arvey, “Emotionality and Leadership,” p. 1113.
38. JohnAntonakis, NealM. Ashkanasy, andMarie T. Dasborough, “Does Leadership Need Emotional Intelligence?” The Leadership Quarterly, April 2009, pp. 247–261; FrankWalter,Michael S. Cole, and Ronald H. Humphrey, “Emotional Intelligence: Sine Qua Non of Leadership or Folderol?” Academy of Management Perspective, February 2011, pp. 45–59.
39. Kathleen K. Reardon, “Courage as a Skill,” Harvard Business Review, January 2007, p. 63.
40. David C. McClelland and Richard Boyatzis, “Leadership Motive Pattern and Long-Term Success in Management,” Journal of Applied Psychology, December 1982, p. 727.
41. Locke andAssociates,TheEssence of Leadership: The Four Keys to Leading Successfully (New York: Lexington/Macmillan, 1992), p. 22.
42. Quoted in Jeffrey Pfeffer, “The Courage to Rise Above,” Business 2.0 , May 2006, p. 86.
43. Locke and Associates, The Essence of Leadership, p. 22.
44. John B. Miner, Normal R. Smith, and Jeffrey S. Bracker, “Role of Entrepreneurial Task Motivation in the Growth of Technologically Innovative Firms,” Journal of Applied Psychology, August 1989, p. 554.
45. Tom Flynn, “A CEO’s Stable Regimen Without the Horses,” The Wall Street Journal, June 18, 2013, p. D3.
46. Timothy A. Judge, Amy E. Colbert, and Remus Ilies, “Intelligence and Leadership: A Quantitative Review and Test of Theoretical Propositions,” Journal of Applied Psychology, June 2004, pp. 542–552.
47. Jonathan Wai, “The Brainiac-Billionaire Connection,” Psychology Today, July/August 2012, p. 80.
70 CHAPTER 2• TRAITS, MOTIVES, AND CHARACTERISTICS OF LEADERS
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
48. Robert J. Sternberg, “The WICS Approach to Leadership: Stories of Leadership and the Structures and Processes That Support Them,” The Leadership Quarterly, June 2008, pp. 360–371.
49. J. Robert Baum, Barbara Jean Bird, and Sheetal Singh, “The Practical Intelligence of Entrepreneurs: Antecedents and a Link with New Venture Growth,” Personnel Psychology, no. 2, 2011, pp. 397–425.
50. Shayndi Raice, “The Man Behind Facebook’s Marketing,” The Wall Street Journal, February 3, 2012, p. B7.
51. Boris Groysberg, L. Kevin Kelly, and Bryan McDonald, “The New Path to the C-Suite,” Harvard Business Review, March 2011, p. 66.
52. Jessica Shambora and Beth Kowitt, “The Queen of Pop,” Fortune, September 28, 2009, p. 108.
53. “How Stanford Is Grooming Next Business Leaders,” The Wall Street Journal, May 29, 2007, p. B6.
54. Adrienne Fox, “Leading with the Brain: David Rock Explains How Scientists’ Growing Understanding of the Brain Illuminates Techniques for Leadership and Decision Making,” HR Magazine, June 2011, pp. 52–53.
55. Pierre A. Balthazard, David A. Waldman, Robert W. Thatcher, and Sean T. Hannah, “Differentiating Transformational and Non- transformational Leaders on the Basis of Neurological Imaging,” The Leadership Quarterly, April 2012, pp. 244–258.
56. Goleman, “What Makes a Leader?” p. 97. 57. Kirkpatrick and Locke, “Leadership: Do Traits
Matter?” p. 59. 58. “Bloomberg’s Peter Grauer: How the
‘And Factor’ Defines Leadership,” Knowledge@Wharton (http://knowledge. wharton.upenn.edu/), July 31, 2013, p. 1.
59. Zacarro, “Trait-Based Perspectives,” p. 14. 60. Emotional Intelligence Appraisal—Me Edition,
available at www. Talentsmart.com. 61. “Buff Up Your Emotional Intelligence,”
Executive Leadership, February 2009, p. 2.
NOTES 71
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
CH AP
TE R
3 Charismatic and Transformational Leadership
LEARNING OBJECTIVES After studying this chapter and doing the exercises, you should be able to
• Describe many of the traits and behaviors of charismatic leaders.
• Explain the visionary component of charismatic leadership.
• Explain the communication style of charismatic leaders.
• Have an action plan for developing your charisma.
• Explain the nature of transformational leadership.
• Identify several of the impacts of charismatic and transformational leadership on performance and behavior.
• Describe the concerns about charismatic leadership from the scientific and moral standpoint.
CHAPTER OUTLINE The Meanings of Charisma Charisma: A Relationship Between the Leader, Group
Members, and Other Stakeholders The Effects of Charisma
Three Types of Charismatic Leaders
Characteristics of Charismatic Leaders
The Vision Component of Charismatic Leadership
The Communication Style of Charismatic Leaders Leadership by Inspiration Leadership by Storytelling Extensive Use of Social Networking
The Development of Charisma Techniques for Developing Charisma
Transformational Leadership How Transformations Take Place
Attributes of Transformational Leaders The Impact of Transformational and Charismatic
Leadership on Performance and Behavior
Concerns about Charismatic Leadership Challenges to the Validity of Charismatic Leadership The Dark Side of Charismatic Leadership
Summary
Key Terms
Guidelines for Action and Skill Development
Leadership Case Problem A
Leadership Case Problem B
Notes
72 Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s).
Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
Panera Bread Co. is the major player in the fast-casual restaurant business, referring to thespace between fast-food and fine dining. The res- taurant chain, with over 1,700 outlets in the United States and Canada, is headed by Ron Shaich, a business leader who feels committed to reducing poverty, including hunger. His combination of business success, intelligence, and commitment to his values has inspired many people to recognize that Shaich is making an impact on society. He is also regarded as a restaurant business visionary.
The Panera Cares cafés originated by Shaich are located in areas that have struggled economically, including Detroit and St. Louis, and where the customer base is mixed income. In these five cafés, there are no prices listed next to menu items and no cash registers. Instead, the customer finds donation boxes at the end of the counter with signs reading, “Take what you need, leave your fair share.” Panera cashiers take food orders and dispense receipts indicating how much the items typically cost. The customer decides how much cash to leave, or how much to charge his or her credit card.
Shaich notes that about one million customers per year are served in these cafés. Twenty percent of customers leave more than the suggested donation; 60 percent leave the suggested donation; and 20 percent leave considerably less than the suggested donation. Some people, particularly bands of teenagers, have abused the system.
Shaich says many critics thought it didn’t make business sense for a publicly traded company to devote time and resources to building a nonprofit enterprise. He explains that Panera Care is a conscious approach to business whereby making a difference in the community strengthens the business. “Panera Cares is a powerful differentiator,” he says, “that helps build trust with our customers, pride with our associates, and ultimately enhances the competition.”
Shaich knows that five pay-what-you-want cafés will not cure poverty nor end world hunger. Yet they can be a stim- ulus for other consumer companies such as Home Depot and Gap to reach out to the neediest members of the com- munity. He believes that more companies should do more than extract profits from society.1
The words and actions of Ron Shaich illustrate a couple of key points about charismatic and transformational leaders. They think big, are committed to their values, and are willing to pursue a nontraditional path. The study of charismatic and transformational leadership, an extension of the trait the- ory, has become an important way of understanding leadership. One of the many reasons that charisma is important is that it facilitates leaders in car- rying out their roles. Charisma makes the leader’s job much easier. In today’s fiercely competitive global economy, leaders need to energize their constituents more than ever. Helping people attain stretch goals and under- stand why change is necessary is done more quickly with charisma than relying solely on reasoning and logic.2 (A stretch goal tests most of your capa- bilities but is not so difficult to attain that you are likely to fail.)
In this chapter, we examine the meaning and effects of charismatic leader- ship, the characteristics of charismatic leaders, how such leaders form visions, and how one develops charisma. We also describe the closely related and overlapping subject of transformational leadership. Finally, we look at the dark side of charismatic leadership.
The Meanings of Charisma
Charisma, like leadership itself, has been defined in various ways. Neverthe- less, there is enough consistency among these definitions to make charisma a useful concept in understanding and practicing leadership. Charisma is a
THE MEANINGS OF CHARISMA 73
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
Greek word meaning “divinely inspired gift.” In the study of leadership, charisma is a special quality of leaders whose purposes, powers, and extraordinary determination differentiate them from others.3 In general use, the term charismatic means to have a charming and colorful personal- ity, such as that shown by many talk-show hosts.
The various definitions of charisma have a unifying theme. Charisma is a positive and compelling quality that makes many others want to be led by the person that has it. The phrase many others is chosen carefully. Few lea- ders are perceived as charismatic by all of their constituents. A case in point is the late Steve Jobs of Apple Inc., whose name surfaces frequently in dis- cussions of charisma. Fortune magazine once declared Jobs to be the CEO of the Decade in part because he has cheated death (overcome pancreatic cancer for a while) and changed our world.4 In contrast, a news reporter and novelist described Jobs as “a brilliant but short-tempered figure known for his outsized ego and penchant for control.” He was also known to be stubborn and arrogant.5 Furthermore, Jobs was cruelly insulting toward people who challenged him. Such behavior is hardly a characteristic of an inspiring leader.
Given that charisma is based on perceptions, an important element of charismatic leadership involves the attributions made by group members about the characteristics of leaders and the results they achieve. According to attribution theory, if people perceive a leader to have a certain character- istic, such as being visionary, the leader will more likely be perceived as charismatic. Attributions of charisma are important because they lead to other behavioral outcomes, such as commitment to leaders, self-sacrifice, and high performance.
A study of attributions and charisma found that the network a person belongs to influences the attributions he or she makes. The subjects in the study were police workers who rated the director of a police organization and students in an introductory business course who rated the charisma of their professors. The study found that network members influenced to some extent whether the study participants perceived their leader or professor to be char- ismatic and that perceptions of charisma were the closest among friends within networks.6 What about you? Are your perceptions of the charisma of your professors influenced by the opinions of your network members?
Charisma: A Relationship Between the Leader, Group Members, and Other Stakeholders A key dimension of charismatic leadership is that, like all leadership, it involves a relationship or interaction between the leader and the people being led. Furthermore, the people accepting the leadership must attribute charis- matic qualities to the leader. John Gardner believes that charisma applies to leader–constituent relationships in which the leader has an exceptional gift for inspiration and nonrational communication. At the same time, the consti- tuents’ response is characterized by awe, reverence, devotion, or emotional dependence.7 Sheryl Sandberg, the COO of Facebook, has this type of
74 CHAPTER 3• CHARISMATIC AND TRANSFORMATIONAL LEADERSHIP
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
relationship with many of her employees. Sandberg’s most avid supporters believe she is an inspired executive to whom they can trust their careers.
Charismatic leaders use impression management to deliberately cultivate a certain relationship with group members. In other words, they take steps to create a favorable, successful impression, recognizing that the percep- tions of constituents determine whether they function as charismatic lea- ders.8 Impression management seems to imply that these leaders are skillful actors in presenting a charismatic face to the world. But the beha- viors and attitudes of truly charismatic leaders go well beyond superficial aspects of impression management, such as wearing fashionable clothing or speaking well. For example, a truly charismatic leader will work hard to create positive visions for group members.
A notable aspect of charismatic and transformational leaders is that their influence extends beyond the immediate work group and beyond reporting relationships. An example is that some consumers are influenced to pur- chase products from a company, and some suppliers want to do business with it, based partly on the charisma of a company leader.9 An example is Kevin A. Plank, the CEO of Under Armour, described in Chapter 2, who inspires many people in the community to wear Under Armour products.
Another way in which the highly charismatic leader influences external stakeholders is that he or she becomes the symbol of the organization. If the leader meets the stakeholders’ (or followers’) needs, such as wanting to identify with a powerful figure, the stakeholders will have favorable interac- tions with the organization. Plank fits this role in part because he is athletic and was a college football player.
Charismatic leadership is possible under certain conditions. The constitu- ents must share the leader’s beliefs and must have unquestioning accep- tance of and affection for the leader. The group members must willingly obey the leader, and they must be emotionally involved both in the mission of the charismatic leader and in their own goals. Finally, the constituents must have a strong desire to identify with the leader.10
The Effects of Charisma The study of charisma grows in importance when its effects are recognized, such as whether by being charismatic a leader can enhance productivity, lower accidents, and enhance job satisfaction. Much of the impact of cha- risma is based on the positive affect (emotion) the charismatic leader trig- gers among the group members. A group of researchers conducted a study of firefighters and their leaders to explore how the emotional component of charisma affects the mood and happiness of subordinates.
The firefighter study followed a preliminary laboratory study with college students designed to explore how the leader’s emotion might affect sub- ordinate behavior. The field study involved 216 firefighters and 48 officers. Happiness, including positive affect and negative affect (unhappiness), was measured through a questionnaire. Leader charisma was measured by a questionnaire quite similar to one presented later in this chapter.
THE MEANINGS OF CHARISMA 75
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
The results suggested that firefighters under the command of a charismatic officer were happier than those under the command of a noncharismatic officer. Charismatic leaders who expressed positive emotion and thoughts tended to have an even stronger impact on the positive emotional state of firefighters. The positive affect of the officers also tended to reduce negative affect among the firefighters.
A conclusion of the study going beyond firefighters is that one of the ways by which charismatic leaders emotionally touch subordinates is through enhancing their positive affect. Furthermore, happier leaders spread their positive mood to group members.11
Another major impact of a charismatic leader in a senior-level position is that he or she leaves a personal stamp on the organization. A few years ago, when Microsoft Corp. was in the process of seeking a new CEO to help revi- talize the company, many observers thought that only by bringing back Bill Gates to his former position could the task be accomplished. Although Gates had vacated his operating role at Microsoft years ago, most people still identified him as the driving force and charismatic figure behind the company. A business writer commented, “As long as Microsoft’s founder is around, only Mr. Gates will be able to inflict on Microsoft the change it needs.”12 When a new CEO, Satya Nadella, was appointed, Gates shifted from the role of chairman to being a technical advisor for Nadella, thereby continuing Gates’s influence on the direction of Microsoft.
The information just presented is useful for the aspiring charismatic leader. Using charisma and a positive mood to help workers become happy is valuable. Productivity might increase as stress might be reduced, resulting in less time lost to illness. Also, not being charismatic enough can some- times make it difficult to hold on to a high-level leadership position.
Three Types of Charismatic Leaders
The everyday use of the term charisma suggests that it is a straightforward and readily understood trait. As already explained, however, charisma has different meanings and dimensions. As a result, charismatic leaders can be categorized into various types, with the three most relevant for today described here: socialized charismatics, personalized charismatics, and celebrities.13
Following the distinction made for the power motive, some charismatic leaders use their power for the good of others. A socialized charismatic is a leader who restrains the use of power in order to benefit others. This type of leader also attempts to bring group members’ values in line with his or her values. The socialized charismatic formulates and pursues goals that fulfill the needs of group members and provide intellectual stimulation to them. Followers of socialized charismatics are autonomous, empowered, and responsible. A study conducted in a health care organization indicated that direct reports of leaders perceived to be socialized charismatics are
76 CHAPTER 3• CHARISMATIC AND TRANSFORMATIONAL LEADERSHIP
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
less likely to engage in workplace deviance (such as lying, stealing, and cheating). Part of the reason is that the socialized charismatic imparts posi- tive values to group members.14
The effect of the socialized charismatic on followers provides more insight into this type of charismatic. In the socialized relationship, the fol- lowers have a clear sense of who they are and a clear set of values. The charismatic relationship gives them an opportunity to express their impor- tant values within the framework of being a group member, such as want- ing to work together to preserve the planet. In a socialized relationship, the followers derive a sense of direction and self-expression not from identifying with the leader but from the leader’s message.15 The message of the social- ized charismatic in this situation might be, “We want to make money but we want to contribute to a sustainable environment at the same time.”
A second type of charismatic leader is the personalized charismatic. Such individuals serve primarily their own interests and so exercise few restraints on their use of power. Personalized charismatics impose self- serving goals on constituents, and they offer consideration and support to group members only when it facilitates their own goals. Followers of per- sonalized charismatics are typically obedient, submissive, and dependent. They also identify more with the leader than the leader’s message and there- fore might follow the leader down an unethical path, such as granting homeowner loans that will most likely result in a high foreclosure rate.
The celebrity charismatic can be found in organizational life as well as in the political and entertainment realms. Charismatic people of this type may overlap with the other types such as being socialized and personalized. Carly Fiorina, the former Hewlett-Packard CEO and one-time candidate for U.S. Senator, was perceived by many to be a celebrity charismatic. She was often accused of being more interested in personal fame than taking care of the internal operations of Hewlett-Packard. Howard Schultz, the founder and CEO of Starbucks, has emerged into a celebrity CEO because he often takes a stand on national and political issues, such as urging people to get the federal debt under control.
Characteristics of Charismatic Leaders
The outstanding characteristic of charismatic leaders is that they are charismatic, and therefore they can attract, motivate, or lead others. They also have other dis- tinguishing characteristics. Because charisma is a key component of transforma- tional leadership, many of these characteristics also apply to transformational leaders. A transformational leader is one who brings about positive, major changes in an organization. Many charismatic leaders, however, are not transfor- mational. Although they inspire people, they may not bring about major organi- zational changes. As we look at the characteristics of charismatic leaders,16 you will note that many of these characteristics apply to leaders in general.
First, charismatic leaders are visionary because they offer an exciting image of where the organization is headed and how to get there. A vision is
CHARACTERISTICS OF CHARISMATIC LEADERS 77
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
more than a forecast; it describes an ideal version of the future of an entire organization or an organizational unit. The next section provides additional information about vision in leadership, including guidelines on how to develop a vision. Chapter 13, which discusses the leadership aspects of busi- ness strategy, also contains information about formulating visions.
Charismatic leaders also possess masterful communication skills. To inspire people, the charismatic leader uses colorful language and exciting metaphors and analogies. (More about the communication skills of charis- matic leaders is presented later in this chapter.) Another key characteristic is the ability to inspire trust. Constituents believe so strongly in the integrity of charismatic leaders that they will risk their careers to pursue the chief’s vision. Charismatic leaders are also able to make group members feel capable. Sometimes they do this by enabling group members to achieve success on relatively easy projects. They then praise the group members and give them more demanding assignments.
Charismatic people are typically tactful in social situations based partly on their ability to read other people’s emotions (part of emotional intelli- gence). Related to reading emotions is the ability to connect with people, as in the now overdone phrase, “I feel your pain.” For example, during a severe business downturn, a company leader might say, “I know a lot of you are worried about losing your jobs. Working with you as a team, we are fighting to avoid layoffs.”
In addition, charismatic leaders demonstrate an energy and action orien- tation. Like entrepreneurs, most charismatic leaders are energetic and serve as role models for getting things done on time. Emotional expressiveness and warmth are also notable. A key characteristic of charismatic leaders is the ability to express feelings openly. A bank vice president claims that much of the charisma people attribute to her can be explained very simply: “I’m up front about expressing positive feelings. I praise people, I hug them, and I cheer if necessary. I also express my negative feelings, but to a lesser extent.” Nonverbal emotional expressiveness, such as warm gestures and frequent (nonsexual) touching of group members, is also characteristic of charismatic leaders.
An example of a charismatic business executive who combines an action orientation with emotional expressiveness and warmth is Luis Manuel Ramirez, the CEO of the Industrial Solutions unit of GE. According to one observer, he “emits energy like one of GE’s new WATT electric vehicle char- gers. His hands are in perpetual motion, now orchestrating through the air, now reaching out to gently touch the wrist of the interviewer for emphasis.”
The ability of Ramirez to adapt to multiple, global environments also enhances his charisma, including emotional expressiveness. As Ramirez explains:
When they see my face in the Middle East, they think I am Middle Eastern. In India, they think I am Indian. In Europe, maybe I was born in southern Spain. People see that I am not the typical Anglo-American, and they ask me where I am from. It is like an icebreaker.17
78 CHAPTER 3• CHARISMATIC AND TRANSFORMATIONAL LEADERSHIP
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
Another trait of charismatic leaders is that they romanticize risk. They enjoy risk so much that they feel empty in its absence. Jim Barksdale, now a venture capitalist for online startup companies and former CEO of Netscape, says that the fear of failure is what increases your heart rate. As great opportunists, charismatic people yearn to accomplish activities others have never done before. Risk taking adds to a person’s charisma because others admire such courage. In addition to treasuring risk, charismatic leaders use unconventional strategies to achieve success.
Charismatic leaders often have a self-promoting personality. They fre- quently toot their own horn and allow others to know how important they are. Richard Branson, the colorful chairman of the Virgin Group, has relied on self-promotion to build his empire, a collection of about 200 companies with the Virgin trademark. Among his antics have been flying around the world in a balloon, and sliding down the side of a silver ball attached to a New York City building. He also conducts much of his business electroni- cally from his private island in the Virgin Islands.
Another characteristic observed in many charismatic leaders is that they challenge, prod, and poke. They test your courage and your self-confidence by asking questions like “Do your employees really need you?” Larry Elison, the celebrity charismatic who is founder and CEO of Oracle Corporation, often asks workers to explain how their job contributes to the organization.
Many charismatic leaders are narcissistic, or self-adoring in excess. On the positive side, the air of confidence and dominance so characteristic of narcissisms often inspires followers. During a crisis, for example, followers might want a narcissistic leader who believes that he or she is talented enough to get through a crisis. The narcissistic leader is likely to be charm- ing except when engaging in excessive self-puffery and blaming others for mistakes.
Donald Trump exemplifies a well-known business leader who displays both the positive and negative aspects of narcissism. Trump is primarily a real-estate developer with his name on many office buildings and condomi- niums. He also has his name on dozens of products, is the titular head of an entrepreneurial institute, and has twice explored the possibilities of run- ning for U.S. President. Lots of people find “the Donald” to be a compelling individual and want to work for him or with him. Trump receives untold thousands of unsolicited e-mails, social networking messages, and letters from people who want to partner with him in a business deal. (Money adds to charisma.) Yet some people dislike Trump because they perceive him to be arrogant and overbearing.
A final strategy for becoming more charismatic is really an amalgam of the ideas already introduced: Being dramatic and unique in significant, positive ways is a major contributor to charisma. This quality stems from a combination of factors, such as being energetic, promoting yourself, romanticizing risk, and being emotionally expressive. Leadership scholar Warren G. Bennis contends that great leaders, particularly those in public life, are great actors. The effective leader sells people on a vision to elevate their spirits.18
CHARACTERISTICS OF CHARISMATIC LEADERS 79
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
To personalize charisma characteristics, go through the charisma check- list presented below. If you can respond to checklist with a reasonable degree of objectivity, the quiz should enhance your understanding of how you might or might not be perceived as charismatic by many people at this stage of your career.
LEADERSHIP SELF-ASSESSMENT QUIZ 3-1
A Checklist of Behaviors and Attitudes Reflecting Charisma
Instructions: Indicate whether each of the following statements applies to you now, or whether it does not apply now or probably never will.
APPLIES NOW
DOES NOT APPLY OR PROBABLY NEVER WILL
1. Many people have said that I am likeable and charming. □ □
2. In groups I have been part of or led, I have offered a vision that others accepted.
□ □
3. I have more physical energy than most people, and the energy is apparent to other people.
□ □
4. I do a good job of telling true stories and anecdotes to others on the job.
□ □
5. My appearance in terms of dress and personal grooming is well above average.
□ □
6. I communicate a lot of passion about my own work, or about the task of the group.
□ □
7. I am successful at making other people feel important. □ □
8. I am candid without being offensive. □ □
9. I make frequent use of a firm handshake or fist-bumps when greeting people I know or first-time introductions.
□ □
10. My posture is good and I look people in the eye without being accused of staring at them.
□ □
11. I have taken sensible risks at least several times in my life. □ □
12. I am comfortable in letting other people know of my accomplishments. □ □
13. I have been told that I have a warm smile. □ □
14. People listen to me when I talk at a meeting. □ □
15. I have an exceptional number of social media friends and followers. □ □
Scoring and Interpretation: The more of these fifteen statements that apply to you now, the greater the probabil- ity that you are perceived to be charismatic by many people. If twelve or more of the statements in the checklist apply to you now, you have above average charismatic tendencies. Answering these statements is so subjective that it would be helpful for one or two people who know you well to also respond to the checklist in relation to you. You might then compare your responses to the responses of the other person or persons.
80 CHAPTER 3• CHARISMATIC AND TRANSFORMATIONAL LEADERSHIP
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
The Vision Component of Charismatic Leadership
A major buzzword in leadership and management is vision, the ability to imagine different and better future conditions and ways to achieve them. A vision is a lofty, long-term goal. An effective leader is supposed to have a vision, whereas an ineffective leader either lacks a vision or has an unclear one. Being a visionary is far from an ordinary task, and recent research in neu- roscience suggests that visionary leaders use their brain differently than others.
Studies conducted at Arizona State University by Pierre Balthazard required participants to think about the future. Brain activity was measured through EEG technology. A key finding was that levels of brain activity differed significantly between those participants considered visionaries and nonvisionaries. Classifying a business, academic, or political leader as “visionary” was based on interview observations. Visionaries showed much higher levels of brain activity in the areas of the brain associated with visual processing and the organization of information. For example, visionaries showed higher activity in the occipital lobe, which is associated with visual processing and procedural memory.19
Many people use the terms vision and mission interchangeably, yet man- agement theorists see them differently. According to organizational change specialist Peter M. Senge, a mission is a purpose, and reason for being, whereas a vision is a picture or image of the future we seek to create.20 A mission of a company that rents private warehouse space to consumers and small business might be, “To extend the living and working space of respon- sible people.” The same company’s vision might be, “To create a more com- fortable, less cramped world for the decades ahead.”
Creating a vision is one of the major tasks of top management, yet quite often vision statements fail to inspire constituents. According to Jim Collins, a vision statement is likely to be more inspirational when it combines three elements:
1. A reason for being beyond making money 2. Timeless, unchanging core values 3. Ambitious but achievable goals
Mechanisms should then be established that set the values into action.21
At Google, for example, engineers have “20 percent time,” in which they are free to pursue projects about which they are passionate. (In recent years, many fewer engineers have been allocated 20 percent of their time to dream up new ideas.) This policy supports the company vision of being a world-class innovator. A vision is also considered an important part of strat- egy implementation. Implementing the vision (or ensuring that the vision is executed) is part of the leader’s role. This is true despite the opinion that the leader creates the vision and the manager implements it.
Vision statements typically relate to the entire organization, yet a leader or manager responsible for an organizational unit can have a vision about what he or she is attempting to accomplish. An example is Laura Ipsen, the senior
THE VISION COMPONENT OF CHARISMATIC LEADERSHIP 81
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
vice president and general manager of Smart Grid Cisco. Her big idea (vision) is to create the twenty-first century energy ecosystem—and take a big piece of what is forecasted to be a $100 billion smart-grid market.22
Visions have become so popular that some companies have them repro- duced on wallet-size plastic cards, key rings, and coffee mugs. It has been said than an effective vision fits on a T-shirt. Here are several sample vision statements:
Google: To make nearly all information accessible to everyone all the time. Microsoft Corporation: To enable people throughout the word to realize
their potential. Anheuser-Busch: Be the world’s best beer company. Through all of our
products, services, and relationships, we will add to life’s enjoyment. GM: GM’s vision is to be the world leader in transportation products and
related services. We will earn our customers’ enthusiasm through contin- uous improvement driven by the integrity, teamwork, and innovation of GM people.
Kraft Foods: Helping People Around the World Eat and Live Better.
Although many vision statements appear as if they could be formulated in fifteen minutes, managers invest considerable time in their preparation and often use many sources of data. To create a vision, obtain as much information from as many of the following sources as necessary:23
• Your own intuition about developments in your field, the market you serve, demographic trends in your region, and the preferences of your constituents. Think through what are the top industry standards.
• The work of futurists (specialists in making predictions about the future) as it relates to your type of work.
• A group discussion of what it takes to delight the people your group serves. Analyze carefully what your customers and organization need the most.
• Annual reports, management books, business magazines, and Internet search engine results to uncover the type of vision statements formulated by others.
• Group members and friends; speak to them individually and collectively to learn of their hopes and dreams for the future.
• For a vision of the organizational unit, support the organization’s vision. You might get some ideas for matching your unit’s vision with that of the organization.
After vision statements have been formulated, a wide range of employees must be involved in implementing the vision. Research conducted with 340 employees from a health maintenance organization (HMO) found that two- way communication between leaders and group members had an impact on employees actually integrating the vision into their work. An example of a research statement measuring upward communication about the vision statement was “I initiate conversation with my immediate supervisor about aligning my work behavior with the company’s vision.” An example of a
82 CHAPTER 3• CHARISMATIC AND TRANSFORMATIONAL LEADERSHIP
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
vision integration statement was, “The vision serves as a ‘mental guideline’ on how to do my job.”24 A vision for an HMO to be integrated into work behavior would include an idea such as, “Become a regional standout in helping out patients prevent becoming ill in the future.”
Leadership Skill-Building Exercise 3-1 gives you an opportunity to prac- tice vision formulation. Keep in mind that a critic of vision statements once said that it is often difficult to tell the difference between a vision and a hallucination. Google’s vision statement about making nearly all the information in the world accessible to everyone appears to be close to a hallucination.25 For example, the amount of information available is nearly infinite, and not everybody on the planet has access to Google.
The Communication Style of Charismatic Leaders
Charismatic and transformational leaders typically communicate their visions, goals, and directives in a colorful, imaginative, and expressive man- ner. In addition, they communicate openly with group members and create a comfortable communication climate. To set agendas that represent the interests of their constituents, charismatic leaders regularly solicit constitu- ents’ viewpoints on critical issues. They encourage two-way communication with team members while still promoting a sense of confidence.26 Here we describe three related aspects of the communication style of charismatic leaders: leadership by inspiration, leadership by storytelling, and communi- cation via social networking.
Leadership by Inspiration According to Jay A. Conger, the era of managing by dictate is being replaced by an era of leadership by inspiration. An important way to inspire others is to articulate a highly emotional message. An example would be the CEO
LEADERSHIP SKILL-BUILDING EXERCISE 3-1
Formulating a Vision
Along with your teammates, assume the role of the top management group of an organization or organizational unit that is in need of revitalization. Your revitalization task is to create a vision for the organization. Express the vision in not more than twenty-five words, using the guidelines for developing a vision described in the text. Come to an agreement quickly on the organization or large organizational unit that needs a vision. Or choose one of the following:
● The manufacturer of an electric-powered automobile ● An online store that sells used designer clothes for
women and men ● A waste disposal company ● A chain of home-improvement and hardware stores ● A manufacturer of watches retailing for a minimum of
$25,000
THE COMMUNICATION STYLE OF CHARISMATIC LEADERS 83
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
explaining to her top-management team, “If we continue to provide such outstanding customer service we will double our market share within one year.” Conger has observed two major rhetorical techniques of inspirational leaders: the use of metaphors and analogies, and the ability to gear language to different audiences.27
Using Metaphors and Analogies A well-chosen analogy or metaphor appeals to the intellect, to the imagination, and to values. The charismatic Mary Kay Ash (now deceased), founder of the cosmetics company Mary Kay, Inc., made frequent use of metaphors during her career. To inspire her associates to higher performance, she often said: “You see, a bee shouldn’t be able to fly; its body is too heavy for its wings. But the bumblebee doesn’t know that and it flies very well.” Mary Kay explained the message of the bumble- bee metaphor in these terms: “Women come to us not knowing they can fly. Finally, with help and encouragement, they find their wings—and then they fly very well indeed.”28
Gearing Language to Different Audiences Metaphors and analogies are inspir- ing, but effective leaders must also choose the level of language that will suit their audience. This is important because constituents vary widely in verbal sophistication. One day, for example, a CEO might be attempting to inspire a group of Wall Street financial analysts, and the next day he or she might be attempting to inspire first-level employees to keep working hard despite limited salary increases.
An executive’s ability to speak on a colloquial level helps create appeal. A person with the high status of an executive is expected to use an elevated language style. When the person unexpectedly uses the everyday language of an operative employee, it may create a special positive response. One of the many reasons mega-developer Donald Trump is so popular with con- struction workers and tradespeople is that he often speaks to them in a tough-guy language familiar to them.
Leadership by Storytelling Another significant aspect of the communication style of charismatic and transformational leaders is that they make extensive use of memorable stor- ies to get messages across. Leadership by storytelling is the technique of inspiring and instructing team members by telling fascinating stories. The technique is a major contributor to building a strong company culture. Storytelling also helps bring out the need for organizational change. A Coca-Cola company executive might tell a story about how the company’s clean-water efforts prevented deaths of thousands of children in an African village. At the same time, the executive might emphasize that Coca-Cola must move more quickly to help thousands of other people throughout the world who lack safe drinking water.
Storytelling as a leadership tool has been elevated to such a level that some companies hire corporate storytelling consultants to help their
84 CHAPTER 3• CHARISMATIC AND TRANSFORMATIONAL LEADERSHIP
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
executives develop the art. Storytelling is regarded as a useful tool for get- ting people to embrace change, because a well-crafted story captures peo- ple’s attention.
A team of researchers in Germany conducted an experiment to investi- gate whether story telling by a leader had an impact on subordinates. The leaders in the experiment were actors whose stories were videotaped, and the stories told were related to life experiences of the leader. A modest amount of evidence indicated that leaders are perceived to be more authen- tic when they tell life stories that include negative turning point.29 An exam- ple of a negative turning point for an entrepreneurial leader would be, “My savings were down to zero, I was unemployed, and my family and I faced eviction when I thought of the idea for founding this company. The first day we opened for business I had no customers and no employees. Today we have hundreds of customers across the country, and 75 employees.”
To get started developing the skill of leadership by storytelling, do Leadership Skill-Building Exercise 3-2.
Extensive Use of Social Networking To help facilitate their interpersonal communication, charismatic leaders make extensive use of social networks—both in face-to-face interactions and through social media websites. The members of the network are basi- cally contacts with whom the leader has some kind of relationship. The vast majority of managers and professionals also rely on social networking, yet charismatic leaders are particularly aware of its relevance for accom- plishing their purposes.
Face-to-Face Networks Charismatic leaders are aware of the importance of face-to-face interactions for establishing effective relationships with consti- tuents. A charismatic leader is therefore likely to invest time in such activi- ties as the following: having lunch with group members, visiting group members at their offices or cubicles, chatting with subordinates in the park- ing lot or cafeteria, dropping by break rooms to chat for a few moments, and attending as many company social functions as feasible.
LEADERSHIP SKILL-BUILDING EXERCISE 3-2
Charismatic Leadership by Storytelling
Instructions: Gather in a small problem-solving group to develop an inspiring anecdote about something that actually happened, or might have happened, at a current or former employer. Search for a scenario that illustrates an important value of the firm. For example, the CEO of a large international bank while on vacation discovered a
company ATM that was not working properly. He immedi- ately went inside the bank branch to investigate the prob- lem and what could be done about it.
Share your stories with other members of the class, and discuss whether this exercise could make a contri- bution to leadership development.
THE COMMUNICATION STYLE OF CHARISMATIC LEADERS 85
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
In recognition of the importance of internal networks for building relation- ships and accomplishing goals, some large firms establish formal networking groups. An example is the GE Women’s Network, which has 100,000 active members worldwide. The Women’s Network was created in 1997 to help women working at GE advance their careers and contribute to company suc- cess. A key focus of the initiative includes sharing the experience, best practices, and knowledge of successful women role models. Members of the network cul- tivate their leadership skills, business practices, and career opportunities.
The focus on the network on leadership, advancement, and career- broadening opportunities has helped the company get to the point where women run businesses generating 20 percent of total company revenues. Women outside GE are invited to some of the key networking events, which help the GE women strengthen their external as well as internal networks. Also, the company outsiders are key customers who might develop ties with the GE women that lead to a better working relationship and more sales.30
Social Networking Sites The charismatic leader goes beyond the ordinary use of public social networking sites (such as Facebook, Twitter, G+, and LinkedIn), and company-special social media sites. The ordinary use of these websites would be to post status reports, present due dates, ask questions, and perhaps post trivial personal information. A more charismatic use of social networking sites would be to post messages designed to inspire, motivate, and make group members feel good about themselves and the organization. A few examples of messages that might project charisma are as follows:
• I liked the cost-saving suggestion you made in this morning’s meeting. I think it will result in cost-effective savings.
• Congratulations on having attained your certification as a professional office administrator. Our company can use more professionalism like that.
• I am so sorry that Taboo, your 15-year-old-cat, passed away. Yet it’s wonderful to know that you had all the love and friendship for so long. (A charismatic leader will often show empathy.)
Despite the positive use of social networking sites to project charisma, the leader has to guard against posting sensitive information, such as an idea for a new product or service, or legal problems the company might be facing.
The Development of Charisma
A person can increase charisma by developing some of the traits, character- istics, and behaviors of charismatic people. Several of the charismatic characteristics described earlier in the chapter are capable of development. For example, most people can enhance their communication skills, become more emotionally expressive, take more risks, and become more self- promoting. In this section, we examine several behaviors of charismatic people that can be developed through practice and self-discipline.
86 CHAPTER 3• CHARISMATIC AND TRANSFORMATIONAL LEADERSHIP
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
Techniques for Developing Charisma
Create Visions for Others Being able to create visions for others will be a major factor in your being perceived as charismatic. A vision uplifts and attracts others. To form a vision, use the guidelines presented previously in the chapter. The visionary person looks beyond the immediate future to cre- ate an image of what the organization or unit within is capable of becom- ing. A vision is designed to close the discrepancy between current and ideal conditions. The vision thus sees beyond current realities.
Another characteristic of an effective vision formulated by the leader is that it connects with the goals and dreams of constituents.31 For example, the leader of a group that is manufacturing fuel cells for electric cars might listen to team members talk about their desires to help reduce pollution in the atmosphere and then base the vision statement on a “desire to save the planet” or “reduce global warming.”
Be Enthusiastic, Optimistic, and Energetic A major behavior pattern of charis- matic people is their combination of enthusiasm, optimism, and high energy. Without a great amount of all three characteristics, a person is unlikely to be perceived as charismatic by many people. A remarkable quality of charis- matic people is that they maintain high enthusiasm, optimism, and energy throughout their entire workday and beyond. Elevating your energy level takes considerable work, but here are a few feasible suggestions:
1. Get ample rest at night, and sneak in a fifteen-minute nap during the day when possible. If you have a dinner meeting where you want to shine, take a shower and nap before the meeting.
2. Exercise every day for at least ten minutes, including walking. No excuses are allowed, such as being too busy or too tired or the weather being a handicap.
3. Switch to a healthy, energy-enhancing diet. 4. Keep chopping away at your To Do list, so you do not have unfinished
tasks on your mind—they will drain your energy.
An action orientation helps you be enthusiastic, optimistic, and energetic. “Let’s do it” is the battle cry of the charismatic person. An action orientation also means that the charismatic person prefers not to agonize over dozens of facts and nuances before making a decision.
Be Sensibly Persistent Closely related to the high energy level of charismatics is their almost-never-accept-no attitude. I emphasize the word almost because outstanding leaders and individual contributors also know when to cut their losses. If an idea or a product will not work, the sensible charis- matic absorbs the loss and moves in another, more profitable direction.
Remember People’s Names Charismatic leaders, as well as other successful people, can usually remember the names of people they have seen only a few times. (Sorry, no charisma credits for remembering the names of everyday work associates.) This ability is partly due to the strong personal interest charismatic leaders take in other people.
THE DEVELOPMENT OF CHARISMA 87
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
The surest way to remember names, therefore, is to really care about peo- ple. Failing that, the best way to remember a name is to listen carefully to the name, repeat it immediately, and study the person’s face. You can also use the many systems and gimmicks available for remembering names, such as associ- ating a person’s name with a visual image. For example, if you meet a woman named Betsy Applewhite, you can visualize her with a white apple (or a white tablet computer) on her head. The best system of name retention remains to listen carefully to the name, repeat it immediately, and study the person’s face.
Develop Synchrony with Others A subtle, yet defining, aspect of a truly charis- matic person is one who connects well with others. Psychology professor Frank Bernieri studies physical signals that people send to each other, and con- cludes that being in synch physically with other people is part of charisma. If someone is in synchrony with you, you tend to think he or she is charismatic. A practical method of being in synch with another person is to adjust your pos- ture to conform to his or her posture. The other person stands up straight, and so do you; when he or she slouches, you do also. Charismatic people make these postural adjustments almost subconsciously, or at least without giving the process much thought. Highly skilled charismatic people through the timing of their breaths, gestures, and cadence can entrap listeners into synchrony to the point that they “breathe and sway in tune with the speaker.”32
Develop a Personal Brand, Including Making an Impressive Appearance A current trend in career advancement is to build a personal brand. Understanding your basket of strengths forms the basis for developing your personal brand. Your identity as shown on the Internet, including social networking sites such as Facebook, is also part of your personal brand. Your personal brand makes you unique, thereby distinguishing you from the competi- tion.33 Perhaps your brand will not reach the recognition of Nike or Rolex, but it will help develop your reputation. Your personal brand also helps you attract people to accept your leadership.
Another component of your personal brand is your appearance. By creating a polished appearance, a person can make slight gains in projecting a charismatic image. An example of this approach is Frank Bisignano, the CEO of First Data Corp., an electronics payment firm based in Atlanta. Bisignano has a strong record as a transformational leader in the financial industry, and the Brooks Brothers suits and Hermès ties he wears to work enhance his charisma.34 In most cases, the effect of appearance depends on the context. If exquisite cloth- ing and good looks alone made a person a charismatic leader, those impressive-looking store associates in upscale department stores and boutiques would all be charismatic leaders. Therefore, in attempting to enhance your cha- risma through appearance, it is necessary to analyze your work environment to assess what type of appearance is impressive. Frank Bisignano with his highly polished appearance would create a negative image at a Silicon Valley firm.
Despite these caveats, there is much you can do to enhance your appear- ance. In recent years, there has been a surge of image consultants who help businesspeople develop an appearance that is useful in influencing people and getting hired. These consultants perform such services as helping you
88 CHAPTER 3• CHARISMATIC AND TRANSFORMATIONAL LEADERSHIP
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
shop for a new wardrobe, suggesting a new hairstyle, or helping you revamp your slouching posture.
Be Candid Charismatic people, especially effective leaders, are remarkably candid with people. Although not insensitive, the charismatic person is typi- cally explicit in giving his or her assessment of a situation, whether the assessment is positive or negative. Charismatic people speak directly rather than indirectly, so that people know where they stand. Instead of asking a worker, “Are you terribly busy this afternoon?” the charismatic leader will ask, “I need your help this afternoon. Are you available?”
Display an In-Your-Face Attitude The preferred route to being perceived as char- ismatic is to be a positive, warm, and humanistic person. Yet some people, including business and sports figures, earn their reputation for charisma by being tough and nasty. An in-your-face attitude may bring you some devoted supporters, although it will also bring you many detractors. The tough attitude is attractive to people who themselves would like to be mean and aggressive.
Experimental evidence exists that charismatic leadership can be taught. John Antonakis, Marika Fenley, and Sui Liechti of the University of Lausanne tested whether individuals could be taught to behave more charismatically, and whether changes in charisma affected the impact of leaders. One study involved middle managers, and a second study involved videotapes of MBA students giving a speech. Participants in both studies were trained in charis- matic techniques quite similar to those previously mentioned here. Charisma was measured by ratings of coworkers or other students on behaviors and attitudes similar to the checklist presented earlier in the chapter. Training had a significant impact on charisma ratings given by coworkers and other students. In addition, the charisma of individuals had a significant impact on ratings of being a prototypical (conforming to a stereotype) leader, and the probability of the personal emerging as a leader.35
Transformational Leadership
Transformational leadership focuses on what the leader accomplishes, yet it still pays attention to the leader’s personal characteristics and his or her relationship with group members. As mentioned previously, the transforma- tional leader helps bring about major, positive changes by moving group members beyond their self-interests and toward the good of the group, orga- nization, or society. The essence of transformational leadership is develop- ing and transforming people.36 As a result, the organization is transformed. In contrast, the transactional leader focuses on more routine transactions, rewarding group members for meeting standards (contingent reinforce- ment). Extensive research by Bernard M. Bass indicates that the transformational-versus-transactional distinction has been observed in a wide variety of organizations and cultures.37
The accompanying Leadership Self-Assessment Quiz 3-2 shows how transformational leadership is measured as perceived by subordinates.
TRANSFORMATIONAL LEADERSHIP 89
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
LEADERSHIP SELF-ASSESSMENT QUIZ 3-2
The Dual-Level Transformational Leadership (TFL) Scale
Directions: Check which of the following statements are true or relatively true in relation to a specific manager or supervisor you work for now or in the past.
THE INDIVIDUAL-FOCUSED TFL SUBSCALE
1. Encourages me to set high goals for myself. □ 2. Communicates high performance expectations to me. □ 3. Shows confidence in my ability to meet performance expectations. □ 4. Demonstrates total confidence in me. □ 5. Encourages me to live up to my potential. □ 6. Helps me develop my strengths. □ 7. Suggests training to improve my ability to carry out the job. □ 8. Provides me with developmental experiences. □ 9. Provides feedback to help me develop my abilities. □
10. Provides coaching to help me improve my job performance. □ 11. Gets me to look at problems from many different angles. □ 12. Challenges me to think about old problems in new ways. □ 13. Challenges me to be innovative in my approach to work assignments. □ 14. Encourages me to be an independent thinker. □ 15. Commends me when I achieve my goals. □ 16. Gives me positive feedback when I perform well. □ 17. Gives me special recognition when my work is very good. □ 18. Acknowledges improvement in my quality of work. □
THE GROUP-FOCUSED TFL SUBSCALE
1. Encourages team members to take pride in our team. □ 2. Says things that make us feel proud to be members of the team. □ 3. Says positive things about the team. □ 4. Encourages others to place the interests of the team ahead of their own interests. □ 5. Emphasizes the uniqueness of the team. □ 6. Articulates a compelling vision of the future of our team. □ 7. Talks optimistically about the future of our team. □ 8. Talks enthusiastically about what needs to be accomplished by our team. □ 9. Communicates a clear direction of where our team is going. □
10. Fosters collaboration among team members. □ 11. Encourages group members to be team players. □ 12. Develops a team attitude and spirit among team members. □ 13. Gets the team to work together for the same goal. □ 14. Resolves friction among team members in the interest of teamwork. □
Scoring and interpretation: The Transformational Leadership Scale is a research instrument that subordinates respond to in relation to their manager. The greater the number of statements that apply to the manager, the more he or she is a transformational leader. Source: Adapted from Xiao-Hua (Frank) Wang and Jane M. Howell, “Exploring the Dual Effects of Transformational Leadership on Followers,” Journal of Applied Psychology, November 2010, p. 1144.
90 CHAPTER 3• CHARISMATIC AND TRANSFORMATIONAL LEADERSHIP
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
So, who is a transformational leader? One example from the retail busi- ness is Hubert Joly, a turnaround specialist, who came in from outside the company to be appointed as CEO of Best Buy. Over a period of fifteen years, Joly had developed a track record of successfully turning around companies in the media technology and service sectors.
Best Buy had been losing market share to competitors, the stock price was falling rapidly, and the former CEO was dismissed because he was having an affair with an employee. Joly helped limit Best Buy from functioning as a showroom in which many consumers would visit the stores mostly to try out merchandise, and then purchase the product online. Under Joly, Best Buy soon matched online prices but also offered the experience of touching mer- chandise and asking questions. Joly cut costs and reduced the workforce, par- ticularly at company headquarters. He also emphasized selling large appliances and promoting the Geek Squad. Under the transformational lead- ership of Joly, both profits and employee morale showed some improvement, but enhancing sales and profits consistently proved to be a problem.38
How Transformations Take Place Leaders often encounter the need to transform organizations from low per- formance to acceptable performance or from acceptable performance to high performance. At other times, a leader is expected to move a firm from a crisis mode to high ground. To accomplish these lofty purposes, the trans- formational leader attempts to overhaul the organizational culture or sub- culture. His or her task can be as immense as the process of organizational change. To focus our discussion specifically on the leader’s role, we look at ten ways in which transformations take place.39 (See also Figure 3-1.)
THE LEADER:
TRANSFORMATIONS
1. Raises people’s awareness 2. Helps people look beyond self-interest 3. Helps people search for self-fulfillment 4. Helps people understand need for change 5. Invests managers with a sense of urgency 6. Commits to greatness 7. Adopts long-range broad perspective 8. Builds trust 9. Facilitates proactive behavior 10. Concentrates resources where most needed
© Ce ng ag e Le ar ni ng
FIGURE 3-1 How Transformations Take Place.
TRANSFORMATIONAL LEADERSHIP 91
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
1. Raising people’s awareness. The transformational leader makes group members aware of the importance and values of certain rewards and how to achieve them. He or she might point to the pride workers would experi- ence should the firm become number one in its field. At the same time, the leader should point to the financial rewards accompanying such success.
2. Helping people look beyond self-interest. The transformational leader helps group members look to the big picture for the sake of the team and the organization. The executive vice president of a bank told her staff mem- bers, “I know most of you dislike doing your own support work. Yet if we hire enough staff to make life more convenient for you, we’ll be losing money. Then the government might force us to be taken over by a larger bank. Who knows how many management jobs would then have to be cut.”
3. Helping people search for self-fulfillment. The transformational leader helps people go beyond a focus on minor satisfactions to a quest for self- fulfillment. The leader might explain, “I know that making sure you take every vacation day owed you is important. Yet if we get this proposal out on time, we might land a contract that will make us the envy of the industry.” (Being the envy of the industry satisfies the need for self-fulfillment.)
Related to helping people search for self-fulfillment is for transforma- tional leaders to help workers understand how their values fit the values of the organization (person–organization value congruence). A study con- ducted with 140 managers enrolled in an MBA program suggested that transformational leadership influenced work group effectiveness. The impact on effectiveness tended to be positive because of the leader’s ability to help workers understand that there was a good fit between their values and those of the organization. Visualize a leader of a group of workers engaged in the fabrication of cement pipes, and that many of the group members value helping people.40 The transformational leader would be able to enhance group effectiveness by explaining how the pipes are instru- mental in delivering potable water to a wide variety of people.
4. Helping people understand the need for change. The transformational leader must help group members understand the need for change both emo- tionally and intellectually. The problem is that change involves dislocation and discomfort. An effective transformational leader recognizes this emo- tional component to resisting change and deals with it openly. Dealing with the emotional conflicts of large numbers of staffers is obviously an immense task. One approach taken by successful leaders is to conduct discussion groups in which managers and workers are free to discuss their feelings about the changes. This approach has been used quite effectively when firms are downsized. Many of the survivors feel guilty that they are still employed while many competent coworkers have lost their jobs. Clearly, conducting these sessions requires considerable listening skill on the manager’s part.
5. Investing managers with a sense of urgency. To create the transforma- tion, the leader assembles a critical mass of managers and imbues in them the urgency of change. The managers must also share the top leader’s vision
92 CHAPTER 3• CHARISMATIC AND TRANSFORMATIONAL LEADERSHIP
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
of what is both necessary and achievable. To sell this vision of an improved organization, the transformational leader must capitalize on available opportunities.
6. Committing to greatness. Peter Koestenbaum argues that business can be an opportunity for individual and organizational greatness. By adopting this greatness attitude, leaders can ennoble human nature and strengthen societies. Greatness encompasses striving for business effectiveness such as profits and high stock value, as well as impeccable ethics. An emphasis on ethical leadership instills a desire for customer service and quality and fosters feelings of proprietorship and involvement.41 (A commitment to greatness is, of course, important for all leaders, not just those who are transformational.)
7. Adopting a long-range perspective and at the same time observing organizational issues from a broad rather than a narrow perspective. Such thinking on the part of the transformational leader encourages many group members to do likewise. Unless many people think with a future ori- entation, and broadly, an organization cannot be transformed.
8. Building trust. Another useful process for transforming a firm is to build trust between leaders and group members, particularly because distrust and suspicion are rampant during a company revival. Dave Cote, CEO of one of the world’s largest conglomerates, Honeywell International, led one of the best corporate comebacks in recent history. His greatest accomplishment in the turnaround was unifying Honeywell’s formerly fractured, disenchanted culture. At the same time, he developed a successful business strategy, including a cooperative approach in dealing with asbestos lawsuits. Cote also shifted the company to a less aggressive type of accounting, and a shift to manufacturing efficiencies.42 Such moves in a highly ethical direction helped Cote gain the trust of the workforce including managers.
9. Facilitating proactive behavior. Another way in which transformational leaders bring about transformations is to facilitate proactive behavior on the part of subordinates. By being proactive, subordinates take the initiative to bring about positive change. Imagine a Best Buy store manager who responds positively to the change efforts of the CEO Hubert Joly. The store manager is likely to encourage store associates to listen more attentively to customer inquiries and provide useful suggestions. Proactive behavior is facilitated by giving group members more autonomy, or the opportunity to make decisions independently, as revealed in a study of sixty-nine compa- nies in the Netherlands. In addition to being granted autonomy, workers are more likely to be proactive if they have self-perceived ability to perform proactive tasks successfully (role breadth self-efficacy).43
10. Concentrating resources on areas that need the most change. The turn- around artist or transformational leader cannot take care of all problems at once in a troubled organization. A practical strategy is to get around limita- tions on funds, staff, or equipment by concentrating resources on problem areas that are most in need of change and have the biggest potential payoff.
TRANSFORMATIONAL LEADERSHIP 93
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
For example, when police chief Bill Bratton turned around the much- maligned New York Police Department in the mid-1990s, he concentrated resources on the narcotics squad because so much crime is related to narco- tics. During Brattons’s tenure as the head of the NYPD, serious crime dropped by 33 percent and the murder rate decreased by 50 percent.44
Attributes of Transformational Leaders Transformational leaders possess the personal characteristics of other effec- tive leaders, especially charismatic leaders. In addition, a compilation of stud- ies suggests that nine qualities are particularly helpful in enabling leaders to bring about transformations.45 Our discussion of those qualities follows.
Above all, transformational leaders are charismatic. Two key personality factors enhancing their charisma are agreeableness and extraversion, which combine to enhance their interpersonal relationships. Of these, extraversion had the biggest impact.46 Included in the charisma of transformation leaders are their optimism and their openness to the viewpoints of others. An exam- ple of a charismatic, transformational leader is Akio Toyoda, the president of Toyota Motor Corporation. Among his charismatic behaviors are race car driving, being a TV pitchman for his company, and having a rock star per- sona. Among the transformations he is credited with are helping Toyota over- come the effects of an embarrassing 2009 recall, and the effects of the 2011 earthquakes that severely damaged the company’s production facilities.47
Unless they are the brutal slash-and-burn type of turnaround manager, transformational leaders have the respect, confidence, and loyalty of group members. One reason is that managers who use the transformational lead- ership style tend to score higher on emotional intelligence. A specific attri- bute here is that transformational leaders read emotions well.48
Similar to effective leaders in general, transformational leaders often have positive core self-evaluations. (As described in Chapter 2, this composite per- sonality factor is composed of self-esteem, locus of control, generalized self- efficacy, and emotional stability.) A study conducted with three high-tech companies in China found that leaders with positive core evaluations were more likely to be perceived as transformational by subordinates.49
Charismatic, transformational leaders create a vision. By communicating a vision, they convey a set of values that guide and motivate employees. The vision describes an optimistic picture of what the organization will become after the transformation is complete, such as a division being threatened with being shut down becoming the leading division in a conglomerate.
Although transformational leaders are often greatly concerned with organiza- tional survival, they also take the time to encourage the personal development of their staff. As group members develop, their performance is likely to increase. Transformational leaders also give supportive leadership, such as by giving positive feedback to group members and recognizing individual achievements. Supportive leadership also contributes to the development of group members.
Transformational leaders, like most effective leaders and managers, practice empowerment by involving team members in decision making. Empowerment
94 CHAPTER 3• CHARISMATIC AND TRANSFORMATIONAL LEADERSHIP
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
is a key component of developing group members. Innovative thinking, another important characteristic, helps transformational leaders achieve their goals; for example, they might develop innovative ways to raise cash and cut costs quickly. Transformational leaders encourage their staff to think innovatively as well and give them challenging assignments. As with other effective leaders and managers, they also lead by example. During a period of cost-cutting, for example, a transformational leader might fly business coach and eat in the company cafeteria instead of having gourmet food catered to his or her office.
A study conducted with 132 managers and 407 subordinates indicated that managers who are perceived to be transformational score higher on a test of moral reasoning than do transactional leaders.50 In contrast to the type of transformational leaders in the study just mentioned, those who specialize in rescuing failed corporations do not appear to score high in moral reasoning. Such actions include shutting down many company facilities, laying off much of the work force, and canceling contracts with various vendors.
Not every leader classified as transformational will have the nine character- istics just described. For example, some transformational leaders are brusque with people rather than agreeable. Furthermore, it is not always easy to deter- mine whether a given leader can be accurately described as transformational. Sometimes situational forces contribute more heavily to the turnaround than do the leader’s personal qualities. The director of an indoor tennis club was complimented about how he transformed the club from one that was close to bankruptcy and short on membership. He replied, “It wasn’t me. Two of our competitors closed down and we picked up a lot of their membership.”
The Impact of Transformational and Charismatic Leadership on Performance and Behavior Although the present discussion deals primarily with transformational leader- ship, we also include the impact of charismatic leadership because the two overlap. The general picture of the impact of transformational leadership is that, at its best, it can arouse followers to a higher level of thinking. Transfor- mational leaders appeal to the ideals and values of their constituents, thereby enhancing commitment to a carefully crafted vision. Followers are inspired to develop new ways of thinking about problems. Group members become more responsible because they are inspired, and they engage in more constructive behavior such as organizational citizenship behavior—or helping out even with- out the promise of a reward.51 Workers who report to transformational leaders are even more likely to have a positive mood throughout the workday.52
Here we look at several empirical studies about the effects of charismatic and transformational leadership in work settings. The studies summarized here are also useful in understanding how transformational leadership affects behavior.
Overall Validity of Transformational Leadership Timothy A. Judge and Ronald F. Piccolo reviewed eighty-seven studies to examine the impact of transforma- tional leadership on various measures of performance. The researchers also
TRANSFORMATIONAL LEADERSHIP 95
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
evaluated the impact of transactional leadership and laissez-faire leadership on performance. Laissez-faire leadership is a style that gives group mem- bers the freedom to do basically what they want with almost no direction. The three approaches to leadership were measured by questionnaires based on subordinates’ perceptions.
Transformational leadership showed the highest overall relationships on six criteria: (a) follower job satisfaction, (b) follower leader satisfaction, (c) follower motivation, (d) leader job performance, (e) group or organiza- tion performance, and (f) rated leader effectiveness. Interestingly, transac- tional leadership was also shown to produce good results, and laissez-faire leadership was associated with negative results. Unlike previous studies, transactional leadership showed a strong positive relationship to transforma- tional leadership. (Ordinarily, transformational leadership and transactional leadership are negatively related because transformational leaders are said not to engage in routine transactions with group members.) Transformational leadership was negatively related to laissez-faire leadership.53 The explana- tion is most likely that transformational leaders are actively involved with group members.
Team Level Performance Transformational and charismatic leadership also have positive effects on work teams. A study investigated the relationship between charismatic leadership behavior and team performance in both work settings in the United States and India, and in teams working on a simulation project in a business strategy course. As part of the same study, the researchers investigated how being part of a network influences percep- tions of charisma. A major finding was that leaders who are in a central position in an advice network tend to be seen as charismatic by subordi- nates. In turn, leader charisma inspires and facilitates team performance, as rated by managers and the course instructor.54
Organizational Level Performance A group of researchers studied the impact of leadership effectiveness on organizational performance that reinforces several of the ideas already presented in this book. Data were collected from 134 mid-level managers from a large Brazilian energy company. The personality traits of the participants and transformational leadership were measured by questionnaires completed by subordinates, and performance was measured by both ratings from superiors and company records. The findings indicated that leadership effectiveness as measured by organizational outcomes (or business results) was a direct function of the leader’s transformational behavior. Furthermore, intelligence and conscientiousness are the individual differences that contribute the most to being a transformational leader. A study of this nature emphasizes how transformational leadership can benefit organizations.55
The accompanying Leader in Action insert illustrates a leader who helps bringing about major changes in one of the world’s best known business corporations.
96 CHAPTER 3• CHARISMATIC AND TRANSFORMATIONAL LEADERSHIP
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
LEADER IN ACTION
Mary Barra, CEO of GM
In early 2014, the product global chief of General Motors Co., Mary Barra, was named the new company CEO. When Barra, age 51 at the time, was appointed to this position, she was the first woman to become CEO of a major vehicle manufacturer. Departing CEO Dan Akerson stated that he picked Barra to be his successor based on her ability to “make order out of chaos.” In March 2014 Barra faced the chaos of the recall of 2.53 million cars for faulty switches, and 1.3 million vehicles for power steering problems.
As the head of product development as well as global purchasing and supply chain, Mary Barra was the highest- ranking woman in the global automobile and truck industry. She was promoted to head of product development in 2011. Previous to her appointment as head of product development, Barra spent four years as Vice President, Global Human Resources. Joining GM after graduation as an electrical engineer, she was soon identified as a per- sonal with executive potential. Shemoved up the corporate ladder steadily in jobs in manufacturing, administration, and internal communications before the HR position.
Dan Ackerson, the CEO of General Motors, regards Barra as one of his key change agents in his efforts to remake the often slow-moving company culture. Ackerson identifies Barra as “a strong leader and change agent who knows the business inside and out.” He placed Barra on his short list of internal candidates to be his successor.
In 2013, Barra told the Most Powerful Women Summit organized by Fortune magazine that her directive to GM’s designers and engineers is simple, “No more [expletive meaning poorly made] cars, with no excuses.”
In one of her initiatives to change the culture, Barra has helped GM loosen the controls over engineers, allowing them more creative freedom with vehicles. She said her approach is “empowering them to make the decisions, and I think you see it with some of the vehi- cles we just put out, whether it’s the Chevrolet Impala or the Cadillac CTS or the Corvette.” One of the organiza- tional complexities Barra wants to change is the practice of having twelve executive chief engineers responsible for every automobile, truck, or crossover that the
company makes around the world. (Barra perceives this practice as too complex.)
As the head of HR, she deleted a ten-page dress code section in the HR handbook and replaced it with two words, “dress appropriately.” Barra said that GM was entrusting its employees with million dollar budgets but did not think that employees could dress for work without detailed instructions. She believes that this same approach to simplicity can be applied throughout the company in its various processes and mechanisms.
Barra believes that her thrust for creative freedom and simplicity will strengthen GM in the long term. She is adamant about leading by persuasion rather than direct commands. Barra said that when employees say “I’m doing it because Mary told me to do it” is the day she loses.
Barra received a bachelor of science in electrical engineering (BSEE) from the General Motors Institute (now the Kettering University). Later she graduated with an MBA from Stanford University. She was raised in a GM family, with her father having been a diemaker in a Pontiac plant for 39 years.
QUESTIONS
1. Why might Barra be classified as a transformational leader?
2. What relevance might Barra’s experience in HR have for the product development of vehicles?
3. Based on whatever information you might have avail- able, how well is Mary Barra doing as the CEO?
Sources: Original story created from facts and observations in the following sources: Alex Taylor III, “Big Wheel at GM,” Fortune, December 24, 2012, p. 22; Justin Lloyd-Miller, “For GM’s Mary Barra, Simplicity is the Key to Quality,” Wall Street Cheat Sheet (http://wallstcheatsheet.com). October 21, 2013; TTAC Staff, “GM Puts Mary Barra In Charge of Purchasing Too, Says ‘No Excuses…No More Crappy Cars’,” The Truth about Cars (www.thetruthaboutcars.com), October 24, 2013, pp. 1–28; Beth Kowitt, “GM’s Mary Barra to Staff: ‘No More Crappy Cars,’” CNNMoney (http://management.fortune.cnn.com), October 16, 2013, pp. 1–2.
TRANSFORMATIONAL LEADERSHIP 97
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
Concerns about Charismatic Leadership
Up to this point, an optimistic picture has been painted of both the concept of charisma and charismatic leaders. For the sake of fairness and scientific integrity, contrary points of view must also be presented. The topic of char- ismatic leadership has been challenged from two major standpoints: the validity of the concept and the misdeeds of charismatic leaders.
Challenges to the Validity of Charismatic Leadership Some leadership researchers doubt that charisma can be accurately defined or measured. Conducting research about charisma is akin to conducting research about high quality: You know it when you see it, but it is difficult to define in operational terms. Furthermore, even when one leader is deemed to be charis- matic, that leader has many detractors. According to the concept of leadership polarity, leaders are often either revered or vastly unpopular. Martha Stewart is a prime example of a leader who experiences leadership polarity. Many of her fans are mesmerized by her personality and accomplishments. Many of her detractors detest her (perhaps based on envy) and were gleeful when Stewart was accused of insider trading and spent time in prison. People who disliked Stewart also enjoyed reading about her legal disputes with Macy’s over whether she could also merchandise her products at Macy’s and J.C. Penney at the same time.56 Stewart, along with other celebrity charismatics, is often perceived as being narcissistic, with little real concern for others. Charisma needs to be mixed with humility for full effectiveness.
Another problem with the concept of charisma is that it may not be neces- sary for leadership effectiveness. Warren Bennis and Burt Nanus hypothesized that instead of charisma resulting in effective leadership, the reverse may be true: People who are outstanding leaders are granted charisma (perceived as charismatic) by their constituents as a result of their success.57 A representative example is that when retailing executive Ron Johnson had major successes at Target and Apple, he was regarded as highly charismatic. Yet, when his business strategy failed as CEO of J.C. Penney, he was ridiculed being insensitive to his customer base—a perception of weak charisma. The take-away lesson here is that if you are successful in attaining goals, it will enhance your charisma.
The Dark Side of Charismatic Leadership Some people believe that charismatic leadership can be exercised for evil purposes. This argument was introduced previously in relation to personal- ized charismatic leaders. Many years ago, Robert Tucker warned about the dark side of charisma, particularly with respect to political leaders:
The magical message which mesmerizes the unthinking (and which can often be supplied by skilled phrase makers) promises that things will become not just bet- ter but perfect. Charismatic leaders are experts at promising Utopia. Since perfec- tion is the end, often the most heinous actions can be tolerated as seemingly necessary means to that end.58
98 CHAPTER 3• CHARISMATIC AND TRANSFORMATIONAL LEADERSHIP
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
READER’S ROADMAP
Some charismatic leaders are unethical and lead their organizations and outsiders toward illegal and immoral ends. People are willing to follow the charismatic leader down a quasi-legal path because of his or her personal magnetism. Perhaps the most widely publicized financial fraud in history was carried out by Bernard M. Madoff. Investors lost about $50 billion before approximately 10 percent of their money was recovered a few years later. Madoff, whose career included a term as the president of NASDAQ, a popular stock exchange, was well liked and considered by many to be warm and charismatic. His ability to defraud people depended somewhat on his ability to be well liked and entrusted.
Boards of directors currently seek CEOs who do not overemphasize cha- risma and celebrity status at the expense of concentrating on running the business. In this way, the dark side of charisma can be minimized. Recog- nize that a true charismatic and transformational leader is highly concerned about human welfare and attaining outstanding organizational performance.
In Chapter 2, we focused on the traits, motives, and characteristics of the leader—the inner qualities. Here we dug further into leadership qualities by studying charismatic and transformational leadership. In the next chapter, we focus more sharply on the actions of leaders in terms of their behaviors, attitudes, and styles.
SUMMARY
Charisma is a special quality of leaders whose pur- poses, powers, and extraordinary determination dif- ferentiate them from others. It is also a positive and compelling quality of a person that makes many others want to be led by that person. An important element of charismatic leadership involves the attri- butions made by group members about the charac- teristics of leaders and the results they achieve. Social network members often influence a person’s attributions of charisma. The relationship between group members and the leader is important because of these attributions. Charismatic leaders frequently manage their impressions to cultivate relationships with group members.
Much of the impact of charisma is based on the positive effect the charismatic leader triggers
among group members. A study with firefighters showed that having a charismatic leader contrib- uted to their happiness. In a top-level executive position, being perceived as not having enough cha- risma can lead to your downfall.
Three major charismatic leader subtypes are socialized (helping others), personalized (self- interested), and celebrity. Charismatic leaders have characteristics that set them apart from non- charismatic leaders: They have a vision, masterful communication skills, the ability to inspire trust, and the ability to make group members feel capa- ble. They are tactful; they have energy and an action orientation; they are emotionally expressive and warm; they romanticize risk; they use un- conventional strategies; they have self-promoting
SUMMARY 99
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
personalities; and they emphasize being dramatic and unique.
The idea of vision is closely linked to charisma because charismatic leaders inspire others with an uplifting and attractive vision. Visionaries may have different levels of brain activities than nonvision- aries in certain areas of the brain. A vision is more future-oriented than a mission. In formulating a vision, it is helpful to gather information from a variety of sources, including one’s own intuition, futurists, and group members.
Charismatic and transformational leaders com- municate their visions, goals, and directives in a colorful, imaginative, and expressive manner. Communication effectiveness allows for manage- ment by inspiration. One technique for inspiring others is to use metaphors, analogies, and or- ganizational stories. Another is gearing language to different audiences. Charismatic and transfor- mational leaders also extensively use memorable stories or anecdotes to get messages across. Social networking sites can be used to communicate the leader’s charisma.
A person can increase his or her charisma by developing some of the traits, characteristics, and behaviors of charismatic people. The suggestions presented here include creating visions for others; being enthusiastic, optimistic, and energetic; being sensibly persistent; remembering people’s names; developing a personal brand and making an impres- sive appearance; being candid; and displaying an in- your-face attitude.
To bring about change, the transformational leader attempts to overhaul the organizational cul- ture or subculture. Specific change techniques include raising people’s awareness of the impor- tance of certain rewards and getting people to look beyond their self-interests for the sake of the team and the organization. Transformational lea-
ders help people search for self-fulfillment and understand the need for change, and they invest managers with a sense of urgency. The transforma- tional leader also commits to greatness, adopts a long-range perspective, builds trust, facilitate pro- active behavior by subordinates, and concentrates resources where change is needed the most.
Transformational leaders have characteristics similar to those of other effective leaders. In addi- tion, they are charismatic, extraverted, create a vision, encourage personal development of the staff, and give supportive leadership. Emphasis is also placed on empowerment, innovative thinking, and leading by example. Transformational leaders are likely to be strong on moral reasoning.
Transformational leadership can arouse fol- lowers to a higher level of thinking and to engage in more constructive behavior. Transformational leadership is positively related to the criteria of fol- lower job satisfaction, leader satisfaction, follower motivation, leader job performance, group or orga- nization performance, and rated leader effective- ness. Transactional leadership attains the same results to a lesser degree, whereas laissez-faire lead- ership is negatively related to such criteria. Trans- formational and charismatic leadership also have positive effects on work teams. A study showed that being perceived as a transformational leader is related to the performance of small-size and medium-size firms.
One concern about charismatic and transforma- tional leadership is that the concept is murky. Many noncharismatic leaders are effective. Another con- cern is that some charismatic leaders are unethical and devious, suggesting that being charismatic does not necessarily help the organization. A true charis- matic and transformational leader is highly con- cerned about human welfare and attaining organizational goals.
KEY TERMS
charisma 74 socialized charismatic 76 personalized charismatic 77
transformational leader 77 vision 81 leadership by storytelling 84
personal brand 88 leadership polarity 98
100 CHAPTER 3• CHARISMATIC AND TRANSFORMATIONAL LEADERSHIP
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
GUIDELINES FOR ACTION AND SKILL DEVELOPMENT
Following are suggestions to help a person act in a charismatic manner. All of them relate to well- accepted interpersonal skill techniques.
1. Be sure to treat everyone you meet as the most important person you will meet that day. For example, when at a company meeting, shake the hand of every person you meet.
2. Multiply the effectiveness of your handshake. Shake firmly without creating pain, and make enough eye contact to notice the color of the other person’s eyes. When you take that much trouble, you project care and concern. Think a positive thought about the person whose hand you shake.
3. Stand up straight, and use other nonverbal signals of self-confidence. Practice good posture. Minimize fidgeting, scratching, floor tapping, and speaking in a monotone. Walk at a rapid pace without appearing to be anxious. Dress fashionably without going to the extreme that people notice your clothes than they notice you. A fist can project confidence, power, and certainty. Waving a hand, pointing, or rapping a table can help get attention focused on you.
4. Give sincere compliments. Most people thrive on flattery, particularly when it is plausible. Attempt to compliment only those behaviors, thoughts, and attitudes you genuinely believe merit praise. At times you may have to dig to find something praiseworthy, but it will be a good investment of your time.
5. Thank people frequently, especially your own group members. Thanking others is still so infrequently practiced that it gives you a charismatic edge.
6. Smile frequently, even if you are not in a happy mood. A warm smile seems to indicate a confident, caring person, which contributes to a perception of charisma. A smile generally says, “I like you. I trust you. I’m glad we’re together.”
7. Maintain a childlike fascination for your world. Express enthusiasm for and interest in the thoughts, actions, plans, dreams, and material objects of other people. Your
enthusiasm directed toward others will engender enthusiasm in you.
8. Be more animated than others. People who are perceived to be more charismatic are simply more animated than others. They smile more frequently, speak faster, articulate better, and move their heads and bodies more often.59
9. Think big. If you want to become a charismatic and transformational leader, you must develop the capacity to spin beautiful, sweeping visions, and, in general, think big. It is so easy to become preoccupied with small problems that face us daily, such as high prices at the gas pump or a smartphone battery running low on power. Such problems require attention but can block visionary and charismatic thinking if they become preoccupying.
10. Inspire trust and confidence. Make your deeds consistent with your promises. Get people to believe in your competence by making your accomplishments known in a polite, tactful way.
Discussion Questions and Activities
1. Identify a business, government, education, or sports leader whom you perceive to be charis- matic. Explain the basis for your judgment.
2. Identify a business, government, education, or sports leader whom you perceive to have very little charisma. What other factors appear to compensate for his or her limited charisma?
3. How might being charismatic contribute to the effectiveness of the manager of entry-level workers, such as those employed as cashiers or fast-food preparers?
4. Describe how a person might write e-mail mes- sages of social media posts to give an impres- sion of being charismatic.
5. Explain why the presence of a charismatic leader tends to enhance the job satisfaction of group members.
6. To what extent do you think dressing expen- sively and fashionably really contributes to the charisma of a leader within an organization?
GUIDELINES FOR ACTION AND SKILL DEVELOPMENT 101
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
LEADERSHIP CASE PROBLEM A
7. If a transformational leader is supposed to be so smart and visionary, why would he or she emphasize empowerment in his or her leader- ship approach?
8. How might a major retailer such as Sears or J.C. Penney benefit from having a transforma- tional leader as CEO?
9. Do you think a true transformational leader should ever lay off thousands of workers to help make a company profitable?
10. What opportunities might a first-level supervi- sor or team leader have to be a transforma- tional leader?
Tim Puts His Charisma Online
Tim is the sales manager at a national auto parts supplier. Among the many accounts his company serves are small auto supply stores, service stations, repair shops, supermarkets, and small retailers. Tim has a staff of fifteen external sales representatives, as well as five internal sales specialists who deal with online and telephone sales.
The auto parts supply business is highly competi- tive, with most of the competition providing equally good parts and service. The personal touch there- fore becomes quite important in gaining sales. Providing good service—such as refilling orders on frequently purchased parts and delivering on time—is essential. Tim also believes that inspiring the sales staff is vital in gaining a competitive edge. He notes, “If I inspire my sales reps, they will do a better job of building relationships with their customers. If I inspire the reps to sell more and better, they might inspire their customers to buy more parts and supplies from us.”
Tim reasoned that his attempts to inspire and motivate the sales staff were working fairly well, but improvement was needed. When appropriate, he sees members of his staff in person, phones them, and sends out frequent voice mails and text messages. Yet Tim thought that he could do more: “I have been described as charismatic by my boss and several friends. Maybe I could get a bigger bang out of my charisma, if I made better use of the social media to inspire my staff.”
Tim decided that for the next month he would post inspiring messages on the Facebook, Twitter, Google +, and LinkedIn pages of all the members of his sales staff, including the internal staff. Tim would also post the same messages on his own pages. Six of Tim’s postings designed to project his charisma and inspire the staff were as follows:
● The only limits we have are those we impose on ourselves.
● If you are still breathing, maybe it’s not such a bad day after all.
● I want to wake up the inner greatness in each and every one of you.
● If not you, who? ● Welcome every rejection. It means you are one
step closer to a Yes. ● The harder you try, the luckier you get.
Tim received fewer responses than he antici- pated, but a few sales representatives thanked him for the positive ideas.
Questions
1. How effective do you think Tim’s posts are in terms of expressing his charisma?
2. How effective do you think Tim’s posts are for purposes of inspiring the sales representatives to sell more auto parts and supplies?
3. What else do you recommend that Timdo to express his charisma via social networking websites?
ASSOCIATED ROLE PLAY One student plays the role of Tim who one morning during a work break sits down with two of his direct reports for an informal chat. Tim wants to find out in
person if he is inspiring the group with his social media posts. Two other students play the role of direct reports who tend to think that Tim’s posts
102 CHAPTER 3• CHARISMATIC AND TRANSFORMATIONAL LEADERSHIP
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
LEADERSHIP CASE PROBLEM B
are mostly a waste of time because they would rather receive information about more directly work-related topics. Yet being good office politicians, the two
workers do not want to offend Tim. Observers will look to see how well the direct reports attain their goal without being insensitive toward their boss.
Turnaround Ashley
At age 32, Ashley believed that she had landed an opportunity to accelerate her career as a leader and manager. Ashley had worked four years as a manufacturing manager in the industrial pump divi- sion of a conglomerate. Based on her outstanding performance, she was offered the opportunity to be the division head of a small and troubled unit of the company, Ultra Covers. The division in question manufactures after-market stylish covers for cell phones, smartphones, laptops, and tablet computers. Although the products are of high quality, Ultra Cov- ers has been losing money for several years. Compe- tition in the field of stylish covers for electronic devices is intense, and profit margins are thin. Despite these challenges, Ashley took just one hour to accept the offer. She told the top-management committee, “I know I can convert Ultra Covers into a proud and profitable business unit.”
Thirty days later, Ashley began her new position as division president. The former president was reassigned to a plant manager position in another unit of the conglomerate. Ashley’s first move was to conduct a listening tour of the company, interact- ing with workers and managers at all levels of the division. She also spoke with the major customers and several kiosk operators who sold Ultra Covers at shopping malls.
After listening to so many people, making obser- vations of her own, and analyzing financial and production data from the Ultra Cover division, Ashley swung into action. Her first step was to inform the manufacturing group that if they could not reduce manufacturing costs by 10 percent within six months, she might shut down domestic manufacturing and outsource all manufacturing to China. Ultra Covers would then become a sales and distribution unit, with almost no manufacturing.
Ashley’s next major initiative came in a meeting with the sales manager, Ken. She told him that his
goal for the upcoming fiscal year is to increase sales by 15 percent, and that no excuses would be accept- able. Ken explained that his sales force is highly moti- vated, and that they are doing everything they can to boost sales, including intense Internet marketing. He said, “The channels are already saturated with deco- rative covers for portable electronic devices. A 15 percent jump in sales is unrealistic.” Ashley told Ken it was his job to find a way to increase sales— particularly if he wanted to keep his job.
Another initiative Ashley took was to order man- agers and supervisors to find ways to reduce division costs by 10 percent in the upcoming fiscal year. “Do whatever it takes,” said Ashley. “Our costs are too high for our sales volume. Adjust the thermostats, do not replace some of the workers who quit or retire, cut back on scrap. And when youmake photo- copies, remember to print on both sides of the sheet of paper.”
Ashley began to sense from comments she heard from her staff that perhaps her turnaround efforts appeared to be a little harsh. Based on this feedback, she decided to prepare a video that would be distrib- uted on the Ultra Cover intranet. A central part of her message was that about four billion people in the world use some type of portable phone or computer, and that only 3 percent of them are purchasing a cover for these devices. She concluded, “We have a potential market of about 3:9 billion people through- out the world who could use at least one Ultra Cover. We have just begun our journey to greatness.”
Questions
1. How successful do you think Ashley will be as a transformational leader at Ultra Cover?
2. What might Ashley be doing right as a transfor- mational leader?
3. What suggestions might you offer Ashley to be more successful as a transformational leader?
LEADERSHIP CASE PROBLEM B 103
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
NOTES
ASSOCIATED ROLE PLAY One student plays the role of turnaround leader Ashley who is driven to transform Ultra Covers into a high-performing unit within the conglomer- ate. Today she has a face-to-face meeting with Ken to hammer home the point that sales must increase by 15 percent. Another student plays the
role of Ken who wants to cooperate but thinks that Ashley is being unrealistic considering the business climate. Ken also wants to preserve his job. One focal point for observers will be the extent to which Ashley is being inspirational and transformational.
LEADERSHIP SKILL-BUILDING EXERCISE 3-3
My Leadership Portfolio
How much charisma, or how many charismatic behaviors, have you exhibited this week? Think back to all your interactions with people in this last week or two. What have you done that might have been interpreted as charismatic? Review the characteristics of a charismatic leader described in the text and in the Guidelines for Action and Skill
Development. For example, did you smile warmly at someone, did you wave to a person you see infre- quently and address him or her by name? Did you help your team, club, or group think seriously about its future? As part of this same exercise, record your charismatic behaviors for the upcoming week. Be alert to opportunities for displaying charisma.
LEADERSHIP SKILL-BUILDING EXERCISE 3-4
Finding Inspirational Messages on a Social Networking Site
The purpose of this exercise is to find a few inspir- ing messages on social media websites. For exam- ple, track down your followers on Twitter to see if you can find at least two inspirational messages such as those posted by Tim in the above case.
Reflect on the effect these messages have on you. What impact do these messages have on your perception of the charisma of the sender? Compare your results to those of one or two other classmates.
1. Original story created from facts and observations in the following sources: Rahim Kanani, “How Restaurant Visionary Ron Shaich Is Tackling America’s Hunger Crisis,” Forbes (www.forbes.com), September 16, 2012, pp. 1–6; Annie Gasparro, “Panera’s New Push for Pay-What-You-Can,” The Wall Street Journal, June 5, 2013, p. B5; Amy Sullivan, “The Panera Model: How To Do Good and Make Money at the Same Time,” The National Journal, June 13, 2013, pp. 1–4; Ron Ruggless,
“Panera to Address Service Speed,” National Restaurant News (http://nrn.com), October 25, 2013, pp. 1–2.
2. Jack and Suzy Welch, “It’s Not About Empty Suits,” BusinessWeek, October 16, 2006, p. 032.
3. Jay A. Conger and Rabindra N. Kanungo, Charismatic Leadership in Organizations (Thousand Oaks, Calif.: Sage Publications, 1998).
4. Stephanie N. Mehta, “Why Him?” Fortune, November 23, 2009, pp. 89–90.
104 CHAPTER 3• CHARISMATIC AND TRANSFORMATIONAL LEADERSHIP
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
5. Daniel Lyons, “Digital Tools: Big Brother,” Forbes, October 1, 2007, p. 51; Mehta, “Why Him?” p. 90.
6. Juan-Carlos Pastor, James R. Meindl, and Margarit C. Mayo, “A Network Effects Model of Charisma Attributions,” Academy of Management Journal, April 2002, pp. 410–420.
7. Cited in Jay A. Conger, The Charismatic Leader: Beyond the Mystique of Exceptional Leadership (San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 1989).
8. William L. Gardner and Bruce J. Avolio, “The Charismatic Relationship: A Dramaturgical Perspective,” Academy of Management Review, January 1998, pp. 32–58.
9. Angelo Fanelli and Vilmos F. Misangyi, “Bringing Out Charisma: CEO Charisma and External Stakeholders,” Academy of Management Review, October 2006, p. 1053.
10. Eugene Schmuckler, book review in Personnel Psychology, Winter 1989, p. 881.
11. Amir Erez, Vilmost Misangyi, Diane E. Johnson, Marcie A. LePine, and Kent C. Halverson, “Stirring the Hearts of Followers: Charismatic Leadership as the Transferal of Affect,” Journal of Applied Psychology, May 2008, pp. 602–613.
12. Holman W. Jenkins, Jr., “Only Bill Gates Can Change Microsoft,” The Wall Street Journal, August 28, 2013, p. A13.
13. Bernard M. Bass with Ruth Bass, The Bass Handbook of Leadership: Theory, Research, & Managerial Applications, Fourth Edition (New York: The Free Press, 2008), pp. 578–580.
14. Michael E. Brown and Linda K. Treviño, “Socialized Charismatic Leadership, Values Congruence, and Deviance in Work Groups,” Journal of Applied Psychology, July 2006, pp. 954–962; Michael E. Brown and Linda K. Treviño, “Leader-Follower Values Congruence: Are Socialized Charismatics Leaders Better Able to Achieve It?” Journal of Applied Psychology, March 2009, pp. 478–490.
15. Jane M. Howell and Boas Shamir, “The Role of Followers in the Charismatic Leadership Process: Relationships and Their Consequences,” Academy of Management Review, January 2005, p. 100.
16. Mark Greer, “The Science of Savoir Faire,” Monitor on Psychology, January 2005, pp. 28–39; Jane M. Howell and Bruce Avolio, “The Ethics of Charismatic Leadership: Submission or
Liberation?” The Academy of Management Executive, May 1992, pp. 43–52; Andrew J. DuBrin,Narcissism in the Workplace (Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar, 2012), pp. 108–119.
17. This quote and the preceding quote are from Stephen Barlas, “New Horizons for Growth at GE,” Hispanic Business, January/February 2011, p. 25.
18. Warren Bennis, “Acting the Part of a Leader,” BusinessWeek, September 19, 2009, p. 080.
19. Research reported in “This Is Your Brain on the Job,” The Wall Street Journal, September 20, 2007, pp. B1, B6.
20. Cited in “Vision and Mission: Know the Difference,” Executive Leadership, February 2006, p. 1.
21. Jim Collins, “Aligning Action and Values,” Leader to Leader Institute, http:// leadertoleader.org, as reported in “Actions: Louder Than Vision Statements,” Executive Leadership, May 2004, p. 8.
22. “Who’s Next: Laura Ipsen: SVP and GM, Smart Grid Cisco,” Fast Company, December 2010, January 2011, p. 39.
23. A couple of the ideas in the list are from “Nailing Down Your Vision: 8 Steps,” Executive Leadership, September 2007, p. 2.
24. Jeffrey C. Kohles, Michelle C. Bligh, and Melissa K. Carsten, “A Follower-Centric Approach to the Vision Integration Process,” The Leadership Quarterly, June 2012, pp. 476–487.
25. Ellen Florian, “Dr. Mehmet Oz: The Crown Prince of Medical Media on Leadership,” Fortune, February 27, 2012, p. 20.
26. Howell and Avolio, “The Ethics of Charismatic Leadership,” p. 46.
27. Jay A. Conger, “Inspiring Others: The Language of Leadership,” The Academy of Management Executive, February 1991, p. 39.
28. Ibid. 29. Anna Elisabeth Weischer, Jürgen Weibler, and
Malte Petersen, “‘To Thine Own Self Be True’: The Effects of Enactment and Life Storytelling on Perceived Leader Authenticity,” The Leadership Quarterly, August 2013, pp. 477–495.
30. “Women’s Network,” www.ge.com/careers /culture/diversity/womens-network, © 2013; General Electric; Diane Brady and Jena McGregor, “What Works in Women’s Networks,” Business Week, June 18, 2007, pp. 58–60.
NOTES 105
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
31. Dennis A. Romig, Side by Side Leadership: Achieving Outstanding Results Together (Marietta, Ga.: Bard Press, 2001), p. 157.
32. Research cited in Greer, “The Science of Savoir Faire,” p. 30.
33. Judy Martin, “Aligning Your Passion with Your Personal Brand,” San Francisco Examiner (www.examiner.com), March 7, 2009.
34. Ray A. Smith and Robin Sidel, “When the Boss Sets the Style,” The Wall Street Journal, July 25, 2013, p. D1.
35. John Antonakis, Marika Fenley, and Suie Liechti, “Can Charisma Be Taught? Test of Two Interventions,” Academy of Management Learning & Education, September 2011, pp. 374–396.
36. Marshall Sashkin and Molly G. Sashkin, Leadership That Matters: The Critical Factors for Making a Difference in People’s Lives and Organizations’ Success (San Francisco: Berrett- Koehler, 2003).
37. Bernard M. Bass, “Does the Transactional- Transformational Leadership Paradigm Transcend National Boundaries?”American Psychologist, February 1997, p. 130.
38. Frank Vasceilaro, “New CEO Single-Handedly Turing Best Buy Around,” http://minnesota .cbslocal.com, November 6, 2013, pp. 1–4; Anne Innocenzio, “Best Buy Hires Joly as New CEO,” www.detroitnews.com, August 20, 2012, pp. 1–3: Justin Lahart, “No One Buys When Best Is Worst,” The Wall Street Journal, January 17, 2014, p. C8.
39. Many of the items in the list are derived from John J. Hater and Bernard M. Bass, “Superiors’ Evaluations and Subordinates’ Perceptions of Transformational and Transactional Leadership,” Journal of Applied Psychology, November1988, p. 65; Noel M. Tichy and Mary Anne Devanna, The Transformational Leader (New York: Wiley, 1990); Shaul Oreg and Yair Berson, “Leadership and Employees’ Reactions to Change: The Role of Leaders’ Personal Attributes and Transformational Leadership Style,” Personnel Psychology, no. 3, 2011, pp. 627–659.
40. Brian J. Hoffman, Bethany H. Bynum, Ronald F. Piccolo, and Ashley W. Sutton, “Person- Organization Value Congruence: How Transformational Leaders Influence Work
Group Effectiveness,” Academy of Management Journal, August 2011, pp. 779–790.
41. Peter Koestenbaum, Leadership: The Inner Side of Greatness (San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 1991).
42. Shawn Tully, “The Man Who Got Honeywell’s Groove Back,” Fortune, May 21, 2012, pp. 176–184.
43. Deanne N. Den Hartog and Frank D. Belschak, “When Does Transformational Leadership Enhance Employee Proactive Behavior? The Role of Autonomy and Roles Breadth Self- Efficacy,” Journal of Applied Psychology, January 2012, pp. 194–202.
44. W. Chan Kim and Renée Mauborgne, “Tipping Point Leadership,” Harvard Business Review, April 2003, pp. 65–66; Susan Berfield. “Bill Bratton, Globocop,” Bloomberg Businessweek, April 12, 2010, p. 50.
45. Literature reviewed in Sally A. Carless, Alexander J. Wearing, and Leon Mann, “A Short Measure of Transformational Leadership,” Journal of Business and Psychology, Spring 2000, pp. 389–405; Joyce E. Bono and Timothy A. Judge, “Personality and Transformational and Transactional Leadership: A Meta-Analysis,” Journal of Applied Psychology, October 2004, pp. 901–910; Taly Dvir, Dov Eden, Burce J. Avolio, and Boas Shamir, “Impact of Transformational Leadership on Follower Development and Performance: A Field Experiment,” Academy of Management Journal, August 2002, pp. 735–744; Bass, Bass’s Handbook of Leadership, pp. 633–636.
46. Timothy A. Judge and Joyce E. Bono, “Five-Factor Model of Personality and Transformational Leadership,” Journal of Applied Psychology, October 2000, pp. 751–765; Bono and Judge, “Personality and Transformational and Transactional Leadership,” pp. 901–910.
47. Chester Dawson, “Toyota Chief Grabs the Wheel to Turn Around Humbled Auto Giant,” The Wall Street Journal, July 13, 2012, pp. A1, A8.
48. Robert S. Rubin, David C. Munz, and William H. Bommer, “Leading from Within: The Effects of Emotional Recognition and Personality on Transformational Leadership
106 CHAPTER 3• CHARISMATIC AND TRANSFORMATIONAL LEADERSHIP
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
Behavior,” Academy of Management, October 2005, pp. 845–856.
49. Jia Hu, Zhen Wang, Robert C. Liden, and Jianmin Sun, “The Influence of Leader Core Self-Evaluation on Follower Reports of Transformational Leadership,” The Leadership Quarterly, October 2012, pp. 860–868.
50. Nick Turner et al., “Transformational Leadership and Moral Reasoning,” Journal of Applied Psychology, April 2002, pp. 304–311.
51. Ronald F. Piccolo and Jason A. Colquitt, “Transformational Leadership and Job Behaviors: The Mediating Role of Core Job Characteristics,” Academy of Management Journal, April 2006, p. 327.
52. Joyce E. Bono, Hannah Jackson Foldes, Gregory Vinson, and John P. Muros, “Workplace Emotions: The Role of Supervision and Leadership,” Journal of Applied Psychology, September 2007, pp. 1357–1367.
53. Timothy A. Judge and Ronald F. Piccolo, “Transformational and Transactional Leadership: A Meta-Analytic Test of Their Relative Validity,” Journal of Applied Psychology, October 2004, pp. 755–768.
54. Prasad Balkundi, Martin Kilduff, and David A. Harrison, “Centrality and Charisma:
Comparing How Leader Networks and Attributions Affect Team Performance,” Journal of Applied Psychology, November 2011, pp. 1209–1222.
55. Flavia Cavazotte, Valter Moreno, and Mateus Hickmann, “Effects of Leader Intelligence, Personality, and Emotional Intelligence on Transformational Leadership and Managerial Performance,” The Leadership Quarterly, June 2012, pp. 443–455.
56. Shelly Banjo and Anna Prior, “Penney, Martha Stewart Adjust Product Pact,” The Wall Street Journal, October 22, 2013, p. B3.
57. Warren G. Bennis and Burt Nanus, Leaders: Strategies for Taking Charge (New York: Harper & Row, 1985), p. 223.
58. Robert C. Tucker, “The Theory of Charismatic Leadership,” Daedalus, Summer 1968, pp. 731–756.
59. Items 1, 2, 4, 5, and 6 on the list are from Roger Dawson, Secrets of Power Persuasion: Everything You’ll Need to Get Anything You’ll Ever Want (Upper Saddle River, N.J.: Prentice Hall, 1992), pp. 179–194; the eighth item is from James M. Kouzes and Barry Z. Posner, The Leadership Challenge, Third Edition (San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 2002), p. 158.
NOTES 107
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
CH AP
TE R
4 Leadership Behaviors, Attitudes, and Styles
LEARNING OBJECTIVES After studying this chapter and doing the exercises, you should be able to
• Explain the key leadership dimensions of initiating structure and consideration.
• Describe at least five task-oriented leadership beha- viors and attitudes.
• Describe at least five relationship-oriented attitudes and behaviors.
• Explain how leaders use 360-degree feedback to improve their performance.
• Describe the participative and autocratic leadership styles.
• Present the case for the entrepreneurial style of lead- ership and for gender differences in leadership style.
• Determine how to choose the most appropriate lead- ership style.
CHAPTER OUTLINE The Classic Dimensions of Consideration and Initiat- ing Structure
Task-Related Attitudes and Behaviors
Relationship-Oriented Attitudes and Behaviors
360-Degree Feedback for Fine-Tuning a Leadership Approach
Leadership Styles Participative Leadership Autocratic Leadership Leadership Grid™ Styles
Entrepreneurial Leadership Gender Differences in Leadership Style Selecting the Best Leadership Style
Summary
Key Terms
Guidelines for Action and Skill Development
Leadership Case Problem A
Leadership Case Problem B
Notes
By job title, Sheryl Sandberg is COO (chief operatingofficer) at Facebook, placing her in charge of busi-ness operations that encompass sales, marketing, business development, human resources, public policy,
and communication. Beyond her job title, Sandberg has been a driving force behind the phenomenal success of Facebook, the best-selling author of Lean-in: Women, Work, and the Will to Succeed, and regarded as one of the
108 Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s).
Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
most powerful women in the world. She is also a mentor to her boss, company cofounder, Mark Zuckerberg.
Before joining Facebook in 2008, Sandberg was Vice President of Global Online Sales and Operations at Google, Chief of Staff to the United States Secretary of the Treasury, and a management consultant at McKinsey & Company. Sandberg graduated from Harvard College, with a major in economics, and an MBA from Harvard University.
As part of her role as COO, Sandberg provides leader- ship for solving the problems of users, advertisers, and partner websites by using automated systems rather than hiring new staff. She generously praises team mem- bers who develop productivity-generating tools that enable Facebook to grow in members and revenue without grow- ing the size of the company.
Jim Breyer, a member of the Facebook board, said about Sandberg, “I have never met anyone with her combination of infectious, enthusiastic spirit, combined with extraordinary
intelligence.” As Zuckerberg sees it, Sandberg “… is unique in that she has a high IQ and EQ [emotional intelligence quo- tient], and it’s just really rare to get than in any single person.”
Sandberg’s management style has been described as highly professional, because she pairs empathy with high expectations and frequent direct feedback, and values entrepreneurial problem-solving above all else. During meetings, Sandberg is an attentive listener, and makes careful observations about how people feel. For example, during an acquisitions meeting, she reminded the team that the firm’s founder was about to have a birthday, and the he wanted to complete the deal before the big day.
If you want to know if you are a good leader, according to Sandberg, answer the following three questions:
• Do I have followers? • Do I have a cause bigger than myself? • Do I get stuff done?1
The story about a world leading technology executive illustrates how lea- ders’ behaviors can influence their effectiveness. Among these behaviors are listening carefully to staff members, providing feedback and guidance, and welcoming risk taking. This chapter describes a number of key behaviors and attitudes that help a manager function as a leader. We also describe the closely related topic of leadership styles.
Frequent reference is made in this chapter, and at other places in the text, to leadership effectiveness. A working definition of an effective leader is one who helps group members attain productivity, including high quality and customer satisfaction, as well as job satisfaction. Leadership effective- ness is typically measured by two key criteria.
The first criterion relates to objective data, such as those dealing with sales, production, safety, number of patents produced by the group, cost cutting, or staying within budget. Measures of job satisfaction and turnover are also used to measure leadership effectiveness. The second criterion focuses on judgments by others about the leader’s effectiveness, such as a plant manager rating a supervisor or the board rating a CEO. Most of the research reported through- out this text includes measures of leadership effectiveness in the study design.
The Classic Dimensions of Consideration and Initiating Structure
Studies conducted at Ohio State University in the 1950s identified 1,800 spe- cific examples of leadership behavior that were reduced to 150 questionnaire items on leadership functions.2 The functions are also referred to as
THE CLASSIC DIMENSIONS OF CONSIDERATION AND INITIATING STRUCTURE 109
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
dimensions of leadership behavior. This research became the foundation for most future research about leadership behavior, attitudes, and styles. The researchers asked team members to describe their supervisors by responding to the questionnaires. Leaders were also asked to rate themselves on leader- ship dimensions. Two leadership dimensions accounted for 85 percent of the descriptions of leadership behavior: consideration and initiating structure.
Consideration is the degree to which the leader creates an environment of emotional support, warmth, friendliness, and trust. The leader creates this environment by being friendly and approachable, looking out for the personal welfare of the group, keeping the group abreast of new develop- ments, and doing small favors for the group.
Leaders who score high on the consideration factor typically are friendly and trustful, earn respect, and have a warm relationship with team members. Leaders with low scores on the consideration factor typically are authoritar- ian and impersonal in their relationships with group members. Three ques- tionnaire items measuring the consideration factor are as follows:
1. Do personal favors for people in the work group. 2. Treat all people in the work group as your equal. 3. Do little things to make it pleasant to be a member of the staff.
The relationship-oriented behaviors described later in this chapter are specific aspects of consideration. Another key example of consideration is making connections with people. For example, much of the time Sheryl Sandberg spends outside the office on business is devoted to making con- nections with key people who could advance the cause of Facebook, as well as help women succeed in their careers.
Being soft-spoken is a leadership style element that contributes to consid- eration because workers feel respected when the leader does not attempt to dominate the discussion. Adam Silver, the National Basketball Association (NBA) commissioner is regarded as dispassionate, congenial, and practical— and rarely argumentative.3
Initiating structure means organizing and defining relationships in the group by engaging in such activities as assigning specific tasks, specifying procedures to be followed, scheduling work, and clarifying expectations for team members. A team leader who helped group members establish realistic goals would be engaged in initiating structure. Other concepts that refer to the same idea include production emphasis and task orientation. The task- related leadership behaviors and attitudes described later in this chapter are specific aspects of initiating structure.
Leaders who score high on this dimension define the relationship between themselves and their staff members, as well as the role that they expect each staff member to assume. Such leaders also endeavor to establish well-defined channels of communication and ways of getting the job done. Three self- assessment items measuring initiating structure are as follows:
1. Try out your own new ideas in the work group. 2. Emphasize meeting deadlines. 3. See to it that people in the work group are working up to capacity.
110 CHAPTER 4• LEADERSHIP BEHAVIORS, ATTITUDES, AND STYLES
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
A positive example of an emphasis on initiating structure is the way Sheryl Sandberg focuses on finding operating efficiencies such as using software instead of adding more people to resolve user problems.
Leaders have been categorized with respect to how much emphasis they place on consideration and initiating structure. As implied by Figure 4-1, the two dimensions are not mutually exclusive. A leader can achieve high or low status on both. For example, an effective leader might contribute to high productivity and still place considerable emphasis on warm human relationships. The four-cell grid of Figure 4-1 is a key component of several approaches to describing leadership style. We return to this topic later in this chapter and in Chapter 5.
A study of the validity of consideration and initiating structure indicates that these classic dimensions do indeed contribute to an understanding of leadership because they are related to leadership outcomes. A meta-analysis showed that consideration is strongly related to the job satisfaction of group members, satisfaction with the leader, worker motivation, and leader effectiveness. Initiating structure was slightly more strongly related to job performance, group performance, and organization performance. However, initiating structure was also associated with satisfaction and performance.4
These results are encouraging because they reinforce the importance of this pioneering research.
Recent research conducted with an online research group and U.S. Air Force officers provides additional insight into the effects of initiating struc- ture and consideration on employee work-related attitudes. The focus of the research was the fit between consideration and initiating structure needed and received. One key result of the study was that when employees did not receive the amount of consideration and initiating structure they thought they needed, unfavorable attitudes were forthcoming. Among these attitudes were less trust in the supervisor, lower job satisfaction, and less commitment to the organization. The study also found that excess levels of consideration were associated with favorable attitudes, and excess levels of
INITIATING STRUCTURE
CONSIDERATION
High
High
Low
Low structure and
high consideration
High structure and
high consideration
Low structure and
low consideration
High structure and
low consideration
© Ce ng ag e Le ar ni ng
FIGURE 4-1 Four Combinations of Initiating Structure and Consideration.
THE CLASSIC DIMENSIONS OF CONSIDERATION AND INITIATING STRUCTURE 111
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
initiating structure were associated with unfavorable attitudes. (Apparently, employees don’t mind being treated with excess kindness, but they do object to being over-controlled.)5
Task-Related Attitudes and Behaviors
The task-related versus relationship-related classification remains a useful framework for understanding leadership attitudes, behaviors, and practices. This section identifies and describes task-related attitudes and behaviors that are characteristic of effective leaders, as outlined in Table 4-1. Task-related in this context means that the behavior, attitude, or skill focuses more on the task to be performed than on the interpersonal aspect of leadership.
As mentioned in Chapter 2, a synthesis of many studies indicates that the combination of leadership traits and behaviors (both task and relationship) accounts for a minimum of 31 percent of the differences in leadership effec- tiveness. Yet, according to the research in question, leader behaviors have a bigger impact on effectiveness than do traits. Although certain traits may predispose individuals to certain behaviors, behaviors are the more impor- tant predictor of leadership effectiveness. For example, a leader who is assertive may take naturally to providing clear guidelines and providing feedback to subordinates. It is also noteworthy to recognize that it is easy to develop behaviors than to develop or modify traits.6
1. Adaptability to the situation. Effective leaders adapt to the situation. Adaptability reflects the contingency viewpoint: A tactic is chosen based on the unique circumstances at hand. A leader who is responsible for psycho- logically immature group members will find it necessary to supervise them closely. If the group members are mature and self-reliant, the leader will use less supervision. The adaptive leader also selects an organization struc- ture that is best suited to the demands of the situation, such as choosing between a brainstorming group and a committee.
2. Direction setting. Given that a major responsibility of leadership is to produce change, the leader must set the direction of that change. Direction setting is part of creating a vision and a component of strategy. The strategy
TABLE 4-1 Task-Related Leadership Attitudes and Behaviors
1. Adaptability to the situation
2. Direction setting
3. High performance standards
4. Concentrating on strengths of group members
5. Risk taking and execution of plans
6. Hands-on guidance and feedback
7. Ability to ask tough questions
8. Organizing for collaboration
© Ce ng ag e Le ar ni ng
112 CHAPTER 4• LEADERSHIP BEHAVIORS, ATTITUDES, AND STYLES
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
describes a feasible way of achieving the vision. Former GE executive turned business author Larry Bossidy believes that it is part of a business leader’s job to communicate clearly where the business is going, why, and how the company will benefit if goals are achieved.7
3. High performance standards. Effective leaders consistently hold group members to high standards of performance. High performance standards can also take the form of challenging the thinking of others. Former General Motors CEO Daniel Akerson has been known to press executives in meetings to justify their plans and initiatives. Furthermore, he does not back down when told that matters were complicated. Akerson would reply that issues should not be complicated; instead, they should be simplified.8
When performance is measured against high standards, productivity is likely to increase, since people tend to live up to the expectations of their superiors. This is called the Pygmalion effect, and it works in a subtle, almost unconscious way. When a managerial leader believes that a group member will succeed, the manager communicates this belief without realiz- ing it. Conversely, when a leader expects a group member to fail, that per- son will not disappoint the manager. The manager’s expectation of success or failure becomes a self-fulfilling prophecy because the perceptions con- tribute to success or failure.
4. Concentrating on the strengths of group members. An axiom of effec- tive leadership and management is to make good use of the strengths of group members rather than concentrating effort on patching up areas for improvement. The effective leader helps people improve, yet still capitalizes on strengths. A team member might have excellent interpersonal skills, yet poor technical skills. It would be best to assign that person a role that emphasizes interpersonal skills, while at the same time helping him or her improve technical skills. Marcus Buckingham emphasizes that capitalizing on each person’s unique pattern of skills saves time because group members are not laboring at tasks outside their capability and interest. The manager might even develop a job description that best fits each employee’s unique- ness.9 Suppose you are the leader of a call center, and one staffer is great at calming down angry customers. Other call center members are then asked to refer customers who have gone ballistic to your team member who can handle customer rage well.
5. Risk taking and execution of plans. To bring about constructive change, the leader must take risks and be willing to implement those risky decisions. The relevance of risk taking to leadership effectiveness is emphasized by Sarah Mensah, the chief operating officer & chief marketing officer of the professional basketball team, the Portland Trail Blazers. She believes that the ability to welcome and seek out risks is a valuable skill: “I’ve learned that if there is no risk, there will be no reward.”10 Larry Bossidy says about the importance of execution: “I’m an impatient person, and I get more satisfaction from seeing things get done than I do about philosophizing or building sand castles. Many people regard execution as detail work that’s beneath the dignity of a business leader. That’s wrong. It’s a leader’s most important job.”11
TASK-RELATED ATTITUDES AND BEHAVIORS 113
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
6. Hands-on guidance and feedback. You will recall that technical compe- tence and knowledge of the business are important leadership characteristics. They enable the leader to provide group members with hands-on guidance about how to accomplish important work. The leader who provides such guidance helps the group accomplish important tasks; at the same time, group members learn important skills. Too much guidance of this nature, however, can be a symptom of poor delegation and micromanagement (man- aging too closely). Too little guidance, and macromanagement is the result, in which the manager gives too little or no direction to group members. Henry Mintzberg observes that the leader’s strategy might suffer because he or she does not understand the operations of the business.12
Muhtar Kent, the CEO of Coca-Cola Co., is a well-regarded leader who emphasizes using hands-on management to help him better understand the business. He says that he goes to the market at least once a week everywhere he is at the time to help him comprehend the dynamics of the business. When he joined the company in 1978, he spent time on the trucks for about seven and one-half months.13 (The point here is that understanding the front- line operations of the business facilitates providing hands-on guidance.)
Closely related to guidance is giving frequent feedback on performance. The leader can rarely influence the actions of group members without appropriate performance feedback. This feedback tells group members how well they are doing so that they can take corrective action if needed. It also serves as rein- forcement that prompts group members to continue favorable activities. Leader- ship Skill-Building Exercise 4-1 provides practice in developing feedback skills.
LEADERSHIP SKILL-BUILDING EXERCISE 4-1
Feedback Skills
After small groups have completed an assignment such as answering the case questions or discussion questions, hold a performance feedback session. Also use observations you have made in previous problem-solving activities as the basis for your feedback. Each group member provides some feedback to each other member about how well he or she thinks the other person performed. Use only volunteers, because this type of feedback may be uncomfortable and disturbing to some individuals. Students not receiving feed- back can serve as observers and later present their views on what took place during the exercise. To increase the probability of benefiting from this experience, feedback recipients must listen actively. Refer to the section in Chapter 10 on coaching skills and techniques for more information on feedback and active listening.
A convenient way to do this exercise is for everyone to sit in a circle. Choose one feedback recipient to begin. Going clockwise around the circle, each group member gives that person feedback. After all people have spo- ken, the feedback recipient gives his or her reactions. The person to the left of the first recipient is the next one to get feedback.
After everyone has had a turn receiving performance feedback, hold a general discussion. Be sure to discuss three key issues:
1. How helpful was the feedback? 2. What was the relative effectiveness of positive
versus negative feedback? 3. Were some group members better than others in
giving feedback?
114 CHAPTER 4• LEADERSHIP BEHAVIORS, ATTITUDES, AND STYLES
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
7. Ability to ask tough questions. Often, leaders can be effective by asking tough questions rather than providing answers. A tough question is one that makes a person or group stop and think about why they are doing or not doing something. (A tough question might also be considered the right question.) In this way, group members are forced to think about the effec- tiveness of their activities. They might ask themselves, “Why didn’t I think of that? It seems so obvious.” Asking questions is important because quite often group members may have the solutions to difficult problems facing the organization.
When Alan R. Mulally was the newly appointed CEO at Ford Motor Co., he was told that the company loses close to $3,000 every time a customer buys a Focus compact. He asked, “Why haven’t you figured out a way to make a profit?” Given a few excuses, Mulally hammered away again: “I want to know why no one figured a way to build this car at a profit, whether it has to be built in Michigan or China or India, if that’s what it takes.”14
8. Organizing for collaboration. A leadership behavior on the borderline between a task orientation and a relationship orientation is to demand that workers collaborate with each other. The task focus is that the information sharing takes place, whereas the relationship focus is that group members must work collaboratively with each other. The Corporate Executive Board, a research and advisory service company, recommends three steps for the leader who wants more collaboration:
• First, identify the high-value business outcomes desired, such as acceler- ating new-product development, before selecting collaboration technologies.
• Second, identify collaboration hot spots. Speak with employees to under- stand their communication patterns and workflows. (A specialist might be required here to help map workflows, such as who is interacting with whom. More will be said about this topic in Chapter 12.)
• Select technologies that will improve or speed up existing workflows. For example, a search engine dedicated to in-company practices might be effective. Most leaders would have to work with an IT consultant to find a technology most likely to increase collaboration.15
Now that you have studied various components of task-oriented attitudes and behaviors, do Leadership Self-Assessment Quiz 4-1. It will further sensi- tize you to the task activities of leaders and managers.
Relationship-Oriented Attitudes and Behaviors
Leadership involves influencing people, so it follows that many effective leadership attitudes, behaviors, and practices deal with interpersonal relationships.
RELATIONSHIP-ORIENTED ATTITUDES AND BEHAVIORS 115
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
Table 4-2 lists the seven relationship-oriented attitudes and behaviors that we will discuss next. (Most other parts of this book describe the inter- personal skill aspects of leadership.)
1. Aligning people. Getting people pulling in the same direction and collab- orating smoothly is a major interpersonal challenge. To get people pulling together, it is necessary to speak to many people. The target population can involve many different stakeholders. Among them are managers and team leaders, higher-ups, peers, and workers in other parts of the organization,
LEADERSHIP SELF-ASSESSMENT QUIZ 4-1
Task-Oriented Attitudes and Behaviors
Instructions: Indicate whether you mostly agree or mostly disagree with the following statements. Relate the statements to any work situation— including sports, community activities, and school activities— in which you have been responsible for others’ work. If a work situation does not come to mind, imagine how you would act or think.
MOSTLY AGREE MOSTLY DISAGREE
1. I keep close tabs on productivity figures and interpret them to the group.
□ □
2. I send frequent e-mail and text messages to group members, giving them information about work procedures.
□ □
3. I clearly specify the quality goals our group needs to achieve. □ □
4. I maintain clear-cut standards of performance. □ □
5. When I conduct a meeting, the participants can count on a clear-cut agenda.
□ □
6. I feel good about my workweek only if our team has met or exceeded its productivity goals.
□ □
7. Workers should not access e-mail, text messages, or the Internet during working hours unless the activity is actually increasing productivity.
□ □
8. I freely criticize work that does not meet standards. □ □
9. I spend at least 5 percent of my workweek either planning myself or helping team members with their planning.
□ □
10. I spend a good deal of time solving technical or business problems myself, or helping group members do the same.
□ □
Interpretation: If you responded “mostly agree” to eight, nine, or ten of these statements, you have a strong task orientation. If you responded “mostly disagree” to four or more of the statements, you have below-average task- oriented behaviors and attitudes. Skill Development: A task orientation is important because it can lead directly to goal attainment and productivity. Nevertheless, a task orientation must be balanced with a strong people orientation and interpersonal skills for maximum effectiveness.
116 CHAPTER 4• LEADERSHIP BEHAVIORS, ATTITUDES, AND STYLES
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
as well as suppliers, government officials, and customers. Anyone who can implement the vision and strategies or who can block implementation must be aligned.16 After being aligned, organizational members can pull together toward a higher purpose. Alignment also incorporates getting the group working together smoothly.
2. Openness to worker opinions. A major part of relationship-oriented leader- ship is to engage in management openness, or a set of leader behaviors par- ticularly relevant to subordinates’ motivation to voice their opinion.17 When the leader is open in this way, subordinates perceive that their boss listens to them, is interested in their ideas, and gives fair consideration to suggestions. Being open to worker opinions is part of the consideration dimension, and it is also central to participative leadership. A representative example being open to worker opinions is Frank Blake, the CEO of Home Depot. He incorporates face-to-face meetings with almost all new store managers or assistant man- agers at the home-improvement chain, as well as occasional meetings with other store managers.18 During these meetings, Blake listens attentively to sug- gestions for improving store operations and customer experience.
3. Creating inspiration and visibility. As described in the discussion of charis- matic and transformational leadership, inspiring others is an essential leader- ship practice. Inspiring people usually involves appealing to their emotions and values, such as when the head of a snowmobile business unit encourages work- ers to believe that they are making winters more enjoyable for people who live in regions that accumulate snow as well as facilitating rescue missions.
Because human contact and connections reinforce inspiration, another part of being inspirational is being visible and available. Frank Blake’s fre- quent visits to Home Depot stores help create the visibility that has enhanced his stature as the company leader. The fact that he dons the Home Depot uniform of an orange apron adds to his accessibility.
4. Satisfying higher-level needs. To inspire people, effective leaders motivate them by satisfying higher-level needs, such as needs for achievement, personal growth, a sense of belonging, recognition, self-esteem, and a feeling of control over one’s life. Many leaders in organizations express an awareness of the importance of need satisfaction for building good relationships with workers. A robust method of satisfying workers’ higher-level needs is to help them
TABLE 4-2 Relationship-Oriented Attitudes and Behaviors
1. Aligning people
2. Openness to worker opinions
3. Creating inspiration and visibility
4. Satisfying higher-level needs
5. Giving emotional support and encouragement
6. Promoting principles and values
7. Being a servant leader
© Ce ng ag e Le ar ni ng
RELATIONSHIP-ORIENTED ATTITUDES AND BEHAVIORS 117
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
grow professionally. Star executive W. James McNerney, now the Boeing Company chairman, president, and CEO, says that he has been a successful executive at three major companies primarily through helping people perform better. McNerney contends that people who grow are open to change, have the courage to do so, work hard, and are good team players. In his words, “What I do is figure out how to unlock that in people, because most people have that inside of them. But they often get trapped in a bureaucratic environ- ment where they’ve been beaten about the head and shoulders.”19
5. Giving emotional support and encouragement. Supportive behavior toward team members usually increases leadership effectiveness. A supportive leader gives frequent encouragement and praise and also displays caring and kindness even about nonwork-related matters such as the health of a worker’s ill family member. Keep in mind that encouragement means to fill with cour- age. One of the many work-related ways of encouraging people is to ask for their input about important decisions. Emotional support generally improves morale and sometimes improves productivity. In the long term, emotional sup- port and encouragement may bolster a person’s self-esteem. Being emotionally supportive comes naturally to the leader who is empathetic and warm.
Giving encouragement was also the eighth leadership principle of Dale Carnegie, the famous early proponent of human relations principles, in work and personal life. Recently, Tessa E. Basford and Andrea Molberg searched for empirical evidence for the validity of Carnegie’s leader- ship principles, including encouragement. Overall, they found support for Carnegie’s recommendations to use encouragement. Encouragement is linked to improvement of job performance and attitudes, probably because encouragement boosts feelings of self-worth.20
Michael Mathieu, the CEO of YuMe, an online video advertising team, believes that part of the reason he landed his job was his personality, which includes the willingness to encourage workers. He says that his employees can talk to him about anything with absolutely no fear of being told their idea is stupid.21
6. Promoting principles and values. A major part of a top leader’s role is to help promote values and principles that contribute to the welfare of indivi- duals and organizations. This promotion can be classified as relationship- oriented because it deals directly with the emotions and attitudes of people, and indirectly with the task. The late Stephen Covey, who is widely quoted for his uplifting messages, advises that an organization’s mission statement must be for all good causes.22 Leaders who believe in these good causes will then espouse principles and values that lead people toward good deeds in the work place. To encourage managers and all other employees to con- duct their work affairs at a high moral level, many companies put their values in written form. The values might be placed in employee handbooks, on company intranets, or on company websites.
IBM is an example of a company that heavily emphasizes values in the lead- ership of the enterprise. Randy MacDonald, the company’s worldwide HR czar explains that being an IBMer is not about a product line, about a team, or
118 CHAPTER 4• LEADERSHIP BEHAVIORS, ATTITUDES, AND STYLES
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
about the individual. The focus is on the values built into the enterprise with an emphasis on the client, innovations for the both the company and society around trust and personal responsibility, and the way company employees treat each other.23 An emphasis on such values helps an IBM project leader inspire the team to develop solutions to help a city decrease pollutants.
Another value that often helps an enterprise is a strong focus on the wel- fare of employees. A notable example is the leadership of Rich Snyder, CEO of the successful fast-food chain, In-N-Out Burger. Wages and benefits are relatively high, and managers who meet their goals are eligible for company- paid luxury vacations. The Snyder family was committed to viewing employ- ees as if they were family members. As a result, In-N-Out Burger boasts one of the lowest turnover rates in the industry. Snyder met an early death at age 49, but the family kept the business operating based on the same values.24
Providing moral leadership begins with understanding one’s own values. Leadership Skill-Building Exercise 4-2 gives you an opportunity to think
LEADERSHIP SKILL-BUILDING EXERCISE 4-2
Clarifying Your Interpersonal Work Values
Instructions: To provide effective value leadership, it is essential that you first understand your own values with respect to dealing with others. Rank from 1 to 15 the importance of the following values to you as a person. The most important value on the list receives a rank of 1; the least important, a rank of 15. Use the space next to “Other” if we have left out an important value related to interpersonal relations on the job.
Having respect for the dignity of others Ensuring that others have interesting work to perform Earning the trust of others Earning the respect of others Impressing others with how well my group performs Giving others proper credit for their work Inspiring continuous learning on the part of each member in our group, myself included Holding myself and others accountable for delivering on commitments Helping others grow and develop Inspiring others to achieve high productivity and quality Developing the reputation of being a trustworthy person
Being in contact regularly with work associates using social networking sites Contributing to the job satisfaction of work associates Avoiding creating intense job dissatisfaction for any work associate Other
1. Compare your ranking of these values with that of the person next to you, and discuss your observations.
2. Perhaps your class, assisted by your instructor, might arrive at a class average on each of these values. How does your ranking compare to the class ranking?
3. Look back at your own ranking. Does your ranking surprise you?
4. Are there any surprises in the class ranking? Which values did you think would be highest and lowest?
Clarifying your values for leadership is far more than a pleasant exercise. Many business leaders have fallen into disgrace and brought their companies into bank- ruptcy because of values that are unacceptable to employees, stockholders, outside investigators, and the legal system. For example, a CEO who valued “develop- ing the reputation of being a trustworthy person” would not borrow $400 million from the company while paying thousands of employees close to the minimum wage.
RELATIONSHIP-ORIENTED ATTITUDES AND BEHAVIORS 119
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
through your work-related values so that you can better provide moral leader- ship to others. Also, more will be said about values and ethics in Chapter 6.
7. Being a servant leader. Your desire to help others is another important workplace value. A servant leader serves constituents by working on their behalf to help them achieve their goals, not the leader’s own goals. The idea behind servant leadership, as formulated by Robert K. Greenleaf, is that leadership derives naturally from a commitment to service.25 Serving others, including employees, customers, and community, is the primary motivation for the servant leader. A study with CEOs found, not surpris- ingly, that narcissism as measured by a personality test is negatively related to servant leadership.26 True leadership emerges from a deep desire to help others. A servant leader is therefore a moral leader. Servant leadership has been accomplished when group members become wiser, healthier, and more autonomous. The following are key aspects of servant leadership.27
• Place service before self-interest. A servant leader is more concerned with helping others than with acquiring power, prestige, financial reward, and status. The servant leader seeks to do what is morally right, even if it is not financially rewarding. He or she is conscious of the needs of others and is driven by a desire to satisfy them. (You will recall that wanting to satisfy the needs of others is a relationship behavior.)
• Listen first to express confidence in others. The servant leader makes a deep commitment to listening in order to get to know the concerns, requirements, and problems of group members. Instead of attempting to impose his or her will on others, the servant leader listens carefully to understand what course of action will help others accomplish their goals. After understanding others, the best course of action can be chosen. Through listening, for example, a servant leader might learn that the group is more concerned about team spirit and harmony than striving for companywide recognition. The leader would then concentrate more on building teamwork than searching for ways to increase the visibility of the team.
• Inspire trust by being trustworthy. Being trustworthy is a foundation behavior of the servant leader. He or she is scrupulously honest with others, gives up control, and focuses on the well-being of others. Usually such leaders do not have to work hard at being trustworthy because they are already moral. In support of this principle, a survey found that most employees want a boss who is a trusted leader, not a pal.28
• Focus on what is feasible to accomplish. Even though the servant leader is idealistic, he or she recognizes that one individual cannot accomplish everything. Therefore, the leader listens carefully to the array of prob- lems facing group members and then concentrates on a few. The servant leader thus systematically neglects certain problems. A labor union official might carefully listen to all the concerns and complaints of the constituents and then proceed to work on the most pressing issue.
• Lend a hand. A servant leader looks for opportunities to play the Good Samaritan. As a supermarket manager, he or she might help out by
120 CHAPTER 4• LEADERSHIP BEHAVIORS, ATTITUDES, AND STYLES
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
bagging groceries during a busy period. Or a servant leader might help clean out mud in the company lobby after a hurricane.
• Provide emotional healing. A servant leader shows sensitivity to the per- sonal concerns of group members, such as a worker being worried about taking care of a disabled parent. A recurring example of the need for emo- tional healing is when a natural disaster, such as a tornado or sinkhole strikes an employee’s home. The servant leader would likely grant the employee time off with pay to manage the problem, and also direct the employee toward any company resources available for emergency help.
• Act as a role model for other organizational members to emphasize service. As a result of the behaviors just described, servant leaders often ignite a cycle of service by acting as a role model servant behavior. A study con- ducted in a large retail chain found that the leader’s servant behavior is mirrored through coworker modeling behavior and high-quality cus- tomer service.29
In addition to being logically sound, research with 182 workers indicates that servant leadership has a positive relationship with organizational citi- zenship behavior, job performance, and staying with the organization.30 A study with seven multinational companies in Kenya suggested that servant leadership sets up a positive climate (company atmosphere) that in turn encourages employees to be good organizational citizens.31
Recent evidence suggests that servant leadership at the top of the organi- zation has a positive impact on the performance of a firm. The study involved 126 CEOs in the United States from the software and hardware technology industries. Servant leadership was measured by a self-report questionnaire, and firm performance was measured by return on assets (annual income divided by net assets). Analysis of data revealed that CEO servant leadership tendencies were significantly related to firm perfor- mance. Another part of the study suggested that CEOs who were company founders were more likely to be servant leaders,32 reinforcing the idea that founders are often passionate about their company and its employees.
Leadership Skill-Building Exercise 4-3 provides an opportunity for you to practice relationship-oriented and task-oriented behaviors. Combined, these are sometimes referred to as the nuts and bolts of leadership.
360-Degree Feedback for Fine-Tuning a Leadership Approach
In most large organizations, leaders not only provide feedback to group members, but they also receive feedback that gives them insight into the effects of their attitudes and behaviors. This feedback is systematically derived from a full sampling of parties who interact with the leader. In par- ticular, 360-degree feedback is a formal evaluation of superiors based on input from people who work for and with them, sometimes including custo- mers and suppliers. It is also referred to as multirater feedback. The process is also called 360-degree survey because the input stems from a survey of a
360-DEGREE FEEDBACK FOR FINE-TUNING A LEADERSHIP APPROACH 121
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
handful of people. The multiple input becomes another way of measuring leadership effectiveness. The specific 360-degree form is often customized to a particular firm’s needs, but standardized (off-the-shelf) forms are used by about 25 percent of firms using the method.
Specialists in the field view 360-degree feedback as more suited for its original purpose of development for a manager or leader than for adminis- trative purposes, such as performance evaluation and salary administration. When used for development, 360-degree feedback should emphasize qualita- tive comments rather than strictly quantitative ratings.33 For example, being told, “You do not maintain eye contact with me during meetings,” is more helpful than simply receiving a low rating on “Makes others feel comfort- able.” The feedback is communicated to the leader (as well as others receiv- ing 360-degree feedback) and interpreted with the assistance of a human resources professional or an external consultant.
The data from the survey can be used to help leaders fine-tune their atti- tudes and behavior. For example, if all the interested parties gave the leader low ratings on “empathy toward others,” the leader might be prompted to improve his or her ability to empathize, such as by reading about empathy, attending a seminar, or simply making a conscious attempt to empathize when involved in a conflict of opinion with another person.
An example of a 360-degree feedback form is shown in Figure 4-2. When used for purposes of development, the leader will often provide a self-rating on each dimension and then compare self-ratings with those of subordinates as well as other work associates. When there is a large gap between self-ratings and ratings by others, professionally trained counse- lors or business coaches should be involved in 360-degree feedback. Some
LEADERSHIP SKILL-BUILDING EXERCISE 4-3
Applying Relationship-Oriented and Task-Oriented Attitudes and Behaviors
About six role players who can tolerate brutal outdoor conditions are needed for this exercise. The setting is an oil drilling rig in the Arctic Circle, where deep under- ground oil reserves have been discovered, and energy companies are now digging. Today the wind chill factor is –40 degrees Fahrenheit. The crew of five is un- comfortable and a little confused about how to get the drilling started this morning. The leadership task of the supervisor is to help the crew get the digging accomplished.
Supervisor A attempts to engage in relationship- oriented attitudes and behavior with the group. He or she will use several of the behaviors mentioned in the
text. The other five or so role players will react to his or her leadership. Work the role play for about ten minutes.
After the first scenario is complete, Supervisor B will engage in task-oriented attitudes and behaviors, using several of the behaviors mentioned in the text. The other five or so role players will react to this leadership. Continue the role play for about ten minutes.
Class members not thrown into the frozen tundra will observe the interactions of the supervisor with the work- ers. Provide feedback as to (a) how well the leadership attitudes and behaviors were carried out, and (b) how likely these attitudes and behaviors were helpful in accomplishing the task of getting the drilling started.
122 CHAPTER 4• LEADERSHIP BEHAVIORS, ATTITUDES, AND STYLES
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
people feel emotionally crushed when they find a wide discrepancy between their self-perception on an interpersonal skill dimension and the perception of others. A middle manager involved in a 360-degree evalua- tion prided herself on how well she was liked by others. The feedback that emerged, however, depicted her as intimidating, hostile, and manipulative. Upon receiving the feedback, the woman went into a rage (proving the feedback true!) and then into despondency. Professional counseling can sometimes help a person benefit from critical feedback and place it in perspective.
For best results, it is extremely important that 360-degree surveys reflect those behaviors and attitudes that the organization values most highly. Care should also be taken that the dimensions measured reflect important aspects of leadership functioning. Following are some suggestions for mak- ing better use of 360-degree surveys.34
You are providing feedback to Elizabeth McGee about her leadership effectiveness. She will not see your individual responses, but will see the average results for the people report- ing to her. Please be candid and objective, without being unduly positive or negative. Rate each evaluation factor on a 1-to-10 scale, with 1 being the lowest (or totally ineffective) and 10 being the highest (totally effective). Also provide written comments about Elizabeth’s effectiveness as a leader.
Leadership Behavior or Attitude Ratings (1 to 10)
1. Provides guidance and direction to the group related to the work we are performing.
2. Creates an exciting vision.
3. Gives useful feedback to group members.
4. Sets high performance standards.
5. Motivates the group to perform well, including getting us engaged in the work
6. Coaches team members as needed.
7. Provides emotional support and encouragement to group members.
8. Gets people working together as a team.
9. Thinks strategically in terms of the future of our group.
10. Anticipates potential problems and involves us in planning how to deal with or prevent them.
Please provide a few comments about Elizabeth’s effectiveness as a leader, and what she can do to become even more effective.
FIGURE 4-2 A 360-Degree Feedback Chart
© Ce ng ag e Le ar ni ng
360-DEGREE FEEDBACK FOR FINE-TUNING A LEADERSHIP APPROACH 123
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
• The person receiving the multiple feedback should have some say about who the raters will be. The supervisor of the person receiving the survey is also invited to suggest who should provide the feedback.
• Customize the assessment dimensions based on the leadership compe- tencies that are associated with success in your organization.
• Train workers in giving and receiving feedback. Giving constructive feedback takes coaching, training, and practice.
• Create an action plan for improvement for each leader based on the feedback. For example, a leader rated low on interpersonal skills might benefit from training in emotional intelligence. When a serious leader- ship problem exists, the regular sessions might be scheduled with an industrial psychologist or executive coach.
• Ensure that the managers rated have full ownership of the feedback information so that they will perceive the feedback as being geared toward personal development rather than administrative control.
A potential problem with 360-degree feedback is its anonymity. Much like people who post nasty comments about people on social media websites, an angry subordinate can write an insulting and crushing comment about a man- ager on the 360-degree feedback form. The criticism might be without merit.
Leadership Styles
A leader’s combination of attitudes and behaviors leads to a certain regular- ity and predictability in dealing with group members. Leadership style is the relatively consistent pattern of behavior that characterizes a leader. Studying leadership style is an extension of understanding leadership beha- viors and attitudes. Most classifications of leadership style are based on the dimensions of consideration and initiating structure. Comments such as “He’s a real command-and-control-type” and “She’s a consensus leader” have become commonplace.
An important insight into leadership style is that personality traits influ- ence which style will be natural for a given individual. The same association exists between the leadership behaviors already described in this chapter. Imagine a person who is authoritarian and controlling; this person would gravitate toward an authoritarian leader. And a person who scores high on the traits of agreeableness and extraversion might take naturally to a shared type of leadership.
Reinout E. de Vries conducted a study with 113 leaders and 201 subordi- nates at several companies to explore the relationship between personality traits and leadership style. His key findings support information presented at several places in this book in addition to being directly related to the styles to be described in this section. The study concluded that (1) honesty– humility was positively related to ethical leadership, (2) extraversion is posi- tively related to charismatic leadership, (3) agreeableness is positively related to supportive leadership, and (4) conscientiousness is positively related to task-oriented leadership.35
124 CHAPTER 4• LEADERSHIP BEHAVIORS, ATTITUDES, AND STYLES
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
Here we describe the participative leadership style, the autocratic leader- ship style, the Leadership Grid, the entrepreneurial leadership style, gender differences in leadership style, and choosing the best style. Chapter 5 con- tinues the exploration of leadership styles by presenting several contingency leadership theories.
Participative Leadership Sharing decision making with group members and working with them side by side has become the generally accepted leadership approach in the mod- ern organization. Consultant Maria Collar observes that in today’s volatile markets where abilities to explore and innovate are highly valued, collective approaches to leadership can help foster creative problem solving.36 A use- ful perspective for understanding collective and participative leadership is that they are based on networks of people working together and sharing information. A social network consists of a set of individuals and the rela- tionships that bind them, such as people within a work group who trust each other enough to accept their advice on a problem.37 (Social network in this context refers more to physical than virtual groups).
Participative leaders share decision making with group members. The terms shared leadership, collaborative leadership, and team leadership all refer to the same idea as participative leadership. Participative leadership encompasses so many behaviors that it can be divided into three subtypes: consultative, consensus, and democratic.
Consultative leaders confer with group members before making a deci- sion. However, they retain the final authority to make decisions. Consensus leaders strive for consensus. They encourage group discussion about an issue and then make a decision that reflects general agreement and that group mem- bers will support. All workers who will be involved in the consequences of a decision have an opportunity to provide input. A decision is not considered final until it appears that all parties involved will at least support the decision. Democratic leaders confer final authority on the group. They function as col- lectors of group opinion and take a vote before making a decision.
The participative style is based on management openness because the leader accepts suggestions for managing the operation from group members. Welcoming ideas from below is considered crucial because as technology evolves and organizations decentralize, frontline workers have more indepen- dence and responsibility. These workers are closer to the market, closer to seeing how the product is used, and closer to many human resource problems. Frontline knowledge can provide useful input to leaders for such purposes as developing marketing strategy and retaining employees.
The participative style encompasses the teamwork approach. Predomi- nant behaviors of participative leaders include coaching team members, negotiating their demands, and collaborating with others. Often, the team member who has the most relevant knowledge for the task at hand slips into a leadership role. Research indicates that poor-performing teams are often dominated by the team leader, whereas high-performing teams are characterized by shared leadership.38
LEADERSHIP STYLES 125
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
The participative style is well suited to managing competent people who are eager to assume responsibility. Such people want to get involved in making decisions and giving feedback to management. Because most gradu- ates from business and professional programs expect to be involved in deci- sion making, participative leadership works well with the new breed of managers and professionals.
Participative leadership does have some problems. It often results in extensive and time-consuming team meetings and committee work. Also, consensus and democratic leaders are sometimes accused of providing too little direction, or being macromanagers. Sometimes, participative leader- ship is carried to extremes. Team members are consulted about trivial things that management could easily handle independently. Another prob- lem is that many managers still believe that sharing decision making with members reduces their power.
If democratic leadership goes one step further, the result is extreme macromanagement, which is referred to as the laissez-faire leadership style. A study conducted with 4,500 Norwegian employees found that employees managed by a laissez-faire (the French term for “let do”) leader experienced role ambiguity. The ambiguity led them to anxiously guess what criteria their supervisor would follow when evaluating their performance, and also guess about which tasks should receive the highest priority.39
A practical problem with participative leadership, especially the consen- sus subtype, is that it consumes so much time, particularly in the form of so many face-to-face meetings to make decisions. The use of communica- tion technology, such as collaborative software, can often help overcome the problem of the time consumed by in-person meetings.
The accompanying Leader in Action describes a high-technology execu- tive who emphasizes a consensus style.
Autocratic Leadership In contrast to participative leaders are autocratic leaders, who retain most of the authority. They make decisions confidently, assume that group mem- bers will comply, and are not overly concerned with group members’ atti- tudes toward a decision. Autocratic leaders are considered task-oriented because they place heavy emphasis on getting tasks accomplished. Typical autocratic behaviors include telling people what to do, asserting authority, and serving as a model for team members.
In some situations, and in some organizational cultures, autocratic lead- ership is called for. Dan Ackerman became the CEO at General Motors in 2010, a time when quick results were needed. He had served GM for a year previously as a financial officer. Ackerman was a former naval officer with a reputation for being tough-minded in seeking results and quite decisive. Also, as a private equity fund manager, he had led companies in turnaround situations where clear goals must be attained quickly. As with other effec- tive autocratic leaders, Ackerman moves quickly in making many decisions but does seek some input from trusted advisors.40 To be described as auto- cratic does not necessarily mean the leader is impulsive or stubborn.
126 CHAPTER 4• LEADERSHIP BEHAVIORS, ATTITUDES, AND STYLES
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
Part of your skill development as a leader involves gaining insight into your own leadership style or potential style. To this end, do Leadership Self-Assessment Quiz 4-2.
Leadership Grid™ Styles A classic method of classifying leadership styles suggests that the best way to achieve effective leadership is to integrate the task and relationship
LEADER IN ACTION
Craig Federighi, Senior Vice President, Software Engineering at Apple Inc.
A key rising star at Apple Inc. is Craig Federighi, the senior vice president of software engineering, who reports directly to CEO Tim Cook. He oversees several major Apple technology groups including the common operating system engineering teams. The teams Federighi oversees are responsible for delivering the software at the heart of Apple’s products, including the user interface, applica- tions, and frameworks.
Prior to his present position, Federighi had been work- ing at Apple on and off for many years. He began his professional career as a project engineer in 1994 at NeXT, the company Steve Jobs started after being released from Apple in the 1980s. Federighi joined Apple when the company acquired NeXT, and Jobs was brought back. Soon thereafter, Federighi resigned from Apple to join Ariba, an enterprise software company. He spent ten years at Ariba, eventually being promoted to chief technology officer. Federighi rejoined Apple to head the division responsible for the Mac OS X.
Federighi contributes enormous technical expertise to the company and frequently appears on stage during prod- uct launch events, such as the developer’s conference. His passion for Apple hardware and software, combined with his charisma contribute to his effectiveness as a product pitchperson. As Federighi explains, “OK, I’m a technology freak, but I think probably if someone mapped my brain, you would find there were moments when I lit up the love pattern in my neurons in association with our products.”
Several people who know both Federighi and Tim Cook say that the two are similar in their preference for building consensus on major decisions, which often increases the time consumed in making a decision. Federighi also
works to attain collaboration among specialists who relish complexity in products with those who look to make things simple for the end user. He says that having team members who are good at complexity and those who are not is a critical element of collaboration.
To overcome some of the divisiveness that existed in the previous top-management team, the new top team consisting of Cook, Jony Ive, and Federighi emphasizes collaboration and camaraderie. The three men collec- tively are considered to be the new visionary-in-chief to replace the late Steve Jobs.
Federighi’s formal education includes a Master of Science degree in computer science and a bachelor of science degree in electrical engineering and computer science from the University of California, Berkeley.
QUESTIONS
1. How would you characterize the leadership style of Craig Federighi?
2. What appear to be several of Federighi’s leadership characteristics?
3. To what extent do you think Federighi is qualified for his position as a leading technology executive?
Sources: Original story created from facts and observations in the following sources: Seth Fiegerman, “Apple’s Next Big Thing: Craig Federighi,” Mashable (www.mashable.com), June 12, 2013, pp. 1–10; Jessica E. Lessin, “Apple’s Rising Star: Craig Federighi,” The Wall Street Journal, June 12, 2013, p. B8; Casey Newton, “Apple’s Most Important Introductions: Tim Cook, Craig Federighi, and Jony Ive,” Verge (www.theverge.com), September 20, 2013, pp. 1–11; Sam Grobart, “Apple’s Jonathan Ive and Craig Federighi: The Complete Interview,” Businessweek (www.businessweek.com), September 25, 2013, pp. 1–20.
LEADERSHIP STYLES 127
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
LEADERSHIP SELF-ASSESSMENT QUIZ 4-2
What Style of Leader Are You or Would You Be?
Instructions: Answer the following statement, keeping in mind what you have done, or think you would do, in the scenarios and attitudes described.
MOSTLY TRUE MOSTLY FALSE
1. I am more likely to take care of a high-impact assignment myself than turn it over to a group member.
□ □
2. I would prefer the analytical aspects of a manager’s job to working directly with group members.
□ □
3. An important part of my approach to managing a group is to keep the mem- bers informed almost daily of any information that could affect their work.
□ □
4. It is a good idea to give two people in the group the same problem and then choose what appears to be the best solution.
□ □
5. I like to have updates a few times a day on the work progress of subordi- nates, even if the update is simply a text message or instant message.
□ □
6. I look for opportunities to obtain group input before making a decision, even on straightforward issues.
□ □
7. I would reverse a decision if several of the group members presented evi- dence that I was wrong.
□ □
8. Differences of opinion in the work group are healthy. □ □
9. I think that activities to build team spirit, like fixing up a poor family’s house on a Saturday, are an excellent investment of time.
□ □
10. If my group were hiring a new member, I would like the person to be inter- viewed by the entire group.
□ □
11. An effective team leader today uses e-mail or other digital media for about 98 percent of communication with team members.
□ □
12. Some of the best ideas are likely to come from the group members rather than from the manager.
□ □
13. If our group were going to have a banquet, I would get input from each member on what type of food should be served.
□ □
14. I have never seen a statue of a committee in a museum or park, so why bother making decisions by committee if you want to be recognized?
□ □
15. I dislike it intensely when a group member challenges my position on an issue. □ □
16. I typically explain to group members how (what method) they should use to accomplish an assigned task.
□ □
17. If I were out of the office for a week, most of the important work in the department would get accomplished anyway.
□ □
18. Delegation of important tasks is something that would be (or is) very difficult for me.
□ □
19. When a group member comes to me with a problem, I tend to jump right in with a proposed solution.
□ □
20. When a group member comes to me with a problem, I typically ask that per- son something like, “What alternative solutions have you thought of so far?”
□ □
128 CHAPTER 4• LEADERSHIP BEHAVIORS, ATTITUDES, AND STYLES
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
orientations. The Leadership Grid™ is a framework for specifying the extent of a leader’s concern for production and people.41
Concern for production is rated on the grid’s horizontal axis. Concern for production includes results, bottom line, performance, profits, and mission. Concern for people is rated on the vertical axis, and it includes concern for group members and coworkers. Both concerns are leadership attitudes or ways of thinking about leadership. Each of these concerns (or dimensions) exists in varying degrees along a continuum from 1 to 9. A manager’s stand- ing on one concern is not supposed to influence his or her standing on the other. As shown in Figure 4-3, the Grid encompasses seven leadership styles. If you are already familiar with the Grid, you will notice that the names of the styles have been changed in this version.
The creators of the Grid argue strongly for the value of 9, 9 Sound (con- tribute and commit). According to their research, the sound management approach pays off. It results in improved performance, low absenteeism and turnover, and high morale. Sound (9, 9) management relies on trust and respect, which combine to bring about good results.
An example of a manager who might qualify as a 9, 9 leader is Mark Mason, the CEO of the private banking division of Citigroup Inc. He has a staff of his own and is also responsible for working with each of the regional CEOs in addition to market managers, bankers, and investment counselors for the purpose of accelerating growth. Mason is known for his outstanding business results and also has been highly effective in developing relationships with team members, his mentors, and senior executives.42
QUIZ 4-2 (continued) Scoring and Interpretation: The answers for a participative leader are as follows:
1. Mostly false 8. Mostly true 15. Mostly false
2. Mostly false 9. Mostly true 16. Mostly false
3. Mostly true 10. Mostly true 17. Mostly true
4. Mostly false 11. Mostly false 18. Mostly false
5. Mostly false 12. Mostly true 19. Mostly false
6. Mostly true 13. Mostly true 20. Mostly true
7. Mostly true 14. Mostly false
Give yourself a score of 1 for each answer that matches the answer key. If your score is 15 or higher, you are most likely (or would be) a participative leader. If your score is 5 or lower,
you are most likely (or would be) an authoritarian leader.
Skill Development: The quiz you just completed is also an opportunity for skill development. Review the twenty statements and look for implied suggestions for engaging in participative leadership. For example, statement 20 suggests that you encourage group members to work through their own solutions to problems. If your goal is to become an authoritarian leader, the statements can also serve as useful guidelines. For example, statement 19 suggests that an authoritarian leader first looks to solve problems for group members.
LEADERSHIP STYLES 129
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
The Seven Managerial Grid Styles
• I expect results and take control by clearly stating a course of action. I enforce rules that sustain high results and do not permit deviation.
• I support results that establish and reinforce harmony. I generate enthusiasm by focusing on positive and pleasing aspects of work.
• I endorse results that are popular but caution against taking unnecessary risk. I test my opinions with others involved to assure ongoing acceptability.
• I distance myself from taking active responsibility for results to avoid getting entangled in problems. If forced, I take a passive or supportive position.
• I provide leadership by defining initiatives for myself and others. I offer praise and appreciation for support, and discourage challenges to my thinking.
• I persuade others to support results that offer me private benefit. If they also benefit, that’s even better in gaining support. I rely on whatever approach is needed to secure an advantage.
• I initiate team action in a way that invites involvement and commitment. I explore all facts and alternative views to reach a shared understanding of the best solution.
1
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
HIGH
1,9
5,5
1,1
9,9
9,1 HIGHLOW 2 3 4 5
Concern for Results 6 7 8 9
® C
on ce
rn fo
r Pe
op le
1,9 Accommodating (Yield & Comply)
1,1 Indifferent (Evade & Elude)
OPP Opportunistic (Exploit & Manipulate)
9,1 Controlling (Direct & Dominate)
5,5 Status Quo (Balance & Compromise)
PAT Paternalistic (Prescribe & Guide)
9,9 Sound (Contribute & Commit)
FIGURE 4-3 The Leadership Grid.™
The Managerial Grid (or the Leadership Grid) is a very simple framework that elegantly defines seven basic styles that characterize workplace behavior and the resulting relationships. The seven Managerial Grid styles are based on how two fundamental concerns (concern for peo- ple and concern for results) are manifested at varying levels whenever people interact.
Source: Grid International, Inc.
130 CHAPTER 4• LEADERSHIP BEHAVIORS, ATTITUDES, AND STYLES
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
Entrepreneurial Leadership Many entrepreneurs use a similar leadership style that stems from their per- sonality characteristics and circumstances. Although there are different types and definitions of entrepreneurs; in general, an entrepreneur is a per- son who founds and operates an innovative business. Not all business own- ers, including franchise operators, are therefore entrepreneurial leaders. The general picture that emerges of an entrepreneur is a task-oriented and char- ismatic person. Entrepreneurs drive themselves and others relentlessly, yet their personalities also inspire others.
This entrepreneurial leadership style often incorporates the behaviors described in the following paragraphs. Although some authorities disagree about whether an entrepreneurial personality exists, evidence is accumulat- ing that many entrepreneurs share a recognizable personality pattern.43
Leadership Self-Assessment Quiz 4-3 gives you the opportunity to think about the type of entrepreneurial thinking and behavior typical of the entrepreneurial personality.
