team project
Team Project: Final Solution Plan Video Presentation
Start Assignment
Instructions
Now that you've created your solution plan, it is time to present it. First, your team will create a 7-9 minute Zoom video presentation that will address each of the bulleted requirements of your solution plan paper:
A brief overview of your selected company.
The principal challenge impacting the organization. Please note that it is important that your challenge is quantifiable based on your research.
The likely cause of the challenge and how other companies have addressed the same or similar issue. This form of benchmarking adds considerable influence to your preferred solution.
The direct effects the problem creates (be sure the effects are measurable).
The individuals that are or could be impacted by the problem.
A comprehensive, direct, measurable multi-step solution plan that will address and resolve your challenge.
The goals and objectives that your solution plan will address.
How you will communicate your plan.
A detailed measurement plan that will assess the metrics or criteria you are proposing to determine the effectiveness of your solution plan.
Presentation requirements
Your video must contain a presentation. As a team, you will decide which tool to use to present. Be creative and engaging! You will be graded on your communication style (professional and appropriate), your presentation's flow and visual appeal, your connection to your audience, and your body language.
Each team member must contribute to both the presentation and the video. It is ok to record separately. If you do, remember to provide a link to your recording and your portion of the presentation to your team leader.
A transcript must accompany your video.
***If you need accommodations under ADA to complete this assignment, don't hesitate to get in touch with your professor for an alternative assignment.***
You will collaborate with your team in this discussion forum. Your team leader will be responsible for submitting the final presentation.
Your final solution plan presentation is due by the end of this module.
Please note: This is a required artifact for your E-portfolio.
If you have not yet up your Zoom account, please see these instructions
Download these instructions
. Note: you will be recording an MP4 file that will save locally to your computer. Please upload that MP4 file to the discussion. Please also include a written transcript in your post. For more information on starting a Zoom meeting and recording, please see these links:
Zoom Video Tutorials Home
(Links to an external site.)
Using Zoom with Canvas FAQ
(Links to an external site.)
Local (MP4) Recording With Zoom
Evaluation
All team projects combined are worth 35% of your final course grade. Your video presentation will be assessed using the Final Solution Plan Video Presentation rubric.
References
|
Zoom Instructions Download Zoom Instructions |
Outcomes |
Course Q & A |
Return to Learning Pathway
Rubric
Final Solution Plan Video Presentation Rubric
Final Solution Plan Video Presentation Rubric
|
Criteria |
Ratings |
Pts |
|
|
|
|
20 pts |
|
|
|
|
20 pts |
|
|
|
|
15 pts |
|
|
|
|
15 pts |
|
|
|
|
15 pts |
|
|
|
|
15 pts |
|
|
Total Points: 100 |
|
20 to >15.0 pts Exemplary Narration is clear, well-articulated, well-paced, and appropriately projected. Visual aids are used creatively and appropriately to supplement the narration. |
15 to >9.0 pts Satisfactory Narration is generally well-articulated, well-paced, and appropriately projected. Minor areas could have been clearer. |
9 to >0.0 pts Minimally Responsive Messages are articulated verbally, but with inconsistencies in terms of pacing and/or projecting, making the video distracting. Visual aids are used, but do not necessarily supplement nor add clarity to video, or the connections are unclear. |
0 pts Unacceptable Messages, if delivered verbally, were hardly audible or were not engaging. |
|
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Quality of Content of Presentation |
|
20 to >14.0 pts Exemplary The content of the presentation is well organized and easy to follow, including a clear, step-by-step solution to the problem supported with research, and a clear measurement plan. Content as presented is logical and builds a strong case for the need for a solution to the problem/issue. There are no problems with spelling, punctuation, and grammar. |
14 to >8.0 pts Satisfactory The content of the presentation, including a step-by-step solution to the problem supported with research, and a measurement plan are clear and easy to follow once the organization of information was realized. Some reorganization would help build a case for need for a solution to the problem/issue. These problems and errors, however, are not serious enough to distract the audience. |
8 to >0.0 pts Minimally Responsive The content of the presentation is difficult to follow. Although information is provided, it is unclear how the information is organized. The organization of material should be reconsidered, and more details should be added. |
