Foundations of nursing and evidence-based healthcare

Michelle_Michy
Teamworkinnursing3.pdf

Teamwork in nursing by Josephine Nyamekye Amlak

Submission date: 03-May-2021 11:00PM (UTC+0100) Submission ID: 151488592 File name: jossy_assignment_leo.docx (22.79K) Word count: 2000 Character count: 10180

1

2

3

4

5

6

7 8

10

2

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

2

2

2

1

21

22 23

24

25

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

3

3

4

26

27

28 29

30

31

1

1

1

32

1

13% SIMILARITY INDEX

9% INTERNET SOURCES

0% PUBLICATIONS

12% STUDENT PAPERS

1 9%

2 2% 3 2% 4 1%

Exclude quotes Off

Exclude bibliography Off

Exclude matches Off

Teamwork in nursing ORIGINALITY REPORT

PRIMARY SOURCES

Submitted to Buckinghamshire Chilterns University College Student Paper

journals.rcni.com Internet Source

Submitted to Queen's University of Belfast Student Paper

Submitted to La Trobe University Student Paper

FINAL GRADE

35/100 Teamwork in nursing GRADEMARK REPORT

GENERAL COMMENTS

Instructor

Please note:  We acknowledge the difficulties and challenges that many of you would have faced in the completion of this assessment. Marking has been completed in accordance with the marking grid and assignment requirements, but in accordance with the current principles of the no detriment policy with uncapped marks for referral submissions to mitigate the impact of Covid-19. In addition, each Examination Board will act on your behalf to mitigate any detrimental impact. We will continue to work with you and for you to help you meet programme requirements.  

 

Marked in accordance with the University’s SPLD guidelines – non-applicable

Please refer to the Rubric Assignment & Learning Criteria

 

  Mark Awarded                

Weighting

Presentation 6 15

References 5 15

Knowledge & Understanding

7 20

Comprehension 7 20

Organisation of ideas

5 15

Integrating academic learning and practice

5.1 15

Marker’s Name: Rachel Cabral

 

Date of Marking:10.05.2021

 

Overall Strengths of the Assignment:

You have identified that you are discussing teamworking in nursing.

You have some relevant information about teamworking included in your work

You have tried to use referencing

 

Action Plan for Student Improvement:

Unfortunately, you have not demonstrated that you have successfully addressed the learning outcomes for this assessment.

I strongly recommend that you seek the advice and support of the LDU regarding how to plan and structure an essay and how to use supporting evidence and referencing in your work.

It appears that you have not fully understood the relevance of choosing a core article about teamwork in nursing. You need to use this to assist you in your discussion about teamworking in this essay. If you are not sure what article to use, there is one available in the assignment brief folder you can use.

You need to carefully read the instructions on the assignment brief and follow these to ensure that you address all the requirements to b able to pass the assignment.

You need a title page as per the assignment brief.

To pass this assignment you need to:

Write an introduction that outlines the aim of the assignment, gives a rationale for choosing teamworking and signposts the reader to the summary of the chosen article in the appendix.

In the main body of your assignment you need to address the key concepts of teamworking. You

have some identified – expand these and draw in supporting reference sources that you have read (such as other articles, the NMC code etc)

Make sure you think about the order and flow of these points.

Reflect on how you will use what you have learned in your research of teamworking in nursing to develop yourself as a student nurse. What have your learned, what skills do you need to develop, how might you do this?

Provide a conclusion that summarises the key points in your assignment.

It appears that you may have used one article form the Journal of Nursing management and tried to infer that you have read other papers, or you just do not know how to reference. You do need to read widely around your topic area so that you can demonstrate you have good knowledge and comprehension.

For further support and guidance please contact me Rachel.cabral@bucks.ac.uk

 

Comment on high Originality Score (above 15%):13% N/A

 

Percentage Mark 35%

 

Note to Marker: final marks must be rounded, up or down, to the nearest whole number.

 

Moderator’s name:

Date of Moderation:

Moderator’s Comments:

 

NB All marks are provisional until confirmed by a formally constituted Assessment Board. If you

have not achieved the pass mark of 40%, a decision will be made about whether you are permitted to resubmit the work. Registry will normally post the Board results within 5 working days after the Board (via the organisational shell) and these will confirm whether you are permitted to resubmit, and the confirmed deadline. An announcement will be made once the Board results are posted.