1. Strong achievement drive and sensible risk taking. Entrepreneurs have stronger achievement motives than most leaders (see Chapter 2). Building a business is an excellent vehicle for accomplishment and risk taking. To accomplish what they think needs to be accomplished, entrepreneurs are willing to work extraordinary hours, with twelve-hour days, seven days a week not being unusual. Because entrepreneurs take sensible risks, many do not perceive themselves as being risk takers—just as many tightrope walkers believe they are not taking risks because they perceive themselves to be in control.
2. High degree of enthusiasm and creativity. Entrepreneurs are highly enthusiastic, partially because they are so excited about their achievements. As Entrepreneur magazine puts it, “Something about being an entrepreneur is, for them, a five-star, butt-kicking, rocket-boosting blast.” Entrepreneurs’ enthusiasm, in turn, makes them persuasive. As a result, they are often per- ceived as charismatic. Some entrepreneurs are so emotional that they are regarded as eccentric.
The enthusiasm of entrepreneurs often develops into passion. The late Anna Roddick, who founded the Body Shop, asserted that “to succeed you have to believe in something with such a passion that it becomes a reality.” A theoretical analysis of entrepreneurial passion suggests that it is invested in three roles. First is the inventor role of recognizing an opportunity such as seeing the need for a product or service. Second is the founder role of creating the venture, with all its associated managerial and leadership responsibilities. Third is the developer role of growing the venture, such as expanding into the global market.44
3. Typical pattern of being proactive. Leon C. Prieto argues that the proac- tive personality has potential for providing additional insight into how per- sonality traits are related to entrepreneurship. The natural link is that entrepreneurship is inherently proactive—to be an entrepreneur one has to
LEADERSHIP STYLES 131
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
LEADERSHIP SELF-ASSESSMENT QUIZ 4-3
Entrepreneurial Thinking and Behavior
Instructions: Indicate how well each of the following statements reflects your attitudes or behavior, using this scale: very inaccurately (VI), inaccurately (I), moderately well (MW), accurately (A), very accurately (VA).
VI I MW A VA
1. I have actually started a business of my own. 1 2 3 4 5 2. The thought of starting my own business appeals to me. 1 2 3 4 5 3. So many new products are being introduced practically every week that it
seems senseless to bother dreaming up an idea for another new product. 5 4 3 2 1
4. In enjoy the challenge of meeting new people and explaining what I do. 1 2 3 4 5 5. I get excited about thinking of a new idea for a product or service. 1 2 3 4 5 6. My career advice to young people is to pursue a well-established occu-
pation with a high demand for newcomers to the field. 5 4 3 2 1
7. Betting money on sports is exciting and fun. 1 2 3 4 5 8. Taking care of administrative details is boring for me. 1 2 3 4 5 9. I am (or would be) comfortable working outside of regular working hours. 1 2 3 4 5
10. The best job for me would be one that offers a stable salary, regular working hours and vacations, and a guaranteed pension.
5 4 3 2 1
11. Self-employment fits (or would fit) my personality. 1 2 3 4 5 12. What a horrible life it would be for me to get paid strictly on commission. 5 4 3 2 1 13. I enjoy the challenge of selling my ideas and myself to people I have not
met before. 1 2 3 4 5
14. I need at least eight hours of sleep and regular rest breaks during the day to perform well.
5 4 3 2 1
15. If I personally knew a family that had been a disaster victim, I would be willing to attempt to raise money for that family.
1 2 3 4 5
16. I enjoy purchasing lunch from a street vendor when the opportunity arises. 1 2 3 4 5 17. If you are not a scientist or an engineer it is useless to try to invent
something that is intended for the marketplace. 5 4 3 2 1
18. Most people who become rich and famous got there by luck. 5 4 3 2 1 19. I would enjoy the experience of working on developing new products in a
company department located away from where most employees worked. 1 2 3 4 5
20. If I were self-employed or worked from home for an employer, I would probably start my workday at about 10 A.M.
5 4 3 2 1
Total Score:
Scoring and Interpretation: Add the numbers that you have circled.
• 85–100: The results suggest that you have many of the tendencies of an entrepreneurial personality. You probably enjoy risk taking and change, and would be willing to take the risk of earning your income through self-employment.
• 50–84: You most likely have average tendencies toward being an entrepreneurial personality. You probably would not enjoy a career filled with risk and uncertainty.
• 20–49: Your personality makeup most likely does not resemble that of an entrepreneurial personality. You might place a high value on stability and security. A regular paycheck is probably quite important to you.
132 CHAPTER 4• LEADERSHIP BEHAVIORS, ATTITUDES, AND STYLES
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
scan the environment to find an opportunity, and then capitalize on the opportunity. Individuals with a proactive personality may be more inclined to mobilize resources and gain the commitment required for value creation that the entrepreneur requires.45
Proactive personality types may have a strong desire to become entrepre- neurial leaders to create value for the firm. An assistant manager at a large restaurant, for example, might explore the possibilities of establishing a team-building component based on the preparation of gourmet meals. The program would be sold to organizations, as has been done successfully by a handful of elite restaurants.
4. Tendency to act quickly when opportunity arises. Entrepreneurs are noted for seizing upon opportunity, as part of their proactivity. When a deal is on the horizon, they push themselves and those around them extra hard. Entrepreneurs are always in a hurry. While engaged in one meeting, their minds typically begin to focus on the next meeting. Their flurry of activity rubs off on group members and those around them. Entrepreneurs often adopt a simple dress style in order to save time, and they typically allow little slack time between appointments.
5. Visionary perspective combined with tenacity. Entrepreneurs, at their best, are visionaries. As with other types of effective leaders, they see oppor- tunities others fail to observe. Specifically, they have the ability to identify a problem and arrive at a solution. Ted Turner of CNN is a legendary example of an entrepreneurial visionary. Turner picked up on a trend that people wanted—an all-news cable channel that they could access anytime. Not only is CNN a commercial success, but it also revolutionized the way people get their news all over the globe. After the vision is established, the entre- preneur tenaciously implements the vision, working an eighty-hour week if need be.
For many entrepreneurs, just growing their businesses requires tenacity. A relevant example is none other than Mark Zuckerberg, who in his early twenties became one of the best-known entrepreneurs of all time. During the Great Recession, he sank money and time into developing Facebook and grew its engineering ranks by 50 percent.46
6. Dislike of hierarchy and bureaucracy. Entrepreneurs are not ideally suited by temperament to working within the mainstream of a bureaucracy. Many successful entrepreneurs are people who were frustrated by the con- straints of a bureaucratic system. The implication for leadership style is that entrepreneurs deemphasize rules and regulations when managing people.
7. Preference for dealing with external customers. One reason that entre- preneurs have difficulty with bureaucracy is that they focus their energies on products, services, and customers, rather than on employees. Some entrepreneurs are gracious to customers and moneylenders but brusque with company insiders. A blind spot many entrepreneurs have is that they cannot understand why their employees do not share their passion for
LEADERSHIP STYLES 133
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
work and customer focus. As a result, they may be curt with employees who do not share their dedication to the firm.
8. Eye on the future. Entrepreneurs have the pronounced characteristic of thinking about future deals and business opportunities even before a cur- rent business is running smoothly. “Where is my next deal coming from?” is the mantra of the true entrepreneur. Even after accumulating great wealth from a current business activity, the entrepreneurial leader looks toward future opportunities. A good example is Richard Branson, whose empire contains about 250 companies with the Virgin label, yet he con- tinues to look for the next company to start or acquire.
A survey conducted by Ernest & Young and The Wall Street Journal found that the six top qualities of an entrepreneurial leader are vision, passion, drive, integrity, innovation, and risk-taker thereby supporting most of the points just presented.47 A caution, however, is that the entrepreneurial per- sonality carried to an extreme can lead to addictive behavior, including sub- stance abuse.
To practice one aspect of entrepreneurial leadership, do Leadership Skill- Building Exercise 4-4.
Gender Differences in Leadership Style Controversy over whether men and women have different leadership styles continues. Several researchers and observers argue that women have certain acquired traits and behaviors that suit them for relations-oriented leader- ship. Consequently, women leaders frequently exhibit a cooperative, empowering style that includes nurturing team members. According to this same perspective, men are inclined toward a command-and-control, milita- ristic leadership style. Women find participative management more natural than do men because they appear to feel more comfortable interacting with people. Furthermore, it is argued that women’s natural sensitivity to people gives them an edge over men in encouraging group members to participate
LEADERSHIP SKILL-BUILDING EXERCISE 4-4
Entrepreneurial Leadership
An important part of the entrepreneurial role is convinc- ing others of the merit of your idea so that they will invest in your company or lend you money. Two students play the role of a team of entrepreneurs who have a new product or service and want to launch a business. (The two entrepreneurs choose the product or service.) About five other students play the role of a group of venture capitalists or bankers listening to the presentation to
decide whether to invest or lend money. The entrepre- neurs will communicate excitement and commitment about their product, along with a good business plan. (You might want to quickly review the material about per- suasive communication in Chapter 12.) The students who are not participating will evaluate how well the two entrepreneurs displayed aspects of the entrepreneurial leadership style.
134 CHAPTER 4• LEADERSHIP BEHAVIORS, ATTITUDES, AND STYLES
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
in decision making. Here we look briefly at some of the evidence and rea- soning whether gender differences exist in leadership style.
As many researchers use the term, gender refers to perceptions about the differences among males and females. An example would be to believe that women managers tend to be better listeners than their male peers. Gender differences refer to roles that men and women occupy. Sex differences, however, refer to actual (objective and quantitative) differences, such as the fact that the mean height of men exceeds that of women. Nevertheless, the terms gender and sex are still used interchangeably in general usage and to some extent in scholarly writings.
The Argument for Male–Female Differences in Leadership Style Judy Rosener, a specialist in workplace gender issues, concluded that men and women do tend toward opposite styles. Based on self-reports, she found that men tended toward a command-and-control style. In contrast, women tended toward a transformational style, relying heavily on interpersonal skills.48 As corporate managers, women tend to place greater emphasis on forming car- ing, nurturing relationships with employees. Women are also more likely than men to praise group members. And when an employee falls short of expectations, women are more likely to buffer criticism by finding some- thing praiseworthy.
Fundamental differences in the biological and psychological makeup of men and women have also been used as evidence that the two sexes are likely to manifest different leadership styles. Brain researchers Raquel Gur and Ruben Gur uncovered one such set of differences. They found that women may be far more sensitive to emotional cues and verbal nuances than men are. Women leaders would therefore be more suited to respond- ing to the feelings of group members and understanding what they really mean by certain statements.49
Gender differences in communication also are reflected in leadership style. Above all, women are more likely than men to use spoken communi- cation for building relationships and giving emotional support.50 Men focus more on disseminating information and demonstrating competence. Women are therefore more likely to choose a relationship-oriented leader- ship style.
An experiment was conducted with working adults by administering questionnaires about how men and women exhibit certain aspects of trans- formational leadership, and which aspects they should emphasize to get promoted. Conforming to stereotypes about gender differences, it was found that women display more transformational behavior and give rewards more based on merit. It was also believed that women engage in fewer management-by-exception (only intervening when a problem exists) and laissez-faire behaviors than do men. In terms of getting promoted, inspira- tional motivation was perceived as more important for men than women, especially to be promoted to CEO. In contrast, individualized consideration (responding to the needs of individuals) was perceived as more important for women than men, and especially important for promotion to CEO.51
LEADERSHIP STYLES 135
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
Placing Gender Differences in Leadership Style in Perspective To what extent the stereotypes of men and women leaders are true is difficult to judge. Even if male and female differences in leadership style do exist, they must be placed in proper perspective. Both men and women leaders differ among them- selves in leadership style. Plenty of male leaders are relationship oriented, and plenty of women practice command and control (the extreme task ori- entation). Many women believe that women managers can be more hostile and vindictive than men managers.
Perhaps the best approach to leadership takes advantage of the positive traits of both men and women. To compete in the global marketplace, com- panies need a diverse leadership team including men and women. Not rec- ognizing that both male and female styles are needed can lead to confusion for women managers.
Selecting the Best Leadership Style An underlying theme of our discussion of leadership styles in this and the next chapter is that there is no one best or most effective leadership style. A study of 3,000 executives revealed that leaders who get the best results do not rely on one style. Instead, they use several different styles in one week, such as being autocratic in some situations and democratic in others.52
Another consideration is the national culture in which the leadership takes place. An effective leadership style for most German workers would be a high performance (task) orientation and a modest amount of compassion (consideration).53 However, Scandinavian workers respond best to a demo- cratic leadership style.
The organizational culture also influences which leadership style will be tolerated and effective. A friendly, collaborative culture calls for more of a consensus style of leadership. In contrast, in a perform-or-perish culture, a more directive or autocratic leadership style will be effective.
At several places in this book, we will mention the leader–member exchange (LMX) theory. A key point of the theory is that the leader estab- lishes different quality relationships with each group member.54 Part of establishing a high-quality relationship would be for the leader to vary his or her style to meet the needs of each subordinate. For example, Randy might need more guidance, and Suzanne might want to work more independently.
Over forty years ago, pioneering researcher Ralph Stogdill made a state- ment about selecting a leadership style that still holds today: “The most effective leaders appear to exhibit a degree of versatility and flexibility that enables them to adapt their behavior to the changing and contradictory demands made on them.”55 A recent suggestion urges leaders to follow a similar path of changing with the times, and customize a culture that is spe- cific to each company, and the personality of its work force.56
Before moving on to the end-of-chapter activities, do Leadership Skill- Building Exercise 4-5 that deals with flexibility and adaptability.
136 CHAPTER 4• LEADERSHIP BEHAVIORS, ATTITUDES, AND STYLES
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
READER’S ROADMAP So far in this book, we have examined the nature of leadership and the inner qualities of leaders, along with their behaviors, attitudes, and styles. In the next chapter, we describe some of the specific approaches to adapting one’s leadership approach to the situation.
SUMMARY
Effective leadership requires the right behaviors, skills, and attitudes, as emphasized in the classic Ohio State University studies. Two major dimen- sions of leadership behavior were identified: consid- eration and initiating structure. Consideration is the degree to which the leader creates an environ- ment of emotional support, warmth, friendliness, and trust. Making connections with people is a cur- rent aspect of consideration. Initiating structure is the degree to which the leader organizes and defines relationships in the group by such activities as assigning tasks and specifying procedures. Both consideration and initiating structure are related to important leadership outcomes such as job satisfac- tion and performance.
Many task-related attitudes and behaviors of effective leaders have been identified. Among them are (1) adaptability to the situation, (2) direction setting, (3) high performance standards, (4) concen- trating on strengths of group members, (5) risk tak- ing and execution of plans, (6) hands-on guidance and feedback, (7) ability to ask tough questions, and (8) organizing for collaboration.
Many relationship-oriented attitudes and beha- viors of leaders have also been identified. Among them are (1) aligning people, (2) openness to work- ers’ opinions, (3) creating inspiration and visibility, (4) satisfying higher-level needs, (5) giving emotional support and encouragement, (6) promoting princi- ples and values, and (7) being a servant leader.
LEADERSHIP SKILL-BUILDING EXERCISE 4-5
Contrasting Leadership Styles
One student plays the role of a new associate working for a financial services firm that sells life insurance and other investments. The associate has completed a six- week training program and is now working full time. Four weeks have passed, and the associate still has not made a sale. The associate’s boss is going to meet this associate today to discuss progress. Another stu- dent plays the role of a task-oriented leader. The two people participate in the review session.
Before playing (or assuming) the role of the asso- ciate or the boss, think for a few minutes how you would behave if you were placed in that role in real life.
Empathize with the frustrated associate or the task- oriented leader. A good role player is both a scriptwriter and an actor.
Another two students repeat the same scenario, except that this time the manager is a strong relationship-oriented leader. Two more pairs of students then have their turn at acting out the task-oriented and relationship-oriented performance reviews. Another varia- tion of this role play is for one person to play the roles of both the task-oriented and the relationship-oriented boss. Other class members observe and provide feedback on the effectiveness of the two styles of leadership.
SUMMARY 137
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
Servant leaders are committed to serving others rather than achieving their own goals. Aspects of ser- vant leadership include placing service before self- interest, listening to others, inspiring trust by being trustworthy, focusing on what is feasible to accom- plish, lending a hand, and emotional healing.
Many leaders receive extensive feedback on their behaviors and attitudes in the form of 360-degree feedback, whereby people who work for or with the leader provide feedback on the leader’s performance. Such feedback is likely to be useful when the feed- back relates to business goals and strategy and to important aspects of leadership, when training is provided in giving and receiving feedback, when action plans are developed, and when managers own the feedback evaluation. The anonymous com- ments in 360-degree feedback can be a problem.
Understanding leadership style is an extension of understanding leadership attitudes and behavior. Par- ticipative leaders share decision making with group members. The participative style can be subdivided into consultative, consensus, and democratic leader- ship. The participative style is well suited to managing competent people who are eager to assume responsi- bility. Yet the process can be time-consuming, and some managers perceive it to be a threat to their
power. Autocratic leaders retain most of the authority for themselves. The Leadership Grid™ classifies lea- ders according to their concern for both production (task accomplishment) and people.
Another important style of leader is the entre- preneur. The entrepreneurial style stems from the leader’s personal characteristics and the circum- stances of self-employment. It includes a strong achievement drive and sensible risk taking; a high degree of enthusiasm (including passion) and crea- tivity; a typical pattern of being proactive; the ten- dency to act quickly on opportunities; hurriedness and impatience; a visionary perspective; a dislike of hierarchy and bureaucracy; a preference for dealing with external customers; and an eye on the future.
Male–female differences in leadership style have been observed. Women have a tendency toward relationship-oriented leadership, whereas men tend toward command and control. Perhaps the best approach to leadership takes advantage of the positive traits of both men and women.
Rather than searching for the one best style of leadership, managers are advised to diagnose the situation and then choose an appropriate leader- ship style to match. To be effective, a leader must be able to adapt style to circumstance.
KEY TERMS
effective leader 109 consideration 110 initiating structure 110 Pygmalion effect 113 tough question 115
management openness 117 servant leader 120 360-degree feedback 121 leadership style 124 participative leaders 125
consultative leaders 125 consensus leaders 125 democratic leaders 125 autocratic leaders 126 Leadership Grid™ 129
GUIDELINES FOR ACTION AND SKILL DEVELOPMENT
A major consideration about choosing a leadership style is that you may have to modify your style to fit the occasion. For example, your group members may need close direction at one point, and at other times they may require less direction (as
explained in several of the leadership theories pre- sented in this chapter).
Most leadership-style classifications are based on the directive (task-oriented) dimension versus the nondirective (relationship-oriented) dimension.
138 CHAPTER 4• LEADERSHIP BEHAVIORS, ATTITUDES, AND STYLES
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
LEADERSHIP CASE PROBLEM A
In deciding which of these two styles is best, con- sider the following questions:
1. What is the structure of your organization and the nature of your work? You might decide, for example, that stricter control is necessary for some types of work, such as dealing with proprietary information.
2. Which style suits you best? Your personality, values, and beliefs influence how readily you can turn over responsibility to others.
3. Which style suits your boss and the organization culture? For example, a boss who is highly directive may perceive you as weak if you are too nondirective. In a tough-minded, perform-or-perish culture, you might want to use a highly directive leadership style.
4. Is there high potential for conflict in the work unit? A directive leadership style can trigger conflict with independent, strong- willed people. A more nondirective style allows for more freedom of discussion, which defuses conflict.57
It is probably better for you to lead in the style you consider to be the most effective rather than be concerned with a gender stereotype dictating the style you should be using. For example, many male leaders are the most effective when being con- ciliatory and supportive. And many female leaders prefer to be more task-oriented in their leadership and are less concerned with building cordial rela- tionships and being supportive.
Discussion Questions and Activities
1. Give an example of a high-consideration behavior that a supervisor of yours showed on your behalf. What was your reaction to his or her behavior?
2. Why is direction setting still an important lead- ership behavior in an era of empowerment and shared leadership?
3. How might a manager use e-mail and text mes- saging to help carry out both task-oriented and relationship-oriented behaviors?
4. Why do so many CEOs say they want entrepre- neurial style leaders in their company even though the company is essentially a large bureaucracy?
5. Why would being a highly narcissistic person interfere with being an effective servant leader?
6. Visualize yourself in a leadership position in a field of interest to you. How would you feel about being described as a hands-on leader by the members of your team?
7. How would you characterize the leadership style of your favorite executive, athletic coach, or television character who plays a boss?
8. Why is shared or participative leadership likely to be effective with well-educated and intelli- gent team members?
9. Which, if any, style differences have you noticed between men and women leaders?
10. Several people have commented that this chap- ter deals with the “nuts and bolts of leadership.” What makes them say that?
Frank Won’t Accept “We Can’t” for an Answer
Frank is the business development manager at a small firm that provides business process improvement solutions to federal, state, and local governments. His firm’s organization structure includes four project managers who are both managers of projects and also solicit for new
business. Up until last year, the company had enough contracts to be profitable. This year, a few big government contracts have expired and have not yet been renewed. As a result, the com- pany could lose money and perhaps be forced to lay off one-third of the staff.
LEADERSHIP CASE PROBLEM A 139
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
LEADERSHIP CASE PROBLEM B
Frank is particularly worried. He calls a meeting with his four project managers to discuss the need for more sales. A couple of minutes into the meet- ing, Frank informs his four direct reports, “The time for excuses is over. We need at least $1 million worth of new contracts to stay afloat. I haven’t heard about even a warm lead for a new contract from any of you in about a year. We need new busi- ness, and we need it now.”
Project manager Jennifer responded: “Frank, I hear you. The other project managers hear you. But government spending has tightened up. It’s not possible to squeeze a contract out of a government agency if they don’t have money in the budget.”
Oliver, another project manager, responded, “Frank, I have to agree with Jenny. There is no way to coax a contract out of a government agency when the well is dry. You know as well as we do that gov- ernment funding is way down for everything but national defense. Help us by pointing us in a new
direction for obtaining contracts. Do you have any contacts in private industry that we might pursue?”
Shaking his head in discouragement, Frank said: “I’ve heard enough excuses. I know you are trying, but get out there and try harder. I don’t care which one of you pulls it off, but I want one new pending contract for my approval within six months.
“I will do what I can to find new business for the firm also. But I am not here to do your job. Get back to me when you have made some progress.”
Questions
1. Based on the limited evidence, how would you characterize Frank’s leadership style?
2. What leadership behaviors and attitudes is Frank displaying?
3. How else might Frank approach his project managers about developing new business?
ASSOCIATED ROLE PLAY One student plays the role of Frank who wants to use an effective leadership approach to encourage his project managers/account managers to bring in a few new accounts. He knows that this is a tough leadership task. Four other students play the roles
of the project manager who will react to Frank’s leadership initiatives. Class members providing feedback should be particularly observant of Frank’s leadership approach.
Tricia and Her Facebook Friends and Twitter Followers
Tricia is the human resources team leader in the regional headquarters of an international bank. She has five direct reports plus considerable individual responsibility for carrying out various human resource initiatives. About six months ago, Tricia started thinking about how she could improve her leadership effectiveness with her team of human resource professionals, plus one support person. As she reflected on feedback she had received from their boss, the vice president of administration, Tricia thought that perhaps she was a little too business-like and task oriented. The insight came to
her that perhaps she should become Facebook friends and have Twitter exchanges with her staff of five.
Tricia’s first step was to invite each staff member to become a Facebook friend and also follow each group member on Twitter. (All five direct reports already had Facebook and Twitter accounts.) Tricia began her social media initiative by writing about strictly work-related topics, with posts such as the following:
● “I feel good about the response we are getting to our proposed wellness program.”
140 CHAPTER 4• LEADERSHIP BEHAVIORS, ATTITUDES, AND STYLES
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
● “Did you catch how the regional VP of adminis- tration said in her monthly intranet post that our team was doing a great job?”
● “Our new group interview program seems to be working. Most of our new hires are turning in above-average performance, and turnover among them is below average.”
After a couple of months of these business-like posts on Facebook and Twitter, Tricia did not observe that she and the group were developing a better personal relationship. Consequently, she decided to send posts that were more personal, including the following:
● “How about you and I spending a little quality time at the shopping mall this weekend?”
● “My two-year old nephew is having a birthday party October 10 at noon. You are warmly invited. Let me know ASAP.”
● “I thought that taupe and beige combination you wore to the office today was stunning. The way you dress picks up morale.”
● “My boyfriend was angry with me last night because he said I don’t like his parents.”
● “Don’t let the fact that I’m the team leader inter- fere with us being friends.”
Tricia did receive a few positive responses from her posts, but a few responses to her posts sug- gested the team members were not comfortable receiving the personal messages. One tweet response was simply “????.”
Questions
1. What would you advise Tricia to do about future posts of a personal nature to the team?
2. Which one or two relationship-oriented beha- viors does Tricia appear to be exaggerating?
3. If your team leader sent you a post about his or her team leadership role and your potential friendship, how would you respond?
ASSOCIATED ROLE PLAY One student plays the role of Tricia who happens to meet Ken, the benefits specialist, in the company cafeteria. Another student plays the role of Ken who wants to preserve a good working relationship with Tricia, but he thinks her social media posts to
him have become unprofessional. Class members who provide feedback will be particularly observant of (a) how receptive Tricia is to the feedback from Ken, and (b) how diplomatic Ken is in expressing his concerns.
LEADERSHIP SKILL-BUILDING EXERCISE 4-6
My Leadership Portfolio
For this addition to your leadership portfolio, iden- tify four leadership task-oriented behaviors or relationship-oriented behaviors that you have dem- onstrated this week. Your list can comprise any combination of the two sets of behaviors. Also jot down the result you achieved by exercising these behaviors. Here is an example:
“Thursday night, I applied direction setting and it really worked. We have a group assignment in our marketing class with each group consisting of about five people. Our assignment is to analyze how well employee self-service is working in supermarkets
and home-improvement stores. The group was hit- ting a wall because in their Internet searches they were finding mostly advertisements for Home Depot and the like. I suggested that we each visit a supermarket or home-improvement store and make firsthand observations of the customers who were using the automated checkout system. I also sug- gested we ask a couple of questions of the store associate supervising the activity. The group loved my idea, and the project was a big success. We sup- plemented written articles with a firsthand field study. I set the group in the right direction.”
LEADERSHIP SKILL-BUILDING EXERCISE 4-6 141
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
NOTES
LEADERSHIP SKILL-BUILDING EXERCISE 4-7
The Entrepreneurial Leadership Style
Work in a small group to write an essay about an entrepreneurial leader. First, agree on an entrepreneur for whom there is likely to be considerable informa- tion available in magazines and newspapers, including Internet access to this material. Prepare an essay of about 400 words, concentrating on the person’s entrepreneurial traits and behaviors. Refer back to
the chapter section about entrepreneurial leadership to gather some ideas for categories, such as “high degree of enthusiasm and creativity.” Also, look to see if you can identify traits or behaviors not men- tioned in the text. Remember that an entrepreneur is somebody who founds and develops a business based on a creative idea, such as David Karp of Tumblr.
1. Original story based on facts and observations from the following sources: Allison Pearson, “Waiting for Superwoman,” Bloomberg Businessweek, March 11–March 17, 2013, pp. 6–7; Michelle Sosinski, “Leadership… Sheryl Sandberg Style,” www.wcleadership. com, Women’s Leadership Center Inc.; Miguel Helft and Jessi Hempl, “Inside Facebook: How Does the Social Media Giant Really Work? Read this Story Before You Buy the Stock,” Fortune, March 19, 2012, p. 120; Brad Stone, “Everybody Needs a Sheryl Sandberg,” Bloomberg Businessweek, May 16– May 22, 2011, pp. 50–58; Belinda Luscombe, “Confidence Woman,” Time, March 18, 2013, pp. 34–42.
2. Ralph M. Stogdill and Alvin E. Coons, eds., Leader Behavior: Its Description and Measurement (Columbus, Ohio: The Ohio State University Bureau of Business Research, 1957); Carroll L. Shartle, Executive Performance and Leadership (Upper Saddle River, N.J.: Prentice Hall, 1956).
3. Scott Cacciola, Matthew Futterman, and Ashley Jones, “The NBA’s Calmer, Cooler New Boss,” The Wall Street Journal, October 26, 2012, p. D10.
4. Timothy A. Judge, Ronald F. Piccolo, and Remus Ilies, “The Forgotten Ones? The Validity of Consideration and Initiating Structure in Leadership Research,” Journal of Applied Psychology, February 2004, pp. 36–51.
5. Lisa Schurer Lambert, Bennett J. Tepper, Jon C. Carr, Daniel T. Holt, and Alex J. Barelka,
“Forgotten but Not Gone: An Examination of Fit Between Leader Consideration and Initiating Structure Needed and Received,” Journal of Applied Psychology, September 2012, pp. 913–930.
6. D. Scott Derue, Jennifer D. Nahrgang, Ned Welman, and Stephen E. Humphrey, “Trait and Behavior Theories of Leadership: An Integration and Meta-Analytic Test of Their Relative Validity,” Personnel Psychology, no. 1, 2011, pp. 7–52.
7. Larry Bossidy, “What Your Leader Expects of You, and What You Should Expect in Return,” Harvard Business Review, April 2007, p. 64.
8. Sharon Terlep and Joann S. Lublin, “New GM CEO: Brash, Blunt, and Demanding,” The Wall Street Journal, August 16, 2010, p. B2.
9. Marcus Buckingham, “What Great Managers Do,” Harvard Business Review, March 2005, pp. 70–79.
10. Quoted in Sonja D. Mack, “Sarah Mensah: Chief Operating Officer & Chief Marketing Officer, Portland Trail Blazers,” Black Enterprise, February 2011, p. 106.
11. Desa Philadelphia, “Q&A: Larry Bossidy on Execution.” Time Global Business, July 2002, p. B5.
12. Henry Mintzberg, Managing (San Francisco: Berrett-Koehler, 2009), p. 88.
13. Mike Esterl, “Coke Ready to Share Cash, Not Blame,” The Wall Street Journal, June 19, 2012, p. B8.
14. Quoted in David Kiley, “The New Heat on Ford,” BusinessWeek, June 4, 2007, p. 035.
142 CHAPTER 4• LEADERSHIP BEHAVIORS, ATTITUDES, AND STYLES
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
15. Mitch Betts, “How Job: Corporate Anthropologist to Boost Collaboration,” Computerworld, October 25, 2010 (www .computerworld.com).
16. John P. Kotter, “What Leaders Really Do,” Harvard Business Review, May–June 1990, pp. 105–106.
17. James R. Detert and Ethan R. Burris, “Leadership Behavior and Employee Voice: Is the Door Really Open?” Academy of Management Journal, August 2007, p. 871.
18. Arielle Kass, “Going to School with Home Depot’s CEO,” The Atlanta Journal Constitution (www.ajc.com), July 29, 2012, p. 1.
19. Geoffrey Colvin, “How One CEO Learned to Fly,” Fortune, October 30, 2006, p. 98.
20. Tessa E. Basford and Andrea Molberg, “Dale Carnegie’s Leadership Principles: Examining the Theoretical and Empirical Support,” Journal of Leadership Studies, no. 4, 2013, pp. 37–38.
21. Cited in Adam Bryant, “Want the Job? Tell Him the Meaning of Life,” The New York Times (www.nytimes.com), June 18, 2010, p. 3.
22. “Covey Proposes Principle-Based Leadership,” Management Review, September 1995, p. 21.
23. Richard McGill Murphy, “Secrets of the Big Blue Leader,” Fortune, November 21, 2011, p. 169.
24. Stacy Perlman, “The Secret Sauce at In-N-Out Burger,” (Book Excerpt), BusinessWeek, April 20, 2009, pp. 068–069; “In-N-Out Burgers Inc.” Encyclopedia of Business, Second Edition. Accessed November 23, 2013.
25. Robert K. Greenleaf, The Power of Servant Leadership (San Francisco: Berrett-Koehler Publishers, 1998).
26. Suzanne J. Peterson, Benjamin M. Galvin, and Donald Lange, “CEO Servant Leadership: Exploring Executive Characteristics and Firm Performance,” Personnel Psychology, no. 3, 2012, pp. 565–596.
27. Based on Robert K. Greenleaf, Servant Leadership: A Journey into the Nature of Legitimate Power and Greatness (Mahwah, N.J.: Paulist Press, 1997); Robert C. Liden, Sandy J. Wayne, Hao Zhao, and David Henderson, “Servant Leadership: Development of a Multidimensional Measure and Multi-Level Assessment,” The Leadership Quarterly, April 2008, pp. 161–177.
28. “Be a Leader, Not a Pal,” Manager’s Edge, March 2007, p. 3.
29. Emily M. Hunter, et al., “Servant Leaders Inspire Servant Followers: Antecedents and Outcomes for Employees and the Organization,” The Leadership Quarterly, April 2013, pp. 316–331.
30. Liden, et al., “Servant Leadership: Development of a Multidimensional Measure,” p. 172.
31. Fred O. Walumbwa, Chad A. Hartnell, and Adegoke Oke, “Servant Leadership, Procedural Justice Climate, Service Climate, Employee Attitudes, and Organizational Citizenship Behavior,” Journal of Applied Psychology, May 2010, pp. 517–529.
32. Suzanne J. Peterson, Benjamin M. Galvin, and Donald Lange, “CEO Servant Leadership: Exploring Executive Characteristics and Firm Performance,” Personnel Psychology, no. 3, 2012, p. 585.
33. Ginka Toegel and Jay A. Conger, “360-Degree Assessment: Time for Reinvention,” Academy of Management Learning and Education, September 2003, pp. 297–311.
34. Harriet Edleson, “Do 360 Evaluations Work?” Monitor on Psychology, November 2012, pp. 58–60; Bruce Pfau and Ira Kay, “Does 360-Degree Feedback Negatively Affect Company Performance?” HR Magazine, June 2002, pp. 58–59; Tina Smagala, “Assessment Tool Can Be Used to Collect Anonymous Feedback.” Democrat and Chronicle, October 8, 2013, p. 5B.
35. Reinout E. de Vries, “Personality Predictors of Leadership Styles and the Self-Other Agreement Problem,” The Leadership Quarterly, October 12, 2012, pp. 800–821.
36. Maria Collar, “Try Leading Collectively: Command-and-Control Leadership Gives Way to a More Democratic Style,” HR Magazine, January 2013, p. 63.
37. Noshir S. Contractor, Leslie A. DeChurch, Jay Carson, Dorothy R. Carter, and Brian Keegan, “The Topology of Collective Leadership,” The Leadership Quarterly, December 2012, pp. 994–1011.
38. Craig L. Pearse, “The Future of Leadership: Combining Vertical and Shared Leadership to Transform Knowledge Work,” Academy of Management Executive, February 2004, pp. 47–57.
NOTES 143
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
39. Anders Skogstad, et al., “The Destructiveness of Laissez-Faire Leadership Behavior,” Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, no. 1, 2007, pp. 80–92.
40. “GM Boss-to-Be Has Hard-Nosed Reputation,” Detroit Free Press, August 14, 2010.
41. Robert R. Blake and Anne Adams McCanse, Leadership Dilemmas—Grid Solutions (Houston, Tex.: Gulf Publishing, 1991), http:// www.gridinternational.com/gridtheory.html, 2007.
42. Alan Hughes, “The Maestro of Finance,” Black Enterprise, September 2013, p. 63.
43. Andrew J. DuBrin, Proactive Personality and Behavior for Individual and Organizational Productivity (Cheltenham, UK; Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar, 2014), pp. 118–122; J. Robert Baum and Edwin A. Locke, “The Relationship of Entrepreneurial Traits, Skill, and Motivation to Subsequent Venture Growth,” Journal of Applied Psychology, August 2004, pp. 587–598; Gayle Sato Stodder, “Goodbye Mom & Pop: The Neighborhood’s Not Big Enough for Today’s Entrepreneur. Only the World Will Do,” Entrepreneur, May 1999, pp. 145–151.
44. Melissa S. Cardon, Joakim Wincent, Jagdip Singh, and Mateja Dronovsek, “The Nature and Experience of Entrepreneurial Passion,” Academy of Management Review, July 2009, pp. 511–532. The Roddick quote is also from this source, p. 511.
45. Leon C. Prieto, “Proactive Personality and Entrepreneurial Leadership: Exploring the Moderating Role of Organizational Identification and Political Skill,” Academy of Entrepreneurship Journal, July 1, 2010, pp. 1–16.
46. “The World’s 50 Most Innovative Companies,” Fast Company, March 2010, p. 67.
47. “Can Entrepreneurship Be Taught?” The Wall Street Journal, March 19, 2012, p. R4.
48. Judy Rosener, “Ways Women Lead,” Harvard Business Review, November–December 1990, pp. 119–125.
49. Research reported in Michael Schrage, “Why Can’t a Woman Be More Like a Man?” Fortune, August 16, 1999, p. 184.
50. Much of the research on this topic is summarized in Mary Crawford, Talking Difference: On Gender and Language (London: Sage Publications, 1995).
51. Claartje J. Vinkenburg, Marloes L. van Engen, Alice H. Eagly, and Mary C. Johannesen- Schmidt, “An Exploration of Stereotypical Beliefs About Leadership Styles: Is Transformational Leadership a Route to Women’s Promotion?” The Leadership Quarterly, February 2011, pp. 10–21.
52. Daniel Goleman, “Leadership That Gets Results,” Harvard Business Review, March– April 2000, pp. 78–90.
53. Felix Brodbeck, Michael Frese, and Mansour Havidan, “Leadership Made in Germany: Low on Compassion, High on Performance,” Academy of Management Executive, February 2002, pp. 16–30.
54. David J. Henderson, Robert C. Liden, Brian C. Glibkowski, and Anjali Chaudhry, “LMX Differentiation: A Multilevel Review and Examination of Its Antecedents and Outcomes,” The Leadership Quarterly, August 2009, pp. 517–534.
55. Ralph M. Stogdill, “Historical Trends in Leadership Theory and Research,” Journal of Contemporary Business, Autumn 1974, p. 7.
56. Christopher Hann, “We’re All in This Together,” Entrepreneur, March 2013, p. 56.
57. “Directive Management or Not?” Working SMART, December 1992, p. 3.
144 CHAPTER 4• LEADERSHIP BEHAVIORS, ATTITUDES, AND STYLES
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
CH AP
TE R
5 Contingency and Situational Leadership
LEARNING OBJECTIVES After studying this chapter and doing the exercises, you should be able to
• Describe how the situation influences the choice of leadership objectives. Present an overview of the contingency theory of leadership effectiveness.
• Explain the path-goal theory of leadership effectiveness.
• Explain Situational Leadership® II (SLII).
• Use the normative decision model to determine the most appropriate decision-making style in a given situation.
• Explain the basics of leadership during a crisis.
• Explain how evidence-based leadership can contribute to contingency and situational leadership.
CHAPTER OUTLINE Situational Influences on Effective Leadership Behavior
Fiedler’s Contingency Theory of Leadership Effectiveness Measuring Leadership Style: The Least Preferred
Coworker (LPC) Scale Measuring the Leadership Situation Overall Findings Making the Situation More Favorable for the Leader Evaluation of Fiedler’s Contingency Theory
The Path-Goal Theory of Leadership Effectiveness Matching the Leadership Style to the Situation Steps Leaders Can Take to Influence Performance and
Satisfaction
Situational Leadership® II (SLII) Basics of SLII Evaluation of SLII
The Normative Decision Model Decision-Making Styles Contingency Factors and Application of the Model
Leader–Member Exchange (LMX) and Contingency Theory
Leadership During a Crisis
Evidence-Based Leadership for the Contingency and Situational Approach
Summary
Key Terms
Guidelines for Action and Skill Development
Leadership Case Problem A
Leadership Case Problem B
Notes
145 Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s).
Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
I n March 2013, Michigan governor Rick Snyderappointed Kevyn Orr as emergency manager of Detroitfor an eighteen-month term to help resolve the city’s overwhelming problems. Detroit had a history of political corruption, bribery, and sex scandals. The city’s population shrank from 1.8 million in 1950 to 700,000 in 2013. Detroit led the United States in violent crime. Many parts of the outer city looked to be bombed out, with approxi- mately 66,000 vacant lots, and 78,000 abandoned or dis- tressed buildings, many of which were used as drug houses. A four-bedroom house in the inner city could be purchased for $7,000. City debt had reached $18 billion.
Orr, a graduate of the University of Michigan Law School, had been a bankruptcy attorney for many years including working on Chrysler’s bankruptcy in 2009. Orr admitted he had dictatorial powers as an emergency man- ager but he said he was going to be a benevolent dictator. Five months after Orr’s appointment, Detroit filed for bank- ruptcy, and he regarded the decision as the beginning of the rebirth of the beleaguered city. He talked about other cities, such as Miami, Washington D.C., that rebounded from adversity in major sections of the metropolitan areas.
Orr exuded optimism and energy as he talked about his plans to work Detroit out of bankruptcy before his term expired. He admitted that Detroit had horrendous problems, as reflected in his quip, “You can’t have 20-year-old oak trees growing through the roofs of houses and not notice that there’s some blight.” Yet Orr also pointed to pockets of optimism about the city. He referred to people in their 20s who are launching high-tech firms, restaurants, and rehabbing abandoned or blighted buildings. Venture capital- ists and private foundations were investing billions in down- town. Dan Gilbert, the chairman of Quicken Loans, moved company headquarters to Detroit in 2010. He also attracted eighty-five other companies to downtown through a program that provides office space for startups.
A key part of Orr’s strategy for revitalization was the Detroit Future City plan created by public officials, commu- nity groups, and philanthropists to undo blight, and improve lighting and public safety in six demonstration districts. The hope is that improvements in one neighborhood become contagious. Despite the city’s crippling debt, Orr proposed a $1.25 billion investment in the city over the next decade. At the same time, he is trimming costs through such measures as privatizing refuse collection and negotiating for lower pension payments to city retirees.
Although candid about the dreadful corruption and mis- judgments of the past, Orr points his stakeholders toward a brighter future. He says that Detroit has been given a second chance that should not be wasted. “This is our opportunity for a great All-American city to show what it really is,” he says.1
The story about the emergency manager of a troubled city illustrates an increasingly important leadership task: leading people through a crisis. Leadership of this type is a special case of the general subject of this chapter— adjusting one’s approach to the situation. Contingency and situational leadership further expand the study of leadership styles by adding more specific guidelines about which style to use under which circumstance.
In this chapter, we present an overview of the situa- tional perspective on leadership. We then summarize four classic contingency theories of leadership: Fiedler’s contingency theory, path-goal theory, the situational lead- ership model, and the normative decision model. We also explain how a more contemporary theory, the leader– member exchange, contributes to understanding the contingency perspective. In addition, we describe crisis leadership because leading others through a crisis has become a frequent challenge in recent years. Finally, we describe how evidence-based leadership and management contribute to the contingency approach.
Situational Influences on Effective Leadership Behavior
The situation can influence the leadership behavior or style a leader empha- sizes. The essence of a contingency approach to leadership is that leaders are most effective when they make their behavior contingent on situational forces, including group member characteristics. Both the internal and the
146 CHAPTER 5• CONTINGENCY AND SITUATIONAL LEADERSHIP
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
external environment have a significant impact on leader effectiveness. For example, the quality of the workforce and the competitiveness of the envi- ronment can influence which behaviors the leader emphasizes. A manager who supervises competent employees might be able to practice consensus leadership readily. And a manager who faces a competitive environment might find it easier to align people to pursue a new vision.
A useful perspective on implementing contingency leadership is that the manager must be flexible enough to avoid clinging to old ideas that no longer fit the current circumstances.2 Being stubborn about what will work in a given situation and clinging to old ideas can result in ineffective leadership. The effective leader adapts to changing circumstances. For example, at one point, offering employees generous benefits might not have been motivational. In reality, with many employers having cut back on benefits such as health insur- ance, these benefits can actually be helpful in attracting and retaining workers.
As mentioned in several places in this textbook, the leader needs to take into account the major situational variable of organizational culture when choosing which approach to leadership will lead to favorable outcomes. A command-and-control leadership style may not be effective in a company with a collaborative, friendly organizational culture. If the culture seems at odds with what a highly placed leader wants to accomplish, the leader may attempt to change the culture.
Victor H. Vroom and Arthur G. Jago have identified three conclusions about the role of situations in leadership, and these findings support the model of leadership presented in Figure 1-2, Chapter 1. The conclusions are geared to support the idea that leadership involves motivating others to work collaboratively in the pursuit of a common goal.3 We also add a fourth conclusion, focused on the organization structure.
1. Organizational effectiveness is affected by situational factors not under leader control. The leader might be able to influence the situation, yet some situational factors are beyond the leader’s complete control. The manager of a prosperous, independent coffee shop might be running her business and leading her employees successfully for ten years. Suddenly, a Starbucks opens across the street, thereby seriously affecting her ability to lead a successful enterprise. She might be smart enough to have a contingency plan of offering services Starbucks cannot equal, yet staying in business will be a struggle.
2. Situations shape how leaders behave. Contingency theorists believe that forces in the situation are three times as strong as the leader’s personal characteristics in shaping his or her behavior. How the leader behaves is therefore substantially influenced by environmental forces. In the face of competition from Starbucks, our coffee shop owner might now act with a greater sense of urgency, be much more directive in telling her workers what to do, and become much less warm and friendly. Her normal level of enthusiasm might also diminish.
3. Situations influence the consequences of leader behavior. Popular books about management and leadership assume that certain types of
SITUATIONAL INFLUENCES ON EFFECTIVE LEADERSHIP BEHAVIOR 147
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
leader behavior work in every situation. Situational theorists disagree strongly with this position. Instead, a specific type of leadership behavior might have different outcomes in different situations. The leader behavior of empowerment illustrates this idea. Perhaps empowerment will work for our coffee shop owner because she has a group of dedicated workers who want their jobs and her enterprise to endure. However, empowering incom- petent workers with a weak work ethic is likely to backfire because the workers will most likely resist additional responsibility.
4. The type of organization influences which leadership approach is best. Henry Mintzberg has identified the form of organization as a key situ- ational variable influencing which approach to leadership is likely to be most effective. Two examples will suffice here. In an entrepreneurial organi- zation, the key leader will engage in considerable doing and dealing as well as creating visions. In a machine organization, or classic bureaucracy, the leader will engage in a considerable amount of controlling.4
In this chapter, as well as throughout the book, possible situational factors are mentioned that should be taken into consideration in leading others. A general approach to being aware of all these factors is for the leader to be mindful of events in the environment. If you are mindful, you are sensitive to what is happening around you. According to stress researcher Jon Kabat- Zinn, you learn to pay attention on purpose to the present moment, in a non- judgmental way, to whatever arises in your leadership situation.5
Fiedler’s Contingency Theory of Leadership Effectiveness
Fred E. Fiedler developed a widely researched and quoted contingency model more than forty years ago that holds that the best style of leadership is determined by the situation in which the leader is working.6 Here we examine how the style and situation are evaluated, the overall findings of the theory, and how leaders can modify situations to their advantage. Although this theory is no longer the subject of new research, it still provides a few useful suggestions for today’s leader.
Measuring Leadership Style: The Least Preferred Coworker (LPC) Scale Fiedler’s theory classifies a manager’s leadership style as relationship moti- vated or task motivated. Style is therefore based on the extent to which the leader is relationship motivated or task motivated. According to Fiedler, leadership style is a relatively permanent aspect of behavior and thus diffi- cult to modify. Leaders are regarded as having a consistent style of task or relations orientation. Fiedler reasons that once leaders understand their particular leadership style, they should work in situations that match that style. Similarly, the organization should help managers match leadership styles and situations.
148 CHAPTER 5• CONTINGENCY AND SITUATIONAL LEADERSHIP
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
The least preferred coworker (LPC) scale measures the degree to which a leader describes favorably or unfavorably his or her LPC—that is, an employee with whom he or she could work the least well. A leader who describes the LPC in relatively favorable terms tends to be relationship motivated. In contrast, a person who describes this coworker in an unfavor- able manner tends to be task motivated. The coworker is described by rating him or her on a series of eighteen polar-opposite adjectives, such as the following:
Pleasant 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 Unpleasant
Tense 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Relaxed
The leadership style measure presented in Leadership Self-Assessment Quiz 4-1 is a more direct and less abstract way of measuring your style. To repeat, the general idea of the LPC approach is that if you have a positive, charitable attitude toward people you had a difficult time working with, you are probably relationship oriented. In contrast, if you take a dim view of people who gave you a hard time, you are probably task oriented. The message here is that a relationship-oriented leader should be able to work well with a variety of personalities.
Measuring the Leadership Situation Fiedler’s contingency theory classifies situations as high, moderate, and low control. The more control that the leader exercises, the more favorable the situation is for the leader. The control classifications are determined by rat- ing the situation on its three dimensions: (1) leader–member relations mea- sure how well the group and the leader get along; (2) task structure measures how clearly the procedures, goals, and evaluation of the job are defined; and (3) position power measures the leader’s authority to hire, fire, discipline, and grant salary increases to group members.
Leader–member relations contribute as much to situation favorability as do task structure and position power combined. The leader therefore has the most control in a situation in which relationships with members are the best.
Overall Findings The key points of Fiedler’s contingency theory are summarized and simpli- fied in Figure 5-1. The original theory is much more complex. Leadership effectiveness depends on matching leaders to situations in which they can exercise more control. A leader should therefore be placed in a situation that is favorable to, or matches, his or her style. If this cannot be accom- plished, the situation might be modified to match the leader’s style by manipulating one or more of the three following situational variables.
The theory states that task-motivated leaders perform the best in situa- tions of both high control and low control. Relationship-motivated leaders
FIEDLER’S CONTINGENCY THEORY OF LEADERSHIP EFFECTIVENESS 149
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
perform the best in situations of moderate control. The results of many studies indicated that the relationship-motivated leader outperformed the task-motivated leader in three of the eight situations but that the reverse was true in the other five situations. The eight situations result from each of the three situational variables being classified in one of two ways (good or poor, high or low, or strong or weak), as shown in Figure 5-2.
Task-motivated leaders perform better in situations that are highly favor- able for exercising control because they do not have to be concerned with the task. Instead, they can work on relationships. In moderately favorable situations, the relationship-motivated leader achieves higher group produc- tivity because he or she can work on relationships and not get involved in micromanaging. In very-low-control situations, the task-motivated leader is able to structure and make sense out of confusion, whereas the relationship-motivated leader wants to give emotional support to group members or call a meeting.
Making the Situation More Favorable for the Leader A practical implication of contingency theory is that leaders should modify situations to match their leadership style, thereby enhancing their chances of being effective. Consider a group of leaders who are task motivated and
AMOUNT OF SITUATIONAL CONTROL BY LEADER
a. Leader–member relations are good. b. Task is well structured. c. Leader has high position power.
Both favorable and unfavorable factors are present.
a. Leader–member relations are poor. b. Task is poorly structured. c. Leader has low position power.
Task-motivated leaders perform best when they have the most control (highly favorable).
High
Relationship-motivated leaders perform best when they have moderate control (moderately favorable).
Moderate
Task-motivated leaders perform best when they have low control (highly unfavorable).
Low
© Ce ng ag e Le ar ni ng
FIGURE 5-1 Summary of Findings from Fiedler’s Contingency Theory.
Situational Characteristics
Situation (Octant) Number 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
Leader–Member Relations Good Good Good Good Poor Poor Poor Poor
Task Structure High High Low Low High High Low Low
Position Power Strong Weak Strong Weak Strong Weak Strong Weak
© Ce ng ag e Le ar ni ng
FIGURE 5-2 The Eight Different Situations in Fiedler’s Contingency Theory.
150 CHAPTER 5• CONTINGENCY AND SITUATIONAL LEADERSHIP
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
decide that they need to exercise more control over the situation to achieve higher work unit productivity. To increase control over the situation, they can do one or more of the following:
● Improve leader–member relations through displaying an interest in the personal welfare of group members, having meals with them, actively listening to their concerns, telling anecdotes, and in general being a nice person.
● Increase task structure by engaging in behaviors related to initiating structure, such as being more specific about expectations, providing deadlines, showing samples of acceptable work, and providing written instructions.
● Exercise more position power by requesting more formal authority from higher management. For example, the leader might let it be known that he or she has the authority to grant bonuses and make strong recom- mendations for promotion.
Now imagine a relationship-motivated leader who wants to create a situa- tion of moderate favorability so that his or her interests in being needed by the group could be satisfied. The leader might give the group tasks of low structure and deemphasize his or her position power.
Evaluation of Fiedler’s Contingency Theory A major contribution of Fiedler’s work is that it has prompted others to con- duct studies about the contingency nature of leadership. Fiedler’s theory has been one of the most widely researched theories in industrial/organizational psychology, and at one time it was used extensively as the basis for leader- ship training programs. The model has also alerted leaders to the impor- tance of sizing up the situation to gain control. At the same time, Fielder pioneered in taking into account both traits and the situation to better understand leadership.7
Despite its potential advantages, however, the contingency theory is too complicated to have much of an impact on most leaders. A major problem centers on matching the situation to the leader. In most situations, the amount of control the leader exercises varies from time to time. For exam- ple, if a relationship-motivated leader were to find the situation becoming too favorable for exercising control, it is doubtful that he or she would be transferred to a less favorable situation or attempt to make the situation less favorable.
The Path-Goal Theory of Leadership Effectiveness
The path-goal theory of leadership effectiveness, as developed by Robert House, specifies what a leader must do to achieve high productivity and morale in a given situation. In general, a leader attempts to clarify the path to a goal for a group member so that the group member receives personal
THE PATH-GOAL THEORY OF LEADERSHIP EFFECTIVENESS 151
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
payoffs. At the same time, this group member’s job satisfaction and perfor- mance increase.8 Similar to the expectancy theory of motivation on which it is based, path-goal theory is multifaceted and has several versions. Its key features are summarized in Figure 5-3.
The theory is so complex that it is helpful to consider an overview before studying more of the details. The major proposition of path-goal theory is that the manager should choose a leadership style that takes into account the characteristics of the group members and the demands of the task. Furthermore, initiating structure will be effective in situations with a low degree of subordinate task structure but ineffective in highly structured task situations. The rationale is that in the first situation, subordinates wel- come initiating structure because it helps to provide structure to their some- what ambiguous tasks. Instead of just flailing around, the leader provides guidance. In the situation of highly structured tasks, more structure is seen as unnecessary and associated with overly close supervision.9
In his reformulated version of path-goal theory, House offered a meta- proposition, which provides a capsule summary of a dizzying amount of studies and theorizing in relation to the theory. Understanding this meta- proposition would be a good take-away from the theory: For leaders to be effective, they should engage in behaviors that complement subordinates’ environments and abilities. They should engage in these behaviors in a manner that compensates for deficiencies and that enhances subordinate
LEADERSHIP STYLE
(Contingency factors)
(Contingency factors)
OUTCOMES
Productivity Morale
Demands of the Task
Characteristics of Group Members
Directive
Supportive
Participative
Achievement-oriented
FIGURE 5-3 The Path-Goal Theory of Leadership.
To achieve the outcomes of productivity and morale, the manager chooses one of four leadership styles, depending on (a) the characteristics of the situation and (b) the demands of the task.
© Ce ng ag e Le ar ni ng
152 CHAPTER 5• CONTINGENCY AND SITUATIONAL LEADERSHIP
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
satisfactions as well as individual and work unit performance.10 For exam- ple, if our coffee shop owner found that one of her workers was fearful of losing his or her job because of Starbucks competition, she would give him or her lots of encouragement and explain the survival plan of the coffee shop in detail.
Two key aspects of this theory will be discussed: matching the leadership style to the situation and steps the leader can take to influence performance and satisfaction.
Matching the Leadership Style to the Situation Path-goal theory emphasizes that the leader should choose among four leadership styles to achieve optimum results in a given situation. Two important sets of contingency factors are the type of subordinates and the tasks they perform (a key environmental factor). The type of subordinates is determined by how much control they think they have over the environ- ment (locus of control) and by how well they think they can do the assigned task.
Environmental contingency factors are those that are not within the con- trol of group members but influence satisfaction and task accomplishment. Three broad classifications of contingency factors in the environment are (1) the group members’ tasks, (2) the authority system within the organiza- tion, and (3) the work group.
To use path-goal theory, the leader must first assess the relevant variables in the environment. Then he or she selects one of the four styles listed next that fits those contingency factors best:
1. Directive style. The leader who is directive (similar to task motivated) emphasizes formal activities such as planning, organizing, and control- ling. When the task is unclear, the directive style improves morale.
2. Supportive style. The leader who is supportive (similar to relationship motivated) displays concern for group members’ well-being and creates an emotionally supportive climate. The supportive leader enhances morale when group members work on dissatisfying, stressful, or frus- trating tasks. Group members who are unsure of themselves prefer the supportive leadership style.
3. Participative style. The leader who is participative consults with group members to gather their suggestions, and then considers these sugges- tions seriously when making a decision. The participative leader is best suited for improving the morale of well-motivated employees who per- form nonrepetitive tasks.
4. Achievement-oriented style. The leader who is achievement oriented sets challenging goals, pushes for work improvement, and sets high expectations for team members, who are also expected to assume responsibility. This leadership style works well with achievement- oriented team members and with those working on ambiguous and nonrepetitive tasks.
THE PATH-GOAL THEORY OF LEADERSHIP EFFECTIVENESS 153
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
A leader can sometimes successfully combine more than one of the four styles, although this possibility is not specified in path-goal theory. For example, during a crisis, such as a major product recall, the marketing manager might need to be directive to help the group take fast action. After the initial emergency actions have been taken, the leader, recognizing how stressed the workers must be, might shift to a supportive mode.
Few practicing leaders and managers attempt to systematically apply the path-goal theory, yet many effective leaders apply some aspects of the theory intuitively. An example is Mark Murphy, the president and CEO of the Green Bay Packers, a National Football League (NFL) team. Part of the reason Murphy is so well liked by team members and fans is that he uses a supportive style. At the same time, he emphasizes an achievement-oriented style to get the most from his staff and the players. After his playing days were over, Murphy earned a law degree and an MBA.
Joe Gibbs, a Hall of Fame coach, noticed Murphy’s knack for leadership early on. “He was somebody I could go and talk to if I were having pro- blems,” he says. “Mark was so smart. He made the absolute most of his abilities.”11 Murphy also practices participative leadership, as evidenced by his frequent use of management by wandering around (MBWA) with his senior management.12 (MBWA refers to casually dropping by the work sites of subordinates and chatting with them about work and listening to their input.)
Steps Leaders Can Take to Influence Performance and Satisfaction In addition to recommending the leadership style to fit the situation, the path-goal theory offers other suggestions to leaders. Most of them relate to motivation and satisfaction, including the following:
1. Recognize or activate group members’ needs over which the leader has control.
2. Increase the personal payoffs to team members for attaining work goals. The leader might give high-performing employees special recognition.
3. Make the paths to payoffs (rewards) easier by coaching and providing direction. For instance, a manager might help a team member be selected for a high-level project.
4. Help group members clarify their expectations of how effort will lead to good performance and how performance will lead to a reward. The leader might say, “Anyone who has gone through this training in the past came away knowing how to implement a Six Sigma (quality stan- dards) program. And most people who learn how to use this system wind up getting a good raise.”
5. Reduce frustrating barriers to reaching goals. For example, the leader might hire a temporary worker to help with a seasonal work overload.
154 CHAPTER 5• CONTINGENCY AND SITUATIONAL LEADERSHIP
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
6. Increase opportunities for personal satisfaction if the group member performs effectively. The if is important because it reflects contingent behavior on the leader’s part.
7. Be careful not to irritate people by giving them instructions on things they already can do well.
8. To obtain high performance and satisfaction, the leader must provide structure if it is missing and supply rewards contingent on adequate performance. To accomplish this, leaders must clarify the desirability of goals for the group members.13
As a leader, you can derive specific benefit from path-goal theory by applying these eight methods of influencing performance. Although research interest in path-goal theory has almost disappeared in recent years, the basic tenets of the theory are on target. Any comprehensive the- ory of leadership must include the idea that the leader’s actions have a major impact on the motivation and satisfaction of group members.14
Despite the potential contributions of path-goal theory, it contains so many nuances and complexities that it has attracted little interest from managers.
Situational Leadership® II (SLII)
The two contingency approaches to leadership presented so far take into account collectively the task, the authority of the leader, and the nature of the subordinates. Another explanation of contingency leadership places its primary emphasis on the characteristics of group members. Situational Leadership II (SLII), developed by Kenneth H. Blanchard and his collea- gues, explains how to match leadership style to the capabilities of group members on a given task.15 (The SLII model presented here is a newer ver- sion of the older Hersey–Blanchard Situational Leadership Theory.) For example, you might need less guidance from a supervisor when you are skilled in a task than when you are performing a new task. The situational model is particularly applicable to frontline leaders such as supervisors and team leaders.
SLII is designed to increase the frequency and quality of conversations about performance and professional development between managers and group members so that competence is developed, commitment takes place, and turnover among talented workers is reduced. Leaders are taught to use the leadership style that matches or responds to the needs of the situation.
Before delving further into the situational leadership model, do the Leadership Self-Assessment Quiz 5-1. It will help alert you to the specific behaviors involved in regarding the characteristics of group members as key contingency variables in choosing the most effective leadership style.
SITUATIONAL LEADERSHIP® II (SLII) 155
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
LEADERSHIP SELF-ASSESSMENT QUIZ 5-1
Measuring Your Situational Perspective
Instructions: Indicate how well you agree with the following statements, using the following scale: DS ¼ disagree strongly; D ¼ disagree; N ¼ neutral; A ¼ agree; AS ¼ agree strongly. Circle the most accurate answer.
DS D N A AS
1. Workers need to be carefully trained before you can place high expectations on them.
1 2 3 4 5
2. Workers who are more knowledgeable have less need of small, day-by-day goals.
1 2 3 4 5
3. Workers who are self-confident and intelligent require less supervision and guidance than do other workers.
1 2 3 4 5
4. Workers who are anxious usually need a lot of reassurance. 1 2 3 4 5
5. Most workers learn at about the same pace, so the manager can give about the same amount of instruction to each worker.
5 4 3 2 1
6. The same well-delivered pep talk will usually appeal to workers at all levels. 5 4 3 2 1
7. A manager will usually need to provide clear directions during a crisis. 1 2 3 4 5
8. As a manager, I would invest the least amount of time supervising the most competent workers.
1 2 3 4 5
9. An effective approach to supervising emotionally immature workers is to grant them a lot of freedom.
5 4 3 2 1
10. It is best not to put much effort into supervising unenthusiastic staff members. 5 4 3 2 1
11. An effective leader delegates equal types and amounts of work to group members.
5 4 3 2 1
12. If I noticed that a team member appeared to be insecure and anxious, I would give him or her especially clear instructions and guidance.
1 2 3 4 5
13. Many competent workers get to the point where they require relatively little leadership and supervision.
1 2 3 4 5
14. Whether a person is a young adult or old adult often influences the best approach to leading him or her.
1 2 3 4 5
15. A person’s cultural background usually has no significance in providing him or her appropriate leadership.
5 4 3 2 1
Scoring and Interpretation
• 46–75 points: You have (or would have) a strong situational perspective as a leader and manager.
• 31–45 points: You have (or would have) an average situational perspective as a leader and manager.
• 15–30 points: You rarely take (or would take) a situational perspective as a leader and manager.
Skill Development: For the vast majority of leadership and management assignments, it pays to sharpen your situational perspective. If you scored lower than you want, sharpen your insights into situations by asking yourself, “What are the key factors in this situation that will influence my effectiveness as a leader–manager?” Study both the people and the task in the situation.
156 CHAPTER 5• CONTINGENCY AND SITUATIONAL LEADERSHIP
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
Basics of SLII SLII stems from the original situational model. The major premise of SLII is that the basis for effective leadership is managing the relationship between a leader and a subordinate on a given task. The major concepts of the SLII model are presented in Figure 5-4. According to SLII, effective lea- ders adapt their behavior to the level of commitment and competence of a particular subordinate to complete a given task. For example, team member Tanya might be committed to renting some empty office space by year-end and is also highly skilled at such an activity. Or she might feel that the task is drudgery and not have much skill in selling office space. The combination of the subordinate’s commitment and competence determines his or her developmental level, as follows:
D1—Enthusiastic Beginner. The learner has low competence but high commitment.
D2—Disillusioned Learner. The individual has gained some competence but has been disappointed after having experienced several setbacks. Commitment at this stage is low.
D3—Capable but Cautious Performer. The learner has growing compe- tence, yet commitment is variable.
D4—Self-Reliant Achiever. The learner has high competence and commitment.
S up
po rt
in g
(R el
at io
ns hi
p B
eh av
io rs
)
Directing (Task-Related Behaviors)
S3 Supporting Leadership Style: Low on directing and high on supporting behaviors
D3 Capable but Cautious Performer: Growing competence and variable commitment
S4 Delegating Leadership Style: Low on directing and low on supporting behaviors
D4 Self-Reliant Achiever: Highest level of commitment and competence
S2 Coaching Leadership Style: High on directing and high on supporting behaviors
D2 Disillusioned Learner: Some competence but low commitment
S1 Directing Leadership Style: High on directing and low on supporting behaviors
D1 Enthusiastic Beginner: Low competence but high commitment
© Ce ng ag e Le ar ni ng
FIGURE 5-4 Situational Leadership II (SLII).
SITUATIONAL LEADERSHIP® II (SLII) 157
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
SLII explains that effective leadership depends on two independent behaviors: supporting and directing. (By now, you have read about this dichotomy several times in this chapter as well as in Chapter 4.) Support- ing refers to relationship behaviors such as the leader’s listening, giving recognition, communicating, and encouraging. Directing refers to task- related behaviors such as the leader’s giving careful directions and controlling.
As shown in Figure 5-4, the four basic styles are:
S1—Directing. High directive behavior/low supportive behavior. S2—Coaching. High directive behavior/high supportive behavior. S3—Supporting. Low directive behavior/high supportive behavior. S4—Delegating. Low directive behavior/low supportive behavior.
For best results on a given task, the leader is required to match his or her style to the developmental level of the group member. Each quadrant in Figure 5-4 indicates the desired match between leader style and subordinate development level.
A key point of SLII is that no single style is best: An effective leader uses all four styles depending on the subordinate’s developmental level on a given task.
The most appropriate leadership style among SI to S4 corresponds to the subordinate developmental levels of Dl to D4, respectively: Enthusiastic beginners (Dl) require a directing (SI) leader; disillusioned learners (D2) need a coaching (S2) leader; capable but cautious performers (D3) need a supporting (S3) style of leader; and self-reliant achievers (D4) need a dele- gating (S4) style of leader.
Evaluation of SLII Situational leadership represents a consensus of thinking about leadership behavior in relation to group members: Competent people require less spe- cific direction than do less competent people. The model is also useful because it builds on other explanations of leadership that emphasize the role of task and relationship behaviors. As a result, it has proved to be use- ful as the basis for leadership training. At least 3 million managers have been trained in situational leadership, covering various stages of the model, so we can assume that situational leadership makes sense to managers and companies. The situational model also corroborates common sense and is therefore intuitively appealing. You can benefit from this model by attempt- ing to diagnose the readiness of group members before choosing the right leadership style.
A challenge in applying SLII is that the leader has to stay tuned into which task a group member is performing at a given time and then imple- ment the correct style. Because assignments can change rapidly and group
158 CHAPTER 5• CONTINGENCY AND SITUATIONAL LEADERSHIP
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
members are often working on more than one task in a day, the leader may have to keep shifting styles.
SLII presents categories and guidelines so precisely that it gives the impression of infallibility. In reality, leadership situations are less clear- cut than the four quadrants suggest. Also, the prescriptions for leadership will work only some of the time. For example, many supervisors use a coaching style (S2) with a disillusioned learner (D2) and still achieve poor results. A major concern is that there are few leadership situations in which a high-task, high-relationship orientation does not produce the best results.
Leadership Skill-Building Exercise 5-1 provides you with the opportunity to practice implementing the situational leadership model. The same exercise also supports other contingency and situational models.
The Normative Decision Model
Another contingency viewpoint is that leaders must choose a style that eli- cits the correct degree of group participation when making decisions. Since many of a leader’s interactions with group members involve decision mak- ing, this perspective is sensible. The normative decision model views lead- ership as a decision-making process in which the leader examines certain factors within the situation to determine which decision-making style will be the most effective. Here we present the latest version of the model that has evolved from the work of Victor Vroom and his associates over thirty years, based on research with more than 100,000 managers.16 The models have changed but they all include the basic idea of matching decision- making style to situational factors.
LEADERSHIP SKILL-BUILDING EXERCISE 5-1
Applying Situational Leadership II
You are playing the role of a team leader whose team has been given the responsibility of improving customer service at a consumer electronics megastore. Before jumping into this task, you decide to use SLII. Today, you are going to meet with three team members individ- ually to estimate their developmental level with respect to performing the customer-service-improvement task. You will want to estimate both their competence and
commitment to perform the task. (Three different people will play the role of group members whose readiness is being assessed.) After the brief interviews (about five minutes) are conducted, you will announce which leader- ship style you intend to use with each of the people you interviewed. Class members not directly involved in the role play will offer feedback on how well you assessed the team members’ readiness.
THE NORMATIVE DECISION MODEL 159
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
Decision-Making Styles The normative model (formerly known as the leader–participation model) identifies five decision-making styles, each reflecting a different degree of participation by group members:
1. Decide. The leader makes the decision alone and either announces or sells it to the group. The leader might use expertise in collecting infor- mation from the group or from others who appear to have information relevant to the problem.
2. Consult (Individually). The leader presents the problem to the group members individually, gathers their suggestions, and then makes the decision.
3. Consult (Group). The leader presents the problem to group mem- bers in a meeting, gathers their suggestions, and then makes the decision.
4. Facilitate. The leader presents the problem and then acts as a facil- itator, defining the problem to be solved and the boundaries in which the decision must be made. The leader wants concurrence and avoids having his or her ideas receive more weight based on position power.
5. Delegate. The leader permits the group to make the decision within prescribed limits. Although the leader does not directly intervene in the group’s deliberations unless explicitly asked, he or she works behind the scenes, providing resources and encouragement.
Contingency Factors and Application of the Model The leader diagnoses the situation in terms of seven variables, or contin- gency factors, that contribute to selecting the most appropriate decision- making style. Based on answers to those variables, the leader or manager follows the path through decision matrices to choose one of five decision- making styles. The model has two versions: one when time is critical, and one when a more important consideration is developing group members’ decision-making capabilities. When development of group members receives higher priority, the leader or manager relies more on the group to make a decision even if the process is time consuming.
The situational factors, or problem variables, make the model a contin- gency approach. The decision-making style chosen depends on these factors, which are defined as follows:
Decision Significance: The significance of the decision to the success of the project or organization (significance deals with decision quality).
Importance of Commitment: The importance of team members’ com- mitment to the decision (commitment deals with decision acceptance).
160 CHAPTER 5• CONTINGENCY AND SITUATIONAL LEADERSHIP
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
Leader Expertise: Your knowledge or expertise in relation to the problem. Likelihood of Commitment: The likelihood that the team will commit
itself to a decision you might make on your own. Group Support: The degree to which the team supports the organiza-
tion’s objectives at stake in the problem. Group Expertise: Team members’ knowledge or expertise in relation to
the problem. Team Competence: The ability of the team members to work together in
solving problems.
Accurate answers to these seven situational factors can be challenging to obtain. The leader may have to rely heavily on intuition and also minimize distorted thinking, such as believing he or she has some expertise but in fact does not.
Although applying the model in its true form is complicated and subject to misinterpretation, the take-away from the model provides useful clues about making group versus individual decisions, as follows:17
1. A consultative or collaborative decision-making style is likely to bring about the best results when (a) you need information from others to solve the problem in question, (b) the problem is not clearly defined, (c) team member acceptance of the decision is important, and (d) you have sufficient time to deal with a group decision.
2. A decide decision-making style (making the decision by yourself) is recommended when (a) you have more expertise than the individual group members, (b) you are confident about your ability to make the decision in question, (c) the team will most likely accept your decision, and (d) the time available for decision making is limited.
The normative model provides a valuable service to practicing managers and leaders. It prompts them to ask questions about contingency variables in decision-making situations. At a minimum, the model prompts the leader to reflect on whether to make a group or unilateral decision in relation to an issue of consequence.
Leader–Member Exchange (LMX) and Contingency Theory
Another perspective on the contingency approach is suggested by the leader–member exchange theory. Leaders who adapt their style to different individuals within the group, or have different quality relationships with individual group members, are essentially practicing contingency leader- ship. Hundreds of studies have been conducted about LMX theory. One of the many questionnaires used to measure the quality of the relationship between the leader and the group member is presented in Leadership Self- Assessment Quiz 5-2. Here we present several conclusions from LMX research that suggest a contingency approach to leadership.
LEADER–MEMBER EXCHANGE (LMX) AND CONTINGENCY THEORY 161
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
1. Leaders tend to give members of their in-group more favorable perfor- mance ratings than they give to out-group members, even when their objec- tive performance is the same. This finding reflects the idea that the leader might be kinder toward group members he or she likes.
2. Leaders do not always develop entirely different relationships with each group member, but may respond the same way to a few members of the group. For example, the leader might show equal care and trust for three members of an eight-person team.18
3. In larger groups, there tends to be more differences with respect to leader–member exchanges. As a result, the leader of a large group is more likely to use a slightly different style with various group members, such as being more authoritarian with several of the group members.
LEADERSHIP SELF-ASSESSMENT QUIZ 5-2
Quality of Leader–Member Relations
Instructions: Indicate whether you agree or disagree with each of the following statements in reference to a specific present or former supervisor.
AGREE DISAGREE
1. I like my supervisor very much as a person. □ □
2. I respect my supervisor’s knowledge and competence on the job. □ □
3. My supervisor would defend me to others in the organization if I made a mistake. □ □
4. I am impressed with my supervisor’s knowledge of his or her job. □ □
5. My supervisor is the kind of person one would like to have as a friend. □ □
6. My supervisor is a lot of fun to work with. □ □
7. I do not mind working my hardest for my supervisor. □ □
8. I admire my supervisor’s professional skills. □ □
9. My supervisor would come to my defense if I were “attacked” by others. □ □
10. I am willing to apply extra efforts, beyond those normally required to meet my supervisor’s work goals.
□ □
11. My supervisor defends my work actions to a superior, even without complete knowledge of the issue in question.
□ □
12. I do my work for my supervisor that goes beyond what is specified in my job description. □ □
Scoring and Interpretation: The more of the above statements you agree with, the higher the quality of your leader–member exchange. Agreeing with nine or more statements suggests a high-quality leader–member exchange. Agreeing with between four and eight statements suggests an average quality leader–member exchange. Agreeing with three or fewer suggests a poor-quality leader–member exchange.
Source: Robert Eisenberger et al., “Leader-Member Exchange and Affective Organizational Commitment: The Contribution of Supervisor’s Organizational Embodiment,” Journal of Applied Psychology, November 2010, p. 1091.
162 CHAPTER 5• CONTINGENCY AND SITUATIONAL LEADERSHIP
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
4. A manager is more likely to act as a servant leader toward subordinates with whom he or she has high-quality exchanges.19 As a consequence, in-group members are likely to perceive that they have a leader who is working on their behalf.
5. Leaders are more likely to empower group members with whom they have a high-quality exchange (or good relationship) because they are more likely to trust those members. Research suggests, however, that better results for the organization will be attained if leaders attempt to have high- quality relationships with more group members and empower them at the same time.20
6. Larger differences in leader–member exchanges tend to lead to higher team performance when the LMX-quality median is low (meaning that group members tend to have poor exchanges with the leader). In contrast, when the LMX-quality median is high, differences in leader–member exchanges are not related to team performance. (If most group members feel that they have good exchanges with the leader, being treated a little differently by the leader does not affect their performance.) Similarly, when the LMX-quality median is low, more differentiation in exchanges leads to higher commitment to the group by its members. In contrast, when the LMX-quality median is high, differentiation has no effect on commitment.21
(If you like your exchanges with the leader, your commitment is not affected by his or her different relationships with team mates.)
Leadership During a Crisis
Among the potential crises facing organizations are a drastic revenue decline; pending bankruptcy; homicide in the workplace; scandalous or criminal behavior by executives; natural disasters, such as hurricanes, floods, or earthquakes; nuclear radiation spills; bombings and other terror- ist attacks; and a cruise ship being shipwrecked. Leading during a crisis can be regarded as contingency leadership because the situation demands that the leader emphasize certain behaviors, attitudes, and traits. Crisis leadership is the process of leading group members through a sudden and largely unanticipated, intensely negative, and emotionally draining circum- stance. Robin Kielkowski, vice president of Global Business Continuity with BNY Mellon, observes that leadership is the key ingredient in success- ful crisis management. Effective crisis leadership ensures that a business is prepared before a crisis emerges, and that successfully navigates response and recovery.22
Here we describe nine leadership attributes and behaviors associated with successfully leading an organization or organizational unit through a crisis. Leadership Self-Assessment Quiz 5-3 gives you an opportunity to think through your own tendencies toward being able to lead through a crisis.
LEADERSHIP DURING A CRISIS 163
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
Be Decisive The best-accepted principle of crisis leadership is that the leader should take decisive action to remedy the situation. The graver the crisis, the less time the leader has to consult a wide array of people. After the plan is formulated, it should be widely communicated to help reassure group members that something concrete is being done about the predica- ment. After their physical facilities were destroyed in the terrorist attacks on the World Trade Center on September 11, 2001, several leaders announced the next day that their firms would move to nearby backup loca- tions. Communicating plans helps reduce uncertainty about what is happen- ing to the firm and the people in it. A leader who takes highly visible action to deal with a crisis is likely to be viewed as competent.
A corollary of being decisive during a crisis is not to be indecisive or to hide from the crisis in its midst. The first phase of crisis leadership is to
LEADERSHIP SELF-ASSESSMENT QUIZ 5-3
Checklist for Crisis Leadership
Instructions: Indicate whether you agree or disagree with each of the following statements in reference to dealing with a work-related crisis.
AGREE DISAGREE
1. I can make decisions and recommendations although under extreme time pressures. □ □
2. I stay composed when I have to deal with an urgent problem that is suddenly facing me. □ □
3. I almost never choke under pressure. □ □
4. When the pressure is heavy, I can give clear direction to other people. □ □
5. When someone else is facing a very difficult situation, I am reassuring and helpful. □ □
6. When faced with an emergency, I can make a good decision even without all the facts I need.
□ □
7. When facing a major problem, I quickly get the input from people who might have useful suggestions for dealing with the problem.
□ □
8. If I am faced with a real mess that is mostly or partly my responsibility, I tell the truth about what happened.
□ □
9. When faced with an overwhelming problem, I can usually imagine what can be done to find a solution.
□ □
10. I can change my usual work activities immediately to take care of an urgent need. □ □
Scoring and Interpretation: The more of the above statements you agree with, the stronger your tendencies for being an effective crisis leader. Agreeing with eight or more statements suggests (and your perception is accurate) high ability to deal with and lead others through a crisis. Agreeing with between three and seven statements sug- gests an average degree of crisis leadership ability. Agreeing with two or fewer statements suggests a limited ability right now to lead others through a crisis.
Source: Statements 1 and 10 are adapted from Constance Noonan Hadley, Todd L. Pittinsky, S. Amy Sommer, and Weichun Zhu, “Measuring the Efficacy of Leaders to Assess Information and Make Decision in a Crisis: The C-LEAD Scale,” The Leadership Quarterly, August 2011, p. 638.
164 CHAPTER 5• CONTINGENCY AND SITUATIONAL LEADERSHIP
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
stabilize the emergency situation and buy time.23 Suppose, for example, that five key managers leave the company at the same time to join a competitor, and only one in-house replacement is available. To deal with the emergency, the CEO might hire four managers from an employment agency that specia- lizes in providing temporary managers and professionals. The next step would be to prepare other company personnel to replace managers who quit in the near future.
Being decisive in response to a crisis also includes communicating widely the plans for resolving the problems that created the crisis, assuming that the organization had some responsibility for the crisis. Announcing these plans appeared to give many employees hope for better times ahead.
Another component of decisiveness is to avoid the fear of failure that can prevent taking the necessary action to exit the crisis. Chris Warner and Don Schmincke, authors of High Altitude Leadership, advise leaders that fear is the ultimate strategy killer. “It stops staff from making great decisions, stops change agents from disrupting the status quo, and stops leaders from leading.”24 The decision of Alan Mullaly at Ford to bring back the defunct Taurus model is a good example of avoiding the fear of failure. Ford offi- cials had discontinued the Taurus because of declining sales, but Mullaly thought the former popularity of the model warranted bringing it back to the public.
Lead with Compassion Displaying compassion with the concerns, anxieties, and frustrations of group members is a key interpersonal skill for crisis leadership. The type of compassionate leadership that brings about organi- zational healing involves taking some form of public action that eases pain and inspires others to act as well. Compassionate leadership encompasses two related sets of actions. The first is to create an environment in which affected workers can freely discuss how they feel, such as a group meeting to talk about the crisis or disaster. The second is to create an environment in which the workers who experience or witness pain can find a method to alleviate their own suffering and that of others. The leader might establish a special fund to help the families of workers who were victims of the disas- ter or give workers the opportunity to receive grief counseling.
Another way to display compassion is for the leader to make personal sacrifices before asking others to make sacrifices to get through the crisis.25
During a financial crisis facing an organization, many leaders have volun- tarily taken a pay cut before mandating a salary reduction for others. An extreme approach is for the CEO of a troubled company to ask the board for an annual salary of $1.00 until the company is again profitable. (Skeptics will point out that executives who take the $1.00 annual salary usually receive generous stock options.)
Think Strategically (See the Big Picture) A success factor for the leader of an organization or a key organizational unit is to think strategically, including seeing the big picture. During an organizational crisis, this cognitive skill increases in importance because subordinates may become so mired in the
LEADERSHIP DURING A CRISIS 165
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
crisis that they see no way out. The effective crisis leader helps the group understand that conditions will soon change for the better. A group of researchers headed by Leslie A. DeChurch used measures of historical events (or historiometric analysis) to elucidate the aspects of leadership essential in extreme contexts. Critical incidents, or key activities, taking place during the crisis situation were also studied. Published reports of events, including newspapers and books, constituted the qualitative data in this type of analysis. These extreme situations included responding to the aftermaths of natural disasters and orchestrating post-war stability, support, transition, and reconstruction efforts.
As described in the study, multiteam systems are situations in which the leader orchestrates events beyond the individual and single team level but less than the total organization. The teams work together in a network fash- ion, such as teams of firefighters dealing with a burning apartment build- ing. One category of multiteam systems studied was disaster response systems. The primary objectives of a disaster response system include immediate actions to save lives, protect property and the environment, and meet human needs. A disaster response system would be called for in response to an event such as Hurricane Katrina.
Another category of multiteam systems studied was provincial recon- struction teams, or joint civilian–military systems designed to deliver aid and assist local communities in post-war reconstruction projects. At the same time, security is provided for the workers involved in the projects. The ability to reduce terrorism and build local communities and their gov- ernments (such as in Afghanistan and Iraq) is contingent upon the success of these teams.
A major finding of the historical analysis of leadership events was that the leadership function of strategy was important in dealing with the crisis event. One aspect of strategy relevant here was labeled analyze the situation/ mission analysis. It involves such action as gathering information, analyzing what is going on, determining constraints, and defining the problem. Another aspect of strategy uncovered that is relevant here was understand- ing the big picture. It involves the integration of gathered information in such a way that an understanding of the multiteam system’s place in the system is achieved.26 Understanding how the component teams fit into the system is also part of understanding the big picture.
Reestablish the Usual Work Routine A temporary drop in performance and productivity is almost inevitable for most workers after disaster strikes, such as an earthquake or terrorist attack—even if the organization was not directly affected.
Although it may appear callous and counterintuitive, the leader should emphasize the temporary nature of the performance decline. An effective way of helping people deal with a workplace crisis is to encourage them to return to their regular work. It is important for workers to express their feelings about the crisis before refocusing on work, but once they have,
166 CHAPTER 5• CONTINGENCY AND SITUATIONAL LEADERSHIP
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
returning to work helps ground them in reality and restores purpose to their lives. Randall Marshall, director of trauma studies for the New York State Office of Mental Health, said after 9/11, “A healthy response to this type of situation is to get back into a routine.”27
Avoid a Circle-the-Wagons Mentality One of the worst ways to lead a group through a crisis is to strongly defend yourself against your critics or deny wrongdoing. The same denial approach is referred to as maintaining a bun- ker mentality or stonewalling the problem. Instead of cooperating with other stakeholders in the crisis, the leader takes a defensive posture. A case in point is how U.S. interior secretary Ken Salazar dealt with one aspect of the disastrous BP oil spill in the Gulf of Mexico in 2009. Part of the problem had been attributed to a too-friendly relationship between the Minerals Management Service and oil companies, which might have resulted in non- rigorous inspections of oil drilling. Instead of denying that problems existed at the Minerals Management Service, Salazar quickly reorganized the government unit with a new name: Bureau of Ocean Energy Management, Regulation, and Enforcement. Stricter ethical standards were also imposed to show that the new agency would act more independently in inspecting oil-drilling equipment and processes.28
Display Optimism Pessimists abound in every crisis, so an optimistic leader can help energize group members to overcome the bad times. The effective crisis leader draws action plans that give people hope for a better future (as in strategic thinking). Barbara Baker Clark contends that the role of a leader during a crisis is to encourage hopefulness. She states:
I’m not saying that you have to plaster a stupid grin on your face even if the bottom line is tanking or people are dying in battle. I am saying don’t wallow in pessimism. Believe it or not, it matters to your employees that you remain reasonably optimistic. It will reduce anxiety and keep everyone motivated. That’s the power of leadership.29
Prevent the Crisis Through Disaster Planning The ideal form of crisis leadership is to prevent a crisis through disaster planning. A key part of planning for a physical disaster, for example, is to anticipate where you would go, how you would get in touch with employees, and where you might set up a tempo- rary workplace. Having a list of backup vendors in case they are hit by a physical disaster is also important. Small business owners should be net- working with other business owners and agree to assist each other if a crisis strikes. Arranging in advance for support groups, such as grief counselors, is another key element of disaster planning. Even the fact of letting employees know that a disaster plan is in place can be an effective leadership act because it may lower worker anxiety. Also, the leader might communicate that the company has purchased disaster insurance.
The Deepwater Horizon oil spill disaster was attributed, in part, to inade- quate disaster plans. Former BP executive Tony Hayward said it was
LEADERSHIP DURING A CRISIS 167
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
probably true that the company didn’t do enough planning in advance of the disaster. He said that “There are some capabilities that we could have avail- able to deploy instantly rather than creating as we go.” Apparently, BP was not prepared for the long-term, round-the-clock process of coping with a deep-sea spill.30
Stay Calm and Provide Stable Performance Effective leaders stay calm and are steady performers, even under heavy workloads and uncertain conditions. Remaining steady under crisis conditions contributes to effectiveness because it helps team members cope with the situation. When the leader remains calm, group members are reassured that things will work out. Sta- bility also helps the managerial leader appear professional and cool under pressure. A representative example is Fréderic Oudén, the chairman and chief executive officer of Société Générale. One of the major crises faced by this French banking giant were the stock market plunge in 2008, followed by a stock market scandal that cost the bank $7 billion (U.S.). Another crisis took place in 2011 when rumors arose that the bank had lost its liquidity as the Greek debt crisis swept Europe. Oudén says that the key to dealing with crisis of this magnitude is to remain calm, and manage your stress. Further- more, to avoid creating useless turbulence, you must create a process to help the teams organize themselves to make the right decisions at the right time.31
Be a Transformational Leader During times of large and enduring crisis, transformational leadership may be the intervention of choice. The transfor- mational leader can often lead the organization out of its misery. Transfor- mational leadership is likely to benefit the troubled organization both in dealing with the immediate crisis and in performing better in the long run. David Novak, the CEO of Yum! Brands (which includes KFC, Taco Bell, Pizza Hut, and Long John Silver’s), has seen his share of crisis, including vermin infestation in a restaurant that was broadcast on television and You- Tube. He says that honesty, consistency, and continuity of communication is the key to managing through these issues and that the transformation may take six to nine months.32
Another way a transformational leader helps a company or work unit cope with crisis is to establish a climate of trust long before a crisis strikes.33
If workers and other shareholders trust the leader, they will take more seri- ously his or her directives during the crisis. Leaders at both Walmart and McDonald’s did a notable job of holding their work force together after Hurricane Katrina. Executives and store managers alike scrambled to get in touch with employees to assure them that they would all have their jobs back as soon as operations were up and running. In general, workers in the Gulf Coast area had trusted leadership at the two companies.
The Leader in Action profiles suggest a leader in a well-known company who practices contingency management, in general, and is facing a situa- tion approaching the need for crisis leadership.
168 CHAPTER 5• CONTINGENCY AND SITUATIONAL LEADERSHIP
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
Evidence-Based Leadership for the Contingency and Situational Approach
A leading-edge way for a person to practice contingency leadership would be to look for research-based evidence about the best way to deal with a given situation. Before taking action, the leader would ask, “What does the research literature tell me is most likely to work in this situation?”
LEADER IN ACTION
Sandra E. Peterson, Group Worldwide Chairman of the Johnson & Johnson Consumer Health Unit
In 2012, the Johnson & Johnson consumer health unit that manufactures and sells such household brands as Band Aid and Tylenol was really hurting. A series of forty-eight product recalls had cost the consumer unit about $1.6 billion in lost sales. Among the problems necessitating the recalls were metal shavings floating in some bottles, incorrect levels of certain ingredients, and bad odors. To help remedy these problems, the Johnson & Johnson board, including the com- pany CEO decided to bring in an outsider.
Sandra A. Peterson, the person chosen for this posi- tion as the group worldwide chairwoman (officially “chair- man”), was given the responsibility of overseeing consumer companies, information technology, and the global supply chain. Prior to this position, she was the chairwoman and chief executive of Bayer CropScience, a division of the German pharmaceutical company, Bayer. Upon recruiting Peterson, Alex Gorsky, the John- son & Johnson chief executive said, “Sandi Peterson is an experienced global leader known for her strategic thinking and proven track record in growing businesses. She brings 25 years of experience to her new role, which will draw on her expertise in building fully integrated global businesses, and focusing on growth.”
As Peterson dug into her new position, she knew that the company was planning to make numerous upgrades in factories producing consumer health products, includ- ing rebuilding a factory that produces liquid children’s medicines such as Tylenol. The same factories had to undergo more frequent inspections under a consent decree with the U.S. Food and Drug Administration. Many people thought that Peterson’s distinguished
career and stable leadership and management approach would give her the credibility needed to bring about these substantial changes.
Peterson received a BA in government from Cornell University and an MPA in applied economics from Princeton University. Prior to joining Bayer, she held several leader- ship roles at Medco Health Solutions and had been in charge of research and development, quality, and regula- tory affairs and procurement at Nabisco, Inc. She also worked in strategy, finance, and product development at Whirlpool Corp., and began her career as a consultant at McKinsey & Company Inc.
QUESTIONS
1. Which aspect of Peterson’s leadership experiences do you think will enhance her ability to practice con- tingency management and leadership?
2. Why might her position at the consumer unit of Johnson & Johnson call for skills in crisis leadership?
3. Check media sources to see if Peterson has been suc- cessful in her leadership role at Johnson & Johnson.
Source: Original story based on facts and observations in the following sources: Ed Silverman, “J & J Hires Bayer Exec to Oversee Troubled Units,” Pharmalot (www.pharmalive.com), September 13, 2012, pp. 1–4; Katie Thomas, “J. & J. Names Outsider to Rut Its Troubled Con- sumer Unit,” The New York Times (www.nytimes.com), September 13, 2012, pp. 1–2; Jonathan D. Rockoff and Joann S. Lublin, “J & J Recruits Bayer Executive,” The Wall Street Journal, September 14, 2012, p. B3; Linda A. Johnson, “J & J Taps Bayer Exec for New Post Over 3 Divisions,” The Associated Press, September 13, 2009; “Man- agement Team: Sandra E. Peterson,” (www.investor.jnj.com/), Johnson & Johnson Services, Inc. 1997–2013, p. 1.
EVIDENCE-BASED LEADERSHIP FOR THE CONTINGENCY AND SITUATIONAL APPROACH 169
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
READER’S ROADMAP
Evidence-based leadership or management is an approach whereby man- agers translate principles based on best evidence into organizational prac- tices.34 Quite often the best evidence is empirical (based on experience) and recent. Yet, at times, old principles can still be useful. For example, it has been known for at least a century that when a manager has too many subor- dinates, coordinating the work of subordinates is difficult. The alternative to evidence-based leadership is to rely heavily on common sense and adopting practices used by other companies, whether or not they fit a particular situ- ation. Many of the principles and suggestions presented throughout this text would help a manager practice evidence-based leadership.
An example of using evidence-based leadership follows: Research indicates that empowerment is more likely to succeed with group members whose cul- tural values favor a manager or leader sharing power. In contrast, empower- ment is less likely to succeed when the group members expect the leader to retain most of the power. (See Chapter 14 for the evidence.) In this example, a principle (empowerment works best when cultural values are compatible) is translated into practice (using empowerment to motivate and satisfy workers when the cultural values of the workers are compatible with empowerment).
An example of using evidence-based leadership stemming from the expe- rience of managers is to regularly express thanks for a job well done.35 The thank you can be expressed orally or in writing and should focus on some- thing specific the person has accomplished such as, “Your tracking down of potential candidates for our opening by using the social media produced four good prospects. Thanks so much for lending your expertise.”
Evidence-based leadership and management is not yet widely practiced, but taking the study of leadership and management seriously will move man- agers and organizations toward basing their practices and decisions on valid evidence. The result is likely to be more precise contingency leadership.
So far in this book, we have examined the nature of leadership, the inner qualities of leaders, and leadership styles, including contingency leadership. In the next chapter, we focus on a topic that incorporates many of these ideas: leadership ethics and social responsibility.
SUMMARY
Theories of contingency and situational leadership build on the study of leadership style by adding more specific guidelines about which style to use under which circumstances. Leaders are most effective
when they make their behavior contingent on situa- tional forces, including group member characteristics. Organizational effectiveness is affected by situational factors not under the leader’s control. Situations shape
170 CHAPTER 5• CONTINGENCY AND SITUATIONAL LEADERSHIP
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
how leaders behave, and they also influence the con- sequences of leader behavior.
Fiedler’s contingency theory states that the best style of leadership is determined by the leader’s work situation. Style, in Fiedler’s theory, is measured by the LPC scale. If you have a reason- ably positive attitude toward your LPC, you are relationship motivated. You are task motivated if your attitude is negative. Situational control, or favorability, is measured by a combination of the quality of leader–member relations, the degree of task structure, and the leader’s position power.
The key proposition of Fiedler’s theory is that in situations of high control or low control, leaders with a task-motivated style are more effective. In a situation of moderate control, a relationship- motivated style works better. Leaders can improve situational control by modifying leader–member relations, task structure, and position power.
The path-goal theory of leadership effectiveness specifies what the leader must do to achieve high productivity and morale in a given situation. The major proposition of the theory is that the man- ager should choose a leadership style that takes into account the characteristics of the group mem- bers and the demands of the task. Initiating struc- ture by the leader works best when the group faces an ambiguous task. Effective leaders clarify the paths to attaining goals, help group members progress along these paths, and remove barriers to goal attainment. Leaders must choose a style that best fits the two sets of contingency factors— the characteristics of the subordinates and the tasks. The four styles in path-goal theory are direc- tive, supportive, participative, and achievement oriented.
SLII, developed by Blanchard, explains how to match leadership style to the capabilities of group members on a given task. The combination of the subordinate’s commitment and competence deter- mines the four developmental levels: enthusiastic beginner, disillusioned learner, capable but cau- tious performer, and self-reliant achiever. The
model classifies leadership style according to the relative amounts of supporting and directing the leader engages in. The four styles are different com- binations of task and relationship behavior, both rated as high versus low: directing, coaching, sup- porting, and delegating. The most appropriate lead- ership style corresponds to the subordinate developmental levels. For example, enthusiastic beginners require a directing leader.
The normative decision model explains that leadership is a decision-making process. A leader examines certain contingency factors in the situation to determine which decision-making style will be the most effective in either a time- driven or developmental situation. The model defines five decision-making styles: two individual styles and three group styles. By answering a series of seven diagnostic questions in a matrix, the manager follows the path to a recommended decision style. The most important take-away from the model is to know when to consult with the group versus making an independent decision.
Leader–member exchange theory provides some insights into contingency leadership. LMX influ- ences such factors as the favorability of perfor- mance ratings, which group member receives servant leadership, extent of empowerment, and team member performance.
Leading others through a crisis can be consid- ered a form of contingency leadership because the leader adapts his or her style to the situation. In a crisis, leaders should (a) be decisive, (b) lead with compassion, (c) think strategically, (d) reestablish the usual work routine, (e) avoid a circle-the- wagons mentality, (f) display optimism, (g) prevent the crisis through disaster planning, (h) provide stable performance, and (i) be a transformational leader.
A leading-edge way for a person to practice con- tingency leadership would be to look for research- based evidence about the best way to deal with a given situation. This approach means using evidence-based leadership or management.
SUMMARY 171
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
KEY TERMS
contingency approach to leadership 146
path-goal theory 151
Situational Leadership II (SLII) 155
normative decision model 159
crisis leadership 163 evidence-based leadership or
management 170
GUIDELINES FOR ACTION AND SKILL DEVELOPMENT
1. A major contingency factor for a team or group leader is the talent and motivation of the individual being led. Although talented and well-motivated workers may not require close monitoring of their efforts, they still require encouragement and recognition to sustain high performance. Otherwise, the leader has very little impact on their performance or their intention to stay a member of the team or group.
2. When practicing the leader–member exchange theory of leadership by forming unique relationships with members of the group, it is important to minimize the potential unintended negative consequences of this type of leadership. For morale purposes, it is important to avoid establishing favorites or pets in the group, and having only superficial, mechanical relationships with other group members.
3. A subtle way of practicing contingency leadership is to adapt to times that may have changed in terms of the demands of your leadership position. You have to fine-tune your leadership approach to meet the new circumstances. Assume that hospital administrator Maggie has held her position for ten years. According to her perception of her role, the focus of her leadership would be to inspire her staff toward doing what is best for patient care. Yet her role has now changed. Focusing on what is good for patients still receives high priority, yet Maggie has to emotionally accept the reality that finding ways to inspire her group to reduce the cost of operating the hospital has become a
key part of her leadership and management role.
Discussion Questions and Activities
1. What relevance might contingency leadership have for dealing with (a) men versus women, and (b) old versus young?
2. Describe how it might be possible for a man- ager to be charismatic yet also practice contin- gency leadership.
3. Identify a personality trait you think would help a manager function as a contingency leader. Also identify a trait you think might detract from a manager’s ability to function as a contingency leader.
4. How might a leader modify the clothing he or she wore to different work situations to help practice contingency leadership?
5. How would a manager know which variables in a given situation should influence which approach to leadership he or she should take?
6. Which of the four path-goal styles do you think would be the best for managing a group of soft- ware engineers? Justify your answer.
7. To what extent do you think that battlefield experience would help a person become an effective crisis leader in a business situation?
8. Why are both a task emphasis and a relation- ship emphasis often necessary to get a group through a crisis, such as a hurricane having destroyed a company facility?
9. To what extent do you think most business lea- ders will ever use experience-based leadership or management?
10. In what way do effective teachers practice con- tingency leadership?
172 CHAPTER 5• CONTINGENCY AND SITUATIONAL LEADERSHIP
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
LEADERSHIP CASE PROBLEM A
Supervisory Styles at the Red Rascal
Jessica Perez is the manager of a thriving Red Rascal Restaurant, a chain of several hundred mod- erately priced restaurants throughout the country. Jessica recently returned from a regional conference in which she was informed about a new program of recruiting several developmentally disabled workers to work at each restaurant. The restaurants would work closely with local institutions that provided vocational training for individuals who are intellec- tually challenged. In many of the communities, these institutions coordinate their effort with both psychology and special education departments at local colleges.
The developmentally disabled workers would be hired into basic positions that fit their capabilities, such as salad chefs, bakers, dishwashing machine attendants, and custodial workers. Restaurant (store) managers would receive training into how to optimize the capabilities of developmentally dis- abled workers, as well as how to motivate or disci- pline the workers as needed.
Three months after the program was launched, Jessica’s branch had hired three developmentally disabled young adults, all assigned jobs within the kitchen. Jessica spent a little time coaching her kitchen supervisors about supervising developmen- tally disabled workers. She emphasized the impor- tance of providing clear, uncomplicated directions, and not overwhelming these workers by changing their assignments frequently. As instructed at regional headquarters, Jessica also explained the need to provide positive feedback and encourage- ment to the intellectually challenged recruits.
The program of hiring a few developmentally dis- abled kitchen workers appeared to be going generally
well at the Red Rascal. No particular problems with the food prepared by the new workers were found, food preparation was not delayed, and their attendance was satisfactory. Yet as Jessica listened to several of the restaurant associates, the wait staff and kitchen staff included, she heard some grumbling. Head chef Tammy expressed her concerns in these terms: “I’m not exactly sure why this is happening, but these days my supervisor is treating me like I’m 10 years old. She’s so condescending, and she tells me what she wants done in tiny details. I asked Mindy (the supervisor) to taste a new salad dressing I prepared. She told me, ‘Tammy, I’m so proud of you. You did a great job.’ I mean, she’s acting like I’m stupid or something.”
Kurt, the host, made a similar comment about Jessica. He said, “All of a sudden you’re treating me as if I’m a little slow. You made such a fuss just because my shoes were shined and my shirt was wrinkle free. Are you forgetting that I’m not developmentally challenged?”
Mindy began to think that maybe there were some supervisory style problems at the Red Rascal.
Questions
1. What does the restaurant scenario presented above have to do with contingency leadership?
2. In what ways might Jessica and the supervisors modify their leadership styles to adapt to the differences in intellectual levels of the Red Rascal staff?
3. What is the problem with the kitchen staff and wait staff at the Red Rascal? Should not all workers receive careful instructions, feedback, and encouragement?
ASSOCIATED ROLE PLAY One student plays the role of a supervisor whose responsibility is to show a developmentally chal- lenged recruit how to prepare a salad in a giant bowl, that will then be divided into single-portion salads as needed.
Another student plays the role of the twenty- year-old recruit who has never previously pre- pared food. Observers should be particularly cog- nizant if the supervisor is using an effective leadership style.
LEADERSHIP CASE PROBLEM A 173
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
LEADERSHIP CASE PROBLEM B
Metal Recycling Executive Attempts to Salvage Martha Stewart Living
For several years, Martha Stewart Living Omnia- media Inc. (MSLO) had been losing money as a media company despite the fame of company founder Martha Stewart. As a result, company management decided to recast itself a merchandis- ing company, particularly because of its former success in home-décor retailing.
The company had also been involved in a pro- longed lawsuit between retail chains Macy’s and J.C. Penny Co. Macy’s filed suit because it contended that it had the exclusive right to sell Martha Stewart branded merchandise in certain categories, including bedding and cookware. However, Martha Stewart Liv- ing also signed an agreement with Macy’s competitor J.C. Penney. As part of the settlement, Martha Stewart Living shortened by four years, the length of its con- tract with J.C. Penney. Also, J.C. Penney agreed not sell certain Martha Stewart products, such as bed and bath products, but would sell others including lighting and rugs.
During these troubled times, MSLO decided to appoint board member Daniel Dienst as Chief Executive Officer (CEO) of the company. Dienst was a metal industry veteran who had recently been CEDO of Sims Metal Management, the largest metal recycler in North America. Dienst had turn- around experience in the metals industry, plus cor- porate finance experience from positions he held on Wall Street.
Upon joining MSLO, Dienst said, “I have long been a fan of Martha Stewart, the person and the brand, and believe there is enormous untapped opportunity for this organization and a terrific base of talented people to help us realize that opportunity.” He also mentioned that the company had already embarked on a turnaround plan that is
expected to produce good results quickly. Dienst also said, “I look forward to rolling up my sleeves, getting to work, and helping write the next few chapters of this remarkable Company’s story.”
During the ten years previous to Dienst, six dif- ferent people served as CEO of MSLO. Other senior executives have departed also, often because they clashed with Martha Stewart, the company founder and nonexecutive chairman.
Questions
1. To what extent do you think Dan Dienst was facing a crisis leadership situation when he was appointed the CEO of the Martha Stewart company?
2. So what leadership steps should Dienst take to begin “rolling up his sleeves?”
3. What steps do you recommend that Dienst take to avoid becoming another senior executive who departs the company?
4. What situational factors might make running a media and merchandise business quite differ- ent from running a metal recycling company?
5. Based on current media reports, how success- ful has Dienst been in turning around MSLO?
Source: Original case based on facts and observations pre- sented in the following sources: TNM Staff, “Metal Recy- cling Executive Becomes New CEO Of Martha Stewart Living Omnimedia,” Talking News Media (www.talking newsmedia.com), October 29, 2013, pp. 1–4; Jeffrey A. Trachtenberg, “Martha Stewart’s New CEO Is a Scrap- Metal Expert,” The Wall Street Journal, October 29, 2013, pp. B1–B2; Crayton Harrison and Sarah Frier, “Martha Stewart Appointment of Dienst as CEO Signals Cuts,” Bloomberg (www. Bloomberg.com), October 29, 2013, pp. 1–2.
ASSOCIATED ROLE PLAY One student plays the role of Daniel Dienst, the new CEO of MSLO. Wanting to avoid being scrapped within one year, Dienst takes the initiative to ask why so many senior executives preceding him have
left the company. He is concerned that Stewart might be a domineering personality who likes to micromanage her senior executives. Dienst schedules a lunch with Stewart at a high-class restaurant to
174 CHAPTER 5• CONTINGENCY AND SITUATIONAL LEADERSHIP
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
NOTES
discuss the situation. Stewart recognizes that she is a household name and believes that her charm, creativ- ity, and superior leadership skills make her an
excellent boss for any executive who can obtain good business results. Observers will provide feedback as to whether the meeting has been productive.
LEADERSHIP SKILL-BUILDING EXERCISE 5-2
My Leadership Portfolio
For this chapter entry in your leadership portfolio, visualize two different leadership scenarios that you witnessed directly, read about, or saw on television or in a movie. Think through how you would have used a different leadership approach for each one if you had been the leader. To illustrate, suppose you had passed a construction site for a skyscraper and noticed that the crane operator seemed confident and competent. You might conclude, “In this situa- tion, I would have used a delegating style of leadership
with the crane operator because she was so self- sufficient. Yet I would still have given her some rec- ognition for a job well done at the end of her shift.”
Another scenario might be that you witnessed a bloody fight at a professional hockey match. You might conclude, “In this situation, I would be as directive as possible. I would suspend and fine the players, with no room for negotiation. Decisive action must be taken to quell violence in profes- sional sports.”
LEADERSHIP SKILL-BUILDING EXERCISE 5-3
Crisis Leadership
Working in a small group, find a crisis that a busi- ness or not-for-profit organization is facing these days. Examples would include a pharmaceutical firm needing to recall an over-the-counter medicine that has triggered illnesses in hundreds of consu- mers, or an investment banking firm in which
several key executives have been accused of insider trading. After agreeing on which crisis to tackle, develop a list of suggestions on how the CEO should deal with the situation. Use several ideas from the section about crisis leadership presented in this chapter to help you develop an action plan.
1. Original story based on facts and observations in the following sources: Anne VanderMey, “Detroit’s Benevolent Dictator,” CNNMoney, (http://features.blogs.fortune.com), July 23, 2013, pp. 1–2; Allysia Finley, “How Detroit Can Rise Again,” The Wall Street Journal, August 3–4, 2013, p. A11; Daniel Howes, “Status Quo Won’t Avoid Bankruptcy,” detroitnews.com, October 18, 2013, pp. 1–3; Matt Wirz and Emily Glazer, “European Banks Hold Out on Detroit,” The Wall Street Journal, October 3, 2013, pp. C1, C4.
2. “Surprising and Effective Cure for Today’s Biggest Workplace Crisis,” Executive Focus, September 2004, p. 21.
3. Victor H. Vroom and Arthur G. Jago, “The Role of the Situation in Leadership,” American Psychologist, January 2007, pp. 6–16.
4. Henry Mintzberg, Managing (San Francisco: Berrett-Koehler Publishers, 2009), pp. 106–107.
5. Cited in Karen Barrow, “Mindfulness Lets Leaders See More Possibilities,” Democrat and Chronicle (Rochester, New York), January 18, 2009, p. 2E.
NOTES 175
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
6. For a synthesis of contingency theory by one of its key researchers, see Martin M. Chemers, An Integrative Theory of Leadership (Mahwah, N.J.: Erlbaum, 1997), pp. 2838. See also Bernard M. Bass (with Ruth Bass), The Bass Handbook of Leadership: Theory, Research, and Managerial Applications, Fourth Edition (New York: The Free Press, 2008), pp. 522–527.
7. Vroom and Jago, “The Role of the Situation,” p. 20.
8. Robert J. House, “A Path-Goal Theory of Leader Effectiveness,” Administrative Science Quarterly, September 1971, pp. 321–328; Robert T. Keller, “A Test of the Path-Goal Theory with Need for Clarity as a Moderator in Research and Development Organizations,” Journal of Applied Psychology, April 1989, pp. 208–212; Robert J. House and Terence R. Mitchell, “Path-Goal Theory of Leadership,” Journal of Contemporary Business, Autumn 1974, pp. 81–97.
9. Vroom and Jago, “The Role of the Situation,” p. 20.
10. Robert House, “Path-Goal Theory of Leadership: Lessons, Legacy, and a Reformulated Theory,” Leadership Quarterly, vol. 7, no. 3, 1996, p. 348.
11. Quoted in Jeff Bercovici, “The Power of the Packers: How Tiny Green Bay Became the NFL’s Most Improbable Financial Juggernaut,” Forbes, September 20, 2011, p. 90.
12. “Packers’ CEO Conveys Keys to Leadership Success,” University of Wisconsin-Parkside (http://www.uwp.edu/explore/media/), April 5, 2013, p. 1.
13. House and Mitchell, “Path-Goal Theory,” p. 84; Bass, The Bass Handbook of Leadership, pp. 804–811.
14. Chemers, An Integrative Theory of Leadership, p. 48.
15. Kenneth H. Blanchard, David Zigarmi, and Robert Nelson, “Situational Leadership After 25 Years: A Retrospective,” Journal of Leadership Studies, vol. 1, 1993, pp. 22–26; Kenneth Blanchard and Robert Nelson, “Recognition and Reward,” Executive Excellence, vol. 14, no. 4, 1997, p. 15; “Building Materials Leader Builds Better Leaders,” kenblanchard.com/casestudies/certainteed.pdf, accessed November 26, 2004.
16. Victor H. Vroom, “Leadership and the Decision- Making Process,” Organizational Dynamics,
vol. 28, Spring 2000, pp. 82–93; Victor H. Vroom, “Educating Managers in Decision Making and Leadership,” Management Decision, vol. 10, 2003, pp. 968–978.
17. “The Vroom-Yetton-Jago Decision Model: Deciding How to Decide,” Mind Tools (www.mindtools.com), Mind Tools Ltd, 1996–2013.
18. The first two statements are based on Li Ma and Qing Qu, “Differentiation in Leader- Member Exchange: A Hierarchical Linear Modeling Approach,” Leadership Quarterly, October 2010, pp. 733–744.
19. The second two statements are based David J. Henderson, Robert C. Liden, Brian C. Glibkowski, and Anjali Chaudrhy, “LMX Differentiation: A Multilevel Review and Examination of Its Antecedents,” Leadership Quarterly, August 2009, pp. 517–534.
20. Kenneth J. Harris, Anthony R. Wheeler, and K. Michele Kacmar, “Leader-Member Exchange and Empowerment: Direct and Interactive Effects on Job Satisfaction, Turnover Intentions, and Performance,” Leadership Quarterly, June 2009, p. 399.
21. Pascale M. Le Blanc and Vicente Gonzalez- Roma, “A Team Level Investigation of the Relationship Between Leader-Member Exchange (LMX), and Commitment and Performance,” The Leadership Quarterly, June 2012, pp. 534–554.
22. Robin Kielkowski, “Leadership During a Crisis,” Journal of Leadership Studies, no. 3, 2013, p. 65.
23. Ronald Heifetz, Alexander Grashow, and Marty Linsky, “Leadership in a (Permanent) Crisis,” Harvard Business Review, July–August 2009, p. 64.
24. Chris Warner and Don Schmincke, High Altitude Leadership: What the World’s Forbidding Techniques Teach Us About Success (San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 2009), p. 6.
25. Observation of Bill George reported in Alan Murray, The Wall Street Journal Essential Guide to Management (New York: Harper Business, 2010), p. 18.
26. Leslie A. DeChurch, C. Shawn Burke, Marissa. L. Shuffler, Rebecca Lyons, Daniel Doty, and Eduardo Salas, “A Historiometric Analysis of Leadership in Mission Critical Multiteam Environments,” The Leadership Quarterly, February 2011, pp. 152–169.
176 CHAPTER 5• CONTINGENCY AND SITUATIONAL LEADERSHIP
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
27. Suzanne Koudsi, “How to Cope with Tragedy,” Fortune, October 1, 2001, p. 34.
28. Neil Simon, “Crisis Management: Department of Interior, Department of Labor,” Hispanic Business, October 2010, p. 43.
29. Barbara Baker Clark, “Leadership During a Crisis,” Executive Leadership, December 2001, p. 8.
30. Quoted in Ben Casselman and Guy Chazan, “Disaster Plans Lacking at Deep Rigs,” The Wall Street Journal, May 18, 2010, p. 1A.
31. “Lead in the 21st Century: An Interview with Société Générale’s Frédéric Oudéa,” www .mckinsey.com, November 2013, p. 1.
32. Jia Lynn Yang, “A Recipe for Consistency,” Fortune, October 29, 2007, p. 58.
33. Erika Hayes James and Lynn Perry Wooten, “How to Display Competence in Times of Crisis,” Organizational Dynamics, vol. 34, no. 2, 2005, p. 146.
34. Demis M. Rousseau, “Presidential Address: Is There Such a Thing as ‘Evidence-Based Management’?” The Academy of Management Review, April 2006, pp. 256–269; Wayne F. Cascio, “Evidence-Based Management and the Marketplace for Ideas,” Academy of Management Journal, October 2007, pp. 1009–1012.
35. Quint Studer, “Evidence-Based Leadership,” Studer Group (www.studergroup.com), January 14, 2008.
NOTES 177
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
CH AP
TE R
6 Leadership Ethics and Social Responsibility
LEARNING OBJECTIVES After studying this chapter and doing the exercises, you should be able to
• Specify key principles of ethical and moral leadership.
• Apply a guide to ethical decision making.
• Present representative examples of unethical behavior by business leaders.
• Describe what leaders can do to foster an ethical and socially responsible organization.
• Explain the link between business ethics and organizational performance.
CHAPTER OUTLINE Principles and Practices of Ethical and Moral Leadership Four Ethical Leadership Behaviors Factors Contributing to Ethical Differences The Ethical Mind for Leaders
Guidelines for Evaluating the Ethics of a Decision
A Sampling of Unethical Leadership Behaviors
Leadership, Social Responsibility, and Creating an Ethical Organizational Culture Providing Strategic Leadership of Ethics and Social
Responsibility Creating a Pleasant Workplace Helping Build a Sustainable Environment Engaging in Social Entrepreneurship Engaging in Philanthropy Working with Suppliers to Improve Working Conditions
Establishing Written Codes of Ethical Conduct Developing Formal Mechanisms for Dealing with Ethical
Problems Accepting Whistleblowers Providing Training in Ethics and Social Responsibility Placing Company Interests over Personal Interests
Ethical and Socially Responsible Behavior and Organizational Performance
Summary
Key Terms
Guidelines for Action and Skill Development
Leadership Case Problem A
Leadership Case Problem B
Notes
Judy Chen, head of garment production at a clothingretailer for infants and children, was facing adilemma caused by profit-margin squeezing pres- sures. Major increases in cotton and labor costs weremaking it much more expensive to produce garments with-out raising prices. Many other apparel company executives 178
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
were upset by the increases in the cost of production because for a twenty-year period, production costs were stable or declining. The problem Chen and her counter- parts in other companies faced was that budget- conscious consumers resisted higher prices.
Chen was familiar with the “deconstruction” approach several other apparel makers were taking to lower the price of producing a garment. The deconstruction approach involves some nipping and tucking to reduce the amount of fabric or buttons in a garment. In the manufacture of a pair of khaki pants that sold for about $34, the company could save about 50 cents per garment through such measures as eliminating cuffs, pleats, and coin pockets and replacing a metal hook and bar clasp with a button.
One day Chen was contemplating which cost-cutting steps to implement in order to save about $1 in the
manufacture of two of the best-selling pants for children— “Khaki Prince” and “Khaki Princess.” A deconstruction consultant suggested eliminating the coin pocket in the pants, reasoning that “What child or parent is going to notice the difference?” Chen thought about this particu- lar cost savings of approximately 40 cents per garment, and she decided no. In her words, “First of all my own children, my nephews and nieces, and my neighbors’ children love the small coin pockets. Just the other day, I found two little stones in the pocket, along with a small twig and a nickel. Then I did the public knowl- edge test, and I asked myself how I would feel if there were a Twitter post that said, ‘Judy Chen saves company 40 cents per children’s garment by eliminating coin pocket’ We’ll find some other way to reduce manufactur- ing costs.”1
In this chapter, we examine leadership ethics and social responsibility from several major perspectives: principles of ethical and moral leadership, an ethical decision-making guide, examples of ethical violations, examples of how leaders develop an ethical and socially responsible culture, and the link between business ethics and organizational performance.
Principles and Practices of Ethical and Moral Leadership
Enough attention has been paid to what leaders at all levels should do that some principles of ethical and moral leadership have emerged. Because terms dealing with the ideal behavior of leaders are used so loosely, it is helpful to define what these terms have generally come to mean in the business commu- nity. Ethics is the study of moral obligations, or of separating right from wrong. Ethics can also be a plural noun meaning the accepted guidelines of behavior for groups or institutions.2 In this sense, it means much the same as morals, which are an individual’s determination of what is right or wrong; morals are influenced by a person’s values. Values are tied closely to ethics because ethics become the vehicle for converting values into action. A leader who values fairness will evaluate group members on the basis of their perfor- mance, not personal friendships. And a moral leader will practice good ethics.
Edwin A. Locke, the goal theorist, argues that ethics is at the center of leadership because the goal of a rational leader is to merge the interests of all parties so that everyone benefits and the organization prospers.3 The ethics link is that if everyone benefits, all people are being treated ethically.
In this section, we present a sampling of ethical and moral behaviors, all centering on the idea that a leader should do the right thing, as perceived by a consensus of reasonable people. None of these terms can be pinned down
PRINCIPLES AND PRACTICES OF ETHICAL AND MORAL LEADERSHIP 179
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
with great precision. We also present a brief explanation of why the ethical and moral behavior of leaders differs so widely, and pay separate attention to the importance of an ethical mind. Before studying these principles, do Leadership Self-Assessment Quiz 6-1 to think through your work-related ethics and morality.
LEADERSHIP SELF-ASSESSMENT QUIZ 6-1
The Leadership Ethics Quiz
Directions: Circle the numbers to indicate how well each statement describes your current attitudes and behavior, or how you would behave if placed in the situation suggested by the statement. Response choices: 1 ¼ disagree strongly; 2 ¼ disagree; 3 ¼ agree; 4 ¼ agree strongly.
DS D A AS
1. A small bribe to make a sale is entirely reasonable. 1 2 3 4
2. As the manager, I would have no problem in taking credit for an innovative idea of a subordinate. 1 2 3 4
3. Supplying a customer with a prostitute to help win a big contract is justified. 1 2 3 4
4. I would be willing to use a video surveillance camera to see what my subordinates are doing when I am out of the office.
1 2 3 4
5. Cheating on your expense account up to about 10 percent of the total expenses is usually justifiable.
1 2 3 4
6. Honest guys and gals tend to finish last. 1 2 3 4
7. If I were fired, I would be willing to get revenge on my employer by taking away trade secrets. 1 2 3 4
8. I would avoid hiring someone into the work group who might become a competitor for my position.
1 2 3 4
9. Overcharging a government customer for goods or services is justified because most com- panies already pay too much in taxes.
1 2 3 4
10. All things being equal, I would give higher performance evaluations to people of my own ethnic group or race.
1 2 3 4
11. I deliberately give lower performance evaluations to subordinates who I dislike personally. 1 2 3 4
12. I typically play favorites within the group or team. 1 2 3 4
13. I am willing to fake productivity figures just to look good to upper management. 1 2 3 4
14. I would not take time from writing an important report to coach a group member who needed help at the moment.
1 2 3 4
15. I exaggerate the mistakes a subordinate might make just so he or she does not become too self-confident.
1 2 3 4
16. I look for ways to get revenge on any group member who makes me look bad. 1 2 3 4
17. I rarely praise an employee without also finding a way to criticize something he or she has done. 1 2 3 4
18. If a subordinate wants me to do something I do not want to do, I blame upper management for not letting me do it.
1 2 3 4
19. I think it is justified to ask group members to run errands for me, such as getting my car repaired or shopping.
1 2 3 4
20. I will ignore an employee’s request to help him or her with a problem just so I can spend some personal time on the Internet.
1 2 3 4
180 CHAPTER 6• LEADERSHIP ETHICS AND SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
Four Ethical Leadership Behaviors Be Honest and Trustworthy and Have Integrity in Dealing with Others Continuing reports of frauds and scandals in recent have placed ethical behavior high on the priority list of many organizations. The problem is that ethical problems erode the trust of both leaders and organizations.4 Despite the importance of leaders who are trustworthy, evidence suggests that business firms have many ethical problems. As part of an ongoing study of employee attitudes and opinions, the Ethics Resource Center surveyed 2,100 employ- ees among Fortune 500 companies. More than one-half of the respondents observed misconduct, and 28 percent of the employees believed there was no investigation of the misconduct. Another problem was that 22 percent of employees who reported misconduct said they were retaliated against. Thirty-four percent of employees surveyed said that their manager does not display ethical behavior. Also of note, more than 10 percent of employees reported incidences of sexual harassment, stealing, and health and safety violations.5
An ethical leader is honest and trustworthy and therefore has integrity. According to ethics researcher Thomas E. Becker, this quality goes beyond honesty and conscientiousness. Integrity refers to loyalty to rational princi- ples; it means practicing what one preaches regardless of emotional or social pressure.6 For example, a leader with integrity would believe that employees should be treated fairly, and the pressure to cut costs would not prompt him or her to renege on a commitment to reimburse an employee for relocation expenses. As another example, a leader who preaches cultural diversity would assemble a diverse team.
Pay Attention to All Stakeholders Ethical and moral leaders strive to treat fairly all interested parties affected by their decisions. To do otherwise cre- ates winners and losers after many decisions are made. The widely held belief that a CEO’s primary responsibility is to maximize shareholder wealth conflicts with the principle of paying attention to all stakeholders. A team of
QUIZ 6-1 (continued)
Scoring and interpretation: Add up your responses to the twenty statements. Recognize that people tend to perceive themselves as more ethical and honest than they really are, so your score could be positively biased.
• 20–25: If you scored in this range, your self-image is that of a highly ethical and trustworthy leader or potential leader. Assuming that your answers are accurate, your ethics could be an asset to you as a leader.
• 26–45: Scores in this range suggest the self-image of a leader or potential leader with an average level of ethics. There are probably times when you could behave more ethically.
• 46–80: Scores in this range suggest the self-image of a highly unethical leader or potential leader. If your score is an accurate reflection of your behavior, you are (or would be) perceived as highly unethical and devi- ous to the point that it could damage your career. You should study ethics seriously.
PRINCIPLES AND PRACTICES OF ETHICAL AND MORAL LEADERSHIP 181
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
management scholars observes, “We used to recognize corporations as both economic and social institutions—as organizations that were designed to serve a balanced set of stakeholders, not just the narrow interests of the share- holder.”7 A leader interested in maximizing shareholder wealth might attempt to cut costs and increase profits in such ways as (1) laying off valuable employ- ees to reduce payroll costs, (2) overstating profits to impress investors, (3) over- charging customers, and (4) reducing health benefits for retirees. Although these practices may be standard, they all violate the rights of stakeholders.
Jim Goodnight, the CEO of software company SAS, is among the busi- ness leaders who contend that there is a strong link between employee satis- faction and increased productivity and profits. He explains, “Because we put employee-oriented measures in place long ago, we have the benefit of years of experience to show that the long-term benefits far outweigh the short- term costs. Most companies don’t know how to represent that kind of return in their annual reports.”8
Another behavior of authentic leaders is to perceive their role to include having an ethical responsibility to all of their shareholders. The welfare of others takes precedence over their own personal welfare (as in servant lead- ership). Authentic leaders have a deep commitment to their personal growth as well as to the growth of other stakeholders.9
Build Community A corollary of taking into account the needs of all stake- holders is that the leader helps people achieve a common goal. Leadership researcher Peter G. Northouse explains that leaders need to take into account their own and their followers’ purposes and search for goals that are compatible to all.10 When many people work toward the same construc- tive goal, they build a community. A business leader who works with many people to help poor schoolchildren is an ideal example of someone who builds a community.
Respect the Individual Respecting individuals is a principle of ethical and moral leadership that incorporates other aspects of morality. If you tell the truth, you respect others well enough to be honest. If you keep promises, you also show respect. And if you treat others fairly, you show respect.11
Showing respect for the individual also means that you recognize that everybody has some inner worth and should be treated with courtesy and kindness. An office supervisor demonstrated respect in front of his depart- ment when he asked a custodian who entered the office, “What can we do in this department to make your job easier?”
Factors Contributing to Ethical Differences There are many reasons for differences in ethics and morality among lea- ders. Here we look at a variety of these factors.
1. Leader moral identity. A set of studies confirmed the idea that a leader’s moral identity has a major influence on his or her level of ethical behavior. A moral identity involves a self-perception organized around a set of moral
182 CHAPTER 6• LEADERSHIP ETHICS AND SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
traits such as honesty, caring, and compassion. The moral identity acts as a self-regulatory mechanism rooted in a person’s sense of what is right and wrong. The studies in question concluded that leaders set the ethical tone of an organization and are instrumental in encouraging ethical behavior among subordinates, as well as reducing interpersonal conflict. Leaders with a strong moral identity are more likely to achieve such good results.12
2. Greed, gluttony, and avarice. Many people seek to maximize personal returns, even at the expense of others. Former Federal Reserve chairman Alan Greenspan commented publicly on the problem of executive greed. He said that an infectious greed had contaminated the business community in the late 1990s, as one executive after another manipulated earnings or resorted to fraudulent accounting to capitalize on soaring stock prices.13
The devastating stock market downturn in 2008 appeared to have a few sim- ilar causes.
Exceptionally high executive compensation could be interpreted as signs of greed and avarice. Two examples are the recent total one-year compensation paid to David Simon of the Simon Property Group ($137.2 million) and Lawrence Ellison of Oracle ($96.2 million).14 Instead of taking so much money for themselves, how about sharing more of the money with employees and stockholders, and offering lower prices for customers? The counterargu- ment is that supply and demand rules, with a limited supply of capable CEOs. So you have to pay talented executives loads of money to stay competitive, even if the compensation exceeds $100 million per year. Also, an effective CEO can point the firm in the right direction to enhance its prosperity and survival.
3. Rationalization and implied permission. Timothy P. Flynn, chairman of the global accounting firm KPMG, has identified reasons why good people choose the wrong path. One reason is rationalization, which leads people to focus on the intent of the action rather than on the action itself. For example, people might say that they are doing something wrong (such as exaggerating profits) in order to help a client or that they are boosting the stock price to help inves- tors. Another reason is implied permission—“Nobody is telling me to stop, so it must be OK.”15 For example, managers might continue to place only per- sonal friends and relatives in key jobs because they were not told to stop.
4. Moral development level. A notable contributor to a leader’s ethics and morality is his or her level of moral development. Some leaders are morally advanced, whereas others are morally challenged—a mental condition that often develops early in life. People progress through three developmental levels in their moral reasoning. At the preconventional level, a person is concerned primarily with receiving external rewards and avoiding punishment. A leader at this level of development might falsify earnings statements for the primary purpose of gaining a large bonus. At the conventional level, people learn to conform to the expectations of good behavior as defined by key people in their environment and societal norms. A leader at this level might be moral enough just to look good, such as being fair with salary increases and encour- aging contributions to the United Way campaign. At the post-conventional
PRINCIPLES AND PRACTICES OF ETHICAL AND MORAL LEADERSHIP 183
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
level, people are guided by an internalized set of universal principles that may even transcend the laws of a particular society. A leader at the post- conventional level of moral behavior would be concerned with doing the most good for the most people, without regard for whether such behavior brought him or her recognition and fortune.16 The servant leader described in Chapter 4 would be at this advanced level of moral development.
5. Sense of entitlement. The moral excesses of business leaders can occur because many of them have developed a sense of entitlement. In the opin- ion of several psychiatrists and corporate governance experts, some CEOs lose their sense of reality and feel entitled to whatever they can get away with or steal. For example, when John Thain was appointed CEO of Merrill Lynch, he felt entitled to have the company pay $1.2 million to remodel his office.17 (Thain lasted less than one year at the Merrill Lynch, partially over disputes about his level of compensation.) Many executives feel entitled to extraordinary compensation. The average CEO pay at major corporations for Standards & Poor’s 500 corporations is 204 times that of the average rank-and-file worker; the average of the top 100 companies is 495.18
6. Situational influences. Unethical and immoral leadership behavior can also be influenced by the situation, particularly the organizational culture. If lea- ders at the top of the organization take imprudent, quasi-legal risks, other leaders throughout the firm might be prompted to behave similarly. The imprudent risks in subprime mortgages taken with investor money by invest- ment banks in recent history might also reflect an aggressive culture. Finan- cial executives were pushed to maximize profits, sometimes not taking into account investor welfare.19 Many financial specialists believe that the federal government push for availability of mortgages to applicants with low credit ratings encouraged the availability of subprime mortgages to be invested.
7. Character of the person. A person’s character contributes heavily to ethical differences. The higher the quality of a person’s character, the more likely he or she will behave ethically and morally. For example, a leader who is honest and cooperative will tend to behave more ethically than a leader who is dishonest and uncooperative. A person’s character is quite close in meaning to moral identity, discussed first in this list. Leadership Self- Assessment Quiz 6-2 digs into the behavioral specifics of good character as perceived by the U.S. Air Force.
8. Motivated blindness. A final factor to be considered here that contributes to unethical leadership behavior is motivated blindness, or seeing what we want to see and missing contradictory information. The result can be a con- flict of interest, such as a compensation consultant being paid by the CEO to make recommendations about her financial compensation. Although the consultant is attempting to be honest, the desire to please the CEO leads him to recommend a pay package so generous that the CEO becomes over- paid. Another example of motivated blindness is that a manager who hires an individual may not notice the new hire’s unethical behavior because the behavior would reflect an error in selecting the new hire.20
184 CHAPTER 6• LEADERSHIP ETHICS AND SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
LEADERSHIP SELF-ASSESSMENT QUIZ 6-2
The Air Force Character Attributes Checklist
Instructions: Listed and defined next are character attributes the U.S. Air Force wants to see among the ranks of its leaders. For each attribute, note your standing as being high (H), average (A), or low (L). A checklist of this nature lends itself to self-serving bias, so work extra hard to be objective. When applicable, visualize an example of how you have exhibited, or have not exhibited, a particular character attribute.
MY STANDING
FACTOR DESCRIPTION H A L
Integrity Consistently adhering to a moral or ethical code or standard. A person who consistently chooses to do the right thing when faced with alternative choices.
□ □ □
Honesty Consistently being truthful with others. □ □ □
Loyalty Being devoted and committed to one’s organization, supervisors, coworkers, and subordinates.
□ □ □
Selflessness Genuine concern about the welfare of others and a willingness to sacrifice one’s personal interests for others and the organization.
□ □ □
Compassion Concern for the suffering or welfare of others and providing aid or showing mercy for others.
□ □ □
Competency Capable of excelling at all tasks assigned. Is effective and efficient. □ □ □
Respectfulness Shows esteem for and consideration and appreciation of other people. □ □ □
Fairness Treats everyone in an equitable, impartial, and just manner. □ □ □
Responsibility and self-discipline
Can be depended on to make rational and logical decisions and to do tasks assigned. Can perform tasks assigned without supervision.
□ □ □
Decisiveness Capable of making logical and effective decisions in a timely manner. Makes good decisions promptly after considering data appropriate to the decision.
□ □ □
Spiritual appreciation
Values the spiritual diversity among individuals with different backgrounds and cultures and respects all individuals’ rights to differ from others in their beliefs.
□ □ □
Cooperativeness Willing to work or act together with others in accomplishing a task toward a common end or purpose.
□ □ □
Interpretation: The more of the attributes you rated as high, the more likely it is that others perceive you as having a good character. The list may provide some clues to leadership development. For example, if you are perceived to be low on integrity and cooperativeness, you are less likely to be able to influence others.
Note: Although competency and decisiveness are not ordinarily considered character traits, being competent and decisive contributes to having good character.
Source: U.S. Air Force, as reprinted in Cassie B. Barlow, Mark Jordan, and William H. Hendrix, “Character Assessment: An Examination of Leadership Levels,” Journal of Business and Psychology, Summer 2003, p. 568.
PRINCIPLES AND PRACTICES OF ETHICAL AND MORAL LEADERSHIP 185
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
The Ethical Mind for Leaders Cognitive and educational psychologist Howard Gardner believes that for a leader to stay ethical, he or she must develop an ethical mind, or a point of view that helps the individual aspire to good work that matters to their colleagues, companies, and society in general.21 Developing an ethical mind begins with the belief that retaining an ethical compass is essential to the health of the organization. Early life influences, such as encouragement not to cheat on exams or plagiarize when writing papers, are a good start. Next, the leader must state his or her ethical beliefs and stick to them. (The ethi- cal beliefs already mentioned in this chapter are relevant, such as being convinced that attention must be paid to all stakeholders.) The leader must also make a rigorous self-test to make sure values are being adhered to, such as checking to see if merit instead of favoritism is a key criterion for promotion. Taking the time to reflect on beliefs can help the leader stay focused on ethical behavior. Asking mentors to comment on the ethics of your behavior can be a useful reality check. Finally, to stay ethical, the leader should act quickly on strongly unethical behavior of others, such as confronting a colleague who is using the corporate jet for a family vacation.
So which leader has an ethical mind? You will probably find many of them as hard-working middle managers. A famous business leader with an ethical mind might be Sheryl Sandberg based on her high reputation to date. We never know, however, when a business leader with an out- standing reputation for ethical behavior will have a moral lapse at some point.
A review of the literature about ethical leadership behavior reveals dimensions of ethical behavior that help pinpoint more specifically what constitutes an ethical mind. The researchers identified five dimensions of ethical leadership behavior, as described next.22 You will observe that these dimensions support information in this chapter as well as other places in this book.
1. Fairness. The leader who practices fairness avoids favoritism, treats others in a manner that is right and equal, and makes principled choices.
2. Power sharing. The leader who shares power allows for group member input into decisions and listens to their suggestions, ideas, and concerns.
3. Role clarification. To give group members more structure in their work, the leader clarifies responsibilities, expectations, and performance goals.
4. People orientation. The leader with people orientation cares about, respects, and supports followers.
5. Integrity. A leader with integrity shows a consistency between word and deeds, and keeps promises.
186 CHAPTER 6• LEADERSHIP ETHICS AND SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
6. Ethical guidance. A leader provides ethical guidance by communicating about ethics, explains ethical rules, and encourages and rewards ethical conduct.
7. Concern for sustainability. A leader with a true concern for sustainability cares about the environment in such ways as being a champion of recycling.
Guidelines for Evaluating the Ethics of a Decision
Several guidelines, or ethical screens, have been developed to help leaders or other influence agents decide whether a given act is ethical or unethical. The Center for Business Ethics at Bentley College has developed six ques- tions to evaluate the ethics of a specific decision:23
● Is it right? This question is based on the deontological theory of ethics that states there are certainly universally accepted guiding principles of rightness and wrongness, such as “thou shalt not steal.”
● Is it fair? This question is based on the deontological theory of justice that certain actions are inherently just or unjust. For example, it is unjust to fire a high-performing employee to make room for a less competent person who is a relative by marriage.
● Who gets hurt? This question is based on the utilitarian notion of attempting to do the greatest good for the greatest number of people.
● Would you be comfortable if the details of your decision or actions were made public in the media or through e-mail? This question is based on the universalist principle of disclosure.
● What would you tell your child, sibling, or young relative to do? This ques- tion is based on the deontological principle of reversibility, which evalu- ates the ethics of a decision by reversing the decision maker.
● How does it smell? This question is based on a person’s intuition and common sense. For example, counting a product inquiry over the Internet as a sale would smell bad to a sensible person.
Ethical issues that require a run through the guide are usually subtle rather than blatant, or a decision that falls into the gray zone. An example took place several years ago when GM and Ford offered to buy out the pen- sions of 140,000 employees, meaning that workers were offered a lump-sum payout instead of monthly payments for the rest of their lives. For example, an employee with 40 years of service might be offered $500,000, and then receive no more pension money from the company. Employees who refused the buyout would find their plan shifted to a private financial services firm. The ethics of this pension buyout plan might fall into the gray zone because the workers who accept the offer are receiving a large sum of money.24 If these same workers die early, their beneficiaries will have
GUIDELINES FOR EVALUATING THE ETHICS OF A DECISION 187
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
profited handsomely. Also, the financial services firm would still provide them with at least a limited pension. Yet, most workers who accept the buy- out will receive much less money than if they received monthly payments for the rest of their life.
Leaders regularly face the necessity of running a contemplated decision through an ethics test. Leadership Skill-Building Exercise 6-1 provides an opportunity to think through the ethics of a decision facing a beverage manufacturer.
A Sampling of Unethical Leadership Behaviors
We have been alluding to unethical behavior in this and previous chapters. Here, we present a sampling of unethical behaviors from the past and pres- ent. A statement often made is that about 95 percent of business leaders are ethical and that the 5 percent of bad apples (mostly senior executives) get all the publicity. However, the impact of unethical leadership has been enormous. Unethical behavior has thrown companies into bankruptcy, led to the layoffs of thousands of workers, diminished trust in stock invest- ments, and discouraged many talented young people from embarking on a business career. Table 6-1 presents some unethical, immoral, and often ille- gal behaviors engaged in by business leaders whose acts have been publicly reported. All of these unethical acts resulted in convictions or indictments rather than simply accusations or allegations. Thousands of other unethical acts go unreported, such as a business owner who places a family member, friend, or lover on the payroll at an inflated salary for work of limited value to the firm.
LEADERSHIP SKILL-BUILDING EXERCISE 6-1
Should “Dinosaur Power” Be Placed on the Market?
A manufacturer of niche beverages such as vitamin water, canned tea drinks, and multi-vegetable bottled drinks, is looking to expand its product line in order to raise revenue. The product development team has been working for several months on an energy-boosting drink, called Dinosaur Power. Product development head Cliff explained to company leadership that energy drinks are among the fastest-growing products in the beverage sector. He pointed out that Dinosaur Power will differ- entiate itself from the many other products on the mar- ket because it will contain an extra-heavy dose of caffeine, will resemble the taste of an alcoholic bever- age, and will have a thick cherry taste known to be
habit forming, particularly with young adults. Cliff said, “Our test results show that the energy surge provided by this drink will keep people coming back for more. Consumers will be using it on and off the job to feel energized.”
With company revenues showing signs of declines, sales could use a quick boost, yet there is some con- cern about releasing what would be the highest-power, and most habit-forming energy drink on the market. Work in a small group to take the contemplated deci- sion about releasing Dinosaur Power into the market through the guidelines for evaluating the ethics of a decision.
188 CHAPTER 6• LEADERSHIP ETHICS AND SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
TABLE 6-1 Examples of Unethical Behavior by Business Leaders.
The sampling of behaviors presented here includes behaviors that resulted in criminal prosecutions, and those that result in only embarrassment and negative press.
LEADER AND COMPANY OFFENSE AND OUTCOME
Bernard L. Madoff, former CEO of Bernard L. Madoff Investment Securities and also former chairman of Nasdaq (the stock exchange)
Convicted of defrauding investors out of about $17 billion over a period of years. Basically sold investors phantom investments, pocketed most of the money, and made some payments to new investors from money paid by earlier investors. Had worldwide network of brokers and other contacts sending him referrals. Sent to prison for 150 years for crimes including securities fraud, international money laundering, mail fraud, and wire fraud. At the time of conviction, said he was sorry. The Madoff finance chief, Frank DiPascali, pleaded guilty to 10 counts of conspiracy, fraud, and other charges and faced a 125-year prison sentence. In hopes of gaining leniency, he testified against five former coworkers accused of participating in the fraud.
Angelo R. Mozilo, former CEO of Countrywide Financial (now a unit of Bank of America)
As CEO, played a major role in issuing mortgages to high- risk customers, then sold securities based on these mort- gages, touting them as high-rated safe securities. Accused of knowing that many borrowers could not pay back their loans. Paid $67.5 million in penalties to settle civil fraud and insider-trading charges, but was not prosecuted. Later included as defendant in lawsuit by Allstate Corp., claiming that lax underwriting standards led to collapse of residen- tial mortgage-based securities.
Deon Anderson, former Boeing procurement officer
Anderson and three other executives were indicted by a federal grand jury and accused of engaging in a bribery and kickback scheme. He was accused of leaking nonpublic information to bidders for contracts on military aircraft parts in exchange for cash. Faced a wire fraud count that carries a maximum prison sentence of 20 years, and a 250,000 fine.
Paul Shinn Devine, Global Supply Manager at Apple Inc.
Accused in 2010 by a federal grand jury indictment of receiving more than $1 million in kickbacks from Apple suppliers in Asia. Devine was charged with offenses including wire fraud, money laundering, and unlawful mon- etary transactions. Apple also named Devine in a civil suit, with the company saying that it has zero tolerance for dis- honest behavior.
Source: The facts in the table have been widely circulated in the media. Representative sources for the facts include the following: Kevin McCoy, “Madoff’s Top Aide to Testify Today,” USA Today Money, December 2, 2013, p. 5B; Roger Parloff, “As If a Credit Tsunami Weren’t Enough: The Case of Accused Ponzi Schemer Bernard L Madoff,” Fortune, January 19, 2009, p. 61; David Benoit, “Allstate Sues Countrywide,” The Wall Street Journal, December 29, 2010, p. C2; Shayndi Raice, “Ex-Countrywide Official on Defense,” The Wall Street Journal, October 16, 2013, p. C3; “Former Boeing Executive, Three Others Indicted in Bribery Scheme,” Bloomberg News, October 18, 2013; Yukari Iwatani Kane, “For Apple Suppliers, Pressure to Win.” The Wall Street Journal, August 16, 2010, p. B3; “Executives on Trial,” The Wall Street Journal, May 26, 2006, p. A9.
A SAMPLING OF UNETHICAL LEADERSHIP BEHAVIORS 189
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
Leadership, Social Responsibility, and Creating an Ethical Organizational Culture
The idea of corporate social responsibility continues to evolve. One new framework is that such responsibility is part of external engagement, or the efforts a company makes to manage its relationship with the external world. The external engagement should be integrated into decision making at every organizational level. The external engagement should include a wide variety of activities including philanthropy, community programs, aspects of prod- uct design, and recruiting policy.25 The initiatives to be described in the fol- lowing pages are examples of both corporate social responsibility and external engagement.
Being socially responsible fits into the Thou Shalt approach, or finding out better ways for leaders to make a positive contribution to society. In contrast, the Thou Shalt Not approach focuses on avoiding the kind of wrongdoing depicted in Table 6-1.26 When corporate social responsibility generates value for shareholders and stakeholders, it is regarded as good business strategy.27
Our focus here is illustrative actions that leaders can take to enhance social responsibility, as well as create an organizational culture that encourages ethical behavior, as outlined in Figure 6-1.
Provide strategic leadership of social responsibility and
ethics
SOCIALLY RESPONSIBLE AND ETHICAL
ORGANIZATION
Create a pleasant
workplace
Develop formal mechanisms
for dealing with ethical problems
Place company interests over
personal interests
Provide training in ethics and
social responsibility
Accept whistleblowers
Engage in social entrepreneurship
Help build a sustainable
environment
Engage in philanthropy
Work with suppliers to improve working
conditions
Establish written codes of ethical
conduct
© Ce ng ag e Le ar ni ng
FIGURE 6-1 Initiatives for Achieving a Socially Responsible and Ethical Organization.
190 CHAPTER 6• LEADERSHIP ETHICS AND SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
Providing Strategic Leadership of Ethics and Social Responsibility The most effective route to an ethical and socially responsible organization is for senior management to provide strategic leadership in that direction. In this way, senior managers become ethics leaders: Their policies and actions set the ethical and social responsibility tone for the organization. If high ethics receive top priority, workers at all levels are more likely to behave ethically. Around 2008, an analysis of the troubles facing the bank- ing industry suggested that lack of moral leadership was a contributing factor. Christina Rexrode, who follows the banking industry, wrote:
Although the industry faces sweeping new rules and regulations imposed by Congress, legality isn’t the same thing as morality. In some corridors of banking, people turned a blind eye to troubling practices—such as the issuance of subprime mortgages—as long as they were technically legal.28
Strategic leadership of ethics and social responsibility includes leading by example. If workers throughout the firm believe that behaving ethically is in and behaving unethically is out, ethical behavior will prevail. Ethical behav- ior that is rewarded is likely to endure. In addition, workers who perform unethically should not be rewarded, and perhaps disciplined. A sales man- ager who uses a 35-day month might not be rewarded for sales booked dur- ing those five days borrowed from the next month just to look good in the previous months.
Creating a Pleasant Workplace Creating a comfortable, pleasant, and intellectually stimulating work envi- ronment is a social responsibility initiative that directly affects employees’ well-being. Because many people invest about one-third of their time at work, a pleasant work environment increases the chances that their lives will be enriched. Robert Levering and Milton Moskowitz of the Great Place to Work® Institute, in cooperation with Fortune, have institutionalized the idea of being a “best company to work for.” Employers nominate them- selves, and two-thirds of the score is based on how randomly selected employees respond to the Great Place to Work Trust Index,® a survey mea- suring organizational culture. An evaluation of the Culture Audit by staff members at the Great Place to Work Institute determines the rest of the score. The focus is on employee satisfaction, yet the firms that fall into “the 100 best companies to work for” are also typically profitable. Among the benefits these companies offer are flexible working hours; on-site day care; concierge services, such as dry-cleaning pickup; domestic-partner benefits to same-sex couples; and fully paid sabbaticals. Following are the three of the most highly rated companies:29
Google, Mountain View, California: The business firm whose name has become a verb sets the standard for Silicon Valley. Google has placed first four times so far as a Fortune best company to work for. Among its perks are free gourmet meals, free
LEADERSHIP, SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY, AND CREATING AN ETHICAL ORGANIZATIONAL CULTURE 191
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
massages, a seven-acre sports complex, and free medical services on-site. Engineers are empowered to spend 20 percent of their time on independent projects. Google employees are empowered to award one another $175 on-the-spot peer spot bonuses, and more than two-thirds of “Googlers” made the awards. Hiring standards are tough, emphasizing brilliance, good team player skills, and diverse interests.
