Design a Strategy Map and Create a Stakeholder Survey
RESEARCH
Development, Implementation and Assessment of a Comprehensive Strategic Plan in a School of Pharmacy
Bhaskara R. Jasti, PhD, John C. Livesey, PhD, Phillip R. Oppenheimer, PharmD, Eric G. Boyce, PharmD
Thomas J. Long School of Pharmacy and Health Sciences, University of the Pacific, Stockton, California
Submitted December 4, 2017; accepted March 26, 2018; published August 2019.
Objective. To develop, implement and assess a strategic plan and its process within a school of pharmacy. Methods. The process for developing the strategic plan included five phases: designing and scanning by a planning committee; divergent thinking with input from key internal and external stakeholders who shared their vision for the school; convergent planning in which faculty members helped to prioritize the clusters, goals, and metrics that had been identified; refining ideas into strategies; and assessment, during which metrics were aligned with assessment plans and data were collected and analyzed. Results. The completed strategic plan had five broad strategies, 20 specific goals, and 90 associated metrics. The plan was implemented with engagement by all major stakeholders in the program. Reallocation of existing resources and generation of new resources were key in making progress. The assessment, which was conducted three years after implementation of the strategic plan, found that each strategy had affected the school’s mission to provide an exemplary educational experience for students and to advance the institution. Conclusion. The strategic plan provided direction and focus to meet the challenges of continuing to advance the school. The keys for success in strategic planning are having a well-defined process, involving all faculty members and other key stakeholders, implementing the plan, and routinely assessing progress in meeting the strategic goals.
Keywords: strategic planning, planning, resource allocation, continuous improvement
INTRODUCTION A strategy is a long-termplan of action designed to
achieve a particular goal. The aim is to realize the goal by following a deliberate pattern of behavior over time1
Strategy can be used to set direction, focus effort, define the organization, and provide consistency. Recognizing and embedding emergent elements is important in strate- gic planning, which can take different forms. Strategic planning has been defined as “a systematic process through which an organization agrees on—and builds commitment among key stakeholders to—priorities that are essential to its mission.”
2 Similarly, others have de- scribed strategic planning as “a formal process designed to help an organization identify and maintain an optimal alignment with the most important elements of its envi- ronmental set.”3
Strategic planning should serve as an adaptive, long- term course of action for an institution for the purpose of improvement.4 Such a plan must possess a set of specific, interconnected human, technological, and organizational capacities to achieve these strategic directions. These ca- pacities also require changing academic and administra- tive processes, aspects of the culture, and behaviors of executive leadership, faculty, and staff. Some of the changes may be achieved quickly while others will take more time. Resources and the inclusion of multiple per- spectives, processes, and incentives are necessary con- textual elements in strategic planning. A well-focused strategic plan with inclusive input of all stakeholders helps a school or college leverage and possibly reallocate existing resources (including people, budgets, and facili- ties) to achieve the goals and initiatives of the plan.
4
By including all pertinent stakeholders in the process, redirecting and building resources will be supported by those involved in the development of the plan. A well thought out plan with metrics for assessment can pro- vide persuasiverationaleandjustification to centraluniver- sity administration when requesting additional resources,
Corresponding Author: Eric G. Boyce, Thomas J. Long School of Pharmacy and Health Sciences, University of the Pacific, 3601 Pacific Ave., Stockton, CA 95211. Tel: 209-946- 3144. E-mail: eboyce@pacific.edu
American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education 2019; 83 (6) Article 6899.
1391
especially if the school plan is consistent with a university plan, and also to potential donors when strategies are consistent with their values and goals.
An effective strategic plan must include the mission and vision of an institution. In higher education, strategic planning has evolved from planning mostly for physical facilities of the campus to the current use as a rational tool for orderly and systemic advancement of the academic enterprise.
5,6 Demographic shifts, technological advances, and educational costs have outpaced the inflation driving this evolution. Strategic planning in higher education is challenging to accomplish, at least in part because it has few rewards available to bring about the necessary changes.