 

 

PAGE 1

Comment 1

you need to include a front title page as outlined in the assignment brief. Be sure to include this in future assignments 

Comment 2

When you start an assignment it is beneficial to introduce the topic and then outline the purpose of the essay. 

for example:

It is recognised that teamwork is an important factor in the safe and effective delivery of healthcare. This assignment will explore the concept of teamwork through the exploration of..............

Comment 3

You  need an introduction that outlines the purpose of your essay and includes information about what will be addressed. you also need to signpost the reader to the article you used and refer to it in the appendix. 

Comment 4

This sentence stands alone and as such has little meaning. By starting with 'ensuring' there is an expectation from the reader that you will continue this sentence - as it stands it is unfinished.

Comment 5

who reported this? This is where you need to pop in a reference to support what you are saying

Comment 6

Reference needed here to support this

Comment 7

Kalish, et.al., (2010)

Comment 8

this does not read well

Strikethrough.

Comment 10

this is unclear

PAGE 2

Comment 11

less turn over of what? Be clear

Comment 12

is this the number of jobs? What do you mean by increases the job rate?

Comment 13

How can you be sure? Where is your supporting evidence?

Comment 14

what is the relevance of this point? It doesn't seem to fit here

Comment 15

co-operation

Comment 16

This is a concerning statement. Nurses need to work in collaboration with their patient/client to provide patient centred care (ie care that is acceptable to the patient and not just what fits the nurses needs )

Comment 17

the NMC is not the correct reference source here for what you are saying/ 

Comment 18

How do leaders achieve this?

Comment 19

effective would be a better term to use here

Comment 20

just communicating does not achieve this. what type of communication achieves this?

PAGE 3

PAGE 4

Comment 21

as an adult and general nursing what? 

Comment 22

try to use more academic language - this sounds as though you are talking to a friend  "sort out stuff!"

Comment 23

what is this? Where is the reference?

Comment 24

You have not reflected effectively here. you need to think about what you have learned about teamworking and think about how you will take this forward in your role as a student nurse. How will you develop and enhance these skills in yourself and perhaps others? 

Comment 25

You need a conclusion to your work

PAGE 5

Comment 26

Why are you using the same article but trying to pass it off as separate reference sources?

Comment 27

and this one

Comment 28

this is not the reference for the NMC 

Comment 29 no comment

Comment 30 no comment

Comment 31

it appears that you have only actually read one article and are trying to use this with the names of authors within it as separate sources. 

PAGE 6

Comment 32

If this was your summary then you have not used only one article and provided a summary of it. You also need to label this as your appendix.

PAGE 7

PAGE 8

RUBRIC: LEVEL 4 RUBRIC

PRESENTATION

WEIGHTING

A(85-100%)

A(70%-84%))

B (60-69%)

C (50-59%)

D (40-49%)

E (34-39%)

F (33% - 0%)

REFERENCING

WEIGHTING

A(85-100%)

A(70%-84%))

B (60-69%)

C (50-59%)

D (40-49%)

 

D (40-49%)

PASS / FAIL

Demonstrates exceptional academic writing style for this level of work

Grammar and spelling accurate Thoughts and ideas clearly expressed Fluent academic writing style Within the word limit Work displays a professional approach Word count declared

Minimal errors in grammar and spelling Thoughts and ideas clearly expressed Fluent academic writing style Within the word limit Work displays a professional approach Word count declared

Minimal errors in grammar and spelling Meaning apparent but not always clearly- expressed Writing style not consistently fluent and academic Within the word limit Work displays a professional approach Word count declared

Errors in grammar and spelling Meaning apparent but not always clearly expressed Writing style not consistently fluent and academic Within the word limit Work displays a professional approach Word count declared

Major problems with grammar and spelling Meaning unclear in places Non- academic writing style Not within the word limit Work lacks a professional approach Word count not declared

Major problems with grammar and spelling Work is unstructured Meaning unclear Non-academic writing style Not within the word limit Work lacks a professional approach Word count not declared

F (33% - 0%)