SAS, Cory, N.C.: This business analytics software and services firm took the top spot among Best Companies for two consecutive years and has been on the list for sixteen years. Notable perks include on-site health care (also available to fam- ily members), summer camp for employee children, organic farm-produced food for the four company cafeterias, car wash and interior cleaning service, a salon, and a massive gym on company premises. The company philosophy is “Treat employees like they make a difference and they will.”
Carmax, Richmond, Virginia: This nationwide dealership operates 117 no-haggle used-car lots. Floor employees wear uniforms, and the stores are family friendly. Sales reps are salaried to help motivate them to do what is best for the customer. Associates are authorized to take off as much times as they need without an established limit. The CEO increases his accessibility to employees by means of town hall meetings and cookouts.
The employee programs that qualify a company as a best place to work focus on employee benefits. However, the leaders of these companies also emphasize stimulating work.
Helping Build a Sustainable Environment Socially responsible leaders influence others to sustain and preserve the external environment through a variety of actions that go beyond manda- tory environmental controls such as managing toxic waste. Helping build a sustainable environment can involve hundreds of different actions such as making packaging smaller; making more extensive use of fluorescent light- ing; and, when feasible, using energy from solar panels and wind turbines to replace burning of fossil fuels. Furthermore, many companies sponsor team-building events, in which participants build a playground or refurbish an old house in a declining neighborhood. Preserving an old building uses less energy than constructing a new one, and it enhances the aesthetics of the environment, as well.
A relatively new leadership position has been created in several firms, bearing a title such as chief sustainability officer. At Coca-Cola Co., the major role of chief sustainability officer Beatriz Perez is to work on sustain- ability issues in packaging and recycling, water, climate protection, and community.30 At Nike Corporation, Hannah Jones is vice president of sus- tainable business & innovation. She is responsible for stewarding Nike’s global sustainability and labor rights strategies.31
Three specific examples of representative leadership initiatives for help- ing create a sustainable environment follow:
● Pioneer Millworks, a small business of 105 employees, takes old items destined for landfills, or left to rot, and transforms them into beautiful
192 CHAPTER 6• LEADERSHIP ETHICS AND SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
objects. For example, wine barrels made from redwood, Cyprus, and Douglas fir, are dismantled and processed. The revitalized wood is then used for flooring or paneling in upscale homes and restaurants, and hip office places. All of the company’s electricity is either bought from wind and power sources or generated from solar panels. Scrap wood from cut- ting and shaping is used as fuels in kilns or to heat the workplace.32
● Levi-Strauss & Co., manufactures a line of jeans called Waste<Less™ that incorporates an average of eight 12- to 20-ounce recycled plastic bottles per pair of jeans. Plastic bottles are converted into polyester fabric and blended with cotton. The payoff to the environment is that fewer plastic bottles wind up in landfills, and less new material is required to make the jeans.33
● UPS has improved the fuel efficiency of its domestic delivery fleet by 10 percent in recent years. To improve another 10 percent, the company has added more alternative fuel vehicles. UPS now has all-electric vehi- cles, hybrid-electric vehicles, vehicles that run on compressed natural gas, and those that run on liquid natural gas.34 A newer development is the use of trucks with plastic rather than aluminum paneling, creating a lighter, more fuel-efficient vehicle.
In addition to gaining favorable publicity for the company, the environment benefits from the type of initiatives just described. Another way for a leader to help the environment is to be in the recycling business. Electronic recycling is particularly important because electronics are the fastest-growing solid waste stream in the world and contain toxins such as mercury and chromium. A siz- able company in this field is Electronic Recyclers International in Fresno, California. The business has been increasing by approximately 50 percent per year. ERI chief executive John S. Shegerian takes performing a good deed for society one step further: One-third of the 200 full- and part-time employees are part of its second chance program, which includes primarily ex-cons and former addicts.35 The social-good aspect is that being employed facilitates a person’s not lapsing back into criminal behavior and drug addiction.
For company leadership to better evaluate their sustainability initiatives, it is important to rigorously evaluate the steps, the processes they are using, and the true impact on the environment. According to the research of Magali A. Delmas, Dror Etzion, and Nicholas Nairn-Birch, 80 percent of corporate environmental performance is accounted for by two factors. One is the environmental processes and practices implemented by the firm; and the other is the environmental outcomes they generate.36
A case in point is the Waste<Less denim collection of Levi-Strauss. In one year, 3.5 million recycled plastic bottles are used in the spring collection—an admirable process. Yet, the true impact on the environment would be how many plastic bottles are really removed from the environ- ment. If landfills and waters became less clogged, the environmental impact would be substantial. However, if these same plastic bottles would have been converted to other uses anyway, such as plastic benches, driveways, and ball-point pens, the environmental impact would be zero.
The accompanying Leader in Action describes the efforts of two well- known consumer products companies in creating a more sustainable
LEADERSHIP, SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY, AND CREATING AN ETHICAL ORGANIZATIONAL CULTURE 193
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
LEADER IN ACTION
Leadership at Coca-Cola and Nestlé Waters Protects Freshwater Supplies
Former U.S. Attorney John Ashcroft said during a confer- ence at the Wharton School that “If water runs out, it will be more important than if the oil runs out. Corporate lea- ders can redefine the possible in these areas. When companies take initiative with intensity and enthusiasm, they can actually lead the customer.”
Coca-Cola and Nestlé Waters are two companies that focus on protecting the world’s increasingly challenged freshwater supplies. Coca Cola noted in a sustainability report that because it sells its products where it makes them, the company added to “the ecological and ethical imperatives that drive our water stewardship, we also have a vested business interest in preserving and improving local water sources.”
Jeff Seabright, vice president of environmental and water resources at Coca-Cola, noted at the conference that water and agricultural production are tightly inter- twined. Succeeding at transforming company-wide opera- tions will take more than a board vote. Seabright pointed out that Coca-Cola follows a franchise model, so it must work with 200 other companies, 500 brands, 300 indepen- dent bottling partners, and 1,000 manufacturing facilities.
Among its goals, Coca-Cola aims to increase waste efficiency 25 percent by 2020, and that same year “safely return to communities and nature an amount of water equal to what we use in our finished beverages and their production.” It wants to be a “net-zero” user of water.
Coca-Cola has also committed $30 million over six years to the Replenish Africa Initiative (RAIN), which will give two million people access to safe drinking water by 2015. RAIN intends to start more than 100 water access programs in Africa.
Some 40 percent of Nestlé Global’s factories are in regions experiencing water stress, and 10 percent are in areas of severe scarcity. The company is reducing its water withdrawal (in part through rainwater harvesting), at the same time it increases operating efficiency. In the long run, the efficiencies “reduce operating costs and conserve scarce resources,” saysMichaelWashburn, vice president of sustain- ability at Nestlé Waters in North America. “Yes, our projects have to pay back in a certain amount of time, but our company gives us flexibility on taking a longer time to pay back.”
Bottled water, meanwhile, has its own imperatives. “We produce a product that in certain quarters is controversial, and has a precise set of societal expectations,” said Washburn. “We’re expected to be good stewards, to be involved in responsible disposal of our packaging, and to use energy as efficiently as possible. If we fall short on any of those things, we’re confronted with a societal backlash.”
Sustainability, said Washburn, in some cases pro- vokes engagement outside the company’s own bound- aries. In north Florida, Nestlé works with the Suwanee River Partnership to help farmers with best practices in irrigation, and use of fertilizers and herbicides, to reduce effluent releases into rivers and streams. Also in Florida, the company is working with Southern Forestry Consul- tants to manage its 468-acre certified tree farm for opti- mal soil conservation and biodiversity.
Because Nestlé Waters draws its product from springs, not rivers, why do that work with ranchers? “It’s about local relationships,” said Washburn. We are pres- ent in twenty-six communities around the country where we have factories, and our employees live there and inter- act with stakeholders there. We actively seek positive community engagement, because it builds brand equity and local trust. It’s not a selfless act, because there are benefits that come back to our company.”
QUESTIONS
1. To what extent should business leaders take positive actions to improve the world’s freshwater supply?
2. To what extent do you think Coca-Cola and Nestlé Waters are simply engaging in a public relations gimmick in their efforts to improve the quality of local water supplies?
3. What specific benefits might come back to Coca-Cola and Nestlé Waters from their investments of resources in producing potable water?
4. Has the information presented about the Coca-Cola and Nestlé companies influenced whether or not you will purchase any of their products?
Source: Excerpted and adapted from “Resource Scarcity Will Recast Corporate Environmental Behavior,” Knowledge @Wharton (http://knowledge.wharton.upenn.edu/), June 28, 2013, pp. 4–5.
194 CHAPTER 6• LEADERSHIP ETHICS AND SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
environment. Leadership Skill-Building Exercise 6-2 provides an opportu- nity for you to practice conducting an environmental audit.
Engaging in Social Entrepreneurship A social responsibility initiative gainingmomentum is social entrepreneurship, the use of market-based methods to solve social problems.37 Social entre- preneurship is therefore an entrepreneurial approach to social problems such as homelessness, contaminated drinking water, damaged physical envir- onments, and extreme poverty. John S. Shegerian at Electronic Recyclers could therefore be regarded as a social entrepreneur. Leaders at a business firm might also form a foundation to help a cause, or be a socially focused, for-profit company such as Better World Books. Through the sale of used and new books, one of the company’s social initiatives is to fund literacy pro- grams around the world. Partners of Better World build schools, launch libraries, and provide scholarships.38
A research-based model of social entrepreneurship emphasizes that com- passion encourages social entrepreneurship. Compassion in the model is viewed as a prosocial (helping others) motivation that connects the individual with a suffering community and triggers sensitivity to the pain and needs of others.39 An exceptional example of a business leader with compassion is Father Gregory Boyle, the CEO of Homeboy Industries. The beginning mis- sion of the company was to create jobs for former Los Angeles gang mem- bers, many of whom had prison records. The company takes former men and women gang members and trains them in job-related skills, starting with custodial work, followed by baking skills. To create work for the former gang
LEADERSHIP SKILL-BUILDING EXERCISE 6-2
Conducting an Environmental Audit
To create an environmentally friendly workplace, some- body has to take the initiative to spot opportunities for change, thereby exercising leadership. Organize the class into groups of about five, with one person being appointed the team leader. You might have to do the work outside of class because your assignment is to do an environmental audit of a workplace that might include nonprofit setting such as a place of worship, a school, or an athletic facility. If the audit is done during class time, evaluate a portion of the school, such as a classroom, an athletic facility, or the cafeteria. Your task is to conduct an environmental audit with respect to the energy effi- ciency and healthfulness of the workplace. Make judg- ments, perhaps on a 1-to-10 scale, plus comments about the following factors:
1. How energy efficient is the workplace in terms of such factors as building insulation, use of fluores- cent lighting, heating and cooling, and use of solar panels?
2. How safe is the environment in terms of pollutants and steps to prevent physical accidents?
3. How aesthetic is the environment in terms of protect- ing against sight and sound pollution?
Summarize your findings and suggestions in a bul- leted list of less than one page. Present your findings to classmates and perhaps to a manager of the work- place. Classmates might comment on whether your find- ings will really improve the planet from an ecological standpoint.
LEADERSHIP, SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY, AND CREATING AN ETHICAL ORGANIZATIONAL CULTURE 195
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
members, Boyle started a bakery. The product line has expanded into items such as chips and salsa dip. The food product has become so popular in stores that Homeboy recently had 2,500 accounts and growing.40
Engaging in Philanthropy A standard organizational leadership approach to social responsibility is to donate money to charity and various other causes. Most charities are heavily dependent on corporate support. Colleges, universities, and career schools also benefit from corporate donations. Many of the leading philanthropists donate money during their lifetime rather than giving through their estates. The most striking example is Bill and Melinda Gates of Microsoft, who formed their own foundation with the primary global aims of reducing extreme pov- erty, combating AIDS, and vaccinating children against illnesses. Financier Warren Buffet is also a director of the foundation. In the United States, the focus is more on educational opportunities and access to information technology. In 2014, the foundation had an endowment of over $45 billion, with Buffet having doubled the endowment in 2006. Furthermore, Bill Gates has called for a revision of capitalism in which poor people receive more ben- efits. Gates said he is troubled because advances in technology, health care, and education tend to help the rich and neglect the poor.41
Many corporate donors want their charitable investments to benefit the end consumer, not get lost in red tape and overhead, and show measurable results. The new breed of philanthropist studies each charitable cause as he or she would a potential business investment, seeking maximum return in terms of social impact. This philanthropist might also seek follow-up data, for example, on how many children were taught to read or by what percent- age new cases of AIDS declined.
Working with Suppliers to Improve Working Conditions An opportunity for practicing social responsibility is for company leaders to work with suppliers to improve physical and mental working conditions. Instead of refusing to deal with a supplier who operates a sweatshop, man- agement might work with the supplier to improve plant working conditions. The justification for helping the supplier improve conditions is that the sup- plier’s employees are often in dire need of a paying job. Almost any job is better than no job to a person facing extreme poverty or who is dependent on modest wages for food and shelter. Helping suppliers improve working conditions has been conceptualized as corporations being vehicles for posi- tive social change—yet another way of demonstrating corporate social responsibility.42 Another form of helping to improve working conditions is to assist factory management to repair potential hazards such as inadequate escape routes in case of fire.
Apple Inc. is one example whereby company leadership took action to work with suppliers to improve substandard working conditions. Worker advocates and Apple representatives found that workers assembling iPhones, iPads, and other Apple devices often work in harsh and dangerous
196 CHAPTER 6• LEADERSHIP ETHICS AND SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
conditions. It was found that many employees worked excessive overtime, lived in crowded dorms, and often stood at the assembly tables for such a long time that their legs swelled until they could barely walk. Underage workers were often included in the workforce of subcontractors. In recent years, Apple made significant progress in improving the factories. The com- pany now has a supplier code of conduct that provides specific guidelines on labor standards and safety protection. Apple conducts thorough audits, and when abuses are discovered, corrections are required for the subcon- tractor to continue to be an Apple supplier.43 Apple leadership has to stay vigilant to labor abuses, because labor abuses have a tendency to resurface, as reported by China Labor Watch, a nonprofit group.
Establishing Written Codes of Ethical Conduct Many organizations use written codes of conduct as guidelines for ethical and socially responsible behavior. Regardless of the industry, most codes deal with quite similar issues. Patricia Breeding, integrity compliance officer for Covenant Health, in Knoxville, Tennessee, says, “They all address conflicts of interest, gifts and things like vendor relationships. They use the word ‘customer’ in one and ‘patient’ in another but they’re all about doing the right thing.”44
Prohibition against bribery of government or corporate officials is being incorporated more frequently into ethical codes to combat potential major problems. For example, in 2011, U.S. regulators accused IBM of ten years of bribery in Asia, contending that employers handed over shopping bags filled with cash in South Korea. IBM allegedly also arranged junkets for government officials in China in exchange for millions of dollars in contracts. IBM agreed to pay $10 million to settle the civil charges in which more than 100 employees of IBM subsidiaries were involved in the bribes.45 (This case is remarkable because IBM has a positive reputation for ethics and social responsibility.)
The Sarbanes–Oxley Act, triggered by the financial scandals around the year 2000, requires public companies to disclose whether they have adopted a code of ethics for senior financial officers. In some firms, workers at all levels are required to sign the code of conduct. At defense contractor Lock- heed Martin Corp., the incoming chief executive Christopher Kubasik was dismissed for “having a close personal relationship” with a subordinate. Although not sexual harassment, the relationship violated the company’s code of ethics.46 A written code of conduct is more likely to influence behavior when both formal and informal leaders throughout the firm refer to it frequently. Furthermore, adherence to the code must be rewarded, and violation of the code should be punished.
Developing Formal Mechanisms for Dealing with Ethical Problems Many large employers have ethics programs of various types. Large organi- zations frequently establish ethics committees to help ensure ethical and socially responsible behavior. Top-level leadership participation in these
LEADERSHIP, SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY, AND CREATING AN ETHICAL ORGANIZATIONAL CULTURE 197
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
formal mechanisms gives them more clout. Committee members include a top management representative, plus other managers throughout the orga- nization. An ethics and social responsibility specialist from the human resources department might also join the group. The committee establishes policies for ethics and social responsibility and may conduct an ethical audit of the firm’s activities. In addition, committee members might review complaints about ethical problems.
Company ethics teams often establish an ethics hotline that enables workers who have questions about ethical behavior or want to report an ethics violation speak with a company official. Hotlines of this nature are more likely to be used when employees throughout the organization do not fear retaliation for reporting an ethical violation.
Accepting Whistleblowers A whistleblower is an employee who discloses organizational wrongdoing to parties who can take action. Whistleblowers often go directly to a federal gov- ernment bureau to report what they consider to be fraud and poor ethics by their employer. One of the largest settlements was $920 million against Tenet Healthcare Corp., the nation’s second-largest hospital chain. Following allega- tions by six whistleblowers, prosecutors accused Tenet of overbilling the gov- ernment by $806 million in Medicare payments and paying $49 million in kickbacks to physicians who referred patients to the health care organization.47
Whistleblowers are often ostracized and humiliated by the companies they hope to improve. For example, they may receive no further promotions or poor performance evaluations. Also, many whistleblowers are fired or demoted, even for high-profile tips that proved true.48 The Sarbanes–Oxley Act includes some protection for whistleblowers. Employees who report fraud related to corporate accounting, internal accounting controls, and auditing have a way of gaining reinstatement, as well as back pay and legal expenses. More than half of the pleas of whistleblowers are ignored.
Because the pleas of whistleblowers are often dismissed, it is important for leaders at all levels to create a comfortable climate for legitimate whis- tleblowing. The leader needs to sort out the difference between a trouble- maker and a true whistleblower.
Being a whistleblower requires a small act of leadership, in the sense of taking the initiative to bring about change. However, leaders of the organi- zation that is turned in might not perceive the change as constructive.
Providing Training in Ethics and Social Responsibility Forms of ethics training include messages about ethics and social responsibil- ity from company leadership, classes on ethics at colleges, and exercises in ethics. These training programs reinforce the idea that ethical and socially responsible behavior is both morally right and good for business. Much of the content of this chapter reflects the type of information communicated in such programs. Training programs in ethics and social responsibility are most likely to be effective when the organizational culture encourages ethical behavior.
198 CHAPTER 6• LEADERSHIP ETHICS AND SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
Caterpillar, the manufacturer of construction and mining equipment, exemplifies a modern approach to training in ethics. During the annual training, all 95,000 employees ponder a series of questions presented to them either via the Internet or on paper. The scenarios, written in-house, encourage workers to consider the best way to behave in a particular situa- tion. Employees are able to consult the code of ethics as they reflect on the scenarios. One scenario involves a plant-floor employee adding a cleansing agent used by other employees to the agent the employee is presently using. One of the alternatives is “Check with an environmental health and safety group to ensure the combination is safe.”49
Leadership Skill-Building Exercise 6-3 gives you the opportunity to engage in a small amount of ethics training.
Placing Company Interests over Personal Interests Many ethical violations, such as senior managers voting themselves outra- geous compensation, stem from managers placing their personal interests over the welfare of the company and other employees. According to the research and theorizing of management professors Craig L. Pearce, Charles C. Manz, and Henry P. Sims Jr., executives are more likely to be less cor- rupt (and therefore placing company interests first) when leadership is shared. The researchers reason that power can corrupt and absolute power can be an especially toxic influence. Shared leadership can provide a robust system of checks and balances, thereby reducing the possibility of some unethical and criminal behavior by business executives.50 Nevertheless, we still have to be realistic. Criminal business leaders such as Bernie Madoff probably enlisted the cooperation of a few other executives (thereby engag- ing shared leadership) to pull off their massive swindles.
Leadership Skill-Building Exercise 6-3 gives you an opportunity to work through issues of ethics and social responsibility.
LEADERSHIP SKILL-BUILDING EXERCISE 6-3
Getting More Bang for the Buck with Layoffs
Your assignment as mid-level leaders in a large com- pany is to develop a list of workers to lay off for pur- poses of company downsizing. The CEO says that she wants you to develop a list of fifty employees to lay off. She says that the more money you save the company, the better, but that you should still pay some attention to retaining high-producing workers. As you and your team start poring over employee salaries, you notice that the older employees are often the most highly paid because they have received salary increases for many years. These high-paid workers are a mix of
outstanding, average, and below-average performers based on the results of performance evaluations. You also notice that some of the younger employees who are not necessarily outstanding performers are rela- tively low paid.
Your job is to develop criteria for choosing fifty employees to lay off, taking into account both financial and ethical factors. You want to practice ethical and socially responsible leadership, but you also want the lay off to save the company a lot of money, thereby keep- ing your CEO happy.
LEADERSHIP, SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY, AND CREATING AN ETHICAL ORGANIZATIONAL CULTURE 199
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
Ethical and Socially Responsible Behavior and Organizational Performance
High ethics and social responsibility are sometimes related to good financial performance. A model of the relationship between corporate social perfor- mance and profits emphasizes the role of supply and demand. The model states that when demand for investments in social responsibility increases, value-maximizing managers will find it in their self-interest to make these investments even if cash flow is reduced. Also, despite spending money, the market value of the firm might increase when the demand for these invest- ment opportunities is greater than the supply. An example might be that investing in programs to improve literacy among poor children might have a payoff because there is a big demand for this type of investment.51 How- ever, investing money to help preserve reptiles in the Arizona desert might not have a good return because of low demand.
A group of researchers from the Boston Consulting Group and World Economic Forum found that many companies in emerging economies take steps to preserve the environment. Two examples are Florida Ice & Farm in Costa Rica and Shree Cement in India. The study also found that the enter- prises pursuing sustainability have consistently above-average growth rates and profit margins. Sustainable practices in these companies include invest- ing at first in more environmentally-friendly operating methods that eventu- ally lead to lower operating costs and higher yields. For example, it might take a lot of money up front to invest in a water-recycling system, but the payoff would be substantial in the long run.52
The relationship between social responsibility and profits can also work in two directions: More profitable firms can better afford to invest in social responsibility initiatives, and these initiatives can lead to more profits. The relationship between social and financial performance may be a virtuous circle, meaning that corporate social performance and corporate financial performance feed and reinforce each other.53
According to a study conducted by the Ethics Resource Center, employ- ees who work in an ethical environment tend to be better motivated. The study concluded that the chance to contribute to something larger than themselves and be recognized for it is a strong incentive to employees for delivering superior performance.54 Using this approach, it is helpful if com- pany leaders explain why the work is larger than oneself, such as a cement manufacturer explaining to employees that the cement is vital for building infrastructure that serves the needs of many people.
Being ethical also helps avoid the costs of paying huge fines for being unethical. According to the Carnegie Council for Ethics in International Affairs, during an eight-year period Wal-Mart paid about $1 billion in damages to U.S. employees in six different cases related to unpaid work.55
Being accused of unethical and illegal behavior can also result in a sudden drop in customers and clients, as well as extreme difficulty in obtaining new customers and clients.
200 CHAPTER 6• LEADERSHIP ETHICS AND SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
READER’S ROADMAP
Another key payoff from high corporate social responsibility is the ability to attract high-quality employees. A nonprofit organization, B Lab, certifies business firms that demonstrate sustainable business practices such as pro- ducing less waste, purchasing from local suppliers, compensating employees fairly, and having a clearly stated social mission. Close to 900 firms have received such designation, including Patagonia Inc., (top-quality outdoor clothing), Ben & Jerry’s (rich ice cream), and Method Products Inc. (cleaning supplies). Leadership at many B Lab companies claims that the certification has been helpful in recruiting, especially among environmentally-conscious young people.56
A study conducted with 1,084 employees from seventeen countries sug- gests that when workers perceive the employer to have high corporate social responsibility, they tend to be more emotionally committed to the company. Perceptions of corporate social responsibility were measured by responses to statements such as, “Does our company do enough towards protecting the environment,” and “How satisfied are you with the way your company is tak- ing responsibility for its employees?” An example of a statement measuring commitment was, “Overall, how strong is your sense of loyalty to the com- pany.”57 Employee commitment often improves organizational performance because turnover decreases, and workers invest more effort into their jobs.
In short, a leader who is successful at establishing a climate of high ethics and social responsibility can earn and save the company a lot of money. Yet, there are times when being socially responsible can eat into profits. For example, installing solar panels in a geographic area with lim- ited sunshine might create a long payback from the panels.
So far in this book, we have examined the nature of leadership; the inner qualities of leaders; and leadership styles, contingency leadership, and the leader’s ethical behav- ior and social responsibility. In the next chapter, we focus on how leaders acquire and maintain power and their use of organizational politics.
SUMMARY
Principles of ethical and moral leadership all center on the idea that a leader should do the right thing, as perceived by a consensus of reasonable people. Key principles of ethical and moral leadership are as follows: (1) be honest and trustworthy and have integrity in dealing with others, (2) pay attention to all stakeholders, (3) build community, and (4) respect the individual.
Differences in ethics and morality can be traced to eight factors: (1) leader moral identity; (2) the
leader’s level of greed, gluttony, and avarice; (3) rationalization and implied permission to engage in unethical acts; (4) the leader’s level of moral development; (5) a sense of entitlement; (6) situational influences; (7) a person’s character; and (8) motivated blindness.. It has been proposed that to stay ethical a leader must develop an ethical mind focused on good work.
Before reaching a decision about an issue that is not obviously ethical or blatantly unethical, a leader
SUMMARY 201
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
or manager should seek answers to questions such as: Is it right? Is it fair? Who gets hurt? Unethical behavior has brought companies into bankruptcy, led to layoffs of thousands of workers, diminished trust in stock investments, and discouraged many talented young people from embarking on a busi- ness career.
Another way a leader can be ethical and moral is to spearhead the firm, or a unit within it, toward doing good deeds—toward being socially responsi- ble and creating an ethical organizational culture. Among the many possible socially responsible and ethical acts are (1) providing strategic leadership of social responsibility and ethics, (2) creating a pleas- ant workplace, (3) helping build a sustainable envi- ronment, (4) engaging in social entrepreneurship, (5) engaging in philanthropy, (6) working with sup- pliers to improve working conditions, (7) establish- ing written codes of conduct, (8) developing formal
mechanisms for dealing with ethical problems, (9) accepting whistleblowers, (10) providing train- ing in ethics, and (11) placing company interests over personal interests.
High ethics and social responsibility are some- times related to good financial performance, according to research evidence and opinion. Causes in big demand are more likely to have a financial payoff. More profitable firms have the funds to invest in good social programs. Employees who work in an ethical environment tend to be better motivated. Being ethical helps avoid big fines for being unethical, and ethical organizations attract more employees. Corporate social responsibility can help in recruiting talented employees, and can lead to higher commitment to the company. Socially responsible behavior can be cost-effective. However, being socially responsible can sometimes lower profit margins.
KEY TERMS
ethics 179 morals 179 integrity 181 entitlement 184
ethical mind 186 corporate social
responsibility 190 social entrepreneurship 195
whistleblower 198 virtuous circle 200
GUIDELINES FOR ACTION AND SKILL DEVELOPMENT
A solid foundation for developing a leadership career is to establish a personal ethical code. An ethical code determines what behavior is right or wrong, good or bad, based on values. The values stem from cultural upbringing, religious teachings, peer influences, and professional or industry stan- dards. A code of professional ethics helps a leader deal with such issues as accepting bribes, backstab- bing coworkers, and sexually harassing a work associate.
A provocative explanation of the causes of uneth- ical behavior emphasizes the strength of relation- ships among people. Assume that two people have close ties to each other—they may have worked together for a long time or have known each other both on and off the job. As a consequence, they are
likely to behave ethically toward one another on the job. In contrast, if a weak relationship exists between two individuals, either party is more likely to treat the other badly. In the work environment, the people involved may be your work associates, your contacts, or your internal and external custo- mers.58 The message is for you as a leader to build strong relationships with others in order to increase the frequency of ethical behavior.
Discussion Questions and Activities
1. If reputable companies such as IBM and Apple have been charged with using bribes to obtain sales, why should you worry about being ethical?
202 CHAPTER 6• LEADERSHIP ETHICS AND SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
LEADERSHIP CASE PROBLEM A
2. The majority of business executives accused of unethical behavior have studied ethics either as a subject in a business course or as an entire course. So what do you think went wrong?
3. Suppose you had inside information that your employer was thinking about declaring bank- ruptcy, and you find out that a family member was about to purchase $20,000 in the stock of your employer. To what extent would it be unethical for you to dissuade the family mem- ber from making the investment?
4. How can consumers use the Internet to help control the ethical behavior of business leaders?
5. What is your position on the ethics of a busi- ness leader’s receiving $100 million or more in annual compensation?
6. Should leaders of companies that produce fat- tening food that can lead to cardiac problems
and obesity be targeted for being socially irresponsible?
7. What social responsibility obligations should top-level management of major retailers have for the severe injuries that often take place in their stores on Black Friday? (This is the highly promoted shopping event that takes place after Thanksgiving Thursday)?
8. How fair do you think it is to deny an executive a CEO position he or she had been promised because of a romantic relationship with a sub- ordinate? Explain your reasoning.
9. As a present or future organizational leader, what can you do to be an ethical role model for others?
10. In this chapter, we have discussed ethical prob- lems mostly in business. For sake of fairness and balance, identify a few ethical problems you have observed among lawyers, physicians, politicians, or sports figures.
Are Drivers or Smartphones to Blame?
Top-level leaders at a company that manufactures smartphones, tablet computers, and portable music players, among other electronic devices held a one- day retreat. The purpose was to think though how well the company was contributing to society. Technology chief, Olivia, commented, “I am very proud of us as a company. Think of what we have done for the world. Because of our products, people are more productive, smarter, and happier. At any time of the day, millions of users can access the information they need, and get in touch with who- ever they want. Furthermore, they don’t have to clutter their minds with facts, or even know how to spell correctly, or do basic math. With the tap of a few buttons, or touching a screen, they get all the information they need.”
CEO Raphael added, “You are so right Olivia. Also, people don’t even have to pay for landline tel- ephones any longer. And think of how hundreds of companies can hire fewer people because of our devices. I learned recently that many car dealer-
ships have laid off many of their in-store sales reps because a good deal of car purchasing is now done over the Internet. And people don’t have to purchase those ink-laden newspapers because they can get all the information they need on a hand- held device.”
Derek, the marketing manager, with a worried look said to the group. “We all make a great living from the electronic devices we make and sell, and so do our competitors. The information technology industry has created millions of jobs. And maybe we have also eliminated millions of jobs. However, I want us as industry leaders to focus on one issue right now.
“The accidents and deaths our devices are facili- tating are getting out of hand. At first it was people sending and receiving calls on their cell phones that was creating driving hazards. Then along came texting which is even a bigger problem. Now we have data that the number of people who surf the Internet while driving is surging.
LEADERSHIP CASE PROBLEM A 203
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
LEADERSHIP CASE PROBLEM B
“I know that states, provinces, and municipali- ties forbid texting or handheld phone use while driving, but the laws are largely ignored, and the carnage continues. I am asking us to consider what role we should play as an industry leader in getting consumers to use our products in a way that does not harm or kill other people on the streets and highways.”
Raphael replied, “I think that local governments, Internet service providers, and perhaps schools have more responsibility for minimizing accidents with smartphone users. If we were making kitchen knives instead of electronic devices would we be responsible for the occasional deaths and injuries caused by these knives?
“In our situation, we have to ask whether the drivers or the smartphones are to blame for the accidents of distracted drivers.”
Questions
1. What role do you think this industry leader should play in encouraging safer use of their smartphones?
2. With the negative perspective Derek has about the use of smartphones while driving, should he be released from his position as the market- ing manager?
3. How ethical and socially responsible are the opinions of Olivia and Raphael about the advantages of smartphones to society?
ASSOCIATED ROLE PLAY One student plays the role of Derek, who later in the meeting tells a story about a neighbor whose teenage daughter and two companions died in an auto acci- dent because the daughter was texting while driving. Derek is purposely being dramatic because he wants
the team to be more socially responsible. Two other students play the roles of Olivia and Raphael who sympathize with Derek’s neighbor, yet want Derek to be more realistic about the company’s social responsibility with respect to smartphones.
Let’s Go Green
Monica is the CEO of a regional chain of hospitals and clinics that includes several thousand employ- ees. The medical facilities continue to grow as insurance companies are eager to form partner- ships with relatively low-cost suppliers and the pop- ulation ages. Monica has been thinking lately that medical facilities have not been as aggressive as manufacturing companies in pushing for environ- mental sustainability. In her words, “Medical facili- ties could be a lot greener than they are. Obviously we don’t throw contaminated bandages and body parts into the river, but we could still do a lot more. I think that we need to get more of our lea- ders and regular employees thinking green.”
The following week, Monica worked with her administrative assistant, Karen, to come up with a list of suggestions that hospital and clinic managers, supervisors, and employees could implement to help
create a greener environment. Monica believes strongly that only collective action can create a sus- tainable environment, meaning that all employees can help make medical facilities more environmen- tally friendly. She then sent an e-mail to every employee with a work e-mail address, making sugges- tions for creating a greener environment. Monica also explained that the hospital had established a central budget to help fund some of the green initiatives. Her suggestions for helping the hospitals and clinics con- tribute to a sustainable environment contained twenty-five suggestions, including the following six:
● Conserve energy by adjusting thermostats to keep working areas cooler during cold months, and warmer during warm months.
● Encourage patients to conserve on the use of towels because laundering towels consume so much energy.
204 CHAPTER 6• LEADERSHIP ETHICS AND SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
● Encourage visitors to hospitals and clinics to not waste so much gas circling around the parking lots to find a spot close to the medical facility. Our patients and their family members are spewing too much carbon dioxide into their air because they want to minimize walking.
● Encourage employee use of mass transportation in any locations where it is feasible.
● Use mugs instead of Styrofoam, and set up bins to recycle aluminum cans and plastic bottles.
● Create signs that say “Think Before You Print,” and post them near office printers and copy machines. At the same time, include under your e-mail signature a line that encourages people not to print e-mails unless absolutely necessary.
Among the first replies from her mass- distributed e-mail were, “Thanks. If we follow your advice we will soon be one of the greenest health care chains in the country,” and “Nice idea, but our staff is already so overworked I doubt we can work on the environment.”
Questions
1. What do you think of the effectiveness of Monica’s leadership in sending an e-mail mes- sage to encourage environmental sustainability?
2. What other leadership technique might Monica use to help prompt the hospitals and clinics toward sustainability?
3. Help CEO Monica by stating a vision to cover her efforts toward sustainability.
ASSOCIATED ROLE PLAY Assemble in a small group to play the role of super- visors in one of the hospitals in the chain headed by CEO Monica. Your group decides to brainstorm some ideas for helping the hospital contribute to a sustainable environment. Spend about fifteen
minutes on the group brainstorming session. Edit the list down to about six useful suggestions. Send them to Monica to demonstrate that your group wants to exercise leadership in going green.
LEADERSHIP SKILL-BUILDING EXERCISE 6-4
My Leadership Portfolio
For this chapter’s entry into your leadership journal, reflect on any scenario you have encountered recently that would have given you the opportunity to practice ethical or socially responsible behavior. The scenario could have taken place in relation to employment, an interaction with fellow students, or being a customer of some type. Write down the sce- nario, and how you responded to it. Indicate what you learned about yourself. An example follows:
I had been thinking of purchasing advanced soft- ware to manage and edit photos on my computer. The software I needed would cost several hundred dollars. The other day, while going through my e-mail, I came upon an advertisement offering the
exact photo software I wanted for $50. At first, I thought this would be a real money saver. After thinking through the ethical issues, I came to real- ize that the person selling this software was proba- bly a pirate. If I purchased from this character, I would be supporting a software pirate. Besides, buying stolen goods might even be a crime. I learned from this incident that there are many opportunities in everyday life to practice good—or bad—ethics. I want to become a moral leader, so practicing good ethics will help me.
P.S.: By being ethical, I probably avoided buying virus-infected software that could have played havoc with my computer.
LEADERSHIP SKILL-BUILDING EXERCISE 6-4 205
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
NOTES
LEADERSHIP SKILL-BUILDING EXERCISE 6-5
Company Policy for Employee Recycling of Electronic Products
Assume that you are in a leadership position within your company. You and several other managers are concerned about the physical envi- ronment becoming cluttered with discarded elec- tronic products, including personal computers, laptop computers, smartphones, and television sets. You know that there are appropriate channels for discarding and recycling these products respon- sibly, yet these channels are often neglected. Your company has environmentally conscious proce- dures for getting rid of electronic devices. You are
concerned, however, that employees are not doing enough at home to safely discard used electronic products.
Work individually or with other students to develop a company policy that will facilitate employees being socially responsible when discard- ing electronic devices no longer in use. Recognize that the company has limited direct control over how employees conduct their personal life. A sug- gested guideline is to create a company policy about 100 words long.
1. Original story with a couple of facts about the clothing industry from Chris Burritt, “Why ‘Less Is More’ Rules Fashion,” Bloomberg Businessweek, May 30–June 5, 2011, pp. 18–19.
2. James G. Clawson, Level Three Leadership: Getting below the Surface, Second Edition (Upper Saddle River, N.J.: Prentice Hall, 2002), p. 54.
3. Cited in Joanne B. Ciulla, ed., Ethics: The Heart of Leadership, Second Edition (Westport, Conn.: Praeger, 2004), p. 119.
4. Karianne Kalshoven, Deanne N. Den Hartog, and Annebel H. B. De Hoogh, “Ethical Leadership at Work Questionnaire (ELW): Development and Validation of a Multidimensional Measure,” The Leadership Quarterly, February 2001, p. 51.
5. National Business Ethics Survey, Ethics Resource Center, Arlington, VA: 2012 survey (www.ethics.org).
6. Thomas E. Becker, “Integrity in Organizations: Beyond Honesty and Conscientiousness,” Academy of Management Review, January 1998, pp. 154–161.
7. Robert Simons, Henry Mintzberg, and Kunal Basu, “Memo to CEOs Re Five Half-Truths of Business,” Fast Company, June 2002, p. 118.
8. Tricia Bisoux, “Corporate Counter Culture,” BizEd, November/December 2004, p. 18.
9. Douglas R. May, Adrian Y. L. Chan, Timothy D. Hodges, and Bruce J. Avolio, “Developing the Moral Component of Authentic Leadership,” Organizational Dynamics, no. 3, 2003, p. 248.
10. Peter G. Northouse, Leadership: Theory and Practice, Second Edition (Thousand Oaks, Calif.: Sage Publications, 2001), p. 263.
11. Clawson, Level Three Leadership, p. 57. 12. David M. Mayer, Karl Aquino, Rebecca L.
Greenbaum, and Maribeth Kuenzi, “Who Displays Ethical Leadership, and Why Does It Matter?” Academy of Management Journal, February 2012, pp. 151–171.
13. “Fed Chief Points to Cautious Recovery,” Gannett News Service, July 17, 2002.
14. Elliot Blair Smith and Phil Kuntz, “Some CEOs Are More Equal Than Others,” Bloomberg Businessweek, May 8–May 12, 2013, p. 72.
15. “KPMG’s Timothy Flynn: Restoring Credibility and Not Looking Back,” Knowledge @ Wharton, December 12, 2007, p. 1.
16. Lawrence Kohlberg, Essays on Moral Development (New York: Harper & Row, 1984).
17. Ray Fishman and Tim Sullivan, “In Defense of the CEO,” The Wall Street Journal, January 12–13, 2013, p. C1
18. Smith and Kuntz, “Some CEOs Are More Equal Than Others,” p. 71.
206 CHAPTER 6• LEADERSHIP ETHICS AND SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
19. Aaron Lucchetti and Monica Langley, “ Perform-or-Die Culture Leaves Thin Talent Pool for Top Wall Street Jobs,” The Wall Street Journal, November 5, 2007, p. A1.
20. Max H. Bazerman and Ann E. Tenbrunsel, “Ethical Breakdowns,” Harvard Business Review, April 2011, pp. 61–62.
21. “The Ethical Mind: A Conversation with Psychologist Howard Gardner,” Harvard Business Review, March 2007, pp. 51–56.
22. Karianne Kalshoven, Deanne N. Den Hartog, and Annebel H. B. De Hoogh, “Ethical Leadership at Work Questionnaire (ELW): Development and Validation of a Multidimensional Measure,” The Leadership Quarterly, February 2011, p. 54.
23. James L. Bowditch and Anthony F. Buono, A Primer on Organizational Behavior, Fifth edition (New York: Wiley, 2001), p. 4.
24. Keith Naughton, “U.S. Automakers Cut Retirees Loose,” Bloomberg Businessweek, July 2–July 8, 2012, pp. 14–16.
25. John Browne and Robin Nuttail, “Beyond Corporate Social Responsibility: Integrated External Engagement,”McKinsey Quarterly (www.mckinseyquarterly.com), March 2013, p. 1.
26. Richard L. Schmalensee, “The ‘Thou Shalt’ School of Business,” The Wall Street Journal, December 30, 2003, p. B4.
27. Christine Arena, “‘Corporate Social Responsibility’: A Wobbly Concept,” The Christian Science Monitor (CSMonitor.com), October 22, 2010, p. 2.
28. Christina Rexrode, “Ringing Silence on Topic of Ethics, Banking,” The Charlotte Observer, December 25, 2010.
29. Milton Moscowitz and Robert Levering, “The 100 Best Companies to Work For,” Fortune, February 4, 2014, pp. 108–120; Robert Levering and Milton Moskowitz, “The 2008 List,” Fortune, February 4, 2008, p. 75.
30. Jeremiah McWilliams, “Coca-Cola Names Bea Perez Chief Sustainability Officer,” The Atlanta- Journal Constitution (www.ajc.com), May 19, 2011, p. 1.
31. Maya Albanese, “How She Leads: Hannah Jones of Nike,” Greenbiz.com, February 6, 2012, pp. 1–5.
32. Bennett J. Loudon, “Against the Grain,” Democrat and Chronicle, November 10, 2013, pp. 1E, 4E.
33. David J. Unger, “Why Are US Firms Going ‘Green’: CEOs or Customers?” The Christian Science Monitor (CSMonitor.com), December 26, 2012, pp. 1–2.
34. Geoff Colvin, “The UPS Green Dream,” Fortune, December 27, 2010, pp. 49–50.
35. Erika Brown, “Rehab, Reuse, Recycle,” Forbes, April 21, 2008, pp. 70, 72; “John Shegerian, Electronic Recyclers International (ERI),” Business Interviews.com, August 30, 2013.
36. Magali A. Delmas, Dror Etzion, and Nicholas Nairn-Birch, “Triangulating Environmental Performance: What Do Corporate Social Responsibility Ratings Really Capture?” Academy of Management Perspectives, August 2013, pp. 255–267.
37. Matthew G. Grimes, Jeffery S. McMullen, and Toyah L. Miller, “Dialogue,” Academy of Management Review, July 2013, p. 460.
38. BetterWorldBooks.com. Accessed January 2, 2014.
39. Toyah L. Miller, Matthew G. Grimes, Jeffery S. McMullen, and Timothy J. Vogus, “Venturing for Others with Heart and Head: How Compassion Encourages Social Entrepreneurship,” Academy of Management Review, October 2012, pp. 616–640.
40. Melinda Newman, “Off the Streets and into Business,” Entrepreneur, November 2013, pp. 34–38.
41. For details see www.gatesfoundation.org. 42. Robert J. Bies, Jean M. Bartunek, Timothy L.
Fort, and Mayer N. Zald, “Corporations as Social Change Agents: Individual, Interpersonal, Institutional, and Environmental Dynamics,” Academy of Management Review, July 2007, pp. 788–793.
43. Charles Duhigg and David Barboza, “In China, Human Costs Are Built into an iPad,” The New York Times (www.nytimes.com), January 25, 2012.
44. Quoted in Joanne Lozar Glenn, “Making Sense of Ethics,” Business Education Forum, October 2004, p. 10.
45. Jessica Holzer and ShayndiRaice, “IBM Settles Bribery Charges,” The Wall Street Journal, March 19–20, 2011, p. B1.
46. Doug Cameron and Joann S. Lublin, “Lockheed Ousts New Chief,” The Wall Street Journal, November 10–11, 2012, p. B1.
NOTES 207
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
47. Lara Lakes Jordan, “Whistle-Blowers Identified $1.3 in Fraud over Year,” The Associated Press, November 22, 2006.
48. “A Tip for Whistleblowers: Don’t,” Mother Jones, June 2007, reprinted in The Wall Street Journal, May 31, 2007, p. B6.
49. Jean Thilmany, “Supporting Ethical Employees,” HR Magazine, September 2007, p. 108.
50. Craig L. Pearse, Charles C. Manz, and Henry P. Sims Jr., “The Roles of Vertical and Shared Leadership in the Enactment of Executive Corruption: Implications for Research and Practice,” Leadership Quarterly, June 2008, pp. 353–359.
51. Alison Mackey, Tyson B. Mackey, and Jay B. Barney, “Corporate Social Responsibility and Firm Performance: Investor Preferences and Corporate Strategies,” Academy of Management Review, July 2007, p. 833.
52. Knut Haanaes, David Michael, Jeremy Jurgens, and Subramanian Rangan, “Making Sustainability Profitable,” Harvard Business Review, March 2013, pp. 110–115.
53. Sandra A. Waddock and Samuel B. Graves, “The Corporate Social Performance–Financial
Performance Link,” Strategic Management Journal, Spring 1997, pp. 303–319.
54. “Employees Who Work in an Ethical Environment Are More Inclined To Go the Extra Mile for the Boss,” Ethics Resource Center (www.ethics.org), July 8, 2010.
55. S. Prakash Sethi, “The World of Wal-Mart,” Carnegie Council for Ethics in International Affairs (www.carnegiecouncil.org), May 8, 2013, p. 1.
56. Lindsay Gellman and Rachel Feintzeig, “Companies Play Up Social Endeavors,” The Wall Street Journal, November 13, 2013, p. B6.
57. Karsten Mueller, Kate Hattrup, Sven-Oliver Spiess, and Nick Lin-Hi, “The Effects of Social Responsibility on Employees’ Affective Commitment: A Cross-Cultural Investigation,” Journal of Applied Psychology, November 2012, pp. 1186–1200.
58. Daniel J. Brass, Kenneth D. Butterfield, and Bruce C. Skaggs, “Relationships and Unethical Behavior: A Social Network Perspective,” Academy of Management Review, January 1998, pp. 14–31.
208 CHAPTER 6• LEADERSHIP ETHICS AND SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
CH AP
TE R
7 Power, Politics, and Leadership
LEARNING OBJECTIVES After studying this chapter and doing the exercises, you should be able to
• Recognize the various types of power.
• Identify tactics used for becoming an empowering leader.
• Know how to use delegation to support empowerment.
• Pinpoint factors contributing to organizational politics.
• Describe both ethical and unethical political behaviors.
• Explain how a leader can control dysfunctional politics.
CHAPTER OUTLINE Sources and Types of Power Position Power Personal Power Power Stemming from Ownership Power Stemming from Dependencies Power Derived from Capitalizing on Opportunity Power Stemming from Managing Critical Problems Power Stemming from Being Close to Power Power and Self-Serving Behavior
Tactics for Becoming an Empowering Leader The Nature of Empowerment Empowering Practices Effective Delegation and Empowerment
Factors that Contribute to Organizational Politics Pyramid-Shaped Organization Structure Subjective Standards of Performance Environmental Uncertainty and Turbulence
Emotional Insecurity Machiavellian Tendencies Encouraging Admiration from Subordinates
Political Tactics and Strategies Ethical Political Tactics and Strategies Unethical Political Tactics and Strategies
Exercising Control over Dysfunctional Politics
Summary
Key Terms
Guidelines for Action and Skill Development
Leadership Case Problem A
Leadership Case Problem B
Notes
The founder and CEO of Amazon.com Inc., JeffBezos, has become one of the world’s best-known,wealthiest, and most creative businesspersons. He is also a feared business leader because he takes great
delight in entering any business that has high profit margins, and that Amazon could fit under its wing. A favorite Bezos motto is, “Your margin is my opportunity.” His company is willing to make little or no profit on a
209 Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s).
Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
product or service just to gain loyal customers who will make more purchases from Amazon over time.
Beginning as an online bookseller in 1995, Amazon today sells over 20 million products and a wide variety of information technology services including cloud computer and data storage. Amazon has over 200 million customers, and annual sales exceeding $60 billion that grow quarterly. In his quest for power, Bezos has orchestrated the acquisi- tion of key competitors including Zappos.com and Quidsi, parent of shopping sites including Diapers.com and Soap.com. Amazon also bought a robot manufacturer, Kiva Systems, to help robotize its workplace. Part of Bezos’s path to low prices is to minimize operating costs to the point of requiring managers to work at desks made out of cardboard-laminated doors and keeping salaries low. Incen- tives are based on price gains from employee stock options.
Bezos believes strongly that the key to growth and power in business is imagination and innovation. “I encourage our employees to go down blind alleys and experiment,” says Bezos. “If you can increase the number of experiments you try from a hundred to one thousand, you dramatically increase the number of innovations you produce.”
Bezos’ demeanor connotes power, including a polished bald head, prominent eyebrows, an explosive voice and laugh, and a boisterous manner. Bezos has become the leading role model for founders who want to keep control of their companies. Bill Gurley, a venture capitalist said about Bezos, “If you were to ask 100 startup entrepre- neurs who the CEO [living] they admire the most, he would show up on 95 of the ballots.”
Bezos bought the Washington Post with $250 million of his own money with the hope of modernizing the venerable newspaper and helping it survive. Even more startling was Bezos’ announcement in 2013 that he wanted Amazon to soon deliver packages by unmanned flying vehicles, or drones, the company calls octocopters. With no reference to the enormous potential problems of thieves waiting for the drones to drop packages, deliveries falling on people’s heads, and trespassing issues, Bezos pronounced, ‘It will work, and it will happen.”
Bezos uses shrewd political tactics when needed to gain advantage for the company. For example, Amazon pushed to market baby products to parents at the same time it was negotiating to buy the parent of Diapers.com. The tactic drove down the acquisition price by creating fear and concern from other buyers of the baby supply company.
One way in which Bezos wields his power in the company is through his public e-mail address, jeff@amazon.com. When he receives a customer complaint of significance, he forwards the e-mail, followed by a question mark, to the relevant Amazon employee or employees. When employees receive such a forwarded e-mail message from Bezos, they react with fear, and know that they have only a few hours to respond.
Bezos graduated from Princeton University where he concentrated his studies in computer science and electri- cal engineering. He then worked for a Wall Street invest- ment firm before founding Amazon.com.1 (See Chapter 11 for details about the start of Amazon.com.)
This powerful and influential e-commerce executive’s story illustrates sev- eral sources of power held by leaders, including expertise and the power of ownership. This chapter covers the nature of power, the ways leaders acquire power and empower others, and the use and control of organiza- tional politics. Chapter 8 continues the discussion of organizational (or office) politics by examining influence tactics. An encouraging note for the student of power and organizational politics is that despite all the advances in technology and organizational theory, the basic principles of power, politics, and influence remain constant. For example, from cave people to the modern business executive, self-enhancement remains a basic motive.2
210 CHAPTER 7• POWER, POLITICS, AND LEADERSHIP
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
Sources and Types of Power
To exercise influence, a leader must have power, the potential or ability to influence decisions and control resources. Organizational power can be derived from many sources. How people obtain power depends to a large extent on the type of power they seek. Therefore, to understand the mechan- ics of acquiring power, one must also understand what types of power exist and the sources and origins of these types of power. Seven types of power, including some of their subtypes, are described in the following sections.
Position Power Power is frequently classified according to whether it stems from the organiza- tion or the individual.3 Three bases of power—legitimate power, reward power, and coercive power—stem from the person’s position in the organization.
Legitimate Power The lawful right to make a decision and expect compli- ance is called legitimate power. People at the highest levels in the organi- zation have more power than do people below them. However, organizational culture helps establish the limits to anyone’s power. Newly appointed executives, for example, are often frustrated with how long it takes to effect major change. A chief financial officer (CFO) recruited to improve the profitability of a telecommunications firm noted, “The com- pany has been downsizing for three years. We have more office space and manufacturing capacity than we need. Yet whenever I introduce the topic of selling off real estate to cut costs, I get a cold reception.”
At the top of the organization, a leader’s legitimate power is strengthened when he or she carries the titles of both chief executive officer and chair- man or chairwoman. Executives who occupy the dual role show a unity of command and strong leadership to stakeholders. A study found, curiously, that when women occupy the two roles, they are often both chairperson and president, rather than chairperson and CEO, thereby having slightly less power.4
Reward Power The authority to give employees rewards for compliance is reward power. If a vice president of operations can directly reward supervi- sors with cash bonuses for achieving productivity targets, this manager will exert considerable power. Almost any leader occupying a formal position has some reward power. Even the ability to give a subordinate a positive performance evaluation is a form of reward power.
Coercive Power Coercive power is the power to punish for noncompliance; it is based on fear. A common coercive tactic is for an executive to demote a subordinate manager who does not comply with the executive’s plans for change. Coercive power is limited, in that punishment and fear achieve mixed results as motivators. The leader who relies heavily on coercive power runs the constant threat of being ousted from power. Nevertheless,
SOURCES AND TYPES OF POWER 211
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
coercive power is widely practiced. At their worst, leaders who rely heavily on coercive power are considered to be power mongers in the sense that they will go to extremes to gain and retain power.5 An example would be fir- ing a capable subordinate because the person might be regarded by influen- tial people as a possible replacement for the executive.
Personal Power Three sources of power stem from characteristics or behaviors of the power actor: expert power, referent power, and prestige power. All are classified as personal power because they are derived from the person rather than the organization. Expert power and referent power contribute to charisma. Ref- erent power is the ability to influence others through one’s desirable traits and characteristics. Expert power is the ability to influence others through specialized knowledge, skills, or abilities. A component of expert power is having information not widely possessed by others, such as being an accu- rate predictor of commodity prices.
An example of a leader with substantial expert power is Doug McMillon who became Wal-Mart’s fifth CEO in company history, at age 47. He began his career with the company as a teenager unloading trucks at a Wal-Mart dis- tribution center. McMillon then held positions in various aspects of purchasing and merchandising, helping him develop expertise relevant to the company.6
Another important form of personal power is prestige power, the power stemming from a person’s status and reputation.7 A manager who has accu- mulated important business successes acquires prestige power. Managers acquire visibility based on their reputation—for example, a middle manager who has been successful at reducing turnover in the restaurant or hotel industry. Integrity is another contributor to prestige power because it enhances a leader’s reputation. Executive recruiters identify executives who can readily be placed in senior positions because of their excellent track records (or prestige).
Manager Assessment Quiz 7-1 provides a sampling of the specific beha- viors associated with five of the sources of power—three kinds of position power and two kinds of personal power.
Power Stemming from Ownership Executive leaders accrue power in their capacity as agents acting on behalf of shareholders. The strength of ownership power depends on how closely the leader is linked to shareholders and board members. A leader’s owner- ship power is also associated with how much money he or she has invested in the firm. An executive who is a major shareholder is much less likely to be fired by the board than one without an equity stake. The CEOs of high- technology firms are typically company founders who later convert the firm into a publicly held company by selling stock. After the public offering, many of these CEOs own several hundred million dollars’ worth of stock, making their position quite secure. The New Golden Rule applies: The per- son who holds the gold rules.
212 CHAPTER 7• POWER, POLITICS, AND LEADERSHIP
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
MANAGER ASSESSMENT QUIZ 7-1
Rating a Manager’s Power
Instructions: If you currently have a supervisor or can clearly recall one from the past, rate that supervisor. Circle the appropriate number of your answer, using the following scale: 5 ¼ strongly agree; 4 ¼ agree; 3 ¼ neither agree nor disagree; 2 ¼ disagree; 1 ¼ strongly disagree. (The actual scale presents the items in random order. They are classified here according to the power source for your convenience.)
STRONGLY AGREE
STRONGLY DISAGREE
My manager can (or former manager could) …
Reward Power
1. increase my pay level. 5 4 3 2 1
2. influence my getting a pay raise. 5 4 3 2 1
3. provide me with specific benefits. 5 4 3 2 1
4. influence my getting a promotion. 5 4 3 2 1
Coercive Power
5. give me undesirable job assignments. 5 4 3 2 1
6. make my work difficult for me. 5 4 3 2 1
7. make things unpleasant here. 5 4 3 2 1
8. make being at work distasteful. 5 4 3 2 1
Legitimate Power
9. make me feel that I have commitments to meet. 5 4 3 2 1
10. make me feel like I should satisfy my job requirements. 5 4 3 2 1
11. make me feel I have responsibilities to fulfill. 5 4 3 2 1
12. make me recognize that I have tasks to accomplish. 5 4 3 2 1
Expert Power
13. give me good technical suggestions. 5 4 3 2 1
14. share with me his or her considerable experience and/or training. 5 4 3 2 1
15. provide me with sound job-related advice. 5 4 3 2 1
16. provide me with needed technical knowledge. 5 4 3 2 1
Referent Power
17. make me feel valued. 5 4 3 2 1
18. make me feel that he or she approves of me. 5 4 3 2 1
19. make me feel personally accepted. 5 4 3 2 1
20. make me feel important. 5 4 3 2 1
Total score:
SOURCES AND TYPES OF POWER 213
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
Power Stemming from Dependencies According to the dependence perspective, people accrue power when others are dependent on them for things of value. Figure 7-1 depicts this basic model of sources of power. Because the things valued could be physi- cal resources or a personal relationship, dependence power can be posi- tional or personal. Richard M. Emerson noted that power resides implicitly in the other’s dependence.8 A leader–group member example would be that the group member who needs considerable recognition to survive becomes dependent on the leader, who is a regular source of such recognition. An organizational example is that the health care system in the United States has become heavily dependent on information technology to help stream- line the system. Health care information technology specialists therefore have more power.
QUIZ 7-1 (continued) Scoring and Interpretation: Add all the circled numbers to calculate your total score. You can make a tentative interpretation of the score as follows:
• 901: High power
• 70–89: Moderate power
• below 70: Low power
Also, notice whether you rated your manager significantly higher in one category.
Skill Development: This skill development rating can help you as a leader because it points to specific behaviors you can use to be perceived as high or low on a type of power. For example, a behavior specific for establishing referent power is to “make people feel important” (No. 20).
Source: Adapted from “Development and Application of New Scales to Measure the French and Raven (1959) Bases of Social Power,” by Timothy R. Hinkin and Chester A. Schriescheim, Journal of Applied Psychology, August 1989, p. 567.
Power
Dependence
Person A Person B
FIGURE 7-1 The Dependence Theory of Power.
Source: Adapted from Wilt H. Ratsburg, “Power Defined,” http://www.geocities.com/Athens/Forum/1650 /htmlpower.htm, accessed January 4, 2008.
214 CHAPTER 7• POWER, POLITICS, AND LEADERSHIP
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
Should leaders lose some of their power to control resources, their power declines. For example, a real estate developer can lose power when several major properties lose money, or worse enter bankruptcy. (Part of the power lost is the ability to borrow money.) When business conditions improve, and the developer slowly rebuilds, he or she tends to regain power. Several key real estate developers lost fortunes in the real estate bust in south Florida around 2009, but then regained power with the rebirth of the real estate market in the same region four years later.
Power Derived from Capitalizing on Opportunity Power can be derived from being in the right place at the right time and tak- ing the appropriate action. It pays to be where the action is. For example, the best opportunities in a diversified company lie in one of its growth divisions. Also, many small recycling firms moved from junkyard status to ecology firms as the interest in environmental sustainability surged in the late 2000s. A person or a firm also needs to have the right resources to capitalize on an opportunity, such as having the capacity to recycle on a larger scale.
Another ecology-related example of capitalizing on opportunity took place at outdoor clothing manufacturer Patagonia. For years, founder Yvon Chouinard had led campaigns to use eco-friendly materials and fabrics in its clothing. Patagonia had also pioneered sustainable manufacturing practices. During the Great Recession, Patagonia enjoyed its two best years ever. The opportunity capitalized on had two aspects: First, despite the recession, many upscale consumers still want to purchase eco-friendly products.9 Second, dur- ing a recession, many consumers want to purchase durable, multiple-use clothing—such as using the same jacket for hiking, skiing, and shopping.
Power Stemming from Managing Critical Problems The strategic contingency theory of power suggests that units best able to cope with the firm’s critical problems and uncertainties acquire relatively large amounts of power.10 The theory implies, for example, that when an organization faces substantial lawsuits, the legal department will gain power and influence over organizational decisions. Furthermore, the leader of the legal department gains power. The leaders of units directly involved with the organization’s core purposes (such as product development) usu- ally have more power than those leaders of departments not directly linked to the core purpose (such as maintenance).
Power Stemming from Being Close to Power The closer a person is to power, the greater the power he or she exerts. Likewise, the higher a unit reports in a firm’s hierarchy, the more power it possesses. In practice, this means that a leader in charge of a department reporting to the CEO has more power than one in charge of a department reporting to a vice president. Leaders in search of more power typically maneuver toward a higher-reporting position in the organization.
SOURCES AND TYPES OF POWER 215
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
Power and Self-Serving Behavior An obvious problem about leadership power is that it can be directed more toward self-serving behavior than the good of others including the organiza- tion and all stakeholders. A study conducted with working supervisors as well as a laboratory simulation investigated the influence of accountability on leader self-serving behavior. Accountability focused on the expectation that the leader may be called upon to justify his or her beliefs, feelings, and actions to others. Self-serving behavior in the study focused on the distribution of resources, such as the leader receiving a disproportional share of cash bonuses. The major finding of the study was that powerful leaders who were held accountable, acted less self-servingly than their nonaccountable counterparts.11
Another set of studies helps explain why some people who attain power act out of self-interest, whereas others with power act in the interest of others. The influential (or moderating) variable studied was moral identity—the extent to which an individual holds morality as part of his or her self- concept. Trait power was measured both through a questionnaire about power, and subjective power was measured from study participants describing situations in which they experienced power. The study concluded that indivi- duals with a strong moral identity were less likely to act in self-interest when they had strong trait power or subjective feelings of experiencing power. In contrast, individuals with a weak moral identity were more likely to act in self-interest under trait power or feelings of power.12 If you are moral, you are less likely to use power for your own good.
To conclude our discussion of sources of power, historian Robert A. Caro reminds us that acquiring power alone does not make for great leadership. It takes an ambitious person to acquire power, and sometimes the approach to acquiring power may not be highly ethical, such as hoarding vital infor- mation or making others dependent on you. The person who then uses the accumulated power to create and implement a useful vision qualifies as an excellent leader.13 The concept of who is an excellent leader could be based on a person’s values, but two leaders already described in this book might qualify: Ron Shaich of Panera Bread, and Sheryl Sandberg of Facebook.
Tactics for Becoming an Empowering Leader
A leader’s power and influence increase when he or she shares power with others. Empowerment is therefore the basic component of shared or distrib- uted leadership. As team members receive more power, they can accom- plish more—they become more productive. And because managers share credit for their accomplishments, they become more powerful. A truly pow- erful leader empowers team members to accomplish tasks on their own.
Strategy theorist Gary Hamel believes that companies that empower and train people at all levels to lead can create competitive advantage. The infer- ence is that talent from all levels should capitalized upon, not just the talents of those at the top of the organizational pyramid.14 Research evidence with
216 CHAPTER 7• POWER, POLITICS, AND LEADERSHIP
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
eighty-two top-management teams supports Hamel’s comments just made about the positive impact of empowerment. Empowering leadership was defined as the CEO encouraging top team members to exercise control over decisions, and facilitates such decision making. The three variables studied affected by empowerment were behavioral integration, top-management team potency, and the performance of the firm. Behavioral integration refers to subordinates integrating the empowered approaches into their regular activities, specifically information exchange, collaborative behavior, and joint decision making. Team potency refers to the group’s shared perception of its ability to successfully perform challenges and tasks. Performance of the firm was measured by top team managers rating the organization’s performance in comparison to the competition.
The overall finding was that empowering leadership by the CEO influ- ences top-management team processes (behavioral integration) which in turn improves performance of the firm. Especially important is that empow- ering leadership leads to behavioral integration which then enhances team potency, which then bolsters performance of the firm.15
Here we look briefly at the nature of empowerment before discussing a number of practices and two cautions about empowerment.
The Nature of Empowerment In its basic meaning, empowerment refers to passing decision-making authority and responsibility from managers to group members. Almost any form of participative management, shared decision making, and delegation can be regarded as empowerment. Gretchen M. Spreitzer conducted research in several work settings to develop a psychological definition of empowerment.16 Four components were identified: meaning, competence, self-determination, and impact. Full-fledged empowerment includes all four dimensions, along with a fifth one, internal commitment.
Meaning is the value of a work goal, evaluated in relation to a person’s ideals or standards. Work has meaning when there is a fit between the requirements of a work role and a person’s beliefs, values, and behaviors. A person who is doing meaningful work is likely to feel empowered. Compe- tence, or self-efficacy, is an individual’s belief in his or her capability to per- form a particular task well. People who feel competent believe that they have the capability to meet performance requirements in a given situation, such as a credit analyst saying, “I’ve been given the authority to evaluate credit risks up to $10,000 and I know I can do it well.” A newer model of empowerment also features the key roles of self-efficacy and competence in helping a fellow group member feel that he or she has gained power.17
Self-determination is an individual’s sense of having a choice in initiating and regulating actions. A high-level form of self-determination occurs when workers feel that they can choose the best method to solve a particular problem. Self-determination also involves such considerations as choosing the work pace and work site. A highly empowered worker might choose to perform the required work while on a cruise rather than remain in the
TACTICS FOR BECOMING AN EMPOWERING LEADER 217
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
office. Impact is the degree to which the worker can influence strategic, administrative, or operating outcomes on the job. Instead of feeling there is no choice but to follow the company’s course, a worker might have a say in the future of the company. A middle manager might say, “Here’s an oppor- tunity for recruiting minority employees that we should exploit. And here’s my action plan for doing so.”
Another dimension of true empowerment is for the group member to develop an internal commitment toward work goals. Internal commitment takes place when workers are committed to a particular project, person, or program for individual motives. An example would be a production techni- cian in a lawn mower plant who believes he or she is helping create a more beautiful world.
The focus of empowerment, then, is on the changes taking place within the individual. However, groups can also be empowered in such a way that the group climate contributes to these attitudes and feelings. An example of a statement reflecting an empowering climate would be “People in our orga- nization get information about the organization’s performance in a timely fashion.”18 Being part of an empowered group can help a member commit to achieving shared goals.
Empowering Practices The practices that foster empowerment supplement the standard approaches to participative management, such as conferring with team members before reaching a decision. The practices, as outlined in Figure 7-2, are based on direct observations of successful leaders and experimental evidence. Before reading about these practices, do Leadership Self-Assessment Quiz 7-1.
LEADERSHIP PRACTICES
1. Foster initiative and responsibility 2. Link work activities to organizational goals 3. Provide ample information 4. Allow group members to choose methods 5. Encourage self-leadership 6. Establish limits to empowerment 7. Continue to lead 8. Take into account cultural differences 9. Take into account empowerment expectations
EFFECTIVE EMPOWERMENT
• Meaning to work • Competence • Self-efficacy • Self-determination • Impact • Internal commitment
© Ce ng ag e Le ar ni ng
FIGURE 7-2 Effective Empowering Practices.
Certain leadership and managerial practices lead to effective empowerment, which in turn often leads to higher motivation and productivity.
218 CHAPTER 7• POWER, POLITICS, AND LEADERSHIP
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
Foster Initiative and Responsibility A leader can empower team members sim- ply by fostering greater initiative and responsibility in their assignments. For example, a manufacturer of battery-powered construction tools might inform an information technology enthusiast in the company, “From now on, you are responsible for online sales. You have the product knowledge and the IT smarts. I don’t. The job is your baby.”
LEADERSHIP SELF-ASSESSMENT QUIZ 7-1
Empowering Attitudes and Beliefs
Instructions: To empower employees successfully, the leader has to convey appropriate attitudes and have certain beliefs. To the best of your ability, indicate which attitudes you now have and which ones require further development.
HAVE NOW WOULD NEED TO DEVELOP
Empowering Attitude or Belief
1. Most workers have considerable unused talent that could be put to good use. □ □
2. Instead of demanding immediate results, the leader should give group members the time to develop the needed information or skill.
□ □
3. It is productive for the leader to ask team members questions to help them develop a new perspective on problems.
□ □
4. Responsible workers usually know what needs to be done without too much direction from the boss.
□ □
5. It is ideal to let a professional worker figure out the best method for accomplishing a task.
□ □
6. Even if workers are empowered, a little inspiration and encouragement from the leader is still useful.
□ □
7. Feedback to workers is still useful even if they have considerable responsibility for a task or project.
□ □
8. Quite frequently, workers have more knowledge of how to solve a particular problem than does the boss.
□ □
9. I urge (or would urge) subordinates to think of problems as opportunities rather than problems.
□ □
10. Good results come about when workers are encouraged to search for solutions without supervision.
□ □
Skill Development: If, as a leader or manager, you already have most of these attitudes and have engaged in most of these behaviors, you will be good at empowerment. Most of these attitudes and practices can be devel- oped without transforming your personality.
Source: Statements 9 and 10 are adapted from Robert P. Vecchio, Joseph E. Justin, and Craig L. Pearse, “Empowering Leadership: An Examination of Mediating Mechanisms within a Hierarchical Structure,” The Leadership Quarterly, June 2010, p. 540.
TACTICS FOR BECOMING AN EMPOWERING LEADER 219
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
Henry Mintzberg reminds us that many professional workers already have considerable initiative and responsibility. In his words: “Truly empow- ered workers, such as doctors in a hospital, even bees in a hive, do not await gifts from their managerial gods; they know what they are there to do, and just do it.”19
Link Work Activities to Organizational Goals Empowerment works better when the empowered activities are aligned with the strategic goals of the organi- zation. Empowered workers who have responsibility to carry out activities that support the major goals of the organization will identify more with the company. At the same time, they will develop a feeling of being a partner in the business.20 Imagine a scenario in which a company auditor is autho- rized to spend large sums of travel money to accomplish her job. She is given this authority because a strategic goal of top-level management is to become a company admired for its honest business practices.
Provide Ample Information For empowerment to be effective, employees should have ample information about everything that affects their work. Especially important is for workers to fully understand the impact of their actions on the company’s costs and profits. Armed with such information, employees are more likely to make decisions that have a positive influence on the bottom line. And they are more likely to use empowerment to make decisions that contribute to business success. For example, an empowered sales representative, armed with cost information, is less likely to grant dis- counts that lose money for the company.
Allow Group Members to Choose Methods Under ideal conditions, the leader or manager explains to the individual or group what needs to be done (sets a direction) and lets the people involved choose the method. Explaining why the tasks need to be performed is also important. One of the roles of a true professional is to choose the method for accomplishing a task, such as a tax consultant deciding how to prepare the taxes for a business owner. Allowing people to determine the most efficient work technique is the essence of empowerment.
Encourage Self-Leadership Encouraging team members to lead themselves is the heart of empowerment. The basic idea of self-leadership is that all organizational members are capable of leading themselves at least to some extent. Complete self-leadership would involve workers deciding what should be done, why it should be done, and how to accomplish the task. A trigger to self-leadership would be to give a handful of talented employees the general instructions, “Why not spend a few hours per week dreaming up something that can make us money?”
When employees practice self-leadership, they feel empowered. At W. L. Gore & Associates, Inc., a manufacturer of insulated material, includ- ing GORE-TEX®, there are no bosses or managers, but many leaders. Every
220 CHAPTER 7• POWER, POLITICS, AND LEADERSHIP
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
employee is regarded as a knowledge worker who has the ability to identify profitable new products.21
Establish Limits to Empowerment One of the major situations in which empowerment creates disharmony and dysfunction is when workers lack a clear perception of the boundaries of empowerment. Empowered group members may feel that they can now make decisions unilaterally, without conferring with managers, team leaders, or other team members.22 Limits to empowerment might mean explaining to employees that they have more authority than before, but still they cannot engage in such activities as the following:
● Set their own wages and those of top management ● Make downsizing decisions ● Hire mostly friends and relatives ● Work fewer than forty hours for full pay ● Voicing their discontent about the company and its leadership on social
media
Many employees justify dysfunctional actions by saying, “I’m empowered to do what I want.” It is management’s responsibility to guide employment activities that support the organization.
Continue to Lead Although leaders empower group members, they should still provide guidance, emotional support, and recognition. Mark Samuel helps companies organize into teams to enhance accountability for results, yet at the same time he emphasizes the leader’s role: “Empowerment often becomes an abdication of leadership. In other words, if I empower you, I don’t have to guide you. People need guidance. Leadership cannot abdicate the role of providing guidance.”23 Because employees are empowered does not mean that they should be abandoned.
Take into Account Cultural Differences All empowering practices can be influ- enced by cross-cultural factors. A group member’s cultural values might lead to either an easy acceptance of empowerment or reluctance to be empowered. Americans are stereotyped as individualists. Nevertheless, they are so accustomed to working in teams (sports included) that being part of an empowered team would seem natural.
But not all cultures support empowerment. In one study, data from employees of a single firm with operations in the United States, Mexico, Poland, and India were used to test the fit of empowerment and continuous improvement practices with national culture. The company was engaged in light manufacturing, and data were collected from about forty sites. Empowerment was negatively associated with job satisfaction in the Indian plants, but positively associated in the other three samples. The underlying cultural reason is that Indians (at least those working in India) expect the leader or manager to make most of the decisions.24 Continuous improve- ment was positively related to satisfaction in all four samples.
TACTICS FOR BECOMING AN EMPOWERING LEADER 221
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
Take into Account Empowerment Expectations Although the advantages of empowerment are widely proclaimed, not all workers enjoy being empow- ered. Some workers, for example, just want to work within their job description without being burdened with extra responsibility. A study with first-line manufacturing workers and their supervisory leaders explored the impact of supervisor matching the empowerment expectations of their subordinates, implying that some workers want more empowerment than others. Measures were taken of both how much empowerment subordi- nates wanted, and how well the supervisory leaders understood these expectations.
One study result was that workers experienced more role ambiguity (con- fusion about what was expected of them) when supervisors over-estimated how much empowerment they wanted. Another key result was that the less the leader is aware of the individual’s demand for empowerment, the less the worker’s level of intrinsic (internal) motivation. Conversely, intrinsic motivation of workers is higher when the leader has a more accurate per- ception of how much empowerment the workers really want.25
Effective Delegation and Empowerment A major contributor to empowerment is delegation, the assignment of for- mal authority and responsibility for accomplishing a specific task to another person. Without delegation, effective leadership and management cannot take place. Delegation becomes more important as more tasks need to be done, and those tasks are complex. To lead is to inspire and persuade others to accomplish tasks, not to accomplish everything by working alone.
Delegation is narrower than empowerment because it deals with a spe- cific task, whereas empowerment covers a broad range of activities and a mental set about assuming more responsibility. Also, delegation often involves more checking on subordinates than does empowerment. Mark Hellerstein, the former CEO of a SM Energy Co. explains how he per- ceived the difference between delegation and empowerment: “When you delegate you are still in control. I empowered others to take control and responsibility.”26
Delegation, like empowerment, is motivational because it gives group members a chance to develop their skills and demonstrate their compe- tence. Instead of delegation being simply a method for the manager or leader to lighten the personal workload, it becomes a developmental oppor- tunity for the recipient of the delegated task. When delegation is poor, con- flict often erupts between the individual who thought he or she was responsible for a task and the delegator. An example is when a manager del- egating a choice task to a subordinate and then taking it back as the task becomes more important to the organization.
You are invited to gain some practice in the realities of empowerment by doing Leadership Skill-Building Exercise 7-1. Keep in mind the importance of delegation when doing the exercise.
222 CHAPTER 7• POWER, POLITICS, AND LEADERSHIP
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
Factors that Contribute to Organizational Politics
As used here, the term organizational politics refers to informal approaches to gaining power through means other than merit or luck. Pol- itics are played to achieve power, either directly or indirectly. For example, a person seeking to enhance his or her legitimate power might use a vari- ety of tactics to be favorably perceived by top-level decision makers in the company. Power may be achieved in such diverse ways as by being pro- moted, by receiving a larger budget or other resources, by obtaining more resources for one’s work group, or by being exempt from undesirable assignments.
The meaning of organizational politics continues to shift in a positive, con- structive direction. Politics are often used to advance the purposes of the lea- der’s group such as obtaining valuable resources. A team of scholars have recently proposed the concept of leader political support that points to the contribution of political behavior. Leader political support refers to “politi- cal acts and influence behaviors performed by leaders to provide followers
LEADERSHIP SKILL-BUILDING EXERCISE 7-1
Conducting an Empowerment Session
If you are already a manager, the description of empower- ing practices has given you some useful ideas about empowering others. The role-playing exercise described here gives you a chance to practice your empowering skills. One person plays the role of a leader, and six other people play the role of group members. You are meeting with your group today to get them started on the road toward empowerment. You will need to engage in dialogue with the group to begin the process. The following scenar- ios should be staffed by different groups of students:
Information Technology Customer Service Center You are in charge of an information technology call cen- ter whose primary activity is to respond to telephone inquiries from around the country from customers who are having problems using the company’s software. The workers who answer the phone are full-time profes- sionals, many of whom are recent college graduates. A major goal of yours is to empower your workers to do as much as they can to satisfy callers’ demands. You
want your staff to take more personal responsibility for customer problems.
Debt-Collection Specialists You are the manager of a regional office of a large debt- collection service. Most of your clients are business firms owed money by other firms. Your office is 25 percent below target for debt collection so far this fiscal year, with five months remaining. The standard methods of debt collection prescribed by the company do not appear to be effective enough. You meet with your staff today to empower them to go beyond the standard methods of debt collection, such as a series of letters and phone calls.
Doing this exercise is useful because it helps you develop the right mental set for a leader who empowers group members. Another advantage is that it sensitizes you to the importance of looking for signs of hesitation and ambivalence when you attempt to empower group members.
FACTORS THAT CONTRIBUTE TO ORGANIZATIONAL POLITICS 223
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
with valuable resources to advance individual, group, or organizational objec- tives.”27 Leaders need political skill for such purposes as building alliances and gaining resources for their constituents. Nevertheless, many writers still regard organizational politics as emphasizing self-interest at the expense of others, engaging in mysterious activities, or kissing up.
People want power for many different reasons, including having more prestige and income, which is why political behavior is so widespread in organizations. By definition, politics is used to acquire power. A number of individual and organizational factors contribute to political behavior, as described next.
Pyramid-Shaped Organization Structure The very shape of large organizations is the most fundamental reason why organizational members are motivated toward political behavior. A pyramid concentrates power at the top. Only so much power is therefore available to distribute among the many people who would like more of it. Each succes- sive layer on the organization chart wields less power than the layer above. At the very bottom of the organization, workers have limited power except for their legal rights. Also, an entry-level worker with a valuable skill in a tight labor market has some usable power. Since most organizations today have fewer layers than they previously had, the competition for power has become more intense. Although empowerment may be motivational for many workers, it is unlikely to satisfy the quest to hold a formal position of power. Workers still struggle to obtain a corner office, a corner cubicle, or to sit closer to the boss in an open space arrangement.
Subjective Standards of Performance People often resort to organizational politics because they do not believe that the organization has an objective and fair way of judging their perfor- mance and suitability for promotion. Similarly, when managers have no objective way of differentiating effective people from less effective, they will resort to favoritism. The adage “It’s not what you know but who you know” applies to organizations that lack clear-cut standards of performance.
Environmental Uncertainty and Turbulence When people operate in an unstable and unpredictable environment, they tend to behave politically. They rely on organizational politics to create a favorable impression because uncertainty makes it difficult to determine what they should really be accomplishing.
The uncertainty, turbulence, and insecurity created by corporate down- sizings, or rightsizings, are a major contributor to office politics. Many people believe intuitively that favoritism plays a major role in deciding who will survive the downsizing. In response to this perception, organizational members attempt to ingratiate themselves with influential people.
224 CHAPTER 7• POWER, POLITICS, AND LEADERSHIP
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
Emotional Insecurity Some people resort to political maneuvers to ingratiate themselves with superiors because they lack confidence in their own talents and skills. A pension fund manager who has directed the firm toward investments with an annualized 10 percent return does not have to be overly political because he or she will have confidence in being capable. A person’s choice of political strategy may indicate emotional insecurity. For instance, an inse- cure person might laugh loudly at every humorous comment the boss makes.
Machiavellian Tendencies Some people engage in political behavior because they want to manipulate others, sometimes for their own personal advantage. The term Machiavellian- ism traces back to Niccolo Machiavelli (1469–1527), an Italian political phi- losopher and statesman. His most famous work, The Prince, describes how a leader may acquire and maintain power. Machiavelli’s ideal prince was an amoral, manipulating tyrant who would restore the Italian city-state of Florence to its former glory. Machiavelli has been described as charming, wicked, and disturbing,28 which are also characteristics of the most extreme office politicians. Three hundred and sixty years later, a study by Gerald Biberman showed a positive relationship between Machiavellianism and polit- ical behavior, based on questionnaires that measured these two tendencies.29
Encouraging Admiration from Subordinates Most organizational leaders say they do not encourage kissing up and that they prefer honest feedback from subordinates. Yet, without meaning to, these same managers and leaders encourage flattery and servile praise. Managers, as well as other workers, send out subtle signals that they want to be praised, such as smiling after receiving a compliment and frowning when receiving negative feedback. Also, admirers are more likely to receive good assignments and high performance evaluations. Executive coach Marshall Goldsmith explains that, without meaning to, many managers create an environment where people learn to reward others with accolades that are not completely warranted. People generally see this tendency in others but not in themselves.30
Communication technology, including social media, facilitates the admira- tion of superiors. A subordinate who might feel uncomfortable complimenting a superior in-person or by phone can easily post a compliment online. For example, a status update on Facebook or a tweet might state: “Just received some dynamite feedback from Shana. She pointed me in right direction.”
Political Tactics and Strategies
To make effective use of organizational politics, leaders must be aware of specific political tactics and strategies. To identify and explain the majority of political tactics would require years of study and observation. Leaders so
POLITICAL TACTICS AND STRATEGIES 225
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
frequently need support for their programs that they search for innovative types of political behaviors. Furthermore, new tactics continue to emerge as the workplace becomes increasingly competitive.
The impact of political tactics and strategies by leaders on the behaviors of subordinates and colleagues depends to a large extent on perceptions of politics. When employees perceive that the environment is heavily political, particularly in the form of self-interest, they may be prompted to stand out from other workers rather than be good team players. For example, the employees might display more organizational citizenship behavior. Employ- ees might believe that by demonstrating an interest in helping other work- ers, they will be more valued.31 Later in the chapter, we will describe how excessive political behavior can have dysfunctional consequences to the organization, such as job stress.
Here we look at a representative group of political tactics and strategies categorized as to whether they are ethical or unethical. (Several of the influ- ence tactics described in Chapter 8, such as ingratiation, might also be considered political behaviors.)
Ethical Political Tactics and Strategies So far, we have discussed organizational politics without pinpointing spe- cific tactics and strategies. This section describes a sampling of ethical polit- ical behaviors, divided into three related groups: tactics and strategies aimed at (1) gaining power, (2) building relationships with superiors and coworkers, and (3) avoiding political blunders. All of these political approaches help the leader gain or retain power. Using them can also help the leader succeed in and manage stressful work environments. As defined by a group of researchers, political skill is a constructive force. It is an inter- personal style that manifests itself in being socially astute and engaging in behaviors that lead to feelings of confidence, trust, and sincerity.32 For example, a middle manager with political skill might be able to defend his or her group against an angry CEO looking for a scapegoat. Despite the statements just made, political skill can be used for unethical purposes, as described in the following section.
Leadership Self-Assessment Quiz 7-2 gives you an opportunity to measure your tendencies toward engaging in positive political tactics and strategies.
Strategies Aimed at Gaining Power All political tactics are aimed at acquiring and maintaining power, even the power to avoid a difficult assignment. Tom Peters said years ago that although power can often be abused, it can also be used to benefit many people. “And as a career building tool, the slow and steady (and subtle) amassing of power is the surest road to success.”33 Here are nine techniques aimed directly at gaining power.
1. Develop power contacts. Cultivating friendly, cooperative relationships with powerful organizational members and outsiders can make the leader’s cause much easier to advance. Developing power contacts is a focused type of social networking. These contacts can benefit a person by supporting his
226 CHAPTER 7• POWER, POLITICS, AND LEADERSHIP
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
LEADERSHIP SELF-ASSESSMENT QUIZ 7-2
The Positive Organizational Politics Questionnaire
Answer each question “mostly agree” or “mostly disagree,” even if it is difficult for you to decide which alternative best describes your opinion.
MOSTLY AGREE
MOSTLY DISAGREE
1. Pleasing my boss is a major goal of mine. □ □
2. I go out of my way to flatter important people. □ □
3. I am most likely to do favors for people who can help me in return. □ □
4. I intend to, or already have, cultivated friendships with powerful people.
□ □
5. I will compliment a coworker even if I have to think hard about what might be praiseworthy.
□ □
6. If I thought my boss needed the help, and I had the expertise, I would show him or her how to use an electronic gadget for personal life.
□ □
7. I laugh heartily at my boss’s humor, so long as I think he or she is at least a little funny.
□ □
8. I would not be too concerned about following a company dress code, so long as I looked neat.
□ □
9. If a customer sent me a compliment through e-mail, I would forward a copy to my boss and another influential person.
□ □
10. I smile only at people in the workplace whom I genuinely like. □ □
11. An effective way to impress people is to tell them what they want to hear. □ □
12. I would never publicly correct mistakes made by the boss. □ □
13. I would be willing to use my personal contacts to gain a promotion or desirable transfer. □ □
14. I think it is a good idea to send a congratulatory note to someone in the company who receives a promotion to an executive position.
□ □
15. I think office politics is only for people who cannot succeed based on their talents.
□ □
16. I have already started to develop a network of useful contacts. □ □
17. I am quite willing to make negative comments about my company on social media websites if the comments are deserved.
□ □
18. I don’t care if there are silly photos of me posted on the Internet because private life is separate from one’s career.
□ □
19. I have posted positive comments about my boss on the Internet. □ □
20. I have posted positive comments about my employer on the Internet. □ □
POLITICAL TACTICS AND STRATEGIES 227
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
or her ideas in meetings and other public forums. One way to develop these contacts is to be more social, for example, by throwing parties and inviting powerful people and their guests. Some organizations and some bosses frown on social familiarity, however. And power holders receive many invi- tations, so they might not be available.
Considerable networking for the development of power contacts takes place through social networking websites geared toward professionals, such as LinkedIn, and specialty sites such as those geared toward specific indus- try groups, such as sales and marketing, and information technology. Busi- ness writer Denise Campbell notes that the social media websites have become to business professionals and entrepreneurs what golf is to C-suite occupants—an opportunity to strategically network and execute business transactions. Also, social media can level the playing field by allowing more people access without restrictions on time, location, or social status.34
A key aspect of networking is to find some way of reciprocating when a network member provides you a useful contact or helps you in some other way. Leadership Skill-Building Exercise 7-2 provides some insight into reci- procity when networking.
2. Have a compelling vision. Jeffrey Pfeffer, a noted professor of organiza- tional behavior at Stanford University, writes that a compelling vision helps
QUIZ 7-2 (continued) Scoring and interpretation: Give yourself a plus 1 for each answer that matches the answer key. Each question that receives a score of plus 1 shows a tendency toward playing positive organizational politics. The scoring key is as follows:
1. Mostly agree 8. Mostly disagree 15. Mostly disagree
2. Mostly agree 9. Mostly agree 16. Mostly agree
3. Mostly agree 10. Mostly disagree 17. Mostly disagree
4. Mostly agree 11. Mostly agree 18. Mostly disagree
5. Mostly agree 12. Mostly agree 19. Mostly agree
6. Mostly agree 13. Mostly agree 20. Mostly agree
7. Mostly agree 14. Mostly agree
• 1–9: Below-average tendency to play office politics
• 10–14: Average tendency to play office politics
• 15 and above: Above-average tendency to play office politics; strong need for power
Skill Development: Thinking about your political tendencies in the workplace is important for your career because most successful leaders are moderately political. The ability to use politics effectively and ethically increases with importance in the executive suite. Most top players are effective office politicians. Yet being overly and blatantly political can lead to distrust, thereby damaging your career.
228 CHAPTER 7• POWER, POLITICS, AND LEADERSHIP
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
the leader exercise power. A compelling vision in this context is a socially valuable objective. A leader within a school system will often recommend a particular initiative, such as establishing rewards for good teachers, because it is in the best interests of the children. In a business organization, a leader might propose an initiative, such as acquiring another company, because it serves the interests of shareholders.35
3. Control vital information. Power accrues to those who control vital information. Many former government or military officials have found power niches for themselves in industry after leaving the public payroll. Fre- quently, such an individual will be hired as the Washington representative of a firm that does business with the government. They control the vital information of knowing whom to contact in order to sidestep some of the roadblocks to getting government contracts approved.
Although the reflex answer for obtaining information is now “Google it,” personal contacts are still important for nonrecorded information. To facili- tate controlling vital information, it is politically important to stay informed. Successful leaders develop a pipeline to help them keep abreast, or even ahead, of developments within the firm. For this reason, a politi- cally astute individual befriends the president’s assistant. No other source offers the potential for obtaining as much information as the executive administrative assistant.
4. Do what the political environment demands. A high-level political strat- egy is to do whatever the political environment demands to attain your goals. In this way, you gain the support of decision makers. At Amazon.com, the focus of top-level management including Jeff Bezos is the highest possible customer satisfaction. A politically astute manager or professional looking to get in good graces with people in power would therefore frequently mention ways of taking customer satisfaction to an even higher level.
LEADERSHIP SKILL-BUILDING EXERCISE 7-2
Paying Back Favors from Network Members
Most readers are aware that effective networkers find some way to pay back those people in their network who have done them favors. For example, if a store owner refers you to a contact that leads to a job interview you might refer a customer to his or her store. However, find- ing useful ways to reciprocate favors by network members is not so easy. Your assignment is to brainstorm in groups to develop alternative solutions to the problem, “How can we reciprocate when a network member does us a favor?” The network members can be those developed offline as well as those you have developed virtually, such as
Facebook members. Aim for at least a dozen suggestions. After first compiling the suggestions, refine the list for duplication and precision. Perhaps reduce your list to the six most effective suggestions. If feasible, a team leader from each group presents the suggestions to the rest of the class.
Class members might then discuss answers to these questions: (1) Which several suggestions were the most frequently offered across the groups? (2) Which sugges- tions do I think are good enough to use now or in the future?
POLITICAL TACTICS AND STRATEGIES 229
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
5. Make a quick showing. A display of dramatic results can help gain acceptance for one’s efforts or those of the group. Once a person has impressed management with his or her ability to solve that first problem, that person can look forward to working on problems that will bring greater power. A staff professional might volunteer to spruce up a company website to make it more appealing. After accomplishing that feat, the person might be invited to join the e-commerce team.
6. Remember that everyone expects to be paid back. According to the Law of Reciprocity, everybody in the world expects to be paid back.36 If you do not find some way to reimburse people for the good deeds they have done for you, your supply of people to perform good deeds will run short. Because many of these good deeds bring you power, such as by supporting your initiative, your power base will soon erode. As a way of paying back the person who supported your initiative, you might mention publicly how the person in question provided you with expert advice on the technical aspects of your proposal.
Leadership Skill-Building Exercise 7-2 gives you an opportunity to develop practical solutions to the challenge of reciprocating for favors granted you by network members.
7. Be politically correct. Political correctness involves being careful not to offend or slight anyone, and being extra civil and respectful.37 The politi- cally correct person therefore avoids creating some enemies who might erode his or her power. An effective use of political correctness would be to say that “We need a ladder in our department because we have workers of different heights who need access to the top shelves.” It would be politically incorrect to say, “We need ladders because we have some short workers who cannot reach the top shelves.”
8. Be the first to accept reasonable changes. A natural inclination for most people is to resist change, so the person who steps forward first to accept reasonable changes will acquire some political capital. The team member who welcomes the changes exerts a positive influence on group members who may be dragging their heels about the change. An example might be that the company is attempting to shift to an online system of performance evaluation, thereby eliminating paper filing. It is politically wise to be an early adopter of the new system.
9. Develop positive psychological capital. A comprehensive strategy for both gaining power, as well as building relationships, is to develop positive psychological capital. The term refers to an individual’s positive psycho- logical state of development, characterized by four psychological resources: self-efficacy, hope, optimism, and resilience. (Self-efficacy refers to confi- dence to take on and invest the necessary effort to succeed at challenging tasks.) Although a complex aspect of behavior, positive psychological capital can be developed over time, particularly if the individual focuses on one of the four resources at a time. A person with considerable positive psycholog- ical capital tends to be powerful.
230 CHAPTER 7• POWER, POLITICS, AND LEADERSHIP
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
A study conducted with 79 police leaders and 264 sergeants indicated that leaders’ psychological capital was positively related to the job perfor- mance of their team members. Performance was measured in terms of a straightforward scale developed for the study, with one of the items being, “How would you judge the overall competence of this individual?”38 The link to power in this study is that strong job performance by subordinates accrues power to the leader.
Strategies and Tactics Aimed at Building Relationships You would probably not be studying leadership if you did not think building relationships was a key part of success in the workplace. To reinforce this point, here is what Stephen I. Sadove, the chairman and chief executive of Saks, Inc., said were his biggest leadership lessons:
I used opportunities to get involved and develop relationships with a diverse set of people, as opposed to the narrow group of people I was dealing with day- to-day, and that made a huge difference. It shaped my philosophy in terms of the importance of relationship building. It really underlies my entire philosophy of how to run a business.39
The lion’s share of organizational politics involves building positive rela- tionships with network members who can be helpful now or later. This net- work includes superiors, subordinates, other lower-ranking people, coworkers, external customers, and suppliers. Following are several repre- sentative strategies and tactics:
1. Display loyalty. A loyal worker is valued because organizations prosper more with loyal than with disloyal employees. Blind loyalty—the belief that the organization cannot make a mistake—is not called for because most ratio- nal organizations welcome constructive criticism. A clear form of loyalty to the organization is longevity. Although job-hopping is more acceptable today than in the past, tenure with the company is still an asset for promotion. Tenure tends to contribute more to eligibility for promotion in a traditional industry, such as food processing, than in high-technology firms.
2. Manage your impression. Impression management includes behaviors directed at enhancing one’s image by drawing attention to oneself. Often the attention of others is directed toward superficial aspects of the self, such as clothing and grooming. Yet, impression management also deals with deeper aspects of behavior, such as speaking well and presenting one’s ideas coherently. Bad speech habits are recognized as a deterrent to advancement in organizations.40 Impression management also makes a con- tribution because it makes you more visible to others, meaning that your presence in the organization is noticed.
Another part of impression management is telling people about your suc- cess or implying that you are an insider. E-mail is used extensively today to send messages to others for the purpose of impressing them with one’s good deeds. Displaying good business etiquette has received renewed attention as a key part of impression management, with companies sending staff members
POLITICAL TACTICS AND STRATEGIES 231
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
to etiquette classes to learn how to create favorable impressions on key people. Etiquette training for professionals and managers is in high demand because so many people have neglected to learn about etiquette earlier in life, and civil- ity in the workplace has declined.41 Many management scholars take a dim view of impression management, yet the topic has been carefully researched.42
3. Ask satisfied customers to contact your boss. A favorable comment by a customer receives considerable weight because customer satisfaction is a top corporate priority. If a customer says something nice, the comment will carry more weight than one from a coworker or subordinate. The reason is that coworkers and subordinates might praise a person for political reasons. Customers’ motivation is assumed to be pure because they have little con- cern about pleasing suppliers.
4. Be courteous, pleasant, and positive. Courteous, pleasant, and positive people are the first to be hired and the last to be fired (assuming they also have other important qualifications). Polite behavior provides an advantage because many people believe that civility has become a rare quality.
5. Ask advice. Asking advice on work-related topics builds relationships with other employees. Asking another person for advice—someone whose job does not require giving it—will usually be perceived as a compliment. Asking advice transmits a message of trust in the other person’s judgment. Leadership Skill-Building Exercise 7-3 gives you the opportunity to practice asking advice in a sensible way.
6. Send thank-you notes to large numbers of people. One of the most basic political tactics, sending thank-you notes profusely, is simply an application of sound human relations. Many successful people take the time to send handwritten notes to employees and customers to help create a bond with those people. Handwritten notes have gained in currency because they are a refreshing change from electronic communication.
LEADERSHIP SKILL-BUILDING EXERCISE 7-3
Asking Advice Role Play
One student plays the role of a team leader who wants to build constructive relationships with coworkers and superiors by asking advice. At the same time, the stu- dent does not want to generate the impression of being someone who needs considerable help in solving pro- blems. The student therefore must think of a topic for asking advice that shows a legitimate interest in the other person’s opinion, yet not appear clueless. It might therefore require a few minutes to think of an advice-asking topic. Another student plays the role of the
advice-giver who might enjoy giving the advice, or be annoyed that he or she is being bothered. The rest of the class members will observe and provide some feed- back on the effectiveness of the advice-asking techniques.
The potential contribution of this exercise is that it may help raise your awareness of the opportunity to engage in constructive political behavior. Recognizing opportunities to gain political advantage can be helpful to a leader’s career.
232 CHAPTER 7• POWER, POLITICS, AND LEADERSHIP
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
7. Flatter others sensibly. Flattery in the form of sincere praise can be an effective relationship builder. By being judicious in your praise, you can lower the defenses of work associates and make them more receptive to your ideas. A survey of 760 directors found that ingratiatory behavior toward the chief executive plays a bigger role in receiving a board appointment than does having attended an elite school or having elite social connections. James D. Westphal and Ithai Stern concluded that the most efficient way to get more board appointments is to engage in ingratiating behavior (a form of politics). The type of political behavior focused on flattery. Providing advice and information to CEOs frequently was advantageous. Furthermore, not monitoring the strategic decisions of board members too closely was also effective in receiving nominations to other boards.43
The importance of praising others through flattery shows up in the lead- ership principles espoused by Dale Carnegie in his advice to be lavish in your praise about any improvement. Decades of research indicate that rein- forcing the behavior you want can lead to behavioral change.44 In the situa- tion under discussion, the behavioral change the political actor wants is to be more valued by the object of the praise.
An example of the research evidence about the contribution of political skill to relationship building comes from a study with 179 employees conducted in a retail service organization. Employees who scored higher on a test of politi- cal skill tended to overcome a challenging aspect of leader–member exchanges. Prior research had suggested that superiors and subordinates who were of the same race typically had better quality leader–member exchanges (or quality of the relationship). Correspondingly, racial dissimilarity was associated with a poorer quality leader–member exchange. The results of the study under consid- eration indicated that subordinates with good political skill were able to develop better relationships with superiors who were of a different race.45
Strategies Aimed at Avoiding Political Blunders A strategy for retaining power is to refrain from making power-eroding blunders. Committing these politi- cally insensitive acts can also prevent one from attaining power. Several leading blunders are described next.
1. Criticizing the boss in a public forum. The oldest saw in human rela- tions is to “praise in public and criticize in private.” Yet in the passion of the moment, we may still surrender to an irresistible impulse to criticize the boss publicly. Also, hundreds of people have lost their jobs because they make a vindictive statement about their boss on a social media website, par- ticularly Facebook. Negative e-mail messages about the company can be political suicide also. Jerry Murray, a chief financial officer of logistics at Wal-Mart Stores Inc., wrote an e-mail to other company managers stating the company’s February 2013 sales were a “total disaster.” Murray left the company in less than two months without a replacement being named.46
2. Bypassing the boss. Protocol is still highly valued in a hierarchical organi- zation. Going around the boss to resolve a problem is therefore hazardous. You might be able to accomplish the bypass, but your career could be
POLITICAL TACTICS AND STRATEGIES 233
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
damaged and your recourses limited. Except in cases of outrageous miscon- duct such as blatant sexual harassment or criminal misconduct, your boss’s boss will probably side with your boss. Take Leadership Self-Assessment Quiz 7-3 to examine your tendencies toward making blunders.
3. Declining an offer from top management. Turning down top manage- ment, especially more than once, is a political blunder. You thus have to bal- ance sensibly managing your time against the blunder of refusing a request from top management. Today, an increasing number of managers and corpo- rate professionals decline opportunities for promotion when the new job requires geographic relocation. For these people, family and lifestyle prefer- ences are more important than gaining political advantage on the job.
4. Putting your foot in your mouth (being needlessly tactless). To avoid hurting your career, it is important to avoid—or at least minimize—being blatantly tactless toward influential people. An example would be telling the CEO that he or she should delegate speech making to another person because he or she is such a poor speaker. When you feel you are on the verge of being critical, delay your response, and perhaps reword it for later delivery. Use your emotional intelligence! If you are needlessly tactless, compensate the best you can by offering a full apology later.
Putting your foot in your mouth can also take the form of making a public statement that many people interpret to have a negative meaning or to reflect callousness. The Deepwater Horizon oil rig explosion in 2010 spewed hun- dreds of millions of gallons of oil into the Gulf of Mexico and killed eleven workers. BP chief executive at the time, Tony Hayward, made a series of pub- lic appearances explaining the company’s recovery efforts. During one appear- ance, Hayward said he wanted his “life back,” which angered many people because they thought he had not suffered much in comparison to the many victims of the disaster. This gaffe contributed to his inability to elicit much empathy from the U.S. public, and he was dismissed shortly thereafter.47
5. Not conforming to the company dress code. Although some degree of independence and free thinking is welcome in many organizations, violating the dress code can block you from acquiring more power. Conforming to the dress code suggests that you are part of the team and you understand what is expected. Dress codes can be violated by dressing too informally or formally, and by wearing clothing that symbolizes a cultural identity.48
The accompanying Leader in Action suggests somebody in a powerful position who makes good use of political skills. Take Leadership Self- Assessment Quiz 7-3 to think more about political blunders.
A study with 1,600 headmasters and teachers in German state schools adds another perspective on how political skills contribute to leader effec- tiveness. The study found that political skills facilitated leaders being able to carry out both transformational and transactional leadership. For exam- ple, transformational leadership requires political skill because the leader needs to be able to size up the needs of stakeholders. Both transformational and transactional leadership enhanced their leadership effectiveness, as measured by teacher ratings of the headmaster.49
234 CHAPTER 7• POWER, POLITICS, AND LEADERSHIP
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
LEADER IN ACTION
Carol B. Tomé, the Home Depot CFO
Her job title at Home Depot Inc. is chief financial officer (CFO), but Carol B. Tomé has unusually broad responsi- bilities for someone in that position. She is also execu- tive vice president of corporate services, and provides leadership to the company in the areas of real estate, store construction, financial services, strategic business development, and growth initiatives. Her areas of respon- sibility have been referred to as the central nervous sys- tem of the company. Prior to joining The Home Depot— one of the world’s largest retailers— she was vice presi- dent and treasurer of Riverwood International Corpora- tion. Tomé is also a member of the UPS board, and chair of the board of the Federal Reserve Board of Atlanta.
Tomé is widely recognized for her ability to get along with people inside and outside Home Depot. Yet she admits to having worked hard to hone her interpersonal skills. She says that she has never done anything to derail her career but that she has made a few mis- takes. Being a passionate person, she has had to learn to channel that passion in ways that rally the troops. Tomé says, “I’ve also learned that it isn’t about me; it is about everyone else. Putting people first is absolutely the right thing to do. I didn’t always do that, but I do now. For more than eleven years, I’ve never lost anyone on my team that I didn’t want to lose. I’m proud of that.”
Tomé also explains that earlier in her career she was highly focused on the deal instead of people. One time she conducted a performance review with one of her employees over the phone. “The next day she quit, and who could blame her?” said Tomé. She also said that she could never repeat the mistake, and how she practices servant leadership, and always puts people first.
In her seventeen years with Home Depot, she is the only senior executive to work for all four of its CEOs. One CEO in particular, Robert Nardelli, had a difficult
time in terms of popularity with the troops, and a substantial decline in customer satisfaction. However, during Nardelli’s six-year reign, Tomé was promoted from treasurer to CFO, and her responsibilities expanded to include store operations and customer service.
Her colleagues say she has advanced by combining high-level intelligence with a passion to learn the busi- ness from the hammers and nails on up, including how to mix paint for a customer. Tomé tours at least one store a week, talking to customers and asking ques- tions of store associates. Tomé is proud of her collec- tion of ninety orange aprons (The Home Depot trademark) that employees decorated for her as a gift during store visits. Her favorite apron is one blinged out with sequins— the only such jewelry-decorated apron in the company.
Tomé was born in a log cabin hospital in Jackson, Wyoming. She holds a bachelor’s degree in communica- tion from the University of Wyoming, and an MBA in finance from the University of Denver.
QUESTIONS
1. What evidence do you find in this story to suggest that Carol Tomé has good political skills?
2. What does having worked for four different CEOs without being replaced suggest about the effective- ness of Tomé’s political skills?
3. Which types of power does Tomé appear to possess?
Sources: Original story created from facts and observations in the fol- lowing sources: Chris B Burritt, “Home Depot’s Fix-It Lady,” Bloomberg Businessweek, January 17–January 23, 2011, pp. 64–67; “Dare Q & A with: Carol B. Tomé, (www.facebook.com/DareforWomen). Accessed January 3, 2014, pp. 1–3; Katie Benner, “Home Depot’s Home Improvement Star,” www.FortuneMagazine.com, October 23, 2012, pp. 1–2; “One on One with The Home Depot’s Carol Tomé (www.womenetics.com), November 6, 2012, pp. 1–2. Carol B. Tomé: Chief Financial Officer & Executive Vice President, The Home Depot, Inc. (www.pressroom.ups.com). Accessed January 4, 2014.
POLITICAL TACTICS AND STRATEGIES 235
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
Unethical Political Tactics and Strategies Any technique of gaining power can be devious if practiced in the extreme. A person who displays loyalty to a boss by feeding him or her insider infor- mation that could affect the price of company stock is being devious. Some
LEADERSHIP SELF-ASSESSMENT QUIZ 7-3
The Blunder Quiz
Directions: Indicate whether you agree or disagree with the following statements.
AGREE DISAGREE
1. It is acceptable to criticize your manager in a meeting as long as the criticism is valid. □ □
2. If your boss criticizes you, an effective way of getting revenge is to post a tweet making fun of him or her.
□ □
3. If my boss showed me a photo of his or her dog, and I thought the dog was ugly I would say so.
□ □
4. If I worked for Microsoft, I would still use whatever search engine I thought was best instead of using Bing (the Microsoft search engine) while at the office.
□ □
5. If I thought my company’s product or service was not worth the price, I would openly express my opinion on the job.
□ □
6. If I objected to a decision made by top management, I would send a company-wide e-mail, or make an intranet post, explaining my objection.
□ □
7. I am willing to insult any coworker if the insult is deserved. □ □
8. If I am at a meeting, and the content becomes boring, I will take out my smartphone and check e-mail or surf the Web.
□ □
9. If I thought that my company’s stock was a poor investment, I would freely share my opinion with work associates.
□ □
10. During a national election, I would place campaign banners for my favorite candidates outside my cubicle or office, or on my desk in an open work area.
□ □
11. I see no problem in using competitors’ products or services and letting my superiors know about it.
□ □
12. If I thought the CEO of my company were way overpaid, I would send him or her an e-mail making my opinion known.
□ □
13. During a company picnic, I would go on at length about my opinion on same-sex marriage.
□ □
14. I openly criticize most new ventures my company or department is contemplating, pointing out that most new ventures fail.
□ □
15. I avoid any deliberate attempt to please or impress coworkers or superiors. □ □
Total: “Agree” “Disagree”
Scoring and Interpretation: The greater the number of statements you agree with, the more prone you are to political blunders than can damage your career. You need to raise your awareness level of workplace blunders.
236 CHAPTER 7• POWER, POLITICS, AND LEADERSHIP
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
approaches are unequivocally unethical, such as those described next. In the long run, they erode a leader’s effectiveness by lowering credibility. Devious tactics might even result in lawsuits against the leader, the organi- zation, or both.
Backstabbing The ubiquitous backstab requires that you pretend to be nice but all the while plan someone’s demise. A frequent form of backstabbing is to initiate a conversation with a rival about the weaknesses of a common boss, encouraging negative commentary and making careful mental notes of what the person says. When these comments are passed along to the boss, the rival appears disloyal and foolish. E-mail is a widely used medium for the backstab. The sender of the message documents a mistake made by another individual and includes key people on the distribution list. A sample message sent by one manager to a rival began as follows, “Hi, Ted. I’m sorry you couldn’t make our important meeting. I guess you had some other important priorities. But we need your input on the following major agenda item we tackled.…”
Embrace or Demolish The ancient strategy of “embrace or demolish” suggests that you remove from the premises rivals who suffered past hurts through your efforts; otherwise, the wounded rivals might retaliate at a vulnerable moment. This kind of strategy is common after a hostile takeover; many executives lose their jobs because they opposed the takeover. A variation of embrace or demolish is to terminate managers from the acquired organiza- tion who oppose adapting to the culture of the new firm. For example, a free-wheeling manager who opposes the bureaucratic culture of the acquiring firm might be terminated as “not able to identify with our mission.”
Setting a Person Up for Failure The object of a setup is to place a person in a position where he or she will either fail outright or look ineffective. For example, an executive whom the CEO dislikes might be given responsibility for a troubled division whose market is rapidly collapsing. The newly assigned division president cannot stop the decline and is then fired for poor performance.
Divide and Rule An ancient military and governmental strategy, this tactic is sometimes used in business. The object is to have subordinates fight among themselves, therefore yielding the balance of power to another person. If team members are not aligned with one another, there is an improved chance that they will align with a common superior. One way of getting subordinates to fight with one another is to place them in intense competi- tion for resources. An example would be asking them to provide data explain- ing why their budget is more worthy than the budget requested by rivals.
Playing Territorial Games Also referred to as turf wars, territorial games involve protecting and hoarding resources that give one power, such as information, relationships, and decision-making authority. Territorial behavior, according to Annette Simmons, is based on a hidden force that
POLITICAL TACTICS AND STRATEGIES 237
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
limits peoples’ desire to give full cooperation. People are biologically pro- grammed to be greedy for whatever they think it takes to survive in the cor- porate environment.
The purpose of territorial games is to vie for the three kinds of territory in the modern corporate survival game: information, relationships, or author- ity. A relationship is hoarded through such tactics as discouraging others from visiting a key customer or blocking a high performer from getting a promotion or transfer.50 For example, the manager might tell others that his star performer is mediocre to prevent the person from being considered for a valuable transfer possibility. Other examples of territorial games include monopolizing time with clients, scheduling meetings so someone cannot attend, and shutting out coworkers from joining you on an impor- tant assignment.
Creating and Then Resolving a False Catastrophe An advanced devious tactic for a manager is to pretend a catastrophe exists and then proceed to “res- cue” others from the catastrophe, thereby appearing to be a superhero.51
The political player rushes in and declares that everything is a mess and the situation is almost hopeless; shortly thereafter, he or she resolves the problem. An example would be for a newly appointed information technol- ogy manager to inform top management that the system he inherited is antiquated and approaching the point of severely damaging the company’s operations. One week later, he claims to have miraculously overhauled the information system, such as by ordering new equipment and hiring a few key personnel.
Abusing Power Abusing power might be conceptualized as an unethical political tactic because the abuse often relates to behavior outside of formal responsibility. (Formal ways of abusing power might be for a CEO to close a plant overseen by a manager he or she disliked, or to use company funds to build an exorbitantly luxurious personal office.) Political abuse of power includes such acts as shouting and swearing at subordinates, sexually haras- sing them, and humiliating them in meetings. Several surveys have sug- gested that most rude and inappropriate behaviors, such as the shouting of profanities, stem from those people with the most formal authority.52
Exercising Control over Dysfunctional Politics
Carried to excess, organizational politics can hurt an organization and its members. Too much politicking can result in wasted time and effort, thereby lowering productivity. A group of researchers conducted a meta- analysis of available studies of the relationship between the perception of organizational politics and certain important outcomes. The perception of political behavior refers to the recognition that organizational politics is present, as in “I can’t take all the politics around here.” The major outcomes related to the perception of politics were as follows: (1) more strain, or
238 CHAPTER 7• POWER, POLITICS, AND LEADERSHIP
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
adverse effects of stress, (2) more intentions to quit, (3) less job satisfaction, (4) less emotional commitment to the employer, (5) lower task performance, and (6) less organizational citizenship behavior.53
In short, when a high degree of political behavior is perceived to exist, it can damage individuals and the organization. To avoid these negative con- sequences, leaders are advised to combat political behavior when it is exces- sive and dysfunctional.
In a comprehensive strategy to control politics, organizational leaders must be aware of its causes and techniques. For example, during a downsiz- ing, the CEO can be on the alert for instances of backstabbing and transpar- ent attempts to please. Open communication also can constrain the impact of political behavior. For instance, open communication can let everyone know the basis for allocating resources, thus reducing the amount of poli- ticking. If people know in advance how resources are allocated, the effec- tiveness of attempting to curry favor with the boss will be reduced. When communication is open, it also makes it more difficult for some people to control information and pass along gossip as a political weapon.
Avoiding favoritism and cronyism—avoiding giving the best rewards to the group members you like the best or to old friends—is a potent way of minimizing politics within a work group. If group members believe that get- ting the boss to like them is much less important than good job perfor- mance in obtaining rewards, they will kiss up to the boss less frequently. In an attempt to minimize favoritism, managers must reward workers who impress them through task-related activities.
Setting good examples at the top of the organization can help reduce the frequency and intensity of organizational politics. When leaders are nonpolitical in their actions, they demonstrate in subtle ways that political behavior is not welcome. It may be helpful for the leader to announce during a staff meeting that devious political behavior is undesirable and unprofessional.
Another way of reducing the extent of political behavior is for individuals and the organization to share the same goals, a situation described as goal congruence. If political behavior will interfere with the company and indivi- duals achieving their goals, workers with goal congruence are less likely to play office politics excessively. A project leader is less likely to falsely declare that the boss’s idea is good just to please the boss if the project leader wants the company to succeed.
Politics can sometimes be constrained by a threat to discuss questionable information in a public forum. People who practice devious politics usually want to operate secretly and privately. They are willing to drop hints and innuendoes and make direct derogatory comments about someone else, pro- vided they will not be identified as the source. An effective way of stopping the discrediting of others is to offer to discuss the topic publicly.54 The per- son attempting to pass on the questionable information will usually back down and make a statement closer to the truth.
Finally, hiring people with integrity will help reduce the number of dys- functional political players. References should be checked carefully with
EXERCISING CONTROL OVER DYSFUNCTIONAL POLITICS 239
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
READER’S ROADMAP
respect to the candidate’s integrity and honesty.55 Say to the reference, “Tell me about ——— ’s approach to playing politics.” Leadership Skill-Building Exercise 7-4 provides an opportunity to practice the subtle art of discourag- ing excessive political behavior on the job.
So far in this book, we have examined the nature of leaders, their ethics, and how they acquire power. The next chapter explains influence tactics, or ways of converting power into action.
SUMMARY
Organizational power is derived from many sources, including position power (legitimate, reward, and coercive) and personal power (expert, reference, and prestige). Power also stems from ownership, dependencies, capitalizing on oppor- tunity, managing critical problems, and being close to power. A problem with leadership power is that it can be self-serving. People with a strong moral identity are less likely to use power for self- interest.
Full-fledged empowerment includes the dimen- sions of meaning, self-determination, compe- tence, impact, and internal commitment. Actions that can be taken to become an empowering leader include the following: foster initiative and
responsibility, link work activities to the goals of the organization, provide ample information, allow group members to choose methods, encour- age self-leadership, establish limits to empower- ment, and continue to lead. Also, take into account cultural differences in how empower- ment is accepted, and empowerment expectations of group members. Delegation is another impor- tant part of empowerment.
To acquire and retain power, a leader must skillfully use organizational politics. The meaning of politics continues to shift in a positive, construc- tive direction. Contributing factors to organiza- tional politics include the pyramidal shape of organizations, subjective performance standards,
LEADERSHIP SKILL-BUILDING EXERCISE 7-4
Controlling Office Politics
One student plays the role of a corporate executive vis- iting one of the key divisions. Six other students play the roles of managers within the division, each of whom wants to impress the boss during their meeting. The corporate executive gets the meeting started by asking the managers in turn to discuss their recent activities and accomplishments. Each division-level
manager will attempt to create a very positive impres- sion on the corporate executive. After about nine min- utes of observing them fawning over him or her, the executive decides to take action against such exces- sive politicking. Review the information on political tac- tics and their control before carrying out this role- assuming exercise.
240 CHAPTER 7• POWER, POLITICS, AND LEADERSHIP
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
environmental uncertainty, emotional insecurity, Machiavellian tendencies, and encouraging admi- ration from subordinates.
To make effective use of organizational politics, leaders must be aware of specific political tactics and strategies. Ethical methods can be divided into those aimed directly at gaining power, those aimed at building relationships, and those aimed at avoiding political blunders. Unethical and devious tactics, such as the embrace or demolish
strategy, constitute another category of political behavior.
Carried to extremes, organizational politics can hurt an organization and its members. Being aware of the causes and types of political behavior can help leaders deal with the problem. Setting good examples of nonpolitical behavior is helpful, as is achieving goal congruence and threatening to publicly expose devious politicking. It is also good to hire people who have integrity.
KEY TERMS
power 211 legitimate power 211 reward power 211 coercive power 211 personal power 212 prestige power 212
dependence perspective 214 strategic contingency
theory 215 moral identity 216 empowerment 217 self-leadership 220
delegation 222 organizational politics 223 leader political support 223 positive psychological
capital 230 territorial games 237
GUIDELINES FOR ACTION AND SKILL DEVELOPMENT
A striking advantage of gaining power is that it helps you control your environment, which in turn leads to less stress and better physical and mental health—and therefore prolongs your life. In con- trast, having so little power that you cannot control your job and your environment creates stress, lead- ing to poorer physical and mental health, and quite often a shorter life.56 Finding ways to increase your power is therefore a vital life skill.
So much has been said and written about the importance of building your in-person and virtual network that it seems as if the more contacts you have the better. It is usually better to have a smaller network of useful, high-quality contacts. British anthropologist Robin Dunbar claims the average human can maintain only 150 close social connec- tions. With information technology, that number can be stretched a bit, but mental capacity and avail- able time set limits to the size of a useful network.57
The company leadership team must sometimes find the right balance between control and empow- erment. Colin Price of McKinsey & Co., a key player in management consulting, suggests that the
company needs more control when it must change directions, such as entering a new market or down- sizing considerably. When the new course is set for the organization, more empowerment is in order because the managers must figure out how to implement the new direction.58
Discussion Questions and Activities
1. How might a person in an information technol- ogy company have a lot of power even if he or she does not hold an executive title?
2. Many business leaders today give up having a private office, and instead work at a desk or cubi- cle in the middle of the work area to be among other employees. What effect do you think this work area placement has on their power?
3. Contrary to popular opinion, CEOs of major U.S. companies come from a wide variety of private universities and state universities, not just a handful of well-publicized MBA programs. What does this fact tell you about sources of power and organizational politics?
GUIDELINES FOR ACTION AND SKILL DEVELOPMENT 241
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
LEADERSHIP CASE PROBLEM A
4. What can you do this week to enhance your power?
5. To what extent do you think wearing the right type of clothing and accessories can really make a person appear more powerful?
6. Many business leaders say something to the effect of, “We practice empowerment because we don’t expect our employees to leave their brains at the door.” What are these leaders talk- ing about?
7. Empowerment has been criticized because it leaves no one in particular accountable for results. What is your opinion of this criticism?
8. Many people have asked the question “Isn’t office politics just for incompetents?” What is your answer to this question?
9. A regular occurrence in business firms, and some government agencies, is for somebody to be fired because of a Facebook or Twitter post criticizing the employer or a specific manager. Why do you think so many people commit this career-threatening error?
10. Ask an experienced worker to give you an example of the successful application of organi- zational politics. Which tactic was used, and what was the outcome?
Ray, the Empowered Athletic Club Director
Ray was moving along well in his career in sports administration, having graduated from college with a degree in sports and health administration five years ago. He spent the first two years after gradu- ation working as a fitness instructor at one health and fitness club. Ray then found a position as an assistant manager at a chain of athletic clubs, Mod- ern Fitness. The manager suddenly resigned to move to an athletic club in Las Vegas. Ray was then asked by the CEO of the chain to accept the position as manager of the local Modern Fitness. The CEO, Larry, said to Ray, “You’ve got the smarts and the charisma to do a great job as manager.” Ray was flattered, and he saw the management position as a splendid opportunity to make a con- tribution in his chosen field.
Five months into the job, all was going well with the Modern Fitness staff. The group appeared to be well motivated, customer complaints were at a min- imum, and only one person had quit voluntarily. Yet the local Modern Fitness was facing a problem of declining club enrollment, rather than experienc- ing growth. New club memberships enrollments were not coming in fast enough to make up for existing members not renewing their enrollment.
Larry, who carefully reviewed enrollment data each month, scheduled a meeting at Ray’s club to
discuss the enrollment picture. Larry told Ray that he was pleased with the operations of the club, but not with the enrollment figures. “I am empowering you to boost enrollment to a net gain,” said Larry, “do what you need to do.”
Ray replied, “Larry I am doing all I can. We send out flyers. We advertise on social media. We encourage word-of-mouth advertising. This town is saturated with athletic and fitness clubs. It’s tough for our Modern Fitness club to get a bigger market share. What advice can you give me to boost enrollment?”
Larry responded, “Ray you are empowered as the manager to boost enrollment working within your advertising budget. Boosting enrollment is your responsibility, not mine. We’ll talk about your enroll- ment figures again in thirty days.”
Questions
1. How effective is Larry’s approach to empower- ing Ray to boost enrollment?
2. Which political tactic or tactics do you recom- mend Ray use to deal effectively with his empowering boss?
3. What might Larry do to help Ray boost enroll- ment, within the limits of empowerment?
242 CHAPTER 7• POWER, POLITICS, AND LEADERSHIP
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
LEADERSHIP CASE PROBLEM B
ASSOCIATED ROLE PLAY One person plays the role of Ray who wants to be an effective Modern Fitness manager and leader, but he knows that he needs help. Three days after the meet- ing, he gets on the phone with Larry asking him for
whatever guidance he can offer. Another person plays the role of Larry who believes that the most effective way to being an empowering manager is to turn over total control of a problem to a subordinate.
Brenda the Tweeting Leader
Brenda is the director of claims processing in a busi- ness process outsourcing company that specializes in taking care of the payroll and benefits administration for small- and mid-size companies. Her manager, the CEO, has told Brenda that her leadership skills are satisfactory, but it would be better if she had a bigger impact on the employees in her area of responsibility. “Touch their lives more; be a bigger influence,” the CEO told Brenda. “It’s up to you to figure out how.”
In thinking about potential tactics, Brenda thought of having a bigger impact on her direct reports, as well as other members of the company, by sending them encouraging tweets. Brenda reflected, “Using Twitter, I can spend about thirty minutes per night developing the type of positive relationships it would take days and hours to do with lunch and coffee breaks.”
Two days later, Brenda began her Twitter cam- paign. Much to her comfort, she found that most people in her target group had accounts. Some of Brenda’s tweets were as follows:
“You’re doing great. It’s a pleasure to work for the same employer as you.” [Sent to everybody on her list of company employees with Twitter accounts.]
“Carpal tunnel syndrome can cure itself. Sweat it out.” [Sent to input clerk on medical leave with carpal tunnel syndrome.]
“You are simply the best leader. Can learn from you.” [Sent to company CEO.]
“You are a ray of sunshine on a cloudy day.” [Sent to all four mailroom workers.]
“Love ya baby, but put on some speed.” [Sent to her administrative assistant.]
“Can’t live without you. Wouldn’t want to.” [Sent to a member of the tech support staff.]
One of the tweet recipients said to another, “Brenda is so cool these days. She’s leading by tweet.” Another one of these tweet recipients said to another, “Have you seen what Brenda is doing with her Twitter account? She’s given me another good reason not to check Twitter every day.”
Questions
1. What impact do you think Brenda’s tweeting will have on her leadership effectiveness?
2. What do you think of the political effective- ness of sending the same tweet to several workers?
3. What suggestions might you offer Brenda for making even more effective use of Twitter as a leadership tool?
ASSOCIATED ROLE PLAY One student plays the role of a worker who reports to Brenda. The worker receives yet another tweet from Brenda, this one stating, “I know that today is going to be a winner for all of us.” The worker
is having a bad day at home and work. As a result, the worker perceives Brenda’s tweet to be annoying and sends the following e-mail to a few coworkers: “Did Brenda’s tweet of the day sicken you also?”
LEADERSHIP CASE PROBLEM B 243
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
NOTES
The worker then receives a tweet from Brenda, say- ing, “I just heard that my latest tweet sickened you. What’s your problem?” Another student plays the
role of Brenda who perceives the counter-tweet to reflect poor judgment, and decides to express her discontent to the worker.
LEADERSHIP SKILL-BUILDING EXERCISE 7-5
My Leadership Portfolio
For this insert into your leadership portfolio, think through all the recent opportunities you might have had to use political tactics. How did you deal with the situation? Did you capitalize on any opportunities? Did you use an ethical approach? Did you use any unethical tactics? Did you commit any political blunders? Here would be an example:
I saw a flyer indicating that our Business Manage- ment Association was having a guest speaker, an executive from Merrill Lynch. I had been pretty
busy with studies, my job, and social life, yet I decided to invest the time and attend. As it worked out, the meeting was a wonderful opportunity to make a couple of good contacts. After the talk, I spoke to the speaker and complimented her. We had a brief conversation about how I was looking for a career in investment banking, and she gave me her business card. I sent her an e-mail message the next day, thanking her for the time she gave me. I also met a couple of important people at the meet- ing and got their cards also.
1. Original story created from facts and observations in the following sources: Greg Bensinger, “Hurdles Surround Amazon’s Plans to Use Drones,” The Wall Street Journal, December 3, 2013, p. B3; David Von Drehle, “The Fixer: What Jeff Bezos Can Do for the Washington Post,” Time, August 19, 2013, pp. 14–17; Adam Lashinsky, “Jeff Bezos: The Ultimate Disrupter,” Fortune, December 3, 2012, pp. 100–106; Georgen Anders, “Jeff Bezos Gets It,” Forbes, April 23, 2012, pp. 76–86; J. J. McCorvey, “The Race Has Just Begun,” Fast Company, pp. 66–76; Jeff Dyer and Hal Gregersen, “The Secret of Unleashing Genius,” Forbes, September 2, 2013, p. 96; Brad Stone, The Everything Store: Jeff Bezos and the Age of Amazon (New York: Little Brown and Company, 2013).
2. Jeffrey Pfeffer, “Your’e Still the Same: Why Theories of Power Hold Over Time and Across Contexts,” The Academy of Management Perspective, November 2013, pp. 269–280.
3. John R. French and Bertram Raven, “The Basis of Social Power,” in Dorwin Cartwright, ed.,
Studies in Social Power (Ann Arbor, Mich.: Institute for Social Research, 1969); Timothy R. Hinkin and Chester A. Schriescheim, “Power and Influence: The View from Below,” Personnel, May 1988, pp. 47–50.
4. Maureen I. Muller-Kahle and Eduardo Shhiehll, “Gaining the Ultimate Power Edge: Women in the Dual Role of CEO and Chair,” The Leadership Quarterly, October 2013, pp. 666–679.
5. Bryant Urstadt, “The Sociopath Network,” Bloomberg Businessweek, July 28–July 31, 2011, pp. 82–83.
6. Max Nisen, “How Doug McMillon Went from Unloading Trucks at Wal-Mart to Its Next CEO,” http://finance.yahoo.com, November 27, 2013, pp. 1–3.
7. Sydney Finkelstein, “Power in Top Management Teams: Dimensions, Measurement, and Validation,” Academy of Management Journal, August 1992, p. 510.
8. Richard M. Emerson, “Power-Dependence Relations,” American Sociological Review, vol. 27, 1962, p. 32.
244 CHAPTER 7• POWER, POLITICS, AND LEADERSHIP
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
9. Jennifer Wang, “Patagonia, from the Ground Up,” Entrepreneur, June 2010, pp. 26–28.
10. C. R. Hinings, D. J. Hickson, C. A. Lee, R. E. Schenck, and J. W. Pennings, “Strategic Contingencies Theory of Intraorganizational Power,” Administrative Science Quarterly, 1971, pp. 216–229.
11. Diana Rus, Daan van Kippenberg, and Barbara Wisse, “Leader Power and Self-Serving Behavior: The Moderating Role of Accountability,” The Leadership Quarterly, February 2012, pp. 13–26.
12. Katherine A. DeCelles, D. Scott DeRue, Joshua D. Margolis, and Tara L. Ceranic, “Does Power Corrupt or Enable? When and Why Power Facilitates Self-Interested Behavior,” Journal of Applied Psychology, May 2012, pp. 681–689.
13. “Lessons in Power: Lyndon Johnson Revealed: A Conversation with Historian Robert A. Caro,” Harvard Business Review, April 2006, pp. 47–52.
14. “Leaders Everywhere: A Conversation with Gary Hamel,” McKinsey & Company (www.mckinsey.com), May 2013, p. 1.
15. AbrahamCarmeli, JohnSchaubroeck, andAsher Tishler, “How CEO Empowering Leadership Shapes Top Management Team Processes: Implications for Firm Performance,” The Leadership Quarterly, April 2011, pp. 399–411.
16. Gretchen M. Spreitzer, “Psychological Empowerment in the Workplace: Dimensions, Measurement, and Validation,” Academy of Management Journal, October 1995, pp. 1442–1465.
17. Lauren Bennett Cattaneo and Aliya R. Chapman, “The Process of Empowerment: A Model for Use in Research and Practice,” American Psychologist, October 2010, pp. 646–659.
18. Scott E. Seibert, Seth R. Silver, and W. Alan Randolph, “Taking Empowerment to the Next Level: A Multiple-Level Model of Empowerment, Performance, and Satisfaction,” Academy of Management Journal, June 2004, pp. 332–349.
19. Henry Mintzberg, Managing (San Francisco: Berrett-Koehler, 2009), p. 64.
20. Barbara Ettorre, “The Empowerment Gap: Hype vs. Reality,” HRfocus, July 1997, p. 5.
21. Craig L. Pearce and Charles C. Manz, “The New Silver Bullets of Leadership: The Importance of Self- and Shared-Leadership in
Knowledge Work,” Organizational Dynamics, no. 2, 2005, pp. 130–140.
22. Kyle Dover, “Avoiding Empowerment Traps,” Management Review, January 1999, p. 52.
23. Dimitry Elias Léger, “Tell Me Your Problem, and I’ll Tell You Mine,” Fortune, October 6, 2000, p. 408.
24. Christopher Robert et al., “Empowerment and Continuous Improvement in the United States, Mexico, Poland, and India: Predicting Fit on the Basis of the Dimensions of Power Distance and Individualism,” Journal of Applied Psychology, October 2000, pp. 751–765.
25. Sut I Wong Humborstad and Bârd Kuvas, “Mutuality in Leader–Subordinate Empowerment Expectation: Its Impact on Role Ambiguity and Intrinsic Motivation,” The Leadership Quarterly, vol. 24, no. 2, April 2013, pp. 363–377.
26. “Mark Hellerstein, “Learn to Empower Others,” Executive Leadership, April 2013, p. 3.
27. Gerald R. Ferris et al., “Political Skill at Work,” Organizational Dynamics, Spring 2000, p. 25.
28. David Polansky, “Counsel to Tyrants,” The Wall Street Journal, November 12, 2013. Comment contained in book review of Joseph Markulin, Machiavelli (Amherst, New York: Prometheus, 2013).
29. Gerald Biberman, “Personality Characteristics and Work Attitudes of Persons with High, Moderate, and Low Political Tendencies,” Psychological Reports, vol. 57, 1985, p. 1309.
30. Marshall Goldsmith, “All of Us Are Stuck on Suck-Ups,” Fast Company, December 2003, p. 117.
31. K. Michele Kacmar, Daniel G. Bachrach, Kenneth J. Harris, and SizanneZivnuska, “Fostering Good Citizenship Through Ethical Leadership: Exploring the Moderating Role of Gender and Organizational Politics,” Journal of Applied Psychology, May 2011, p. 635.
32. Pamela L. Perrewé et al., “Political Skill: An Antidote for Workplace Stressors,” Academy of Management Executive, August 2000, p. 115.
33. Tom Peters, “Power,” Success, November 1994, p. 34.
34. Denise Campbell Laidler, “What’s Your Social Media Strategy?” Black Enterprise, November 2010, p. 75.
35. Jeffrey Pfeffer, “Power Play,” Harvard Business Review, July–August 2010, p. 92.
NOTES 245
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
36. Michael Warshaw, “The Good Guy’s (and Gal’s) Guide to Office Politics,” Fast Company, April 1998, p. 160.
37. Robin J. Ely, Debra Meyerson, and Martin N. Davidson, “Rethinking Political Correctness,” Harvard Business Review, September 2006, p. 80.
38. The definition of psychological capital and the research findings are from Fred O. Walumbwa, Suzanne J. Peterson, Bruce J. Avolio, and Chad A. Hartnell, “An Investigation of the Relationships among Leader and Follower Psychological Capital, Service Climate, and Job Performance,” Personnel Psychology, Winter 2010, pp. 937–963.
39. Cited in Adam Bryant, “For the Chief of Saks, It’s Culture That Drives Results,” The New York Times (www.nytimes.com), May 28, 2010.
40. Joann S. Lublin, “To Win Advancement, You Need to Clean Up Any Bad Speech Habits,” The Wall Street Journal, October 3, 2004, p. B1.
41. “Etiquette School,” Bloomberg Businessweek, October 16–Octrober 24, 2010, pp. 89–91.
42. Much of the scholarly impression management research is reviewed in Andrew J. DuBrin, Impression Management in the Workplace: Research, Theory, and Practice (New York and London: Routledge, 2011).
43. James D. Westphal and Ithai Stern, “Flattery Will Get You Everywhere (Especially If You Are a Male Caucasian): How Ingratiation, Boardroom Behavior, and Demographic Minority Status Affect Additional Board Appointments at U.S. Companies,” Academy of Management Journal, April 2007, pp. 267–288.
44. Tessa E. Basford and Andrea Molberg, “Dale Carnegie’s Leadership Principles: Examining the Theoretical and Empirical Support,” Journal of Leadership Studies, vol. 6, no. 4, 2013, pp. 34–35.
45. Robyn L. Brouer, Allison Duke, Darren C. Treadway, and Gerald R. Ferris, “The Moderating Effect of Political Skill on the Demographic Dissimilarity—Leader-Member Exchange Quality Relationship,” The Leadership Quarterly, April 2009, pp. 61–69.
46. “Wal-Mart Exec Who Called Sales ‘Total Disaster’ Leaves,” Reuters, April 10, 2013, p. 1.
47. Paul Sonne, “Hayward Fell Short of Modern CEO Demands,” The Wall Street Journal, July 26, 2010, p. A7.
48. Tracy Minor, “Office Politics: Master the Game by Making Connections,” Monster: Diversity & Inclusion (monster.com), October 30, 2002.
49. Christian et al, “Further Specification of the Leader Political Skill-Leadership Effectiveness Relationships: Transformational and Transactional Leader Behavior as Mediators,” The Leadership Quarterly, August 2013, pp. 516–533.
50. Annette Simmons, Territorial Games: Understanding & Ending Turf Wars at Work (New York: AMACOM, 1998); Robert J. Herbold, The Fiefdom Syndrome (New York: Currency Doubleday, 2004).
51. Jared Sandberg, “Office Superheroes: Saving the Rest of Us from Unseen Dangers,” The Wall Street Journal, December 10, 2003, p. B1.
52. Jonah Lehr, “The Power Trip,” The Wall Street Journal, August 14–15, 2010, p. W1; Anne Kreamer, “Go Ahead—Cry at Work,” Time, April 4, 2011, p. 52.
53. Chu-Hsiang Chang, Christopher C. Rosen, and Paul E. Levy, “The Relationship between Perceptions of Organizational Politics and Employee Attitudes, Strain, and Behavior: A Meta-Analytic Examination,” Academy of Management Journal, August 2009, pp. 779–801.
54. Robert P. Vecchio, Organizational Behavior, Fourth Edition (Fort Worth, Tex.: The Dryden Press, 2000), p. 136.
55. “Throw Politics Out of Your Office,” Manager’s Edge, July 2001, p. 8.
56. Research synthesized in Pfeffer, “Power Play,” p. 90.
57. Research cited in Drake Bennett, “The Dunbar Number,” Bloomberg Businessweek, January 14–January 20, 2013, pp. 52–56.
58. Colin Price, “Leadership and the Art of Plate Spinning,” McKinsey Quarterly, November 2012, p. 3.
246 CHAPTER 7• POWER, POLITICS, AND LEADERSHIP
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
CH AP
TE R
8 Influence Tactics of Leaders
LEARNING OBJECTIVES After studying this chapter and doing the exercises, you should be able to
• Describe the relationship between power and influence.
• Identify a set of honest and ethical influence tactics.
• Identify a set of influence tactics relatively neutral with respect to ethics and honesty.
• Identify a set of dishonest and unethical influence tactics.
• Summarize some empirical research about the effectiveness and sequencing of influence tactics.
• Describe how implicit leadership theories are related to a leader’s ability to influence group members.
CHAPTER OUTLINE A Model of Power and Influence
Description and Explanation of Influence Tactics Essentially Ethical and Honest Tactics Essentially Neutral Influence Tactics Essentially Dishonest and Unethical Tactics
Leadership Influence for Organizational Change
Relative Effectiveness and Sequencing of Influence Tactics Relative Effectiveness of Influence Tactics Sequencing of Influence Tactics
Implicit Leadership Theories and Leadership Influence
Summary
Key Terms
Guidelines for Action and Skill Development
Leadership Case Problem A
Leadership Case Problem B
Notes
I n July 2012, Marissa Mayer was hired away fromGoogle to become the fifth CEO in six years at Yahoo!Inc. The well-known search, news, and entertainment website had been struggling versus the competition, and the board was looking for a leader who could revitalize the company’s financial results as well as boost morale. Mayer broke ground at the time as the first pregnant CEO of a major company. Some people wondered if the mother of a newborn could handle major business leadership responsibilities at the same time. (Mayer quickly had a nursery built adjacent to her office.)
Born in 1975, Mayer held a variety of technology lead- ership positions at Google Inc., with her last role at the company being the vice president of consumer products. Mayer had been personally involved with every product and service offered by Google. As the new CEO at Yahoo!, Mayer moved swiftly to strengthen the company. She orchestrated seventeen acquisitions of mostly technology startup companies, including a $1.1 billion purchase of Internet blogging and picture display service Tumblr. In addition, Yahoo! purchased a news summation website, Summly, from its founder, a British teenager. Mayer also
247 Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s).
Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
spearheaded an upgrade of the Yahoo! website, making it more streamlined, visually attractive, and less cluttered.
Mayer’s strategic thrust was to reimagine Yahoo!’s direction as a company. To attract more site visitors and advertisers, she said that she wanted to build beautiful products and execute them well. Mayer said, “This is really the fun part. This is where we get to really think about how we can inspire and delight our end users and how we can provide them with amazing features.”
Mayer moved swiftly on making changes in human resource policies. She severely restricted company employ- ees from working at home because she believes that face-to-face interaction enhances creativity and speed. Mayer also initiated the extension of maternity and pater- nity leave, giving $500 grants to employees who became new parents, and providing free food to employees. Later she encouraged managers to evaluate employees on a bell (normal) curve, and fire the poorest performers.
Mayer’s magnetism and vision were credited for boosting morale, and turning around a beleaguered com- pany. (Yet many employees disliked the restrictions on working from home, as well as being rated on a bell curve.) Mayer noted that the Yahoo! culture had improved, as evidenced by a doubling of people applying for jobs at Yahoo! in one quarter. Furthermore, the attri- tion rate for top talent had been reduced by one-half. Meanwhile, one in seven hires during that quarter were “boomerangs,” or former staffers returning to Yahoo!. Mayer said, “Companies with the best talent win, and it’s clear we’re now back in the game.”
Mayer is perceived by many as a visionary leader with a strong focus on product improvement and company opera- tions. She is a self-described geek. Mayer graduated from Stanford University a BS degree in symbolic systems, and then an MS in computer science, majoring in artificial intel- ligence for both degrees.1
In her leadership role, Marissa Mayer is working hard to influence employ- ees to collaborate in her quest to revitalize Yahoo!. She appeals to financial logic, brings considerable expertise to the table, and is personally magnetic. Without effective influence tactics, a leader is similar to a soccer player who has not learned to kick a soccer ball, or a newscaster who is unable to speak. Leadership, as oft repeated, is an influence process.
To become an effective leader, a person must be aware of the specific tac- tics leaders use to influence others. Here, we discuss a number of specific influence tactics, but other aspects of leadership also concern influence. Being charismatic, as described in Chapter 3, influences many people. Leaders influence others through power and politics, as described in Chapter 7. Furthermore, motivating and coaching skills, as described in Chapter 10, involve influencing others toward worthwhile ends.
The terms influence and power are sometimes used interchangeably, whereas at other times power is said to create influence and vice versa. In this book, we distinguish between power and influence as follows: Influence is the ability to affect the behavior of others in a particular direction, whereas power is the potential or capacity to influence. Leaders are influential only when they exercise power. A leader, therefore, must acquire power in order to influence others.
Influence tactics have grown in importance because so often a leader or corporate professional has to influence others without having formal authority over them. An example is that a vice president at Google needed
248 CHAPTER 8• INFLUENCE TACTICS OF LEADERS
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
to lobby Gmail engineers who did not work for him to modify software for potential corporate customers. He likens his efforts to a Peace Corps mis- sion: all heart but with little power to enforce his will.2
This chapter presents a model of power and influence, a description and explanation of influence tactics (both ethical and less ethical), a description of how leaders influence large-scale change, and a summary of the research about the relative effectiveness and sequencing of influence tactics. We also present a theory about the characteristics group members expect in a leader in order to be influenced by him or her.
A Model of Power and Influence
The model shown in Figure 8-1 illustrates that the end results of a leader’s influence (the outcomes) are a function of the tactics he or she uses. The influence tactics are in turn moderated, or affected, by the leader’s traits, the leader’s behaviors, and the situation.
Looking at the right side of the model, the three possible outcomes are commitment, compliance, and resistance. Commitment is the most suc- cessful outcome: The target of the influence attempt is enthusiastic about carrying out the request and makes a full effort. Commitment is particularly important for complex, difficult tasks because these require full concentra- tion and effort. If you were influencing a technician to upgrade your operat- ing system software, you would need his or her commitment. Compliance means that the influence attempt is partially successful: The target person is apathetic (not overjoyed) about carrying out the request and makes only a modest effort. The influence agent has changed the person’s behavior but
INFLUENCE TACTICS
Influence Outcomes Commitment, compliance, or resistance
Leader traits
Leader behaviors
Situation
© Ce ng ag e Le ar ni ng
FIGURE 8-1 A Model of Power and Influence.
A MODEL OF POWER AND INFLUENCE 249
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
not his or her attitude. A long-distance truck driver might comply with demands that he sleep certain hours between hauls, but he is not enthusias- tic about losing road time. Compliance for routine tasks—such as wearing a hard hat on a construction site—is usually good enough. Resistance is an unsuccessful influence attempt: The target is opposed to carrying out the request and finds ways to either not comply or do a poor job. Resistance includes making excuses for why the task cannot be carried out, procrasti- nating, and outright refusing to do the task.3
Going to the left side of the model, the leader’s personality traits affect the outcome of influence tactics. An extroverted and warm leader who has charisma can more readily use some influence tactics than a leader who is introverted and cold. For example, he or she can make an inspirational appeal. A highly intelligent leader would be able to influence others because he or she has built a reputation as a subject matter expert. Which- ever influence tactics leaders choose, the goal is to get group members on their side.
The leader’s behaviors also affect the outcome of influence tactics in a variety of ways. For example, setting high standards facilitates making an inspirational appeal. Additionally, leaders who perform well consistently are better able to lead by example because they are good role models. Finally, the situation partly determines which influence tactic will be effec- tive. The organizational culture or subculture is one such key situational factor. For example, in a high-technology environment, inspirational appeal and emotional display are less likely to be effective than rational persuasion and being a subject matter expert, because high-tech workers are more likely to be impressed by facts than by feelings.
The rest of this chapter identifies and describes influence tactics, includ- ing some mention of situational variables. Leader traits and power have been described in previous chapters. Leadership Self-Assessment Quiz 8-1 will give you an opportunity to think about which influence tactics you tend to use.
Description and Explanation of Influence Tactics
Influence tactics are often viewed from an ethical perspective. Following this perspective, the influence tactics described here are classified into three categories: (a) those that are essentially ethical and honest, (b) those that are essentially neutral with respect to ethics and honesty, and (c) those that are essentially manipulative and dishonest. The categorization pre- sented here is far from absolute. Except for the extremes, most of the tactics could conceivably be placed in any of the three categories, depending on how they are used. For example, one can use the tactic “joking and kidding” in either a well-meaning or mean-spirited way. Joking and kidding could therefore be classified as “essentially ethical,” “essentially neutral,” or “essentially dishonest and unethical.”
250 CHAPTER 8• INFLUENCE TACTICS OF LEADERS
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
LEADERSHIP SELF-ASSESSMENT QUIZ 8-1
Survey of Influence Tactics
Instructions: Indicate how frequently you use the influence tactics listed here: VI ¼ very infrequently or never; I ¼ infrequently; S ¼ sometimes; F ¼ frequently; VF ¼ very frequently. The VI to VF categories correspond to a 1-to-5 scale.
1 2 3 4 5
VI I S F VF
1. I lead by demonstrating the right behavior myself. □ □ □ □ □
2. I rely on facts and logic to persuade others. □ □ □ □ □
3. People often listen to me because of my expertise. □ □ □ □ □
4. If I want something done, I stand ready to do a favor in return. □ □ □ □ □
5. I enjoy negotiating a price or an offer. □ □ □ □ □
6. I am assertive (open and forthright in my demands). □ □ □ □ □
7. I joke with or kid other people to make a point. □ □ □ □ □
8. I will sometimes get quite emotional to make a point. □ □ □ □ □
9. I promise to reward the person to get what I want. □ □ □ □ □
10. I attempt to get other people on my side in order to win my point. □ □ □ □ □
11. I cooperate with others in order to influence them. □ □ □ □ □
12. As a leader, I participate heavily in the task of the group. □ □ □ □ □
13. I form an alliance with the other person. □ □ □ □ □
14. I threaten to go over the person’s head to the boss. □ □ □ □ □
15. I compliment the other person. □ □ □ □ □
16. I use as much charm as possible to get my way. □ □ □ □ □
17. I will post a positive comment about a work associate on the Internet, such as Facebook or G+, if he or she has done something I particularly like.