7 Manytimes,administratorsandfacultymembers are unsure of the process, even when they acknowledge the need for a strategic plan.8
The accreditation standards for the Doctor of Phar- macy (PharmD) degree from the Accreditation Council for Pharmacy Education (ACPE) include the need to per- form strategic planning.9 The pharmacy education litera- ture includes reports on the development of a continuous quality improvement process for a pharmacy program as a whole based on prior strategic planning,10 the use of stra- tegic planning in an academic unit within a college of pharmacy,11 and the use of strategic planning in the de- velopment of a satellite campus and an interprofessional education program.12,13 There are also a limited number of reports of strategic planning and its impact in other health care educational programs and in academic health centers.14-17 All of those reports are very helpful, but none address the methods and outcomes associated with stra- tegic planning performed at the program level to address the major components of a college or school of pharmacy.
There are no standardized methods for performing strategic planning.Instead,there area seriesoffundamen- tal components that should be included in strategic plan- ning. Strategic planning methods must meet the needs, expertise, and structure of the entity performing the plan- ning, including alignment with the strategic plan and stra- tegic planning process of the parent organization. Strategic planning for a college or school within a univer- sity is typically done through an executive committee or a steering committee with input from key individuals to keep the process well organized, inclusive, and well aligned with the university’s strategic plan and strategic planning process.
10
The purpose of this report is to share the process used to develop Pacific 2020, the strategic plan for the PharmD program at the Thomas J. Long School of Pharmacy and Health Sciences to assist other colleges and schools to develop their strategic planning process with a focus on meeting the fundamental components of a strategic plan.
Additionally, three years after implementing the plan, we assessed our progress using the outcomes we had out- lined. In addition to describing the process for forming the strategic plan, in this paper we share the findings from our assessments and provide lessons learned. The goals are to assist others in the development and implementa- tion of their own specific strategic plan and appropriate metrics which are designed to meet the needs of their program, academic unit, and parent institution.
METHODS The University of the Pacific is a nationally ranked
university with three distinct campuses united under one common goal: to educate and prepare the leaders of to- morrow through intensive academic study, experiential learning, and service to the community. The Thomas J. Long School of Pharmacy and Health Sciences is located on the Stockton campus, and has provided innovative programs and extensive leadership opportunities to stu- dents from around the world. The mission of the school is to prepare students for lifelong success in health careers by providing an excellent, student-centered learning en- vironment. We aspire to develop leadership skills in stu- dents and a strong commitment to their professions, to interprofessional collaboration, and to society. These ef- forts are assisted by linkages between the university’s professional and liberal arts programs. We support out- standing professional and graduate teaching, research and other scholarly activity, and services as a means of achieving our mission. The school adapts its program- ming alongside the ever-evolving health care industry. To comply with ACPE accreditation standards and to continue to advance our curriculum, programs, research, and community outreach initiatives to stay a step ahead of the industry landscape, the dean initiated a strategic plan- ning process in 2012 entitled Pacific 2020.
The Strategic Planning Committee, a nine-person ad hoc group reporting to the dean, served as the central co- ordinating body for the development of the strategic plan. The committee included multiple members from each of the three academic departments and an administrative staff member. Each member of the committee was ex- pected to serve the needs of the school and the program as a whole, rather than serve the needs of a specific de- partment or office. The committee established the follow- ing goals upon receiving its charge to develop a strategic plan: define the school’s core values, assess current pro- cesses, identify future trends, establish strategies and goals to educate students, and assess the effectiveness of the plan periodically. An additional goal of the plan was to align the strategic plan for the school with the strategic plan of the university. The strategic plan was
American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education 2019; 83 (6) Article 6899.
1392
designed to be dynamic and adapt to change. To succeed in the development and implementation of the plan, the committee designed an inclusive approach where all stakeholders (faculty, staff, alumni, executive leadership, etc.) participated in the process. For the purposes of this strategic plan, a strategy was envisioned to be a general description of several interconnected goals that could be accomplished over the duration of the plan, and a goal was a well-defined effort to achieve a certain outcome. Met- rics were designed to assess the outcomes of a goal with multiple measurements. The strategic planning commit- tee divided the planning process into the five phases de- scribed below.
