Complete the fields in the table
Martha Rogers’ Science of Unitary Human Beings
FOR THE THEORY CRITIQUE of Martha Rogers’ Science of Unitary Human Beings
SUGGESTION: Get article/s which are CRITIQUES of the THEORY ASSIGNED TO YOU
|
CRITERIA |
UNITS OF ANALYSIS |
CRITIQUE ARTICLE NO. 1 (Author of Critique) |
CRITIQUE ARTICLE NO. 2 (Author of Critique) |
MY VIEWPOINT |
|
(3.1) Relationship between structure and function
|
(3.1.1) Clarity |
|
|
|
|
|
(3.1.2) Consistency |
|
|
|
|
|
(3.1.3) Simplicity / Complexity |
|
|
|
|
|
(3.1.4) Tautology / Teleology |
|
|
|
|
(3.2) Diagram of Theory |
(3.2.1) Visual and Graphic Presentation |
|
|
|
|
|
(3.2.2) Logical Representation |
|
|
|
|
|
(3.2.3) Clarity |
|
|
|
|
(3.3) Circle of Contagiousness |
(3.3.1) Graphical origin of theory and geographical spread |
|
|
|
|
|
(3.3.2) Influence of theorist versus theory |
|
|
|
|
(4) Usefulness |
(4.1) Practice (4.1.1) Direction (4.1.2) Applicability (4.1.3) Generalizability (4.1.4) Cost Effectiveness (4.1.5) Relevance |
|
|
|
|
|
(4.2) Research (4.2.1) Consistency (4.2.2) Testability (4.2.3) Predictability |
|
|
|
|
|
(4.3) Education (4.3.1) Philosophical Statement (4.3.2) Objectives (4.3.3) Concepts |
|
|
|
|
|
(4.4) Administration (4.4.1) Structure of Care (4.4.2) Organization of Care (4.4.3) Guidelines for Patient Care (4.4.4) Patient Classification System |
|
|
|
|
(5) External Components of Theory |
(5.1) Personal Values (5.1.1) Theorist implicit/explicit values |
|
|
|
|
|
(5.2) Congruence with other professional values (5.2.1) Comlementarity (5.2.2) Esoterism (5.2.3) Competition |
|
|
|
|
|
(5.3) Congruence with social values (5.3.1) Beliefs (5.3.2) Values (5.3.3) Customs |
|
|
|
|
|
(5.4) Social Significance |
|
|
|