□ □ □ □ □
18. I will make a comment pointing out that I am not much good at what I want the other person to do.
□ □ □ □ □
19. I would bring the person a little gift, such as a beverage he or she likes or an attractive ballpoint pen.
□ □ □ □ □
20. I refer to the importance of doing a particular task for the overall good of the organization.
□ □ □ □ □
Scoring and Interpretation: The more of these tactics you use frequently or very frequently, the more influential you probably are. Experience is a factor because you could be potentially influential but have not yet had the opportunity to use many of these tactics.
Skill Development: The Survey of Influence Tactics might give you some clues for development. Look for influence tactics that appear to represent a good idea, but where you need skill development. Next, take the opportunity to practice the tactic. For example, take statement 15, “I compliment the other person.” Perhaps you neglect to compliment others when you want to influence them. Use the guidelines for flattery given in the previous chapter practice to compliment another person when you want to influence him or her.
DESCRIPTION AND EXPLANATION OF INFLUENCE TACTICS 251
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
Essentially Ethical and Honest Tactics This section describes essentially ethical and honest tactics and strategies for influencing others, as outlined in Table 8-1. Used with tact, diplomacy, and good intent, these strategies can help you get others to join you in accomplishing a worthwhile objective. Because these influence tactics vary in complexity, they also vary with respect to how much time is required to develop them.
Leading by Example, Respect, and Trust A simple but effective way of influenc- ing group members is by leading by example, or acting as a positive role model. The ideal approach is to be a “do as I say and do” manager—that is, one whose actions and words are consistent. Actions and words confirm, support, and often clarify each other. Being respected facilitates leading by example because group members are more likely to follow the example of leaders they respect. A major way in which a leader obtains respect is by being trusted. Part of the respect Marissa Mayer has received is that she can be trusted to follow through on her plans such as acquiring companies to help Yahoo! grow, and granting more leave time for new parents.
Leading by example is often interpreted to mean that the leader works long and hard, and expects others to do the same, with this type of behavior being prevalent among entrepreneurs who hire a staff. During the startup phase of a company, the entrepreneur will often work over 60 hours per week and expect the new hires to follow a similar work schedule.
Research conducted with 683 workers and managers in a large commu- nication organization indicated that a leader who demonstrates organiza- tional citizenship behavior (OCB) is likely to influence subordinates to behavior in a similar manner. Leader OCB was measured by area managers rating their subordinate managers. One dimension of citizenship behavior measured was performance above and beyond the call of duty and high attention to quality. Group managers rated the OCB of their groups as a
TABLE 8-1 Essentially Ethical and Honest Influence Tactics
1. Leading by example and respect
2. Using rational persuasion
3. Explaining the benefits to the target
4. Making a personal appeal
5. Developing a reputation as a subject matter expert
6. Exchanging favors and bargaining
7. Legitimating a request
8. Making an inspirational appeal, being charming, and emotional display
9. Consultation with others
10. Forming coalitions
11. Being a team player
12. Practicing hands-on leadership
© Ce ng ag e Le ar ni ng
252 CHAPTER 8• INFLUENCE TACTICS OF LEADERS
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
whole. The result showed that managers who received high ratings on OCB tended to have subordinate groups that exhibited strong organizational citi- zenship behavior. Leading by example may therefore promote group-level behaviors that enhance organization effectiveness.4
Using Rational Persuasion Rational persuasion is an important tactic for influencing people. It involves using logical arguments and factual evidence to convince another person that a proposal or request is workable and likely to achieve the goal. Assertiveness combined with careful research is neces- sary to make rational persuasion an effective tactic. It is likely to be most effective with people who are intelligent and rational. Chief executive offi- cers typically use rational persuasion to convince their boards that an undertaking, such as product diversification, is mandatory. A major moder- ating variable in rational persuasion is the credibility of the influence agent. Credibility helps an individual be more persuasive in two ways. First, it makes a person more convincing. Second, it contributes to a person’s perceived power, and the more power one is perceived to have, the more targets will be influenced.5
The following two statements are samples of how rational persuasion is measured as perceived by subordinates in research about influence processes.
• Explains clearly why a request or proposed change is necessary to attain a task objective.
• Provides information or evidence to show that a proposed activity or change is likely to be successful.6
Leaders who emphasize the rational decision-making model favor ratio- nal persuasion. For example, a leader favoring this model might say, “Don’t tell me what you feel, give me the facts,” in response to a subordinate who said, “I have the feeling that morale is down.” Leaders at Google heavily emphasize such data-based decision making. A Google professional in a meeting would be rejected if he or she said, “I think there are too many ran- dom photos appearing in Google Images.” In contrast, he or she would be accepted if the statement were, “I sampled 100 Google Images, and found that eight of them had random images.”
Explaining Benefits to the Target A strongly effective way of influencing another person is to explain what’s in it for him or her if that individual honors your request. Apprising means that the influence agent explains how carrying out a request or supporting a proposal will benefit the target personally, including advancing the target’s career.7 An example of apprising would be for the man- ager to tell a subordinate, “Perhaps two weeks helping out for one month on the company’s oil rig in the Arctic Circle may seem like a tough assignment. But you will seem like a hero to top management, and you will make great contacts.” Two apprising behaviors on the part of the leader are as follows:
• Describes benefits you could gain from doing a task or activity (e.g., learn new skills, meet important people, enhance your reputation).
• Explains how the task he or she wants you to do could help your career.
DESCRIPTION AND EXPLANATION OF INFLUENCE TACTICS 253
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
Making a Personal Appeal A personal appeal in the context of influence the- ory is the same as it is in everyday life. The agent asks the target to imple- ment a request or support a proposal out of friendship.8 Another form of personal appeal is to ask for a personal favor before specifying the nature of the favor, as in “How would you like to do something important for me?” Asking for a favor without specifying its nature would likely be inter- preted as unprofessional in a work environment. Two behaviors reflecting a personal appeal by a leader are as follows:
• Appeals to your friendship when asking you to do something. • Asks for your help as a personal favor.
Developing a Reputation as a Subject Matter Expert Becoming a subject matter expert (SME) on a topic of importance to the organization is an effective strategy for gaining influence. Being an SME can be considered a subset of rational persuasion. Managers who possess expert knowledge in a relevant field and who continually build on that knowledge can get others to help them get work accomplished. Many of the leaders described throughout this text use expert knowledge to influence others. The leaders of Internet and social media companies such as Google and Foursquare are usually subject matter experts.
In recent years, General Electric Co. has emphasized the importance of industry expertise for business unit managers. GE is now keeping its senior leaders in place longer with the expectation that deeper understanding of the products and customers will enhance sales. In the past, business unit leaders relocated every few years to give them a broader understanding of the company. David Joyce, the president of commercial engines operation, represents the subject matter expertise approach. He has spent his entire 32 years with GE working his way up the aviation unit.9
Small business owners, in particular, rely on being subject matter experts because they founded the business on the basis of their product or technical knowledge. (Also, the major high-tech companies usually began small.) For example, the leader of a software company is usually an expert in software development.
Exchanging Favors and Bargaining Offering to exchange favors if another per- son will help you achieve a work goal is another standard influence tactic. By making an exchange, you strike a bargain with the other party. The exchange often translates into being willing to reciprocate at a later date. It might also be promising a share of the benefits if the other person helps you accomplish a task. For example, you might promise to place a person’s name on a report to top management if that person will help you analyze the data and prepare the tables.
A recommended approach to asking for a favor is to give the other person as much time as feasible to accomplish the task, such as by saying, “Could you find ten minutes between now and the end of the month to help me?“ Not pressing for immediate assistance will tend to lower resistance to the request. Giving a menu of options for different levels of assistance also helps
254 CHAPTER 8• INFLUENCE TACTICS OF LEADERS
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
lower resistance. For example, you might ask another manager if you can borrow a technician for a one-month assignment; then, as a second option, you might ask if the technician could work ten hours per week on the project.10 To ensure that the request is perceived as an exchange, you might explain what reciprocity you have in mind: That you will mention your coworker’s helpfulness to his or her manager.
Two behavior specifics for exchanging favors and bargaining are as follows:
• Offers to do a specific task for you in return for your help and support. • Offers to do something for you in the future for your help now.
Legitimating a Request To legitimate is to verify that an influence attempt is within your scope of authority. Another aspect of legitimating is showing that your request is consistent with the organizational policies, practices, and expectations of professional people. Making legitimate requests is an effective influence tactic because most workers are willing to comply with regulations. A team leader can thus exert influence with a statement such as this one: “Top management wants a 25 percent reduction in customer complaints by next year. I’m therefore urging everybody to patch up any customer problems he or she can find.”
Legitimating sometimes takes the form of subtle organizational politics. A worker might push for the acceptance of his or her initiative because it conforms to the philosophy or strategy of higher management. At Amazon.com, for example, it is well known that CEO Jeff Bezos likes to keep costs to a minimum. A distribution center manager might then encour- age workers to be careful about wasting energy because “It’s something Jeff would want us to do.”
Two leadership behaviors that reflect legitimating are as follows:
• Says that his or her request is consistent with official rules and policies. • Verifies that a request is legitimate by referring to a document such as a
work order, policy manual, charter, bylaws, or formal contract.
Making an Inspirational Appeal, Being Charming, and Emotional Display A leader is supposed to inspire others, so it follows that making an inspirational appeal is an important influence tactic. As Jeffrey Pfeffer notes, “Executives and others seeking to exercise influence in organizations often develop skill in displaying, or not displaying, their feelings in a strategic fashion.”11 An inspirational appeal usually involves displaying emotion and appealing to group members’ emotions. A moderating variable in the effectiveness of an inspirational appeal or emotional display is the influence of agent’s personal magnetism, or the quality of being captivating, charming, and charismatic. Possessing personal magnetism makes it easier for the leader to inspire people.
The relevance of inspiration to influence is emphasized by the research of John H. Zenger and his associates. Based on results from 150,000 360-degree feedback assessments of 11,000 leaders, it was found that the
DESCRIPTION AND EXPLANATION OF INFLUENCE TACTICS 255
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
key leadership behavior was, “Inspires and motivates to high performance.” A key component of inspiring and motivation was found to be understand- ing the role of emotion in the workplace, as well as being able to use his or her emotions comfortably.12
A useful component of inspirational appeal for leaders is to provide meaning to the work, showing that it has significance to the entire organi- zation or the outside world. Most people like to be involved with projects that matter, and sometimes the leader might have to explain why the work matters.13 For example, the leader of a company that specializes in sub- prime mortgages might have to explain, “Without our type of work, loads of people with modest incomes would not be able to become homeowners.”
Another approach to inspiring workers is to create a vision that surpasses the wants and needs of most people.14 One of the ways in which leaders at both Apple and Google have inspired workers is to involve them in a vision of “changing the world” with their products and services.
Two recorded behaviors of leaders who make an inspirational appeal are as follows:
• Says a proposed activity or change is an opportunity to do something really exciting and worthwhile.
• Makes an inspiring speech or presentation to arouse enthusiasm for a proposed activity or change.
Consultation with Others Consultation with others before making a decision is both a leadership style and an influence technique. The influence target becomes more motivated to follow the agent’s request because the target is involved in the decision-making process. Consultation is most effective as an influence tactic when the objectives of the person being influenced are consistent with those of the leader.15 An example of such goal congruity took place in a major corporation. The company had decided to shrink its pool of suppliers to form closer partnerships with a smaller number of high-quality vendors. As a way of influencing others to follow this direction, a manufacturing vice president told his staff, “Our strategy is to reduce deal- ing with so many suppliers to improve quality and reduce costs. Let me know how we should implement this strategy.” The vice president’s influ- ence attempt met with excellent reception, partially because the staff mem- bers also wanted a more streamlined set of vendor relationships. Two specific leadership behaviors reflecting consultation are as follows:
• Asks you to suggest things you could do to help him or her achieve a task objective or resolve a problem.
• Invites you to suggest ways to improve a preliminary plan or proposal that he or she wants you to support or help implement.
Forming Coalitions At times, it is difficult to influence an individual or group by acting alone. A leader will then have to form coalitions, or alliances, with others to create the necessary clout. A coalition is a specific arrangement of parties working together to combine their power. Coalition formation works
256 CHAPTER 8• INFLUENCE TACTICS OF LEADERS
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
as an influence tactic because, to quote an old adage, “there is power in numbers.” Coalitions in business are a numbers game—the more people you can get on your side, the better. However, the more powerful leaders are, the less they need to create a coalition.
Having a network of powerful people facilitates forming a coalition. If you need something done, you can get these other influential people to agree that it is a good idea. An example of getting something done might be getting permission to erect an office building close to a park.
One of the best connected and therefore one of the most powerful people in business is Mellody Hobson, president of Ariel Capital Management, LLC, a large mutual fund company based in Chicago. Hobson has become a nationally recognized authority on financial literacy and financial educa- tion. Among the well-known people in her network are John Rogers, Jr., the founder of Ariel; Diane Sawyer of Good Morning America; William Lauder, CEO of Estée Lauder; Barack Obama, U.S. president; first lady, Michelle Obama; George Lucas, her husband and billionaire filmmaker; and Paul Allen, cofounder of Microsoft.16
Two specific leadership behaviors that reflect coalition formation are as follows:
• Mentions the names of other people who endorse a proposal when asking you to support it.
• Brings someone along for support when meeting with you to make a request or proposal.
Being a Team Player Influencing others by being a good team player is an important strategy for getting work accomplished. A leader might be a team player by doing such things as pitching in during peak workloads. An example would be an information technology team leader working through the night with team members to combat a virus attack on the company’s computer network.
Being a team player is a more effective influence tactic in an organiza- tional culture that emphasizes collaboration than one in which being tough-minded and decisive is more in vogue. A study of CEO leadership profiles among buyout firms found that teamwork was less associated with success than traits such as persistence and efficiency. Leaders in buyout firms are strongly financially oriented and are much more concerned with making deals than building relationships.17
Practicing Hands-On Leadership A hands-on leader is one who gets directly involved in the details and processes of operations. Such a leader has exper- tise, is task oriented, and leads by example. By getting directly involved in the group’s work activities, the leader influences subordinates to hold cer- tain beliefs and to follow certain procedures and processes. For example, managers who get directly involved in fixing customer problems demon- strate to other workers how they think such problems should be resolved.
Hands-on leadership is usually expected at levels below the executive suite, yet many high-level executives are also hands-on leaders. A strong
DESCRIPTION AND EXPLANATION OF INFLUENCE TACTICS 257
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
example is Sergio Marchionne, the Chrysler and Fiat CEO, who intervenes in such matters as a leaking car door handle. The downside of being a hands-on leader is that if you do it to excess, you become a micromanager.
The accompanying Leader in Action insert describes an automotive com- pany executive who has been successful in influencing others.
Essentially Neutral Influence Tactics The four influence tactics described in this section and listed in Table 8-2 might best be regarded as neutral with respect to ethics and honesty. If implemented with good intent, they tend to be positive, but if implemented with the intent of duping another person, they tend to be negative.
LEADER IN ACTION
Doug Scott, Truck Group Marketing Manager at Ford Motor Company
Doug Scott holds the formal job title of truck group man- ager at Ford Motor Company. Yet, he is so influential in his field that he has been referred to as the Sovereign of Truck Mountain. Scott is the leader of a truck business that gen- erates $22 billion annually and outsells all its rivals. Despite heavy competition from GM, Dodge, and Toyota, the Ford Series pickup trucks have been the best-selling model in the United States for over thirty years.
A University of Michigan graduate, Scott climbed the corporate ladder through the sales route. He was in charge of the of the Ford Explorer SUV marketing before being promoted to head of the truck division in 2002. His present responsibilities include pickup trucks, large SUVs, and commercial vehicles.
Scott is well respected for the marketing insights he brings to his position. One of his most influential decisions was to segment the market for the F-150 pickup truck series. During the 2009 recession, Scott championed a low-cost F-150 for contractors and landscapers. In addi- tion, there are models in the intermediate price range, as well as the high-end luxury range. One truck, labeled the Raptor SVT, is an off-the-road vehicle that climbs boulders and supposedly jump small canyons. The recently intro- duced Tremor is a two-seater sports truck that can accel- erate to 60 miles per hour in 6.4 seconds.
Scott does not consider himself to be a “gearhead” in the traditional sense, but he has long been fascinated by the relationship between the automobile industry and
the public’s passion for cars and trucks. Scott’s love for trucks and his devotion to Ford have helped him be well liked as a leader. He has developed close bonds among designers, marketers, and customers that have brought him substantial clout within the company. Mark Williams, the editor of website pickuptrucks.com, says about Scott, “The depth of his knowledge seems real and gen- uine. No matter what the situation, he has an answer.”
As a leader, Scott has been successful in building a tight-knit team, many of who have been with Ford for dec- ades. The team knows its customers quite well. Scott said that the team attends events such as the Profes- sional Bull Riders Association and the Future Farmers of America. Such activities give the team an opportunity for face-to-face contact with customers.
QUESTIONS
1. Which influence tactics can you infer that Doug Scott uses in his leadership role?
2. What career lessons might be taken away from this story about Scott?
Sources: Original story created from facts and observations in the following sources: Mike Ramsey, “Ford Truck Czar Divides to Con- quer,” The Wall Street Journal, November 7, 2013, p. B10; Cameron Miquelon, “The Legend of Ford’s Truck Czar’s Rule Over Truck Moun- tain,” The Truth about Cars (www.thetruthaboutcars.com), November 12, 2013, pp. 1–2; “Doug Scott: Marketing Manager Enjoys Con- sumer Connection,” http://corporate.ford.com, September 24, 2009, p. 1.
258 CHAPTER 8• INFLUENCE TACTICS OF LEADERS
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
Ingratiation When ingratiation takes the form of well-deserved flattery or compliments, it is a positive tactic. Yet, getting somebody else to like you can be considered a mildly manipulative influence tactic if you do not like the other person.
Ingratiation is often directed upward, in the sense of a subordinate attempting to get the superior to like him or her, as in organizational poli- tics. Ingratiation also works in a downward direction, when leaders attempt to get their subordinates to like them. Typical ingratiating techniques directed toward subordinates include luncheon invitations, compliments, giving a plum work assignment, and feeding a subordinate’s hobby, such as contributing a rare stamp to an employee’s collection.
Leaders who ordinarily are quite the opposite of ingratiating will some- times go out of their way to be humble and agreeable to fit an important purpose. An example is the CEO of a large fast-food franchise operation. She might be cutting and sarcastic when at company headquarters. Yet when on a goodwill tour to visit franchisees, she is ingratiating. For exam- ple, she compliments the quality of the food of one of the chain restaurants, and asks to be photographed with the franchisee.
Ingratiating tactics identified in a study about influence tactics included the following:
• Says you have the special skills or knowledge needed to carry out a request.
• Praises your skill or knowledge when asking you to do something.
Leadership Self-Assessment Quiz 8-2 provides you an opportunity to measure your own ingratiating tendencies and to think through further what ingratiating yourself to your boss means in practice. Remember that being liked helps you get promoted, receive more compensation, and avoid being downsized, yet you should avoid being dishonest.
Joking and Kidding Good-natured kidding is especially effective when a straightforward statement might be interpreted as harsh criticism. Joking or kidding can thus get the message across and lower the risk that the influ- ence target will be angry with the influence agent. Joking and kidding might be interpreted either as dishonest or as extraordinarily tactful because the criticizer softens the full blow of the criticism. A small business owner suc- cessfully used joking and kidding to help the receptionist wear clothing more appropriate for the position. As the owner entered the office,
TABLE 8-2 Essentially Neutral Influence Tactics
1. Ingratiation
2. Joking and kidding
3. Upward appeal
4. Co-opting antagonists
© Ce ng ag e Le ar ni ng
DESCRIPTION AND EXPLANATION OF INFLUENCE TACTICS 259
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
LEADERSHIP SELF-ASSESSMENT QUIZ 8-2
Measure of Ingratiating Behavior in Organizational Settings (MIBOS)
Instructions: Indicate how frequently you use (or would use) the tactics for pleasing your boss listed here. N ¼ never do it; S ¼ seldom do it; Oc ¼ occasionally do it; Of ¼ often do it; A ¼ almost always do it. The N-to-A categories correspond to a 1-to-5 scale.
1 2 3 4 5
N S OC OF A
1. Impress upon your supervisor that only he or she can help you in a given situation mainly to make him or her feel good.
□ □ □ □ □
2. Show your supervisor that you share enthusiasm about his or her new idea even when you may not actually like it.
□ □ □ □ □
3. Try to let your supervisor know that you have a reputation for being liked. □ □ □ □ □ 4. Try to make sure that your supervisor is aware of your success. □ □ □ □ □ 5. Highlight the achievements made under your supervisor’s leadership in a meeting
he or she does not attend. □ □ □ □ □
6. Give frequent smiles to express enthusiasm and interest about something your supervisor is interested in even if you do not like it.
□ □ □ □ □
7. Express work attitudes that are similar to your supervisor’s as a way of letting him or her know that the two of you are alike.
□ □ □ □ □
8. Tell your supervisor that you can learn a lot from his or her experience. □ □ □ □ □ 9. Exaggerate your supervisor’s admirable qualities to convey the impression that you
think highly of him or her. □ □ □ □ □
10. Disagree on trivial or unimportant issues but agree on those issues in which he or she expects support from you.
□ □ □ □ □
11. Try to imitate such work behaviors of your supervisor as working late or occasionally working on weekends.
□ □ □ □ □
12. Look for opportunities to let your supervisor know your virtues and strengths. □ □ □ □ □ 13. Ask your supervisor for advice in areas in which he or she thinks he or she is smart
to let him or her feel that you admire his or her talent. □ □ □ □ □
14. Try to do things for your supervisor that show your selfless generosity. □ □ □ □ □ 15. Look out for opportunities to admire your supervisor. □ □ □ □ □ 16. Let your supervisor know the attitudes you share with him or her. □ □ □ □ □ 17. Compliment your supervisor on his or her achievement, however it may appeal to
you personally. □ □ □ □ □
18. Laugh heartily at your supervisor’s jokes even when they are really not funny. □ □ □ □ □ 19. Go out of your way to run an errand for your supervisor. □ □ □ □ □ 20. Offer to help your supervisor by using your personal contacts. □ □ □ □ □ 21. Try to persuasively present your own qualities when attempting to convince your
supervisor about your abilities. □ □ □ □ □
22. Volunteer to be of help to your supervisor in matters like locating a good apartment, finding a good insurance agent, etc.
□ □ □ □ □
23. Spend time listening to your supervisor’s personal problems even if you have no interest in them.
□ □ □ □ □
24. Volunteer to help your supervisor in his or her work even if it means extra work for you.
□ □ □ □ □
260 CHAPTER 8• INFLUENCE TACTICS OF LEADERS
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
he noticed that the receptionist was wearing a tank top and very large hoop earrings. The owner said, “Melissa, you look great, but I think you have your dates confused. You are dressed for the company picnic, and it takes place tomorrow.” Melissa smiled, and then dressed more professionally in the future.
Upward Appeal In upward appeal, the leader exerts influence on a team member by getting a person with more formal authority to do the influenc- ing. Some managers and researchers regard upward appeal as an ethical and standard practice, yet it does contain an element of manipulation and heavy-handedness. An example: “I sent the guy to my boss when he wouldn’t listen to me. That fixed him.” More than occasional use of upward appeal weakens the leader’s stature in the eyes of group members and superiors, eroding effectiveness. Leaders can apply upward appeal in other ways. A leader might attempt to persuade another staff member that higher management approved his or her request. The target of the influence event is thus supposed to grant acceptance automatically. Or, the leader can request higher management’s assistance in gaining another person’s compli- ance with the request. The influence target thus feels pressured.18
Co-Opting Antagonists A potentially effective influence tactic, as well as a method of conflict resolution, is to find a clever way to get the other person or group of persons to join forces with you. In this sense, to co-opt is to win over opponents by making them part of your team or giving them a stake in the system.19 Assume that the director of human resources is receiving con- siderable opposition to some of her initiatives from the chief financial offi- cer. For example, the CFO is opposed to her proposed program of cross- cultural training. To soften the opposition, and perhaps even make him an ally, the director of human resources invites the CFO to become a member
QUIZ 8-2 (continued)
Scoring and Interpretation: The more of these ingratiating behaviors you use frequently or almost always, the more ingratiating you are. A score of 40 or less suggests that you do not put much effort into pleasing your manager, and you may need to be a little more ingratiating to achieve a good relationship with your supervisor. A score between 41 and 99 suggests a moderate degree of ingratiating behavior. A score of 100 or more suggests that you are too ingratiating and might be perceived as being too political or insincere. So some honesty is called for, providing you are tactful.
Skill Development: Leaders or future leaders should remember that a moderate amount of ingratiating behavior is the norm in relationships with superiors. Ingratiating yourself to people who report to you can also be a useful influence tactic.
Source: Adapted from Kamalesh Kumar and Michael Beyerlein, “Construction and Validation of an Instrument for Measuring Ingratiatory Behaviors in Organizational Settings,” Journal of Applied Psychology, October 1991, p. 623. American Psychological Association.
DESCRIPTION AND EXPLANATION OF INFLUENCE TACTICS 261
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
of the “human resources advisory board” composed of company executives and distinguished citizens from the community.
Essentially Dishonest and Unethical Tactics The tactics described in this section are less than forthright and ethical, yet they vary in intensity with respect to dishonesty. Most people would con- sider the first two strategies presented here as unethical and devious, yet they might regard the second two tactics as still within the bounds of acceptable ethics, even though less than fully candid. The tactics in question are outlined in Table 8-3.
Deliberate Machiavellianism Niccolò Machiavelli advised that princes must be strong, ruthless, and cynical leaders because people are self-centered and self- serving. As implied in Chapter 7, people in the workplace who ruthlessly manipulate others have therefore come to be called Machiavellians. They tend to initiate actions with others and control the interactions. Machiavellians regularly practice deception, bluffing, and other manipulative tactics.20 A mod- ern example of deliberate Machiavellianism is the practice of forcing manage- rial and professional employees into working many extra hours of uncompensated overtime. The employees are told that if they refuse to work extra hours, they will not be considered worthy of promotion or as good team players. Even when positions in other companies are readily available, most career-minded people will stay because they want to preserve a good reputation.
Gentle Manipulation of People and Situations Some people who attempt to influence others are manipulative, but to a lesser extent than an outright Machiavellian. They gain the compliance of another person by making untrue statements or faking certain behaviors. For example, a leader might imply that if a colleague supports his position in an intergroup conflict, the person might be recommended for promotion. Another manipulative approach is to imply dire consequences to innocent people if the influence target does not comply with demands of the influence agent, such as, “Even if you don’t want to put in extra effort for me, think of the people with fam- ilies who will be laid off if we don’t make our targets.”
A widely used manipulative approach is to tap into social norms in order to gain consensus. According to Steve Martin, behavior specialist at the consult- ing firm Influence at Work, this technique can move people to model their
TABLE 8-3 Essentially Dishonest and Unethical Influence Tactics
1. Deliberate Machiavellianism
2. Gentle manipulation of people and situations
3. Undue pressure
4. Debasement
© Ce ng ag e Le ar ni ng
262 CHAPTER 8• INFLUENCE TACTICS OF LEADERS
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
behavior after others. He gives the example of working with the U.K. tax col- lecting service. Martin witnessed an increase in the return rate after enclosing messages such as “nine out of ten people pay their tax on time.” The rate of returns increased even more when the tax collection service presented mes- sages referring to the number of people who field returns with the individual’s own town or postal code.21 A workplace example is a manager who informs the vice president that she wants an enlarged budget for attendance at the lat- est social networking seminars because “all other companies are doing it.”
The technique of tapping into social norms can be combined with peer pressure to influence a group member. If one person is not stepping for- ward to work well as a team member, the manager will say, “Bob, everyone in the department is committed to developing a team atmosphere, and we’d like you to be a part of it.”22
Undue Pressure Effective leaders regularly use motivational techniques such as rewards and mild punishments. Yet, when rewards become bribes for compliance and threats of punishment become severe, the target person is subjected to undue pressure or coercion. An example of a bribe by a manager might be, “If you can work eighty hours on this project this week, I’ll recom- mend you for the highest pay grade.” Another approach to pressure is for the manager to scream and swear at the subordinate as a form of intimidation. As one manager under pressure of his own, shouted to a subordinate:
“Get some of these receivables paid by the end of the week or find another job.”
Two specific behaviors labeled pressure in a research study were as follows:
• Uses threats or warnings when trying to get you to do something. • Tries to pressure you to carry out a request.
Debasement A subtle manipulative tactic is debasement, demeaning or insulting oneself to control the behavior of another person. Richard Par- sons, the former chair of Citigroup, uses debasement to disarm people. A long-time friend said of Parsons, “Richard’s ability to get people to underes- timate him is a great skill. If you are obvious, they know where to hit you. Who wins between the bull and matador?“23 Specific debasing tactics revealed by research include the following: “I lower myself so she’ll do it,” and “I act humble so she’ll do it.”24
In studying the most severe unethical influence (and political) tactics, it is important to recognize that the use of these influence approaches can bring about human suffering. For example, bullying and intimidating tactics may not be illegal, but they are unethical. Cruelty in the organization creates many problems. As one observer notes, “Cruelty is blatantly unethical and erodes the organizational character through intellectual, emotional, moral, and social vices that reduce the readiness of groups to act ethically.”25 Exam- ples of cruelty include insulting a group member’s physical appearance or belittling him or her.
DESCRIPTION AND EXPLANATION OF INFLUENCE TACTICS 263
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
Leadership Skill-Building Exercise 8-1 gives you an opportunity to prac- tice influence tactics in a high-stakes business situation.
Leadership Skill-Building Exercise 8-2 will help you recognize several of the influence tactics described in this chapter. Another tactic mentioned in the exercise, assertiveness, was described in Chapter 2.
LEADERSHIP SKILL-BUILDING EXERCISE 8-1
Influence Tactics
One student plays the role of a chief financial officer of a large company. After months of analysis, the CFO deci- des that a key step the company can take to be profit- able during the next several years is to get about 5,000 employees to accept voluntary retirement. As severance pay, the workers who accept the retirement package will receive one year’s salary, depending on the length of service. The buyout could cost the company around
$5 million in payouts plus some liability for future health benefits and retirement pay. Four other students will play the role of the top-management team, several of whom might be skeptical about the soundness of the plan offered by the CFO. Observers will pay close atten- tion to the influence tactics used by the CFO, and per- haps by the other members of the top-management team.
LEADERSHIP SKILL-BUILDING EXERCISE 8-2
Identifying Influence Tactics
Instructions: After reading the following passage, identify which influence tactics the leader is using, and explain your reasoning.
Gina is the director of human resources in a diversi- fied company with approximately 50,000 workers. She has assembled her five direct reports in a hotel confer- ence room for a Saturday morning meeting. With an intense facial expression, Gina launched directly into her presentation, supported by PowerPoint slides on a large screen.
“Enjoy your coffee, tea, juice, donuts, bagels, and pastries because I can offer you no other goodies this morning. As HR professionals, you know we are in trouble. As hard as we all work, and as much good as we do, our jobs are in peril. The trend is clear. Our corporation, simi- lar to many others, might be outsourcing our work to HR vendors. The movement has already begun with payroll being outsourced last year and health insurance this year.
“Even worse, the corporate group is planning to pur- chase HR software that will enable line managers throughout the company to take care of their own HR responsibilities, such as recruiting and selection.
“I want to work with all of you to develop strategies and tactics so vital that the top-management team will decide to keep our group intact, and not join the outsour- cing movement. We need also to discourage line man- agers from being performing HR on their own without our help. Think of HR activities so vital that we become indispensable. Maybe we should be coordinating a flu- shot program. Maybe we should beef up our wellness program so much that absenteeism and insurance costs are reduced to an extent that our contribution to the bottom line is obvious even to our chief financial officer.
“Now that I’ve told you the truth, let’s get started having a true dialogue about the challenges facing us.”
264 CHAPTER 8• INFLUENCE TACTICS OF LEADERS
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
Leadership Influence for Organizational Change
Most of the discussion so far relates to the leader/manager influencing peo- ple one at a time or in small groups. Top-level leaders exert many of their influence attempts in the direction of bringing about changes throughout the entire organization, often by attempting to overhaul the organizational culture. One such change would be attempting to influence a culture that was too collaborative to make decisions more quickly and independently, or the reverse. Another change would be to make the culture more focused on products the market wanted and less focused on innovation for its own sake. Yet another cultural change facing a CEO would be to make a risk- averse workforce more entrepreneurial and risk taking.
Before plunging ahead with attempts at massive cultural change, the leader needs to study the old culture and understand why it contributed to the prosperity and growth of the organization. When Marissa Mayer joined Yahoo!, she already knew a lot about the company as part of her role at Google. She intuitively recognized that the excitement and pride of Yahoo!’s past had contributed to its Internet prominence. Marissa also recognized that the Yahoo! culture had taken a downturn. She worked swiftly to upgrade the technology-feel to the company by such steps as acquisition and spearheading a large number of Yahoo! mobile apps. The influx of new talent helped upgrade the culture and image of Yahoo!. As one employee was quoted as saying, “It’s no longer shameful to work at Yahoo!.”26
After a new CEO is appointed, the person typically makes a public state- ment to the effect that: “My number-one job is to change the culture.” A leader might do the following to bring about change as well as ensuring that a healthy corporate culture is maintained.
• Serve as a role model for the desired attitudes and behaviors. Leaders must behave in ways consistent with the values and practices they wish to see imitated throughout the organization. If the change the leader wants is a stronger focus on customer service, leaders must treat employees as customers, thereby acting as role models for the way cus- tomers should be treated. The leaders must also talk in positive terms about customer service, with a statement such as, “The real joy in our work is helping customers solve their problems.” Another frequently used method of bringing about change by acting as a role model is for the newly appointed leader to be frugal to encourage frugality through- out the organization. The frugal CEO, for example, might fly on com- mercial airlines and not by corporate jet, have one instead of several administrative assistants, and eat lunch in the company cafeteria.
• Impose a new approach through executive edict. From the time he started his position as chairman and CEO of General Electric, Jeff Immelt was on a mission to transform the hard-driving process-oriented company into an organization steeped in creativity and wired for busi- ness growth. In addition to outstanding efficiency in operations, Immelt presented new imperatives for risk taking, sophisticated marketing, and,
LEADERSHIP INFLUENCE FOR ORGANIZATIONAL CHANGE 265
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
of utmost importance, innovation.27 Ten years later, his approach to cul- ture change was still bringing about positive, but not spectacular, results.
• Establish a reward system that reinforces the culture, such as giving huge suggestion awards to promote an innovative culture. Jeff Bezos at Amazon.com is so committed to innovation that being imaginative is almost a requirement for being promoted into a key position at the company.
• Select candidates for positions at all levels whose values mesh with the values of the desired culture. Many firms hire only those candidates whose work and school experience suggest that they might be good team players—a cultural value.
• Sponsor new training and development programs that support the desired cultural values. Among many examples, top management might sponsor diversity training to support the importance of cultural diversity, or training in quality to support the value of quality.
A leader who exhibited all of these behaviors would qualify as a transfor- mational leader because of all the positive changes.
Relative Effectiveness and Sequencing of Influence Tactics
Although we have described influence tactics separately, they must also be understood in relation to one another. Two ways of comparing influence tactics are to examine their relative effectiveness and to study the order in which they might be used to achieve the best result.
Relative Effectiveness of Influence Tactics Since influence tactics are a major component of leadership, research about their relative effectiveness is worth noting. A classic study by Gary Yukl and J. Bruce Tracey provides insights into the relative effectiveness of influence tactics.28 One hundred and twenty managers participated in the study, along with 526 subordinates, 543 peers, and 128 superiors, who also rated the managers’ use of influence tactics. Half the managers worked for manufacturing companies, and half worked for service companies.
The people who worked with the managers completed a questionnaire to identify which of the nine influence tactics the managers used. As defined for the participants, the tactics were as follows: (1) rational persuasion, (2) inspirational appeal, (3) consultation, (4) ingratiation, (5) exchange, (6) personal appeal, (7) coalition, (8) legitimating, and (9) pressure.
Another question asked how many influence attempts by the agent resulted in complete commitment by the target respondent. Respondents were also asked to rate the overall effectiveness of the manager in carrying out manage- rial job responsibilities. The item had nine response choices, ranging from “the least effective manager I have ever known” to “the most effective manager.”
The results suggested that the most effective tactics were rational persua- sion, inspirational appeal, and consultation. (An effective tactic was one that led to task commitment and that was used by managers who were perceived
266 CHAPTER 8• INFLUENCE TACTICS OF LEADERS
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
to be effective by the various raters.) In contrast, the least effective were pres- sure, coalition, and appealing to legitimate authority (legitimating). Ingratia- tion and exchange were moderately effective for influencing team members and peers. The same tactics, however, were not effective for influencing super- iors. A related interpretation of the data would be that noncoercive tactics that provide a rational and justifiable basis for attitude change are more effective in gaining compliance than are threatening or manipulative attempts.29
Inspirational appeal, ingratiation, and pressure were used primarily in a downward direction, that is, toward a lower-ranking person. Personal appeal, exchange, and legitimating were used primarily in a lateral direction. It was also found that coalitions were used most in lateral and upward directions and that rational persuasion was used most in an upward direction.
The researchers concluded that some tactics are more likely to be suc- cessful than others. Yet, they caution that the results do not imply that these tactics will always result in task commitment. The outcome of a spe- cific influence attempt is also determined by other factors, such as the tar- get’s motivation and the organizational culture. Also, any tactic can trigger target resistance if it is not appropriate for the situation or if it is applied unskillfully. Tact, diplomacy, and insight are required for effective applica- tion of influence tactics.
Which influence tactic a manager might consider effective, and therefore choose, depends to some extent on how much group members are trusted. When we distrust people, we are likely to attempt to control their actions. Carole V. Wells and David Kipnis conducted a survey about trust involving 275 managers and 267 employees. The managers answered questions about subordinates, and subordinates answered questions about their managers. A key finding was that both managers and employees used strong tactics of influence when they distrusted the other party—either a manager or a sub- ordinate. The strong influence tactics studied were appeals to higher authority, assertiveness, coalition building, and sanctions.30
Another perspective on the relative effectiveness of influence tactics comes from a study of territory managers and their service center managers who worked for a distribution company. A major finding was that the qual- ity of the relationship with the leader (leader–member exchange, or LMX) had an impact on the effectiveness of influence tactics. When group mem- bers perceived a poor relationship with their leader, the leader’s use of inspirational appeal and exchange resulted in less helping of coworkers by members. However, the leaders’ consultation tactics were positively associ- ated with the members helping work associates. When group members per- ceived their relationship with the leader as positive, exchange tactics by the leaders positively related to helping behavior.
An interpretation offered for these interactions has a lesson for leaders. Members in low-quality relationships may interpret appeals to their values, goals, and aspirations or exchange offers as empty. As a result, the members did not engage in more helping behaviors based on inspirational appeals. Yet, consultation is more effective and may prompt members to become more helpful.31
RELATIVE EFFECTIVENESS AND SEQUENCING OF INFLUENCE TACTICS 267
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
Sequencing of Influence Tactics Another important consideration in using influence tactics is the sequence or order in which they should be applied. In general, you should begin with the most positive, or least abrasive, tactic. If you do not gain the advantage you seek, proceed to a stronger tactic. For example, if you want a larger sal- ary increase than that initially assigned you, try rational persuasion. If per- suasion does not work, move on to exchanging favors. Use a more abrasive tactic such as upward appeal only as a last resort. The reason is that abra- sive tactics trigger revenge and retaliation. Many people who have taken their complaints to an outside agency, such as a governmental office, have found themselves with a limited future in their organization. Although the appeal is legally justified, it is politically unwise.
The sequencing of tactics can also be considered in terms of cost and risk. A sensible approach is to begin with low-cost, low-risk tactics. If the outcome is important enough to the influence agent, he or she can then proceed to higher-cost and higher-risk influence tactics. An example of a low-cost, low-risk tactic would be joking and kidding. An accounting man- ager who was disappointed with the budget offered to her group might say to her boss, “Does the new budget mean that our group will have to pay for our own laser cartridges and green eyeshades?“ It would be much more costly in terms of time and potential retaliation to form a coalition with another under-budgeted group to ask for an enlarged budget.
In addition to the sequencing of tactics, the influence agent must also consider the direction of the influence attempt as a contingency factor. In general, the more position power an individual exerts over another, the less the need for being cautious in the use of influence tactics. For example, a vice president can more readily use undue pressure against a supervisor than vice versa. When you have more power, there are likely to be fewer negative consequences from using more powerful tactics.
Leadership Skill-Building Exercise 8-3 provides an opportunity to prac- tice implementing various influence tactics. As with any other skill, influ- ence skills need to be practiced under field conditions.
LEADERSHIP SKILL-BUILDING EXERCISE 8-3
Applying Influence Tactics
Divide the class into small teams. Each group assigns one leadership influence tactic to each team member. During the next week or so, each team member takes the oppor- tunity to practice the assigned influence tactic in a work or personal setting. Hold a group discussion with the same class teams after the influence attempts have been prac- ticed. Report the following information: (1) under what cir- cumstances the influence tactic was attempted; (2) how
the influence target reacted; and (3) what results, both positive and negative, were achieved.
Practicing influence tactics directly contributes to your leadership effectiveness because leadership cen- ters on influence. If you want to exert leadership as a non-manager, you will have to be particularly adept at using influence tactics because your formal authority will be quite limited.
268 CHAPTER 8• INFLUENCE TACTICS OF LEADERS
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
Implicit Leadership Theories and Leadership Influence
A final perspective on influence tactics is that people are more likely to be influenced by leaders who match their expectations of what a leader should be. Implicit leadership theories are personal assumptions about the traits and abilities that characterize an ideal organizational leader. These assump- tions, both stated and unstated, develop through socialization and past experiences with leaders. The assumptions are stored in memory and acti- vated when group members interact with a person in a leadership position. Our assumptions about leaders help us make sense of what takes place on the job. Assume that Reggie was raised in a household and neighborhood in which business leaders are highly respected and thought to be dedicated and intelligent. When Reggie later works in a full-time professional job, he is most likely to be influenced by a supervisor he perceives to be dedicated and intelligent because this person fits Reggie’s preconceived notion of how a leader should behave.
According to implicit leadership theory, as part of making assumptions and expectations of leader traits and behaviors, people develop leadership prototypes and antiprototypes. Prototypes are positive characterizations of a leader, whereas antiprototypes are traits and behaviors people do not want to see in a leader. People have different expectations of what they want in a leader, yet research conducted with 939 subordinates in two different sam- ples in British companies shows there is some consistency in implicit lead- ership theories. The study showed that these theories are consistent across different employee groups and are also stable, trait-based stereotypes of leadership.32 Another study in England showed that if the leader matches employee assumptions about having the right traits, the leader–member exchange (LMX) will be more positive. In turn, the group member will be more readily influenced by the leader.33
Table 8-4 lists the six traits group members want to see in a leader (prototypes), as well as the two traits they do not want to see in a leader (anti- prototypes). Your study of leadership traits in Chapters 2 and 3 will reinforce these leadership attributes. The antiprototype of masculinity suggests that
TABLE 8-4 Implicit Leadership Theory Dimensions
LEADERSHIP PROTOTYPE LEADERSHIP ANTIPROTOTYPE
1. Sensitivity (compassion, sensitive) 1. Tyranny (dominant, selfish, manipulative)
2. Intelligence (intelligent, clever) 2. Masculinity (male, masculine)
3. Dedication (dedicated, motivated)
4. Charisma (charismatic, dynamic)
5. Strength (strong, bold)
6. Attractiveness (well dressed, classy)
Source: Gathered from information in Olga Epitropaki and Robin Martin, “Implicit Leadership Theories in Applied Settings: Factor Structure, Generalizability, and Stability over Time,” Journal of Applied Psychology, April 2004, 297–299.
IMPLICIT LEADERSHIP THEORIES AND LEADERSHIP INFLUENCE 269
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
READER’S ROADMAP
followers prefer a compassionate and relationship-oriented leader to a command-and-control leader. An implication of these data is that a leader who fits group members’ prototypes is more likely to influence them than a leader who fits their antiprototype.
So far we have studied considerable information about the nature of leadership; the attributes, behaviors, and styles of leaders; the ethics and social responsibility of lea- ders; and how leaders exert power and use politics and influence. The next chapter explains a variety of techniques for developing teamwork.
SUMMARY
To become an effective leader, a person must be aware of specific influence tactics. Influence is the ability to affect the behaviors of others in a particu- lar direction. Power, in contrast, is the potential or capacity to influence. A model presented here indi- cates that a leader’s influence outcomes are a func- tion of the influence tactics he or she uses. The influence tactics are, in turn, moderated, or affected by, the leader’s traits and behaviors and also by the situation. The outcomes of influence attempts are commitment, compliance, or resistance, all of which influence end results such as group success or failure.
Influence tactics are often viewed from an ethi- cal perspective. Some tactics are clearly ethical, some are neutral, but others are clearly unethical. Used with tact, diplomacy, and good intent, ethical influence tactics can be quite effective. The essen- tially ethical tactics described here are leading by example and respect, using rational persuasion, explaining the benefits to the target, personal appeal, being a subject matter expert, exchanging favors and bargaining, legitimating a request, mak- ing an inspirational appeal and emotional display, consulting, forming coalitions, being a team player, and practicing hands-on leadership.
Influence tactics essentially neutral with respect to ethics are ingratiation, joking and kidding, upward appeal, and co-opting antagonists. Essen- tially dishonest and unethical tactics presented here were deliberate Machiavellianism, gentle
manipulation of people and situations, undue pres- sure, and debasement.
Top-level leaders exert many of their influence attempts toward bringing about changes through- out the entire organization, often by attempting to overhaul the organizational culture. The leader should first study the old culture to search for its merits. Tactics for cultural change by the leader include serving as a role model, executive edict, giving rewards to reinforce the culture, selecting candidates who fit the culture, and establishing training and development programs to support the culture.
A study of influence tactics concluded that the most effective were rational persuasion, inspira- tional appeal, and consultation. The least effective were pressure, coalition, and appealing to legiti- mate authority. The quality of the leader–member (LMX) relationship has an impact on the effective- ness of influence tactics, with a poor relationship lowering the effectiveness of inspirational appeal and exchange.
Certain tactics are more effective for exerting influence upward, whereas others are better suited for downward influence. For example, inspirational appeal, ingratiation, and exchange are moderately effective for influencing subordinates and peers. Yet, the same tactics are not effective for influenc- ing superiors. When we distrust people, we tend to think that stronger influence tactics, such as an appeal to higher authority, will be effective.
270 CHAPTER 8• INFLUENCE TACTICS OF LEADERS
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
Sequencing of influence tactics is another important consideration. In general, begin with the most positive, or least abrasive, tactic. If you do not gain the advantage you seek, proceed to a stronger tactic. Also, begin with low-cost, low-risk tactics.
Implicit leadership theories are personal assumptions about the traits and abilities that
characterize an ideal organizational leader. Proto- types are positive characterizations of a leader, whereas antiprototypes are negative. Subordinates are more likely to be influenced by leaders who fit their prototype, and do not fit their antiprototype, of a leader.
KEY TERMS
influence 248 power 248 commitment 249 compliance 249 resistance 250 leading by example 252
apprising 253 personal magnetism 255 coalition 256 hands-on leader 257 upward appeal 261 co-opt 261
Machiavellians 262 debasement 263 implicit leadership
theories 269
GUIDELINES FOR ACTION AND SKILL DEVELOPMENT
To become an effective leader, learning to use influ- ence tactics comfortably is inevitable. If you use influence tactics naturally, without giving them much thought, there is still more to learn. For example, even a great leader such as Elton Musk might be even more effective with employees if he were more conciliatory toward those people he per- ceived to be of average intelligence. Being concilia- tory fits the influence tactics of being charming and consulting with others.
A field study provides some clues as to the cir- cumstances in which more heavy-handed influence tactics will work with a subordinate. Managers tended to use hard (tough) follow-up tactics when a subordinate’s refusal is related to work expected in his or her role, and when the subordinate was seen as malingering. (An example here would be saying to a specialist in accounts receivable, “You’ve been goofing off too long. If you don’t chase after those customers overdue on their accounts, you might not get a raise for next year.”) Harder tactics were also used more frequently when exchanges between the leader and member were not positive. Managers withdrew their request when the request was seen as outside the subordinate’s role, or the request was
ambiguous. When the leader–member exchange was less positive, managers were also more likely to withdraw the request.
Discussion Questions and Activities
1. Explain the following analogy: Influence is to leadership as eggs are to an omelet.
2. Which influence tactic described in this chapter do you think would work the best for you? Why?
3. Howmight a manager use leading by example to help develop ethical behavior in his or her unit?
4. With so many workers habituated to using mobile devices for so much of their work, should company management develop apps for influ- encing subordinates? Explain your reasoning.
5. Assume that as their leader, you wanted to influ- ence minimum wage earners in a plastic bottle recycling center to work faster. Which one or two influence tactics are likely to be effective?
6. Identify two exchanges of favor you have seen or can envision on the job.
7. Why is developing a reputation as a subject matter expert important for a leader if leader- ship deals so heavily with interpersonal skills?
GUIDELINES FOR ACTION AND SKILL DEVELOPMENT 271
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
LEADERSHIP CASE PROBLEM A
8. How might a business owner use the tapping into the social norms to get his or her employ- ees to lead a healthier lifestyle?
9. Over a long period of time, Sears has slipped from being America’s largest retailer to plac- ing 41 in a recent analysis. What cultural
change can you suggest to help company lead- ership at Sears restore some of the retailer’s past glory?
10. Get the opinion of an experienced leader as to the most effective influence tactics. Share your findings with class members.
Steve Tackles Mall World
Thirty-nine year-old Steve was ecstatic. Ever since he earned an MBA a few years ago, he set his sights on becoming a CEO, somewhere, somehow. If need be, he would purchase an existing small company if he could figure out a scheme to raise enough cash and borrowing power. Steve was moving along well in his career as a marketing manager in a real estate development company when he received the oppor- tunity to become a CEO. The CEO of an affiliated company, Mall World, suddenly resigned because of all the pressures associated with the position.
The board explained to Steve that he was offered the position because of his drive, leadership skills, incisive thinking, and educational qualifications. Steve was told that the job would be tough, but that he would be given two years to improve occu- pancy rates at the five malls the company owned and operated in the United States and Canada. Dur- ing his first couple of weeks as CEO of Mall World, Steve went on a listening tour, speaking with mem- bers of the top management team, mall managers, and a few anchor tenants. In addition to more gen- eral discussions, Steve asked each person he spoke with what he or she thought of the future of shop- ping malls. Among the comments he heard are as follows:
Leasing Manager, Home Office: The lower occu- pancy rates are hardly a problem. Americans love their malls. Our malls are still the most comfortable place to shop, dine, and interact with strangers and store associates. As the economy picks up, we once again have more demand for our space than we can provide.
Mall Manager in Boston Area: Anyone who thinks that online shopping will take a permanent bite
out of mall shopping is just plain stupid. It is natural for people to want to touch, feel, smell, and experience goods in person. “Have you ever attempted to try on a sweater over the Internet?” [Said with a grin and laugh.]
Mall Manager in Toronto Area: You may not be old enough to recognize it Steve, but mall occu- pancy rates run in cycles. When gas prices and unemployment are relatively high, few consu- mers visit the mall. As a result, a few of the weaker stores close in panic. And cold weather will always contribute to mall traffic. When the conditions outside are uncomfortable, people love to flock to the malls to walk around com- fortably, shop, and dine. Our future is as secure as the bricks and mortar encasing us.
Marketing Manager, Home Office: I wouldn’t worry too much about the relatively high number of vacancies in our malls. We have some attrac- tive new leasing programs coming along that will have tenants flocking to the mall. Online shopping will taper off as the novelty wears thin.
Small Store Manager in Chicago Area Mall: I am starting to think why bother with having a bricks and mortar store. Mall traffic has been slowing down for a couple of years. With an online store, I wouldn’t have the huge overhead of renting space in a mall.
As Steve attempted to synthesize the feedback, he thought that unfortunately the store manager might be close to telling the true story. He also thought that most of the opinions he heard suggested the need for a quick attitude change in order to help Mall World survive.
272 CHAPTER 8• INFLUENCE TACTICS OF LEADERS
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
LEADERSHIP CASE PROBLEM B
Questions
1. In what way does this case suggest that a cul- ture change might be necessary at Mall World?
2. What steps might Steve take to influence his managers that they need to worry more
about the future of Mall World, as well as taking action steps to improve occupancy rates?
3. Which specific influence tactics do you recom- mend Steve use with his managers?
ASSOCIATED ROLE PLAY One student plays the role of Steve, who decides to attempt to influence mall manager in the Boston Area to think more competitively about mall occu- pancy rates. (Or the other student can select one of the other managers that Steve interviewed.) The
other student plays the role of the mall manager who thinks that CEO Steve is worrying needlessly. Run the role play for about eight minutes. Obser- vers can provide feedback on how well the influ- ence attempt went.
Maya the Manipulator
Maya is the director of sales for United Events, a company that organizes events, such as trade shows and exhibitions for other companies. In addition to lining up the hotel or convention hall space, United Events sets up booths as well as the communication technology for the events. The company has done well in recent years, partly because the activity of organizing events has become too complicated to do in-house.
Maya is regarded by most clients and staff as mentally sharp and charming. Yet, several members of the sales representatives are concerned about how she treats them. A leadership coach found out the following in speaking to two sales representatives:
Ivan, a sales rep in the New Jersey area, said, “Maya shows a little disconnect between what she hints she will do and what she actually does. Six months ago, I had a good prospect lined up for us to organize an annual meeting for them. The prob- lem was that I would have to invest an enormous amount of time in bagging the contract. The com- pany wanted to go over endless details. Plus they wanted documentation of a couple of annual meet- ings we had organized for other companies.
“I told Maya that my pinning down this con- tract might not be cost effective because of all the time it would take that I could be spending on other prospects. Maya told me to keep trying
because the CEO might be very pleased with the contract, to the point that I could be eligible for a double bonus.
“Well, I finally did get us the contract even though the deal took a ridiculous amount of time away from my personal life. I did get an ordinary bonus, but no double bonus. When I asked Maya about the size of the bonus, she said she told me that I could be eligi- ble but that did not imply a guarantee.”
Courtney, a sales representative in the Chicago region, said that she was having the best year last year among her five years with the company. Dur- ing an in-person meeting with Maya, Courtney was asked if she would mind crediting Maya with her biggest individual sale. Maya said to her, “You have had a great year, and my personal accounts are a little below average this year. If I receive full credit for the last big sale, you will still have had a great year. And don’t forget that as your leader, I gave you suggestions for bringing the deal home.”
When Courtney expressed some hesitancy in transferring credit for the big sale to Maya, the lat- ter said, “Courtney, please remember that I am your ally. Remember how I let you off the hook last year on that little expense account irregularity? If I do get credit for the sale, I will not change my mind about overlooking the irregularity.”
LEADERSHIP CASE PROBLEM B 273
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
Questions
1. In what specific ways is Maya being a manipulator?
2. To what extent do you think Maya’s behavior is justifiable?
3. How should Ivan and Courtney have handled the situation?
4. What suggestions might you offer Maya for being a more effective leader?
ASSOCIATED ROLE PLAY One student plays the role of Courtney who is being asked to permit Maya to take credit for her (Courtney’s) biggest sale. Courtney feels she is being exploited, yet she wants to maintain a good working relationship with Maya—who she dis- trusts a little. Another student plays the role of
Maya who will be at her manipulative best in attempting to receive credit for Courtney’s biggest sale. Run the role play for about seven minutes. Observers will provide feedback on how well Courtney and Maya are able to carry out their influence challenges.
LEADERSHIP SKILL-BUILDING EXERCISE 8-4
My Leadership Portfolio
Influence is necessary for leaders, so you need to practice your influence tactics to enhance your lead- ership effectiveness. In this chapter’s entry to your leadership journal, describe any influence tactic you implemented recently. Describe what you did and how the influence target reacted. Comment on how you might use the tactic differently in your next influence attempt. Also describe which influ- ence tactic or combination of tactics you plan to use in the upcoming week. Here is a possible example:
I coach a youth basketball team called the West Side Chiefs. The kids are great, and I am enjoying the experience. Yet the name Chiefs really bothers
me because it is so behind the times, and a lot of people think using the term Chief for sport is racist. So I tried to influence the league director that we needed a name change. I presented my argument using a bunch of facts about how Chief has become passé for sports teams. (My technique was rational persuasion.) I did get a listen, but I didn’t get approval for the name change. So next, I combined my logical argument with an inspirational appeal. I asked the league directors how they would like it if our team were called The West Side Chinese or the West Side Jews. Finally, my influence tactics worked, and for next season my team will be the West Side Rattlers.
LEADERSHIP SKILL-BUILDING EXERCISE 8-5
A Leadership Essay
Now that you have studied leadership power and influence in this and the previous chapter, it is your turn to write something about leadership. Work alone, or collaboratively in a small group, to write about an article on the subject of “How to Become a Powerful
and Influential Leader.” Your article should be about 400 words long, and will be published in a print or online magazine. Several individuals or groups might share their article with other class members. Look for similarities and differences among the articles.
274 CHAPTER 8• INFLUENCE TACTICS OF LEADERS
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
NOTES
1. Original story created from facts and observations in the following sources: Michael Liedtke, “Yahoo! Revived by CEO, Alibaba,” Associated Press, July 16, 2013; Jenna McGregor, “Marissa Mayer’s Performance Review,” The Washington Post (www .washingtonpost.com), July 11, 2013, pp. 1–2; “Yahoo! Continues Its Search for a New Identity,” Knowledge@Wharton (http:// knowledge.wharton.upenn.edu/), June 19, 2013, pp. 1–4; David Olive, “Yahoo! CEO Marissa Mayer Is Fighting the Odds, Even Without Motherhood,” www.thestar.com, July 22, 2012, pp. 1–2; Ken Myers, “Leadership Development: 5 Lessons Marissa Mayer Can Teach You About Business Leadership,” Women in Leadership (www.womenin leadership.com), December 2013, pp. 1–5; Amir Efrati, Ann Rachel, and Emma Silverman, “Yahoo!’s Marissa Mayer, One Year Later,” The Wall Street Journal, July 16, 2013, pp. B1, B2; Greg Bensinger, “Yahoo!: Profit Stuck, for Now,” The Wall Street Journal, October 16, 2013, p. B3; Cited in Adam Lashinsky, “Where Does Google Go Next?” Fortune, May 26, 2008, p. 108.
2. Gary Yukl, Leadership in Organizations, Fifth Edition (Upper Saddle River, N.J.: Prentice Hall, 2002), p. 143.
3. Tal Yaffe and Ronit Kark, “Leading by Example: The Case of Leader OCB,” Journal of Applied Psychology, July 2011, pp. 806–826.
4. Mitchell S. Nesler, Herman Aguinis, Brian M. Quigley, and James T. Tedeschi, “The Effect of Credibility on Perceived Power,” Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 1993, vol. 23, no. 17, pp. 1407–1425.
5. The sample statements indicating the influence tactic in question here and at the other places in the chapter where they are presented are from Gary Yukl, Charles F. Seifert, and Carolyn Chavez, “Validation of the Extended Influence Behavior Questionnaire,” The Leadership Quarterly, October 2008, pp. 618–620 (© Gary Yukl).
6. Yukl, Seifert, and Chavez, “Validation of the Extended Influence Behavior Questionnaire,” p. 610.
7. Yukl, Seifert, and Chavez, “Validation of the Extended Influence Behavior Questionnaire,” p. 610. (For both endnotes 9 and 10 the definitions are credited as Copyright © 2001 by Gary Yukl.)
8. Kate Linebaugh, “The New GE Way: Go Deep, Not Wide,” The Wall Street Journal, March 7, 2012, p. B1.
9. “You Scratch My Back … Tips on Winning Your Colleague’s Cooperation,” Working Smart, October 1999, p. 1.
10. Jeffrey Pfeffer, Managing with Power: Power and Influence in Organizations (Boston: Harvard Business School Press, 1992), p. 224.
11. John H. (Jack) Zenger, “Leadership’s Silver Bullet: The Magic of Inspiration,” in Marshall Goldsmith, John Baldoni, and Sarah McArthur, eds., The AMA Handbook of Leadership (New York: AMACOM, 2010), pp. 103–109.
12. Alan Murray, The Wall Street Journal Essential Guide to Management (New York: Harper Business, 2010), p. 90.
13. Carlin Flora, “The Art of Influence,” Psychology Today, September/October 2011, pp. 68–69.
14. Gary Yukl, Skills for Managers and Leaders: Text, Cases, and Exercises (Upper Saddle River, N.J.: Prentice Hall, 1990), p. 65.
15. Some of the contacts are listed in Laurie Bennett, “Mellody Hobson: From Chicago to the White House to the Jet Set,” Forbes (www .forbes.com), January 2, 2012, pp. 1–4.
16. George Anders, “Tough CEOs Often Most Successful, a Study Finds,” The Wall Street Journal, November 19, 2007, p. B3.
17. Gary Yukl and Cecilia M. Falbe, “Influence Tactics and Objectives in Upward, Downward, and Lateral Influence Attempts,” Journal of Applied Psychology, April 1990, p. 133.
18. Jeffrey Pfeffer, “Power Play,” Harvard Business Review, July–August 2010, p. 90.
19. Bernhard M. Bass (with Ruth Bass), The Bass Handbook of Leadership: Theory, Research, & Managerial Applications, Fourth Edition (New York: The Free Press, 2008), p. 160.
20. Cited in Heidi Grant Halvorson, “How to Be a Better Boss,” The Wall Street Journal, January 2, 2013, p. B6.
NOTES 275
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
21. “Create an Arsenal of Influence Strategies,” Manager’s Edge, March 2003, p. 1.
22. Anthony Bianco and Tom Lowry, “Can Dick Parsons Rescue AOL Time Warner?“ BusinessWeek, May 19, 2003, p. 089.
23. David M. Buss, Mary Gomes, Dolly S. Higgins, and Karen Lauterbach, “Tactics of Manipulation,” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, December 1987, p. 1222.
24. Comment contributed anonymously to author by a professor of organizational behavior.
25. Efrati and Silverman, “Yahoo!’s Marissa Mayer, One Year Later,” The Wall Street Journal, p. B2.
26. Diane Brady, “The Immelt Revolution: He’s Turning GE’s Culture Upside Down, Demanding Far More Risk and Innovation,” BusinessWeek, March 28, 2005, pp. 064–066, 071–073.
27. Gary Yukl and J. Bruce Tracey, “Consequences of Influence Tactics Used with Subordinates, Peers, and the Boss,” Journal of Applied Psychology, August 1992, pp. 525–535.
28. Martin M. Chemers, An Integrative Theory of Leadership (Mahwah, N.J.: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 1997), p. 76.
29. Carole V. Wells and David Kipnis, “Trust, Dependency, and Control in the Contemporary Organization,” Journal of Business and Psychology, Summer 2001, pp. 593–603.
30. Raymond T. Sparrowe, Budi W. Soetjipto, and Maria L. Kraimer, “Do Leaders’ Influence Tactics Relate to Members’ Helping Behavior? It Depends on the Quality of the Relationship,” Academy of Management Journal, December 2006, pp. 1194–1208.
31. Olga Epitropaki and Robin Martin, “Implicit Leadership Theories in Applied Settings: Factor Structure, Generalizability, and Stability over Time,” Journal of Applied Psychology, April 2004, pp. 297–299.
32. Epitropaki and Martin, “From Real to Ideal: A Longitudinal Study of Implicit Leadership Theories in Leader–Member Exchanges and Employee Outcomes,” Journal of Applied Psychology, July 2005, pp. 659–676.
33. Study described in Chester A. Schriesheim and Linda L. Neider, eds., Power and Influence in Organizations: New Empirical and Theoretical Perspectives (Greenwich, Conn.: IAP, 2006), Chapter 1.
276 CHAPTER 8• INFLUENCE TACTICS OF LEADERS
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
CH AP
TE R
9 Developing Teamwork
LEARNING OBJECTIVES After studying this chapter and doing the exercises, you should be able to
• Understand the leader’s role in a team-based organization.
• Describe leader actions that foster teamwork.
• Explain the potential contribution of outdoor training to the development of team leadership.
• Describe how the leader–member exchange model contributes to an understanding of leadership.
CHAPTER OUTLINE The Leader’s Role in the Team-Based Organization
Leader Actions That Foster Teamwork Actions Leaders Can Take Using Their Own Resources Actions Generally Requiring Organization Structure or Policy
Offsite Training and Team Development Features of Outdoor and Offsite Training Programs Evaluation of Outdoor Training for Team Development
The Leader–Member Exchange Model and Teamwork Different-Quality Relationships
First Impressions
Summary
Key Terms
Guidelines for Action and Skill Development
Leadership Case Problem A
Leadership Case Problem B
Notes
Darryl is the manager of a sales group that sellswind turbines (big windmills) to communities andcompanies. Selling a wind turbine is a long and complicated activity that requires the cooperation and careful teamwork of at least five people in the group. Today, Darryl is interviewing Kate, a candidate for a cost estimator position. Kate has already made it through a telephone interview. If she is successful in today’s inter- view, she will be moved to the next step— being inter- viewed by several members of the team simultaneously. At the moment, Darryl is attempting to gauge whether Kate has already developed good teamwork skills.
Darryl: I see that you did quite well in college. How much of your studies required collective effort and cooper- ative learning?
Kate: At least ten of my courses required group and team projects, especially my business courses. For one course project, our group played the role of business consul- tants that helped a local pottery shop expand its business.
Darryl: How did you like that experience? Kate: It was terrific. Our group actually helped the
pottery shop boost sales. What a great group we had. Darryl: Sounds good, but I notice that you played on the
college tennis team. That’s not really a team sport is it?
277 Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s).
Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
Kate: It is true that tennis is not a team sport like hockey or soccer. But our coach emphasized teamwork. We helped each other by working on areas for improve- ment in practice. We planned our strategy for the individ- ual matches in a group. And we hung out together a lot as a team.
Darryl: What other teamwork experience have you had?
Kate: For about four years, part-time, I worked at an upscale restaurant. The owner believed strongly that the success of a restaurant depends on everybody pulling together, and helping out each other. If we all gave good service, there would be more customers and more tips. We received a small bonus each month based on the total success of the restaurant. The serve staff working as a team was an awesome idea.
The anecdote about the wind turbine sales manager illustrates the impor- tance business firms attach to building better teamwork. Part of this strat- egy includes hiring workers who are oriented toward being team players. Developing teamwork is such an important leadership role that team building is said to differentiate successful from unsuccessful leaders.1
Furthermore, leaders with a reputation as teamwork builders are often in demand, such as Tim Cook, the CEO of Apple Inc. His ability to work smoothly with managers from different disciplines at the company has contributed to him being chosen as the CEO of Apple to replace the late Steve Jobs.
A difficulty in understanding teams is that the words teams and team- work are often overused and applied loosely. For some people, team is simply another term for group. As used here, a team is a work group that must rely on collaboration if each member is to experience the optimum success and achievement.2 Teamwork is work done with an understanding and commitment to group goals on the part of all team members.
All teams are groups, but not all groups are teams. Jon R. Katzenbach and Douglas K. Smith, on the basis of extensive research in the workplace, make a clear differentiation between teams and groups.3 A team is charac- terized by a common commitment, whereas the commitment within a group might not be as strong. A team accomplishes many collective work products, whereas group members sometimes work slightly more indepen- dently. A team has shared leadership roles, whereas members of a group have a strong leader.
Although the distinction between a group and a team may be valid, it is difficult to cast aside the practice of using the terms group and team inter- changeably. For example, a customer service team is still a team even if its teamwork is poor.
The central focus of this chapter is a description of specific leader actions that foster teamwork. We also describe outdoor training, a widely used method of teamwork development. In addition, we summarize a lead- ership theory that provides insight into how teamwork emerges within a work group.
278 CHAPTER 9• DEVELOPING TEAMWORK
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
The Leader’s Role in the Team-Based Organization
Although an important goal of a team-based organization is for group mem- bers to participate in leadership and management activities, leaders still play an important role. In fact, they learn to lead in new ways. Team-based organizations need leaders who are knowledgeable in the team process and can help with the interpersonal demands of teams, for example, by giving feedback and resolving conflict. Quite often the leader is a facilitator who works with two or three teams at a time. He or she helps them stay focused when personality and work style differences create problems. Without effective leadership, teams can get off course, go too far or not far enough, lose sight of their mission, and become blocked by interpersonal conflict. Effective leader- ship is particularly important early in the history of a group to help it reach its potential. Key roles of a leader in a team-based organization include the following:
• Building trust and inspiring teamwork • Coaching team members and group members toward higher levels of per-
formance, even to the point of being a high-performing transformational team (one that brings about major constructive changes)
• Facilitating and supporting the team’s decisions • Expanding the team’s capabilities • Creating a team identity • Anticipating and influencing change • Inspiring the team toward higher levels of performance • Enabling and empowering group members to accomplish their work • Encouraging team members to eliminate low-value work4
Several of these roles have already been noted in this book, and several others, such as building trust and coaching, are described later. All of these roles contribute to effective leadership in general. The enabling role, for example, centers on empowerment. Yet properly motivating team members also enables, or facilitates, work accomplishment. The empowering processes described in Chapter 7 are a major part of enabling. Group members who are empowered are enabled to accomplish their work. The leader behavior and attitudes that foster teamwork, described in the next section, might also be interpreted as part of the leader’s role in a team-based organization.
A role for executive-level leaders requiring separate mention is that of leading a number of teams within the organization, referred to as intergroup leadership. A basic example is that the CEO needs to coordi- nate the efforts of large teams, such as marketing, finance, information technology, and operations. An even broader challenge is for the executive to lead groups and teams in different organizations, such as a joint venture between two companies working together to build a petroleum pipeline across the United States and Canada.
To carry out the role successfully of building teamwork among various teams, a starting point is for the leader to frequently talk about the identity
THE LEADER’S ROLE IN THE TEAM-BASED ORGANIZATION 279
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
of the team composed of teams. Three researchers on the topic argue that the leader must work at building a shared collective identity across the teams.5 For example, the leader of the collection of teams building the pipe- line might occasionally communicate the message, “Through our collective effort we have become a team bringing North American energy to North Americans.”
Intergroup leadership can also take place at middle levels within the organization. When the leader is not a member of the team, he or she is classified as an external leader. A study conducted in three different indus- trial workplaces with self-managing teams offers some understanding of the external leader’s role. (A self-managing team has considerable autonomy.) It was found that under ordinary work conditions, when the leaders were too actively involved in coaching the team and in sense making, satisfaction with leadership declined. Sense making refers to identifying important envi- ronmental events and offering interpretations of these events to the team. An example would be identifying increases in the price of natural gas, and then explaining to the facilities maintenance team how price increases will affect their work. When the team faced disruptive conditions, such as an unusually heavy work overload or a rapid change in technology, coaching and sense making by the leader increased satisfaction with leadership.6
We emphasize again that an important role for the leader in a team- based organization is often to lead a group of people who do not report directly to him or her.7 As a consequence, many of the teamwork develop- ment tactics described in this chapter become all the more important for accomplishing results.
Leader Actions That Foster Teamwork
Fostering teamwork is well worth the leader’s attention because teamwork is a major contributor to team success. Based on a study of 130 offshore operations in India, two researchers found that what really determines suc- cess versus failure is not the ease with which knowledge can be transferred from one location to another. Instead, the major success factor is managing teamwork, or helping onshore and offshore workers to coordinate their linked work effectively. Projects that attended to managing coordination performed close to four times as well as their less successful counterparts.8
Sometimes a leader’s inspiring personality alone can foster teamwork. An experiment with Dutch business students showed that leaders who were perceived as charismatic and fair facilitated cooperation among group members.9 Yet, inspirational leaders, as well as less charismatic ones, can also encourage teamwork through their attitudes and what they do. Table 9-1 lists the teamwork-enhancing actions that are described in the fol- lowing pages. For convenience, the actions are divided into two types: actions that leaders can take using their own resources (informal techni- ques) and actions that generally require organization structure or policy (formal techniques).
280 CHAPTER 9• DEVELOPING TEAMWORK
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
Actions Leaders Can Take Using Their Own Resources Defining the Team’s Mission A starting point in developing teamwork is to spec- ify the team’s mission. Commitment to a clear mission is a key practice of a highly effective team. The mission statement for the group helps answer the questions, “Why are we doing this?” and “What are we trying to accomplish?” To answer these questions, the mission statement should set out a specific goal, purpose, and philosophical tone. Any goal contained within the mission statement should be congruent with organizational objectives. If a team wants to cut back on its number of suppliers, the organization should have the same intent as well. Here are two examples of team mission statements:
• To plan and implement new manufacturing approaches to enhance our high-performance image and bolster our competitive edge
• To enhance our website development capability, so we can provide deci- sion makers throughout the organization with assistance in developing websites that exceed the state of the art
The leader can specify the mission when the team is formed or at any other time. Developing a mission for a long-standing team breathes new life into its activities. Being committed to a mission improves teamwork, as does the process of formulating a mission. The dialogue necessary for developing a clearly articulated mission establishes a climate in which team members can express feelings, ideas, and opinions. Shared leadership is required in devel- oping a mission, as in most other ways of enhancing teamwork.
TABLE 9-1 Leader Actions That Foster Teamwork
ACTIONS LEADERS CAN TAKE USING THEIR OWN RESOURCES
ACTIONS GENERALLY REQUIRING ORGANIZATION STRUCTURE OR POLICY
1. Defining the team’s mission
2. Establishing a climate of trust
3. Developing a norm of teamwork, based on cooperation theory
4. Developing group emotional intelligence
5. Emphasizing pride in being outstanding
6. Serving as a model of teamwork, including power sharing
7. Using a consensus leadership style
8. Establishing urgency, demanding performance standards, and providing direction
1. Designing physical structures that facilitate communication
2. Emphasizing group recognition and rewards
3. Initiating ritual and ceremony
4. Practicing open-book management
5. Selecting team-oriented members
6. Using technology that facilitates teamwork including social media
7. Blending representatives from the domestic company and foreign nationals on the team
9. Encouraging competition with another group
10. Engaging in ample interaction with the team
11. Minimizing micromanagement
12. Practicing e-leadership for virtual teams
© Ce ng ag e Le ar ni ng
LEADER ACTIONS THAT FOSTER TEAMWORK 281
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
To help implement the mission, it is quite helpful for the leader to define the team tasks, or to work with the group in defining these tasks. Team members can then identify the subtasks for which each member has responsibility. For example, a dental office might want to understand why so many patients have left the practice. One teammember might be assigned the task of contacting for- mer patients, and another team member might be assigned the task of asking current patients if they are experiencing any problems with the dental practice.
Establishing a Climate of Trust If team members do not trust each other or the leader, it is unlikely that they will work cooperatively together. Trust is at the heart of collaboration. Unless team members trust each other, they will not be dependent on each other and therefore will not work well as a team.10 A starting point in establishing a climate of trust is for the leader to be credible and engage in the many other trustworthy behaviors described in Chapter 2. Encouraging open communication about problems and shar- ing information are two specific ways the leader can help promote a climate of trust. Being open about problems facing the group and being candid in expressing opinions is often referred to as the leader being transparent.
Developing a Norm of Teamwork Based on Cooperation Theory A major strategy of teamwork development is to promote the attitude among group members that working together effectively is expected. Most profit as well as not-for-profit organizations emphasize that teamwork is important. A representative example is HP Financial Services, a unit of Hewlett-Packard Co. Irv Rothman, president and chief executive of this 1,500 employee division, says he maximizes perfor- mance by organizing into small, manageable teams. Employees are expected to manage themselves to make decisions on behalf of the customer. Teams are asked to behave like they are business owners.11 (Both of these points carry the message that teamwork is the expected behavior.)
Another approach to developing a norm of teamwork is to discourage excessive politicking in which employees attempt to appear more capable than teammates, and might even discredit the contribution of others to the team. Gary Rankin and Colin Gautrey recommend that the political infight- ing can be decreased through encouraging teamwork. A specific technique is for the team leader to incorporate into his or her dialogue the terms “working together,” and “winning team.”12
A norm of teamwork based on cooperation theory, a belief in coopera- tion and collaboration rather than competitiveness as a strategy for building teamwork, has been referred.13 Individuals who are accustomed to competing with one another for recognition, salary increases, and resources must now collaborate. Despite the challenge of making a culture shift, the leader can make progress toward establishing a teamwork norm by doing the following:
• Encourage team members to treat one another as if they were custo- mers, thus fostering cooperative behavior and politeness
• Explicitly state the desirability of teamwork on a regular basis both orally and in writing
282 CHAPTER 9• DEVELOPING TEAMWORK
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
• Communicate the norm of teamwork by frequently using words and phrases that support teamwork. Emphasizing the words team members or teammate and deemphasizing the words subordinates and employees helps communicate the norm of teamwork.
• Work with the group to establish a code of conduct that everyone agrees to follow. Aspects of the code might include “never abandon a team- mate,” “never humiliate anyone,” and “keep all agreements.”
Normative statements about teamwork by influential team members are also useful in reinforcing the norm of teamwork. A team member might assume a leadership role by saying to coworkers: “I’m glad this project is a joint effort. I know that’s what earns us merit points here.”
Research reported by Adam Grant reinforces the importance of coopera- tion within teams for attaining high team performance. A team of research- ers investigated what made U.S. intelligent units effective. Hundreds of analysts from sixty-four different intelligence groups were surveyed, inter- viewed, and observed, and the researchers ranked those units from best to worst. The single strongest predictor of group effectiveness was the amount of help the analysts gave each other. It was found that in the highest- performing teams, analysts invested extensive time and energy in coaching, teaching, and consulting with colleagues. The cooperative behavior assisted analysts in such ways as filling in gaps in their knowledge and recognizing patterns in seemingly disconnected pieces of information. In the units related the lowest by the researchers, the analysts exchanged small amounts of mutual help and struggled to make sense of considerable data.14
Develop Group Emotional Intelligence The leader’s role in developing teamwork can also be described as helping the group develop emotional intelligence. The leader contributes to the group’s emotional intelligence by creating norms that establish mutual trust among members. It is also important for members to have a sense of group identity as defined in their mission statement. Group efficacy, or feeling competent to complete the group task, also contributes to emotional intelligence. Ensuring that the group has the right skills can enhance such efficacy. These three conditions—mutual trust, group identity, and group efficacy—are the foundation of cooperation and collaboration.
The leader can also promote group emotional intelligence by bringing emotions to the surface in both group and one-on-one meetings. The leader then discusses how these emotions might be affecting the group’s work.15
For example, team members might discuss how they feel about their per- ceived importance to the organization. One maintenance group said that they felt entirely unappreciated until a key piece of equipment broke down, and this under-appreciation was adversely affecting their morale. The team leader helped the group develop an internal public relations campaign about their contribution to productivity.
Another example of dealing with emotions is encouraging group mem- bers to speak up when they feel the group is being either unproductive or highly productive. Expressing positive emotion can be an energizer.
LEADER ACTIONS THAT FOSTER TEAMWORK 283
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
Emphasizing Pride in Being Outstanding A standard way to build team spirit, if not teamwork, is to help the group realize why it should be proud of its accomplishments. Most groups are particularly good at some task. The leader should help the group identify that task or characteristic and pro- mote it as a key strength. A shipping department, for example, might have the best on-time shipping record in the region. Or, a claims-processing unit might have the fewest overpayments in an insurance company.
To try your hand at being part of an outstanding team, do Leadership Skill-Building Exercise 9-1.
Serving as a Model of Teamwork, Including Power Sharing A powerful way for a leader to foster teamwork is to be a positive model of team play. And one way to exemplify teamwork is to reveal important information about ideas and attitudes relevant to the group’s work. As a result of this behavior, team members may follow suit. A leader’s self-disclosure fosters teamwork because it leads to shared perceptions and concerns.16 Self-disclosure is an element of leader transparency. Interacting extensively with team members serves as a model of teamwork because it illustrates the mechanism by which team development takes place—frequent informal communication. While interacting with team members, the team leader can emphasize that he or she is a team member. For example, the team leader might say, “Remember the deadline. We must all have the proposal in the mail by Thursday.” A less team member-oriented statement would be, “Remember the deadline. I need the proposals in the mail by Thursday.”17
Another way of being a model of teamwork is to share power with group members because a good team player avoids hogging power and making all of the decisions. As each team member takes the opportunity to exert power, he or she feels more like a major contributor to team effort.
LEADERSHIP SKILL-BUILDING EXERCISE 9-1
Shelters for the Homeless
This exercise should take about thirty-five minutes; it can be done inside or outside class. Organize the class into teams of about six people. Each team takes on the assignment of formulating plans for building temporary shelters for the homeless. The dwellings you plan to build, for example, might be two-room cottages with elec- tricity and indoor plumbing. During the time allotted to the task, formulate plans for going ahead with Shelters for the Homeless. Consider dividing up work by assigning certain roles to each team member. Sketch out tentative answers to the following questions: (1) How will you obtain funding for your venture? (2) Which homeless people will
you help? (3) Where will your shelters be? (4) Who will do the construction?
After your plan is completed, evaluate the quality of the teamwork that took place within the group. Review the chapter for techniques you might have used to improve it.
The same kind of teamwork skills you use in this exercise can be readily applied to most teamwork assignments on the job. Note carefully that although some types of teams call for members to be generalists, dividing up the tasks is still a basic principle of collective effort.
284 CHAPTER 9• DEVELOPING TEAMWORK
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
Peter Pronovost, an anesthesiologist and critical-care specialist at Johns Hopkins Hospital, believes that hospitals would be safer for patients with more power sharing among physicians and other medical personnel. (The mistakes in hospitals he refers to include ordering the wrong drug or oper- ating on the wrong limb.) Pronovost believes that nurses should have the power to challenge doctors, and members of the medical team need to work like flight crews in terms of power sharing to help minimize medical mistakes.18
Sharing power with team members, or empowering them, appears to be particularly effective in terms of the long-term development of the team. A team of three researchers studied the impact of directive (high initiating structure) leadership versus empowering leadership on the teamwork devel- opment of sixty, five-person teams over time. The study participants were undergraduates in a management course, and the task was a three-hour computer simulation task. The results of the study indicated that although teams with directive leaders started performing well more quickly, they soon reached a performance plateau. In contrast, the improved learning and coordination capabilities of teams that work under empowering leader- ship allowed them to improve over time and attain higher performance levels than did the other teams.19 We might infer that in a traditional work setting, directive leadership gets the team off to a good start, but in the long run, empowering leadership fosters higher-level team performance.
To be a model of team play as a leader, you need the attitudes of a team player. Leadership Self-Assessment Quiz 9-1 gives you an opportunity to measure such attitudes.
Using a Consensus Leadership Style Teamwork is enhanced when a leader practices consensus decision making. Contributing to important decisions helps group members feel that they are valuable to the team. Consensus decision making also leads to an exchange of ideas within the group, with group members supporting and refining each other’s suggestions. As a result, the feeling of working jointly on problems is enhanced. Generation X managers (born between 1965 and 1980) and Generation Y managers (born between 1981 and 2002) are likely to practice consensus leadership. Of course, it is the older members of Generation Y who would hold mana- gerial positions. Part of the reason is that many of these people have taken leadership courses.
Striving for consensus does not mean that all conflict is submerged to make people agree. Disagreements over issues are healthy, and team mem- bers are more likely to be committed to the consensus decision if their voice has been heard. When voices are heard, some power is shared. An example of a conflict over an issue would be the marketing team of an automotive company debating whether dealer discounts improve sales in the long run.
Establishing Urgency, Demanding Performance Standards, and Providing Direction Team members need to believe that the team has urgent, constructive pur- poses. They also want a list of explicit expectations. The more urgent and
LEADER ACTIONS THAT FOSTER TEAMWORK 285
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
relevant the rationale is, the more likely it is that the team will achieve its potential. A customer service team was told that further growth for the corpo- ration would be impossible without major improvements in providing service to customers. Energized by this information, the team met the challenge.
To help establish urgency, it is helpful for the leader to challenge the group regularly. Teamwork is enhanced when the leader provides the team valid facts and information that motivate them to work together to modify the status quo. New information prompts the team to redefine and enrich its understanding of the challenge it is facing. As a result, the team is likely to focus on a common purpose, set clearer goals, and work together more smoothly.20
LEADERSHIP SELF-ASSESSMENT QUIZ 9-1
Team Player Attitudes
Instructions: Describe how well you agree with each of the following statements, using the following scale: disagree strongly (DS); disagree (D); neutral (N); agree (A); agree strongly (AS).
DS D N A AS
1. I am at my best when working alone. 5 4 3 2 1
2. I have belonged to clubs and teams since I was a child. 1 2 3 4 5
3. It takes far too long to get work accomplished with a group. 5 4 3 2 1
4. I like the friendship of working in a group. 1 2 3 4 5
5. I would prefer to run a one-person business than to be a member of a large firm.
5 4 3 2 1
6. It is difficult to trust others in the group on key assignments. 5 4 3 2 1
7. Encouraging others comes to me naturally. 1 2 3 4 5
8. I like the give-and-take of ideas that is possible in a group. 1 2 3 4 5
9. It is fun to share responsibility with others in the group. 1 2 3 4 5
10. Much more can be accomplished by a team than by the same number of people working alone.
1 2 3 4 5
11. I will often poke fun at my other members of my work group through a social media post.
5 4 3 2 1
12. I would pay a deserving compliment to a team member through a social media post.
1 2 3 4 5
Total score:
Scoring and Interpretation: Add the numbers you circled to obtain your total score.
• 46–60: You have strong positive attitudes toward being a team member and working cooperatively with other members.
• 35–46: You have moderately favorable attitudes toward being a team member and working cooperatively with other members.
• 15–34: You much prefer working by yourself to being a team member. To work effectively in a company that emphasizes teamwork, you may need to develop more positive attitudes toward working jointly with others.
286 CHAPTER 9• DEVELOPING TEAMWORK
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
Studies in several industry settings, including the development of the Boeing 777 midsize airliner, suggest that urgent, demanding tasks also contribute to the teamwork effectiveness of teams composed of top talent. The researchers in question raise the caution that leader should prune anybody from the group who is not a good team player, regardless of the person’s capability.21
Encouraging Competition with Another Group One of the best-known methods of encouraging teamwork is rallying the support of the group against a real or imagined threat from the outside. Beating the competition makes more sense when the competition is outside your organization. When the enemy is within, the team spirit within may become detrimental to the overall organi- zation, and we–they problems may arise. While encouraging competition with another group, the leader should encourage rivalry, not intense competi- tion that might lead to unethical business practices, such as making false charges against them. An example of ethical competition against another group would be a product development group at Dodge Ram competing to produce a pickup truck that outperformed the Ford 150 series of pickups.
Engaging in Ample Interaction with the Team A helpful tactic for building team- work is to build positive relationships with team members, and relation- ships are built on conversations.22 The conversations should go beyond superficialities such as discussing weekend plans or how busy the team member is. Meaningful topics would include the team member’s perception of potential problems, his or her job satisfaction, and suggestions for improvement.
An effective way of interacting with team members is to hold question- and-answer sessions. The same approach demonstrates participative leader- ship. Both leader and members ask and answer questions, such as “How can we make an even bigger contribution to the company?” When Kevin Johnson became CEO of Juniper Networks, he met with all his direct reports as a group. He told them that their input was very important. Two of the ques- tions he asked were “What needs to change, and why?” and “What do you hope I do as CEO?” The group question-and-answer sessions appeared to have a positive impact on creating a cohesive top-management team.23
Minimizing Micromanagement A strategic perspective on encouraging team- work is for the leader to minimize micromanagement, the close monitor- ing of most aspects of group member activities (as mentioned in Chapter 4 in relation to leadership behaviors). To be a good team leader, the manager must give group members ample opportunity to manage their own activi- ties. Avoiding micromanagement is a core ingredient of employee empower- ment because empowered workers are given considerable latitude to manage their own activities. Not stepping in to make suggestions or correc- tions helps team members develop, and the feeling of growing profes- sionally will often translate into workers developing a stronger team spirit.
An effective way of avoiding micromanagement is for the leader to learn to ignore minor actions that he or she does not like, yet are not real
LEADER ACTIONS THAT FOSTER TEAMWORK 287
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
problems. Suppose a manager has a preference for certain fonts used in PowerPoint presentations. To avoid being a micromanager, he or she should not insist that team members use only the favored fonts in Power- Point slides.
A micromanager is also referred to as a control freak, because he or she wants to maintain so much control. Mickey Drexler, formerly of Gap, and now CEO of J. Crew, is by his own admission a control freak. His job satisfac- tion is the highest when he is involved in every facet of merchandising, even button selection. He also personally responds to shopper e-mails and telephone calls. Drexler is an acknowledged merchandising talent, and also the CEO and part owner of J. Crew, so his micro managing is tolerated. At the team level, a micromanager might be perceived as more of an annoyance.24
The contingency leader recognizes the fine line between avoiding micro- management and not providing the guidance and accountability that team members may need to function well as a unit. Consultant Bruce Tulgan reports, “When we asked employees what they want from the people above them, the first thing they mention is never a raise. It’s always more coaching, more guidance, clearer goals, more constructive criticism, and more recogni- tion for achievement.”25 An implication is that a manager tinged with a little micromanagement is likely to engage in these constructive behaviors.
Practicing E-Leadership for Virtual Teams The heavy presence of communica- tion technology has had a significant impact on team leadership, especially when team members do not work in the same physical location.
If team leader Jennifer, based in Seattle, sends a note of congratulations to team member Surinda, based in Mumbai, she is practicing e-leadership. Jennifer and Surinda are part of a virtual team: They work with each other, yet they do not share the same physical facility. E-leadership is a form of leadership practiced in a context where work is mediated by information technology. The leadership focus shifts from individuals to networks of rela- tionships because the Internet facilitates connecting so many people.26
E-leadership could, therefore, encompass any activity undertaken by a leader when the Internet connects people. Our concern here is how e-leadership facilitates building teamwork, especially in a virtual team.
When team members are geographically dispersed, a leader’s communi- cation with team members takes place using information technology, including the dissemination of information needed for task accomplish- ment. A participative leader may establish chat rooms to solicit opinions from members of a cross-border virtual team before reaching a final deci- sion. The leader might also conduct an electronic poll to attain consensus on a controversial issue and have all team members share their reactions on an intranet or social media site.
The leader can foster team spirit (and therefore teamwork) by sending congratulatory e-mail messages for a job well done. In short, the e-leader improves teamwork by staying connected electronically to team members— although not to the point of blitzing them with so many messages that he or she becomes an annoyance.
288 CHAPTER 9• DEVELOPING TEAMWORK
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
Based on observations, interviews, and survey data, two intensive studies have identified leadership practices of effective leaders of virtual teams. The purpose of these practices is to overcome the unique challenges of managing virtual teams, such as not being able to see in-person when the team needs focus and direction. The conclusions of the researchers along with a few other studies dealing mostly with building teamwork are presented next.27
1. When building a virtual team, solicit volunteers when feasible. As the experiences at Wikipedia and Linux have shown, virtual teams appear to thrive when they include volunteers with valuable skills. A team of volun- teers has an elite status that contributes to team spirit. In addition to being volunteers, it is helpful for the virtual team to include members who already know each other. In this way, a component of camaraderie already exists.
2. Ensure that the task is meaningful to the team and the company. Ide- ally, the team task should resonate with the values of each member and the team collectively. The team leader should take the time to explain to all team members that the work matters because it will result in meaningful outcomes. Team members working on a relevant task are more likely to be spirited and cooperative. For example, a virtual team of Samsung employ- ees would enjoy working on a smart watch because all members of the team would most likely regard the project as highly meaningful.
3. Establish and maintain trust through the use of communication tech- nology. A major hurdle in working with a virtual team is deciding on what information gets communicated and to whom. In some instances, a norm might be established that restricts members from conveying negative infor- mation to anyone outside the team. It is also useful to ensure that all team members are equally inconvenienced by time zone differences, such as hav- ing a meeting at 3 A.M. their time. Meeting times would be rotated, so team members in one time zone would not suffer.
4. Ensure that diversity in the team is understood, appreciated, and lev- eraged. Diversity within the team can take many forms, such as experiences, skills, and interests. To ensure that diversity is understood and appreciated, leaders frequently develop an expertise directory when the team first forms. The directory can include a photo of each member along with details about his or her training, experience, and previous assignments. A skills matrix of team members can serve the same purpose.
5. Maintain frequent communications, including virtual meetings. The majority of team leaders in the study reported that regular audioconferences involving all members were the lifeblood of the team, even when tasks were distributed among the team members. The virtual meetings are used to keep members engaged, excited about the work, and aligned with each other. At the beginning of the meeting, it is helpful to have the team member recon- nect with the human side of each team member. Exchanging personal stor- ies helps build closeness.
LEADER ACTIONS THAT FOSTER TEAMWORK 289
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
Other forms of communication besides audioconferences can serve the function of developing teamwork. At Nokia, for example, the favored com- munication tool is text messaging, while at other companies e-mail or voice mail was more effective. Many companies use internal social media web- sites to encourage frequent shared interaction among team members. Most importantly, communication should be frequent and rapid.
Communication among team members shortly after the team is formed helps establish a pattern of continuing interaction. Yael Zofi recommends that the members schedule an instant messaging session among team mem- bers in which they ask several get-acquainted questions.28 A sample intro- ductory question might be, “How did you get into this line of work?”
6. Monitor team progress through the use of technology. An example of monitoring would be checking to see who is using the team’s online knowl- edge repository regularly and who is not. The leader can also check to see if some members are not doing their fair share of work, and then coach the underperformer. This approach might improve teamwork because loafers drag down a team.
7. Enhance external visibility of the team and its members. Virtual team members may have at least two bosses (the virtual team leader and the on- site boss), so it is important that the work of the virtual team gets reported externally. A virtual team in the electronics testing industry was required to report the team’s results to a steering committee. The link to teamwork is that receiving rewards and recognition helps build team spirit.
8. Ensure that individuals benefit from participating in virtual teams. Even if the members are good team players, they need personal benefits to experience team spirit. One approach is to have virtual reward ceremonies, such as having gifts delivered to each team member and then having a vir- tual party. (No need for designated drivers here because the party takes place at the homes of team members!) The team leader can also encourage executives at the team members’ work environment to thank the team mem- bers. Offering opportunities for personal growth, such as mini-lectures by an expert, can also be helpful.
9. To maintain a high-touch environment, conduct one or two face- to-face meetings per year. According to Richard Lepsinger, electronic tech- nology is not a perfect substitute for human interaction. Lack of attention during virtual meetings is a warning sign to look for. Virtual teams that invest in one or two face-to-face meetings annually tend to perform better than those who skip such meetings.29 Even the use of the most advanced videoconferencing equipment or Skype lacks the feel of interacting with a colleague face to face.
10. Recognize and reward above-average individual and team perfor- mance. As with other types of teams, the rewards given to virtual teams should be linked to individual and team goals, and they should be rewarded frequently.
290 CHAPTER 9• DEVELOPING TEAMWORK
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
You will observe that the ten suggestions for leading virtual teams include both actions leaders can take on their own, plus the use of company technology.
Actions Generally Requiring Organization Structure or Policy Designing Physical Structures That Facilitate Communication Group cohesive- ness, and therefore teamwork, is fostered when team members are located close together and can interact frequently and easily. In contrast, people who spend most of their time in their private offices or cubicles are less likely to interact. Frequent interaction often leads to camaraderie and a feel- ing of belongingness. A useful tactic for achieving physical proximity is to establish a shared physical facility, such as a conference room, research library, or beverage lounge. This area should be decorated differently from other areas in the building, and a few amenities should be added, such as a coffeepot, microwave oven, and refrigerator. Team members can then use this area for refreshments and group interaction.
Recognizing the contribution of a shared physical facility to promoting teamwork, many organizations have incorporated more open working space into the workplace, often eliminating private offices and cubicles. Many people express dissatisfaction with this lack of privacy, but it is diffi- cult to assess the productivity loss and morale problems stemming from limited opportunity for quiet reflection on the job.
Emphasizing Group Recognition and Rewards Giving rewards for group accom- plishment reinforces teamwork because people receive rewards for what they have achieved collaboratively. Also, much of work that is accomplished in organizations requires collaboration, so group rewards are justifiable and sensible. A warning, however, is that many employees may view switching to a team-based pay plan that places much of their pay at risk as an unner- ving proposition. Quite often a mix of individual rewards and team rewards is the most effective in terms of morale.
The recognition accompanying the reward should emphasize the team’s value to the organization rather than that of the individual. Recognition promotes team identity by enabling the team to take pride in its contribu- tions and progress. The following are examples of team recognition:
• A display wall for team activities such as certificates of accomplishment, schedules, and miscellaneous announcements
• Celebrations to mark milestones such as first-time activities, cost sav- ings, and safety records
• Team-of-the-Month award, with gifts from the organization to team members or to the entire team
Another aspect of rewarding team performance is to avoid disincentives for teamwork. An example would be a stack-ranking system in which a fixed percentage of workers must be classified as bottom or poor perfor- mers, regardless of the team’s overall performance.30
The accompanying Leader in Action insert illustrates a restaurant busi- ness leader who emphasizes group incentives to enhance teamwork.
LEADER ACTIONS THAT FOSTER TEAMWORK 291
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
LEADER IN ACTION
Jerry Murrell, the CEO and Founder of Five Guys Rewards Teamwork
The CEO and founder of these Five Guys Burgers and Fries (usually referred to as Five Guys) is Jerry Murrell. The name stems from the fact that Murrell has five sons, all of whom are now top-level managers in his enterprise. The company has more than 1,100 restau- rants in the United States and Canada, with expansion plans into Great Britain.
The Murrell family, including wife Janie, ran five res- taurants in the Washington, DC area before starting a franchise operation. Within five months, Five Guys had 300 franchisees. The tightly enforced food preparation system includes fresh food only, and no freezers or microwave ovens. Customers are permitted to choose from an unlimited toppings included in the price. French fries are made from high-quality potatoes (usually from Idaho), cooked in peanut oil. The only permanent menu change has been the addition of hot dogs, a veggie sand- wich, and a grilled cheese sandwich.
The Five Guys mission statement recognizes that to complete in a restaurant industry that is crowded with hamburger and French fries chains, it is essential to do hamburgers and French fries better than anyone else. This includes using top-quality ingredients, toasting buns on the grill, and hand-cutting the meat portions.
Murrell heavily emphasizes good team work among the store employees, the vast majority of whom are teen- agers. The absence of paid advertising helps free up money for building team spirit. Five Guys management collects 1:5 percent of revenues from franchisee stores to give to employees teams who receive outstanding independent audits for quality of service, safety, and cleanliness. Crew members earn about $9 per hour. In addition, the crews that score well on the audit can earn up to $1,000 to divide equally among themselves. The bonus is paid each week based on the secret shopper incentive program.
Murrell says that the franchise tries to make the young workers feel ownership in the company. If the auditor does an inspection and the bathroom is not clean, that crew has lost potentially big bonus money.
Next thing he knows, the guy who was supposed to clean the bathroom has bathroom tissue all over his car and a potato lodged in the tail pipe.
Another teamwork building approach Five Guys relies on is an independent franchise committee that meets quarterly. Ideas for improvement are exchanged, and committee members are free to express objection to any one idea.
Mark Mosely, a former player for the NFL team, the Washington Redskins, is the head of franchising for Five Guys. He says about Murrell, “I look at him like a football coach. He’s the leader, and he hires good people and lets them do their jobs.”
Murrell received an Associates of Arts degree from Alpena Community College and a bachelor’s degree with a major in economics from the University of Michigan. His work in a fraternity house kitchen at the U of M triggered his interest in the restaurant business. However, before founding Five Guys, he worked first for a life insurance company, and then as a financial planner.
QUESTIONS
1. At least seven family members are part of the exec- utive team at Five Guys. What effect do you think this fact should have on top-management teamwork?
2. What is your opinion of the impact on teamwork of paying large financial bonuses to crew members?
Source: Original story created from facts and observations in the fol- lowing sources: Monte Burke, “All in the Family,” Forbes, August 6, 2012, pp. 92–97; “Five Guys Famous Burgers and Fries founder Jerry Murrell Offers about 250,000 Burger Combinations at His Stores. How Does He Do It?” QSR (www2.qsrmagazine.com); “The Five Guys Story,” Five Guys® Burgers and Fries (www.fiveguys.com /about-us); “How I Did It: Jerry Murrell, Five Guys Burgers and Fries As Told to Liz Welch,” Inc. (www.inc.magazine, pp. 1–13. Accessed January 4, 2014; “Alumnus Jerry Murrell: The Founder of Five Guys Burgers,” The Lumberjack Link (http//discoveralpenacc.edu) Spring 2013, pp. 1–2.
292 CHAPTER 9• DEVELOPING TEAMWORK
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
Initiating Ritual and Ceremony Another way to enhance teamwork is to initi- ate ritual and ceremony.31 Ritual and ceremony afford opportunities for reinforcing values, revitalizing spirit, and bonding workers to one another and to the team. An example is holding a team dinner whenever the group achieves a major milestone, such as making a winning bid on a major contract. Another formal ritual is to send a team on a retreat to develop its mission and goals and to build camaraderie. When the team is working and socializing closely together during the retreat—even one long day— teamwork is reinforced.
Practicing Open-Book Management A method of getting the company working together as a team is to share information about company finances and strategy with large numbers of employees. In open-book management, every employee is trained, empowered, and motivated to understand and pursue the company’s business goals. In this way, employees become business partners and perceive themselves to be members of the same team.
In a full form of open-book management, workers share strategic and financial information as well as responsibility. The company also shares risks and rewards based on results, so workers are likely to pull together as a team so that the company can succeed.32 The idea is to have a well-informed, partner-oriented, high-performance company. Part of keeping workers well informed is for company leaders to host roundtable discussions about com- pany financial information. Another approach is to regularly disseminate, by e-mail, information about the company’s financial progress.
Selecting Team-Oriented Members A foundation strategy for achieving good teamwork is to select members for the team with aptitude, skill, and interest in teamwork. (Selecting team-oriented members is often a company policy, but it is also an action managers can take operating on their own.) A start- ing point is self-selection. It is best for the team leader to choose workers who ask to be members of a team. A person’s record of past team activity can also help one determine whether that person is an effective team player (as suggested in the opening case to this chapter). Many managers believe that those who participate in team sports now or in the past are likely to be good team players on the job.
At times, workers will be assigned to the team rather than selected by the team leader or team members, so selecting team-oriented mem- bers is not possible. Among the key criteria for selecting teamwork- oriented members would be teamwork experience, prior success as a team player, and favorable personality traits such as agreeableness and extraversion.
Todd Carlisle, the Google staffing manager, looks carefully for team- work preferences and skills when selecting new employees for the com- pany. One of Carlisle’s criteria is simply how likeable the candidates are: “You have to want to take them to lunch after the interview. It’s important to hire leaders who play well with others, so ask about their experiences
LEADER ACTIONS THAT FOSTER TEAMWORK 293
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
working on a team. Their bragging that they convinced everybody else that they were right or taking credit for everything are red flags.”33
Using Technology That Enhances Teamwork Workers can collaborate better when they use information technology that fosters collaboration, often referred to as collaborative software. For example, the straightforward act of exchanging frequent e-mail messages and instant messages can facilitate cooperation. Electronic brainstorming is another example of groupware. Virtual teams by their nature rely on information technology to enhance teamwork.
Advances in videoconferencing facilitate teamwork because of the ease in which geographically separated workers can participate in a virtual confer- ence and exchange ideas almost as effectively as in a face-to-face meeting. An example is TelePresence, an advanced conferencing system installed in its own offices, customer offices, and in the homes of company executives. Meetings can be called spontaneously and group decisions made rapidly without traveling.
Social networking might be regarded as the most far-reaching technology for enhancing teamwork because so many workers can exchange informa- tion with each other and thereby collaborate more extensively. Also, when groups of people can readily see what information others are exchanging, a spirit of cooperation might develop. Even the exchange of jokes and inter- esting YouTube and Hulu videos might improve team spirit.
David Eisert, associate director of emerging technologies at the Kelley School of Business, Indiana University, says, “When you’ve got people in the network engaged, sharing information and openly communicating, that’s where the meat of knowledge transfer comes from.”34 When the knowledge transfer leads to more collaboration, teamwork is enhanced. Merely glancing over posted information and doing nothing about it has no positive impact on teamwork.
Blending Representatives from the Domestic Company and Foreign Nationals on the Team Cross-cultural considerations enter into enhancing teamwork, as well as in most aspects of leadership. The fact of working with people from your own country, as well as a representative from the country of company headquarters, often enhances teamwork. Perhaps having a repre- sentative from the parent company, yet still respecting local talent, creates a spirit of cooperation. Also, blending cultural differences is appealing to some workers and might make them more interested in performing as a team.
A case in point is the experience of Jessica C. Isaacs, senior vice presi- dent of field operations for a reinsurance division of AIG. She notes: “Every time we’ve opened in a new country, instead of shipping expats in we’ve seen a transition from that and we’ve started to hire more local talent. My best performing teams are teams where I have lots of local talent sprinkled with some expat or foreign talent. Having the balance really optimizes everyone’s skill set and opens new opportunities.”35
294 CHAPTER 9• DEVELOPING TEAMWORK
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
Offsite Training and Team Development
Cognitive information about strategies and tactics for improving teamwork is potentially valuable. People reading such information can selectively apply the concepts, observe the consequences, and then fine-tune an approach. Another approach to developing teamwork is to participate in experiential activities (several are presented throughout this text).
The most popular experiential approach to building teamwork and lead- ership skills is offsite training, also referred to as outdoor training. Wilder- ness training is closely associated with outdoor training, except that the setting is likely to be much rougher—perhaps in the frozen plains of north- ernmost Minnesota. Some forms of outdoor training take place in city parks, as well as in the city itself in order to rehabilitate or build a house.
Both outdoor and wilderness training are forms of learning by doing. Participants are supposed to acquire leadership and teamwork skills by con- fronting physical challenges and exceeding their self-imposed limitations. The goals of offsite training are reasonably consistent across different train- ing groups, including the following.
• Discover your strengths and weaknesses. • Test your limits (they are far broader than you imagine). • Work together as a team. • Have fun. • Face the essence of who you are and what you are made of.
Features of Outdoor and Offsite Training Programs Program participants are placed in a demanding outdoor environment, where they rely on skills they did not realize they had and on one another to complete the program. The emphasis is on building not only teamwork but also self-confidence for leadership. Sometimes lectures on leadership, self-confidence, and teamwork precede the activity. The list of what consti- tutes a team-building activity continues to grow and now includes tightrope walking, gourmet cooking as a team, paintballing, and scavenger hunts. Building or repairing houses for people in need is popular.
Another novel approach is for participants to perform stand-up comedy in front of work associates. Participants attend a Comedy Experience work- shop in which they learn about the importance of humor on the job, and develop their own three-to-four minute comedy routines. The potential pay- off to the company from staff members taking a turn at standup comedy is that the experience brings them closer together. As you would imagine, some participants are so frightened by having to do standup comedy that they derive no benefit from the program.36
Outward Bound is the best-known and largest outdoor training program. It offers more than 500 courses in wilderness areas in twenty states and provinces. The courses typically run from three days to four weeks. Worldwide, Outward Bound runs about forty-eight schools on five continents. The Outward Bound
OFFSITE TRAINING AND TEAM DEVELOPMENT 295
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
Professional Development Program, geared toward organizational leaders, emphasizes teamwork, leadership, and risk taking. The wilderness is the class- room, and the instructors draw analogies between each outdoor activity and the workplace. Among the courses offered are dog-sledding, skiing and winter camping, desert backpacking, canoe expeditions, sailing, sea kayaking, alpine mountaineering, mountain backpacking and horse-trailing, and cycling.
Rope activities are typical of outdoor training. Participants are attached to a secure pulley with ropes; then they climb up a ladder and jump off to another spot. Sometimes the rope is extended between two trees. Another activity is a trust fall, in which each person takes a turn standing on a plat- form and falling backward into the arms of coworkers. The trust fall can also be done on ground level. Many readers of this book have already partici- pated in a trust fall. Leadership Skill-Building Exercises 9-2 and 9-3 present representative offsite activities.
LEADERSHIP SKILL-BUILDING EXERCISE 9-3
Trust Me
Part of trusting team members is to trust them with your physical safety. The trust builder described here has been incorporated into many team-building programs. Proceed as follows:
Step 1: Each group member takes a turn being blind- folded, perhaps using a bandanna. Step 2: The remaining team members arrange between five and eight chairs into a formation of their choosing, using a different formation for each blindfolded member. Step 3: At the appropriate signal from a team member, the blindfolded person starts to walk. The rest of the team gives instructions that will enable the blindfolded
person to get past the formation of chairs without a collision. Step 4: At the end of the blindfolded person’s experi- ence, he or she immediately answers the following ques- tions: (a) How did you feel when blindfolded in this exercise? (b) Explain why you either trusted or did not trust your team members, (c) What did you need from your team members while you were blindfolded? Step 5: After each person has taken a turn, discuss in your team (a) the impact of this exercise on the develop- ment of trust in teams, and (b) what you learned about teamwork from the exercise.
LEADERSHIP SKILL-BUILDING EXERCISE 9-2
The Team Leader Candidates
Gather in a group of about six people, on your own or in front of the class. Your group is to carry out a mission that all members can visualize, such as the product develop- ment team for a pet food manufacturer. Management has empowered you to select your own team leader, and each of you would like to be chosen for the position. After being given about 15 minutes to prepare, each person will
address the rest of the team explaining why he or she should be chosen as the team leader. After the presenta- tions are completed, hold a brief group discussion about the effectiveness of the presentations. Attempt to reach consensus about which candidate should be chosen as team leader. Also, reflect on what this exercise demon- strated about team leadership and teamwork.
296 CHAPTER 9• DEVELOPING TEAMWORK
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
Outdoor training enhances teamwork by helping participants examine the process of getting things done through working with people. Partici- pants practice their communication skills in exercises such as rappelling down a cliff by issuing precise instructions to one another about how to scale the cliff safely. At the same time, they have to learn to trust one another because their survival appears to depend on trust.
One of the most intensive and extensive examples of team building through outdoor training is conducted annually at Seagate Technology, the leading manufacturer of hard drives. About 200 employees from around the world spend a week in Queenstown, New Zealand, located at the bottom of the world. The activities include hiking, kayaking, adventure racing, and breaking boards with the goal of building a more collaborative, team- oriented company. (Adventure racing is about running and biking through an unfamiliar course, such as at the bottom of a glacier.) Participants fre- quently shout to each other, “You’re awesome,” throughout many of the activities. A major rationale for the extensive team-building activity is that when people are placed in unfamiliar situations, especially when fatigued, they are more likely to ask for help and work as a team.37
Evaluation of Outdoor Training for Team Development Many outdoor trainers and participants believe strongly that they derive sub- stantial personal benefits from outdoor training. Among the most important are greater self-confidence, appreciating hidden strengths, and learning to work better with others. Strong proponents of outdoor training believe that those who do not appreciate the training simply do not understand it. Many training directors also have positive attitudes toward outdoor training. They believe that a work team that experiences outdoor training will work more cooperatively back at the office. For example, Ron Roberts, the president of Action Centered Training, points out that paintball may have little to do with a job, but it can have a powerful effect. Winning demands teamwork, includ- ing forceful communication. Roberts says, “If they don’t work as a team, they get shot and experience pain. It’s not for everybody. But the principles of communication, teamwork, leadership and strategic planning are there.”38
Many people have legitimate reservations about outdoor training, how- ever. Although outdoor trainers claim that almost no accidents occur, a threat to health and life does exist, and groin injuries are frequent. (To help minimize casualties, participants usually need medical clearance.) Another concern is that the teamwork learned in outdoor training does not spill over into the job environment.
Some approaches to outdoor training are so physically demanding that they can be questioned on ethical and medical grounds. A glaring example is the Tough Mudder obstacle race offered to individuals and office teams. Participants slog their way through mud, leap over burning coals, stand on each other to scale walls, and jump into an ice-filled dumpster when the outside temperature is just below the freezing point. Participants are requested to sign a “death waiver.”39
OFFSITE TRAINING AND TEAM DEVELOPMENT 297
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
A major concern about offsite training is that some participants or poten- tial participants find it repellent. Not every worker wants to play games, climb rocks, or prepare a gourmet meal with coworkers after hours. They would prefer a more natural, relaxing environment in which to build team- work, such as doing volunteer work or having a family day at the workplace.40
One way to facilitate the transfer of training from outdoors to the office is to hold debriefing and follow-up sessions. Debriefing takes place at the end of outdoor training. The participants review what they learned and dis- cuss how they will apply their lessons to the job. Follow-up sessions can then be held periodically to describe progress in applying the insights learned during outdoor training.
The Leader–Member Exchange Model and Teamwork
Research and theory about the development of teamwork lag research and theory about many other aspects of leadership. Nevertheless, the leader– member exchange model, developed by George Graen and associates, helps explain why one subgroup in a unit is part of a cohesive team but another group is excluded.41 The theory, already mentioned several times in this text, deals with the relationship between a leader and a team member. How- ever, the same theory tells us a lot about teamwork.
The leader–member exchange (LMX) model proposes that leaders develop unique working relationships with group members. One subset of employees, the in-group, is given additional rewards, responsibility, and trust in exchange for their loyalty and performance. The in-group becomes part of a smoothly functioning team headed by the formal leader. In con- trast, the out-group employees are treated in accordance with a more for- mal understanding of leader–group member relations. Out-group members are less likely to experience good teamwork.
Figure 9-1 depicts the major concept of the leader–member exchange model. Here we look at several aspects of LMX as it relates most closely to teamwork. Leader–member exchange has also been researched in relation- ship to many other aspects of workplace behavior, and published research about LMX continues to expand.
Different-Quality Relationships Leaders do not typically use the same leadership style in dealing with all group members. Instead, they treat each member somewhat differently. The linkages (relationships) that exist between the leader and each individ- ual team member probably differ in quality. In theory, the differences lie on a continuum of low quality to high quality. With group members on the top half of the continuum, the leader has a good relationship; with those on the lower half of the continuum, the leader has a poor relationship. Each of these pairs of relationships, or dyads, must be judged in terms of whether a
298 CHAPTER 9• DEVELOPING TEAMWORK
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
group member is in or out with the leader. The positive regard that leaders and members have for each other is a major contributor to the quality of their relationship.42
A note of caution about leader–member exchanges is that evidence sug- gests that the leader and the group members may perceive the quality of the exchange differently.43 For example, the leader might think the exchange is positive, whereas the subordinate might think the exchange is neutral or neg- ative. Because of this difference in perception, the leader should look care- fully for evidence of the quality of a relationship with a given subordinate.
Treatment of In-Group Versus Out-Group Members In-group members are invited to participate in important decision making, are given added responsibility, and are privy to interesting gossip. Members of the out-group are managed according to the requirements of their employment contract. They receive little warmth, inspiration, or encouragement. In-group members tend to achieve a higher level of performance, commitment, and satisfaction than do out-group members. Furthermore, they are less likely to quit. A study con- ducted in a retail setting found that when the quality of the leader–member exchange is high, group members are more strongly committed to company goals.44 In turn, this commitment leads to stronger teamwork because the workers pull together to pursue goals.
Reciprocity Between Leader and Members The in-group versus out-group sta- tus also includes an element of reciprocity or exchange. The leader grants more favors to the in-group member, who in response works harder to please the leader, a contributor to being a good team player. Two studies provide more specific information about the consequences of a positive
Group Member
1
LEADER
Group Member
2
Group Member
3
Group Member
4
Group Member
5
Group Member
6
OUT-GROUP (poor or neutral teamwork)
IN-GROUP (good teamwork)
FIGURE 9-1 The Leader–Member Exchange Model. Source: From Gregory Moorhead and Ricky W. Griffin, Organizational Behavior: Managing People and Organizations, 11th ed., p. 351. Copyright © 2014 by Cengage Learning.
THE LEADER–MEMBER EXCHANGE MODEL AND TEAMWORK 299
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
exchange between a supervisor and group members. In a hospital setting, positive exchanges involved group members’ engaging in increased good cit- izenship behavior and in-group role behaviors such as putting extra effort into performing their duties.45 As a result, the leader would feel justified in granting the in-group members more resources, such as a larger salary increase or a larger budget.
Extra-Role Behavior A study conducted in diverse industrial settings also found that high-quality exchanges between supervisors and employees con- tribute to employees’ engaging in extra-role behavior, or being cooperative in ways that were not expected of them. Supervisory ratings of employee altru- ism were used to measure helping behaviors, as when an accountant helps a sales representative prepare a sales forecast. The researchers concluded that through the development of high-quality relationships with group members, supervisors are able to motivate the group members and enable them to engage in helping behaviors that benefit them as well as their coworkers.46
Safety Performance Another contribution of positive LMXs is that they facil- itate good safety performance, an important aspect of teamwork in many work environments. Sixty-four group leaders in a manufacturing plant par- ticipated in a study. A major finding of the study was that positive leader– member exchanges were associated with more communication about safety. The enhanced communication led to more commitment to safety, which in turn led to fewer accidents on the job.47
Transformational Effects Another of the many consequences of positive leader– member exchanges is that they may facilitate the leader having a transforma- tional effect. A study of 283 individuals from a broad cross-section of job types indicated that transformational relationships were significantly stronger for followers who perceived high-quality relationships with their supervisors. An example of a transformational relationship would be inspiring the subordi- nate to seek different perspectives when solving problems or bringing about change. Transformational effects also tie in with teamwork because the work- ers become energized to jointly accomplish goals.48
Leader Status When group members perceive leaders to have high status, it is easier for the leader to form the type of high-quality relationships that contribute to good teamwork. A study of 184 bank employees and 42 man- agers found that leaders who were perceived to have higher quality relation- ships with their bosses and who were strongly connected to network members were regarded as having relatively high status. As a result, the lea- ders were able to have higher quality exchanges with their subordinates.49
Leadership Emergence and Team Performance A complex way in which LMX enhances teamwork is that teams tend to attain better results when multiple members of the team emerge as leaders. Leadership emergence often depends on which expertise is required for the task at hand, such as an
300 CHAPTER 9• DEVELOPING TEAMWORK
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
READER’S ROADMAP
expert in graphic design acting in a leadership role when the group task requires graphic design. A study conducted with customer service teams at a large telecommunications company in China investigated one condition under which high-quality leader–member exchanges encouraged more emer- gent leadership. It was found that when the team shared a vision, emergent leadership was more likely to take place. An item measuring shared vision was “My teammates provide a clear vision of where our team is going.”
The link to LMX in the study was that when the team shared vision was high, high-quality leader–member exchanges facilitated leader emergence. Conversely, when team shared vision was low, LMX is negatively related to emergent leadership. One implication of the study is that if the leader wants to facilitate emergent leadership by developing high-quality exchanges with group members, he or she must first work on establishing a shared vision within the group.50
First Impressions The leader’s first impression of a group member’s competency plays an important role in placing the group member in the in-group or the out- group. Another key linking factor is whether the leader and team member have positive or negative chemistry. We can assume that group members who make effective use of influence and political tactics increase their chances of becoming members of the in-group.
A field study seems to confirm that first impressions make a difference. The researchers gathered ratings of six aspects of the manager–group mem- ber dyad. Results showed that the initial leader expectations of members and member expectations of the leader were good predictors of the leader– member exchanges at two weeks and at six weeks. Member expectations of the leader also accurately predicted member assessments of the quality of the leader–member exchange at six months. An important interpretation of these results is that the leader–member exchange is formed in the first days of the relationship.51 As the adage states, “You have only one chance to make a good first impression.”
In summary, the leader–member exchange model provides a partial explanation of teamwork development. Members of the in-group work smoothly together and with the leader because they feel privileged. Being a member of the out-group may not diminish teamwork, but it certainly does not make a positive contribution.
So far we have studied considerable information about the nature of leadership; the attributes, behaviors, and styles of leaders; the ethics and social responsibility of lea- ders; and how leaders exert power and use politics and influence. The techniques for developing teamwork are part of a leader’s relationship with the group, as is the sub- ject of the next chapter, motivational skills.
THE LEADER–MEMBER EXCHANGE MODEL AND TEAMWORK 301
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
SUMMARY
Developing teamwork is a key leadership role. Teamwork is an understanding of and commitment to group goals on the part of all group members.
Leaders still play an important role in a team- based organization, such as being expert in the team process, being facilitators, building trust and inspiring teamwork, and enabling and empowering group members to accomplish their work. The enabling role centers on empowerment. It is impor- tant for top-level leaders to build a shared collective identity among the teams reporting to them. The external leader of a self-managing team plays a key role when the team faces disruptive conditions.
A wide range of leader actions fosters teamwork. Measures leaders can take using their own resources include (1) defining the team’s mission and tasks; (2) establishing a climate of trust; (3) developing a norm of teamwork based on coop- eration theory; (4) developing group emotional intelligence; (5) emphasizing pride in being out- standing; (6) serving as a model of teamwork, including power sharing; (7) using a consensus leadership style; (8) establishing urgency, demand- ing performance standards, and providing direc- tion; (9) encouraging competition with another group; (10) engaging in ample interaction with the team; (11) minimizing micromanagement; and (12) practicing e-leadership for virtual teams.
Techniques to foster teamwork that require relying on organization structure or policy include the
following: (1) designing physical structures that facili- tate communication; (2) emphasizing group recogni- tion and rewards; (3) initiating ritual and ceremony; (4) practicing open-book management; (5) selecting team-oriented members; (6) using technology that facilitates teamwork including social media; and (7) blending representatives from the domestic company and foreign nationals on the team.
In offsite training, a popular experiential approach to building teamwork and leadership skills, building self-confidence is the focus. Outdoor training enhances teamwork by helping partici- pants examine the process of collaboration. The Outward Bound Professional Development Pro- gram is geared toward organization leaders. Opin- ion about the effectiveness of outdoor training for developing teamwork and leadership skills is mixed. Concern has been expressed that the skills learned in the field do not carry over to the workplace.
The leader–member exchange model helps explain why one subgroup in a work unit is part of a cohesive team and another unit is excluded. According to the model, leaders develop unique working relationships with subordinates. As a result, in-groups and out- groups are created. Members of the in-group tend to perform better, have higher satisfaction, and exhibit more teamwork than members of the out-group. The leader’s first impression of a group member’s compe- tency plays an important role in placing that person into the in-group or the out-group.
KEY TERMS team 278 teamwork 278 cooperation theory 282
micromanagement 287 e-leadership 288 open-book management 293
leader–member exchange (LMX) model 298
GUIDELINES FOR ACTION AND SKILL DEVELOPMENT
When attempting to develop teamwork, the leader would ordinarily be thinking of coaching individual team members to be more effective team players. Some research, however, suggests that teamwork is
more likely to be enhanced when the team leader coa- ches the team as an entity.52 For example, the team leader might meet with the group physically or through an internal website, and say, “I don’t notice
302 CHAPTER 9• DEVELOPING TEAMWORK
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
LEADERSHIP CASE PROBLEM A
you folks offering each other enough constructive feedback. In an effective team, the members learn from each other.”
Improving teamwork through the design of offices is receiving considerable attention. Texas Professional Training Associates explains how to customize your (you being the leader/manager) space to promote teamwork:
1. Create common areas. Have ample space, accessible from throughout your office, for the team to meet formally and informally. Leave your team meeting tools—flip charts, whiteboards—in place even when the team is not meeting. One such building enables employees to collaborate more in a single, one- story space designed to encourage creative interaction and teamwork.
2. Put yourself in the center. Instead of reserving the back office, try to put yourself in the middle. You can be close to day-to-day action and more accessible to your team.
3. Set up multipurpose rooms. The back office can be used as a well-equipped workroom or library whenever team members—individually or in groups—feel they would be more productive away from their desks.
4. Insert activity generators. Lively activity depends on having generators to draw traffic and bring people together. In your office, this could be the coffeepot, the mailboxes, or the reception desk. Turn these areas into places for team members to gather and interact comfortably and productively.53
Discussion Questions and Activities
1. What would be the potential disadvantages of selecting a team leader who is highly charis- matic and visionary?
2. Some top-level managers prohibit or discour- age workers from telecommuting (including working from home and other remote loca- tions) because they think such activity inter- feres with teamwork. What is your opinion on this issue?
3. Imagine yourself as the newly appointed leader of a team doing work in your field of knowl- edge and experience. Which one or two first steps would you take to encourage teamwork?
4. Imagine yourself as the team leader, and the gang invites you to join them for an after- hours drink at a bar. From the standpoint of enhancing teamwork, explain whether joining the team would be effective.
5. Is there a role for independent-thinking, deci- sive, and creative leaders in a team-based orga- nization? Explain.
6. Each member of the top-management team wears khaki pants and a polo shirt with the Five Guys logo. What impact do you think this practice has on teamwork?
7. As the team leader, should you dress in about the same fashion as the rest of the team? Or should you dress a little fancier? Explain your reasoning.
8. What is your opinion of the value of experience in team sports for becoming a good team player in the workplace?
9. One of the character-building exercises in the Tough Mudder obstacle course is “electro- shock therapy” in which participants pass through a dangling curtain of electrical wires, some carrying 10,000 volts of electric shock. Any thoughts on the leadership-skill value of this exercise, along with the ethics of the task?
10. How can political skill help a person avoid being adversely affected by the leader–member exchange model?
The Global Insurance Tag Team
Calvin is the director of disaster insurance at a global insurance company. He has a large depart- ment of his own in New York, but he is also the
team leader of ten different representatives around the world. Each team member is responsible for encouraging the sales representatives in offices
LEADERSHIP CASE PROBLEM A 303
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
LEADERSHIP CASE PROBLEM B
around the globe to sell disaster insurance to cover such risks as floods, hurricanes, earthquakes, and terrorist attacks.
As Calvin describes it, “I wear two major hats. One hat is the leader of my own group of professionals in the disaster insurance field. My other major hat is that of a team leader and product manager who is trying to get team members around the world to facilitate the sale of disaster insurance. What makes this hat so difficult is that the team members do not really report to me. To complicate matters further, the reps who actually sell the insurance do not actu- ally report to the members of my team.”
When asked how the disaster insurance team was performing, Calvin replied, “Not as well as I would like. I have to keep chasing after the team members to remind them of their roles in helping the company cover disaster risks. Hillary, my team leader in Great Britain, told me that I need to trig- ger an earthquake in Europe to get clients inter- ested in more disaster insurance. She asked me to start a major flood as a second possibility.”
“Another problem I’m facing,” said Calvin, “is that I don’t see much integrated effort among the team members. I do see a few e-mails sent to the group discussing common concerns, but I don’t see much coordinated effort.
“We held a videoconference early this year, attempting to get everybody on board pulling
together. One problem was that we couldn’t get full participation because of the difficulty in finding a time to meet because of the wide spread in time zones. We had a few laughs, with Tom from Australia saying that his wife thought he was headed out to the pub, not really attending a late- night meeting.
“Another hurdle I need to conquer is that there seem to be some cross-cultural differences in the importance businesspeople attach to disaster insur- ance. Sophie, our team member in Columbia, told me that executives in South American countries worry less about potential disasters than do Amer- icans. As a result, she said it is difficult for her to be as heavily committed to selling disaster insurance as some of the other team members.”
“One of my biggest agenda items for the year,” concluded Calvin, “is to get my disaster insurance team coordinating their efforts better.”
Questions
1. Identify the teamwork problems you think Calvin might be facing.
2. What steps do you recommend Calvin take to enhance teamwork in his global disaster insur- ance team?
3. What might Calvin do to provide stronger lead- ership to his global team?
ASSOCIATED ROLE PLAY One student plays the role of Calvin who is conducting a transnational videoconference to encourage better teamwork in selling disaster insurance. Four or five
other students play the roles of team members across the globe, not all of whom are so convinced that disas- ter insurance will sell well in their country.
Ashley Wants to Boost Teamwork
Ashley considered herself fortunate to be chosen as the team leader for one of the newly formed teams at the insurance company where she worked. The purpose of forming teams was to improve customer service. Each team now had the authority to issue policies and settle claims, within limits, for specific geographic regions. Before the shift into teams,
separate departments existed for sales, underwrit- ing, and claims. Although the company was profit- able, it received too many criticisms about poor service, particularly in the time required to process a claim. Sales representatives within the company contended that the underwriting department took too long to approve and issue policies.
304 CHAPTER 9• DEVELOPING TEAMWORK
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
One of Ashley’s first initiatives was to hold frequent in-person meetings to discuss how service was going to be improved. She emphasized to the team that the company had adopted the popular team concept and that teams were empowered to look for ways to improve efficiency. Ashley also emphasized that each teammember had more responsibility than under the department structure. Each team member would be doing some sales, underwriting, and claims.
Team member George commented during one of the meetings, “Just think of it, three jobs in one and being paid just the same as before.” During the same meeting, team member Roz asked, “What’s so special about calling us a team? I had a nice job in the under- writing department before these teams were formed. I enjoyed that work. Now my job is more confusing.”
Ashley responded, “The company decided this was the way to go. Trust me, everything will work out fine. Just go along with the team idea for now.”
Four months after the teams were formed, Ashley’s boss, James, met with her to discuss progress. James said, “Your team isn’t making as much progress as I would like. Policies are not being issued any faster. Customer complaints about slow claims settlements are at the same level as before we converted into
teams. The other teams are making more progress. Does your team have a problem?”
“We do have a problem,” said Ashley. “Everyone comes to work just as in the days before teams. They do most of the work alone, but they send e-mail messages to each other as needed. It just seems to be business as usual. So far, the idea of a high-producing team hasn’t caught on.”
“Are you an effective team leader?” asked James. “I think I am,” said Ashley. “I do everything I’msup-
posed to. I holdmeetings, I postmessages. I answer all questions asked of me. I try to settle problems.”
“I’ll be back to you in two months to discuss your team’s progress. I want to see some improved results in terms of better customer service.”
Case Questions
1. How can Ashley be a more effective team leader?
2. What can Ashley do to get her team more inter- ested in functioning as a team?
3. Based on whatever information you have found in the case, what is your evaluation of Ashley’s charisma?
ASSOCIATED ROLE PLAY Ashley Holds a Team Development Meeting
In this group role play, one student plays the role of Ashley who holds a team meeting designed to get her group more oriented toward teamwork. The e-mail she sent a few days before the meeting just alluded to a team meeting to discuss items relevant to the team progress. During the meeting, Ashley attempts to implement a few ideas for developing strong teamwork. Several other students play the role of team members, not all of whom see much
value in the team structure. Run the role play for about eight minutes. Observers will look to see if Ashley uses any technique, or says anything, that will most likely inspire this team to higher levels of performance. Observe the reactions of team members to see if they appear to be inspired. Check to see if Ashley uses any specific technique of teamwork development, rather than simply using common sense.
LEADERSHIP SKILL-BUILDING EXERCISE 9-4
My Leadership Portfolio
Now that you have studied a basketful of ideas about enhancing teamwork, you can add to your skill rep- ertoire by implementing a few of these tactics. The
next time you are involved in group activity, as either the leader or a group member, attempt to enhance cooperation and teamwork within the group. Make
LEADERSHIP SKILL-BUILDING EXERCISE 9-4 305
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
NOTES
specific use of at least two of the recommended tac- tics for improving teamwork. Make an entry in your journal after your first attempts to enhance team- work. Here is an example:
I am the head of the Latino Business Club at our college. Attendance hasn’t been too great in recent meetings, and the club seems headed nowhere. So at our last meeting, I suggested that we devote the entire meeting to building a mission statement.
I explained that if we knew what our purpose was, maybe we would pull together better. We are still working on the mission, but so far it has to do with enhancing the impact and reputation of His- panic business leaders. I also suggested that we invest in T-shirts with a logo we could be proud of. This idea may sound hokey, but the group really ral- lied around the idea of building unity through new T-shirts.
LEADERSHIP SKILL-BUILDING EXERCISE 9-5
The Trust Fall
Perhaps the most widely used team-building activity is the trust fall, which may be familiar to many readers. Nevertheless, each application of this exer- cise is likely to produce new and informative results. The class organizes itself into teams. In each team, each willing member stands on a chair and falls back into the arms of teammates. A less frightening alternative to falling off a chair is to sim- ply fall backward standing up. Team members who, for whatever physical or mental reason, would pre- fer not to fall back into others or participate in
catching others are unconditionally excluded. How- ever, they can serve as observers. After the trust falls have been completed, a team leader gathers answers to the following questions and then shares the answers with the rest of the class.
1.How does this exercise develop teamwork? 2.How does the exercise develop leadership skills? 3.What did the participants learn about
themselves?
1. Edwin A. Locke and Associates, The Essence of Leadership: The Four Keys to Leading Successfully (New York: Lexington/Macmillan, 1991), p. 94.
2. William G. Dyer, Team Building: Issues and Alternatives (Reading, Mass.: Addison-Wesley, 1977), as cited in Lynn R. Offerman and Rebecca K. Spiros, “The Science and Practice of Team Development: Improving the Link,” Academy of Management Journal, April 2001, p. 380.
3. Jon R. Katzenbach and Douglas K. Smith, “The Discipline of Teams,” Harvard Business Review, March–April 1993, p. 112.
4. Peter Hawkins, Leadership Team Coaching: Collective Transformational Leadership (London and Philadelphia, PA: Kogan Page Limited, 2011); Andrew J. DuBrin, The
Reengineering Survival Guide: Managing and Succeeding in the Changing Workplace (Mason, OH.: Thomson Executive Press, 1996), pp. 129–144.
5. Michael A. Hogg, Daan Van Knippenberg, and David E. Rast, III, “Intergroup Leadership in Organizations: Leading across Group and Organizational Boundaries,” Academy of Management Review, April 2012, pp. 232–255.
6. Frederick P. Morgeson, “The External Leadership of Self-Managing Teams: Intervening in the Context of Novel and Disruptive Events,” Journal of Applied Psychology, May 2005, pp. 497–508.
7. Alan Murray, The Wall Street Journal Essential Guide to Management (New York: Harper Business, 2010), p. 89.
306 CHAPTER 9• DEVELOPING TEAMWORK
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
8. Kannan Srikanth and Phanish Puranam, “Advice for Outsourcers: Think Bigger,” The Wall Street Journal, January 25, 2010, p. R7.
9. David De Cremer and Daan van Knippenberg, “How Do Leaders Promote Cooperation? The Effects of Charisma and Procedural Fairness,” Journal of Applied Psychology, October 2002, pp. 858–866.
10. James M. Kouzes and Barry Z. Posner, The Leadership Challenge, Third Edition (San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 2002), p. 244.
11. “A Conversation with Irv Rothman: Teamwork at Its Best,” Executive Leadership, December 2013, p. 3.
12. Gary Ranker and Colin Gautrey, “Adjusting the Political Temperature of Your Team,” in Marshall Goldsmith, John Baldoni, and Sarah McArthur (eds.), The AMA Handbook of Leadership (New York: AMACOM, 2010), p. 185.
13. Dean Tjosvold and Mary M. Tjosvold, The Emerging Leader: Ways to a Stronger Team (New York: Lexington Books, 1993); “Improve Teamwork with a ‘Code of Conduct,’” Manager’s Edge, February 2005, p. 1.
14. Adam Grant, “Givers Take All: The Hidden Dimension of Corporate Culture,” McKinsey Quarterly, April 2013, pp. 1–10.
15. Vanessa Urch Druskat and Steven B. Wolff, “Building the Emotional Intelligence of Groups,” Harvard Business Review, March 2001, pp. 80–90.
16. Paul S. George, “Teamwork without Tears,” Personnel Journal, November 1987, p. 129.
17. Clive Goodworth, “Some Thoughts on Creating a Team,” in Michel Syrett and Clare Hogg (eds.), Frontiers of Leadership (Oxford, UK: Blackwell Publishers, 1992), p. 472.
18. Peter Pronovost and Eric Vohr, Safe Patients, Smart Hospitals (New York: Hudson Street Press, 2010).
19. Natalia M. Lorinkova, Matthew J. Pearsallk, and Henry P. Sims Jr., “Examining the Differential Longitudinal Performance of Directive Versus Empowering Leadership in Teams,” Academy of Management Journal, April 2013, pp. 573–596.
20. Katzenbach and Smith, “The Discipline of Teams,” pp. 118–119.
21. Michael Mankins, Alan Bird, and James Root, “Making Star Teams Out of Star Players,”
Harvard Business Review, January–February 2013, pp. 77–78.
22. Amy C. Edmonson, “Teamwork on the Fly,” Harvard Business Review, April 2012, p. 78.
23. “A New CEO Asked Just 4 Questions,” Executive Leadership, May 2013, p. 5.
24. John Brodie, “King of Cool,” Fortune, September 1, 2008, p. 52; Tina Gaudoin, “Mickey Drexler: Retail Therapist,” The Wall Street Journal (http://magazine.wsj.com), June 10, 2010, p. 3.
25. Anne Fisher, “In Praise of Micromanaging,” Fortune, August 23, 2004, p. 40.
26. Bruce J. Avolio and Surinder S. Kahai, “Adding ‘E’ to E-Leadership: How It May Impact Your Leadership,” Organizational Dynamics, vol. 31, no. 4, 2003, p. 325.
27. Arvind Malhotra, Ann Majchzak, and Benson Rosen, “Leading Virtual Teams,” Academy of Management Perspectives, February 2007, pp. 60–70; study reported in Lynda Gratton, “Working Together … When Apart,” The Wall Street Journal, June 16–17, 2007, p. R4; Achieve Global Staff, “Leading Virtually: Inspiring Peak Performance in Long-Distance Teams,” Special Advertising Supplement to Workforce Management, December 2011, p. S; Bill Leonard, “Managing Virtual Teams,” HR Magazine, June 2011, pp. 38–42.
28. Yael Zofi, A Manager’s Guide to Virtual Teams (New York: AMACOM, 2011).
29. Richard Lepsinger, “Virtual Team Failure: 6 Common Missteps That Threaten Your Team’s Success,” Communication Briefings, February 2011, p. 6.
30. Mankins, Bird, and Root, “Making Start Teams Out of Star Players,” Harvard Business Review, January–February 2013, p. 77.
31. Bolman and Deal, “What Makes a Team Work?” pp. 41–42.
32. Thomas J. McCoy, Creating an “Open Book”Organization … Where Employees Think & Act Like Business Partners (New York: AMACOM, 1999); John Case, “HR Learns How to Open the Books,” HR Magazine, May 1998, pp. 71–76.
33. Jennifer Wang, “Unbeatable,” Entrepreneur, February 2011, p. 16.
34. Quoted in Todd Henemann, “Firms Making Friends with Social Media,” Workforce Management, April 2010, p. 4.
NOTES 307
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
35. Quoted in Sonia Alleyne, “Rallying the Troops,” Black Enterprise, February 2011, p. 75.
36. Max Mihelich, “Bit By Bit: Stand-Up Comedy as a Team-Building Exercise,” Workforce Management, February 2013, p. 16.
37. Jeffrey M. O’Brien, “Team Building in Paradise,” Fortune, May 26, 2008, pp. 112–116.
38. Quoted in Jeffrey M. O’Brien, “Team Building in Paradise,” Fortune, May 26, 2008, pp. 112–116.
39. Alina Dizik, “Office Workers Run Amok,” The Wall Street Journal, June 6, 2012, pp. D1, D2.
40. “Avoid ‘Cringe Factor’ in Team Building,” Manager’s Edge, May 2009, p. 8.
41. George Graen and J. E. Cashman, “A Role- Making Model of Leadership in Formal Organizations: A Developmental Approach,” in J. G. Hunt and L. L. Larson (eds.), Leadership Frontiers (Kent, OH.: Kent State University Press, 1975), pp. 143–165; Robert P. Vecchio, “Leader–Member Exchange, Objective Performance, Employment Duration, and Supervisor Ratings: Testing for Moderation and Mediation,” Journal of Business and Psychology, Spring 1998, p. 328.
42. Elaine M. Engle and Robert G. Lord, “Implicit Theories, Self-Schemas, and Leader–Member Exchange,” Academy of Management Journal, August 1997, pp. 988–1010.
43. Xiaohua (Tracy) Zhou and Chester A. Schriesheim, “Supervisor-Subordinate Convergence in Descriptions of Leader- Member Exchange (LMX) Quality: Review and Testable Propositions,” The Leadership Quarterly, December 2009, pp. 920–932.
44. Howard J. Klein and Jay S. Kim, “A Field Study of the Influences of Situational Constraints, Leader–Member Exchange, and Goal Commitment on Performance,” Academy of Management Journal, February 1998, pp. 88–95.
45. Randall P. Settoon, Nathan Bennett, and Robert C. Liden, “Social Exchange in Organizations: Perceived Organizational Support, Leader–Member Exchange, and
Employee Reciprocity,” Journal of Applied Psychology, June 1995, pp. 219–227.
46. Pamela Tierney and Talya N. Bauer, “A Longitudinal Assessment of LMX on Extra- Role Behavior,” Academy of Management Best Papers Proceedings, 1996, pp. 298–302.
47. David A. Hofman and Frederick P. Morgeson, “ Safety-Related Behavior as a Social Exchange: The Role of Perceived Organizational Support and Leader–Member Exchange,” Journal of Applied Psychology, April 1999, pp. 286–296.
48. Ronald F. Piccolo and Jason A. Colquitt, “Transformational Leadership and Job Behaviors: The Mediating Role of Core Job Characteristics,” Academy of Management Journal, April 2006, pp. 327–340.
49. Vijaya Venkataramani, Stephen G. Green, and Deidra J. Schleicher, “Well-Connected Leaders: The Impact of Leaders’ Social Network Ties on LMX and Members’ Work Attitudes,” Journal of Applied Psychology, November 2010, pp. 1071–1084.
50. Zhen Zhang, David A. Waldman, and Zhen Wang, “A Multilevel Investigation of Leader- Member Exchange, Informal Leader Emergence, and Individual and Team Performance,” Personnel Psychology, no. 1, 2012, pp. 49–78.
51. Robert C. Liden, Sandy J. Wayne, and Deal Stilwell, “A Longitudinal Study on the Early Development of Leader–Member Exchanges,” Journal of Applied Psychology, August 1993, pp. 662–674.
52. Ruth Wageman, Colin M Fisher, and J. Richard Hackman, “Leading Teams When the Time Is Right: Finding the Best Moments to Act,” Organizational Dynamics, July–September 2009, p. 193.
53. “Promote Teamwork by Rearranging the Office,” people@work, sample issue, 1999, published by Texas Professional Training Associates, Inc.; Diana Louise Carter, “Global Crossing Fuses Staff,” Rochester, New York, Democrat and Chronicle, January 18, 2008, pp. 6D, 5D.
308 CHAPTER 9• DEVELOPING TEAMWORK
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
CH AP
TE R
10 Motivation and Coaching Skills
LEARNING OBJECTIVES After studying this chapter and doing the exercises, you should be able to
• Explain the leader’s role in employee engagement.
• Identify and describe leadership skills linked to expectancy theory.
• Describe goal theory.
• Describe how leaders can motivate others through recognition.
• Understand the characteristics of coaching and how to practice coaching skills and techniques.
• Describe how executive coaches help enhance leader- ship skills.
CHAPTER OUTLINE Leadership and Employee Engagement The Impact of Worker Engagement on Productivity Meaningful Work for Employee Engagement
Expectancy Theory and Motivational Skills Basic Components of Expectancy Theory Leadership Skills and Behaviors Associated with
Expectancy Theory
Goal Theory Basic Findings of Goal Theory The Importance of How Goals Are Attained and Other
Concerns
Using Recognition and Pride to Motivate Others Appealing to the Recognition Need of Others Appealing to Pride
Coaching as an Approach to Motivation Key Characteristics of Coaching Fallacies About Coaching
Coaching Skills and Techniques
Executive Coaching and Leadership Effectiveness Specific Forms of Assistance Provided by Executive
Coaches Contributions of and Concerns About Executive
Coaching
Summary
Key Terms
Guidelines for Action and Skill Development
Leadership Case Problem A
Leadership Case Problem B
Notes
309 Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s).
Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
Chipotle Mexican Grill is a well-known and finan-cially successful restaurant chain with 1,500 loca-tions, mostly in the United States, but also in Canada, the United Kingdom, and France. Co-CEOs Steve Ellis and Monty Moran attribute much of the chain’s suc- cess to a program that motivates workers by giving them an opportunity to become leaders, mentor others, and earn six-figure incomes. The centerpiece to the program is possibility of being promoted to restaurateur, a medium-level leader. He or she must have the knowledge and skill to create an outstanding restaurant experience by building a culture of high performers who consistently achieve high standards.
According to Moran, “Our 200 Restaurateurs represent a group of top-performers who have worked their way up from hourly crew positions. These top performers are poised for an incredible future with Chipotle. These are people who could be our future executives and offi- cers, to who we will entrust the leadership of our entire organization.”
The Restaurateur program began in 2006, shortly after Moran joined the company. The program has been effective in attracting potential store managers to
Chipotle— those with knack for attracting the best teams and developing them into leaders who can create outstanding restaurant experiences. Restaurateurs earn a regular salary and bonus, plus up to a $10,000 bonus for each crew member they develop into a general man- ager (person in charge of the restaurant). This bonus pro- gram leads to hiring potential managers right into the burrito lines, building a motivated workforce. Ninety- seven percent of the managers began with the company by rolling burritos. In addition to recruiting store employ- ees, the restaurateur invests considerable time in coach- ing, mentoring, and training general managers and other employees.
The highest-performing restaurateurs go on to mentor- ing several stores, until they become a team director in charge of sixty units, and then a regional director who over- sees 220 Chipotle outlets. A restaurateur also has a strong possibility of obtaining a corporate executive posi- tion. Approximately 1 percent of Chipotle’s 37,000 employees are restaurateurs. Moran explains that a res- taurateur is the gateway position for every leadership posi- tion in the company. “We want all of our future leaders, our future CEO, to become a restaurateur.”1
This story about a fast-food chain illustrates how important it is for lea- ders to motivate employees in order to grow at an organization. Equally important, the Chipotle story illustrates that the opportunity to help others and advance one’s own leadership career (and also earn a high income) can be highly motivational. Effective leaders are outstanding motivators and coaches. They influence others in many of the ways previously described. In addition, they often use specific motivational and coaching skills. These techniques are important because not all leaders can influ- ence others through formal authority or charisma and inspirational leader- ship alone. Face-to-face, day-by-day motivational skills are also important. Good coaching is a related essential feature of management because moti- vating workers is an important part of coaching them. During a coaching session, the leader will often attempt to motivate the person being coached.
In this chapter, we approach motivation and coaching skills from various perspectives. First, we take an overview of motivation by explaining the lea- der’s role in employee engagement. We then examine first how leaders make effective use of expectancy theory, recognition, and goal setting, to motivate group members. Second, we describe coaching, including a description of specific coaching skills and the role of the executive coach.
310 CHAPTER 10•MOTIVATION AND COACHING SKILLS
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
Most readers of this book have already studied motivation, so here we describe how it is possible to apply a few popular motivation theories rather than repeat a discussion of theories you have already studied, such as rein- forcement theory or Maslow’s need hierarchy.
LEADERSHIP SELF-ASSESSMENT QUIZ 10-1
How Meaningful Is My Work?
Instructions: Indicate whether you mostly agree or mostly disagree as to how well each of the following state- ments applies to your present, or a previous, position. If relating to a job you hold or have held is not sensible, relate each of the statements to school or volunteer work.
