Audience and media term project

Kai_Kaye
Termproject.pdf

TERM PROJECT

 ALTERNATIVE PLANS  CHOOSE A PLAN

 SUPPORTING MATERIAL  DATA, ETC. TO USE IN JUSTIFYING YOUR

SELECTIONS

TERM PROJECT

 ALTERNATE PLANS

Plan I—TV/ Outdoor/Digital

Traditional Television  Cable-select/OTT 15% $300M  Daytime TV 15 300M  Prime TV 40 900M Outdoor – 25 500 M  Selected markets—key airports Total—Traditional 100 2000M Digital  Social--Facebook, Twitter, Snapchat, etc  Display

Note: for this plan, an added objective is required—Provide Advertising support in key markets with airports accounting for significant international travel.

Plan I-- (cont.)

Wom. 25-54 R/F

TV 73/2.4 Outdoor 35/1.2 Total 76/3.7

Comments:  No need to justify digital recommended plan in terms of R/F. This corresponds to the approach favored by many advertisers: use ‘traditional’ media for awareness and reach and use ‘digital’ media for stimulus close to purchase occasion

Plan II—TV/DIGITAL

Traditional Television  Cable select/OTT 20% $400,000  Daytime 15 300,000  Prime Time 65 1,300,000 Total-Traditional 2,000,000 Digital Various—select among options—including  Search  Social--Facebook, Twitter, Snapchat, etc  Display

Plan II (cont.)

Wom. 25-54 R/F

TV 76/3.6

Comments: No need to justify digital recommended plan in terms of R/F. This corresponds to the approach favored by many advertisers: use ‘traditional’ media for awareness and reach and use ‘digital’ media for stimulus close to purchase occasion

Plan III—Magazines/Digital

Traditional  Magazines 100% $2,000,000 Total –Traditional $2,000,000 Digital Various—select among options—including  Search  Social--Facebook, Twitter, Snapchat, etc  Display

Plan III—Magazines/Internet

Plan III (cont.) R/F 60/2.4

Comments:  No need to justify digital recommended plan in terms of R/F.  This corresponds to the approach favored by many advertisers:  use ‘traditional’ media for awareness and reach and use ‘digital’  media for stimulus close to purchase occasion

Plan IV—TV, Radio, Digital

Traditional Television  Cable-select/OTT 20% $400M  Daytime TV 15 300M  Prime TV 40 800M Radio 25 500M Total-Traditional $2,000M Digital Various—select among options—including  Search  Social--Facebook, Twitter, Snapchat, etc  Display

Plan IV-- (cont.)

Wom. 25-54 R/F

TV 83/2.7 Radio 49/2.3 Total 88/3.8

Comments: No need to justify digital recommended plan in terms of R/F. This corresponds to the approach favored by many advertisers: use ‘traditional’ media for awareness and reach and use ‘digital’ media for stimulus close to purchase occasion

SUPPORT MATERIAL

Traditional Media Following section contains:  Reach potential  Audience composition data, indexes, etc.  As well as other data/materials that can be cited

in strategy/rationale as basis for justifying media choices.

Also provided—non-traditional—digital-media  Issues to be cited/considered in justifying digital

media choices including: search, display, social

Audience and Rate Data—TV Dayparts

Wom 25-54 CPP

Prime $9756 Daytime 3390 Morning 5712 Cable Select 5454

Select-cable—diversification

 cable programs performing well against upscale women 25-54.  included-- OTT—the limited forms that accept advertising-

Comment: Despite fragmentation, it is still possible to achieve broad reach through tv —even among millennials—but diversification is critical, and cable/OTT plays an important role in this regard. Prime continues to be essential as a reach producing engine, but significant diversification is also required.

NOTES

WOMEN 25-54 Audience Composition-Index of Concentration

Morning TV 33 110

Daytime TV 37 123

Prime 33 110

Cable—select 35 117

Radio 32 108

Newspapers 32 105

Magazines 44 146

% Index

PERSONAL TRAVEL—3+TIMES/YEAR Index of Concentration

Morning TV 98 Daytime TV 90 Prime TV 102 Cable-select 112 Radio 109 Newspapers 105 Magazines 120

Note: 1)These numbers—hopefully reasonable—are ’made up’ for the purpose of the project. 2) The base=100 is women 25-54 taking 3+ flights/yr. in U. S. population.

Index

ATTENTIVENESS Women 25-54 Paying Full Attention

% Attentive

Morning TV 33

Daytime TV 57

Prime TV 68

Note: Attentiveness data available for over-the-air TV only— not for cable or for other media

TELEVISION DAYPARTS— REACH POTENTIAL—WOM.25-54

To maximize reach—  Include prime—  Also include day—for efficiency— inexpensive grp’s help build reach though day cannot be relied upon exclusively  diversify—include cable /OTT— OTT particularly important for reach against millennials

INTERNET/DIGITAL— COMMENTS ON JUSTIFICATION

 In general, demo data not applied, since digital targeting is largely based on ‘browsing’ history together with other aspects of personal makeup that may be included as factors in Facebook algorithms or other digital/social targeting. This form of fine personal profile targeting can and should be cited as an advantage.

 Use of Facebook or Twitter or Instagram or Snapchat should be discussed and justified in terms of how ads are presented, likelihood of ‘click-in,’ selling force and strength of ad delivery, mood created by environment of social media setting, etc.

 Search should be discussed and justified based on the ‘self-targeting’ process by which a prospect arrives at the advertiser’s site.

 ‘Display’ should be discussed in terms of: sites where placed in order to assure ‘relevance likelihood of ‘click- in,’ etc.

,’