0 pts Unacceptable The content of the presentation is incomplete and/or confusing. |
|
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Connection with Audience |
|
15 to >10.0 pts Exemplary The material is presented clearly with the intended audience in mind (i.e., clear and relevant explanations are presented). Examples, details, and language is interesting and relevant, as well as used effectively to keep the audience engaged and connected with the presentation. |
10 to >5.0 pts Satisfactory The material is presented clearly with the intended audience in mind; however, further explanation of some ideas would enhance the clarity. Examples, details, and language are appropriate. More relevant examples would facilitate a stronger connection with the audience. |
5 to >0.0 pts Minimally Responsive The material is presented at too high or too low of a level for the intended audience, making it difficult for the speaker to engage and connect with the audience. Examples, details, and language are inappropriate or irrelevant for the audience. Presentation indicates a lack of interest or confusion on the part of the presenter. |
0 pts Unacceptable There is no consideration of the audience taken into account. |
|
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Body Language |
|
15 to >10.0 pts Exemplary Non-verbal behavior is well-maintained, with appropriate body language used effectively to enhance persuasion. Good posture and eye contact are maintained appropriately throughout the entire delivery of video. |
10 to >5.0 pts Satisfactory Non-verbal behavior is generally well- maintained, good posture and eye contact is maintained appropriately throughout the entire delivery of video. Some inappropriate body language may have been used, though not enough to be distracting. |
5 to >0.0 pts Minimally Responsive There are moments during the video when good posture, eye contact, and body language is maintained, though inconsistently. At times, eyes were darting in different directions at inappropriate times, and distracting postures and body language. |
0 pts Unacceptable There is no body language involved; the student simply stayed in one position during the entire duration of the video. |
|
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Use of Sources as Evidence |
|
15 to >10.0 pts Exemplary Your selected resources are credible and have clear relevance to the topic at hand. You have skillfully used these sources as evidence to support claims made. You used the required two sources to make strong arguments. |
10 to >5.0 pts Satisfactory Some of your selected resources are credible and have relevance with the topic at hand and are used as sources of evidence to support claims made. Better selection of sources, and/or better integration of these sources would have strengthened the support of certain claims. |
5 to >0.0 pts Minimally Responsive Some of your selected resources are credible, though one or more has little relevance to the topic at hand. and are used as sources of evidence to support claims made. Use of two required sources, better selection of sources, and/or better integration of these sources would have strengthened the support of many of your claims. |
0 pts Unacceptable The sources used are not relevant or credible to the topic at hand. Including the required two resources did little to support your claims, as the chosen sources were not supportive of your work. |
|
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Control of Syntax, Mechanics, and APA Style |
|
15 to >10.0 pts Exemplary Choice of words and sentences demonstrate expertise in the field, using relevant key terms appropriately to convey messages in a natural way. There are no problems with spelling, punctuation, and grammar; APA style guidelines are followed accurately. |
10 to >5.0 pts Satisfactory Choice of words and sentences demonstrate proficiency in the field, using relevant key terms appropriately to convey messages. There are minimal problems with spelling, punctuation, and grammar that should have been fixed. Problems and errors are not serious enough to distract the reader. APA style guidelines are followed, with only minor errors. |
5 to >0.0 pts Minimally Responsive Choice of words and sentences demonstrate competence in the field, referring to relevant terms to convey messages, though at times forcibly, or not appropriately. There are problems with spelling, punctuation, and grammar, but not enough to interfere with the meaning. APA style guidelines are attempted with major errors.. |
0 pts Unacceptable Although ideas are presented, there is minimal usage of terms relevant and important to the field. There are significant problems with spelling, punctuation, and grammar that make it difficult to understand. APA style guidelines are not adhered to, which increases the risk of plagiarism. |