Phase 1: Designing and Scanning was conceptual and focused on the pre-work necessary to launch a suc- cessful planning process. The objective of this phase was to examine the existing value statements of the school and the assumptions regarding the direction of the school, and to design a planning process that enabled the reconsider- ation of these elements in the context of potential future developments.
Activities during the design and scanning phase also focused on how the new strategic planning process aligned with university planning and change-related ac- tivities, and howto manage and assess that alignment.The first phase of the strategic planning process also focused on scanning the environment for key factors influencing the PharmDprogramat thattime and in thefuture.Knowl- edge and information was gathered on the following fac- tors: political/community, economic/competitive, social/ demographic, technology/teaching, learning and scholar- ship, and environmental factors affecting higher educa- tion, specifically those related to the pharmacy profession and accreditation guidance. These knowledge and infor- mation resources were made available in a repository to support the work of the planning groups and were acces- sible to all faculty and staff members. Also, each admin- istrative office was asked to provide a preliminary strengths, weaknesses, opportunities and threats (SWOT) analysis re- lated to their responsibilities within the school.
Phase 2: Divergent Thinking was highly participa- tory and consisted of a “bottom-up” approach for strategy generation. In this phase, the existing values, assump- tions, and offerings were discussed in the context of the possible futures that the school might confront. Future conditions, challenges, opportunities, and alternatives were explored. This phase was guided by the program’s statements of values and principles, the Environmental Scan provided by internal experts, documents from exter- nal professional and educational entities [eg, American Association of Colleges of Pharmacy (AACP), American College of Clinical Pharmacy (ACCP)], input from
alumni, and the SWOT analyses provided by each depart- ment, administrative officers, and those in professional leadership positions. During this phase, all participating individuals were asked to consider the evolution of the profession for the next 20 years and how to train future professionals to navigate the changes in the profession and health care they would face.
Phase 3: Convergent Planning was a “quieter” phase of the strategic planning process in that it primarily in- volved members of the Strategic Planning Committee who were tasked with weaving together the many threads put forward in the Divergent Thinking Phase. Phase 3 was focused on developing possible solutions, strategies, and decisions. These were clustered and incorporated into a first draft of the strategic plan. All the opportunities that were presented in the divergent thinking process were clustered into five cohesive groups, each cluster having 12 potential goals formulated by the strategic planning committee. These clusters were presented to faculty members at a retreat at which all on-campus faculty mem- bers participated, with the exception of two members who were on sabbatical leave. During this meeting, faculty groups discussed the clusters and potential goals and met- rics, and prioritized them into five potential strategies, each with five to six goals.
Phase 4: Refining involved continued refinement of the strategic plan with a description of each strategy, and the creation of a strategic financial plan aligned with the strategic plan. The spirit of this phase was refinement and detailing of plans by the strategic planning committee, with input from the dean and dean’s cabinet members. Consultations with external constituencies (eg, alumni board, dean’s leadership council) were also sought. The focus was on providing measures for effective and flexi- ble execution of strategies. Finally, the developed plan was reviewed with the university’s strategic plan to en- sure that priorities aligned.
Phase 5: Assessment consisted of refining the met- rics and supporting analytics necessary to enable strategy execution and capacity building. The metrics were cross- referenced and aligned with the school’s assessment plan to ensure agreement and synergism. The goals of the as- sessments were to determine the progress and impact made by each strategy on the pharmacy program.
Implementation of the strategic plan began during the development and approval stages of the strategic plan, which was followed by full implementation within 12 months after approval of the strategic plan. Faculty com- mittees, academic departments, and administrativeoffices, where appropriate, were engaged in implementation of the strategic plan. Faculty meetings included discussions re- lated to the implementation and the progress made on the
American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education 2019; 83 (6) Article 6899.
1393
strategic plan. The assessment of the strategic plan was incorporated into the school’s assessment plan, including all strategic goals and metrics. Assessment data were col- lected each year and reviewed. At the end of three years, assessment data for each strategic goal were then aggre- gated to evaluate the progress on each strategic goal.