STATEMENT ABOUT THE WORK AND OR JOB MOSTLY AGREE
MOSTLY DISAGREE
1. When I am at work, the time flies by quickly. □ □
2. My job gives me as much pleasure as participating in my favorite pastime. □ □
3. The work I do really helps other people. □ □
4. The work I do really has an impact on society. □ □
5. I feel totally absorbed in my work. □ □
6. I am so excited about my job. □ □
7. I discover something new and interesting about my job almost every week. □ □
8. My job fills me with energy because it is so exciting. □ □
9. It would make me sad to let my coworkers down. □ □
10. I put a lot of mental energy into my job. □ □
11. I put a lot of physical energy into my job. □ □
12. I would feel guilty if I was too sick to come to work. □ □
13. I don’t care if many celebrities earn much more money than I because my work is very important.
□ □
14. I throw myself into my job. □ □
15. My work helps give me a purpose in life. □ □
Scoring and interpretation: The more of the above statements you agree with, the more meaning you have in your work and your job.
• 12–15: Your work is quite meaningful, and if your attitudes persist, you should have a long and rewarding career.
• 5–11: You have an average degree of meaningfulness in your work and job.
• 1–4: Your work may not be meaningful enough to bring you long-term satisfaction. You are advised to look for ways to make your work more meaningful, such as looking for new tasks that you perceive as more meaningful.
Source: A few of the statements in the quiz are based on questionnaire items presented in a review of the literature found in Michael S. Christian, Adela S. Garza, and Jerel E. Slaughter, “Work Engagement: A Quantitative Review and Test of Its Relation with Task Perfor- mance,” Personnel Psychology, No. 1, 2011, pp. 108–109.
CHAPTER 10•MOTIVATION AND COACHING SKILLS 311
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
Leadership and Employee Engagement
A broad purpose of leaders applying motivation and coaching techniques is to get employees involved in their work and excited about working for the organization. Engagement is the current buzz word for the commitment workers make to their employer. The term refers to high levels of personal investment in the tasks performed on a job.2 Engagement is reflected in employee willingness to stay with the firm and go beyond the call of duty.
Later in this section, we describe how leaders can enhance employee engagement through making work more meaningful. A preliminary observa- tion about the impact of leadership on employee engagement comes from a study of industrial consultants in the Netherlands. Using both surveys and individual diaries, it was found that leaders perceived to be transforma- tional had had a positive impact on worker optimism, resulting in workers experiencing engagement on a daily basis.3
Gaining employee commitment is especially important in the current era because a study conducted in 142 countries found that about 63 percent of workers are not fully engaged in their work. They do what is expected of them but do not contribute extra mental and physical effort to be outstanding. Fur- thermore, their motivation is low and they are less likely to invest discretionary effort in important organizational outcomes. The same study found that 13 percent of employees are engaged, and 24 percent actively disengaged.4
The Impact of Worker Engagement on Productivity According to Jim Harter, a Gallup research scientist, engagement—or the lack of it—has substantial implications for how well business organizations achieve their goals.5 Quantitative evidence points toward the impact of employee engagement. A Gallup Organization study involving approxi- mately 32,400 business units found that those in the top quartile on engage- ment had 18 percent higher productivity, 16 percent higher profitability, and 29 percent fewer accidents than companies in the bottom quartile on engagement.6 Engagement was measured by a questionnaire. The State of the American Workplace report shows that companies with a 9-to-1 ratio of engaged to actively disengaged employees experience 147 percent higher earnings per share, on average, in comparison to their competitors.7
A key link between leadership, motivation and coaching techniques, and engagement is that leaders need to use motivation and coaching techniques to help keep employees engaged. An example of the value of a coaching tech- nique is that a survey of 1,000 employees revealed that leaders who give posi- tive feedback to employees foster engagement. Furthermore, giving mostly negative feedback is better than no feedback or being ignored. A total of 5 percent of employees were engaged who believed that supervisors focused on their weaknesses (11 percent of employees fell into this category).8
Looking at the leader’s role in enhancing motivation more broadly, Jean Houston, an Atlanta-based human resources consultant, says that managers
312 CHAPTER 10•MOTIVATION AND COACHING SKILLS
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
can engage their workers by seeing them as whole people and having the cou- rageous conversations that will build trust and see what is really going on. Houston also encourages managers to learn and use soft skills such as commu- nication, recognition, mentoring, and caring because soft skills can have a hard impact.9 (Such is the thrust of this chapter and this book.) According to a survey conducted by BlessingWhite Inc., 20 percent of respondents cited career advancement as a key driver of engagement. A specific technique for leaders to engage employees is therefore to initiate career discussions.10
Skill-Building Exercise 10-1 provides you an opportunity to develop fresh insights into employee engagement.
Meaningful Work for Employee Engagement A key driver of worker engagement is the opportunity to perform meaningful work, the feeling of doing work that matters or makes a difference. Research by McKinsey and company indicates that the opportunity to make an impact in the following four areas is the most likely to increase the meaningfulness of work for employees:
• On society—including making a better society, building the community, or managing resources carefully
• On the customer—for example, making life easier for customers and providing a superior service or product
• On the workgroup or team—for example, having a sense of belonging, a caring environment, or working collectively in an efficient and effective manner
• On themselves—including personal development, higher financial compensation, and a sense of empowerment
A management team at an American financial services firm worked to create stories related to these four sources of impact in order to enhance worker engagement in reducing costs. The society source of impact was
LEADERSHIP SKILL-BUILDING EXERCISE 10-1
Collecting Live Data on Worker Engagement
The purpose of this exercise is to obtain some first-hand data about worker engagement, and then think through the leadership implications of your findings. Conduct interviews of about seven minutes in length with the next five working people you can find, doing any kind of work, at any job level. In-person or telephone interviews would be best, but if necessary use e-mail, text messag- ing, chat, or social media. Ask each interviewee how much he or she feels engaged in or committed to his or her present job. Also, ask why the person feels that
way. After you have collected your interview data, think through the leadership implications, such as the following:
1. What could I do as a leader to facilitate group mem- bers getting more engaged in their work?
2. What role did leaders play in helping my interviewees get engaged in their work?
If class time permits, it could prove insightful for class members to share some of their findings.
LEADERSHIP AND EMPLOYEE ENGAGEMENT 313
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
told in terms of more affordable housing. The impact on customers was described in relation to increased simplicity and flexibility, fewer errors, and more competitive prices. The team impact story was told in terms of less duplication of effort, more delegation, increased accountability, and a faster pace. Finally, the story about individual impact was related to bigger and more attractive jobs, an opportunity to build turn-around skills, and creating one’s own institution. Within one month, the number of employees reporting that they were motivated to bring about cost reductions surged to 57 percent from 55 percent, based on morale surveys.11
A major way in which leaders can make work highly meaningful for sub- ordinates is to provide them with the opportunity to lead projects or task forces. Such leadership opportunities enhance engagement of the heads of the projects or task forces. According to a McKinsey global survey of 1,047 executives, other managers, and employees, the opportunity to lead projects or tasks forces was an extremely or highly effective incentive. (A compara- ble percentage responded that performance-based cash incentives had the same effect.)12
Leadership Self-Assessment Quiz 10-1 gives you an opportunity to per- sonalize the concept of meaningful work and employee engagement.
Another illustrative way in which leaders can facilitate engagement among employees is to provide them feedback on the progress they are making with their work. Teresa Amabile and Steven Kramer gathered and analyzed diary reports from 238 professional-level workers in twenty-six project teams from seven companies across three different industries. The diaries were e-mailed to participants, and asked a few questions about the day, including what stood out in relation to work. Based on 12,000 diary entries, the authors discovered that a feeling of making progress was the key to employee engagement among these workers.13 An example of a leader providing feedback on worker of progress would be to say, “It looks like you found a way to reduce energy costs another one percent toward our goal of a 25 percent reduction.”
Expectancy Theory and Motivational Skills
Expectancy theory is a good starting point in learning how leaders can apply systematic explanations of motivation, for two major reasons. First, the theory is comprehensive: It incorporates and integrates features of other motivation theories, including goal theory and behavior modification. Second, it offers the leader many guidelines for triggering and sustaining constructive effort from group members. Although not much research is conducted about expectancy theory nowadays, it remains a stable approach to understanding work motivation.
The expectancy theory of motivation is based on the premise that the amount of effort people expend depends on how much reward they expect to get in return. In addition to being broad, the theory deals with cognition and process. Expectancy theory is cognitive because it emphasizes the
314 CHAPTER 10•MOTIVATION AND COACHING SKILLS
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
thoughts, judgments, and desires of the person being motivated. It is a pro- cess theory because it attempts to explain how motivation takes place.
The theory is really a group of theories based on a rational, economic view of people.14 In any given situation, people want to maximize gain and minimize loss. The theory assumes that they choose among alternatives by selecting one they think they have the best chance of attaining. Further- more, they choose the alternative that appears to have the biggest personal payoff. Given a choice, people will select the assignment they think they can handle the best and will benefit them the most.
Basic Components of Expectancy Theory Expectancy theory contains three basic components: valence, instrumental- ity, and expectancy. Because of these three components, the theory is often referred to as VIE theory. Figure 10-1 presents a basic version of expectancy theory. All three elements must be present for motivation to take place. To be motivated, people must value the reward, think they can perform, and have reasonable assurance that their performance will lead to a reward.
Valence The worth or attractiveness of an outcome is referred to as valence. As shown in Figure 10-1, each work situation has multiple out- comes. An outcome is anything that might stem from performance, such as a reward. Each outcome has a valence of its own. And each outcome can lead to other outcomes or consequences, referred to as second-level out- comes. A person who receives an outstanding performance evaluation (a first-level outcome) becomes eligible for a promotion (a second-level out- come). Second-level outcomes also have valences. The sum of all the valences must be positive if the person is to work hard. If the sum of all of the valences is negative, the person might work hard to avoid the outcome.
Valences range from !100 to þ 100 in the version of expectancy theory pre- sented here. (The usual method of placing valences on a !1:00 to þ 1:00 scale does not do justice to the true differences in preferences.) A valence of þ100
Expectancy Instrumentality Valence of outcomeEffort Performance Outcome
Outcome
Outcome
Environment
Ability
FIGURE 10-1 The Expectancy Theory of Motivation.
© Ce ng ag e Le ar ni ng
EXPECTANCY THEORY AND MOTIVATIONAL SKILLS 315
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
means that a person intensely desires an outcome. A valence of −100 means that a person is strongly motivated to avoid an outcome such as being fired or declaring bankruptcy. A valence of zero signifies indifference to an outcome and is therefore of no use as a motivator.
An example of using negative and positive valence at the same time would be for the CEO to use data to point out how bleak the company will become if it does not change, and how wonderful the company will become if it does change.
Instrumentality An individual’s assessment of the probability that performance will lead to certain outcomes is referred to as instrumentality. (An instrumen- tality is also referred to as a performance-to-outcome expectancy because it relates to the outcome people expect from performing in a certain way.) When people engage in a particular behavior, they do so with the intention of achiev- ing a desired outcome or reward. Instrumentalities range from 0 to 1:0, where 0 is no chance of receiving the desired reward and 1:0 is a belief that the reward is certain to follow. For example, an hourly worker might say, “I know for sure that if I work overtime, I will receive overtime pay.”
Expectancy An individual’s assessment of the probability that effort will lead to correct performance of the task is referred to as expectancy. (The same concept is also referred to as effort-to-performance expectancy.) An important question people ask themselves before putting forth effort to accomplish a task is, “If I put in all this work, will I really get the job done properly?” Expectancies range from 0 to 1:0, where 0 is no expectation of performing the tasks correctly, and 1:0 signifies absolute faith in being able to perform the task properly. Expectancies thus influence whether a person will even strive to earn a reward. Self-confident people have higher expec- tancies than do less self-confident people. Being well trained increases a person’s subjective sense that he or she can perform the task.
The importance of having high expectancies for motivation meshes well with the contribution of self-efficacy, the confidence in your ability to carry out a specific task. If you have high self-efficacy about the task, your motivation will be high. Low self-efficacy leads to low motivation. Some people are poorly motivated to skydive because they doubt they will be able to pull the rip cord while free falling at 120 mph.
In short, if you are confident about your task-related skills, you will get your act together to do the task. This is one reason that you should give people the skills and confidence they need to put forth effort.
An apparent contradiction in expectancy theory requires explanation. Some people will engage in behaviors with low expectancies, such as trying to invent a successful new product or become the CEO of a major corporation. The compensating factor is the large valences attached to the second-level out- comes associated with these accomplishments. The payoffs from introducing a successful new product or becoming a CEO are so great that people are willing to take a long shot that helps verify the justification for leaders’ and managers’ concern about motivating employees: People who try harder perform better.
316 CHAPTER 10•MOTIVATION AND COACHING SKILLS
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
Leadership Skills and Behaviors Associated with Expectancy Theory Expectancy theory has many implications for leaders and managers with respect to motivating others.15 Some of these implications also stem from other motivational theories, and they fit good management practice in gen- eral. As you read each implication, reflect on how you might apply the skill or behavior during a leadership assignment.
1. Determine what levels and kinds of performance are needed to achieve organizational goals. Motivating others proceeds best when workers have a clear understanding of what needs to be accomplished. At the same time, the leader should make sure that the desired levels of performance are pos- sible. For example, sales quotas might be set too high because the market is already saturated with a particular product or service.
2. Make the performance level attainable by the individuals being moti- vated. If the group members believe that they are being asked to perform extraordinarily difficult tasks, most of them will suffer from low motivation. A task must generally be perceived as attainable to be motivational.
3. Train and encourage people. Leaders should give group members the necessary training and encouragement to be confident they can perform the required task. Some group members who appear to be poorly motivated simply lack the right skills and self-confidence.
4. Make explicit the link between rewards and performance. Group mem- bers should be reassured that if they perform the job to standard, they will receive the promised reward.
5. Make sure the rewards are large enough. Some rewards that are the right kind fail to motivate people because they are not in the right amount. The promise of a large salary increase might be motivational, but a 1 percent increase will probably have little motivational thrust for most workers.
6. Analyze what factors work in opposition to the effectiveness of the reward. Conflicts between the leader’s package of rewards and other influ- ences in the work group may require the leader to modify the reward. For example, if the work group favors the status quo, a large reward may be required to encourage innovative thinking.
7. Explain the meaning and implications of second-level outcomes. It is helpful for employees to understand the value of certain outcomes, such as receiving a favorable performance evaluation. (For example, it could lead to a salary increase, assignment to a high-status task force, or promotion.)
8. Understand individual differences in valences. To motivate group mem- bers effectively, leaders must recognize individual differences or preferences for rewards. An attempt should be made to offer workers rewards to which they attach a high valence. One employee might value a high-adventure assign- ment; another might attach a high valence to a routine, tranquil assignment. Cross-cultural differences in valences may also occur. For example, many (but not all) Asian workers prefer not to be singled out for recognition in front
EXPECTANCY THEORY AND MOTIVATIONAL SKILLS 317
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
of the group. According to their cultural values, receiving recognition in front of the group is insensitive and embarrassing. Another example is that gift certi- ficates for stores might have more valence in the United States than in Italy, where workers may prefer a small fashion boutique. Leadership Skill-Building Exercise 10-2 deals with the challenge of estimating valences.
LEADERSHIP SKILL-BUILDING EXERCISE 10-2
Estimating Valences for Applying Expectancy Theory
Instructions: A major challenge in applying expectancy theory is estimating what valence attaches to possible out- comes. A leader or manager also has to be aware of the potential rewards or punishment in a given work situation.
Listed are a group of rewards and punishments, along with a space for rating the reward or punishment on a scale of –100 to +100. Work with about six teammates, with each person rating all of the rewards and punishments.
POTENTIAL OUTCOME RATING (–100 TO þ100)
1. Promotion to vice president
2. One-step promotion
3. Above-average performance evaluation
4. Top-category performance evaluation
5. $10,000 performance bonus
6. $5,000 performance bonus
7. $150 gift certificate
8. Employee-of-the-month plaque
9. Note of appreciation sent by e-mail or posted on social media website, and placed in file
10. Lunch with boss at good restaurant
11. Lunch with boss in company cafeteria
12. Challenging new assignment
13. Allowed to accumulate frequent flyer miles for own use
14. Allowed to ride in company-owned jet for business travel
15. Assigned latest mobile device for own use
16. Private corner office with great view
17. Assigned a full-time administrative assistant
18. Documentation of poor performance
19. Being fired
20. Being fired and put on industry bad list
21. Demoted one step
22. Demoted to entry-level position
23. Being ridiculed in front of others
24. Being suspended without pay
25. Being transferred to undesirable geographic location
318 CHAPTER 10•MOTIVATION AND COACHING SKILLS
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
9. Recognize that when workers are in a positive mood, high valences, instrumentalities, and expectancies are more likely to lead to good per- formance. An experiment with college students indicated that participants in a positive mood performed better, were more persistent, tried harder, and reported higher levels of motivation than those in a neutral mood. The positive affect made awards appear more attractive (higher valence). Being in a good mood also strengthened the link between performance and out- come (instrumentality), as well as between effort and performance (expec- tancy).16 A note of caution is that the mood elevator in this experiment was a bag of candy. A manager might need more sustainable methods of increasing positive affect. Being able to keep employees in a good mood is an advanced application of emotional intelligence.
Goal Theory
Goal setting is a basic process that is directly or indirectly part of all major theories of work motivation. Leaders and managers widely accept goal set- ting as a means to improve and sustain performance. A vision, for exam- ple, is really an exalted goal. One example is that Yang Yuanqing, the CEO of Lenovo, motivates his team with his aggressive vision for the com- puter manufacturer’s global growth. To develop goals to support the vision, an annual meeting is held at his home for senior executives. Wineglass in hand, each executive shares an ambitious goal, which is then toasted by the group. An example: “We’ll sell more PCs than Hewlett Packard next year.”17
The core finding of goal theory is that individuals who are provided with specific hard goals perform better than those who are given easy, nonspecific, “do your best” goals or no goals. At the same time, however, the individuals
After completing the ratings, discuss the following issues:
1. Which rewards and punishments received the most varied ratings?
2. Which rewards and punishments received similar ratings?
Another analytical approach would be to compute the means and standard deviations of the valences for each outcome. Each class member could then compare his or
her own valence ratings with the class norm. To add to the database, each student might bring back two sets of ratings from employed people who are not in the class.
To apply this technique to the job, modify this form to fit the outcomes available in your situation. Explain to team members that you are attempting to do a better job of rewarding and disciplining and that you need their thoughts. The ratings made by team members might provide fruitful discussion for a staff meeting.
EXERCISE 10-2 (continued)
GOAL THEORY 319
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
must have sufficient ability, accept the goals, and receive feedback related to the task.18 Our overview of goal theory elaborates on this basic finding.
Basic Findings of Goal Theory The premise underlying goal theory (or goal-setting theory) is that behavior is regulated by values and goals. A goal is what a person is trying to accom- plish. Our values create within us a desire to behave in a way that is consis- tent with them. For example, a leader who values honesty will establish a goal of hiring only honest employees. The leader would therefore have to make extensive use of reference checks and honesty testing. Edwin A. Locke and Gary P. Latham have incorporated hundreds of studies about goals into a theory of goal setting and task performance.19 Figure 10-2 sum- marizes some of the more consistent findings, and the information that fol- lows describes them. A leader should keep these points in mind when motivating people through goal setting.
To begin, remember that specific goals lead to higher performance than do generalized goals. Telling someone, “Do your best” is a generalized goal. A specific goal would be, “Increase the number of new hires to our manage- ment training program to fifteen for this summer.” Another key point is that performance generally improves in direct proportion to goal difficulty. The harder one’s goal is, the more one accomplishes. An important excep- tion is that when goals are too difficult, they may lower performance. Diffi- culty in reaching the goal leads to frustration, which in turn leads to lowered performance (as explained in relation to expectancy theory).
The finding about effective goals being realistic has an important excep- tion for the accomplishment of high-level complex tasks. Effective leaders often inspire constituents by framing goals in terms of a noble cause or something heroic.20 The manager of a group that made photo printers, for example, might explain that making high-quality printers enables people to preserve their memories. Here are two suggestions for developing noble powerful goals:
• Create a big, comprehensive goal: an ideal accomplishment for your group. • Break the goal down into smaller steps, such as hiring two top-notch
workers for the group. Regard each step (or subgoal) as a project
VALUES IMPROVEDPERFORMANCE
GOALS THAT ARE:
Specific Hard but realistic Accepted by the person Used to evaluate performance Linked to feedback and rewards Set by individuals or groups Learning oriented
FIGURE 10-2 Goal Theory.
© Ce ng ag e Le ar ni ng
320 CHAPTER 10•MOTIVATION AND COACHING SKILLS
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
designed to get you to your destination. The same approach has been referred to as “running sprints rather than marathons.”
For goals to improve performance, the group member must accept them. If a group member rejects a goal, he or she will not incorporate it into plan- ning. This is why it is often helpful to discuss goals with group members rather than impose goals on them. Other research, however, suggests that the importance of goal commitment may be overrated. Goals appeared to improve performance whether or not people participating in the studies felt committed to them.21 Despite these recent findings, many managers and leaders think employee commitment to goals is important.
Participating in goal setting has no major effect on the level of job perfor- mance except when it improves goal acceptance. Yet the leader should recog- nize that participation is valuable because it can lead to higher satisfaction with the goal-setting process. Goals are more effective when they are used to eval- uate performance. When workers know that their performance will be evalu- ated in terms of how well they attain their goals, the impact of goals increases.
A key principle is that goals should be linked to feedback and rewards. Rewarding people for reaching goals is the most widely accepted principle of management. Another goal-setting principle is that group goal setting is as important as individual goal setting. Having employees work as teams with a specific team goal, rather than as individuals with only individual goals, increases productivity. Furthermore, a combination of compatible group and individual goals is more effective than either individual or group goals alone.
A final goal-setting principle is that a learning goal orientation improves performance more than a performing goal orientation does. A person with a learning (or mastery) goal orientation wants to develop competence by acquiring new skills and mastering new situations. In contrast, the person with a performing goal orientation wants to demonstrate and validate his or her competence by seeking favorable judgments and avoiding negative judgments. In support of the distinction being made, a study with medical supply sales representatives found that a learning goal orientation had a positive relationship with sales performance. In contrast, a performing goal orientation was unrelated to sales performance.22
A meta-analysis of seventy-six different results with the impact of goals on group performance supported also several of the conclusions just pre- sented. The major findings of the study of studies included the following:
1. Specific difficult goals yield higher group performance than do nonspe- cific goals.
2. Moderately difficult and easy goals also enhance group performance but to a lesser extent than do difficult goals.
3. Participation did not have much of an influence on the effectiveness of goals. 4. Egocentric goals aimed at maximizing individual performance had a
negative impact on group performance.23
Encouraging support for the contribution of goals to organizational success comes also from an international research effort conducted over a decade with
GOAL THEORY 321
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
WARNING
8,000 manufacturers in twenty countries. The general finding was that follow- ing good management practices enhances organizational success. A specific finding relevant to the present discussion is that when company management supports long-term goals with tough, but achievable short-term performance benchmarks (or goals), the organization is more likely to be profitable.24
The Importance of How Goals Are Attained and Other Concerns A major concern about using goals to motivate performance is that leaders, as well as other workers, will take unethical and dysfunctional shortcuts to attain their goals. For example, a CEO might drastically reduce investment in research and development and lay off too many valuable workers to meet a profit goal such as earnings per share. Also, managers have been known to engage in unethical behavior such as shipping unfinished pro- ducts to reach sales goals.25 To implement goal setting without creating dys- functions, it is therefore essential to specify how the goals will be attained with a particular focus on ethical behavior.
The use of financial incentives for attaining goals often encourages unethi- cal behavior. One analysis conducted at the Wharton School of the University of Pennsylvania suggests that excessive reliance on financial incentives facili- tated the major financial scandals in recent history.26 To attain huge commis- sions, many investment bankers sold investor toxic securities—such as those based on subprime mortgages—to investors unaware of the risks.
A heavy emphasis on goals can also create such problems as workers focusing so much on attaining their goals that they neglect emergencies and new opportunities. For example, a recruiter might ignore an inquiry from an excellent prospect because he or she had to finish a quota of processing job inquiries to the company website. A related problem with goals, such as working to earn large commissions, is that other aspects of a sales represen- tative’s position might be ignored. For example, Susan Parker, the owner of the dressmaker Bari Jay, observed that her commissioned sales representative tended to ignore some accounts where they didn’t see a big commission opportunity. Parker’s antidote to the problem was to give year-end bonuses and profit sharing to employees rather than commissions.27
The potential pitfalls of over-reliance on goals have been humorously condensed by group of researchers suggesting the following “warning label” for setting goals:28
Goals may cause systematic problems in organizations due to narrowed focus, increased risk taking, unethical behavior, inhibited learning, decreased cooperation, and decreased intrinsic motivation.
Use care when applying goals in your organization.
322 CHAPTER 10•MOTIVATION AND COACHING SKILLS
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
Goal setting is widely practiced by leaders and managers, but they typically do not give careful consideration to goal theory. Leadership Skill-Building Exercise 10-3 gives you an opportunity to apply what you have learned about goal setting.
Using Recognition and Pride to Motivate Others
Motivating others by giving them recognition and praise can be considered a direct application of positive reinforcement, that is, reinforcing the right behavior by giving a reward. Nevertheless, recognition is such a potentially powerful motivator that it merits separate attention. Also, recognition pro- grams to reward and motivate employees are a standard practice in busi- ness and nonprofit firms. An example is rewarding high-performing employees with a wristwatch inscribed with the company logo or designat- ing them as employee of the month. Pride, as described next, is related to recognition. People who are proud of their work want to be recognized for their good deeds.
Recognition is a strong motivator because it is a normal human need. Tony Schwartz, head of the Energy Project, reminds us that nothing influ- ences employees’ engagement as the feeling that they are genuinely cared for and valued by their leaders.29 (Both being cared for and valued are strong forms of recognition.) Recognition is also effective because most workers feel they do not receive enough recognition. As indicated by Stress in America survey conducted by the American Psychological Association, only 46 percent of employees are satisfied with the recognition practices of their employer.30
LEADERSHIP SKILL-BUILDING EXERCISE 10-3
The Application of Goal Theory
In a group of about five to six people, visualize your group as a task force whose mission is to make and implement suggestions for making your company more environmentally sustainable (greener). The company manufactures sports clothing, such as athletic shoes, swimsuits, and soccer outfits. One of the group mem- bers plays the role of the task force leader. The leader must help the group establish goals that are likely to be motivational, following the principles of goal theory.
The goal of today’s meeting is to establish four goals that are likely to lead to a greener company but not be
excessive in cost. After each team has established its goals, present them to other class members. Students listening to the goals of the other groups should be will- ing to offer constructive feedback.
Practice in setting effective goals is useful because leaders and managers are frequently expected to set goals. When the goal follows at least some of the major findings of goal theory, there is a greater likelihood that productivity will increase.
USING RECOGNITION AND PRIDE TO MOTIVATE OTHERS 323
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
To think through the strength of your own need for recognition, take Leadership Self-Assessment Quiz 10-2.
LEADERSHIP SELF-ASSESSMENT QUIZ 10-2
How Much Do I Crave Recognition?
Instructions: Respond to the following statements on the following scale: disagree strongly (DS), disagree (D), neutral (N), agree (A), and agree strongly (AS).
DS D N A AS
1. I keep (or would keep) almost every plaque, medal, or trophy I have ever received on display in my living quarters.
1 2 3 4 5
2. I feel a nice warm glow each time somebody praises my efforts. 1 2 3 4 5
3. When somebody tells me “nice job,” it makes my day. 1 2 3 4 5
4. When I compliment someone, I am really looking for a compliment in return.
1 2 3 4 5
5. I would rather win an employee-of-the-month award than receive a $100 bonus for my good work.
1 2 3 4 5
6. If I had the resources to make a large donation to charity, I would never make the donation anonymously.
1 2 3 4 5
7. Thinking back to my childhood, I adored receiving a gold star or similar acknowledgment from my teacher for my good work.
1 2 3 4 5
8. I would rather be designated as Time magazine’s Person of the Year than be one of the world’s richest people.
1 2 3 4 5
9. I love to see my name in print or electronically. 1 2 3 4 5
10. I do not receive all the respect I deserve. 1 2 3 4 5
11. I regularly check to see how many times my name shows up on an Internet search (such as Google or Bing).
1 2 3 4 5
Total score
Scoring and Interpretation: Add the circled numbers to obtain your total score.
• 50–55: You have an above-average recognition need. Recognition is therefore a strong motivator for you. You will be happiest in a job where you can be recognized for your good deeds.
• 30–49: You have an average need for recognition and do not require constant reminders that you have done a good job.
• 11–29: You have a below-average need for recognition and like to have your good deeds speak for themselves. When you do receive recognition, you would prefer that it be quite specific to what you have done, and not too lavish. You would feel comfortable in a work setting with mostly technical people.
324 CHAPTER 10•MOTIVATION AND COACHING SKILLS
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
Appealing to the Recognition Need of Others To appeal to the recognition need of others, identify a meritorious behavior, and then recognize that behavior with an oral, written, or material reward. Two examples of using recognition to sustain desired behavior (a key aspect of motivation) follow:
• As the team leader, you receive a glowing letter from a customer about Kate, one of your team members, who solved the customer’s problem. You have the letter laminated and present it as a gift to Kate. (The behavior you are reinforcing is good customer service.)
• As the manager of IT, one of your software engineers, Evan, suggests that you post an ad on craigslist to fill two vacancies for software technicians. You are skeptical at first, but you give it a try, and your recruiting goals are met. You warmly congratulate Evan. You are rewarding his proactive behavior.
An outstanding advantage of recognition, including praise, as a motiva- tor is that it is no cost or low cost yet powerful. Reward expert Bob Nelson reminds us that while money is important to employees, thoughtful recog- nition motivates them to elevate their performance.31 Furthermore, one of the Dale Carnegie principles of leadership states: “Praise the slightest improvement and praise every improvement; be hearty in your approba- tion and lavish in your praise.” This basic principle is strongly supported by decades of research on operant conditioning, including positive reinforcement.32
Recognition thus has an enormous return on investment in comparison to a cash bonus. Following are a few suggestions for the motivational use of recognition and praise:
1. To maximize its motivational impact, recognition should be linked to corporate values and should also help workers attain personal goals. Visual- ize a security guard whose outside passion is sustaining the environment and who becomes recognized with the new title of Security and Energy Conservation Monitor. The title combines his interest in saving energy with the company’s interest in keeping outside doors closed and unusual lights turned off.33
2. Inform others in the group and organization about the meritorious behavior, such as via a mention in a staff meeting or a posting on the intra- net. Also, praise related to specific tasks is usually more effective than general praise. Workers may appreciate praise, but they also prefer to know what specifically they are being praised for, such as, “Your forecast for the sale of our cutting gear to factories in Poland was right on target. Congratulations.”
3. Do not use praise to set employees in competition against one another. Praise the employee who merits the praise, but do not suggest that other employees are less praiseworthy, such as: “Great job, José. I wish the rest of the group had put in the same kind of effort.”34
USING RECOGNITION AND PRIDE TO MOTIVATE OTHERS 325
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
4. Take into account the individual’s preference for the type of praise. A challenge in using recognition effectively is that not everyone responds well to the same form of recognition. An example is that highly technical people tend not to like general praise like “Great job” or “Awesome, baby.” Instead, they prefer a laid-back, factual statement of how their work made a contri- bution. According to one study, the more highly a person sees himself or herself as having a technical orientation, the more the person wants praise to be quite specific and task oriented.35 The tech center worker who just conquered a virus on your desktop would prefer a compliment such as, “I appreciated you having disabled the virus and restored my computer to full functioning.” This type of compliment would be preferable to, “Fantastic, you are a world-class virus fighter.”
Appealing to Pride Wanting to feel proud motivates many workers, and giving recognition for a job well done helps satisfy this desire to feel proud. Being proud of what you accomplish is more of an internal (intrinsic) motivator than an external (extrinsic) motivator, such as receiving a gift. Giving workers an opportu- nity to experience pride can therefore be a strong internal motivator, yet they simultaneously receive recognition.
Imagine that you are the assistant service manager at a company that customizes recreational vehicles to meet the requirements of individual clients. Your manager asks you to prepare a PowerPoint presentation of trends in customization for people who live most of the year in their recreational vehicles RVs. You make your presentation to top manage- ment, the group applauds, executives shake your hand, and later you receive several congratulatory e-mail messages. One of the many emo- tions you experience is likely to be pride in having performed well. You are motivated to keep up the good work.
Workers can also experience pride in relation to recognition symbols. For example, a worker might receive a floor clock for having saved the company thousands of dollars in shipping costs. The clock might be more valuable to the worker as a symbol of accomplishment than as a house- hold decoration. The feeling of pride stems from having accomplished a worthwhile activity (saving the company money) rather than from being awarded a floor clock.
According to consultant Jon R. Katzenbach, managers and leaders can take steps to motivate through pride. A key tactic is for the manager to set his or her compass on pride, not money. It is more important for workers to be proud of what they are doing day by day than for them to be proud of reaching a major goal. The manager should celebrate steps (or attaining small goals) equally as much as landings (major goals). (As described earlier, the feeling of making progress contributes to the mean- ingfulness of work.) The most effective pride builders are masters at identifying and recognizing the small achievements that will instill pride in their people.36
326 CHAPTER 10•MOTIVATION AND COACHING SKILLS
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
Coaching as an Approach to Motivation
Effective leaders are good coaches, and good coaches are effective motiva- tors. The coaching demands are much less rigorous for leaders who have lit- tle face-to-face contact with organization members, such as financial deal makers, CEOs, and chairpersons of the board. Nevertheless, coaching plays an important role in the organization, as expressed by John Russell, manag- ing director of Harley-Davidson Ltd: “I never cease to be amazed at the power of the coaching process to draw out the skills or talent that was pre- viously hidden within an individual, and which invariably finds a way to solve a problem previously thought insolvable.”37
Coaching is a way of enabling others to act and build on their strengths. To coach is to care enough about people to invest time in building personal relationships with them. The organization also benefits from coaching because of the elevated productivity of many of the workers who are coa- ched. Coaching is also seen as a key vehicle for engaging (or motivating) workers. A survey-based report found that organizations have less money to compensate employees, so they look to coaching and development as a method to boost engagement and retention.38
Key Characteristics of Coaching Coaching in the workplace might ordinarily be explained as the art of management. Because a coaching relationship is unique, the person being coached is better motivated to accomplish goals for the good of the organi- zation. Coaching is an interaction between two people, usually the man- ager and an employee. The purpose of the interaction is to help the employee learn from the job in order to help his or her development. The interaction of the two personalities influences the coaching outcome. Some leaders, for example, can successfully coach certain people but not others.
Coaching requires a moderate degree of interpersonal risk and trust on the part of both people in the relationship. The coach might give the person being coached wrong advice. Or the person being coached might reject the coach’s encouragement. Think of the risk involved when a basketball player asks the coach for advice on how to correct a shot that is not working well. As a result of the coaching, the player might shoot more poorly, to the embarrassment of both. Similarly, an organizational leader might coach a team member in a direction that backfires—for example, that results in even fewer sales than before.
Effective coaching focuses on the growth and development of individuals rather than telling them what to do in a given situation. To help subordi- nates grow and develop, the leader as coach should give subordinates the resources they need to make their own decisions. The people being coached should be challenged to find the right solution, and then should be provided feedback on how well they have performed.39
COACHING AS AN APPROACH TO MOTIVATION 327
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
Assume that a manager wants the accident rate on the construction of skyscrapers reduced substantially. Instead of telling a direct report exactly how to accomplish this goal, the manager might point to new sources of help for accident reduction. In the process, the direct report might find solutions the manager did not already know about.
At its best, coaching offers concrete contributions, including higher moti- vation. An effective coach keeps spirits up and offers praise and recognition frequently. Good coaching also leads to personal development. Group mem- bers are encouraged to cross-train and serve as backups for each other. Good coaching also improves group performance. The effective coach makes team members aware of one another’s skills, and how these skills can contribute to attaining the group’s goals.40
Fallacies About Coaching Another approach to understanding the coaching function of leadership is to examine certain common misperceptions about coaching, as explained by Ian Cunningham and Linda Honold.41 One false belief is that coaching applies only in one-to-one work. In reality, the team or other group can also be coached. As a team leader, you might make a suggestion to the group, such as, “Why are you rushing through such an important issue?” A major misperception is that coaching is mostly about providing new knowledge and skills. The truth is that people often need more help with underlying habits than with knowledge and skills. A good example is coaching another person about work habits and time management. You can provide the individual with loads of useful knowledge and techniques; however, if the person is a procrastinator, he or she must reduce procrastination before time- management skills will help.
Another stereotype deals with an important ethical issue: If coaches go beyond giving instruction in knowledge and skills, they are in danger of getting into psychotherapy. The counterargument is that coaches should simply follow the model of effective parents: listening to the other person, attempting to understand his or her real concerns, and offering support and encouragement. Another stereotype particularly resistant to extinction is that coaches need to be expert in something in order to coach. To use a sports analogy, a good coach does not have to be or have been an outstanding athlete. An important role for the coach is to ask pertinent questions and listen. Questioning and listening can help the other person set realistic learning goals.
An understandable stereotype is that coaching has to be done face-to-face. The face-to-face approach facilitates coaching. Nevertheless, telephone, e-mail, text messaging, videoconferencing, tweets, and chats are useful alter- natives when time and distance create barriers.42 A worker on a field trip, for example, might send his manager an e-mail similar to this one: “The customer says that if I make a mistake with this installation, he’ll never do business with us again. Any suggestions?”
The accompanying Leader in Action profile illustrates how effective coaching might contribute to an organization.
328 CHAPTER 10•MOTIVATION AND COACHING SKILLS
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
Coaching Skills and Techniques
Leaders and managers have varied aptitudes for coaching. One way to acquire coaching skill is to study basic principles and suggestions and then practice them. Another is to attend a training program for coaching that involves modeling (learning by imitation) and role playing. Here we examine a number of suggestions for coaching, all of which might also apply to coaching a group or a team as well as an individual. The typical scenario for a leader to coach a team would take place in a meeting with all or most of the group. If implemented with skill, the suggestions will improve the chances that coaching will lead to improved performance of individuals and groups.
1. Communicate clear expectations to group members. For people to per- form well and to continue to learn and grow, they need a clear perception of what is expected of them. The expectations of a position become the standards by which performance will be judged, thus serving as a base point for coaching. If a team member is supposed to contribute three new ideas each month for improving operations, coaching is justified when an average of only one idea per month is forthcoming.
LEADER IN ACTION
Tammy the Kindly Coach
Tammy is the administrative vice president of Quality Components, a manufacturer and distributor of auto- mated manufacturing systems. The company makes such specialty machines as leak-testing equipment for vehicle radiators. At a luncheon in honor of her twenty- five years of service to the company, Tammy was asked to briefly address the gathering. Her comments included the following:
“Our CEO, Brad, asked me to tell you what I am most proud of during my first quarter of a century with Quality Components. My job title has stayed essentially the same for ten years, but that is OK with me. The way I see it, a company leader at my level should be more concerned about the development of company employees than get- ting promoted. We sometimes forget that a manager is a teacher and a coach as well as a businessperson.
“What I am most proud of, without a doubt, is having spent a lot of time with my staff giving them whatever guidance and encourage I could. My happiest days at
Quality have been when I gave somebody advice and he or she became more effective because of that advice.”
After Tammy set down to cheers, Terry, an office supervisor, stood up and said, “Tammy is so right, she has helped so many of us. I remember joining the com- pany a few years back, nervous and unsure if I could be successful at Quality Components. Tammy was wonder- ful. She coached me; she gave me constructive feed- back when I made an error. She helped me believe in myself. So here’s to Tammy— a great coach and a great leader.”
QUESTIONS
1. What does this brief description tell you about the importance of coaching subordinates?
2. What is Tammy implying about the possible conflict between getting promoted and being a good coach?
Source: The facts for this story were collected in Fairfax, Virginia, April 2011, from a source who chooses to remain anonymous.
COACHING SKILLS AND TECHNIQUES 329
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
2. Build relationships. Effective coaches build personal relationships with team members and work to improve their interpersonal skills.43
Having established rapport with team members facilitates entering into a coaching relationship with them. The suggestions that follow about active listening and giving emotional support are part of relationship building.
3. Give feedback on areas that require specific improvement. To coach a group member toward higher levels of performance, the leader pinpoints what specific behavior, attitude, or skills require improvement. An effec- tive coach might say, “I read the product-expansion proposal you submit- ted. It’s OK, but it falls short of your usual level of creativity. Our competitors are already carrying each product you mentioned. Have you thought about ... ?” Another important factor in giving specific feedback is to avoid generalities and exaggerations, such as, “You never come up with a good product idea” or “You are the most unimaginative product development specialist I have ever known.” To give good feedback, the leader or manager has to observe performance and behavior directly and frequently, such as by watching a supervisor dealing with a safety problem.
A major challenge in giving feedback is that many people find nega- tive feedback to be uncomfortable. It is therefore helpful to get the per- son’s buy-in, or at least acceptance, to receive the feedback. For example, if coaching on the fly, the leader might ask, “Chris, I’d like to offer some quick feedback because I want to help you. Is this a good time?”44
Feedback is also likely to be less intimidating when the coach explains which behaviors should decrease and which should increase. This approach is a variation of combining compliments with criticism to avoid insulting the person being coached. You might say, “Tanya, I need you to place more emphasis on quality and less on speed.”
Feedback can also be made less intimidating when the coach begins with a question, such as “How do you think you’re doing?” The question helps give the person being coached joint ownership of the problem, and helps him or her feel included rather than excluded.45
Should the coach be dealing with a person who is highly sensitive to crit- icism, it can be helpful to convert the criticism into a positive suggestion to avoid intimidating the person being coached. Replace “A few of your facts were way off in your last report” with “You could improve your accuracy by double checking your facts.”
Inside or outside of a formal coaching session, feedback is a vital aspect of the leadership role. Tiffany Cooper Gueye, chief executive of BELL, a nonprofit organization that assists urban children, explains: “Assuming I have all the right people in the right positions, I think the most important thing I can do for them is provide direct, honest, clear feedback. And I get a lot of feedback in return from my direct reports that they really value that.”46
330 CHAPTER 10•MOTIVATION AND COACHING SKILLS
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
4. Listen actively. Listening is an essential ingredient in any coaching session. An active listener tries to grasp both facts and feelings. Observing the group member’s nonverbal communication is another part of active listening. The leader must also be patient and not poised for a rebuttal of any difference of opinion between him or her and the group member. Beginning each coaching session with a question helps set the stage for active listening. The question will also spark the employee’s thinking and frame the discussion: For example, “How might we use the new database of customers who have purchased simi- lar products help our staff generate more sales?”
Part of being a good listener is encouraging the person being coached to talk about his or her performance. Asking open-ended questions facili- tates a flow of conversation: For example, ask, “How did you feel about the way you handled conflict with the marketing group yesterday?” A close-ended question covering the same issue would be, “Do you think you could have done a better job of handling conflict with the marketing group yesterday?”
5. Help remove obstacles. To perform at anywhere near top capacity, indi- viduals may need help in removing obstacles such as a maze of rules and regulations and rigid budgeting. An important role for the leader of an orga- nizational unit is thus to be a barrier buster. A leader or manager is often in a better position than a group member to gain approval from a higher-level manager, find money from another budget line, expedite a purchase order, or authorize hiring a temporary worker to provide assistance. Yet, if the coach is too quick to remove obstacles for the group member, the latter may not develop enough self-reliance.
6. Give emotional support and empathy. By being helpful and construc- tive, the leader provides much-needed emotional support to the group mem- ber who is not performing at his or her best. A coaching session should not be an interrogation. An effective way of giving emotional support is to use positive rather than negative motivators. For example, the leader might say, “I liked some things you did yesterday, and I have a few suggestions that might bring you closer to peak performance.”
Displaying empathy is an effective way to give emotional support. Indicate with words that you understand the challenge the group member faces with a statement such as, “I understand that working with a reduced staff has placed you under heavy time pressures.” The genuine concern you show will help establish the rapport useful in working out the problem together.
7. Reflect content or meaning. An effective way of reflecting meaning is to rephrase and summarize concisely what the group member is saying. A sub- standard performer might say, “The reason I’ve fallen so far behind is that our company has turned into a bureaucratic nightmare. We’re being hit right and left with forms to fill out for customer satisfaction. I have fifty e-mail messages that I haven’t read yet.” You might respond, “You’re falling so far behind because you have so many forms and messages that require attention.” The group member might then respond with something like, “That’s exactly what I mean. I’m glad you understand my problem.”
COACHING SKILLS AND TECHNIQUES 331
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
(Notice that the leader is also giving the group member an opportunity to express the feelings behind his or her problem.)
8. Give some gentle advice and guidance. Too much advice giving interferes with two-way communication, yet some advice can elevate performance. Also, workers being coached usually expect to receive some advice. The manager should assist the group member in answering the question “What can I do about this problem?” Advice in the form of a question or suppositional state- ment is often effective. One example is, “Could the root of your problem be insufficient planning?” A direct statement such as, “The root of your problem is obviously insufficient planning,” often makes people resentful and defensive. By responding to a question, the person being coached is likely to feel more involved in making improvements.
Part of giving gentle guidance for improvement is to use the word could instead of should. To say, “You should do this,” implies that the person is currently doing something wrong, which can trigger defensiveness. Saying, “You could do this,” leaves the person with a choice: Accept or reject your input, and weigh the consequences.47 (You could accept this advice to become a better coach!)
9. Allow for modeling of desired performance and behavior. An effective coaching technique is to show the group member, by example, what con- stitutes the desired behavior. Assume that a manager has been making statements to customers that stretch the truth, such as falsely saying that the product met a zero-defects standard. In coaching him, the manager’s boss might allow the manager to observe how she handles a similar situa- tion with a customer. The manager’s boss might telephone a customer and say, “You have been inquiring about whether we have adopted a zero- defects standard for our laser printers. Right now, we are doing our best to produce error-free products. Yet so far we do not have a formal zero- defects program. We stand by our printers and will fix any defect at no cost to you.”
10. Gain a commitment to change. Unless the leader receives a commit- ment from the team member to carry through with the proposed solution to a problem, the team member may not attain higher performance. An experienced manager develops an intuitive sense for when employees are serious about performance improvement. Two clues that commitment to change is lacking are (1) over-agreeing about the need for change and (2) agreeing to change without display of emotion.
11. Applaud good results. Effective coaches on the playing field and in the workplace are cheerleaders. They give encouragement and positive reinforce- ment by applauding good results. Some effective coaches shout with joy when an individual or team achieves outstanding results; others applaud.
Leadership Self-Assessment Quiz 10-3 will help you think through the development you need to be an effective coach. If you are already an effective coach, look for ways to improve. Leadership Skill-Building Exercise 10-4 gives you a chance to practice coaching.
332 CHAPTER 10•MOTIVATION AND COACHING SKILLS
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
Executive Coaching and Leadership Effectiveness
A form of coaching in vogue is for managers to consult professional coaches to help them become more effective leaders and to guide them in their careers. Executive coaching is “a one-on-one development process formally contracted between a coach and a management-level client to help achieve goals related to professional development and/or business performance.”48
In the past, management psychologists were typically hired as outside coaches to help managers become more effective leaders. Today, people
LEADERSHIP SELF-ASSESSMENT QUIZ 10-3
Characteristics of an Effective Coach
Instructions: Following is a list of traits, attitudes, and behaviors characteristic of effective coaches. Place a check mark next to each trait, attitude, or behavior that you need to develop along those lines (for example, whether you need to become more patient). On a separate sheet of paper, design an action plan for improvement for each trait, attitude, or behavior that you need to develop. An example of an action plan for improving patience might be, “I’ll ask people to tell me when I appear too impatient. I’ll also try to develop self-control about my impatience.”
TRAIT, ATTITUDE, OR BEHAVIOR
1. Empathy (putting self in other person’s shoes) □
2. Listening skill □
3. Insight into people □
4. Diplomacy and tact □
5. Patience toward people □
6. Concern for welfare of people □
7. Low hostility toward people □
8. Self-confidence and emotional security □
9. Noncompetitiveness with group members □
10. Enthusiasm for people □
11. Satisfaction in helping others grow □
12. Interest in development of group members □
13. High expectations for each group member □
14. Ability to give authentic feedback □
15. Interest in people’s potential □
16. Honesty and integrity (or trustworthiness) □
17. Friendliness □
18. Develops trust and respect □
Source: Items 11–15 gathered from information in William D. Hitt, The Leader-Manager: Guidelines for Action (Columbus, OH: Battelle Press, 1988), pp. 183–186.
EXECUTIVE COACHING AND LEADERSHIP EFFECTIVENESS 333
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
from a wide variety of backgrounds become executive coaches, as well as career coaches and life coaches. Many executive coaches are former execu- tives themselves.
Specific Forms of Assistance Provided by Executive Coaches Executive coaches help managers become more effective leaders by helping them in a variety of ways. A variety of reasons for hiring coaches are described next. However, it is unlikely that one coach would provide all these services, or that one manager would want or need all of them.
• Helping corporate stars attain peak performance, similar to an athletic coach working with an outstanding athlete. One approach to heightened performance is to help the leader uncover personal assets and strengths he or she may not have known existed. An example would be discovering that the leader has untapped creativity and imagination.49
• Counseling the leader about weaknesses that could interfere with effec- tiveness, such as being too hostile and impatient. The coach will also solicit feedback by interviewing coworkers and subordinates, and then distilling the feedback to help the executive. One coaching client pro- vided this description of how the coach’s comments provided a critical moment for him: “It was when my coach directly challenged me to be bolder and give more of myself as a management team member. I had been reflecting on this for a while, and his challenge was what was needed. The timing was right.”50
• Serving as a sounding board when the leader faces a complex decision about strategy, operations, or human resource issues. Closely related to being a sounding board is a coach’s ability to ask tough questions, such as asking why the executive is pursuing a particular strategy.51
• Making specific suggestions about self-promotion and image enhance- ment, including suggestions about appearance and mannerisms.
LEADERSHIP SKILL-BUILDING EXERCISE 10-4
Coaching for Improved Performance
Clayton is a financial consultant (stockbroker) at a branch office of an established financial services firm. His manager, Marlene, is concerned that Clayton is 25 percent below quota in sales of a new gold mutual fund offered by the company. Marlene schedules a late afternoon meeting in her office to attempt to help Clayton make quota. She has told Clayton, “I want to talk about your sales performance on the new gold fund and see if I can be helpful.” Clayton is concerned that the meeting might be a discipline session in disguise.
Have one member of the class assume the role of Marlene, and another the role of Clayton. Marlene will attempt to implement recommended coaching techni- ques. Other class members will watch and then provide constructive feedback.
This exercise is a key skill builder because so much of face-to-face leadership involves working out perfor- mance problems with group members. If every employee were an outstanding, independent performer, we would have less need for managers and leaders.
334 CHAPTER 10•MOTIVATION AND COACHING SKILLS
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
• Helping the leader achieve a better balance between work and family life, thereby having more focused energy for the leadership role.
• Serving as a trusted confidante to discuss issues the leader might feel uncomfortable talking about with others: for example, talking about feel- ing insecure in his or her position.
• Giving advice about career management, such as developing a career path. • Strengthening the executive’s strategic decision-making skills by helping
him or her think more broadly about issues and appreciate how his or her actions will affect the organizational system. The coach might point out a blind spot in the leader’s decision making, such as neglecting part of the human consequences of a decision.
• Serving as a coach to the entire team to help guide the team to insights into their behavior as it affects performance, and to help improve the teamwork.52
Note that the coach works as an adviser about behavior but does not explicitly help the leader with functional details of the job, such as how to develop a new product strategy or design an organization.
The leader/manager’s employer usually hires the executive coach. The pur- pose of engaging the coach could be to accelerate the development of a star player or assist an executive who is having soft-skill problems. For example, the direct reports of a manager at a consulting firm referred to her as a “weed whacker,” so an executive coach was hired to help the executive develop more emotional intelligence. The executive soon learned that employees perceived in her tone and body language that she was attacking them. Coaching helped her soften her approach and work better with others.53
A refinement of individual coaching is for the coach to work with both the individual and his or her work associates. The coach solicits feedback from the group members and involves them in helping the manager improve. For example, the coach might tell team members to assert their rights when the manager throws a temper tantrum or makes unreasonable demands. The coach might also work with the superiors or peers of the per- son being coached to obtain useful feedback about the leader’s behavior.
Contributions of and Concerns About Executive Coaching Executive coaching may frequently accomplish several of the ends specified in the previous list. A survey of 230 organizations conducted by the American Management Association found that 88 percent of the respon- dents found executive coaching to be “somewhat effective” or “very effec- tive,” whereas 12 percent responded “ineffective.”54
Executive coaching, however, has some potential drawbacks for the leader. A major problem is that a coach may give advice that backfires because he or she does not understand the particular work setting. One out- side coach told a manager in an information technology firm that she should become more decisive in her decision making and less dependent on consensus. The advice backfired because the culture of the firm empha- sized consensus decision making. Furthermore, many people who present
EXECUTIVE COACHING AND LEADERSHIP EFFECTIVENESS 335
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
READER’S ROADMAP
themselves as executive coaches may not be professionally qualified or may not have much knowledge about business.55
An ethical problem is that many coaches delve into personal and emo- tional issues that should be reserved for mental health professionals. The leader who is performing poorly because of a deep-rooted problem, such as hostility toward others, is given superficial advice about making nice. (The opposite ethical problem occurs when a relationship coach offer business advice, without having the experience or qualifications to offer such advice.) Another potential ethical problem is that the leader/manager may become too dependent on the coach, checking with him or her before mak- ing any consequential decision.56
So far, we have studied considerable information about the nature of leadership; the attributes, behaviors, and styles of leaders; the ethics and social responsibility of lea- ders; and how leaders exert power and use politics and influence. The techniques for developing teamwork are part of a leader’s relationship with the group, as is the sub- ject of this chapter: motivation and coaching skills. In the next chapter, we describe creativity and innovation as part of leadership.
SUMMARY
Effective leaders are outstanding motivators and coaches, and the role of the leader and manager today emphasizes coaching. A broad purpose of lea- ders applying motivation and coaching techniques is getting employees involved in their work and excited about working for the organization. Engagement is reflected in employee willingness to stay with the firm and go beyond the call of duty. Leaders use motivation and coaching techni- ques to help keep employees engaged. Employee engagement has a positive impact on productivity. Meaningful work is a key driver of worker engage- ment. The opportunity to lead projects or task forces makes work meaningful, as does the feeling of making daily progress in one’s work.
The expectancy theory of motivation is useful for developingmotivational skills because it is comprehen- sive, building on other explanations of motivation.
Expectancy theory has three major components: valence, instrumentality, and expectancy. Valence is the worth or attractiveness of an outcome. Each work situation has multiple outcomes, and each
outcome has a valence of its own. Valences range from −100 to þ 100 in the version of expectancy theory presented here. Zero valences reflect indiffer- ence and therefore are not motivational. Very high valences help explain why some people persist in efforts despite a low probability of payoff. Instrumen- tality is the individual’s assessment of the probability that performance will lead to certain outcomes. (An outcome is anything that might stem from perfor- mance, such as a reward.)Expectancy is an individual’s assessment of the probability that effort will lead to performing the task correctly.
Expectancy theory has implications and provides guidelines for leaders, including the following: (1) determine necessary performance levels; (2) make the performance level attainable; (3) train and encour- age people; (4) make explicit the link between rewards and performance; (5) make sure the rewards are large enough; (6) analyze factors that oppose the effective- ness of the reward; (7) explain the meaning and impli- cations of second-level outcomes; (8) understand individual differences in valences; and (9) recognize
336 CHAPTER 10•MOTIVATION AND COACHING SKILLS
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
that when workers are in a good mood, valences, instrumentalities, and expectancies will more likely enhance performance.
Goal setting is a basic process that is directly or indirectly part of all major theories of motivation. Goal theory includes the following ideas: (1) specific and difficult goals result in high performance (yet out- rageous goals can inspire); (2) goals must be accepted by group members; (3) goals are more effective when they are linked to feedback and rewards; (4) the com- bination of individual and group goals is very effec- tive; and (5) a learning goal orientation is more effective than a performance goal orientation. A meta-analysis of many studies supports the conclu- sions just presented about the effectiveness of goals.
A major concern about using goals to motivate performance is that leaders, as well as other work- ers, will take unethical and dysfunctional shortcuts to attain their goals. A heavy emphasis on goals can also create problems such as workers focusing so much on attaining their goals that they neglect emergencies and new opportunities.
Motivating others by giving them recognition and praise can be considered a direct application of positive reinforcement. Recognition programs to reward and motivate employees are standard practice. Recognition is a strong motivator because it is a normal human need to crave recognition, and workers often do not feel they receive enough rec- ognition. To appeal to the recognition need, identify a meritorious behavior and then recognize that behavior with an oral, written, or material reward. To maximize its motivational impact, recognition should be linked to corporate values and personal goals. Recognition and praise are no-cost or low- cost motivators that are powerful.
Giving workers an opportunity to experience pride can be a strong internal motivator, yet work- ers still receive recognition. To motivate through pride, it is best for the manager to set the compass
on pride, not money, and for workers to be proud of daily accomplishments.
A major purpose of coaching is to achieve enthu- siasm and high performance in a team setting. Several characteristics of coaching contribute to its close relationship with leadership. Coaching is a two-way process, suggesting that being a great coach requires having a talented team. Coaching requires a moderate degree of interpersonal risk and trust on the part of both sides in the relation- ship. Effective coaching focuses on the growth and development of people rather than telling them how to deal with a given situation.
The coaching function can also be understood by recognizing several common misperceptions: (1) coaching applies only to one-on-one work; (2) coach- ing is mostly about providing new knowledge and skills; (3) coaching easily falls into psychotherapy; (4) coaches need to be experts in what they are coach- ing; and (5) coaching has to be done face-to-face.
Suggestions for improving coaching are as follows: (1) communicate clear expectations, (2) build rela- tionships, (3) give feedback on areas that require spe- cific improvement, (4) listen actively, (5) help remove obstacles, (6) give emotional support including empa- thy, (7) reflect content or meaning, (8) give gentle advice and guidance, (9) allow for modeling of desired performance and behavior, (10) gain a com- mitment to change, and (11) applaud good results.
Managers frequently consult executive coaches to help them be more effective leaders. Such coaches provide a variety of services, including helping attain peak performance, counseling about weaknesses, helping achieve balance in life, helping the leader uncover hidden assets, and giving career advice. Executive coaching often achieves its purposes, yet there are potential problems: Executive coaches can give bad advice, the coach might be unqualified in general or to deal with mental health issues, and the leader may become too dependent on the coach.
KEY TERMS
engagement 312 meaningful work 313 expectancy theory 314 valence 315
outcome 315 instrumentality 316 expectancy 316 self-efficacy 316
goal 320 executive coaching 333
KEY TERMS 337
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
LEADERSHIP CASE PROBLEM A
GUIDELINES FOR ACTION AND SKILL DEVELOPMENT
It is worth repeating that a major way goal setting can backfire as a motivational strategy is when there is not careful agreement about the ethical means by which the goal will be pursued. For exam- ple, the manager of a trucking fleet might be assigned a goal of reducing costs by 10 percent. An unethical means would be to reduce truck safety by delaying tire and brake replacements.
Given that recognition can be such a relatively low-cost, yet highly effective motivator, the leader/manager should keep in mind available forms of recognition. In addition to considering those in the following list, use your imagination to think of other forms of recognition. For the recognition technique to work well, it should have high valence for the person or group under consideration.
● Compliments, such as “You help us accomplish our mission,” or “Our customers love what you are doing for them” to give encouragement for a job well done
● Comradeship with the boss ● A pat on the back or a handshake ● Public expression of appreciation such as on an
intranet or social media website (company exclu- sive or public), including a note of thanks to the individual (handwritten, e-mail, or text message)
● A flattering letter from a customer distributed over e-mail
● Employee-of-month award ● A gift from the company recognition program,
such as a watch, a clock, or a pin
Approaches to recognition may pack an extra punch when they do not take the same form every time. For a job well done, the worker might receive a warm e-mail one week, a gift certificate the next, and
perhaps an employee-of-the month designation in the future.
Discussion Questions and Activities
1. Why do many people think that motivation is the most important part of a leader’s job?
2. Why should a leader be concerned about employee engagement when almost all of his or her direct reports are corporate professionals?
3. To what extent would the amount of financial compensation you receive in a position influ- ence your level of engagement?
4. Identify several outcomes you expect from occupying a leadership position. What valences do you attach to them?
5. How can the influence exerted by a charismatic leader tie in with expectancy theory?
6. What is an example of a noble cause a leader at Chipotle might use to motivate a store manager? What about a noble cause for the plant manager of a division that manufactures paperclips?
7. In what way might giving team members fre- quent recognition contribute to a leader’s being perceived as charismatic?
8. For purposes of recognition, many companies give out watches, clocks, sport shirts, and crys- tal vases with a company logo embedded. What do you think of the effectiveness of this form of recognition?
9. Imagine that you have a couple of extra-high performers reporting to you, who are carrying out all their job responsibilities in a superior manner. What kind of coaching might you con- duct with these people?
10. Ask a manager or coach to describe the amount of coaching he or she does on the job. Be pre- pared to bring your findings back to class.
We Need More Engagement Around Here
Margot is the CEO of a regional health maintenance organization (HMO) with twenty-five local offices serving business and nonprofit organizations. The
competition for business has become more intense in recent years as organizations continue to look for ways to reduce cost for medical insurance, yet still
338 CHAPTER 10•MOTIVATION AND COACHING SKILLS
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
offering medical insurance to employees. A particu- lar concern is that a given company might shift to another HMO if that health care provider can offer lower costs.
Margot expressed her concern at a meeting with the management staff in these words, “I think our HMO could provide better service and lower costs if our employees put in more effort. A lot of the employees I have seen are so laid back, and almost indifferent. They don’t seem to have a sense of urgency.
“I don’t think that by simply downsizing the company we will reduce costs. Having fewer work- ers to accomplish our important work would just make things worse. We would get less work accom- plished, and the quality would suffer.”
After listening to Margot, the vice president of marketing, Jerry, commented: “Margot, you might be right about some of our employees not being totally engaged in our work. Yet I cannot understand why. Taking care of people’s health is one of the most important responsibilities in the world. We often increase life spans and save lives.”
Cora, the director of human resources, said: “Jerry, from your point of view, you are correct. Health care is a noble undertaking. Yet when a per- son is seated at a computer for eight hours proces- sing claims, he or she might not feel like an angel of mercy.”
“We can speculate all we want about how well our employees are engaged and motivated, and what we should do about the situation. I propose that we get some data to work with so we can learn more about the nature of the problem fac- ing us. I suggest that we hire an HR consulting firm to conduct a survey about employee engagement. It could prove to be a good investment.”
Margot said with a smile, “Here I am concerned about our costs being too high, and Cora makes a suggestion about spending money.”
Cora retorted, “Margot, I am talking about investing, not spending money. If we could boost our level of employee motivation 10 percent, we would get a tremendous return on investment.”
Margot, Cora, and the rest of the executive team agreed to hire a firm to conduct the survey. Four months later, the survey was completed, and the results presented to management. The consul- tant, Ken, focused on the data presented in the accompanying Exhibit as the key finding of the survey. He said, “Folks, here is the meat of the survey. Let’s discuss what calls for action are revealed by the data.”
CASE EXHIBIT Data from Employee Attitude Survey
QUESTION PERCENT
YES PERCENT
NO
1. Do you have a clear description of your responsibilities?
72 28
2. Do you have the opportunity to use you best skills each workday?
55 45
3. Do you put your full effort into the job most days?
44 56
4. Do you think that your immedi- ate supervisor is doing a good job?
85 15
5. Do you expect to be working for this company for at least another three years?
34 66
6. Do you ever take work home with you (assuming that you have the type of work that can be done off company premises)?
41 59
7. In the past year, have you had opportunities at work to learn and grow professionally?
38 62
8. Are you satisfied with your compensation (salary and benefits combined)?
69 31
9. Do you feel committed to the company in terms of its work?
45 55
10. Do you think that your work serves an important purpose?
48 52
Note: A total of 376 employees were surveyed, representing 89 percent of the workforce.
LEADERSHIP CASE PROBLEM A 339
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
LEADERSHIP CASE PROBLEM B
Questions
1. How bad is employee motivation and engage- ment as revealed by the exhibit?
2. What actions can management take to increase motivation and engagement?
3. To what extent might employees at this HMO not perceive their work to be meaningful?
ASSOCIATED ROLE PLAY About five students play the role of leadership team at the regional HMO. The team is gathered to have a brief discussion about the meaning and relevance
of the data presented in the employee attitude sur- vey. Differing perceptions of the meaningfulness of the data are welcome.
Tyler Faces a Feedback Challenge
Tyler is the chief operations officer (COO) of Min- ing and Drilling Co., a company that manufactures equipment for the mining industry. With the CEO being heavily involved in strategy formulation, mer- gers and acquisitions, and company finances, Tyler is essentially in charge of running the company. With all the exploration for resources in recent years, the company is prospering.
Tyler sees a major part of his role at Mining and Drilling to be that of a leader who inspires, guides, and monitors the behavior of subordi- nates. At the moment, Tyler is facing what he con- siders to be a delicate issue. He wants to provide constructive feedback to one of his direct reports, Gus, the director of materials management. The feedback has to do with incidents he heard about Gus’s relationships with staff members. Although none of these incidents or reported inci- dents rumors deal with behavior that violates the code of conduct at Mining and Drilling, they sug- gest poor professionalism.
Sherry, an office manager, once told Tyler that Gus often stares at her in a lecherous manner. Sherry also said that Gus tends to stand about five inches from her when they have a conversation about work-related matters.
A few weeks ago, Tyler heard Garth, the IT man- ager, joke about how much advice and help Gus wants with his off-the-job communication technology
pursuits, such as setting up a smart house, and inter- connecting the electronic devices in his home.
Last week Tyler asked Kaitlin, his administrative assistant, how she and her family planned to spend the weekend. Kaitlin said with a sarcastic expres- sion on her face, “As usual, I will have to put a lot of time into deleting the dozens of text messages Gus sends me. I don’t do anything to encourage Gus, but he keeps bombarding me with silly mes- sages. Last night he sent me five texts about cute things his dog did recently.”
Tyler was wondering how he should approach Gus about his behavior unbecoming to a company executive, yet still not in violation of company pol- icy. “I should give Gus some feedback about these problems,” thought Tyler. “Yet I don’t want to dam- age my relationship with one of the key leaders at Mining and Drilling.”
Questions
1. Are the reported incidents in relation to Gus even worth the attention of a COO?
2. If you think the case describes a problem wor- thy of his attention, how should Tyler coach Gus about the reported incidents?
3. What opening line do you recommend for Tyler if he does hold a coaching session with Gus about the incidents reported in the case?
340 CHAPTER 10•MOTIVATION AND COACHING SKILLS
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
NOTES
ASSOCIATED ROLE PLAY You guessed it. One person plays the role of CEOTyler who decides to hold a coaching session with COOGus about the latter’s unprofessional behavior. Tyler feels awkward because he is not even certain that he should be providing feedback to Gus about the incidents. Gus
assumes that the session will be about a key opera- tions or strategy issue. Furthermore, Gus doesn’t think he has a problem about behaving professionally. Observers will provide feedback on how well the coaching and feedback session went.
LEADERSHIP SKILL-BUILDING EXERCISE 10-5
My Leadership Portfolio
One of the easiest and most powerful ways of moti- vating people is to recognize their efforts, as described in this chapter. Like any other interper- sonal skill, being effective at giving recognition takes practice. During the next week, find three peo- ple to recognize, and observe how they react to your recognition. For example, if a server gives you fine service, explain after the meal how much you enjoyed the service and leave a larger-than-average tip. If your hair stylist does a fine job, similarly pro-
vide a compliment and a good tip. Or find some helper to recognize with a compliment but without a tip. Observe the responses of these people—both their facial expressions and what they say. Of even more importance, observe if any of these people appear eager to serve you the next time you interact with them.
As with other parts of your leadership portfolio, keep a written record of what happened to you and how much skill you think you have developed.
LEADERSHIP SKILL-BUILDING EXERCISE 10-6
Position Paper on Motivation
Write a position paper on the topic of whether or not a leader/manager should have to invest time motivating workers. The general argument for a leader needing to spend time motivating subordi- nates is that it is part of human nature to not work
very hard unless an external force provides some motivation. The general argument against a leader needing to spend time motivating subordinates is that people are expected to work hard, especially because they are financially compensated.
1. Original story created from facts and observations in the following sources: Kevin C. Keller, “Chipotle Fuels Growth by Motivating Workforce, Promoting from Within,” The Denver Post (www.denverpost.com), July 15, 2012, pp. 1–2; Chris Arnold, “Chipotle Names 200th Restaurateur,” www.reuters.com, April 14, 2011, pp. 1–2; “Internal Promotion—How Chipotle Reduced Turnover by 64%,” Upstart HR (http://upstarthr.com), pp. 1–7. Accessed December 20, 2013.
2. Michael S. Christian, Adela S. Garza, and Jerel E. Slaughter, “Work Engagement: A Quantitative Review and Test of Its Relation with Task Performance,” Personnel Psychology, no. 1, 2011, p. 89.
3. Maria Tims, Arnbold B. Bakker, and Desponia Xanthopoulou, “Don Transformational Leaders Enhance Their Followers’ Daily Work Engagement?” The Leadership Quarterly, February 2011, pp. 121–131.
NOTES 341
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
4. Steve Crabtree, “Worldwide, 13% of Employees Are Engaged at Work,” Gallup.com (http:// www.gaullup.com), October 8, 2013, pp. 1–6.
5. Cited in Gary Kranz, “Employees Want Feedback, Even If It’s Negative,” Workforce Management, February 2010, p. 11.
6. Ed Frauenheim, “Commitment Issues,” Workforce Management, November 16, 2009, p. 20.
7. Susan Sorenson and Keri Garman, “How to Tackle U.S. Employees’ Stagnating Engagement,” Gallup Business Journal (http://businessjournal .gallup.com/), June 11, 2013, pp. 1–2.
8. Garry Kraus, “Employees Want Feedback— Even If It’s Negative,” Workforce Management, February 2010, pp. 10–11.
9. Cited in Laura Raines, “Re-engaging Workers Is a Big Hurdle for HR,” AJC (www.ajc.com /jobs), March 17, 2011, p. 2.
10. Survey cited in “Special Report: Employee Engagement,” Workforce Management, July 11, 2011, p. 26.
11. Susie Cranston and Scott Keller, “Increasing the ‘Meaning Quotient’ of Work,” McKinsey Quarterly (www.mckinseyquarterly.com), January 2013, pp. 4–5.
12. Martin Dewhurst, Matthew Guthridge, and Elizabeth Mohr, “Motivating People: Getting beyond Money,” McKinsey Quarterly (www .mckinseyquarterly), November 2009, pp. 1–2.
13. Tersa Amabile and Steven Kramer, The Progress Principle Using Small Wins to Ignite Joy, Engagement, and Creativity at Work (Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press, 2011).
14. Thad Green, Motivation Management: Fueling Performance by Discovering What People Believe about Themselves and Their Organizations (Palo Alto, Calif.: Davies-Black Publishing, 2000). An original version of expectancy theory applied to work motivation is Victor H. Vroom, Work and Motivation (New York: Wiley, 1964).
15. David A. Nadler and Edward E. Lawler III, “Motivation: A Diagnostic Approach,” in Richard Hackman, Edward E. Lawler III, and Lyman W. Porter (eds.) , Perspectives on Behavior in Organizations, Second Edition (New York: McGraw-Hill, 1983), pp. 67–78; James A. F. Stoner and R. Edward Freeman, Management, Fourth Edition (Upper Saddle River, N.J.: Prentice Hall, 1989), p. 448.
16. Amir Erez and Alice M. Isen, “The Influence of Positive Affect on the Components of Expectancy Motivation,” Journal of Applied Psychology, December 2002, pp. 1055–1067.
17. Miquel Helft, “Can Lenovo Do It?” Fortune, May 23, 2013. CNN Money (http://money.com), May 23, 2013, pp. 1–2.
18. Literature reviewed in Gerard H. Seitjts, Gary P. Latham, Kevin Tasa, and Bradon W. Latham, “Goal Setting and Goal Orientation: An Integration of ‘Two Different Yet Related Literatures,’” Academy of Management Journal, April 2004, pp. 227–228.
19. Edwin A. Locke and Gary P. Latham, A Theory of Goal Setting and Task Performance (Upper Saddle River, N.J.: Prentice Hall, 1990); Latham, Work Motivation: History, Theory, Research, and Practice (Thousand Oaks, Calif.: Sage Publications, 2007).
20. “Motivate Staff with Noble Cause,” Manager’s Edge, June 2005, p. 1.
21. John J. Donavan and David J. Radosevich, “The Moderating Role of Goal Commitment on the Goal Difficulty–Performance Relationship: A Meta-Analytic Review and Critical Reanalysis,” Journal of Applied Psychology, April 1998, pp. 308–315.
22. Don VandeWalle, Steven P. Brown, William L. Cron, and John W. Slocum Jr., “The Influence of Goal Orientation and Self-Regulation Tactics on Sales Performance: A Longitudinal Field Test,” Journal of Applied Psychology, April 1999, pp. 249–259.
23. Ad Kleingeld, Heleen van Mierlo, and Lidia Arends, “The Effect of Goal Setting on Group Performance: A Meta-Analysis,” Journal of Applied Psychology, November 2011, pp. 1289–1304.
24. Nicholas Bloom, Raffela Sadun, and John Van Reenen, “How Three Essential Practices Can Address Even the Most Complex Global Problems,” Harvard Business Review, November 2012, pp. 76–82.
25. Maurcie E. Schweitzer, Lisa Ordoñez, and Bambi Douma, “Goal Setting as a Moderator of Unethical Behavior,” The Academy of Management Journal, June 2004, p. 430.
26. “The Problem with Financial Incentives—And What to Do about It,” Knowledge @Wharton (http://knowledge.wharton.upenn.edu), March 30, 2011, pp. 1–4.
342 CHAPTER 10•MOTIVATION AND COACHING SKILLS
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
27. Cited in Adriana Gardella, “Owner Gets Lesson in Managing Sales Reps,” The New York Times, February 4, 2013, p. 1.
28. Lisa D. Ordóñez, Maurice E. Schweitzer, Adam D. Galinksy, and Max H. Bazerman, “Goals Gone Wild: The Systematic Side Effects of Overprescribing Goal Setting,” Academy of Management Perspective, February 2009, p. 14.
29. Tony Schwartz, “Powering Employees with More Than a Paycheck,” The New York Times Dealbook (http://dealbook.nytimes.com/), November 10, 2013, p. 2.
30. “Employees Want More Recognition, Growth Opportunity,” American Psychological Association (www.phwa.org/media), 2011.
31. Leslie Gross Klaff, “Getting Happy with the Rewards King,” Workforce, April 2003, p. 47.
32. Analysis presented in Tessa E. Basford and Andrea Molberg, “Dale Carnegie’s Leadership Principles: Examining the Theoretical and Empirical Support,” Journal of Leadership Studies, no. 4, 2013, p. 34.
33. Adrian Gostick and Chester Elton, The Carrot Principle: How the Best Managers Use Recognition to Engage Their People, Retain Talent, and Accelerate Performance (New York: The Free Press, 2007).
34. “Raise Workplace Morale without Spending a Dime,” Communication Briefings, April 2010, p. 5.
35. Andrew J. DuBrin, “Self-Perceived Technical Orientation and Attitudes toward Being Flattered,” Psychological Reports, vol. 96, 2005, pp. 852–854.
36. Cited in John A. Byrne, “How to Lead Now,” Fast Company, August 2003, p. 66.
37. Quoted in Sally Ward, “Coach Employees for Peak Performance,” Democrat and Chronicle, November 12, 2013, p. 7A.
38. Survey cited in Garry Kranz, “Companies Draw Coaching Plays but Managers’ Skills Could Be Technically Foul,” Workforce Management, August 2011, p. 6.
39. Douglas Riddle, “Prepping Tomorrow’s Leaders Today,” Leading Effectively (www.ccl .org), September 2006.
40. Robert D. Evered and James E. Selman, “Coaching and the Art of Management,” Organizational Dynamics, Autumn 1989, p. 15.
41. Ian Cunningham and Linda Honold, “Everyone Can Be a Coach,” HR Magazine, June 1998, pp. 63–66.
42. “8th Annual Survey: Executive Coaching at the Summit,” The Executive Coaching Survey 2013, © Sherpa Coaching, p. 27.
43. “Coaching—One Solution to a Tight Training Budget,” HRfocus, August 2002, p. 7.
44. Tina Smagala, “Giving Effective Feedback on the Fly,” Democrat and Chronicle, May 28, 2013, p. 5B.
45. Karen Wright, “A Chic Critique,” Psychology Today, March/April 2011, p. 59.
46. Quoted in Adam Bryant, “Want to Inspire? Don’t Sugarcoat Your Feedback,” New York Times (www.nytimes.com), September 10, 2011, p. 2.
47. “Fast Tips for Savvy Managers,” Executive Strategies, April 1998, p. 1.
48. Anna Marie Valerio and Robert J. Lee, Executive Coaching: A Guide for the HR Professional (San Francisco: Pfeiffer, 2005).
49. Douglas P. Shuit, “Huddling with the Coach,” Workforce Management, February 2005, pp. 53–57.
50. Erik De Haan, Colin Bertie, Andrew Say, and Charlotte Sills, “Clients’ Critical Moments of Coaching: Toward a ‘Client Model’ of Executive Coaching,” Academy of Management Learning & Education, December 2011, p. 612.
51. Diane Brady, “The Unknown Guru,” Bloomberg Business Week, November 29–December 5, 2010, p. 86.
52. “8th Annual Survey: Executive Coaching at the Summit,” The Executive Coaching Survey 2013, © Sherpa Coaching, p. 8.
53. Amy Joyce, “Career Coaches Nurture Executives,” Washington Post (syndicated story), August 16, 2004.
54. “Executive Coaching’s Effectiveness Questioned,” http://www.amanet.org/news /6929.aspx, December 7, 2011, p. 1
55. Stratford Sherman and Alyssa Freas, “The Wild West of Executive Coaching,” Harvard Business Review, November 2004, pp. 86–88; Brady, “The Unknown Guru,” Bloomberg Business Week, November 29, p. 84.
56. Michael Maccoby, “The Dangers of Dependence on Coaches,” Harvard Business Review, January 2009, p. 95.
NOTES 343
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
CH AP
TE R
11 Creativity, Innovation, and Leadership
LEARNING OBJECTIVES After studying this chapter and doing the exercises, you should be able to
• Identify the steps in the creative process.
• Identify characteristics of creative problem solvers.
• Be prepared to overcome traditional thinking in order to become more creative.
• Describe both organizational and individual approaches to enhance creative problem solving.
• Explain how the leader and the organization can establish a climate that fosters creativity.
• Identify several leadership practices that contribute to organizational innovation.
CHAPTER OUTLINE Steps in the Creative Process
Characteristics of Creative Leaders Knowledge Cognitive Abilities Personality Passion for the Task and the Experience of Flow
Overcoming Traditional Thinking as a Creativity Strategy
Organizational Methods to Enhance Creativity Systematically Collecting Fresh Ideas Brainstorming Using the Pet-Peeve Technique The Morality of Enhancing Creativity
Self-Help Techniques to Enhance Creative Problem Solving Practicing Creativity-Enhancing Activities Staying Alert to Opportunities Maintaining an Enthusiastic Attitude, Including Being
Happy
Maintaining and Using a Systematic Place for Recording Your Ideas
Playing the Roles of Explorer, Artist, Judge, and Lawyer
Engaging in Appropriate Physical Exercise Establishing a Climate and Culture for Creative Thinking Leadership Practices for Enhancing Creativity Methods of Managing Creative Workers
Additional Leadership Practices That Enhance Innovation
Summary
Key Terms
Guidelines for Action and Skill Development
Leadership Case Problem A
Leadership Case Problem B
Notes
344 Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s).
Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
I n 2014, some of high-fashion thinking behind Burberryfused with Apple in the presence of Angela Ahrendts,the former Burberry chief executive. She was hired to become the senior vice president of retail and online stores at Apple. A major reason for recruiting Ahrendts to this position is that she is creative in both fashion and digital marketing, and a strong leader of creative people. Also, executives at Apple wanted to create some new excitement at their retail stores.
At Burberry, Ahrendts was the executive behind a seven- year growth spurt at the British luxury goods maker. During her last five years in the position, Burberry’s revenue more than tripled, and the company is regarded by many as one of the leading British brands in the world, with a thriving corporate culture. Before joining Burberry, Ahrendts was executive vice president at Liz Claiborne Inc. Her other major fashion leadership role was as president of Donna Karan International.
To enhance product creativity at Burberry, Ahrendts cre- ated two executive teams. One consisted of the younger generation of workers who dreamt up ideas, whereas the older generation implemented these innovative ideas. Ahrendts was able to convince customers around the world
to pay a premium for such products as Burberry scarves and bags. She also facilitated the growth of Burberry’s website when other luxury brands de-emphasized e-commerce. Ahrendts’s other initiatives included placing iPads in stores to help customers make purchases, video streaming Burberry’s fashion shows live, and installing software to reduce costs and improve profitability. She aggressively drove technology into every facet of Burberry’s business.
One of Ahrendts’s key responsibilities at Apple is to maintain its allure as a luxury product and not a commodity sold at big discounts. Upon agreeing to join the company, she said that she was profoundly honored to join Apple in this newly created position, and that she looked forward to working with the global teams to further enrich the con- sumer experience on and offline. Ahrendts also said, “I have always admired the innovation and impact Apple pro- ducts and services have on people’s lives and hope in some small way I can help contribute to the company’s con- tinued success and leadership in changing the world.”
Born and raised in a small town in Indiana, Ahrendts grad- uated with a bachelor’s degree in merchandising and market- ing from Ball State University in Muncie, Indiana. Ball State granted her an Honorary Doctor of Humane Letters in 2010.1
The emphasis on fusing fashion and communication technology devices by a highly acclaimed executive fits closely some of the themes in this chapter. Leaders of creativity and innovation are creative themselves, and they make a special effort to engage in leadership and management practices that fos- ter creativity and innovation.
By thinking creatively, a person can form a new enterprise or enlarge an existing one that can keep many people engaged in productive activity. However, the creative idea has to be executed properly for innovation to take place. Although the terms creativity and innovation are often used interchangeably, innovation refers to the creation of new ideas and their implementation or commercialization. Quite often, the term innovation is used loosely in business to refer to almost any positive change rather than restricting the term to a breakthrough development.2 True innovation is regarded by some management thinkers as the only sustainable source of competitive advantage.3
Long-time leadership authority Warren Bennis regards creativity as an essential characteristic of leaders.4 The role of a creative leader is to bring into existence ideas and things that did not exist previously or that existed in a different form. Leaders are not bound by current solutions to problems. Instead, they create images of other possibilities. Leaders often move a firm
CHAPTER 11• CREATIVITY, INNOVATION, AND LEADERSHIP 345
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
into an additional business or start a new department that offers another service.
This chapter emphasizes the development of creativity in the leader. It also explains the nature of creativity and creative people and examines the leader’s role in establishing an atmosphere that helps group members become more creative, along with leadership practices conducive to innovation.
Steps in the Creative Process
An important part of becoming more creative involves understanding the stages involved in creativity, which is generally defined as the production of novel and useful ideas. A still well-accepted model of creativity developed almost ninety years ago can be applied to organizations. This model divides creative thinking into five stages,5 as shown in Figure 11-1. Step 1 is oppor- tunity or problem recognition: A person discovers that a new opportunity exists or a problem needs to be resolved. One day in 1994, a financial ana- lyst named Jeff Bezos was seated at his desk at the New York hedge fund, D. E. Shaw, when he noticed an astonishing statistic: The number of Internet users was growing by 2,300 percent per year. Bezos thought that there must be some good way to commercialize this development. Bezos was concerned that he or his company had not yet capitalized on the revo- lutionary development called the Internet. He detected an opportunity for some kind of business, but he did not yet know which one.6
Step 2 is immersion: The individual concentrates on the problem and becomes immersed in it. He or she will recall and collect information that seems relevant, dreaming up alternatives without refining or evaluating them. Bezos grabbed every fact he could about mail order businesses and thought about which ones could be conducted more efficiently over the Internet than by the traditional means, such as phoning in or writing for orders.
Step 1 Opportunity or problem recognition
Step 2 Immersion
Step 3 Incubation
Step 5 Verification and application
Step 4 Insight
© Ce ng ag e Le ar ni ng
FIGURE 11-1 Steps in the Creative Process.
Creative problem solvers often go through these steps below the level of conscious awareness. Yet being aware of these steps (such as immersing yourself in knowledge) when faced with a challenging problem will often increase the probability of finding a creative solution.
346 CHAPTER 11• CREATIVITY, INNOVATION, AND LEADERSHIP
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
Step 3 is incubation: The person keeps the assembled information in mind for a while. He or she does not appear to be working on the problem actively, but the subconscious mind is still engaged. While the information is simmering, it is being arranged into meaningful new patterns. Bezos kept thinking about using the Internet for a mail order business while perform- ing his regular work.
Step 4 is insight: The problem-conquering solution flashes into the per- son’s mind at an unexpected time, such as on the verge of sleep, during a shower, or while running. Insight is also called the Aha! experience: All of a sudden, something clicks. At some point it clicked in Bezos’s mind that books were the commodity for which no comprehensive mail order catalog existed because a catalogue of this nature would be much too large to mail profitably. A catalogue of this type would be ideally suited to the Internet because a vast database could be shared with an almost unlimited number of users. The aha! experience usually arrives after hours of thought and study, as indicated by Step 2, immersion.
Step 5 is verification and application: The individual sets out to prove that the creative solution has merit. Verification procedures include gathering sup- porting evidence, using logical persuasion, and experimenting with new ideas. Application requires tenacity because most novel ideas are first rejected as being impractical. The day after his insight experience, Bezos flew to Los Angeles to the American Booksellers’ Convention to learn all he could about the book business. One key fact he found was that the major book wholesalers had already assembled electronic lists of their inventory. Bezos reasoned that the potential new venture only needed one Internet location where the book- buying public could search through the stock and place orders directly.
Because his employer wasn’t interested in jumping into the Internet bookselling business, Bezos decided to go into business for himself, found- ing Amazon.com. He and his wife then drove to Seattle, Washington, to set up the new business, drawing up the business plan as they rolled down the highway in a 1988 Chevy Blazer.
Bezos’ opportunity-spotting has evolved into a major business corporation that now sells all kinds of merchandise in addition to books and music, as well as information technology services such as cloud computing. Today, Amazon.com is the largest online retailer in the world. The end product of Bezos’ creative thinking was a business possibility rather than an invention. Nevertheless, businesspeople typically follow the same five steps of creative thought as do inventors. Even though creativity usually follows the same steps, it is not a mechanical process that can be turned on and off. Much of creativity is intricately woven into a person’s intellect and personality.
Characteristics of Creative Leaders
Creative leaders, like creative workers of all types, are different in many ways from their less creative counterparts. They are devoted to their fields and enjoy intellectual stimulation, and they challenge the status quo, which
CHARACTERISTICS OF CREATIVE LEADERS 347
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
leads them to seek improvements. Above all, creative people are mentally flexible and can see past the traditional ways of looking at problems.
As described next, the specific characteristics of creative people, including creative leaders, can be grouped into four areas: knowledge, cognitive abilities, personality, and passion for the task and the experience of flow.7 These char- acteristics are highlighted in Figure 11-2. In addition, we present a formula about human behavior that helps explain how these characteristics lead to creative output. Before studying this information, compare your thinking to that of a creative person by doing Leadership Self-Assessment Quiz 11-1.
Knowledge Creative problem solving requires a broad background of information, includ- ing facts and observations. Knowledge provides the building blocks for gener- ating and combining ideas. Most creative leaders are knowledgeable, and their knowledge contributes to their charisma. A well-known case in point is Steven P. Jobs, the late chief executive of Apple Inc. He contributed design and mar- keting decisions to most of Apple’s key products, and he played a major role in the development of the popular iPhone and iPad. A contributor to Jobs’ cre- ativity is his in-depth technical knowledge of computer hardware and software. Jobs said at the peak of his career something to the effect that creativity is the result of having enough dots to connect. (The dots are bits of knowledge.)
An example of connecting dots is the cross-breeding of the tablet compu- ters and smartphones with the dashboard on automobiles and trucks. Modern vehicles have so many computerized features on the dashboard that Alan R. Mulally, the CEO of Ford Motor Company, said that the company’s vehicles have become computer apps.
Knowledge Knowledgeable about wide range of information
Cognitive AbilitiesPersonality
Passion for the Task and Flow
Nonconformist
Self-confident
Thrill-seeking
Energetic
Persistent
Highly intelligent
Intellectually curious
Able to think divergently
© Ce ng ag e Le ar ni ng
FIGURE 11-2 Characteristics of Creative Leaders.
Having the right characteristics improves the chances of a person being a creative problem solver and a creative leader.
348 CHAPTER 11• CREATIVITY, INNOVATION, AND LEADERSHIP
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
LEADERSHIP SELF-ASSESSMENT QUIZ 11-1
The Creative Personality Test
Instructions: Describe each of the following statements as “mostly true” or “mostly false.”
MOSTLY TRUE
MOSTLY FALSE
1. It is generally a waste of time to read magazine articles, Internet articles, and books outside my immediate field of interest.
□ □
2. I frequently have the urge to suggest ways of improving products and services I use. □ □
3. Taking an elective course outside of my major is (or was, or would be) a time waster. □ □
4. I am a person of very strong convictions. What is right is right; what is wrong is wrong. □ □
5. I enjoy it when my boss hands me vague instructions. □ □
6. Making order out of chaos is actually fun. □ □
7. Only under extraordinary circumstances would I deviate from my To Do list (or other ways in which I plan my day).
□ □
8. I often use search engines other than Google just to explore something different. □ □
9. Rules and regulations should not be taken too seriously. Most rules can be broken under unusual circumstances.
□ □
10. Playing with a new idea is fun even if it does not benefit me in the end. □ □
11. Some of my best ideas have come from building on the ideas of others. □ □
12. In writing, I try to avoid the use of unusual words and word combinations. □ □
13. I frequently jot down improvements in the job I would like to make in the future. □ □
14. I prefer to stay with technology devices I know well rather than frequently updating my equipment or software.
□ □
15. I prefer writing personal notes or poems to loved ones rather than relying on greeting cards. □ □
16. At one time or another in my life, I have enjoyed doing puzzles. □ □
17. If your thinking is clear, you will find the one best solution to a problem. □ □
18. It is best to interact with coworkers who think much like you. □ □
19. I would readily accept an assignment to a new product development committee. □ □
20. Tight controls over people and money are necessary to run a successful organization. □ □
Scoring and Interpretation: Give yourself a score of 1 for each answer that matches the answer key:
1. Mostly false 8. Mostly true 15. Mostly true 2. Mostly true 9. Mostly true 16. Mostly true 3. Mostly false 10. Mostly true 17. Mostly false 4. Mostly false 11. Mostly true 18. Mostly false 5. Mostly true 12. Mostly false 19. Mostly true 6. Mostly true 13. Mostly true 20. Mostly false 7. Mostly false 14. Mostly false
Total score: ______________
CHARACTERISTICS OF CREATIVE LEADERS 349
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
Cognitive Abilities Cognitive abilities comprise such abilities as general intelligence and abstract reasoning. Creative problem solvers, particularly in business, are often bright but are not at the absolute top end of the brilliance scale. A subtle exception here is that when the creativity centers on highly technical matters, the creative business person is often brilliant. Two examples pre- sented so far in this chapter are Angela Ahrendts and Jeff Bezos. Jack Dorsey of Twitter and Square, presented later, is also brilliant.
Even if extraordinarily high intelligence is not required to be creative, creative people are facile at generating creative solutions to problems in a short period of time. Creative people also maintain a youthful curiosity throughout their lives, and the curiosity is not centered just on their own field of expertise. Instead, their range of interests encompasses many areas of knowledge, and they are enthusiastic about puzzling problems. These mental workouts help sharpen a person’s intelligence.
Creative people show an identifiable intellectual style: being able to think divergently. They are able to expand the number of alternatives to a prob- lem, thus moving away from a single solution. Yet, the creative thinker also knows when it is time to narrow the number of useful solutions. For exam- ple, the divergent thinker might think of twenty-seven ways to reduce costs, but at some point he or she will have to move toward choosing the best of several cost-cutting approaches.
A hallmark of a creative businessperson’s intellect is to spot opportunities that others might overlook. A case in point is Hamdi Ulukaya, a Turkish immigrant who launched Chobani brand yogurt in 2007. At the time, the Greek market share of yogurt in the United States was less than 1 percent. Today the share is over 60 percent. Ulukaya says that the growth of his enterprise began when he spotted an abandoned and dilapidated yogurt plant Kraft Foods was looking to sell. With only $3,000 left in his pocket, Ulukaya needed an opportunity to make a living.8
The popular belief that creative people are right-brain dominant, whereas left-brain dominant people are more logical, detail-oriented, and analytical has been challenged by brain specialists. Recent neuroscience research sug- gests that developing original ideas is a process, and not something that stems from one side of the brain. Antonio Damasio, director of the Brain
QUIZ 11-1 (continued) Extremely high or low scores are the most meaningful. A score of 15 or more suggests that your personality
and attitudes are similar to those of creative people, including creative leaders. A score of 8 or less suggests that you are more of an intellectual conformist at present. Do not be discouraged. Most people can develop in the direction of becoming more creative.
How does your score compare to your self-evaluation of your creativity? We suggest you also obtain feedback on your creativity from somebody familiar with your thinking and your work.
350 CHAPTER 11• CREATIVITY, INNOVATION, AND LEADERSHIP
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
and Creativity Institute at the University of Southern California, explains that there is a high level of cooperation between different parts and different sys- tems within the brain. As a result, creative problem solving is orchestrated by different parts of the brain working together. The imagination that is an integral part of creativity stems from memory because memory is necessary to recognize when something is original—a key component of creativity.9
Personality Personality factors or the noncognitive aspects of an individual heavily influence creative problem solving. Creative people tend to have a positive self-image without being blindly self-confident. But because they are reason- ably self-confident, they are able to cope with criticism of their ideas, and they can tolerate the isolation necessary for developing ideas. Part of the self-confidence of a creative worker focuses on the belief that he or she can solve problems creatively. Talking to others is a good way to get ideas, yet at some point the creative problem solver has to work alone and concentrate.
Self-confidence is an influential factor for enhancing the creativity neces- sary for successful entrepreneurship. A report on entrepreneurial success notes that “You have to be crazy-sure your product or service is something the world needs and that you can deliver it to overcome the naysayers, who will always deride what the majority has yet to validate.”10
Creative people are frequently nonconformists and do not need strong approval from the group. They prefer to search for alternatives than worry about attaining consensus. Josh Linkner, the founder and chairman of ePrize LLC, an interactive promotions company, said that groupthink (striv- ing for consensus at any cost) discourages innovation.11
Many creative problem solvers are thrill seekers and risk takers who find that developing imaginative solutions to problems is a source of thrills. Larry Page, a big risk taker himself, has said that the biggest payoffs at Google have stemmed from risky ideas and investments.12 Creative people are also persistent, which is especially important for the verification and application stage of creative thinking. Selling a creative idea to the right people requires considerable follow-up. Finally, creative people enjoy deal- ing with ambiguity and chaos. Less creative people become quickly frus- trated when task descriptions are unclear and disorder exists.
Passion for the Task and the Experience of Flow A dominant characteristic of creative people that is closely related to per- sonality is a passion for the work. More than twenty years of research in industry conducted by Teresa M. Amabile and her associates led to the intrinsic motivation principle of creativity: People will be at their creative best when they feel motivated primarily by the interest, satisfaction, and challenge of the work itself—and not by external pressures.13
Passion for the task and high intrinsic motivation contribute in turn to a total absorption in the work and intense concentration, or the experience of flow. It is an experience so engrossing and enjoyable that the task
CHARACTERISTICS OF CREATIVE LEADERS 351
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
becomes worth doing for its own sake regardless of the external conse- quences.14 Perhaps you have had this experience when completely absorbed in a hobby or some analytical work, or when you were at your best in a sport or dance. (Flow also means being in the zone.) The highly creative leader, such as a business owner developing a plan for worldwide distribu- tion of a product, will often achieve the experience of flow.
To fully understand the contribution of personal characteristics to crea- tivity, we note the basic formula of human behavior: B ¼ f(P " E) (behavior is a function of a person interacting with the environment). In this context, certain personal characteristics may facilitate a leader’s being creative, but the right environment is necessary to trigger creative behavior. As will be described later, the right environment includes the leader encouraging crea- tive thinking.
Overcoming Traditional Thinking as a Creativity Strategy
A unifying theme runs through all forms of creativity training and sugges- tions for creativity improvement: Creative problem solving requires an abil- ity to overcome traditional thinking. The concept of traditional thinking is relative, but it generally refers to a standard and frequent way of finding a solution to a problem. A traditional solution to a problem is thus a modal or most frequent solution. For example, traditional thinking suggests that to increase revenue, a retail store should conduct a sale. Creative thinking would point toward other solutions. As an example, a retail store might increase sales by shipping goods for a small fee, or by having store associ- ates offer free fashion advice.
The creative person looks at problems in a new light and transcends con- ventional thinking about them. A historically significant example is Henry Ford, who was known for his creative problem-solving ability. A meatpack- ing executive invited Ford to visit his Chicago plant and observe how employees processed beef. The automotive executive noticed that at one end of the plant whole carcasses of steers were placed on a giant conveyor belt. As the meat traveled through the plant, workers carved it into various cuts until the carcass was consumed. A flash of whimsical insight hit Ford: What if the process were reversed, and all the pieces would become a whole steer again? Ford asked himself, “Why can’t an automobile be built that way?” He took his creative idea back to the Ford Motor Company in Detroit and constructed the world’s first manufacturing assembly line.15
The central task in becoming creative is to break down rigid thinking that blocks new ideas. At the same time, the problem solver must unlearn the conventional approach. Henry Ford unlearned the custom approach to building autos, so he could use an assembly line. (In the current era, people who have unlearned the assembly-line approach and switched to customiza- tion are considered to be creative!)
Overcoming traditional thinking is so important to creative thinking that the process has been characterized in several different ways. The most
352 CHAPTER 11• CREATIVITY, INNOVATION, AND LEADERSHIP
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
familiar is that a creative person thinks outside the box. A box, in this sense, is a category that confines and restricts thinking. Because you are confined to a box, you do not see opportunities outside the box. For example, if an insurance executive thinks that health insurance is only for humans, he or she might miss out on the growing market for domestic animal health insurance.
A caution about thinking outside the box: Workers still need some con- straints as to how far outside the box they are permitted to think. Creativity writer Shawn Coyne contends that when people are told to think outside the box with no constraints they quickly become overwhelmed by the unlimited scope of the task. Effective project leaders establish parameters and prepare their teams for idea generation by pointing them in a specific direction. Coyne also explains that the best ideas come from “thinking inside a very carefully designed box that’s not too big or too small.”16 An example might be telling team members that they need to find ways of sav- ing the company energy costs but that no suggestions will be used that are too expensive or result in widespread employee complaints.
Marketing professors Drew Boyd and Jacob Goldenberg have developed the merits of thinking creatively by working within constraints into a system of creativity. The key principle of the system is that innovation is mostly likely to occur when you create a new form for something familiar, and then find a function it can perform. The psychological finding behind the principle is that most people are more adept at starting with a solution rather than with a problem. An example is as follows:
Visualize you are handed a baby bottle and told that it changes color as the tem- perature of the milk or baby formula changes. The bottle would be useful because it would help to ensure that you do not burn the baby’s mouth and tongue with milk that is too hot. Now imagine that you were asked the question in reverse: “How can we guard against not burning a baby’s mouth with milk that is too hot? It would be exceedingly difficult to answer that question.17
We might conclude from these concerns about thinking outside the box that imagination is still required to think outside the box within the con- straints of a required framework. The accompanying box contains business examples of thinking outside the box.
Organizational Methods to Enhance Creativity
To enhance creative problem solving, most organizations regularly engage in systematic approaches to develop creative and innovative ideas. We focus here on new developments in brainstorming and other creativity-enhancing methods. Programs of this nature are applied to actual problems, while at the same time they provide an opportunity to improve creative thinking.
The leader has a dual role in implementing creative problem-solving tech- niques: He or she facilitates group interaction and also provides a fair share
ORGANIZATIONAL METHODS TO ENHANCE CREATIVITY 353
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
of creative output. The three creativity-enhancing, problem-solving techni- ques described here are (1) systematically collecting fresh ideas, including the use of whiteboards and granting time to explore ideas; (2) brainstorming; and (3) the pet-peeve technique. A notable point about creativity-enhancing methods is that no one method is likely to be consistently better than any other method. The underlying mechanism is that each creativity-enhancing method helps bring new ideas to the surface.
Systematically Collecting Fresh Ideas Creativity is often referred to as a numbers game, because the more ideas you try, the greater the probability of finding one that works. Several approaches to systematically collecting fresh ideas are listed next.
1. Straightforward collection of ideas. A basic way of collecting fresh ideas is for employees to furnish them to a company database so that when some- body needs a fresh idea it can be accessed through a company search
LEADER IN ACTION
Modern Business Examples of Thinking Outside the Box
• Conventional wisdom held that intercity bus service requires terminals usually including restrooms, food vending machines, and perhaps a lunch counter. Then, in mid-2000 in the United States and Canada (and earlier in England) along came Megabus, the discount intercity bus services that picks up and drops off passengers at designated curbside loca- tions. The company saves money by not having bus stations, although there are some “warming buses” for passengers who wait in the extreme cold or heat. At first, the bus service linked eight Midwestern cities to a Chicago hub for as little as $1 a ticket (at least one ticket per bus). Most tickets are sold online, and the passenger base is concentrated on people youn- ger than 36. Today, approximately 7 million people are Megabus customers across about 100 cities in the United States and Canada. (The idea for Megabus appears to have been borrowed from bus service in Chinatown, located in the Manhattan borough of New York City).
• Conventional wisdom says that you do not permit competitors to sell products and services in your own store or on your own website. Amazon.com, however, has had a program in place for years that enables the
consumer to shop at other online stores through its own website. Amazon.com collects a small commis- sion, and customer experience has been improved, thereby increasing sales at Amazon.
• Conventional wisdom says that there is not much a pharmacy can do about customers who neglect to refill their prescription, thereby often suffering health consequences, as well as the pharmacy forgoing revenue. Leadership at CVS/Caremark thought that a proactive approach was needed. A system has been installed to deal with the problem. If a patient on a pharmacy benefit management program has stopped taking his or her drugs, a CVS pharmacist may tele- phone to remind the patient to order refills. The pro- gram is also thought to be a creative way of reducing the number of patients who become so ill that they require hospitalization.
Sources: Ben Austen, “The Mega Bus: Why Are So Many People Climbing Aboard Curbside Buses?” Bloomberg Businesssweek, April 11–17, 2011, pp. 62–67; Phil Rosenthal, “Discount Buses Enjoying the Ride,” Chicago Tribune Business, October 28, 2012, pp. 1–2; Heather Green, “How Amazon Aims to Keep You Clicking.” BusinessWeek, March 2, 2009, pp. 34–40; Matthew Boyle, “CVS: Dispensing Drugs— and Health Reform,” BusinessWeek, February 23, 2009, pp. 42–43.
354 CHAPTER 11• CREATIVITY, INNOVATION, AND LEADERSHIP
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
engine. Posting ideas on an intranet is similar to the database. Another straightforward approach to collecting ideas is for company leadership to engage more of its own staff in the search for innovation. A representative example is Reckitt Benckiser PLC, a British maker of household cleaning and personal hygiene products. The company has alerted many of its staff members in purchasing, marketing, and customer relations to be on the lookout for relevant, new market trends. A small in-house team attempts to authenticate reported trends and build on them. The team reports its find- ings to senior managers who decide which products are worth pursuing. Forty percent of revenue in one year resulted from innovations launched in the previous three years.18
2. Establishing idea quotas. To facilitate having fresh ideas, the leader or manager can establish idea quotas, such as by asking staff members to bring one new idea to each meeting. Although the vast majority of these ideas may not lead to innovation, a few good ones will emerge. One reason idea quotas work is that they are a goal. Another is that an environmental need (in this case, the idea quota) is an excellent creativity stimulant.
3. Making whiteboards regularly available for sketching ideas. The com- bination of a whiteboard and felt-tip pen has proven to be an effective method of sparking creative ideas. A wide range of companies encourage employees to doodle their ideas and draw diagrams to explain complicated concepts to colleagues in fields such as information technology, retailing, and real estate. Other doodling mechanisms include chalkboards and writ- able glass on a variety of surfaces.
Advocates of doodling say it can facilitate idea generation, boost collabo- ration, and simplify communication. Everett Katigbak, a communication designer at Facebook, emphasizes that even with electronic gadgets such as smartphones and tablet computers the hand is the most effective way of recording an idea. A representative example is that at Turner Broadcasting System, the strategy development team sketched tree branches and placed sticky notes on the end of the branches to think of ways to extend the Turner Classic Movie Brand. The exercise yielded more than 200 ideas, some of which proceeded to the development stage.19
4. Granting tinkering time. A formal policy approach for collecting fresh ideas is to allocate an amount or percentage of time for employees to think and experiment. Several innovative companies, including 3M, W. L. Gore & Associates, and Google, attribute some of their most successful new pro- ducts to employees who were granted thinking time. The Google policy per- mitted its employees to spend one-fifth of their time on whatever innovative products they wished. Company leadership claimed that many of its signifi- cant advances can be traced to granting tinkering time to employees.20
In recent years, Google and 3M have both restricted employee use of time off from regular responsibilities to explore innovative ideas, perhaps because the policy was regarded as an expensive employee perk. Neverthe- less, “time to tinker” worked in the past and still remains another method
ORGANIZATIONAL METHODS TO ENHANCE CREATIVITY 355
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
of systematically collecting creative and innovative ideas. Apple and LinkedIn have both introduced such programs in recent years, with the for- mer being labeled Blue Sky, and the latter InCubator.21
Brainstorming The best-known method for creativity improvement is brainstorming, which you have probably already done. Although brainstorming is often con- demned as being superficial, it remains a key idea-generation method for even the most advanced technology companies. Furthermore, brainstorming is as much entrenched into business life as are job interviews and problem- solving meetings. A notable example of brainstorming is the firm Intellec- tual Ventures, whose primary mission is to develop inventions, cofounded by Nathan P. Myhrvold, the former chief technology officer at Microsoft. Myhrvold assembles groups of doctors, engineers, and scientists known for their brilliance, along with in-house inventors and lawyers, for day-long brainstorming sessions. The Intellectual Ventures staff takes ideas from the brainstorming sessions and turns them into patents. Inventors get a share of any eventual royalties. Through a combination of its own brainstorming and $5 billion in investment funds, the company has collected nearly 70,000 “intellectual assets.”22
The Intellectual Ventures application of brainstorming emphasizes goals as an essential part of the process. The Ventures team focuses on the goal of attaining ideas worthy of a patent. According to the theorizing of Robert C. Litchfield, the various rules of brainstorming can be regarded as goals, including (a) generate quantity, (b) avoid criticism, (c) combine and improve on previous ideas, and (d) encourage free-wheeling.23 A key aspect of brain- storming is that all ideas can be stepping stones and triggers for new and more useful ideas. Any idea might lead to other associations and connections. Thus, during the idea-generating part of brainstorming, potential solutions are not criticized or evaluated in any way, so that spontaneity is encouraged.
Brainstorming, much like other creative problem-solving techniques, works best in an organizational culture that fosters innovation. It is an inte- gral part of the famous design firm IDEO, Inc., whose employees believe passionately in innovation. As a result, they are able to argue about alterna- tive solutions to problems yet still unite to produce an effective design.24
As a refresher, do Leadership Skill-Building Exercise 11-1. Because the vast majority of employers use brainstorming, it is helpful to have some advanced knowledge of the topic other than that it is simply shouting out ideas.
Using the Pet-Peeve Technique An important part of leadership is for organizational units to find ways to continuously improve their service to external and internal customers. The pet-peeve technique is a method of brainstorming in which a group identi- fies all the possible complaints others might have about the group’s organi- zational unit.25 Through brainstorming, group members develop a list of
356 CHAPTER 11• CREATIVITY, INNOVATION, AND LEADERSHIP
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
complaints from any people who interact with their group. Sources of com- plaints include inside customers, outside customers, competitors, and sup- pliers. Although the pet-peeve technique is not well known, it is potentially valuable.
Group members can prepare for the meeting by soliciting feedback on themselves from the various target groups. In keeping with the informal, breezy style of the pet-peeve group, feedback should be gathered informally. Rather than approach target groups with a survey, members might tell others about the upcoming pet-peeve session and then ask in person or electronically, “What complaints can you contribute?”
During the no-holds-barred brainstorming session, group members throw in some imaginary and some humorous complaints. Humorous complaints
LEADERSHIP SKILL-BUILDING EXERCISE 11-1
Presented below are two different scenarios for brain- storming. Choose one or both to work on practical busi- ness problems.
A. Choose an Effective Domain Name Organize into groups to play Choose an Effective Domain Name. Your task is to develop original domain names for several products or services. An effective domain name is typically one that is easy to remember and will capture potential customers in an uncomplicated Internet search. One reason this exercise is difficult is that “cybersquatters” grab unclaimed names they think busi- ness owners might want, and then sell these names later. For example, a cybersquatter (or domain name exploiter) might develop or buy the domain name www .catfood.com, hoping that an online retailer of cat food will want this name in the future. The owner of catfood.com would charge a company like PetSmart every time a surfer looking to purchase cat food over the Internet entered www.catfood.com and was then linked to PetSmart.
After your team has brainstormed a few possible domain names, search the Internet to see if your domain name is already in use. Simply enter the name you have chosen plus “.com” into your browser. After you have developed your list of domain names not already in use, the team leader will present your findings to the rest of the class.
• Tattoo and body-piercing studios
• Replacement parts for antique or classic autos
• A chain of reading and math-learning centers for children
• Alzheimer’s disease treatment centers
• Personal loans for people with poor (subprime) credit ratings
• Recycled steel for manufacturers
B. The Next Billion Dollar Brand Students organize into small new venture groups for your employer, Coca-Cola, PepsiCo, or Dr. Pepper Snapple Group. Although the company is a major player in its field, the CEO tasks you with the responsibility of identi- fying the next billion dollar brand, meaning that the brand will bring in gross revenues of about $1 billion annually. Although the CEO is giving you considerable latitude to think creatively and innovatively, the major constraint is that you are a food and beverage company. The CEO tells you that carbonated beverages have lost some of their fizz in recent years, so he or she thinks that your mission is high priority. You have twenty minutes to conduct your problem-solving/brainstorming session to think of what might be the next billion dollar brand. At the end of that short time period, present your best suggestion to the CEO.
ORGANIZATIONAL METHODS TO ENHANCE CREATIVITY 357
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
are especially important, for humor requires creative thinking. After all complaints have been aired, the group can process the information during a later session, when they can draw up action plans to remedy the most serious problems.
A pet-peeve session in the human resources department of a manufac- turer of small electronic appliances generated many complaints, including the following:
“A lot of people wonder what we are doing. They think we just fill out forms and create work for ourselves.” “Some line managers think our job is to find good reasons why they shouldn’t hire their best job candidates.” “Job candidates from the outside think our job is to shred resumes. They think we throw away or delete 90 percent of the resumes that arrive at the company.”
As a result of these penetrating, albeit exaggerated, self-criticisms, the human resources department developed an effective action plan. The department leader arranged brief meetings with units throughout the orga- nization to discuss the department’s role and to answer questions.
The pet-peeve technique is potentially valuable for a leader because it can help the group improve its work processes. Because it has a good-spirited touch, it is not likely to be perceived as threatening.
The Morality of Enhancing Creativity Methods that help generate creative ideas, as well as the leadership and managerial actions to enhance creativity described at various places in this chapter, have ethical and moral consequences. Creativity writer Gerald Sindell emphasizes the need for creative thinkers to place their work within a moral context. He notes that creative work and output never exist in a vacuum. In contrast, every idea and product has potential harmful conse- quences in minor and major ways.26
A relevant example is the smartphone that enables millions of people to communicate readily for business and personal purposes. Yet, the unin- tended dysfunctional consequences have been enormous. Driving under the influence of smartphones, including texting and Internet surfing, is as dan- gerous as driving under the influence of alcohol. Also, productivity suffers enormously as workers become distracted by the ready availability of their smartphone for nonwork purposes. A few technology companies are push- ing for the virtual elimination of cash for commerce. Yet, many workers such as servers and hair stylists prefer to receive tips in cash. And business owners prefer cash payments to paying credit card or debit card fees, and many of their customers want to avoid the potential identity theft associated with using credit cards and debit cards. Another ethical issue is that some scientists are concerned that excessive use of smartphones can create brain cancer.
358 CHAPTER 11• CREATIVITY, INNOVATION, AND LEADERSHIP
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
Hundreds of other products and services also have ethical implications. For example, brilliantly developed financial products, such as derivatives, have also created harm for many consumers. Sindell recommends that crea- tive workers should imagine all the possible misuses of an innovative prod- uct or service, and then take steps to limit the damage from the misuses.27
Warning labels and informative advertising are at least a step in the right direction.
Self-Help Techniques to Enhance Creative Problem Solving
Leaders and others who want to solve problems more creatively can find hundreds of methods at their disposal, all of them aiming to increase men- tal flexibility. Six strategies and specific techniques for enhancing creative problem solving are presented next and are outlined in Table 11-1. These strategies and techniques support and supplement the organizational pro- grams described previously. An underlying contribution of these techniques is that they facilitate flexible thinking, or viewing the world with open and curious eyes.28 With such a mental stance, almost anything can spark a new idea. As a warehouse manager, you might observe young people roller- blading in the park. With a creative attitude, you might conclude that your logistic specialists would be more efficient if they used Rollerblades rather than walked.
Practicing Creativity-Enhancing Activities An established way to sharpen creative thinking is to regularly engage in activities that encourage flexible thinking. If you enjoy photography, put yourself on assignment to take a photograph illustrating a theme. You might, for example, take photographs illustrating the proper use of your company’s product. Puzzles of all types are useful in stretching your imagi- nation; many creative people regularly do crossword puzzles. Another mind stretcher is to force yourself to write jokes around a given theme. Can you create a joke about the creativity of a leader?
Another standard technique for become a more flexible thinker is to ask yourself “what-if” questions. Such questions stretch your imagination to
TABLE 11-1 Self-Help Techniques for Creativity Improvement
1. Practicing creativity-enhancing activities
2. Staying alert to opportunities
3. Maintaining an enthusiastic attitude, including being happy
4. Maintaining and using a systematic place for recording your ideas
5. Playing the roles of explorer, artist, judge, and lawyer
6. Engaging in appropriate physical exercise
© Ce ng ag e Le ar ni ng
SELF-HELP TECHNIQUES TO ENHANCE CREATIVE PROBLEM SOLVING 359
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
think of possibilities not previously given much or any thought. Two exam- ples: “What would be the consequences if next year vehicle manufacturers switched the location of the break and accelerator pedals?” “What would hap- pen if all consumers in the world refused to buy anything for three days?”
Learning a second language, including sign language, can facilitate crea- tivity because you are forced to shift mental sets. For example, your second language may require you to remember the gender of every noun and to match the spelling of each adjective to the gender and number (singular ver- sus plural) of the noun.
Leadership Skill-Building Exercise 11-2 gives you an opportunity to prac- tice creative thinking. Doing exercises of this nature enhances creative prob- lem solving.
Staying Alert to Opportunities A key characteristic of creative leaders is that they can spot opportunities that other people overlook (as already mentioned twice in this chapter). Opportunity seeking is associated with entrepreneurial leadership because the entrepreneur might build an organization around an unmet consumer need. Tom Kelly, CEO of IDEO, provides a humorous example of opportu- nity spotting in the extreme. He was waiting for a subway train in a jammed Japanese station. Thousands of people streamed by, yet Kelly and a col- league were intrigued by one person—a young woman wearing mismatched shoes. The observers debated the reason for the mismatch, such as dressing in the dark, wearing borrowed clothes, or maybe an intentional decision. The last insight led to a company that prospers by selling mismatched socks.29 Apparently, the unmet consumer need is to wear socks in a playful way. Does this example of opportunity spotting blow your socks off?
LEADERSHIP SKILL-BUILDING EXERCISE 11-2
The Multiple Uses Technique
A standard technique for developing creativity is to find multiple uses for ordinary objects. In other words, the person doing the exercise is requested to go beyond con- ventional thinking in visualizing potential uses for a stan- dard object. The point of the exercise is to develop skill in thinking flexibly. A basic example is that a soup bowl might also be used as a flower pot or paper weight. Working alone or using group brainstorming, identify about six potential uses for the following objects:
1. A paperclip* 2. A plastic tennis ball container
3. A shopping cart 4. An e-mail address 5. A pickup truck that no longer runs 6. A five-pound reference book
It will be instructive to share solutions with other classmates; for one thing, it helps to determine if your alternative use was not mentioned, or rarely mentioned, by others. Infrequent mention suggests a higher degree of imagination, although not necessarily practicality.
*Finding multiple uses for a paperclip might have been the first cre- ativity development exercise in history.
360 CHAPTER 11• CREATIVITY, INNOVATION, AND LEADERSHIP
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
Maintaining an Enthusiastic Attitude, Including Being Happy The managerial leader faces a major hurdle in becoming a creative problem solver. He or she must resolve the conflict between being judicial and being imaginative. In many work situations, being judicial (or judgmental) is nec- essary. Situations calling for judicial thinking include reviewing proposed expenditures and inspecting products for quality or safety defects. Being judicial is much like a self-imposed restraint on creativity. Imaginative thinking is involved when searching for creative alternatives. Alex F. Osburn, a former advertising executive and the originator of brainstorming, notes how judgment and imagination are often in conflict:
The fact that moods won’t mix largely explains why the judicial and the creative tend to clash. The right mood for judicial thinking is largely negative. “What’s wrong with this? ... No, this won’t work.” Such reflexes are right and proper when trying to judge.
In contrast, our creative thinking calls for a positive attitude. We have to be hopeful. We need enthusiasm. We have to encourage ourselves to the point of self-confidence. We have to beware of perfectionism lest it be abor- tive.30 The action step is therefore to project oneself into a positive frame of mind when attempting to be creative. The same principle applies when attempting to be creative about a judicial task. For instance, a leader might be faced with the task of looking for creative ways to cut costs. The man- ager would then have to think positively about thinking negatively!
Closely related to enthusiasm as a contributor to creativity is that being in a good mood facilitates creativity. The finding comes from an analysis of diaries or journals. The journal entries showed that people are happiest when they come up with a creative idea. However, they are more likely to have a breakthrough idea if they were happy the day before. One day’s hap- piness is often a predictor of the next day’s creative idea.31
Maintaining and Using a Systematic Place for Recording Your Ideas It is difficult to capitalize on creative ideas unless you keep a careful record of them. A creative idea trusted to memory may be forgotten in the press of everyday business. An important suggestion kept on your daily planner may become obscured. Creative ideas can lead to breakthroughs for your group and your career, so they deserve the dignity of a separate notebook, or com- puter file, or any other storage device that works for you. Many people today store their creative ideas on a mobile device. A cautious or forgetful person is advised to keep two copies of the ideas in separate places or storage devices.
Playing the Roles of Explorer, Artist, Judge, and Lawyer Another creativity-improvement method incorporates many of the preceding methods. Say you want to enhance your creativity on the job. This method calls for you to adopt four roles in your thinking.32 First, be an explorer.
SELF-HELP TECHNIQUES TO ENHANCE CREATIVE PROBLEM SOLVING 361
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
Speak to people in different fields and get ideas that can bring about inno- vations for your group. For example, if you manage a telecommunications group, speak to salespeople and manufacturing specialists.
Second, be an artist by stretching your imagination. Strive to spend about 3 percent of your day imagining new solutions to the challenges you face. For example, the leader of a manufacturing department might ask, “Where else can we look to find people who want to become manufacturing technicians?” Also remember to challenge the commonly perceived rules in your field. A night club manager asked why continue to have a cover charge? The questioning led to increased revenue because more people vis- ited the club, resulting in higher beverage and food sales.
Third, know when to be a judge. After developing some imaginative ideas, at some point you have to evaluate them. Do not be so critical that you dis- courage your own imaginative thinking. Be critical enough, however, so that you do not try to implement weak ideas. A managing partner in an established law firm formulated a plan for opening two storefront branches that would offer legal services to the public at low prices. The branches would advertise on radio, on television, online, and in newspapers. After thinking through her plan for several weeks, however, she dropped the idea. She decided that the storefront branches would most likely divert cli- ents away from the parent firm, rather than create a new market.
Fourth, achieve results with your creative thinking by playing the role of lawyer. Negotiate and find ways to implement your ideas within your field or place of work. The explorer, artist, and judge stages of creative thought might take only a short time to develop a creative idea. Yet, you may spend months or even years getting your breakthrough idea implemented. For example, many tax preparation firms now loan clients instant refunds in the amount of their anticipated tax refunds. It took a manager in a large tax preparation firm a long time to convince top management of the merits of the idea.
Engaging in Appropriate Physical Exercise A well-accepted method of stimulating creativity is to engage in physical exercise. Stephen Ramocki, a marketing professor at Rhode Island College, found that a single aerobic workout is sufficient to trigger the brains of stu- dents into high gear—and that the benefit lasted for a minimum of two hours. Gary Kasparov, the chess champion, is a gym fanatic and has an extraordinary intellect. He has credited his physical fitness with boosting his skill in chess.
The fact that creative insights often arise during physical exercise fits the steps on the creative process referred to as immersion and incubation. Another explanation of why exercise facilitates creativity is that exercising pumps more blood and oxygen into the brain. Exercise also enhances activ- ity in the frontal lobe, the region of the brain involved in abstract reasoning and attention.33 The fact that physical exercise can boost creative thinking should not be interpreted in isolation. Without other factors going for a
362 CHAPTER 11• CREATIVITY, INNOVATION, AND LEADERSHIP
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
leader, such as a storehouse of knowledge and passion for the task, physical exercise will not lead to creative breakthroughs. Physical exercise also facil- itates sleeping well, and a rested brain is helpful for creative problem solving.
Establishing a Climate and Culture for Creative Thinking
Leaders need to develop creative ideas of their own to improve productivity and satisfaction. Establishing a climate, or culture, conducive to creative problem solving is another requirement of effective leadership. The point is that top management purposely sets about to take steps to make the organi- zation more innovative. The surge in innovation at Procter & Gamble a few years ago was facilitated by the appointment of a chief innovation officer, a five-fold increase in the number of design managers, and the establishment of an innovation gym, a place to train managers in thinking about product design.34
A foundation step in fostering organizational creativity is to establish a vision and mission that includes creativity, such as that of DuPont: “Our vision is to be the world’s most dynamic science company, creating sustainable solutions essential to a better, safer and healthier life for people everywhere.” Vision statements and mission statements set the pace, but they must be supported by the right climate, or organizational culture, and extensive use of the techniques described throughout this chapter.
Information about establishing a climate for creativity can be divided into (1) leadership and managerial practices for enhancing creativity and (2) meth- ods for managing creative workers. To become sensitized to this vast amount of information, do Leadership Diagnostic Activity 11-1. The instrument gives you an opportunity to ponder many of the management and leadership prac- tices that encourage or discourage creative problem solving.
Leadership Practices for Enhancing Creativity Nine leadership and managerial practices are particularly helpful in foster- ing creative thinking, as revealed by the work of many researchers and observers.35 The organizational methods already described for enhancing creativity might also be interpreted as leadership practices.
1. Hire creative people from the outside, and identify creative people from within. The most robust leadership and management practice for enhancing creativity is to hire people with the aptitude for, or track record in, being creative. Creativity training is helpful, yet starting with creative people enhances the potential of training. Part of the same argument is that hiring innovative people helps foster an innovative environment. Arthur D. Levinson, chairman and chief executive of Genentech, the heralded biotech- nology firm, says, “If you want an innovative environment, hire innovative people, listen to them tell you want they want, and do it.”36
ESTABLISHING A CLIMATE AND CULTURE FOR CREATIVE THINKING 363
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
2. Intellectual challenge. Matching people with the right assignments enhances creativity because it supports expertise and intrinsic motivation. The amount of stretch is consistent with goal theory; too little challenge leads to boredom, but too much challenge leads to feelings of being over- whelmed and loss of control. The leader or manager must understand his or her group members well to offer them the right amount of challenge. Moderate time pressures can sometimes bring about the right amount of challenge.
3. Empowerment including freedom to choose the method. Research with information technology workers in the People’s Republic of China sup- ported the idea that an empowering style of leadership facilitates worker creativity. Specifically, when workers are empowered they are more likely to work through the steps for creative problem solving. Part of the creativity
LEADERSHIP DIAGNOSTIC ACTIVITY 11-1
Assessing the Climate for Creativity and Innovation
Instructions: Respond “mostly yes” or “mostly no” as to how well each of the following characteristics fits an organization familiar to you. If you are currently not familiar with an outside organization, respond to these state- ments in regard to your school.
MOSTLY YES
MOSTLY NO
1. Company leadership wants workers to be creative. □ □
2. People who contribute new and useful ideas often receive financial rewards. □ □
3. Creative thinking is mostly the responsibility of people in creative jobs such as research and development, and marketing.
□ □
4. Workers are encouraged to spend part of their time coming up with new ideas for products or services.
□ □
5. Creative types rarely get promoted. □ □
6. The company invests considerable resources in innovation. □ □
7. Few of our leaders appear to be innovative thinkers. □ □
8. Innovative thinkers are publicly recognized in our organization. □ □
9. People are often poked fun at for suggesting a unique idea. □ □
10. Constructive change is welcome in this organization. □ □
11. Many of our work groups are diverse both in terms of professional background and cultural factors.
□ □
Scoring and Interpretation: The score in the direction of a climate for creativity and innovation is “mostly yes” for statements 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, and 11, and “mostly no” for statements 3, 5, 7, and 9. A score of 7 or higher suggests a climate well suited for creativity and innovation. A score of 4 to 6 is about average, and 3 or below suggests a climate that inhibits creativity and innovation.
364 CHAPTER 11• CREATIVITY, INNOVATION, AND LEADERSHIP
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
was attributed to empowered workers having a sense of self-determination, which sparked their creative thinking.37 Another study in China, this time with professional and administrative workers, attempted to understand why empowerment fosters creativity. Two findings of the study relevant here are that (1) psychological empowerment has a direct effect on creativity, and (2) structural empowerment leads to psychological empowerment which then enhances creativity. (Psychological empowerment is the feeling of empowerment as described in Chapter 7. Structural empowerment refers to policies and practices enacted by management such as granting decision- making authority to employees.38)
Workers also tend to be more creative when they are granted the free- dom to choose which method is best for attaining a work goal (as described in our study of empowerment in Chapter 7). Stable goals are important because it is difficult to work creatively toward a moving target.
4. Ample supply of the right resources. Time and money are the most important resources for enhancing creativity. Deciding how much time and money to give to a team or project is a tough judgment call that can either support or stifle creativity. Under some circumstances, setting a time dead- line will trigger creative thinking because it represents a favorable chal- lenge. An example would be hurrying to be first to market with a new product. False deadlines or impossibly tight ones can create distrust and burnout. To be creative, groups also need to be adequately funded.
An example of providing the right resources is an eBay process labeled the Garden, which enables engineers to get real customer feedback on inno- vations. Using the Garden, the engineers observed how customers react to the opportunity to make a choice between an auction and a fixed-price sale. Refinements were then made in giving customers an opportunity to make the choice.39
5. Effective design of work groups. Work groups are the most likely to be creative when they are mutually supportive and when they have a diversity of back grounds and perspectives. Blends of gender, race, and ethnicity are recognized today as contributing to creative thought, similar to cross- functional teams with their mix of perspectives from different disciplines. The various points of view often combine to achieve creative solutions to pro- blems. Homogeneous teams argue less, but they are often less creative. Put- ting together a team with the right chemistry—just the right level of diversity and supportiveness—requires experience and intuition on the leader’s part.
A leadership and management practice related to work group design is encouraging face-to-face contact to facilitate innovative thinking. It is more difficult for geographically dispersed workers to think creatively. The use of whiteboards around the company, as described earlier, is one work arrange- ment that facilitates face-to-face contacts, as do open work spaces.
6. Supervisory encouragement and linking innovation to performance. The most influential step a leader can take to bring about creative problem solving is to develop a permissive atmosphere that encourages people to
ESTABLISHING A CLIMATE AND CULTURE FOR CREATIVE THINKING 365
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
think freely. Praising creative work is important because, for most people to sustain their passion, they must feel that their work matters to the organiza- tion. Creative ideas should be evaluated quickly rather than put through a painfully slow review process.
In addition to encouraging innovation, supervisory leaders should promote the idea that innovative thinking improves job performance. A study conducted with 238 pairs of workers and supervisors in four U.S. companies in several dif- ferent industries supported the importance of employee expectations. When employees believed that innovative thinking would lead to better job perfor- mance, they were more likely to solve problems creatively. The supervisor could help in the process by explaining how innovation improves job perfor- mance.40 A study conducted in a social agency aimed at helping vulnerable chil- dren and their families found similar results. When the workers believed that creative work was part of their job, and when supervisors expected them to be creative, they became more confident in their creative abilities over time. Furthermore, creative performance levels increased over a six-month period as employee’s creative self-efficacy (or self-confidence) became stronger.41
7. Organizational support. The entire organization as well as the immedi- ate manager should support creative effort if creativity is to be enhanced on a large scale. The company-wide reward system should support creativ- ity, including recognition and financial incentives. Organizational leaders should encourage information sharing and collaboration, which lead to the development of the expertise so necessary for creativity and to more oppor- tunities for intrinsic motivation. Executives who combat excessive politics can help creative people focus on work instead of fighting political battles. In a highly political environment, a worker would be hesitant to suggest a creative idea that was a political blunder, such as replacing a product par- ticularly liked by the CEO.
8. Have favorable exchanges with creative workers. Another insight into encouraging a creative climate is for leaders to have favorable exchanges with group members, as defined by LMX theory (see Chapter 9). A study with 191 research and development specialists found a positive relationship between LMX ratings and creativity of workers as measured by supervisory ratings.42 When group members have positive relationships with their man- ager, they may have a more relaxed mental attitude that allows the imagina- tion to flow. A useful strategy for enhancing creativity throughout the organization is to emphasize the importance of working with a sense of heightened awareness, of being alert to new possibilities.
9. Give financial rewards for innovation. Creativity is self-rewarding to some extent because it is so exciting. Nevertheless, financial rewards for contributions to innovation help sustain a climate of innovation. Jeffrey Wadsworth is the chief executive of the Battelle Memorial Institute, a think tank of 23,000 employees specializing in inventions for profit. He points out that financial rewards for creativity are widespread in industry and universi- ties. “If you publish a patent you get $1,000, or you get $1 in a frame. Or
366 CHAPTER 11• CREATIVITY, INNOVATION, AND LEADERSHIP
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
you get a piece of the action moving forward.”43 A specific example is that at Zebra Technologies, a manufacturer of bar code printers and radio- frequency identification printing systems, employees earn cash awards hav- ing earned a patent.44 Another factor is that financial rewards have spurred useful inventions for hundreds of years.
Figure 11-3 presents capsule descriptions of five illustrative companies that are successful in establishing a climate and culture for creative thinking.
Methods of Managing Creative Workers Closely related to establishing organizational conditions favoring creativity is choosing effective methods for managing creative workers. The sugges- tions that follow supplement effective leadership and management practices in general.45
1. Give creative people tools and resources that allow their work to stand out. Creative workers have a high degree of self-motivation and therefore want to achieve high-quality output. To achieve such high quality, they
FIGURE 11-3 Five Business Organizations Judged to Be Highly Innovative.
COMPANY JUSTIFICATION FOR BEING PERCEIVED AS INNOVATIVE
Apple Inc. Apple has consistently invented products that have created enormous demand for consumer-oriented digital technology, including the iPad that has been the pacesetter for tablet computers. Business leaders throughout the world admire the creativity of Apple, as led by an innova- tive design team, and Apple products are increasingly used in the work- place. The legal staff at Apple continually fights off imitators of the company’s innovations.
Twitter Twitter has had explosive growth and is often regarded as having rede- fined communication. Although scattered with nonsensical and often dis- honest postings, this social networking site is also a vital component of business communication.
Nike The best-known sports clothing and equipment company in the world, Nike continues to introduce products into the market that have a science fiction feel. One example is the FuelBand, an electronic bracelet that measures a person’s movements throughout the day whether the person plays golf, jogs, or walks. Color cues help readers track activity, such as red for inactive, and green for having achieved a daily goal.
Trader Joe’s Beloved by its customers, this grocery chain jumped past Whole Foods to become the favorite specialty grocer in the United States. Part of the innovation is in the selection of products that are both low priced and have a gourmet appeal.
Hyundai Motors Formerly known as a South Korean manufacturer of low-price automo- biles, Hyundai is a fierce competitor with a reputation for high-quality and excellent styling at a moderate price. In recent years, the demand for its Kia vehicles has exceeded supply.
Sources: Based partially on information in Michael Arndt and Bruce Einhorn, “The 50 Most Innovative Companies” Bloomberg Business Week, April 25, 2010, pp. 38–39; Fast Company Staff, “The World’s Most Innovative Companies,” Fast Company, March 2011, pp. 66–82; March 2013, pp. 89–90.
ESTABLISHING A CLIMATE AND CULTURE FOR CREATIVE THINKING 367
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
usually need adequate resources, such as state-of-the-art equipment and an ample travel budget for such purposes as conducting research.
2. Give creative people flexibility and a minimum amount of structure. Many creative workers regard heavy structure as the death knell of creativ- ity. Structure for these workers means rules and regulations, many layers of approval, strict dress codes, fixed office hours, rigid assignments, and fill- in-the-blank Internet forms or paperwork. (Typically, the leader/manager will have to achieve a workable compromise in this area that stays within the framework of organizational policy. Regular office hours, for example, are a must for team assignments. Also, creative people may need help with meeting deadlines because many creative people do not manage time well.)
A national survey conducted with employees of the Taiwan Customs Bureau supports the idea that too much structure can inhibit creativity on the job. Structure was measured in terms of centralized decision making by the team leader, and the extent to which work was structured and regulated by rules and protocols. Creativity was measured by both a self-quiz and supervisor ratings of the behavior of subordinates. An illustrative item to rate creativity was as follows: “Generates ideas revolutionary to the field.” The findings indicated that team bureaucracy in terms of centralization and formalization can suppress the expression of individual differences that may engender creativity.46
Although structure should be minimized, some constraints will foster cre- ativity, such as the leader presenting demands about the cost of the product or service and the deadline for the innovation. For example, a product developer might want to add an expensive feature to a washing machine that would enable it to interact with other electronic devices in the house. Although a superb gimmick, the “smart” feature would make the machine too expensive for its intended market.
3. Give gentle feedback when turning down an idea. Creative employees are emotionally involved with their work. As a result, they are likely to inter- pret criticism as a personal attack on their self-worth. (Students often feel the same way about their term papers and projects.)
4. Employ creative people to manage and evaluate creative workers. Man- agers of creative workers should have some creative ability of their own so that they can understand creativity and be credible as leaders. Understand- ing the creative process is important for evaluating the creative contribution of others. What constitutes creative output is somewhat subjective, but the output can be tied to objective criteria. At Hallmark Cards, Inc., for exam- ple, creativity is measured by such factors as how well the creative work sold and how well it performed in a consumer preference test. In general, a manager’s intuition about the potential contribution of a creative idea or product still weighs heavily in the evaluation.
The accompanying Leader in Action insert describes a technology leader who is highly creative and also aware of the importance of building a crea- tive and innovative organization.
368 CHAPTER 11• CREATIVITY, INNOVATION, AND LEADERSHIP
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
LEADER IN ACTION
Jack Dorsey, the Creative Leader and Cofounder of Twitter and Square
St. Louis native, Jack Dorsey is now the executive chairman of Twitter and the CEO of Square, the credit card and debit card processing company. As a college student, Dorsey became involved with web development, and then cofounded Twitter in 2006. Four years later, he cofounded Square, a system that allows people to receive card pay- ments through a tiny device plugged into a mobile phone or computer, or simply by giving one’s name to the cashier.
Twitter had its origins when Dorsey moved to Oakland, California early in his career and started a company that pro- duced dispatch software for vehicles. The software helped the vehicles drivers stay in touch with each other. He then thought of a website that would combine the broad reach of dispatch software with instant messaging that became the foundation of Twitter. Even as a pre-teenager, Dorsey was fascinated with city maps, which eventually morphed into the Twitter concept of knowing what people are doing all over the world at a given moment. Today, he regards Twitter as a tool that can take the pulse of the planet.
In creating Twitter, Dorsey is credited by some with changing the way in which people communicate with each other. In founding Square, he has simplified the process of making noncash payments—a development with several direct competitors. Dorsey says that every technology was invented for the purpose of enabling humans to take actions faster. Dorsey envisions a future in which information technology will engulf us in the form of a growing cashless society where most consumer transactions are done with smartphones. We will also have same-day delivery of goods ordered online or at physical stores; smartphones will replace PCs; robots will dominate in industry and in other areas as well; and cloud computing will handle most data.
Dorsey regards his CEO role as an editor-in-chief, as a person who both collects ideas and suggests ideas to them. “I really like that model at both Twitter and Square because it allows for people with the most information to bubble something up.” He says it also allows the leaders in our company to spot trends and assign teams to dig into
them. “Employees can actually dramatically change the course of the company by presenting a good idea.” Dorsey also allows for spontaneity and idea-collecting by wandering around the office and listening to people. He also does much of his work at a stand-up table, so he is accessible to employees wanting to discuss an idea with him.
To be a better leader, Dorsey decided to hone his storytelling skills, so he can deliver his message both inside and outside the company. He approaches his leadership role in a tightly scheduled manner, such as Monday being for management with holding a directional meeting at Square, and an operating meeting at Twitter.
The approximately 350 employees at Square collabo- rate in an open and uncluttered, well-lighted room designed for the purpose of high-level collaboration. Dorsey holds monthly town hall meetings with the entire Square staff, also for the purpose of enhancing commu- nication. Company members discuss new developments in communication technology. Dorsey asks the staff to surprise him with their innovative ideas. “It’s empower- ing to be asked to look at what’s possible,” he says, “not told how to do it.”
Dorsey works toward having a transparent company by such means as sending notes about all meetings involving more than two people to the entire staff. To be transparent, he also holds frequent meetings with business people around the country to exchange ideas and promote his visions. One vision is to improve busi- ness through the Square payment method. He states, “We fundamentally believe that the power of the local economy can help fix the national economy and poten- tially the global economy.”
Dorsey attended the Missouri University of Science and Technology and New York University. Although he left both universities to pursue entrepreneurship, his schooling had a strong influence on his future work. For example, his time working for his high school newspaper was the origins of his editor-in-chief approach to leadership.
ESTABLISHING A CLIMATE AND CULTURE FOR CREATIVE THINKING 369
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
Additional Leadership Practices That Enhance Innovation
Creativity in organizations leads to innovations in products, services, and processes (such as a billing system or safety improvement). All leadership and management practices that enhance creative problem solving therefore also enhance innovation. Here, we describe eight additional leadership initiatives that enhance innovation.
1. Emphasize transformational leadership if possible. A macro- perspective on a leader’s role in fostering innovation is to exercise transfor- mational leadership. The transformational leader creates an environment of change and growth. Based on case histories, management professors Adegoke Oke, Natasha Munshi, and Fred O. Walumbwa concluded that transformational leaders are particularly well suited to jump start the inno- vation process.47 This is probably because the transformational leader is good at providing intellectual stimulation.
2. Continually pursue innovation. A major characteristic of the Most Admired Companies, as compiled by the Hay Group consultancy for Fortune, is constant innovation. Translated into practice, this means that company leaders stay alert to innovative possibilities. Innovation is important because a new technology can make an industry obsolete or place it in grave danger. What will happen to petroleum refineries when (and if) the fuel cell takes hold? Another practical way of pursuing innovation is to assign innovation teams freed of daily time- to-market pressures. At tool maker Stanley Works, one team based in Maryland concentrates on developing new technology to current products. A second team in the United Kingdom develops disruptive technologies. The teams are given time, money, and regular access to senior leaders. One of the first hits from the innovation teams was a motion-activated screwdriver inspired by the con- cept behind a Nintendo Wii controller.48
3. Take risks and encourage risk taking. “No risk, no reward” is a rule of life that applies equally well to the leadership of innovation. Even in a
ACTION (continued) QUESTIONS
1. Identify several of Dorsey’s leadership techniques that are known to be effective ways for enhancing creativity and innovation.
2. By now Dorsey must have about 3 million followers on Twitter. What appears to be his appeal to Twitter members?
3. Dorsey at one time talked about running for mayor of New York City. What about his approach to
leadership might make him plausible as a major politician?
Sources: Original story created from facts and observations in the following sources: Michal Lev-Ram, “The Pride of St. Louis,” Fortune, October 7, 2013, pp. 41–44; Jon Swartz, “Creator of Twitter Sees Blur of Change,” USATODAY.com, September 15, 2012, pp. 1–3; Ellen McGirt, “Square: For Making Magic Out of the Mercantile,” Fast Company, March 2012, pp. 82–85; Eric Savitz, “The Master Entrepreneur,” Forbes, November 5, 2012, pp. 64–70; “Jack Dorsey,” www.biography.com, pp. 1–2. Accessed January 5, 2014.
370 CHAPTER 11• CREATIVITY, INNOVATION, AND LEADERSHIP
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
slow-growth economy, companies cannot win big in the marketplace by doing things just a teeny bit better than the competition. It is necessary to gamble intelligently, shrewdly, and selectively, even during a period of inse- curity and instability.49 Because most new ideas fail, part of taking risks is being willing to go down blind alleys.
4. Emphasize collaboration among employees. Most innovations stem from networks, that is, groups of people working in concert. The workers needed for the innovation are often dispersed throughout the organization. Choosing the right leader for a project can be the key to collaboration. The workers cho- sen to develop new ideas are often top performers in individual areas. How- ever, they may be lacking the connections within the company that are vital for accomplishing the innovation task. For instance, an outstanding engineer might be selected to lead a major project. But a lower-ranking engineer who has worked in more divisions of the company might be a wiser choice because he or she could tap broader knowledge and connections inside the company.
A consumer products company intentionally placed workers together on a project who had developed friendships during a business conference. One result was customized packaging and designs for candy that commanded much higher prices than the company’s traditional offerings.50
Leaders in multiunit organizations are at an advantage for innovation because workers from the various units can share ideas that would be use- ful for many different products. For example, if one unit of a medical com- pany developed a patch for delivering medicine to the body, other units might be able to profit from the same technology. The topic of encouraging idea sharing will be reintroduced in Chapter 13.
A more direct way of attaining collaboration is to organize workers into teams for purposes of innovation. Wadsworth from Battelle notes that most of the successful innovations he has seen have come from remarkably com- plex teams. People from different disciplines, such as accountants, lawyers, and customer service representatives must work together smoothly for inno- vation to surface.51
5. Avoid innovation for its own sake. Leaders also have to exercise good judgment: Innovation just for the sake of innovation is not always valuable. Many gadgets are scientific marvels, yet they have limited market appeal. An example is the robot lawnmower, which arouses the curiosity of many people but does not appeal much to consumers. Most companies have loads of interesting ideas floating to the surface, but very few will even translate into a profitable product or service.
6. Use loose–tight leadership. Looseness refers to granting space for new ideas and exploration, whereas a tight approach means finally making a choice among the alternatives. Innovation is also enhanced when workers throughout the organization are able to pursue absurd ideas without pen- alty for being wrong or for having wasted some resources. An axiom of cre- ativity is that many ideas typically have to be tried before a commercially successful one emerges.
ADDITIONAL LEADERSHIP PRACTICES THAT ENHANCE INNOVATION 371
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
READER’S ROADMAP
7. Integrate development and production. Innovation may suffer when the people who develop ideas do not work closely with the people responsible for their production or manufacture. For many years, Japanese companies had moved manufacturing to low-cost countries to save money. Leadership at Canon, Inc., however, has found that the key to creating new products quickly is for the production team to physically work close to the product developers. The result is more input and communication. Although the cost of the product, such as an advanced digital camera, may be higher, its high quality leads to higher consumer demand.52
So far, we have studied considerable information about the nature of leadership; the attributes, behaviors, and styles of leaders; the ethics and social responsibility of lea- ders; and how leaders exert power and use politics and influence. We then studied techniques for developing teamwork as well as motivation and coaching skills. After having studied creativity and innovation as part of leadership, we focus next on commu- nication skills as they relate to leadership.
SUMMARY
A creative idea becomes an innovation when it is implemented or commercialized. Creativity is an essential characteristic of leaders. A creative leader brings forth ideas or things that did not exist previ- ously or that existed in a different form. The crea- tive process has been divided into five steps: opportunity or problem recognition; immersion (the individual becomes immersed in the idea); incubation (the idea simmers); insight (a solution surfaces); and verification and application (the per- son supports and implements the idea).
Distinguishing characteristics of creative people fall into four areas: knowledge, cognitive abilities, personality, passion for the task, and the experience of flow. Creative people possess extensive knowl- edge, good intellectual skills, intellectual curiosity, and a wide range of interests. Personality attributes of creative people include a positive self-image, tol- erance for isolation, nonconformity, and the ability to tolerate ambiguity and chaos. Passion for the work and flow are related to intense intrinsic moti- vation. Creative people also enjoy interacting with others. The right personal characteristics must
interact with the right environment to produce cre- ative problem solving.
A major strategy for becoming creative is to overcome traditional thinking, or a traditional men- tal set. Also, it is necessary to break down rigid thinking that blocks new ideas. Yet, workers still need some constraints in terms of creative solutions to problems. A principle suggests that most people are more adept at starting with a solution rather than with a problem.
Creative thinking can be enhanced by systemati- cally collecting fresh ideas, including collecting ideas, establishing idea quotas, and using white- boards throughout the company. Brainstorming is a key idea-generation method even for the most advanced technology companies. Goals are an important part of brainstorming. A spin off of brainstorming is the pet-peeve technique, in which a group thinks of all the possible complaints others might have about their unit. The generation of cre- ative ideas has moral implications. Every idea and product has potential harmful consequences in minor and major ways.
372 CHAPTER 11• CREATIVITY, INNOVATION, AND LEADERSHIP
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
Self-help techniques to enhance creative problem solving include (1) practicing creativity-enhancing exercises, (2) staying alert to opportunities, (3) main- taining enthusiasm and being happy, (4) maintaining and using a systematic place for recording ideas, (5) playing the roles of explorer, artist, judge, and lawyer, and (6) engaging in appropriate physical exercise.
