Comparison/Contrast Paper
Rubric Summary Papers
Masters in Educational Leadership
Category Excellent Good/Average Average/Minimum Unsatisfactory POINTS
Introduction
3 points 2 points 1 point 0 points Introduction is well written, capturing the reader’s attention.
A good attempt is made to capture the reader’s attention.
Very little attention paid to the introduction and does not capture the reader’s attention.
Introduction is vaguely written and does not lead the reader to want to read the paper.
Organization Paper is well organized and follows all designated guidelines.
Paper is organized and follows designated guidelines.
Paper is somewhat organized and follows some of the designated guidelines.
Paper is disorganized and difficult to follow.
Writing Conventions
The paper is free of mechanical/grammatical errors and demonstrates high quality writing at the graduate level.
Paper is free of mechanical/grammatical errors and demonstrates good quality writing at the graduate level.
Paper contains some mechanical/grammatical errors and is not quality writing at the graduate level.
Paper contains numerous mechanical/grammatical errors and is not graduate level writing.
Quality of Summary
Paper captures a very strong restatement of the main thrust of the article or video and reveals the opinion from the author.
Paper captures a restatement of the main thrust of the article or video and reveals the opinion from the author.
Paper attempts to capture a restatement of the main thrust of the article or video but reveals little opinion from the author.
Paper shows little or no evidence of a summary that captures the main thrust of the article of video and no opinion from the author.
Conclusion Paper has a strong conclusion that recaps ideas introduced in the paper.
Paper has a conclusion that recaps some of the ideas introduced in the paper.
Paper has a conclusion that has attempted to recap the ideas introduced in the paper.
Paper has no conclusion to recap the ideas introduced in the paper.