RESULTS The final strategic plan approved by the faculty had
five major strategies and each strategy was associated with three to five specific goals (Table 1). The plan as- pired to achieve 20 goals over a seven-year period. The five strategies were as follows: 1. enhance pharmacy stu- dent abilities and learning through curricular innovation, integration, application and assessment; 2. enhance phar- macy students’ academic and professional success; 3. build, expand and sustain community service and scholar- ship; 4. strengthen partnerships with internal and external constituencies to maximize Pacific’s competitiveness; and 5. recruit, develop, retain, and support exceptional faculty and staff in fulfilling their roles and responsibili- ties.
The five major strategies, the abbreviated strategic goals, an example of a metric identified for each strategic goal, and the general outcomes for each metric are pro- vided in Tables 1-5. The status of the expected metric for each goal was assessed as one of the following: exceeded, met, on course, or metric needs revision (when it was difficult to collect assessment data).
Each strategy and each goal in the strategic plan was paired with one or more measurable metrics to determine whether the listed goal was achieved. This permitted as- sessment of the outcomes of the strategic plan in a trans- parent way. Our strategic plan had a total of 90 metrics to evaluate the 20 goals spread over five strategies.
The aim of the plan was to fulfill all the goals by the year 2020. Since this strategic plan is a living document, we assessed the goals at the end of the 3
rd year. As shown in Table 2, of the 90 metrics we listed, we
exceeded 29, met 29, and were approaching the goal for 21 others. For the remaining 19 metrics, we either did not have data or the metric needed to be revised.
Strategy 1 had considerable impact on the design and delivery of the curriculum by expanding active-learning methods across the curriculum, enhanced curricular map- ping to ensure appropriate content coverage and sequenc- ing,andenhancedcommunicationamongfacultymembers to enhance integration of content. Additionally, methods were used to ensure high passage rates on the North Amer- ican Pharmacist Licensure Examination (NAPLEX) and to enhance student participation in conducting, presenting, and publishing research. Progress in this strategy also pro- vided a solid base and rationale for upcoming curricular revision.
Strategy 2 was to enhance pharmacy students’ aca- demic and professional success, refocused faculty and administrative support on student academic success, ca- reer planning, and graduate placement. The opening of the Office of Academic Success and Instructional Support (OASIS) was a major development supported by this strategy. Services offered by OASIS include individual and personal meetings with its director, and an elective course targeting improvement of academic and related abilities and activities. A midsemester early warning sys- tem has all faculty members provide lists of students at risk and then contact each student at risk with recommen- dations to use OASIS, advisors, instructors, and other re- sources. Career planning and job placement for students and graduates was centralized and communication of op- portunities was enhanced. Additionally, student readiness
Table 1. The Abbreviated Goals, Sample Metrics, and Outcomes of the Sample Metrics for Strategy 1: Enhance Pharmacy Student Abilities and Learning Through Curricular Innovation, Integration, Application and Assessment
Abbreviated Goals Sample Target Metrics Achievement of Target
Metric at 3 Years
Evidence-based, active learning methods are used in courses
Effective active learning methods are used in all courses Met
The curriculum is well-coordinated and well-sequenced
Progressive curricular development of important topics On Course
Graduates develop abilities and meet outcomes
$95% of graduates pass NAPLEX Met
Graduates develop distinctive and competitive abilities
$20% of students participate in research activities Exceeded
Assessment data are used to enhance the program
Comprehensive review of the curriculum and courses is performed at least every 4 years
Met
On Course: the outcome did not meet the target metric but was within 2 to 5% of meeting the target Unknown/Needs Revision: the outcome was unknown due to lack data collection and/or a useful metric
American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education 2019; 83 (6) Article 6899.
1394
for careers and postgraduate training and education was enhanced through elective coursework, on-campus speakers, and development of a list of faculty members who could serve as career path advisors. In their responses to the AACP Curriculum Assessment Survey question on the school providing access to guidance on career planning, the percent of graduating students (indicating effective guidance) increased from 46% to 54% up to 71% follow- ing these enhancements.
Strategy 3, to build, expand and sustain community service and scholarship, impacted the development and delivery of health care outreach activities by students and faculty members, the creation of a master of science/ fellowshipandexpansionofinternationalmasterofscience programs, and continued expansion of research and schol- arship support, grants submitted, and publication and pre- sentation of research and scholarship.