Establishing a climate conducive to creative prob- lem solving is another requirement of effective lead- ership. A foundation step is to establish a vision statement and mission that include creativity. Specif- ically, leaders should (1) hire creative people from the outside and identify creative people from within, (2) provide intellectual challenge, (3) empower work- ers and allow them freedom to choose their own method, (4) supply the right resources, (5) design work groups effectively, (6) have supervisors encour-
aging and linking innovation to performance, (7) give organizational support for creativity and explain how innovation improves performance, (8) have favorable exchanges with creative workers, and (9) give finan- cial rewards for innovation.
Special attention should be paid to managing creative workers. One should provide excellent tools and resources, give creative people flexibility, turn down ideas gently, and employ creative people to manage and evaluate creative workers.
Eight additional leadership initiatives that enhance innovation are the following: emphasize transformational leadership; continually pursue innovation; take risks and encourage risk taking; emphasize collaboration; avoid innovation for its own sake; use loose–tight leadership; and integrate development and production.
KEY TERMS
innovation 345 creativity 346
experience of flow 351 pet-peeve technique 356
GUIDELINES FOR ACTION AND SKILL DEVELOPMENT
Although creativity is important for leaders, research suggests that being perceived as highly creative has a downside. Creative people are some- times perceived as quirky, and such a perception can block a person’s attempt to climb the leadership and management ladder. In studies conducted with business groups in India, and then repeated with U.S. college students, individuals who expressed more creative ideas were viewed as having less— not more—leadership talent.53
The way to get around this potential negative per- ception is for the imaginative person, who wants to climb the leadership ladder, to frequently remind others in a subtle way that he or she is business- oriented. If you are the creative person aspiring to climb the ladder, casually mention such concepts as the return on investment of your ideas, and how your idea might contribute to the bottom line.
In an attempt to be consumer oriented, many business leaders believe that all innovation should stem from customer desires and sugges- tions, as often revealed in a focus group. True product leadership, however, can sometimes stem from offering a new product or service con- sumers never thought they wanted or needed. During the first McIntosh team retreat, one mem- ber asked whether market research would be helpful to find out what customers wanted. Steve Jobs, replied, “No, because customers don’t know what they want until we’ve shown them.” He then quoted the famous line from Henry Ford, “If I’d asked customers what they wanted, they would have told me, ‘A faster horse!’ ” The point here is that the product lea- der’s own intuition can sometimes be the source of profitable innovation.54
GUIDELINES FOR ACTION AND SKILL DEVELOPMENT 373
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
LEADERSHIP CASE PROBLEM A
Discussion Questions and Activities
1. Give an example of creativity in business that does not relate to the development or market- ing of a product or service.
2. Is it important for leaders to be creative and innovative? Or, should they simply hire creative and innovative direct reports?
3. Assume that you are the leader of the paperclip manufacturing division of a company. Do you think it would be worth your time and that of your group to attempt to improve the design and intended use of the paperclip? Explain your reasoning.
4. In what way does your current program of study contribute to your ability to solve pro- blems creatively?
5. The opinion has often been expressed that too much emphasis on teamwork inhibits creativ- ity. What do you think of this argument?
6. Why do many people believe that if you empha- size being efficient, such as using the quality
improvement process Six Sigma, creativity and innovation are likely to suffer?
7. Several people have written that Twitter is one of the most creative developments in the his- tory of business and the world in general. What is your opinion about Twitter as a power- fully creative development?
8. What do you think the next great creative breakthrough in business will be that will rival e-commerce and mobile phones in importance? (Loads of product planners and business lea- ders are waiting for your answer.)
9. Assuming that you are convinced that creativity is a legitimate part of a leader’s role, what per- cent of your working time do you think you should invest in creative thinking? Explain your answer.
10. Speak to the most creative person you know in any field, and find out if he or she uses any specific creativity-enhancing technique. Be pre- pared to bring your findings back to class.
The Rapid Cash Store Needs Ideas
Sam is the CEO of The Rapid Cash Store, a chain of twenty stores whose primary business is to provide payday loans and cash checks for people who typi- cally do not have a bank account. A payday loan is essentially a loan against an upcoming paycheck, such as a person borrowing $100 to be repaid when he or she receives a paycheck within ten days. The paycheck has been signed over to Rapid Cash, and a company representative gives the check to the lender minus the fee charged by Rapid Cash. The checks cashed are often payroll checks for workers whose checks are not directly deposited because they do not have bank accounts.
A criticism of The Rapid Cash Store, as well as other payday lenders, is that their interest rate on loans, if projected on an annual basis, would be about 350 percent. Sam says, “This is an irrelevant criticism. Almost no customer takes out a loan for a year. We provide a useful service at a reasonable fee
for people who are strapped for cash. Why look at the annual rate? If you rent a hotel room for one night, it might cost $150. Does anybody complain that the hotel is charging $54,750 per year for the room?”
Despite Sam’s defense of his company’s prac- tices, as well as those of his industry, he is worried that the mounting criticism of his company might result in lost revenue.
Among the criticisms of The Rapid Cash Store is that it exploits the poor. Furthermore, many large discount retailers are getting in to the business of payday loans and check cashing. For example, the MoneyCenters at Walmart stores cash checks for customers at fees much lower than those charged by payday lenders.
Sam is so worried about the forces against his business that he decides to work on the problem with his top management team. Sam said that he
374 CHAPTER 11• CREATIVITY, INNOVATION, AND LEADERSHIP
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
LEADERSHIP CASE PROBLEM B
has been casually talking about the problem with his team, but he hasn’t really put the problem on his agenda. Sam sends his team an e-mail about the necessity of finding new sources of revenue for the firm, and he alerts them to a meeting to work on the problem.
At the meeting, Sam says to the group, “The Rapid Cash Store is in trouble. Our revenues only declined 15 percent last year, but the handwriting is on the wall. The criticism of our business model is getting more vocal, with even local politicians turn- ing against us. The big box stores are breathing down our neck.
“I want you as the executive team to come up with a way of finding new sources of revenue for the Rapid Cash.”
“No disrespect,” said Kim, the director of mar- keting. “But you are our leader. You are supposed to provide the breakthrough idea that will create a solid future for Rapid Cash. We’ve often talked about broadening our services, but we usually hit the same brick wall. The most notable idea was the one about installing tattoo parlors in our stores because so many of our customers wear tattoos.
“I think the best idea we had was the one about selling lottery tickets in all the stores. But I think we ran into some potential legal problems.”
Sam then said, “I don’t disagree that as CEO maybe I should have the next great idea for The Rapid Cash Store. But I don’t right now, so that’s why I’m asking you for your creative suggestions.”
Greg, the CFO, said, “I think that we need to ask an even deeper question than where we can find new sources of revenue. We need to ask where to look and whom to ask about new lines of business.”
Questions
1. To what extent do you think it is Sam’s individual responsibility to furnish creative ideas for gener- ating new business for The Rapid Cash Store?
2. In response to Greg’s comment, where should the management team look for creative ideas for enlarging the revenue of The Rapid Cash Store?
3. From the standpoint of ethics, do you think The Rapid Cash Store should stay in business? Explain your reasoning.
ASSOCIATED ROLE PLAY One student plays the role of Sam, who, during his meeting with the executive team, presses them to suggest at least one useful idea for expanding The Rapid Cash Store’s top line (revenue) by either sell- ing more of existing services or creating a new ser- vice. Several other students play the roles of members of the executive team. They enjoy this
opportunity of participative decision making as well as the chance to engage in creative thinking. Yet, they also believe that it is Sam’s role to exercise strong leadership by pointing The Rapid Cash Store in the right direction. Observers will look to see if this problem-solving session is likely to result in any innovations for The Rapid Cash Store.
“How Can We Encourage a Few Disrupters?”
Adrianna is the CEO of Luxury Designs, an office furniture company that has been in business for forty years. The company both manufactures its own furniture and assembles furniture from a few manufacturers overseas. Although Luxury Designs is profitable, revenue has declined slowly for five years. In today’s meeting with her top management
team, Adrianna is going to discuss the need for innovation.
“We are meeting today on a topic we have talked about in the past. I also sent you an e-mail on this topic just two days ago to give you an opportunity to think about today’s meeting. My concern is that we are not doing anything radical enough to deal
LEADERSHIP CASE PROBLEM B 375
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
with today’s market for office furniture. A big hur- dle we face is that the market for fashionable office furniture is shrinking as more and more private offices and even cubicles are being eliminated. Almost any old work table and chairs will do in an open-space office.”
Seth, the director of new product development, signaled that he wanted to comment. “We are right with you, Adrianna. We are in the design phase of some interesting concepts in open-office design. We are thinking of some really cool tables, chairs, and whiteboards that will excite our consumers.”
Adrianna replied, “Seth, I am confident that you and your group will tweak our product line to have something new to offer. But the challenge I have for us as company leadership is to find a way to be disrupters. Our long-term prosperity depends on disrupting the industry, rather than just adapting to trends.
“You have heard about disruption. The PCs dis- rupted the mainframe computer industry a long time ago. Cell phones and smartphones disrupted the traditional telephone makers. The ZIP Cars dis- rupted the car rental business. I want somebody, somewhere in Luxury designs to come up with an
idea to disrupt the office furniture industry. If we have to cannibalize some of our traditional busi- ness, that’s okay.”
Diane, the CFO said, “Maybe we should run a one-time disrupter campaign, and pay a big bonus for the best idea. We have to figure out how to encourage a few disrupters.”
Adrianna said, “Diane, your idea has some merit. But we have to go beyond a one-time gimmick to get us on the right path. Let’s all meet one week from today to reintroduce the topic of disrupting the office furniture industry.”
Questions
1. What do you recommend that leadership at Luxury Designs do to facilitate having a dis- rupter within the company?
2. What thought should Adrianna and the other members of the leadership team at Luxury Design give to going beyond the confines of the office furniture industry in order to be a disrupter?
3. In what way is this case about creativity and innovation?
ASSOCIATED ROLE PLAY One student plays the role of Seth, the head of new product development, who decides to meet with his own group of product developers for a brainstorming session. He tells them that maybe the company will be able to set up an atmosphere that encourages disruption, but in the meantime why not develop a breakthrough office furniture idea of our own. A few other students play the
role of members of the product development group, perhaps including the department admin- istrative assistant, to brainstorm ideas for a breakthrough idea in office furniture. Seth believes that the product development group can be successful at disruption. Run the role play for about fifteen minutes to see what plausible ideas you develop.
LEADERSHIP SKILL-BUILDING EXERCISE 11-3
My Leadership Portfolio
For this chapter’s entry into your leadership port- folio, record any creative or innovative idea you have had lately in relation to organizational activ- ity, including school. After recording the idea, ask yourself what prompted you to develop it. If you
have not contributed a creative idea recently, your assignment is to develop a creative idea within the next ten days. If possible, make plans to implement the idea; otherwise, it will not lead to innovation. Here is an example of a creative
376 CHAPTER 11• CREATIVITY, INNOVATION, AND LEADERSHIP
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
NOTES
community initiative taken by Alexis, a marketing major:
In my neighborhood, there is a ten-story high-rise building. Practically all of the tenants are senior citizens who live on limited pensions. Some of the folks in the building are in their eighties or even their nineties. The building is old and not particu- larly warm, especially for people with poor blood circulation. I’ve often heard friends and family members say that we should do something to help the seniors in the high rise, but nobody seems to go beyond expressing a little sympathy.
Then I got a brainstorm. I thought, “Why not organize a ‘Socks for Seniors’ program?” My
friends and I would buy dozens of pairs of socks that usually sell for about $4.00 a pair from deep discounters like Dollar General. We could raise some of the money by returning bottles and cans with deposits. A few friends of mine made a bunch of telephone calls, and we raised $200 in no time for our project. Then, one cold night, we visited the high rise, rang a few doorbells, and told the residents what we were up to. We were allowed in to start distributing the socks. The smiles and words of appreciation we received were enormous. My idea is so good, I plan to do it every year. My friends are with me, and we think that if we post this idea on a website, it might spread around the country.
LEADERSHIP SKILL-BUILDING EXERCISE 11-4
The Multimedia Presentation
Here is an opportunity to be creative about the topic of business creativity. Work individually or in groups to develop a multimedia presentation about the importance of creativity in business. By multi- media, we refer to using more than one media to develop your presentation. For example, you might make a presentation using bulleted lists, narratives, still photos, video clips, and Internet links. It might
also be possible to upload your presentation to a social networking site. The presentation might also include music, art, poetry, or quotations from liter- ary figures. Spoken words might also be considered a medium for delivering your message. If the multi- media presentations are limited to about five min- utes, class time might allow for several students, or student groups, to present.
1. Original story created from facts and observations in the following sources: Vikram Alexei Kansara, “Angela Ahrendts to Leave Burberry for Apple, Christopher Bailey to Be CEO,” BOF (www.businessoffashion.com), October 15, 2013, pp. 1–2; Kathy Gordon, Ian Sherr, and Joann S. Lublin, “Apple Taps Fashion CEO as Retail Magic Fades,” The Wall Street Journal, October 16, 2013, pp. 1A, 2A; “Angela Ahrendts: Chief Executive Officer, Burberry,” www.moneypages.com, accessed January 4, 2014; Jeff Macke, “Apple Hires Burberry CEO in Tim Cook’s Best Decision Yet,” http://yahoofinance .com, October 15, 2013, pp. 1–2; Angela Ahrendts,
“Bio-Bizleadership-Angela-Ahrendts,” www .scribd.com, c Copyright 2013 Scribd Inc.
2. Leslie Kwoh, “You Call That Innovation? Companies Say They Innovate, but the Term Has Begun to Lose Meaning,” The Wall Street Journal, May 23, 2012, p. B1.
3. Andrew Razeghi, “Innovation: Vehicle to Greatness,” Executive Leadership, December 2011, p. 3.
4. Warren Bennis, “The Challenges of Leadership in the Modern World,” American Psychologist, January 2007, p. 2.
5. Graham Wallas, The Art of Thought (New York: Harcourt Brace, 1926).
NOTES 377
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
6. Josh Quittner, “How Jeff Bezos Rules the Retail Space,” Fortune, May 5, 2008, pp. 126–132; “Jeff Bezos: Founder and CEO, Amazon.com,” Academy of Achievement (www .achievement.org), August 9, 2010, pp. 1–4.
7. Teresa M. Amabile, “How to Kill Creativity,” Harvard Business Review, September–October 1998, pp. 78–79; Darrell K. Rigby, Kara Gruver, and James Allen, “Innovation in Turbulent Times,” Harvard Business Review, June 2009, pp. 79–86.
8. Maria Bartiromo, “Entrepreneur Lives the Dream: Chobani’s Ulukaya Created Greek Yogurt Craze,” USA Today, June 18, 2013.
9. Research of Damasio reported in Karen Weintraub, “Inner Workings of a Creative Brain,” USA Today, November 9, 2013; Amy Novotney, “No Such Thing as ‘Right-Brained’ or ‘Left-Brained,’ New Research Finds,” Monitor on Psychology, November 2013, p. 10.
10. Research reported in Joe Robinson, “Do You Have What It Takes?” Entrepreneur, January 2014, p. 49.
11. Tim Devaney, “ePrize Exec Says Creativity Key to Detroit’s Future,” The Detroit News (www .detnews.com), February 18, 2011, p. 1.
12. Cited in “Larry Page on How to Change the World,” Fortune, May 12, 2008, p. 84.
13. Amabile, “How to Kill Creativity,” p. 79. 14. Mihaly Csikszentmihalyi, “If We Are So Rich,
Why Aren’t We Happy?” American Psychologist, October 1999, p. 824.
15. “Putting Creativity into Action,” Success Workshop, supplement to The Pryor Report, April 1996, p. 1.
16. Cited in Dawn Klingensmith, “Give Your Team Direction,” CTW Features, March 8, 2011. Based on information in Shawn Coyne, Brainsteering: A Better Approach to Breakthrough Ideas (New York: HarperCollins, 2011).
17. Drew Boyd and Jacob Goldenberg, “Think Inside the Box,” The Wall Street Journal, June 15–16, 2013, pp. C1, C2.
18. John Bessant, Kathrin Moslein, and Bettina von Stamm, “In Search of Innovation,” The Wall Street Journal, June 22, 2009, p. R4.
19. Rachel Emma Silverman, “Doodling for Dollars,” The Wall Street Journal, April 25, 2012, pp. B1, B8.
20. Brian M. Carney and Issac Getz, “How an Endangered Google Policy Got Results,” The Wall Street Journal, August 29, 2013, p. A15.
21. Alec Foege, “The Trouble with Tinkering Time: Company-Mandated ‘Play’ Is the Latest Craze— But There Are Far Better Ways to Spark Innovation,” The Wall Street Journal, January 19–20, 2013, p. C3.
22. Michael Orey, “Inside Nathan Myhrvold’s Mysterious New Idea Machine,” BusinessWeek, July 3, 2006, pp. 054, 057; Jim Kerstetter and Josh Lowensohn, “Inside Intellectual Ventures, the Most Hated Company in Tech,” http://news .cnet.com, August 21, 2012, pp. 1–2.
23. Robert C. Litchfield, “Brainstorming Reconsidered: A Goal-Based View,” Academy of Management Review, July 2008, pp. 649–668.
24. Michael Schrage, “Playing around with Brainstorming,” Harvard Business Review, March 2001, pp. 149–154; “Stock a Room to Improve Brainstorming,” Business Management Daily (www.businessmanagement daily.com), March 18, 2011, p. 1.
25. Anne Sagen, “Creativity Tools: Versatile Problem Solvers That Can Double as Fun and Games,” Supervisory Management, October 1991, pp. 1–2.
26. Gerald Sindell, The Genius Machine: The 11 Steps That Turn Raw Material into Brilliance (Novato, Calif.: New World Library, 2009).
27. Sindell, The Genius Machine, p. 40. 28. Juanita Weaver, “The Mental Picture: Bringing
Your Definition of Creativity into Focus,” Entrepreneur, February 2003, p. 69.
29. Anecdote reported in Tom Tobin, “Inspired to Be Innovators,” Democrat and Chronicle, May 24, 2012, p. 5B.
30. Quoted in Alex F. Osburn, “Breakthrough Ideas,” Success, October 1990, p. 38.
31. Research cited in Bill Breen, “The Six Myths of Creativity,” Fast Company, December 2004, p. 78.
32. “Be a Creative Problem Solver,” Executive Strategies, June 6, 1989, pp. 1–2.
33. Richard A. Lovett, “Jog Your Brain: Looking for a Creative Spark? Hop to the Gym,” Psychology Today, May/June 2006, p. 55.
34. Tim Brown, “Change by Design,” BusinessWeek, October 5, 2009, p. 054; Bruce Brown and Scott D. Anthony, “How P&G
378 CHAPTER 11• CREATIVITY, INNOVATION, AND LEADERSHIP
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
Tripled Its Innovation Success Rate,” Harvard Business Review, June 2011, pp. 64–72.
35. Amabile and Khaire, “Creativity and the Role of the Leader,” pp. 100–109; “How to Kill Creativity,” pp. 80–81; Teresa M. Amabile, Constance N. Hadley, and Steven J. Kramer, “Creativity Under the Gun,” Harvard Business Review, August 2002, pp. 52–61; Giles Hirst, Daan van Kippenberg, and Jing Zhou, “A Cross- Level Perspective on Employee Creativity: Goal Orientation, Team Learning Behavior, and Individual Creativity,” Academy of Management Journal, April 2009, pp. 280–293.
36. Quoted in Jena McGregor, “25 Most Innovative Companies,” BusinessWeek, May 14, 2007, p. 052.
37. Xiaomeng Zhang and Kathryn M. Bartol, “Linking Empowering Leadership and Employee Creativity: The Influence of Psychological Empowerment, Intrinsic Motivation, and Creative Process Engagement,” Academy of Management Journal, February 2010, pp. 107–128.
38. Li-Yun Sun, Zhen Zhang, Jin Qi, and Zhen Xiong Chen, “Empowerment and Creativity: A Cross-Level Investigation,” The Leadership Quarterly, February 2012, pp. 55–65.
39. Interview with EBay CEO John Donahoe, “How eBay Developed a Culture of Experimentation,” Harvard Business Review, March 2011, p. 95.
40. Feron Yuan and Richard W. Woodman, “Innovative Behavior in the Workplace: The Role of Performance and Image Outcome Expectations,” Academy of Management Journal, April 2010, pp. 323–342.
41. Pamela Tierney and Steven M. Farmer, “Creative Self-Efficacy Development and Creative Performance over Time,” Journal of Applied Psychology, March 2011, pp. 277–293.
42. Pamela Tierney, Steven M. Farmer, and George B. Graen, “An Examination of Leadership and Employee Creativity: The Relevance of Traits and Relationships,” Personnel Psychology, Autumn 1999, pp. 591–620.
43. Quoted in “The Profit Motive,” The Wall Street Journal, September 27, 2010, p. R11.
44. Todd Henneman, “Brighter Ideas,” Workforce Management, January 2013, p. 18.
45. Shari Caudron, “Strategies for Managing Creative Workers,” Personnel Journal, December 1994, pp. 104–113; Chris Pentila, “An Art in Itself,” Entrepreneur, December 2003, pp. 96–97.
46. Giles Hurst, Daan Van Kinppenberg, Chin-Hui Chen, and Claudia A. Sacramento, “How Does Bureaucracy Impact Individual Creativity? A Cross-Level Investigation of Team Contextual Influences on Goal Orientation-Creativity Relationships,” Academy of Management Journal, June 2011, pp. 624–441.
47. Adegoke Oke, Natasha Munshi, and Fred O. Walumbwa, “The Influence of Leadership Process on Innovational Processes and Activities,” Organizational Dynamics, January– March 2009, pp. 64–72.
48. Henneman, “Brighter Ideas,” p. 18. 49. Keith H. Hammonds, “No Risk, No Reward,”
Fast Company, April 2002, pp. 81–93. 50. Rob Cross, Andrew Hargadon, Salvatore
Parise, and Robert J. Thomas, “Together We Innovate,” The Wall Street Journal, September 15–16, 2007, p. R6.
51. “The Profit Motive,” p. R11. 52. Sebastian Moffett, “Separation Anxiety,” The
Wall Street Journal, September 27, 2004, p. R11.
53. Jennifer Mueller, Jack A. Goncalo, and Dishan KIamdar, “Recognizing Creative Leadership: Can Creative Idea Expression Negatively Relate to Perceptions of Leadership Potential?” Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, March 2011, pp. 494–498; “A Bias against ‘Quirky’? Why Creative People Can Lose Out on Leadership Positions,” Knowledge@Wharton (http://knowledge.wharton.upenn.edu/), February 16, 2011, pp. 1–3.
54. Walter Isaacson, “The Real Leadership Lessons of Steve Jobs,” Harvard Business Review, April 2012, p. 96.
NOTES 379
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
CH AP
TE R
12 Communication and Conflict Resolution Skills
LEARNING OBJECTIVES After studying this chapter and doing the exercises, you should be able to
• Describe how leaders use communication networks to accomplish their tasks.
• Describe the basics of inspirational and emotion- provoking communication.
• Describe key features of a power-oriented linguistic style.
• Describe the six basic principles of persuasion.
• Describe the challenge of selective listening, and the basics of making the rounds.
• Be sensitive to the importance of overcoming cross- cultural barriers to communication.
• Identify basic approaches to resolving conflict and negotiating.
CHAPTER OUTLINE Communication Networks for Leaders Face-to-Face Communication Networks Social Media Networks
Inspirational and Powerful Communication Speaking and Writing The Six Basic Principles of Persuasion Nonverbal Communication Including Videoconferencing
and Telepresence
Listening as a Leadership Skill Show Respect Selective Listening to Problems Making the Rounds
Overcoming Cross-Cultural Communication Barriers
The Leader’s Role in Resolving Conflict and Negotiating Conflict Management Styles Resolving Conflict Between Two Group Members Negotiating and Bargaining
Summary
Key Terms
Guidelines for Action and Skill Development
Leadership Case Problem A
Leadership Case Problem B
Notes
The CEO of David Yurman, Glen Senk, has been asuccessful retailing executive. Yurman jewelry issold at high-end retailers such as Neiman-Marcus and Saks Fifth Avenue, with big-name actors and
actresses among its wearers. Senk began his retailing career at Bloomingdales, but he is best known for his two decades with Urban Outfitters, beginning in 1994, and becoming CEO in 2007. Urban Outfitters Inc. is a
380 Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s).
Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
company that includes five retail brands: Anthropologie, Free People, Terrain, BHLDN, and Urban Outfitters. The company has 400 locations and projects a hip, funky image, and its offerings include luxury brands. During Senk’s tenure, Urban Outfitters was highly successful.
As a leader, Senk strongly emphasizes the importance of effective communication. During a leadership conference, he pointed to the importance of recruiting and developing a team that is a good fit for the corporate culture. After the team is assembled, it is essential to listen to what employees have to say, even when the feedback isn’t always positive. Senk says, “When you are the CEO, everybody wants to ‘yes’ you; no one wants to give you bad news. But I have to pull the bad news out of them. I need to know what I’m doing wrong.” Communi- cating consistent objectives to employees is also an impor- tant success factor the company.
Senk said that the willingness of managers to debate with him and each other drove the success of Urban
Outfitters while he was CEO. He remembered that in 2000, an Anthropologie executive asked for funding to create a company website. Senk initially dismissed the notion, arguing that the brand’s customers were unlikely to shop online. Yet, Senk listened to the executive and was impressed by the number of hits the website received when it went live.
Senk believes also in the importance of communicat- ing with customers. He once commented that social net- working is word of mouth on steroids. He pointed out that if Urban Outfitters was doing its job, and constantly focused on wowing the customer, then the company would not have to worry about what is said on blogs and social media posts.
Senk holds an undergraduate degree in business from New York University and an MBA from the University of Chicago. While at school, he decided he wanted a career in retail, partly because of its theater and excitement.1
The executive leader just described acts on an obvious truth that many leaders ignore—open communication between company leaders and group members helps an organization overcome problems and attain success. Effective man- agers and leaders listen to employees, and open communications contribute to leadership effectiveness. John Hamm notes that effective communication is a leader’s most essential tool for executing the essential job of leadership: inspir- ing organizational members to take responsibility for creating a better future.2
Effective communication skills contribute to inspirational leadership. Chapter 3 describes how charismatic leaders are masterful oral communica- tors. This chapter expands on this theme and also covers the contribution of written, persuasive, and nonverbal communication. In addition, this chapter describes the leadership use of communication networks, how the ability to overcome cross-cultural communication barriers enhances leadership effec- tiveness. Finally, because leaders spend a substantial amount of communica- tion time resolving conflicts, the chapter also discusses conflict resolution and negotiating skills.
To focus your thinking on your communication effectiveness, complete Leadership Self-Assessment Quiz 12-1.
Communication Networks for Leaders
A major feature of communication by leaders is to rely on networks of con- tacts both in-person and electronically. Without being connected to other people, leaders would find it almost impossible to carry out their various
COMMUNICATION NETWORKS FOR LEADERS 381
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
roles. Communication researchers Bruce Hoppe and Claire Reinelt note that leadership networks are a response to a rapidly changing world in which interconnectedness is important because it facilitates learning and solving complex problems. Networks provide resources and support for leaders. With networks, leaders have more impact because they influence more people.3 Many of these contacts are within the organization, but many are
LEADERSHIP SELF-ASSESSMENT QUIZ 12-1
A Self-Portrait of My Communication Effectiveness
Instructions: The following statements relate to various aspects of communication effectiveness. Indicate whether each of the statements is mostly true or mostly false, even if the most accurate answer would depend somewhat on the situation. Asking another person who is familiar with your communication behavior to help you answer the questions may improve the accuracy of your answers.
MOSTLY TRUE
MOSTLY FALSE
1. When I begin to speak in a group, most people stop talking, turn toward me, and listen. □ □
2. I receive compliments on the quality of my writing, including my e-mail messages and social media postings.
□ □
3. The reaction to the outgoing message on my voice mail has been favorable. □ □
4. I welcome the opportunity to speak in front of a group. □ □
5. I have published something, including a letter to the editor, an article for the school newspaper, or a comment in a company newsletter.
□ □
6. I have my own website, and have received at least two compliments about its effectiveness.
□ □
7. The vast majority of my written projects in school have received a grade of B or A. □ □
8. People generally laugh when I tell a joke or make what I think is a witty comment. □ □
9. I stay informed by reading newspapers, watching news on television, or reading news websites.
□ □
10. I have heard such terms as enthusiastic, animated, colorful, or dynamic applied to me. □ □
11. The text messages I send look a little better in terms of spelling and grammar than most of the text messages I receive.
□ □
Total score: ____________________
Scoring and Interpretation: If eight or more of these statements are true in relation to you, it is most likely that you are an effective communicator. If three or fewer statements are true, you may need substantial improvement in your communication skills. Your scores are probably highly correlated with charisma.
Skill Development: The behaviors indicated by the ten statements in the self-assessment exercise are significant for leaders because much of a leader’s impact is determined by his or her communication style. Although effec- tive leaders vary considerably in their communication style, they usually create a positive impact if they can com- municate well. Observe some current business leaders on CNBC news or a similar channel to develop a feel for the communication style of successful business leaders.
382 CHAPTER 12• COMMUNICATION AND CONFLICT RESOLUTION SKILLS
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
also external, such as communicating with a customer, supplier, govern- ment official, or union official.
Here we describe briefly how organizational leaders use face-to-face (or in-person) as well as social media networks to communicate. Recognize, however, that the categories often overlap. A leader might be chatting with a colleague from another department in the company cafeteria, and then continue the communication that evening by tweeting the network member.
Face-to-Face Communication Networks Developing networks of live interpersonal contacts remains an essential method for a leader building relationships, motivating others, and attaining collaboration. Even the most smartphone-obsessed executives who carry sev- eral mobile devices with them at the same time supplement their electronic messages with some personal contacts. A major reason that face-to-face com- munication networks are vital is that leaders achieve more engagement and credibility when they participate in genuine conversation with the subordinates and coworkers. A conversation in this sense is a frank exchange of ideas and information with an agenda specified or unspecified.4 An example would be a product designer at an automotive manufacturer talking with the CEO about how the company emphasizing fuel-efficient vehicles might make sense for the environment but could be losing sales. The designer might allude to the fact that the latest growth in vehicles sales is for pickup trucks and SUVs, not small-size vehicles. The two people would talk about the issue rather than the CEO delivering as stern message about obeying his or her orders.
According to the research in organizations of Boris Groysberg and Michael Slind, one major factor behind the importance of conversations is organizational change. As organizations have become flatter and less hierarchical, and frontline employees are more involved in value-creating work, lateral and bottom-up communication has attained the importance of top-down communication. Another major factor favoring conversations is generational change. As young people have gained a foothold in organizations, they expect that coworkers and superiors alike to engage in two-way communication with them.5
Various types of leadership networks have been identified, with four of these types being particularly relevant. First is the peer leadership network that is a system of social ties among leaders who are connected through shared interests and commitments, as well as shared work. Network mem- bers share information, provide advice and support, engage in mutual learn- ing, and sometimes collaborate together. Members of the leader’s network are perceived as providing resources that can be trusted.6
The operational network is aimed at doing one’s assigned task more effec- tively. It involves cultivating stronger relationships with coworkers whose membership in the network is clear. Some of these relationships may be part of the formal structure, such as getting cost data from a member of the finance department. Personal networks engage cooperative people from out- side the organization in a person’s effort to develop personally and advance. This type of networking might involve being mentored on how to deal with a
COMMUNICATION NETWORKS FOR LEADERS 383
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
challenge, such as dealing with the problem of sexual harassment by a senior manager. (The personal network has much in common with the peer network, except that it might include people who are not peers.)
Strategic networks focus networking on attaining business goals directly. At this level, the manager creates a network that will help identify and capi- talize on new opportunities for the company, such as breaking into the African market.7 Even when the manager’s own company has good resources for identifying business opportunities, speaking to external people can provide a fresh and useful perspective.
Social Media Networks An important use of the social media is for the leader to build and maintain a professional network, much like being a member of LinkedIn. The productive leader is more likely to focus on contacts of relevance or density rather than focus on accumulating hundreds of superficial network mem- bers. The websites used for networking can be external (or public) as well as internal. Most consulting and management services firms, such as Accenture, have widely internal social media websites.
The strength-of-ties perspective explains the difference between strong and weak ties.8 The quality of a contact in the network is particularly important for social media networks because so many contacts can be of dubious value. A key part of the theory is that there are different densities in different parts of the network. A high-density network consists of close friends or associates linked together, such as CEOs in the same industry exchanging information. In contrast, a low-density network consists of acquaintances linked together.
The relationships among the different actors in a network can be broadly classified into two major types: strong versus weak ties and direct versus indirect ties. An acquaintance would be a weak tie, whereas a close friend would be a strong tie. Strength of ties would ordinarily be measured by fre- quency of contact, yet some contact could be relatively superficial and others might be more emotional and intimate. Melissa might ask Trevor for status reports on his prediction about currency fluctuation, whereas she talks to Sylvie about her career and her relationship with her boss. (The conversation about the relationship with the boss would probably only take place on a social media website if it could not be observed by others.)
Direct versus indirect ties relate to whether you are directly connected to a person because of a contact you developed, or indirectly, such as a friend of a friend. Your direct contact might be Mike, but Mike is connected to Sally, so Sally is an indirect contact.
A caution about internal social networking sites such as Yammer and Chatter is that the leader or other worker will communicate in the same brash, insulting, and overly casual manner often found on public social net- working sites. The result is that the leader or other worker will appear unprofessional, thereby detracting from his or her leadership image. Noshir Contractor, a professor of behavioral sciences at Northwestern University, warns that people can fall into the trap of being too informal on internal
384 CHAPTER 12• COMMUNICATION AND CONFLICT RESOLUTION SKILLS
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
social media sites. “When you’re considered for a promotion ... anything you said on Yammer will be used in some case to determine if you’re quali- fied,” said Contractor.9
Inspirational and Powerful Communication
Information about communicating persuasively and effectively is extensive. Here we focus on suggestions for creating the high-impact communication that contributes to effective leadership. Effective communication is fre- quently a criterion for being promoted to a leadership position. U.S. Senator and former mayor of Newark, N.J., Cory Booker, reminds us that the real communicators are those who can motivate people to act and ultimately lead themselves.10 In this section, suggestions for becoming an inspirational and emotion-provoking communicator are divided into the following two categories: (1) speaking and writing, and (2) nonverbal communication. We also discuss six basic principles of persuasion.
Speaking and Writing You are already familiar with the basics of effective spoken and written com- munication. Yet, the basics—such as writing and speaking clearly, maintain- ing eye contact, and not mumbling—are only starting points. The majority of effective leaders have an extra snap or panache in their communication style, both in day-by-day conversations and when addressing a group. The same energy and excitement is reflected in both speaking and writing. Suggestions for dynamic and persuasive oral and written communication are presented next and outlined in Table 12-1.
TABLE 12-1 Suggestions for Inspirational Speaking and Writing
A. A Variety of Inspirational Tactics
1. Be credible.
2. Gear your message to the listener.
3. Sell group members on the benefits of your suggestions.
4. Use heavy-impact and emotion-provoking words.
5. Use anecdotes to communicate meaning.
6. Back up conclusions with data (to a point).
7. Minimize language errors, junk words, and vocalized pauses.
8. Write crisp, clear memos, letters, and reports, including a front-loaded message.
9. Use business jargon in appropriate doses.
B. The Power-Oriented Linguistic Style
Included here are a variety of factors such as downplaying uncertainty, emphasizing direct rather than indirect talk, and choosing an effective communication frame.
© Ce ng ag e Le ar ni ng
INSPIRATIONAL AND POWERFUL COMMUNICATION 385
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
Be Credible Attempts at persuasion, including inspirational speaking and writing, begin with the credibility of the message sender. If the speaker is perceived as highly credible, the attempt at persuasive communication is more likely to be successful. The perception of credibility is influenced by many factors, including those covered in this entire section. Being trustwor- thy heavily influences being perceived as credible. A leader with a reputa- tion for lying will have a difficult time convincing people about the merits of a new initiative such as outsourcing. Being perceived as intelligent and knowledgeable is another major factor contributing to credibility.
Gear Your Message to the Listener, Including His or Her Needs An axiom of persuasive communication is that a speaker must adapt the message to the listener’s interests and motivations. The company CEO visiting a manufacturing plant will receive careful attention—and build support— when he says that jobs will not be outsourced to another country. The same CEO will receive the support of stockholders when he emphasizes how cost reductions will boost earnings per share and enlarge dividends.
In order to gear your message to the listener, it is usually necessary to figure out what he or she wants, or deal with the other person’s perceived self-interest.11 Visualize the head of a customer support center who believes strongly that more funding is necessary to meet the demands placed on the department. To be convincing, the woman needs to figure out what the CEO really expects from a customer support center. Careful listening might indicate that the CEO is mainly interested in customers not asking for refunds and/or badmouthing the company face-to-face as well as online. The customer support head can then direct her pitch for more funding in terms of how an expanded department can reduce merchandise returns and customer complaints.
The average intelligence level of the group is a key contingency factor in designing a persuasive message. People with high intelligence tend to be more influenced by messages based on strong, logical arguments. Bright people are also more likely to reject messages based on flawed logic.12
Sell Group Members on the Benefits of Your Suggestions A leader is constrained by the willingness of group members to take action on his or her sugges- tions and initiatives. As a consequence, the leader must explain to group members how they can benefit from what he or she proposes. For example, a plant manager attempting to sell employees on the benefits of recycling supplies as much as possible might say, “If we can cut down enough on the cost of supplies, we might be able to save one or two jobs.”
Use Heavy-Impact and Emotion-Provoking Words Certain words used in the proper context give power and force to your speech. Used comfortably, natu- rally, and sincerely, these words will project the image of a self-confident person with leadership ability or potential. Two examples of heavy-impact phrases are “We will be outsourcing those portions of our knowledge work that are not mis- sion critical” and “We will be leading edge in both product development and business processes.” However, too much of this type of language will make the
386 CHAPTER 12• COMMUNICATION AND CONFLICT RESOLUTION SKILLS
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
leader appear that he or she is imitating a Dilbert cartoon (a long-running cartoon satire about managers and businesspeople).
Closely related to heavy-impact language is the use of emotion-provoking words. An expert persuasive tactic is to sprinkle your speech with emotion- provoking—and therefore inspiring—words. Emotion-provoking words bring forth images of exciting events. Examples of emotion-provoking and powerful words include “outclassing the competition,” “bonding with customers,” “sur- passing previous profits,” “capturing customer loyalty,” and “rebounding from a downturn.”
Communications specialist Frank Lunt found that five words resonate in the current business world: consequences, impact, reliability, mission, and commitment. A leader who incorporated these words into his or her busi- ness vocabulary would therefore be influential.13 It also helps to use words and phrases that connote being modern. Those now in vogue include virtual organization, transparent organization, and seamless organization.
A large vocabulary assists using both heavy-impact and emotion- provoking words. When you need to persuade somebody on the spot, it is difficult to search for the right words in a dictionary or thesaurus—even if you access the Internet with your smartphone. Also, you need to practice a word a few times to use it comfortably for an important occasion.
Use Anecdotes to Communicate Meaning Anecdotes are a powerful part of a lea- der’s kit of persuasive and influence tactics, as already mentioned in this chapter and in Chapter 3 about charismatic leadership. Although storytelling is an ancient art, it is more in vogue than ever as a method for leaders to influence and inspire others. A carefully chosen anecdote is also useful in persuading group members about the importance of organizational values. So long as the anecdote is not repeated too frequently, it can communicate an important message.
Zippo is a consumer products company that has hundreds of anecdotes to share about how those sturdy steel cigarette lighters saved somebody’s life by deflecting a bullet. It seems that the stories originated in World War II but have continued into modern times, such as how a Zippo in the pocket of a police worker prevented a criminal’s bullet from killing the officer. Zippo leaders can inspire workers with such heroic tales starring the Zippo lighter. In recent years, Zippo has shifted into many nonsmoking-related products, but the anecdotes are still inspiring for the nonsmoker.
Back Up Conclusions with Data You will be more persuasive if you support your spoken and written presentations with solid data. One approach to obtaining data is to collect them yourself—for example, by conducting an online survey of your customers or group members. Published sources also provide convincing data for arguments. Supporting data for hundreds of arguments can be found in the business pages of newspapers, in business magazines and newspapers, and on the Internet. The Statistical Abstract of the United States, published annually, is an inexpensive yet trusted reference for thousands of arguments.
INSPIRATIONAL AND POWERFUL COMMUNICATION 387
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
Relying too much on research has a potential disadvantage, however. Being too dependent on data could suggest that you have little faith in your own intuition. For example, you might convey an impression of weakness if, when asked your opinion, you respond, “I can’t answer until I collect some data.” Leaders are generally decisive. An important issue, then, is for the leader to find the right balance between relying on data and using intuition alone when communicating an important point.
Minimize Language Errors, Junk Words, and Vocalized Pauses Using colorful, powerful words enhances the perception that you are self-confident and have leadership qualities. Also, minimize the use of words and phrases that dilute the impact of your speech, such as “like,” “y know,” “you know what I mean,” “he goes” (to mean “he says”), and “uh.” Such junk words and vocalized pauses convey the impression of low self-confidence, especially in a professional setting, and detract from a sharp communication image.
An effective way to decrease the use of these extraneous words is to video-record your side of a phone conversation and then play it back. Many people are not aware that they use extraneous words until they hear record- ings of their speech.
An effective leader should be sure always to write and speak with gram- matical precision to give the impression of being articulate and well informed, thereby enhancing his or her leadership stature. Here are two examples of common language errors: “Just between you and I” is wrong; “just between you and me” is correct. “Him and I,” or “her and I,” are incor- rect phrases despite how frequently they creep into social and business language. “He and I” and “she and I” are correct when used as the subjects of a sentence. “Him and me” or “Her and me” are correct when used as the objects of a sentence. For example, “She and I greeted the client” and “The client greeted her and me” are both correct.
Another very common error is using the plural pronoun they to refer to a singular antecedent. For example, “The systems analyst said that they can- not help us” is incorrect. “The systems analyst said she cannot help us” is correct. Using they to refer to a singular antecedent has become so common in the English language that many people no longer make the distinction between singular and plural. For example, nowadays most people say, “Everyone placed their order,” when actually “Everyone placed his (or her) order” is the grammatically correct statement. Staff at Facebook systemati- cally confuse singular and plural with such statements as “What does Jessica do in their spare time?” Some of these errors are subtle and are made so frequently that many people do not realize they are wrong; but again, avoiding grammatical errors may enhance a person’s leadership stature.
Perhaps the most common language error business leaders make is to convert hundreds of nouns into verbs. Many nouns do become legitimate verbs, such as using the noun phone for a verb, such as “I will phone you later.” The leader has to set a limit, and perhaps not use such verb-to-noun conversions such as, “Facebook me tonight,” “Focus-group this problem,” and “Skype me a message.” Yet, the hip leader will correctly use nouns that
388 CHAPTER 12• COMMUNICATION AND CONFLICT RESOLUTION SKILLS
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
have been recently been converted into dual use as a verb and noun, such as “Google some potential customers for this product.” Judgment is called for with respect to which nouns should be used as verbs to avoid sounding silly, and therefore weak.
When in doubt about a potential language error, consult a respected dic- tionary. An authoritative guide for the leader (and anyone else) who chooses to use English accurately is The Elements of Style by William Strunk Jr. and E. B. White.14 First published in 1918, the book has its critics but has sold millions of copies.
Use Business Jargon in Appropriate Doses Business and government executives and professionals make frequent use of jargon. (Only athletic coaches exceed businesspeople in the heavy use of jargon and clichés.) Often the jar- gon is used automatically without deliberate thought, and at other times jargon words and phrases are chosen to help establish rapport with the receiver. A vastly overused phrase these days is “at the end of the day,” with “buckets” fighting for second place. “The end of the day” has come to replace “in the final analysis,” and “buckets” replace “categories.” Many businesspeople say “at the end of the day” twice in the same few sentences.
Six major executives and management professors were asked which buzzwords they would ban from conversation in the boardroom, office, and beyond: The six disliked buzzwords, or jargon words, were “push the enve- lope,” “de-layering” (in place of downsizing), “dynamic resilience,” “out- of-the-box thinking,” “passionate,” and “viral.”15
Sprinkling business talk with jargon does indeed help establish rapport and adds to a person’s popularity. But too much jargon makes a person seem stereotyped in thinking, and perhaps even unwilling to express an original thought—and therefore lacking power.
Write Crisp and Clear Memos, Letters, and Reports that Include a Front-Loaded Message Business leaders characteristically write easy-to-read, well- organized messages, both in e-mail and in more formal reports. Writing, in addition to speaking, is more persuasive when key ideas are placed at the beginning of a conversation, e-mail message, paragraph, or sentence.16
Front-loaded messages (those placed at the beginning of a sentence) are particularly important for leaders because people expect leaders to be force- ful communicators. A front-loaded and powerful message might be “Cost reduction must be our immediate priority,” which emphasizes that cost reduction is the major subject. It is clearly much more to the point than, for example, “All of us must reduce costs immediately.”
One way to make sure messages are front-loaded is to use the active voice, making sure the subject of the sentence is doing the acting, not being acted upon. Compare the active (and front-loaded) message “Loyal workers should not take vacations during a company crisis” to the passive (not front-loaded) message “Vacations should not be taken by loyal workers during a company crisis.” Recognize, however, that less emphasis is placed on the active voice today than several years ago. Also, the passive voice
INSPIRATIONAL AND POWERFUL COMMUNICATION 389
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
may be necessary for front-loading, as in “Cloud backups are recommended by cybersecurity experts.”
Suggestions for effective business writing continue to evolve, and many of these tips are worthy of a leader’s or potential leader’s attention. For example, there is much less emphasis using “Dear” in a salutation, particu- larly in the United States. Yet, “Hello” beats “Hey” for appearing dignified.
Use a Power-Oriented Linguistic Style A major part of being persuasive involves choosing the correct linguistic style, a person’s characteristic speaking pattern. According to Deborah Tannen, linguistic style involves such aspects as the amount of directness, pacing and pausing, word choice, and the use of such communication devices as jokes, figures of speech, anecdotes, questions, and apologies.17
Linguistic style is complex because it includes the culturally learned signals by which people communicate what they mean, along with how they interpret what others say and how they evaluate others. The complexity of linguistic style makes it difficult to offer specific prescriptions for using one that is power ori- ented. Many of the elements of a power-oriented linguistic style are included in other suggestions made in this section of the chapter, including using heavy- impact words. Nevertheless, here are several components of a linguistic style that would give power and authority to the message sender in many situations, as observed by Deborah Tannen and other language specialists:18
• Speak loudly enough to be heard by the majority of people with at least average hearing ability. Speaking too softly projects an image of low self- confidence.
• Use the pronoun I to receive more credit for your ideas. (Of course, this could backfire in a team-based organization.)
• Minimize self-deprecation with phrases such as “This will probably sound stupid, but ...” Apologize infrequently, and particularly minimize saying, “I’m sorry.”
• Make your point quickly. You know you are taking too long to reach a conclusion when others look bored or finish your sentences for you.
• Emphasize direct rather than indirect talk: Say, “I need your report by noon tomorrow,” rather than, “I’m wondering if your report will be available by noon tomorrow.”
• Weed out wimpy words. Speak up without qualifying or giving other indices of uncertainty. It is better to give dates for the completion of a project rather than say “I’ll get it to you soon” or “It shouldn’t be a problem.” Instead, make a statement like “I will have my portion of the strategic plan shortly before Thanksgiving. I need to collect input from my team and sift through the information.”
• Know exactly what you want. Your chances of selling an idea increase to the extent that you have clarified the idea in your own mind. The clearer and more committed you are at the outset of a session, the stronger you are as a persuader and the more powerful your language becomes.
• Speak at length, set the agenda for a conversation, make jokes, and laugh. Be ready to offer solutions to problems, as well as to suggest a
390 CHAPTER 12• COMMUNICATION AND CONFLICT RESOLUTION SKILLS
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
program or plan. All of these points are more likely to create a sense of confidence in listeners.
• Strive to be bold in your statements. As a rule of thumb, be bold about ideas, but tentative about people. If you say something like “I have a plan that I think will solve these problems,” you are presenting an idea, not attacking a person.
• Frame your comments in a way that increases your listener’s receptivity. The frame is built around the best context for responding to the needs of others. An example would be to use the frame, “Let’s dig a little deeper,” when the other people present know something is wrong but cannot pin- point the problem. Your purpose is to enlist the help of others in finding the underlying nature of the problem.
Despite these suggestions for having a power-oriented linguistic style, Tannen cautions that there is no one best way to communicate. How you project your power and authority is often dependent on the people involved, the organizational culture, the relative rank of the speakers, and other situa- tional factors. The power-oriented linguistic style should be interpreted as a general guideline.
The Six Basic Principles of Persuasion Persuasion is a major form of influence, so it has gained in importance in the modern organization because of the reason described in Chapter 8: Managers must often influence people for whom they have no formal responsibility. The trend stems from leaner corporate hierarchies and the breaking down of division walls. Managers must persuade peers in situa- tions where lines of authority are unclear or do not exist. One way to be persuasive is to capitalize on scientific evidence about how to persuade peo- ple. Robert B. Cialdini has synthesized knowledge from experimental and social psychology about methods for getting people to concede, comply, or change. These principles can also be framed as influence principles, but with a focus on persuasion.19 The six principles described next have accom- panying tactics that can be used to supplement the other approaches to per- suasion described in this chapter.
1. Liking: People like those who like them. As a leader, you have a better chance of persuading and influencing group members who like you. Emphasizing similarities between you and the other person and offering praise are the two most reliable techniques for getting another person to like you. The leader should therefore emphasize similarities, such as com- mon interests with group members. Praising others is a powerful influence technique and can be used effectively even when the leader finds something relatively small to compliment. Genuine praise is the most effective.
2. Reciprocity: People repay in kind. Managers can often influence group members to behave in a particular way by displaying the behavior first. The leader might therefore serve as a model of trust, good ethics, or strong com- mitment to company goals. In short, give what you want to receive.
INSPIRATIONAL AND POWERFUL COMMUNICATION 391
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
3. Social proof: People follow the lead of similar others. Persuasion can have high impact when it comes from peers. If you as the leader want to influence a group to convert to a new procedure, such as virtually eliminat- ing paper records in the office, ask a believer to speak up in a meeting or send his or her statement of support via e-mail. (But do not send around paper documents.)
4. Consistency: People align with their clear commitments. People need to feel committed to what you want them to do. After people take a stand or go on record in favor of a position, they prefer to stay with that commit- ment. Suppose you are the team leader and you want team members to become more active in the community as a way of creating a favorable image for the firm. If the team members talk about their plans to get involved and also put their plans in writing, they are more likely to follow through. If the people involved read their action plans to each other, the commitment will be even stronger.
5. Authority: People defer to experts. The action plan here is to make con- stituents aware of your expertise to enhance the probability that your plan will persuade them. A leader might mention certification in the technical area that is the subject of influence. For example, a leader attempting to persuade team members to use statistical data to improve quality might mention that he or she is certified in the quality process Six Sigma (is a Six Sigma Black Belt).
6. Scarcity: People want more of what they can have less of. An application of this principle is that the leader can persuade group members to act in a par- ticular direction if the members believe that the resource at issue is shrinking rapidly. They might be influenced to enroll in a course in outsourcing knowl- edge work, for example, if they are told that the course may not be offered again for a long time. Another way to apply this principle is to persuade group members by using information not readily available to others. The leader might say, “I have some preliminary sales data. If we can increase our sales by just 10 percent in the last month of this quarter, we could be the highest per- forming unit in the company.”
The developer of these principles explains that they should be applied in combination to multiply their impact. For example, while establishing your expertise you might simultaneously praise people for their accomplish- ments. It is also important to be ethical, such as by not fabricating data to influence others.20
Nonverbal Communication Including Videoconferencing and Telepresence Effective leaders are masterful nonverbal as well as verbal communica- tors. Nonverbal communication is important because leadership involves emotion, which words alone cannot communicate convincingly. A major
392 CHAPTER 12• COMMUNICATION AND CONFLICT RESOLUTION SKILLS
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
component of the emotional impact of a message is communicated nonverbally.
A self-confident leader not only speaks and writes with assurance but also projects confidence through body position, gestures, and manner of speech. Not everybody interprets the same body language and other nonverbal signals in the same way, but some aspects of nonverbal behavior project a self- confident leadership image in many situations.21
• Using an erect posture when walking, standing, or sitting. Slouching and slumping are almost universally interpreted as an indicator of low self-confidence.
• Standing up straight during a confrontation. Cowering is interpreted as a sign of low self-confidence and poor leadership qualities.
• Patting other people on the back while nodding slightly. • Standing with toes pointing outward rather than inward. Outward-
pointing toes are usually perceived as indicators of superior status, whereas inward-pointing toes are perceived to indicate inferiority. Also, opening limbs at 18 inches or more expresses power and dominance.
• Speaking at a moderate pace, with a loud, confident tone. People lacking in self-confidence tend to speak too rapidly or very slowly.
• Smiling frequently in a relaxed, natural-appearing manner. • Maintaining eye contact with those around you, with the ideal
gaze lasting about seven to ten seconds. The ability to make eye contact has multiplied in importance as a sign of leadership because so many people are accustomed to looking at their mobile devices at every possible moment, and therefore lack skill in looking directly at people.
• Gesturing in a relaxed, nonmechanical way, including pointing toward others in a way that welcomes rather than accuses, such as using a gesture to indicate, “You’re right,” or “It’s your turn to comment.”
• Having a big desk or big chair helps project a powerful image, yet the opportunities for having such trappings of power are diminishing in organizations. Related to this finding is that taking up a lot of space, which might include extending the arms, conveys power and confidence.
A general approach to using nonverbal behavior that projects confi- dence is to have a goal of appearing self-confident and powerful. This type of autosuggestion makes many of the behaviors seem automatic. For example, if you say, “I am going to display leadership qualities in this meeting,” you will have taken an important step toward appearing confident.
Your external image also plays an important role in communicating messages to others. People pay more respect and grant more privileges to those they perceive as being well dressed and neatly groomed. Even on casual dress days, most effective leaders will choose clothing that gives them an edge over others. Appearance includes more than the
INSPIRATIONAL AND POWERFUL COMMUNICATION 393
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
choice of clothing. Self-confidence is projected by such small items as the following:
• Neatly pressed and sparkling clean clothing • Freshly polished shoes • Impeccable fingernails • Clean jewelry in mint condition • Well-maintained hair • Good-looking teeth with a white or antique-white (or off-white) color
What constitutes a powerful and self-confident external image is often influenced by the organizational culture. At a software development com- pany, for example, powerful people might dress more casually than at an investment banking firm. Leadership at many law firms is moving back toward formal business attire for the professional staff. Your verbal behav- ior and the forms of nonverbal behavior previously discussed contribute more to your leadership image than your clothing, providing you dress acceptably.
Videoconferencing places extra demands on the nonverbal communication skills of leaders, managers, and other participants. A recent advance in video- conferencing, referred to as telepresence, places even more demands on non- verbal communication skills because it appears closer to human presence. For example, the illumination highlights the facial features of the people sit- ting in the telepresence studio. Some telepresence systems are custom-built meeting rooms equipped with a bank of high-definition screens and cameras. Other systems take the form of humanoid robots that are used outside of meeting rooms. Etiquette tips for making a strong nonverbal presence during a videoconference or telepresence conference include the following (and are similar to nonverbal communication suggestions in general):
• Choose what you wear carefully, remembering that busy (confusing and complex) patterns look poor on video. Also do not wear formal attire mixed with running shoes because you might move into full camera view.
• Speak in crisp conversational tones and pay attention. (The tone and paying attention are the nonverbal aspects of communication.)
• Never forget the video camera’s powerful reach, such as catching you rolling your eyes when you disagree with a subordinate, or sending and receiving text messages during the conference.
• Avoid culturally insensitive gestures including large hand and body gestures that make many Asians feel uncomfortable. Asians believe that you should have long-term relationships before being demonstrative.22
An effective way of sharpening your videoconferencing and telepresence nonverbal skills, as well as other nonverbal skills, is to be videotaped several times. Make adjustments for anything you don’t like, and repeat what you do like. Feedback on your behavior from another observer can be quite helpful.
Now that you have refreshed your thoughts on effective verbal and non- verbal communication, do Leadership Skill-Building Exercise 12-1.
394 CHAPTER 12• COMMUNICATION AND CONFLICT RESOLUTION SKILLS
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
Listening as a Leadership Skill
Listening is a fundamental management and leadership skill. Listening also provides the opportunity for dialogue and conversation, in which people understand each other better by taking turns having their point of view understood. For a leader to support and encourage a subordi- nate, active listening (as described in the discussion of coaching) is required. Also, effective leader–member exchanges require that each party listen to one another. The relationship between two parties cannot be enhanced unless each one listens to the other. Furthermore, leaders cannot identify problems unless they listen carefully to group members. Multitasking is a major deterrent to listening carefully to subordinates because the leader who is involved in another task at the moment, such as glancing at a tablet computer, is not paying full attention to the speaker.
An effective approach to develop good listening habits is to remember to ask questions—and then listen to the answers. Bill Kanarick, the senior vice president and chief marketing officer of Sapient Corp., a global services company, believes that the organizational culture contributes to effective listening. He says that it is incumbent upon the company to create an envi- ronment that welcomes exploration and questioning.23
Two major impediments face the leader who wants to be an effective listener. First, the leader is so often overloaded with responsibilities, including analytical work, that it is difficult to take the time to carefully listen to subordinates. Second is the speed difference between speaking and listening. The average rate of speaking is between 110 and 200 words per minute, yet people can listen in the range of 400 to 3,000 words per minute. So the leader, as well as anybody else, will often let his or her mind wander.
LEADERSHIP SKILL-BUILDING EXERCISE 12-1
Feedback on Verbal and Nonverbal Behavior
Ten volunteers have one week to prepare a three-minute presentation on a course-related subject of their choice. The topics of these presentations could be as far-reaching as “The Importance of Investing in Gold” or “My Goals and Dreams.” The class members who observe the presentations prepare feedback slips on 3 ! 5 cards, describing how well the speakers communicated power- fully and inspirationally. One card per speaker is usually sufficient. Notations should be made for both verbal and nonverbal feedback.
Emphasis should be placed on positive feedback and constructive suggestions. Students pass the feedback cards along to the speakers. The cards can be anony- mous to encourage frankness, but they should not be mean-spirited.
Persuading and inspiring others is one of the main vehicles for practicing leadership. Knowing how others perceive you helps you polish and refine your impact.
LISTENING AS A LEADERSHIP SKILL 395
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
Here we look at three leadership aspects of listening to supplement your general knowledge of listening, acquired most likely in other courses: showing respect, selective listening to problems, and making the rounds.
Show Respect A foundation tactic for a leader to become an effective listener is to show respect for others. Consultant Bernard T. Ferran provides the case in point of the COO of a large medical institution. He told Ferran that he could not run an operation as complex as a hospital without gathering input from staff members at all levels—from the chief of surgery to the custodial crew. The chief operating officer let everyone know that he believed each one of them had something unique to contribute. As the executive drew out the critical information, he attentively processed what he heard. Part of the COO’s being liked and admired stemmed from his listening approach.24
Selective Listening to Problems Organizational leaders are so often bombarded with demands and informa- tion that it is difficult to be attentive to a full range of problems. So the leader makes an intentional or unintentional decision to listen to just cer- tain problems. Erika H. James notes that despite how our brains ordinarily work, success is dependent on staying open to all incoming information.25
The busy leader must avoid listening to limited categories of information such as good news, bad news, or financial news. A CEO with a propensity to listen only to financial results might ignore any word of problems so long as the company is earning a profit.
Making the Rounds A robust communication channel for the leader/manager is to engage in face-to-face communication with direct reports and others, with an empha- sis on listening. Making the rounds refers to the leader casually dropping by constituents to listen to their accomplishments, concerns, and problems and to share information. Rounding is a well-established concept from health care in which the physician talks to patients and other health care workers to observe problems and progress firsthand.26 Through rounding, vital information is gathered if the physician or manager listens carefully. Making the rounds is also referred to as management by wandering (or walk- ing) around, yet rounding seems more focused and systematic.
From the perspective of listening, the leader stays alert to potential pro- blems. Assume that a subordinate is asked, “How are things going?” and he or she replies, “Not too terrible.” This response begs a little digging, such as, “What is happening that is a little terrible?”
Leadership Skill-Building Exercise 12-2 gives you an opportunity to try out the fundamental leadership skill of listening.
396 CHAPTER 12• COMMUNICATION AND CONFLICT RESOLUTION SKILLS
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
Overcoming Cross-Cultural Communication Barriers
Another communication challenge facing leaders and managers is overcoming communication barriers created by dealing with people from different cultures and subcultures. Leaders typically communicate with people from other coun- tries and with a more diverse group of people in their own country. Because of this workplace diversity, leaders who can manage a multicultural and cross- cultural work force are in strong demand. Here we give some guidelines for overcoming a variety of cross-cultural communication barriers. Implementing these guidelines will help overcome and prevent many communication problems. A useful starting point here is to take Leadership Self-Assessment Quiz 12-2 to help you think through your cross-cultural skills and attitudes.
LEADERSHIP SKILL-BUILDING EXERCISE 12-2
Leadership Listening
Six or seven students gather for a team meeting to dis- cuss an important operational problem, such as finding new ways to reduce the cycle time required to complete their tasks, or deciding how to convince top manage- ment to expand the team budget. One person plays the role of the team leader. All of the group members take turns at making both useful and apparently not useful
suggestions. The team leader, along with team mem- bers, displays careful listening whenever ideas surface. Students not directly involved in the group role play will take note of the listening skills they observe so that they can provide feedback later. Be particularly observant of selective listening. If class time allows, another team of six or seven students can repeat the group role play.
LEADERSHIP SELF-ASSESSMENT QUIZ 12-2
Cross-Cultural Skills and Attitudes
Instructions: Listed here are various skills and attitudes that various employers and cross-cultural experts think are important for relating effectively to coworkers in a culturally diverse environment. Indicate whether or not each statement applies to you.
APPLIES TO ME NOW
NOT THERE YET
1. I have spent some time in another country. □ □
2. At least one of my friends is deaf, blind, or uses a wheelchair. □ □
3. I have an approximate idea of how much the U.S. dollar is worth in comparison to the euro.
□ □
4. I have tried eating food from a culture much different than my own— aside from eating in a Chinese or Italian restaurant.
□ □
5. I can speak in a language other than my own. □ □
6. I can read and write in a language other than my own. □ □
OVERCOMING CROSS-CULTURAL COMMUNICATION BARRIERS 397
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
1. Be sensitive to the fact that cross-cultural communication barriers exist. Awareness of these potential barriers is the first step in dealing with them. When dealing with a person of a different cultural background, solicit feedback to minimize cross-cultural barriers to communication. For example, investigate which types of praise or other rewards might be ineffective for a par- ticular cultural group. In many instances, Asians newly arrived in the United States feel uncomfortable being praised in front of others because in Asian cul- tures group performance is valued more than individual performance.
Being alert to cultural differences in values, attitudes, and etiquette will help you communicate more effectively with people from different cultures. Observe carefully the cultural mistakes listed in Table 12-2. At the same time, recognize that these mistakes are based on cultural stereotypes and reflect typical or average behavior of members of a particular cultural group.
2. Challenge your cultural assumptions. The assumptions we make about cultural groups can create communication barriers. The assumption you make about another group may not necessarily be incorrect, but stopping to challenge the assumptions may facilitate communication. A U.S. leader, for example, might assume that the norms of independence and autonomy
QUIZ 12-2 (continued)
APPLIES TO ME NOW
NOT THERE YET
7. I can understand people speaking in a language other than my own. □ □
8. I can identify a religious holiday from at least three religions. □ □
9. My friends include people of races different from my own. □ □
10. My friends include people of different ages. □ □
11. I feel (or would feel) comfortable having a friend with a sexual orientation dif- ferent from mine.
□ □
12. My attitude is that although another culture may be very different from mine, that culture is equally good.
□ □
13. I would be willing to (or already do) hang art from different countries in my home. □ □
14. I would accept (or have already accepted) a work assignment of more than several months in another country.
□ □
15. I have a passport. □ □
Scoring and Interpretation: If you answered “Applies to Me Now” to ten or more questions, you most likely func- tion well in a multicultural work environment. If you answered “Not There Yet” to ten or more questions, you need to develop more cross-cultural awareness and skills to work effectively in a multicultural work environment. You will notice that being bilingual gives you at least 4 points on this quiz.
Source: Several ideas for statements on this quiz are derived from Ruthann Dirks and Janet Buzzard, “What CEOs Expect of Employees Hired for International Work,” Business Education Forum, April 1997, pp. 3–7; Gunnar Beeth, “Multicultural Managers Wanted,” Management Review, May 1997, pp. 17–21.
398 CHAPTER 12• COMMUNICATION AND CONFLICT RESOLUTION SKILLS
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
TABLE 12-2 Cultural Mistakes to Avoid with Selected Cultural Groups
Europe
Great Britain • Asking personal questions. The British protect their privacy. • Thinking that a businessperson from England is unenthusiastic when he or she says, “Not bad at all.”
English people understate positive emotion. • Gossiping about royalty.
France • Expecting to complete work during the French two-hour lunch. • Attempting to conduct significant business during August—la vacance (vacation time). • Greeting a French person for the first time and not using a title such as sir or madam (or monsieur, madame,
or mademoiselle).
Italy • Eating too much pasta, as it is not the main course. • Handing out business cards freely. Italians use them infrequently.
Spain • Expecting punctuality. Your appointments will usually arrive twenty to thirty minutes late. • Making the U.S. sign for “OK” with your thumb and forefinger. In Spain (and many other countries), this is vulgar.
Scandinavia (Denmark, Sweden, Norway)
• Being overly rank-conscious in these countries. Scandinavians pay relatively little attention to a person’s place in the hierarchy.
Asia
All Asian Countries • Pressuring an Asian job applicant or employee to brag about his or her accomplishments. Asians feel self-conscious when boasting about individual accomplishments and prefer to let the record speak for itself. In addition, they prefer to talk about group rather than individual accomplishment.
Japan • Shaking hands or hugging Japanese (as well as other Asians) in public. Japanese consider the practices offensive.
• Not interpreting “We’ll consider it” as a “no” when spoken by a Japanese businessperson. Japanese negotiators mean “no” when they say, “We’ll consider it.”
• Not giving small gifts to Japanese when conducting business. Japanese are offended by not receiving these gifts.
• Giving your business card to a Japanese businessperson more than once. Japanese prefer to give and receive business cards only once.
China • Not taking a business card presented to you seriously, such as quickly putting it in your pocket. • Using a strong handshake instead of a limp one. Insisting on a handshake rather than a polite bow. • Making cold calls on Chinese business executives. An appropriate introduction is required for a first-time
meeting with a Chinese official. • Giving expensive gifts because this may obligate the person to reciprocate with something of equal value
to you. Giving a clock can sometimes backfire because the Mandarin word for “to give clocks” resembles “to attend a dying relative.”
Korea • Saying “no.” Koreans feel it is important to have visitors leave with good feelings. India
Thailand
• Telling Indians you prefer not to eat with your hands. If the Indians are not using cutlery when eating, they expect you to do likewise.
• Putting the sole of your shoes toward another person. (It’s not so cool in other countries also.) Be aware of this potential mistake when sitting.
Mexico and Latin America
Mexico • Flying into a Mexican city in the morning and expecting to close a deal by lunch. Mexicans build business relationships slowly.
Brazil • Attempting to impress Brazilians by speaking a few words of Spanish. Portuguese is the official language of Brazil.
Most Latin American Countries
• Wearing elegant and expensive jewelry during a business meeting. Most Latin Americans think Americans should appear more conservative during a business meeting.
A cultural mistake for Americans to avoid when conducting business in most countries outside the United States and Canada is to insist on getting down to business too quickly. North Americans in small towns also like to build a relationship before getting down to business. Also, the entire world is becoming more informal, as evidenced by people from different cultures addressing others by their first name upon first meeting.
Source: The first and third items about China are adapted from Eric Spitsnagel, “Impress Your Chinese Boss,” Bloomberg Businessweek, January 16, 2012, pp. 8081.
OVERCOMING CROSS-CULTURAL COMMUNICATION BARRIERS 399
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
are valued by all groups in the workplace. In reality, the idea of individual accomplishment does not have positive connotations for all groups. Among many Latino cultural groups, interpersonal harmony is valued over individual accomplishment.
3. Show respect for all workers. The same behavior that promotes good cross-cultural relations in general helps overcome communication barriers. A widely used comment that implies disrespect is to say to a person from another culture, “You have a funny accent.” Should you be transposed to that person’s culture, you too might have a “funny accent.” The attitude of highest respect is to communicate your belief that although another per- son’s culture is different from yours, it is not inferior to your culture. Show- ing respect for another culture can be more important than being bilingual in overcoming communication barriers.27
4. Use straightforward language, and speak slowly and clearly. When working with people who do not speak your language fluently, speak in an easy-to-understand manner. Minimize the use of idioms and analogies specific to your language. A systems analyst from New Delhi, India, left confused after a performance review with her manager. The manager said, “I will be giving you more important assignments because I notice some good chemistry between us.” The woman did not understand that good chemistry means rapport, and she did not ask for clarification because she did not want to appear uninformed.
Speaking slowly is also important because even people who read and write a second language at an expert level may have difficulty catching some nuances of conversation. Facing the person from another culture directly also improves communication because your facial expressions and lips contribute to compre- hension. And remember, there is no need to speak much louder.
5. Look for signs of misunderstanding when your language is not the listener’s native language. Signs of misunderstanding may include nods and smiles not directly connected to what you are saying, a lack of ques- tions, inappropriate laughter, and a blank expression. If these signs are present, work harder to apply the suggestions in point 4.28
6. When the situation is appropriate, speak in the language of the people from another culture. Americans who can speak another language are at a competitive advantage when dealing with businesspeople who speak that language. The language skill, however, must be more advanced than speak- ing a few basic words and phrases. Speaking the local language will often bring a person more insight and prevent misunderstandings. Equally impor- tant, being bilingual helps bring a person the respect that a leader needs to be fully credible.29
A frustration the native English speaker who is using another language faces is that so many people around the world capitalize on an opportunity to speak English. So the leader who speaks another language to establish rapport might be rebuffed. Despite this problem, speaking another language in the workplace is likely to have a positive net effect.
400 CHAPTER 12• COMMUNICATION AND CONFLICT RESOLUTION SKILLS
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
As more deaf people have been integrated into the work force, knowing American Sign Language can be a real advantage to a leader when some of his or her constituents are deaf.
7. Observe cross-cultural differences in etiquette. Violating rules of etiquette without explanation can erect immediate communication barriers. A major rule of business etiquette in most countries is that the participants conducting serious business together should first share a meal. So if you are invited to a banquet that takes place the night before discussions about a major business deal, regard the banquet as a major opportunity to build a relationship. To avoid the banquet is a serious faux pas.
8. Do not be diverted by style, accent, grammar, or personal appearance. Although these superficial factors are all related to business success, they are difficult to interpret when judging a person from another culture. It is therefore better to judge the merits of the statement or behavior. A highly intelligent worker from another culture may still be learning English and thus make basic mistakes. He or she might also not yet have developed a sensitivity to dress style in your culture, for example.
9. Avoid racial or ethnic identification except when it is essential to com- munication. Using a person’s race or ethnicity as an adjective or other descriptor often suggests a negative stereotype.30 For example, suppose a leader says, “I am proud of Julio. He is a very responsible Mexican- American customer service rep.” One possible interpretation of this state- ment is that most Mexican-American customer service reps are not so responsible. Or, a leader might say, “We are happy to have Martha on our team. She is an easy-to-get-along-with English lady.” A possible implication is that women from England country are usually not too easy to work with.
10. Be sensitive to differences in nonverbal communication. A person from another culture may misinterpret nonverbal signals. To use positive reinforcement, some managers will give a sideways hug to an employee or will touch the employee’s arm. People from some cultures resent touching from workmates and will be offended. Koreans in particular dislike being touched or touching others in a work setting.
11. Be attentive to individual differences in appearance. A major cross- cultural insult is to confuse the identity of people because they are members of the same race or ethnic group. An older economics professor reared in China and teaching in the United States had difficulty communicating with students because he was unable to learn their names. The professor’s defense was that “so many of these Americans look alike to me.” A study suggests that people have difficulty seeing individual differences among people of another race because they see so-called racial differences first; they might think, “He has the nose of a Chinese person.” However, people can learn to search for more distinguishing features, such as a dimple or eye color, and expression (serious or not so serious).31
OVERCOMING CROSS-CULTURAL COMMUNICATION BARRIERS 401
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
The Leader’s Role in Resolving Conflict and Negotiating
Leaders and managers spend considerable time resolving conflicts and negotiating. A frequent estimate is that they devote about 20 percent of their time to dealing with conflict including negotiation. Conflict arises fre- quently among top executives, and it can have enormous consequences for the organization. An example of such competition would be two business units competing for resources.
Departmental competition has been regarded as the ugly underbelly of all sizes of companies, often resulting in product delays, increased costs, and dwindling market shares as departments fight each other for domination behind the scenes. Until conflict between or among the groups is resolved, collaboration is unlikely.32 For example, if the operations group is in con- flict with the human resources group, it will be difficult for the two groups to collaborate on a diversity training program.
Another type of intergroup conflict leaders might face is dealing with heavy demands from a large employee group, such as employees uniting to complain about working conditions. A representative example is an employee uprising that took place at a Walmart in Hialeah Gardens, Florida. About 100 employees walked off the job one morning demand- ing better hours and fair treatment. A major complaint was that store management was demanding more work from fewer employees. A repre- sentative of the employee group said that the employees had issues with store leadership, not Wal-Mart Inc. Store leadership met with employees to discuss their concerns, as a way of resolving the conflict at least for the short term.33 The accompanying Leader in Action insert illustrates how a high-level business leader might enter into conflict with the workforce.
Leaders are sometimes involved in conflict with groups outside their organization, and such conflict may need to be resolved. An example is that state governments have begun demanding sales taxes from online mer- chants who claimed that they were exempt from such taxation.
An extensive description of conflict resolution is more appropriate for the study of managerial skills than for the study of leadership skills. The reason is because conflict resolution has more to do with establishing equilibrium than with helping the firm or organizational unit reach new heights. Here we focus on a basic framework for understanding conflict resolution styles, resolving conflict between two group members, and a few suggestions for negotiating and bargaining.
Conflict Management Styles As shown in Figure 12-1, a widely accepted finding is that there are five major styles of conflict management: competitive, accommodative, sharing, collaborative, and avoidant. Each style is based on a combination of satisfy- ing one’s own concerns (assertiveness) and satisfying the concerns of others
402 CHAPTER 12• COMMUNICATION AND CONFLICT RESOLUTION SKILLS
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
(cooperativeness).34 Leadership Self-Assessment Quiz 12-3 gives you an opportunity to think about your conflict management style.
Competitive Style The competitive style is a desire to achieve one’s own goals at the expense of the other party, or to dominate. A person with a competitive orientation is likely to engage in win–lose power struggles.
Accommodative Style The accommodative style favors appeasement, or satis- fying the other’s concerns without taking care of one’s own. People with this orientation may be generous or self-sacrificing just to maintain a relation- ship. An irate customer might be accommodated with a full refund, “just to
LEADER IN ACTION
IBM CEO, Ginni Rometty, Expresses Anger at Total Workforce
Virginia (“Ginni”) Rometty became the CEO of IBM Corpo- ration after a 31-year distinguished career at the com- pany that included key marketing positions. Although IBM remained an internationally respected business enterprise with annual sales of about $115 billion, the company was not performing as well as Rometty and Wall Street analysts had expected. When assigned the CEO position, Rometty was supposed to get IBM back on a smoother path of progress.
Apparently fed up with the company’s lack of substan- tial progress, in April 2012, Rometty expressed anger toward employees in a five-minute video. All 434,000 employees were told by their leader to step up by work- ing faster and more effectively. She wanted them to more proactively and productively engage customers, and stop letting big deals slip away to the competition.
Rometty then focused some of the blame toward the sales staff, particularly for poor sales in the quarter preced- ing the video release. She said that sales representatives had failed to close on a number of software and hardware deals. Rometty expressed particular disappointment at a failed attempted software sale to a major retailer. She said, “We were too slow to understand the value and then engage on the approval and the sign-off process.” The result was that the sales staff did not get the job done.
Six months later, Rometty decided to criticize the workforce again, this time in an e-mail. “Ours is a pay for performance culture and we must all be committed to take action to address our performance gaps,” she
said. Rometty also noted that sales of hardware contin- ued to perform poorly, particularly in growth market countries.
Both in the video and the e-mail, Rometty did express optimism about the company’s ability to overcome its lack- luster sales performance. She concluded that “Our funda- mentals are strong and our future is in our own hands. I know we will confront this honestly and with urgency.” She added that in moments like this IBMers rise to the occa- sion, and go on the offense rather than retreating.
QUESTIONS
1. How effective do you think Rometty’s expression of anger and disappointment will be in motivating IBM employees to perform better?
2. What damage might Rometty have done to her rela- tionship with the sales staff?
3. How effective do your think Rometty’s concluding positive comments were in patching up any hard feelings her criticisms might have created?
Sources: Original story created from facts and observations in the following sources: Spencer E. Ante, “IBM’s Chief to Employees: Think Fast, Move Faster,” The Wall Street Journal, April 25, 2013, pp. B1, B2; Nicholas Carlson, “After Poor Earnings, IBM CEO ‘Reprimands’ 443,000 Employees in 5-Minute Companywide Video Memo,” www.businessinsider.com, April 25, 2013, p. 1; Dale Buss, “Never Mind Not Working From Home, IBM CEO Tells Employees to Work Faster,” Brandchannel, (www.brandchannel.com), April 25, 2013, pp. 1–2; Spencer E. Ante, “IBM Shakes Up a Unit: CEO Criticizes Company for Failing to executive in Sales of Computer Hardware,” The Wall Street Journal, October 18, 2013, p. B3.
THE LEADER ’S ROLE IN RESOLVING CONFLICT AND NEGOTIATING 403
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
PARTY’S DESIRE TO SATISFY OTHER’S CONCERN
Competitive (Domination)
Accommodative (Appeasement)
Collaborative (Integration)
Avoidant (Neglect)
CooperativeUncooperative
A ss
er tiv
e
Sharing (Compromise)
PA R
TY ’S
D E
S IR
E T
O S
A TI
S FY
O W
N C
O N
C E
R N
U na
ss er
tiv e
FIGURE 12-1 Conflict-Handling Styles According to the Degree of Cooperation and Assertiveness. Source: Kenneth W. Thomas, “Organizational Conflict,” in Marvin D. Dunnette, ed., Handbook of Industrial and Organi- zational Psychology, p. 900 (Rand McNally).
LEADERSHIP SELF-ASSESSMENT QUIZ 12-3
My Conflict Resolution Style
Instructions: Answer each of the following statements “mostly true” or “mostly false” with respect to how you have dealt with the situation, would deal with the situation, or how much you agree with the attitude expressed.
MOSTLY TRUE
MOSTLY FALSE
1. I see myself as a hard-hitting, smash-mouth negotiator. □ □
2. The best way to resolve conflict is to overwhelm the other side. □ □
3. When negotiating a price, I like to make sure that the other side walks away with at least some profit.
□ □
4. When negotiating a price, I like to start with an outrageous demand or offer so I can eventually get the price I really wanted.
□ □
5. After a successful negotiation, one side wins and one side loses. □ □
6. After a successful negotiation, both sides walk away with something of value. □ □
7. When I am in conflict with somebody else, I try to listen carefully to understand his or her point of view.
□ □
404 CHAPTER 12• COMMUNICATION AND CONFLICT RESOLUTION SKILLS
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
shut him (or her) up.” The intent of such accommodation might also be to retain the customer’s loyalty.
Sharing Style The sharing style is halfway between domination and appease- ment. Sharers prefer moderate but incomplete satisfaction for both parties, which results in a compromise. The term splitting the difference reflects this orientation, which is commonly used in such activities as purchasing a house or car.
Collaborative Style In contrast to the other styles, the collaborative style reflects a desire to fully satisfy the desires of both parties. It is based on the underlying philosophy of the win–win approach to conflict resolution, the belief that after conflict has been resolved, both sides should gain some- thing of value. The user of win–win approaches is genuinely concerned about arriving at a settlement that meets the needs of both parties, or at least does not badly damage the welfare of the other side. When collabora- tive approaches to resolving conflict are used, the relationships among the parties are built on and improved.
The collaborative style of conflict management has many variations, one of which is to agree with the person criticizing you. When you agree with a critic, you show that you seek a solution, not a way to demonstrate that you are right. If you agree with the substance of the criticism, you show that you are aware of the situation and ready to do what is best to solve the problem.
QUIZ 12-3 (continued)
MOSTLY TRUE
MOSTLY FALSE
8. Face it: Business is war, so why grant concessions when in a dispute? □ □
9. When working out a disagreement with a workmate, I keep in mind the fact that we will have to work together in the future.
□ □
10. Nice people finish last when it comes to resolving disputes. □ □
Total score: ________________________
Scoring and Interpretation: Give yourself a score of 1 for each answer that matches the scoring key:
1. Mostly false 5. Mostly false 9. Mostly true 2. Mostly false 6. Mostly true 10. Mostly false 3. Mostly false 7. Mostly true 4. Mostly true 8. Mostly false
If your score is 8, 9, or 10, you most likely use the collaborative (win–win) approach to resolving conflict and negotiating. If your score is 7 or less, you most likely use the competitive (win–lose) approach to resolving con- flict and negotiating. The collaborative approach is more likely to enhance your leadership effectiveness in the long run.
THE LEADER ’S ROLE IN RESOLVING CONFLICT AND NEGOTIATING 405
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
To illustrate, if a group member criticizes you for having been too harsh in your evaluation of him or her, you might say: “I agree that my evaluation was harsh, but I was harsh for a purpose. I want to be candid with you so you will be motivated to make what I think are necessary improvements.” Your agreement is likely to spark further discussion about how the group member can improve. The collaborative style is the approach an effective leader is most likely to use because the outcome leads to increased produc- tivity and satisfaction.
Another form of agreeing with criticism is for leaders to apologize when they have truly made a mistake. An apology often reduces conflict because the other side becomes less hostile, and the scene is set for coop- eration. Visualize a scenario in which members of the executive team vote themselves large financial bonuses during a period of financial losses to the company and layoffs of employees. Saying, “We’re sorry, and we goofed” to the union and/or employees can help soften the sting. Giving back some of the bonuses would be even more helpful. In general, a good apology must be perceived as genuine, with an honest appeal for forgiveness.35
Avoidant Style Avoiders combine lack of cooperation and unassertiveness. They are indifferent to the concerns of either party. The person may actu- ally be withdrawing from the conflict or be relying upon fate. An example of an avoider is a manager who stays out of a conflict between two team members, leaving them to resolve their own differences.
People engaged in conflict resolution typically combine several of the five resolution styles to accomplish their purpose. For example, a generally effective approach to resolving conflict is to be competitive with regard to a cost that is important to oneself but unimportant to the opponent, and at the same time use accommodation for a cost that is unimportant to oneself but important to the opponent.36
Deciding which mode or modes of conflict handling to use depends upon a number of variables. The major contingency factors are the importance of the conflict issue and the relative power of the opposing parties. An issue may be so important to a leader, such as preventing his or her organiza- tional unit from being outsourced, that domination may be the most effec- tive mode. At other times, a leader may use the accommodating mode of conflict management when the opposing side has much more power, and he or she may want to save domination for a more important issue in the future.
A variable influencing how much conflict a leader has to resolve is his or her personality. An accepting, warm, and understanding leader will have less conflict to resolve than a rejecting, cold, and noncompassionate leader. Ken Frazier, the Merck CEO, was formerly the company’s general counsel and then the head of marketing. He minimizes conflict by scrupulously never making anyone look bad, including allowing scientists at the giant pharmaceutical firm do their job. Frazier says, “I am a person who does not subscribe to the hero-CEO school of thought.”37
406 CHAPTER 12• COMMUNICATION AND CONFLICT RESOLUTION SKILLS
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
Resolving Conflict Between Two Group Members A high-level managerial skill is to help two or more group members resolve conflict between or among them. Much of the time a manager or leader invests in conflict resolution is geared toward assisting others to resolve their conflict. Often, the conflict is between the heads of two different departments or divisions. The most useful approach is to get the parties in conflict to engage in confrontation and problem solving. (Confrontation refers to discussing the true problem, and problem solving refers to finding a way to resolve the conflict.) The manager sits down with the two sides and encourages them to talk to each other about the problem (rather than to the manager). This approach is preferable to inviting each side to speak with the manager or leader alone, because then each side might attempt to convince the manager that he or she is right.
During the confrontation and problem-solving session, the leader/man- ager is placed in a mediator role of being impartial and wanting the both sides to come to an agreement. As shown in the illustration below, the heart of the approach is storytelling in which each employee tells how and why the conflict started and persists. Each side must allow the other side to talk, and the leader maintains his or her impartiality.38 An abbreviated example follows:
Leader: I’ve brought you two together to see if you can overcome the problems you have about sharing the workload during a period in which one of you is overloaded.
Stephanie: I’m glad you did. Josh never wants to help me, even when I’m drowning in customer requests.
Josh: I would be glad to help Stephanie if she ever agreed to help me. If she has any downtime, she runs to the break room so she can chat on her cell phone.
Stephanie: Look who’s talking. I have seen you napping in your SUV when you have a little downtime.
Leader: I’m beginning to see what’s going on here. Both of you are antagonistic toward each other, and you look for little faults to pick. With a little more respect on both sides, I think you would be more willing to help each other out.
Josh: Actually, Stephanie’s not too bad. And I know she can perform well when she wants to. Next time I see her needing help, I’ll pitch in.
Stephanie: I know that the name “Josh” is related to joking around, but our Josh really has a warm heart. I’m open to starting with a fresh slate. Maybe Josh can ask me politely the next time he needs help.
Conflict specialist Patrick S. Nugent believes that being able to intervene in the conflicts of group members is a management skill that grows in impor- tance. Such competencies are useful in an emerging form of management based less on traditional hierarchy and more on developing self-managing subordinates and teams. When the conflict is between two different groups,
THE LEADER ’S ROLE IN RESOLVING CONFLICT AND NEGOTIATING 407
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
such as online versus off-line marketing, a major goal of conflict resolution is to get the two sides to see the company’s big picture.39
Negotiating and Bargaining As described in Chapter 1, negotiating and bargain is a basic leadership role. Few leaders have enough formal power to get everything they want without negotiation. Situations call for negotiation include arriving at a price for purchasing another company, receiving a tax break from a local government, or satisfying worker (or labor union) demands for adequate working conditions.
The link between negotiating and bargaining is that conflicts can be considered situations that call for negotiating and bargaining, or confer- ring with another person to resolve a problem. When you are trying to negotiate a fair price for relocating an office, you are simultaneously try- ing to resolve a conflict. At first, the demands of the two parties may seem incompatible, but through negotiation a salary may emerge that satisfies both parties. Here we review a handful of practical negotiating tactics a leader will find helpful. The approaches to negotiation presented here emphasize a strategy of integration or collaboration, with a philosophy of win–win.
Listen First to Investigate What the Other Side Wants An advanced negotiating technique is to begin by soliciting the other person’s or group’s point of view. You can use this information to shape the objectives of the negotia- tion, and figure out how you will be able to attain them.40 For example, a business unit leader might be negotiating with executives from headquar- ters about outsourcing the manufacture of a product. The unit head might attempt to analyze why the headquarters group really wants to outsource. Are they attempting to reduce operating costs? Are they concerned mostly about increasing quality? Are they concerned mostly about enhancing profits?
Listening skills are essential for seeing the big picture. Bobby Covie says, “There’s a saying among negotiators that whoever talks the most during a negotiation loses.” Being the first to listen helps establish trust. Listening also involves paying attention to what the other side is saying.41 A person might begin a negotiating session claiming to want a bigger share of the division budget. Yet careful listening might indicate that he or she really is looking for his or her department to receive more respect and attention. So the issue is not financial.
As shown in the example just presented, listening helps the negotiator dig for information as to why the other side wants what it does.42 If the other side wants a bigger budget just to have more respect, there are less expen- sive ways to grant respect than grant a bigger share of the budget. Perhaps the leader can give the person a classier job title, rename the department, or appoint the person to head a task force. For example, the head of market- ing is renamed “chief of brands,” and her department, “brand development.”
408 CHAPTER 12• COMMUNICATION AND CONFLICT RESOLUTION SKILLS
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
Begin with a Plausible Demand or Offer Most people believe that compromise and allowing room for negotiation include beginning with an extreme demand or offer. The theory is that the final compromise will be closer to the true demand or offer than if the negotiation were opened more realisti- cally. But a plausible demand is better because it reflects good faith bar- gaining. Also, if a third party has to resolve the conflict, a plausible demand or offer will receive more sympathy than an implausible one.
When it appears that the negotiation requires compromise to reach a sat- isfactory solution, it is usually time to brainstorm and barter. Brainstorming is helpful when a negotiation has hit a wall, and when no middle ground seems possible. According to negotiation researcher Nadine Kaslow, it may be helpful for both sides to consider multiple, mutual solutions. All parties should come up with at least ten options.43 For example, both sides might search for ten ways of increasing an employee pension fund without damag- ing profits or lowering the stock price.
In bartering, the parties exchange one set of goods and services for another, in a way that pleases both sides. Bartering, however, may not be applicable to many types of negotiation. A possible example is that a leader of an information technology services company might be willing to provide a construction company a couple of years of cloud computing in exchange for a lower price on a new building.
Focus on Interests, Not Positions Rather than clinging to specific negotiating points, one should keep overall interests in mind and try to satisfy them. The true object of negotiation is to satisfy the underlying interests of both sides. As professional mediator John Heister explains, when you focus on interests, all of the disputants get on the same side of the table and say, “We have a problem to solve. Based on our common interests, we need to find a solution that meets the needs of each of the stakeholders.”44
Here is how the strategy works: Your manager asks you to submit a pro- posal for increasing sales volume. You see it as an important opportunity to link up with another distributor. When you submit your ideas, you learn that management wants to venture further into e-commerce, not to expand the dealer network. Instead of insisting on linking with another dealer, be flexible. Ask to be included in the decision making for additional involve- ment in e-commerce. You will increase your sales volume (your true inter- est), and you may enjoy such secondary benefits as having helped the company develop a stronger e-commerce presence.
Be Sensitive to International Differences in Negotiating Style A challenge facing the multicultural leader is how to negotiate successfully with people from other cultures. Frank L. Acuff notes that Americans often have a no- nonsense approach to negotiation. A key attitude underlying the U.S. approach to negotiation is “Tell it like it is.”
A problem with this type of frankness and seeming impatience is that people from other cultures may interpret such remarks as rudeness. The adverse interpretation, in turn, may lead to a failed negotiation. Acuff gives
THE LEADER ’S ROLE IN RESOLVING CONFLICT AND NEGOTIATING 409
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
a case example: “It is unlikely in Mexico or Japan that the other side is going to answer ‘yes’ or ‘no’ to any question. You will have to discern answers to questions through the context of what is being said rather than from the more obvious direct cues that U.S. negotiators use.”45
By sizing up what constitutes an effective negotiating style, the negotia- tor stands a reasonable chance of achieving a collaborative solution. Other cross-cultural differences in negotiation style include these tendencies: Japanese avoid direct confrontation and prefer an exchange of information. Russians crave combat; Koreans are team players; Nigerians prefer the spo- ken word; and Indians the written one.46 (We caution again that cultural stereotypes are true much of the time, but not all of the time.)
Allow for Face Saving While negotiating, it is important to recognize that you might want to make another deal, another day, with the same party. As a result, you want to conduct yourself in a dignified way and not attempt to maximize gain for yourself and minimize gain for the other side. Allowing for face saving is one of the principles of leadership espoused by Dale Carnegie that has considerable empirical and theoretical support. One such research finding is that when a person’s face is threatened, the individual attempts to use face-saving techniques. Furthermore, if employees are allowed to save face after dealing with a problem, they are more likely to perform well and report errors.47
Negotiating and bargaining, as with any other leadership and manage- ment skill, require conceptual knowledge and practice. Leadership Skill- Building Exercise 12-3 gives you an opportunity to practice collaboration, the most integrative form of negotiating and bargaining, as well as conflict resolution. Practice in finding options for mutual gains is helpful for the leader because negotiating is a high-impact part of his or her job.
LEADERSHIP SKILL-BUILDING EXERCISE 12-3
Win–Win Bargaining
The class is organized into groups of six, with each group being divided into two negotiating teams of three each. The members of the negotiating teams would like to find a win- win (collaborative) solution to the issue separating the two sides. The team members are free to invent their own pressing issue, or they can choose one of the following:
• Management wants to control costs by not giving cost-of-living adjustments in the upcoming year. The employee group believes that a cost-of-living adjust- ment is absolutely necessary for its welfare.
• The marketing team claims it could sell 350,000 units of a jeweled smartphone case if it could be produced at
$40 per unit. The manufacturing group says it would not be feasible to get the manufacturing cost below $50 per unit.
• Taco Bell would like to build in a new location that is adjacent to a historic district in one of the oldest cities in North America. The members of the town planning board would like the tax revenue and jobs that the Taco Bell store would bring, but they do not want a Taco Bell restaurant (or store) adjacent to the historic district.
After the teams have arrived at their solutions through high-level negotiating techniques, the creative solutions can be shared with teammates.
410 CHAPTER 12• COMMUNICATION AND CONFLICT RESOLUTION SKILLS
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
READER’S ROADMAP So far we have studied considerable information about the nature of leadership; the attributes, behaviors, and styles of leaders; the ethics and social responsibility of lea- ders; and how leaders exert power and use politics and influence. We then studied techniques for developing teamwork, as well as motivation and coaching skills. After studying creativity and innovation as part of leadership, we focused on communication skills as they relate to leadership. Next, we shift our study to direction setting at the organizational level: strategic leadership.
SUMMARY
Open communication between company leaders and employees helps an organization overcome problems and attain success. Effective communica- tion skills contribute to inspirational leadership. Nonverbal skills are also important for leadership effectiveness. A major feature of communication by leaders is to rely on networks of contacts both in-person and electronically. Without being con- nected to other people, it would be almost impossi- ble for leaders to carry out their various roles. Developing networks of live interpersonal contacts remains an essential method for a leader building relationships, motivating others, and attaining col- laboration. Face-to-face communication networks allow for helpful conversations. Changes in the organization as well as generational changes have increased the importance of conversations. Leader- ship networks include the peer, operational, per- sonal, and strategic.
An important use of the social media is for the leader to build and maintain a professional net- work. The productive leader is more likely to focus on contacts of relevance or density rather than superficial contacts. The strength-of-ties perspec- tive explains the difference between strong and weak ties. The relationships among the different actors in a network can be broadly classified into two major types: strong versus weak ties and direct versus indirect ties.
Inspirational and powerful communication helps leaders carry out their roles. Suggestions for inspirational and powerful speaking and writing
include the following: (1) be credible; (2) gear your message to your listener including his or her needs; (3) sell group members on the benefits of your suggestions; (4) use heavy-impact and emotion- provoking words; (5) use anecdotes to communi- cate meaning; (6) back up conclusions with data; (7) minimize language errors, junk words, and vocalized pauses; (8) use business jargon in appro- priate doses; and (9) write crisp, clear memos, let- ters, and reports, including a front-loaded message.
Using a power-oriented linguistic style is another way to communicate with inspiration and power. The style includes a variety of techniques, such as downplaying uncertainty, emphasizing direct rather than indirect talks, and choosing an effective com- munication frame. Leaders can also improve their communication skills by following the six principles of persuasion: liking, reciprocity, social proof, con- sistency, authority, and scarcity.
Skill can also be developed in using nonverbal communication that connotes power, being in con- trol, forcefulness, and self-confidence. Among the suggestions for nonverbal communication are to stand erect; speak at a moderate pace with a loud, clear tone; and smile frequently in a relaxed man- ner. A person’s external image also plays an impor- tant part in communicating messages to others.
Videoconferencing, including telepresence, places heavy demands on nonverbal communica- tion. Videoconferences represent a powerful tool for far-flung managers to make a name for them- selves at corporate headquarters. The camera
SUMMARY 411
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
magnifies small nonverbal communication errors, such as scratching your head.
Listening is a fundamental management and leadership skill. A foundation tactic for a leader to become an effective listener is to show respect for others. Two impediments for the leaders who want to listen well are (1) leaders are already overloaded, and (2) people can listen to more words per minute than others can speak. Leaders have to be careful about listening selectively. A robust communication channel for the leader/manager is to engage in face-to-face communication with direct reports by making the rounds. Such rounds are effective for dealing with morale problems.
Overcoming communication barriers created by dealing with people from different cultures is another leadership and management challenge. Guidelines for overcoming cross-cultural barriers include the following: (1) be sensitive to the exis- tence of cross-cultural communication barriers; (2) challenge your cultural assumptions; (3) show respect for all workers; (4) use straightforward language, and speak slowly and clearly; (5) look for signs of misunderstanding when your language is not the listener’s native language; (6) when appropriate, speak in the language of the people from another culture; (7) observe cross-cultural differences in etiquette; (8) do not be diverted by style, accent, grammar, or personal appearance; (9) avoid racial or ethnic identification except when it is essential to communication; (10) be sen- sitive to differences in nonverbal communication;
and (11) be attentive to individual differences in appearance.
Leaders and managers spend considerable time managing conflict, including conflict with outsi- ders. Resolving conflict facilitates collaboration. Five major styles of conflict management are as fol- lows: competitive, accommodative, sharing, collab- orative (win–win), and avoidant. Each style is based on a combination of satisfying one’s own concerns (assertiveness) and satisfying the concerns of others (cooperativeness). The collaborative style of conflict management includes agreeing with the criticizer and apologizing. When resolving conflict, people typically combine several of the five resolution styles to accomplish their purpose, such as domi- nating and accommodating. Which modes of con- flict handling to use depends upon a number of variables such as the importance of the issue and the relative power between the parties.
A high-level managerial skill is to help two or more group members resolve conflict between or among them. The most useful approach is to get the parties in conflict to engage in confrontation and problem solving.
Conflicts can be considered situations calling for negotiating and bargaining. Specific negotiating techniques include the following: (1) listen first to investigate what the other side wants; (2) begin with a plausible demand or offer; (3) focus on interests, not positions; (4) be sensitive to international differ- ences in negotiating style; and (5) allow for face saving.
KEY TERMS
linguistic style 390 making the rounds 396
win–win approach to conflict resolution 405
GUIDELINES FOR ACTION AND SKILL DEVELOPMENT
A subtle part of being an effective communicator— including be a good listener—is to avoid language that discourages another person from expressing his or her opinion, or worse, shuts the person up.
At times you may feel like putting the lid on a sub- ordinate. However, in the long run, silencing your team will backfire because you will lose valuable input. Here are three examples of statements
412 CHAPTER 12• COMMUNICATION AND CONFLICT RESOLUTION SKILLS
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
LEADERSHIP CASE PROBLEM A
leaders and managers frequently use that clamp down on communication: “I already know that,” “Why would you want to change that? It’s not bro- ken,” and, “Well, it’s my decision and I say no.”48
Another technique for curtailing communication is to react to a comment with a blank stare and no comment of your own. Such behavior implies that you either don’t care or are denying the reality of what the person is saying.
Discussion Questions and Activities
1. Now that you have studied this chapter, what are you going to do differently to improve your communication effectiveness as a leader?
2. What is your opinion of the advantages and dis- advantages of a leader, such as a CEO or divi- sion president being Facebook friends with as many company employees as possible?
3. In the United States, a person who has an English (U.K.) accent is often at advantage to obtain a leadership position. What is your opin- ion of the ethics of a person developing such an accent in order to get promoted?
4. What do you see as a potential downside to using a power-oriented linguistic style?
5. In what ways does being good at public speak- ing enhance a leader’s effectiveness?
6. Jack Dorsey, the executive chairman of Twitter and the CEO of Square, is quite soft spoken yet still very persuasive. How can that be?
7. Given that people really do defer to experts, how might the leader establish his or her expertise?
8. Some managers avoid developing personal friendships with any direct reports because they do not want to be at a disadvantage in resolving conflict or negotiating with a subordi- nate. Does this idea seem reasonable to you?
9. What concrete steps can a leader take to demon- strate that he or she respects a group member from another culture?
10. Assume that during a meeting, a middle man- ager is told by a subordinate that he or she is not fit for the position and should resign. What approach do you recommend that the leader take to resolve this conflict?
Margot, the Cross-Cultural Communicator
Margot is the sales development manager of an online retailer that specializes in the sale of upscale clothing for men and women, at drastically low prices. Most of the clothing sold stems from resel- ling of inventory from high-end retailers who have gone out of business, are bankrupt, or liquidating merchandise for other reasons such as needing cash desperately.
Based in Los Angeles, the online store has an office and a distribution warehouse. Yet some sales are shipped directly from the distressed retailers who receive a small payment for making the shipments.
Margot was raised in Mexico. She speaks both English and Spanish fluently, which facilitates her workingwell in Los Angeles. However,Margot consid- ers herself to be multicultural beyond working well with Americans, Latinos, and Mexican-Americans. “Give me anybody, whatever ethnicity and race, and
I’ll warm up to that person,” she says. Not all the staff members at the company are so convinced about the effectiveness of Margot’s multicultural skills.
Derek, the company website designer, who is African-American, said this about Margot: “I love the lady, but sometimes I think she patronizes me. She starts almost all our conversations asking me something about professional basketball. Oh, yes, I know that the vast majority of NBA players are black, but so are almost all the doctors, scientists, and lawyers in Africa. To please Margot, I make a few general comments about basketball so the con- versation can proceed.”
Lucie, an order-fulfillment specialist, is a Latina raised in Costa Rica. She said that she appreciates Margot’s working hard to establish rapport with her, but that she gets tired of Margot so frequently asking
LEADERSHIP CASE PROBLEM A 413
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
LEADERSHIP CASE PROBLEM B
her questions about Costa Rican cooking and holi- days. “Okay, I was raised in Costa Rica. That doesn’t mean that I think about my home country every day. I am here living and working in L.A.”
Basil, a purchasing specialist, is the only senior working at the company. He has forty years of experi- ence in merchandising women’s clothing. “To me, Margot is like a niece, but I don’t think she gets it about dealing with a senior. Margot keeps talking to me about my health, retirement planning, and how I like working with younger people in an online busi- ness. I just don’t like talking about senior concerns.”
Questions
1. What suggestions can you make to Margot about overcoming cross-cultural communica- tion barriers?
2. What might be the factor or factors contribut- ing to any errors Margot might be making in terms of cross-cultural communication?
3. To what extent do you think the three staff members mentioned above are being too harsh in judging Margot’s attempts at estab- lishing rapport?
ASSOCIATED ROLE PLAY One person plays the role of Margot who will be having brief face-to-face interactions today with Derek, Lucie, and Basil. She will be taking her usual approach to establishing rapport with her staff members. Three other students will play the roles of Derek, Lucie, and Basil. All three would
prefer that Margot not focus so much on the cul- tural identity mentioned above. (Most people have more than one cultural identity, such as being Latino as well as a member of Generation Y.) Observers will be alert to how well the cross- cultural interactions go.
Sean Contemplates a Delicate Confrontation
Sean is the head of the logistics group at a medium- size company that makes plastic parts for other companies, including manufacturers of printers, television sets, computers, and washing machines. His department provides a few valuable services for the company such as receiving and storing raw materials, shipping products, and disposal of waste materials. The logistics department consists of ten people including an administrative support specialist. Sean’s department is meeting its goals, and Sean regularly receives average or above- average performance evaluations.
In contrast to the generally positive job situation facing Sean, he sees one irritating problem that needs resolution. Sean has received feedback from several employees inside and outside the depart- ment that Phil, one of the logistic technicians, fre- quently mocks him but not to his face. Karen, the administrative support person, casually mentioned
to Sean recently, “Have you seen Phil do one of his impressions of you? He did one the other day dur- ing coffee break. It was kind of negative, and very unprofessional.”
Sean noticed that Phil made the following post on his Facebook page: “Life isn’t always so easy when you know much more than your boss.” Although the post may not have been directed spe- cifically at Sean, it was still hurtful.
Sean was thinking while driving to work, “I don’t have any direct evidence that Phil is mocking me, but it sure seems to be true. I have to figure what to do about this problem.”
Questions
1. What kind of a leadership issue is Sean dealing with?
2. What do you recommend that Sean do about his conflict with Phil?
414 CHAPTER 12• COMMUNICATION AND CONFLICT RESOLUTION SKILLS
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
ASSOCIATED ROLE PLAY One student plays the role of Sean who decides to confront Phil about what could very well be a form of insubordination. Another student plays the role of Phil who is not very impressed with Sean as a
leader, but he does not think he has done anything out of line in terms of reacting negatively toward him. Observers will look to see how the potential conflict in this situation might be resolved.
LEADERSHIP SKILL-BUILDING EXERCISE 12-4
My Leadership Portfolio
For this chapter’s entry into your leadership portfo- lio, think through how you have dealt with your opportunities to communicate as a leader in your experiences. Did you have an opportunity to attempt to persuade an individual or group? Did you have an opportunity to be supportive toward another person? Did you have an opportunity to make a presentation on the job or in class? During these communication opportunities, how well did you come across as a leader? Did you impress any- body with persuasive skill or warmth? Carlos, an assistant restaurant manager, made this entry in his portfolio:
I help manage an upscale restaurant. The wait staff has to be on top of its game when in the dining room. Without superior service, nobody is going to pay our prices, even if the food and wine are good. Late one afternoon, Rick dragged in, looking in no
shape to give good service to our guests. He looked worried and distracted. Instead of telling Rick to go home, I took him aside in the office. I asked him to give me a full explanation of whatever problem he was facing. We both sat down, and I poured Rick a cup of coffee. After a minute or so, Rick opened up to tell me about how he rammed the back of his car into a two-foot-high guardrail in a parking lot. His fiberglass bumper split, and he figures it will cost him $750 to replace it. I listened to his whole story without being judgmental. I said I would check with the manager to see if we could give him extra hours this month to earn more money to apply toward his repair. Rick said, “Thanks for listening,” and he left our one-on-one session feeling better and looking well enough to face the guests.
I give myself a gold star for having been a sup- portive leader. Ha! Ha!
LEADERSHIP SKILL-BUILDING EXERCISE 12-5
Evaluating the Communication Skills of an Organizational Leader
So much has been said about the importance of good communication skills for an effective leader. Your assignment is to observe a specific organiza- tional leader of your choice, such as a business executive. Methods of observing an organizational leader include (a) a live or video replay interview of an executive on a television news channel, (b) finding a brief executive presentation on YouTube or Hulu, and (c) attending a function in which an
executive is either giving a talk or interacting with visitors. In preparing your evaluation, look for such factors as persuasiveness, adequate grammar and sentence structure, and ability to establish rapport with the receiver of the message.
A side aspect of this assignment is to observe the executive’s communication skills with the intent of picking up an idea or two to improve your own communication effectiveness.
LEADERSHIP SKILL-BUILDING EXERCISE 12-5 415
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
NOTES
1. Original story created from facts and observations in the following sources: “Urban Outfitters’ Glen Senk: Look for the Right Culture, Diverse Opinions and ‘Bad News,’” Knowledge@Wharton (http://knowledge .wharton.upenn.edu), May 25, 2011, pp. 1–3; Erin Carlyle, “Glen Senk Out, Richard Hayne in as Urban Outfitters CEO,” Forbes (www .forbes.com), January 10, 2012, pp. 1–2; Margaret Case Little, “Talking With … Urban Outfitters CEO Glen Senk,” http://blog.shop .org, August 17, 2010, pp. 1–3; Adrianne Pasquarelli, “David Yurman Taps Senk as CEO,” Crain’s New York Business (www .crainsnewyork.com), January 11, 2012, p. 1.
2. John Hamm, “The Five Messages Leaders Must Manage,” Harvard Business Review, May 2006, p. 116.
3. Bruce Hoppe and Claire Reinelt, “Social Network Analysis and the Evaluation of Leadership Networks,” The Leadership Quarterly, August 2010, p. 600.
4. Boris Groysberg and Michael Slind, “Leadership Is a Conversation,” Harvard Business Review, June 2012, p. 79.
5. Boris Groysberg and Michael Slind, “Leadership Is a Conversation,” pp. 80, 81.
6. Bruce Hoppe and Claire Reinelt, “Social Network Analysis,” p. 601.
7. Networks three, four, and five are from Herminia Ibarra and Mark Hunter, “How Leaders Create and Use Networks,” Harvard Business Review, January 2007, pp. 40–47.
8. Mark Granovetter, “The Strength of Weak Ties: A Network Theory Revisited,” Sociological Theory, vol. 1, 1983, pp. 201–233.
9. Quoted in Jim Aley and Brian Bremmer (eds.), “Trouble at the Virtual Water Cooler,” Bloomberg Businessweek, May 2–May 8, 2011, p. 31.
10. Cary Booker, “How to Get People to Listen,” Bloomberg Businessweek, April 15–April 21, 2013, p. 61. (As told to Devin Leonard.)
11. Carlin Flora, “The Art of Influence,” Psychology Today, September/October 2011, p. 67.
12. Stephen P. Robbins and Phillip L. Hunsaker, Training in Interpersonal Skills: Tips for Managing People at Work (Upper Saddle River,
N.J.: Prentice Hall, 1996), p. 115. (These findings are still valid today.)
13. Frank Luntz, “Words That Pack Power,” BusinessWeek, November 3, 2008, p. 106.
14. William Strunk Jr., E. B. White, and Maira Kalman, The Elements of Style, Sixth Edition (Boston: Allyn and Bacon, 2007).
15. “Which Buzzwords Would You Ban?” The Wall Street Journal, January 2, 2014, p. B4.
16. Sherry Sweetham, “How to Organize Your Thoughts for Better Communication,” Personnel, March 1986, p. 39.
17. Deborah Tannen, “The Power of Talk: Who Gets Heard and Why?” Harvard Business Review, September–October 1995, pp. 138–148.
18. Deborah Tannen, “The Power of Talk: Who Gets Heard and Why?” pp. 138–148; “How You Speak Shows Where You Rank,” Fortune, February 2, 1998, p. 156; “Speak Like You Mean Business,” Working Smart (www.nibm .net), March 2004; “Weed Out Wimpy Words: Speak Up Without Backpedaling, Qualifying,” Working SMART, March 2000, p. 2.
19. Robert B. Cialdini, “Harnessing the Science of Persuasion,” Harvard Business Review, October 2001, pp. 72–79.
20. Ibid., p. 79. 21. Several of the suggestions here are from Sue
Shellenbarger, “Strike a Powerful Pose: Posture Can Determine Who’s a Hero, Who’s a Wimp; Bad News for Phone Users,” The Wall Street Journal, August 21, 2013, pp. D1, D2; Shellenbarger, “Just Look Me in the Eye Already,” The Wall Street Journal, May 29, 2013, p. D1; Body Language for Business Success (New York: National Institute for Business Management, 1989), pp. 2–29; Andy Yap et al., “The Ergonomics of Dishonesty: The Effects of Incidental Posture on Stealing, Cheating, and Traffic Violations,” Psychological Science, November 2013, pp. 2281–2289.
22. Cited in Joann S. Lublin, “Some Dos and Don’ts to Help You Hone Videoconference Skills,” The Wall Street Journal, February 7, 2006, p. B1.
23. “A Conversation with Bill Kanarick: The Art of Asking Questions,” Executive Leadership, January 2014, p. 3.
416 CHAPTER 12• COMMUNICATION AND CONFLICT RESOLUTION SKILLS
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
24. Bernard T. Ferran, “The Executive’s Guide to Better Listening,” McKinsey Quarterly (www .mckinseyquarterly), February 2012, p. 2.
25. Erika H. James, “Selective Hearing Can Lead to a Blind Eye,” The Darden Perspective in First Person, published in The Wall Street Journal, December 4, 2007, p. A16.
26. Linda Dulye, “Get Out of Your Office,” HR Magazine, July 2006, pp. 99–100; “‘Making Rounds’ Like a Physician,” Manager’s Edge, February 2006, p. 8.
27. Gunnar Beeth, “Multicultural Managers Wanted,” Management Review, May 1997, p. 17.
28. “When English Is Not Their Native Tongue,” Manager’s Edge, April 2003, p. 5.
29. Kathryn Kranhold, “Lost in Translation,” The Wall Street Journal, May 18, 2004, p. B1.
30. Orlando, L. Taylor. “Cross-Cultural Communication: An Essential Dimension of Effective Education,” Northwest Regional Educational Library: CNORSE (www.nwrel.org /cnorse), 1987.
31. Siri Carpenter, “Why Do ‘They All Look Alike’?” Monitor on Psychology, December 2000, p. 44.
32. Jeff Weiss and Jonathan Hughes, “Want Collaboration? Accept—and Actively Manage— Conflict,” Harvard Business Review, March 2005, pp. 92–101.
33. Joey Flechas, “Workers Seek Changes at Their Walmart,” Miami Herald, October 18, 2013, pp. 1–2.
34. Kenneth Thomas, “Conflict and Conflict Management,” in Marvin D. Dunnette, ed., Handbook of Industrial and Organizational Psychology (Chicago: Rand McNally, 1976), pp. 900–922.
35. Barbara Kellerman, “When Should a Leader Apologize and When Not?” Harvard Business Review, April 2006, pp. 72–81.
36. Elizabeth A. Mannix, Leigh L. Thompson, and Max H. Bazerman, “Negotiation in Small
Groups,” Journal of Applied Psychology, June 1989, pp. 508–517.
37. Quoted in Matthew Herper, “Merck on the Spot,” Forbes, May 6, 2013, p. 106.
38. Deb Levine, “Solutions: Advice from HR Knowledge Advisors,” HR Magazine, October 2013, p. 18.
39. Patrick S. Nugent, “Managing Conflict: Third-Party Interventions for Managers,” Academy of Management Executive, February 2002, p. 152.
40. Jeff Weiss, Aram Donigian, and Jonathan Hughes, “Extreme Negotiations,” Harvard Business Review, November 2010, pp. 68–69.
41. Cited in Brenda Goodman, “The Art of Negotiation,” Psychology Today, January/ February 2007, p. 65.
42. Deepak Malhotra and Max H. Bazerman, “Investigative Negotiation,” Harvard Business Review, September 2007, pp. 72–78.
43. Cited in Tori DeAngelis, “Achieving Win-Win,” Psychology Today, November 2008, p. 64.
44. John Heister, “Collaborate to Solve Societal Ills,” Rochester, New York, Democrat and Chronicle, May 14, 2004, p. 18A.
45. Frank Acuff, The World-Class Negotiator: An Indispensable Guide for Anyone Doing Business with Those from a Foreign Culture (New York: AMACOM, 1992).
46. Wendi L. Adair, Tetsushi Okumura, and Jeanne M. Brett, “Negotiation Behavior When Cultures Collide: The United States and Japan,” Journal of Applied Psychology, June 2001, pp. 371–385.
47. Analysis presented in Tessa E. Basford and Andrea Molberg, “Dale Carnegie’s Leadership Principles: Examining the Theoretical and Empirical Support,” Journal of Leadership Studies, vol. 6, no. 4, 2013, pp. 32–34.
48. “Avoid Language That Shuts People Up,” Executive Leadership, January 2008, p. 8.
NOTES 417
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
CH AP
TE R
13 Strategic Leadership and Knowledge Management
LEARNING OBJECTIVES After studying this chapter and doing the exercises, you should be able to
• Describe the nature of strategic leadership.
• Explain how to use the SWOT model to assist in strategic planning.
• Identify a number of current business strategies.
• Describe how leaders contribute to the management of knowledge and the learning organization.
CHAPTER OUTLINE The Nature of Strategic Leadership High-Level Cognitive Activity of the Leader Maintaining a Human and Emotional Aspect Gathering Multiple Inputs to Formulate Strategy Anticipating and Creating a Future Revolutionary and Contrarian Thinking Creating a Vision Leadership Effectiveness and Strategy Implementation
Conducting a SWOT Analysis Internal Strengths Internal Weaknesses External Opportunities External Threats
A Sampling of Business Strategies Formulated by Leaders
Knowledge Management and the Learning Organization Knowledge Management Servant Leadership and the Creation of Knowledge The Learning Organization
Summary
Key Terms
Guidelines for Action and Skill Development
Leadership Case Problem A
Leadership Case Problem B
Notes
The chairman and CEO of PepsiCo, Indra Nooyi,combines analytical skills with a charmingdemeanor to inspire thousands of employees and other stakeholders. PepsiCo has twenty-two brands that gross more than $1 billion per year each in annual sales.
Among the company’s most popular brands are Pepsi- Cola, Gatorade, Tropicana, and Frito-Lay.
As a business leader, Nooyi is best known for her developing and executing strategy. Prior to becoming CEO, Nooyi was the company president and chief financial
418 Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s).
Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
officer. In this position, her responsibilities included the direction of finance, strategy, business process optimiza- tion, investor relations, and information technology. She also served in other strategy positions with PepsiCo, including senior vice president, strategic planning, for two years. Nooyi began her career in management consult- ing. Between 1986 and 1990, she was vice president and director of corporate strategy at Motorola Corporation.
Nooyi is the chief architect of Performance with Pur- pose, PepsiCo’s commitment to do what is right for the company by doing what is right for people and the planet. The goal is to deliver consistent financial performance by providing a wide range of foods and beverages from treats to healthy snacks. At the same time, PepsiCo finds ways to minimize any negative company impact on the environ- ment, keep costs low, provide a safe and inclusive work- place for employees, and invest in the local communities in which the company operates. Nooyi is also leading the company to move the company away from emphasizing low-nutritional value food to healthier alternatives.
As part of directing the company’s business strategy, Nooyi divested its restaurants in Yum! Brands Inc. She
has also spearheaded the acquisition of Tropicana and the merger with Quaker Oats that included Gatorade. Nooyi was behind the purchase, in 2011, of Russian yogurt giant Wimm-Bill-Dann Foods, PepsiCo’s biggest foreign acquisition to date. She explained that Russia was just a base. “You’re doing it for the former Soviet Union countries. This is a business that is going to grow substantially. That’s what fires everybody up.” Part of the marketing strategy was to shift consumers from lower- margin dairy and juice products to more profitable “value-added” products such as drinkable yogurts or juices with added vitamins.
To help bolster PepsiCo’s share of the beverage mar- ket, Nooyi has invested in research to develop something the industry has long pursued— a low-calorie or no-calorie all-natural sweetener that will make soft drinks taste just like their full-calorie beverages.
Nooyi graduated with a major in physics, chemistry, and mathematics from Madras Christian College, and an MBA from the Indian Institute of Management in Calcutta. She also received a master of public and private manage- ment from Yale University.1
The story about CEO and chairman Indra Nooyi illustrates how leaders must continually think through the direction in which the firm is headed. A key leadership role is to form a strategy, an integrated, overall concept of how the firm will achieve its objectives.2 In this chapter, we approach strategic leadership by emphasizing the leader’s role rather than presenting extensive information about business strategy and the analytics that support strategy and strategic planning. First, we examine the nature of strategic leadership and describe a frequently used tool for development strategy, SWOT analysis. We then examine the strategies that leaders most frequently use to bring about success. Following that is a description of a leader’s con- tribution to an important thrust in strategy, knowledge management, and developing a learning organization.
The Nature of Strategic Leadership
Strategic leadership deals with the major purposes of an organization or an organizational unit, and therefore has a different focus than leadership in general: Strategic leadership emphasizes balancing the short- and long-term needs of the organization to ensure the enduring success of the organiza- tion, yet the emphasis is on the future. Strategy professor Roger L. Martin
THE NATURE OF STRATEGIC LEADERSHIP 419
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
explains that true strategy is about placing bets and making hard choices.3
Leaders engage in strategic leadership when they act, think, and influence in ways that promote the competitive advantage of their organization.4 For our purposes, strategic leadership is the process of providing the direction and inspiration necessary to create or sustain an organization. Netflix founder Reed Hastings provided strategic leadership because he developed a concept for an organization, developed the organization, and inspired large numbers of people to help him achieve his purpose. Furthermore, developing a major presence on the Internet was an example of direction setting by Hastings.
Strategic leadership is a complex of personal characteristics, thinking patterns, and effective management, all centering on the ability to think stra- tegically. Do Leadership Self-Assessment Quiz 13-1 to explore your orienta- tion toward thinking strategically. Our approach to understanding the nature of strategic leadership will be to describe certain associated characteristics, behaviors, and practices, as outlined in Figure 13-1. The information about transformational leadership presented in Chapter 3 is also relevant here.
High-Level Cognitive Activity of the Leader Thinking strategically requires high-level cognitive skills, such as the ability to think conceptually, absorb and make sense of multiple trends, and condense all of this information into a straightforward plan of action. The ability to process information and understand its consequences for the organization in its interaction with the environment is often referred to as
STRATEGIC LEADERSHIP
Revolutionary thinking
(Intuition works for strategy.)
Human and emotional component
(Nothing like this has ever been done before.)
Gathering multiple inputs
(Strategy formulation is democratic.)
Anticipating and creating a future
(Let’s invent a new world.)
(Come share my dream.)
Creating a vision
High-level cognitive activity
(Strategy is hard work.)
© Ce ng ag e Le ar ni ng
FIGURE 13-1 Components of Strategic Leadership
420 CHAPTER 13• STRATEGIC LEADERSHIP AND KNOWLEDGE MANAGEMENT
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
systems thinking. Systemic thinking means that the person thinks in terms of a system, and the process gets quite complex.5 For instance, a part of sys- temic thinking would be to investigate how parts of a system react and interact to each other and external factors. Suppose a company leader decides to reduce expenditures for research and development. He or she should analyze how the cutback will affect marketing and sales in the next
LEADERSHIP SELF-ASSESSMENT QUIZ 13-1
Are You a Strategic Thinker?
Instructions: Indicate your strength of agreement with each of the following statements: SD ¼ strongly disagree, D ¼ disagree, N ¼ neutral, A ¼ agree, SA ¼ strongly agree.
SD D N A SA
1. Every action I take on my job should add value for our customers, our clients, or the public.
1 2 3 4 5
2. Let company leadership ponder the future; I have my own job to get done. 5 4 3 2 1
3. Strategic thinking is fluff. Somebody down the organization has to get the job done. 5 4 3 2 1
4. A company cannot become great without an exciting vision. 1 2 3 4 5
5. What I do on the job each day can affect the performance of the company many years into the future.
1 2 3 4 5
6. It is rather pointless to develop skills or acquire knowledge that cannot help you on the job within the next month.
5 4 3 2 1
7. Strategic planning should be carried out in a separate department rather than involve people throughout the organization.
5 4 3 2 1
8. It makes good sense for top management to frequently ask itself the question, “What business are we really in?”
1 2 3 4 5
9. If a company does an outstanding job of satisfying its customers, there is little need to worry about changing its mix of goods or services.
5 4 3 2 1
10. Organizational visions remind me of pipe dreams and hallucinations. 5 4 3 2 1
11. I like the idea of an organization sending a group of managers and professionals to an off-site strategy development session every couple of years or so.
1 2 3 4 5
12. Strategy formulation is a bureaucratic exercise that usually gets the organization nowhere.
5 4 3 2 1
Scoring and Interpretation: Find your total score by summing the point values for each question. A score of 52 to 60 suggests that you already think strategically, which should help you provide strategic leadership to others. Scores of 30 to 51 suggest a somewhat neutral, detached attitude toward thinking strategically. Scores of 12 to 29 suggest thinking that emphasizes the here and now and the short term. People scoring in this category are not yet ready to provide strategic leadership to group members.
Skill Development: Reflecting on your ability to think strategically is useful because leaders at all levels are expected to see the big picture and point people in a useful direction.
THE NATURE OF STRATEGIC LEADERSHIP 421
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
several years. Long-term thinking is a key part of strategy. A CEO might work with a twenty-five-year perspective regardless of whether he or she would be with the same firm in twenty-five years.
High-level cognitive ability is also required to interpret all the data and information that often accumulate when developing strategy. The strategist needs to recognize patterns, clarify ambiguity, and seek new insights. A chief marketing officer was studying data about who was purchasing and not purchasing the company’s line of snacks. One interpretation she made of the data was that a fast-growing segment of the population, diabetics, was rarely buying the snacks. The marketing officer then introduced a line of sugar-free cakes that was successful.6
Emphasizing the cognitive activity of the leader helps emphasize that the leader plays a major role in strategy formulation. The leader must think through what makes the organization distinct, and define its purpose. Creativity and insight are required to achieve these profound conclusions.
As one moves up the hierarchy, more problem-solving ability and imagi- nation are required to handle the task environment effectively. To engage in strategic management and leadership, a person must have conceptual prowess. An organization will be successful when the cognitive abilities of its leaders are a good fit with the nature of the work. An essential compo- nent of the leader’s cognitive ability for strategy formulation is the ability to focus outward. The outward focus includes understanding how seemingly unrelated data can relate to the leader’s central interest. Melinda Gates once said on the television show 60 Minutes that her husband, Bill Gates, could read an entire book about fertilizer. The relevance of fertilizer to the work of Bill Gates was that he is constantly looking for technological advances that can save thousands of lives. “A few billion people would have to die if we hadn’t come up with fertilizer,” said Gates.7
Creative problem solving is also important because the strategic leader has to develop alternative courses of action for shaping the organization. Furthermore, asking what-if questions requires imagination. For example, at Ford Motor Co., Alan Mullaly asked at one time, “What if we sold off our luxury brands, terminated the Mercury line, and concentrated on Ford— would we be a stronger company?” (He was right.)
Maintaining a Human and Emotional Aspect As implied by the creative component to strategy, strategic leaders rely heavily on intuition as to what direction the organization should take. Cynthia Montgomery, a strategy professor and former head of the Strategy Unit at Harvard Business School, says that many executives have lost the leadership and human dimension of strategy. She believes that strategy has become too analytical, a must-do instead of a want-to-do. To make strategy more personal, leaders should answer the questions: “Does your company matter? What is your company adding to what already exists in the market?”
To illustrate the human touch in strategy, Montgomery gives the example of Gucci. The brand had become trashed and of low value because the
422 CHAPTER 13• STRATEGIC LEADERSHIP AND KNOWLEDGE MANAGEMENT
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
name appeared on 22,000 products including cigarette lighters and tennis balls. A new CEO revamped the Gucci strategy. He decided the brand should be sexy, at the leading edge of fashion, and a good value. The origi- nal Gucci market niche was high-fashion appealing to an older audience. The new CEO turned the company around to meet the new strategy, leading to survival and good profits.8
Most great companies start with great purposes formulated by the founder. A sterling example is IKEA’s intent to offer customers “a wide range of well-designed, functional home furnishing products at prices so low that as many people as possible can afford them.”9 Typically, the pur- pose comes from intuition rather than extensive analysis. Mintzberg believes that synthesizing information and thinking ahead is more impor- tant than strategic planning in developing useful business strategy.10
Gathering Multiple Inputs to Formulate Strategy Many strategic leaders arrive at their ideas for the organization’s future by consulting with a wide range of interested parties, in a process similar to conducting research to create a vision. Customers are a natural source of inputs for formulating strategy, often by simply asking them what new products, services, or features they would want. A few years ago, Coastal Contacts, a large online contact lens retailer, was searching for a way to enhance growth. During a six-month period, the CEO and the senior team phoned customers to see if they had any ideas. A surprise finding was that many customers wanted to receive their lenses the next day. When Coastal Contacts began using overnight delivery, sales surged.11 (We recognize that some strategy experts would regard shortening of delivery time as a market- ing tactic, not a true business strategy.)
A growing number of companies are gathering strategy inputs through crowdsourcing, the use of collective intelligence gathered from the public for accomplishing tasks, often by the use of social media. One reason for gathering data for strategy formulation through crowdsourcing is to pull in diverse and end-user perspectives that are typically overlooked but poten- tially useful. A second reason is to build enthusiasm and alignment behind a company’s strategic direction. The people whose opinions are solicited might become more committed to the new strategic direction of the com- pany. Crowdsourcing can involve employees as well as other stakeholders including customers and the general public.
3M used crowdsourcing successfully when it decided to reinvigorate its Markets of the Future process—a critical input to the company’s strategic planning. Previously, a small group of analysts conducted research about megatrends that could affect the company’s future. The new method of gathering input was to invite all of the company sales, marketing, and R&D employees to a Web-based forum. In two weeks, the forum attracted more than 1,200 participants from more than forty countries and generated more than 700 ideas. As a result of crowdsourcing, nine new future markets were identified with an aggregate multibillion dollar sales potential.12
THE NATURE OF STRATEGIC LEADERSHIP 423
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
Anticipating and Creating a Future A major component of leadership is direction setting, which involves antici- pating and sometimes creating a future for the enterprise or organizational unit. To set a direction is also to tell the organization what it should be doing. To set a productive direction for the future, the leader must accurately forecast or anticipate that future. Insight into tomorrow can take many forms, such as a leader’s making accurate forecasts about consumer prefer- ences, customer demands, and the skill mix needed to operate tomorrow’s organization. The head of a government agency might visualize what services will be the most important to the population in the future. A truly visionary leader anticipates a future that many people do not think will come to pass. A classic example is that in the early days of computers few people predicted that anyone would want to use a computer while not in the office or at home.
Creating the future is a more forceful approach than anticipating the future. The leader, assisted by widespread participation of team members, creates conditions that do not already exist. He or she must ask questions about the shape of the industry in five to ten years and decide how to ensure that the industry evolves in a way that is highly advantageous to the company. Furthermore, the leader must recognize the skills and capabilities that must be acquired now if the company is to occupy the industry high ground in the future.
Creating the future has been conceptualized as reinventing an industry. Entrepreneurial leaders frequently engage in such activity. An example of creating the future was the development of the iPad by the late Steve Jobs and his product designers at Apple Inc. Hand-held computers had existed before, but nothing of the nature of the iPad. Industrial applications of the device spread rapidly including using them to display products as well as the owner’s manual for the Kia automobiles and SUVs.
So how much time should an executive leader invest in plotting the future? About 5 percent of work time invested in plotting the future might seem realistic. One reason is that a leader has to invest time in executing the existing strategy.
Revolutionary and Contrarian Thinking Using even stronger terms than reinventing an industry, Gary Hamel charac- terizes strategy as being revolutionary. According to Hamel, corporations are reaching the limits of incrementalism. Incremental improvements include squeezing costs, introducing a new product a few weeks earlier, enhancing quality a notch, and capturing another point of market share. These continual improvements enhance an organization’s efficiency and are therefore vital to a firm’s success, but they are not strategic breakthroughs or radical innovations.13
To be an industry leader, a company’s leaders must think in revolution- ary terms. Revolutionary companies such as Amazon.com and Netflix create the rules for others to follow. According to Hamel, any strategy that does
424 CHAPTER 13• STRATEGIC LEADERSHIP AND KNOWLEDGE MANAGEMENT
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
not seriously challenge the status quo is not actually a strategy. What passes for strategy in most companies is often sterile and unimaginative. Another variation of revolutionary thinking is to discover ways to disrupt the busi- ness activities of other companies or to ward off being disrupted by others. A disruptive innovation is aimed at serving a new market or less demanding customers with a product that may be inferior or easier to use. Among the many disruptive innovations in modern times have been personal compu- ters disrupting mainframe computers, smartphones disrupting personal computers and expensive cameras, cell phones disrupting watches, and manufactured patio homes replacing larger, standard homes.14
Contrarian thinking, in which the leader rejects conventional wisdom, is much like the investor who trolls for hidden value in out-of-favor stocks. Travis Kalanic, CEO of the car-service app Uber, has successfully engaged in contrarian thinking. His company enables consumers to purchase rides on vehicles for hire and also share rides. Airports have long been the target of nonlicensed vehicles that compete with taxis. Kalanick’s contrarian think- ing was that a company could compete against licensed taxis nationally and internationally. Another aspect of Kalanick’s contrarian thinking is to charge customers more for ground transportation during peak demands times—something done by air carriers but not taxis. As a company, Uber continues to face legal challenges but the company continues to grow.15
Creating a Vision We have already mentioned visions in this book, including the description in Chapter 3 of the vision component of charismatic leadership. Here we exam- ine the concept of vision in more depth, because visions are an integral part of strategic leadership. One of the most important challenges of high-level leadership is to create a shared vision that will motivate organizational mem- bers to perform well.16 Whether the effort takes place is also a function of the leader’s behavior and personality. Otherwise a carefully crafted vision written anonymously and emitted by e-mail would be a strong motivator.
The final vision statement is relatively short. James R. Lucas, a specialist in vision formulation, writes that a carefully considered and articulated vision helps us know who we are and who we are not. The vision also points to what we do successfully and what we do not, which activities we should take on and which we should avoid.17 An example of a short vision statement that appears to be motivational is the statement Marc Benioff, the founder of Salesfor.com: “In ten years I want us to be the largest and most important enterprise cloud computing company.”18 (A few more speci- fics about developing a vision statement are presented in the Guidelines for Action and Skill Development section of this chapter.)
Articulating a clear vision helped get several great companies off the ground when the company founders were seeking funding from venture capitalists. When Sergey Brin and Larry Page were planning to launch a company, they had no business experience and no track record, yet they had a powerful one-line vision. They told investors at Sequoia Capital,
THE NATURE OF STRATEGIC LEADERSHIP 425
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
“We deliver the world’s information in one click.” The investors liked the vision statement, and invested in the company called Google.19 The Google statement might be classified as dealing with a mission because it relates to the present, not the future. However, even the smartest minds in business often use mission and vision interchangeably.
In companies that believe strongly in visions and strategic goals, all activ- ities throughout the company are supposed to support the vision and goals. For example, at Salesforce.com, company leadership expects workers at all levels to make suggestions for enhancing cloud computing service to other companies.
Leadership Effectiveness and Strategy Implementation Carefully crafting a strategy and vision is not sufficient for its effectiveness. The strategy and vision must also be implemented or executed by the leader/manager. Part of being an effective leader is to implement a strategic initiative. A basic example is that Domino’s managers throughout the orga- nization successfully implemented the strategic initiative of upgrading pizza quality after the CEO decided that a high quality was necessary.
The cofounders of Honest Tea, Yale professor Seth Goldman and one of his students, Barry Nalebuff, have spoken to many business executives about strategy implementation. The Honest Tea partners point out that no strategy, however brilliant, can be implemented successfully unless the peo- ple with key jobs know what they need to do differently, and understand how and why they should be executing.20 The key people must also have the necessary resources, such as every Domino manager having the correct ingredients to upgrade the Domino Pizzas after the CEO at the time initi- ated a strategy of high quality.
Quite often, implementation requires a series of goals that will be steps along the way to implementing the strategy. An example is the rise to prom- inence of VIZIO, the manufacturer of television receivers and other elec- tronic products. The company moved gradually from being a store brand to a brand name that consumers wanted to purchase. The goals along the way included selling to more prominent retailers and creating brand recognition through advertising on television and purchasing the rights to college foot- ball games.
Formulating and implementing organizational strategy is a process that must quite often be repeated in order for the firm to be competitive and sur- vive. Strategy researcher and Columbia University Business School professor, Rita Gunther McGrath, points out that leaders need to embrace the idea that advantage is transient. Companies must therefore launch new strategic initia- tives from time to time. The result is a portfolio of advantages that can be built quickly and dropped as rapidly.21 PepsiCo is an example of a company that has shifted its marketing strategy several times, moving away from depen- dence on carbonated beverages to a firm that sells a wide variety of snack foods and noncarbonated beverages. The accompanying Leader in Action insert describes an executive who is widely admired for his strategic thinking.
426 CHAPTER 13• STRATEGIC LEADERSHIP AND KNOWLEDGE MANAGEMENT
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
LEADER IN ACTION
Ford CEO Alan Mulally Focuses on the Company and the Outside World
Alan Mulally, the CEO of Ford Motor Co., through June 2014 is widely admired for his accomplishments in recapturing much of the past glory of Ford. Mulally has played a key role in two different industries. As the presi- dent of the commercial airplane business at Boeing in the late 1990s, he revitalized the company including a major thrust into digital technology.
Mulally was hired as the CEO of Ford in 2006, to help turn around the company, at a time when Ford was on the verge of collapse. One of Mulally’s first giant moves was to borrow $23 billion by putting up Ford’s assets as collateral. The purpose of the loan was to give the com- pany enough cash to survive until its cash flow position improved. The huge loan enabled the company to avoid bankruptcy and a federal government bailout. Ford soon became a stable, profitable company, and by 2013 became the number one seller of automobiles and trucks in the United States.
A key part of the turnaround plan was to create global heads of manufacturing, marketing, and product develop- ment, thereby contributing to a consolidation labeled “One Ford.” The One Ford plan is a vision for the organization and its mission. At the heart of the plan is the phrase “One Team.” Another part of Ford’s vision derives from Henry Ford, who understood that the desire to move— to have freedom of mobility— is enduring and universal. Mulally believes that the company’s role in attaining his enduring vision will evolve. He believes that one day Ford might be part of connecting different modes of transporta- tion, including bicycles, waterways, cars, busses, and sub- ways. His short-range vision for automobiles is that they will really be another instrument on the Internet.
Mulally believes that a leader must have a compelling vision and a comprehensive plan. He refers to this as posi- tive leadership, referring to the idea that there is always a way forward, and that the leader must find the right path to move forward. Every employee is included in this plan, and everyone’s contribution is respected. Mulally also focuses on understanding what is happening in the world, such as
sensing the rise of the middle class in Asia thereby creat- ing an expanded market for vehicles.
To help managers respond to the outside world, Ford holds a Business Plan Review meeting every week. The entire global leadership team attends either in person or remotely. Leaders discuss the worldwide business envi- ronment at the time, including such factors as the econ- omy, the energy and technology sectors, and what competitors are doing, and what customers want. The group then talks about forces in the world that are going to shape what consumers will value in the future. The Business Plan Review meeting functions as both a strategic plan and a relentless execution plan.
Mulally believes that leaders across the company are responsible for deciding “What business are we in?” At the same time leadership, with the contribution of their team members, must figure out what deep consumer need the company is uniquely positioned to satisfy.
Mulally received a bachelor of science and a master of science in aeronautical and astronautical engineering from the University of Kansas. He also holds a master’s degree in management from the MIT Sloan School of Management.
QUESTIONS
1. Which aspects of strategic leadership are mentioned in this story about the Ford CEO?
2. To what extent does Mulally make use of his cogni- tive skills as a leader?
3. What takeaway for managing your own career can you squeeze out of the story just presented?
Sources: Original story created from facts and observations in “Leading in the 21st Century: An Interview with Ford’s Alan Mulally,” McKinsey & Company (www.mckinsey.com), November 2013, pp. 1–3; Dan Gallagher, “Back-Seat Drivers at Microsoft,” The Wall Street Journal, January 9, 2014, p. C8; Mike Snider, “Ford’s Mulally: Be Nice, Work Hard,” USA Today, October 14, 2013, p. 6B; Keith Naughton, “The Happiest Man in Detroit,” Bloomberg Business Week, February 7–13, 2011, pp. 66–71; Steve Ballmer,” Alan Mulally,” Time, May 11, 2009, p. 74.
THE NATURE OF STRATEGIC LEADERSHIP 427
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
Leadership Skill-Building Exercise 13-1 gives you an opportunity to prac- tice a straightforward approach to developing business strategy.
Conducting a SWOT Analysis
Strategic planning helps a manager lead strategically. Strategic planning encompasses those activities that lead to the statement of goals and objec- tives and the choice of strategy. Quite often, a firm arrives at its strategy after completing strategic planning. In practice, many executive leaders choose a strategy prior to strategic planning. As mentioned earlier, at times intuition and judgment is more important than planning in the creation of a strategy. Once the firm has the strategy, such as forming strategic alliances, a plan is developed to implement it.
Quite often, strategic planning takes the form of a SWOT analysis, a long-standing method of considering internal strengths and weaknesses as well as external opportunities and threats in a particular situation. A SWOT analysis represents an effort to examine the interaction between the particular characteristics of your organization or organizational unit and the external environment, or marketplace, in which you compete.22
The framework, or technique, is useful in identifying a niche the company has not already exploited. The components of a basic version of SWOT are described next.
Internal Strengths The emphasis in this step is assessing factors within the organization that will have a positive impact on implementing the plan. (In some versions of SWOT analysis, an analysis of the external environment is included in this step.) What are the good points about a particular alternative? What are
LEADERSHIP SKILL-BUILDING EXERCISE 13-1
Mapping Out a Future for an Organization
The purpose of this exercise is to give you practice on a key aspect of strategic leadership, articulating where you want your organization to be, and how to arrive at that in future. To formulate a basic organizational strategy, first choose an organization. The organization could be a present employer (including self- employment), a past employer, or any organization familiar to you.
Step One is to write down at the bottom of a page a brief description of where the organization (business or
non-profit) is today. This might include product or service offerings, annual revenues, and number of employees.
Step Two is to write down where you want the firm to be at a future date.
Step Three is to write down what must be done to get from Step One to Step Two. You have therefore created future goals for your organization and the strategy required to achieve those goals (or vision).
Source: The idea for this exercise stems from “Business Strategies for ThinkingManagers,” (www.thinkingmanagers.com), June 7, 2006, p. 1.
428 CHAPTER 13• STRATEGIC LEADERSHIP AND KNOWLEDGE MANAGEMENT
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
your advantages? What do you do well? Use your own judgment and intui- tion, and also ask knowledgeable people. As a business owner, you may have a favorable geographic location that makes you more accessible to cus- tomers than your competitor is. Another strength is that you may have invested in state-of-the art equipment that became available only recently.
A successful example of capitalizing on internal strengths took place when leaders at Amazon.com capitalized on its world-class capabilities for payment processing and order management for physical retailing. Soon the company offered these services to other companies, therefore becoming an outsourcing firm in addition to its many other capabilities. The specific service provided is that Amazon customers can make purchases on a company’s website using the payment and shipping information stored in their Amazon accounts.23
Internal Weaknesses Here the strategy developer takes a candid look at factors within the firm that could have a negative impact on the proposed plan. Consider the risks of pursuing a particular course of action, such as subcontracting work to a low-wage country (outsourcing). What could be improved? What is done badly? What should be avoided? Examine weaknesses from internal and external perspectives. Do outsiders perceive weaknesses that you do not see? (You may have to ask several outsiders to help you identify these weaknesses.) Are there products, services, or work processes your competi- tors perform better than you do? You are advised to be realistic now and face any unpleasant truths as soon as possible. Again, use your judgment and ask knowledgeable people. As a manager or business owner, you may have problems managing your inventory, or you may have employees who are not up to the task of implementing a new plan or venture.
External Opportunities The purpose of this step is to assess socioeconomic, political, environmen- tal, and demographic factors among others to estimate what benefits they may bring to the organization. Think of the opportunities that await you if you choose a promising strategic alternative, such as creating a culturally diverse customer base. Use your imagination, and visualize the possibilities. Look for interesting trends. Useful opportunities can derive from such events as the following:
• Changes in technology and markets on both a broad and narrow scale • Changes in government policy related to your field • Changes in social patterns, population profiles, lifestyles, and so forth.
External Threats The purpose of this step is to assess what possible negative impact socioeco- nomic, political, environmental, and demographic factors may have on the organization. There is a downside to every alternative, so think ahead, and
CONDUCTING A SWOT ANALYSIS 429
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
do contingency planning. Ask people who may have tried in the past what you are attempting now. Answer questions such as:
• What obstacles do you face? • What is your competition doing? • Are the required specifications for your job, products, or services changing? • Is changing technology changing your ability to compete successfully?
Despite a careful analysis of threats, do not be dissuaded by the naysayers, heel draggers, and pessimists. To quote Nike, “Just do it.”
Carrying out a SWOT analysis is often illuminating in terms of both pointing out what needs to be done and putting problems into perspective. Although much more complex schemes have been developed for strategic planning, they all include some analysis of strengths, weaknesses, and opportunities. Leadership Skill-Building Exercise 13-2 gives you an opportu- nity to conduct a SWOT analysis.
A Sampling of Business Strategies Formulated by Leaders
We have been focusing on the process by which leaders and managers make strategic decisions. Also of interest to leaders and potential leaders is the content of such decisions. Business strategies are often classified according to their focus of impact: corporate level, business level, or functional level. Corporate-level strategy asks, “What business are we in?” Business-level strategy asks, “How do we compete?” And functional-level strategy asks, “How do we support the business-level strategy?” Some of the business strategies listed next might cut across more than one of these three levels. The first three of these strategies are the generic strategies espoused by Michael Porter.24
1. Differentiation. A differentiation strategy seeks to offer a product or service that the customer perceives as being different from available alternatives. The organization may use advertising, distinctive features, exceptional service, or new technology to gain this perception of uniqueness. What differentiates one
LEADERSHIP SKILL-BUILDING EXERCISE 13-2
Conducting a SWOT Analysis
In small groups, develop a scenario for a SWOT analysis, such as the group starting a chain of Panini restaurants, pet-care service centers, or recycling centers for elec- tronic devices. Because you will probably have mostly hypothetical data to work with, you will have to rely heavily on your imagination. Group leaders might share
the results of the SWOT analysis with the rest of the class. Conducting a SWOT analysis reinforces the skill of thinking strategically about a course of action. A key challenge in preparing this hypothetical SWOT analysis is to make a distinction between internal and external forces.
430 CHAPTER 13• STRATEGIC LEADERSHIP AND KNOWLEDGE MANAGEMENT
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
of your favorite products? A challenge with the differentiation strategy is that if the product or service is successful, competitors move in quickly. Groupon, the popular website specializing in local shopping deals by placing consumers into groups, was an immediate sensation. The business model required no special technology, and soon other websites were in competition, including Livingsocial and BuyWithMe.25
2. Cost leadership. A basic strategy is to produce a product or service at a low cost in order to lower the selling price and gain market share. Aldi, a chain of deep-discount food stores, is the eighth largest retailer in the world. The com- pany capitalizes on the bargain hunter who accepts private labels, limited choices, and paying 25 cents to use a grocery cart. The choice of fewer brands helps cut costs. Aldi does not accept credit cards or checks and encourages customers to bring their own bags. An investor in urban grocery stores said, “Now it’s private label that is attractive, that has nutritious labels on it, and that are part of the corporate strategy.”26 A variety of general merchandise stores, such as Dollar General and Family Dollar, implement the cost leader- ship strategy. A major problem with a cost-leadership strategy is that competi- tors can easily enter the field, creating a downward spiral in pricing.