PASS / FAIL

Draws on wide range of reading from a variety of academic sources

Harvard System used consistently and accurately Adequate range and amount of reading from a reasonable variety of academic sources Accurate and comprehensive reference list supplied

Harvard System used consistently and accurately Adequate range and amount of reading from an acceptable variety of academic sources Accurate and comprehensive reference list supplied

Harvard System generally used consistently with minimal errors Satisfactory range and amount of reading from a reasonable variety of academic sources A mainly accurate and comprehensive reference list supplied

Harvard System used although errors are apparent Small range and amount of reading, using a limited variety of academic sources A mainly accurate reference list supplied

E (34-39%)

F (33% - 0%)

KNOWLEDGE

WEIGHTING

A(85-100%)

A(70%-84%))

B (60-69%)

C (50-59%)

D (40-49%)

E (34-39%)

F (33% - 0%)

COMPREHENSION

WEIGHTING

A(85-100%)

A(70%-84%))

B (60-69%)

C (50-59%)

D (40-49%)

E (34-39%)

Harvard System used although errors are apparent Limited range and amount of reading and few academic sources utilised Reference list not accurate or comprehensive

Harvard System not used or used unsystematically and with many errors Insufficient range, amount of reading and academic sources utilised No reference list supplied

E (34-39%)

PASS / FAIL

Demonstrates exceptional comprehension of knowledge

Demonstrates extensive and relevant exploration of the topic Identifies and addresses key issues and discusses these effectively Does not contain irrelevant material

Demonstrates fairly extensive and relevant exploration of the topic Identifies and addresses most of the key issues and discusses these in appropriate depth Does not contain irrelevant material

Exploration of the topic restricted in range Some key issues identified but not all given due consideration Some irrelevant material may be included

Exploration of the topic very restricted in range Several key issues not identified and discussion is superficial Some irrelevant material may be included

Exploration of the topic very restricted in range Several key issues not identified and discussion is superficial Some irrelevant material may be included

Exploration of the topic very restricted in range Key issues are not identified and discussion is absent or lacks focus Irrelevant material included

E (34-39%)

PASS / FAIL

Demonstrates thorough comprehension of the topic.

Clarity of thought demonstrated by logical presentation of ideas Demonstrates good understanding of the topic Safe practice demonstrated

Clarity of thought demonstrated with a clear presentation of ideas Demonstrates understanding of the topic Safe practice demonstrated

Some clear ideas are presented Demonstrates understanding of the topic Safe practice demonstrated

Demonstrates understanding of the topic Safe practice demonstrated

Limited understanding of the topic Safe practice is not demonstrated 1

F (33% - 0%)

ORGANISATION

WEIGHTING

A(85-100%)

A(70%-84%))

B (60-69%)

C (50-59%)

D (40-49%)

E (34-39%)

F (33% - 0%)

INTEGRATION

WEIGHTING

A(85-100%)

A(70%-84%))

B (60-69%)

C (50-59%)

D (40-49%)

E (34-39%)

F (33% - 0%)

Lacks understanding of the topic Safe practice is not demonstrated 1

F (33% - 0%)

Organisation of Ideas

PASS / FAIL

Incorporates ideas and evidence from a wide range of sources.

Able to link and integrate ideas and evidence from various sources Provides a well-reasoned conclusion

Able to link ideas and evidence from some sources Provides a clear conclusion

Attempts to link ideas but not always successfully Provides a conclusion

Work is rather disjointed and poorly structured but there is some evidence of integration of ideas Provides a conclusion

Ideas not linked Work lacks structure Conclusion is very weak or omitted

Ideas not linked Work lacks structure Conclusion is very weak or omitted

E (34-39%)

Integrating academic learning and practice.

PASS / FAIL

Demonstrates insight into the specific context.

All relevant implications for practice are clearly identified and explained Confidentiality is maintained

Most relevant implications for practice are clearly identified and explained. Confidentiality is maintained

Some relevant implications for practice are clearly identified but explanations may be lacking Confidentiality is maintained.

Few relevant implications for practice are identified and explanations may be lacking Confidentiality is maintained.

Few relevant implications for practice are identified and explanations may be lacking, incomplete or incorrect Confidentiality is not maintained 2

No relevant implications for practice are identified Confidentiality is not maintained 2