Strategy 4, to strengthen partnerships with internal and external constituencies to maximize Pacific’s compet- itiveness, resulted in a marked increase in communications with external partners through monthly newsletters, social media, and on-campus and off-campus meetings with alumni and other major constituents. Additionally, student attendance at professional and scientific local, regional, and national meetings was supported by the school and has increased. Particularly noteworthy was the increase in students who participated in the presentation of research abstracts at professional and national scientific meetings.
Strategy 5, to recruit, develop, retain, and support exceptional faculty and staff members in fulfilling their roles and responsibilities, resulted in ongoing improve- ments in the facilities and technologies for students, staff members, preceptors, and faculty members. Additionally, the focus on professional development has been key for new and existing faculty and staff members in enhancing and keeping up with changes in their responsibilities and abilities. Following further discussion after approval of the strategic plan, staff members decided not to initiate a formal recognition system to provide annual awards or recognition based on performance.
In the context of Pacific 2020, the strategic plan led to the reallocation of resources in our programs (and lead- ership). This plan guided the establishment of two Master of Science programs, enhancements in the assessment program, and enhanced professional development oppor- tunities for faculty members. This plan also helped guide fundraising for our strategies such as OASIS, an impor- tant service to our students in overcoming academic chal- lenges, enhancing information on career options and opportunities, increasing scholarships, upgrading facili- ties, providing immediate needs for operating funds, and enhancing endowment funds for operations.
The overall impact of the strategic plan was also demonstrated in faculty responses on the AACP Curric- ulum Assessment Surveys. When asked if the school ef- fectively employed strategic planning, the percent of faculty members who strongly agreed or agreed increased from 73% just prior to the development of the strategic plan to 80% after implementing this plan. Additionally, when asked if the school requested their input during the development of the current strategic plan, the percent of faculty members who strongly agreed or agreed increased from 89% to 97% over the same period.
DISCUSSION Strategic planning is an important activity in higher
education for directing the academic institution, unit, or program towards meeting its goals. Strategic planning acknowledges and builds upon the mission and vision to determine the priorities, strategies, desired outcomes, and resource allocation that are thought to be most important in continuous quality improvement for the institution, unit, orprogram.There are numerousmethodsof strategic planning,
1-4 but they all contain similar major compo- nents, and there are very few reports related to strategic planning in pharmacy or higher education.1 Those funda- mental elements of strategic planning appear to be direc- tion, guidance, and support from leadership; broad-based involvement by key constituents (faculty and staff mem- bers, students, and external partners); collection, review,
Table 2. The Abbreviated Goals, Sample Metrics, and Outcomes of the Sample Metrics for Strategy 2: Enhance Pharmacy Students’ Academic and Professional Success
Abbreviated Goals Sample Target Metrics Achievement of Target
Metric at 3 Years
High quality is maintained in applications and matriculations
The average pre-professional GPA $3.30 On Course
Student retention and progression are supported and enhanced
Mid-semester early warning system identifies and contacts all students at risk
Met
Student career planning and graduate placement are well supported
Career development services are rated $4.0 on a 5-point scale by graduating students
On Course
American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education 2019; 83 (6) Article 6899.
1395
analysis and use of pertinent information and data; and review and approval of the plan by major constituents. There are fewer reports in the literature describing what processes are needed after approval of the strategic plan, particularly with respect to monitoring and reviewing progress and determining the need for potential revisions.
We used a strategic planning model that had full in- volvement and acceptance by faculty members as well as other key groups (staff members, students, and external partners). Our planning process was designed to meet a fundamental component of strategic planning of being inclusive in nature, where all faculty members, alumni, and leadership participated in the development of the plan at multiple stages. Sharing our organization of and ap- proach to the strategic planning process with all key players within the university at the beginning of the proj- ect distinguished our method from that described by others working in a complex academic environment like ours.