3. Focus or niche. In a focus strategy, the organization concentrates on a specific regional market or buyer group. To gain market share, the company will use either a differentiation or a cost-leadership approach in a targeted market. The focus strategy is a natural, common-sense approach to business because it is difficult to serve every customer well. A focus strategy is about the same thing as finding a niche, or your place in the market. Almost every successful business venture was found by locating a niche. Pawn shops that cater to the affluent exemplify how varied a niche strategy can be. One such firm is Suttons & Robertsons. CEO, Jeffrey A. Weiss, explains, “We focus on the blue-chip, wealthy crowd.” The company has been in business for over 250 years and capitalizes on the fact that many people today are asset rich but have a temporary liquidity problem.27
4. High quality. A basic business strategy is to offer goods or services of higher quality than the competition does. Leaders continue to emphasize quality, even if there is less explicit emphasis today on formal quality pro- grams than in the past. Important exceptions are the Six Sigma programs that emphasize statistical approaches to attaining quality. Leaders at GE and 3M, for example, emphasize Six Sigma. One reason that quality is clas- sified as a strategy is that it contributes to competitive advantage in cost and differentiation. Because many customers now expect high quality, a quality strategy must be supplemented with other points of differentiation, such as supplying customized features and services that customers desire. How about Apple Inc. or the Swiss Army knife for a quality strategy? Also, all the merchandise offered at the pawn shop just mentioned is of high quality, such as diamond necklaces.
Drifting away from a strategy of high quality can damage an organiza- tion’s reputation and sales. A few years back, Toyota Motor Corp. had to
A SAMPLING OF BUSINESS STRATEGIES FORMULATED BY LEADERS 431
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
recall millions of automobiles and trucks because of a variety of electronic and mechanical problems. President Akio Toyoda blamed some of the pro- blems on excessive focus on growth. He said that the rapid expansion had “attracted much praise from outside the company and some people just got too big-headed and focused too excessively on profit.”28 The implication was that Toyota’s strategy of high quality was diminished.
5. Imitation. If you cannot be imaginative, why not imitate the best? Manu- facturers of popular digital devices such as digital cameras and smart phones use an imitation strategy. The company waits for the right time to introduce a lower-priced competitor. Benchmarking is a form of learning by watching. One company emulates the best practices of another company, usually without outright stealing the product or service ideas of another company. The automotive industry is rampant with one company imitating another. Next time you are in a busy parking lot or driving on the highway, see how many hoods and auto grilles you can find that resemble a Mercedes.
6. Strategic alliances. A modern business strategy is to form alliances, or joint ventures, with other companies to exploit a market opportunity. Stra- tegic alliances have become more common as leaders in the high-tech industry attempt to capitalize on the strengths of other companies. Typi- cally, the parent companies have complementary skills and assets. Eli Lilly, a major pharmaceutical company, has been forming strategic alliances for about 100 years. The many partnerships around the world are aimed at dis- covery, development, and marketing. One example is that Lilly partners with the Belgium company Galapagos to develop treatments for osteoporosis.29
7. Growth through acquisition. A standard strategy for growth is for one company to purchase others. Growth in size is important, but companies may also purchase other companies to acquire a new technology or com- plete a product line. Buying a new technology is often less expensive than investing huge sums in R&D that might not yield a marketable product. Much of General Electric’s growth over the years can be attributed to acquiring other companies. When Marissa Mayer became the CEO of Yahoo, she quickly implemented a strategy of growth through acquisition. Within ten months, Yahoo purchased ten smaller firms. One purchase was Loki Studios, a mobile gaming company purchased primarily because of its experience with “community and location-based services.”30
8. High-speed and first-mover strategy. High-speed managers focus on speed in all of their business activities, including product development, sales response, and customer service. Believing that time is money, they choose time as a competitive resource. It is important to get products to market quickly because the competition might get there first or might deliver a product or service more rapidly. Getting to market first is also referred to as the first-mover strategy. Starbucks was the first national chain of coffee bars. The many storefronts served as marketing devices to
432 CHAPTER 13• STRATEGIC LEADERSHIP AND KNOWLEDGE MANAGEMENT
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
acquire more customers. A first-mover strategy sometime gives only a tem- porary advantage, such as the BlackBerry once being almost synonymous with smartphone. Many competitors swept in, including Samsung, Apple, and Nokia, making it difficult for BlackBerry to survive.
9. Product and global diversification. A natural business strategy is to offer a variety of products and services and to sell across borders to enhance market opportunities. Coca-Cola Co. exemplifies a company that thrives on both global and product diversification. Coke now generates 75 percent of its revenue and operating profit from countries outside the United States. Despite the company’s reputation for relying too heavily on Coke, it has acquired many smaller brands of beverages in recent years, including the purchase of the organic beverage company Honest Tea of Bethesda in 2011. A key point of the acquisition is that Honest Tea is a growth company, and many consumers have made a move toward health and wellness in their beverage consumption.31
Global diversification is such a widely accepted strategy that the burden of proof would be on a business leader who shunned globalization.
10. Sticking to core competencies. Many firms of all sizes believe they will prosper if they confine their efforts to the activities they perform best—their core competencies. Corporate strategist Jim Collins calls this the Hedgehog concept: becoming very good at one thing in a world of companies that spread themselves into many areas where they lack depth.32 Many firms that expanded through diversification later trimmed back operations to activities on which they had built their reputation.
GE, mentioned above as a major example of growth through acquisition, is also a case history in refocusing on core competencies. A few years ago, CEO Jeff Immelt decided that GE was drifting too far from its industrial roots, including at one time earning more than half its profits from its financial wing, GE Capital. The new strategy of simplification resulted in reducing the scope of GE Capital, the sale of NBC Universal, and a portfolio with a refocus on industrial product such as power generators and jet engines.33 (Reducing the scope of GE Capital would include no longer mak- ing certain types of loans, such as subprime loans to restaurants.)
11. Brand leadership. As obvious as it may appear, succeeding through devel- oping the reputation of a brand name can be considered a business strategy. The opposite strategy is to build components for others, build products that others market under their names, or be a commodity, such as cinder blocks.
According to research company Interbrand, the world’s ten leading brands in order of brand strength are (1) Apple, (2) Google, (3) Coca-Cola, (4) IBM, (5) Microsoft, (6) General Electric, (7) McDonald’s, (8) Samsung, (9) Intel, and (10) Toyota.34 By building the reputation of their brands, senior management (assisted by countless thousands of workers) has helped these companies succeed financially.
12. Focus on environmental sustainability. Yet another strategy is for company leadership to focus on being green, that is, engaging in many
A SAMPLING OF BUSINESS STRATEGIES FORMULATED BY LEADERS 433
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
activities that help sustain the external environment. Among the myriad activities fitting the green strategy would be using solar panels and wind turbines for as much energy as possible, using recycled paper, and encour- aging employees to car pool. (Many of these green initiatives were presented in Chapter 6.)
A specific example of the green strategy was formulated by former Chief Executive Officer Peter Loscher of the German conglomerate Siemens. Shortly after becoming the CEO, he focused on green business to assure the company’s future. Loscher increased the proportion of Siemens that sells sustainability- focused customers products such as light bulbs, high-speed trains, and factory control systems. Siemens also generates considerable revenue from the sale of wind power, solar energy, and energy-conserving electricity grids. About one- quarter of Siemens employees are classified as green-collar workers because they produce or market resource-efficient products.35 Note that the green strat- egy of Siemens focuses on customers rather than the company itself.
13. Competitive advantage through hiring talented people. A powerful strategy for gaining competitive advantage is to build the organization with talented, well-motivated people at every level. The most urgent need in building great companies is to find and keep great people. Microsoft and Amazon.com, along with elite business consulting firms, are examples of firms that explicitly use the hiring-talented-people strategy. Talented people may need some leadership direction, but they will think of new products and services and develop effective work processes.
All of these impressive strategies have limited impact unless they are implemented properly, meaning that effective management must support strategic leadership. To repeat, visions must be followed up with execution. Based on case research in many companies, Michael Beer and Russell A. Eisenstat found that strategies are sometimes not implemented correctly because top management is not aware of problems that threaten the busi- ness.36 An example would be that faced with pressures to reduce costs, some manager in operating units do not report that quality is being sacri- ficed to hold down manufacturing costs.
Knowledge Management and the Learning Organization
Another thrust of leaders is to help their organizations better adapt to the environment by assisting workers and the organization to become better learners. To accomplish this, the leader manages knowledge and cultivates a learning organization. Knowledge management (KM) is a concerted effort to improve how knowledge is created, delivered, and applied.37 When knowledge is managed effectively, information is shared as needed, whether it be printed, stored electronically, or rests in the brains of workers. Manag- ing knowledge helps create a learning organization—one that is skilled at creating, acquiring, and transferring knowledge and at modifying behavior to reflect new knowledge and insights.38
434 CHAPTER 13• STRATEGIC LEADERSHIP AND KNOWLEDGE MANAGEMENT
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
Knowledge Management Knowledge management (KM) deals with a cultural focus on knowledge sharing. Managing knowledge is an important leadership role because very few organizations make systematic use of the collective wisdom of employ- ees. Loads of information is often collected in databases, and even through text messaging, but little systematic use is made of the information. Here we look at the general format of KM programs.
Knowledge management has three components, as revealed by the research and observations of Thomas H. Davenport, Laurence Prusak, and Bruce Strong.39 Knowledge creation is used to spur innovation. Programs for creating knowledge solicit ideas, insights, and innovations from many sources, including rank and file workers, customers, and business partners, instead of relying exclusively on the research and development staff. For example, more than 40 percent of Procter & Gamble products have a com- ponent from external sources that is up from 10 percent ten years ago.
Knowledge dissemination through information technology is the most fre- quent activity within knowledge management. Methods of sharing knowledge include company intranets that consolidate information in one place so that it is more accessible to potential users. Also of importance are internal online col- laboration networks in which workers from the same as well as geographically dispersed units share work-related information. An example is to make an intra- net a one-stop information shop designed to support critical jobs and work pro- cesses. For example, Intel places on one website all of the information workers need to make a capital purchase. Knowledge application is the process of getting workers better at what they do. Many organizations have discovered that the most effective way of encouraging workers to apply knowledge is through basic practices such as mentoring, on-the-job training, and workshops.
General Format of KM Programs Knowledge management systems sometimes take the form of a computer-based system for collecting and organizing potentially useful information. However, knowledge is still disseminated through traditional approaches such as people exchanging stories about incidents that have taken place in the past. A noteworthy example is the British Royal Navy and its highly efficient informal internal network. Lead- ership information and stories referred to as “dits” are exchanged across the network—among layers of management, generations, branches, and social groups. Aided by these dits, the Royal Navy’s collective consciousness processes new knowledge and insights while reinforcing established ones. Crews are encouraged to share their dits.40 A dit might take this form: “A few years ago Admiral _______ visited one of the biggest vessels in the fleet. He said that he could tell our morale was high and we were battle ready because so many sailors were smiling.”
A very practical form of knowledge management is to deliver information just in time, or at the point at which it is most needed. A widely practiced method of delivering information just in time is through tablet computers, such as an insurance accessing the right information to help a customer
KNOWLEDGE MANAGEMENT AND THE LEARNING ORGANIZATION 435
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
with a complicated coverage problem. Whatever advanced technology is used to implement knowledge management, it works best in an organiza- tional culture that values knowledge and encourages its dissemination. A study conducted in 121 new-product development teams and 41 subsidiar- ies of a high-technology company quantified another factor that influences knowledge sharing. Professional workers are less likely to hoard knowledge when there is less competition across the organizational units.41
The organizational subculture shapes our assumptions about what con- stitutes knowledge and which knowledge is worth managing.42 Professional workers in the finance division of Gap, Inc. might think that watching music channels on company time or surfing the Internet is a waste of com- pany time. In the merchandising division, however, watching music chan- nels and Internet surfing might be perceived as a valuable way of understanding clothing trends.
Servant Leadership and the Creation of Knowledge A new theory of how knowledge is created in organizations focuses on the role of the servant leader. A key point of the theory is that servant leaders are effective in sharing leadership responsibility, and shared leadership enhances the creation of knowledge. One reason is that shared leadership leads to a free flow of information exchange among group members. Shared leadership de-emphasizes hierarchical boundaries, which facilitates servant lea- ders and followers communicating freely. With less power distance between group member and leader, the group members believe in the importance of their opinions and suggestions, which leads to more information exchange. The exchange of information often triggers new learning.
Caring for people is another aspect of servant leadership that facilitates knowledge creation. The reason is that caring relationships facilitate the expression of diverse ideas and foster constructive reasoning and evaluation of ideas. When people feel that they are cared for, they are more willing to disclose information and put effort into processing information.43
An example of this abstract theory about servant leadership and the crea- tion of knowledge is as follows: A marketing assistant at a financial services was concerned about the portion of the company’s website that dealt with customers investing in funds. The manager in his caring and sharing style could be classified as a servant leader. The assistant said that she had three relatives (who were customers of the company) who attempt to navigate the appropriate portion of the website, and all three agreed that the experience was frustrating. Furthermore, two of the relatives said the website was so goofy that they would telephone customer service rather than invest online. The manager accepted the information in a relaxed and inquisitive manner. The discussion ultimately led to getting the cooperation of the website developer in creating a more user-friendly experience for customers.
Think through your attitudes toward sharing knowledge by taking Leadership Self-Assessment Quiz 13-2. Then, to round out your understand- ing of knowledge management, do Leadership Skill-Building Exercise 13-3.
436 CHAPTER 13• STRATEGIC LEADERSHIP AND KNOWLEDGE MANAGEMENT
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
The Learning Organization A learning organization can be viewed as a group of people working together to enhance their capacities to create the results they value.44 Orga- nizational leadership, however, must usually take the initiative to create the conditions whereby such enhancement of capacities, or learning, takes place. The research noted earlier in the chapter based on 20,000 executives
LEADERSHIP SELF-ASSESSMENT QUIZ 13-2
My Attitudes Toward Sharing Knowledge
Instructions: Indicate how much you agree with the following statements: disagree strongly (DS); disagree (D); neutral (N); agree (A); and agree strongly (AS).
DS D N A AS
1. I have often helped other students with their homework. 1 2 3 4 5
2. In brainstorming sessions, I usually hold back from giving my best ideas because I do not want them stolen.
5 4 3 2 1
3. I enjoy helping another person with a work or school problem. 1 2 3 4 5
4. I would be willing to submit some of my best ideas to a company database, such as an intranet.
1 2 3 4 5
5. I am concerned about submitting my most creative ideas on a term paper because these ideas could be stolen.
5 4 3 2 1
6. I enjoy working as part of a team and sharing ideas. 5 4 3 2 1
7. I get a little suspicious when a coworker or fellow student attempts to pick my brain.
1 2 3 4 5
8. It upsets me if I do not receive full credit for my ideas. 5 4 3 2 1
9. If I had a great idea for a screenplay or novel, I would not tell anyone about it before I was finished with the idea.
5 4 3 2 1
10. I have often let other people know about a good method I developed to improve work efficiency.
1 2 3 4 5
Total score:
Scoring and Interpretation: Tally your score by adding the numbers you circled or checked.
• 40 or higher: You are generous with respect to knowledge sharing and would probably fit well in an organiza- tion that practices knowledge management.
• 20–39: You have average attitudes toward sharing knowledge, with a mixture of enthusiasm and skepticism about knowledge sharing.
• 1–19: You are quite cautious and guarded about sharing ideas. Unless you become more willing to share your ideas, you would not fit well in an organization that emphasized knowledge management.
Note: You are authorized to share this quiz with as many people as you would like.
KNOWLEDGE MANAGEMENT AND THE LEARNING ORGANIZATION 437
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
found that strategic leaders are the focal point for organizational learning. Such leaders promoted a culture of inquiry, and they search for the lessons to be learned in both successful and unsuccessful outcomes. Strategic lea- ders also study their own failures and those of the team to find hidden les- sons.45 For example, a retailing executive might conclude that going too far to attract young, more fashionable customers wound up alienating too many older, more traditional customers.
To facilitate organizational learning, several firms have created a position labeled chief knowledge officer (CKO), or its equivalent. The major justifica- tion for creating such a position is that in many companies, human skills, intuition, and wisdom are replacing capital as the most precious resource. Chief knowledge officers seek to disperse those assets throughout the firm and convert them into innovations. They are in charge of systematically col- lecting information and connecting people with others who might have valuable information.
Here we look at a variety of leadership practices and attitudes that facili- tate organizational learning.
Transformational Versus Transactional Leadership and Organizational Learning Research in a large European financial services firm has brought into sharper focus the leader’s role in organizational learning. One major finding was that transformational leadership behaviors contribute signifi- cantly to encouraging workers to pursue exploratory innovation. An explor- atory innovation deals with finding new products, services, processes, or technology. An example would be a bank finding an entirely new service to offer to the public, such as a relocation service for geographically trans- ferred employees. Another major finding was that transactional leadership behaviors facilitate improving and extending existing knowledge and are associated with exploitative innovation.46 Exploitation relates to learning
LEADERSHIP SKILL-BUILDING EXERCISE 13-3
The Knowledge-Sharing Investigation Teams
A challenge with the idea of knowledge sharing is to know what knowledge should be shared among company members. The class is organized into knowledge-sharing investigation teams. Members of each team contact two people working in a support, technical, sales, profes- sional, or managerial position in a profit or nonprofit organization. Ask the contact persons what knowledge would be valuable to share in their place of work.
Communicate using the easiest method, whether it be a phone call, a text message, or a tweet.
Discuss your findings in a group, and perhaps add opinions of your own as to what knowledge would be worthwhile sharing in an organization. Arrive at a conclu- sion about five specific types of knowledge within an organization worth sharing. Share your findings with members of the other groups in the class.
438 CHAPTER 13• STRATEGIC LEADERSHIP AND KNOWLEDGE MANAGEMENT
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
ways to make incremental improvements in existing products, services, or processes. An example would be a bank developing a line of credit specifi- cally geared toward the one-person enterprise.
Leadership Initiatives for Enhancing the Learning Organization A wide variety of leadership initiatives can create and enhance a learning organization. Understanding them will help you grasp the concept of what a leader might do to enhance organizational learning.47
A major building block of a learning organization is a supportive learning environment. Several factors comprise a supportive learning environment. Employees should not fear being belittled or marginalized when they dis- agree with their manager or coworkers or ask naive questions. Instead, they should feel comfortable about expressing disagreement or puzzlement. Dif- ferences in opposing views should be both accepted and appreciated. Sup- portive learning also includes being open to new ideas and having the time to think and reflect. In many organizations, a person seen looking out the window would be assumed to be daydreaming rather than thinking about work-related problems.
A second building block of a learning organization is concrete learning processes and practices. One example would be for a company to hold debriefing sessions discussing what went right or wrong with a recent pro- gram of placing product advertisements as temporary tattoos on the fore- heads of paid participants.
A third building block is leadership that reinforces learning. For example, when leaders actively question and listen to employees, dialogue and debate as well as learning are encouraged. Most of the behaviors in the rest of this section would fit the building block of leadership that reinforces learning.
A top-level leader should create a strategic intent to learn. Organizational learning then becomes a vehicle for gaining competitive advantage. Creating a shared vision enhances learning, as organization members develop a com- mon purpose and commitment to having the organization keep learning. If workers at all levels believe that the company is headed toward greatness, they will be motivated to learn to help deliver greatness.
In a learning organization, employees are empowered to make decisions and seek continuous improvement. The idea is to develop a community of learning in which every worker believes that he or she can contribute to a smarter, more effective organization.
Systems thinking is almost synonymous with organizational learning. The leader helps organization members regard the organization as a system in which everybody’s work affects the activities of everybody else. Systems thinking also means keeping the big picture foremost in everybody’s mind and being keenly aware of the external environment. In addition to the big picture of systems thinking, the leader must encourage the little picture of personal mastery of the job. As team members gain personal mastery of their jobs, they contribute to team learning, an essential part of a learning
KNOWLEDGE MANAGEMENT AND THE LEARNING ORGANIZATION 439
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
READER’S ROADMAP
organization. Team learning centers on collective problem solving in which members freely share information and opinions to facilitate problem solving.
Action learning, or learning while working on real problems, is a funda- mental part of a learning organization. Participants in action learning are asked to work in teams to attack a significant organizational problem, such as decreasing the cycle time on a project. In the process of resolving an actual work problem, the participants acquire and use new skills, tools, or concepts. As the project progresses, new skills are applied while working with the problem. For example, if the team learned how to eliminate dupli- cation of effort in one aspect of the work process, it would look to eliminate duplication at other points in the cycle.
Learning from failure contributes immensely to a learning organization. A company that diversified into an area unsuccessfully might analyze why it failed, and then not repeat the same mistake. Encouraging continuous exper- imentation is another important practice for crafting a learning strategy. The leader encourages workers to learn from competitors, customers, sup- pliers, and other units within the organization.
For organizational learning to proceed smoothly, workers throughout the organization must have the political skills to make connections with and influence others. For example, if a production technician discovers an effec- tive method of reducing water consumption, he or she must have the skill to sell an influential person on the merits of this idea.
A final perspective on creating the learning organization is that the leader must encourage organizational members to think creatively—to imagine possibilities that do not already exist. Research synthesized by Yukl suggests that a comprehensive way for leaders to enhance organiza- tional learning is to “Develop, implement, and support programs and sys- tems that will encourage and reward the discovery of new knowledge and its diffusion and application in the organization.”48 Instead of merely adapting to the environment, the organization engages in the type of breakthrough thinking described in our previous discussions of creativity and strategic leadership.
So far we have studied the nature of leadership; the attributes, behaviors, and styles of leaders; the ethics and social responsibility of leaders; and how leaders exert power and use politics and influence. We then studied techniques for developing teamwork as well as motivation and coaching skills. After having studied creativity and innovation as part of leadership, we focused on communication skills as they relate to leadership. We then shifted to strategic leadership. Next, we examine another broad challenge fac- ing leaders: dealing with cultural diversity within the organization and across borders.
440 CHAPTER 13• STRATEGIC LEADERSHIP AND KNOWLEDGE MANAGEMENT
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
SUMMARY
Strategic leadership deals with the major purposes of an organization or organizational unit and pro- vides the direction and inspiration necessary to cre- ate, provide direction to, or sustain an organization. Strategic leadership has six important components: (1) the high-level cognitive activity by the leader, (2) human and emotional aspect, (3) gathering multi- ple inputs to formulate strategy, (4) anticipating and creating a future, (5) revolutionary and contrar- ian thinking, and (6) creating a vision.
Creating a vision is an integral part of strategic leadership. The final vision statement is relatively short. After formulating a vision, the leader should be involved in its communication and implementa- tion. A carefully considered and articulated vision helps us know who we are and who we are not. The vision also points to what we do successfully and what we do not, which activities we should take on and which to avoid. In companies that believe in visions and strategic goals, all activities throughout the company are supposed to support the vision and goals.
Carefully crafting a strategy and vision is not suf- ficient for effectiveness. The strategy and vision must also be implemented or executed by the leader/manager. Strategy cannot be implemented successfully unless key people know what they need to do differently and understand how they should be executing. Quite often, implementation requires a series of goals that will be steps along the way to implementing the strategy. Strategic planning quite often takes the form of a SWOT analysis, taking into account internal strengths and weaknesses and external opportunities and threats in a given situation. A SWOT analysis exam- ines the interaction between the organization and the environment.
Strategic leaders use many different types of busi- ness strategies, including the following: (1) differentia- tion, (2) cost leadership, (3) focus or niche, (4) high quality, (5) imitation, (6) strategic alliances, (7) growth
through acquisition, (8) high speed and first-mover strategy, (9) product and global diversification, (10) sticking to core competencies, (11) brand leader- ship, (12) focus on environmental sustainability, and (13) competitive advantage through hiring talented people.
Another strategic thrust of leaders is to help their organizations adapt to the environment by assisting workers and the organization to become better lear- ners. To accomplish this feat, the leader manages knowledge and cultivates a learning organization. Knowledge management focuses on the systematic sharing of information, including being able to deliver information just in time. Knowledge man- agement consists of knowledge creation, dissemina- tion, and application.
Servant leaders are effective in sharing leader- ship responsibility, and shared leadership enhances the creation of knowledge. De-emphasizing hierar- chical boundaries facilitates servant leaders com- municating freely. People who feel cared for are more willing to disclose and process information.
The leader has many roles in a learning organiza- tion. Transformational leaders tend toward encour- aging exploratory innovation, whereas transactional leaders tend toward encouraging exploitative (incre- ments in what already exists) innovation.
Major leadership initiatives for creating a learn- ing organization include creating a strategic intent to learn, creating a shared vision, and empowering employees to make decisions and seek continuous improvements. Also important is encouraging sys- tems thinking, encouraging personal mastery of the job, and team learning. Action learning, or learning while working on real problems, learning from failures, and encouraging continuous experi- mentation are also part of the learning organiza- tion. Workers must have the political skills to make connections and influence others. Encourag- ing creative thinking is also part of the learning organization.
SUMMARY 441
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
KEY TERMS
strategy 419 strategic leadership 420 crowdsourcing 423
strategic planning 428 SWOT analysis 428
Knowledge management (KM) 434
learning organization 434
GUIDELINES FOR ACTION AND SKILL DEVELOPMENT
Business strategy may be a complex subject, but the end result should be something almost everybody in the organization can understand. Three recom- mended rules toward making strategy understand- able are as follows:49
1. Make it simple. Strategy can usually be reduced to one page that addresses in which space the organization will compete, and how it will win.
2. Perfection is not necessary. Strategy is not about finding perfect answers, but more about placing bets with a reasonable chance of winning.
3. Explain the logic behind the strategy clearly. Be clear about the changes necessary to achieve the strategic goal and mission.
To make sure that all workers understand the company’s vision of where it wants to go, the vision statement should have certain key characteristics:50
1. Brief. The statement should be short enough, so employees can recall it with ease. It has been suggested that a vision should fit on an adult-size T-shirt.
2. Verifiable. A verifiable vision is one that ten people could agree that an organization has achieved.
3. Focused. Vision statements often contain too many ideas. It is better to focus on a major goal such as the vision of Ford Motor Company: “Employee involvement is our way of life.” (Notice that this vision is about human resource management, not about a product or brand.)
4. Understandable. A major purpose of the vision statement is that employees will know
where the organization wants to go and how to help it get there. Being understandable is therefore a key quality of the vision statement. Terms such as world class and leading edge might be subject to wide interpretation. The following component of the H&R Block vision statement would be understandable by most company employees: “Quality products, excellent service, and reasonable fees.”
5. Inspirational. To inspire, a vision statement should make employees feel good about working for the organization and should focus them on measurable business goals.
Discussion Questions and Activities
1. Why might being very practical minded inter- fere with being an outstanding strategic leader?
2. How might being very strong with business analytics (such as analyzing reams of data and preparing spreadsheets) help a person develop business strategy?
3. In what way can a business strategy motivate and inspire employees?
4. How could you adapt a business strategy to guide you in your own career as a leader?
5. Many top-level managers say that they want lower-ranking managers to think strategically. How can a middle manager or a first-level man- ager think strategically?
6. Imagine that you are a high-level executive of a consumer products or industrial company, and that you are in the final stages of developing a business strategy. What would be an advan- tage and a disadvantage of posting this strategy
442 CHAPTER 13• STRATEGIC LEADERSHIP AND KNOWLEDGE MANAGEMENT
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
LEADERSHIP CASE PROBLEM A
on several social media sites and asking for input from readers?
7. Working alone or with several team members, provide a recent example of revolutionary thinking by a company.
8. During the Great Recession, many consumers who had previously shopped at traditional supermarkets shifted to doing basic shopping at dollar stores and discount department stores.
Furthermore, some of these shoppers remained loyal to the low-priced stores after the reces- sion. What are the strategy lessons here?
9. In what way might doing a good job of knowl- edge management give a company a competi- tive advantage?
10. Why do you think it has been so difficult for researchers to prove that knowledge manage- ment pays dividends to an organization?
The Saratoga Supply Company Needs a Strategy
The Saratoga Supply Company is a distributor of a wide variety of industrial supplies to small- and medium-size companies, as well as schools, hospi- tals, and government agencies. The wide range of supplies number in the thousands including paper clips, copying paper, office furniture, desktop com- puters, pencil sharpeners, paper towels, and clean- ing solvents. Saratoga Supply uses state-of-the art information technology for purchasing, selling, and delivering products.
Although the company has been in business for sixty years, CEO Wes is worried about the future of Saratoga Supply. In consultation with CFO, Darleen, and head of sales, Gary, Wes notices a dis- turbing and steady decline in sales for almost all the products the company supplies. Wes agrees with Darleen that the downward trend in sales is accelerating (sales are decelerating) at an unhealthy rate. He also agrees with Gary’s analysis that too many customers are now ordering directly from manufacturers through online sales. In the past,
most manufacturers did not want to bother with small sales to individual companies. But with e-commerce, sales can be implemented more readily without going through intermediaries such as Sara- toga Supply Company.
With a concerned look on his face, Wes says to Darleen and Gary, “We need to develop a business strategy to prevent going out of business. Maybe we should meet for an all-day strategy session real soon.”
Questions
1. How should Wes and his team go about devel- oping a survival strategy for Saratoga Supply?
2. Does Saratoga Supply really need a survival strategy? Or should the company just begin to downsize to fit the demand for its products and services?
3. From the limited evidence presented, how effectively do you think Wes is carrying out the role of a strategic leader?
ASSOCIATED ROLE PLAY Organize into teams of about six students because Wes has selected you to come up with a strategy for Saratoga that will enable the company to sur- vive. Wes instructs you via e-mail: “Be as coura- geous as you want in giving me a strategy suggestion. We have been in business for sixty years, but we have to do something different to
survive and prosper. The handwriting is on the wall. Saratoga Supply is headed toward extinction.” You have about thirty minutes to arrive at a survival strategy for Saratoga Supply. An alternative is to spend some supplementary time outside of class working on the problem. Brainstorm by e-mail or social media if you prefer.
LEADERSHIP CASE PROBLEM A 443
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
LEADERSHIP CASE PROBLEM B
“Superintendent Briggs Is Busy Creating Visions Today”
Mary Briggs is the superintendent of schools of a city school district comprised of more than sixty schools, including pre-kindergarten, elementary, middle, and high schools. The school district has approximately 50,000 students enrolled at any one time. Many of the students are doing well, but the school district is also beset with many problems. Fewer than 50 per- cent of the students graduate from high school, and only about 10 percent of the high school graduates are considered ready for college or employment.
The local press, many parent groups, and the office of the mayor voice frequent complaints about the low performance of the city schools. Some people blame the teachers and the school principals for the pro- blems. Others blame the parents and the neighbor- hood influences for the problems. Still others blame the problems of the school district on Superintendent Briggs, who, as the leader, should be able to fix most of the problems facing the district, they believe.
A member of the school board recently asked Mary Briggs what she perceived to be the most important part of her job. Briggs replied, “I do visions. As a leader my job is to help create a better future for the schools, our students, and our tea- chers. I see a great future for our schools in which most of our students develop the skills and intellect to prepare them for the modern world. Many of our students will become leaders in our society, no mat- ter what field they enter.”
The school board member replied, “Thanks, Dr. Briggs, but I thought you might be working on pro- blems like there not being enough money in the food program for our poorest students.”
During the workday, school principals and vice principals often send Briggs e-mails asking her advice for dealing with an immediate problem, such as a student physically assaulting a teacher or another student in the classroom. Usually it takes about twenty-four hours to receive a response.
As an alternative to sending Briggs an e-mail about an important operational problem, some principals or vice principals will attempt to get through to her on the telephone. Usually, the calls go to voice mail. On occasion, the call does get through to Briggs’ administrative assistant. A response from the assistant that has come to irri- tate many of the principals and vice principals, is “Sorry, Superintendent Briggs is busy creating visions today. So she cannot talk with you unless this problem is a total emergency.” As a result, the phrase “Superintendent Briggs is busy creating visions today” has become a punch line for many jokes among principals, vice-principals, and teachers.
Questions
1. As a strategic leader, what error might Mary Briggs be making?
2. To what extent should a school superintendent be spending more time on strategy than opera- tional problems?
3. What advice might you offer Briggs to enhance her leadership image in her school district?
ASSOCIATED ROLE PLAY One student plays the role of the head of the teacher’s union in the school district just described. The union leader believes firmly that Mary Briggs is not devoting enough time to work- ing on operational problems, such as dealing with teacher complaints about classroom assaults. The
union leader has arranged a face-to-face meeting with Briggs. Another student plays the role of Briggs who will probably defend her role as a visionary for the school system who cannot spend too much time on mundane, operational problems.
444 CHAPTER 13• STRATEGIC LEADERSHIP AND KNOWLEDGE MANAGEMENT
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
NOTES
LEADERSHIP SKILL-BUILDING EXERCISE 13-4
My Leadership Portfolio
A major part of being a strategic leader is to think strategically. Entrapped by the necessities of the small tasks facing us daily, it is easy to “think little” instead of “think big” as required to be a strategic thinker. A “little thinker” might attend a leadership seminar and spend five minutes demanding a $5.00 rebate because he or she was served ill-prepared food at lunch. A “big thinker” might reflect on the same poorly prepared meal as a lesson in the impor- tance of employees’ taking care of small details to ensure customer satisfaction. For this installment in your leadership portfolio, enter into your journal how you capitalized—or did not capitalize—on the opportunity to think strategically during the last week, or so. An example follows:
My friend and I visited a large shopping mall on Saturday morning. We noticed a large number of vehicles, both autos and small trucks, circling around within a block of the mall entrance. The drivers were
obviously looking for a parking spot close enough so they could avoid walking the block, or so, necessary if they parked farther from the entrance.
My friend is a fitness nut, so he said the parking space chasers could do themselves a favor by parking a long distance from the mall entrance. In this way they could get a little physical exercise. A strategic flash went through my mind. If I, or perhaps the First Lady, could launch a national campaign for parking a distance away from mall entrances, we could make some headway on two of the major pro- blems facing our society. First, physical inactivity is becoming almost as big a killer as smoking. Second, think of all the gas people are wasting. On a national scale, think of all the gas we would save if people would stop circling around looking for spaces. Besides, those little extra blocks of gas consumption add up. My strategic brainstorm could lead to more fitness and less energy consumption in our country.
LEADERSHIP SKILL-BUILDING EXERCISE 13-5
Developing a Business Strategy for a Small Appliance Repair Chain
Imagine that you and a few classmates are the management team of a business that is almost dead—a chain of household small appliance repair stores. Over the years, your business has been declining steadily. A major contributing factor is that most people just replace rather than repair appliances such as television sets, DVD players, irons, heaters, hair dryers, and electric razors.
Today you are holding a business strategy session focused on the survival of your business. Be as bold as possible in your thinking, but keep in mind that your probably do not have much cash on hand and that your borrowing power is limited. Within thirty minutes, see if you can construct at least a tenta- tive path for the survival of your appliance-repair business.
1. Original story created from facts in observations in the following sources: Team Glad2baWoman, “Indra Nooyi—Successful Strategies Which Have Helped PepsiCo Grow,” Glad2baWOMAN (www .glad2bawoman.com), June 27, 2013, pp. 1–3;
Geoff Colvin, “Can Indra Nooyi Keep Investors Sweet on Pepsi?” Fortune, July 1, 2013, p. 41; Duane Stanford, “PepsiCo Prepares for A Snack War in Russia,” Bloomberg Businessweek, March 4–March 10, 2013, pp. 21–22; Tommy Cornelis,
NOTES 445
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
“Today’s Leader in STEM: Indra Nooyi of PepsiCo,” STEMblog™ (http://blog.stem connector.org), August 28, 2013, pp. 1–3; “Indra K. Nooyi: Chairman and Chief Executive Office, PepsiCo,” www.pepsico.eu/company. Accessed January 10, 2014.
2. Donald C. Hambrick and James W. Fredrickson, “Are You Sure You Have a Strategy?” Academy of Management Executive, November 2001, p. 48.
3. Roger L. Martin, “The Big Lie about Strategic Planning,” Harvard Business Review, January– February 2014, p. 78.
4. Richard L. Hughes and Katherine C. Beatty, Becoming a Strategic Leader: Your Role in Your Organization’s Enduring Success (San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 2005).
5. J. Brian Atwater, Vijay R. Kannan, and Alan A. Stephens, “Cultivating Systemic Thinking in the Next Generation of Business Leaders,” Academy of Management Learning & Education, March 2008, p. 13.
6. Paul J. H. Schoemaker, Steve Krupp, and Samantha Howland, “Strategic Leadership: The Essential Skills,” Harvard Business Review, January–February 2013, p. 132.
7. Daniel Goleman, “The Focused Leader,” Harvard Business Review, December 2013, p. 577.
8. “A Conversation with Cynthia Montgomery: How We Think about Strategy,” Executive Leadership, June 2012, p. 3.
9. Cynthia Montgomery, “Putting Leadership Back in Strategy,” Harvard Business Review, January 2008, pp. 54–80.
10. Henry Mintzberg, Managing (San Francisco: Berrett-Koehler, 2009), p. 162.
11. Verne Harnish, “Five Ways to Get Your Strategy Right,” Fortune, April 2011, p. 42
12. AmeGast and Michele Zanini, “The Social Side of Strategy,” McKinsey Quarterly (www. mckinsey quarterly.com), May 2012, pp. 1–4.
13. Gary Hamel, “Revolution vs. Evolution: You Need Both,” Harvard Business Review, May 2001, p. 150.
14. Simon Phipps, “Disruption as a Business Strategy,” InfoWorld (http://infoworld.com), July 7, 2009, pp. 1–2. Accessed February 9, 2014.
15. Douglas McMillan, “CEO of Uber Car Service Drives Pricing Debate,” The Wall Street Journal, January 8, 2014, p. B7.
16. Adam Bryant, The Corner Office (New York: Times Books), 2011.
17. James R. Lucas, “Anatomy of a Vision Statement,” Management Review, February 1998, p. 26.
18. Quoted in Victoria Barret, “The Web’s Big Upstart,” Forbes, December 6, 2010, p. 74.
19. Carmine Gallo, “Be a Visionary Leader,” The Ladders.com Executive Coach (TheLadders .com), January 23, 2008.
20. Seth Goldman and Barry Nalkebuff, “Mission in a Bottle’: Making Honest Tea,” Knowledge at Wharton (http://knowledge.wharton.upenn .edu), October 28, 2013, pp. 5–6.
21. Rita Gunther McGrath, “Transient Advantage,” Harvard Business Review, June 2013, pp. 62–70.
22. Several ideas for this version of SWOT are from “SWOT Analysis,” Business Owner’s Tool Kit (http://csi.toolkit.tst.cch.com/text/P02_4341 .asp), November 8, 1999; “Performing a SWOT Analysis,” in Business: The Ultimate Resources (Cambridge, Mass.: Perseus Publishing, 2002), pp. 226–227.
23. “Checkout by Amazon,” Amazon Payments (https: //payments.amazon.com). Accessed January 13, 2014.
24. Michael Porter, Competitive Strategy (New York: The Free Press, 1980), pp. 36–46.
25. Elise Moreau, “Groupon Competitors: Sites Like Groupon,” About.com Web Trends (http:// webtrends.about.com). Accessed January 16, 2014.
26. Stephanie Clifford, “Where Wal-Mart Failed, Aldi Succeeds,” The New York Times (www .nytimes.com), March 20, 2011, pp. 1–4.
27. Paul Sullivan, “Need Cash? Own a Bentley? Take a Pawn Ticket,” The New York Times (www.nytimes.com), January 13, 2014, pp. 1–4.
28. Norihiko Shirouzu, “Toyoda Rues Excessive Profit Focus,” The Wall Street Journal, March 2, 2010, p. B3.
29. Je’ Caaja, “Examples of Successful Strategic Alliances.”Chron.com (http://smallbusiness .chron.com). Accessed January 13, 2014.
30. Seth Fiegerman, “Yahoo Has Now Acquired 10 Startups since Marissa Mayer Became CEO,” mashable.com, May 12, 2013, p. 2.
31. Seth Goldman and Barry Nalkebuff, “Mission in a Bottle,” pp. 1–13.
446 CHAPTER 13• STRATEGIC LEADERSHIP AND KNOWLEDGE MANAGEMENT
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
32. George Anders, “Homespun Strategist,” The Wall Street Journal, January 6, 2004, p. B1.
33. Erika Fry, “GE Gets Back to Basics,” Fortune, May 20, 2013, p. 31.
34. “Best Global Brands 2013,” Interbrand (www .interbrand.com), © 2014.
35. “How Siemens Got Its Geist Back,” Bloomberg Business Week, January 31–February 6, 2011, pp. 18–20.
36. Michael Beer and Russell A. Eisenstat, “How to Have an Honest Conversation about Your Business Strategy,” Harvard Business Review, February 2004, pp. 82–89.
37. Thomas H. Davenport, Laurence Prusak, and Bruce Strong, “Putting Ideas to Work: Knowledge Management Can Make a Difference, but It Needs To Be More Pragmatic,” The Wall Street Journal, March 10, 2008, p. R11.
38. David A. Garvin, “Building a Learning Organization,” Harvard Business Review, July–August 1993, p. 80.
39. Davenport, Prusak, and Strong, “Putting Ideas to Work,” p. R11.
40. Andrew St. George, “Leadership Lessons from the Royal Navy,” McKinsey Quarterly (www .mckinseyquarterly.com), January 2013, pp. 1–5.
41. Morten T. Hansen, Marie Louise Mors, and Bjorn Lovas, “Knowledge Sharing in Organizations: Multiple Networks, Multiple Phases,” Academy of Management Journal, October 2005, p. 790.
42. David W. De Long and Liam Fahey, “Diagnosing Cultural Barriers to Knowledge Management,” Academy of Management Executive, November 2000, pp. 115–117.
43. Rishabh Rai and Anand Prakash, “A Relational Perspective to Knowledge Creation: Role of
Servant Leadership,” Journal of Leadership Studies, Number 2, 2012, pp. 61–85.
44. Robert M. Fulmer and J. Bernard Keys, “A Conversation with Peter Senge: New Developments in Organizational Learning,” Organizational Dynamics, Autumn 1998, p. 35.
45. Schoemaker, Krupp, and Howland, “Strategic Leadership,” pp. 133–134.
46. Justin J. P. Jansen, Dusya Vera, and Mary Crossan, “Strategic Leadership for Exploration and Exploitation: The Moderating Role of Environmental Dynamism,” Leadership Quarterly, February 2009, pp. 5–18.
47. The three building blocks are from David A. Garvin, Amy C. Edmondson, and Francesca Gino, “Is Yours a Learning Organization?” Harvard Business Review, March 2008, pp. 110–114. The rest of the list is from the following sources: Robert M. Fulmer and Philip Gibbs, “The Second Generation Learning Organizations: New Tools for Sustainable Competitive Advantage,” Organizational Dynamics, Autumn 1998, pp. 7–20; Thomas P. Lawrence, Michael M. Mauws, Bruno Dyck, and Robert F. Kleysen, “The Politics of Organizational Learning: Integrating Power into the 4I Framework,” Academy of Management Review, January 2005, pp. 180–191; Joe Raelin, “Does Action Learning Promote Collaborative Leadership?” Academy of Management Learning & Education, June 2006, pp. 152–168.
48. Gary Yukl, “Leading Organizational Learning: Reflections on Theory and Research,” Leadership Quarterly, February 2009, p. 50.
49. Martin, “The Big Lie of Strategic Planning,” p. 81.
50. “Making Vision Statements ‘Visionary,’ ” Manager’s Edge, December 1998, p. 1.
NOTES 447
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
CH AP
TE R
14 International and Culturally Diverse Aspects of Leadership
LEARNING OBJECTIVES After studying this chapter and doing the exercises, you should be able to
• Explain the potential, ethical, and competitive advan- tage from leading and managing diversity.
• Describe how cultural factors, including values, influ- ence leadership practice.
• Explain the contribution of cultural sensitivity and cultural intelligence to leadership effectiveness.
• Explain how global leadership skills contribute to leadership effectiveness.
• Pinpoint leadership initiatives to enhance the acceptance of cultural diversity.
CHAPTER OUTLINE The Advantages of Managing for Diversity
Cultural Factors Influencing Leadership Practice Key Dimensions of Differences in Cultural Values Cultural Values and Leadership Style
Cultural Sensitivity and Cultural Intelligence Cultural Sensitivity The English-Only Policy and Cultural Sensitivity Cultural Intelligence
Global Leadership Skills General Model of Global Leadership Skills Success Factors in International Management Positions Motivating and Inspiring Workers in Other Cultures Avoiding Product Names That Could Be Embarrassing in
Another Culture
Leadership Initiatives for Achieving Cultural Diversity Hold Managers Accountable for Achieving Diversity Establish Minority Recruitment, Retention, and Mentoring
Programs
Conduct Diversity Training Conduct Cross-Cultural Training Encourage the Development of Employee Networks Avoid Group Characteristics When Hiring for Person–
Organization Fit Modify Products and Services for Targeted Demographic
Groups Attain Diversity Among Organizational Leaders
Summary
Key Terms
Guidelines for Action and Skill Development
Leadership Case Problem A
Leadership Case Problem B
Notes
448 Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s).
Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
Hilton Worldwide Inc. has long been a culturallydiverse organization with respect to its workforceand customer base. In recent years, leadership at the hotel chain has developed a new thrust that moves them even further into promoting cultural diversity, and at the same time expands its investment market. Hilton man- agement actively seeks hotel franchise owners who are former well-known athletes because these men are skilled in teamwork and leadership, and often have considerable money to invest.
Hilton Worldwide especially covets African-American and Latino athletes because they sometimes have the influence required to build in hard-to-reach markets, inner cities included. David Robinson, the well-known former San Antonio star and Naval Academy Graduate, has been an active inves- tor through his Admiral Capital Group and its real estate hold- ings. (The 7-foot-1 inch Robinson was nick-named “The Admiral” during his playing days.) As part of the transaction, Admiral Capital purposely creates opportunities for lower- income employees including internships, training and mentor- ing, and a partnership with the University of Houston’s Hilton School to support outreach to lower-income communities.
Robinson was a natural fit for Hilton chain because he and his partner Dan Bassichis, formerly of Goldman Sachs, founded the Admiral Capital Group to invest in office, hotel, multifamily, and retail properties valued between $20 million and $100 million. Admiral Capital gives 10 percent of their profits to philanthropic causes in the geographic areas where they invest. Robinson has also launched the Admiral Hospitality Scholars, an internship that provides motivated high-school stu- dents earn a degree and pursue a career in the hospitality industry. The educational program is spon- sored by both the Admiral Capital Group and Hilton Worldwide.
Jennifer Silberman, vice president corporate responsi- bility, Hilton Worldwide, said about the program, “We applaud the Admiral Capital Group for creating opportu- nities and fostering diversity within our industry through its Admiral Hospitality Scholars Program.”
Leadership at Hilton Worldwide encourages also the investment of athletes who are Caucasian, including for- mer Houston Astros first baseman, Glenn Davis, who owns two Hilton-branded hotels in Columbus, Ohio.1
The story about Hilton Worldwide and a famous former professional bas- ketball player illustrates how building cultural diversity into its business plan can help a company expand its market (and practice a high level of social responsibility at the same time). A broader perspective of note is that corporate success, profit, and growth depend increasingly on the manage- ment of a diverse work force both outside and within one’s own country.
Because the focus on diversity includes giving many types of people an opportunity to participate fully in the organization, the word inclusion is often used to replace diversity. Not only is the work force becoming more diverse, but business has also become increasingly global. Small- and medium-size firms, as well as corporate giants, are increasingly dependent on trade with other countries. Furthermore, most manufactured goods con- tain components from more than one country, and global outsourcing has become a dominant trend.
Frances Hesselbein, the former CEO of the Girl Scouts of the USA, and then the president and CEO of the Peter F. Drucker Foundation for Non- profit Management, wrote five years ago, “Today, if we are not developing a richly diverse organization, led by a wonderfully diverse team of leaders, then we are already an organization of the past, led by leaders of the past.2
Our approach to cultural diversity both within and across countries emphasizes the leadership perspective. Key topics include the ethical and
CHAPTER 14• INTERNATIONAL AND CULTURALLY DIVERSE ASPECTS OF LEADERSHIP 449
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
competitive advantage of managing for diversity, how cultural factors influ- ence leadership practices, and how cultural sensitivity and global leadership skills contribute to leadership effectiveness. This chapter also describes initiatives that enhance the acceptance of cultural diversity. The underlying theme is that effective leadership of diverse people requires a sensitivity to and enjoyment of cultural differences.
The Advantages of Managing for Diversity
The ethical and socially responsible goals of leaders and their organizations include providing adequately for members of the diverse work force. Ethical leaders should therefore feel compelled to use merit instead of favoritism or bias as a basis for making human resource decisions. A firm that embraces diversity is also behaving in a socially responsible manner. A leader, for exam- ple, who chose to hire five developmentally disabled, unemployed individuals, would be acting in a socially responsible manner. Hiring these people would transfer responsibility for their economic welfare from the state or private charity to the employer. (Some would argue that unless hiring these people is cost effective, the company is neglecting its responsibility to shareholders.)
According to research and opinion, managing for diversity also brings the firm a competitive advantage. Patricia Harris, the Global Chief Diversity Officer of McDonald’s Corporation, expresses the matter quite directly: “We began to diversify our operations when it became clear to us it was the best way to sell more hamburgers in minority communities.”3 Javier Palomarez, president and CEO of the U.S. Hispanic Chamber of Commerce, points to a broader contribution of diversity than selling a product. He believes that diversity can provide new perspectives on dealing with public policy or mar- ketplace strategies or developing the next generation of robotic rovers to explore Mars.4
The advantages just cited are most likely to accrue when diversity is built into the firm’s strategy. In addition, the chief executive of an organization should be the champion for valuing inclusion and must establish this per- spective and associated actions for others throughout the organization.5
Here we review evidence and opinion about the competitive advantage of demographic and cultural diversity.
1. Managing diversity well offers a marketing advantage. A representa- tional work force facilitates the sale of products and services, and the need for such a workforce appears to be increasing. A major component of the marketing advantage of diversity is that a work force that matches the diver- sity of a company’s customer base has an edge in appealing to those custo- mers. According to the Future Work Institute, the fastest-growing domestic markets in the United States for goods and services will be minority com- munities. One such emerging group is African immigrants, representing a fast-growing market in terms of buying power.6
450 CHAPTER 14• INTERNATIONAL AND CULTURALLY DIVERSE ASPECTS OF LEADERSHIP
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
Another marketing advantage is that many people from culturally diverse groups prefer to buy from a company with a good reputation for managing diversity. Allstate Insurance Company, Inc. is well known for its diversity initiatives, and the company has become the nation’s leading insurer of African-Americans and Latinos. Allstate leadership states that inclusive diversity is one of its core values.7 The large number of agents and customer service representatives from these two groups facilitates attracting and retaining a high percentage of African-Americans and Latinos as customers. State Farm is another example of a financial services company that pro- motes diversity as part of its business strategy.
The general picture is that cultural diversity can drive business develop- ment. By reflecting the demographics of the community companies become more desirable in the global marketplace. The networks of talented employ- ees from culturally and demographically diverse groups enable the company to connect with various audiences and expand into new markets.8 For example, the many Latino employees at the Buick division of General Motors have helped increase the popularity of Buick cars among Latinos in the United States.
2. Companies with a favorable record in managing diversity are at a dis- tinct advantage in recruiting and retaining talented people. Those compa- nies with a favorable reputation for welcoming diversity attract the strongest job candidates among women and racial and ethnic minorities. Also, a company that does not welcome a diverse work force shrinks its sup- ply of potential candidates. An organization that strives for diversity in recruiting simply has a larger talent pool in which to search for candidates. A telling example is that in recent years companies have chosen more exec- utive leaders who are women or who are foreigners. When companies hire culturally diverse workers and provide them with all the tools, resources, and opportunities they need to succeed, those companies are more likely to display the full talents of their work force.
3. Heterogeneity in the work force may offer the company a creativity advantage, as well as improve its problem-solving and decision-making capability. Creative solutions to problems are more likely to be reached when a diverse group attacks a problem. Diversity specialist Joe Gerstandt presents a chemical analogy: By themselves, atoms of oxygen, carbon, and hydrogen are tasteless. When combined, however, they create sugar. Gerstandt believes that innovation takes place at the intersection of differ- ences, even if getting there may bring some tensions at first.9 In support of this statement, a spokesperson at Hewlett-Packard said that diversity and inclusion are the key drivers of creativity, innovation, and invention.10
4. Diversity and inclusion programs help local economies thereby boost- ing social responsibility. Many large companies take the diversity initiative of purchasing from local, minority, as well as female suppliers. The substan- tial purchases aid the local economy in terms of the flow of money as well as employment. Joyce Ibardolasa, director of diversity and inclusion at
THE ADVANTAGES OF MANAGING FOR DIVERSITY 451
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
PG&E, a San Francisco utility, says: “There’s no doubt in my mind that spending money at minority-owned businesses has a positive net effect on local economies.”11
5. Enhancement of team performance. Similar to the creativity advan- tage, cultural diversity can enhance team performance, often because diverse backgrounds are associated with diverse information, knowledge, and perspectives that can be used to solve problems. Two studies con- ducted with students at a Dutch business school working on business simulations tasks provide some insight into when the conditions under which diversity enhances team performance. The general finding was that cultural diversity is more likely to enhance team performance when team members have a high learning approach orientation to attaining goals. (Refer back to Chapter 10.) In contrast, when team members are oriented toward the avoidance of poor performance, cultural diversity has no par- ticular impact on team performance.12 An interpretation here is that when the culturally diverse teammates are more concerned about developing new skills, they will perform better as a group than when they attempt to prevent looking bad.
According to Frances J. Milliken and Luis L. Martins, diversity appears to be a double-edged sword: It increases both the opportunity for creativ- ity and the likelihood that group members will be dissatisfied and fail to identify with the group.13 (The diverse viewpoints often enhance creativity.) Another caution is that the leader of the diverse group must help members collaborate; otherwise, the advantages of diverse perspec- tives will be lost.14
To raise your level of awareness about how to capitalize on the potential advantages of diversity, do Leadership Skill-Building Exercise 14-1, which illustrates that diversity skills are another important subset of interpersonal skills associated with leadership.
LEADERSHIP SKILL-BUILDING EXERCISE 14-1
Pinpointing a Diversity Advantage
Much has been written and talked about of the advan- tage that a culturally diverse workforce can bring to a company, school, or government agency. Organize into teams of about five, or conduct this exercise on your own. Each person outside of class attempts to find one advantage that stemmed to an organization from having a culturally diverse workforce. Instead of relying on writ- ten information, contact one or two people in your net- work. Speak to your contact person or persons by
telephone, text, or conduct a video interview. Ask the person to identify any workplace advantage to diversity that he or she has observed. Record the evidence you have collected, and share with group members if you formed a group. The skill builder in this exercise is that you might raise your awareness level of the advantages of a culturally diverse workforce. You might also become aware of a potential problem to diversity that you would have to manage as a leader.
452 CHAPTER 14• INTERNATIONAL AND CULTURALLY DIVERSE ASPECTS OF LEADERSHIP
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
Cultural Factors Influencing Leadership Practice
A multicultural leader is a leader with the skills and attitudes to relate effectively to and motivate people across race, gender, age, social attitudes, and lifestyles. To influence, motivate, and inspire culturally diverse people, the leader must be aware of overt and subtle cultural differences. Although such culturally based differences are generalizations, they function as start- ing points in the leader’s attempt to lead a person from another culture. For example, many Asians are self-conscious about being praised in front of the group because they feel that individual attention clashes with their desire to maintain group harmony. Therefore, a manager might refrain from praising an Asian group member before the group until he or she understands that group member’s preferences. The manager is likely to find that many Asians welcome praise in front of peers, especially when working outside their homeland.
Here we examine two topics that help a leader learn how to manage in a culturally diverse workplace: (1) understanding key dimensions of differ- ences in cultural values and (2) the influence of cultural values on leader- ship style.
Key Dimensions of Differences in Cultural Values One way to understand how national cultures differ is to examine their values or cultural dimensions. The cultural dimensions presented here and outlined in Figure 14-1 are based mostly on those included in Global Lead- ership and Organizational Behavior Effectiveness (GLOBE), a research pro- gram in sixty-two societal cultures, and builds on previous analyses of cultural dimensions.15 We also include two other dimensions useful in working with people from other cultures—attitudes toward time and work orientation. Keep in mind that these cultural dimensions are stereotypes that apply to a representative person from a particular culture and are not meant to insult anybody. Individual differences are substantial. For exam- ple, many Americans are not assertive, and many French people are willing to work seventy hours per week (particularly during the long-term recession in France).
1. Performance orientation is the degree to which a society encourages (or should encourage) and rewards group members for performance improve- ment and excellence. Countries high on this dimension are the United States and Singapore, whereas those low on this dimension are Russia and Greece.
2. Assertiveness is the degree to which individuals are (and should be) assertive, confrontational, and aggressive in their relationships with one another. Countries scoring high on this dimension are the United States and Austria, whereas those low on this dimension are Sweden and New Zealand. Assertive people enjoy competition in business, in contrast to less assertive cultural groups who prefer harmony, loyalty, and solidarity.
CULTURAL FACTORS INFLUENCING LEADERSHIP PRACTICE 453
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
3. Future orientation is the extent to which individuals engage (and should engage) in future-oriented behaviors such as delaying gratification, plan- ning, and making investments for the future. Singapore and Switzerland are examples of societies with longer time horizons, whereas Russia and Argentina are less future oriented.
4. Time orientation is the importance nations and individuals attach to time. People with an urgent time orientation perceive time to be a scarce resource and tend to be impatient. People with a casual time orientation view time as an unlimited and unending resource and tend to be patient. Americans are noted for their urgent time orientation. They frequently impose deadlines and are eager to get started doing business. Asians, Mexicans, and Middle Easterners, in contrast, are patient negotiators.
5. Humane orientation is the degree to which a society encourages and rewards, and should encourage and reward, individuals for being fair, altru- istic, and caring to others. Egypt and Malaysia rank high on this cultural dimension, and France and Germany rank low.
6. In-group collectivism is the degree to which individuals express, and should express, pride, loyalty, and cohesiveness in their organizations and families. Asian societies emphasize collectivism, as do Egypt and Russia. One consequence of collectivism is taking pride in family members and the organizations that employ them.
Work orientation
Uncertainty avoidance
Power distance
Gender egalitarianism
In-group collectivism vs.
individualism
Performance orientation
Assertiveness
Future orientation
Time orientation
Humane orientation
© Ce ng ag e Le ar ni ng
FIGURE 14-1 Dimensions of Cultural Values.
454 CHAPTER 14• INTERNATIONAL AND CULTURALLY DIVERSE ASPECTS OF LEADERSHIP
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
7. Gender egalitarianism is the degree to which a culture minimizes, and should minimize, gender inequality. European countries emphasize gender egal- itarianism, and so do the United States and Canada. South Korea is an example of a country that is low on gender egalitarianism and is male dominated.
8. Power distance is the degree to which members of a society expect, and should expect, power to be distributed unequally. Individuals who accept power and authority expect the boss to make the major decisions. These same individuals are more formal; however, being formal toward people in positions of authority has decreased substantially throughout the world in recent years. Examples of societies that score high on acceptance of power and authority are Thailand, Brazil, France, and Japan.
9. Uncertainty avoidance is the extent to which members of a society rely (and should rely) on social norms, rules, and procedures to lessen the unpredictability of future events. The stronger the desire to avoid uncer- tainty, the more likely people are to seek orderliness, consistency, and laws to cover situations in daily life. Examples of societies with high uncertainty avoidance are Singapore and Switzerland. Societies with low uncertainty avoidance include Russia and Greece.
10. Work orientation is the number of hours per week and weeks per year people expect to invest in work versus leisure, or other nonwork activities. American corporate professionals typically work about fifty-five hours per week, take forty-five-minute lunch breaks, and go on two weeks of vacation. Americans tend to have a stronger work orientation than Europeans but a weaker one than Asians. U.S. employees average 1,804 hours of work per year, compared with 1,407 for Norwegian workers and 1,564 for the French. Workers in seven Asian countries including South Korea, Bangladesh, and China work 2,200 hours per year.16
How might a manager use information about differences in values to become a more effective leader? A starting point would be to recognize that a person’s national values might influence his or her behavior. Assume that a leader wants to influence a person with a low power distance orientation to strive for peak performance. The low-power person will not spring into action just because the boss makes the suggestion. Instead, the leader needs to patiently explain the personal payoffs of achieving peak perfor- mance. Another example is a leader who wants to improve quality and therefore hires people who value collectivism. A backup tactic would be to counsel people who value individualism on the merits of collective action. Leadership Self-Assessment Quiz 14-1 will help you think about how values can moderate (or influence) work performance.
Cultural Values and Leadership Style The values embedded in a culture influence the behavior of leaders and managers as well as the behavior of other workers. As Geert Hofstede explains, relationships between people in a society are affected by the values
CULTURAL FACTORS INFLUENCING LEADERSHIP PRACTICE 455
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
programmed in the minds of these people. Because management deals heavily with interpersonal relationships, management and leadership are affected by cultural values. Management and leadership processes may vary from culture to culture, but, being value based, these processes show strong continuity in each society.17
LEADERSHIP SELF-ASSESSMENT QUIZ 14-1
Charting Your Cultural Value Profile
Instructions: For each of the ten value dimensions, circle the number that most accurately fits your standing on the dimension. For example, if you perceive yourself to have a “high humane orientation,” circle the 7 on the fifth dimension.
1. Low performance orientation High performance orientation
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
2. Low Assertiveness High Assertiveness
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
3. Casual time orientation Urgent time orientation
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
4. Low future orientation High future orientation
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
5. Low humane orientation High humane orientation
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
6. In-group individualism In-group collectivism
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
7. Low gender egalitarianism High gender egalitarianism
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
8. Low power distance High power distance
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
9. Low uncertainty avoidance High uncertainty avoidance
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
10. Low work orientation High work orientation
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
Scoring and Interpretation: After circling one number for each dimension, use a marker, pen, or pencil to connect the circles; this gives you a profile of cultural values. Do not be concerned if your line cuts through the names of the dimensions. Compare your profile to others in class. Should time allow, develop a class profile by computing the class average for each of the ten dimensions and then connecting the points. If the sample size is large enough, compare the cultural value profiles of Westerners and Easterners.
One possible link to leadership development is to hypothesize which type of profile would be the most respon- sive and which would be the least responsive to your leadership.
456 CHAPTER 14• INTERNATIONAL AND CULTURALLY DIVERSE ASPECTS OF LEADERSHIP
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
French Managers One example of the influence of values on management and leadership style is the behavior of French managers. France has always put a strong emphasis on class. French managers who have attended the major business schools (Grand Écoles) have the highest status of all. The implication for leadership style is that French managers, particularly in major corporations, are part of an elite class, and they behave in a superior, authoritarian manner. (Not every French manager follows the cultural tradi- tion of being authoritarian, with the more modern managers being less class conscious.) The traditional style of manager would expect obedience and high respect from group members, and would tend to emphasize bureaucracy.18 In recent years, most cultures have undergone a decrease in power–distance values. As a result, a greater number of French managers are more egalitarian.
German Managers Another example of a distinctive leadership style related to culture is the stereotype of the German manager. German managers were studied as part of the GLOBE project. Data were collected on culture and leadership from 457 middle managers in the telecommunications, food processing, and finance industries. A strong performance orientation was found to be the most pronounced German cultural value. German middle managers thus tend to avoid uncertainty, are assertive, and are not terribly considerate of others.
German managers typically show little compassion, and their interper- sonal relations are straightforward and stern.19 (Another interpretation of these findings is that the performance orientation of German managers is so strong that they seem less interested in interpersonal relations in com- parison. This does not mean that German managers and leaders are inconsiderate.) And the strong performance they expect must be packed into a short workweek!
Malaysian Managers The characteristic leadership style of Malaysian man- agers is instructive because other Asian managers use a similar style. Malaysia has become important as a trading partner of both the United States and Europe, particularly because of the outsourcing movement. The following conclusions about the Malaysian leadership style were also based on the GLOBE project.20 Malaysians emphasize collective well- being (collectivism) and display a strong humane orientation within a soci- ety that respects hierarchical differences (high power difference). The cul- ture discourages aggressive, confrontational behavior, preferring harmonious relationships. The preferred organizational leadership style is therefore for managers to show compassion, while at the same time be more autocratic than participative. The Malaysian work group member defers to the boss and in turn is treated with respect and compassion. A Malaysian supervisor might say typically to a worker, “Here is exactly how I want this job done, but I want you to enjoy yourself and learn something valuable while doing the job.”
CULTURAL FACTORS INFLUENCING LEADERSHIP PRACTICE 457
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
Northern U.S. Versus Southern U.S. Managers Differences in cultural values between regions of a large country can also have an impact. An example of a cross-regional stereotype is that managers in the southern United States are lower key and more interested in relationship building than are their brusque counterparts in the north. Leaders from the north have a reputa- tion for efficiency and getting tasks accomplished quickly. Leaders from the south perceive such behavior as rude, pushy, and short on relationship building. The point here is that southern chivalry has worked its way into leadership style.
However, the stereotype of southern business leaders being more laid- back and slow moving has been challenged. Business in the south may have moved more slowly in the days before air conditioning was wide- spread. Heat tends to slow people down. John W. Thompson, former CEO of Symantec Corporation and now chairman of Microsoft Corporation, is a Florida A&M graduate. He says there is nothing regional about attaining business results. “I was raised in the south and spent 27 years working for IBM all over the world. I don’t think management style can be localized.”21
Despite culturally based differences in leadership style, certain leadership practices are likely to work in every culture, including giving people clear directions and administering appropriate rewards for attaining goals. A comprehensive analysis of leader–member relations, conducted with studies from twenty-three countries found that high-quality relationships with sub- ordinates facilitated task performance in countries with different values. The anchor values in clusters of values studied were individualistic versus collectivist.22
Cultural Sensitivity and Cultural Intelligence
Some managers are more effective at leading diverse groups than others. The traits and behaviors described in Chapters 2, 3, and 4 should equip a person to lead diverse groups. In addition, cultural sensitivity, cultural intel- ligence, and certain specific global leadership skills are essential for inspir- ing people from cultures other than one’s own. Although they reinforce each other, here we describe cultural sensitivity and cultural intelligence separately. Global leadership skills encompass so many behaviors that they receive a section of their own.
Cultural Sensitivity Leaders, as well as others, who are attempting to influence a person from a foreign country must be alert to possible cultural differences. Thus, the leader must be willing to acquire knowledge about local customs and learn to speak the native language at least passably (unless the company has an English-only policy on the job). A cross-cultural leader must be
458 CHAPTER 14• INTERNATIONAL AND CULTURALLY DIVERSE ASPECTS OF LEADERSHIP
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
patient, adaptable, flexible, and willing to listen and learn. All of these characteristics are part of cultural sensitivity, an awareness of and a will- ingness to investigate the reasons why people of another culture act as they do. Five aspects of cultural sensitivity are described next.
1. Recognition of nuances in customs. A person with cultural sensitivity will recognize certain nuances in customs that will help build better rela- tionships with work associates from another culture. Refer to Table 12-3 in Chapter 12 for a sampling of appropriate and less appropriate behaviors in a variety of countries for the purpose of overcoming communication bar- riers. (These are suggestions, not absolute rules.) Additional information about appropriate leadership behavior, or good etiquette, in different cul- ture is presented in Figure 14-2.
Another aspect of cultural sensitivity is being tolerant of the subtle differ- ences between cultures. Leadership Self-Assessment Quiz 14-2 gives you an opportunity to reflect on your own tolerance for cross-cultural issues.
2. Being a multicultural worker. Cultural sensitivity is also important because it helps a person become a multicultural worker. Such an individ- ual is convinced that all cultures are equally good and enjoys learning about other cultures. Multicultural workers and leaders are usually people who have been exposed to more than one culture in childhood. (Refer to Leadership
Positive Behaviors ● Demonstrate empathy by listening carefully to employees with different experiences and
perspectives. Careful eye contact will help show empathy. ● Show that you care about the other culture by learning what is important to them, such as
asking about the national and local soccer teams in most countries and cities. ● Know where the country you are visiting is located; know name of the city in which the busi-
ness interaction is taking place, and pronounce it correctly. ● Define acronyms, slang and jargon, such as explaining that “EBITDA” means earnings
before interest, taxes, depreciation, and amortization. ● Emphasize how everybody’s job is important to the team.
Negative Behaviors ● Touching and hugging employees without first knowing that such behavior is acceptable. ● Suggesting that the business practices from your country are superior to those of the
country you are visiting. ● Display some humility and a group-oriented, rather than individualistic, approach in most
countries. ● Emphasizing the importance of financial incentives in motivating people.
FIGURE 14-2 Suggestions for Engaging in Successful Cross-Cultural Leadership Interactions. Source: Several of the ideas are adapted from Gayle Cotton, “Do This, Not That When Doing Business Overseas,” (www.cnbc.com), April 8, 2013, pp. 1–5; Tina Smagala, “Empathy a Critical Skill for Leaders to Have,” Democrat and Chronicle, January 21, 2014, p. 5B.
CULTURAL SENSITIVITY AND CULTURAL INTELLIGENCE 459
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
Self-Assessment Quiz 12-2, about cross-cultural relations.) Being multicultural helps one be accepted by a person from another culture. The concept of a multicultural worker also refers to an employee who identifies with two more cultures, such as a graphics designer born in Japan, who speaks Japanese at home and works in the United States. Because multicultural workers can readily relate to people from other cultures, they are well-suited to the global workplace.23
Sensitivity is the most important characteristic for leading people from other cultures because cultural stereotypes rarely provide entirely reliable
LEADERSHIP SELF-ASSESSMENT QUIZ 14-2
My Tolerance for Cultural Differences
Instructions: Indicate how comfortable you would feel in the following circumstances: very uncomfortable (VU); uncomfortable (U); neutral (N); comfortable (C) ; very comfortable (VC).
VU U N C VC
1. Working on a team with both men and women 1 2 3 4 5
2. Coaching a team or club when all the members are of a different sex than myself 1 2 3 4 5
3. Having a transsexual person for a boss 1 2 3 4 5
4. Having a person of a different race for a boss 1 2 3 4 5
5. Having an opposite-sex person for a boss 1 2 3 4 5
6. Answer 6a if you are heterosexual; 6b if you are homosexual: 1 2 3 4 5
6a. Having a gay or lesbian boss
6b. Having a straight boss
7. Having dinner with someone who eats what I consider to be a pet 1 2 3 4 5
8. Having dinner with someone who eats what I consider to be a repulsive animal or insect
1 2 3 4 5
9. Working alongside a teammate who I know is HIV positive 1 2 3 4 5
10. Working alongside a teammate who has served prison time for vehicular homicide 1 2 3 4 5
Total score:
Scoring and Interpretation:
• 40–50: You are highly tolerant and flexible in terms of working with a broad spectrum of people. These atti- tudes should help you be an effective multicultural leader.
• 21–39: Your tolerance for working with people different from yourself is within the average range. If you learn to become more tolerant of differences, you are more likely to become an effective multicultural leader.
• 10–20: You may be experiencing difficulties in working with people quite different from yourself. As a conse- quence, your effectiveness as a multicultural leader might be hampered. If you seek out more diverse cross- cultural experiences, you are likely to become more tolerant of differences.
460 CHAPTER 14• INTERNATIONAL AND CULTURALLY DIVERSE ASPECTS OF LEADERSHIP
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
guides for dealing with others. An American manager, for example, might expect Asian group members to accept his or her directives immediately because Asians are known to defer to authority. Nevertheless, an individual Asian might need considerable convincing before accepting authority.
3. Recognizing potential problems of cultural misunderstanding. Pro- blems of cultural misunderstanding leaders should be aware of cluster in five areas.24 Language differences create problems because U.S. workers (most of whom are monolingual) can become frustrated by coworkers’ accents and limited English skills. Non-English speakers may feel that they do not fit well into the team. Differences in religion are the source of many misunderstandings. In many cultures, religion dominates life in ways that Americans find difficult to comprehend. Work habits vary enough across cultures to create friction and frustration. Employees in some cultures are unwilling to spend personal time on work. Problems can also stem from office rituals, such as having coffee or tea together during work breaks, or singing songs together at the start of the workday.
Women’s roles may differ considerably from those in the United States. Women in many countries may not have the same independence or access to education and higher-level jobs as American women. Workers from vari- ous countries may therefore have difficulty accepting the authority of an American manager who is female.
What constitutes acceptable personal appearance and behavior varies con- siderably across cultures. Grooming, office attire, eating habits, and nonver- bal communication may deviate significantly from the U.S. standards. Many workers around the world may perceive American workers as overfriendly, aggressive, or rude.
A key item in personal appearance is choosing appropriate attire when working in another culture. Cultural sensitivity helps you detect what type of clothing is appropriate. Many faux pas are possible, including that many Hindus in India may be offended by a finely tooled leather belt and brief- case because steers have religious significance. In some parts of Asia, white is the color of mourning. A cross-cultural guideline for professionals is that a dark, well-made business suit and conservative accessories such as ties and simple jewelry are acceptable for business around the world.25
Generational differences are another manifestation of cultural differences, quite often within a leader’s national culture. For example, young people typically want more frequent recognition and rewards as well as flexible scheduling. Older people might want more deference to their knowledge and experience.
4. Transgender employees. The reality of greater number of transgender employees in the workplace requires considerable cultural sensitivity on the part of the leader or manager. (A transgender person goes beyond cross- dressing, and converts to the opposite sex through a combination of surgery and hormone treatments.) Managers may have to deal with their own toler- ance toward the transgender (or transsexual) workers, as well as the toler- ance and flexibility of employees and customers. A particular need for
CULTURAL SENSITIVITY AND CULTURAL INTELLIGENCE 461
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
cultural sensitivity is to begin referring to an employee as “him” or “her,” when the person was formerly “her” or “him.” A general guide is that trans- gender employees are rare, but are still part of a culturally diverse workforce, and they have some legal protections with respect to job discrimination.
5. Flexibility in dealing with others. Cultural sensitivity is enhanced by cultural training, and also by simply listening carefully and observing. A key principle is to be flexible when dealing with people from other cultures. Cultural sensitivity is also enhanced by asking questions, such as whether it is reasonable to expect people to work on Saturday and Sunday. When cross- cultural issues about performance arise, the leader/manager is advised to ask: “My job requires that I manage your performance. Your job is to meet or exceed our performance standards. How can I help you do that?“26
The English-Only Policy and Cultural Sensitivity To facilitate communication in international enterprise, a growing number of companies have declared English as the official language for conducting business. For example, Honda Motor has made English the official language of global meetings as the Japanese vehicle manufacturer transfers decision- making authority to regional units. The new rule applies to in-person meet- ings and videoconferences.27
A key argument for an English-only policy in companies involved in cross-cultural activity is that multilingualism without restriction interferes with accomplishing business goals.28 Without clearly understood communi- cation, sales are lost, physical accidents occur, and post-merger cultures are difficult to integrate. (The accidents might occur with respect to misunder- standing safety directions or not taking precautions.) Many businesspeople from all over the world are proud of their ability to speak English that tends to minimize negative attitudes toward an English-only policy.
Despite the general acceptance of English as the language of business, problems of cultural sensitivity remain. Some people may regard the policy as an affront to their cultural identity and may resent the implication that English is the superior language. Furthermore, some businesspeople may not feel comfortable speaking about complicated topics in English if their English-speaking ability is not strong. One approach the leader can take to demonstrate cultural sensitivity in this area is to emphasize that English- only policy applies mostly to formal meetings, and he or she wants to listen to the sound of another language at other times. Also, if the leader speaks another language well, he or she might exchange a few words in that lan- guage before the formal meeting gets started.
A word of caution here is that an English-only policy may not legally per- mit a manager to insist that all workers speak only English when they inter- act with each other during working hours or on break. In general, the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) states in its compliance manual, “An English-only rule is justified by ‘business necessity’ if it is needed for an employer to operate safely and efficiently.”29 As with any law, this would be the subject to interpretation.
462 CHAPTER 14• INTERNATIONAL AND CULTURALLY DIVERSE ASPECTS OF LEADERSHIP
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
Cultural Intelligence A refinement and expansion of cultural sensitivity is cultural intelligence (CQ): an outsider’s ability to interpret someone’s unfamiliar and ambiguous gestures the way that person’s compatriots would.30 For example, an Ameri- can might be attending a business meeting in Europe. He or she might pick up the clue that the Europeans present prefer to discuss U.S. politics and trade agreements (or current events) for twenty minutes before discussing the business purpose of the meeting. So the cross-border visitor engages in a lively but nonpartisan discussion of politics and trade agreements. Cul- tural intelligence has three facets or components:
● Cognitive CQ (head). The first facet of cultural intelligence is the ability to pick up some factual clues about relevant behavior such as the impor- tance of deadlines.
● Physical CQ (body). Your actions and demeanor must prove to your for- eign hosts that you have entered their world by adopting people’s habits and mannerisms. You might gently kiss each cheek of a French compa- triot (or be kissed), and not shake hands with a Japanese work associate in Tokyo. With the latter, you might bow slightly or smile as a form of greeting.
● Emotional/motivational CQ (heart). Adapting to a new culture involves overcoming obstacles and setbacks. You need the self-confidence and courage to keep trying even though your first few attempts at adapting your behavior to a group of foreign workers went poorly. You might say to yourself, “OK, when I stood very close to the Mexican workers, they didn’t like it even though they stand close to each other. Maybe I looked a little stiff. I’ll practice some more.”
To attain the highest level of cultural intelligence, you would need com- petence in all three facets, and the head, body, and heart would have to work together smoothly. You would need to gather the facts, adapt your mannerism and appearance to fit the culture, and stay motivated to make refinements.
Cultural intelligence is similar to emotional intelligence, yet it goes one step further by enabling a person to distinguish among behaviors that are (a) produced by the culture in question, (b) peculiar to particular indivi- duals, and (c) found in all human beings. Suppose you are making a Power- Point presentation in Germany and suddenly your presentation is verbally attacked. You ask yourself, “Is this a German trait? Are these people just being hostile? Or are my slides so bad anyone would attack them?” Picking up on the cues, you decide that German corporate professionals find it nor- mal to challenge ideas and that they are not being personal.
A study conducted with 294 international executives and graduate busi- ness students in China and Ireland provides insights into which leaders are the most likely to develop cultural intelligence. It was found that overseas work experience is more likely to contribute to the development of cultural intelligence when the global executive has a divergent learning style.
CULTURAL SENSITIVITY AND CULTURAL INTELLIGENCE 463
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
A divergent learning style emphasizes concrete experience and reflective observation. Individuals with this learning style are often imaginative and emotional. As a result, they can attach their feelings to the experience. Peo- ple with a divergent learning style tend to have broad cultural interests and show a strong interest in obtaining international experiences. (The latter is part of motivational CQ.) Divergent learners are interested in people from other cultures and are likely to develop relationships with them. A person with a divergent learning style might think after several days of visiting a customer in another country, “People over here tend to smile and nod when I talk about the competition with respect. But when I talk tough, like referring to eliminating competitors, they look disappointed.”
The study participants with other type of learning styles profited less from overseas experience with respect to developing cultural intelligence. One example of a learning style not so well suited to developing cultural intelligence is the accommodative style characterized by learning in an intu- itive trial-and-error manner. Then, same people tend to be impatient and lacking in reflection.31
Global Leadership Skills
In general, global leadership skills refer to the ability to exercise effective leadership in a variety of countries. The definition stems from the idea that the essence of global leadership is the ability to influence people who are dissimilar to the leader and stem from different cultural backgrounds.32
Such skills would therefore include the concepts already reviewed of cul- tural sensitivity, being a multicultural worker, and cultural intelligence. Understanding the culture from another country is also important. Here we look at global leadership skills from several perspectives: a general model of global leadership skills, success factors in international positions, motivat- ing workers in different cultures, and minimizing the use of product names that could be embarrassing.
General Model of Global Leadership Skills Global leadership skills are so important that they improve a company’s rep- utation and contribute to a sustainable competitive advantage.33 Excellent global leaders have a leadership style that generates superior corporate per- formance in terms of four criteria: (1) profitability and productivity, (2) con- tinuity and efficiency, (3) commitment and morale, and (4) adaptability and innovation. Behavioral complexity is the term given to this ability to attain all four criteria of organizational performance. Excellent global leaders are able to understand complex issues from the four perspectives just men- tioned and to achieve the right balance. For example, when a company is facing a mature market, it might be necessary to invest more effort into being innovative than into achieving high profits.
464 CHAPTER 14• INTERNATIONAL AND CULTURALLY DIVERSE ASPECTS OF LEADERSHIP
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
The global leader must tap into a deep, universal layer of human motiva- tion to build loyalty, trust, and teamwork in different cultures. Universal needs are found among people in all cultures; for example, both Dominican Republicans and Inuit want to be part of a group. Another example of a uni- versal need is to have meaning in the work one performs. Meaningful work would therefore be another universal need, with a large percentage of peo- ple wanting to perform work they consider to be relevant. People vary con- siderably in what they regard as meaningful work, with some people thinking that producing pharmaceuticals is meaningful while others think the same for producing video games.
Success Factors in International Management Positions A study was conducted of success factors in international management posi- tions. Two traits were specifically related to success in conducting international business: sensitivity to cultural differences and being culturally adventurous.34
Cultural sensitivity has already been described. The adventurous aspect refers to a willingness to take chances and experiment with a new culture. A Mexican-American from Phoenix, Arizona, who volunteered for a six-month assignment in Johannesburg, South Africa, would be culturally adventurous.
A study demonstrated that deficits in emotional intelligence contributed to executive failure on assignments in Latin America, Europe, and Japan.35
Being able to read emotions is particularly helpful when evaluating how well the person from another culture is accepting your propositions.
Tolerance for ambiguity is important for leaders in general, and espe- cially important for developing global leadership skills. Every country he or she works in represents a new way of doing things, so the leadership has to work with only general guidelines. A leader from an American company might be visiting a Korean affiliate. He or she should probably reflect, “Kor- eans have high respect for authority, and at the same time have a strong work ethic. So how far should I go in asking questions? They might expect me as the leader to have all the answers. Yet at the same time, they proba- bly want to display their knowledge.” Asking Korean managers questions before the presentation might be a good idea.36
Another area where tolerance for ambiguity is a success factor lies within providing leadership to cross-cultural teams. One of the more pronounced cross-cultural differences is that various members of the team nay have dif- fering attitudes toward hierarchy and authority (or power distance). Team members from some cultures may have difficulty with the flat structure of most teams. If team members defer to a higher-status team member, their behavior will be regarded as appropriate when most of the team derives from a hierarchical culture. In contrast, team members who defer to authority may damage their stature and credibility if most of the team comes from a culture of low power distance (egalitarian). One manager of Mexican heritage who belonged to a cross-cultural team lamented:
In Mexican culture, you’re always supposed to be humble. So whether you under- stand something or not, you’re supposed to put it in the form of a question. You
GLOBAL LEADERSHIP SKILLS 465
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
have to keep it open-ended, out of respect. I think that actually worked against me, because the Americans thought I really didn’t know what I was talking about. So it made me feel like they thought I was wavering on my answer.37
A potential leadership intervention to the problem of status and hierar- chy is to talk about the problem in advance, and to encourage behavior that will fit most team members. The team leader might mention several times that the structure is flat, and that all team members have an equal voice. Because cultural values control behavior so strongly, the message will have to be repeated frequently.
A confusing skill issue for many international workers is the importance of having a good command of a second language. Part of the confusion comes from the fact that English has become the standard language of business, as well as technology, engineering, and science. However, when you are trying to influence a person from another culture, you are more influential if you can speak, read, and write well in his or her language. (We assume that even with an English-only policy, some conversations take place outside of group meetings. Also, not every company has an English-only policy.) A command of a second language also enhances the person’s charisma.
Motivating and Inspiring Workers in Other Cultures The discussion of expectancy theory in Chapter 10 provided the best general clue to motivating people in other cultures—figure out which rewards have high valence for them. Workers who lack basic necessities in life would rather be rewarded with a scooter or bicycle than a $500 luxury fountain pen or watch. Workers will be motivated and inspired to the extent that need satisfaction will be forthcoming.
Cross-cultural trainer Nancy Settle-Murphy provides another example: Team members from the United States tend to crave popularity and approval. For Germans, the goal is to do an excellent job with great atten- tion to detail. The implication is that German professionals prefer motiva- tion through exciting work, whereas Americans prefer external rewards. Team members from Asian cultures are more motivated by rewards that emphasize group harmony, such as a group reward.38 (Again we are pre- sented with cultural stereotypes that work much of the time.)
So who is an example of a leader with global leadership skills—one per- son who has most of the attributes described in this section? A highly visi- ble example is Carlos Ghosn, the chief executive of both Nissan and Renault, known as the “hottest car guy on earth.” He travels around the world in a corporate jet that can fly between Paris and Tokyo nonstop. Ghosn also spends considerable time visiting the U.S. operations of Nissan. He carries two briefcases, one for Renault and another for Nissan. He crosses time zones and cultures with great facility. After many years being the CEO of two companies, Ghosn recommended that two CEOs be hired to eventually replace him, stating, “Being in charge of two companies and having to run between two countries is extremely taxing on people.” Born in Brazil to Lebanese parents and college-educated in Paris, Ghosn speaks several languages and enjoys cuisine from many countries.39
466 CHAPTER 14• INTERNATIONAL AND CULTURALLY DIVERSE ASPECTS OF LEADERSHIP
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
Avoiding Product Names That Could Be Embarrassing in Another Culture Another global leadership skill is to be mindful of how a product name might be interpreted in another culture. A leader or manager cannot be expected to do everything working alone, so it is best to use skilled transla- tors who know that target language quite well. Checking out the use of a product name with a few native speakers is another helpful safety check. Two examples of product-naming errors follow:
● The British food company Sharwood launched a new curry sauce over a decade ago called Bundh. Many Punjabi (India) speakers called the com- pany saying that the brand name sounded like their word for “backside.”40
● A few German manufacturers of back packs, or knapsacks, referred to them as “body bags” for the English-speaking market thereby limiting their appeal.
The accompanying Leader In Action insert describes a business leader whose business has achieved success in two different cultures.
LEADER IN ACTION
Adriana Cisneros, CEO of the International Conglomerate, the Cisneros Group
At age 33, Adriana Cisneros was appointed as CEO of the Cisneros Group, a family-owned international con- glomerate (or holding company) with annual sales esti- mated at $1 billion. The company’s holdings include media, entertainment, telecom, and consumer products. The group owns the top-rated television channel in Venezuela, the Miss Venezuela beauty pageant, and a production company that supplies soap opera and other content for many partners, including Univision, the larg- est Spanish-language channel in the United States.
Cisneros had spent seven years with the company, the previous three as the company’s vice chairman and director of strategy. As the director of strategy, Cisneros created an interactive strategy for the company’s twelve television programs, from news to a soap opera, and headed game applications for mobile devices. She was responsible for creating Cisneros Interactive, the com- pany’s digital media division that focuses on mobile and online advertising networks, e-commerce, social gaming, and crowd-funding.
After being based in Venezuela for many decades, the Cisneros Group is now headquartered in Coral Gables,
Florida. Cisneros said the she is 95 percent focused on doing business in Latin America, and that her major goal is to dominate Spanish-language TV. Beyond media, the Cisneros Group is developing Tropicalia, a $2 billion resort complex in the Dominican Republic. The company plays an active role in corporate social responsibility with a focus on education in Latin America. Cisneros observed a few years ago that company employees were not relating to corporate social responsibility. She therefore made it a priority by assigning a dedicated executive in each business unit to develop a corporate social responsibility campaign.
Cisneros says that nurture was a big influence on her business drive. Her parents were highly supportive of their children coming up with crazy ideas. When she was six years old, she started a club, Los Emprende- dore, in the Dominican Republic where the family had a beach house. The children collected bottles they picked up on the beach, and the parents paid for them.
Gustavo Cisneros, the father of Adiana, said this about his daughter as the new CEO: “She has immense drive. She’s tireless. She has very good ideas and wants
GLOBAL LEADERSHIP SKILLS 467
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
Leadership Initiatives for Achieving Cultural Diversity
For organizations to value diversity and inclusion, top management must be committed to it. The commitment is clearest when it is embedded in organi- zational strategy, as well as in the life and culture of the organization. Com- pany leadership should dedicate time to work personally on diversity and inclusion initiatives.41 Diversity initiatives should be deep rather than superficial.42 A true diversity strategy should encourage all employees to contribute their unique talents, skills, and expertise to the organization’s operations, independent of race, gender, ethnic background, and any other definable difference. In addition, leaders should take the initiative to ensure that many activities are implemented to support the diversity strategy. Table 14-1 lists the eight leadership initiatives for encouraging diversity that are discussed in the following text.
ACTION (continued) to carry them out. We had a big success with the inter- active strategy on Eva Luna (a soap opera).
Cisneros is fluent in Spanish and English, both essential for role as an international manager. She holds a BA degree from Columbia University and an MA from New York University, both with a major in journal- ism. She is also a graduate of the Harvard Business School Program for Leadership Development.
QUESTIONS
1. Identify two global leadership skills Adriana Cisneros needs to be successful in her role as the CEO of the family business.
2. Cisneros is the daughter and granddaughter of former CEOs and chairmen of her company. What has she done to make her credible in her role as the new CEO of the company?
Sources: Original story created from facts and observations in the following sources: Corina Pone, “Cisneros’s First Female CEO Seeks Latin American Expansion,” www.bloomberg.com, November 15, 2013, pp. 1–2; Suzan Adams, “Adriana Cisneros and Gustavo Cisneros of Cisneros Group,” Forbes (www.forbes.com), May 6, 2011, pp. 1–2; “Gustavo Cisneros Appoints Adriana Cisneros CEO of Cisneros,” (http://cisneros.com), August 28, 2013, p. 1; Cindy Krischer Goodman, “Adriana Cisneros: The New Face of Cisneros Group,” Miami Herald (www.miamiherald.com), October 27, 2013, pp. 1–5; “Jane Cisneros Named CEO of Media Conglomerate,” Miami Herald (www.miamiherald.com), August 29, 2013, pp. 1–2.
TABLE 14-1 Leadership Initiatives for Achieving Cultural Diversity
1. Hold managers accountable for achieving diversity.
2. Establish minority recruitment, retention, and mentoring programs.
3. Conduct diversity training.
4. Conduct cross-cultural training.
5. Encourage the development of employee networks.
6. Avoid group characteristics when hiring for person–organization fit.
7. Modify products and services for targeted demographic groups.
8. Attain diversity among organizational leaders.
© Ce ng ag e Le ar ni ng
468 CHAPTER 14• INTERNATIONAL AND CULTURALLY DIVERSE ASPECTS OF LEADERSHIP
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
Hold Managers Accountable for Achieving Diversity A high-impact diversity initiative is for top-level organizational leaders to hold managers accountable for diversity results at all levels. If managers are held accountable for behavior and business changes in the diversity arena, an organizational culture supportive of diversity will begin to develop. A group of CEOs whose organizations are well known for their diversity practices agreed that metrics are essential because, “What gets measured gets done.” Bank of America, for example, includes questions about diversity and inclusiveness in its biannual employee engagement survey, and results are compared against a normative group of companies. CEO Brian Moynihan says, “We’ve also built a diversity-and-inclusion index that tells us if people here feel they are treated fairly and to help us ensure that people of diverse backgrounds can succeed at Bank of America.”43
Accountability for diversity results when achieving diversity objectives is included in performance evaluations and when compensation is linked in part to achieving diversity results. Another way of making managers accountable for diversity is to consider the attainment of diversity and inclusion a factor in being promoted to a higher-level position.
Establish Minority Recruitment, Retention, and Mentoring Programs An essential initiative for building a diverse work force is to recruit and retain members of the targeted minority group. Because recruiting talented members of minority groups and women is competitive, careful human resources planning is required.
Efforts at recruiting a culturally diverse work force must be supported by a leadership and management approach that leads to high retention. To increase retention rates, diversity consultants advise employers to strengthen cultural training programs, recognize employees’ hidden skills and talents, and give diversity committees clout with top management.44
Retaining employees is also a function of good leadership and management in general, such as offering workers challenging work, clear-cut goals, feed- back, and valuable rewards for goal attainment. Mentoring is a key initiative for retaining minority group members, as well as for facilitating their advancement.
Conduct Diversity Training Diversity training has become a widely used method for enhancing diver- sity within organizations. The purpose of diversity training is to bring about workplace harmony by teaching people how to get along better with diverse work associates. Quite often the program is aimed at minimizing open expressions of racism and sexism. All forms of diversity training center on increasing people’s awareness of and empathy for people who are
LEADERSHIP INITIATIVES FOR ACHIEVING CULTURAL DIVERSITY 469
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
different from themselves in some important way. Diversity training often emphasizes leveraging diversity to enhance business performance.45 The enhancements to performance were described at the outset of the chapter.
Training sessions in valuing differences focus on the ways in which men and women, or people of different races, reflect different values, attitudes, and cultural backgrounds. These sessions can vary from several hours to several days or longer. Sometimes the program is confrontational, some- times not.
An essential part of relating more effectively to diverse groups is to empa- thize with their point of view. To help training participants develop empa- thy, representatives of various groups explain their feelings related to workplace issues. Leadership Skill-Building Exercise 14-2 gives you the opportunity to engage in an effective diversity training exercise. A useful way of framing diversity training is to say that it represents a subset of interpersonal skills: Relating effectively to coworkers who are different from you in some meaningful way adds to your interpersonal effectiveness.
A frequently mentioned concern about diversity training is that it rein- forces stereotypes about groups. Participants are informed about group dif- ferences, such as cultural values, and tactics might be suggested for coping with these differences—such as using more body language when relating to Latinos.
Leaders of diversity training exercises are cautioned to guard against encouraging participants to be too confrontational and expressing too much hostility. Companies have found that when employees are too blunt during these sessions, it may be difficult to patch up interpersonal relations in the work group later on. Sometimes the diversity trainer encourages group members to engage in outrageous behavior, such as by having
LEADERSHIP SKILL-BUILDING EXERCISE 14-2
The Diversity Circle
Some diversity trainers use the diversity circle exercise to help workers appreciate diversity and overcome mis- perceptions. The exercise adapts well for classroom use. Form a group of about ten students. Arrange your chairs into a circle, and put one additional chair in the center of the circle. A group member who feels diverse in any way volunteers to sit in the center chair and become the first awareness subject. Because most people are diverse in some way, most people are eligible to occupy the center chair.
The person in the center tells the others how he or she has felt about being diverse or different, and how people have reacted to his or her diversity. For example, an Inuit
described how fellow workers were hesitant to ask him out for a beer, worrying whether he could handle alcohol. Another name for this exercise is “How I Felt Different” because each person describes how he or she felt differ- ent from others at one point in his or her life.
An equally effective alternative to this procedure is for each class member to come up in front of the class to describe a significant way in which he or she is different. After each class member has presented, a discussion might be held of observations and interpretations.
What lessons did you learn about interpersonal rela- tions from this exercise that will help you be a more effective leader?
470 CHAPTER 14• INTERNATIONAL AND CULTURALLY DIVERSE ASPECTS OF LEADERSHIP
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
women sexually harass men so the men know what it feels like. Key themes of negative reactions to diversity training are charges of political correctness and white male bashing.
Diversity training is yet another initiative that needs to be incorporated into a culture that supports inclusion for the training to have much of an impact on the organization. In the words of diversity training pioneer, Roosevelt Thomas, “I may come out with some skills (after diversity train- ing), but I also know that if I’m going to use these skills effectively, I must have a culture that supports their use, that affirms their use.”46
A review of 178 articles about diversity training supports the comments made by Thomas. When diversity training was integrated into a system of other diversity-related activities, the outcomes were more likely to be positive, such as participants believing that they learned to interact more effectively with other cultural groups. Another key finding was that programs that focus on a more general, positive, and inclusive approach—rather than singling out one demographic group—may be better received by all participants.47
Conduct Cross-Cultural Training For many years, companies and government agencies have prepared their managers and other workers for overseas assignments. The method fre- quently chosen is cross-cultural training, a set of learning experiences designed to help employees understand the customs, traditions, and beliefs of another culture. Foreign language training is often included in cultural training. The multicultural leader needs to know that English is spoken dif- ferently in the United States, Great Britain, Australia, and South Africa, among other countries. Four examples follow:
● Britons say “keen” whereas Americans say “enthusiastic.” ● Britons say “to table (an idea),” whereas Americans say “to put (an idea)
out for discussion.” ● Britons say “to put (an idea) aside,” whereas Americans say “to table
(an idea).” ● Britons say “lift,” whereas Americans say “elevator.” ● Britons say “sorry” when they accidentally get in your way, whereas
Americans say “excuse me.”48
Cross-cultural training usually includes the type of information about cross-cultural bloopers included in Chapter 12. In addition, the art of facial cheek-kissing is an amusing, yet important, aspect of cross-cultural training. Americans favor handshakes for greetings, yet in most countries outside of Asia, light kisses on the cheek of the other person are more acceptable. The kisses are given to people of the same and opposite sex for greeting pur- poses; however, kissing a business acquaintance of the opposite sex is even more expected and appropriate. Frank Higgins, a global leader of two divi- sions for Nestle USA Inc., observes, “I would be rude if I didn’t kiss my female colleagues from Mexico.” At the company’s Zurich headquarters, Higgins triple cheek-kisses.49
LEADERSHIP INITIATIVES FOR ACHIEVING CULTURAL DIVERSITY 471
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
Another development in intercultural training is to train global leaders in cultural intelligence. Following the model of cultural intelligence described earlier in this chapter, global managers receive training in the cognitive, physical, and emotional or motivational domains. The training is highly complex, with the leader being expected to learn dozens of different con- cepts and behaviors, as well as insights. A sampling of what training in cul- tural intelligence involves is as follows:50
A Canadian manager is attempting to interpret a “Thai smile.” First, she needs to observe the various cues provided in addition to the smile gesture itself (for example, other facial or bodily gestures, significance of others who may be in proximity, the source of the original smile gesture) and to assemble them into a meaningful whole and make sense of what is really experienced by the Thai employee. Second, she must have the requisite motivation (directed effort and self-confidence) to persist in the face of confusion, challenge, or apparently mixed signals. Third, she must choose, generate, and execute the right actions to respond appropriately.
If any of these elements is deficient, she is likely to be ineffective in dealing with the Thai employee. A high CQ manager has the capability with all three facets as they act in unison.
Again, cultural intelligence is a refinement of cultural sensitivity. The international leader who remains alert to cues in the environment can go a long way toward building relationships with people from different cultures.
Encourage the Development of Employee Networks Another leadership initiative toward recognizing cultural differences is to permit and encourage employees to form employee network (or affinity) groups. The network group is composed of employees throughout the com- pany who affiliate on the basis of a group characteristic such as race, eth- nicity, sex, sexual orientation, or physical ability status. Group members typically have similar interests and look to the groups as a way of sharing information about succeeding in the organization. Although some human resources specialists are concerned that network groups can lead to divisive- ness, others believe they play a positive role.
Macy’s is an example of a business firm that encourages diversity through affinity groups, also known as employee resource groups. The groups help employees network and bond across different functions and levels within Macy’s. Affinity groups include those for women, African- Americans, Latinos, Native Americans, Chinese-Americans, the disabled, plus gay, lesbian, and transgender employees.51
Employee networks sometimes play a functional role in the organization. Angela Brady, CEO of WellPoint, the managed-care firms, says, “I visit each group twice a year and give them real assignments. I am very clear about my expectation that they will have a real impact on the business.”52
A caution about employee network groups is that they can result in employees segregating rather than integrating themselves into the workforce,
472 CHAPTER 14• INTERNATIONAL AND CULTURALLY DIVERSE ASPECTS OF LEADERSHIP
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
thereby defeating the purpose of diversity initiatives. A series of studies in over 800 companies referred to above found that networking and affinity groups may simply resegregate the workplace.53
Avoid Group Characteristics When Hiring for Person–Organization Fit An important consideration in employee recruitment and hiring is to find a good person–organization fit, the compatibility of the individual with the organization. The compatibility often centers on the extent to which a per- son’s major work-related values and personality traits fit major elements of the organization culture. Following this idea, a person who is adventure- some and prone to risk taking would achieve highest performance and satis- faction where adventuresome behavior and risk taking are valued. Conversely, a methodical and conservative individual should join a slow- moving bureaucracy.
Many business firms today are investing time and effort into recruiting and hiring employees who show a good person–organization fit. A selection strategy of this type can lead to a cohesive and strong organizational cul- ture. The danger, however, is that when employers focus too sharply on cul- tural fit in the hiring process, they might inadvertently discriminate against protected classes of workers. Specifically, the hiring manager might focus on superficial aspects of conformity to culture, such as physical appearance and which schools the candidates attended.
The selection of candidates who look alike and act alike conflicts with a diversity strategy. Leaders can take the initiative to guard against this prob- lem. The way to circumvent it is to avoid using group characteristics (such as race, sex, ethnicity, or physical status) in assessing person–organization fit. The alternative is to focus on traits and behaviors, such as intelligence or ability to be a team player. Leaders at Microsoft and Amazon emphasize hiring intelligent people only because bright people fit their culture best. Being intelligent is an individual difference rather than a group characteristic.
Modify Products and Services for Targeted Demographic Groups Managing for diversity often means modifying products and services as to increase their appeal to targeted demographic groups. Hundreds of exam- ples abound in everyday life including advertisements written in Spanish in newspapers and on the Internet to enhance their appeal to the Latino com- munity. Even as ordinary an act as having a larger kosher food section in supermarkets situated in a neighborhood with many Jewish people is an example of this straightforward business tactic. State Farm Insurance exem- plifies a company whose leadership emphasizes ethnic-targeted services. An advisory committee meets annually to discuss how they can better meet the needs of Hispanic customers. Rural Texas is one such focus because of its
LEADERSHIP INITIATIVES FOR ACHIEVING CULTURAL DIVERSITY 473
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
READER’S ROADMAP
large proportion of Spanish-speaking residents. Invoices for insurance are sent in both English and Spanish, and customer service agents in the regional call center have a bilingual unit to handle calls in English and Spanish.54
Another approach to targeting products to minority groups is to empha- size purchasing from minority vendors who have expertise to make the right connections with customers. Macy’s has a training program for minor- ity vendors to help them learn the basics of big-time retail, and the most promising ones are offered the opportunity to sell the company’s local mar- ket. One such winning firm was a manufacturer of cosmetics targeted at African-American and multiethnic women.55
Attain Diversity Among Organizational Leaders To achieve a multicultural organization, firms must also practice leader- ship diversity—that is, have a culturally heterogeneous group of leaders. Many global firms have already achieved leadership diversity with respect to ethnicity. Sex is another key area for leadership diversity, with many organizations today having women in top executive positions. An organiza- tion with true leadership diversity also has a heterogeneous group of leaders in such positions as supervisors, middle managers, and team leaders. McDonald’s Corp. and General Motors Corporation are two examples of well-known companies whose C-level executives include minority group members and women. One of the executive positions at McDonald’s is chief diversity officer, a practice also followed by several other large business firms including PepsiCo.
Top-team diversity appears to be associated with the financial success of the enterprise. A study of 180 firms conducted by the consulting firm, McKinsey & Company, measured diversity in terms of women and foreign nationals on senior teams. Firms in the top quartile of executive diversity, in comparison to the bottom quartile, had a 53 percent higher return on equity. The same firms had scored 14 percent higher on earnings before interest and taxes.56 (Another interpretation of these results is that more prosperous firms are more willing to recruit diverse leaders.)
So far we have studied the nature of leadership; the attributes, behaviors, and styles of leaders; the ethics and social responsibility of leaders; and how leaders exert power and use politics and influence. We then studied techniques for developing teamwork as well as motivation and coaching skills. After studying creativity and innovation as part of leadership, we focused on communication skills as they relate to leadership. We then shifted our attention to strategic leadership, after which we discussed another broad challenge facing leaders: dealing with cultural diversity within the organization and across borders. Next, we deal with the capstone topic of developing leaders and choosing successors for executives.
474 CHAPTER 14• INTERNATIONAL AND CULTURALLY DIVERSE ASPECTS OF LEADERSHIP
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
SUMMARY
The modern leader must be multicultural because corporate success, profit, and growth depend increas- ingly on the management of a diverse work force. The ethical and social responsibility goals of leaders and their organizations include providing adequately for the members of the diverse work force.
Managing for diversity brings a competitive advan- tage to the firm in several ways. Marketing can be improved because a representational work force facilitates selling products and services, and a good reputation for diversity management may attract customers. Companies with a favorable record in managing diversity are at an advantage in recruiting and retaining talented minority group members. Managing diversity also helps unlock the potential for excellence among employees who might otherwise be overlooked. A heterogeneous work force may also offer an advantage in creativity and problem solving. Diversity and inclusion programs also help local economies partly because of the reliance on minority suppliers, and team performance is often enhanced.
To influence, motivate, and inspire culturally diverse people, the leader must be aware of overt and subtle cultural differences. Differences in cul- tural values help explain differences among people. Ten of these values are as follows: (1) performance orientation, (2) assertiveness, (3) future orientation, (4) time orientation, (5) humane orientation, (6) in- group collectivism, (7) gender egalitarianism, (8) power distance (acceptance of formal authority), (9) uncertainty avoidance, and (10) work orientation.
Cultural values influence leadership style as well as the behavior of other workers. For example, French managers believe in a class system. Another way to understand how culture influences leader- ship is to compare leadership styles across cultural groups. For Malaysian managers, the preferred organizational leadership style is to show compas- sion while at the same time being more autocratic than participative. Cultural differences in leader- ship style within the same country exist also, such as the stereotype of U.S. Southern managers being more interested in building relationships than their Northern counterparts.
Cultural sensitivity is essential for inspiring peo- ple from different cultures. Part of this sensitivity is the leader’s willingness to acquire knowledge about local customs and to learn to speak the native lan- guage. A person with cultural sensitivity will recog- nize certain nuances in customs that help him or her build better relationships with people from different cultures. Cultural misunderstandings tend to cluster in five key areas: (1) language differences, (2) reli- gious differences, (3) work habits, (4) women’s roles, and (5) personal appearance and behavior. Choosing appropriate attire for conducting business in another culture requires careful observation. The reality of a greater number of transgender employees requires considerable sensitivity by the leader or manager. A key principle is to be flexible in dealing with people from other cultures.
To facilitate communication in international enterprise, many companies have declared English as the official language for conducting business. Despite the general acceptance of English as the official language of business, problems of cultural sensitivity remain, and speaking a second language well still gives the leader an edge.
Cultural intelligence helps an outsider interpret someone’s unfamiliar and ambiguous gestures the way that person’s compatriots would. Such intelli- gence has three facets: (1) cognitive (head), (2) phys- ical (body), and (3) emotional/motivational (heart).
Global leadership skills help improve a com- pany’s reputation and contribute to a sustainable competitive advantage. One model of such skills contends that behavioral complexity helps a leader attain high organizational performance. Among the success factors for international management posi- tions are cultural sensitivity; cultural adventurous- ness (or being a global explorer); being a contextual chameleon (adaptation to the unfamiliar); emo- tional intelligence; and tolerance for ambiguity. Having a command of a second language is helpful for influencing a person from another culture.
Top management commitment to valuing diver- sity is clearest when valuing diversity is embedded in organizational strategy. Specific leadership
SUMMARY 475
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
initiatives for valuing diversity can be divided into eight categories: (1) hold managers accountable for diversity; (2) establish minority recruitment, retention, and mentoring programs; (3) conduct diversity training; (4) conduct cross-cultural training;
(5) encourage the development of employee networks; (6) avoid group characteristics when hiring for per- son–organization fit, (7) modify products and services for targeted demographic groups; and (8) attain diver- sity among organizational leaders.
KEY TERMS
multicultural leader 453 performance orientation 453 assertiveness 453 future orientation 454 time orientation 454 humane orientation 454 in-group collectivism 454
gender egalitarianism 455 power distance 455 uncertainty avoidance 455 work orientation 455 cultural sensitivity 459 multicultural worker 459 cultural intelligence (CQ) 463
global leadership skills 464 diversity training 469 cross-cultural training 471 employee network (or affinity)
groups 472 leadership diversity 474
GUIDELINES FOR ACTION AND SKILL DEVELOPMENT
A major problem to manage in developing a diverse work force is for company leadership to reduce turn- over among the employees they have worked so hard to recruit. A report that surveyed 490 minority pro- fessionals in finance suggests that companies that work so hard to get diverse employees in the building don’t try nearly hard enough to keep them from leav- ing. Among the suggestions made in the report were to include communicating a clear path for employee advancement and providing suggestions for develop- ment as part of performance evaluation. The report also stated that “Professionals of color are, or per- ceive themselves to be, outside of the informal mechanisms of information sharing and social net- works, including lunch or coffee with peers, being invited to drinks, and socializing with managers.”57
A caution in implementing diversity manage- ment is for managers and other interviewers not to go overboard in trying to make a minority group member feel comfortable. “When inter- viewers try too hard to be black, Latin, or Asian,” says Martin de Campo, managing consultant with an executive search firm, “they come across as hokey.” John Fujii, the president of a diversity recruiting firm, says, “The best way to make minor- ity candidates feel comfortable is to make them feel
that they have an equal opportunity to compete for a position. That’s all they want.”58
Discussion Questions and Activities
1. A wheelchair user is conducting a job search to land a middle management position. Given that so many companies are attempting to build a more culturally diverse group of managers, should this job hunter include a photo of him- self in a wheelchair on his job resume? Explain your reasoning.
2. With so much business being conducted over the Internet, including e-mail, why is it impor- tant to understand cross-cultural differences in values?
3. If a business leader is regarded as charismatic by many people in one culture, to what extent do you think the leader would be perceived as charismatic in many other cultures?
4. What actions might a leader take to demon- strate that his or her interest in diversity goes beyond rhetoric?
5. Assume that a manager becomes the leader of a division in which the vast majority of the work- ers are under twenty-five, such as a restaurant
476 CHAPTER 14• INTERNATIONAL AND CULTURALLY DIVERSE ASPECTS OF LEADERSHIP
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
LEADERSHIP CASE PROBLEM A
chain. Would you recommend that the leader get some body piercing and tattoos to help establish rapport with the division work force? Explain your reasoning.
6. Many international companies have found that it is particularly helpful to hire local citizens for key management positions in a company loca- tion in another country. What advantages might a native offer to the company?
7. Many large business firms make it mandatory for CEOs to retire from their position when they reach a designated age such as 62 or 65. In what way might this retirement practice interfere with the goal of having a workforce with the widest possible diversity?
8. Should a company such as McDonald’s Restau- rants that already has a highly diverse work- force and customer base require managers and franchise owners attend diversity training? Explain your reasoning.
9. Suppose you are a team leader and one of your team members has a strong work ethic, based on his or her cultural values. Is it fair to assign this member much more work just because he or she is willing to work longer and harder than the other team members?
10. What can you do this week to help prepare yourself to become a multicultural leader?
What to Do About Louie?
Louie is the manager of a Mighty Muffler Brake service center in the Great Lakes Regions of the United States. The centers offer a wide range of ser- vices for vehicles including muffler and exhaust system replacement, brake systems, oil change, lubrication, tune-ups, and state inspection. Louie’s branch is located close to a busy highway, yet stores and residential neighborhoods are also close by. His store is among the chain’s highest- volume and most profitable units.
Management at Mighty Muffler is pleased with the financial management of Louie’s store, yet com- plaints have surfaced about aspects of his relation- ships with employees and customers. Emma, the human resources and customer services for the com- pany, was recently poring over the results from cus- tomer satisfaction cards mailed back to the company. She found that a few of the customer comments sug- gested that Louie might have made some inappropri- ate comments, as reflected in the following feedback:
“You did a wonderful job replacing my brakes and fixing a rattle in my exhaust system. But the manager insulted me a little by suggesting that I talk over with my husband about whether to get a new exhaust system now.”
“I have no complaints about the repairs you made or the price you charged.
However, you better replace that manager of yours. He is definitely out of touch with the times. My partner and I are proud of our gayness, so we don’t attempt to hide occasional public displays of affection. When your manager saw me giving my partner a light kiss on the cheek, he asked if we were from San Francisco.”
“When I came back to pick up my car, I had to wait two hours even though I was told the car would be ready by 3 p.m. I also found some smudge marks on the beige leather seats. When I complained to the manager, he said, ‘Granny, watch your blood pressure. It’s not good for a senior citizen to get too excited.’ I was never so insulted.”
Concerned about these comments, Emma sched- uled a trip to Louie’s store to investigate any possible problems he might be having in managing cultural diversity among customers and employees. Emma explained to Louie that the home office likes to make periodic trips to the stores to see now well employee relations are going, and how well employ- ees are working together. Louie responded, “Talk to
LEADERSHIP CASE PROBLEM A 477
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
LEADERSHIP CASE PROBLEM B
anybody you want. I may joke a little with the boys and girls in the shop, but we all get along great.”
In Emma’s mind, her informal chats with work- ers at Louie’s Mighty Muffler suggested that employee relations were generally satisfactory, but she did find a few troublesome comments. A young African-American noted that when he does some- thing particularly well, or Louie agrees with him strongly, Louie gives him a high five. In contrast, Caucasian or Latino workers will receive a congrat- ulatory handshake or a fist bump, respectively.
A woman brake technician said that Louie is a kind-hearted boss but that he is sometimes patron- izing without realizing it. She volunteered this inci- dent: “During breaks I sometimes enter the waiting room area because we have a vending machine up front that sells small bags of nuts and raisins, which I particularly like. One day, I was about to enter the waiting room when Louie tells me to stay in the back. He said that there was a Hell’s Angels-type guy waiting for his truck to be repaired, and he probably wouldn’t appreciate it if he thought that
a ‘girl’ was working on his truck. How could any- body be that sexist in today’s world?“
Emma went back to the home office to discuss her findings with the CEO and the vice president of administration. Emma said that Louie is making a contribution to the firm, but that some changes needed to be made. The two other executives agreed that Louie should become a little more mul- ticultural, but that they didn’t want to upset him too much because he could easily join a competitor. Emma concluded, “So I guess we need to figure out what to do about Louie.”
Questions
1. Does Louie have a problem, or are the people who made the negative comments about him being too sensitive?
2. What improvements might Louie need to make to become a truly multicultural manager?
3. What activity or program would you recommend to help make Louie more culturally sensitive?
ASSOCIATED ROLE PLAY One student plays the role of Emma who decides to take it upon herself to coach Louie about becoming more culturally sensitive and schedules an appoint- ment with Louie for her first coaching session. Another person plays the role of Louie, who does not quite understand the purpose of the meeting, yet
agrees to the appointment. During this first coaching session, Emma will focus on getting Louie to become more aware that he should become more culturally sensitive. Louie might become a little defensive during the session. Observers will make particular note as to whether Emma is getting through to Louie.
An Affinity Group for Workers 60 and Over?
Penelope is the vice president of HR at a large util- ity company, Power Energy. The company prides itself for its culturally diverse workforce, including a leadership team that is demographically and cul- turally diverse. One of the company initiatives for recognizing the rights of different groups are the company sponsorship of affinity groups. Power Energy affinity groups (also referred to as employee network groups) include the Latino Association,
The Black Tech Workers Group, The Gay Workers Alliance, and the Lesbian Rainbows. The groups receive both encouragement and a modest financial budget from the company.
Penelope is the official coordinator for these groups, and has helped each group form a charter and organize meetings. Last week she received an e-mail from five workers who have decided to form another affinity group, Power Energy employees
478 CHAPTER 14• INTERNATIONAL AND CULTURALLY DIVERSE ASPECTS OF LEADERSHIP
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
60 years of age and older. Skeptical of the purposes of such a group, Penelope holds a meeting with the group who is attempting to form the new affinity group, “The Splendid Seniors.”
During the meeting, members of the Splendid Seniors explain to Penelope that the company has a large number of workers aged 60 and over who col- lectively have special interests. Ron, the leader of the group, explains that many senior workers like to talk about retirement, as well as their concerns that Power Energy might soon cut their retirement and medical benefits. Ron also pointed out that if the company can sponsor affinity groups for Latinos, Blacks, Gays, and Lesbians, the company should be willing to support a group organizing itself by age.
Penelope explains to the group that an affinity group is usually reserved for Equal Opportunity Commission (EEO) protected groups such as race,
gender, and sexual orientation. She also asks why outside of talk about future retirement, workers over 60 have any particular concerns that would warrant a company-sponsored affinity group.
Ron replied, “I and the rest of the group are dis- appointed. We thought that Power Energy really believed in demographic diversity.” Penelope replied that she would give the subject of an affinity group for people 60 and over some more thought.
Questions
1. What do you recommend that Penelope do with the request to form a company-sponsored affin- ity group, The Splendid Seniors?
2. What concerns, if any, do you have about Penelope’s commitment to demographic and cultural diversity at Power Energy?
ASSOCIATED ROLE PLAY One student plays the role of Ron, who has requested a private meeting with Penelope to rein- force the group meeting. However, Ron is much more aggressive in his demands that Power Energy form the affinity group, “The Splendid Seniors.” He also hints of possible legal action because Penelope
might be in violation of Equal Employment Oppor- tunity legislation. Another student plays the role of Penelope who wants to be a firm but fair leader in this situation. Observers should look to evaluate the extent to which Penelope demonstrates effective cultural sensitivity and leadership.
LEADERSHIP SKILL-BUILDING EXERCISE 14-3
My Leadership Portfolio
To be an effective cross-cultural leader, you need to work effectively with people from demographic and cultural groups different from your own. Describe what experiences you have had lately in working with and/or relating effectively to a person quite dif- ferent from you. If you have not had such an experi- ence, take the initiative during the next week to relate meaningfully to a person quite different from you in terms of culture or demographic group mem- bership. Finance major Stephanie had this to say:
Claire, a special education teacher, lives on my block. Claire goes to work every school day in
spite of being legally blind. She can read with visual assists, including reading what is on her computer screen. Yet paper forms are difficult for Claire to navigate. I telephoned Claire one night and asked her if she could use my assistance in preparing her income tax this year. Claire agreed, and it worked out well. I now feel more comfortable working side by side with a visually handicapped person. Also, I picked up some practical experience in pre- paring a complicated tax form.
LEADERSHIP SKILL-BUILDING EXERCISE 14-3 479
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
NOTES
LEADERSHIP SKILL-BUILDING EXERCISE 14-4
Positive Cross-Cultural Experiences in the Workplace
Organize into brainstorming groups to identify at least six positive cross-cultural experiences you have observed in the workplace, or would like to observe. Take an expansive view of cross-cultural experiences to include many types of demographic factors such as wheelchair use, visual status, and
ethnic, racial, and age groups. After you have com- pleted your brainstorming, attempt to draw conclu- sions from the findings. Comparing the results of your group with those of other brainstorming groups in the class will be helpful in drawing conclusions because you will have more data at your disposal.
1. Original story created from facts and observations in the following sources: Kris Hudson, “Hotels a Win for Ex-Athletes,” The Wall Street Journal, June 13, 2012, p. C6; Nancy Sarnoff, “ ‘The Admiral’ Buys Houston Hotel,” blog.chron.com, November 15, 2011, pp. 1–4; “Hotels Seek Athletes for Brand Expansion,” The Real Deal (http://therealdeal.com), June 13, 2012, p. 1; “NBA Legend David Robinson Launches ‘Admiral Hospitality Scholars,’ ” Hiltonworldwide (http://news.hiltonworldwide .com/), May 20, 2013, pp. 1–3.
2. Frances Hesselbein, “Diversity: The Imperative for Today’s Leaders,” in Marshall Goldsmith, John Baldoni, and Sarah McArthur (eds.), The AMA Handbook of Leadership (New York: AMACOM, 2010), p. 9.
3. Patricia Harris, “The McDonald’s Diversity Story,” Guest Insights (http://views.washington post.com), November 25, 2009, p. 1.
4. Richard Larsen, “The Deep Horizon of Diversity,” Hispanic Business, December 2011, p. 33.
5. Susan Meisinger, “Diversity: More Than Just Representation,” HR Magazine, January 2008, p. 8.
6. Cited in Annya M. Lott, “Future of Diversity: Cultural Inclusion Is a Business Imperative,” Black Enterprise, August 2010, p. 75.
7. “Workforce Diversity,” www.allstate.com /diversity.aspx, © 2014 Allstate Insurance Company.
8. Juan Baron, “Workforce Diversity: Building a Stronger Future,” www.hispanicbusiness.com, September 18, 2013, p. 1.
9. Quoted in Diana Louise Carter, “The Diversity Dilemma,” Democrat and Chronicle, December 15, 2013, p. 5E.
10. Richard Larsen, “Workplace Diversity,” Hispanic Business, November 2011, p. 37.
11. Quoted in Frank Nelson, “U.S. Economy Gets a Life from Diversity Best Companies,” Hispanic Business, September 2010, p. 14.
12. Anne Nederveen Pieterse, Daan Van Knippenberg, and Dirk Van Dierendonck, “Cultural Diversity and Team Performance: The Role of Team Member Goal Orientation,” Academy of Management Journal, June 2013, pp. 782–804.
13. Frances J. Milliken and Luis L. Martins, “Searching for Common Threads: Understanding the Multiple Effects of Diversity in Organizational Groups,” Academy of Management Review, April 1996, p. 403; see also, Daan van Knippenberg, Carsten K. W. De Dreu, and Astrid C. Homan, “Work Group Diversity and Group Performance: An Integrative Model and Research Agenda,” Journal of Applied Psychology, December 2004, pp. 1008–1022.
14. Katherine J. Klein and David A. Harrison, “On the Diversity of Diversity: Tidy Logic, Messier Realities,” Academy of Management Perspectives, November 2007, p. 31.
15. Mansour Javidan, Peter W. Dorfman, May Sully de Luque, and Robert J. House, “In the Eye of the Beholder: Cross Cultural Lessons in Leadership from Project GLOBE,” Academy of Management Perspectives, February 2006, pp. 69–70. Similar dimensions were described
480 CHAPTER 14• INTERNATIONAL AND CULTURALLY DIVERSE ASPECTS OF LEADERSHIP
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
in Geert Hofstede, Culture’s Consequences: International Differences in Work Related Values (Beverly Hills, Calif.: Sage Publications, 1980); updated and clarified in Hofstede, “Who Is the Fairest of Them All, Galit Ailon’s Mirror,” Academy of Management Review, July 2009, pp. 570–571. Dimension 10 is not included in the above research.
16. Study reported in Bradley S. Klapper, “Report: U.S. Workers Are the Most Productive,” Associated Press, September 2, 2007; “World’s Shortest Workweek,” CNNMoney (http: //money.cnn.com), July 10, 2013, pp. 1–5.
17. Geert Hofstede, “The Universal and the Specific in 21st-Century Global Management,” Organizational Dynamics, Summer 1999, pp. 35–37.
18. The observation about bureaucracy is from Javidan, Dorfman, de Luque, and House, “In the Eye of the Beholder,” p. 79.
19. Felix C. Brodbeck, Michael Frese, and Mansour Javidan, “Leadership Made in Germany: Low on Compassion, High on Performance,” Academy of Management Executive, February 2002, pp. 16–30.
20. Jeffrey C. Kennedy, “Leadership in Malaysia: Traditional Values, International Outlook,” Academy of Management Executive, August 2002, pp. 15–26.
21. Del Jones, “North vs. South: Leaders from Both Sides of the Mason-Dixon Line Have Strong Opinions About the Styles of Their Regionally Different Peers,” USA Today, July 9, 2004, p. 5B.
22. Thomas Rockstuhl, James H. Dulebohn, Soon Ang, and Lynn M. Shore, “Leader-Member Exchange (LMX) and Culture: A Meta-Analysis of Correlates of LMX Across 23 Countries,” Journal of Applied Psychology, November 2012, pp. 1097–1130.
23. Stacey R. Fitzsimmons, “Multicultural Employee: A Framework for Understanding How They Contribute to Organizations,” Academy of Management Review, October 2013, pp. 525–549.
24. Carla Johnson, “Cultural Sensitivity Adds Up to Good Business Sense,” HR Magazine, November 1995, pp. 83–85.
25. Christina Binkley, “Where Yellow’s a Faux Pas and White Is Death,” The Wall Street Journal, December 6, 2007, p. D8.
26. “Managing Diversity: When Cultures Collide,” Managing People at Work, sample issue, 2008, p. 7.
27. “English Please—Honda Requires It,” USA Today, November 23, 2013, p. 4B.
28. Tsedal Neeley, “Global Business Speaks English: Why You Need a Language Strategy Now,” Harvard Business Review, May 2012, pp. 116–124.
29. Cited in Amanda Shelby, “EEOC to Update Guidance on English-Only Policies?” HR Hero (http://blogs.hrhero.com), January 19, 2014, p. 1.
30. P. Christopher Earley and Elaine Mosakowski, “Cultural Intelligence,” Harvard Business Review, October 2004, pp. 139–146.
31. Ming Li, William H. Mobley, and Adrian Kelly, “When Do Global Leaders Learn Best to Develop Cultural Intelligence? An Investigation of the Moderating Role of Experiential Learning Style,” Academy of Management Learning & Education, March 2013, pp. 32–50.
32. Javidan, Dorfman, de Luque, and House, “In the Eye of the Beholder,” p. 85.
33. Joseph A. Petrick, Robert E. Scherer, James D. Bodzinski, John F. Quinn, and M. Fall Ainina, “Global Leadership Skills and Reputational Capital: Intangible Resources for Sustainable Competitive Advantage,” The Academy of Management Executive, February 1999, pp. 58–69.
34. Gretchen M. Spreitzer, Morgan W. McCall Jr., and Joan D. Mahoney, “Early Identification of International Executive Potential,” Journal of Applied Psychology, February 1997, pp. 6–29.
35. Research cited in Douglas T. Hall, Guorong Zhu, and Amin Yan, “Developing Global Leaders: To Hold on to Them, Let Them Go,” Advances in Global Leadership, vol. 2, 2001, p. 331.
36. Javidan, Dorfman, de Luque, and House, “In the Eye of the Beholder,” p. 85.
37. Jeanne Brett, Kristin Behfar, and Mary C. Kern, “Managing Multicultural Teams,” Harvard Business Review, November 2006, p. 87.
38. Cited in Simon Kent, “Go Team, Go!” PM Network, November 2007, p. 41.
39. “Renault-Nissan’s Ghosn Recommends Two Successors: Report,” Reuters.com (www .reuters.com), January 10, 2014, p. 1; Paul
NOTES 481
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
Ingrassia and John Stoll, “Hottest Car Guy on Earth,” The Wall Street Journal, January 14, 2006, p. A8; Sebastian Moffett, “Renault’s No. 2 Executive Quits,” The Wall Street Journal, April 12, 2001, p. B1.
40. James Hookway, “IKEA’s Products Make Shoppers Blush in Thailand.” The Wall Street Journal, June 5, 2012, p. A16.
41. Boris Groysberg and Katherine Connolly, “ Twenty-Four CEOs on Creating Diverse and Inclusive Organizations,” Harvard Business Review, September 2013, p. 76.
42. Todd Campbell, “Diversity in Depth,” HR Magazine, March 2003, p. 152.
43. Groysberg and Connolly, “Twenty-Four CEOs,” p. 73.
44. Marc Adams, “Building a Rainbow One Stripe at a Time,” HR Magazine, August 1998, pp. 73–74.
45. Rohini Anand and Mary-Frances Winters, “A Retrospective View of Corporate Diversity Training from 1964 to the Present,” Academy of Management Learning & Education, September 2008, pp. 356–372.
46. Quoted in C. Douglas Johnson, “It’s More Than the Five to Do’s: Insights on Diversity Education and Training from Roosevelt Thomas, A Pioneer and Thought Leader in the Field,” Academy of Management Learning & Education, September 2008, p. 411.
47. Katerina Bezrukova, Karen A. Jehn, and Chester S. Spell, “Reviewing Diversity Training: Where We Have Been and Where We Should Go,” Academy of Management Learning & Education, June 2012, pp. 207–227.
48. DeeDee Doke, “Perfect Strangers,” HRMagazine, December 2004, p. 64; Terry Eagleton, “Sorry, But Do You Speak English?” The Wall Street Journal, June 22–23, 2013, p. C3.
49. Christina Binkley, “Americans Learn the Global Art of the Cheek Kiss,” The Wall Street Journal, March 27, 2008, p. D1.
50. P. Christopher Earley and Randall S. Peterson, “The Elusive Cultural Chameleon: Cultural Intelligence as a New Approach to Intercultural Training for the Global Manager,” Academy of Management Learning and Education, March 2004, p. 105.
51. Frank Nelson, “U.S. Economy Gets a Lift from Diversity Best Companies,” Hispanic Business, September 2010, p. 16.
52. Groysberg and Connolly, “Great Leaders Who Make the Mix Work,” p. 75.
53. Fay Hansen, “Diversity of a Different Color,” Workforce Management, June 2010, p. 25.
54. Gary D. Fackler, “The Texas Hispanic Touch,” Hispanic Business, December 2010, pp. 35–36.
55. Cotton Timberlake, “At Macy’s, the Many Colors of Cash,” Bloomberg Businessweek, January 16–January 22, 2012, p. 21.
56. Thomas Barta, Markus Kleiner, and Tilo Neumann, “Is There a Payoff from Top-Team Diversity?” McKinsey Quarterly (www .mckinseyquarterly), April 2012, pp. 1–4.
57. Michael Todd, “Report: Companies Should Help Workers Get Comfortable, Stay Awhile,” Hispanic Business, March 2007, p. 44.
58. Julie Bennett, “‘Corporate Angst’ Can Generate Gaffes That Turn Off Coveted Candidates,” The Wall Street Journal, October 21, 2003, p. D9.
482 CHAPTER 14• INTERNATIONAL AND CULTURALLY DIVERSE ASPECTS OF LEADERSHIP
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
CH AP
TE R
15 Leadership Development and Succession
LEARNING OBJECTIVES After studying this chapter and doing the exercises, you should be able to
• Explain how leaders develop through self-awareness and self-discipline.
• Explain how leaders develop through education, expe- rience, and mentoring.
• Summarize the nature of leadership development programs.
• Describe the nature of leadership succession.
CHAPTER OUTLINE Development Through Self-Awareness and Self-Discipline Leadership Development Through Self-Awareness Leadership Development Through Self-Discipline
Development Through Education, Experience, and Mentoring Education Experience Mentoring
Leadership Development Programs Types of Leadership Development Programs
Leadership Succession How the Board Chooses a Successor
Succession Planning at General Electric and Procter & Gamble
The Emotional Aspects of Leadership Succession Developing a Pool of Successors Promotion from Within
Challenges of Being a New Leader
Summary
Key Terms
Guidelines for Action and Skill Development
Leadership Case Problem A
Leadership Case Problem B
Notes
Many people have heard about those brave andhighly skilled men and women who are membersof the New York Fire Department. They fight fires in buildings and subways, and they rescue people trappedin vehicular accidents. Now a select number of these fire-fighters are helping develop corporate leaders. 483
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
The FDNY Firefighter for a Day Team Challenge was developed to share the New York City Fire Department’s team building and leadership practices with members of corporations. The setting for the training is the FDNY train- ing academy. Participants are exposed to state-of-the-art training simulators to strengthen teamwork and leadership skills. Executives have reached out to the FDNY to express how increasingly complex the business environment has recently become, and dependent on leaders who could motivate teams to work together quickly and efficiently to solve difficult problems.
The key component of the challenge is that corpora- tions compete in teams of four people where they receive hands-on training designed to improve team building, lead- ership, communication, and problem-solving skills. A major goal of the program is to help leaders become more skilled at dealing with a crisis.
On a given day of training, to enhance their leadership skills, managers from about two dozen different companies joined with some of their employees to simulate being fire- fighters on a given afternoon. Teams of four wear firefighter gear, including gas masks. Supervised by New York City firefighters, the four-person teams go through emergency drills, particularly rushing into burning buildings and rescu- ing passengers from simulated subway accidents.
Leadership skills are needed, as the four-person teams quickly make assignments within the group to deal with a building fire or a subway accident. The program coordina- tors from the FDNY recommend that each team has one senior official and several nonmanagerial employees.
One of the demanding exercises to help build trust and communication is lowering down participants from a five-story building. “Up the stairs, all the way!” yell the course instructors. Upon arriving on the roof and at a rope dangling from the edge of the building, participants learn that one at a time they are going to lower each other from the roof. The theme of the exercise is trust and communication. As participants are lowered, they need to communicate with teammates, helping from floors above and the below, the appropriate pace of descent.
Scott Parel, of the major law firm Weil, Gotshal, & Manges, offered this comment about the firefighter train- ing: “A truly incredible and unique experience. You will leave with valuable team building and leadership skills and a new sense of pride and respect for the FDNY.”
Malinda Robey reacted to her experience in these words: “The FDNY Firefighter for a Day Team Challenge is a once in a lifetime, must-do experience! I now have a newfound respect for New York’s bravest, the FDNY.”1
The leadership development program (yet another type of offsite training) just described illustrates the importance companies place on developing the lead- ership ability of managers and other personnel. The previous chapters in this book have included information and activities designed to develop leaders and enhance their effectiveness. This chapter describes how self-development can enhance leadership effectiveness, as well as the processes organizations use to develop current and future leaders. Such activities and processes are typically referred to as leadership development or management development.
The primary emphasis in leadership development is on building and using interpersonal competence, even when it appears that a trait or behavior is the focus of development.2 For example, a leader might work on enhancing his or her self-discipline, yet being more self-disciplined might help the leader to remember to provide feedback and recognition to group members.
In addition to describing various approaches to leadership development, this chapter also describes leadership succession. Leadership succession is included here because an important part of leadership development is being groomed for promotion. Leadership development combined with suc- cession planning was ranked as the top human capital priority for business
484 CHAPTER 15• LEADERSHIP DEVELOPMENT AND SUCCESSION
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
executives looking ahead two to three years, according to a Conference Board report.3 The text concludes with a glimpse of the challenges newly appointed leaders face.
Development Through Self-Awareness and Self-Discipline
Leadership development is often perceived in terms of education and train- ing, job experience, and coaching. Nevertheless, self-help also contributes heavily to developing leadership capabilities. Self-help takes many forms, including working on one’s own to improve communication skills, to develop charisma, and to model the behavior of effective leaders. As the self becomes developed, the leader is able to engage in more effective inter- actions with people. Two major components of leadership self-development are self-awareness and self-discipline.
Leadership Development Through Self-Awareness An important mechanism underlying self-development is self-awareness, insightfully processing feedback about oneself to improve one’s effective- ness. Part of self-awareness is being able to understand how the individual is perceived by others.4 For example, a leader might say, “I come across to others as a person of passion and commitment.” If others perceive the leader in the same way, the leader has good self-awareness. In contrast, if most subordinates perceive the leader as unexcited about attaining group goals, the leader’s self-awareness is low.
According to two specialists in leadership assessment, many big mistakes in careers and organizations result from gaps in self-awareness.5 For exam- ple, a managerial leader might observe that three key group members left her group over a six-month time span. The leader might defensively dismiss this fact with an analysis such as, “I guess we just don’t pay well enough to keep good people.” Her first analysis might be correct. With a self- awareness orientation, however, the leader would dig deeper for the reasons behind the turnover. She might ask herself, “Is there something in my lead- ership approach that creates turnover problems?” She might ask for exit interview data to sharpen her perceptions about her leadership approach.
The late Chris Argyris has coined the terms single-loop learning and double-loop learning to differentiate between levels of self-awareness.6
Single-loop learning occurs when learners seek minimum feedback that might substantially confront their basic ideas or actions. As in the example of the high-turnover leader, single-loop learners engage in defensive think- ing and tend not to act on the clues they receive. Argyris offers the example of a thermostat that automatically turns on the heat whenever the room temperature drops below 68 degrees Fahrenheit (20 degrees Celsius).
Double-loop learning is an in-depth type of learning that occurs when people use feedback to confront the validity of the goal or the values implicit in the situation. The leader mentioned earlier was engaged in
DEVELOPMENT THROUGH SELF-AWARENESS AND SELF-DISCIPLINE 485
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
double-loop learning when she questioned the efficacy of her leadership approach. To achieve double-loop learning, one must minimize defensive thinking. Many people are blind to their areas of incompetence and do not know their vision is blocked. Figure 15-1 illustrates the difference between single-loop and double-loop learning.
An important contribution of double-loop learning is that it enables the leader to learn and profit from setbacks. Interpreting the reason that a set- back occurred may help the leader to do better the next time. Faced with a group in crisis, a leader might establish a vision of better days ahead for group members. The leader observes that the vision leads to no observable changes in performance and behavior. Perhaps the group was not ready for a vision. In a comparable situation in the future, the leader might hold back on formulating a vision until the group is headed out of the crisis.
A fruitful area of self-awareness is for leaders to recognize their standing on two key dimensions of leadership: forceful versus enabling leadership, and strategy versus operational. Bob Kaplan explains that the leader should not go overboard on each dimension, such as being too forceful or too enabling (empowering). A leader should also not spend so much time strate- gizing that operations become neglected, or so much time focusing on operations that strategy is neglected. The process of self-awareness on these two dimensions is much like volume control—raise or lower the volume to get the best result. Figure 15-2 outlines this area of self-awareness in terms of the extremes, or being lopsided. Leaders can take the Leadership Versatil- ity Index®, which enables them to find their standing on the two dimen- sions of leadership. The ideal point is to be just right in forcefulness versus enabling, and strategic versus operational. Feedback from others helps a leader become self-aware of his or her standing on these two dimensions.7
“That’s interesting feedback, I’ll keep it in mind.”
“That’s interesting feedback. It could be a wakeup call that I’m working on the wrong project. I’ll investigate further.”
Leader
Environment
Leader
Environment
SINGLE-LOOP LEARNING DOUBLE-LOOP LEARNING
© Ce ng ag e Le ar ni ng
FIGURE 15-1 Single-Loop Learning Versus Double-Loop Learning.
486 CHAPTER 15• LEADERSHIP DEVELOPMENT AND SUCCESSION
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
Self-awareness can also be helpful in understanding how close an individ- ual is to his or her concept of an ideal leader.8 Many people develop percep- tions of who they consider to be an ideal leader, even without a conscious process of searching for such a person. A person with high self-awareness might think, “I’m getting close to behaving like , but I still have to develop my charisma and strategic thinking further to get there.”
Leadership Development Through Self-Discipline As with other types of personal development, leadership development requires considerable self-discipline. In the present context, self-discipline is mobilizing one’s effort and energy to stay focused on attaining an impor- tant goal. Self-discipline is required for most forms of leadership develop- ment. Assume, for example, that a leader is convinced that active listening is an important leadership behavior. The leader reads about active listening and also attends a workshop on the subject. After the reading and workshop are completed, the leader will need to concentrate diligently in order to remember to listen actively. Self-discipline is particularly necessary because the pressures of everyday activities often divert a person’s attention from personal development.
Self-discipline plays an important role in the continuous monitoring of one’s behavior to ensure that needed self-development occurs. After one identifies a developmental need, it is necessary to periodically review whether one is making the necessary improvements. Assume that a person recognizes the developmental need to become a more colorful communica- tor as a way of enhancing charisma. The person would need self-discipline to make the conscious effort to communicate more colorfully when placed in an appropriate situation. Leadership Self-Assessment Quiz 15-1 contains an interpersonal skills checklist that will help you identify your own devel- opmental needs related to interpersonal relationships.
A specific example of a leader addressing a developmental need is adver- tising account manager Samantha Reeb-Wilson who recognized that honing her negotiation skills might accelerate her career. She said, “In my role, we try to figure out the best way to solve a client’s business problems, and that
Heroic Leader (too forceful and strategic)
Presidential (too strategic and too enabling)
Field General (too forceful and too operational)
One of the Troops (too operational and too enabling)
Forceful Enabling Operational
Strategic
FIGURE 15-2 Four Kinds of Lopsided Leaders. Source: Based on concepts from Bob Kaplan with Rob Kaiser, The Versatile Leader: Make the Most of Your Strengths— Without Overdoing It (San Francisco: Pfeiffer, 2006).
DEVELOPMENT THROUGH SELF-AWARENESS AND SELF-DISCIPLINE 487
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
LEADERSHIP SELF-ASSESSMENT QUIZ 15-1
The Interpersonal Skills Checklist
Instructions: Following are a number of specific aspects of behavior that suggest that a person needs to improve his or her interpersonal skills related to leadership and influence. Check each statement that is generally true for you. You can add to the reliability of this exercise by asking one or two other people who know you well to rate you. Then compare your self-analysis with their analysis of you.
DEVELOPMENTAL NEEDS AND AREAS FOR IMPROVEMENT
1. I am too shy and reserved. □
2. I bully and intimidate others frequently. □
3. I tell others what they want to hear rather than emphasizing the truth. □
4. I have trouble expressing my feelings. □
5. I make negative comments about group members too readily. □
6. Very few people pay attention to the ideas I contribute during a meeting. □
7. My personality is not colorful enough. □
8. People find me boring. □
9. I pay too little attention to the meaning behind what team members and coworkers are saying. □
10. It is very difficult for me to criticize others. □
11. I am too serious most of the time. □
12. I avoid controversy in dealing with others. □
13. I do not get my point across well. □
14. It is difficult for me to make small talk with others. □
15. I boast too much about my accomplishments. □
16. I strive too much for individual recognition instead of looking to credit the team. □
17. Self-confidence is my weak point. □
18. My spoken messages are too bland. □
19. I rarely ever speak to people any longer. Instead I rely on text messages. □
20. I relate poorly to people from cultures different from my own. □
21. I read people poorly. □
22. I display a lot of nervous mannerisms when I am working in a group. □
23. I do a poor job of making a presentation in front of others. □
24. I multitask, such as receiving a phone call, while talking to another person face-to-face. □
25. □
(Fill in your own statement.)
Now that you (and perhaps one or two others) have identified specific behaviors that may require change, draw up an action plan. Describe briefly a plan of attack for bringing about the change you hope to achieve for each statement that is checked. Ideas might come from personal development books or from leadership development and human relations workshops. After formulating an action plan, you will need self-discipline for its successful implementation. For example, if you checked, “People find me boring,” you might want to expand your fund of
488 CHAPTER 15• LEADERSHIP DEVELOPMENT AND SUCCESSION
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
requires laying out an argument and defending it.” As a result, she signed up for a seminar on persuasive argument at a women’s leadership program at her alma mater, Barnard College.9
A key part of making self-awareness and self-discipline vehicles for per- sonal development is to have a healthy belief in personal growth. According to psychology professor Carol Dweck, some people have a healthy belief in growth, whereby they assume that they will develop their talents during their personal and work lives. In contrast, others possess a fixed mindset, whereby they believe that talents are innate and will carry them to the top without the need for modification.10
Development Through Education, Experience, and Mentoring
Much of leadership development takes place through means other than self- awareness and self-discipline or leadership development programs. Leader- ship is such a comprehensive process that almost any life activity can help people prepare for a leadership role. Three important life and work experi- ences that contribute to leadership development are education, experience as a leader, and mentoring. In the next several pages, we look at the link between each of these three factors and leadership.
Education Education generally refers to acquiring knowledge without concern about its immediate application. If a potential leader studies mathematics, the log- ical reasoning acquired might someday help him or her solve a complex problem facing the organization. As a result, the leader’s stature is enhanced. Reading biographies and autobiographies about successful peo- ple is a good source of ideas about leadership. Formal education is posi- tively correlated with achieving managerial and leadership positions. Furthermore, there is a positive relationship between the amount of formal education and the level of leadership position attained.
The correlation between education and leadership status, however, may not reflect causation. Many people get the opportunity to hold a business leadership position only if they have achieved a specified level of education.
QUIZ 15-1 (continued)
knowledge by extensive reading and by talking to dynamic people. You will then need the self-discipline to con- tinue your quest for ideas and to incorporate some of these ideas into your conversation.
Another approach to this exercise is for each student to choose one developmental need, combined with an action plan, that he or she is willing to share with others. Next, students present their developmental need and action plan to the rest of the class. After all students have presented, a class discussion is held about whatever observations and generalizations students have reached.
DEVELOPMENT THROUGH EDUCATION, EXPERIENCE, AND MENTORING 489
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
A more important issue than the statistical association between leadership and formal education is how education contributes to leadership effectiveness.
Most high-level leaders are intelligent, well-informed people who gather knowledge throughout their career. The knowledge that accrues from for- mal education and self-study provides them with information for innovative problem solving. Being intellectually alert also helps them exert influence through logical persuasion.
Experience On-the-job experience is an obvious contributor to leadership effectiveness. Without experience, knowledge cannot readily be converted into skills. For example, you will need experience to put into practice the appropriate influ- ence tactics you studied in Chapter 8. Leadership experience also helps build skills and insights that a person may not have formally studied. Many company leadership development programs focus on giving participants varied experiences, such as Yum! Brands requiring that executive leaders obtain experience managing a store.
Challenging Experiences The best experiences for leadership development are those that realistically challenge the manager, including dealing with stress- ful problems. Creating an environment for development requires that an organization first rid itself of the belief in survival of the fittest. The goal of leadership development is to provide meaningful development opportu- nities, not to push managers to the point where they are most likely to fail.11 An example of a stretch experience for many managers is being placed in charge of an organizational unit with low productivity and morale. The manager would need to apply many leadership skills to improve the situation.
Failure is a special type of challenging experience that contributes enor- mously to reaching one’s leadership potential. One reason is that people who have never failed have avoided taking big risks. Richard Branson, the flamboyant chair of Virgin Atlantic Airways Limited, claims that “the best developer of a leader is failure.” An effective way of capitalizing on failure is to reflect on what you might do differently in the future. Ask yourself questions such as “What would have to change inside me to enable me to do things differently?”12 For example, perhaps the project failed because you did not provide enough guidance to the group and did not communi- cate a sense of urgency. In the future, you might lead with more control and assertion. Table 15-1 lists a number of powerful learning experiences for developing leadership and managerial skills.
An important part of capitalizing on challenging experiences is for the leader or manager to be given leeway in choosing how to resolve the problem. A team leader, for example, might be told, “Increase productivity by 10 percent and, at the same time, decrease costs by 10 percent.” The team leader would have the developmental opportunity of finding a solution to this challenge.
490 CHAPTER 15• LEADERSHIP DEVELOPMENT AND SUCCESSION
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
Extremely challenging experiences are sometimes referred to as crucibles—critical events and experiences that more often reflect failure than grand success. The crucible demands that leaders step up and do something they have never done before, such as rescuing a failing business or rebuilding after a hurricane has struck a key business location.13
TABLE 15-1 Powerful Learning Experiences for Developing Leadership Skills
Research with managers has revealed fifteen types of powerful learning experiences that contribute to one’s development as a leader and manager.
1. Unfamiliar responsibilities. Responsibilities are new, quite different, or much broader than previous ones. As a result, the situation requires skills and abilities beyond a per- son’s current competencies.
2. Proving yourself. There is pressure to show others that one can get the job done. 3. Developing new directions. The leader is responsible for starting something new, imple-
menting a reorganization, or responding to rapid changes in the business environment. 4. Inherited problems. The manager must fix problems created by a former manager or is
handed the responsibility for problem employees. 5. Downsizing decisions. The manager must make decisions about shutting down
operations or reducing staff. 6. Dealing with problem employees. The group members lack adequate experience, are
incompetent, or are resistant. 7. Facing high stakes. The manager is faced with tight deadlines, pressure from senior
management, high visibility, and responsibility for success and failure. 8. Managing business complexity. The job is large in scope, and the manager is
responsible for multiple functions, groups, products, customers, or markets. 9. Role overload. The size of the job requires a large investment of time and energy.
An example is that suddenly you deal with a customer request far beyond the capacity of the company to handle.