10 Early involvement and communication was a key fundamental component used in our strategic planning process. This strategic plan was implemented and helped guide resource allocation and a comprehensive spectrum of activities at the school. The overall strengths and uniqueness of our strategic planning process was its com- prehensive approach, use of a core strategic plan organiz- ing committee, involvement of major stakeholders, and ongoing monitoring and assessment of progress.
The development and approval of the strategic plan are first steps towards the path of meeting the important goals of the academic institution, unit, or program. The next steps include the widespread communication of the strategic plan and implementation of the plan. Our stra- tegic plan was disseminated to a broad audience, includ- ing the university leadership and administration, school faculty and staff, program students and alumni, and ex- ternal partners including current and potential donors. It was not placed on the school or program webpage, but in retrospect that may have enhanced its dissemination.
Strategies were implemented in multiple ways. Efforts to enhance fund raising, community health care outreach, and enhancing student services were overt and very in- tentional. Efforts to enhance curricular delivery, scholar- ship and research, and faculty and staff development were more subtle, but still very apparent.
Monitoring and discussion of progress in meeting strategic goals and potential revisions were the next major steps. How progress would be monitored and reviewed was not initially clear to all faculty members, most likely because of the complexity of the strategic plan and some lack of clarity on how progress was to be assessed on each of those strategic goals. Once the progress was reviewed within the context of the strategic plan, the relationship of the progress to the strategic plan and the importance and value of the strategic plan became more evident to faculty members. However, the discussion, monitoring, and re- view of progress did not systematically include all ele- ments of the strategic plan. A formal review of all the major strategies, goals, and metrics was only performed in preparation for the next strategic plan.
The assessment of the metrics used to determine progress on the strategic goals also provided insights into the design, utility, meaningfulness and measurability of the metrics. A few strategic goals and/or metrics were no longer relevant and other metrics were either not mea- sured or the data collected were not consistent with the metric that was created in the strategic plan. For example, the first goal in strategy 2 was to assure high-quality ap- plicants for the PharmD program, which included an as- pirational metric as a pre-professional GPA of 4.0 and an achievable metric as a GPA of 3.0. However, our history showed a GPA of .3.30 would be more meaningful (Ta- ble 2) since over 95% of our matriculated students exceeded that metric. An example of an initial metric with built-in challenges was associated with strategy 3 in pro- viding health care outreach to the community. The metric envisioned that .50% of those served would come from
Table 3. The Abbreviated Goals, Sample Metrics, and Outcomes of the Sample Metrics for Strategy 3: Build, Expand and Sustain Community Service and Scholarship
Abbreviated Goals Sample Target Metrics Achievement of Target
Metric at 3 Years
Health care outreach is provided to the community
$50% of those served by health care outreach are from underserved populations
Unknown/Needs revision
Postgraduate programs are expanded
$2 postgraduate education or training programs are evaluated for development over next 5 years
Met
Faculty research and scholarship is enhanced
$50% of tenure track faculty publish each year Met
The graduate program is enhanced
$90% of PhD graduates will be employed within 1 year Exceeded
American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education 2019; 83 (6) Article 6899.
1396
underserved populations (Table 3). Unfortunately, it was difficult to collect the data and to ascertain whether each of those served came from an underserved population, considering the thousands of patients served at the many health care outreach events sponsored by the school. Al- though organizers of health outreach events believed that at least 50% of those served were from underserved pop- ulations, there were no data to document those impres- sions. Also within strategy 3, “our graduate students will publish peer reviewed paper(s) under the advisor’s guid- ance,” is a metric that proved difficult to measure at a given time. Many research papers are typically published well after a student graduates, and consequently we need to revise this metric to state that “graduate students will publish peer-reviewed paper(s) within two years of grad- uation under the advisor’s guidance.” The data for several metrics described in Strategy 4 were also difficult to col- lect, including metrics related to relationships with orga- nizations and partners, communications with constituents, and the brand image (Table 4).The lessons learned from this step is that early and planned timely review of all major strategies, strategic goals, and metrics is needed to fully assure the appropriate value and use of each ele-
ment of the strategic plan. We recommend ensuring re- view of each major strategy, strategic goal, and metric by assigning responsibilitycentrally to aplanning committee and/or decentralized to the administrative offices or com- mittees associated with each element.
We propose the following guidelines to assist other pharmacy schools in creating an effective strategic plan. The strategic plan must be a living document with the ability to adapt to future trends, with assessment conduct- ed early and systematically and necessary alterations to goals and metrics made in a timely manner. The plan should have clear goals, structure, and process set by the academic leader(s) and supported by faculty and staff members. To be effective, the strategic plan must be de- veloped by a core group of planners drawn from all de- partments and key groups (staff, students, alumni, etc). An effective strategic plan should also involve essentially all faculty members in its development and then include adoption by the faculty as a whole and key representatives of staff, students, alumni, and external partners. The plan should contain strategies that cohesively focus on the most important areas. Additionally, the plan should in- clude three to five specific goals for each strategy to
Table 4. The Abbreviated Goals, Sample Metrics, and Outcomes of the Sample Metrics for Strategy 4: Strengthen Partnerships with Internal and External Constituencies to Maximize Pacific’s Competitiveness
Abbreviated Goals Sample Target Metrics Achievement of Target
Metric at 3 Years
Relationships with organizations and partners are strong
$25% of students attend a state or national meeting Unknown/Needs revision
Relationships with alumni and preceptors are strong
Preceptor development programs are rated at least 4.0 on a 5-point scale by preceptors
Met
Communications with internal and external constituents are effective
Pertinent communications are disseminated to $90% of available constituents
Unknown/Needs revision
The Pacific pharmacy brand image enhances the School
The Pacific pharmacy brand image is rated $4.0 on a 5-point scale by constituents
Unknown/Needs revision
Table 5. The Abbreviated Goals, Sample Metrics, and Outcomes of the Sample Metrics for Strategy 5: Recruit, Develop, Retain, and Support Exceptional Faculty and Staff in Fulfilling Their Roles and Responsibilities
Abbreviated Goals Sample Target Metrics Achievement of Target
Metric at 3 Years
Faculty and staff evaluations support development
All faculty and staff undergo evaluation in a timely manner Met
Faculty and staff are supported to enhance their abilities
$95% of faculty and staff participate in $1 development opportunity each year
On Course
Faculty and staff are rewarded for outstanding accomplishments
Faculty and staff with outstanding accomplishments are formally recognized annually
Faculty: Met Staff: Unknown/Needs
Revision Facilities, technologies and resources support
School personnel and students Students, faculty, preceptors and staff rate facilities and technology at $4.0 on a 5-point scale
Met
American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education 2019; 83 (6) Article 6899.
1397
provide focus for implementation. A strategic plan must include a sufficient number of measurable metrics to ef- fectively evaluate the achievement of each strategy or goal. The plan should include continual communication of the strategies and progress in meeting strategic goals to all relevant participants. The plan must also include some strategies that can be accomplished in the near term and other strategies that take longer to accomplish. Finally, an effective strategic plan should provide guidance for re- source generation and allocation.
CONCLUSION A robust process involving all faculty members and
key representatives from other constituencies was used to create a strategic plan in a school of pharmacy. The major challenges met in the planning process included full in- volvement and approval of faculty members and the crea- tion of a strategic plan that was meaningful and led to enhancements in the vast majority of the strategic goals identified. Recommendations for other schools include making an early and sustained effort to monitor and review progress in an explicit manner, and incorporating a process for making revisions to major strategies, strategic goals, and/or metrics when appropriate. While strategic planning can be very effective in providing a platform for continu- ous improvement, a strategic plan should also be consid- ered a “living” document that can be revised and refreshed.
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS We express our sincere gratitude to all our faculty and
staff, especially the other strategic planning committee members: Mamoun Alhamadsheh, Susan Burkhardt, Sean Carr-Lopez, Nancy DeGuire, Rajul Patel, Roshanak Rahimian, and Mark Walberg.
REFERENCES 1. Mintzberg H, Ahlstrand B, Lampel J. Strategy Safari: A Guide Tour Through the Wilds of Strategic Management. 1st ed. New York, NY: Free Press; 1998. 2. Allison M, Kaye J. Strategic Planning for Nonprofit Organizations: A Practical Guide and Workbook. 2nd ed. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons; 2005.