10. Handling external pressure. The manager is forced to deal with external factors that affect the business, such as negotiating with unions or government agencies or coping with serious community problems.
11. Having to exert influence without authority. To accomplish the job, it is necessary to influence peers, higher management, external parties, or other key people over whom one has no formal control.
12. Adverse business conditions. The business unit faces a drop in revenues or a drastic budget cut. For example, it becomes necessary to raise funds from investors and you have to be humble and almost beg for money.
13. Lack of top management support. Senior management is reluctant to provide direction, support, or resources for the manager’s major work activities or for a new project.
14. Lack of personal support. The manager is excluded from key networks and receives little encouragement from others about the work activities.
15. Difficult boss. A personality clash with the boss is evident, or he or she is incompetent.
Source: Adapted from C. McCauley, M. Ruderman, P. Ohlott, and J. Morrow, “Assessing the Developmental Components of Managerial Jobs,” Journal of Applied Psychology, 79, 4 (1994), pp. 544–560. Point 1 is also derived from Gretchen M. Spreitzer, “Leadership Development Lessons from Positive Organizational Studies,” Organi- zational Dynamics, Issue No. 4, 2006, p. 307. Points 7 and 12 are also derived from “Moments of Truth: Global Executives Talk About the Challenges That Shaped Them as Leaders,” Harvard Business Review, January 2007, pp. 16, 17.
DEVELOPMENT THROUGH EDUCATION, EXPERIENCE, AND MENTORING 491
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
Sources of Experience The two major developmental factors in any work sit- uation are work associates and the task itself.14 Work associates can help a person develop in myriad ways. An immediate superior can be a positive or negative model of effective leadership. You might observe how your boss skillfully confronts a cost overrun problem during a staff meeting. You observe carefully, and plan to use a similar technique when it becomes nec- essary for you to confront a problem with a group. In contrast, assume that your boss’s confrontational approach backfires and the group becomes defensive and recalcitrant. You have learned how not to confront. Members of upper management, peers, and reporting staff can also help a worker profit from experience. For example, by trial and error, the worker might learn which type of praise is best for influencing others.
Work-related tasks can also contribute to leadership development because part of a leader’s role is to be an effective and innovative problem solver. The tasks that do most to foster development are those that are more complex and ambiguous than a person has faced previously. Starting a new activity for a firm, such as establishing a dealer network, exemplifies a developmental experience.
An extreme approach to developing leadership skills is to be assigned responsibility for an area in which you lack the appropriate skills or knowl- edge of the business. An example would be appointing an operations man- ager as the director of marketing. According to Matt Paese of Development Dimensions International, leadership ability is the most effective way of succeeding in areas where you lack technical expertise. Among the specific leadership skills would be consulting with people who have the necessary expertise and exuding self-confidence, yet not being arrogant.15
Broad Experience Many aspects of leadership are situational. A sound approach to improving leadership effectiveness is therefore to gain manage- rial experience in different settings. An aspirant to executive leadership is well advised to gain management experience in at least two different organi- zational functions, such as marketing and operations.
A widespread practice is to assign managers to cross-functional teams to give them experience in working with other disciplines. The more urgent the purpose of the team, the more likely meaningful leadership development will take place. Achieving broad experience fits well with the current emphasis on growth through learning new skills rather than a preoccupa- tion with vertical mobility. For example, more professionals today than in the past are willing to take a lateral move instead of a promotion if there is an opportunity to acquire new skills. For example, the manager of market research might be content to become a sales manager (a position at about the same level) in order to enhance his or her skill portfolio.
A particularly effective type of broad experience early in a career is to perform technical work in one’s specialty, and combine it with frontline supervision. A representative example is a person with a specialty in materi- als management who receives an assignment of managing order delivery technicians.
492 CHAPTER 15• LEADERSHIP DEVELOPMENT AND SUCCESSION
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
As implied by double-loop learning, experience is the most beneficial when the person extracts value from what is happening. People with this capability have the capacity to scan for new ideas, the intellectual skills to absorb them, and the practical intelligence to translate that new learning into productive action for customers and organizations.16 For example, the materials management supervisor just mentioned might spot a way to stack inventory to save enough space to avoid having to construct a new wing to the distribution center.
The leadership portfolio that you have been maintaining will help you capitalize on experience as a source of leadership development.
Mentoring Another experience-based way to develop leadership capability is to be coa- ched by an experienced, knowledgeable leader. Quite often this person is a mentor, a more experienced person who develops a protégé’s abilities through tutoring, coaching, guidance, and emotional support. Mentoring others is an important leadership responsibility. In some companies, every manager from the CEO on down is supposed to be an active mentor. The mentor, a trusted counselor and guide, is typically a person’s manager. However, a mentor can also be a staff professional or coworker. An emo- tional tie exists between the person mentored and the mentor. To personal- ize the subject of mentoring, test your attitudes toward the process by taking Leadership Self-Assessment Quiz 15-2.
Informal Versus Formal Mentoring Mentoring is traditionally thought of as an informal relationship based on compatibility or spark between two person- alities. In reality, employers often formally assign a mentor to a new employee to help him or her adjust well to the organization and to succeed. Belle Rose Ragins and John L. Cotton conducted a study comparing the effectiveness of informal versus formal mentoring programs for men and women.17 Three occupations were studied: engineering (male dominated), social work (female dominated), and journalism (gender integrated). Formal mentoring programs were used in all three of these occupations.
Protégés with informal mentors received greater benefits than protégés with formal mentors. Informal mentors were also perceived as more effec- tive. The protégés with informal mentors reported that their mentors pro- vided more career development and psychological and social support than protégés with formal mentors. Protégés with informal mentors also reported higher incomes. A possible explanation for these findings is that people who are able to attract their own mentor are more career-driven and have the type of interpersonal skills that help one earn a higher income.
Another approach to mentoring is shadowing, or directly observing the work activities of the mentor by following the person around for a stated period of time, such as one day per month. The protégé might be invited to strategy meetings, visits with key customers, discussions with union leaders, and the like. The protégé makes observations about how the mentor handles
DEVELOPMENT THROUGH EDUCATION, EXPERIENCE, AND MENTORING 493
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
situations, and a debriefing session might be held to discuss how and why certain tactics were used.
Online Mentoring Online, or virtual, mentoring is popular because sending e- mail messages and social media posts helps overcome barriers created by geography, limited time, and voice mail. Exchanges of tweets are popular for mentoring also because of the brevity and pointedness, such as a mentor sending this message to the person being mentored, “Good presentation this morning, but avoid getting defensive when questioned. Ask for clarification rather than getting angry.” Another positive feature of online mentoring is that the protégé might pose a career or work question to the mentor and receive a helpful reply that day. A major advantage of online mentoring is that it offers a wide pool of possible mentors and better matches between the mentor and the person mentored. Going online, you might be working in Chicago, yet have a good fit with a manager in San Francisco or London.
One innovation in online mentoring is websites that link mentors and mentored employees via profiling software, modeled after dating websites. Another innovation is virtual mentoring that makes face-to-face contact
LEADERSHIP SELF-ASSESSMENT QUIZ 15-2
My Attitudes Toward Mentoring
Instructions: Answer “Generally Agree” or “Generally Disagree” to the following ten statements.
GENERALLY AGREE
GENERALLY DISAGREE
1. Many times in life I have taught useful skills to younger family members or friends. □ □
2. Few people would be successful if somebody else had not given them a helping hand. □ □
3. I would enjoy (or have enjoyed) being a Big Brother or Big Sister. □ □
4. Experienced workers should be willing to show the ropes to less experienced workers. □ □
5. I would like to be considered a good role model for others in my field. □ □
6. I have very little concern that if I shared my knowledge with a less experienced person, he or she would replace me.
□ □
7. At least one of my teachers has been an inspirational force in my life. □ □
8. I am willing to drop what I am doing to help somebody else with a work or study problem.
□ □
9. I am willing to share my ideas with others, even if I do not receive any credit. □ □
10. Helping others contributes toward becoming immortal. □ □
Scoring and Interpretation: This quiz does not have a precise scoring key. However, the more of the statements that you agree with, the more likely you have the proper mental set to be a mentor.
Source: DUBRIN, ANDREW J., COACHING & MENTORING SKILLS NETEFFECT SERIES, 1st Edition, © 2005. Reprinted by permission of Pearson Education, Inc., Upper Saddle River, NJ
494 CHAPTER 15• LEADERSHIP DEVELOPMENT AND SUCCESSION
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
rare. With one system, an employee searching for a mentor logs onto an intranet and enters up to three career interests or skills he or she wants to develop. Video transmissions, such as webcams and Skype, can also be effective for mentoring.
Despite the efficiency advantage of online mentoring, some face-to-face contact with a mentor is recommended to help keep the relationship vibrant. Can you imagine somebody recommending you for promotion after having communicated with you exclusively by e-mail and a website?
Effective Mentoring Behaviors Because many mentors are leaders, effective mentors are likely to engage in many of the behaviors of effective leaders described throughout this book. Interviews with professionals in service firms, such as consultancies and accounting firms, suggest that the follow- ing behaviors in particular are characteristic of a good mentor:
• Highly credible, and whose integrity shows through whether the message delivered is positive or negative
• If necessary, will tell you things you do not want to hear, but listens to you
• Interacts with you in a way that makes you want to improve your effectiveness
• Makes you feel secure enough to be willing to take risks • Helps boost your self-confidence enough to put aside your inner doubts
and fears • Encourages you to set stretch goals for yourself • Presents opportunities and points to challenges you might not have seen
on your own • Instead of giving a definitive answer to your problem, shares a way of
thinking about a problem you may not have thought about18
The behaviors just listed are examples of contributions by a mentor that can assist the protégé develop as a leader.
Impact on Leadership Mentors enhance the career of protégés in many ways, such as by recommending them for promotion and helping them establish valuable contacts. High-level leaders sometimes use mentors as a way of obtaining useful feedback. Coaching can be a component of mentoring. Mentors demonstrating a high level of involvement tend to coach appren- tices on how they handle certain leadership assignments. The mentor is usually not physically present when the protégé is practicing leadership. An important role for a mentor is to coach and guide the person being men- tored on leadership situations the person is facing or will be facing. Jeff Immelt, the CEO of General Electric explains how a former mentor guided him in an aspect of strategic leadership:
I started my career selling plastic in Detroit and my first boss was a sales manager, a guy named Pat Bayes, and he was awesome. He really taught me how to see the company through the eyes of the marketplace and through customers. He told me
DEVELOPMENT THROUGH EDUCATION, EXPERIENCE, AND MENTORING 495
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
to have a healthy skepticism of headquarters, which I still have today. I think there’s value in the CEO having a healthy skepticism of what corporate people do. He taught me in a constructive way how to be agnostic about corporates and see the company through the eyes of the customer. I still carry that with me today.19
A challenge in having a strong mentor is to at some point graduate from mentorship. Your mentor may have given you credibility and connections for a long time, but at some point you have to emerge from the shelter of that shadow in order to be perceived as a leader with your own strengths. Detaching yourself from a strong mentor is often facilitated by a few accom- plishments of your own, outside your mentor’s jurisdiction.20
A study conducted with 260 graduate business students and information systems students provides evidence that mentoring can impact a person’s leadership behaviors. Approximately 80 percent of the students held full- time positions while attending school. The results of the study indicated that participants who had a mentor had slightly more political skill than did participants without a mentor. The presence of a mentor, in general, did not have an impact on leadership self-efficacy. (Political skill and self- efficacy were measured by questionnaires rather than by observing the par- ticipants in action.) Yet having a higher-quality mentoring relationship was associated with significantly higher leadership self-efficacy but not with increased political skill.21 An important implication of this study is that hav- ing a good mentor can help a person develop leadership self-efficacy but might not further enhance political skill.
The Importance of Having More than One Mentor Having a backup mentor is important because mentoring relationships are often fragile, and problems can occur. One potential problem is that the mentor might perceive the pro- tégé to be a rival and therefore attempt to damage the latter’s career through such means as badmouthing. A more common problem is that the mentor may wind up neglecting the protégé because the former becomes preoccupied with his or her own job responsibilities. Having more than one mentor at a time helps alleviate both problems.22
Kate Mitchell, a venture capitalist, uses the term composite mentor to refer to a collection of people you draw lessons from, including enhancing strategic thinking and creativity. A composite mentor is important because challenges typically evolve. Relying on multiple sources enables you to zero in on the best advice for different situations.23
Leadership Development Programs
A time-honored strategy for developing prospective, new, and practicing lea- ders is to enroll them in leadership development programs. Many manage- ment development programs are also aimed at leadership development. The difference, however, is that management development programs offer courses that cover hundreds of topics within the functions of planning, organizing,
496 CHAPTER 15• LEADERSHIP DEVELOPMENT AND SUCCESSION
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
controlling, and leading. About 32 percent of all money spent on employee training and development is invested in leadership training and develop- ment.24 Table 15-2 lists a sample of leadership development programs.
An analysis conducted by Fortune concluded that no matter what busi- ness a company is in, the real business is building leaders. Without a cadre of effective current and future leaders, a company would lose its competi- tive edge. Part of the reason is that leaders are either responsible for provid- ing innovative ideas or for creating the conditions that foster innovation (refer back to Chapter 11). One of the forces compelling companies to develop leaders is the world economy’s shift from dependency on financial capital toward human capital. The general picture of developing leaders is to make such development part of the culture, including mentoring and offering constructive feedback on performance.25 The more specific picture of leadership development is presented next.
Developing and training leaders is far more complex than merely sending aspiring leaders to a one-week seminar. The leadership development pro- gram has to be appropriately sponsored, carefully designed, and profes- sionally executed. Although online learning supplements other forms of leadership development, face-to-face interaction with other leaders and
TABLE 15-2 A Sampling of Leadership Development Programs Offered by Universities and Training and Development Firms
High-Performance Leadership
The Executive Program (four-week program for senior executives involved in the strategic management of their firms)
Transforming Your Leadership Strategy
Reinventing Your Business Strategy
Business Ethics for the Professional Manager
The Disney Approach to Leadership Excellence
Leading Change and Innovation
Building Better Work Relationships
Implementing Successful Organizational Change
Managing People for Maximum Performance
Building Leadership Capital
Developing Exemplary Leaders: Key Practices for Achieving Results
The Voice of Leadership: How Leaders Inspire, Influence, and Achieve Results
The People Side of Great Business
Capitalizing on Social Media for Marketing and Internal Communications
Executive Program in Corporate Strategy
Note: Organizations offering such seminars and courses are the Wharton School of the University of Pennsylvania, the University of Michigan Business School, the University of Chicago Graduate School of Business, the Cornell University School of Industrial and Labor Relations, the Massachusetts Institute of Technology, MIT Sloan School of Manage- ment, the Center for Creative Leadership, the Center for Management Research, the American Management Associa- tion, Dale Carnegie Training, the World Business Forum, Stanford Executive Briefings and DVD Programs, and the Disney Institute.
© Ce ng ag e Le ar ni ng
LEADERSHIP DEVELOPMENT PROGRAMS 497
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
course presenters will most likely remain popular. Leadership development programs for C-level executives are unlikely to be conducted online because executives believe that face-to-face contact with professors and other execu- tives is an important part of the learning process.
Types of Leadership Development Programs In practice, the various programs for developing leaders often overlap. For ease of comprehension, we divide these programs into six categories: feedback-intensive programs, those based on skills, conceptual knowledge and awareness, socialization, action learning, and coaching and psychother- apy. We also comment on the effectiveness of leadership development.
Feedback-Intensive Programs As implied at many places in this text, an important vehicle for developing as a leader is to obtain feedback on vari- ous aspects of your behavior. A feedback-intensive development program helps leaders develop by seeing more clearly their patterns of behaviors, the reasons for such behaviors, and the impact of these behaviors and attitudes on their effectiveness. Such a program also helps leaders or potential lea- ders find more constructive ways of achieving their goals.
An instructive point about feedback-intensive programs, as well as practi- cally all forms of leadership development, is that the person being devel- oped needs to follow up. If you learn that you tend to shut people off with an angry smirk on your face, unless you practice removing that smirk, you have not gained much from the feedback. In the words of leadership coach Marshall Goldsmith, “If you go to a class and don’t do any follow-up, it’s a complete waste of time.”26
Skill-Based Programs Skill training in leadership development involves acquiring abilities and techniques that can be converted into action. Acquir- ing knowledge precedes acquiring skills, but in skill-based training the emphasis is on learning how to apply knowledge. A typical example would be for a manager to develop coaching skills, so he or she can be a more effective face-to-face leader. Skills training, in short, involves a considerable element of how to.
Five different methods are often used in skill-based leadership training: lecture, case study, role play, behavioral role modeling, and simulations. Because the first three methods are quite familiar, only the last two are described here. Behavioral role modeling is an extension of role playing and is based on social learning theory. You first observe a model of appropriate behavior, and then you role-play the behavior and gather feedback. A per- son might observe a video of a trainer giving positive reinforcement, then role-play giving positive reinforcement. Finally, the classroom trainer and the other participants would offer feedback on performance.
Simulations give participants the opportunity to work on a problem that simulates a real organization. In a typical simulation, participants receive a computerized packet of information about a fictitious company.
498 CHAPTER 15• LEADERSHIP DEVELOPMENT AND SUCCESSION
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
The participants are given details such as the organization chart, the com- pany’s financial status, descriptions of the various departments, and key problems facing the organization and/or organizational units. Participants then play the roles of company leaders and devise solutions to the problems. During the debriefing, participants receive feedback on the content of their solutions to problems and the methods they used. The group might be told, for example, “Your decision to form a strategic alliance was pretty good, but I would have liked to have seen more group decision making.”
According to simulation developer and founder of the online training company, Enspire Learning, Bjorn Billhardt, the most effective training involves competition. He says that having teams go up against each other is a powerful motivator for people to test and hone their skills. Another advan- tage of simulations for leadership training is that making mistakes and learning from a simulation is better than failing in the outside world. An energy management company executive says his company uses Enspire to train employees who are moving into supervisory roles. The simulations give these employees an opportunity to develop leadership skills.27
Simulations are also used to give managers the opportunity to work on problems that approximate those faced by the company. For example at Macy’s Leadership Institute in Cincinnati, Ohio teams of four or five middle managers tackle problems such as contending with an underperforming juniors department.28
Conceptual Knowledge and Awareness Programs A standard university approach to leadership development is to equip people with a conceptual understanding of leadership. The concepts are typically supplemented by experiential activities such as role playing and cases. Conceptual knowledge is very important because it alerts the leader to information that will make a difference in leadership. For example, if a person studies how a leader brings about transformations, he or she can put these ideas into practice. Table 15-2 presents examples of the types of conceptual knowledge con- tained in leadership development programs. One of the reasons for the con- tinuing acceptance of university-based conceptual knowledge programs for leadership development is that these programs often address topics of immediate concern to business. For example, programs have been devel- oped in recent years to help managers provide leadership in using social media to the company’s advantage.
Socialization Programs From the company standpoint, an essential type of leadership development program emphasizes becoming socialized—becom- ing acclimated to the company and accepting its vision and values. Senior executives make presentations in these programs because they serve as role models who thoroughly understand the vision and values participants are expected to perpetuate.29 Many of the other types of programs presented so far also include a segment on socialization, particularly in the kickoff ses- sion. Quite frequently, the chief executive makes a presentation of the com- pany’s vision and values. An important purpose of a socialization program
LEADERSHIP DEVELOPMENT PROGRAMS 499
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
is to help leaders sustain the organizational culture, such as placing a high priority on honest dealing with each other and customers.
Action Learning Programs A directly practical approach to leadership devel- opment is for leaders and potential leaders to work together in groups to solve organizational problems outside their usual sphere of influence. You will recall that action learning is part of the learning organization, as described in Chapter 13. Much of the development relates to problem solv- ing and creativity, yet collaborating with a new set of people from your firm can also enhance interpersonal skills.
A few years ago, executives at Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co, decided to change the business from a volume tire supplier to one that focused on market segments, such as tires for construction equipment. A deep leader- ship bench was required to bring about these changes. An action learning format was included in developing the necessary number of leaders. (Other aspects of the leadership development program included virtual learning overseen by a business school professor.) Program participants identified areas they wanted to learn more about, and found learning partners to assist them. The executive team developed the learning projects by identify- ing real business issues. High-impact projects were chosen, including a cost- reduction plan that had a major impact on the supply chain. One measure of the success of the program is that within a year after the program began, one half of the members received new assignments or increased responsibil- ities, and 22 percent received promotions.30
A variation on action learning for leadership development is to assign managers to socially responsible projects that are not part of company operations. Natural Cosmeticos of Brazil sends managers to work full time organization and building nongovernmental organizations, such as hospi- tals, clinics, and community centers. The responsibility helps develop lead- ership skills as well as a first-hand view of the importance of social responsibility.31
Coaching and Psychotherapy Executive coaching as described in Chapter 10 is clearly a form of leadership development because the managers coached receive advice and encouragement in relation to their leadership skills. A coach, for example, might advise a leader that giving more recognition for good performance would make him a more dynamic leader. Coaching is perhaps the most direct approach to leadership development because the person might be able to improve in an area that is preventing him or her from becoming a leader, or blocking further progress as a leader.
Leadership coach Julie Cohen describes how she helped an SAP sales sup- port executive move into a new leadership role by reshaping his image of being quiet and reflective. He was encouraged to present himself as an innovator and expert on public sector clients. Cohen suggested that he pro- mote himself and his skills rather than assuming “people would see his ability and tap him on the shoulder.” The client advanced so rapidly in his interper- sonal skills that an SAP executive commented, “I barely recognized him.”32
500 CHAPTER 15• LEADERSHIP DEVELOPMENT AND SUCCESSION
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
Another highly personal way of enhancing leadership effectiveness is to undergo treatment for emotional problems that could be blocking leader- ship effectiveness. For example, a leader who has difficulty giving recogni- tion might not improve in response to coaching. The person might have underlying problems of being so hostile toward people that he or she really does not want to boost their morale. Psychiatrist Kerry Sulkowicz notes that change from psychotherapy does not always take place quickly. How- ever, executives are accustomed to getting quick results, which can make them highly motivated patients.33
In general, leaders who score low on the personality dimension of emo- tional stability might become more effective in their interpersonal relation- ships with the benefit of psychotherapy. Some of the bizarre behavior exhibited by executives, such as swearing at and belittling subordinates, sex- ually harassing subordinates, and arbitrarily firing workers, are symptoms of emotional instability. The hostility is often directed at people who dis- agree with them, even about technical and design issues.
Evaluation of Leadership Development Programs Many companies evaluate their leadership development programs to see if they are cost effective. In a large company, for example, a comparison would be made of the ratings from superiors and subordinates for those leaders who participated in the program versus those who did not. Another method of evaluating the out- come of a leadership development program would be to compare the finan- cial results of participants versus nonparticipants.
According to a leadership development benchmarking survey of 329 orga- nizations around the globe, about 75 percent of organizations said their leadership development programs are not very effective. Yet the satisfaction with the programs was high under certain conditions: A specific leadership development strategy was in place; the financial investment in leadership development is substantial; and the leadership development program has been in existence five years or longer34
The accompanying Leader in Action insert illustrates the extensive involvement a company might have in leadership development.
Leadership Succession
In a well-managed organization, replacements for executives who quit, retire, or are dismissed are chosen through leadership succession, an orderly process of identifying and grooming people to replace managers. Succession planning is vital to the long-term health of an organization, and therefore an important responsibility of senior leadership. Instead of engag- ing in a flurry of activity after a key person leaves the organization, the planning is done in an orderly way over time. Despite the importance of succession planning, only 23 percent of organizations responding to a Society for Human Resource survey reported having a succession plan in place for the CEO position.35
LEADERSHIP SUCCESSION 501
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
LEADER IN ACTION
Leadership at Hilton Worldwide Commits Heavily to Leadership Development
Company leadership at Hilton Worldwide believes it is essential that its leaders and team members have the requisite skills and knowledge to carry out their jobs effectively, and the ability to grow professionally and per- sonally. To achieve these ends, Hilton Worldwide offers a wide selection of learning opportunities ranging from on- the-job training to management development programs and learning seminars.
At the Leadership College, senior leaders participate in executive and leadership development programs and experiences to help Hilton Worldwide attain a steady, best-in-class pipeline of company leaders. Executive coaching is also available to Hilton Worldwide senior lea- ders who want an opportunity to test out ideas, while gaining better self-insight. Coaching offers feedback and guidance on the spot, helping leaders utilize their strengths and enhance their skills.
A key part of the leadership development program at Hilton Worldwide is partnerships with universities, includ- ing Harvard and Cornell. Harvard Business Publishing and Hilton Worldwide establish a multiyear agreement to provide the Leadership College with a number of programs including Harvard ManageMentor®, an online resource for management essentials. Ray Carvey, an executive vice president at Harvard Business Publishing, said, “Great Leaders are integral to Hilton Worldwide’s outstanding reputation for quality and providing excep- tional guest experiences. We are proud to partner with them on this important initiative.”
eCornell and Hilton Worldwide established a partner- ship to offer a selection of online learning opportunities in hospitality management, revenue management, and strategic leadership to Hilton senior executives and hotel general managers. The Cornell University School of Hotel Administration also contributes to these pro- grams. Matt Schuler, Chief Human Resources Officer, Hilton Worldwide, said, “With a network of more than
3,800 hotels across 88 countries, our business leaders can now access a wide variety of training courses online through eCornell which is both convenient and cost- effective for us.”
The leadership development programs at Hilton Worldwide include personalized attention to the needs and styles of individual leaders. As offered by the con- sulting firm TMBC, founded by Marcus Buckingham, indi- vidualized leadership styles are diagnosed using assessment devices based on algorithms. Advice and coaching is then offered to leaders based on their style. Some of these suggestions are delivered by apps. Here is a sample targeted advice: “Your leader- ship style is Connector, so here is a tip for you. Link your idea to the success of a coworker or customer. Show how your solution will increase his or her influence and control. Some people attempting this tactic might appear manipulative, but you will not.”
QUESTIONS
1. Why would a hotel chain (and also a housing complex developer) invest so heavily in leadership develop- ment and management training?
2. The consulting firm that develops the algorithms to assess leadership style and corresponding advice implies that the method is highly scientific. Yet, do you think the kind of individual advice offered is a little hokey, much like reading palms or tea leaves?
Source: Original story based on facts and observations in the follow- ing sources: Marcus Buckingham, “Leadership Development In the Age of the Algorithm,” Harvard Business Review, June 2012, pp. 86–94; “Advance Your Knowledge & Career,” Hilton Worldwide (http://jobs.hiltonworldwide.com), accessed January 24, 2014; “Hilton Worldwide and Harvard Business Publishing Partner to Develop a Word-Class Leadership Curriculum,” (http://news.hiltonworldwide .com), January 26, 2012, pp. 1–6; Hilton Worldwide Expands Leader- ship Development Training Partnership with eCornell,” (http://news .hiltonworldwide.com/), January 24, 2012.
502 CHAPTER 15• LEADERSHIP DEVELOPMENT AND SUCCESSION
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
Succession planning is linked to leadership development in two impor- tant ways. First, being groomed as a successor is part of leadership develop- ment. Second, the process of choosing and fostering a successor is part of a manager’s own development. Our approach to understanding the leadership aspects of succession focuses on five topics: (1) how the board chooses a new chief officer; (2) succession planning at GE and P&G; (3) the emotional aspects of leadership succession; (4) developing a pool of successors; and (5) promotion from within. Understanding these factors should lead to more success in new appointments to leadership positions.
How the Board Chooses a Successor A major responsibility of the board of directors is to select a successor to the chief executive, typically a CEO. The general approach is to follow stan- dard principles of human resource selection, such as thoroughly screening candidates, including speaking to several people who have worked with the individual. Conducting a background investigation to uncover any possible scandalous or illegal behavior is also important. When the successor is an outsider, boards consistently use executive search firms (also known as headhunters) to locate one or several candidates. Even when the board has an outside candidate in mind, a search firm might be hired to act as an intermediary.
George D. Kennedy, a person with experience on many boards, provides a few specifics of a representative approach to selecting an internal candidate for the top executive position. First, the information from a development pro- gram for successors must be carefully reviewed, including documentation of performance. Second, the board should have direct and regular contact with all of the promising candidates. Some of the contact should be formal; for example, the candidate should make regular presentations at board meetings. Informal connections are also important. Board members should invest the time to develop a feel for the personal chemistry of the candidates through such means as casual conversations over dinner and lunch.36
Whether selecting an insider or an outsider to succeed a given leader, the board is encouraged to obtain objective data about the candidate’s perfor- mance in addition to opinions about his or her effectiveness.37 Among these objective performance indicators would be profits, changes in stock price, new product introductions, employee turnover, and cost control.
Succession Planning at General Electric and Procter & Gamble General Electric is often noted for its progressive and thorough manage- ment techniques. Its system for identifying and developing talent is consid- ered exemplary. Leadership development is so important to the company that CEO Jeffrey Immelt reportedly invests 30 percent of his time to the process. GE-trained executives are in high demand at other business firms.
Much of this activity is linked closely to succession planning. Board members are closely involved in an ongoing evaluation of the company’s
LEADERSHIP SUCCESSION 503
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
130 highest-ranking managers. Twice a year, directors scrutinize about 15 of these people. The information they use comes from lengthy interviews with the managers, their managers, former associates, and group members. Directors investigate the managers’ strengths and weaknesses, make sugges- tions for leadership development, and discuss future assignments. Ruthless honesty in evaluating the performance of managers and the businesses they represent contributes to the succession planning. Should the day arrive when a manager must be chosen to replace a higher-level manager, the board will be prepared to make an independent decision rather than have to give automatic approval to an insider’s recommendations.38
Key advantages of the GE system for identifying successors are that it is based on multiple opinions and that it tracks longitudinal performance. Yet, the system may still be replete with political biases. The board members, for example, are not exempt from giving high ratings to the people they like the best or to people who have personal characteristics similar to theirs.
Another famous company, Procter & Gamble, has a rigorously developed succession program. Labeled Build from Within, it tracks the performance of every manager in great detail, making sure that he or she is ready for promotion. Each of the top fifty leadership positions has three replacement candidates in line. Most replacements are from within, helping reduce the 50 percent fail rate often attributed to promoting outsiders into key posi- tions. A key part of developing successors is to give high-potential managers broad experience, such as being the assistant manager for Cascade deter- gent, then taking on assignments in Canada and Asia.39
A key part of succession planning at P&G is for a high-level manager to identify likely successors. In 2013, A.G. Lafley came out of retirement to become CEO again at P&G because his own successor did not meet the board’s expectations. (You could argue that the well-known succession plan- ning system was not a total success.) One of Lafley’s top priorities was to prepare a lineup of P&G executives who could replace him. The company was reorganized into four sectors, each headed by a president who was most likely on the successor list.40
The Emotional Aspects of Leadership Succession Leadership succession should not be regarded as a detached, objective man- agement process. Even financially independent executives are likely to experi- ence an emotional loss when they are replaced; they might yearn for the power and position they once possessed. Leadership succession in family- owned firms is a highly emotional process for many reasons. Family members may fight over who is best qualified to take the helm, or the owner and founder may not feel that any family member is qualified. An intensely emo- tional situation exists when the owner would like a family member to succeed him or her, yet no family member is willing. The business may therefore have to be sold or simply abandoned; in any case, its identity will be lost.
The emotional aspects of leadership succession are also evident when a business founder is replaced by another leader, whether or not the
504 CHAPTER 15• LEADERSHIP DEVELOPMENT AND SUCCESSION
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
enterprise is a family business. After the sale of his or her company, the busi- ness founder often stays on in some capacity, perhaps as a consultant or chair. Watching the new owner manage the business can be uncomfortable for the founder. The issue transcends concerns about delegation. Entrepre- neurial leaders typically are emotionally involved in the firms they have founded and find it difficult to look on while somebody else operates the firm.
Emotional reactions to leadership succession also take place at the work- group level, as described in a theory developed by Gary A. Ballinger and F. David Schoorman. For example, when a departing leader is well liked by the group or team, it will be more difficult for the new leader to exert his or her authority or to be accepted. Another problem is that when the previous leader was well liked, turnover in the group will be higher and productivity might be lower. Yet, on the positive side, if the previous leader was disliked, turnover might be lower and productivity might be higher.41
Developing a Pool of Successors Developing a pool of successors goes beyond succession planning, which usually involves identifying one or two candidates for a specific job. The steps involved in developing a pool of successors (or succession manage- ment) follow:42
• Evaluate the extent of an organization’s pending leadership shortage. Planning should begin several years in advance of when the new leaders will be needed.
• Identify needed executive competencies based on the firm’s future busi- ness needs, values, and strategies.
• Identify high-potential individuals for possible inclusion in the pool, and assess these individuals to identify strengths and developmental needs to determine who will stay in the high-potential pool.
• Establish an individually tailored developmental program for each high- potential candidate that includes leadership development programs, job rotation, special assignments, and mentoring. Rising stars should be given the opportunity to change responsibilities every three to five years.
• Select and place people into senior jobs based on their performance, experience, and potential. While in these positions, the leaders should have access to board members including making presentations. The managers develop a sense of what matters to directors, and directors get to see firsthand the talent in the pipeline.
• Continuously monitor the program and give it top management support.
Developing a pool of candidates, therefore, combines evaluating potential with giving high-potential individuals the right type of developmental experiences. To the extent that these procedures are implemented, a leader- ship shortage in a given firm is less likely to take place.
To help preserve a strong pool of candidates for future assignments, financial services giant Aetna focuses on mentoring young managers with high potential. A specific program is that eight high-level Aetna managers,
LEADERSHIP SUCCESSION 505
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
including the chief executive, meet one-on-one with eight target candidates for an hour each month for a year. To qualify, the protégés must have at least a decade of experience at the company and have received high perfor- mance evaluations.43
Promotion from Within A continuing debate related to succession planning is whether a company should promote an insider or an outsider to a top position. Research and analysis suggest that promoting insiders with an outside perspective may be the best solution. Joseph Bower found in his analysis of 1,800 succes- sions that companies performed substantially better when they appointed insiders to CEO. Other researchers have reached similar conclusions. A study conducted by the consultancy Booz & Co. found that CEOs hired from outside a company are more than twice as likely to be dismissed as those promoted from within. A major problem is that the outsider often does not understand how to bring about change within the company.44
Promotion from within also offers the advantage of more hope to insiders because they believe they have more opportunity for advancement within their own company. Company insiders promoted to a top position know the company, its culture, and its people but often do not see clearly the need for radical change. Also, their many political ties may inhibit them from making some necessary personnel shifts. Outsiders may recognize the need for a new approach but may be limited because they do not understand the company culture or the industry. Bower recommends that companies nurture insider– outsiders—internal candidates who have developed an outside perspective.
Insider-outsiders are frequently those who have considerable experience away from the company mainstream (and away from headquarters), and experience in taking on challenging opportunities. Before being selected as CEO of Procter & Gamble, A. G. Lafley, for instance, worked for years building the Chinese cosmetics division of the company rather than P&G’s core business.45
A study indicated that board members who are appointed as CEO outper- formed other types of candidates because they represent a strong blend of insider and outsider. Board members have more company knowledge than a pure outsider. Yet, at the same time, they don’t have the constraints of a pure insider with respect to making politically unpopular decisions or bring about painful changes. For example, it is often difficult for an insider to lay off a well-liked but underperforming executive.46
Challenges of Being a New Leader
People participate in leadership development programs for two broad pur- poses: (1) preparing to become a leader for the first time, or (2) enhancing their leadership skills for a current position or advancement into more lead- ership responsibility. Everything that has been written in this book and
506 CHAPTER 15• LEADERSHIP DEVELOPMENT AND SUCCESSION
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
discussed in your leadership course fits these two broad purposes. Another way of preparing for becoming a leader for the first time is to think through some of the inevitable challenges in the role. The information about the rewards and frustrations of occupying a leadership role in Chapter 1 points to the challenges of occupying a formal leadership position for the first time. In addition, consider these five additional challenges for the first-time leader:
1. Uncertainty about how much time to spend leading versus doing individual tasks. From the first-level supervisor of entry-level workers to the chairperson of the board, leaders spend some time as individual contributors, including preparing budgets, thinking of ideas for new products, and making financial deals. As a new leader, you have to work with your manager and perhaps your direct reports to find the right balance between doing and leading.
2. Overcoming the resentment of the people in the group who wanted your leadership position. If you are selected from among the group to be the new leader, you will have to deal with the resentment and envy of several direct reports who wanted your position. It can be helpful to deal openly with the issue with such statements as, “I know that other people would be equally qualified to be the leader of the group. Yet management has chosen me for this position, at least for now. I respect your expertise, and I need your contribution. I also want your respect for me in my job as the chosen leader.”
3. Building relationships and fostering teamwork quickly enough. As a new leader, a high priority is to build constructive relationships with subordinates as quickly as possible, using many of the techniques described in Chapter 9. Several direct reports who were your former coworkers may attempt to manipulate you and take advantage of prior friendships to receive special treatment. It is essential to build a profes- sional, merit-based team climate as soon as possible. In the words of career coach Aya Fubara Eneli: “Friendships work best between equals. If you were already friends with some of the staff, expect those relation- ships to change. It’s difficult to be a friend while giving orders and judging performance.”47
4. Having realistic expectations about how much you can accomplish right away. The role of a leader/manager is not like that of a house painter—you typically do not see sparkling results right away. Patience is necessary. Many organizational leaders as well as elected officials proclaim, “Everything will be different from day one.” Leadership involves building relationships, so the process will take more time than the implied in the two previous statements.
5. Overcoming the need to be liked by everybody. The most admired lea- ders at every level are rarely liked by everybody. By the nature of their roles, leaders make decisions that not everybody agrees with. The changes you bring about may hurt the feelings of some people and jeopardize their positions. Your role is to establish and implement goals that will result in the greatest good.
CHALLENGES OF BEING A NEW LEADER 507
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
Leadership Skill-Building Exercise 15-1 may give you a few good insights into the type of leader you are becoming and how well you fit the role of a new or experienced leader.
SUMMARY
Leadership and management development are widely practiced in a variety of organizations and take many forms, including self-development. Self- awareness involves the insightful processing of feedback about oneself to improve personal effec- tiveness. Single-loop learning occurs when learners seek minimum feedback that may substantially con- front their basic ideas or actions. Double-loop learning occurs when people use feedback to con- front the validity of the goal or values implicit in the situation; it enables the leader to learn and profit from failure. A promising area of self- awareness is for leaders to recognize their standing on two key dimensions of leadership: forceful ver- sus enabling, and strategy versus operational.
Leadership development requires considerable self-discipline. For example, self-discipline is needed to monitor one’s behavior to ensure that the necessary self-development takes place.
Education, leadership experience, and mentor- ing are all major contributors to leadership deve- lopment. Most high-level leaders are intelligent,
well-informed people who gather knowledge throughout their career. The best experiences for leadership development are those that realistically challenge the manager. An important part of capi- talizing on challenging experiences is for the leader/ manager to be given leeway in how to resolve the problem. Two important aspects of leadership expe- rience are work associates and the task itself (such as a complex and ambiguous assignment). An extreme approach to developing leadership skills is to be assigned responsibility for an area in which you lack the appropriate skills or knowledge of the business.
Broad experience is important for leadership development, as suggested by membership on a cross-functional team. An effective type of broad experience early in a career is to perform technical work in one’s specialty, combined with frontline supervision. People who profit from their experi- ence have good potential for leadership.
Another experience-based way to develop leader- ship capability is to receive mentoring. Although
LEADERSHIP SKILL-BUILDING EXERCISE 15-1
Building for the Future
Our close-to-final skill-building exercise, the use of a feedback circle, encompasses many aspects of leader- ship covered in this and the previous fourteen chapters. Ten members of the class arrange their chairs in a circle. One person is selected as the feedback target, and the other nine people take turns giving him or her supportive feedback. Assume it is Linda’s turn. Each person in the circle gives Linda two pieces of feedback: (a) her best leadership attribute, and (b) how she needs to develop for the future. The feedback should take about thirty
seconds per feedback giver. After receiving input from all of the circle members, Linda is free to comment. It is then the next person’s turn to be the feedback target.
Class members who are not in the circle observe the dynamics of what is happening and report their observa- tions after the circle finishes. With diligence, the whole process will take about ninety minutes. If time permits, a new feedback circle can form. Alternatively, the class can break into several circles that operate simulta- neously, or run just one circle with ten volunteers.
508 CHAPTER 15• LEADERSHIP DEVELOPMENT AND SUCCESSION
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
usually an informal relationship, mentoring can also be assigned. A study showed that informal mentors typically were more helpful to a person’s career than formal mentors, and informal mentor- ing is also associated with higher income.
The human resource department often coordi- nates a formal mentoring program. Shadowing is a form of mentoring. Mentors enhance the career of protégés in many ways, such as by recommend- ing them for promotion and helping them establish valuable contacts. Also, the mentor can serve as a model for effective (or ineffective) leadership. Hav- ing more than one mentor is helpful because a men- toring relationship can fail.
Feedback-intensive development programs help leaders develop by seeing more clearly their pat- terns of behavior, the reasons for such behaviors, and the impact of these behaviors and attitudes on their effectiveness. Skill training in leadership development involves acquiring abilities and tech- niques that can be converted into action. Such training involves a considerable element of how to. Five methods of skill-based training are lecture, case study, role play, behavior role modeling, and simulations. During simulations, participants play the role of company leaders and devise solutions to problems. Simulations can also involve working on hypothetical company problems. Feedback on performance is provided.
A standard university approach to leadership development is to equip people with a conceptual understanding of leadership. The concepts can be applied to leadership situations. From the company standpoint, an essential type of leadership develop- ment is becoming socialized in the company vision and values. Action learning is a directly practical approach to leadership development and may be directed at areas outside the participant’s expertise.
Coaching and psychotherapy are two highly per- sonal ways of developing as a leader. Psychotherapy is called for when the leader has emotional pro- blems that lower his or her effectiveness.
Leadership succession is linked to leadership development because being groomed as a successor is part of a leader’s development. Boards of direc- tors use standard selection methods in choosing a CEO. In addition, they look for both formal and informal contact with insiders. When recruiting an outsider, organizations often employ executive search firms. General Electric and Procter & Gamble are examples of companies that use rigor- ous succession planning. Leadership succession is highly emotional for the leader who is being replaced, especially when a founder sells a business. The succession problem in a family business often leads to conflict among family members. Large family-run businesses are more likely to identify leadership successors. One way to cope with poten- tial shortages of leaders is to identify a pool of high-potential individuals and provide them with developmental experiences. Promotion from within to top-level leadership positions is often more effec- tive than recruiting an outsider. Research and anal- ysis suggest that promoting company insiders with an outside perspective may be the best solution to succession through an internal versus an external candidate.
One way of preparing for becoming a first-time leader is to think through some of the inevitable challenges in the role, including the following: uncertainty about how much time for leading ver- sus doing individual tasks; overcoming resentment of people who wanted your job; quickly building relationships and fostering teamwork; having real- istic expectations about quick accomplishments; and overcoming the need to be liked by everybody.
KEY TERMS
self-awareness 485 single-loop learning 485 double-loop learning 485 self-discipline 487
crucibles 491 mentor 493 shadowing 493
feedback-intensive develop- ment program 498
leadership succession 501
KEY TERMS 509
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
GUIDELINES FOR ACTION AND SKILL DEVELOPMENT
A major determinant of whether a person will develop as a leader later in life is the motivation to lead. Typically, this motivation develops early in life. The motivation is manifested in such activities as volunteering for leadership roles, as well as tak- ing the initiative to lead in sport, club, or neighbor- hood activities.48 It is therefore important to assume leadership roles in both work and personal life as early in your career as possible.
An important method for enhancing both the acceptance and the effectiveness of leadership devel- opment is needs analysis, the diagnosis of the needs for development. A needs analysis is based on the idea that there are individual differences among lea- ders and future leaders. For example, Jasmine might have excellent conceptual knowledge about leadership but limited team experience. Shemight be a good can- didate for outdoor training. Jordan might be an excel- lent team leader with limited conceptual knowledge. He might be a good candidate for a leadership devel- opment program concentrating on formal knowledge about leadership. Sources of data for assessing leader- ship developmental needs include the following:
1. Self-perceptions of developmental needs, including the results of many of the diagnostic instruments presented in this text
2. Perceptions by superiors, subordinates, and peers of the person’s developmental needs, including 360-degree survey results
3. Psychological evaluation of developmental needs
4. A statement of organizational needs for development, such as the importance of leaders who can deal effectively with diversity (within the company, with customers, and globally)
Multiple sources of data are useful because of pos- sible errors in perception, biases, and favoritism.
Discussion Questions and Activities
1. Assuming that you have the physical capabili- ties, would you be willing to participate in the
FDNY Firefighter for a Day Team Challenge as part of your leadership and teamwork skills development? Explain your logic.
2. Many business executives believe that playing team sports helps a person develop as a leader. Based on your knowledge of leadership devel- opment, where do you stand on this issue?
3. How might a leader make use of social media to obtain feedback on his or her leadership effectiveness?
4. Suppose you aspired to become a senior man- ager in a large company. How would working as an office supervisor, production supervisor, or manager in a quick-service restaurant help you achieve your goal?
5. Why is being a member of a cross-functional team considered to be helpful experience for a future leader?
6. According to the Corporate Productivity Insti- tute, companies whose leaders participated in a leadership development program experi- enced better customer satisfaction, more reve- nue growth, and reduced employee turnover. Why might have such good results come about?
7. Identify at least one developmental need with respect to leadership skills for the current pres- ident of the United States. Point to any specific behavior of the president that indicates the need for the particular development you spec- ify. (Attempt to be objective rather than politi- cal in your answer.)
8. What can you as a parent, future parent, or close relative do to help a child under ten years old become a leader later in life?
9. Ask an experienced leader what he or she thinks is the most effective method of develop- ing leadership skills. Bring your findings back to class.
10. Now that you have completed a course in leadership, what do you think of this ancient adage: “Leadership shouldn’t be a popularity contest.”?
510 CHAPTER 15• LEADERSHIP DEVELOPMENT AND SUCCESSION
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
LEADERSHIP CASE PROBLEM A
Malcolm Eyes the Executive Suite
Malcolm comes from a family whose members include many successful business executives, including his parents. Since he was a teenager, Malcolm has been fascinated with the prospects of becoming a corporate executive. In addition to more typical teenage interests, Malcolm would fre- quently read the business section of his local news- paper, The Wall Street Journal and Forbes. He also enthusiastically read biographies of business execu- tives including Warren Buffet, Henry Ford, and Martha Stewart.
Malcolm studied industrial engineering as an undergraduate, thinking that such a program would give him a solid base for understanding the operations of a business. He followed up his under- graduate degree with an MBA, with an emphasis on leadership and organizational behavior. Malcolm said to himself, his family, and friends repeatedly, “I know I have what it takes to get to the corner office.”
With first-rate interpersonal skills to match his solid education, Malcolm was well received by an on-campus recruiter for a major player in the high-tech field, a manufacturer of computer equip- ment and services. He was chosen to a manage- ment training program in which he would be given approximately one-year assignments in sev- eral business functions. His initial assignment was as a member of a team whose purpose was to help reduce the manufacturing costs of desktop computers.
Six weeks after being assigned to the team, Malcolm informed his team leader that he was devel- oping his skills in Mandarin Chinese, a language he had studied in college. As Malcolm explained to his team leader, “Chinese is going to help me because so much of our manufacturing is outsourced to China. And besides, a second language can only be an asset for a future executive leader.”
After about fifteen months on the team, Malcolm was appointed as the supervisor of an order fulfill- ment group within a distribution center of the com- pany within the same manufacturing complex. Upon
accepting the distribution center assignment, Mal- colm told his new manager, “I will do my best to be an outstanding performer here. But I am wondering if spending time in a distribution center will really enhance my credentials for becoming an executive in this company.”
Upon completing his eighteen-month supervi- sory assignment, Malcolm’s performance was eval- uated. His boss noted that his performance was slightly above average, but that he seemed a little too focused on his career ambitions and not focused enough on the good of the company. Malcolm’s next assignment was as a team leader of a logistics group that kept track of the flow of equipment that manufactured overseas. Given that about 80 percent of the company’s manufacturing was globally outsourced, logistics was highly valued at the company.
A few weeks after Malcolm began his new assignment, he met with his company assigned mentor, Jessica, a manufacturing executive. Asked how his work was going at the company, Malcolm replied: “Maybe you can help me. I’m enjoying my work, but I think that my career is inching along, when I should be making big strides. I would like to be assigned to a strategy team, or maybe a new product development team. In this way I would get the experience and the visibility I need to move more quickly into the corner office.”
Jessica responded, “Malcolm, I think highly of you, but your idea of career progress is old fash- ioned. You need to focus more on performance than promotion.”
Questions
1. In what way is this case about leadership development?
2. What would you recommend that Malcolm do to facilitate his path to an executive position?
3. To what extent do you think Jessica’s comment is justified?
LEADERSHIP CASE PROBLEM A 511
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
LEADERSHIP CASE PROBLEM B
ASSOCIATED ROLE PLAY One person plays the role of Malcolm who has arranged to have a brief meeting with Peter, the director of management and organization develop- ment at the company. Malcolm wants to plead his case that he has the potential to be an executive in the company. He wants to make sure that he is not
overlooked by the company. Peter listens but wants to avoid making any commitments to Malcolm. At the same time, Peter thinks that perhaps Malcolm is expecting too much too soon from the company. Observers might want to look for signs of leadership potential Malcolm displays during his interview.
Kaitlin the New Mentor
Kaitlin is the sales manager at a lumber supply com- pany, so successful in its geographic region that it employs 250 full-time workers, and 50 part-time. In addition to selling lumber to builders, the company also makes steps, doors, deck material, and molding. Kurt, the CEO, asked Kaitlin if she would mentor Misty, a newly hired marketing researcher. Kurt explained to Kaitlin that the marketing research position is vital to the future of the company. He believes that the market for the company’s main product line is leveling off, and that a market researcher might be able to explore new markets and product expansion for the company.
Kaitlin said that she was eager to mentor Misty because she thinks that the new market researcher has considerable potential to help the company. Kaitlin said, “I’ve already begun mentoring Misty, and she seems receptive.” Three days later, Kaitlin met with Misty for the first mentoring session. The session included the following comments by Kaitlin:
“Misty, as your official mentor, I want you to do the following things. First, dress more profes- sionally. It looks like you outfit yourself at stores for low-income people. I will recommend a few better stores for you in an e-mail. Second, I have a list of websites I want you to track every day. I have sent you an e-mail listing these sites because
they are excellent for picking up marketing trends. Third, I want you to spend at least one day a week out in field speaking to new potential users of our products.”
Three weeks later, Kaitlin sent Misty a text message saying, “Report back to me immediately on your progress. Send me a summary of your website searches. Also, send me a few photos of any new office clothing you have bought.”
Later that day, Kaitlin sent Misty a brief text message that stated, “Remember to focus on your daily work tasks. Don’t be a dreamer.”
During lunch with Pete, the company infor- mation systems administrator, he asked Misty how she enjoyed being mentored by Kaitlin. Misty responded, “Did you say being mentored or being smothered?”
Questions
1. What is your evaluation of the most likely effec- tiveness of Kaitlin’s approach to mentoring?
2. What recommendations would you make to Kaitlin to improve her mentoring effectiveness?
3. What do you recommend Misty do to profit more from the mentoring and leadership pro- vided by Kaitlin?
ASSOCIATED ROLE PLAY One student plays the role of Kaitlin who meets with Misty to discuss how well she is responding to her mentoring. Kaitlin is concerned that Misty is resisting her mentoring and leadership. One student plays the
role of Misty who feels that she is being microma- naged rather than mentored. Yet she does not want to offend her boss, and she believes that themarketing research position will be a great learning opportunity.
512 CHAPTER 15• LEADERSHIP DEVELOPMENT AND SUCCESSION
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
NOTES
LEADERSHIP SKILL-BUILDING EXERCISE 15-2
My Leadership Portfolio
The final entry for your leadership portfolio deals more with the future than the present. As you build your leadership career in either a formal or informal leadership position, update your journal from time to time, perhaps once a quarter. Review what experiences you have had that contribute to your development as a leader. Entries might take forms such as the following:
• In January, my company sent me to a seminar about dealing with difficult peo- ple. I came away with a few good insights about helping to turn around a difficult person, such as explaining how his or her behavior was hurting productivity and morale. I also learned that many difficult
people are crying out for attention, so I will try to pay more attention to a difficult per- son should I encounter one.
• We had a major flood in the area last week, and our office became inundated. We had to do something quick before we were damaged so badly that we could not serve our customers. Our supervisor was out of town. I called her on her cell phone and asked for her authorization to be in charge of organizing our salvage operation. I spearheaded an effort that helped salvage a lot of equipment and computer records. I think I really polished my crisis manage- ment skills.
LEADERSHIP SKILL-BUILDING EXERCISE 15-3
Analyzing a Local Leader
As an individual or group project, identify a leader in your community who you would like to analyze from the standpoints of strengths, weaknesses, and needs for development. Among the possibilities of a leader to analyze would be a prominent business person, the president of your learning institution, or an athletic coach. Use information from any- where in the text, plus your own thoughts, to
identify both the positive and negative personal characteristics, along with the developmental needs of this particular leader.
If this is a group project, look to see if there is any consistency across groups with respect to the traits, behaviors, and developmental needs of the leader cho- sen. If you think the analysis is constructive, you might send a copy to the leader in question.
1. Original story created from facts and observations presented in the following sources: Greg Pfeifer and Preston Cline, “Firefighters for a Day: Training with the New York City Fire Department,” Wharton Leadership (http://wharton.upenn.edu) © 2013 The Wharton School, University of Pennsylvania; “FDNY Firefighter for a Day Team Challenge,” New York City Fire Department (www.nyc.gov/events), 2011;
“FDNY Firefighter for a Day Team Challenge,” FDNY Foundation (www.fdnyfoundation.org), 2011; Garry Kranz, “Special Report: Leadership Development, From Fire Drills to Funny Skills,” Workforce Management, May 2011, pp. 28–29.
2. Ronit Kark, “Games Managers Play: Play as a Form of Leadership Development,” Academy of Management Learning & Education, vol.10, no. 3, September 13, 2011, p. 507.
NOTES 513
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
3. Study cited in “Succession Planning Orientation Guide,” Workforce Management, March 2013, p. 21.
4. Scott N. Taylor, Mo Wang, and Yujie Zhan, “Going Beyond Self-Other Rating Comparison to Measure Leader Self-Awareness,” Journal of Leadership Studies, vol. 6, no. 2, 2012, p. 7.
5. Robert Hogan and Rodney Warrenfeltz, “Educating the Modern Manager,” Academy of Management Learning and Education, March 2003, p. 74.
6. Chris Argyris, “Teaching Smart People How to Learn,” Harvard Business Review, May–June 1991, pp. 99–109; Chris Argyris, “Double-Loop Learning, Teaching, and Research,” Academy of Management Learning and Education, vol. 1, no. 2, December 2002, p. 206.
7. Bob Kaplan and Rob Kaiser, The Versatile Leader: Make the Most of Your Strengths— Without Overdoing It (San Francisco: Pfeiffer, 2006).
8. Roseanne J. Foti, Bethany C. Bray, Nicole J. Thompson, and Sarah F. Allgood, “Know Thyself, Know Thy Leader: Contributions of a Pattern-Oriented Approach to Examining Leader Perceptions,” The Leadership Quarterly, August 5, 2012, p. 703.
9. Rita Pyrillis, “Programs Help Women Take the Lead,” Workforce Management, January 2011, p. 3.
10. Cited in Jared Sandberg, “Cubicle Culture: Why Learn and Grow on the Job? It’s Easier to Feign Infallibility,” The Wall Street Journal, January 22, 2008, p. B1.
11. Morgan W. McCall, “Leadership Development Through Experience,” Academy of Management Executive, August 2004, pp. 127–130; Jean Martin and Conrad Schmidt, “How to Keep Your Top Talent,” Harvard Business Review, May 2010, p. 58.
12. “How Great Leaders Benefit from Failure,” Manager’s Edge, November 2004, p. 3; Steven Snyder, Leadership and the Art of the Struggle: How Great Leaders Grow through Challenge and Adversity (San Francisco: Berrett-Koehler Publishers, 2013).
13. Robert J. Thomas, “Life’s Hard Lessons,” HR Magazine, June 2008, p. 143.
14. Richard L. Hughes, Robert C. Ginnett, and Gordon J. Curphy, Leadership: Enhancing the
Lessons of Experience (New York: McGraw- Hill/Irwin, 2006), pp. 58–61.
15. Joann S. Lublin, “Leadership Skills Ease Stressful Promotion to Uncharted Area,” The Wall Street Journal, July 3, 2007, p. A7.
16. Douglas A. Ready, Jay A. Conger, and Linda A. Hill, “Are You a High Potential?” Harvard Business Review, June 2010, p. 82.
17. Belle Rose Ragins and John L. Cotton, “Mentor Functions and Outcomes: A Comparison of Men and Women in Formal and Informal Mentoring Relationships,” Journal of Applied Psychology, August 1999, pp. 529–550. Similar observations are reported by Kathy Kram in Jared Sandberg, “With Bad Mentors, It’s Better to Break Up Than to Make Up,” The Wall Street Journal, March 18, 2008, p. B1.
18. Thomas J. DeLong, John J. Gabarro, and Robert J. Lees, “Why Mentoring Matters in a Hypercompetitive World,” Harvard Business Review, January 2008, p. 117; “The Give and Take of Mentoring,” The Wall Street Journal, May 23, 2013, p. B5.
19. “GE’s Jeff Immelt on Leadership, Global Risk and Growth,” Knowledge@Wharton (http:// knowledge.wharton.upenn.edu/), April 30, 2013, p. 3.
20. Lublin, “Protégé Finds Mentor Gave Her a Big Boost, but Shadow Lingers,” The Wall Street Journal, September 7, 2004, p. B1.
21. Suzzette M. Chopin, Steven J. Danish, Anson Steers, and Joshua N. Hook, “Effects of Mentoring on the Development of Leadership Self-Efficacy and Political Skill,” Journal of Leadership Studies, no. 3, 2013, pp. 17–32.
22. Dawn E. Chandler and Lillian Eby, “When Mentoring Goes Bad,” The Wall Street Journal, May 24, 2010, p. R3.
23. Cited in “The Give and Take of Mentoring,” The Wall Street Journal, p. B5.
24. Lorri Freifeid, “Survey: Leadership Programs Lack Effectiveness,” Training (www. trainingmag.com), September 30, 2013, p. 2.
25. Geoff Colvin, “Leader Machines,” Fortune, October 1, 2007, pp. 98, 101–102.
26. Quoted in Jared Sandberg, “The Sensitive Me,” The Wall Street Journal, April 11, 2006, p. B1.
27. Lori Hawkins, “Using Role-Playing to Create Real-Word Success,” Austin American Statesman, January 14, 2014.
514 CHAPTER 15• LEADERSHIP DEVELOPMENT AND SUCCESSION
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
28. Rachel Feintzberg, “Building Middle Manager Morale: Inspiring the Ranks via International Trips, Computer Simulations, and Roller- Coaster Rides.” The Wall Street Journal, August 8, 2013, p. B1.
29. Jay A. Conger and Beth Benjamin, Building Leaders: How Successful Companies Develop the Next Generation (San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 1999), p. 79; Conger, “Can We Really Train Leadership,” www.strategy-business.com, 2006.
30. Gary Vander Lind and Amy Alexy, “All for Tomorrow’s Leaders,” HR Magazine, August 2013, pp. 27–28.
31. “How 4 Top Companies Mold Leaders,” Executive Leadership, June 2010, p. 1.
32. Sue Shellenbarger, “Career Makeover: Shaking Off a Shy Image,” The Wall Street Journal, January 15, 2014, p. D3.
33. Cited in Carol Hymowitz, “More CEOs Seek Psychotherapy,” The Wall Street Journal, June 22, 2004, pp. B1, B3.
34. Lorri Freifeid, “Survey: Leadership Programs Lack Effectiveness,” Training (www .trainingmag.com), September 30, 2013, pp. 1–3.
35. Todd Henneman, “Most Companies Err on Prepping Heir Apparents,” Workforce Management, January 2012, pp. 8–9.
36. Jay W. Lorsch and Rakesh Khurana, “Changing Leaders: The Board’s Role in CEO Succession,” Harvard Business Review, May– June 1999, p. 100.
37. Henneman, “Most Companies Err on Prepping Heir Apparents,” p. 8.
38. Linda Grant, “GE: The Envelope, Please,” Fortune, June 26, 1995, pp. 89–90; George Anders, “When Filling Top Jobs Inside Makes Sense—And When It Doesn’t,” The Wall Street Journal, January 16, 2006, p. B1; Bill Conaty and Ram Charon, The Talent Masters: Why
Smart Leaders Put People Before Numbers (New York: Crown Business, 2010). Fay Hansen, “Training the Top at GE,” Workforce Management, June 9, 2008, p. 26.
39. Mina Kimes, “P&G’s Leadership Machine,” Fortune, April 13, 2009, p. 22.
40. Joann S. Lublin and Serena Ng, “At P&G. Race Starts for Lafley’s Successor,” The Wall Street Journal, May 31, 2013, p. B1.
41. Gary A. Ballinger and F. David Schoorman, “Individual Reactions to Leadership Succession in Workgroups,” Academy of Management Review, January 2007, pp. 118–136.
42. William C. Byham, “Grooming Next- Millennium Leaders,” HR Magazine, February 1999, pp. 46–50; Joseph Weber, “The Accidental CEO,” BusinessWeek, April 23, 2007, p. 068; Henneman, “Most Companies Err on Prepping Heir Apparents,” p. 8.
43. Victoria Barret, “Talent Search,” Forbes, March 1, 2010, p. 26.
44. Joseph L. Bower, “Solve the Succession Problem by Growing Inside-Outside Leaders,” Harvard Business Review, November 2007, pp. 90–96.
45. Study reported in Leslie Kwoh, “Chief Executives Hired Internally Outlast, Outperform Their Rivals,” The Wall Street Journal, May 30, 2012, p. B8.
46. James M. Citrin and Dayton Ogden, “Succeeding at Succession,” Harvard Business Review, November 2010, pp. 29–31.
47. Quoted in Sonja D. Brown, “Congratulations, You’re a Manager, Now What?” Black Enterprise, April 2006, p. 104.
48. Ronald E. Riggio and Michael D. Mumford, “Introduction to the Special Issue: Longitudinal Studies of Leadership Development,” The Leadership Quarterly, June 2011, p. 454.
NOTES 515
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
GLOSSARY
NOTE: The number in brackets following each term refers to the chapter in which the term first appears.
Achievement motivation Finding joy in accom- plishment for its own sake. [2]
Assertiveness Forthrightness in expressing demands, opinions, feelings, and attitudes. [2] As a cultural value, the degree to which individuals are (and should be) assertive, confrontational, and aggressive in their relationships with one another. [14]
Apprising Influence tactic in which influence agent explains how carrying out a request or sup- porting a proposal will benefit the target personally, including advancing the target’s career. [8]
Authenticity Being genuine and honest about your personality, values, and beliefs, as well as having integrity. [2]
Autocratic leader A person in charge who retains most of the authority for himself or herself. [4]
Charisma A special quality of leaders whose purposes, powers, and extraordinary determination differentiate them from others. [3]
Coalition A specific arrangement of parties working together to combine their power. [8]
Coercive power The power to punish for non- compliance; power based on fear. [7]
Cognitive factors Problem solving and intellectual skills collectively. [2]
Commitment The most successful outcome of a leader’s influence tactic: The person makes a full effort. [8]
Compliance Partial success of an influence attempt by a leader: The person makes a modest effort. [8]
Co-opt To win over opponents by making them part of your team or giving them a stake in the system. [8]
Consensus leader The person in charge who encourages group discussion about an issue and then makes a decision that reflects general agree- ment and that group members will support. [4]
Consideration The degree to which the leader creates an environment of emotional support, warmth, friendliness, and trust. [4]
Consultative leader A person in charge who confers with group members before making a decision, but who retains the final authority to make decisions. [4]
Contingency approach to leadership The con- tention that leaders are most effective when they make their behavior contingent upon situational forces, including group member characteristics. [5]
Cooperation theory A belief in cooperation and collaboration rather than competitiveness as a strategy for building teamwork. [9]
Core self-evaluations A broad personality trait that captures bottom-line self-assessment, com- posed of self-esteem, locus of control, generalized self-efficacy, and emotional stability. [2]
Corporate social responsibility Responsibility of the organization that is part of external engage- ment, or the efforts a company makes to manage its relationship with the external world. [6]
Creativity The production of novel and useful ideas. [11]
Crisis leadership The process of leading group members through a sudden and largely unantici- pated, intensely negative, and emotionally draining circumstance. [5]
516 Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s).
Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
Cross-cultural training A set of learning experi- ences designed to help employees understand the customs, traditions, andbeliefs of another culture. [14]
Crowdsourcing The use of collective intelligence gathered from the public for accomplishing tasks, often by the use of social media. [13]
Crucibles Critical events and experiences that more often reflect failure than grand success. [15]
Cultural intelligence (CQ) An outsider’s ability to interpret someone’s unfamiliar and ambiguous ges- tures the way that person’s compatriots would. [14]
Cultural sensitivity An awareness of and a willingness to investigate the reasons why people of another culture act as they do. [14]
Debasement The act of demeaning or insulting oneself to control the behavior of another person. [8]
Delegation The assignment of formal authority and responsibility for accomplishing a specific task to another person. [7]
Democratic leader A person in charge who confers final authority on the group. [4]
Dependence perspective The point of view that a person accrues power by other being dependent on him or her for things they value. [7]
Diversity training A learning experience designed to bring about work-place harmony by teaching people how to get along better with diverse work associates. [14]
Double-loop learning An in-depth style of learning that occurs when people use feedback to confront the validity of the goal or the values implicit in the situation. [15]
Drive A propensity to put forth high energy into achieving goals and persistence in applying that energy. [2]
Effective leader One who helps group members attain productivity, including high quality and cus- tomer satisfaction, as well as job satisfaction. [4]
E-leadership A form of leadership practiced in a context where work is mediated by information technology. [9]
Emergent leader A group member who signifi- cantly influences another groupmember even though he or she has not been assigned formal authority. [1]
Emotional intelligence The ability to do such things as understand one’s feelings, have empathy
for others, and regulate one’s emotions to enhance one’s quality of life. [2]
Employee network (or affinity) group A group of employees throughout the company who affiliate on the basis of a group characteristic such as race, ethnicity, sex, sexual orientation, or physical ability status. [14]
Empowerment Passing decision-making authority and responsibility from managers to group members. [7]
Engagement The high levels of personal investment in the tasks performed on a job. [10]
Entitlement In relation to unethical behavior by executives, the idea that some CEOs lose their sense of reality and feel entitled to whatever they can get away with or steal. [6]
Ethical mind A point of view that helps the indi- vidual aspire to good work that matters to their colleagues, companies, and society in general. [6]
Ethics The study of moral obligations, or separating right from wrong. [6]
Evidence-based leadership or management The approachwherebymanagers translate principles based on best evidence into organizational practices. [5]
Executive coaching A one-on-one development process formally contracted between a coach and a management-level client to help achieve goals related to professional development and/or business performance. [10]
Expectancy An individual’s assessment of the probability that effort will lead to correct perfor- mance of the task. [10]
Expectancy theory A theory of motivation based on the premise that the amount of effort people expend depends on how much reward they can expect in return. [10]
Experience of flow An experience so engrossing and enjoyable that the task becomes worth doing for its own sake, regardless of the external consequences. [11]
Farsightedness The ability to understand the long-range implications of actions and policies. [2]
Feedback-intensive development program A learning experience that helps leaders develop by seeingmore clearly their patterns of behaviors, the reasons for such behaviors, and the impact of these behaviors and attitudes on their effectiveness. [15]
GLOSSARY 517
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
Flexibility The ability to adjust to different situations. [2]
Future orientation As a cultural value, the extent to which individuals engage (and should engage) in future-oriented behaviors such as delaying gratifi- cation, planning, and making investments for the future. [14]
Gender egalitarianism As a cultural value, the degree to which a culture minimizes, and should minimize, gender inequality. [14]
Global leadership skills The ability to exercise effective leadership in a variety of countries. [14]
Goal What a person is trying to accomplish. [10]
Hands-on leader A leader who gets directly involved in the details and process of operations. [8]
Humane orientation As a cultural value, the degree to which a society encourages and rewards, and should encourage and reward, individuals for being fair, altruistic, and caring others. [14]
Implicit leadership theories Personal assump- tions about the traits and abilities that characterize an ideal organizational leader. [8]
Influence The ability to affect the behavior of others in a particular direction. [8]
In-group collectivism As a cultural value, the degree to which individuals express, and should express, pride, loyalty, and cohesiveness in their organizations and families. [14]
Initiating structure Organizing and defining relationships in the group by activities such as assigning specific tasks, specifying procedures to be followed, scheduling work, and clarifying expecta- tions of team members. [4]
Innovation The process of creating new ideas and their implementation. [11]
Insight A depth of understanding that requires considerable intuition and common sense. [2]
Instrumentality An individual’s assessment of the probability that performance will lead to certain outcomes. [10]
Integrity Loyalty to rational principles, thereby practicing what one preaches, regardless of emotional or social pressure. [6]
Intergroup leadership Leading a number of teams within the organization. [9]
Knowledge management (KM) A concerted effort to improve how knowledge is created, delivered, and applied. [13]
Leader-member exchange (LMX) model An explanation of leadership proposing that leaders develop unique working relationships with group members. [9]
Leader political support Political acts and influence behaviors performed by leaders to provide followers with valuable resources to advance individual, group, or organizational objectives. [7]
Leadership The ability to inspire confidence and support among the people who are needed to achieve organizational goals. [1]
Leadership diversity The presence of a culturally heterogeneous group of leaders. [14]
Leadership effectiveness Attaining desirable outcomes such as productivity, quality, and satisfaction in a given situation. [1]
Leadership GridTM A framework for specifying the extent of a leader’s concern for the production and people. [4]
Leadership polarity The disparity in views of leaders: They are revered or vastly unpopular, but people rarely feel neutral about them. [3]
Leadership by storytelling The technique of inspiring and instructing group members by telling fascinating stories. [3]
Leadership style The relatively consistent pattern of behavior that characterizes a leader. [4]
Leadership succession An orderly process of identifying and grooming people to replace executives. [15]
Leading by example Influencing others by acting as a positive role model. [8]
Learning organization An organization that is skilled at creating, acquiring, and transferring knowledge and at modifying behavior to reflect new knowledge and insights. [13]
Legitimate power The lawful right to make a decision and expect compliance. [7]
Linguistic style A person’s characteristic speaking pattern. [12]
Machiavellians People in the work place who ruthlessly manipulate others. [8]
518 GLOSSARY
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
Management openness A set of leadership behaviors particularly relevant to subordinates’ motivation to voice their opinion. [4]
Making the rounds The leader casually dropping by constituents to listen to their accomplishments, concern, and problems and to share information. [12]
Meaningful work The feeling of doing work that matters or makes a difference. [10]
Mentor A more experienced person who develops a protégé’s abilities through tutoring, coaching, guidance, and emotional support. [15]
Micromanagement The close monitoring of most aspects of group member activities by the manager or leader. [9]
Moral identity The extent to which an individual holds morality as part of his or her self-concept.
Morals An individual’s determination of what is right or wrong influenced by his or her values. [6]
Multicultural leader A leader with the skills and attitudes to relate effectively to and motivate people across race, gender, age, social attitudes, and lifestyles. [14]
Multicultural worker A worker who is convinced that all cultures are equally good and enjoys learning about other cultures. [14]
Normative decision model A view of leadership as a decision-making process in which the leader examines certain factors within the situation to determine which decision-making style will be the most effective. [5]
Open-book management An approach to management in which every employee is trained, empowered, and motivated to understand and pursue the company’s business goals. [9]
Organizational politics Informal approaches to gaining power through means other than merit or luck. [7]
Outcome Anything that might stem from perfor- mance, such as a reward. [10]
Participative leader A person in charge who shares decision making with group members. [4]
Path-goal theory An explanation of leadership effectiveness that specifies what the leader must do to achieve high productivity and morale in a given situation. [5]
Performance orientation As a cultural value, the degree to which a society encourages (or should encourage) and rewards group member for performance improvement and excellence. [14]
Personal brand Your basket of strengths that makes you unique. [3]
Personal magnetism A captivating, inspiring personality with charm and charismatic-like qualities. [8]
Personal power Power derived from the person rather than from the organization. [7]
Personalized charismatic A charismatic leader who exercises few restraints on the use of power in order to best serve his or her own interests. [3]
Pet-peeve technique A method of brainstorming in which a group identifies all the possible complaints others might have about the group’s organizational unit. [11]
Positive psychological capital An individual’s positive psychological state of development, characterized by four psychological resources: self-efficacy, hope, optimism, and resilience. [7]
Power The potential or ability to influence decisions and control resources. [7]
Power distance As a cultural value, the degree to which members of a society expect, and should expect, power to be distributed unequally. [14]
Practical intelligence The ability to solve every- day problems by using experience-based knowledge to adapt to and shape the environment. [2]
Prestige power The power stemming from one’s status and reputation. [7]
Proactive personality A relatively stable tendency to effect environmental change. [2]
Pygmalion effect The situation that occurs when a managerial leader believes that a group member will succeed and communicates this belief without realizing it. [4]
Resistance The state that occurs when an influ- ence attempt by a leader is unsuccessful: The target is opposed to carrying out the request and finds ways to either not comply or do a poor job. [8]
Reward power The authority to give employees rewards for compliance. [7]
Self-awareness Insightfully processing feedback about oneself to improve personal effectiveness. [15]
GLOSSARY 519
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
Self-discipline The ability to mobilize one’s efforts to stay focused on attaining an important goal. [15]
Self-efficacy The confidence in one’s ability to carry out a specific task. [10]
Self-leadership The idea that all organizational members are capable of leading themselves, at least to some extent. [7]
Servant leader One who serves constituents by working on their behalf to help them achieve their goals, not the leader’s own goals. [4]
Shadowing An approach to mentoring in which the trainee follows the mentor around for a stated period of time. [15]
Single-loop learning A situation in which learners seek minimum feedback that might substantially confront their basic ideas or actions. [15]
Situational Leadership II (SLII) A model of lead- ership that explains how to match the leadership style to capabilities of group members on a given task. [5]
Social entrepreneurship The use of market-based methods to solve social problems. [6]
Socialized charismatic A charismatic leader who restrains the use of power in order to benefit others. [3]
Strategic contingency theory An explanation of sources of power suggesting that units best able to cope with the firm’s critical problems and uncertain- ties acquire relatively large amounts of power. [7]
Strategic leadership The process of creating or sustaining an organization by providing the right direction and inspiration. [13]
Strategic planning Those activities that lead to the statement of goals and objectives and the choice of strategy. [13]
Strategy An integrated, overall concept of how the firm will achieve its objectives. [13]
Substitutes for leadership Factors in the work environment that provide guidance and incentives to perform, making the leader’s role almost super- fluous. [1]
SWOT analysis A method of considering internal strengths, weaknesses, and external opportunities and threats in a given situation. [13]
Team A work group that must rely on collabora- tion if each member is to experience the optimum success and achievement. [9]
Teamwork Work done with an understanding and commitment to group goals on the part of all team members. [9]
Territorial games Also referred to as turf wars, political tactics that involve protecting and hoarding resources that give one power, such as information, relationships, and decision-making authority. [7]
360-degree feedback A formal evaluation of superiors based on input from people who work for and with them, sometimes including customers and suppliers. [4]
Time orientation As a cultural value, the impor- tance nations and individuals attach to time. [14]
Tough question One that makes a person or group stop and think about why they are doing or not doing something. [4]
Transformational leader A leader who brings about positive, major changes in an organization. [3]
Trust A person’s confidence in another individual’s intentions and motives and in the sincerity of that individual’s word. [2]
Uncertainty avoidance As a cultural value, the extent to which members of a society rely (and should rely) on social norms, rules, and procedures to lessen the unpredictability of future events. [14]
Upward appeal A means of influence in which the leader enlists a person with more formal authority to do the influencing. [8]
Valence The worth or attractiveness of an outcome. [10]
Virtuous circle The idea that corporate social performance and corporate financial performance feed and reinforce each other. [6]
Vision The ability to imagine different and better conditions and ways to achieve them. [3]
Whistleblower An employee who discloses orga- nizational wrongdoing to parties who can take action. [6]
Win-win approach to conflict resolution The belief that after conflict has been resolved, both sides should gain something of value. [12]
Work orientation As a cultural value, the number of hours per week and weeks per year people expect to invest in work versus leisure, or other nonwork activities. [14]
520 GLOSSARY
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
NAME
INDEX
A Ackerman, Dan, 126 Ackerson, Dan, 97 Acuff, Frank L., 409 Ahrendts, Angela, 345 Akerson, Daniel, 113 Allen, Paul, 257 Amabile, Teresa M., 314, 351 Anderson, Deon, 189 Antonakis, John, 89 Applewhite, Betsy, 88 Argyris, Chris, 485 Avey, James B., 46 Avolio, Bruce J., 7, 20, 46
B Ballinger, Gary A., 505 Balthazard, Pierre, 81 Banga, Ajay, 45 Barksdale, Jim, 79 Basford, Tessa E., 118 Bass, Bernard M., 89 Bass, Ruth, 3, 38 Bassichis, Dan, 449 Becker, Thomas E., 181 Beer, Michael, 434 Benioff, Marc, 425 Bennis, Warren G., 27, 79, 98, 345 Bernieri, Frank, 88 Bezos, Jeff, 58, 229, 255, 266, 346–347, 350 Biberman, Gerald, 225 Billhardt, Bjorn, 499 Bisignano, Frank, 88 Blake, Frank, 117 Blanchard, Kenneth H., 155 Booker, Cory, 385 Bossidy, Larry, 113 Bower, Joseph, 506 Boyatzis, Richard, 52 Boyd, Drew, 353 Boyle, Gregory, 195 Brady, Angela, 472 Branson, Richard, 79, 134, 490 Bratton, Bill, 94 Breeding, Patricia, 197 Breyer, Jim, 109
Briggs, Mary, 444 Brin, Sergey, 425 Buckingham, Marcus, 113, 502 Buffet, Warren, 196, 511
C Campbell, Denise, 228 Carlisle, Todd, 293 Carnegie, Dale, 118, 233, 410 Caro, Robert A., 216 Chouinard, Yvon, 215 Cialdini, Robert B., 391 Cisneros, Adriana, 467 Clark, Barbara Baker, 167 Cohen, Julie, 500 Collins, Jim, 10, 81, 433 Conant, Doug, 36 Conger, Jay A., 83 Contractor, Noshir, 384 Cook, Tim, 127, 278 Cote, Dave, 93 Cotton, John L., 493 Covey, Stephen, 118 Covie, Bobby, 408 Coyne, Shawn, 353 Cunningham, Ian, 328
D Damasio, Antonio, 350 Danjsereau, Fred, 22 Davenport, Thomas H., 435 de Campo, Martin, 476 DeChurch, Leslie A., 166 Delmas, Magali A., 193 Devine, Paul Shinn, 189 Dienst, Daniel, 174 Dirks, Kurt T., 41 Dorsey, Jack, 350, 369 Drexler, Mickey, 288 Duke, Mike, 16 Dunbar, Robin, 241 Dweck, Carol, 489
E Einstein, Albert, 30 Eisenstat, Russell A., 434
Eisert, David, 294 Elison, Larry, 79 Ellis, Steve, 310 Ellison, Lawrence, 183 Emerson, Richard M., 214 Eneli, Aya Fubara, 507 Enrico, Roger, 60 Etzion, Dror, 193
F Fenley, Marika, 89 Ferran, Bernard T., 396 Ferrin, Donald L., 41 Fiedler, Fred E., 148, 149, 150 Fiorina, Carly, 77 Fischer, David, 57 Flynn, Timothy P., 183 Ford, Henry, 352 Frazier, Ken, 406 Fujii, John, 476
G Gardner, Howard, 186 Gardner, John, 74 Gates, Bill, 30, 76, 196, 422 Gates, Melinda, 196, 422 Gautrey, Colin, 282 George, Bill, 42 Gerstandt, Joe, 451 Ghosn, Carlos, 466 Gibbs, Joe, 154 Gilbert, Dan, 146 Gino, Francesca, 44 Giuliani, Rudy, 3 Goldenberg, Jacob, 353 Goldman, Seth, 426 Goldsmith, Marshall, 225, 498 Goleman, Daniel, 50, 52 Goodnight, Jim, 182 Gorsky, Alex, 169 Graen, George, 298 Grant, Adam M., 44, 283 Grauer, Peter, 63 Greenleaf, Robert K., 120 Greenspan, Alan, 183 Groysberg, Boris, 383
521 Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s).
Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
Gur, Raquel, 135 Gur, Ruben, 135 Gurley, Bill, 210
H Hackman, J. Richard, 10, 24 Hamel, Gary, 216, 424 Hamm, John, 381 Harris, Patricia, 450 Harrison, Stephen G., 40 Harter, Jim, 312 Hastings, Reed, 420 Hayward, Tony, 167, 234 Heister, John, 409 Hellerstein, Mark, 222 Hesselbein, Frances, 449 Higgins, Frank, 471 Hobson, Mellody, 257 Hofmann, David A., 44 Hofstede, Geert, 455 Honold, Linda, 328 Hoppe, Bruce, 382 House, Robert, 151 Houston, Jean, 312–313
I Ibardolasa, Joyce, 451 Immelt, Jeffrey R., 265, 433, 503 Ipsen, Laura, 81 Isaacs, Jessica C., 294 Ive, Jony, 127
J Jago, Arthur G., 147 James, Erika H., 396 Jobs, Steve, 5, 53, 58, 74, 127, 278,
348, 424 Johnson, Kevin, 287 Johnson, Ron, 98 Joly, Hubert, 91, 93 Jones, Hannah, 192 Joyce, David, 254 Judge, Timothy A., 95 Jurveson, Steve, 30
K Kabatzinn, Jon, 148 Kalanic, Travis, 425 Kanarick, Bill, 395 Kaplan, Bob, 486 Karp, David, 142 Kaslow, Nadine, 409 Kasparov, Gary, 362 Katigbak, Everett, 355 Katzenbach, Jon R., 278, 326 Kellerman, Barbara, 25 Kelley, Robert E., 26 Kelly, Tom, 360 Kennedy, George D., 503 Kent, Muhtar, 114 Kielkowski, Robin, 163
Kipnis, David, 267 Kirkpatrick, Shelley A., 62 Koestenbaum, Peter, 93 Kotter, John P., 5 Kouzes, James, 5 Kramer, Steven, 314 Kubasik, Christopher, 197
L Lafley, A. G., 506 Latham, Gary P., 319 Lauder, William, 257 Lepsinger, Richard, 290 Leslie, Mark, 7 Levering, Robert, 191 Levinson, Arthur D., 363 Liechti, Sui, 89 Lilly, Eli, 432 Linkner, Josh, 351 Litchfield, Robert C., 356 Locke, Edwin A., 62, 179, 319 Lõscher, Peter, 434 Lucas, George, 257 Lucas, James R., 425 Lunt, Frank, 387 Luthans, Fred, 46
M MacDonald, Randy, 118, 136 Machiavelli, Niccolo, 225, 262 Madoff, Bernard L., 189, 199 Madoff, Bernard M., 99 Manz, Charles C., 199 Marchionne, Sergio, 258 Marshall, Randall, 167 Martin, Roger L., 419 Martin, Steve, 262–263 Martins, Luis L., 452 Mason, Mark, 129 Mathieu, Michael, 118 Mayer, Marc, 6 Mayer, Marissa, 247–248, 252, 265 McGee, Elizabeth, 123 McGrath, Rita Gunther, 426 McKee, Annie, 52 McMillon, Doug, 212 McNerney, W. James, 118 Mensah, Sarah, 113 Milliken, Frances J., 452 Mintzberg, Henry, 6, 10, 12, 114, 148,
220, 423 Mitchell, Kate, 496 Molberg, Andrea, 118 Montgomery, Cynthia, 422 Moran, Monty, 310 Morrison, Denise, 54 Mosely, Mark, 292 Moskowitz, Milton, 191 Moynihan, Brian, 469 Mozilo, Angelo R., 189
Mueller, Tim, 30 Mullaly, Alan R., 115, 165, 348, 427 Munshi, Natasha, 370 Murell, Jerry, 292 Murphy, Mark, 154 Murray, Jerry, 233 Musk, Elton, 271 Myhrvold, Nathan P., 356
N Nadella, Satya, 76 Nairn-Birch, Nicholas, 193 Nalebuff, Barry, 426 Nanus, Burt, 98 Nelson, Bob, 325 Nooyi, Indra, 60, 418–419 Northouse, Peter G., 182 Novak, David, 168 Nugent, Patrick S., 407
O Obama, Barack, 257 Obama, Michelle, 257 Oke, Adegoke, 370 Osburn, Alex F., 361 Oudén, Fréderic, 168
P Paese, Matt, 492 Page, Larry, 351, 425 Palanski, Michael E., 42 Parel, Scott, 484 Parker, Susan, 322 Parsons, Richard, 263 Pearce, Craig L., 199 Perez, Beatriz, 192 Peterson, Suzanne J., 136 Petrie, Nick, 4 Pfeffer, Jeffrey, 9–10, 228, 255 Piccolo, Ronald F., 95 Pinera, Sebastian, 1 Plank, Kevin A., 75 Porter, Michael, 430 Posner, Barry, 5 Prieto, Leon C., 131 Pronovost, Peter, 285 Prusak, Laurence, 435
R Ragins, Belle Rose, 493 Ramirez, Luis Manuel, 78 Ramocki, Stephen, 362 Rankin, Gary, 282 Reardon, Kathleen K., 53 Reeb-Wilson, Samantha, 487 Reinelt, Claire, 382 Rexrode, Christina, 191 Roberts, Ron, 297 Robey, Malinda, 484 Robinson, David, 449 Rock, David, 61
522 NAME INDEX
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
Roddick, Anna, 131 Rogers, John, Jr., 257 Rometty, Ginni, 403 Rosener, Judy, 135 Rothman, Irv, 282 Russell, John, 327
S Sadove, Stephen I., 231 Salazar, Ken, 167 Samuel, Mark, 221 Sandberg, Sheryl, 74, 110–111, 186, 216 Sawyer, Diane, 257 Schail, Ron, 216 Schmidt, Eric, 370 Schmincke, Don, 165 Schoorman, F. David, 505 Schultz, Howard, 50, 77 Schwartz, Tony, 323 Senge, Peter M., 81 Senk, Glen, 380–381 Settle-Murphy, Nancy, 466 Shaich, Ron, 73 Shegerian, John S., 193, 195 Silberman, Jennifer, 449 Silver, Adam, 110 Simmons, Annette, 237 Simon, David, 183 Sims, Henry P., Jr., 199 Sindell, Gerald, 358–359
Slind, Michael, 383 Smisek, Jeff, 40 Smith, Douglas K., 278 Smith, Gary, 55 Snyder, Rich, 119 Snyder, Rick, 146 Sougarett, Andre, 2 Spreitzer, Gretchen M., 217 Stern, Ithai, 233 Stewart, Linda, 40 Stewart, Martha, 98, 511 Stogdill, Ralph, 136 Strong, Bruce, 435 Strunk, William, Jr., 389 Sulkowicz, Kerry, 501
T Tannen, Deborah, 390–391 Thain, John, 184 Thomas, Kenneth W., 404 Thomas, Roosevelt, 471 Thompson, John W., 458 Tichy, Noel, 39 Tindell, Kip, 17 Toyoda, Akio, 94, 432 Tracey, J. Bruce, 266 Trump, Donald, 79, 84 Tucker, Robert, 98 Tulgan, Bruce, 288 Turner, Ted, 133
U Ulukaya, Hamdi, 350
V Vroom, Victor H., 147, 159
W Wadsworth, Jeffrey, 366 Wageman, Ruth, 10, 24 Walumbwa, Fred O., 370 Warner, Chris, 165 Washburn, Michael, 194 Weiss, Jeffrey A., 431 Wells, Carole V., 267 Westphal, James D., 233 White, E. B., 389 Wilderotter, Maggie, 36 Williams, Evelyn, 61 Works, Stanley, 370
Y Yammarino, Francis J., 22, 42 Yuanqing, Yang, 319 Yukl, Gary, 7, 266, 440
Z Zenger, John H., 255 Zofi, Yael, 290 Zuckerberg, Mark, 57, 133
NAME INDEX 523
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
COMPANY
INDEX
A Accenture, 384 Action Centered Training, 297 Aetna, 505 AIG, 294 Aldi, 431 Allstate Insurance Company, Inc., 451 Amazon.com, 58, 229, 266, 347, 354, 424,
429, 434 Anheuser-Busch, 82 Apple Inc., 5, 53, 58, 74, 98, 127, 189,
196–197, 256, 278, 345, 348, 356, 367, 424, 431, 433
Ariel Capital Management, LLC, 257 AT&T, 36 Auto Pal, 67
B Bank of America Corp., 189, 469 Bari Jay, 322 Battelle Memorial Institute, 366 Ben & Jerry’s, 201 Bernard L. Madoff Investment Securities,
189 Best Buy, 91, 93 Better World Books, 195 B Lab, 201 BlackBerry, 433 BlessingWhite Inc., 313 Bloomberg Ltd., 63 BNY Mellon, 163 Body Shop, 131 Boeing Company, 118, 189 Booz & Co., 506 British Petroleum (BP), 167–168, 234 Burberry, 345
C Campbell Soup, 54 Canon, Inc., 372 Carmax, 192 Caterpillar Inc., 199 Chatter, 384 Chipotle Mexican Grill, 310 Chrysler Group LLC, 258
Cisneros group, 467–468 Citigroup Inc., 129, 263 Clena Corp., 55 CNN, 133 Coastal Contacts, 423 Coca-Cola Co., 84, 114, 192, 194, 357,
433 Consultancy Interaction Associates, 40 Container Store, 17 Continental Airlines Inc., 40 Covenant Health, 197
D David Yurman, 380–381 D. E. Shaw, 346 Diapers.com, 210 Dodge, 258 Dollar General, 431 DomainCollection.com, 357 Domino’s Pizza, Inc., 426 Dr. Pepper Snapple Group, 357 DuPont, 363
E eBay, 29, 365 Electronic Recyclers International, 193 Eli Lilly, 432 Energy Project, 323 Enspire Learning, 499 ePrize LLC, 351 Ernest & Young, 134 Estée Lauder Companies, 257
F Facebook, 5, 57, 74, 86, 102, 108–109, 110,
133, 141, 216, 225 Family Dollar, 431 First Data Corp., 88 Five Guys Burgers and Fries, 292 Florida Ice & Farm, 200 Ford Motor Co., 115, 165, 187, 258, 352,
422, 427 Foursquare, 254 Frontier Communications, 36 Future Work Institute, 450
G Gap Inc., 288, 436 Genentech, 363 General Electric Co. (GE), 76, 86,
113, 254, 265, 431, 432, 433, 495, 509
General Motors, 82, 97, 126, 187, 258 Girl Scouts, 449 GMO LLC, 6 Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co., 500 Google þ, 86, 102 Google Inc., 81–83, 191–192, 247–248, 253,
254, 256, 265, 293, 349, 351, 355, 426, 433
Green Bay Packers, 154 Gucci, 422–423
H Hallmark Cards, Inc., 368 Harley-Davidson Ltd., 327 Harvard Business Publishing, 502 Hay Group, 370 Hewlett-Packard Co., 77, 282, 319, 451 Hilton Worldwide Inc., 449, 502 Homeboy Industries, 195 Honda Motor, 462 Honest Tea, 426, 433 Honeywell International, 93 HP Financial Services, 282 Hulu, 294 Hyundai Motors, 367
I IBM, 118–119, 197, 403, 433, 458 IDEO, Inc., 356, 360 Influence at Work, 262–263 In-N-Out Burger, 119 Intel, 433 Intellectual Ventures, 356 International Conglomerate, 467
J J.C. Penny Co., 98, 174 J. Crew, 288
524 Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s).
Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
Johns Hopkins Hospital, 285 Juniper Networks, 287
K KFC, 168 Kia automobiles, 424 Kimberly-Clark Corp., 16 Kiva Systems, 210 KPMG, 183 Kraft Foods, 82, 350
L Lenovo, 319 Levi-Strauss & Co., 193 LinkedIn, 86, 102, 228, 356, 384 Linux, 289 Lockheed Martin Corp, 197 Loki Studios, 432 Luxury Designs, 375–376
M Mary Kay, Inc., 84 MasterCard, 45 McDonald’s Corporation, 168, 433, 450,
474 McKinsey & Company Inc., 109, 169, 241,
314, 474 Medtronic Inc., 42 Merck, 406 Merrill Lynch, 184 Method Products Inc., 201 Microsoft Corp., 47, 76, 82, 196, 257, 356,
433, 434, 458, 473 Mighty Muffler Brake, 477–478 Mining and Drilling Co., 340 Motorola Corporation, 419
N Nabisco, 36 Natural Cosmeticos, 500 Nestlé USA Inc., 471 Nestlé Waters, 194 Netflix, 420, 424 Netscape, 79 Nike Corporation, 88, 192, 367, 430 Nissan Motors, 466 Nokia, Inc., 290, 433
O Oracle Corp., 79, 183
P Panera Bread Co., 73, 216 Patagonia Inc., 201 PayPal, 29 PepsiCo., 58, 357, 418, 426, 474 Peter F. Drucker Foundation, 449 PG&E, 452 Pioneer Millworks, 192–193 Pizza Hut, 168 Portland Trail Blazers, 113 Power Energy, 478–479 Procter & Gamble (P&G), 363, 435, 503,
504, 506
Q Quaker Oats, 419 Quality Components, 329 Quidsi, 210
R Rapid Cash Store, 374 Reckitt Benckiser PLC, 355 Red Rascal, 173 Renault, 466 Riverwood International Corporation,
235 Rolex, 88
S Saks, Inc., 231 Salesforce.com, 425 Samsung, 433 Saratoga Supply Company, 443 SAS, 182, 192 Seagate Technology, 297 Sharwood, 467 Shree Cement, 200 Siemens, 434 Simon Property Group, 183 Skype, 495 Smart Grid Cisco, 82 SM Energy Co., 222 Soap.com, 210 Square, 350, 369 Stanley Works, 370 Starbucks, 77, 147, 153, 432 State Farm Insurance, 473 Suttons & Robertson, 431 Symantec Corporation, 458
T Taco Bell, 168 Taiwan Customs Bureau, 368 Target, 98 TelePresence, 294 Tenet Healthcare Corp., 198 Tesla Motors Inc., 29–30 Texas Professional Training Associates,
303 3M, 355, 423, 431 Toyota Motor Corporation, 94, 258, 431,
432, 433 Trader Joe’s, 367 Tumblr, 142 Turner Broadcasting System, 355 Twitter, 5, 86, 102, 104, 141, 243, 367, 369
U Uber, 425 Under Armour, 75 UPS, 193
V Veritas Software, 7 Virgin Atlantic Airways Limited, 490 Virgin Group, 79 VIZIO, 426
W Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., 16, 168, 200, 212,
233, 374, 402 Weil, Gotshal, & Manges, 484 WellPoint, 472 Whirlpool Corp., 169 Wikipedia, 289 Wimm-Bill-Dann Food, 419 W. L. Gore & Associates, Inc., 220, 355
Y Yahoo! Inc., 247–248, 252, 265, 432 Yammer, 384 YouTube, 168, 294 Yum! Brands Inc., 168, 490 YuMe, 118
Z Zappos.com, 210 Zebra Technologies, 367 Zippo, 387
COMPANY INDEX 525
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
SUBJECT
INDEX
A Accommodative style, of conflict
management, 403–404 Achievement-oriented style, 153 Acquisition strategy, 432 Action learning, 440, 500 Active listening, 331 Adaptability to changing times, 173 Adaptability to situation, 112 Admiration encouraging, 225 Advice and guidance giving, 332 Advice asking and politics, 232 Aligning people, 116–117 Anecdotes to communicate meaning, 387 Appearance and charisma, 88–89 Applauding good results, 332 Apprising, 253 Assertiveness
as cultural dimension, 453 to leadership, 45
Attribution theory, 74 Authenticity and authentic leader, 42–44 Autocratic leadership, 126–127 Avoidant style, of conflict management, 406
B Backstabbing, 237 Barter, 409 Behavioral role modeling, 498 Behaviors and attitudes of leaders, 108–124
adaptability to situation, 112 aligning people, 116–117 consideration dimension, 110 direction setting, 112–113 emotional support and encouragement,
118 feedback on performance, 114 hands-on-guidance and feedback, 114 higher-level need satisfaction, 117–118 high performance standards, 113 initiating structure dimension, 110 inspiration and visibility, 117 openness to worker opinions, 117 principles and values promotion,
118–120 Pygmalion effect, 113
relationship-oriented attitudes and behaviors, 115–121
risk taking and execution of plans, 113 servant leader, 120–121 strengths of group members, 113 task-related attitudes and behaviors,
112–115 360-degree feedback, 121–124 tough question asking, 115
B ¼ f(P * E), 352 Brainstorming, 356, 409 Brand leadership, strategy, 433 Broad experience for development,
492–493 Business jargon use, 389 Bypassing boss, 233–234
C Candor and charisma, 89 Capitalizing on opportunity, 215 Capitalizing on strengths of group
members, 113 Case problems
Brittany, blunt person at Auto Pal, 67 business strategy, 443–444 characteristics and traits of leader,
65–66 charisma via social networking websites,
102–103 contingency leadership, 173 creativity, innovative ideas for cash
store, 374–375 crisis management in restaurant, 175 cross-cultural communication barriers,
413–414 delicate confrontation, 414–415 effectiveness of leadership towards envi-
ronmental sustainability, 204–205 employees medical insurance, 38–339 empowerment, 242–243 encourage disrupters, 375–377 ethical and social responsibilities of
smartphones to society, 203–204 feedback challenge, Tyler, 340–341 influence tactics at Mall World, 272–273 Julia as macromanager, 31
leadership development program, 511 leadership effectiveness, 243–244,
273–274 leadership image in schools, 444 leadership styles, 139–140, 173 management at automobile service
center, 477–478 new mentor, Kaitlin, 512 strategic thinking and leadership roles,
29–30 team building for technical writers,
305–306 teamwork problems at insurance
companies, 303–304 transformational leadership challenges,
103–104 Tricia and her Facebook friends and
Twitter followers, 140–141 Catastrophe faking, 238 Celebrity charismatic leaders, 77 Center for Business Ethics, 187 Challenging experiences for development,
490–491 Change acceptance, 230 Character and ethics, 184 Charismatic leadership, 72–99
celebrity type, 77 characteristics of, 77–80 communication style, 83–86 dark side of, 98–99 definitions and meaning, 73–76 development of, 86–89 effects of charisma, 75–76 energy and action orientation, 78 enthusiasm, optimism, and energy, 87 extensive use of social networking,
85–86 face-to-face networks, 85–86 gearing language to different audiences,
84 impressive appearance, 88–89 in-your-face attitude, 89 leadership by inspiration, 83–84 leadership by storytelling, 84–85 leadership polarity, 98 masterful communication skills of, 78
526 Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s).
Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
metaphors an analogies use, 84 persistence and, 87 personal brand for, 88–89 personalized type, 77 relationship aspects, 74–75 risk romanticizing, 79 self-promoting personality, 80 socialized type, 76 social networking sites, 86 suggestions for charismatic behavior,
86–89 synchrony with others, 88 transformational leader and, 77 transformational leadership and, 94 types of, 76–77 unconventional strategies, 79 validity of concept, 98 visionary quality, 77–78 vision component, 81–83, 87
Chief knowledge officer, 438 Circle-the-wagons mentality, 167 Climate and culture for creativity,
363–368 Climate of trust for team, 282 Coach and motivator role, 13 Coaching, 328–336, 500–501
active listening, 331 advice and guidance, 332 applauding results, 332 change commitment, 332 emotional support, 331 employee engagement, 312–314 executive type, 333–336, 500–501 fallacies about, 328 feedback, 330 for improved performance, 334 key characteristics of, 327–328 modeling in, 332 obstacle removing, 331 reflection of content or meaning, 331–
332 relationship building, 330 skills and techniques, 329–332
Coalitions, formation of, 256–257 Coercive power, 211–212 Cognitive abilities for creativity, 350–351 Cognitive activity, strategic leadership,
420–422 Cognitive factors and leadership, 56–60
cognitive (or analytical) intelligence, 56–57
creativity, 57–58, 350–351 farsightedness and conceptual thinking,
58–60 for innovation, 370 knowledge of the business or group
task, 57 Cognitive resource theory, 161–163 Collaboration
for conflict, 402–406 between leaders and followers, 27
Collaborative software, 294
Collaborative style, of conflict manage- ment, 402–406
Collection of ideas idea quotas, 355 sketching ideas, 355 straightforward, 354–355 tinkering time, 355–356
Commitment, influence tactics, 249 Communication, 78, 83–86, 381–401
anecdotes to communicate meaning, 387
avoid racial or ethnic identification, 401 back up of conclusions, 387–388 business jargon use, 389 charismatic leaders and, 78, 83–86 credibility for, 386 cross-cultural barriers, 397–401 cultural assumptions, 398–400 emotion-provoking words, 386–387 etiquette differences across cultures,
401 face-to-face communication networks,
383–384 front-loaded messages, 389–390 gearing message to listener, 386 heavy-impact words, 386–387 individual differences in appearance,
401 inspirational and powerful type,
385–395 junk words, 388–389 language errors, 388–389 listening, 396 making the rounds, 396 networks, for leaders, 381–385 nonverbal, 392–394 persuasion principles, 391–392 power-oriented linguistic style, 390–391 respect for others, 396, 400 selective listening, 396 selling ideas, benefits, 386 social media networks, 384–385 speaking and writing, 385–391 straightforward language and speaking
slowly, 400 videoconferencing and telepresence,
392–394 vocalized pauses, 388–389
Communication technology for teams, 289
Community building, 182 Company interests over personal interests,
199 Competition against group, 289 Compliance and influence, 249–250 Composite mentor, 496 Computers and leadership, 9 Conceptual knowledge programs, 499 Concrete learning processes and practice,
439 Conflict management styles
accommodative style, 403–404
avoidant style, 406 collaborative style, 405–406 competitive style, 403 sharing style, 405
Conflict resolution, 402–411 conflict management styles, 402–406 face saving, 410 group member assistance, 407–408 interests vs. position, 409 international negotiating style differ-
ences, 409–410 listening skills, 408 negotiating and bargaining, 408–410 plausible demand or offer, 409 win-win approach, 405
Confrontation, 407 Connections with people, 108 Consensus leaders, 125 Consideration dimension, 110 Consultation for influence, 266–267 Consultative leaders, 125 Contingency and situational leadership,
145–177 achievement-oriented style, 153 adaptability to changing times, 173 cognitive resource theory, 161–163 contingency factors in normative
model, 159–161 crisis leadership, 163–169 decision-making styles, 160 directive style, 153 evidence-based leadership or
management for, 169–170 factors beyond leader’s control, 147 favorability of the situation, 150–151 Fiedler’s contingency theory, 149–151 leader-member relations, 149 least preferred coworker (LPC) scale,
148–149 matching style to situation, 149–150,
153–154 normative decision model, 159–161 participative leadership style, 153 path-goal theory, 151–155 performance influencing, 154–155 satisfaction influencing, 154–155 situational influences, 146–148 situation measurement, 149 supportive style, 153
Control freak, 288. See also Micromanager Control vital information, 229 Conversation, 383 Cooperation theory, 282 Co-opting antagonists, 261–262 Core competency strategy, 433 Core self-evaluations, 40 Corporate social responsibility, 190 Cost leadership strategy, 431 Courage for leadership, 53 Courteous, pleasant, and positive behavior,
232 Creative worker management, 366
SUBJECT INDEX 527
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
Creativity, 57–58, 131, 339–362 brainstorming, 356 characteristics of creative leaders,
347–352 climate and culture for, 363–368 cognitive abilities, 350–351 creative workers management,
methods, 366 creativity-enhancing activities, 359–360 empowerment, 364–365 encouragement for, 365–366 enthusiastic attitude for, 361 entrepreneurship and, 131, 133–134 explorer, artist, judge, and lawyer roles,
361–362 flow experience, 351–352 insight for, 347 intellectual challenge, 364 knowledge contribution, 348 leadership practices for, 363–367 as leadership trait, 57–58 morality of, 358–359 opportunity alertness, 360 organizational methods for, 353–359 organizational support, 366 passion for the task, 351–352 personality for, 351 pet-peeve technique, 356–358 physical exercise for, 362–363 recording of ideas, 361 resources supplying for, 365 self-help techniques for, 359–363 steps in process, 346–347 systematic idea collection, 354–356 thinking outside the box, 353, 354 traditional thinking, 352–353 work group design for, 365
Credibility in communication, 386 Crisis leadership, 163–169
circle-the-wagon avoidance, 167 compassion approach, 165 decisiveness for, 164–165 disaster planning for, 167–168 optimism for, 167 stability of leadership performance, 168 strategical thinking for, 165–166 transformational leadership for, 168 work routine reestablishment, 166–167
Critical problems and power, 215 Criticizing boss in public, 233 Cross-cultural communication barriers,
397–401 Cross-cultural factors and empowerment,
221 Cross-cultural training, 471–472 Crowdsourcing, 423 Crucibles, 491 Cultural assumptions, 398–400 Cultural factors and leadership, 453–458.
See also International and culturally diverse aspects of leadership
Cultural intelligence, 458
Cultural sensitivity, 458–462 cultural misunderstanding, 461 English-only policy and, 462 flexibility, 462 multicultural worker, 459–461 nuances in customs, 459 product names and, 467 transgender employees, 461–462
Cultural values dimensions, 453–455
D Debasement for influence, 263–264 Decision-making styles, 160 Declining offer from top management, 234 Delegation and empowerment, 222 Democratic leadership style, 125 Dependency theory of power, 214–215 Development of leaders, 493–501
action learning programs, 500 broad experience, 492–493 coaching and psychotherapy, 500–501 conceptual knowledge programs, 499 education for, 489–490 experience as development, 490–493 feedback-intensive programs, 498 forceful versus enabling leadership, 486 informal vs. formal mentoring, 493–494 lop-sided leadership insight, 486–487 mentoring and, 493–496 mentoring behaviors, 495 new leader challenges, 506–508 powerful learning experience, 491 programs for, 496–501 self-awareness and, 485–489 self-discipline for, 487–489 shadowing, 493 simulations, 498–499 single-loop vs. double-loop learning,
485–486 skill-based programs, 498–499 socialization programs, 499–500 sources of experience, 492 strategic vs. operational leadership, 486
Differentiation strategy, 430–431 Dimensions of leadership, 109–112 Direction setting, 112–113 Directive style, 153 Disaster planning, 167–168 Diversity advantage, 452 Diversity circle, 470 Diversity management, 450–452
decision-making and, 451 heterogeneity and, 451 inclusion and, 451 marketing advantage of, 450–451 problem-solving and, 451 social responsibility and, 451–452
Diversity training, 469–471 Divide and rule, 237 Double-loop learning, 485–486 Dress code conformance, 234 Drive and achievement motive, 55
Dysfunctional consequences of political behavior, 238–240
E Education for leadership development,
489–490 Effort-to-performance expectancy, 316 E-leadership, 288
for virtual teams, 288–291 Electronic recycling, 193 Embrace or demolish, 237 Emotional aspects, 504–505 Emotional expressiveness and warmth, 78 Emotional insecurity and politics, 225 Emotional intelligence, 50–52, 62–63, 94
improvement of, 62–63 relationship management, 51–52 self-awareness, 50–51 self-management, 51 social awareness, 51 transformational leaders and, 94
Emotional support and encouragement, 118
Emotion-provoking words, 386–387 Employee engagement, 312–314
impact of, 312–313 meaningful work for, 313–314
Employee network groups, 472–473 Empowerment, 94, 216–223
cultural differences, 221 delegation and, 222 goals of organization and, 220 information providing, 220 initiative and responsibility, 219–220 internal commitment, 218 leadership continuation, 221 limits setting, 221 method choosing, 220 nature of, 217–218 practices for, 218–222 self-determination, 217–218 self-leadership and, 220–221 transformational leadership and, 94
Encouragement for creativity, 365–366 Engagement, 312 English-only policy, cultural sensitivity
and, 462 Enthusiasm, 45–46, 87 Entitlement seeking and ethics, 184 Entrepreneurial leadership, 131, 133–134 Entrepreneurial role, 14 Environmental sustainability, 433–434 Environmental uncertainty and
turbulence, 224 Equal Employment Opportunity
Commission (EEOC), 462 Ethical conduct codes, 197 Ethical decision-making guide, 187–188 Ethical mind of leaders, 186–187 Ethics, 20, 178–208
character of individual, 184 community building, 182
528 SUBJECT INDEX
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
differences in ethics and morals, 182–184
entitlement feelings, 184 greed, gluttony, and avarice, 183 guidelines for evaluating, 187–188 honesty and trustworthiness, 181 integrity and, 181 leadership behaviors for, 188–189 leader’s mind for, 186–187 moral leadership principles and prac-
tices, 179–187 perception of being unethical, 20 respect for individuals, 182 stakeholders attention, 181–182 unethical behaviors, 188–189
Etiquette, 231, 401 Evidence-based leadership, 169–170 Example setting at top, 239 Exchanging favors and bargaining,
254–255 Executive coaching, 333–336
contributions of and concerns about, 335–336
specific forms of assistance, 334–335 Executor role, 14 Exercises and self-assessment quizzes
analyzing a local leader, 513 attitudes and behaviors role play, 122 attitudes toward sharing knowledge,
437 building for the future, 508 business strategy, 445 character attributes checklist, 185 charismatic leadership by storytelling,
85 checklist for crisis leadership, 164 checklist of behaviors and attitudes
reflecting charisma, 80 climate for creativity and innovation,
364 coaching, improved performance, 334 communication effectiveness, 382 company’s contract, importance of, 185 conflict resolution style, 404–405 creative personality test, 348, 349–350 crisis leadership, 175 cross-cultural experiences in workplace,
480 cross-cultural skills and attitudes,
397–398 cultural value profile, 456 Dinosaur Power on market, 188 domain name choosing, 357 dual-level transformational leadership
(TFL) scale, 90 effective coach characteristics, 333 empowering attitudes and beliefs, 219 empowerment, 223 enthusiasm, optimism, and warmth on
the job, 46 entrepreneurial leadership role play,
134, 142
environmental audit, 195 ethical and social responsible leader-
ship, 199 ethics and social responsibility, 199 expectancy theory, 318–319 experience as development, 490–493 feedback to others, 114 goal theory application, 323 group feedback on leadership traits, 60 influence tactics, 251, 264, 268 ingratiating behavior, 260–261 inspirational messages on social net-
working site, 104 interaction with team, 287 interpersonal skills checklist, 488–489 knowledge-sharing investigation teams,
438 leadership essay, 274 leadership ethics quiz, 180–181 leadership experience audit, 24 leadership listening, 397 leadership role analysis, 15 leadership style contrast role pay, 137 leadership style identification, 128–129 manager’s power, rating, 213–214 mentoring attitude, 494 motivation, 311, 341 multimedia presentation, 377 multiple uses technique, 360 office politics control, 240 organizational leader, communication
skills, 415 organizational politics questionnaire,
227–228 portfolio for leadership, 23, 68, 104, 141,
175, 205, 244, 274, 305–306, 341, 376–377, 415, 445, 479, 513
position paper on motivation, 341
pride in being outstanding, 284 reciprocity, networking, 229 recognition, 324 recycling of electronic products, 206 representative offsite activities, 295–296 self-confidence quiz, 39 situational leadership II role play, 159 situational perspective measurement,
156–157 strategic thinking, 420, 421 SWOT analysis, 428 task-oriented attitudes and behaviors,
116 team leader candidates, 296 team player attitude, 286 teamwork development, 278, 305–306 trust fall, 306 trustworthy leader quiz, 43 value clarification, 119 verbal and nonverbal behavior,
395 vision formulation, 83 win-win bargaining, 410
Expectancy theory, 314–319, 336 effort-to-performance expectancy, 316 instrumentality, 316 leadership skills and behaviors, 317–319 and motivational skills, 314–319 valence, 315–316
Expertise directory, 289 Expert power, 212 Explorer, artist, judge, and lawyer roles,
361–362 External leader of team, 280 Extraversion, 44–45
F Face-to-face communication networks,
85–86, 383–384 Factors beyond leader’s control, 147 False catastrophe technique, 238 Farsightedness and conceptual thinking,
58–60 Favorability of leadership situation,
150–151 Favoritism and cronyism avoidance, 239 Feedback-intensive programs, 498 Feedback on performance, 23, 114,
121–124, 498 behavior of leaders and, 114 development programs and, 498 skill development and, 23 360-degree method, 121–124
Fiedler’s contingency theory, 149–151 Figurehead role, 12 First impression of team members, 301 Flattery for political advantage, 233 Flexibility and adaptability, 52–53 Flow experience for creativity, 351–352 Focus or niche strategy, 431 Followership, 24–27
collaboration between leaders and followers, 27
qualities of effective followers, 26–27 types of followers, 25–26
Foot-in-mouth problem, 234 Forceful vs. enabling leadership, 486 Framework for leadership, 20–22 Frustrations of leaders, 18–20 Future orientation and culture, 454
G Gearing language to different audiences,
84 Gender differences in leadership style,
134–136 Gender egalitarianism and culture, 455 General personality traits, 37–47 Generational change, 383 Generational differences, 461 GE succession planning, 503–504 Global insurance tag team, 303–304 Global Leadership and Organizational
Behavior Effectiveness (GLOBE), 453, 457
SUBJECT INDEX 529
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
Global leadership skills, 464–468 Goals, 20, 239, 320
conflicting types, 20 congruence and political behavior, 239 empowerment and, 217–218 motivation and, 319–323, 337
Goal theory and motivation, 319–323, 337 Greatness commitment, 93 Great Place to Work Institute, 191 Greed, gluttony, and avarice, 183 Green-collar workers, 434 Group recognition and rewards, 291 Growth and development of others, 17
H Hands-on-guidance and feedback, 114 Hands-on leadership, 257, 258 Headhunters, 503 Heavy-impact words, 386–387 Hedgehog concept and strategy, 433 Heredity vs. environment for leadership,
60–62 Heterogeneity, and diversity, 451 Higher-level need satisfaction for group,
117–118 High performance standards, 113 High quality strategy, 431–432 High speed and first-mover strategy,
432–433 Hiring talented people, strategy, 434 Honesty and trustworthiness, 181 Human and emotional aspect of strategy,
422–423 Humane orientation and culture, 454 Humility for leadership, 40 Humor and leadership, 46–47
I Imitation strategy, 432 Implicit leadership theories, 269–270 Impression management, 231–232 Inclusion and diversity, 451 Income of leaders, 18 Individual differences in appearance, 401 Individual differences in valence, 317–318 Influence tactics, 247–274
apprising, 253 coalition formation, 256–257 commitment, 249 compliance, 249–250 consulting with others, 256 co-opting antagonists, 261–262 debasement, 263–264 dishonest and unethical tactics, 262–264 ethical and honest tactics, 252–258 exchanging favors and bargaining,
254–255 hands-on leadership, 257, 258 implicit leadership theories, 269–270 ingratiation technique, 259 inspirational appeal and emotional dis-
play, 255–256
joking and kidding, 259, 261 leading by example and respect,
252–253 legitimating a request, 255 Machiavellianism, 262 manipulation of people and situations,
262–263 model of, 249–250 neutral influence tactics, 258–262 personal appeal, 254 personal magnetism, 255 rational persuasion, 253 relative effectiveness of, 266–268 resistance, 250 sequencing of, 268 subject matter expert (SME), 254 team player, 257 undue pressure, 263 upward appeal, 261
Ingratiation for influence, 259, 260–261 In-group collectivism, 454 Initiating structure dimension, 110 Initiative and responsibility for
empowerment, 219–220 Innovation, 345 Innovation gym, 363 Innovation management, 370–72
collaboration emphasis, 371 continual innovation pursuit, 370 development and production
integration, 372 financial rewards for, 366–367 leadership practices for, 370–372 loose-tight leadership, 371 risk taking, 370–371 transformational leadership, 370
Inside-outside leaders, 506 Insight as cognitive trait, 58 Insight for creativity, 347 Inspiration and visibility, 117 Inspiration of group members, 117 Instrumentality, 316, 336 Integrity and ethics, 181 Intellectual challenge for creativity, 364 Intelligence, 56–57. See also Cognitive
abilities Interaction with team, 287 Interests vs. positions in management, 409 Intergroup leadership, 279 International and culturally diverse aspects
of leadership accountability of managers, 469 aspects of leadership, 448–482 assertiveness as cultural dimension, 453 cautions about diversity programs,
476–477 cross-cultural training, 471–472 cultural factors influencing leadership,
453–458 cultural intelligence, 458 cultural sensitivity, 458–462 cultural value dimensions, 453–455
cultural values and styles, 464 diversity management, 450–452 diversity training, 469–471 employee networks, 472–473 future orientation, 454 gender egalitarianism, 455 global leadership skills, 464–468 humane orientation, 454 in-group collectivism, 454 initiatives for cultural diversity, 468–474 leadership diversity, 474 minority recruitment, retention, and
mentoring programs, 469 motivation and inspiration in other
cultures, 466 multicultural leader, 453 multicultural worker, 459 performance orientation, 453 person-organization fit, 473 power distance, 455 success factors in international
management positions, 465–466 targeted demographic groups, 473–474 time orientation, 454 uncertainty avoidance, 455 universal needs and, 465 work orientation, 455
Interpersonal skills for leadership charismatic behavior, 77 charismatic relationship, 74–75 coach and motivator role, 13 compassion during crisis, 165 connections with people, 110 consideration dimension, 110 cultural diversity skills, 451–452,
464–468 emotional intelligence, 50–52 ethics and, 202–203 feedback intensive program for, 498 gearing language to different audiences, 84 recycling of electronic products, 206 relationship building strategies and
tactics, 115–121 relationship-oriented attitudes and
characteristics, 115–121 servant leadership and, 120–121 team builder role, 13 team player role, 13 360-degree survey for improvement,
121–124 trust building, 78, 120 warmth, 45–46
Intrinsic satisfaction, 9 In-your face attitude for charisma, 89 Irrelevance view of leadership, 9–10
J Jargon, business use, 389 Joking and kidding for influence, 259, 261
K Knowledge application, 435
530 SUBJECT INDEX
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
Knowledge creation, 435, 436 Knowledge dissemination, 435 Knowledge for creativity, 348 Knowledge management, 434, 435–436
general format of programs, 435–436 Knowledge of the business or group task,
57
L Laissez-faire leadership style, 126 Language differences, cultural sensitivity
and, 461 Language errors, 388–389 Law of reciprocity, 230 Leader-member exchange (LMX) model,
269, 298–301 Leadership and leaders
behaviors and attitudes, 112–124 charismatic leadership, 72–89, 98 coaching and, 327–336 crisis type, 163–169 cultural diversity and, 448–482 cultural factors and, 453–458 development for, 493–501 difference making, 7–10 effectiveness, 20–22, 109 employee engagement and, 311–314 ethical responsibilities, 178–208 evaluation of development programs,
501 frustrations of leaders, 18–20 influence tactics, 247–274 irrelevance aspect, 9–10 knowledge management, 434, 435–436 learning organization and, 437–440 management and, 5–6 meaning and definitions, 2–6 mentoring impacts on, 495–496 motivation, 310–328 organizational performance and, 7–10 Orr, Kevyn as emergency manager of
Detroit, 146 political behavior and, 225–240 power and, 211–216 readiness for leadership role, 11–12 relationship aspects of, 4–5 roles for, 10–17 satisfactions, 17–18 situational type, 146–148, 173 skill development in, 22–24 social responsibilities, 190–199 styles of, 124–137 substitutes for leadership, 9 succession methods, 501–506 teamwork development and, 277–306 trait, motives, and characteristics, 35–63 transformational type, 89–99
Leadership by inspiration, 83–84 Leadership by storytelling, 84–85 Leadership diversity, 474 Leadership effectiveness, 21, 109, 333–336,
426–428
Leadership Grid styles, 128–130 Leadership irrelevance, 9–10 Leadership polarity, 98 Leadership styles, 124–137, 455–458
autocratic, 126–127 consensus, 125 consultative, 125 cultural values and, 455–458 democratic, 125 entrepreneurial, 131, 133–134 French managers, 457 gender differences, 134–136 German managers, 457 Laissez-faire, 126 leadership grid, 128–130 Malaysian managers, 457 northern U.S. vs. southern U.S. man-
agers, 458–459 participative, 125 selection of best style, 133
Leadership succession, 501 Leaders-inaction and those identified in
case openers Barra, Mary of General Motors, 97 Bezos, Jeff of Amazon.com, 209–210 Brewer, Rosalind of Sam’s Club, 16–17 Chen, Judy of apparel company, 179–
180 FDNY teamwork and leadership skills,
483–484 Gay Workers, Black Tech Workers
Group, 478–479 Jack Dorsey, creative leader and
cofounder of Twitter and Square, 369–370
Julia as macromanager, 31 leader-member exchange (LMX) model,
298–301 leadership at Hilton Worldwide, 502 Management at Mighty Muffler, 477–
478 Morrison, Denise of Campbell Soup Co.,
36 Musk, Elon of X.com, 29–30 Plank, Kevin A. of Armour Inc., 59 Sandberg, Sheryl at Facebook, 108–109 Shaich, Ron of Panera Bread Co., 73 Tammy the kindly coach, 329 Tomé, Carol B. as Home Depot CFO,
235 Leading by example, 252–253 Leading by respect, 252–253 Learning organization, 434, 437–440 Least preferred coworker (LPC) scale,
148–149 Legitimating a request, 255 L ¼ f(l, gm, s), 20 Linguistic style, 390–391 Listening as leadership skill, 395–396 Listening in negotiations, 408–410 Long-range perspective, 93 Loose-tight leadership, 371
Lopsided leaders, 486–487 Loyalty display, 231
M Machiavellianism, 225, 262 Machiavellians, 262 Machiavellian tendencies, 225 Making the rounds for communication,
396 Management at Mighty Muffler, 477–478 Management by wandering, 396 Management openness, 117 Management vs. leadership, 5–6 Manager’s power, rating, 213–214 Manipulation of people and situations,
262–263 Marketing advantage of diversity, 450–451 Meaningful work, 313 Mentor, 493 Mentoring, 469, 493–496
behaviors, 495 impact on leadership, 495–496 informal vs. formal, 493–494 mentoring behaviors, 495 online mentoring, 494–495
Metaphors and analogies for communication, 78, 84
Method choosing and empowerment, 220
Micromanagement minimization, 287–288
Micromanager, 288 Mind of ethical leader, 186–187 Minority programs, 469 Modeling of leader, 332 Moral development levels, 183–184 Moral leadership, 179–187 Morals and ethics, 179 Motivation skills, 310–328, 466
coaching, 327–328 cultural differences, 459 employee engagement, 312–314 expectancy theory, 314–319 goal theory, 319–323 pride appeal, 326 recognition, 323–326 self-efficacy, 316
Motives of leaders, 53–55 Multicultural leader, 453 Multicultural worker, 459
N Name remembering, 87–88 Needs analysis, 510 Negotiating and bargaining, 408–410 Negotiator role, 12–13 Neutral influence tactics, 258–262 New leader challenges, 506–508 Nonverbal communication, 392–394 Normative decision model, 159–161
contingency factors, 160–161 decision-making style, 160
SUBJECT INDEX 531
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
Norm of teamwork, 282–283 Norms for professionals, 9
O Obstacle removing, 331 Open-book management, 293 Openness to worker opinions, 117 Operational network, 383 Opportunity capitalizing, 215 Optimism, 45–46 Optimism in crisis, 167 Organizational change, 265–266, 383 Organizational level performance, 96 Organizational performance
and ethics, 200–201 and leadership, 7–10
Organizational politics, 20. See alsoPolitics in organizations
Organizational support for creativity, 366 Outdoor training for teamwork, 294–296 Outward Bound, 295 Ownership power, 212
P Participative leadership, 125, 153 Passion for task, 351–352 Passion for work and people, 49–50 Path-goal theory, 151–155 Peer leadership network, 383 Perceptions of political behavior, 238–239 Performance and satisfaction influencing,
154–155 Performance orientation and culture, 453 Performance standards for group and
team, 113 Performance-to-outcome expectancy, 316 Perform-or-perish mentality, 19 Persistence and charisma, 87 Personal appearance and behavior,
cultural sensitivity and, 461 Personal brand for charisma, 88–89 Personality for creativity, 351 Personality for leadership, 37–53 Personality traits
general, 37–47 task-related, 47–53
Personalized charismatic, 77 Personalized power motive, 54 Personal magnetism, 255 Personal network, 383 Personal power, 212 Person-organization fit, 473 Persuasion principles, 391–392 Pet-peeve technique, 356–358 Philanthropy, 196 Physical structures, for communication,
291 Pleasant workplace, 191–192 Political blunders, 234 Political correctness, 230 Political skill, 224 Politics in organizations, 20, 223–240
advice asking, 232 backstabbing, 237 blunder avoidance, 233–234 bypassing boss, 233–234 change acceptance, 230 control over dysfunctional type, 238–
240 control vital information, 229 courteous, pleasant, and positive
behavior, 232 criticizing boss in public, 233 declining offer from top management,
234 demands of political environment, 229 divide and rule, 237 dress code conformance, 234 embrace or demolish, 237 emotional insecurity problem,
225 encouraging admiration from
subordinates, 225 environmental uncertainty and turbu-
lence, 224 ethical political tactics and strategies,
225–238 factors contributing to, 223–225 failure set up, 237 false catastrophe technique, 238 favoritism and cronyism avoidance, 239 flattery, 233 foot-in-mouth problem, 234 frustration to leader, 20 goal congruence, 239 good examples at top, 239 impression management, 231–232 law of reciprocity, 230 leadership awareness technique, 239 loyalty display, 231 Machiavellian tendencies, 225 political correctness, 230 political tactics for relationship build-
ing, 232 power contact development, 226, 228 power-gaining tactics, 226–231 pyramid-shaped structure, 224 quick showing technique, 230 relationship building, 232 satisfied customer technique, 232 setting up person for failure, 237 subjective standards of performance,
224 tactics and strategies, 225–238 territorial games, 237–238 territoriality, 237–238 thank-you note technique, 232 unethical approaches, 236–238
Position power, 211–212 Positive psychological capital, 230–231 Power, 211–216, 248
closeness to, 215 critical problems, managing, 215 dependence perspective, 214–215
legitimate type, 211 model of, 249–250 opportunity capitalizing, 215 ownership type, 212 personal type, 212 position type, 211–212 prestige type, 212 reward type, 211 self-serving behavior and, 216 sources and types, 211–216 strategic contingency theory, 215
Power and prestige feelings, 17 Power contacts development, 226, 228 Power distance and culture, 455 Power gaining tactics, 226–231 Power motive, 54–55 Power-oriented linguistic style, 390–391 Practical intelligence, 57 Prestige power, 212 Principles and values promotion, 118–120 Problem-solving capability of diversity,
407, 451 Product and global diversification, strat-
egy, 433 Product names, cultural sensitivity and,
467 Psychotherapy for development, 500–501 Pygmalion effect, 113 Pyramid-shaped organization structure,
224
Q Quick showing technique, 230
R Rational persuasion, 253 Recognition for motivation, 323–326 Recycling, electronic, 193 Referent power, 77 Relationship management, 51 Relationship-oriented attitudes and
behaviors, 115–121 Resilience for leaders, 55 Resistance, influence tactics, 250 Respect and status of leader, 18 Respect for individuals, 182 Revolutionary and contrarian thinking,
424–425 Reward power, 211 Risk romanticizing, 79 Risk taking and execution of plans, 113 Roles in leadership, 10–17 Rounding, 396
S Safety performance, 300 Sarbanes-Oxley Act, 197, 198 Satisfactions and frustrations of leaders,
17–20 Satisfied customer technique, 232 Second-level outcomes, 315 Selective listening, 396
532 SUBJECT INDEX
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
Self-awareness, 50–51, 485–489 Self-confidence, 38–39 Self-discipline for development, 487–489 Self-efficacy, 316 Self-evaluations, 40 Self-fulfillment of group members, 92 Self-management, 51 Self-promoting personality, 79 Sense making, 280 Sense of humor, 46–47 Sense of urgency, 92–93 Servant leader, 120–121 Servant leadership, 436 Shadowing for development, 493 Sharing style of conflict management, 405 Simulations for development, 498–499 Single-loop vs. double-loop learning,
485–486 Situational influences, 146–148 Situational Leadership II (SLII), 155–159 Situation measurement, 149 Six Sigma, 431 Skill-based programs, 498–499 Skill development, 22–24 Social awareness, 51 Social entrepreneurship, 195–196 Socialization programs, 499–500 Socialized charismatic, 76 Socialized power motive, 54–55 Social media networks, 384–385 Social networking
extensive use of, 85–86 teamwork with, 294 websites, 86
Social responsibility and ethical culture, 190–199
company interests over personal inter- ests, 199
corporate social responsibility, 190 ethics and, 191 formal mechanisms for problems,
197–198 organizationalperformanceand, 200–201 personal relationship and, 202–203 philanthropy, 196 pleasant workplace, 191–192 social entrepreneurship, 195–196 strategic leadership for, 191 supplier working conditions
improvement, 196–197 sustainable environment building,
192–195 training for, 198–199 virtuous cycle, 200 whistleblower acceptance, 198 written ethical codes, 197
Sources of experience for development, 492 Spokesperson role, 12 Stability of leadership performance, 168 Stakeholder attention paying, 181–182 Storytelling, 407 Strategic alliances, 432
Strategic leadership, 191, 419–434 acquisition strategy, 432 anticipating and creating a future, 424 brand leadership, 433 cognitive activity, 420–422 core competency strategy, 433 cost leadership strategy, 431 differentiation strategy, 430–431 environmental sustainability, 433–434 ethics and, 191 focus or niche strategy, 431 hedgehog concept, 433 high quality strategy, 431–432 high speed and first-mover strategy,
432–433 hiring talented people, 434 leadership effectiveness, 426–428 limitation strategy, 432 maintaining human and emotional
aspect, 422–423 multiple inputs for strategy, 423 nature of, 419–428 vs. operational leadership, 486 product and global diversification, 433 revolutionary and contrarian thinking,
424–425 social responsibility and, 191 strategic alliances, 432 SWOT analysis, 428–430 types of strategies, 430–434 vision creation, 425–426
Strategic network, 384 Strategic planner role, 14 Strategic planning, 428 Strength-of-ties perspective, 384 Subjective standards of performance, 224 Subject matter expert (SME), 254 Substitutes for leadership, 9 Success factors in international
management positions, 465–466 Succession planning, 501–506
board selection, 503 emotional aspects, 504–505 GE method, 503–504 pool of successors, 505–506 promotion from within, 506
Supportive leadership style, 153 Supportive learning environment, 439 Sustainable environment building, 192–195 SWOT analysis, 428–430
opportunities, 429 strengths, 428–429 threats, 429–430 weaknesses, 429
Synchrony with others, 88 Systems thinking, 421, 439
T Talented people hiring as strategy, 434 Targeted demographic groups, 473–474 Task-related attitudes and behaviors,
112–115
Task-related personality traits, 47–53 Team builder role, 13 Team learning, 439 Team level performance, 96 Team player role, 13 Team play for influence, 257 Teamwork development, 277–306
blending representatives, 294 climate of trust for, 282 communication technology, 289 competition with other group, 289 consensus leadership style, 285 cooperation theory, 276 different quality relationships, 298–301 direction providing, 285–287 diversity, expertise directory, 289 e-leadership for virtual teams, 288–291 element of reciprocity, 299–300 emotional intelligence, 283 external leader, 280 external visibility of team, 290 extra-role behavior, 300 face-to-face meetings, 290 first impressions, 301 group emotional intelligence, 283 group recognition and rewards, 291 in-group vs. out-group members, treat-
ment of, 299 leader-member exchange model (LMX),
298–301 leader’s actions for, 280–294 leadership emergence, 300–301 leader status, 300 meaningful task, 289 micromanagement minimization,
287–288 mission defining, 281 model of teamwork, 284, 285 norm of teamwork, 282–283 offsite training and team development,
295–296 open-book management, 293 organization structure or policy for,
291–294 outdoor training, 295–296 performance standards, 285–287 physical structures for, 291 power sharing, 284, 285 pride in being outstanding, 284 recognition and rewards, 291 ritual and ceremony, 293 role of leader in organization, 279–280 safety performance, 300 sense making, 280 team-oriented members selection,
293–294 team progress monitoring, 290 teamwork building, 292 technology for, 294 transformational effects, 300 virtual meetings, 289–290 virtual reward ceremonies, 290 volunteers solicitation, 289
SUBJECT INDEX 533
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
Technical problem solver role, 13–14 Technology for teamwork, 296 Telepresence, 394 Tenacity and resilience, 55 Territorial games, 237–238 Territoriality and politics, 237–238 Thank-you notes, 232 Thinking outside the box, 353, 354 Thinking strategically, 166 360-degree feedback, 121–124 Time orientation and culture, 454 Tough question asking, 115 Traditional thinking and creativity,
352–353 Traits, motives, and characteristics of
leaders, 35–63 assertiveness, 45 authenticity, 42–44 cognitive factors, 56–60 courage, 53 creativity, 57–58 drive and achievement motive, 55 extraversion, 44–45 farsightedness and conceptual thinking,
58–60 flexibility and adaptability, 52–53 general personality traits, 37–47 heredity vs. environment, 60–62 humility, 40 knowledge of the business or group
task, 57 passion for work and people, 49–50 personalized power motive, 54–55 power motive, 54–55 self-confidence, 38–39 self-evaluations, 40
servant leadership and, 120 socialized power motive, 54–55 strengths and limitations of approach,
62–63 task-related personality traits, 47–53 tenacity and resilience, 55 trustworthiness for leadership, 40–42
Transactional leadership, 89, 96 Transformational leadership, 77, 89–97,
168 attributes of, 94–95 change awareness, 92 vs. charismatic leaders, 83 crisis leadership and, 168 emergence of transformations, 91–94 emotional intelligence and, 94 empowerment, 94 greatness commitment, 93 innovative thinking, 95 leading by example, 95 long-range perspective, 93 moral reasoning and, 95 performance impact, 95–96 self-fulfillment search, 92 self-interest hurdle, 92 sense of urgency, 92–93 vs. transactional leadership, 438–439 vision aspect, 94
Transgender, cultural sensitivity and, 461–462
Trust and trustworthiness for leadership, 40–42, 93, 120, 181
charismatic leadership and, 78 ethical behavior and, 181 trait of, 40–42
Trust building, 120
U Uncertainty avoidance and culture, 455 Undue pressure technique, 263 Unethical behavior, 188–189 Unethical political tactics, 236–238 Universal needs of people, 465 Upward appeal for influence, 261
V Valence, 315–316, 319, 336 Values and principle promotion, 118–120 Videoconferencing communication
challenge, 392–394 Virtual team, 290–291 Virtuous circle, 200 Visibility in group, 117 Visions and visioning, 81–83, 87, 94, 133
charismatic leadership and, 81–83, 87 entrepreneurial leadership and, 133 strategic leadership, 425–426 transformational leadership and, 94
W Warmth characteristic, 45–46 Whistle blowers, 198 Win-win approach, 405 Women’s roles, cultural sensitivity and,
461 Worker engagement, collecting live data,
313 Work group design and creativity, 365 Work habits, cultural sensitivity and,
461 Working conditions improvement of
suppliers, 196–197 Work orientation and culture, 455
534 SUBJECT INDEX
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
- Cover������������
- Title������������
- Statement����������������
- Copyright����������������
- Dedication
- Brief Contents���������������������
- Contents���������������
- Preface��������������
- Ch 1: The Nature and Importance of Leadership����������������������������������������������������
- Ch 1: Learning Objectives��������������������������������
- Ch 1: Chapter Outline����������������������������
- Ch 1: Introduction
- The Meaning of Leadership��������������������������������
- The Impact of Leadership on Organizational Performance�������������������������������������������������������������
- Leadership Roles�����������������������
- The Satisfactions and Frustrations of Being a Leader�����������������������������������������������������������
- A Framework for Understanding Leadership�����������������������������������������������
- Skill Development in Leadership��������������������������������������
- Followership: Being an Effective Group Member����������������������������������������������������
- Ch 1: Summary��������������������
- Ch 1: Key Terms����������������������
- Ch 1: Guidelines for Action and Skill Development��������������������������������������������������������
- Ch 1: Notes������������������
- Ch 2: Traits, Motives, and Characteristics of Leaders������������������������������������������������������������
- Ch 2: Learning Objectives��������������������������������
- Ch 2: Chapter Outline����������������������������
- Ch 2: Introduction
- Personality Traits of Effective Leaders����������������������������������������������
- Leadership Motives�������������������������
- Cognitive Factors and Leadership���������������������������������������
- The Influence of Heredity and Environment on Leadership��������������������������������������������������������������
- The Strengths and Limitations of the Trait Approach����������������������������������������������������������
- Ch 2: Summary��������������������
- Ch 2: Key Terms����������������������
- Ch 2: Guidelines for Action and Skill Development��������������������������������������������������������
- Ch 2: Notes������������������
- Ch 3: Charismatic and Transformational Leadership��������������������������������������������������������
- Ch 3: Learning Objectives��������������������������������
- Ch 3: Chapter Outline����������������������������
- Ch 3: Introduction
- The Meanings of Charisma�������������������������������
- Three Types of Charismatic Leaders�����������������������������������������
- Characteristics of Charismatic Leaders���������������������������������������������
- The Vision Component of Charismatic Leadership�����������������������������������������������������
- The Communication Style of Charismatic Leaders�����������������������������������������������������
- The Development of Charisma����������������������������������
- Transformational Leadership����������������������������������
- Concerns about Charismatic Leadership��������������������������������������������
- Ch 3: Summary��������������������
- Ch 3: Key Terms����������������������
- Ch 3: Guidelines for Action and Skill Development��������������������������������������������������������
- Ch 3: Notes������������������
- Ch 4: Leadership Behaviors, Attitudes, and Styles
- Ch 4: Learning Objectives��������������������������������
- Ch 4: Chapter Outline����������������������������
- Ch 4: Introduction
- The Classic Dimensions of Consideration and Initiating Structure�����������������������������������������������������������������������
- Task-Related Attitudes and Behaviors�������������������������������������������
- Relationship-Oriented Attitudes and Behaviors����������������������������������������������������
- 360-Degree Feedback for Fine-Tuning a Leadership Approach����������������������������������������������������������������
- Leadership Styles������������������������
- Ch 4: Summary��������������������
- Ch 4: Key Terms����������������������
- Ch 4: Guidelines for Action and Skill Development��������������������������������������������������������
- Ch 4: Notes������������������
- Ch 5: Contingency and Situational Leadership
- Ch 5: Learning Objectives��������������������������������
- Ch 5: Chapter Outline����������������������������
- Ch 5: Introduction
- Situational Influences on Effective Leadership Behavior��������������������������������������������������������������
- Fiedler’s Contingency Theory of Leadership Effectiveness���������������������������������������������������������������
- The Path-Goal Theory of Leadership Effectiveness�������������������������������������������������������
- Situational Leadership® II (SLII)����������������������������������������
- The Normative Decision Model�����������������������������������
- Leader–Member Exchange (LMX) and Contingency Theory����������������������������������������������������������
- Leadership During a Crisis���������������������������������
- Evidence-Based Leadership for the Contingencyand Situational Approach����������������������������������������������������������������������������
- Ch 5: Key Terms����������������������
- Ch 5: Guidelines for Action and Skill Development��������������������������������������������������������
- Ch 5: Notes������������������
- Ch 6: Leadership Ethics and Social Responsibility��������������������������������������������������������
- Ch 6: Learning Objectives��������������������������������
- Ch 6: Chapter Outline����������������������������
- Ch 6: Introduction
- Principles and Practices of Ethical and Moral Leadership���������������������������������������������������������������
- Guidelines for Evaluating the Ethics of a Decision���������������������������������������������������������
- A Sampling of Unethical Leadership Behaviors���������������������������������������������������
- Leadership, Social Responsibility, and Creating an Ethical Organizational Culture����������������������������������������������������������������������������������������
- Ethical and Socially Responsible Behavior and Organizational Performance�������������������������������������������������������������������������������
- Ch 6: Summary��������������������
- Ch 6: Key Terms����������������������
- Ch 6: Guidelines for Action and Skill Development��������������������������������������������������������
- Ch 6: Notes������������������
- Ch 7: Power, Politics, and Leadership��������������������������������������������
- Ch 7: Learning Objectives��������������������������������
- Ch 7: Chapter Outline����������������������������
- Ch 7: Introduction
- Sources and Types of Power���������������������������������
- Tactics for Becoming an Empowering Leader������������������������������������������������
- Factors that Contribute to Organizational Politics���������������������������������������������������������
- Political Tactics and Strategies���������������������������������������
- Exercising Control over Dysfunctional Politics�����������������������������������������������������
- Ch 7: Summary��������������������
- Ch 7: Key Terms����������������������
- Ch 7: Guidelines for Action and Skill Development��������������������������������������������������������
- Ch 7: Notes������������������
- Ch 8: Influence Tactics of Leaders�����������������������������������������
- Ch 8: Learning Objectives��������������������������������
- Ch 8: Chapter Outline����������������������������
- Ch 8: Introduction
- A Model of Power and Influence�������������������������������������
- Description and Explanation of Influence Tactics�������������������������������������������������������
- Leadership Influence for Organizational Change�����������������������������������������������������
- Relative Effectiveness and Sequencing of Influence Tactics�����������������������������������������������������������������
- Implicit Leadership Theories and Leadership Influence������������������������������������������������������������
- Ch 8: Summary��������������������
- Ch 8: Key Terms����������������������
- Ch 8: Guidelines for Action and Skill Development��������������������������������������������������������
- Ch 8: Notes������������������
- Ch 9: Developing Teamwork��������������������������������
- Ch 9: Learning Objectives��������������������������������
- Ch 9: Chapter Outline����������������������������
- Ch 9: Introduction
- The Leader’s Role in the Team-Based Organization�������������������������������������������������������
- Leader Actions That Foster Teamwork������������������������������������������
- Offsite Training and Team Development��������������������������������������������
- The Leader–Member Exchange Model and Teamwork����������������������������������������������������
- Ch 9: Summary��������������������
- Ch 9: Key Terms����������������������
- Ch 9: Guidelines for Action and Skill Development��������������������������������������������������������
- Ch 9: Notes������������������
- Ch 10: Motivation and Coaching Skills��������������������������������������������
- Ch 10: Learning Objectives���������������������������������
- Ch 10: Chapter Outline�����������������������������
- Ch 10: Introduction
- Leadership and Employee Engagement�����������������������������������������
- Expectancy Theory and Motivational Skills������������������������������������������������
- Goal Theory������������������
- Using Recognition and Pride to Motivate Others�����������������������������������������������������
- Coaching as an Approach to Motivation��������������������������������������������
- Coaching Skills and Techniques�������������������������������������
- Executive Coaching and Leadership Effectiveness������������������������������������������������������
- Ch 10: Summary���������������������
- Ch 10: Key Terms�����������������������
- Ch 10: Guidelines for Action and Skill Development���������������������������������������������������������
- Ch 10: Notes�������������������
- Ch 11: Creativity, Innovation, and Leadership
- Ch 11: Learning Objectives���������������������������������
- Ch 11: Chapter Outline�����������������������������
- Ch 11: Introduction
- Steps in the Creative Process������������������������������������
- Characteristics of Creative Leaders������������������������������������������
- Overcoming Traditional Thinking as a Creativity Strategy���������������������������������������������������������������
- Organizational Methods to Enhance Creativity���������������������������������������������������
- Self-Help Techniques to Enhance Creative Problem Solving���������������������������������������������������������������
- Establishing a Climate and Culture for Creative Thinking���������������������������������������������������������������
- Additional Leadership Practices That Enhance Innovation��������������������������������������������������������������
- Ch 11: Summary���������������������
- Ch 11: Key Terms�����������������������
- Ch 11: Guidelines for Action and Skill Development���������������������������������������������������������
- Ch 11: Notes�������������������
- Ch 12: Communication and Conflict Resolution Skills����������������������������������������������������������
- Ch 12: Learning Objectives���������������������������������
- Ch 12: Chapter Outline�����������������������������
- Ch 12: Introduction
- Communication Networks for Leaders�����������������������������������������
- Inspirational and Powerful Communication�����������������������������������������������
- Listening as a Leadership Skill��������������������������������������
- Overcoming Cross-Cultural Communication Barriers�������������������������������������������������������
- The Leader’s Role in Resolving Conflict and Negotiating Leaders����������������������������������������������������������������������
- Ch 12: Summary���������������������
- Ch 12: Key Terms�����������������������
- Ch 12: Notes�������������������
- Ch 13: Strategic Leadership and Knowledge Management�����������������������������������������������������������
- Ch 13: Learning Objectives���������������������������������
- Ch 13: Chapter Outline�����������������������������
- Ch 13: Introduction
- The Nature of Strategic Leadership�����������������������������������������
- Conducting a SWOT Analysis���������������������������������
- A Sampling of Business Strategies Formulated by Leaders��������������������������������������������������������������
- Knowledge Management and the Learning Organization���������������������������������������������������������
- Ch 13: Summary���������������������
- Ch 13: Key Terms�����������������������
- Ch 13: Guidelines for Action and Skill Development���������������������������������������������������������
- Ch 13: Notes�������������������
- Ch 14: International and Culturally Diverse Aspects of Leadership������������������������������������������������������������������������
- Ch 14: Learning Objectives���������������������������������
- Ch 14: Chapter Outline�����������������������������
- Ch 14: Introduction
- The Advantages of Managing for Diversity�����������������������������������������������
- Cultural Factors Influencing Leadership Practice�������������������������������������������������������
- Cultural Sensitivity and Cultural Intelligence�����������������������������������������������������
- Global Leadership Skills�������������������������������
- Leadership Initiatives for Achieving Cultural Diversity��������������������������������������������������������������
- Ch 14: Summary���������������������
- Ch 14: Key Terms�����������������������
- Ch 14: Guidelines for Action and Skill Development���������������������������������������������������������
- Ch 14: Notes�������������������
- Ch 15: Leadership Development and Succession
- Ch 15: Learning Objectives���������������������������������
- Ch 15: Chapter Outline�����������������������������
- Ch 15: Introduction
- Development Through Self-Awareness and Self-Discipline�������������������������������������������������������������
- Development Through Education, Experience, and Mentoring���������������������������������������������������������������
- Leadership Development Programs��������������������������������������
- Leadership Succession����������������������������
- Challenges of Being a New Leader���������������������������������������
- Ch 15: Summary���������������������
- Ch 15: Key Terms�����������������������
- Ch 15: Guidelines for Action and Skill Development���������������������������������������������������������
- Ch 15: Notes�������������������
- Glossary���������������
- Name Index�����������������
- Company Index��������������������
- Subject Index��������������������