3. Rowley DJ, Sherman H. From Strategy to Change: Implementing
the Plan in Higher Education. 1st ed. Hoboken, NJ: Jossey-Bass; 2001. 4. Kroboth P. Viewpoints: Planning strategically. Am J Pharm Educ.
2010;74(1):Article 2. 5. Holmes J. 20/20 Planning: The Story of the First Twenty Years of
the Society for College and University Planning. Ann Arbor, MI:
Society for College and University Planning, 1985. https://www.scup.org/
page/resources/books/ttp. Accessed October 4, 2017. 6. Keller G. Academic Strategy: The Management Revolution in
American Higher Education. Baltimore, MD: John Hopkins
University Press, 1983. 7. Tromp SA, Ruben BD. Strategic Planning in Higher Education: A
Guide for Leaders. 2 nd
ed. Washington, DC: National Association of
College and University Business Officers, 2010. 8. Sevier RA. Strategic Planning in Higher Education: Theory and
Practice. 1 st ed. Washington, DC: CASE Books, 2001.
9. Accreditation Standards and Key Elements for the Professional
Program in Pharmacy Leading to the Doctor of Pharmacy Degree:
(“Standards 2016”). Accreditation Council for Pharmacy Education.
https://www.acpe-accredit.org/pdf/Standards2016FINAL.pdf. Accessed
October 4, 2017. 10. Hall PD, DiPiro JT, Rowen RC, McNair D. A continuous quality
improvement program to focus a college of pharmacy on programmatic
advancement. Am J Pharm Educ. 2013;77(6):Article 117. 11. Nahata M, Kelley K, McAuley J, Bennett M, Carnes C, Casper
K, Knoell D, Pruchnicki M, Schneider P, Massaro A. Renewing
vision and strategic priorities for an academic unit. Am J Pharm Educ.
2010;74(1):Article 13. 12. Poirier TI, Newman K. Advancing interprofessional education
via strategic planning. Am J Pharm Educ. 2016;80(4):Article 56. 13. Knapp DA, Roffman DS, Cooper WJ. Growth of a pharmacy
school through planning, cooperation, and establishment of a satellite
campus. Am J Pharm Educ. 2009;73(6):Article 102. 14. Thompson ME, Harver A, Eure M. A model for integrating
strategic planning and competence-based curriculum design in
establishing a public health programme: the UNC Charlotte
experience. Hum Resourc Health. 2009;7:71. DOI: 10.1186/1478-
4491-7-71. 15. Liffs L, Merkley J, Jeffrey J, Ferris E, Dusek J, Hunter C. Case
study: reconciling the quality and safety gap through strategic
planning. Nurs Leadership. 2006;19(2):32-40. 16. Higginbotham EJ, Kathryn C. Church KC. Strategic planning as
a tool for achieving alignment in academic health centers. Trans Am
Clin Climatol Assoc. 2012;123:292-303. 17. Levinson W, Axler H. Strategic planning in a complex academic
environment: lessons from one academic health center. Acad Med.
2007;82:806-811. DOI: 10.1097/ACM.0b013e3180d08d14.
Table 6. Frequency and Percent of Achievement of the Target Metrics within Each Strategy Three Years After Approval and Implementation of the Strategic Plan
Strategy 1 Strategy 2 Strategy 3 Strategy 4 Strategy 5 Total, No. (%) No. (%) No. (%) No. (%) No. (%) No. (%)
Total Number of Metrics 26 19 14 19 12 90 Outcome Exceeded the Target 7 (27) 5 (26) 6 (43) 1 (5) 2 (17) 21 (23) Outcome Met the Target 12 (46) 3 (16) 5 (36) 2 (11) 7 (58) 29 (32) Outcome was “On Course” With the Target 5 (19) 7 (37) 2 (14) 6 (32) 1 (8) 21 (23) Outcome Unknown and/or Needs Revision 2 (8) 4 (21) 1 (7) 10 (53) 2 (17) 19 (21)
American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education 2019; 83 (6) Article 6899.
1398
Copyright of American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education is the property of American Association of Colleges of Pharmacy and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use.